US 6,463,566 B1Grant
Dynamic double sampling charge integrator
Issue Date:2002-10-08
•9 Claims
•15 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A charge processing circuit which integrates charge at an output node that is representative of an input charge provided at an input node. The circuit includes a precharge path coupled to the input node, the precharge path operable for setting the potential of the input node to a fixed precharge potential prior to introduction of input charge to the input node. A sensing path is coupled to the input and output nodes which is operable for returning the potential of the input node to the fixed precharge potential subsequent to introduction of input charge to the input node. A feedback element has an input coupled to the sensing path and the precharge path, the feedback element operable for setting said fixed precharge potential. In another embodiment there is provided a method of integrating charge at an output node of a charge processing circuit that is representative of input charge provided at an input node. The method includes replenishing charge at the input node; draining charge from the input node; stopping the draining of charge from the input node in response to a feedback element detecting when the input node reaches a fixed precharge potential; introducing an input charge on the input node from a source; draining charge from the input node onto the output node; and stopping the draining of charge from the input node in response to a feedback element detecting when the input node reaches the fixed precharge potential.
Metadata
Assignee
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Inventor
- Susanne A. Paul
Application Information
Application Number:US 09/497,985
Filing Date:2000-02-04
Priority Date:2000-02-04
Art Unit:7
Classifications
IPC:
G06F 1750
Field of Search:
327 91327 92327 93327 94327 95327 96327284327554323312348222348250348308
Patent Drawings (15 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
[0003] The invention relates to the field of charge integrating devices.
[0004] Charge generation is necessary whenever CCD signal processing circuitry must interface with voltage-domain signals. A variety of techniques are well known for generating charge packets from voltages. In all of these, an input diffusion is used to provide a source of electrons and the amount of charge that is collected from this source is controlled by either the source potential or the voltages on an initial set of register gates.
[0005] The surface channel fill-and-spill technique, shown diagrammatically in FIG. 1, is the most commonly used method of charge generation. FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a conventional fill-and-spill charge generator circuit 100, and FIGS. 1B-1E are associated potential diagrams for a second, third, fourth and first phase, respectively. In this approach, the input signal vsis provided to gate G2and a fixed reference level Vris placed on G1. During the fill phase in FIG. 1B, node fgis pulsed low and charge is injected into the channel regions underneath G1and G2. During the spill phase in FIG. 1C, fgis returned to a high potential so that excess charge from the output well spills back. The spill transition occurs rapidly at first, but then slows considerably as it nears completion. The long time constant associated with this spill transition limits the speed at which the fill-and-spill circuit can be operated. In addition to its limited speed, the fill-and-spill technique has the disadvantages that it provides poor linearity and does not perform accurate sampling.
[0006] Charge-domain signals can be used by non-CCD elements in two ways. The first method, referred to as destructive sensing, involves transferring the charge packet onto a receiving element. In this case, the charge packet is consumed by the operation. The second method, referred to as nondestructive sensing, involves creating a separate representation of the charge packet, without altering the original, so that multiple nondestructive operations can be performed on the same charge packet.
[0007] A schematic diagram of a conventional nondestructive floating gate amplifier circuit 200 is illustrated in FIG. 2A. FIGS. 2B-2E are associated potential diagrams for a first, second, third and fourth phase, respectively. The circuit includes a sensing gate G4within a CCD channel. The sensing gate and the barrier that precedes it are not clocked. In preparation for receiving charge, node vgis preset to the intermediate bias level Vhduring the time that the G4channel is empty. The precharge is then turned off and vgis left floating. During the next phase, a charge packet is transferred underneath G4by lowering the voltages on G1and G2. As charge collects underneath G4, it couples through the gate-to-channel capacitance and causes the potential on vgto fall. The clocked vgwaveform is then buffered to form the voltage-domain output vb.
[0008] This approach to charge sensing has the disadvantage that nonlinearity is introduced by voltage dependence of its various capacitances. It also is not compatible with low voltage operation. because unclocked CCD gates, G3and G4, reside in the charge transfer path. Finally this circuit provides only a limited signal range before charge collects underneath G3and is not sensed by the floating gate.
