US 6,374,140 B1Grant
Method and apparatus for treating seizure disorders by stimulating the olfactory senses
Issue Date:2002-04-16
•13 Claims
•5 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
The present invention discloses techniques for preventing a possible onset of a seizure using a sensor, a signal generator and at least one implantable electrode. The electrodes are positioned to stimulate the olfactory nervous system. The sensor senses a parameter of the body indicative of the possible onset of a seizure. The sensor generates a sensing signal which is processed and an algorithm is utilized to determine whether the sensing signal shows a pattern indicative of a possible seizure onset. If such a pattern is recognized, the signal generator provides electrical stimulation via electrodes to generate an olfactory sensory stimulus. The patient is thereby alerted, the electrical activity of the brain is desynchronized and the likelihood of a seizure occurring is reduced.
Metadata
Assignee
- Medtronic, Inc.
Inventor
- Mark T. Rise
Application Information
Application Number:US 09/070,678
Filing Date:1998-04-30
Priority Date:1998-04-30
Art Unit:7
Classifications
IPC:
A61N 136
Field of Search:
607 2607 45607 46607 3607117607118128898128899600378600544
Patent Drawings (5 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
[0002] 1. Field of the Invention
[0003] This invention relates to the treatment of seizure disorders and, and more particularly relates to techniques for preventing epileptic seizures.
[0004] 2. Description of Related Art
[0005] Epilepsy is a condition characterized by recurrent seizures which are the outward manifestation of excessive and/or hyper-synchronous abnormal electrical activity of neurons in the cerebral cortex of the brain. A seizure often occurs when the electrical activity of the brain becomes more “synchronized” as would be the case when the person is in a drowsy state.
[0006] A seizure patient may suffer from any combination of different types of seizures. Grand mal seizures are the most common form of epilepsy and are characterized by convulsions with tonic-clonic contractions of the muscles. Absence seizures (previously referred to as “petit mal”) are characterized by a brief and sudden loss of consciousness. The psychomotor form of seizures is characterized by a clouding of consciousness for one or two minutes. A complex partial seizure is characterized by a complete loss of consciousness. The type of seizure experienced is typically dependent upon the function of the portion of the cerebral cortex where hypersynchronous activity is occurring. Many types of seizures generally involve the entire brain, while certain types, such as partial seizures, begin in one part of the brain and may remain local.
[0007] Regardless of the type of epilepsy, seizures significantly limit the autonomy of the patient. When hit with a seizure attack, the patient typically loses some level of control of his/her body. In most cases, seizures occur without prior warning to the patient. As a result, epileptic seizures pose a serious safety hazard to the patient as others surrounding the patient. For example, a patient hit with a sudden seizure attack while he/she is driving a car may endanger his/her own safety as well as the safety of others. Seizure patients are also exposed to a risk of bodily harm when operating machinery and even in daily activities such as crossing a street or going down stairs.
[0008] Researchers have developed a number of techniques for treating seizure disorders and its symptoms. For example, research has shown that inhibiting (namely, reducing the excitation of neurons) the substantia nigra in the brain increases the threshold for seizure occurrence. Researchers have also found that increasing the activity of neurons in the external Globus Pallidum (GPe) increases inhibition of neurons in the subthalamic nucleus which in turn inhibits neural activity in the substantia nigra. Neurosurgeons have also been able to diminish the symptoms of many neural disorders by lesioning certain brain areas, examples being lesioning the ventral lateral portion of the internal Globus Pallidus and the Vim Thalamus for treating movement disorders. Alternatively, it has been demonstrated that open-loop Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) at high frequencies (100 Hz or higher) of certain brain structures can alleviate, diminish, or completely stop symptoms of tremor, rigidity, akinesia or hemiballism much like creating a lesion. Electrical stimulation of the nervous system has also been used to suppress seizures. Finally, infusion of certain drugs into a region of the brain can affect the excitability of the neurons at the site of infusion as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,713,923 (Rise et al.) assigned to Medtronic, Inc.
