US 6,424,703 B1Grant
Telephonic-interface lottery system
Issue Date:2002-07-23
•125 Claims
•6 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A telephonic-interface lottery system D interfaces with a multiplicity of individual terminals T1-Tn of a telephone network facility C to enable lottery players to call and play for at least one additional chance to possibly win by dialing a pay-to-dial telephone number indicated on a “scratch-off” or online game lottery ticket for use in the system. At the terminals, callers are prompted by voice-generated instructions to provide digital data, such as their telephone number, age, social security number, and/or drivers license number. In addition, the sequence number of the caller as well as the date and time of the call is recorded for positive association with a caller and is stored for processing. The caller's identification data is confirmed using various techniques and callers may be ranked and accounted for on the basis of entitlement-and sequence. In accordance with one format, an instant winner is selected online by utilizing techniques such as determining a random winning sequence number or a winning lottery number generated by a number generator. As an adjunct or alternative, the identification data is processed at a later time to determine a grand prize drawing winner by using various processing techniques for determining winners.
Metadata
Assignee
- Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P.
Inventor
- Ronald A. Katz
Application Information
Application Number:US 09/021,956
Filing Date:1998-02-11
Priority Date:1985-07-10
Art Unit:7
Classifications
IPC:
H04M 1100
Field of Search:
379 9313379 9302379 9303379 9101379 91022839032831022731381273139
Patent Drawings (6 sheets)
Description
[0002] This is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/306,650 filed on Sep. 14, 1994, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Lottery System,” which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/756,956 filed on Sep. 9, 1991, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Lottery System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 5,365,575, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/555,111 filed on Jul. 18, 1990, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 5,048,075, which was a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/342,506 filed on Apr. 24, 1989, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System,” now abandoned, which was a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/194,258 filed on May 16, 1988, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 4,845,739, which was a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/018,244 filed on Feb. 24, 1987, and entitled “Statistical Analysis System For Use With Public Communication Facility,” now U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,968, which was a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 06/753,299 filed on Jul. 10, 1985, and entitled “Statistical Analysis System For Use With Public Communication Facility,” now abandoned.
[0003] Also, application Ser. No. 08/306,650 is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 08/306,751 filed on Sep. 14, 1994, and entitled “Multiple Format Telephonic Interface Control System,” which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 08/047,241 filed on Apr. 13, 1993, and entitled “Multiple Format Telephonic Interface Control System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,285, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/509,691 filed on Apr. 16, 1990, and entitled “Multiple Format Telephonic Interface Control System,” now abandoned, and a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/640,337 filed on Jan. 11, 1991, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System”, which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/335,923 filed on Apr. 10, 1989, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System,” which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/194,258 filed on May 16, 1988, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 4,845,739, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/018,244 filed on Feb. 24, 1987, and entitled “Statistical Analysis System For Use With Public Communication Facility,” now U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,968, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 06/753,299 filed on Jul. 10, 1985, and entitled “Statistical Analysis System For Use With Public Communication Facility;” now abandoned, said application Ser. No. 07/509,691, is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/260,104 filed on Oct. 20, 1988, and entitled “Telephonic Interface Control System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 4,930,150, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/018,244 filed on Feb. 24, 1987, and entitled “Statistical Analysis System For Use With Public Communication Facility,” now U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,968, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 06/753,299 filed on Jul. 10, 1985, and entitled “Statistical Analysis System For Use With Public Communication Facility,” now abandoned.
[0004] Also, application Ser. No. 08/306,650 is directly a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/335,923 filed on Apr. 10, 1989, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System,” which is a continuation of application Ser. No. 07/194,258 filed on May 16, 1988, and entitled “Telephonic-Interface Statistical Analysis System,” now U.S. Pat. No. 4,845,739, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 07/018,244 filed on Feb. 24, 1987, and entitled “Statistical Analysis System For Use With Public Communication Facility,” now U.S. Pat. No. 4,792,968, which is a continuation-in-part of application Ser. No. 06/753,299 filed on Jul. 10, 1985, and entitled “Statistical Analysis System For Use With Public Communication Facility,” now abandoned,. The benefit of the earlier filing dates in the United States is claimed under 35 U.S.C. § 120.
Background and Summary of the Invention
[0005] Various forms of publicly accessible communication systems for providing access to a central station have been proposed, some involving telecommunications. However, sometimes a need for ancillary functions arise in that regard, e.g. it may be desirable to positively identify a large group of persons, statistically analyze data from the group so as to accurately identify certain persons in the group and select a subset, or sub subsets of at least one person. In that regard, a need exists for an improved, effective, economical, and expedient system of telecommunication incorporating means for performing qualification, identification, analysis and selection of individual persons.
[0006] It has been proposed to interface persons at telephone calling stations directly with a computer facility. In accordance with such arrangements, recorded voice messages prompt callers to provide data by actuating the alphanumeric buttons that are conventionally employed for dialing from one telephone station to another. In one prior arrangement, a caller may actuate dialing buttons to selectively attain a communication channel or to address specific information in a computer. In another arrangement, dialing buttons may be actuated to specify an individual billing designation as for requested services. Generally, such systems are believed to have been somewhat limited in scope, often involving difficulties that are frustrating or confusing to a caller. Nevertheless, such techniques have been widely used to enhance and broaden communication.
[0007] The public lottery has become widely accepted as a basis for supporting government activities while providing aspects of entertainment and hope. Typically, conventional public lotteries have been facilitated by computers and data processing systems utilizing various formats. One conventional type of lottery incorporates the use of “scratch-off” lottery tickets that are sold by retailers. Under this system, winning tickets are returned to lottery retailers who redeem the tickets for the prize amounts, based on a physical approval of the lottery ticket.
[0008] In general, the present invention comprises a telephonic-interface lottery system and related process to further stimulate interest in the lottery by providing at least one additional chance to possibly win some prize (whether or not the scratch-off lottery ticket is a winner) by calling a pay-to-call number indicated on the scratch-off lottery ticket. The telephonic-interface lottery system can also be utilized with online tickets in which case the online terminal printer can print at least one unique identification number (either the existing printed ticket or lotto number or a new special number which may be interrelated to the existing ticket number) for subsequent telephone use. In one embodiment, scratch-off lottery tickets for use in the telephonic-interface lottery system include primary indicia defining a lottery format to evidence a winning lottery combination and at least one unique identification number used to pursue the additional chances. The lottery format and at least a portion of the identification number are concealed. The telephone number facilitating a play of the additional chance is a pay-to-call-number, such as preferably a 900 phone number.
[0009] The telephonic-interface lottery system utilizes both analog (voice) and digital telephonic communication in a variety of different interface formats or programs, to record data relating to each caller, in particular data formulated by the lottery system such as the sequence number of the call including the date and time at which the call occurred, data provided by the caller such as the area code and telephone number followed by the unique identification number or additional chance number from the lottery ticket. The system is configured to eliminate duplicate entries and verify the unique identification number. Instant winners can be selected while the lottery player is on the telephone by a designated winning sequence number or by a random number generator. In addition, winners can also be selected at a later designated time by a designated winning sequence number or by the random number generator.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0010] In the drawings, which constitute a part of this specification, exemplary embodiments exhibiting various objectives and features hereof are set forth, specifically:
[0011] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a telephonic-interface lottery system constructed in accordance with the present invention;
[0012] FIG. 2 is a top plan view of a scratch-off lottery ticket for use in the system of FIG. 1;
[0013] FIG. 2ais a cross sectional view taken along line 2a-2ain FIG. 2;
[0014] FIG. 3 is a flow diagram of one operating format of the system of FIG. 1;
[0015] FIG. 4 is a block diagram of a form of processor or function unit as may be employed in the system of FIG. 1;
[0016] FIG. 5 is a bottom plan view of the scratch-off lottery ticket shown in FIG. 2;
[0017] FIG. 6 is a block diagram of elements in an operating function unit of FIG. 4;
[0018] FIG. 7 is a fragmentary diagrammatic representation of a storage cell format as may be developed in the system of FIG. 4; and
[0019] FIG. 8 is a block diagram of elements in an operating function unit of FIG. 4.
[0020] FIG. 9 is a block diagram of the connections between an interface CPU, a remote lottery CPU and remote stations.
Description of the Illustrative Embodiments
[0021] As required, detailed illustrative embodiments of the present invention are disclosed herein. However, physical communication systems, data formats, and operating structures in accordance with the present invention may be embodied in a wide variety of forms, some of which may be quite different from those of the disclosed embodiments. Consequently, the specific structural and functional details disclosed herein are merely representative; yet in that regard, they are deemed to afford the best embodiments for purposes of disclosure and to provide a basis for the claims herein which define the scope of the present invention.
[0022] Referring initially to FIG. 1, a series of remote telephone-instrument terminals T1 through Tn are represented (left). The terminals are generally similar, and accordingly, only the terminal T1 is illustrated in detail.
[0023] In the disclosed embodiment, the remote terminals T1 through Tn represent the multitude of conventional telephone terminals that are coupled to a communication facility C which may take the form of a comprehensive public telephone system for interconnecting any associated terminals T1-Tn. In accordance with the present system, the terminals T1-Tn operate through the communication facility C to be coupled with a central station D, an embodiment of which is illustrated in some detail.
[0024] Generally in accordance with the present development, individual callers use the individual telephone stations T1 through Tn to interface the station D through the communication facility C. Callers may be screened or qualified. Also in accordance herewith, the data of individual callers including digital data provided by callers may be collected, correlated and tested in the station D for processing in accordance with various programs and external data. As a consequence, various objectives are accomplished. For example, a select subset of the callers may be isolated and specifically identified, or related data may be processed, or transactions may be actuated. The possibilities for application of the system are substantial and varied as will be apparent from the exemplary structure and functions as described in detail below.
[0025] In one operating process format, legal lotteries are enabled that are interesting, effective and very economical on an individual participant basis. The telephonic-interface lottery system of the present invention further stimulates interest in the lottery by providing at least one additional chance to possibly win a prize in addition to a winning lottery format provided on a scratch-off lottery ticket or an online ticket. The additional chance is facilitated by calling a pay-to-call number indicated on the scratch-off lottery ticket. Some formats may use toll free 800 numbers as well.
[0026] The callers may be variously qualified on the basis of entitlement and may be identified for subsequent verification. The callers may be prompted, either through the interface or externally, to provide appropriate data, such as their age and the additional chance number which may be one or more unique identification numbers.
[0027] Considering the system of FIG. 1 in somewhat greater detail, it is to be understood that the communication facility C has multiplexing capability for individually coupling the terminals T1-Tn to the central station D on request. In the illustrative embodiment of the system, the communication facility C comprises a public telephone network and the individual terminals T1-Tn take the various forms of existing traditional or conventional telephone instruments.
[0028] The exemplary telephone terminal T1 is represented in some detail to include a hand piece 10 (microphone and earphone) and a panel 12 provided with a rectangular array of push buttons 14 in the conventional configuration. Of course, the hand piece 10 accommodates analog signals while the panel 12 is a digital apparatus. Generally in accordance herewith, the hand piece 10 serves to manifest analog signals vocally to the caller.
[0029] In accordance with conventional telephone practice, alphabetic and numeric designations are provided on the buttons 14. For example, several of the buttons 14 carry three letters along with a decimal digit. Specifically, the button designated with the numeral “2” also carries the letters “A”, “B” and “C”. In that manner, the buttons 14 encompass the numerals “0-9”, two symbols, and the alphabet except for the letters “Q” and “Z”. Consequently, the buttons 14 accommodate the entry of decimal data, and to some extent alphabetic data.
[0030] The buttons 14 designated with symbols “*” and “#”, along with the numeral “0”, can be used by predetermined assignment to represent the letters “Q” and “Z” or any of a variety of other data or command components. Generally, in accordance herewith, the buttons 14 are employed to formulate digital data at the central station D in various formats determined by the instant specific use and operating format of the system.
[0031] Considering the central station D in somewhat greater detail, the communication facility C is coupled to interface a series of processing systems P1 through Pn (FIG. 1, right). Specifically, the communication facility C is connected to the processing systems P1-Pn through an associated series of automatic call distributors AC1 through ACn. Each of the automatic call distributors AC1-ACn accommodates one hundred lines from the communication facility C and accordingly, may accommodate and queue up to 100 calls.
[0032] Each of the automatic call distributors AC1-ACn may take various forms as well known in the prior art, functioning to queue incoming calls for connection to a lesser number of lines. Also, in various systems audio response units (ARU's) may be used as for preliminary processing in accordance with the operations as described below.
[0033] In the disclosed embodiment, from each of the call distributors AC1-ACn, fifty lines are connected respectively to the individual data processing systems P1-Pn through an interface 20 and a switch 21. Thus, in the disclosed embodiment, each of the automatic call distributors AC1-ACn can accommodate one hundred lines, fifty of which may be active in association with one of the processing systems P.
[0034] The processing systems P1-Pn are similar, therefore, only the processing system P1 is shown in any detail. Collectively, the processing systems P1-Pn are interconnected with a command computer terminal CT, at least one interface terminal IT, at least one printer PR and an audio unit AD. The command terminal CT is separately coupled to the audio unit AD.
[0035] As represented, the processing systems P1 through Pn each contain a number of individual function units or processors PR1 through PRn. Although various other configurations and arrangements may be employed, the explanation is facilitated by including a plurality of individual function units as treated in detail below.
[0036] Considering the processing system P1, fifty lines from the automatic call distributor AC1 are connected to the interface 20, an exemplary form of which may be a commercially available Centrum 9000 unit. The interface 20 incorporates modems, tone decoders, switching mechanisms, DNIS and ANI capability (call data analyzer 20a) along with voice interface capability. Note that the interface may actually perform analysis on data. However, to preserve the disclosed embodiment manageable, major analysis is explained with reference to processors.
[0037] Generally, DNIS capability is a function of the communication facility C (composite telephone system) to provide called terminal digital data indicating the called number. ANI capability is a similar function whereby the digital data indicates the calling number with calling terminal digital signals. Both capabilities are available for use with equipment as the interface 20 and to provide control through the call data analyzer 20a.
[0038] Accommodating up to fifty independent calls on separate communication paths to the central station D, the interface 20 is capable of providing analog (voice) signals to prompt each caller. Also accommodated are digital signals including the DNIS and ANI signals. The system contemplates the possibility of utilizing sequences of lines in rotary as well as blocking sequences of lines, the numbers for which command a particular program or operation format of a function unit as disclosed in detail below.
[0039] The interface 20 provides the connection of the fifty lines to a switch 21 which is in turn coupled to fifty function units, or processors PR1-PRn. As indicated above, multiple function units, or processors, are described in the disclosed embodiment to facilitate the explanation. Of course, non-parallel techniques and multiplexed operations might well be employed as alternatives. For a similar reason, as disclosed herein, each of the processors PR1-PRn includes memory cells for each of the callers' individual data. Development and compilation of data in such cells according to various operating formats is described below. In the disclosed embodiment, the processors PR1-PRn are connected collectively to the command computer terminal CT (incorporating a CRT display), the interface terminal IT, and the printer PR. Note that the CRT display serves to visually display data regarding select subsets as explained in detail below.
[0040] Exemplary detailed structures for the processors PR1-PRn are described below; however, in general, the units may comprise a microcomputer, for example, programmed as suggested above and as disclosed in detail below to accomplish specific operating formats. As an integral part of such formats, a caller may be qualified as belonging to an entitled set of persons, such as persons holding a proper lottery ticket and being over a certain age. Also, callers may be designated both with respect to their significance and their identification. For example, callers may have different significance in a format, depending on the time or sequence of their call. Also, the designation of a caller may be exceedingly important in relation to the caller eventually being isolated as part of a subset or sub subsets, the members of whom must be accurately verified.
[0041] As described below, in a lottery format the designations may involve multiple elements which may include: random number assignments, encryption techniques, utilization of calling numbers, identification data, sequence of call and so on to facilitate reliable verification. Note that the communication facility C has a customer billing, structure B that is interfaced by the system.
[0042] On the qualification and designation of callers, the system enters a data receiving phase during which digital data (formatted at one of the telephone terminals T1-Tn by the caller) is processed by one of the processors PR1-PRn. In general, the processing evolves a subset (at least one caller) and also possibly a sub subset, the members of which may be verified and confirmed.
[0043] Either during the data accumulation phase, or after the processing phase to isolate a subset, a distinct operation may involve actuating the interface terminal T1 for direct communication between the caller and an operator at the terminal T1. Another distinct operation may involve actuation of the printer PR to provide documents in relation to the operating format, as for providing award certificates as for verifying members of an isolated subset. Also, charge slips may be generated containing at least part of the data of a particular transaction.
[0044] A general sequence of operations for a format is represented to be initiated in FIG. 3 by the “enter” block 40 which is accordingly followed by a “cue voice generator” command block 42. If the ANI (automatic number identification) equipment is not employed, the voice generator in the interface 20 formulates speech, a representative form of which might be: “Thank you for participating in the lottery. Please give us your telephone number by actuating the call buttons on your telephone instrument.”
