US 6,326,004 B1Grant

Antiviral methods using fragments of human rhinovirus receptor (ICAM-1)

Issue Date:2001-12-04

•2 Claims

•4 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

Antiviral methods comprising contacting human rhinovirus with tICAM(453).

Metadata

Assignee

Bayer Corporation

Inventors

Jeffrey M. Greve
Alan McClelland
Gary Davis

Application Information

Application Number:US 08/417,551

Filing Date:1995-04-06

Priority Date:1988-09-01

Art Unit:7

Classifications

IPC:

A61K 3900A61K 3816

Field of Search:

5303005303505303955304025304034241851435 693514 8

Patent Drawings (4 sheets)

Description

[0002] This application is a division of copending application U.S. Ser. No. 08/316,885, filed Sep. 30, 1994, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/103,303 filed Aug. 6, 1993, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 07/631,313 filed Dec. 20, 1990, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 07/556,238 filed Jul. 20, 1990, now abandoned, and a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 07/390,662 filed Aug. 10, 1989, now abandoned, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 07/239,571 filed Sep. 1, 1988, now abandoned, and a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 07/262,428 filed Oct. 25, 1988, now abandoned, which is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. Ser. No. 07/239,571.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

[0003] The present invention relates to novel truncated forms of intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM), designated “tICAMs”, which effectively bind to human rhinovirus (HRV) and to lymphocyte-function associated antigen-1 (LFA-1). The present invention also pertains to DNA sequences coding for various tICAMs and to methods for preventing or amelio-rating infection and inflammation using said tICAMs.

[0004] Human rhinoviruses, the major causative agent of the common cold, belong to the picornavirus family. The three-dimensional structure of several rhinovirus serotypes have now been determined to atomic resolution by Rossmann, M. G., E. Arnold, J. W. Erickson, E. W. Frankenberger, P. J. Griffith, H. Hecht, J. E. Johnson, G. Kamer, M. Luo, A. G. Mosser, R. R. Rueckert, B. Sherry, and G. Vriend, Nature (1985) 317:145-153; Kim, S., T. J. Smith, M. M. Chapman, M. G. Rossmann, D. C. Pevear, F. J. Dutko, P. J. Felock, G. D. Diana, and M. A. McKinlay, J. Mol. Biol. (1990) 210:91-111. The virion is composed of a protein capsid of 60 protomeric units, consisting of the four protein subunits VP1-4, surrounding an RNA genome. Each of the 60 protomeric units possesses a recessed “canyon” that is believed to contain the site that binds to the receptor on the target cell surface [reviewed in Rossmann, M. G., J. Biol. Chem. (1989) 264:14587-14590]. The dimensions of the canyon are such that it is too small to admit the combining site of an antibody but is apparently large enough to admit the virus-binding site of the receptor.

[0005] In order to infect host cells, viruses must bind to and then enter cells to initiate an infection. Since 1959, evidence has accumulated in the literature indicating that the presence of specific binding sites (receptors) on host cells could be a major determinant of tissue tropism of certain viruses. [Holland, J. J., and L. C. McLaren, “The mammalian cell-virus relationship. II. Absorption, reception, and eclipse of poliovirus by HeLa cells,” J. Exp. Med. 109:487-504 (1959); Holland, J. J., “Receptor affinities as major determinants of enterovirus tissue tropisms in humans,” Virology 15:312-326 (1961)]. Among picornaviruses such as poliovirus, Coxsackie virus, and rhinoviruses, specific binding to host cells has been demonstrated. By competition experiments, it has been demonstrated that some of these receptors are distinct from one another in that the saturation of the receptor of one virus had no effect on the binding of a second virus. [Lonberg-Holm, K., R. L. Crowell, and L. Philipson. “Unrelated animal viruses share receptors,” Nature 259:679-681 (1976)].

[0006] Rhinoviruses can be classified according to the host cell receptor to which they bind. Tomassini, J. E. and R. J. Colonno, “Isolation of a receptor protein involved in attachment of human rhinoviruses,” J. Virol. 58:290 (1986) reported the isolation of a receptor protein involved in the cell attachment of HRV. Approximately 90% of the more than 115 serotypes of rhinoviruses, as well as several types of Coxsackie A virus, bind to a single common receptor termed the “major” human rhinovirus receptor (HRR) [Abraham, G., and R. J. Colonno, “Many rhinovirus serotypes share the same cellular receptor,” J. Virol. 51:340-345 (1984)]; the remaining 10% bind to one or more other cell receptors.

[0007] The major human rhinovirus receptor has been transfected, identified, purified, and reconstituted as described in co-pending U.S. patent applications Ser. Nos. 07/262,428 and 07/262,570, both filed Oct. 25, 1988. Greve, J. M., G. Davis, A. M. Meyer, C. P. Forte, S. C. Yost, C. W. Marlor, M. E. Kamarck, and A. McClelland, “The major human rhinovirus receptor is ICAM-1,” Cell 56:839 (1989), identified the major HRR as a glycoprotein with an apparent molecular mass of 95 kD and having an amino acid sequence essentially identical to that deduced from the nucleotide sequence of a previously described cell surface protein named intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1). ICAM-1 had first been identified based on its role in adhesion of leukocytes to endothelial cells [Rothlein, R., et al., J. Immunol. 137:1270-1274 (1986); see also Simmons, D., M. W. Makgoba, and B. Seed, Nature (1988) 331:624; Staunton, D. E., S. D. Marlin, C. Stratowa, M. L. Dustin, and T. A. Springer, “Primary structure of ICAM-1 demonstrates interaction between members of the immunoglobulin and integrin supergene families,” Cell (1988) 52:925-933]. Induction of ICAM-1 expression by cytokines during the inflammatory response may regulate leukocyte localization to inflammatory sites. Subsequently, Staunton, D. E., et al., Cell 56:849 (1989) confirmed that ICAM-1 is the major cell surface receptor for HRV. See also Staunton, D. E., M. L. Dustin, H. P. Erickson, and T. A. Springer, “The arrangement of the immunoglobulin-like domains of ICAM-1 and the binding sites for LFA-1 and rhinovirus,” Cell (1990) 61:243-254. The precise extent of the virus-binding site on ICAM-1 remains to be determined, although results from mouse-human chimeras and site-directed mutagenesis indicate that the two N-terminal domains play a major role in virus binding [Staunton, et al., Cell (1990) 61:243-254], and a model has been developed for the interaction of the N-terminal domain of ICAM-1with HRV14 [Giranda, V. L., M. S. Chapman, and M. G. Rossmann, Proteins (1990) 7:227-233].

[0008] European Patent Application 0 289 949 describes membrane-associated ICAM-1, which mediates attachment of many cell types, including endothelial cells, to leukocytes expressing lymphocyte function associated molecule-1 (LFA-1; CD18/CD11a, a member of the beta-2 integrin family). This patent application provides a discussion of the prior research in the field of intercellular adhesion molecules.

[0009] Heterotypic binding of LFA-1 to ICAM-1 mediates cellular adhesion of diverse cell types and is important in a broad range of immune interactions [Marlin, et al., Cell (1987) 51:813-819]. ICAM-1 also binds to MAC-1 (CD18/CD11b), another beta-2 integrin, but not to p150/95 (CD18/CD11c) [Staunton, D. E., S. D. Marlin, C. Stratowa, M. L. Dustin, and T. A. Springer, Cell (1988) 52:925-933]. MAC-1 and p150/95 differ from LFA-1 by their alpha subunit. Although minimal peptide recognition sites have been identified for many other integrins, the recognition site for LFA-1 on ICAM-1 remains obscure. Staunton, et al., Cell (1990) 61:243-254 have reported that a transmembrane form of the first two domains of ICAM-1 retains some LFA-1-binding activity and that a number of mutations in the first two domains of the full-length molecule cause reductions in LFA-1-binding activity.

[0010] The primary structure of ICAM-1 is homologous to two other cellular adhesion molecules: neural cell adhesion molecule (NCAM) and myelin-associated glycoprotein (MAG). This suggests that ICAM-1 is a member of the immunoglobulin supergene family [Simmons, et al., Nature (1988) 331:624-627; Staunton et al., Cell (1988) 52:925-933]. The cDNA sequences are described in the above-referenced papers by Simmons et al. and Staunton et al., from which the amino acid sequence of ICAM-1 has been deduced.

[0011] ICAM-1 is an integral membrane protein 505 amino acids long and has: i) five immunoglobulin-like extra-cellular domains at the amino-terminal (extracellular) end (designated domain 1 [amino acid residues 1-88], domain 2 [89-185], domain 3 [186-284], domain 4 [285-385], and domain 5 [386-453] [Staunton, et al., Cell (1988) 52:925-933]); ii) a hydrophobic transmembrane domain (454-477); and iii) a short cytoplasmic domain at the carboxy-terminal end (478-505). Electron microscopy has indicated that ICAM-1 is a highly elongated molecule [Staunton, et al., Cell (1990) 61:243-254].

[0012] Several approaches to decreasing infectivity of viruses in general, and of HRV in particular, have been pursued including: i) developing antibody to the cell surface receptor for use in blocking viral binding to the cell; ii) using interferon to promote an anti-viral state in host cells; iii) developing various agents to inhibit viral replication; iv) developing antibodies to viral capsid proteins/peptides; and v) blocking viral infection with isolated cell surface receptor protein that specifically blocks the viral binding domain of the cell surface receptor.

[0013] In 1985, the isolation of a monoclonal antibody that appeared to be directed against the major rhinovirus receptor was described. [Colonno, R. J., P. L. Callahan, and W. J. Long, “Isolation of a monoclonal antibody that blocks attachment of the major group of human rhinoviruses,” J. Virol. 57:7-12 (1986)]. This monoclonal inhibited infection of cells with the appropriate serotypes of rhinovirus and it inhibited binding of radiolabeled rhinovirus to cells. Colonno et al. subsequently reported that the monoclonal antibody bound to a protein with an apparent molecular weight of 90 kD [Tomassini, et al., J. Virol. (1986) 58:290-295]. This monoclonal antibody has been utilized in clinical trials with primates and humans and is understood to provide some protection against rhinovirus infection.

[0014] There are several other reports of attempts at therapeutic intervention in rhinovirus infections. Intranasal application of interferon in humans has been attempted. [Douglas, R. M. et al., “Prophylactic efficacy of intranasal alpha2-interferon against rhinovirus infections in the family setting,” N. Eng. J. Med. 314:65-75 (1986)]. In this case, significant reduction in the severity of the infection was found, although nosebleeds were observed as a side-effect. Also, several analogs of disoxaril (“WIN” compounds) that reduce the infectivity of a number of picornaviruses (with widely varying effectiveness, depending on the serotype) have been tested in tissue culture and in some animal models [Fox, M. P., M. J. Otto, and M. A. McKinlay, Antimicrob. Ag. and Chemotherapy (1986) 30:110-116]. These compounds appear to inhibit replication at a step subsequent to receptor binding, probably at some step of virus uncoating. The atomic coordinates of the binding sites of these compounds within the viral capsid of the serotype HRV14 have been determined by x-ray crystallography, and are located in a hydrophobic pocket present in each protomeric unit of the capsid [Smith, T. J., et al., “The site of attachment in human rhinovirus 14 for antiviral agents that inhibit uncoating,” Science (1986) 233:1286-1293]. The specific function of the binding pocket, if any, is unknown, but drug-resistant mutants with a single amino acid interchange in this region arise at high frequency and are viable [Badger, J., et al., “Structural analysis of a series of antiviral agents complexed with human rhinovirus 14,” PNAS 85:3304-3308 (1988); see also Dearden et al., Arch. Virol. (1989) 109:71]. This result calls into question the efficacy of such compounds as drugs. The production of anti-peptide antibodies in rabbits has been reported using peptides derived from amino acid sequences of the viral capsid proteins that line the “receptor canyon” of HRV14 [McCray, J., and G. Werner, “Different rhinovirus serotypes neutralized by antipeptide antibodies,” Nature (1987) 329:736-738]. While the titers of these sera are quite low, cross-serotype protection of cells in tissue culture from rhinovirus infection was demonstrated, raising the possibility of a vaccine.

[0015] It is an object of the present invention to provide an HRV receptor protein having the property of blocking HRV infection. Given the high affinity the virus has for its receptor, a therapeutic agent effective against HRV infection is the receptor itself, or more specifically, the virus-binding domain of the receptor. A protein, protein fragment, or peptide that comprises the virus-binding domain can block the ability of virus to bind to host cells by occupying (blocking) the receptor binding cleft on the virus. Furthermore, since such a molecule makes some or all of the molecular contacts with the virus capsid that the receptor does, virus mutations that adversely affect binding of the molecule also adversely affect binding of the receptor, and thus are deleterious or lethal for the virus; therefore, the likelihood of drug-resistant mutants is very low.

[0016] Using this approach, Greve, et al., Cell (1989) 56:879, reported that purified transmembrane ICAM-1 (tmICAM-1) could bind to rhinovirus HRV3 in vitro. Other results with HRV2, HRV3, and HRV14 demonstrate a positive correlation between the ability to bind to rhinovirus and the ability to neutralize rhinovirus. Results using HRV14 and HRV2 demonstrate a positive correlation between the receptor class of the virus and the ability to bind to tmICAM-1 in vitro. That is, ICAM-1, being the major receptor, can bind to HRV3, HRV14, and other major receptor serotypes and neutralize them, while it does not bind or neutralize HRV2, a minor receptor serotype. Further studies, using purified tmICAM-1, demonstrate that it effectively inhibits rhinovirus infectivity in a plaque-reduction assay when the rhinovirus is pretreated with tmICAM-1 (50% reduction of titer at 10 nM receptor and one log reduction of titer at 100 nM receptor protein). These data were consistent with the affinity of rhinovirus for ICAM-1 of HeLa cells, which has an apparent dissociation constant of 10 nM, and indicates a direct relationship between the ability of the receptor to bind to the virus and to neutralize the virus.

[0017] The ICAM of the prior art is an insoluble molecule which is solubilized from cell membranes by lysing the cells in a non-ionic detergent. Because large-scale production of tmICAM-1 is not presently economically feasible, and because maintenance of tmICAM-1 in an active form requires the use of detergents, alternate soluble forms of receptor protein suitable for use as a rhinovirus inhibitor are desirable. See generally copending applications U.S. Ser. Nos. 07/130,378; 07/239,570; 07/239,571; 07/262,428; 262,570; 07/390,662; and 07/556,238, all incorporated herein by reference.

[0018] U.S. Ser. No. 07/130,378 (filed Dec. 8, 1987) and its CIP application U.S. Ser. No. 07/262,570 are directed to transfected non-human cell lines which express the major human rhino-virus receptor (HRR), and to the identification of HRR as intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM).

[0019] U.S. Ser. No. 07/301,192 (filed Jan. 24, 1989) and its CIP applications U.S. Ser. No. 07/445,951 (abandoned) and U.S. Ser. No. 07/449,356 are directed to a naturally-occurring soluble ICAM (sICAM) related to but distinct from tmICAM in that said sICAM lacks the amino acids spanning the hydrophobic transmembrane region and the carboxy-terminal cytoplasmic region; in addition this sICAM has a novel sequence of 11 amino acids at its C-terminus.

[0020] Parent application U.S. Ser. No. 07/239,571 (filed Sep. 1, 1988) and its CIP applications U.S. Ser. Nos. 07/262,428 and 07/390,662 are directed to the use of detergent-complexed tmICAM as an inhibitor of HRV infectivity, using the non-ionic detergent complex to maintain the transmembrane protein in solution. These cases are also directed to truncated forms of ICAM comprising one or more of the extracellular domains I, II, and III, IV and V of tmICAM, which truncated forms do not require the presence of non-ionic detergent for solubilization.