[0009] Under another approach, researchers have devised algorithms to detect the onset of a seizure. Qu and Gotman reported a system that recognizes patterns of electrical activity similar to a template developed from recording an actual seizure. See H. Qu and J. Gotman, “A Seizure Warning System for Long-term Epilepsy Monitoring”, Neurology, 1995;45:2250-2254. Similarly, Osario et. al. have reported an algorithm applied to signals recorded from intracranial electrodes capable of 100% seizure detection rate with 0% false negatives and minimal false positives. See I. Osario, M. Frei, D. Lerner, S. Wilkinson, “A Method for Accurate Automated Real-time Seizure Detection”, Epilepsia, Vol. 36, Suppl. 4, 1995. In each of these techniques for recognizing the onset of a seizure, the developers employ two processes. The first process is to extract certain features from the signals representing the electrical activity of the brain. Examples of the signal features include the signal power or the frequency spectrum of the signals. The second process is to recognize a pattern or set of values for those features which characterize a brain state that will reliably lead to a seizure.
[0010] Others have studied the effects of electrically stimulating the vagus nerve as a means of “desynchronizing” the electrical activity of the brain. It has been observed that stimulation of the vagus nerve with certain parameters caused de-synchronization of the brain's electrical activity in animal models. These concepts were disclosed by Zabara in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,867,164 and 5,025,807. De-synchronization can be thought of as “alerting” phenomena since it reflects active mental activity.
[0011] An alternative way to “alert” someone is to activate the sense of smell especially by use of an astringent. The most common example of this phenomena is seen when an athlete is knocked unconscious and the trainer uses an ammonia capsule to stimulate the person to regain consciousness. When, the person breaks the ammonia capsule under the athletes nose is stimulates the olfactory nerve and certain branches of the trigeminal nerve. The trigeminal nerve is a cranial nerve which connects with and provides input into the brainstem. Zabara teaches that stimulation of the trigeminal nerve will inhibit the occurance of seizures (U.S. Pat. No. 5,540,734). The olfactory nerve ultimately provides input into the entorhinal cortex. The entorhinal cortex is located at the tip of the temporal lobe surrounding the amygdala, a structure implicated in temporal lobe epilepsy.
[0012] The present invention is directed to improve on existing methods of desynchronizing the nervous system and thereby decrease the likelihood of having seizures by persons with epilepsy.
Summary of the Invention
[0013] As explained in more detail below, the present invention overcomes the above-noted and other shortcomings of prior techniques for warning of epileptic seizures.
[0014] A preferred form of the invention consists of a sensing portion capable of detecting the onset of a seizure, a signal processing portion, and a therapy delivery portion. The sensing portion may be an electrical sensor, chemical sensor, and/or a sensor for sensing physiological changes. The particular structure and parameter to measure may be selected from any known techniques which provide indication of the possible onset of a seizure. The signal processing portion processes and analyzes the sensed signal using an algorithm for recognizing a pattern scheme indicative of the onset of a seizure. If a pattern indicative of the onset of a seizure is recognized, the therapy delivery portion is triggered. The therapy delivery portion is preferably a stimulation electrode which delivers sensory stimulation to the olfactory sensory system of the patient thereby decreasing the likelihood that a seizure will occur.
[0015] Under another embodiment, the invention includes a therapy delivery portion. Under this embodiment, the therapy delivery portion provides sensory stimulation to the olfactory sensory system of the patient in a continuous or periodic manner to thereby decrease the likelihood that a seizure will occur.