Summary of the Invention
[0009] Accordingly, the invention provides a charge processing circuit which integrates charge at an output node that is representative of an input charge provided at an input node. The circuit includes a precharge path coupled to the input node, the precharge path operable for setting the potential of the input node to a fixed precharge potential prior to introduction of input charge to the input node. A sensing path is coupled to the input and output nodes which is operable for returning the potential of the input node to the fixed precharge potential subsequent to introduction of input charge to the input node. A feedback element has an input coupled to the sensing path and the precharge path, the feedback element operable for setting said fixed precharge potential.
[0010] In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, there is provided a method of integrating charge at an output node of a charge processing circuit that is representative of input charge provided at an input node. The method includes replenishing charge at the input node; draining charge from the input node; stopping the draining of charge from the input node in response to a feedback element detecting when the input node reaches a fixed precharge potential; introducing an input charge on the input node from a source; draining charge from the input node onto the output node; and stopping the draining of charge from the input node in response to a feedback element detecting when the input node reaches the fixed precharge potential.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0011] FIG. 1A is a schematic diagram of a conventional fill-and-spill charge generator circuit; and FIGS. 1B-1E are associated potential diagrams for a second, third, fourth and first phase, respectively;
[0012] FIG. 2A is a schematic diagram of a conventional nondestructive floating gate amplifier circuit; and FIGS. 2B-2E are associated potential diagrams for a first, second, third and fourth phase, respectively;
[0013] FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS charge generator in accordance with the invention; and FIGS. 3B-3E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, a spill phase, a collection phase and a sensing phase, respectively;
[0014] FIGS. 4A-4E are voltage waveforms for a sample-and-hold portion for the example of a linear input ramp for a DDS charge generator;
[0015] FIGS. 5A-5D are simplified linear models of a DDS charge generator in accordance with the invention, during each of the four phases: a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively;
[0016] FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS wire transfer circuit; and FIGS. 6B-6E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively;
[0017] FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS sensing circuit with charge output in accordance with the invention; and FIGS. 7B-7E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively;
[0018] FIG. 8A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS charge sensing circuit with voltage output in accordance with the invention; and FIGS. 8B-8E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively; and
[0019] FIG. 9A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS D/A and subtraction circuit in accordance with the invention; and FIGS. 9B-9E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively.
Detailed Description of the Invention
[0020] Speed and linearity are improved for a dynamic double-sampling (DDS) technique in accordance with the invention by turning off spill and sensing transitions before they enter subthreshold, and by sensing charge over a time-varying, rather than a static, cascode barrier. At the same time, the useful operating range is increased to nearly the full scale and the impact of spill and sensing clock jitter is reduced. Parasitic capacitor voltage dependence is decreased as well.
[0021] FIG. 3A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS charge generator 300 in accordance with the invention. FIGS. 3B-3E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, a spill phase, a collection phase and a sensing phase, respectively. The primary voltage-mode portion of this circuit is the sample-and-hold stage 302 formed from capacitors C1and C2and transistors M3, M4, M2, and M5. In addition, there is a feedback amplifier A1(304) that computes the difference between fgand the fixed reference voltage, Vr. A signal-dependent voltage source 306, which drives the bulk of M5, is also included. Other circuit elements operate in the charge domain.
[0022] A series of precharge transistors connect capacitor C2to the diffusion D1and a series of sensing transistors connect it to an output well, G5. Two gates, both labeled G24, are shown on either side of an input diffusion D2. These elements are shown as separate gates in the figure, but can also be implemented as a single gate. A secondary static sensing path 308, formed from G8, G9, and G10, is located between the input diffusion and the output well. Its cascode gate G8is tied to the fixed bias Vh′.
[0023] The following description of circuit operation references three figures. First, energy level diagrams for the charge-domain portion are provided in FIGS. 3B-3E. Second, voltage waveforms for the sample-and-hold portion are included in FIGS. 4A-4D for the example of a linear input ramp. Exemplary voltage waveforms for a DDS charge generator, signals vi, vm, and vfare shown in FIGS. 4A-4C, and signals fgand fbfollow identical paths during phases 2 and 4 as shown in FIGS. 4D-4E.