[0045] Acting on the instructions, the caller would push the buttons 14 in sequence to indicate his telephone number, e.g. “(213) 627-2222”. Alternatively, the interface 20 can accept the calling number ((213) 627-2222) according to its provision by standard ANI equipment of the communication facility C.
[0046] The resulting data signals are communicated from the interface unit 20 (FIG. 1) to the processor PR1 for testing the telephone number as valid or entitled. Essentially, the format of a proper number prompts production of a valid or “good” signal. The test is indicated by the block 44 (FIG. 3). If the response is not valid or entitled, for example contains an inappropriate number of digits or has been used to a point of excess, the operation of block 46 is initiated again cuing the voice generator 30 (FIG. 1). The voice generator accordingly instructs the caller, e.g.: “You have not entered a proper telephone number. Please reenter your telephone number by pressing the appropriate call buttons.” The caller is then allotted a predetermined period of time to make a proper entry with the consequence that the system moves to a test operation as indicated by the block 48 (FIG. 3). Specifically, block 48 poses the query: “Is the second try good?”
[0047] If the caller is again unsuccessful, the system purges the record as indicated by the block 50 and the call is terminated as indicated by the block 52. In an alternative mode, the processor PR1 may abort the interface and couple the interface terminal IT for direct personal communication with the caller. The interchange would then proceed, person-to-person.
[0048] If the caller responds with a proper telephone number, the operation proceeds. Specifically, the system sequences to record the response of the proper telephone number as indicated by the block 45. That is, the caller's telephone number is recorded in an assigned specific memory cell identified with the caller. The format of the cell C1 is indicated in FIG. 7 showing the individual fields or sections. The first portion, section 53, contains a form of identification data, i.e., the caller's telephone number, i.e. “(213) 627-2222”.
[0049] Note that as explained above, if the second attempt to formulate a proper number is successful, as manifest by the block 48 (FIG. 3), the response is recorded at that stage. In either case, exiting from the block 45 (FIG. 3) invokes the next operation of again queuing the voice generator as indicated by the block 56.
[0050] At this juncture, the system proceeds to receive and process the lottery ticket data as well as other data such as the identification data provided by the caller and the data formulated by the computer. The result is a subset of winners, or perhaps ultimately several subsets or sub subsets of winners or potential winners. However, first the lottery ticket number (such as the unique identification number) is entered by the caller as indicated by the block 68. The lottery number may be stored in section 66 (FIG. 7) of cell C1.
[0051] At the outset, the system may test the lottery ticket number on the basis of its format. That is the number is verifiable (as by digit combinations, for example the first two digits may equal the third) and is tested as explained above in relation to the telephone number. If a received number is invalid, the call may be terminated as explained above. Any record may be purged.
[0052] If the number is valid, it is next tested as a winner. Essentially, the number is treated as a consumable key, entitled for example to a single use for participation. The participation may include an online subset determination of winners and a subsequent offline determination of another subset of winners. These tests are indicated by the block 68. From that point, as illustrated by the block 70, data is accumulated for subsequent offline processing.
[0053] The detailed operation is not represented in FIG. 3 as it is similar to the operation illustrated by the blocks 42 through 56. However, again, a proper response is registered in the storage cell C1 as illustrated in FIG. 7 by the number “58”.
[0054] During the course of the telephonic communication, the processor PR1 formulates identification data for the caller specifically such as: the date and time of the call, the chronological sequence of the call, the assigned designation of the call, and a set of acknowledgment digits for the call. Such data identification is registered in the caller's assigned cell C1 in accordance with the format of FIG. 2 being stored in sections 62, 64, 67 and 69. Note that the data may be stored in a coded interrelationship. For example, the acknowledgment digits may be related to the call record sequence. In the illustrative example, the chronological order number of the caller is 4951. The acknowledge digits may be derived from the sequence number. For example, as illustrated, a coded relationship may be established by adding “two” to each of the individual record sequence digits.
[0055] Considering the example numerically:
[0056] Adding without propagated carries:
[0057] Note that the confirmation data as acknowledgement digits can be extremely important, as to communicate with an isolated member of a subset. For example, identification of an ultimate winner could be published or circulated, as by a television broadcast, then respondents checked by use of confirmation data that may be confidential.
[0058] Continuing with the above example, the call chronological sequence registered for the caller is 4951 as represented in the section 62 while the acknowledge digits are 6173 as registered in the section 66. Additionally, the processor PR1 develops an assigned designation number, e.g. designation “14951684”, which is registered in the section 67, the acknowledge code or digits, e.g. 6173, being registered in the section 69. These values are formulated in accordance with conventional number techniques during the data acquisition phase. With the exemplary numerals formulated, the operation proceeds.
[0059] In the detailed operation, in addition to entering data from the remote terminal, the processor PR1 (FIG. 1) cues the internal memory as indicated by the block 70 (FIG. 3). Thus, the processor PR1 fetches the call record sequence number, assigns a designation (if not previously assigned, in some cases the sequence number is the designated number), and encodes the sequence number as the acknowledgment digits (if not previously accomplished).
[0060] To confirm receipt of the acknowledgement digits, the processor PR1 (FIG. 1) cues the voice generator in the interface 20, as indicated by the block 72 (FIG. 3) to provide information to the caller. Specifically, for example, the voice generator in the interface 20 (FIG. 1) might signal: “This transaction has been designated by the number 4951684, and is further identified by the acknowledgment digits 6173. Please make a record of these numbers as they will be repeated. Specifically, the designation number is 4951684. The acknowledgment digits are 6173. Please acknowledge this transaction by pressing your telephone buttons to indicate the acknowledge digits 6173.” In lottery applications typically involving security, the order and acknowledgment of callers may be very important. Therefore, data for confirmation associated with the order is important.
[0061] The system next proceeds to the test mode as indicated by the block 76 (FIG. 3). If the caller provides the correct acknowledgment digits, the data is confirmed in the record as indicated by the block 80 and is registered in the cell C1 (FIG. 2). Additionally, the voice generator is sequenced as indicated by the block 82 (FIG. 3) to indicate the close of the communication and that the transaction is terminated as represented by the exit block 84.
[0062] In the event that a caller cannot confirm his acknowledgment digits, as indicated by the block 76, a repeat operation is performed as indicated respectively by the blocks 86 and 88. Specifically, the voice generator is queued for a second instructional message. In the event that the second attempt also fails, the data is purged and the call discounted as indicated by block 90 and an exit block 92. If the second try is successful (test block 88), as indicated by the block 80, the record is perfected as indicated above.
[0063] As a result of the likelihood of a large number of calls, as described above, data cells in the processors PR1-PRn (FIG. 1) are developed with specific information relating to each call. Such data, accumulated from the various calls may be considered by logic comparisons in the computer 22 to select the subset of winning persons who should be isolated at a later point.
[0064] The processing operation usually involves comparison testing which compares caller data from individual memory cells of the processors P1-Pn (FIG. 1) with test data, such as a look-up table, that is supplied through the command terminal CT.
[0065] Preliminary to considering an exemplary form of the telephonic-interface lottery system of the present invention, reference will now be made to FIG. 4 showing an exemplary structural form for the processors PR1-PRn. From the switch 21 (FIG. 1) a pair of communication lines 90 and 91 are indicated in FIG. 4 (top left). The line 90 provides signals from a processing unit 92 while the line 91 provides signals to the processing unit 92 along with other components as represented in FIG. 4. The separate lines 90 and 92 facilitate explanation.
[0066] The processing unit 92 may take the form of a mini-computer programmed to accommodate the functions of various applications, as disclosed in detail below. As indicated above, the system may utilize a plurality of independent function units or processing units, e.g., processing unit 92, operating in a somewhat parallel configuration, or alternatively, a limited number of processors may be driven sequentially to accommodate the functional operations as described.
[0067] The input line 91 (upper left) is connected specifically to a qualification unit 93, a sequencer 94 and a designation unit 96, as well as the processing unit 92 as indicated above. The qualification unit qualifies access from a remote terminal T1-Tn to the processing unit 92 as described in detail below. In accordance with various applications or operating formats, the qualification unit 93, the sequencer 94 and the designation unit 96 operate preliminarily with respect to individual callers. Generally, these units qualify or test callers for entitlement to participate in the lottery, develop a sequence-of-calls record and provide forms of designations for callers that may be authenticated. As described in detail below, the units function in sequence to accomplish such operations and accordingly are each individually connected to the processing unit 92 and a buffer storage 97. Essentially, the buffer storage 97 is illustrated separately from the processing unit 92 along with the unit 93, sequencer 94, unit 96, and so on, again in order to facilitate the explanation. Similarly illustrated are memory 98 (with cells C1-Cn), a look-up table 103 and clock 105.
[0068] Considering the processor of FIG. 4 in further detail, the qualification unit 93 (upper left) is connected to a look-up table 99 and a use-rate calculator 100. The designation unit 96 (top center) is connected to a random number generator 101 and an encryptor 102.
[0069] In view of the above structural description of the system, consideration will now be given to a certain specific application in relation to the operation of the system.
[0070] As the illustrative operating format, an embodiment of the telephonic-interface lottery system will now be described. The legalized state lottery typically features various “scratch-off” ticket lottery game formats such as “the California Classic”, “Treasure Hunt”, “Blackjack”, “Lucky 7's” and the like. In addition, lotteries typically offer online games such as Lotto. The enhanced lottery system accommodated by the present telephone system may utilize pay-to-dial numbers (“900-xxxx”) or toll free 800 numbers and may be restricted to a limited number of uses for defined intervals of time. For example, a person might be entitled to play the lottery only a limited number of times or to the extent of a limited dollar value during a predetermined interval.
[0071] Certain digits of the unique identification number may contain information on a particular format, for example the “California Classic”. Multiple formats may run simultaneously and the DNIS for example may indicate the lottery format and processing for each game. Additionally digits in the unique number when entered by the caller might indicate a telephone subformat.
[0072] Referring now to FIG. 2, a lottery participant upon purchasing a “scratch-off” lottery ticket LT for use in the system D has at least two chances to win. The first chance is facilitated by a lottery format defining a winning combination, for example by matching three like dollar amounts or symbols from a plurality provided in a first section S1. Subsequent chances are provided by telephone communication in accordance herewith. Preliminarily, consider the specific structure of a ticket in accordance herewith.
[0073] The lottery ticket LT is made from any suitable base substrate typically used and is likewise suitably sized to accommodate all the information. A scratch-off layer covers part or all of the ticket. Structurally, the ticket LT is a composite including a base substrate L1 (FIG. 2a) bearing a latex scratch-off layer L2. Visible print or indicia L3 appears on the latex layer L2 which may be integral or over stamped. Concealed indicia L4 is fixed on the substrate L1 and is revealed when the latex layer is removed. As illustrated in FIG. 2, the concealing areas S1 and S2 of the latex layer L2 are illustrated by wavy lines, accordingly normally concealed indicia is revealed.
[0074] As illustrated in FIG. 2, the upper section S1 of the scratch-off latex layer L2 defines ticket-specified winners. That is, as indicated above, matching combinations or symbols define winners. The lower scratch-off section S2 of the ticket LT indicates a unique identification number UN which may be several digits. The first section S1 and at least a portion of the identification number UN is covered with a suitable substance, such as latex in order to conceal the lottery format and the complete identification number from the lottery participants, retailers and the like and prevent any fraudulent activity. The unique identification number may also be the stock number (sequence number assigned by the lottery for each ticket to keep track thereof) of the lottery ticket with additional concealed or latex protected digits.
[0075] The lottery ticket LT also indicates the pay-to-dial telephone number indicia 59 to facilitate additional chances to win. For example, the lottery ticket LT bears indicia 61 indicating “For Another Chance call 900-555-1212”. Accordingly, regardless of whether the lottery ticket LT defines a winning combination, the lottery participant has another chance to possibly win by dialing the pay-to-dial number and incurring a further minimal cost, for example 50 cents. In some formats all players including winners of the matching combinations are provided with an additional opportunity to win. Note that the ticket LT also carries another number as indicated by the unconcealed indicia 63.
[0076] The lottery ticket LT on its reverse side is provided with a bar code BC defining a number corresponding to the unique identification number UN which would allow the retailer or the lottery system to verify instant winners when the lottery tickets are redeemed and automatically cancel related information on the data stored in the memory.
[0077] Pursuing the operation of the system in greater detail, using the specified calling number (900 555 1212) from the terminal T1 (FIG. 1) the caller would actuate the push buttons 14 to establish contact with the processing system P1. Communication would be through the communication facility C, the automatic call distributor AC1, the interface 20 and the switch 21 as described in detail above.
[0078] The initial operation involves qualification of the caller to participate in the lottery. Again, ANI or caller interface techniques may be employed as described above. If the caller is involved, the interface 20 is actuated by the qualification unit 93 during the operating interval t1 to instruct the caller: “Please key in your telephone calling number”. As indicated above, an alternative involves the system simply registering the calling number on the basis of its provision by ANI equipment. As indicated above, in one sequence the callers telephone number is tested at this point. Also, the lottery number also may be tested at this stage or subsequently. Various sequences are practical, another of which involves data accumulation prior to winner tests.
[0079] After the caller's telephone number is registered, the instruction is given: “Participation in the lottery is for persons over twenty-one years of age. Accordingly, please key in the year of your birth”. A birth date, social security number, driver's license or credit card number may be similarly registered to confirm age or confirm identification of caller. Alternatively, the combination of telephone number and date or year of birth or age could be used. In any event, the caller's data is registered and the qualification unit 93 then functions to test the data as provided. Specifically, the caller's telephone number is checked in a look-up table 99 to determine whether or not it is a proper and currently valid number for use in the lottery.
[0080] If the data indicates a qualified caller, the system proceeds to the next phase of designating the transaction. The designation unit 96 operates during the interval t3 to provide the caller with a designation for the current transaction which may be the sequence number. As explained above, the random generator 101 with or without the encryptor 102 may be employed to create an identification number which may include an encrypted form of the caller's telephone number. Accordingly, data for the transaction is established in the buffer 97 then set in a cell of the memory 98 (FIG. 4). Specifically, the completed data cell format might be as follows: Telephone No.—Birth Year—Designation—Random No. In the format being described, the system next functions to generate the random number as indicated above which will then be tested against a series of other numbers to determine whether or not the caller is a winner. In that regard, elements in the processing unit 92 which accomplish the operation are illustrated in FIG. 6 which will now be considered in detail.
[0081] Typically, a caller will have scratched off the latex layer L2 over the section S2 prior to placing a call to the lottery interface system. Depending on the operating sequence employed, at some point, the caller is cued to input the number carried by the indicia UN. Specifically, the number is simply entered using the terminal touch tone keypad. As a result winners can be selected with online processing while the caller is on the phone as well as by off-line processing at a later designated time. Both online and off-line winners can be selected by determining a winning sequence number or by selecting a random lottery number or selecting a random sequence number.
[0082] A random number generator 160 functions on command to provide a three-digit number. With the consummation of a call, the random number generator 160 is actuated to provide the caller's random number in a selected caller cell 162. From that location, the caller's random number is compared with numbers from a register 164 by a comparator 166. The numbers in the register 164 were previously passed through a gate 174 from the generator 160. In the event of coincidence, the comparator provides an output “yes” signal to a line 168. Conversely, the failure of coincidence prompts the comparator 166 to provide a “no” output to a line 170. Essentially, a “yes” indicates a win while a “not” indicates the caller has lost.
[0083] The elements of FIG. 6 provide a random operating format to determine winners on a somewhat statistical basis; however, the system increases the probability with the passage of time when no win occurs. In that regard, at the outset of an operating cycle, the random number generator 160 provides a random number that is passed through the gate 174 to the register 164. In the exemplary format, a three-digit number would be provided. At that stage, the caller's random number, from the cell 162, would be compared with the single number in the register 164 by the comparator 166. However, with the passage of time, calls are tallied or time is metered by a counter 178. Accordingly, upon the attainment of a predetermined count, the gate 174 is again qualified to enter another number in the register 164. Accordingly, an increasing set of numbers are held in the register 164 for comparison with each caller's number. Of course, the more numbers in the register 164, the higher probability of a caller winning and that relationship depends upon the duration or number of calls since the last winner.
[0084] Either a win or a loss as indicated within the processing unit 92 (FIG. 4) prompts the interface 20 to respond appropriately to the caller announcing his results. If there is a win, the designation may be reinforced and additional identification may be taken as explained above. Of course, if the prize simply involves a credit on the caller's telephone bill or his credit account, identification and designation become less critical considerations.
[0085] In the event of awards to be claimed, the processing system P1 (FIG. 1) may actuate the printer PR to produce a positive identification of the winner, which document may be redeemed only by the caller providing the assigned designation along with confirmation of his identification data.
[0086] Generally in relation to awards, the processing unit 92 may also utilize a random number format for determining the significance of awards. That is, a random number may be actuated to provide numerals from one through twenty, for example, the magnitude of the number generated for a caller indicating the significance of his award. Normally such information would be provided to the caller and registered in his memory cell.