[0016] By using the foregoing techniques, seizure disorders, including epilepsy, can be treated and seizures can be alleviated or prevented using olfactory sensory stimulation. Examples of the more important features of this invention have been broadly outlined above in order that the detailed description that follows may be better understood and so that contributions which this invention provides to the art may be better appreciated. There are, of course, additional features of the invention which will be described herein and which will be included within the subject matter of the claims appended hereto.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0017] These and other advantages and features of the invention will become apparent upon reading the following detailed description and referring to the accompanying drawings in which like numbers refer to like parts throughout and in which:
[0018] FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic illustration of a preferred embodiment of the present invention having a sensor implanted in a brain, a signal generator and stimulation electrodes;
[0019] FIG. 2 is a diagrammatic illustration of the embodiment of FIG. 1 depicting the placement of the stimulation electrodes to stimulate a predetermined site of the temporal lobe of the brain;
[0020] FIG. 3 is a diagrammatic illustration of the embodiment of FIG. 1 depicting an alternative placement of the stimulation electrodes to stimulate a predetermined site of the temporal lobe of the brain;
[0021] FIG. 4 is a block diagram of the signal processing portion of the present is invention; and
[0022] FIG. 5 is a flow chart depicting the steps for alerting the patient of a possible seizure.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
[0023] The present invention discloses techniques for providing sensory stimulation as a means for desynchronizing the electrical activity of the brain which leads to a seizure. As preferred, the invention includes generally a sensor portion for monitoring the onset of a seizure, a signal processing portion for processing the sensed signals to recognize a pattern indicative of a seizure onset, and a therapy delivery portion for providing sensory stimulation to alert the patient of the possible onset of a seizure.
[0024] Referring to FIGS. 1 and 2, a system made in accordance with the preferred embodiment may be implanted below the skin of a patient. The system includes generally a sensor 20, a signal processor/generator 30 and one or more stimulation electrodes 40.
[0025] Sensor 20 serves as the sensing portion of the present invention. Sensor 20 is implanted into a portion of a patient's body suitable for detecting a condition resulting from the onset of a seizure, including a seizure itself. Sensor 20 is adapted to sense an attribute of the body that changes in advance of or during a seizure. Sensor 20 is operatively coupled to provided sensed signals to the signal processor/generator 30. As shown, sensor is coupled via lead 25 to signal processor/generator 30. Alternatively, telemetry may be used to couple components 20 and 30. As can be seen, sensor 20 (represented as sensor 900) is connected to an antenna 800. Antenna 800 communicates through the body surface with antenna 700 that is connected to telemetry circuit 600 that is, in turn, connected to microprocessor 500. In a further alternative embodiment, communication between components 20 and 30 can be effected through a so called “body bus” where the patient's own body provides the interconnection between components 20 and 30. An example of such a “body-bus” communication system is given in U.S. Pat. No. 4,987,897, issued to Hermann D. Funke on Jan. 29, 1991, entitled “Body Bus Medical Device Communication System”, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Signals that are received by the sensor may by amplified before transmission to signal processor/generator 30.
[0026] Sensor 20 may take the form of a device capable of detecting nerve cell or axon activity that is related to the pathways at the cause of a seizure symptom, or that indicates sensations which are elicited by the onset of a seizure. As preferred, sensor 20 is located deep in the brain parachyma in appropriate locations as shown in FIG. 1 and consists of a tube 50 implanted into brain B that carries one or more depth wire electrodes near end 52 of tube 50. For such detecting, the electrodes may be inserted into the thalamus, internal capsule, hippocampus, cortex or basal ganglia of brain B. Alternatively, the electrodes may be inserted into the seizure focus or part of the central nervous system where seizures begin.
[0027] In other embodiments, sensor 20 may include electrical transducers including subcutaneous electrodes placed on the surface of the skull over appropriate brain structures, peg electrodes implanted into the skull over these brain structures, epidural electrodes, or subdural electrodes placed on the cortical surface of appropriate brain structures. Under these embodiments, brain EEG/ECoG recorded above the cortical surface also may be detected by such a sensor. Sensors placed above the cortical surface may be generally located at two or more locations identified in the International 10-20system of standard sites for EEG (Spehlmann's EEG Primer, Second Edition, Bruce J. Fisch, Elsevier Sciences Publisher BV, 1991).
[0028] Alternatively, sensor 20 may be a chemical sensor implanted in the brain B or ventricular space for detecting certain chemical substances such as transmitter substances or the break down products of transmitter substances. Under this alternative, sensor 20 may take the form of a transducer consisting of an electrode with an ion selective coating applied which is capable of directly transducing the amount of a particular transmitter substance or its breakdown by-products found in the interstitial space of a region of the brain B such as the hippocampus or thalamus. The level of the interstitial transmitter substance is an indicator of the relative activity of the brain region and the onset of a seizure. An example of this type of transducer is described in the paper “Multichannel semiconductor-based electrodes for in vivo electrochemical and electro-physiological studies in rat CNS” by Craig G. van Horne, Spencer Bement, Barry J. Hoffer, and Greg A. Gerhardt, published in Neuroscience Letters, 120 (1990) 249-252.