[0024] FIGS. 5A-5D are simplified linear models of a DDS charge generator in accordance with the invention, during each of the four phases: a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively. Capacitor Cp1, included in this model, represents parasitic junction and routing capacitances on node vf. Capacitor Cp2models capacitance of the cascode channel, underneath G24and G8, as well as parasitic junction and routing capacitances on fg. Saturation and subthreshold modes of G24are modeled by resistor R24in series with a voltage source. The value of this voltage source is (A(Vr−fg)−Vth), where A represents the amplifier gain. This simple model provides a qualitatively accurate description of circuit operation.
[0025] Phase 1 is referred to as the fill phase. Signal vmtracks the ramp on the analog input viand the intermediate node vfis clamped to the bias Vc. When the sensing node fgis pulled low, to Vp, the region underneath G24is flooded with charge, and electrons consumed during the previous generation cycle are replenished. The charge packet underneath G5, which was generated during the previous cycle, is transferred forward upon the transition of G1and G5to ground. Charge can not flow backward during this transfer because of the built-in threshold offset between barrier and storage gates.
[0026] Phase 2 is the spill phase. M1is turned off and fgis left floating. Initially, the voltage on fgis much lower than that on Vrand the amplifier output fbis saturated at its high level, Vh. After the potential on G3is raised and the precharge path is enabled, electrons flow from fgto the drain, Vd. Current flow is determined by the value of (fb−fg), the gate-to-source voltage of G24. Initially, this voltage is large, G24is in saturation, and the voltage on fgrises rapidly. However, as fgrises, currents are reduced and the process slows considerably. Once fgapproaches Vr, the amplifier output falls and G24transitions quickly through subthreshold and is shut off.
[0027] For simplicity in the analysis below, the amplifier is modeled with a linear transfer characteristic, and its saturation at high and low levels is ignored. The value of fgas a function of time during the spill process is
[0028] A comparison between the time constant
[0029] for this operation with that in a circuit with fb held at a constant value shows that the time constant for the circuit is a factor of (A+1) times faster, and the incomplete portion of the transition in Eq. (1) is attenuated by a factor of eA+1.
[0030] To a very good approximation, the precharge path is completely shut off for the remainder of the cycle withfg floating at a level of
[0031] The final voltage on fbis
[0032] Nodes vmand vfare actively driven during this phase and are not impacted by the transition on fg. At the end of phase 2 they have values
[0033] vm(2H)=vi(2H)=Vs (5)
[0034] and
[0035] vf(2H)=Vc. (6)
[0036] Variable Vsis used to refer to the analog input viat the end of the sampling operation, at time 2H.
[0037] Phase 3 is referred to as the collection phase. G5is raised in anticipation of receiving charge and the precharge path is closed by lowering G3. Meanwhile vm, which was previously tied to the analog input, is clamped to ground. The falling transition on vm,
[0038] vm(2H+Δ)−vm(2H)=−Vs, (7)
[0039] is assumed to complete during a short time, Δ. It couples through C1and C2onto vfand fg. Node vffalls toward a final voltage of
[0040] vf(2H+Δ)=Vc−VsK1, (8)
[0041] where the unitless constant K1is defined as
[0042] The voltage on fgalso falls from its precharged level to
[0043] The channel capacitance of G24is included in Cp2because charge fills this region during both the fill and collection phases.
[0044] For optimum performance, the amplifier should remain saturated at its high level Vhduring the entire collection phase. To assure this condition, the input signal range is limited to
[0045] Meanwhile, the potential on G9is high and the secondary sensing path through G8and G9is open. The voltage on fgrises toward the channel potential underneath G8. Eventually G8enters subthreshold and current gradually ceases. The rising transition on fgduring this time is described by
[0046] where the time constant τ3is
[0047] The final phase, phase 4, is referred to as the sensing phase. The sensing path is enabled by raising the voltage on G1. Immediately thereafter, any charge remaining on fgfrom the collection phase is transferred to the output well. The resulting transition on fgis similar to that during the spill phase. The amplifier output fbis originally clamped at its high level, Vh. Current flow, determined by (fb−fg), slows as fgapproaches Vr. Once fb begins to fall, G24transitions rapidly through subthreshold and is shut off.