[0087] With respect to memory cells generally, it is to be noted that actuated memory cells may be cleared for callers who are not winners. Accordingly, a limited number of memory cells store the subset of winners for subsequent confirmation processing and so on. Alternatively, historical data cells for each caller may be maintained.
[0088] As explained above, clearances may be perfected through the look-up table 99 (FIG. 4) in association with the qualification unit 93 or approvals through a consumable key step may be extended to incorporate functions of the processing unit 92 in association with the memory 98. For example, if qualification simply involves a check-off operation, the look-up table 99 will normally be employed.
[0089] As explained above, the arrangement of the function unit (or units) may be variously embodied in a single processor or many processors, depending on various considerations as time sharing, multiplexing, paralleling and so on. The systems as described above embody the components bulked together in one location. However, components of the system could be spaced apart geographically, using dedicated lines or polling techniques. An illustrative embodiment is shown in FIG. 9.
[0090] Call distributors CD1-CDn are located at different geographic locations along with associated interface units IA1-IAn and IB1-IBn. Each of the interface units, as unit IA1 is coupled to an interface central processing unit 260 as indicated by lines 252, 254, 256 and 258. The interface CPU 260 may be located geographically proximate the interface units, for example in Omaha, to record and store the data relating to each caller, including the data provided by the caller and the data formulated by the computer in a data file 264 coupled thereto as indicated at line 266. Each of the lines may take the form of a dedicated telephone line or a polling telephonic coupling. The interface central processing unit 260 is coupled to a lottery central processing unit 251 indicated at line 262 which may be located remote from the interface central processing unit 260 as for example in Indianapolis.
[0091] In the operation of the system of FIG. 9, the call distributors CD are coupled to a telephonic communication system and accordingly allow the interface units I and the interface CPU 260 to provide interface communication between the lottery central processing unit 251 and a multitude of remote terminals T1-Tn. The interface central processing unit 260 stores complete data with regard to each caller in the data file 264. The interface central processing unit 260 may variously transmit or download important data only, for example the unique identification or ticket number and prize type (such as B) or prize amount ($50) stored in section 65 (FIG. 7) to the lottery central processing unit 251. Accumulated data with regard to a plurality of callers may be transmitted at a designated time to save on transmission time and cost. Downloaded data for the additional chances is also stored at a file 270. Thus, the distributed-component system is capable of executing the various formats as explained above with reference to the illustrative structure.
[0092] In view of the above explanation of exemplary systems, it will be appreciated that other embodiments of the present invention may be employed in many applications to accumulate statistical data, process such data, and define subsets of callers of concern. While certain exemplary operations have been stated herein, and certain detailed structures have been disclosed, the appropriate scope hereof is deemed to be in accordance with the claims as set forth below.
Claims
Post-issuance certificates present
The text shown below may not reflect later post-issuance changes.
What is claimed is:
1. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation for use with a communication facility including remote terminal apparatus for individual callers, including voice communication means, and digital input means in the form of an array of alphabetic numeric buttons for providing identification data, comprising the steps of:
assigning a predetermined limit on access to an interactive call processing format;
receiving dialed number identification signals automatically provided from the communication facility (DNIS) to indicate a called number, wherein said called number is indicative of said interactive call processing format selected from a plurality of different interactive call processing formats under control of said dialed number identification signals (DNIS) and also receiving calling number identification signals automatically provided from the communication facility;
storing the calling number identification signals and using the calling number identification signals to control certain operations of the interactive call processing format;
providing an identification number on a ticket, said identification number entered by each individual caller via said digital input means to access said interactive call processing format until said predetermined limit is reached;
storing data indicative of an extent of access accomplished for said identification number entered by each individual caller;
testing said data indicative of said extent of access accomplished against said predetermined limit on access to determine if said predetermined limit on access is reached and further testing to limit access during a predetermined interval of time, wherein if the predetermined limit on access is reached by a particular caller, communication with that caller is terminated or that caller is transferred to an interface terminal for communication with an operator; and
providing a distinct indicia associated with said ticket and co-relating said distinct indicia to at least a portion of said identification number.
2. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, wherein said testing step further comprises the step of:
testing said identification number with a check digit test.
3. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, wherein said testing step further comprises the step of:
testing said identification number based on entitlement.
4. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
concealing at least a portion of said identification number.
5. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 4, wherein said concealing step further comprises the step of:
applying an obscuring material to said identification number.
6. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 5, wherein said applying step further comprises the step of:
using a latex coating as said obscuring material.
7. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
recording the date and time at which each call occurs.
8. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, wherein said distinct indicia associated with said ticket is a bar code indicia on said ticket.
9. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 8, further comprising the step of:
utilizing said bar code indicia for automatic entry of data for accessing related stored information including said identification number.
10. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 9, further comprising the step of:
rendering said ticket ineffective by utilizing said bar code indicia to cancel said related stored information including said identification number.
11. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
providing said identification data as indicia on said ticket along with said distinct indicia and an additional numerical indicia.
12. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
recording additional identification data provided by the caller.
13. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
recording said caller's credit card number.
14. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
recording at least two separate types of caller provided identification data.
15. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
processing said identification number online.
16. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
providing visual indicia on a ticket illustrative of a name of a specific interactive call processing format from a plurality of names of interactive call processing formats.
17. A method according to claim 16, wherein said visual indicia further includes a specific visual theme associated with said interactive call processing format taken from a plurality of visual themes associated with a plurality of different interactive call processing formats.
18. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
receiving digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility.
19. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control on operation as defined in claim 18, further comprising the step of:
storing said digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility.
20. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 18, wherein said testing step further includes a preliminary test for testing digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility to limit or prevent access to said interactive call processing format.
21. A method according to claim 18, further comprising the step of:
processing said data indicative of said extent of access in accordance with said interactive call processing format, and utilizing said digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus for said processing.
22. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 18, wherein said testing step further includes the use of said digital signals representing calling number identification data to at least in part control the extent of access.
23. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 18, wherein said digital signals representing calling number identification data control at least certain aspects of said ticket control operation.
24. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
interfacing a plurality of calls from said individual callers via an automatic call distributor for access to said interactive call processing format.
25. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, wherein at least certain digits of said identification number entered by certain of said individual callers indicate a select subformat.
26. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation according to claim 1, further comprising the step of:
processing data entered by each of said individual callers and utilizing at least part of said data to select at least one subset of at least one caller from said individual callers.
27. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation according to claim 1, further comprising the step of:
providing visual indicia on said ticket including a specific visual theme associated with said interactive call processing format selected from a plurality of visual themes associated with a plurality of interactive call processing formats.
28. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
prompting said individual callers via a voice generator to enter data; and
storing at least certain of said data responsive to said prompting step.
29. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, wherein access is limited based upon a limited number of uses.
30. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 29, wherein the access is limited based upon a limited number of uses in a predetermined interval of time.
31. A method of conducting a telephone-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 29, wherein the access is limited based upon a limited number of uses for defined intervals of time.
32. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 29, wherein access is limited based upon a limited number of uses for a predetermined interval of time.
33. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 29, further comprising the step of:
receiving digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility.
34. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 29, wherein said testing step further includes the use of said digital signals representing calling number identification data to at least in part control the extent of access.
35. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 29, further comprising the step of:
providing visual indicia on a ticket illustrative of a name of a specific interactive call processing format from a plurality of names of interactive call processing formats.
36. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 29, further comprising the step of:
concealing at least a portion of said identification number.
37. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 36, wherein said concealing step further comprises the step of:
applying obscuring material to said identification number.
38. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, wherein access is limited based upon a limited dollar value.
39. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 38, wherein the access is limited based upon a limited number of uses in a predetermined interval of time.
40. A method of conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 38, wherein the access is limited based upon a limited number of uses for defined intervals of time.
41. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 38, wherein access is limited based upon a limited number of uses for a predetermined interval of time.
42. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 38, further comprising the step of:
receiving digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility.
43. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 38, wherein said testing step further includes the use of said digital signals representing calling number identification data to at least in part control the extent of access.
44. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 38, further comprising the step of:
providing visual indicia on a ticket illustrative of a name of a specific interactive call processing format from a plurality of names of interactive call processing formats.
45. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 38, further comprising the step of:
concealing at least a portion of said identification number.
46. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 45, wherein said concealing step further comprises the step of:
applying obscuring material to said identification number.
47. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, wherein said called number is a toll free number selected from a plurality of toll free numbers under control of said dialed number identification signals (DNIS).
48. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation as defined in claim 1, further comprising the step of:
utilizing a clock to limit access during said predetermined interval of time.
49. A method according to claim 1, wherein certain digits of said identification number contain information specific to each of said plurality of interactive call processing formats and said digits are tested for entitlement to access said interactive call processing format selected from said plurality of interactive call processing formats.
50. A telephonic-interface ticket control system for use with a communication facility including remote terminal apparatus for individual callers to call, including voice communication means, and digital input means in the form of an array of alphabetic numeric buttons for providing identification data, said telephonic-interface ticket control system comprising:
interface means couple to said communication facility to interface said remote terminal apparatus for voice and digital communication with said individual callers wherein dialed number identification signals are automatically provided from said communication facility (DNIS) to identify a called number from a plurality of called numbers and calling number identification signals are automatically provided from the communication facility to identify a calling number;
voice generator means coupled through said interface means for providing vocal instructions to an individual caller to enter identification data from a ticket, said ticket having associated therewith a distinct indicia co-related to said identification data;
memory means coupled to said interface means for storing said identification data and data indicative of an extent of access accomplished by said individual callers as well as the calling number identification signals that are used to control certain operations of the telephonic-interface ticket control system; and
qualification means coupled to said interface means for limiting access to said ticket control system based on said extent of access accomplished by said individual callers and wherein if the extent of access is reached by a particular caller, communication with that caller is terminated or that caller is transferred to an interface for communication with an operator.
51. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 50, wherein said plurality of called numbers are indicative of a plurality of different operating formats.
52. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 51, wherein access to said plurality of different operating formats are provided via different toll free numbers.
53. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 51, wherein at least certain digits of said identification data entered by each individual caller indicate a select telephone subformat.
54. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 50, wherein said qualification means utilizes a look-up table to determine if a limit on access is reached.
55. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 50, wherein said qualification means limits access to a one time use only.
56. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 50, further comprising:
means for generating sequence data for each individual call.
57. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 50, further comprising:
means for controlling recording of data in said memory means with respect to the date or time at which each call occurs or both.
58. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 50, further comprising:
receiving means for receiving digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility.
59. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 58, wherein said digital signals are utilized for automated processing of said ticket.
60. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 58, wherein said memory means stores said digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility.
61. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 60, wherein said qualification means tests digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility to limit or prevent access to said ticket control system.
62. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 50, wherein said distinct indicia is a bar code indicia on said ticket.
63. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 50, wherein said bar code distinct indicia is machine readable and is utilized for automatic entry of data for accessing related stored information including said identification number.
64. A telephonic-interface control system as defined in claim 63, further comprising: means for rendering said ticket ineffective by utilizing said machine readable indicia to cancel related stored information including said identification number.
65. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 50, wherein said qualification means also tests to limit access during a predetermined interval of time.
66. A telephonic-interface ticket control system as defined in claim 50, wherein said ticket bears numerical indicia in addition to machine readable indicia and identification data indicia.
67. A telephonic-interface ticket control system as defined in claim 50, wherein at least a portion of said identification data is concealed.
68. A telephonic-interface ticket control system as defined in claim 67, wherein at least a portion of said identification data is concealed with an obscuring material.
69. A telephonic-interface ticket control system as defined in claim 67, wherein at least a portion of said identification data is concealed with a latex coating.
70. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 50, wherein said qualification means limits access to a limited number of uses.
71. A telephonic-interface ticket control system according to claim 50, wherein said qualification means limits access to a specified dollar amount.
72. A telephonic-interface control system for use with a communication facility including remote terminal apparatus for individual callers to call, including voice communication means, and digital input means in the form of an array of alphabetic numeric buttons for providing identification data, said telephonic-interface control system comprising:
interface means coupled to said communication facility to interface said remote terminal apparatus for voice and digital communication with said individual callers based upon dialed number identification signals (DNIS) indicative of a called number provided automatically from said communication facility, said interface means also receiving calling number identification signals provided automatically by the communication facility to identify a calling number, said interface means using said calling number identification signals for controlling certain operations of the telephonic-interface control system;
voice generator means coupled through said interface means for providing vocal instructions to an individual caller to enter data and identification data;
processing means for processing said data supplied by said individual callers, said processing means coupled to said interface means and selecting at least one subset of at least one caller from said individual callers;
qualification means coupled to said interface means for limiting access during at least an interval of time to said processing means based upon comparing said identification data with previously stored identification data and wherein if a particular individual caller is not qualified, communication with that caller is either terminated or that caller is transferred to an interface terminal for communication with an operator; and
means for storing coupled to said interface means for storing said data in association with said previously stored identification data.
73. A telephonic-interface control system as defined in claim 72, wherein said qualification means utilizes a look-up table to determine if a limit on an extent of access is exceeded.
74. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 73, wherein said limit on access relates to a limited number of uses.
75. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 73, wherein said limit on access relates to a limit on a dollar amount.
76. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 75, wherein said limit on a dollar amount is during a predetermined interval of time.
77. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 75, wherein said limit on access relates to a limit on a dollar amount in a defined intervals of time in accordance with a use rate calculator.
78. A telephonic-interface control system as defined in claim 72, wherein said processing means selects said subset offline subsequent to accumulating data with regard to a multitude of said individual callers.
79. A telephonic-interface control system as defined in claim 72, wherein said called number is one of a plurality of called numbers associated with a plurality of distinct operating formats.
80. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 79, wherein one of said plurality of formats is accessed by a toll free number and another format is accessed by a pay to dial number.
81. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 79, wherein one of said formats is accessed by a pay to dial number and a toll free number and another of said formats is accessed by another toll free number.
82. A telephonic-interface control system as defined in claim 72, wherein said dialed number identification signals (DNIS) identify one called number from a plurality of distinct called numbers including toll free called numbers.
83. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 72, wherein sequence data indicative of calling order sequence is generated and stored for certain of said individual callers.
84. A telephonic-interface control system as defined in claim 72, wherein said processing means selects said subset on-line.
85. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 72, wherein said identification data is provided on a ticket.
86. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 85, wherein said identification data and a machine readable indicia are provided on a ticket.
87. A telephonic-interface control system according to claim 86, wherein machine readable indicia on said ticket is co-related to at least a portion of said identification data and said machine readable indicia is utilized for automatic entry of data for accessing purposes.
88. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation for use with a communication facility including remote terminal apparatus for individual callers, including a voice communication device, and a digital input device in the form of an array of alphabetic numeric buttons for providing identification data, comprising the steps of:
providing dialed number identification signals automatically from the communication facility (DNIS) to provide digital identification data indicating a called number, wherein said called number is indicative of an interactive call processing format selected from a plurality of different interactive call processing formats under control of said dialed number identification signals (DNIS) and also providing calling number identification signals automatically from the communication facility to identify a calling number, the calling number identification signals used to control at least a part of the telephonic-interface ticket control operation;
assigning at least one predetermined limit on access to said interactive call processing format;
providing an identification number on a ticket, said identification number entered by each individual caller via said digital input device to access said interactive call processing format until said at least one predetermined limit is reached and providing visual indicia on said ticket illustrative of a specific theme from a plurality of different themes and providing a name or a numerical value on said ticket associated with said specific theme;
storing data indicative of an extent of access accomplished for said identification number entered by each individual caller;
testing said data indicative of said extent of access accomplished against said at least one predetermined limit on access to determine if said at least one predetermined limit on access is reached and if said at least one predetermined limit on access is reached by a particular caller, communication with the caller is either terminated or transferred to an interface terminal for communication with an operator;
providing a distinct indicia associated with said ticket;
prompting said individual callers via a voice generator to enter data;
storing at least certain of said data responsive to said prompting step; and
co-relating said distinct indicia to at least a portion of said identification number.
89. A method according to claim 88, further comprising the step of:
processing at least certain of said data responsive to said step of prompting.
90. A method according to claim 89, further comprising the steps of:
receiving calling number identification signals automatically provided by the communication facility; and
utilizing at least a part of the calling number identification signals to control at least a part of the processing.
91. A method according to claim 88, further comprising the step of:
concealing at least a portion of said identification number.
92. A method according to claim 88, further comprising the step of:
applying an obscuring material to said identification number.
93. A method according to claim 88, wherein said distinct indicia associated with said ticket, being machine readable indicia on said ticket.
94. A method according to claim 88, further comprising the step of:
utilizing said indicia which is machine readable for automatic entry of data for accessing related stored information including at least a portion of said identification number.
95. A method according to claim 94, wherein said machine readable indicia is a bar code.
96. A method according to claim 88, further comprising the step of:
recording additional data provided by callers in the form of callers' credit card numbers.
97. A method according to claim 88, wherein said testing step further includes testing digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility, said testing of the calling number identification data to limit or prevent access to said interactive call processing format.
98. A method according to claim 88, wherein access is limited based upon a limited dollar value.
99. A method according to claim 88, wherein at least certain digits of said identification data entered by each individual caller indicate a select telephone subformat.