[0029] As yet another alternative, sensor 20 may sense physiological changes which are indicative of a seizure onset. For example, sensor 20 may transduce physiological changes in the heart rate or respiration. Under this alternative, sensor 20 may be placed near nerve cells controlling muscles and include a device capable of detecting nerve compound action potentials (e.g., either sensory afferent information from muscle or skin receptors or efferent motor potentials controlling a muscle of interest). Alternatively, sensor 20 may detect muscle EMG in one, two or more muscles. Monitored muscles may include the heart, respiratory muscles or reciprocal muscles at one joint. For such detection, sensor 20 may take the form of a lead with one or more recording electrodes inserted into the muscle of interest. In yet other embodiments, sensor 20 may sense heart rate or respiration rate. Sensor 20 may be physically located outside of the body and communicate with the implanted portion through telemetry.
[0030] The output of sensor 20 is coupled by cable 25, comprising one or more conductors, to the signal processing portion of the present invention. Alternatively, the output of an external sensor would communicate with the implanted pulse generator through a telemetry downlink. Such telemetric systems may use, for example, radio frequency, ultrasound, infrared or other like communication means.
[0031] The signal processing portion of the present invention is preferably included within signal processor/generator 30. Alternatively, signal processor/generator 30 may be separated into a signal processing component and a signal generating component. The signal processing portion or component provides a means for signal processing and means for pattern recognition. FIG. 4 is a block diagram depicting the signal processing portion of the present invention. A signal received from sensor 20 may be processed by amplifying and filtering the signal by amplifier 100 and filter 200 respectively. The signal is then converted to a digital representation by analog to digital converter 300. The signal may then be further processed by a digital signal processing chip 400 or may be input to a microprocessor 500. Microprocessor processes the sensor data in different ways depending on the type of parameter that is sensed by sensor 20. Microprocessor 500 processes the sensor signal and determines whether there exists a threat of a seizure. In particular, microprocessor 500 serves as the means for feature extraction and for pattern recognition. Alternatively, digital signal processing chip 400 could be used to extract features prior to processing by the software algorithm of microprocessor 500. Feature extraction and pattern recognition involves implementing an algorithm to detect the onset of a seizure.
[0032] In a preferred embodiment, the software algorithm for detecting a brain state indicative of a high probability of a seizure occurring is performed as follows. Sixteen channels of EEG waves are recorded. These EEG waves are then low-pass filtered at 70 cycles/sec with a 4-pole analog filter and then sampled at 200 samples/sec/channel. The resulting signal is then broken down into simple features by reducing the sinusoidal EEG signal into a sequences of segments. A segment is a section between two consecutive extremes of amplitude and is characterized by duration, amplitude and direction (i.e., slope of the line). A sequence of segments is created to eliminate small amplitude “noise” (beta frequency EEG, muscle artifact). This noise creates smaller intervening segments that face an opposite direction to that of the neighboring larger segments. The sequence combines one or more segments which are faced in the same direction and smaller intervening segments. A sequence ends when a segment not belonging to that sequence is produced. A segment does not belong to a sequence when its direction is opposite to the previous segment and its length is greater than the length of the previous segment. When a sequence is complete, the following operations take place sequentially to determine whether a possible EEG spike or sharp wave (SSW) is detected. First, the relative amplitude of the current sequence and of the preceding one is checked to determine whether they are above a certain threshold. The relative amplitude is the amplitude of the sequence relative to the average amplitudes of the sequences 5 seconds prior to the instant sequence. The relative amplitude is the ratio of the amplitude of the instant sequence to the average amplitude of the previous sequences taken 5 seconds prior. If the relative amplitude is above 4, then the sequence is marked as being part of a SSW. Next, the pseudo-duration of the segment is checked. The pseudo-duration is graphically determined by extending a line from the start of a sequence (point A) through the half-way point of the actual EEG wave and extending it so its end (point B) equals the amplitude level of the ending point of the sequence. The horizontal distance from A to B is the pseudo-duration. The sequence is marked as a possible SSW if the pseudo-duration in combination with the relative amplitude reaches above a certain amount. Generally, the shorter the pseudo-duration, the lower the relative amplitude needs to be for a SSW marking. Next, the relative amplitudes are checked in relation to the relative sharpness of the waves. The relative sharpness of the wave is the second derivative of a wave at 15 msec before and after the apex of a wave. The higher the relative sharpness, the lower the relative amplitude required to mark the sequence as a possible SSW. Finally, the total duration of the wave is checked. If it is larger or equal to 35 msec, the sequence is marked as a possible SSW.