[0021] Parent application U.S. Ser. No. 07/556,238 (filed Jul. 20, 1990) is directed to multimeric configurations and forms of tmICAM-1 and tICAM-1 with improved ability to prevent HRV infection. When tmICAM-1, tICAM(453), or tICAM(185) is first adsorbed on any of a number of insoluble supports, such as nitrocellulose, PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride), or DEAE (diethylaminoethyl) membranes, and then incubated with radioactive HRV, the virus-binding activity of tICAM(453) becomes comparable to that of tmICAM-1. This binding of multimeric tICAM(453) or of multimeric tICAM(185) to HRV has the same properties as the binding of HRV to ICAM-1 on HeLa cells: it is inhibited by anti-ICAM-1 monoclonal antibodies, it is specific for HRV of the major receptor group, and it has the same temperature-dependence pattern as the binding of HRV to cells (i.e., binds well at 37° C. and undetectably at 4° C.).

[0022] The present application contains further data demonstrating the properties and efficacy of various forms of tICAM.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0023] The present invention provides truncated forms of ICAM-1 designated tICAM-1 which are soluble without the addition of a detergent.

[0024] The present invention also provides purified and isolated tICAM-1, or functional derivatives thereof, substantially free of natural contaminants.

[0025] The present invention further provides a purified and isolated DNA sequence encoding tICAMs as well as host cells encoding said sequences.

[0026] The present invention provides a method of recovering tICAMs in substantially pure form comprising the steps of cloning a genome coding for the desired tICAM form in a suitable expression vector in a suitable host.

[0027] Also provided by the invention are novel pharmaceutical compositions comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent, diluent, adjuvant or carrier, and as the active ingredient, an effective amount of a polypeptide characterized by having HRV binding activity and reduction of virus infectivity.

[0028] The present invention includes monoclonal antibodies against ICAM-1 and tICAMs, and hybridoma cell lines capable of producing such monoclonal antibodies.

[0029] This invention further includes the therapeutic use of antibodies specifically directed to tICAMs to decrease cell adhesion mediated by ICAM-1 and LFA-1.

[0030] The invention further includes a method of inhibiting LFA-1 and ICAM-1 interaction comprising the step of contacting LFA-1-containing cells with a tICAM or a functional derivative thereof.

[0031] A further aspect of the invention is use of fragments, functional domains or analogs of LFA-1 to disrupt interactions between HRR and HRV and thereby treat HRV infections.

[0032] This invention further includes a method for substantially reducing infection by HRV of the major receptor group, comprising the step of contacting the virus with tICAM-1 or a functional derivative thereof.

[0033] This invention further includes a method of diagnosis of the presence and location of an LFA-1-expressing tumor cell.

[0034] Other aspects and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description thereof which includes numerous illustrative examples of the practice of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0035] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram illustrating the domains included in several representative tICAM constructs of the present invention.

[0036] FIG. 2 shows secretion of soluble ICAM-1 proteins. A. Diagram of progressively truncated forms of ICAM-1 used in transfection experiments. Crosshatched region indicates signal sequence and filled region indicates the transmembrane region. B. Fluorograph of ³⁵S-cysteine-labelled products secreted by COS cells analyzed by SDS-PAGE; loading of lanes containing tICAM(283) and tICAM(88) is 10-fold higher than other lanes. C. Silver-stained gel of purified tICAM(453) and tICAM(185) produced by CHO cell transfectants.

[0037] FIG. 3 shows circular dichroism spectra of IgG and ICAM-1 proteins. A: c92.5 IgG; B: ICAM-1; C: tICAM(453); D: tICAM(185). The spectra for c92.5 IgG, tICAM(453), and tICAM(185) were collected in 20 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.5) and the spectrum for ICAM-1 was collected in 0.1% octylglucoside/150 mM NaCl/10 mM sodium phosphate (pH 7.5). The data were averaged from 5 repetitive scans, buffer-subtracted and smoothed.

[0038] FIG. 4 shows inhibition of ICAM-1/LFA-1-mediated cell adhesion by soluble ICAM-1. JY cells were preincubated with various concentrations of tICAM(453) (filled circles) or tICAM(185) (open squares) for 30 min and then allowed to bind to ICAM-1-coated plates for 60 min at 37 C. The binding of JY cells is >90% inhibited by monoclonal antibody c78.4 to ICAM-1 and IOT 16 (AMAC Inc.) to LFA-1.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

[0039] As used herein, the following abbreviations and terms include, but are not necessarily limited to, the following definitions:

[0040] The ICAM-1 terminology has been used although it is now recognized that the terms HRR and ICAM-1 are interchangeable.

[0041] “Multimerization” and “multimeric” include, but are not limited to dimerization and dimeric, and include any multimeric configuration of the ICAM-1 molecule, or fragment thereof, that is effective in reducing viral binding and infectivity.

[0042] “Transmembrane” generally means forms of the ICAM-1 protein molecule which possess a hydrophobic membrane-spanning sequence and which are membrane-bound.

[0043] “Non-transmembrane” generally means soluble forms of the ICAM-1 protein including truncated forms of the protein that, rather than being membrane bound, are secreted into the cell culture medium as soluble proteins, as well as transmembrane forms that have been solubilized from cell membranes by lysing cells in non-ionic detergent.

[0044] “Truncated” generally includes any protein form that is less than the full-length transmembrane form of ICAM.

[0045] “Form” is generally used herein to distinguish among full-length and partial-length ICAM forms; whereas “configuration” is generally used to distinguish among monomeric, dimeric, and multimeric configurations of possible ICAM forms.

[0046] All forms and configurations of the ICAM-1 molecule, whether full length or a fragment thereof, including muteins, whether monomeric or multimeric, may be fully or partially glycosylated, or completely unglycosylated, as long as the molecule remains effective in reducing viral binding and infectivity.

[0047] “Ligand” is generally used herein to include anything capable of binding to at least one of any of the forms and configurations of ICAM and includes, but is not limited to, HRV, other viruses that bind to the “major” group human rhinovirus receptor, LFA-1, and Plasmodium falciparum(the causative agent of malaria).

[0048] “Human rhinovirus” or “HRV” generally includes all human serotypes of human rhinovirus as catalogued in Hamparian, V., et al., Virol. (1987) 159:191-192.

[0049] The sequence of amino acid residues in a peptide is designated in accordance with standard nomenclature such as that given in Lehninger's Biochemistry(Worth Publishers, New York, 1970).

[0050] Full-length ICAM-1, also known as human rhinovirus receptor (HRR), is termed transmembrane ICAM (tmICAM-1). The present invention provides non-transmembrane truncated forms of ICAM-1 designated tICAM-1, i.e., ICAM substantially without the carboxyl-terminal cytoplasmic domain and without the hydrophobic transmembrane domain, which are soluble without the addition of a detergent. Non-transmembrane forms of ICAM can include functional derivatives of ICAM and mutein forms of tICAM. Preferred embodiments are tICAM(453), tICAM(283), tICAM(185), and tICAM(88).

[0051] The present invention further provides purified and isolated tICAMs, or functional derivatives thereof, substantially free of natural contaminants. tICAMs can be obtained from transfected cells, e.g., CHO cells, and are characterized by being soluble in the absence of nonionic detergents and being the translation product defined by novel DNA oligomers. These products have the advantage of being secreted from cells in a soluble form and of not being immunogenic. These truncated products differ from the natural insoluble product in that the truncated soluble products do not contain the membrane-spanning and cytoplasmic domains present in the insoluble form.

[0052] The present invention provides purified and isolated DNA sequences encoding tICAMs as well as host cells encoding said sequences. The nucleotide sequences coding for tICAMs can be contained in vectors, such as plasmids, and the vectors can be introduced into host cells, for example eukaryotic or prokaryotic cells. Examples of suitable eukaryotic cells are mammalian cells, e.g. Chinese hamster ovary cells, and yeast cells. Examples of suitable prokaryotic cells are, e.g, E. coli. Eukaryotic cells are preferred; mammalian cells are particularly preferred.

[0053] Also provided by the invention are novel pharmaceutical compositions comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent, diluent, adjuvant or carrier, and as the active ingredient, an effective amount of a polypeptide characterized by having HRV-binding activity and reduction of virus infectivity.

[0054] The invention further provides novel pharmaceutical compositions comprising a pharmaceutically acceptable solvent, diluent, adjuvant or carrier, and as the active ingredient, an effective amount of a polypeptide characterized by having LFA-1-binding activity and reduction of LFA-1 activity.

[0055] The present invention further provides methods of recovering a tICAM in substantially pure form comprising the steps of cloning a gene coding for the desired tICAM form in a suitable expression vector in a suitable host. The secretion of a soluble protein eliminates the problems associated with production and purification of an insoluble, cell-membrane-bound protein, since cell lysis is not required and thus continuous culture can be employed along with simplified procedures for purification and isolation of the tICAMs. The protein may be purified using an immunoaffinity column, lectin or wheat germ agglutinin column. Other purification steps may include sizing chromatography, ion chromatography, and gel electrophoresis. The antibody capable of binding to tICAM is selected from antibodies against ICAM-1 (tmICAM or HRR) or fragments thereof.

[0056] The present invention includes polyclonal antibodies against tICAM. For a method for producing peptide antisera see Green et al., Cell 28:477-487 (1982).

[0057] The invention also includes hybridoma cell lines capable of producing monoclonal antibodies to tICAMs, and the monoclonal antibodies produced by said cell lines.

[0058] This invention further includes the therapeutic use of antibodies specifically directed to tICAMs to decrease cell adhesion mediated by ICAM and LFA-1.

[0059] Pharmaceutical preparations of proteins, protein fragments, functional domains, and analogs have an application in a plurality of diseases. Since the various forms of ICAM are ligands for both LFA-1 and HRV, they may also be used to block tmICAM interaction with LFA-1, which is critical to many cell adhesion processes involved in the immunological response. This method of inhibition of ICAM-1-mediated adhesion has application in such disease states as inflammation and graft rejection, and for suppression of LFA-1-expressing tumor cells and other processes involving cell adhesion.

[0060] A further aspect of the invention is use of fragments, functional domains or analogs of LFA-1 to disrupt interactions between HRR and rhinovirus and thereby treat rhinovirus infections.

[0061] This invention further includes a method of diagnosis of the presence and location of an LFA-1-expressing tumor cell.

[0062] This invention further includes a method for substantially reducing infection by other pathogens of the major HRR group, e.g., Coxsackie virus and Plasmodium falciparum, comprising the step of contacting the pathogen with one or more tICAMs or functional derivatives thereof.

[0063] The following examples describe preparation and characterization of representative compounds of the present invention and representative compositions containing said compounds. As used hereinabove and below unless expressly stated to the contrary, all temperatures and temperature ranges refer to the centrigrade system; the term percent or (%) refers to weight percent; and the term mole and moles refer to gram moles.

EXAMPLE 1

Growth, Purification and Assay of Rhinoviruses

[0064] Rhinoviruses were grown, purified, and assayed essentially as described in Abraham, G., et al., J. Virol. (1984) 51:340 and Greve, et al., Cell, (1989) 56:839. The serotypes chosen for these studies include HRV14, the standard in the field, and HRV3, which has an approximately 10-fold higher affinity for ICAM than does HRV14. HRV2, which binds to the “minor” receptor rather than the “major” receptor, was used as a negative control.

[0065] Rhinoviruses HRV2, HRV3, and HRV14 were obtained from the American Type Culture Collection, plaque purified, and isolated from lysates of infected HeLa-S3 cells. Purified rhinovirus was prepared by polyethylene glycol precipitation and sucrose density gradient sedimentation. Viral purity was assessed by SDS-PAGE analysis of capsid proteins and by electron microscopy. Infectivity was quantified by a limiting-dilution infectivity assay scoring for cytopathic effect, essentially as described by Minor, P. D., “Growth, assay and purification of picornaviruses,” in Virology: A Practical Approach, B. W. J. May, ed. (Oxford, IRL Press, 1985), pp. 25-41.

EXAMPLE 2

Production and Isolation of Monoclonal Antibodies to ICAM-1

[0066] BALB/cByJ female mice were immunized by intraperitoneal injection of 10⁷intact HeLa cells in 0.5 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) three times at 3-week intervals. Two weeks later the mice were bled and aliquots of serum were tested for protective effects against HRV14 infection of HeLa cells. Positive mice were boosted by a final injection of 10⁷HeLa cells, and 3 days later spleen cells were fused to P3X63-Ag8.653 myeloma cells [Galfre, et al., Nature (1977) 266:550-552] produce a total of approximately 700 hybridoma-containing wells. Each well was tested by incubating 3×10⁴HeLa cells in 96-well plates with 100 μl of supernatant for 1 hour at 37° C.; the cells were then washed with PBS, and a sufficient amount of HRV14 was added to give complete cytopathic effect in 24-36 hours. Wells that were positive (protected from infection) were scored at 36 hours.

[0067] Cells were removed from wells which scored positive in the first screen and cloned by limiting dilution in 96-well microtiter plates. Supernatants from these wells were tested in the cell protection assay and positive wells were again identified. Further clonings were performed until all of the hybridoma-containing wells were positive indicating a clonal population had been obtained. Four cloned cell lines, and their corresponding antibodies, were obtained and were designated c78.1A, c78.2A, c78.4A, c78.5A. An additional two cell lines were obtained by hyperimmunizing mice with L-cells transfected with human genomic DNA comprising HRR and were designated c92.1A and c92.5A.

[0068] C92.1A was deposited on Nov. 19, 1987 with the American Type Culture Collection, 10801 University Boulevard, Manassas, Va. 20110-2209 and was designated HB 9594.

EXAMPLE 3

cDNA Constructions

[0069] ICAM-1 cDNAs encoding soluble forms were constructed by using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) [Saiki, et al., Science (1985) 230:1350-54] to insert stop codons within the reading frame of the ICAM-1 cDNA pHRR-2, [Greve, et al., Cell (1989) 56:839-847]. The plasmid DNA was digested with EcoR1 to excise the ICAM-1 insert and treated with alkaline phosphatase to prevent recircularization of the vector in subsequent ligation steps. 10 ng of template DNA was subjected to 10 cycles of PCR amplification using the 5′ oligonucleotide primer GGAATTCAAGCTTCTCAGCCTCGCTATGGCTCCCAGCAGCCCCCGGCCC [SEQ ID NO:1] and the 3′ oligonucleotide primers GGAATTCCTGCAGTCACTCATACCGGGGGGAGAGCACATT [SEQ ID NO:3] [for tICAM (453)], TTCTAGAGGATCCTCAAAAGCTGTAGATGGTCACTGTCTG [SEQ ID NO:3] [for tICAM (283)], TTCTAGAGGATCCTCAAAAGGTCTGGAGCTGGTAGGGGG [SEQ ID NO:4] [for tICAM (185)], and TTCTAGAGGATCCTCACCGTTCTGGAGTCCAGTACACGG [SEQ ID NO:5] [for tICAM(88)]. The PCR reaction products were digested with EcoR1 [tICAM(453)] or EcoR1and BAMH1 [tICAM(283), tICAM(185), and tICAM(88)] and cloned into the polylinker site of Bluescript SK+ (Stratagene). In this manner, stop codons were inserted immediately before the first residue of the transmembrane domain, at the predicted ends of domains I+II+III, domains I+II, and domain I to produce a series of progressively truncated proteins (FIG. 2A). Clones containing the desired inserts were verified by restriction analysis and DNA sequencing.