100. A method according to claim 88, wherein said at least one predetermined limit on access is indicative of a number of uses.
101. A method according to claim 88, wherein said ticket bears both said name and said numerical value associated with said specific theme.
102. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation for use with a communication facility including remote terminal apparatus for individual callers, including voice communication means, and digital input means in the form of an array of alphabetic numeric buttons for providing identification data, comprising the steps of:
providing dialed number identification signals automatically from the communication facility (DNIS) to provide digital identification data indicating a called number, wherein said called number is indicative of an interactive call processing format selected from a plurality of different interactive call processing formats under control of said dialed number identification signals (DNIS) and also providing calling number identification signals automatically from the communication facility to identify a calling number, the calling number identification signals used to control at least a part of the telephonic-interface ticket control operation;
assigning at least one predetermined limit on access to said interactive call processing format;
providing an identification number on a ticket, said identification number entered by each individual caller via said digital input device to access said interactive call processing format until said at least one predetermined limit is reached and providing visual indicia on said ticket illustrative of a visual theme from a plurality of different visual themes and providing a name or a numerical value on said ticket associated with said specific tickets;
storing data indicative of an extent of access accomplished for said identification number entered by each individual caller;
testing said indicative of said extent of access accomplished against said at least one predetermined limit on access to determine if said at least one predetermined limit on access is reached and if the one predetermined limit access is reach by a particular caller, communication with that caller is terminated or that caller is transferred to an interface terminal for communication with an operator;
providing a distinct indicia associated with said ticket;
prompting said individual callers via a voice generator to enter data;
storing at least certain of said data responsive to said prompting step; and
providing indicia indicating a toll free number for callers to dial from a plurality of toll free numbers, where said indicia indicative of said toll free number is related to a specific one of said visual themes.
103. A method according to claim 102, wherein said ticket bears both said name and said numerical value associated with said specific ticket.
104. A method according to claim 102, wherein at least certain digits of said identification data entered by each individual caller indicate a select telephone subformat.
105. A method according to claim 102, wherein said at least one predetermined limit specifies a dollar amount.
106. A method according to claim 102, wherein said at least one predetermined limit specifies a number of uses.
107. A method according to claim 102, comprising:
further testing to limit access during at least one predetermined interval of time.
108. A method according to claim 102, further comprising the step of:
processing at least certain of said data responsive to said step of prompting.
109. A method according to claim 108, further comprising the steps of:
receiving calling number identification signals automatically provided by the communication facility; and
utilizing at least a part of the calling number identification signals to control at least a part of the processing.
110. A method for conducting a telephonic-interface ticket control operation for use with a communication facility including remote terminal apparatus for individual callers, including a voice communication device, and a digital input device in the form of an array of alphabetic numeric buttons for providing identification data, comprising the steps of:
providing dialed number identification signals automatically from the communication facility (DNIS) to provide digital identification data indicating a called number from a plurality of called numbers and wherein said called number is indicative of said interactive call processing format selected from a plurality of different interactive call processing formats under control of said dialed number identification signals (DNIS) and wherein said called number is indicative of said interactive call processing format selected from a plurality of different interactive call processing formats under control of said dialed number identification signals (DNIS) and also providing calling number identification signals automatically from the communication facility to identify a calling number, the calling number identification signals used to control at least a part of the telephonic-interface ticket control operation;
assigning at least one predetermined limit on access to an interactive call processing format;
providing an identification number on a ticket, said identification number entered by each individual caller via said digital input device to access said interactive call processing format until said at least one predetermined limit is reached;
storing data indicative of an extent of access accomplished for said identification number entered by each individual caller;
testing said data indicative of said extent of access accomplished against said at least one predetermined limit on access to determine if said at least one predetermined limit on access is reached and further testing to limit access during at least one predetermined interval of time and if the at least one predetermined limit on access is reached by a particular caller, communication with that caller is terminated or that caller is transferred to an interface terminal for communication with an operator;
providing a distinct indicia associated with said ticket and co-relating said distinct indicia to at least a portion of said identification number;
providing visual indicia on said ticket illustrative of a specific theme from a plurality of themes and providing a specific name or a numerical value associated with said specific ticket;
prompting said individual callers via a voice generator to enter data; and
storing at least certain of said data responsive to said prompting step.
111. A method according to claim 110, further comprising the step of:
concealing at least a portion of said identification number.
112. A method according to claim 111, wherein said concealing step further comprises the step of:
applying an obscuring material to said identification number.
113. A method according to claim 112, further comprising:
using a latex coating as said obscuring material.
114. A method according to claim 110, wherein said distinct indicia associated with said ticket is a machine readable indicia on said ticket.
115. A method according to claim 110, further comprising the step of:
utilizing said distinct indicia which is machine readable for automatic entry of data for accessing related stored information including said identification number.
116. A method according to claim 110, further comprising the step of:
providing said identification data as indicia on said ticket along with said distinct indicia and an additional numerical indicia.
117. A method according to claim 110, further comprising the step of:
recording additional identification data provided by the caller.
118. A method according to claim 110, further comprising the step of:
recording said caller's credit card number.
119. A method according to claim 110, wherein at least certain digits of said identification data entered by each individual caller indicate a select telephone subformat.
120. A method according to claim 110, further comprising the step of:
receiving digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility.
121. A method according to claim 120, further comprising the step of:
storing said digital signals representing numbers associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility.
122. A method according to claim 110, wherein said testing step further includes testing digital signals representing calling number identification data associated with said remote terminal apparatus automatically provided by said communication facility, said testing of the calling number identification data to limit or prevent access to said interactive call processing format.
123. A method according to 110, wherein said at least one predetermined limit specifies a dollar limit.
124. A method according to claim 110, wherein said at least one predetermined limit specifies a number of uses.
125. A method according to claim 110, wherein said ticket bears both said name and said numerical value associated with said specific ticket.
Patent Citations (324)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2902541(A) | 1959-09-01 | Singleton | Applicant |
| US2941161(A) | 1960-06-01 | Scantlin | Applicant |
| US3060275(A) | 1962-10-01 | Meacham et al. | Applicant |
| US3076059(A) | 1963-01-01 | Meacham et al. | Applicant |
| US3082402(A) | 1963-03-01 | Scantlin | Applicant |
| US3128349(A) | 1964-04-01 | Boesch et al. | Applicant |
| US3159818(A) | 1964-12-01 | Scantlin | Applicant |
| US3246082(A) | 1966-04-01 | Levy | Applicant |
| US3249919(A) | 1966-05-01 | Scantlin | Applicant |
| US3299210(A) | 1967-01-01 | Bandy | Applicant |
| US3337847(A) | 1967-08-01 | Olsson et al. | Applicant |
| US3347988(A) | 1967-10-01 | Marill et al. | Applicant |
| US3371162(A) | 1968-02-01 | Scantlin | Applicant |
| US3381276(A) | 1968-04-01 | James | Applicant |
| US3393272(A) | 1968-07-01 | Hanson | Applicant |
| US3394246(A) | 1968-07-01 | Goldman | Applicant |
| US3482057(A) | 1969-12-01 | Abbott et al. | Applicant |
| US3515814(A) | 1970-06-01 | Morgan | Applicant |
| US3544769(A) | 1970-12-01 | Hedin | Applicant |
| US3556530(A) | 1971-01-01 | Barr | Applicant |
| US3557311(A) | 1971-01-01 | Golstein | Applicant |
| US3568157(A) | 1971-03-01 | Downing et al. | Applicant |
| US3569939(A) | 1971-03-01 | Doblmaier et al. | Applicant |
| US3571799(A) | 1971-03-01 | Coker, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US3573747(A) | 1971-04-01 | Adams et al. | Applicant |
| US3581072(A) | 1971-05-01 | Nymeyer | Applicant |
| US3594004(A) | 1971-07-01 | Barr et al. | Examiner |
| US3617638(A) | 1971-11-01 | Jochimsen et al. | Applicant |
| US3618038(A) | 1971-11-01 | Stein | Applicant |
| US3624292(A) | 1971-11-01 | Guzak, Jr. | Applicant |
| US3644675(A) | 1972-02-01 | Waltington | Applicant |
| US3647973(A) | 1972-03-01 | James et al. | Applicant |
| US3651480(A) | 1972-03-01 | Downing et al. | Applicant |
| US3656113(A) | 1972-04-01 | Lince | Applicant |
| US3665107(A) | 1972-05-01 | Kopec et al. | Applicant |
| US3675513(A) | 1972-07-01 | Flanagan et al. | Applicant |
| US3688126(A) | 1972-08-01 | Klein | Applicant |
| US3696335(A) | 1972-10-01 | Lemelson | Applicant |
| US3697702(A) | 1972-10-01 | Buonsante et al. | Applicant |
| US3781810(A) | 1973-12-01 | Downing | Applicant |
| US3792446(A) | 1974-02-01 | McFiggins et al. | Applicant |
| US3794774(A) | 1974-02-01 | Kemmerly et al. | Applicant |
| US3800283(A) | 1974-03-01 | Gropper | Applicant |
| US3858032(A) | 1974-12-01 | Scantlin | Applicant |
| US3870821(A) | 1975-03-01 | Steury | Applicant |
| US3881160(A) | 1975-04-01 | Ross | Applicant |
| US3889050(A) | 1975-06-01 | Thompson | Applicant |
| US3909553(A) | 1975-09-01 | Marshall | Applicant |
| US3912874(A) | 1975-10-01 | Botterell et al. | Applicant |
| US3914747(A) | 1975-10-01 | Barnes et al. | Applicant |
| US3918174(A) | 1975-11-01 | Miller et al. | Applicant |
| US3920908(A) | 1975-11-01 | Kraus | Applicant |
| US3928724(A) | 1975-12-01 | Byram et al. | Applicant |
| US3934095(A) | 1976-01-01 | Matthews et al. | Applicant |
| US3947972(A) | 1976-04-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US3950618(A) | 1976-04-01 | Bloisi | Applicant |
| US3974338(A) | 1976-08-01 | Luzier et al. | Applicant |
| US3982103(A) | 1976-09-01 | Goldman | Applicant |
| US3989899(A) | 1976-11-01 | Norwich | Applicant |
| US3991406(A) | 1976-11-01 | Downing et al. | Applicant |
| US3998465(A) | 1976-12-01 | Mascola | Applicant |
| US4009342(A) | 1977-02-01 | Fahrenschon et al. | Applicant |
| US4012599(A) | 1977-03-01 | Meyer | Applicant |
| US4017835(A) | 1977-04-01 | Randolph | Applicant |
| US4024345(A) | 1977-05-01 | Kochem | Applicant |
| US4054756(A) | 1977-10-01 | Cornella et al. | Applicant |
| US4071698(A) | 1978-01-01 | Barger, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US4078316(A) | 1978-03-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US4088838(A) | 1978-05-01 | Nakata et al. | Applicant |
| US4090038(A) | 1978-05-01 | Biggs | Applicant |
| US4108361(A) | 1978-08-01 | Krause | Applicant |
| US4117278(A) | 1978-09-01 | Ehrlich et al. | Applicant |
| US4121052(A) | 1978-10-01 | Richard | Applicant |
| US4145578(A) | 1979-03-01 | Orriss | Applicant |
| US4150255(A) | 1979-04-01 | Theis et al. | Applicant |
| US4152547(A) | 1979-05-01 | Theis | Applicant |
| US4160125(A) | 1979-07-01 | Bower et al. | Applicant |
| US4162377(A) | 1979-07-01 | Mearns | Applicant |
| US4187498(A) | 1980-02-01 | Creekmore | Applicant |
| US4191376(A) | 1980-03-01 | Goldman | Applicant |
| US4191860(A) | 1980-03-01 | Weber | Applicant |
| US4194089(A) | 1980-03-01 | Hashimoto | Applicant |
| US4200770(A) | 1980-04-01 | Hellman et al. | Applicant |
| US4201887(A) | 1980-05-01 | Burns | Applicant |
| US4223183(A) | 1980-09-01 | Peters, Jr. | Applicant |
| US4232199(A) | 1980-11-01 | Boatwright et al. | Applicant |
| US4241942(A) | 1980-12-01 | Bachman | Applicant |
| US4242539(A) | 1980-12-01 | Hashimoto | Applicant |
| US4243844(A) | 1981-01-01 | Waldman | Applicant |
| US4255618(A) | 1981-03-01 | Danner et al. | Applicant |
| US4260854(A) | 1981-04-01 | Kolodny et al. | Applicant |
| US4264924(A) | 1981-04-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US4264925(A) | 1981-04-01 | Freeman et al. | Applicant |
| US4270024(A) | 1981-05-01 | Theis et al. | Applicant |
| US4277649(A) | 1981-07-01 | Sheinbein | Applicant |
| US4290141(A) | 1981-09-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US4299637(A) | 1981-11-01 | Oberdeck et al. | Applicant |
| US4302810(A) | 1981-11-01 | Bouricius et al. | Applicant |
| US4303804(A) | 1981-12-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US4307266(A) | 1981-12-01 | Messina | Applicant |
| US4314103(A) | 1982-02-01 | Wilson | Applicant |
| US4317961(A) | 1982-03-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US4320256(A) | 1982-03-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US4323770(A) | 1982-04-01 | Dieulot et al. | Applicant |
| US4328396(A) | 1982-05-01 | Theis | Applicant |
| US4338494(A) | 1982-07-01 | Theis | Applicant |
| US4339798(A) | 1982-07-01 | Hedges et al. | Applicant |
| US4345315(A) | 1982-08-01 | Cadotte et al. | Applicant |
| US4348554(A) | 1982-09-01 | Asmuth | Applicant |
| US4355207(A) | 1982-10-01 | Curtin | Applicant |