[0048] The value of fgas a function of time is given by
[0049] Like the spill transition, the time constant, τ4, for the sensing transition,
[0050] is a factor of (A+1) times faster than that of a circuit where the fbsignal is held at a constant bias.
[0051] Since vfis floating during phase 4, it rises in response to the level
[0052] In contrast to fg, the value of vfat the end of the sensing phase differs from its precharged value.
[0053] After the sensing path is closed, fgremains floating for the remainder of the cycle at a level
[0054] The feedback signal fbremains at the voltage
[0055] Current Isis integrated in both the primary and secondary output wells over the sensing and collection phases. The sum of these two packets represents the final output,
[0056] Combining Eqs. 19, 14 and 10, and retaining only the most significant terms yields the result
[0057] When the assumptions H>>τ2, H>>τ4, and Cp1=0 apply, the result in Eq. 20 is simplified to
[0058] This depends only on the sampled input signal and on C1and C2. Although vth, A, and Vrdetermine the precharge and sensing values of this circuit in Eqs. 1 and 14, they do not impact the result in Eq. 21 because both precharge and sensing are performed with respect to these same values. Matching between different circuits does not depend critically on any of these parameters.
[0059] Spill and sensing transitions in a DDS circuit are, to a good approximation, performed to completion and the approximations H>>τ2, H>>τ4are nearly always valid. The values of fgat the end of the spill and sensing phases are then equal, speed-dependent distortion can be eliminated, and parasitic capacitance, Cp2, has no impact on the output.
[0060] None of the bias voltages Vd, Vc, Vh, Vr, or Vpinfluence the result in Eq. 21. Bias Vpshould be low enough that charge can fill the region underneath G24during the fill operation. Any level, such as ground, that is less than Vh−vthis acceptable. Bias Vdshould be high enough that it can remove electrons from fgduring the spill operation. It is typically held at the most positive supply. The level of Vcmust be high enough that vf(3H) remains greater than zero for all possible values of Vs. Similarly, the levels of Vhand Vrmust be high enough that fg(3H) , given by Eq. 12, remains greater than zero at all times.
[0061] The DDS charge generator 300 of FIG. 3A includes two blocks: a sample-and-hold front end, and a dynamic double-sampling core. The purpose of the sample-and-hold block is to produce a displacement charge proportional to the analog input voltage, vi. The purpose of the DDS core is to integrate this displacement charge in a CCD output well. The DDS technique can also be applied to a number of other circuit functions, in addition to charge generation. In this approach, the sample-and-hold block is removed and an alternative source of electrons is provided to the DDS input. Examples of such circuits, including wire transfer, charge sensing, charge subtraction, and D/A conversion are presented hereinafter.
[0062] Wire transfer circuits provide an additional degree of flexibility by allowing charge packets to be transferred between nonadjacent or distant wells, via a metal line. To incorporate dynamic double sampling into a wire transfer circuit, the output from a CCD register is connected to the input of a DDS core as shown in FIG. 6A. FIG. 6A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS wire transfer circuit 600. FIGS. 6B-6E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively. A CCD register 602, formed by gates G11, G12, and G13, serves as the source of electrons. A DDS core unit 604 reconstructs incoming charge packets by integrating their electrons in a receiving well.
[0063] The operation of the circuit 600 is similar to that of the DDS charge generator 300. It is illustrated using the energy level diagrams of FIGS. 6B-6E. During the fill phase, a new supply of charges is provided to the circuit when fgis pulled low to Vp. Gate G12is off at this time to prevent charge from flooding backward into the source register. During the spill phase, fgis reset high to a level of
[0064] The time constant for this transition is
[0065] where Cp2represents parasitic junction and routing capacitances on fgas well as channel capacitance of gates G24, G8, and G13.