[0070] The inserts were excised by digestion with HindIII and XbaI, inserted into the expression vector CDM8 [Seed, B., Nature (1987) 239:840-42], transfected into COS cells for transient expression, and co-transfected with pSV2-DHFR into CHO cells for establishment of stable cell lines. For transient expression, COS cells were transfected by the DEAE-dextran method [Kingston, R. E., in Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, F. M. Ausubel, R. Brent, R. E. Kingston, D. D. Moore, J. G. Seidman, J. A. Smith, and K. Struhl, eds., pp. 9.0.1-6] and pulse-labeled 72 hours after transfection with [³⁵S]-cysteine for 18 hours; culture supernatants were then immunoprecipitated with c78.4 IgG-SEPHAROSE® (high molecular weight filtration gel, Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.) and analyzed by SDS-PAGE [Greve, et al., Cell (1989) 56:839-847]. Stable CHO transfectants were obtained by cotransfection of ICAM-1 cDNAs with pSV2-DHFR into dihydrofolate reductase-deficient CHO cells by the calcium phosphate method or by electroporation [Bebbington and Hentschel, in DNA Cloning—A Practical Approach, Vol.3, D. M. Glover, ed. (IRL Press, Oxford, 1987), pp. 163-188].

[0071] This experiment indicated that the entire extracellular domain, tICAM(453), and the two N-terminal domains, tICAM(185), were efficiently secreted from transfected COS cells as species of 80 kD and 43 kD, respectively (FIG. 2B). The expression of domains I+II+III [tICAM(283)] was approximately 10-fold lower than the above-mentioned fragments and the secreted protein was more heterogeneous in mobility on SDS-PAGE. Expression of domain I [tICAM(88)] could not be detected in COS cells, and alternative constructs in which the stop codon was shifted to several sites N- and C-terminal to residue 88 also failed to produce detectable amounts of protein.

[0072] Transfected cells were cloned and individual clones secreting ICAM-1 protein were identified by radioimmunoassay of culture supernatants. The expression of tICAMs was monitored by immunoprecipitation of [³⁵S]-cysteine-labeled culture supernatants with monoclonal or polyclonal antisera followed by SDS-PAGE. Two monoclonal antibodies, c92.5 (which recognizes the same epitope as c78.4) and c78.5, define two distinct conformational epitopes on ICAM-1. These two antibodies were utilized in an RIA for soluble ICAM-1. c92.5 IgG was absorbed onto IMMULON®-4 (microtiter plates, Dynex Technologies, Inc., Chantilly, Va.), the plates blocked with 10 mg/ml BSA, and the plates incubated with tICAM-containing samples. The plates were then washed, incubated with ¹²⁵I-c78.5 IgG, and the bound radioactivity determined. The concentration of tICAM was determined by comparison to a standard curve of purified ICAM-1.

[0073] Cell lines secreting tICAM(453) (CT.2A) and tICAM(185) (CD12.1A) were selected for further study and were subjected to gene amplification in methotrexate-containing media [Bebbington et al., supra]. In order to obtain sufficient quantities of protein for functional and structural studies, CHO cell transfectants were cloned and subjected to stepwise gene amplification in increasing concentrations of methotrexate. A clone derived from CT.2A (resistant to 100 nM methotrexate) and a clone derived from CD12.1A (resistant to 1 μM methotrexate) were used for purification of soluble truncated proteins.

[0074] This resulted in the derivation of cell lines secreting 1.5 μg/ml of tICAM(453) and 1.0 μg/ml of tICAM(185). A stable cell line expressing tICAM(283) was not obtained, perhaps because the low level of secretion was at the limit of sensitivity of the immunoassay. The cells were adapted to serum-free media and the secreted ICAM-1 proteins purified to homogeneity from culture supernatants (FIG. 2C).

[0075] tICAM(453) and tICAM(185) were purified from culture supernatants of their respective CHO transfectant cell lines by monoclonal affinity chromatography as described in Greve et al., Cell (1989) 56:839-847, followed by ion exchange chromatography on MONO-Q®(ion exchange resin, Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.) [for tICAM(453); absorption in 10 mM Tris (pH 6.0), elution in a 0-0.5 M NaCl gradient] or gel filtration on SUPEROSE®-12 (filtration gel, Pharmacia, Piscataway, N.J.) [for tICAM(185)] columns (Pharmacia). Protein was quantitated by amino acid analysis and by RIA. Amino acid analysis was performed on an Applied Biosystems Model 420A amino acid analyzer.

EXAMPLE 4

Structure of tICAMs

[0076] Blocking studies with the panel of six monoclonal antibodies to ICAM-1 (all of which inhibit virus binding to ICAM-1) indicated that there are two distinct epitopes defined by these antibodies, one defined by c78.4 (containing c78.1, c78.2, c92.1 and c92.5), and the other by c78.5. Immunoprecipitation studies with proteolytic fragments of ICAM-1 and with in vitro translations of truncated ICAM-1 cDNAs indicate that both of these epitopes are contained within the first Ig-like domain.

[0077] In vitro virus-binding studies utilizing radiolabeled tICAM(453) and purified HRV have indicated that it can bind to rhinovirus in solution.

[0078] ICAM has been predicted, based on homology to NCAM, to be a member of the immunoglobulin gene superfamily. One would expect that the immunoglobulin-like domains in ICAM would have the basic “immunoglobulin fold”, as has been shown for two other members of this family, beta-2-microglobulin and the HLA-A2 alpha-3 domain. This fold consists of a “beta-barrel” conformation consisting of two antiparallel beta-pleated sheets, one composed of three and one composed of four beta strands; a disulfide bond between two cysteine residues (separated by approximately 60 amino acids along the chain) connects the two sheets [Williams, A. F., Immun. Today (1987) 8, 298-303]. Two of the disulfide bonds, those corresponding to domains II (C110-C161) and III (C212-C265), have been experimentally determined by us, providing support for the model. This model for the structure provides a basis for designing unique analogs that could mimic the virus-binding site and be useful as receptor blockers. Each pair of antiparallel beta strands in the beta-barrel is linked by a hairpin turn of variable size; such turns or loops that protrude from secondary structures are often found to play roles in recognition of ligands [Lezczynski and Rose, Science (1986) 224:849-855]. Such protruding structures may be of particular interest in the rhinovirus receptor, since the receptor-binding site on the virus capsid is proposed to be in a recessed cavity. Using the sequence of the HRR, such turns and loops can be predicted based on a beta-barrel structure and produced as synthetic peptides with addition of novel cysteine residues at the N- and C-terminus of the peptides; a disulfide bond can then be formed between such residues on the same peptide to close the loop covalently (in contrast to the native protein, wherein the loop would be closed by noncovalent interactions between the adjacent beta-strands). Such peptides would have a conformation more analogous to the conformation in the native protein than a simple linear peptide, and can be tested for virus-binding activity.

EXAMPLE 5

Hydrodynamic Properties

[0079] The value f_exp/f_oof truncated ICAM-1 proteins were determined from the apparent Stokes radii. (R_s) determined by gel filtration on a SUPEROSE®-12 column calibrated with protein standards (ferritin, 61.0 A; catalase, 52.2 A; bovine serum albumin, 35.5 A; ovalbumin, 30.5 A; and RNase A, 16.4 A) and the calculated molecular weights of the proteins, using the value of M calculated from the core-glycosylated form of the proteins, determined by synthesis in the presence of swainsonin.

[0080] f_exp=6πηR_s

[0081] f_o(frictional coefficient of solvated sphere) was determined from:

[0082] f_o=(v₂+δv₁^o/v₂)^⅓f_min

[0083] where

[0084] f_min=6πη(3Mv₂/4πN_o)^⅓

[0085] (frictional coefficient of unsolvated sphere) The following values are assumed: v₂=0.73 cm²/g (partial specific volume of protein), v₁^o=1.0 cm³/g (partial specific volume of solvent), d₁=0.35 g H₂O/g protein (solvation of protein), r=0.01 g/(cm.s) (viscosity of solvent), and v₁^o=1.0 cm³/g (specific volume of the solvent).

[0086] We have examined several of the physical properties of tICAM(453) and tICAM(185). Both proteins were quantitatively immunoprecipitated by two monoclonal antibodies directed against two distinct conformation-dependent epitopes on ICAM-1, indicating that these epitopes were contained within the first two domains and providing evidence that the purified proteins were correctly folded. The frictional ration, f/f_o, the ratio between the observed and calculated frictional coefficients shown below for both tICAM (453) and tICAM (185) indicates that both fragments of ICAM-1 are highly asymmetric and elongated molecules.

[0087] The ratio of experimental and calculated frictional coefficients, f/f_o, of both tICAMs indicate highly asymmetric and elonged shapes, and are consistent with the data reported for a species essentially identical to tICAM(453) [Staunton, et al., Cell (1990) 61:243-254]. Proteins belonging to the immunoglobulin supergene family would be expected to have domains with the “immunoglobulin fold” motif, which is basically two apposed sheets of antiparallel beta-strands with connecting loops. In support of the immunoglobulin homology, disulfide mapping studies of ICAM-1 have revealed the existence of intradomain disulfide bonds predicted by the immunoglobulin fold in domains 1-4. This is consistent with the data of Staunton, et al., Cell (1988) 52:925-933 with regard to tICAM(453).

EXAMPLE 6

Circular Dichroism

[0088] CD spectra were recorded on an AVIV model 62DS spectrometer. Protein solutions at approximately 0.5 mg/ml (determined by amino acid analysis in the indicated buffers) were scanned at 20 C. in a cell with a 0.1 cm pathlength. Five respective scans (1 nm interval, 1.5 nm bandwidth) were averaged and buffer-subtracted for each spectrum.

[0089] Circular dichroism (CD) spectra were obtained for the soluble forms of ICAM. A single minima at 210-220 nm is indicative of the presence of beta-structure and should be seen in proteins containing immunoglobulin-like domains because of the extensive amount of beta-structure in the “immunoglobulin fold” (Williams, A. F., and A. N. Barclay, Ann. Rev. Immunol. (1988) 6:381-405. As internal standards, spectra were collected for beta-2-microglobulin and a monoclonal IgG, immunoglobulin-like proteins of known three-dimensional structure [Becker, J. W. and G. N. Reeke, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA (1985) 82:4225-4229; Bjorkman, P. J., M. A. Saper, B. Samraoui, W. S. Bennett, J. L. Strominger, and D. C. Wiley, Nature (1987) 329:506-512; Amzel, L. M. and R. J. Poljak, Ann. Rev. Biochem. (1979) 48:961-967]. As expected, the spectra of beta-2-microglobulin (not shown) and IgG (FIG. 3A) possessed single major minima at 215 nm and 217 nm, respectively, indicative of extensive amounts of beta-structure. The spectra of the two truncated proteins tICAM(453) and tICAM(185) were similar to each other and to that of ICAM-1 (FIGS. 3B, C, and D), with minima at 216-217 nm and a broad shoulder at 225-230 nm, although the shoulder was more prominent with tICAM(185) than tICAM(453). Considered qualitatively, these CD spectra provide evidence that the soluble ICAM-1 proteins are folded and possess considerable amounts of beta-structure. The shoulder at 225-230 nM present in the three tICAMs is not found in the spectra of beta-2-microglobulin and IgG, suggesting the presence of secondary structural features not present in proteins with “classical” immunoglobulin-like domains. The fact that the shoulder at 225-230 is more prominent in tICAM(185) suggests that the secondary structural features detected by this method are localized in the first two domains. These CD data are similar to those reported by Sayre, P. H., R. E. Hussey, H-C Chang, T. L. Ciardelli, and E. L. Rheinherz, “Structural and binding analysis of a two domain extracellular CD2 molecule,” J. Exp. Med. (1989) 169:995-1009] for a soluble form of CD2 (which is also thought to be a member of the immunoglobulin supergene family) in that significant amounts of alpha-helix (which is essentialy absent from immunoglobulin molecules) was predicted from the CD spectra. When individual domains of ICAM-1 are compared to domains from other members of the immunoglobulin supergene family by the ALIGN program [Dayoff, M. O., W. C. Barker, and L. T. Hunt, Methods in Enzymology (1983) 91:524-545], the similarity is quite limited, with only domains II and III of ICAM-1 having significant scores (above 3 SD; for discussion see Williams, A. F., and A. N. Barclay, Ann. Rev. Immunol. (1988) 6:381-405]. Domain I has a significant score only when compared with domain I from ICAM-2 and VCAM-1, proteins that are closely related in function. In addition, domain I has a number of unusual features, such as a short distance (44 residues) between intradomain disulfide bonds and the presence of four cysteines instead of the usual two in the B and F beta-strands.

EXAMPLE 7

Radioactive Labeling of tmICAM-1, tICAM(185), and tICAM(453) and Demonstration of Retained Capacity for Binding to Monoclonal Antibodies

[0090] The epitopes reactive with monoclonal antibodies c78.4A and c78.5A are conformationally-dependent epitopes and thus can be used an analytical probes for confirming retention of the native ICAM structure. Known amount of purified ICAM were incubated with c78.4A or c78.5A IgG-SEPHAROSE® and the fraction of the radioactivity bound determined. These experiments showed that the purified tmICAM-1, tICAM(185), and tICAM(453) completely retained the ability to bind to these monoclonal antibodies.

[0091] Transfectants were metabolically labeled with [³⁵S]-cysteine, and cell lysates (for transmembrane ICAM) or culture supernatants (for truncated ICAM) were prepared and incubated with c78.4A IgG-SEPHAROSE® beads. The beads were washed and absorbed proteins were eluted with SDS and analyzed by SDS-PAGE [see Greve, et al., Cell (1989) 56:839-847]. It was found that the isolated proteins were quantitatively bound to the c78.4A and c78.5A Mabs.

[0092] Accordingly, the tICAM(185) and tICAM(453) both have retained native ICAM structure.

EXAMPLE 8

Human Rhinovirus Binding Assays of Transmembrane and of Non-Transmembrane Truncated Forms of ICAM-1

[0093] Described below are three binding assays used to assess binding activity of the various forms of ICAM.

[0094] A. Pelleting Assay

[0095] [³⁵S]-Cysteine-labeled tmICAM-1 or tICAM was mixed with HRV3 in 100 ul of 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5), 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM MgCl₂, 1 mM CaCl₂, 0.1% Triton X-100. The mixture was incubated for 30 minutes at 37° C., cooled on ice, layered on top of a cushion of 200 μl of 10% glycerol, 0.2 M triethanolamine (pH 7.5), and centrifuged in a Beckman air-driven centrifuge at 134,000×g for 30 minutes at 4° C. The top 275 μl was removed, and the pellet was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and scintillation counting. Silver-staining of SDS gels of control experiments indicated that essentially all of the HRV3 is pelleted under these conditions and essentially all of the ICAM remains in the supernatant. The results are shown below:

[0096] These data show that both truncated forms of ICAM bind to rhinovirus.