| US4355372(A) | 1982-10-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US4360827(A) | 1982-11-01 | Braun | Applicant |
| US4371752(A) | 1983-02-01 | Matthews et al. | Applicant |
| US4376875(A) | 1983-03-01 | Beirne | Applicant |
| US4389546(A) | 1983-06-01 | Glisson et al. | Applicant |
| US4393277(A) | 1983-07-01 | Besen et al. | Applicant |
| US4398708(A) | 1983-08-01 | Goldman et al. | Applicant |
| US4405829(A) | 1983-09-01 | Rivest et al. | Applicant |
| US4420656(A) | 1983-12-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US4427848(A) | 1984-01-01 | Tsakanikas | Applicant |
| US4439635(A) | 1984-03-01 | Theis et al. | Applicant |
| US4439636(A) | 1984-03-01 | Newkirk et al. | Applicant |
| US4451700(A) | 1984-05-01 | Kempner et al. | Applicant |
| US4468528(A) | 1984-08-01 | Reece et al. | Applicant |
| US4475189(A) | 1984-10-01 | Herr et al. | Applicant |
| US4489438(A) | 1984-12-01 | Hughes | Applicant |
| US4490583(A) | 1984-12-01 | Bednarz et al. | Applicant |
| US4494197(A) | 1985-01-01 | Troy et al. | Applicant |
| US4511764(A) | 1985-04-01 | Nakayama et al. | Applicant |
| US4517410(A) | 1985-05-01 | Williams et al. | Applicant |
| US4518827(A) | 1985-05-01 | Sagara | Applicant |
| US4521643(A) | 1985-06-01 | Dupuis et al. | Applicant |
| US4523055(A) | 1985-06-01 | Hohl et al. | Applicant |
| US4532378(A) | 1985-07-01 | Nakayama et al. | Applicant |
| US4539435(A) | 1985-09-01 | Eckmann | Applicant |
| US4539436(A) | 1985-09-01 | Theis | Applicant |
| US4541087(A) | 1985-09-01 | Comstock | Applicant |
| US4544804(A) | 1985-10-01 | Herr et al. | Applicant |
| US4547851(A) | 1985-10-01 | Kurland | Applicant |
| US4549047(A) | 1985-10-01 | Brian et al. | Applicant |
| US4555594(A) | 1985-11-01 | Friedes et al. | Applicant |
| US4559415(A) | 1985-12-01 | Bernard et al. | Applicant |
| US4559416(A) | 1985-12-01 | Theis et al. | Applicant |
| US4562342(A) | 1985-12-01 | Solo | Applicant |
| US4566030(A) | 1986-01-01 | Nickerson et al. | Applicant |
| US4567359(A) | 1986-01-01 | Lockwood | Applicant |
| US4570930(A) | 1986-02-01 | Matheson | Applicant |
| US4577062(A) | 1986-03-01 | Hilleary et al. | Applicant |
| US4577067(A) | 1986-03-01 | Levy et al. | Applicant |
| US4578700(A) | 1986-03-01 | Roberts et al. | Applicant |
| US4580012(A) | 1986-04-01 | Matthews et al. | Applicant |
| US4582956(A) | 1986-04-01 | Doughty | Applicant |
| US4584602(A) | 1986-04-01 | Nakagawa | Applicant |
| US4585906(A) | 1986-04-01 | Matthews et al. | Applicant |
| US4586707(A) | 1986-05-01 | McNeight et al. | Applicant |
| US4587379(A) | 1986-05-01 | Masuda | Applicant |
| US4591190(A) | 1986-05-01 | Clark | Applicant |
| US4591664(A) | 1986-05-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US4592546(A) | 1986-06-01 | Fascenda et al. | Applicant |
| US4594476(A) | 1986-06-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US4598367(A) | 1986-07-01 | DeFrancesco et al. | Applicant |
| US4603232(A) | 1986-07-01 | Kurland et al. | Applicant |
| US4611094(A) | 1986-09-01 | Asmuth et al. | Applicant |
| US4614367(A) | 1986-09-01 | Breen | Applicant |
| US4625079(A) | 1986-11-01 | Castro et al. | Applicant |
| US4625276(A) | 1986-11-01 | Benton et al. | Applicant |
| US4630200(A) | 1986-12-01 | Ohmae et al. | Applicant |
| US4630201(A) | 1986-12-01 | White | Applicant |
| US4634809(A) | 1987-01-01 | Paulsson et al. | Applicant |
| US4635251(A) | 1987-01-01 | Stanley et al. | Applicant |
| US4645873(A) | 1987-02-01 | Chomet | Applicant |
| US4649563(A) | 1987-03-01 | Riskin | Applicant |
| US4652998(A) | 1987-03-01 | Koza | Applicant |
| US4654482(A) | 1987-03-01 | DeAngelis | Applicant |
| US4658417(A) | 1987-04-01 | Hashimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US4663777(A) | 1987-05-01 | Szeto | Applicant |
| US4665502(A) | 1987-05-01 | Kreisner | Applicant |
| US4669730(A) | 1987-06-01 | Small | Applicant |
| US4671512(A) | 1987-06-01 | Bachman et al. | Applicant |
| US4674044(A) | 1987-06-01 | Kalmus et al. | Applicant |
| US4677552(A) | 1987-06-01 | Sibley, Jr. | Applicant |
| US4677553(A) | 1987-06-01 | Roberts et al. | Applicant |
| US4685123(A) | 1987-08-01 | Hsia et al. | Applicant |
| US4688170(A) | 1987-08-01 | Waite et al. | Applicant |
| US4692817(A) | 1987-09-01 | Theis | Applicant |
| US4694490(A) | 1987-09-01 | Harvey et al. | Applicant |
| US4696028(A) | 1987-09-01 | Morganstein et al. | Applicant |
| US4696029(A) | 1987-09-01 | Cohen | Applicant |
| US4697282(A) | 1987-09-01 | Winter et al. | Applicant |
| US4704725(A) | 1987-11-01 | Harvey et al. | Applicant |
| US4706275(A) | 1987-11-01 | Kamil | Applicant |
| US4715061(A) | 1987-12-01 | Norwich | Applicant |
| US4716583(A) | 1987-12-01 | Groner et al. | Applicant |
| US4719647(A) | 1988-01-01 | Theis et al. | Applicant |
| US4722526(A) | 1988-02-01 | Tovar et al. | Applicant |
| US4745468(A) | 1988-05-01 | Von Kohorn | Applicant |
| US4748668(A) | 1988-05-01 | Shamir et al. | Applicant |
| US4756020(A) | 1988-07-01 | Fodale | Applicant |
| US4757267(A) | 1988-07-01 | Riskin | Applicant |
| US4761684(A) | 1988-08-01 | Clark et al. | Applicant |
| US4763191(A) | 1988-08-01 | Gordon et al. | Applicant |
| US4764666(A) | 1988-08-01 | Bergeron | Applicant |
| US4766604(A) | 1988-08-01 | Axberg | Applicant |
| US4774655(A) | 1988-09-01 | Kollin et al. | Applicant |
| US4781377(A) | 1988-11-01 | McVean et al. | Applicant |
| US4782510(A) | 1988-11-01 | Szlam | Applicant |
| US4783796(A) | 1988-11-01 | Ladd | Applicant |
| US4783800(A) | 1988-11-01 | Levine | Applicant |
| US4785408(A) | 1988-11-01 | Britton et al. | Applicant |
| US4788682(A) | 1988-11-01 | Vij et al. | Applicant |
| US4788715(A) | 1988-11-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US4788716(A) | 1988-11-01 | Zebe | Applicant |
| US4788718(A) | 1988-11-01 | McNabb et al. | Applicant |
| US4789928(A) | 1988-12-01 | Fujisaki | Applicant |
| US4791664(A) | 1988-12-01 | Lutz et al. | Applicant |
| US4792968(A) | 1988-12-01 | Katz | Applicant |
| US4796293(A) | 1989-01-01 | Blinken et al. | Applicant |
| US4797910(A) | 1989-01-01 | Daudelin | Applicant |
| US4797911(A) | 1989-01-01 | Szlam et al. | Applicant |
| US4797913(A) | 1989-01-01 | Kaplan et al. | Applicant |
| US4799156(A) | 1989-01-01 | Shavit et al. | Applicant |
| US4800583(A) | 1989-01-01 | Theis | Applicant |
| US4805209(A) | 1989-02-01 | Baker, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US4812843(A) | 1989-03-01 | Champion, III et al. | Applicant |
| US4815031(A) | 1989-03-01 | Furukawa | Applicant |
| US4815121(A) | 1989-03-01 | Yoshida | Applicant |
| US4815741(A) | 1989-03-01 | Small | Applicant |
| US4827500(A) | 1989-05-01 | Binkerd et al. | Applicant |
| US4832341(A) | 1989-05-01 | Muller et al. | Examiner |
| US4842278(A) | 1989-06-01 | Markowicz | Applicant |
| US4845739(A) | 1989-07-01 | Katz | Applicant |
| US4847890(A) | 1989-07-01 | Solomon et al. | Applicant |
| US4852154(A) | 1989-07-01 | Lewis et al. | Applicant |
| US4853882(A) | 1989-08-01 | Marshall | Applicant |
| US4856050(A) | 1989-08-01 | Theis et al. | Applicant |
| US4866756(A) | 1989-09-01 | Crane et al. | Applicant |
| US4876717(A) | 1989-10-01 | Barron et al. | Applicant |
| US4876892(A) | 1989-10-01 | Von Kohorn | Applicant |
| US4882473(A) | 1989-11-01 | Bergeron et al. | Applicant |
| US4893328(A) | 1990-01-01 | Peacock | Applicant |
| US4893330(A) | 1990-01-01 | Franco | Applicant |
| US4894857(A) | 1990-01-01 | Szlam et al. | Applicant |
| US4896345(A) | 1990-01-01 | Thorne | Applicant |
| US4897867(A) | 1990-01-01 | Foster et al. | Applicant |
| US4899375(A) | 1990-02-01 | Bauer et al. | Applicant |
| US4907079(A) | 1990-03-01 | Turner et al. | Applicant |
| US4908761(A) | 1990-03-01 | Tai | Applicant |
| US4908850(A) | 1990-03-01 | Masson et al. | Applicant |
| US4922520(A) | 1990-05-01 | Bernard et al. | Applicant |
| US4922522(A) | 1990-05-01 | Scanlon | Applicant |
| US4937853(A) | 1990-06-01 | Brule et al. | Applicant |
| US4942598(A) | 1990-07-01 | Davis | Applicant |
| US4942599(A) | 1990-07-01 | Gordon et al. | Applicant |
| US4942616(A) | 1990-07-01 | Linstroth et al. | Applicant |
| US4943995(A) | 1990-07-01 | Dandelin et al. | Applicant |
| US4955047(A) | 1990-09-01 | Morganstein et al. | Applicant |
| US4959783(A) | 1990-09-01 | Scott et al. | Applicant |
| US4961217(A) | 1990-10-01 | Akiyama | Applicant |
| US4964157(A) | 1990-10-01 | Aoshima | Applicant |
| US4965825(A) | 1990-10-01 | Harvey et al. | Applicant |
| US4969183(A) | 1990-11-01 | Reese | Applicant |
| US4969185(A) | 1990-11-01 | Dorst et al. | Applicant |
| US4972461(A) | 1990-11-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US4974252(A) | 1990-11-01 | Osborne | Applicant |
| US4975945(A) | 1990-12-01 | Carbullido | Applicant |
| US4989233(A) | 1991-01-01 | Schakowsky et al. | Applicant |
| US4992940(A) | 1991-02-01 | Dworkin | Applicant |
| US4996705(A) | 1991-02-01 | Entenmann et al. | Applicant |
| US5000486(A) | 1991-03-01 | Run, Jr. et al. | Examiner |
| US5001710(A) | 1991-03-01 | Gawrys et al. | Applicant |
| US5003574(A) | 1991-03-01 | Denq et al. | Applicant |
| US5014298(A) | 1991-05-01 | Katz | Applicant |
| US5017917(A) | 1991-05-01 | Fisher et al. | Applicant |
| US5018736(A) | 1991-05-01 | Pearson et al. | Applicant |
| US5023904(A) | 1991-06-01 | Kaplan et al. | Applicant |
| US5046183(A) | 1991-09-01 | Dorst et al. | Applicant |
| US5083272(A) | 1992-01-01 | Walker et al. | Applicant |
| US5097528(A) | 1992-03-01 | Gursahaney et al. | Applicant |
| US5109414(A) | 1992-04-01 | Harvey et al. | Applicant |
| US5127003(A) | 1992-06-01 | Doll, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US5146491(A) | 1992-09-01 | Silver et al. | Applicant |
| US5181238(A) | 1993-01-01 | Medamana et al. | Applicant |
| US5233654(A) | 1993-08-01 | Harvey et al. | Applicant |
| US5255183(A) | 1993-10-01 | Katz | Applicant |
| US5263723(A) | 1993-11-01 | Pearson et al. | Applicant |
| US5333185(A) | 1994-07-01 | Burke et al. | Applicant |
| US5335277(A) | 1994-08-01 | Harvey et al. | Applicant |
| US5351276(A) | 1994-09-01 | Doll Jr., et al. | Applicant |
| US5353335(A) | 1994-10-01 | D'Urso et al. | Applicant |
| US5403999(A) | 1995-04-01 | Entenmann et al. | Examiner |
| AU66113/81 | 1981-07-01 | Applicant | |
| CA1022674 | 1977-12-01 | Applicant | |
| CA1025118 | 1978-01-01 | Applicant | |
| CA1056500 | 1979-06-01 | Applicant | |
| CA1059621 | 1979-07-01 | Applicant | |
| CA1162336 | 1984-02-01 | Applicant | |
| CA1225759 | 1987-08-01 | Applicant | |
| CA2009937-2 | 1990-08-01 | Applicant | |
| DEOS2929416 | 1981-02-01 | Applicant | |
| DEOS3726366 | 1988-02-01 | Applicant | |
| DE4005365 | 1990-08-01 | Applicant | |
| EP120322 | 1984-02-01 | Applicant | |
| EP229170 | 1987-07-01 | Applicant | |
| EPPub.0249575 | 1987-12-01 | Applicant | |
| EPPub.0295837 | 1988-12-01 | Applicant | |
| EPPub.0342295 | 1989-11-01 | Applicant | |
| EPPub.0434181 | 1991-06-01 | Applicant | |
| EP568114 | 1993-11-01 | Applicant | |
| EP620669 | 1994-10-01 | Applicant | |
| FR9002131 | 1990-08-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2184327 | 1987-06-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2230403 | 1990-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JPPub.52-17740 | 1977-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JPPub.56-152365 | 1981-11-01 | Applicant | |
| JPPub.62-239757 | 1987-10-01 | Applicant | |
| JP500138/88 | 1988-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP298158/90 | 1990-12-01 | Applicant | |
| JP41855/91 | 1991-02-01 | Applicant | |
| WO87/00375 | 1987-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO88/02966 | 1988-04-01 | Applicant | |
| WO88/05985 | 1988-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO89/02139 | 1989-03-01 | Applicant | |
| WO89/09530 | 1989-10-01 | Applicant | |
| WO93/05483 | 1993-03-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (421)
- Basinger, R. G., et al., “Calling Card Service—Overall Description and Operational Characteristics”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Sep., 1982.Applicant
- Confalone, D. E., et al, “Calling Card Service—TSPS Hardware, Software, and Signaling Implementation”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Sep., 1982.Applicant
- Eigen, D.J., et al., “Calling Card Service—Human Factors Studies”, The Bell Technical Journal, Sep., 1982.Applicant
- Lexis Search, Nov. 1, 1984, re: System 85 Computer Process.Applicant
- Lexis Search, Jan. 28, 1985, re: Rolm Releases Four-Channel Phonemail Voice Message Unit.Applicant
- “The AT&T Multi-Mode Voice Systems—Full Spectrum solutions . . . ” by Hester et al., Sep. 1985.Applicant
- Lexis Search Results (Great American Potato-Chip giveaway/Raisin Bran Game/Giants Baseball Trivia—Dial Info): “In The Chips” AdWeek, Jul. 22, 1985.Applicant
- “San-Fran-Police-League”, Business Wire, Aug. 2, 1985.Applicant
- “Similar Campaigns”, DM News, Dec. 15, 1985.Applicant
- “Phone Offers Action At Push Of Button”, Advertising Age, Feb. 6, 1986.Applicant
- Boles, Stephen J., “A Computer Based Audio Communication System”, Computer Sciences Department, Thomas J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, New York, USA, pp. 701-704—(Article) (Undated).Applicant
- Winckelmann, W.A., “Automatic Intercept Service”, Bell Laboratories Record, May 1968, vol. 46, No. 5, pp. 138-143—Article.Applicant
- “Proposed Agreement Between National Enterprises Board (N.E.B.) and Delphi”, Jan. 30, 1979.Applicant
- Voysey, Hedley, “Nexos wins rights to comms engine”, Computing, Sep. 6, ??, vol. 7, No. 36—(Article).Applicant
- “Appraisal Of The Fair Market Value Of Delphi Communications”, Apr. 30, 1980—(Study) Delphi Communications—(Charts and Exhibits).Applicant
- “Voice-Response System Improves Order Entry, Inventory Control”, Communication News, Aug. 1976—(Article).Applicant
- “Periphonics VoicePak”—(Brochure) (Undated).Applicant
- “The Voice Response Peripheral That Turnes Every Touch-Tone Telephone Into A Computer Terminal”, Periphonics Corporation—(Brochure) (Undated).Applicant
- Rabin, Jeff, “Minorities Seek 30% Share of All Lottery Operations”, Sacramento Bee, Apr. 12, 1985—(Article).Applicant
- Advertisements (Dial Giants Baseball Trivia Game): San Francisco Chronicle, Jul. 3, 1984.Applicant
- Curtis, Cathy, “976 numbers let you dial-a-whatever”, San Francisco Business Journal, Nov. 26, 1984—(Article).Applicant
- Ferrell, Jane, “Three little numbers for instant information”, San Francisco Chronicle, Aug. 15, 1984—(Article).Applicant
- “Dallas Telephone Call-In Game Uses Computer Voice Interface”, Sep. 24, 1984—(Press Release).Applicant
- Rivest, R.L., et al., “A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public-Key Cryptosystems”, Communications of the ACM, Feb. 1978, vol. 21, No. 2, pp. 120-126—(Article).Applicant
- Finnigan, Paul F, “Audiotex: The telephone as data-access equipment”, Data Communications, 1987, pp. 155-161 (Article).Applicant
- Ozawa, Y., et al., “Voice Response System and Its Applications”, Hitachi Review, Dec. 1979, vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 301-305—(Article).Applicant
- “AT&T 2: Reaches agreement with Rockwell (ROK)”, Aug. 26, 1986—Press Release).Applicant
- “AT&T: Expands Computer speech system product line”, Apr. 14, 1986—(Press Release).Applicant