[0066] During the collection phase, a quantity of charge Qsis transferred onto fgby lowering the potential of G11. The potential on fgfalls in response, and charge flows through the secondary sensing path, into the secondary receiving well G10. The voltage on fgis restored to a high level of
[0067] During the sensing phase, charge, any remaining on the wire transfer node, flows through G24to the primary output well, G5. The final value of fgis
[0068] The time constant for the sensing transition, τ4, equals that for the spill transition, τ2.
[0069] Combining Eqs. 22, 24 and 25, and eliminating higher-order exponential terms, yields the resultant charge packet
[0070] Qo=Qs−(Vh′−vth′+Vp)e−H/τCp2. (26)
[0071] In most cases, the approximation H>>τ4is valid for this circuit and the first term, which represents a constant offset, is negligible. The result is then identically equal to the input Qs, regardless of any parasitic capacitances.
[0072] Nondestructive charge sensing is used when a charge packet must be used multiple times. It replicates the original packet in either charge or voltage form, but does not alter the original in the process. The dynamic double-sampling technique can be applied to nondestructive charge sensing. FIG. 7A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS sensing circuit 700 with charge output in accordance with the invention. FIGS. 7B-7E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively.
[0073] The circuit 700 is configured by connecting floating gate G13from within a CCD register 702, to the input of a DDS core unit 704. Input charge is provided by coupling signal electrons from the floating gate channel to the DDS sensing node. These carriers are integrated in a CCD well by the DDS core unit to reconstruct the original charge packet.
[0074] The operation of circuit 700 occurs as follows. During the fill phase, fgis pulled low to Vp. This serves two purposes. First, it provides a new supply of electrons to the DDS core unit 704. Second, it presets the floating gate low and forces electrons, underneath it from a previous cycle, to be transferred forward.
[0075] During the spill phase, fgis preset high to a level of
[0076] The time constant for this transition is
[0077] where Cp2represents parasitic junction and routing capacitances on fgas well as channel capacitance of G24and G8. The second term in this expression corresponds to effective capacitance of the CCD well when it is empty. The high potential on the floating gate at this time leaves it well situated to receive charge during the following phase.
[0078] At the beginning of the collection phase, the floating gate well contains no charge. Its storage capacity, which is proportional to the difference between the channel potentials of G13and G12, is approximately equal to
[0079] |Q|max=(Vr−vth1−4+vth2)(Cgc+Ccs). (29)
[0080] Variables vth1and vth2refer to threshold voltages of the first and second level gates and 4V represents the high level of the φb2clock. A quantity of charge Qsis transferred underneath the floating gate by lowering the potential of G11. The floating gate potential falls temporarily in response and its storage capacity is reduced to approximately
[0081] When Qsis large, this reduction in storage capacity may cause some electrons to be temporarily stored underneath the G12barrier, where they are no longer sensed by the floating gate. However, as charge flows through the secondary sensing path, the voltage on fgrises, storage capacity is restored, and electrons are once again confined to the floating gate. At the end of collection, the level on the floating gate is
[0082] During the sensing phase, any charge that remains on fgis passed to the primary output well, and the potential on fgrises to its final value of
[0083] The time constant for this transition is
[0084] The factor FKeffis used to translate storage capacity into effective capacitance seen by the gate.
[0085] Combining Eqs. 27, 31 and 32, and eliminating higher-order exponential terms, yields the resultant charge packet
[0086] In most cases, the approximation H>>τ4is valid and this expression can be simplified to
[0087] The output packet depends on capacitances of the CCD well, but does not depend on parasitics on the floating gate node.
[0088] The nondestructive sensing circuit 700 of FIG. 7A produces an output charge that is a replica of its input packet. A modified version of this circuit, shown in FIG. 8A, can be used to produce an output voltage instead. FIG. 8A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS charge sensing circuit 800 with voltage output in accordance with the invention. FIGS. 8B-8E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively. The circuit 800 is configured by connecting floating gate G13from within a CCD register 802, to the input of a DDS core unit 804.