[0097] B. Solution Binding Assay

[0098] Previous work has demonstrated that detergent-solubilized tmICAM-1 can bind to rhinovirus [Greve, et al., Cell (1989) 56:839-847] and that the extracellular domain of ICAM-1 competes for rhinovirus binding to cells [Marlin, et al., Nature (1990) 344:70-72]. To quantitatively compare the virus-binding properties of the soluble ICAM-1 proteins, a solid-phase competition assay was employed. In these experiments, varying concentrations of soluble competitor ICAM-1 proteins were assayed for the ability to compete for the binding of [³⁵S]-HRV3 to immobilized ICAM-1; nonionic detergent TRITON® X-100 (nonionic surfactant, Union Carbide, Wilmington, Del.) was included in the buffers so that the different proteins could be compared under identical conditions. First, tmICAM-1 (isolated in the presence of 0.1% octylglucoside instead of TRITON® X-100) was diluted 10-fold into a Tris/NaCl buffer and allowed to adsorb to the walls of a microtiter plate (IMMULON®-4, Dynatech) overnight. Nonspecific binding sites on the plate were then blocked with 10 mg/ml BSA and binding experiments performed in 0.1% TRITON® X-100/1 mg/ml BSA/Tris/NaCl. Approximately 20,000 cpm of [³⁵S]-HRV3 were mixed with varying amounts of tmICAM, tICAM(453) or tICAM(185); incubated for 1 hour at 37° C., and then added to wells of the microtiter plates and incubated for 3 hours at 37° C. The plates were washed and the bound radioactivity determined.

[0099] As shown below, tmICAM-1 inhibits virus binding half-maximally at low concentrations (0.008 μM) while tICAM(453) and tICAM(185) inhibit at much higher concentrations (3.1 μM and 9.7 μM, respectively; or 350- to almost 1,000-fold higher than tmICAM).

[0100] These data confirm and extend the earlier observations that tICAM(453) and tICAM(185) do bind to rhinovirus but with lower affinities than does tmICAM-1 and provide evidence that the virus-binding site is encompassed within the two N-terminal domains (first 185 residues) of ICAM-1. The IC₅₀value of tICAM(453) is comparable to that of tICAM(185). The small (three-fold) lower IC₅₀of tICAM(185) is reproducible but of unknown significance at present. It has been reported that a mouse-human chimera of transmembrane ICAM-1 in which the first two domains are of human origin is capable of binding rhinovirus as well as human ICAM-1, while a shortened transmembrane form containing only the two N-terminal domains binds rhinovirus at approximately one-tenth the level of full-length ICAM-1 [Staunton, et al., Cell (1990) 61:243-254]. These workers interpret these results as demonstrating that domains I and II are important for rhinovirus binding while the distance from the plane of the membrane determines the efficiency with which the rhinovirus can approach the binding site. The interpretation of these results is limited by the requirement for species-specificity of all possible interactions with the rhinovirus and by the steric limitations of shortened transmembrane molecules. Our results with the soluble ICAM-1 clearly and quantitatively demonstrate that the virus-binding site is contained within the first two N-terminal domains.

[0101] C. Dot-Blot Assay

[0102] An alternative method of measuring binding activity was utilized in which tmICAM-1, tICAM(453), or tICAM(185) were adsorbed to nitrocellulose filters, the non-specific binding sites on the filters blocked with 10 mg/ml bovine serum albumin (BSA), and radioactive virus or ¹²⁵I-monoclonal antibody to ICAM-1 incubated with the filter for 60 minutes at 37° C. The filters were washed with buffer and the filters exposed to X-ray film.

[0103] The amount of radioactivity bound to the filters was determined by densitometry of the autoradiograms, and the data is expressed as HRV3 binding (in arbitrary units) normalized to the amount of ICAM bound to the blot by a parallel determination of the amount of ¹²⁵I-monoclonal antibody c78.4A or c78.5A bound to the ICAM (bound to the blot). The results are shown below:

[0104] The results from this experiment indicate that under these assay conditions tICAM(453) is capable of binding rhinovirus at levels comparable to those of tmICAM-1 when the amount of virus bound was normalized to the amount of [¹²⁵I]-Mab bound. Further, these results indicate that the tICAM forms are capable of binding to rhinovirus, but that the binding avidity is dependent to some degree upon the configuration of the tICAM. tmICAM-1 may be a small multimer (probably a dimer) and presentation of tICAM in a multimeric form mimics this multimeric configuration.

[0105] Evidence supporting this hypothesis comes from quantitative binding studies, in which the ratio of the maximum number of rhinovirus particles and the maximum number of antibody molecules that can be bound to cells is approximately 1.5. This is in contrast to the earlier work of Tomassini, J., et al., (1986) J. Virol. 58:290, which suggested a complex of five molecules needed for binding. Their conclusion was based on an erroneous interpretation of gel filtration data that failed to take into account bound detergent molecules.

EXAMPLE 9

Infectivity Assays

[0106] HRVs and [³⁵S]-HRV3 was propagated and purified as described in Example 1). All infectivity assays were performed with HeLa-S3 in Dulbecco's Modified Essential Medium/2% fetal calf serum. Assay I: 0.1 ml of dilutions of HRV3 (with 10⁴-10⁻¹pfu/ml) in the presence or the absence of tICAM(185) or tICAM(453) were added to 10 wells of a 96-well microtiter plate containing 2×10⁴HeLa cells/well in 0.1 ml. The cultures were incubated for five days at 34° C. and the titer determined from the number of infected wells at the limiting dilution. Assay II: 10⁷PFU of HRV3 and various concentrations of ICAM-1 in a final volume of 25 μL of 10 mM HEPES (pH 7.5)/150 mM NaCl were incubated for 30 minutes at 37° C., and then serially diluted into culture medium. The virus was then incubated with HeLa cells at 10⁶cells/ml for 30 minutes at room temperature, plated into 10 wells of a 96-well microtiter plate at 10⁵cells/well, and then scored for infectivity as described above. Assay III: 0.1 ml of HRV3 (0.1 μg/ml, 10⁷PFU/ml) was preincubated for 30 minutes at 37° C. with ICAM-1 and then added to wells of a 96-well microtiter dish containing 10⁵HeLa cells and incubated for 24 hours. The cultures were then scored by staining with crystal violet [Minor, P. D., in Virology: A practical approach, B. W. J. Mahy, ed. (IRL Press, Oxford, 1985), pp. 25-40] and determining the optical density at 550 nm. All experiments were performed in triplicate and the results expressed at the concentration of ICAM-1 needed to reduce the OD₅₅₀by 50%.

[0107] The effect of soluble ICAM-1 on HRV infectivity was examined in three different infectivity assays, the first two being limiting dilution determinations and the third being a high multiplicity of infection (MOI) experiment using the same virus concentrations as the virus binding assay in Example 16. In assay I, cells were infected with serial dilutions of HRV3 in the continuous presence of various concentrations of ICAM-1 and the reduction in virus titer determined. As shown below, the IC₅₀of tICAM(185) for neutralization is 8.2 μM, similar to the concentration needed to inhibit virus binding. In contrast, the IC₅₀for neutralization of tICAM(453) is 0.38 μM, 10-fold lower than the concentration needed to block virus-receptor binding:

[0108] Thus, the neutralizing activity of tICAM(185) is directly correlated with its effect on virus receptor binding, while tICAM(453) is neutralizing HRV at a considerably lower concentration and is presumably acting by a mechanism other than direct competition for receptor-binding sites on the virus. Assay II consists of preincubating HRV3 with ICAM-1, serially diluting the mixture into culture medium, and then adding the virus to the cells; under these conditions the ICAM-1 is diluted out to negligible concentrations for the actual infection. tICAM(185) and tICAM(453) had essentially no neutralizing activity in this assay at concentrations as high as 20 uM protein, indicating that the effects of the soluble ICAMs on rhinovirus must be reversible. Assay III consists of a single cycle infection at an MOI of 10 in the continuous presence of various concentrations of soluble ICAM-1. Under these conditions tICAM(453) neutralized HRV with an IC₅₀of 1.2 μM, an 11-fold lower concentration than that of tICAM(185). The relative difference in the concentrations of the two proteins needed to neutralize rhinovirus in Assay III is essentially the same as in Assay I, although the absolute concentrations are approximately 3-fold higher, perhaps because of a nonlinear relationship between infectious particles and infected cells under conditions of high MOI.

[0109] The neutralization activities of the two soluble ICAM-1 species examined here are intriguing in that they indicate multiple mechanisms of virus neutralization by receptor. The first mechanism, exemplified by tICAM(185), appears to be a simple competitive inhibition of virus-receptor binding by soluble receptor. The second, exemplified by tICAM(453), involves neutralization of virus at a concentration below that necessary to inhibit virus-receptor binding. This disparity between the virus-neutralizing and virus-binding activities of tICAM(453) indicates that steps in virus entry and/or uncoating are affected by this protein. These apparently different mechanisms of virus neutralization may be reflecting different steps in the entry and uncoating process in which the membrane-bound receptor participates in a normal infection. The modes of action of the capsid-binding WIN compounds as revealed by their effects on different rhinovirus serotypes [Pevear, D. C., M. J. Fancher, P. J. Felock, M. G. Rossman, M. S. Miller, G. Diana, A. M. Treasurywala, M. A. McKinlay, and F. J. Dutko, J. Virol. (1989) 63:2002-2007], where some serotypes are blocked from binding to the receptor while other serotypes are blocked at an intracellular uncoating step, suggest a similar “hierarchy” of sites at which the infection can be interrupted. Both of the neutralization mechanisms mediated by soluble ICAM-1 are reversible, since neutralization is seen when cells are infected in the continual presence of soluble ICAM but not when the virus is preincubated at comparable concentrations of ICAM-1 followed by dilution of the ICAM-1 to negligible concentrations. During many picornavirus infections, noninfectious “altered” virions can be recovered from cells, presumably as a direct or indirect result of interaction with the receptor [Roesing, T. G., P. A. Toselli, and R. L. Crowell, J. Virol. (1975) 15:654-667; Guttman, N. and D. Baltimore, Virol. (1977) 82:25-36]. The relationship of the receptor-neutralized rhinoviruses to such “altered” virions found in other picornaviruses is unclear at present.

[0110] Marlin, et al., Nature (1990) 344:70-72 have reported that the extracellular domain of ICAM-1-neutralized virus at a concentration of ICAM considerably lower than that needed to inhibit virus-receptor binding, although this discrepancy was attributed to differences in virus concentrations between the binding and infectivity two assays. Our results, which show a differential effect of the two soluble ICAM-1 proteins even at virus concentrations identical to that in the virus-binding assay indicate that there is a real difference between binding and neutralizing properties of tICAM(453). Possible explanations include: (1) cooperative interactions between ICAM-1 molecules at the surface of the virus leading to more effective virus inactivation, (2) effects of the size of the ICAM-1/rhinovirus complex on virus internalization or uncoating, or (3) interactions of portions of the ICAM-1 molecule other than the two N-terminal domains with the rhinovirus. In an interesting parallel in another system, the soluble CD-4 mediated neutralization of HIV, a nonlinear relationship between soluble CD4 concentration and neutralization at high fractional occupancy of gp 120 molecules was observed, providing evidence for positive cooperativity between virus-bound CD4 molecules [Layne, S. P., M. J. Merges, M, Dembo, J. L. Spouge, and P. L. Nara, Nature (1990) 346:277-279]. While the molecular basis of tICAM(453)-mediated neutralization or its significance to interaction of the rhinovirus with ICAM-1 at the cell surface remains to be determined, it clearly indicates a role for the three domains C-terminal to residue 185.

EXAMPLE 10

Cellular Adhesion Assay

[0111] JY cells at 10⁷cells/ml (labeled with 10 μCi/ml [³⁵S-cysteine for 18 hours) were preincubated with soluble ICAM-1 or indicated monoclonal antibodies for 30 minutes at 37° C. in Dulbecco's Modified Essential Medium/2% fetal calf serum and then added to microtiter plates coated with ICAM-1. The plates were then incubated for 60 minutes at 37° C., the plates washed three times with media, and then the bound cells quantified by scintillation counting.

[0112] Soluble ICAM molecules were then examined for their ability to inhibit the adhesion of JY lymphoblastoid cells (which express LFA-1) to ICAM-1-coated tissue culture plates. As shown in FIG. 4, tICAM(185) and tICAM(453) both inhibited JY cell binding at identical concentrations of 10 μM, indicating that the LFA-1 binding site is entirely encompassed within the first two domains of ICAM-1.

[0113] The identical inhibitory activities of tICAM(453) and tICAM(185) toward ICAM-1/LFA-1-mediated cell adhesion clearly demonstrate that the LFA-1 binding site is completely encompassed within the first 185 residues of ICAM-1. Previous work has indicated that the two N-terminal domains of ICAM-1 were important in LFA-1 binding, in that site-directed mutagenesis at a number of positions in domains I and II reduce the ability to bind to LFA-1 and a shortened transmembrane molecule containing domains I and II retains one-third of the LFA-1 binding activity of full-length ICAM-1 [Staunton, et al., Cell (1990) 61:243-254]. The relatively high concentration of soluble ICAM-1 needed to inhibit cell adhesion illustrates the fact that ICAM-1/LFA-1-mediated cell adhesion is a cooperative result of multiple weak interactions, as might have been predicted from the strong dependence of ICAM-1/LFA-1 mediated cell adhesion on the density of ICAM-1 [Dustin, M. L. and T. A. Springer, J. Cell Biol. (1989) 107:321-331]. A micromolar dissociation constant has been reported for the CD2/LFA-3 interaction (Sayre, P. H., R. E. Hussey, H-C. Chang, T. L. Ciardelli, and E. L. Rheinherz, “Structural and binding analysis of a two domain extracellular CD2 Molecule,” J. Exp. Med. (1989) 169:995-1009], suggesting that low adhesion molecule affinity is a general phenomenon, perhaps to allow for tight regulation of the adhesion process by control of copy number. The identical inhibitory activities of both soluble ICAM-1 proteins toward cell adhesion provide additional evidence that both proteins are correctly folded and underscores the fact that the enhanced neutralizing activity of tICAM(453) relative to tICAM(185) is specific to ICAM-1/rhinovirus interaction.

[0114] While the present invention has been described in terms of specific methods and compositions, it is understood that variation and modifications will occur to those skilled in the art upon consideration of the present invention.

[0115] For example, it is anticipated that smaller protein fragments and peptides derived from ICAM-1 that still contain the virus-binding site would also be effective.

[0116] Further, it is anticipated that the general method of the invention of preparing soluble protein forms from insoluble, normally membrane bound receptor proteins can be used to prepare soluble multimeric forms of other receptor proteins useful for binding to and decreasing infectivity of viruses other than those that bind to the “major group” receptor. Such other viruses include Herpes simplex and Epstein-Barr viruses.

[0117] Accordingly, it is intended in the appended claims to cover all such equivalent variations which come within the scope of the invention as claimed, and consequently only such limitations as appear in the appended claims should be placed thereon.

Claims

We claim:

1. In a method for neutralizing human rhinovirus of the major receptor class by contacting said rhinovirus with a soluble form of ICAM-1, the improvement comprising contacting said virus with tICAM(453).

2. In a method for reducing the infection by human rhinovirus (HRV) of a host cell susceptible to infection by HRV by contacting the virus with tICAM(453) under conditions favorable for binding, the improvement wherein said tICAM(453) is at a concentration below that required for inhibition of binding of said HRV to said host cell.