- Adams, Cynthia, “Conversing With Computers”, Computerworld on Communications, May 18, 1983, vol. 17, No. 20A, pp. 36-44—(Article).Applicant
- Hester, S.D., et al., “The AT&T Multi-Mode Voice Systems—Full Spectrum Solutions For Speech Processing Applications”, Sep. 1985, pp. 1-10—(Proceedings Of The 1985 AVIOS Conference).Applicant
- Davidson, Leon, “A Pushbutton Telephone For Alphanumeric Input”, Datamation, Apr. 1966, pp. 27-30—(Article).Applicant
- Advertisement: Cuervo Gold Beach Chair—VoiceMail Int'l, '83.Applicant
- “Digital's All-In-1 Voice Messaging”, Digital—(Brochure) (Undated).Applicant
- “Access Voice and Mail Messages From One Familiar Source”, Insight,—(Article) (Undated).Applicant
- “Get The Message . . . !” “New VoiceMail Features”, Voicemail International, Inc., Oct. 1984—(Article).Applicant
- Brochures (TWA Crew Scheduling/PSA's Reservation System/Universal Studios Program/Dow Phone): “AVIAR The communication system that keeps you flying”, VoiceMail Int'l—(Brochure) (Undated).Applicant
- “TWA VoiceMail, Flight Attendants Users Guide” Aug. 1986,—(Brochure).Applicant
- Holtzman, Henry, “Voice Mail Soars at TWA”, Modern Office Technology (Reprint), Mar. 1986,—(Article).Applicant
- “Bid Results via VoiceMail—Flight Deck Crew Members”, May 1, 1985 (Script).Applicant
- Borden, W.S., “Flight Attendant Self Input Of Monthly Bids Via Touch Tone Telephone”, In-Flight Services Bulletin, Sep. 15, 1985—(Memo).Applicant
- “Look Ma, no opertors! Automatic voice system doesmany airline jobs”, Air Transport World, Oct. 1986—(Article).Applicant
- “1,000,000 Shares Common Stock” Voicemail International, Inc.,, Jan. 10, 1984—(Public Offering Summary).Applicant
- Levinson, S.E., et al., “A Conversational-Mode Airline Information and Reservation System Using Speech Input and Output”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Jan. 1980, vol. 59, No. 1, pp. 119-137.Applicant
- Emerson, S.T., “Voice Response Systems—Technology to the Rescue for Business Users”, Speech Technology, Jan./Feb. '83, pp. 99-103—(Article).Applicant
- Moslow, Jim, “Emergency reporting system for small communities”, Telephony, Feb. 11, 1985, pp. 30-32, 34—(Article).Applicant
- Rabiner, L.R., et al., “Digital Techniques for Computer Voice Response: Implementation and Applications”, Proceedings of The IEEE, Apr. 1976, vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 416-432—(Article).Applicant
- Moosemiller, J.P., “AT&T's Conversant™ I Voice System” Speech Technology, Mar./Apr. 1986, pp. 88-93—(Article).Applicant
- Frank, R.J., et al., “No. 4 ESS: Mass Announcement Capability”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Jul./Aug. 1981, vol. 60, No. 6, Part 2, pp. 1049-1081—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- “Chapter I General Description” D.I.A.L. PRM/Release 3—Version 2, Mar. 1987 (Product Reference Manual).Applicant
- “Announcing Release 3.3” D-A-S-H- D.I.A.L. Application and Support Hints, Jan./Feb. Mar. 1987, vol. 3, No. 1—(Brochure).Applicant
- “D.I.A.L. Software Relase 4”, OPCOM, Jan. 1988, Version 1—(Product Reference Manual).Applicant
- Brady, R.L., et al., “Telephone Identifier Interface”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Oct. 1976, vol. 19, No. 5, pp. 1569-1571—(Article).Applicant
- Corbett, A.J., “Telephone Enquiry System Using Synthetic Speech”, University of Essex, Dec. 1974, (Thesis).Applicant
- Yoshizawa, K., et al., “Voice Response System for Telephone Betting”, Hitachi Review, Jun. 1977, vol. 26, No. 6 —(Article).Applicant
- Sagawa, S., et al., “Automatic Seat Reservation By Touch-Tone Telephone”, Second USA Japan Computer Conference, 1975, vol. 2, pp. 290-294—(Article).Applicant
- Smith, S.L., “Computer-Generated Speech and Man-Computer Interaction”, Human Factors, 1970, 12(2), pp. 215-223—(Article).Applicant
- Newhouse, A., et al., “On The Use Of Very Low Cost Terminals”, University of Houston, pp. 240-249—(Paper) (Undated).Applicant
- Mullen, R.W., “Telephone—home's ‘friendliest’Computer”, Inside Telephone Engineer And Management, May 15, 1985, vol. 89, No. 10,—(Article).Applicant
- “Telephone Computing Entering Service Bureau Business”, American Banker, Jul. 5, 1979—(Article).Applicant
- Kutler, Jeffrey, “Technology, System Sharing Improve Phone Banking Outlook”, American Banker, Dec. 7, 1979, vol. CXLIV, No. 237—(Article).Applicant
- Kutler, Jeffrey, “Phone Bill Paying Accessed by Pioneer”, American Banker, Dec. 7, 1979, vol. CXLIV, No. 237—(Article).Applicant
- “User's Guide”, Dowphone (Undated).Applicant
- “Audiotex Information From Dow Jones”, The Computer Review, Nov. 1984, vol. 2, No. 1—(Article).Applicant
- “Dow Phone Adds Innovest Systems' Technical Analysis Reports” IDP Report, Jan. 3, 1986—(Report).Applicant
- Perdue, R.J., et al., “Conversant 1 Voice System: Architecture and Applications”, AT&T Technical Journal, Sep./Oct. 1986—(Article).Applicant
- Martin, James, “Design of Man-Computer Dialogues”, IBM System Research Institute, Chapter 16, pp. 283-306—(Chapter from a Book) (Undated).Applicant
- Kaiserman, D.B., “The Role Of Audio Response In Data Collection Systems”, Proceedings of the Technical Sessions, Paleis des Expositions, Geneva, Switzerland, Jun. 17-19, 1980, pp. 247-251—(Article).Applicant
- Boies, S.J., et al., “User Interface for Audio Communication System”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Dec. 1982, vol. 25, No. 7A, pp. 3371-3377—(Article).Applicant
- Kramer, J.J., “Human Factors Problems in the Use of Pushbutton Telephones for Data Entry”, Bell Telephone Laboratories, Holmdel, N.J., Apr. 74, pp. 241-258—(Paper).Applicant
- Cox, Jr., Floyd, “Flora Fax”, Jan. 22, 1986—(Letter and Advertisements).Applicant
- Isayama, Tetsuya, “Automatic Response Processing Equipment as a Multi-media Communication Node”, Japan Telecommunications Review, 1987, vol. 29, No. 1, pp. 29-36—(Article).Applicant
- Imai, Y., et al., “Shared Audio Information System Using New Audio Response Unit” Japan Telecommunications Review, Oct. 1981, vol. 23, No. 4, pp. 383-390—(Article).Applicant
- “Distrust of computer kills home service plan” (date and source missing).Applicant
- “Automatic Call Distributor/Management Information System: Interface between 1/1AESS™ Switch Central Office and Customer Premises Equipment”, Bell Communications Research, Dec. 1986, Technical Reference TR-TSY-000306, Issue 1—(Article).Applicant
- “Comparison Of ACD Systems”, Connection, Feb. 1990—(Chart).Applicant
- “ACD Comparison”, Aspect, Feb. 2, 1990—(Final Report).Applicant
- “AT&T's Response to Plaintiff's Second Set of Interrogatories to Defendant AT&T Corp. (Nos. 17-18)”, Ronald A. Katz Technology Licensing, L.P. and MCI Telecommunications Corp., Civil Action No. 97-4453 (USDC, ED PA).Applicant
- Lanzeter, Ygal, “Automatic Number Identification System For Step-By-Step Exchanges”, The Ninth Convention of Electrical and Electronics Engineers In Israel, Apr. 1975—(Paper).Applicant
- Flanagan, J.L., et al., “Speech Synthesis”, Chapters 1, 39, 42, 45 and 46—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- “Bell Atlantic's Bolger Wants To Be Free”, Telephony, Jul. 14, 1986—(Article).Applicant
- “Advanced New Cable TV Technology Developed For Impulse Pay-Per-View”, Jun. 3, 1985—(Search).Applicant
- Noll, M.A., “Introduction to Telephones & Telephone Systems”, Second Edition, Chapter 9—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- “Proposal for Kome Mediavoice Interactive Phone/Database Marketing System”, “Mediavoice Startup Software Package For Kome”.Applicant
- “Optional Mediavoice Software Packages For Kome”.Applicant
- “Why ATI Mediavoice Is The Choice For Success”—(Proposal).Applicant
- Meade, Jim, Dec. 29, 1992—(Letter).Applicant
- “All About Voice Response”, Datapro Research Corporation, Delran, N.J., Mar. 1972 and Sep. 1974—(Article).Applicant
- “Voice Response in Banking Applications”, Datapro Research Corporation, Delran, N.J., Oct. 1974 and Feb. 1983—(Article).Applicant
- Schiller, T.R., “Field Craft Technician Communication With A Host Computer Synthesized Voice”, Proceedings AVIOS '86 Voice I/O Systems Applications Conference, Sep. 16-18, 1986.Applicant
- Rabin, Richard, “Telephone Access Applications: The Growth Market For Voice Processing”, Proceedings AVIOS '86 Voice I/O Systems Applications Conference, Oct. 6-8, 1987.Applicant
- Schuster, E.R., “B.R.U.T.U.S. Better Registration Using Touch-Tone phones for University Students”, Proceedings AVIOS '86 Voice I/O Systems Applications Conference, Oct. 4-6, 1988.Applicant
- “Exxon's Next Prey, IBM and Xerox”, Business Week, Apr. 28, 1980, pp. 92-96 and 103—(Article).Applicant
- Weinstein, S.B., “Emerging Telecommunications Needs of the Card Industry”, IEEE Communications Magazine, Jul. 1984, vol. 22, No. 7, pp 26-31—(Article).Applicant
- “Riding Gain”, Broadcasting, Mar. 7, 1983—(Article).Applicant
- Pickup, Mike, “Bank from home, by screen or by phone”, Building Society Gazette, Jul. 1988)—(Article).Applicant
- Pickup, Mike, “Voice Response”, Computer Systems, Sep. 1986—(Article).Applicant
- Rabiner, L.R., et al., “Isolated and Connected Word Recognition—Theory and Selected Applications”, IEEE Transaction Communications, May 1981, Com. 29, No. 5, pp. 621, 622, 633, 644-646, 655-659—(Article).Applicant
- Takahashi, K., et al., “The Audio Response System for Telephone Reservation”, U.D.C. Oka, Y., et al., “Development of Ventilating Equipment for Shinkansan Train”, U.D.C.—(Articles in Japanese).Applicant
- Pagones, M.J., et al., “New services follow increased digitization on the long-haul transmission network”, AT&T Bell Laboratories Record, 1983, vol. 61, pp. 25-33—(Article).Applicant
- “New phone service tells customer who's calling”, Bell Laboratories Record, 1984, vol. 62, p. 9—(Article).Applicant
- Hirschman, C.B., et al., “LASS: Putting the telephone customer in charge”, Bell Laboratories Record, 1985, vol. 63, pp. 10-16—(Article).Applicant
- “AT&T building communications network for Defense Department” and “AT&T inaugurates pay-per-view TV”, Bell Laboratories Record, 1986, vol. 64, p. 2—(Article).Applicant
- “Power To . . . ”, Dialogic Corporation, Littleton Road,—(unidentifiable Article).Applicant
- “Representative Customer List For Interface Technology's Total Entry System”, “Toes Solutions—Pharmaceutical Manufacturer”, “The Voice Response Solution For Answering Customer/Sales Calls”, “Toes Solutions—Orthopedic Equipment” and “Toes Solutions—Convenience Store”—(Articles).Applicant
- Lummis, R.C., “Speaker Verification: A Step Toward the “Checkless” Society”, Bell Laboratories Record, pp. 254-259—(Article).Applicant
- Flanagan, J.L., et al., “Synthetic voices for computers”, IEEE Spectrum, Oct. 1970, vol. 7, No. 10, pp. 22-45—(Article).Applicant
- Rabiner, L.R., et al., “Computer Synthesis of Speech by Concatenation of Formant-Coded Words”, The Bell System Technical Journal, May/Jun. 1971, pp. 1541-1558—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- Flanagan, J.L., et al., “Wiring Telephone Apparatus from Computer-Generated Speech”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Feb. 1972, pp. 391-397—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- Homsby, Jr., Thomas G., “Voice Response Systems”, Modern Data, Nov. 1972, pp. 46-50—(Article).Applicant
- Diffie, W., et al., “New Directions in Cryptography”, IEEE Transactions On Information Theory, Nov. 1976, vol. IT-22, No. 6, pp. 644-654—(Article).Applicant
- Rosenthal, L.H., et al., “Automatic voice response: interfacing man with machine”, IEEE Spectrum, Jul. 1974, vol. 11, No. 7—(Article).Applicant
- Rosenthal, L.H., et al., A Multiline Computer Voice Response System Utilizing ADPCM Coded Speech, IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Oct. 1974, vol. ASSP-22, No. 5, pp. 339-352—(Article).Applicant
- Flanagan, James L., “Computers that Talk and Listen: Man-Machine Communication by Voice”, Proceedings for the IEEE, Apr. 1976, vol. 64, No. 4, pp. 405-415—(Article).Applicant
- Maisel, Ivan, “To Put Your Baseball Savvy On The Line, Pick Up The Phone And Call”, Sports Illustrated, Sep. 3, 1984—(Script).Applicant
- Brown, Merrill, “Hollywood Saga: Who Bought J.R.?”, The Washington Post, Final Edition, Oct. 14, 1984—(Script).Applicant
- “Special Olympics: Teams with baseball trivia except Brad Curtis”, Business Wire, Sep. 30, 1985—(Script).Applicant
- Lucas, W.A., et al., “The Spartanburg Interactive Cable Experiments In Home Education”, Rand Corp., U.S. Department of Commerce, National Technical Information Service, Feb., 1979—(Publication).Applicant
- Martin, James, “Viewdata And The Information Society”,—(Book).Applicant
- Gawrys, G.W., “Ushering In The Era Of ISDN”, AT&T Technology, 1986, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 2-9—(Article).Applicant
- Cummings, J.L., et al., “AT&T Network Architecture Evolution”, AT&T Technical Journal, May/Jun. 1987, vol. 66, Issue 3, pp. 2-12—(Article).Applicant
- Yates, C.E., “Telemarketing And Technology: Perfect Business Partners”, AT&T Technology, 1987, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 48-55—(Article).Applicant
- Herr, T.J., “ISDN Applications In Public Switched Networks”, AT&T Technology, 1987, vol. 2, No. 3, pp. 56-65—(Article).Applicant
- “Only the best. Only from Florafax”, Florafax—(Advertisement).Applicant
- Aldefeld, B., et al., “Automated Directory Using Retrieval System Based on Isolated Word Recognition”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Nov. 1980, vol. 68, No. 11, pp. 1364-1379—(Article).Applicant
- Rabiner, L.R., et al., “On the Application of Embedded Training to Connected Letter Recognition for Directory Listing Retrieval”, AT&T Bell Laboratories Technical Journal, Mar. 1984, vol. 63, No. 3, pp. 459-477—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- Rosenberg, A.E., et al., “Recognition of Spoken Spelled Names for Directory Assistance Using Speaker-Independent Templates”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Apr. 1980, vol. 59, No. 4, pp. 571-592—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- “The Voicestar Series By Periphonics”, Periphonics, Jan. 1986—(Publication).Applicant
- “Bank-From-Home system by Periphonics Corporation”.Applicant
- “Bill Payment Success Story”, Periphonics Corporation.Applicant
- “A History of Imagination”, Periphonics Corporation.Applicant
- “Banking Success Story”, Periphonics.Applicant
- “DataVoice and the PDT II”, Periphonics Corporation.Applicant
- “Banking Success Story”, Periphonics Corporation—(Brochures).Applicant
- Schulman, Roger, “TeleLearning: The Computer Brings the Classroom Home”, Family Computing, Sep. 1984, pp. 50-58—(Article).Applicant
- “ICS launches new ?-home interactive video service package”, Cable Vision, Sep. 3, 1984, pp. 71/73—(Article).Applicant
- “The Remarketing of Prestel”, Which Computer?, Aug. 1984, pp. 106, 107 and ?—(Article).Applicant
- “Four-Line TeleClerk Calls, Answers, Stores, Surveys”, Hardcopy, Jan. 1985, vol. 14, No. 1—(Article).Applicant
- “Peripheral Speaks On Phone”, Hardcopy, Dec. 1984—(Article).Applicant
- Page from What's new in Computing, Apr. 1985—(Article).Applicant
- Page from Today, A Compuserve Publication, Jun. 1985—(Article).Applicant
- Page from Computer Communications, Feb. 1984, vol. 7, No. 1—(Article).Applicant
- Gits, Victoria, “Interactive device doesn't interrupt telephone calls”, Cable Vision, Jun. 17, 1985, p.20—(Article).Applicant