[0033] Once a sequence or a wave is marked as a possible SSW, further processing is required to possibly reject this wave. For example, the wave is rejected if it is the result of muscle activity, eye blinks or alpha activity. Muscle activity may cause a large number of high amplitude segments in the immediate surrounding of the wave (⅓ sec). Eye blinks may cause SSW marking from an EEG in the frontal channel having positive polarity, has a duration larger than 150 msec, and a wave of similar amplitude occurs simultaneously on the homologous contralateral channel. Alpha activity causes a dominant frequency of 8-12 cycles/sec.
[0034] Once a wave is determined to be a SSW, its relationships with other channels are important for localization of an epileptic focus. The above analysis proceeds by discrete time units of about ⅓ sec. If several SSWs are found in a given channel during a time unit, only the sharpest is retained. If SSWs are found in one or more channels within the time unit, an event is said to have occurred. The events from the 16 EEG channels may then be tabulated. Based on the location and occurrence frequency of these events, electrical activity indicating a seizure pattern may be determined. Such a system may be that disclosed by J. Gotman and P. Gloor in Automatic Recognition and Quanitification of Interictal Epileptic Activity in the Human Scalp EEG, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 41: 513-529, 1976. The rhythmicity of the electrical activity could also be used to indicate the occurrence of a seizure. The time interval associated with two successive segments is proportional to the frequency of EEG activity. Frequency of EEG activity between 3 to 20 cycles/sec sustained for a sufficient duration indicated the occurrence of a seizure. For example, once a patient suffers a seizure attack, a template may be created which can be used to detect future seizures exhibiting similar EEG activity. Such a template would be patient specific.
[0035] Other examples of algorithms to detect the onset of seizures have been reported in U.S. Pat. No. 5,311,876 (issue May 17, 1994) and U.S. Pat. No. 5,349,962 (issued Sep. 27, 1994) and by Jean Gotman in Epilepsy Surgery, ch. 36 (ed. Hans, Luders, Raven Press, New York 1991) and Ivan Osorio & Mark Frei in Abstracts of the American Epilepsy Society meeting, 1995. These references are incorporated herein by reference. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that any number of other algorithms may be used. An external electronic device may be implemented to telemeter parameter changes or newer algorithms to the implanted signal processing device to adapt the detection algorithm to the particular patient.
[0036] Microprocessor 500 is coupled to signal processor/generator 30 and cues the signal processor/generator 30 to generate a signal when a pattern indicative of a seizure is identified. Signal processor/generator 30 is implanted in a human body in a subclavicular, subcutaneous pocket. Alternatively, the signal processor/generator 30 may be implanted elsewhere, such as in the abdomen. Signal processor/generator 30 may take the form of a modified signal generator Model 7424 manufactured by Medtronic, Inc. under the trademark Itrel II which is incorporated by reference. Signal processor/generator 30 may include a frequency generator, a digital to analog converter, and a pulse width control module to vary the type of stimulation to provide as a warning. The stimulus pulse frequency is controlled by programming a value to the programmable frequency generator (not shown). The programmable frequency generator provides an interrupt signal to signal processor/generator 30 when each stimulus pulse is to be generated. The frequency generator may be implemented by model CDP1878 sold by Harris Corporation.