Patent Citations (132)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US4171365	1979-10-01	Diana et al.	Applicant
US4209526	1980-06-01	Diana et al.	Applicant
US4232161	1980-11-01	Diana et al.	Applicant
US4234725	1980-11-01	Diana et al.	Applicant
US4261928	1981-04-01	Diana et al.	Applicant
US4372976	1983-02-01	Diana	Applicant
US4427653	1984-01-01	Springer	Applicant
US4451476	1984-05-01	Diana	Applicant
US4843087	1989-06-01	Diana	Applicant
US4956281	1990-09-01	Wallner et al.	Applicant
US5081228	1992-01-01	Dower et al.	Applicant
US5109123	1992-04-01	Reinherz et al.	Applicant
US5179017	1993-01-01	Axel et al.	Applicant
US5235049	1993-08-01	McClelland et al.	Applicant
US5240694	1993-08-01	Gwaltney, Jr.	Applicant
US5284931	1994-02-01	Springer et al.	Applicant
US5304636	1994-04-01	Blaas et al.	Applicant
US5324510	1994-06-01	Wegner et al.	Applicant
US5340800	1994-08-01	Liu et al.	Applicant
US5349053	1994-09-01	Landolfi	Applicant
US5359046	1994-10-01	Capon et al.	Applicant
US5372933	1994-12-01	Zamaron et al.	Applicant
US5395929	1995-03-01	Corbi et al.	Applicant
US5422097	1995-06-01	Gwaltney	Applicant
US5472849	1995-12-01	Rothlein et al.	Applicant
US5475091	1995-12-01	Springer et al.	Applicant
US5525487	1996-06-01	Gallatin et al.	Applicant
US5532127	1996-07-01	Gallatin et al.	Applicant
US5580969	1996-12-01	Hoke et al.	Applicant
US5589453	1996-12-01	Greve	Examiner
US5597567	1997-01-01	Whitcup et al.	Applicant
US5603932	1997-02-01	Blaas et al.	Applicant
US5612216	1997-03-01	Springer et al.	Applicant
US5663293	1997-09-01	Gallatin et al.	Applicant
US5674982	1997-10-01	Greve et al.	Applicant
US5686581	1997-11-01	Greve et al.	Applicant
US5686582	1997-11-01	Greve et al.	Applicant
US5712245	1998-01-01	Blaas et al.	Applicant
US5730983	1998-03-01	Wegner et al.	Applicant
US5821341	1998-10-01	McClelland et al.	Applicant
US5831036	1998-11-01	Springer et al.	Applicant
US5849699	1998-12-01	McClelland et al.	Applicant
US5859212	1999-01-01	McClelland et al.	Applicant
US5871733	1999-02-01	Greve et al.	Applicant
US5879712	1999-03-01	Bomberger et al.	Applicant
US6051231	2000-04-01	Greve	Applicant
US6096862	2000-08-01	Greve et al.	Applicant
US6107461	2000-08-01	Greve et al.	Applicant
US6130202	2000-10-01	Greve et al.	Applicant
US6143298	2000-11-01	Greve et al.	Applicant
AUA-14630/88	1988-10-01		Applicant
AU1551888	1988-11-01		Applicant
AU2633288	1989-05-01		Applicant
AU623105	1989-06-01		Applicant
AUB-48767/90	1990-02-01		Applicant
AU637324	1990-03-01		Applicant
AU5129990	1990-09-01		Applicant
AU623105	1992-05-01		Applicant
AU637324	1993-05-01		Applicant
AU641134	1993-09-01		Applicant
AU652567	1994-09-01		Applicant
AU675441	1997-02-01		Applicant
CA1339193	1997-08-01		Applicant
DE3712678A1	1988-10-01		Applicant
EP169146A3	1986-01-01		Applicant
EP169729A2	1986-01-01		Applicant
EP192175A2	1986-08-01		Applicant
EP207453A2	1987-01-01		Applicant
EP227604A2	1987-07-01		Applicant
EP261403A2	1988-03-01		Applicant
EP280578A2	1988-08-01		Applicant
EP287076	1988-10-01		Applicant
EP287076B1	1988-10-01		Applicant
EP289949A2	1988-11-01		Applicant
EP314863A2	1989-05-01		Applicant
EP319815A2	1989-06-01		Applicant
EP380068A1	1990-01-01		Applicant
EP362526A2	1990-04-01		Applicant
EP362531A1	1990-04-01		Applicant
EP364690A2	1990-04-01		Applicant
EP365837A2	1990-05-01		Applicant
EP379904A1	1990-08-01		Applicant
EP387701B1	1990-09-01		Applicant
EP3877668A1	1990-09-01		Applicant
EP391088A2	1990-10-01		Applicant
EP459577A2	1991-12-01		Applicant
EP468257	1992-01-01		Applicant
EP510483	1992-10-01		Applicant
EP566554	1993-10-01		Applicant
EP319815	1994-08-01		Applicant
EP379904	1996-05-01		Applicant
EP488061	1998-11-01		Applicant
FI100601	1998-01-01		Applicant
GB2022826	1979-12-01		Applicant
IE74144	1997-07-01		Applicant
IL91454	1995-08-01		Applicant
KR202435	1999-06-01		Applicant
NZ230474	1989-08-01		Applicant
NZ232203	1990-01-01		Applicant
PT92920	1990-07-01		Applicant
PT91570	1994-11-01		Applicant
SA90/0469	1990-10-01		Applicant
TW52785	1991-11-01		Applicant
TW52785	1992-03-01		Applicant
WO88/06592	1988-09-01		Applicant
WO89/10938	1989-11-01		Applicant
WO90/03400	1990-04-01		Applicant
WO90/10646	1990-09-01		Applicant
WO90/10652	1990-09-01		Applicant
WO90/13316	1990-11-01		Applicant
WO91/16927	1991-11-01		Applicant
WO91/16928	1991-11-01		Applicant
WO91/18010	1991-11-01		Applicant
WO91/18011	1991-11-01		Applicant
WO9201049	1992-01-01		Applicant
WO9206119	1992-04-01		Applicant
WO9212994	1992-08-01		Applicant
WO9306842	1993-04-01		Applicant
WO9306850	1993-04-01		Applicant
WO9313210	1993-07-01		Applicant
WO9400485	1994-01-01		Applicant
WO9401553	1994-01-01		Applicant
WO9411400	1994-05-01		Applicant
WO9527736	1995-10-01		Applicant
WO9528170	1995-10-01		Applicant
WO9603142	1996-02-01		Applicant
WO9606622	1996-03-01		Applicant
WO9627292	1996-09-01		Applicant
WO9634015	1996-10-01		Applicant
WO9640069	1996-12-01		Applicant
ZA896668	1990-06-01		Applicant
ZA900469	1990-10-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (268)