- Cuilwik, Tony, “Reach Out & Touch The Unix System”, Unix Review, Jun. 1985, pp. 50, 52, 53, 56—(Article).Applicant
- Blackwell, Gerry, “Dial-a-Quote: first Canadian commercial audiotex service”, Computing Canada—(Article).Applicant
- Applebaum, Simon, “Two-way television” Cable Vision, Aug. 8, 1983, p. 66—(Article).Applicant
- Sw??ne, Michael, “Fiber-optic TV network lets viewers talk back”, Info World—(Article).Applicant
- Morrill, C.S., et al., “User Input Mode and Computer-Aided Instruction”, Human Factors, 1968, 10(3), pp. 225-232—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- Results of Lexis Search Request for “Dial Info or Dialinfo”, Date of Search Apr. 13, 1992, pp. 1-38.Applicant
- Results of Lexis Search Request for “Phone Programs or International Information Network”, Date of Search Apr. 15, 1992, pp. 1-35.Applicant
- Van Gieson, Jr. W.D., et al., “Machine-Generated Speech For Use With Computers, and the problem of fitting a spoken word into one half second”, Computers and Automation, Nov. 1968, pp. 31-34—(Article).Applicant
- Patel, Jay, “Utility of voice response system depends on its flexibility”, Bank Systems & Equipment, Dec. 1988, pp. 101/103—(Article).Applicant
- Buron, R.H., “Generation of a 1000-Word Vocabulary for a Pulse-Excited Vocoder Operating as an Audio Response Unit”, IEEE Transactions On Audio And Electroacoustics, Mar. 1986, vol. AU-16, No. 1, pp. 21-25—(Article).Applicant
- Gaines, B.R., et al., “Some Experience in Interactive System Development and Application”, Proceedings of the IEEE, Jun. 1975, vol. 63, No. 6, pp. 894-911—(Article).Applicant
- “Application For Registration Of Equipment To Be Connected To The Telephone Network”, Federal Communication Commission, FCC Form 730.Applicant
- Dudley, Homer, “The Vocoder”, Circuit Research Department, Dec. 1939, pp. 122-128—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- “Voice Response System Order Entry, Inventory Control”.Applicant
- “Vendor Index”, Audiotex Directory & Buyer's Guide, Fall/Winter 1989/90, pp. 114-156.Applicant
- Francas, M., et al., “Input Devices For Public Videotex Services”, Human-Computer Interaction—Interact '84, 1985, pp. 171-175—(Paper).Applicant
- Labrador, C., et al., “Experiments In Speech Interaction With Conventional Data Services”, Human-Computer Interaction—Interact '84, 1985, pp. 225-229—(Paper).Applicant
- Long, J., et al., “Transaction Processing Using Videotex or: Shopping on Prestel”, Human-Computer Interaction—Interact '84, 1985, pp. 251-255 —(Paper).Applicant
- Electrical Communication, 1981, vol. 56, Nos. 1-4, pp. 1-110—(Paper).Applicant
- Conway, R.W., et al., “Tele-CUPL: A Telephone Time Sharing System”, Communications of the ACM, Sep. 1967, vol. 10, No. 9, pp. 538-542 —(Article).Applicant
- Marill, T., et al., “Data-Dial Two-Way Communication with Computers From Ordinary Dial Telephones” Communications of the ACM, Oct. 1963, vol. 6, No. 10, pp. 622-624—(Article).Applicant
- Witten, I.H., “Communicating With Microcomputers”, pp. 121-158—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- “Call-It-Co. Hangs Up On Dial-It In Four Markets”, The 976 Exchange, 1984, vol. 2, pp. 1-6 (Article).Applicant
- “DECtalk Help Boston's Shawmut Bank Cut Costs And Improve Service”, Digital—(Article).Applicant
- “VTK 81 Voice Computer”, Voicetek, 1987 (Brochure).Applicant
- “How a Computerized “Voice” Answers Customers' Inquiries”, Bank Automation Newsletter, Feb. 1985, vol. 19, No. 2 (Article).Applicant
- Rickman, J., et al., “Speech Synthesizers—Communications Interface—Implementing a Touch Tone Telephone Talker With DECtalk”, The DEC Professional, May 1985, pp. 38, 39, 42-44 (Article).Applicant
- “DECTalk Delivers”, Digital Review, Sep. 1985—(Article).Applicant
- “DECtalk turns a telephone into a terminal”, —“UNIX and Digital”, —“Legal protection for semiconductor chips”, —“Product safety”, —DECWorld, Apr. 1985, vol. 9, No. 2, pp. 1,3,5,6-8—(Article).Applicant
- “DECtalk: A New Text-to-Speech Product” Digital Guideline, Mar. 1984, vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 1-8—(Article).Applicant
- Straight Talk, A Newsletter about the DECtalk Speech Synthesizer from Digital Equipment Corporation, vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- Straight Talk, A Newsletter about the DECtalk Speech Synthesizer from Digital Equipment Corporation, vol. 1, No. 2, pp. 1-7.Applicant
- Straight Talk, A Newsletter about the DECtalk Speech Synthesizer from Digital Equipment Corporation, vol. 1, No. 3, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Straight Talk, A Newsletter about the DECtalk Speech Synthesizer from Digital Equipment Corporation, vol. 1, No. 4, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Straight Talk, A Newsletter about the DECtalk Speech Synthesizer from Digital Equipment Corporation, vol. 2, No. 2, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Straight Talk, A Newsletter about the DECtalk Speech Synthesizer from Digital Equipment Corporation, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 1-8.Applicant
- Various References/Articles attached with a letter from Smithwin Associates, dated Apr. 22, 1992.Applicant
- Riley, A.A., “Latest: 2-way communication by computer and telephone”.Applicant
- ??evens, W.?., “Computer Helps Children to Add”, The New York Times, Apr. 20, 1970.Applicant
- Harvey, R.W., Times, The Kiplinger Magazine.Applicant
- “A Computerized System ???”, Nov. 23, 1970, p. 14, (unidentifiable Article).Applicant
- “Hardware for a ‘cashless society’”, Electronic Design 3, Feb. 4, 1971, p. 26.Applicant
- Tennant, R.P., “Advanced credit system smooths operation and hastens payout”, Data Processing Magazine, Jun. 1971, vol. 13, No. 6, pp. 34-35.Applicant
- “Computers that talk back to you”, Business Week, Date ??.Applicant
- Smith, Gene, “Chatting Via Computer”, The New York Times, Sep. 12, 1971.Applicant
- EDP Weekly, (Unidentifiable Article).Applicant
- “Did Anybody Here Call a Computer”, Data Management, Feb. 196?.Applicant
- Skala, Martin, “Straight talk from a computer”, Christian Science Monitor, Jun. 14, 1973.Applicant
- “Computer for Watergate Probe”, Science, Jun. 15, 1973.Applicant
- “Tapping AT&T for a $50-million refund”, Business Week, Jun. 9, 1973.Applicant
- “Distrust of computer kills home service plan”.Applicant
- Scherer, Ron, “Chitchat with a computer”, Christian Science Monitor, Apr. 16, 1975, p. 2.Applicant
- “Trying Out the Pay-by-Phone Service”, Technology Review, Mar./Apr. 1975, p. 15.Applicant
- “Pentagon seeks more control”, Electronics, Apr. 5, 1976, p. 39.Applicant
- “Everyman's Computer Terminal”, Industrial Research, Mar./Apr. 1976, p. 14.Applicant
- “DOD could save on test equipment” . . . .Applicant
- “Talking computer speeds Ford parts”, Apr. 25, 1976.Applicant
- “Customers of Ten Banks Paying Bills by Phone”, Computer World, 1976, p. 12.Applicant
- “FAA to test computerized voice response to queries from pilots”, Electronics, Nov. 25, 1976, p. 43.Applicant
- Miller, F.W., “Voice Response Comes to Life with Order Entry”, Infosystems, Oct. 1981, pp. 62/64.Applicant
- Suppes, Patrick, “University-Level Computer Assisted Instruction At Stanford: 1968-1980”, Institute for Mathematical Studies in The Social Sciences, Stanford University, 1981, pp. 589-716.Applicant
- Lerner, E.J., “Products that talk”, IEEE spectrum, Jul. 1982, pp. 32-37.Applicant
- Carlsen, Clifford, “Megaphone plans to blare message on national scale”, Times, Mar. 2, 1987.Applicant
- Michelson, Marlene, “All kinds of information at your fingertips by phone”, Business Times, Sep. 8, 1986, vol. 3, No. 19.Applicant
- Lacter, Mark, “At Megaphone, It's Always Show Time”, San Francisco Chronicle, Jun. 9, 1986.Applicant
- Table of Contents, Megaphone Press Book, pp. 1-3.Applicant
- “Miss Simpson, will you dial-a-joke for me please?”, Cartoon.Applicant
- Lacter, Mark, “At Megaphone, It's Always Show Time”, San Francisco Chronicle, Jun. 9, 1986, Year No. 123, (different perspective).Applicant
- Lacter, Mark, “Narrating Fantasy Messages—It's No Dream Job”, San Francisco Chronicle, Jun. 9, 1986.Applicant
- “Megaphone Serves High-Tech Showbiz”, San Francisco Chronicle, Jun. 9, 1986.Applicant
- “Megaphone Reaches Unique Market”, San Francisco Chronicle, Jun. 9, 1986.Applicant
- Feuer, Jack, “Asher/Gould: Megaphone Dials-a-Shop”, Adweek, May 12, 1986.Applicant
- Symanovich, Steve, “Novelty over for phone porn vendors”, and continuation “Big firms breathing down necks of small phone porn outfits” San Francisco Business Journal, May 5, 1986.Applicant
- Wilke, John, “A ‘Dream’ Business That's Just A Phone Call Away”, Information Processing.Applicant
- Ketcham, D.E., “Dial-a-You-Name-It”, San Francisco Chronicle, 1986.Applicant
- Carter, Alan, “What? You didn't know Erica was engaged again?”, Daily News, Mar. 12, 1986.Applicant
- “Firm plugs into sales with time, temp lines”, Crain's New York Business, Mar. 3, 1986, vol. II, No. 9.Applicant
- Pitts, Gail, “Phone-in trivia games ring up profits”, The Denver Post, Feb. 3, 1986.Applicant
- “Merge Towards Success” IIN and Megaphone, The 976 Exchange, Winter 19?6, vol. 4.Applicant
- Nelson, David, “From dating to soap operas, 976 numbers come on line”, San Jose Business Journal Magazine, Jan. 27, 1986.Applicant
- Greengard, Samuel, “Dial-A-Deluge”, Business, Nov. 1985.Applicant
- “Numbers, Please”, Business, Nov. 1985.Applicant
- “The 976 Telelease Co.”, Business Opportunities Journal, Dec. 1985.Applicant
- “One-time refund for ‘976’ charges”, San Francisco Examiner, Nov. 7, 1985.Applicant
- Kent, Debra, “Interactive phone network stretches for calls”, Advertising Age, Oct. 17, 198?.Applicant
- “Making Your Phone Talk To Computers”, U.S. News, Sep. 23, 1985.Applicant
- Mulqueen, John, “Int'l Information Network Eyes Contact With British Telecom”, Communications Week, Sep. ??.Applicant
- Moorhead, Derrol, “Humor romance: just a call away”, Rocky Mountain Collegian, Sep. 19, 1985, vol. 94, Iss. 32.Applicant
- Keppel, Bruce, “Move Under Way to Curb Abuse of Popular Dial-It Service”, Los Angeles Times, Sep. 1, 1985.Applicant
- “Dial-a-stock”, Forbes, Aug. 1985.Applicant
- Sowa, Tom, “Games people play now include phone trivia”, Spokesman-Review, Jul. 1985.Applicant
- Dougherty, P.H., “Advertising Telephone Is Growing As Medium”, The New York Times, Jul. 17, 1985.Applicant
- Larson, Judy, “976 numbers entice adults—and kids”, Fremont Argas, Jul. 8, 1985.Applicant
- Barbieri, Richard, “Prime Time for the Telephone”, Channels, May/Jun. 1985, pp. 54-55.Applicant
- “Bank Provides Financial Fuel To Fast Track Company”, The Financial Center Bank, First Quarter 1985, vol. II, No. 1.Applicant
- “Don't Phone Santa”, San Francisco Chronicle, Letters to the Editor, Mar. 29, 1985.Applicant
- Carvalho, Deborah, “Will Hillary find happiness with Bob?”, Contra Costa Times, Mar. 15, 1985.Applicant
- Murphy, Win, “Dial-a-romance”, Mar. 13-19, 1985.Applicant
- ?, Martha, “Love, laughs, luck: Just a phone call away”, Burlington County Times, Feb. 17, 1985.Applicant
- Robinett, Stephen, “Blood From A Rock”, Venture, Jan. 1985, pp. 38-41, 44-45.Applicant
- Du Brow, Rick, “Lates hot lines for instant trivia pursuit”, Los Angeles Herald Examiner, Dec. 6, 1984.Applicant
- “Keep up with your favorite soap operas”, Contra costa Times, Nov. 30, 1984.Applicant
- Hanna, Barbara, “Inside Radio/TV”.Applicant
- Behr, Debra, “‘Victory’ makes and writes its own on-the-road news”, and “Whose calling? Michael fans most likely . . . ”, Los Angeles Times, Nov. 29, 1984.Applicant
- “Newcomer Megaphone Has Magnanimous Goals”, The 976 Exchange, Fall 1984, vol. 2.Applicant
- “Phone Santa”, Vecaville Reporter, Nov. 10, 1984.Applicant
- “Dial 976 for Profits”, Time, Sep. 3, 1984.Applicant
- Pendleton, Mike, “For A Fee Your Phone Can Inform”, Burrelle's, Jul. 19, 1984.Applicant
- “Phone numbers to get details about soaps”, Burrelle's, Jul. 18, 1984.Applicant
- Gansberg, A.L., “976 phone prefix as new entertainment fad”, The Hollywood Reporter, Jun. 21, 1984.Applicant
- Carvalho, Deborah, “Another ‘GH’ actor discontented with the soap”, Contra Costa Times, May 26, 1984, p. 4.Applicant
- “Keep up with your favorite soap operas”, San Francisco Examiner.Applicant
- Du Brow, Rick, “‘Dial-a-soap’ service offers daily TV summaries”, Los Angeles Herald Examiner, Apr. 26, 1984.Applicant
- News briefs, Feb. 1966.Applicant
- Martin, J., et al., “The Computerized Society—An apprisal of the impact of computers on society over the next fifteen years”, Chapter 10, pp. 211-226—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- New products, Datamation, Jul. 1966, vol. 12, No. 7, pp. 7/89—(Article).Applicant
- Meacham, L.A., et al., “Tone Ringing and Pushbutton Calling”, The Bell System Technical Journal, 1958, pp. 339-360—(Book).Applicant
- Suppes, Patrick, “The Uses of Computers in Education”, Scientific American, Sep. 1966, vol. 215, No. 3, pp.—(Article).Applicant
- Bruckert, E., et al., “Three-tiered software and VLSI aid development system to read text aloud”, Electronics, Apr. 21, 1983, pp. 133-138—(Article).Applicant
- Hochman, David, “Implementing Automatic Number Identification”, Telecommunications, Dec., 1978, vol. 12, No. 12—(Article).Applicant
- Martin, James, “Telecommunications and the Computer”, 2nd Edition, Introduction, pp. 20-23, Chapter 5, pp. 94-95, Chapter 18—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- Martin, James, “Telematic Society”, Chapter 6, pp. 45-48, Chapter 9, pp. 67-69, Chapter 20, pp. 181-188—(Chapters from a Book).Applicant
- Martin, James, “The Wired Society”, pp. 53-55, 71-79, 99-100, 204-205, 229-231—(Chapters from a Book).Applicant
- Martin, James, “Future Developments in Tele-Communications”, 2nd Edition, Box A, Chapter 1, p. 5, Chapter 7, pp. 95-111, Chapter 9, pp. 149-105, Chapter 12, pp. 207-209, Chapter 18, pp. 310-311, Chapter 19, pp. 314-317, 320, Chapter 20, pp. 330, Chapter 23, pp. 379-401—(Chapters from a Book).Applicant
- Ferrarini, E.M., “Informania”, pp. 59-61, 176-177, 191, 213-214, 223, 245, 250, 257, 285, 286—(Book).Applicant
- Kimura, Y., et al., “Audio Response System”, vol. 55, No. 10, pp. 49-54—(Article in Japanese).Applicant
- Takano, H., “Characteristics of Multipair Exchange Area Telephone Cable with Cellular Polyethylene Insulation by Gas Injection Blouing”, p. 55—(Article in Japanese).Applicant
- Takahashi, T., et al., “SR-2000 Voice Processor and Its Application”, NEC Research and Development, 1984, No. 73, pp. 98-105—(Paper).Applicant
- “Concept Diagram Voicemail International System”.Applicant
- “Voicemail Instruction Manual”, Televoice International, Jun. 1981, Index.Applicant
- Eckhouse, John, “Voice mail spells relief for phone frustration”, San Francisco Examiner, Feb. 7, 1982—(Article).Applicant
- Meade, Jim, “Throw away those pink Call-back slips”, InterOffice, Jan./Feb. 1984, vol. 3, No. 1—(Article).Applicant
- Welsh, Jack, “Everybody's Talking About Talking Bouquets”, Design for Profit, Spring 1986, pp. 7-10—(Article).Applicant
- Mosco, Vincent, “Pushbutton Fantasies”, Contents, Chapter 3 and 4, pp. 67-118 —(Chapters from a Book).Applicant
- Bretz, Rudy, “Media for Interactive Communication”, Chapter 5, pp. 110-116, Chapter 7, pp. 143-153—(Chapters from a Book).Applicant