[0089] In the configuration of circuit 800, the final well G7that was otherwise used to store the result, is replaced by a capacitor, C3. In this circuit, charge packets described by Eq. 35 are generated and stored in the wells of G5and G10. During phases 3 and 4, the output node vois precharged to Vc. During phase 1, the result is transferred onto voby lowering the potential of G5and G10. The potential on voafter all charge has transferred is given by
[0090] One advantage of DDS charge sensing is that it has the same voltage requirements as a simple CCD register because its floating gates are clocked to the same levels as other CCD gates. Two other advantages of DDS charge sensing are that it provides greater storage capacity in its floating gate wells and permits a large output voltage swing. Signals are converted to voltages on the output vo, rather than within the CCD register. Storage capacity is also improved because the floating gate is a virtual ground and output swing does not reduce storage capacity.
[0091] An operation that is commonly required in A/D conversion is subtraction of the output from a multiplying D/A from an incoming analog signal. DDS circuit techniques can be used to perform this function. In a DDS approach, an input quantity of positive charge, generated through capacitor elements, is combined on a wire with an incoming packet of negative charge, from a CCD register. The D/A full scale can be either a time-varying voltage or a constant reference voltage. Since diffusions are necessary on the wire, the operation is nondepleted and subject to thermal noise, coupling, and clock feedthrough. However, DDS subtraction has the advantage that its positive charge is formed through polysilicon capacitors. These capacitors provide good element-to-element matching and low voltage dependence, which is important if the D/A full-scale is a time varying signal. DDS subtraction also has the advantage that its incoming negative signal is not subject to nonlinearities due to capacitor voltage dependence.
[0092] A circuit for performing this function is shown in FIG. 9A. FIG. 9A is a schematic diagram of an exemplary embodiment of a DDS D/A and subtraction circuit 900 in accordance with the invention. FIGS. 9B-9E are associated energy level diagrams for a fill phase, spill phase, collection phase and sensing phase, respectively.
[0093] A CCD register 902, formed by gates G11, G12, and G13, serves as the source of electrons. Its output is connected to the input of a DDS core unit 904. N-bit D/A conversion is performed by an array of (2N−1) identically sized units 906, each one consisting of a clamp-and-sample circuit 908 in series with a capacitor C1. The D/A elements provide positive charge to the input of the DDS core unit. The resulting combination of negative and positive charge is integrated in receiving well G5. The DDS core of this circuit differs from that used for charge generation in that the secondary sensing path is eliminated.
[0094] The operation of this circuit is similar to that of the DDS wire transfer described earlier. During the fill phase, fgis pulled low to Vpto provide a new supply of electrons to the circuit. Gate G12is off at this time to prevent charge from flooding backward into the source register. Meanwhile the array of signals vf(i), within the D/A, is forced low by the precharge through M3.
[0095] The D/A precharge remains on during the spill phase. Node fgis reset to a level of
[0096] The time constant for this transition is
[0097] Capacitor Cp2represents parasitic junction and routing capacitances on fgas well as channel capacitance of G24and G13.
[0098] During the collection phase, a quantity of charge Qsis transferred onto fgby lowering the potential of G11. At the same time, the digital inputs w(i), which are in a thermometer code format, are used to selectively assert some of the signals vf(i). When w(i) is high, a positive transition of Vcis introduced across C1(i). When w(i) is low, the capacitor voltage remains unchanged. Electrons, from the source register, are cancelled by positive displacement charge, and fgis restored to a higher voltage. The resulting potential on fgfrom the combination of these competing effects is
[0099] During the sensing phase, the net charge on fgflows through G24to the output well, and the potential on fgrises to its final value of
[0100] The time constant for the sensing transition, τ4, equals that for the spill transition, τ2.
[0101] Combining Eqs. 37, 39 and 40, and eliminating higher-order exponential terms, yields the resultant charge packet
[0102] The approximation H>>τ4is nearly always valid for this circuit and the first term, which represents a constant offset, is negligible. The result is then identically equal to the difference between the input charge Qsand the D/A displacement charge, regardless of parasitics on the wire transfer node, fg.