Hsiung, G. D., Chapter 14 “Picornaviridae”, in Hsiung Diagnostic Virology, Fourth Edition, Hsiung, G. D., C. K. Y. Fong, and M. L. Landry, eds., (Yale University Press, New Haven , 1994), pp. 119-140.Applicant
Al-Nakib, W., P.G. Higgins, G.I. Barrow, D.A.J. Tyrrell, K. Andries, G. Vanden Bussche, N. Taylor, and P.A.J. Janssen, “Suppression of Colds in Human Volunteers Challenged with Rhinoviurs by a New Synthetic Drug (R61837)”, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 33(4): 522-525 (Apr. 1989).Applicant
Amzel, L. M., and R.J. Poljak, “Three-Dimensional Structure of Immunoglobulins”, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 48: 961-997 (1979).Applicant
Becker, J. W., and G.N.Reeke, Jr., “Three-dimensional structure of β2-microglobulin”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 4225-4229 (Jun. 1985).Applicant
Becker, J. W., H.P. Erickson, S. Hoffman, B.A. Cunningham, and G.M. Edelman, “Topology of cell adhesion molecules”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 86: 1088-1092 (Feb. 1989).Applicant
Bjorkman, P.J., M.A. Saper, B. Samraoui, W.S. Bennett, J.L. Strominger, and D.C. Wiley, “Structure of the human class I histocompatibility antigen, HLA-A2”, Nature 329: 506-512 (Oct. 1987).Applicant
Colman, P. M., “Structure of Antibody-Antigen Complexes: Implications for Immune Recognition”, Advances in Immunology 43: 99-132 (1988).Applicant
Colonno, R. J., J.H. Condra, S. Mizutani, P.L. Callahan, M.-E.Davies, and M.A. Murcko, “Evidence for the direct involvement of the rhinovirus canyon in receptor binding”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 85: 5449-5453 (Aug. 1988).Applicant
Craig, A. G. and A.R. Berendt, “The Role of ICAM-1 as a Receptor for Rhinovirus and Malaria”, in Integrins and ICAM-1 in Immune Responses, N. Hodd, ed. (Chem Immunol. Basel, Karger, 1991), vol. 50, pp. 116-134 (1991).Applicant
Crump, C. E., E. Arruda, and F.G. Hayden, “Comparative Antirhinoviral Activities of Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (sICAM-1) and Chimeric ICAM-1/Immunoglobulin A Molecule”, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 38(6): 1425-1427 (Jun. 1994).Applicant
Dayhoff, M. O., W.C. Barker, and L.T. Hunt, “Establishing Homologies in Protein Sequences”, Methods in Enzymology 91: 524-545 (1983).Applicant
Dearden, C., W. Al-Nakib, K. Andries, R. Woestenborghs, and D.A.J. Tyrrell, “Drug resistant rhinoviruses from the nose of experimentally treated volunteers”, Arch. Virol. 109: 71-81 (1989).Applicant
Dustin, M. L. and T.A. Springer, “Lymphocyte Function-associated Antigen-1 (LFA-1) Interaction with Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) is One of At Least Three Mechanisms for Lymphocyte Adhesion to Cultured Endothelial Cells”, J. Cell Biol. 107: 321-331 (Jul. 1988).Applicant
Ezekovitz, R.A.B., R.B. Sim, G.G. MacPherson, and S. Gordon, “Interaction of Human Monocytes, Macrophages, and Polymorphonuclear Leukocytes with Zymosan in Vitro: Role of Type 3 Compliment Receptors and Macrophage Derived Complement”, J. Clin. Invest. 76: 2368-2376 (Dec. 1985).Applicant
Greve, J. M., C.P. Forte, C.W. Marlor, A.M. Meyer, H. Hoover-Litty, D. Wunderlich, and A. McClelland, “Mechanisms of Receptor-Mediated Rhinovirus Neutralization Defined by Two Soluble Forms of ICAM-1”, J. Virol. 65(11): 6015-6023 (Nov. 1991).Applicant
Guttman, N., and D. Baltimore, “Plasma Membrane Component Able to Bind and Alter Virions of Poliovirus Type 1: Sutides on Cell-Free Alteration Using a Simplified Assay”, Virol. 82: 25-36 (1977).Applicant
Gwaltney, J. M., Jr., and J.O. Hendley, “Rhinovirus Transmission: One if by Air, Two if by Hand”, Trans. Am. Clin. Climatol. Assoc. 89: 194-200 (1977).Applicant
Gwaltney, J.M. ,Jr., and J.O. Hendley, “Rhinovirus Transmission One if by Air, Two if by Hand”, Am. J. Epid. 107(5): 357-361 (May 1978).Applicant
Gwaltney, J. M., Jr., “Rhinovirus colds: epdimiology, clinical characteristics and transmission”, Eur. J. Respir. Dis. 64 (suppl. 128): 336-339 (1983).Applicant
Gwaltney, J. M., Jr., “Rhinoviruses”, Yale J. Biol. Med. 48: 17-45 (1975).Applicant
Hayden, F. G., and J.M. Gwaltney, Jr., “Intranasal Interferon-α2 Treatment of Experimental Rhinoviral Colds”, J. Infect. Dis. 150(2): 174-180 (Aug. 1984).Applicant
Hendley, J. O., and J.M. Gwaltney, Jr., “Mechanisms of Transmission of Rhinovirus Infections”, Epidemologic Reviews 10: 242-258 (1988).Applicant
Horley, K. J., C. Carpenito, B. Baker, and F. Takei, “Molecular cloning of murine intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM-1)”, EMBO J. 8(10): 2889-2896 (1989).Applicant
Jacobs, K., C. Shoemaker, R. Rudersdorf, S.D. Neill, R.J. Kaufman, A. Mufson, J. Seehra, S.S. Jones, R. Hewick, E.F. Fritsch, M. Kawakita, T. Shimizu, and T. Miyake, “Isolation and characterization of genomic and cDNA clones of human erythropoietin”, Nature 313: 806-810 (Feb. 1985).Applicant
Kim S., T.J. Smith, M.S. Chapman, M.G. Rossmann, D.C. Pevear, F.J. Dutko, P.J. Felock, G.D. Diana, and M.A. McKinlay, “Crystal Structure of Human Rhinovirus Serotype 1A (HRV1A)”, J. Med. Biol. 210: 91-111 (1989).Applicant
Layne S. P., M.J. Merges, M. Dembo, J.L. Spouge, and P.L. Nara, “HIV requires multiple gp120 molecules for CD4-mediated infection”, Nature 346: 277-279 (Jul. 1990).Applicant
Leonard, W. J., J.M. Depper, G.R. Crabtree, S. Rudikoff, J. Pumphrey, R.J. Robb, M. Krönke, P.B. Svetlik, N.J. Peffer, T.A. Waldmann, and W.C. Greene, “Molecular cloning and expression of cDNAs for the human interleukin-2 receptor”, Nature 311: 626-631 (Oct. 1984).Applicant
Leszczynski, J. F., and G.D. Rose, “Loops in Globular Proteins: A Novel Category of Secondary Structure”, Science 234: 849-855 (Nov. 1986).Applicant
Lineberger, D. W., D.J. Graham, J.E. Tomassini, and R.J. Colonno, “Antibodies that Block Rhinovirus Attachment Map to Domain 1 of the Major Group Receptor”, J. Virol. 64(6): 2582-2587 (Jun. 1990).Applicant
Martin, S., J.M. Casanovas, D.E. Staunton, and T.A. Springer, “Erfolgreiche Blockade von Rhinovirusinfektionen durch ICAM-1-Immunoglobulinchimare in vitro”, Med. Klin. 88(4): 193-197 (1993).Applicant
McPherson, J. M., and D.J. Livingston, “Protein Engineering: New Approaches to Improved Therapeutic Proteins, Part I”, in Biotech. Trends, S. Petska, ed. (Pharmaceutical Technology, May 1989).Applicant
Livingston, D. J., and J.M. McPherson, “Protein Engineering: New Approaches to Improved Therapeutic Proteins, Part II”, in Biotech. Trends, S. Petska, ed. (Pharmaceutical Technology, Jun. 1989).Applicant
McPherson, J. M., and D.J. Livingston, “Protein Engineering: New Approaches to Improved Therapeutic Proteins, Part III”, in Biotech. Trends, S. Petska, ed. (Pharmaceutical Technology, Sep. 1989).Applicant
McClelland, A., M.E.Kamarck, and F.H. Ruddle, “Molecular Cloning of Receptor Genes by Transfection”, Methods in Enzymology 147: 280-291 (1987).Applicant
Minor, P. D., “Chapter 2: Growth, Assay and Purification of Picornaviruses”, in Virology: a practical approach (IRL Press, Washington, D.C., 1985), pp. 25-41.Applicant
Minor, P. D., P.A. Pipkin, D. Hockley, G.C. Schild, and J.W. Almond, “Monoclonal antibodies which block cellular receptors of poliovirus”, Virus Res. 1: 203-212 (1984).Applicant
Morein B., “Potentiation of the Immune Response by Immunization with Antigens in Defined Multimeric Physical Forms”, Vet. Immunol. Immunopathol. 17: 153-159 (1987).Applicant
Ockenhouse, C.F., R. Betageri, T.A. Springer, and D.E. Staunton, “Plasmodium falciparum-Infected Erythrocytes Bind ICAM-1 at a Site Distinct from LFA-1, Mac-1, and Human Rhinovirus”, Cell 68: 63-69 (Jan. 1992).Applicant
Peppel, K., D. Crawford, and B. Beutler, “A Tumor Necrosis Factor (TNF) Receptor-IgG Heavy Chain Chimeric Protein as a Bivalent Antagonist of TNF Activity”, J. Exp. Med. 174: 1483-1489 (Dec. 1991).Applicant
Pevear, D. C., M.J. Fancher, P.J. Felock, M.g. Rossmann, M.S. Miller, G. Diana, A.M. Treasurywala, M.A. McKinlay, and F.J. Dutko, “Conformational Change in the floor of the Human Rhinovirus Canyon Blocks Adsorption to HeLa Cell Receptors”, J. Virol. 63(5): 2002-2007 (May 1989).Applicant
Plow, E. F., M.D. Pierschbacher, E. Ruoslahti, G.A. Marguerie, and M.H. Ginsberg, “The effect of Arg-Gly-Asp-containing peptides on fibrinogen and von Willebrand factor binding to platelets”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82: 8057-8061 (1985).Applicant
Ray, C. G., “Chapter 32: Respiratory Viruses”, in Medical Microbiology, an Introduction to Infectious Diseases, 2nd Ed, J. C. Sherris, ed. (Elsevier, New York, 1990), pp. 499-516.Applicant
Roesing, T. G., P.A. Toselli, and R.L. Crowell, “Elution and Uncoating of Coxsackievirus B3 by Isolated HeLa Cell Plasma Membranes”, J. Virol. 15(3): 654-667 (Mar. 1975).Applicant
Rossmann, M. G., “The Canyon Hypothesis. Hiding the Host Cell Receptor Attachment Site on a Viral Surface from Immune Surveillance”, J. Biol. Chem. 264(25): 14587-14590 (Sep. 1989).Applicant
Saiki, R.K., D.H. Gelfand, S. Stoffel, S.J. Scharf, R. Higuchi, G.T. Horn, K.B. Mullis, and H.A. Erlich, “Primer-Directed Enzymatic Amplification ofDNA with a Thermostable DNA Polymerase”, Science 239: 487-491 (Jan. 1988).Applicant
Sayre, P.H., R.E. Hussey, H.-C. Chang, T.L. Ciardelli, and E.L. Reinherz, “Structural and Binding Analysis of a Two Domain Extracellular CD2 Molecule”, J. Exp. Med. 169: 995-1009 (Mar. 1989).Applicant
Siu, G., S.M. Hedrick, and A.A. Brian, “Isolation of the Murine Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 (ICAM-1) Gene”, J. Immun. 143(11): 3813-3820 (Dec. 1989).Applicant
Skern, T., W. Sommergruber, D. Blass, P. Gruendler, F. Fraundorfer, C. Pieler, I. Fogy, and E. Kuechler, “Human rhinovirus 2: complete nucleotide sequence and proteolytic processing signals in the capsid protein region”, Nucleic Acids Research 13(6): 2111-2126 (1985).Applicant
Smilek, D. E., D.C. Wraith, S. Hodgkinson, S. Swivedy, L. Steinman, and H.O. McDevitt, “A single amino acid change in a mylelin basic protein peptide confers the capacity to prevent rather than induce experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88: 9633-9637 (Nov. 1991).Applicant
Staunton, D.E., M.L. Dustin, and T.A. Springer, “Functional cloning of ICAM-2, a cell adhesion ligand for LFA-1 homologous to ICAM-1”, Nature 339: 61-64 (May 1989).Applicant
Staunton, D.E., C.F. Ockenhouse, and T.A. Springer, “Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1-Immunoglubulin G1 Immunoadhesin Mediates Phagocytosis of Malaria-infected Erythrocytes”, J. Exp. Med. 176: 1471-1476 (Nov. 1992).Applicant
Uncapher, C. R., C.M. DeWitt, and R.J. Colonno, “The Major and Minor Group Receptor Families Contain All but One Human Rhinovirus Serotype”, Virology 180: 814-817 (1991).Applicant
Wickner W. T., and H.F. Lodish, “Multiple Mechanisms of Protein Insertion Into and Across Membranes”, Science 230: 400-407 (Oct. 1985).Applicant
Weis, W., J.H. Brown, S. Cusack, J.C. Paulson, J.J. Skehel, and D.C. Wiley, “Structure of the influenza virus haemagglutinin complexed with its receptor, sialic acid”, Nature 333: 426-431 (Jun. 1988).Applicant
R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), 1994 Catalog, Item #BBE 1B, “Human Soluble ICAM-1”.Applicant
“Chapter 9, Introduction of DNA into Mammalian Cells”, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology 1997: 9.0.1-9.9.16 (1997).Applicant
British Biotechnology, Ltd. (Oxford, England), 1993 Product Catalog, Item #BBE 1, “Soluble ICAM-1 ELISA”.Applicant
Abraham, G. and R.J. Colonno, “Characterization of human rhinoviruses displaced by an anti-receptor monoclonal antibody”, J. Virol.62(7):2300-2306 (Jul. 1988).Applicant
Ashkenazi, A., L.G. Presta, S.A. Marsters, T.R. Camerato, K.A. Rosen, B.M. Fendly, and D.J. Capon, “Mapping the CD4 binding site for human immunodeficiency virus by alanine scanning mutagenesis”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:7150-7154 (Sep. 1990).Applicant
Brodsky, M.H., M.Warton, R.M. Myers, and D.R. Littman, “Analysis of the site in CD4 that binds to the HIV envelope glycoprotein”, J. Immunol. 144(8):3078-3086 (Apr. 1990).Applicant
Callahan, P.L., S. Mizutani, and R.J. Colonno, “Molecular cloning and complete sequence determination of RNA genome of human rhinovirus type 14”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82(3):732-6 (Feb. 1985).Applicant
Colonno, R.J., “Virus receptors: the Achilles' heel of human rhinoviruses”, in Innovations in Antiviral Development and the Detection of Virus Infection, T. Block et al., eds., (Plenum Press, NY, 1992), pp. 61-70.Applicant
Colonno, R.J., P.L. Callahan, D.M. Leippe, R.R. Rueckert, and J.E. Tomassini, “Inhibition of rhinovirus attachment by neutralizing monoclonal antibodies and their Fab fragments,” J. Virol. 63(1):36-42 (Jan. 1989).Applicant
Colonno, R.J., “Cell surface receptors for picornaviruses”, Bioassays 5(6):270-4 (1986).Applicant
Colonno, R.J., “Molecular interactions between human rhinoviruses and their cellular receptors”, Seminars in Virol. 3(2):101-107 (1992).Applicant
Colonno, R.J., R.L. LaFemina, C.M. DeWitt, and J.E. Tomassini, “The major-group rhinoviruses utilize the intercellular adhesion molecule 1 ligand as a cellular receptor during infection”, in New Aspects of Positive-Strand RNA Viruses, Second International Symposium, Vienna, Austria, Meeting Date 1989, Brinton et al., eds. (Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC, 1990), pp. 257-261.Applicant
Colonno, R.J., G. Abraham, and J.E. Tomassini, “Molecular and biochemical aspects of human rhinovirus attachment to cellular receptors”, in Molecular Aspects of Picornavirus Infection and Detection, [Presentations ICN-UCI Int. Conf. Virol.], Meeting Date 1988, Semler et al., eds. (Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC, 1989), pp. 169-178.Applicant
Colonno, R.J., J.E. Tomassini, P.L. Callahan, and W.J. Long, “Characterization of the cellular receptor specific for attachment of most human rhinovirus serotypes”, in Virus Attachment Entry Cells, Proc. ASM Conf., Meeting Date 1985, Crowell et al., eds. (Am. Soc. Microbiol. Washington, DC, 1986), pp. 109-115.Applicant
Colonno, R.J., “Molecular interactions between human rhinoviruses and the adhesion receptor ICAM- 1”, in Microb. Adhes. Invasion, [Proc. Symp.], meeting date 1990, Hook et al., eds. (Springer, NY, 1992), pp. 33-41.Applicant
Colonno, R.J., J.H. Condra, and S. Mizutani, “Interaction of cellular receptors with the canyon structure of human rhinoviruses”, in UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology New Series, vol. 90, Cell Biology of Virus Entry, Replication, and Pathogenesis, Taos, NM, Feb. 28-Mar. 5, 1988, Compans et al., eds. (Alan R. Liss, Inc., NY, 1988) pp. 75-84.Applicant
Colonno, R.J., R. B. Register, D.W. Lineberger, and C.R. Uncapher, “Identification ofICAM-1 residues critical for attachment of human rhinoviruses”, Meeting on Molecular Biology of Human Pathogenic Viruses held at the 20th Annual Meeting of the Keystone Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology, Lake Tahoe, CA, Mar. 8-15, 1991, J. Cell Biochem. Suppl. 15(Part E):82, #M310 (1991).Applicant
Colonno, R.J., J.H. Condra, S. Mizutani, G. Abraham, P.L. Callahan, J.E. Tomassini, and M.A. Murcko, “Evidence for direct involvement of the rhinovirus canyon with cellular receptors”, in Symposium on Cell Biology of Virus Entry, Replication and Pathogenesis, Positive Strand RNA Viruses, 17th Annual UCLA meeting on Molecular and Cellular Biology, Taos, NM, Feb. 28-Mar. 5, 1988, J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl., 0 (12 Part C):4, #J005 (1988).Applicant
Colonno, R.J., J.E. Tomassini, and P.L. Callahan, “Isolation and characterization of a monoclonal antibody which blocks attachment of human rhinoviruses”, in UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology, New Series, vol. 54, Positive Strand RNA Viruses, Keystone, CO Apr. 20-26, 1986, Brinton et al., eds. (Alan R. Liss, Inc., NY, 1987), pp. 93-102.Applicant
Colonno, R.J., J.E. Tomassini, and P.L. Callahn, “Human rhinovirus attachment requires a specific cellular receptor protein”, in Symposium on Positive Strand RNA Viruses, 15th Annual Meeting of the UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology, Apr. 20-26, 1986, J. Cell. Biochem Suppl., 0 (10 Part D):266, #Q4 (1986).Applicant