- Robinson, G., et al., “Touch-Tone” Teletext A Combined Teletext-Viewdata System, IEEE Transactions on Consumer Electronics, Jul. 1979, vol. CE-25, No. 3, pp. 298-303—(Article).Applicant
- Voice News, Mar. 1982.Applicant
- Voice News, Jun. 1982, William W. Creitz.Applicant
- Voice News, Oct. 1982, p. 5.Applicant
- Voice News, Nov./Dec. 1983.Applicant
- “Consultant Report 28?”, AIS American Bell Advanced Information Systems, Apr. 1983, pp. 27, 118-119, 123-124—(Report).Applicant
- “T-1 Board Sets Deliver High Performance All Digital T-1 Solutions”, NMS Natural MicroSystems—(Product Bulletin).Applicant
- “VBX Product Family Overview”, NMS Natural MicroSystems, pp. 1-20—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Machine Operation Manual”, May 12, 1978, Issue 1, pp. 1-3, 9-10—(Manual).Applicant
- Davey, J.P., “Dytel Western Region Sales Training Manual”, 1985—(Manual).Applicant
- Gutcho, Lynette, “DECtalk—A Year Later”, Speech Technology, Aug./Sep. 1985, pp. 98-102—(Article).Applicant
- Daniels, Richard, “Automating Customer Service”, Insurance Software Review, Aug./Sep. 1989, pp. 60-62—(Article).Applicant
- Golbey, S.B., “Fingertip Flight Service”, Oct. 1985—(Article).Applicant
- “ARO Goes Pushbutton”, Newsletter, Nov. 1985, p. 9—(Article).Applicant
- “ROLM Centralized Attendant Service”, ROLM Corporation, 1979.Applicant
- “AIS, Versatile Efficient Information Service”, Fujitsu Limited, 1972, pp. 153-162—(Brochure).Applicant
- Smith, S.L., et al., “Alphabetic Data Entry Via the Touch-Tone Pad: A Comment”, Human Factors, 1971 13(2), pp. 189-190—(Book).Applicant
- Holtzman, Henry, “Still an Infant Technology Voice Mail”, Modern Office Technology, Jun. 1985, pp. 78-80, 82, 84, 90—(Article).Applicant
- Leander, Monica, “Voice Response—A Technology for Solving Management Problems”, Speech Technology, Mar./Apr. 1986, pp. 50-52—(Article).Applicant
- Stolker, Bud, “CompuCorder speech storage and output device. (evaluation)”, Creative Computing, Jul. 1983, pp. 1-7.Applicant
- Witten, I.H., et al., “The Telephone Enquiry Service: a man-machine system using synthetic speech”, Int'l. Man-Machine Studies, 1983, Jul. 1977, 9, pp. 449-464—(Book).Applicant
- Gould, R.L., “Fidelity's Automated Voice Response System”, Telecommunications, Jan. 1981, pp. 27-28—(Article).Applicant
- “Fidelity Automated Service Telephone”, Fidelity Group, 4 pages—(Manual).Applicant
- “Data Set 407 Interface Specification”, Manager—Data Systems & Operations, Jun. 1975, Issue 2, pp. 1-69 plus Table of Contents—(Manual).Applicant
- Fitzwilliam, J.W., et al., “Transaction Network, Telephones, and Terminals”, The Bell System Technical Journal, Dec. 1978, vol. 57, No. 10, pp. 3325-3537 —(Book).Applicant
- Inbound Outbound, May 1988, complete issue.Applicant
- Koch, Helmut, “Concord Design Services, Inc. Corporate Description”, Exacom.Applicant
- Federal Communications Commission, FDC Form 484, Registration, Registrant: Concord Design Services, Inc.Applicant
- Exacom Telecommunications Systems—Brochure.Applicant
- General Description Installation and Operation Manual for Direct Inward Dial (DID) Trunk Interface Unit, Exacom.Applicant
- Telecommunications Systems, Nov. 21, 1989, Issue 3—(Manual).Applicant
- General Description Installation and Operation Manual for Answering Service Monitor System, Concord Design Services, Inc., Dec. 19, 1986, Issue 1—Manual.Applicant
- “Dialogic Voice Solutions”, Dialogic Corporation, pp. 1-72.Applicant
- “Why Is T-1 Important And How Can It Be Used”, Dialogic Corporation, Application Note, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- “Use of Dialogic T-1 For Telemarketing Applications”, Dialogic Corporation, Application Note, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- “Use of Dialogic T-1 In Operator Service Applications”, Dialogic Corporation, Application Note, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- “Use of Dialogic T-1 In Telephone Company Networks”, Dialogic Corporation, Application Note, pp. 1-10.Applicant
- “Use of Dialogic T-1 Equipment in CPE Gateways”, Dialogic Corporation, Application Note, pp. 1-4.Applicant
- “Integrating Analog Devices into Dialogic-Based T-1 Voice Processing Systems”, Dialogic Corporation, Application Note, pp. 1-16.Applicant
- “Use of Dialogic Components in Automatic Number Identification (ANI) Systems”, Dialogic Corporation, Application Note, pp. 1-16.Applicant
- “Dialogic Unit Pricing”, pp. 1-6.Applicant
- “Voice '92 Spring Conference & Exposition”, 1992, pp. 1-24—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Telecom Developers '92”, Jan. 1991—(Advertisement).Applicant
- Newton, Harry, “The Sheer Thrill Of It All”, Teleconnect, May 1991.Applicant
- “AFIPS Conference Proceedings”, 1987 National Computer Conference, Jun. 15-18, 1987, Chicago, Illinois “Dynamic Network Allocation”.Applicant
- “Calling your computer is as easy as calling your broker, says AT&T”, Record, Nov. 1985.Applicant
- Singleton, L.A., “Telecommunications in the Information Age”, Chapter 12, pp. 115-125—(Chapter from a Book).Applicant
- Weitzen, H.S., “Telephone Magic”, pp. 28-31, 38-39, 54-55, 62-67, 70-79, 82-85, 88-91, 106-115, 118-121, 126-127, 134-137, 176-177, Index—Chapters from a Book).Applicant
- Weitzen, H.S., et al., “Infopreneurs”, pp. 18-19, 138-145, 206-209, Index—(Chapters from a Book).Applicant
- Sullivan, Kathleen, “Paper firm relies on voice-based inventory system”, IDG Communications, Inc., Sep. 10, 1984—(Script).Applicant
- “VTK Training Section” and “Disk Initialization for VTK-30/60”, Voicetek Corporation—(Manual).Applicant
- “VoiceStor Systems Integration Guide”, Voicetek Corporation, May 2, 1983—(manual).Applicant
- “VTK 60 Voice Computer—Technical Description”, Voicetek Corporation, Oct. 1986—(Manual).Applicant
- “Voicetek VS-50 Telephone Interface System”, Apr. 25, 1984, System Integration Guide—(Manual).Applicant
- “VTK Voice System—Programmers Guide”, Voicetek—(Manual).Applicant
- “Disk Initialization Procedures for VTK-30/60”, Voicetek Corporation—(Manual).Applicant
- “VTK81 Voice Computer—Technical Description”, Voicetek Corporation, Oct. 1986—(Manual).Applicant
- “VTK Voice System—VTK/CE Guide”, Voicetek, Jul. 6, 1987—(Manual).Applicant
- Newton, Harry, “Newton's Telecom dictionary”, Telecom Library Inc., 1991 —(Advertisement).Applicant
- “1987 Buyers Guide”, Teleconnect, Jul. 1987, pp. 194, 197-210—(Brochure).Applicant
- Syntellect Inc.—Advertisements.Applicant
- Various copies of Business cards.Applicant
- Guncheon, M.C., “The Incredible Dial-A-Message Directory”, Contemporary Books, Inc., 1985—(Directory).Applicant
- “Voice Box Maintenance Manual”, Periphonics, 1986—(Manual).Applicant
- “Voicepac Maintenance Manual”, Periphonics, 1984—(Manual).Applicant
- Dyer, Ellen, “Wichita Firm Sells 25% Share”, Dec. 14, 1987, and “Spectrum Carving Role In Volatile Business”, Jul. 7, 1986, Search Results.Applicant
- “Don't Miss The Unique Gift Idea Of The Year”, Yam Educational Software, 1987—(Advertisement).Applicant
- “Welcome to the future of advertising.”, Teleline, Inc., 1990—(Presentation).Applicant
- “Greeting Card Project”, Teleline, Inc., Nov. 7, 1988—(Flow Chart).Applicant
- Sharkey, Betsy, “Dialing for Dollars and Data”, Adweek, Nov. 16, 1987, pp. 6-8—(Article).Applicant
- Gay, Verne, “CBS may tie rates to buying p?”, 1988—(Article).Applicant
- Flanagan, J.L., et al., “Synthetic Voices For Computers”, IEEE International Conference on Communications, 1970, pp. 45-9-45-10—(Conference Record).Applicant
- Rabiner, L.R., et al., “Computer Voice Response Using Low Bit Rate Synthetic Speech”, Digest IEEE 71 International Convention, Mar. 22-25, 1971, p. 1-2, Fig. 1-2—(Paper).Applicant
- “DT1000 DigiTalker Speech Synthesis Evaluation Board”, National Semiconductor Corp., Oct. 1980—(Manual).Applicant
- “Data Set 407C Interface Specifications Nov. 1977”, Bell System Technical Reference, Nov. 1977, pp. 1-50—(Paper).Applicant
- Broomfield, R.A., et al., “Making a data terminal out of the Touch-Tone telephone”, Electronics, Jul. 3, 1980, pp. 124-129—(Paper).Applicant
- Godfrey, D., et al., “The Telidon Book—Designing and Using Videotex Systems”, pp. 1-103—(Book).Applicant
- “Industry Marketing Bulletin”, Honeywell EDP Wellesley Hills, Aug. 9, 1967.Applicant
- “Honeywell Communications Configuration Charts And Aids In Designing”, Data Communications, pp. 3-1-3-7 and A.Applicant
- “Burroughs Audio Response System”, Reference Information for Sales Representatives, pp. 1-6Applicant
- “New Product Announcement”, Burroughs Corporation, Feb. 5, 1968.Applicant
- “Stand-Alone Lockbox Application Voice Response (Slave) Communication System Functional Specification”, Cognitronics Corporation, Feb. 19, 1982, p. 21.Applicant
- “Unlock lockbox reporting. with Cognitronics Voice Response Communications System/Banking.”, Speech-maker a division of Cognitronics Corporation.Applicant
- “Voice Response for Banking”, Cognitronics Corporation (Brochure).Applicant
- “voice response for application brief”, Speech-maker—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Instant credit authorization is an easy touch when any telephone is a voice response computer terminal”, Speech-maker a division of Cognitronics Corporation—(Article).Applicant
- Slutsker, Gary, “Relationship marketing”, Forbes, Apr. 3, 1989—(Article).Applicant
- Finnigan, P.F., “To Our Shareholders”, Jun. 1985, Apr. 7, 1986, Apr. 10, 1987—(Letters).Applicant
- “International Programs” (Voicemail).Applicant
- Finnigan, P.F., “Our guest”, Radio-Schweiz AG Telekommunikation und Flugischerung, Jan. 1983, pp. 12-14—(Bulletin).Applicant
- Finnigan, P.F., “Voice mail”, 1983 National Computer Conference, May 16-19, 1983, Anaheim, CA, pp. 375-377 and Abstract.Applicant
- “Conversations in Your Mailbox”, Software News, Jan. 1985—(Article).Applicant
- Fredric, Paul, “Voicemail Int'l, Radio Page America To Offer A ‘Pocket News Network’”, Communications Week, Jul. 8, 1985—(Article).Applicant
- “Voice-Messaging System: Use It While You're In, Not Out”, Information Week—(Article).Applicant
- “Corporate Performance—Companies To Watch”, Fortune, ,Sep. 30, 1985—(Article).Applicant
- “Dream Weaver”, Jon Lindy, Aug. 1986, pp. 32-35, 37—(Article).Applicant
- “Turn any telephone into a complete electronic message service”, Voicemail—(Brochure).Applicant
- Pages from Company Brochure, Televoice International, Inc.Applicant
- “VMI Big Talker”, Voicemail International, Inc.—(Newsletter).Applicant
- “Newsline”, Voicemail International, Inc., Oct. 1984 and Nov. 1984.Applicant
- “Voiceletter No. 1”, Voicemail International, Inc., Dec. 1985.Applicant
- “A New, More Productive Way to Use the Telephone”, Voicemail International, Inc.—(Brochure).Applicant
- “While You Were Out . . . ”—(Brochure).Applicant
- “?For People Who Can't Afford To Miss Messages”, Voicemail International, Inc.—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Voicemail The electronic news service saves time, money, and nerves”, Radio-Suisse Ltd., (Voicemail Agent for Europe)—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Are You Being Robbed of Your Time . . . ?”, Voicemail International, Inc.—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Voicemail Instruction Manual B—85”, Televoice International, Nov. 1980 —(Manual).Applicant
- “Local Telephone Numbers” (for Voicemail) and “Televoice Is As Easy As 1,2,3!”, Televoice International—(Manual).Applicant
- “Voicemail Instruction Manual C—25”, Televoice International, Jun. 1981 —(Manual).Applicant
- “Telephone Numbers” (for Voicemail) and “How To Use Voicemail”, Televoice International—(Manual).Applicant
- “Message Receiving/Sending” (and others), Voicemail International, Inc. —(Manual).Applicant
- “You Can Use Voicemail To Send And Receive Messages At Anytime Anywhere In The World”, Voicemail International, Inc., 1981—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Advanced User Guide”, Voicemail International, Inc.—(Manual).Applicant
- “Voicemail's Basic User's Guide”, Voicemail International, Inc.—(Manual).Applicant
- “Welcome To Dowphone”, Dowphone, Jan. 1987—(Manual).Applicant
- “Telephone 1-800 Check-PDR”, Officers of Medical Economics Company, Inc., 1986—(Circulation/Brochure).Applicant
- “Turn your telephone into an efficient electronic “mailbox””, Western Union, Jan. 1984—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Western Union Voice Message Service User's Guide”, Western Union, Jul. 1984—(Brochure).Applicant
- “PSA's 24 hour reservation system”, PSA, Sep. 1986—(Brochure).Applicant
- “To Better Serve Your Business, We're On Call Days, Nights, and Weekends.”, Maryland Business Assistance Center—(Brochure).Applicant
- “Voice Response: Breaks Trough Call Blockage.”, Business Week, Aug. 26, 1985—(Advertisement for Preception Technology Corporation).Applicant
- “Tools for heavy hitters”, Forbes, May 6, 1985.Applicant
- “The Fidelity Automated Service Telephone”, Fidelity Group—(Manual/Brochure).Applicant
- “Stockquote Hotline”, Norwest Brokerage Services—(Brochure).Applicant
- “All You Need To Get The Stock Quotes And News You Want.” Dowphone, 1984—(Advertisement).Applicant
- “The Most Respected Name In Telemarketing”, West Interactive Corporation —(2 Brochures).Applicant
- Borison, V.S., “Transaction—telephone gets the fact at the point of sale”, Bell Laboratories Record, Oct. 1975, pp. 377-383—(Article).Applicant
- Demeautis, M., et al., “The TV 200 A Transactional Telephone”, Commutation & Transmission n 5, 1985, pp. 71-82—(Article).Applicant
- Erikkson, G., et al., “Voice and Data Workstations and Services in the ISDN”, Ericsson Review., May 1984, pp. 14-19—(Article).Applicant
- Schrage, Michael, “A Game Von Meister in Pursuit of Profits”, Washington Post, Sep. 23, 1985—(Article).Applicant
- Svigals, J., “Low Cost Point-Of-Sale Terminal”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Sep. 1982, vol. 25, No. 4, p. 1835.Applicant
- Turbat, A., “Telepayment And Electronic Money The Smart Card”, Commutation & Transmission n 5, 1982, pp. 11-20—(Article).Applicant
- “Voice Mail”, Sound & Communications, Apr. 1983, vol. 28, No. 12, pp. 84-85—(Article).Applicant
- Aso, Satoshi, “Trends and Applications of Voice Output Devices”, 2209 J.E.E. Journal of Electronic Engineering, Feb. 1982, vol. 19, No. 182, pp. 102-107—(Article).Applicant
- Kroemer, F., “TeleBox”, Unterrichtsblätter, year 38/1985, No. 4, pp. 131-141 (Article)—no translation.Applicant
- Kroemer, F., “TeleBox”, Unterrichtsblätter, year 41/1988, No. 2, pp. 67-83 (Article)—no translation.Applicant
- C.R. Newson, “Merlin Voice Mail VM600,” British Telecommunications Engineering, vol. 4, Apr. 1985, pp. 32-35.Applicant
- A.S. Yatagai, “Telephonic Voice Synthesis Systems”, Telecommunications, Aug. 1985, pp. 56h-I, 68.Applicant
- A.J. Waite, “Getting Personal With New Technologies For Telemarketers,” DM News, Feb. 15, 1987 at 50.Applicant
- “Shopping via a network is no longer just talk,” Data Communications, Aug. 1981 at 43.Applicant
- “Growth-Oriented Systems,” Restaurant Technology, Nation's Restaurant News Newspaper, Jul. 1, 1985 at 51.Applicant
- “Let your fingers do the tapping . . . . . . and the computer the talking,” Modern Office Tech., May 1984 at 80.Applicant
- “American Software unveils systems for IBM mainframes,” Computerworld, Mar. 26, 1984 at 59.Applicant
- “Business Units Get Order Entry,” Computerworld, Jul. 12, 1982 at 36.Applicant