[0037] At the time the present invention is implanted within the patient, the clinician programs certain key parameters into the memory of the implanted device or may do so via telemetry. These parameters may be updated subsequently as needed. Alternatively, the clinician may elect to use default values. The clinician must program the range of values for pulse width, amplitude and frequency which microprocessor 500 may use to optimize the therapy. Stimulus parameters can be adjusted (via telemetry) by a computer algorithm within a range specified by the clinician in an attempt to optimize the seizure suppression.
[0038] FIG. 5 discloses a flow chart for providing a patient with a seizure avoiding stimulation in accordance with the present invention. At step 405, sensor 20 senses a parameter of the body and generates a signal. At step 410, the signal is processed and in step 415, an algorithm, as described above, determines whether the sensed signal indicates that there exists a risk of a seizure onset. This step is continually performed. Steps 410 and 415 may be combined together. If it is determined that a seizure onset is possible, at step 420, electrodes 40 are directed to provide electrical stimulation to provide olfactory sensory stimulation to alert the patient to abort the onset of a seizure.
[0039] Simulation electrodes 40 serve as the therapy delivery portion of the present invention. Each electrode 40 is individually connected to the signal processor/generator 30 through a wire conductor. Depending upon the stimulus desired, any number of electrodes may be used. Model 3387 DBS™ electrodes sold by Medtronic, Inc. of Minneapolis, Minn. may be used. Stimulation electrodes 40 serve to produce an olfactory sensory experience for the patient based on the signal provided by the signal processor/generator 30 through stimulation output circuit 42. Under the embodiment of FIG. 1, the stimulation electrodes 40 are placed along the axis of the hippocampus in the brain parenchyma of the temporal lobe as depicted in FIG. 2. An alternatively embodiment, shown in FIG. 3, makes use of a flat electrode array placed on the surface of the olfactory cortex 60. Examples of this type of electrode is the Model 3986 Resume® lead sold by Medtronic, Inc. The electrode array in FIG. 3 is actually placed under the temporal lobe. Alternatively, it could be place under the frontal lobe adjacent the olfactory tubercule 62.
[0040] In another application, an olfactory sensory stimulus may be applied independently of any sensor signal. The stimulus may be applied continuously or intermittently stimulating only one(1) minute out of every five (5) for example. Under this embodiment the stimulation causes a general state of desynchronization leading to an overall reduced probability that a seizure will occur.
[0041] Still another option is use of a steerable electrode to allow changes to the desired sensory stimulus. Such an electrode is disclosed U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/637,361 filed Apr. 25, 1996 and entitled “Techniques for Adjusting the Locus of Excitation of Neural Tissue in the Spinal Cord or Brain.”
[0042] By using the foregoing techniques for electrical stimulation, seizure patients may be provided adequate warning of a possible seizure onset to avoid the risk of physical injury. The patient may also take action to avoid the possible onset of the seizure. Those skilled in that art will recognize that the preferred embodiments may be altered or amended without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention, as defined in the accompanying claims.
Claims
I claim:
1. A method of preventing the onset of a seizure using a sensor, a signal generator, a signal processor and at least one implantable electrode having a proximal end and a stimulation portion, the method comprising the steps of:
surgically implanting the sensor within a body of a patient;
coupling the sensor to the signal generator;
surgically implanting the electrode in the body;
positioning the stimulation portion to be in communication with the olfactory sensory nervous tissue within the body;
sensing a parameter of the body with the sensor and generating a sensing signal in response thereto;
processing the sensing signal by the signal generator to recognize a pattern indicative of the onset of a seizure; and
providing, in response to the pattern indicative of the onset of a seizure being recognized, a sensory stimulus of variable pulse width, amplitude or frequency to the olfactory sensory nervous tissue with the electrode to responsively initiate desynchronization of neural activity.
2. The method of claim 1 wherein the at least one implantable electrode having a proximal end and a stimulation portion is a flat electrode array.
3. The method of claim 2 wherein the step of positioning the stimulation portion to be in communication with the olfactory sensory nervous tissue within the body includes the step of positioning the stimulation portion of the flat electrode array on the surface of the olfactory cortex.
4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of positioning the stimulation portion to be in communication with the olfactory sensory nervous tissue within the body includes the step of positioning the stimulation portion on the surface of the olfactory cortex.