Condra, J.H., V.V. Sardan, J.E. Tomassini, A.J. Schlabach, M.-E. Davies, D.W. Lineberger, D.J. Graham, and R.J. Colonno,, “Bacterial expression of antibody fragments that block human rhinovirus infection of cultured cells”, J. Biol. Chem. 265(4):2292-2295 (Feb. 1990).Applicant
Cordingley, M.G., P.L. Callahan, V.V. Sardana, V.M. Garsky, and R.J. Colonno, “Substrate requirements of human rhinovirus 3C protease for peptide cleavage in vitro”, J. Biol. Chem. 265(16):9062-5 (1990).Applicant
Cordingley, M.G., R.B. Register, P.1. Callahan, V.M. Garsky, and R.J. Colonno, “Cleavage of small peptides in vitro by human rhinovirus 14 3C protease expressed in Escherichia coli”, J. Virol. 63(12):5037-45 (Dec. 1989).Applicant
Dewalt, P.G., M.A. Lawson, R.J. Colonno, and B.L. Semler, “Chimeric picornavirus polyproteins demonstrate a common 3C proteinase substrate specificity”, J. Virol. 63(8):3444-3452 (1989).Applicant
Dick, E.C., and C.R. Dick, “Natural and Experimental Infections of Nonhuman Primates with Respiratory Viruses”, Laboratory Animal Science 24(1): 177-181 (1974).Applicant
Emini, E.A., W.A. Schleif, R.J. Colonno, and E. Wimmer, “Antigenic conservation and divergence between the viral-specific proteins of poliovirus type 1 and various picornaviruses”, Virol. 140(1):13-20 (1985).Applicant
Hazuda, D., V. Sardana, P. Callahan, M. Cordingley, and R. Colonno, “Chemical approaches to mapping the active site thiol of human rhinovirus 3C protease”, Joint Meeting of the American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology and the American Association of Immunologists, New Orleans, LA, Jun. 4-7, 1990, Fed. Am. Soc. Exp. Biol. J. 4(7):#1605 (1990).Applicant
Johnston, S.C., M.L. Dustin, M.L. Hibbs, and T.A. Springer, “On the species specificity of the interaction of LFA-1 with intercellular adhesion molecules”, J. Immunol. 145(4):1181-1187 (Aug. 1990).Applicant
Lamarre, D., D.J. Capon, D.R. Karp, T.Gregory, E.O. Long, and R.-P. Sekaly, “Class II MHC molecules and the HIV envelope glycoprotein interact with functionally distinct regions of the molecule”, EMBO J. 8(11):3271-3277 (1989).Applicant
Lineberger, D.W., C.R. Uncapher, D.J. Graham, and R.J. Colonno, “Domains 1 and 2 ofICAM-1 are sufficient to bind human rhinoviruses”, Virus Research 24(2): 173-86 (1992).Applicant
Maddon, P.J., A.G. Dalgleish, J.S. McDougal, P.R. Clapham, R.A. Weiss, and R. Axel, “The T4 Gene Encodes the AIDS Virus Receptor and is Expressed in the Immune System and the Brain”, Cell 47: 333-348 (Nov. 1986).Applicant
Mendelsohn, C.L., E. Wimmer, and V.R. Racaniello, “Cellular receptor for poliovirus: molecular cloning, nucleotide sequence, and expression of a new member of the immunoglobulin superfamily”, Cell 56:855-865 (Mar. 1989).Applicant
Mizutani, S., and R.J. Colonno, In vitro synthesis of an infectious RNAfrom cDNA clones ofhuman rhinovirus type 14:, J. Virol. 56(2):628-32 (Nov. 1985).Applicant
Register, R.B., C.R. Uncapher, A.M. Naylor, D.W. Lineberger, and R.J. Colonno, “Human-murine chimeras of ICAM-1 identify amino acid residues critical for rhinovirus and antibody binding”, J. Virol. 65(12):6589-6596 (Dec. 1991).Applicant
Rueckert, R. B. Sherry, A. Mosser, R. Colonno, and M. Rossman, “Location of four neutralization antigens on the three-dimensional surface of a common-cold picornavirus, human rhinovirus 14”, in Virus Attachment Entry Cells, Proc. ASM Conf., Meeting date 1985, Crowell et al., eds. (Am. Soc. Microbiol., Washington, DC, 1986), pp. 21-27.Applicant
Sherry, B., A.G. Mosser, R.J. Colonno, and R.R. Rueckert, “Use of monoclonal antibodies to identify four neutralizing immunogens on a common cold picornavirus, human rhinovirus 14”, J. Virol. 57(1):246-57 (Jan. 1986).Applicant
Tomassini, J.E., T.R. Maxson, and R.J. Colonno, “Biochemical characterization of a glycoprotein required for rhinovirus attachment”, J. Biol. Chem. 264(3):1656-1662 (Jan. 1989).Applicant
Tomassini, J.E., and R.J. Colonno, “Isolation and characterization of a cellular receptor involved in attachment of human rhinoviruses to cells”, in Symposium on Positive Strand RNA Viruses, 15th Annual Meeting of the UCLA Symposia on Molecular and Cellular Biology, Apr. 20-26, 1986, J. Cell. Biochem. Suppl., 0 (10 Part D):300, #Q92 (1986).Applicant
Abraham, G. and Colonno, R. J., “Many Rhinovirus Serotypes Share the Same Cellular Receptor”, J. Virol. 51:340-345 (1984).Applicant
Anasetti et al., “Activation of Natural Killer Cells by LFA-3 Binding to CD2”, Publication, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle WA, and Molecular Diagnostics, West Haven, CT (U.S.A.).Applicant
Argenbright et al., “Monoclonal Antibodies to the Leukocyte Membrane CD18 Glycoprotein Complex and to Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Inhibit Leukocyte-Endothelial Adhesion in Rabbits”, J. Leukoc. Biol. 49:253-257 (1991).Applicant
Argenbright, L. W. and Barton, R. W., “Interactions of Leukocyte Integrins with Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 in the Production of Inflammatory Vascular Injury In Vivo: the Shwartzman Reaction Revisited”, J. Clin. Invest. 89(1):259-272 (1992).Applicant
Badger et. al., “Structure Analysis of a Series of Antiviral Agents Complexed with Human Rhinovirus 14”, PNAS 85:3304-3308 (1988).Applicant
Bangham, C. R. M. and McMichael, A. J., “Nosing ahead in the cold war” Nature 334:16 (1990).Applicant
Bebbington, C. R., and Hentschel, C. C. G. “The use of vectors based on gene amplification for the expression of cloned genes in mammalian cells” DNA Cloning 3:163-186 (1987).Applicant
Blann, A. D., “Cell Hybrids: an important new source of antibody production” Med. Lab. Sci. 36:329-338 (1979).Applicant
Bock et al., “Characterization of soluble forms of NCAM”, FEBS Lett 225(1,2):33-36 (1987).Applicant
Bowie et al., “Deciphering the Message in Protein Sequences: Tolerance to Amino Acid Substitutions”, Science 247:1306-1310 (1990).Applicant
Campbell, B. A. and Cords, C. E., “Monoclonal Antibodies That Inhibit Attachment of Group B Coxsackieviruses”, J. Virol. 48(2):561-564 (1983).Applicant
Capon et al., “Designing CD4 immunoadhesins for AIDS therapy”, Nature 337:525-531 (1989).Applicant
Cate et al., “Isolation of the Bovine and Human Genes for Müllerian Inhibiting Substance and Expression of the Human Gene in Animal Cells”, Cell 45:685-698 (1986).Applicant
Cole et al., “Topographic Localization of the Heparin-binding Domain of the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule N-CAM”, J. Cell Biol. 103:1739-1744 (1986).Applicant
Colonno et al., “Isolation of a Monoclonal Antibody that Blocks Attachment of the Major Group of Human Rhinoviruses”, J. Virology 57:7-12 (1986).Applicant
Colonno, R. J. and Tomassini, J. E., “Viral Receptors: A Novel Approach For The Prevention Of Human Rhinovirus Infection”, in Medical Virology VI, de la Maza, L. M. and E. M. Peterson, eds. (Elsevier, New York, 1987) 331-351.Applicant
Cooper, G.M., “Cellular Transforming Genes”, Science 217: 801-806 (1982).Applicant
Couch, R.B., “Rhinoviruses”, Virology, Second Edition, edited by B. N. Fields, D. M. Knipe et al. Raven Press, Ltd., New York, 607-629 (1990).Applicant
Couch et al., “Effect of Route Inoculation on Experimental Respiratory Viral Disease in Volunteers and Evidence for Airborne Transmission”, Bacteriol. Rev. 30:517-529 (1966).Applicant
Creighton, T.E., Proteins by W. H. Freeman and Company, New York, 33-34 (1984).Applicant
Crump et al., “In Vitro Inhibitory Activity of Soluble ICAM-1 for the Numbered Serotypes of Human Rhinovirus”, Antiviral Chemistry and Chemother. 4(6):323-327 (1993).Applicant
Cunningham et al., “Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule: Structure, Immunoglobulin-Like Domains, Cell Surface Modulation, and Alternative RNA Splicing”, Science 236:799-806 (1987).Applicant
Cybulsky, M. I. and Gimbrone, Jr., M. A., “Endothelial Expression of a Mononuclear Leukocyte Adhesion Molecule During Atherogenesis”, Science 251:788-791 (1991).Applicant
D'Alessio et al., “Short-Duration Exposure and the Transmission of Rhinoviral Colds”, J. Inf. Dis. 150(2):189-193 (1984).Applicant
Deen et al., “A Soluble Form of CD4 (T4) Protein Inhibits AIDS Virus Infection”, Nature 331:82-86 (1988).Applicant
Dick, E.C., “Experimental Infection of Chimpanzees with Human Rhinovirus Types 14 and 43”, Proceedings Of The Society For Experimental Biology And Medicine 127:1079-1081 (1968).Applicant
Dochez et al., “Studies in the Common Cold. IV. Experimental Transmission of the Common Cold to Anthropoid Apes and Human Beings by Means of a Filtrable Agent”, J. Exp. Med. 52:701-716 (1930).Applicant
Douglas et al., “Prophylactic Efficacy of Intranasal Alpha 2-Interferon Against Rhinovirus Infections in the Family Setting”, The New England J. of Med. 314:65-70 (1986).Applicant
Douglas, R. G., “Pathogenesis of Rhinovirus Common Colds in Human Volunteers”, Annals of Otology, Rhinology and Laryngology 79:563-571 (1970).Applicant
Dustin et al., “Induction by IL 1 and Interferon-γ: Tissue Distribution, Biochemistry, and Function of a Natural Adherence Molecule (ICAM-1)”, J. Immunol. 137(1):245-254 (1986).Applicant
Dustin et al., “Supergene Families Meet in the Immune System” Immunology Today, 9(7 and 8):213-215 (1988).Applicant
Dustin et al., “Correlation of CD2 Binding and Functional Properties of Multimeric and Monomeric Lymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen 3”, J. Exp. Med. 169:503-517 (1989).Applicant
Ey, P.L., et. al.,“Isolation of Pure IgG1, IgG2a, and IgG2b Immunoglobulins from Mouse Serum Using Protein A -Sepharose”, Immunochemistry 15:429-436 (1978).Applicant
Fisher et al., “HIV Infection is Blocked in vitro by Recombinant Soluble CD4”, Nature 331:76-78 (1988).Applicant
Fox et al., “Prevention of a Rhinovirus and Poliovirus Uncoating by WIN 51711, a New Antiviral Drug”, Antimicrob. Ag. and Chemotherapy 30:110-116 (1986).Applicant
Galfrey et. al., “Antibodies to Major Histocompatibility Antigens Produced by Hybrid Cell Lines”, Nature 266:550-552 (1977).Applicant
Gething, M.J. and Sambrook, J., “Construction of Influenza Haemagglutinin Genes that Code for Intracellular and Secreted Forms of the Protein” Nature 300:598-603 (1982).Applicant
Ginsberg et al., “Inhibition of Fibronectin Binding to Platelets by Proteolytic Fragments and Synthetic Peptides Which Support Fibroblast Adhesion”, J. Biol. Chem. 260(7): 3931-3936 (1985).Applicant
Giranda et al., “Modeling of the Human Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1, the Human Rhinovirus Major Group Receptor” Proteins: Structure, Function, and Genetics, 7:227-233 (1990).Applicant
Gough, N., “Putting A Stop To An Immunoglobulin Message”, Trends Genet. 3(9):238-240 (1987).Applicant
Gower et al., “Alternative Splicing Generates a Secreted Form of N-CAM in Muscle and Brain”, Cell 55:955-964 (1988).Applicant
Graham, F.L., and Van der Eb, A. J., “A New Technique for the Assay of Infectivity of Human Adenovirus 5 DNA”, Virology 52: 456-467 (1973).Applicant
Green et al., “Immunogenic Structure of the Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin”, Cell 28:477-487 (1982).Applicant
Greve et al., “The Major Human Rhinovirus Receptor Is ICAM-1”, Cell 56:839-847 (1989).Applicant
Greve et al., “Mechanisms of Receptor-Mediated Rhinovirus Neutralization Defined by Two Soluble Forms of ICAM-1”, J. Virology 65:6015-6023 (1991).Applicant
Gross-Bellard et al., “Isolation of High-Molecular-Weight DNA from Mammalian Cells”, Eur. J. Biochem. 36:32-38 (1973).Applicant
Güssow, D. and Ploegh, H., “Soluble class I antigens: a conundrum with no solution?”, Immunology Today 8(7,8):220-222 (1987).Applicant
Gwaltney et al., Diagnostic Procedures for Viral, Rickettsial and Chlamydial Infections, N. J. Schmidt and R. W. Evans, Eds, 6th edition. pp. 603, Am Pub. Health. Assoc., Washington D.C. (1989).Applicant
Halperin et al., “Exacerbations of Asthma in Adults During Experimental Rhinovirus Infections”, Am. Rev. Respir. Dis. 132:976-980 (1985).Applicant
Hamparian et al., “A Collaborative Report: Rhinoviruses-Extension of the Numbering System from 89 to 100”, Virology 159:191-192 (1987).Applicant
Hardy et al., “Intranasal Drug Delivery by Spray and Drops”, J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 37:294-297 (1985).Applicant
Harning et al., “Serum Levels of Circulating Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1 in Human Malignant Melanoma”, Cancer Res. 51(8):5003-5005 (1991).Applicant
Hayden et al., “Safety and Efficacy of Intranasal Pirodavir (R77975) in Experimental Rhinovirus Infection”, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 36(4):727-732 (1992).Applicant
Hayden et al., “Prevention of Natural Colds by Contact Prophylaxis with Intranasal Alpha2-Interferon”, The New England Journal of Medicine, 314(2):71-75 (1986).Applicant
Hayden et al., “Modification of Experimental Rhinovirus Colds by Receptor Blockade” Antiviral Research 9:233-247 (1988).Applicant
Helenius, A. and Von Bonsdorff, C. H., “Semliki Forest Virus Membrane Proteins, Preparation and Characterization of Spike Complexes Soluble in Detergent-Free Medium” Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 436:895-899 (1976).Applicant
Hendley et al., “Relation Between Naturally acquired Immunity and Infectivity of Two Rhinoviruses in Volunteers”, J. Inf. Dis. 125:243-248 (1972).Applicant
Holland, J. J. and McLaren, L. C., “The mammalian cell-virus relationship. II. Absorption, Reception and Eclipse of Poliovirus by HeLa Cells” J. Exp. Med. 109:487-504 (1959).Applicant
Holland, J. J., “Receptor affinities as Major Determinants of Enterovirus Tissue Tropisms in Humans”, Virology 15:312-326.Applicant
Horton et al., “Gene Splicing by Overlap Extension: Tailor-Made Genes Using the Polyerase Chain Reaction”, BioTechniques 8(5):528-535 (1990).Applicant
Hussey et. al., “A Soluble CD4 Protein Selectively Inhibits HIV Replication and Syncytium Formation” Nature, 331:78-81 (1988).Applicant
Illum, L., “The Nasal Delivery of Peptides and Proteins”, Trends in Biotech. 9:284-289 (1991).Applicant
Johnston et al., “Viruses as Precipitants of Asthma Symptoms. III. Rhinoviruses: Molecular Biology and Prospects for Future Intervention”, Clin. Exp. Allergy, 23:237 (1993).Applicant
Johnston et al., “Viral Infections in Exacerbations in School Children with Cough or Wheeze: A Longitudinal Study”, Am. Rev. Resp. Dis., 145:A546 (1992).Applicant
Kamarck, M. E., and Ruddle, F. H., “Somatic Cell Genetics and the Human Gene Map”, Chapter 105 in Handbook of Experimental Immunology in Four Volumes, vol. 3: Genetics and Molecular Immunology, D. M. Weir, ed. (Blackwell Scientific Publications, Boston, MA, 1986).Applicant
Katz et al., “Chromosome Mapping of Cell Membrane Antigens Expressed on Activated B Cells”, Eur. J. Immunol., 15:103-106 (1985).Applicant
Kavenoff, R., and Zimm, B. H., “Chromosome-Sized DNA Molecules from Drosophila”, Chromosoma (Berl.) 41:1-27 (1973).Applicant
Kühn et al., “Gene Transfer, Expression, and Molecular Cloning of the Human Transferrin Receptor Gene”, Cell 37:95-103 (1984).Applicant
Lebman et al., “A Monoclonal Antibody that Detects Expression of Transferrin Receptor in Human Erythroid Precursor Cells”, Blood 59(3):671-678 (1982).Applicant
Lemanske et al., “Rhinovirus Upper Respiratory Infection Increases Airway Hyperreactivity and Late Asthmatic Reactions”, J. Clin. Invest. 83:1-10 (1989).Applicant
Littlefield, J.W., “Selection of Hybrids from Matings of Fibroblasts in vitro and Their Presumed Recombinants”, Science 145:709-710 (1964).Applicant
Lonberg-Holm et al., “Unrelated Animal Viruses Share Receptors”, Nature 259:679-681 (1976).Applicant
Margulies, D. H., et. al., “Engineering Soluble Major Histocompatibility Molecules: Why and How”, Immunol. Res. 6: 101-116 (1987).Applicant
Marlin, S.D. and Springer, T. A., “Purified Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1) Is a Ligand for Lymphocyte Function-Associated Antigen 1 (LFA-1)”, Cell 51:813-819 (1987).Applicant
Marlin et al., “A Soluble Form of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Inhibits Rhinovirus Infection”, Nature 344:70-72 (1990).Applicant
Marsh et al., “Antibody-toxin Conjugation”, Immunotoxins by Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, Dordrecht, Lancaster 213-237 (1988).Applicant