[0103] A pair of DDS sensing circuits 700 can also be used to implement comparison. In this approach, two differential input packets are each replicated, using a DDS replicator circuit. The resulting packets are stored in CCD receiving wells and are translated to voltages at the input to a CMOS comparator during the following phase. This circuit can also incorporate differential amplification and common-mode rejection in the charge domain using the feedback techniques.
[0104] The resolution of this technique is greater than that for a configuration that performs charge-to-voltage translation on the floating gates. First, it supports a larger signal range so that the impact of comparator or amplifier input-offset voltages is reduced. Second, matching in the charge-to-voltage translation is improved because gains are determined by polysilicon capacitors and are only weakly dependent on CCD well capacitances.
[0105] Although the present invention has been shown and described with respect to several preferred embodiments thereof, various changes, omissions and additions to the form and detail thereof, may be made therein, without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A charge processing circuit which integrates charge at an output node that is representative of an input charge provided at an input node, comprising:
a precharge path coupled to said input node, said precharge path operable for setting the potential of said input node to a fixed precharge potential prior to introduction of input charge to said input node;
a sensing path coupled to said input and output nodes which is operable for returning the potential of said input node to said fixed precharge potential subsequent to introduction of input charge to said input node; and
a feedback element having an input coupled to said input node and an output coupled to said sensing path and said precharge path, said feedback element operable for setting said fixed precharge potential.
2. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said output node comprises a CCD receiving well.
3. The circuit of claim 1, wherein said precharge path comprises a first gate coupled to said feedback element and a second gate coupled to a first clocked potential source, and wherein said sensing path comprises a third gate coupled to said feedback element and a fourth gate coupled to a second clocked potential source.
4. The circuit of claim 1 further comprising a source of said input charge, said source comprising a capacitor having an output coupled to said input node, and an input coupled to a circuitry that changes the potential across the capacitor.
5. The circuit of claim 1 further comprising a source of said input charge, said source comprising a CCD register that transfers charge onto said input node.
6. The circuit of claim 1 further comprising a first and second source of said input charge.
7. The circuit of claim 6, wherein said first source comprises a CCD register that transfers charge onto said input node.
8. The circuit of claim 7, wherein said second source comprises one or more capacitors having their outputs coupled to said input node and their inputs coupled to circuitry that changes the potential across said capacitors.
9. A method of integrating charge at an output node of a charge processing circuit that is representative of input charge provided at an input node, comprising:
replenishing charge at said input node;
draining charge from said input node;
stopping the draining of charge from said input node in response to a feedback element detecting when said input node reaches a fixed precharge potential;
introducing an input charge on said input node from a source;
draining charge from said input node onto said output node; and
stopping the draining of charge from said input node in response to a feedback element detecting when said input node reaches said fixed precharge potential.
Patent Citations (14)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3806772(A) | 1974-04-01 | Early | Applicant |
| US4209853(A) | 1980-06-01 | Hyatt | Examiner |
| US5247241(A) | 1993-09-01 | Ueda | Examiner |
| US5736757(A) | 1998-04-01 | Paul | Applicant |
| US5748235(A) | 1998-05-01 | Kondo et al. | Examiner |
| US5872469(A) | 1999-02-01 | Nestler | Examiner |
| US5969758(A) | 1999-10-01 | Sauer et al. | Examiner |
| US5982205(A) | 1999-11-01 | Vallancourt | Examiner |
| US6025935(A) | 2000-02-01 | Tseng | Examiner |
| US6118482(A) | 2000-09-01 | Clark et al. | Examiner |
| US6133954(A) | 2000-10-01 | Jie et al. | Examiner |
| US6147551(A) | 2000-11-01 | Hong | Examiner |
| US6320617(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Gee et al. | Examiner |
| US6366320(B1) | 2002-04-01 | Nair et al. | Examiner |
Non-Patent Literature (1)
- “A Distributed Floating-Gate Amplifier in Charge-Coupled Devices” by wen et al., ISSCC 75/ Wednesday, Feb. 12, 1975.Applicant