5. A method of treating epilepsy comprising the steps of:
placing electrodes in olfactory sensory nervous tissue;
sensing a parameter of the body;
generating a signal in response thereto and forwarding the signal to the electrodes;
determining whether the sensed signal indicates that there exists a risk of a seizure onset;
directing the electrodes to provide electrical stimulation of variable pulse width, amplitude or frequency to olfactory sensory nervous tissue to abort the onset of a seizure in response to a determination that there is a risk of a seizure onset.
6. The method of claim 5 wherein the step of placing electrodes includes the step of placing a flat electrode array.
7. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of placing electrodes includes the step of placing the flat electrode array on the surface of the olfactory cortex.
8. The method of claim 5 wherein the step of placing electrodes includes the step of placing electrodes on the surface of the olfactory cortex.
9. A method of treating epilepsy comprising the step of:
applying an electrical sensory stimulus signal of variable pulse width, amplitude or frequency to olfactory sensory nervous tissue.
10. The method of claim 9 wherein the step of applying an electrical signal includes the step of placing electrodes on the surface of the olfactory cortex.
11. A device to prevent the onset of a seizure in a person comprising:
a sensing system for detecting the impending onset of a seizure;
a therapy delivery system, responsive to the sensing system, for delivering electrical sensory stimulation of variable pulse width, amplitude or frequency to the olfactory sensory system of the person.
12. The device of claim 11 wherein the therapy delivery portion includes at least one stimulation electrode.
13. The device of claim 12 wherein the at least one stimulation electrode is placed on the surface of the olfactory cortex.
Patent Citations (16)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3850161(A) | 1974-11-01 | Liss | Examiner |
| US3918461(A) | 1975-11-01 | Cooper | Applicant |
| US3993046(A) | 1976-11-01 | Fernandez et al. | Applicant |
| US4702254(A) | 1987-10-01 | Zabara | Examiner |
| US4867164(A) | 1989-09-01 | Zabara | Applicant |
| US4878498(A) | 1989-11-01 | Abrams et al. | Examiner |
| US4987897(A) | 1991-01-01 | Funke | Applicant |
| US5025807(A) | 1991-06-01 | Zabara | Examiner |
| US5269302(A) | 1993-12-01 | Swartz et al. | Examiner |
| US5311876(A) | 1994-05-01 | Olsen et al. | Applicant |
| US5349962(A) | 1994-09-01 | Lockard et al. | Applicant |
| US5540734(A) | 1996-07-01 | Zabara | Examiner |
| US5613958(A) | 1997-03-01 | Kochinke et al. | Applicant |
| US5713923(A) | 1998-02-01 | Ward et al. | Examiner |
| US5752979(A) | 1998-05-01 | Benabid | Examiner |
| WO85/01213 | 1985-03-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (20)
- Ivan Osorio, Mark G. Frei, Steven B. Wilkinson, “Real Time Automated Detection and Quantitative Analysis of Seizures and Short-Term Prediction of Clinical Onset”, Epilepsia 39:(6) 615-627, 1998.Applicant
- I. Osorio, M.G. Frei, S.B. Wilkinson, Clinical Neurophysiology; Epilepsy Surgery: Techniques/Localization: and Basic Mechanisms and Experimental Models of Epilepsy, “A Method for Accurate Automated Real-Time Seizure Detection” Epilepsia vol. 36, Suppl 4, 1995.Applicant
- Craig G. Van Horne, Spencer Bement, Barry J. Hoffer, Greg A. Gerhardt, “Multichannel Semiconductor-based Electrodes for In Vivo Electrochemical and Electrophysiological Studies in rat CNS”, Neuroscience Letters, 120 (1990) 249-252.Applicant
- Gotman and P. Gloor, “Automatic Recognition and Quantification of Interictal Epileptic Activity in the Human Scalp EEG”, Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 1976, 41: 513-529.Applicant