Marsh et al., “Interactions of Semliki Forest Virus Spike Glycoprotein Rosettes and Vesicle with Cultures Cells”, J. Cell Biology 96:455-461 (1983).Applicant
McClelland et al., “Identification of Monoclonal Antibody Epitopes and Critical Residues for Rhinovirus in Domain 1 of ICAM-1”, PNAS 88(18):7993-7997 (1991).Applicant
McClelland et al., “Transfectant cell lines which express the major human rhinovirus receptor, their preparation, and their uses”, Chemical Abstracts 112:117175h (1990).Applicant
McCray, J. and Werner, G., “Different Rhinovirus Serotypes Neutralized by Antipeptide Antibodies”, Nature 329:736-738 (1987).Applicant
Medical Microbiology: “An Introduction to Infectious Diseases”, 2nd ed., J.C. Sherris, ed. (Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., N.Y. 1990) pp 514-515.Applicant
Medrano, L. and Green, H., “Picornavirus Receptors and Picornavirus Multiplication in Human-Mouse Hybrid Cell Lines”, Virology 54:515-524 (1973).Applicant
Melchers et al., Lymphocyte Hybridomas, vol. 81 of Current Topics in Microbiology and Immunology, W. Arber, W. Henle, P.H. Hofschneider, J.H. Humphrey, J. Klein, P. Koldovsky, H. Koprowski, O. Maaloe, F. Melchers, R. Rott, H.G. Schweiger, L. Syrucek, P.K. Vogt, eds (Springer Verlang, New York, 1978).Applicant
Mendelsohn et al., “Transformation of a Human Poliovirus Receptor Gene into Mouse Cells”, PNAS 83:7845-7849 (1986).Applicant
Minor, P.D., “Growth, Assay and Purification of Picornaviruses”, in Virology: A Practical Approach, B.W.J. Mahy, ed. (IRL Press Limited, Oxford, England), 25-41 (1985).Applicant
Minor et al., “Monoclonal antibodies which block cellular receptors of poliovirus”, Virus Research 1:203-212 (1984).Applicant
Morein, B., “Potentiation of the Immune Response by Immunization with Antigens in Defined Multimeric Physical Forms”, Veterinary Immunology and Immunopathology 17:153-159 (1987).Applicant
Niman et al., “Anti-peptide antibodies detect oncogene-related proteins in urine”, PNAS 82:7924-7928 (1985).Applicant
Nobis et al., “Production of a Monoclonal Antibody against an Epitope on HeLa Cells that Is the Functional Poliovirus Binding Site”, J. Gen. Virol. 66:2563-2569 (1985).Applicant
Ohlin et al., “Spectrum of Activity of Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 Against Rhinovirus Reference Strains and Field Isolates”, Antimicrob. Agents and Chemother. 38:1413-1415 (1994).Applicant
Parham, P., “Monoclonal Antibodies Against HLA Products and Their use in Immunaffinity Purification,” Methods in Enzymology 92:110-138 (1983).Applicant
Pepinsky et al., “The Increased Potency of Crossed-linked Lymphocyte Function-associated Antigen-3 (LFA-3) Multimers Is a Direct Consequence of Changes in Valency”, J. Biol. Chem. 266(27):18244-18249 (1991).Applicant
Peterson, A. and Seed, B., “Genetic Analysis of Monoclonal Antibody and HIV Binding Sites on the Human Lymophocyte Antigen CD4”, Cell 54:65-72 (1988).Applicant
Rossman et al., “Structure of a Human Common Cold Virus and Functional Relationship to other Picornaviruses”, Nature 317: 145-153 (1985).Applicant
Rothlein et al., “A Form of Circulating ICAM-1 In Human Serum”, J. Immuno. 147(11):3788-3793 (1991).Applicant
Rothlein et al., “A Human Intercellular Adhesion Molecule (ICAM-1) Distinct From LFA-1”, J. Immuno. 137(4):1270-1274 (1986).Applicant
Ruddle et al., “DNA-Mediated Gene Transfer in Mammalian Gene Cloning”, Genetic Engineering 6:319-338 (1984).Applicant
Ruoslahti et al., “Synthetic Peptides in the Analysis of Cell Adhesion,” in Synthetic Peptides in Biology and Medicine Elsvier Science Publishers, pp. 191-197 (1985).Applicant
Saiki et al., “Enzymatic Amplification of β-Globin Genomic Sequences and Restriction Site Analysis for Diagnosis of Sickle Cell Anemia,”Science 230:1350-1354 (1985).Applicant
Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 2d ed. (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, 1989) pp. 1.21-1.52.Applicant
Schipper et al., “The Nasal Mucocilliary Clearance: Relevance to Nasal Drug Delivery”, Pharm. Res. 8:807-814 (1991).Applicant
Scopes, R.K., “Separation By Precipitation,” in Protein Purification: Principles & Practice (1982) Springler Verlag, NY, pp. 39-46.Applicant
Seed, B. and Aruffo, A., “Molecular Cloning of the CD2 antigen, the T-Cell Erythrocyte Receptor, by a Rapid Immunoselection Procedure,” PNAS 84:3365-3369 (1987).Applicant
Seed, B., “An LFA-3 cDNA Encodes a Phospholipid-Linked Membrane Protein Homologous to its Receptor CD2,” Nature 329: 840-842 (1987).Applicant
Seth et al., “Circulating ICAM-1 isoforms: Diagnostic Prospects for Inflammatory and Immune Disorders,” Lancet 338:83-84 (1991).Applicant
Sherman-Gold, R., “Companies Pursue Therapies Based on Complex Cell Adhesion Molecules”, Genetic Engineering News pp. 6-7,14 (Jul. 1993).Applicant
Sherry, B. and Rueckert, R., “Evidence for at Least Two Dominant Neutralization Antigens on Human Rhinovirus 14,” J. Virol. 53(1):137-143 (1985).Applicant
Shih, C. and Weinberg, R. A., “Isolation of a Transforming Sequence from a Human Bladder Carcinoma Cell Line,” Cell 29: 161-169 (1982).Applicant
Shipkowitz et al., “Antiviral Activity of a bis-Benzimidazole Against Experimental Rhinovirus Infections in Chimpanzees”, App. Microbiol. 23(1):117-122 (1972).Applicant
Siddique et al., “The Poliovirus Sensitivity (PVS) Gene Is on Chromosome 19q12->q13.2”, Genomics 3:156-160 (1988).Applicant
Simmons et al., “ICAM, an Adhesion Ligand of LFA-1, is Homologous to the Neural Cell Adhesion Molecule NCAM,” Nature 331:624-627 (1988).Applicant
Simons et al., “Formation of Protein Micelles from Amphiphilic Membrane Proteins”, PNAS 75(11):5306-5310 (1978).Applicant
Skerra, A. and Pluckthun, A., “Assembly of a Functional Immunoglobulin FV Fragment in Escherichia coli” Science, 240: 1038-1041 (1988).Applicant
Smith, T.J., et. al., “The Site of Attachment in Human Rhinovirus 14 for 4 Antiviral Agents that Inhibit Uncoating”, Science 233:1286-1293 (1986).Applicant
Smith et al., “Blocking of HIV-1 Infectivity by a Soluble, Secreted Form of the CD4 Antigen,” Science 238:1704-1707 (1987).Applicant
Smith et al., “Modification and Secretion of Human Interleukin 2 Produced in Insect Cells by a Baculovirus Expression Vector”, PNAS 82:8404-8408 (1985).Applicant
Springer, T.A., “Adhesion Receptors of the Immune System”, Nature 346:425-434 (1990).Applicant
Staunton et al., “Primary Structure of ICAM-1 Demonstrates Interaction between Members of the Immunoglobulin and Integrin Supergene Families,” Cell 52:925-933 (1988).Applicant
Staunton et al., “The Arrangement of the Immunoglobulin-Like Domains of ICAM-1 and the Binding Sites for LFA-1 and Rhinovirus,” Cell 61:243-254 (1990).Applicant
Staunton et al., “A Cell Adhesion Molecule, ICAM-1, is the Major Surface Receptor for Rhinoviruses,” Cell 56:849-853 (1989).Applicant
Steis et al., “Serum Soluble IL-2 Receptor as a Tumor Marker in Patients with Hairy Cell Leukemia”, Blood 71(5):1304-1309 (May 1988).Applicant
Sundquist et al., “Influenza Virus ISCOMs: Antibody Response in Animals”, Vaccine 6:49-53 (1988).Applicant
Sundquist et al., “Influenza Virus ISCOMs: Biochemical Characterization”, Vaccine 6:44-48 (1988).Applicant
Tomassini, J.E., “Isolation, Characterization and Cloning of the Cellular Receptor for the Major Group of Human Rhinoviruses,” Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania (1986).Applicant
Tomassini, J.E. and Colonno, R. J., “Isolation of a Receptor Protein Involved in Attachment of Human Rhinoviruses,” J. Virol. 58(2):290-295 (1986).Applicant
Tomassini et al., “CDNA Cloning Reveals that the Major Group Rhinovirus Receptor on HeLa Cells is Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1, ” PNAS 86:4907-4911 (1989).Applicant
Towbin et. al., “Electrophoretic Transfer of Proteins from Polyacrylamide Gels to Nitrocellulose Sheets: Procedure and Some Applications”, PNAS 76(9):4350-4354 (1979).Applicant
Traunecker et al., “Highly Efficient Neutralization of HIV with Recombinant CD4-Immunoglobulin Molecules,” Nature 339: 68-70 (1989).Applicant
Traunecker et al., “Soluble CD4 Molecules Neutralize Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1” Nature 331:84-86 (1988).Applicant
Turner at el., “Efficacy of Oral WIN 54954 for Prophylaxis of Experimental Rhinovirus Infection”, 37:297-300 (1993).Applicant
Urlaub, G. and Chasin, L. A., “Isolation of Chinese Hamster Cell Mutants Deficient in Dihydrofolate Reductase Activity,” PNAS USA 77(7):4216-4220 (1980).Applicant
Wade, N., “Hybridomas: A Potent New Biotechnology,” Science 208:692-693 (1980).Applicant
Welsh, K.I., “Antibody Production Made Easier,” Nature 266: 495 (1977).Applicant
Wigler et al., “Transformation of Mammalian Cells with Genes from Procaryotes and Eucaryotes,” Cell 16:777-785 (1979).Applicant
Williams, A. F., “A Year in the Life of the Immunoglobulin Superfamily”, Immunology Today 8(10):298-303 (1987).Applicant
Williams, A. F. and Barclay, A. N.,“The Immunoglobulin Superfamily-Domains for Cell Surface Recognition1,2”, Ann. Rev. Immunol. 6:381-405 (1988).Applicant
Winther et al., “Sites of Rhinovirus Recovery After Point Inoculation of the Upper Airway”, JAMA 256(13):1763-1767 (1986).Applicant
Woods et al., “In Vitro and In Vivo Activities of WIN 54954, a New Broad Spectrum Antipicornavirus Drug”, Antimicrob. Agents Chemother 33:2069-2074 (1989).Applicant
Zettlmeissl et al., “Expression and Characterization of Human CD4: Immunoglobulin Fusion Proteins,” DNA and Cell Biology 9: 347-353 (1990).Applicant
Braude, A. (ed.s), “Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology, 2nd edition, W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, PA, (1986) chapter 65 Picornaviruses”, pp. 521-529.Applicant
Gennaro, A.R. (ed.), Remington's Pharmaceutical Sciences, 18th edition, Mack Publishing Co., Easton, PA (1990), “Drug Absorption, Action and Disposition”, pp. 707-721.Applicant
Martin et al., “Efficient Neutralization and Disruption of Rhinovirus by Chimeric ICAM-1/Immunoglobulin Molecules”, J. Virology, 67(6):3561-3568 (Jun. 1993).Applicant
Hendley et al., “Transmission of Rhinovirus Colds By Self-Inoculation”, The New England Journal of Medicine, 288(26):1361-1364 (Jun. 28, 1973).Applicant
Hendley, J. O., and Gwaltney, J. M., Jr., “Mechanisms of Transmission of Rhinovirus Infections”, Epidemiologic Reviews, 10:242-257 (1988).Applicant
Suter, David, Associated Press, “Tests for a Nasal Spray to Deflect Cold Viruses”, New York Times, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Manning, Anita, “War on Bacteria Mix of Victories Amid Warnings”, USA Today, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., “Beyond Chicken Soup. Nasal Spray Keeps Chimps From Catching Cold Virus”, St. Louis Post Dispatch, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, “Common Colds: Nasal Spray May Help Keep The Sniffles Away”, Atlanta Constitution, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, “Drug Sprays Away Colds”, New York Post, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., Associated Press, “The Cold War: Scientists Develop Spray That May End Sniffles”, Arizona Republic, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., Associated Press, “For Colds, Nasal Spray Holds Hope. A Protein Swamps The Virus With Potential Targets In The Nose. Its a Decoy Trick”, Philadelphia Inquirer, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, “Simple Nasal Spray May Be Able To Keep Common Cold Away. Medicine Successful On Chimps So Far”, Washington Times, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, “Doctors Sniffing Out Spray to Fight Colds”, Denver Post, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, “Someday Soon, A Simple Sniff Should Snuff The Sniffles”, Houston Chronicle, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., Associated Press, “Spray May Ward Off Sniffles. Nasal Treatment Studied To Keep Cold Viruses From Invading Victim”, Denver-Rocky Mountain News, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., Associated Press, “Scientists Make Headway In Cold War With Nose Spray”, Chicago Sun-Times, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., Associated Press, “Labs Busy Working On Nose Spray To Keep Colds Away”, Charlotte Observer, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, “Nasal Spray May Prevent Sniffles”, Miami Herald, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, “Cure For The Cold? No, But Prevention May Be Spray Away”, San Diego Union-Tribune, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., “Nasal Spray Touted As Next-Best Thing To Cure For Colds”, The Montreal Gazette, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, “Scientists Feel They Can Develop Spray To Keep The Sniffles Away”, The Spectator, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., Associated Press, “New Nasal Spray May Take Sniffles Out Of Common Cold”, Cleveland Plain Dealer, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Associated Press, No Cure, But Nothing To Sniff(le) At. Nasal Spray To Block Common Cold Is In The Works, Minneapolis Star Tribune, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Haney, Daniel Q., Associated Press, “Out Front: Progress On Cold Front. Spray May Ward Off Sniffles. Medicine Is First To Block Infection”, Sep. 19, 1995.Applicant
Monitoring Report, “Cure For Colds 9/18 to 9/20”, Video Monitoring Services of America, a Burrelle's Affiliate, New York, New York, pp. 1-3, Sep. 20, 1995.Applicant
Bella, J., P.R. Kolatkar, C.W. Marlor, J.M. Greve, and M.G. Rossmann, “The structure of the two amino-terminal domains of human ICAM-1 suggests how if functions as a rhinovirus receptor and as an LFA-1 integrin ligand”, P.N.A.S. USA 95:4140-4145 (Apr. 1998).Applicant
Bella, J., P.R. Kolatkar, C.W. Marlor, J.M. Greve and M.G. Rossmann, “The structure of the two amino-terminal domains of human intercellular adhesion molecule-1 suggests how it functions as a rhinovirus receptor”, Virus Res. 62:107-117 (1999).Applicant
Casasnovas, J.M., J.K., Bickford, and T.A. Springer, “The Domain Structure of ICAM-1 and the Kinetics of Binding to Rhinovirus”, J. Virol. 72(7):6244-6246 (Jul. 1998).Applicant
Casanovas, J.M., and T.A. Springer, “Pathway of Rhinovirus Disruption by Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule 1(ICAM-1): An Intermediate in Which ICAM-1 is Bound and RNA is Released”, J. Virol. 68(9):5882-9 (Sep. 1994).Applicant
Casasnovas, J.M., and T.A.Springer, “Kinetics and Thermodynamics of Virus Binding to Receptor. Studies with Rhinovirus, Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1 (ICAM-1), and Surface Plasmon Resonance”, J. Biomed. Chem. 270(22):13216-13224 (Jun. 1996).Applicant
Casasnovas, J.M., T. Stehle, J-H. Liu, J.-H Wang, and T.A. Springer, “A dimeric crystal structure for the N-terminal two domains of intercellular adhesion molecule-1”, Proc. Narl. Acad. Sci. USA 95:4134-4139 (Apr. 1998).Applicant
Greve, J.M. and M.G. Rossmann, “12. Interaction of Rhinovirus with Its Receptor, ICAM-1”, in Cellular Receptor of Animal Viruses [Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, 1994], pp. 195-213.Applicant
Huguenel, E.D., D. Cohn, D.P. Dockum, J.M. Greve, M.A. Fournel, L. Hammond, R. Irwin, J. Mahoney, A. McClelland, E. Muchmore, A.C. Ohlin, and P. Scuderi, “Prevention of Rhinovirus Infection in Chimpanzees by Soluble Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1”, Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 155:1206-1210 (1997).Applicant
Kolatkar, P.R., M.A. Oliveira, M.G. Rossmann, A.H. Robbins, S.K. Katti, H. Hoover-Litty, C. Forte, J.M. Greve, A. McClelland, and N.H. Olson, “Preliminary X-Ray Crystallographic Analysis of Intercellular Adhesion Molecule-1”, J. Mol. Biol. 225:1127-1130 (1992).Applicant
Olson, N.H., P.R. Kolatkar, M. A. Olveira, R. H. Cheng, J.M. Greve, A. McClelland, T.S. Baker, and M.G. Rossmann, “Structure of a human rhinovirus complexed with its receptor molecule”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 90:507-511 (Jan. 1993).Applicant
Rossmann, M.G., N.H. Olson, P.R. Kolatkar, M.A. Oliveira, R.H. Cheng, J.M. Greve, A. McClelland, and T.S. Baker, “Crystallographic and cryo EM analysis of virion-receptor interactions”, Arch. Virol. [suppl]9:531-541 (1994).Applicant

Description