- Jean Gotman, “Automatic Detection of Seizures and Spikes in the EEG”, Epilepsy Surgery, Chapter 36, 1991 307-316.Applicant
- R. Benlamri, M. Batouche, S. Rami, C. Bouanaka, “An Automated System for Analysis and Interpretation of Epileptiform Activity in the EEG”, Comput. Biol. Med. vol. 27, #2, 129-139, 1997.Applicant
- Michael Crichton, “The Terminal Man”, Ballantine Books, Jan. 1988, 15-26.Applicant
- Dominique M. Durand, Eduardo N. Warman, “Desynchronization of Epileptiform Activity by Extracellular Current Pulses in Rat Hippocampal Slices”, Journal of Physiology (1994), 527-537.Applicant
- Dominique Durand, “Electrical Stimulation Can Inhibit Synchronized Neuronal Activity”, Brain Research, 382 (1986) 139-144).Applicant
- Steven J. Schiff, Kristin Jerger, Duc H. Duong, Taeun Chang, Mark L. Spano, William L. Ditto, “Controlling Chaos in the Brain”, Nature, vol. 370, Aug. 25, 1994, 615-620.Applicant
- A. Depaulis, Z. Liu, M. Vergnes, C. Marescaux, G. Micheletti, J.M. Warter, “Suppression of Spontaneous Generalized Non-Convulsive Seizures in the Rat by Microinjection of GABA Antagonists into the Superior Colliculus”, Epilepsy Research 5 (1990) 192-198.Applicant
- A. Depaulis, O.C. Snead III, C. Marescaux and M. Vergnes, “Suppressive Effects of Intranigral Injection of Muscimol in three Models of Generalized Non-Convulsive Epilepsy Induced by Chemical Agents”, Brain Research 498 (1989) 64-72.Applicant
- I.S. Cooper, I. Amin, S. Gilman, J.M. Waltz, “The Effect of Chronic Stimulation of Cerebellar Cortez on Epilepsy in Man”, Depts. Of Neurosurgery & Neurology, St. Barnabas Hosp., Bronx, N.Y., 119-171.Applicant
- D. Durand, H. Kayyali, E. Warman, “Control of Abnormal Electrical Activity with Applied Electrical Fields”, IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society 10th Annual International Conference, 1988 IEEE.Applicant
- N.M. Sussman, H.W. Goldman, R.A. Jackel, L. Kaplan, M. Callanan, J. Bergen, R.N. Harner (Medical College of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA) “Anterior Thalamic Stimulation in Medically Intractable Epilepsy, Part II: Preliminary Clinical Results” Epilepsia, vol. 29, No. 5, 1988.Applicant
- A.R.M. Upton, I. Amin, S. Garnett, M. Springman, C. Nahmias, I.S. Cooper, “Evoked Metabolic Responses in the LimbicStriate System Produced by Stimulation of Anterior Thalamic Nucleus in Man”, PACE, vol. 10 (1):Jan.-Feb. 1987, Part II, 217-225.Applicant
- Francisco Velasco, Marcos Velasco, Ana Luisa Velasco, Fiacro Jimenez, “Effect of Chronic Electrical Stimulation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nuclei on Various Intractable Seizure Patterns: I. Clinical Seizures and Parosysmal EEG Activity”, Epilepsia, 34(6):1052-1064, 1993.Applicant
- Marcos Velasco, Francisco Velasco, Ana Luisa Velasco, Gabriela Velasco, Fiacro Jimenez, “Effect of Chronic Electrical Stimulation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nuclei on Various Intractable Seizure Patterns: II. Psychological Performance and Background EEG Activity”, Epilepsia, 34(6),:1065-1074, 1993.Applicant
- Robert S. Fisher, Sumio Uematsu, Gregory L. Krauss, Barbara J. Cysyk, Robert McPherson, Ronald P. Lesser, Barry Gordon. Pamela Schwerdt, Mark Rise, “Placebo-Controlled Pilet Study of Centromedian Thalamic Stimulation in Treatment of Intractable Seizures”, Epilepsia, 33(5):841-851, 1992.Applicant
- Francisco Velasco, Marcos Velasco, Ana Luisa Velasco, Fiacro Jimenez, Irma Marquez, Mark Rise, “Electrical Stimulation of the Centromedian Thalamic Nucleus in Seizures: Long-Term Studies”, Epilepsia, 36(1):63-71, 1995.Applicant