US 6,277,753 B1Grant

Removal of CMP residue from semiconductors using supercritical carbon dioxide process

Issue Date:2001-08-21

•17 Claims

•1 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

A method of removing Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) residue from a semiconductor substrate is disclosed. The semiconductor substrate with the CMP residue on a surface is placed within a pressure chamber. The pressure chamber is then pressurized. Supercritical carbon dioxide and a solvent are introduced into the pressure chamber. The supercritical carbon dioxide and the chemical are maintained in contact with the semiconductor substrate until the CMP residue is removed from the semiconductor substrate. The pressure chamber is then flushed and vented.

Metadata

Assignee

Supercritical Systems Inc.

Inventors

William H. Mullee
Marc de Leeuwe
Glenn A. Roberson, Jr.

Application Information

Application Number:US 09/407,628

Filing Date:1999-09-28

Priority Date:1998-09-28

Art Unit:7

Classifications

IPC:

H01L 2100

Field of Search:

438689438691438692438693438704438745438747438753252 791252 792252 794252 795134 1134 3134 2134 31134 34216 57216 58216 88216 89216 91216 99156345 L156345 LP

Patent Drawings (1 sheets)

Description

[0002] This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/101,988, filed on Sep. 28, 1998, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Field of the Invention

[0003] The present invention relates to the field of removing Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) residue from semiconductor wafers. More particularly, the present invention relates to the field of removing CMP residue from semiconductor wafers using supercritical carbon dioxide.

Background of the Invention

[0004] Manufacture of semiconductor devices commonly employ a Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) process to planarize a wafer surface. The CMP process removes top surface layers from a semiconductor wafer. The CMP process leaves a CMP residue of CMP chemicals and particles that is difficult and problematic to remove by current post-CMP cleaning methods. It is well known that the CMP residue predominantly remains in surface features on the wafer surface.

[0005] The current post-CMP cleaning methods require that the wafer surface be mechanically washed or brushed by a commercially available machine called a scrubber. The scrubber may employ heat or ultrasonic augmentation and typically requires immersion times of two to twenty minutes to achieve complete removal of the CMP residue from the wafer surface. Because the wafer surface is mechanically washed or brushed by the scrubber, the scrubber leaves defects or scratches in the wafer surface.

[0006] It is well known that, if some of the CMP residue remains in the surface features, performance of the semiconductor devices will be degraded. Additionally, it is well known that the cost of manufacturing a wafer of the semiconductor devices is proportional to the time employed for each processing step.

[0007] It would be advantageous to be able to remove the CMP residue without using the mechanical washing or brushing employed by the scrubber in order to reduce an amount of the defects and the scratches. Further, it would be advantageous to more effectively remove the CMP residue from the surface features on the wafer surface.

[0008] What is needed is a method of removing the CMP residue that does not use the mechanical washing or brushing.

[0009] What is further needed is a method of removing the CMP residue that is more effective than the mechanical washing or brushing in removing the CMP residue from the surface features.

[0010] What is additionally needed is a method of removing the CMP residue that is more efficient than the scrubber.

Summary of the Invention

[0011] The present invention is a method of removing Chemical Mechanical Polishing (CMP) residue from a surface of a semiconductor substrate. The semiconductor substrate, including the CMP residue on the surface, is placed within a pressure chamber. The pressure chamber is then pressurized. Supercritical carbon dioxide and a solvent are introduced into the pressure chamber. The supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent are maintained in contact with the semiconductor substrate until the CMP residue is removed from the semiconductor substrate. The pressure chamber is then flushed and vented.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0012] FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating the steps of a method of the present invention.

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment

[0013] The present invention utilizes high solvency and cleaning characteristics of supercritical carbon dioxide to assist in a post-CMP cleaning process. In the preferred embodiment, a small amount of a chemical, i.e., a solvent or a solvent mixture, is added to affect the post-CMP cleaning process as compared to the prior art. In the present invention, the supercritical carbon dioxide carries a small amount of the chemical to a wafer surface to be cleaned and is then recycled back to a carbon dioxide compressor for reuse.

[0014] The chemical is soluble or insoluble in carbon dioxide and is not damaging to semiconductor device materials. The high solvency and solubilizing ability of the supercritical carbon dioxide makes this method fast, safe, and very quick. High turbulence at wafer surface features in conjunction with hyper-efficient mass transport of a chemical co-solvent package can clean the wafer surface in less than five minutes. CMP residue of CMP chemicals and abrasive particles is effectively removed without direct mechanical contact, in contrast to current methods. Another advantage of the present invention is that the wafer surface contains fewer defects as compared to mechanical scrubber methods.

[0015] The solvency of supercritical carbon dioxide increases with pressure. Diffusivity and viscosity at or above a critical point of carbon dioxide remains similar to that of a gas phase. Because density above the critical point of the carbon dioxide is nearly equal to that of a liquid state, the supercritical carbon dioxide carries the chemical onto the wafer surface and cleans sub-micron surface features of a modern semiconductor device. In the present invention, the supercritical carbon dioxide also functions to carry away the CMP residue, including the CMP chemicals and abrasive particles, from the sub-micron surface features of the modem semiconductor device. Thus, a small amount of the chemical mixed with the supercritical carbon dioxide performs the post-CMP cleaning process and also cleans away any remaining unwanted chemicals and the CMP residue.

[0016] The preferred embodiment of the post-CMP cleaning process of the present invention is illustrated in FIG. 1. The semiconductor wafer including the CMP residue is placed in a pressure chamber in a first process step 20. The pressure chamber is then sealed and pressurized with the carbon dioxide, in a second process step 22. As the pressure inside the pressure chamber builds, the carbon dioxide becomes liquid and then reaches supercritical temperature and pressure. Typical conditions for this process range from 20 to 70° C. and 1050 and 6000 psig. When the desired conditions are reached, a small amount of the chemical is introduced into a supercritical carbon dioxide stream and thus added into the pressure chamber to begin cleaning, in a third process step 24. Typical types and amounts of chemicals are:

[0017] a. 0.1-15.0 v/v % of isopropyl alcohol and related alcohols;

[0018] b. 0.1-15.0 v/v % of propylene carbonate and related carbonates;

[0019] c. 0.1-15.0 v/v % of ethylene glycol and related glycols;

[0020] d. 0.001-5.0 v/v % of ozone;

[0021] e. 0.1-15.0 v/v % of hydrogen fluoride and related fluorides;

[0022] f. 0.1-15.0 v/v % of ammonium hydroxide and related hydroxides;

[0023] g. 0.1-15.0 v/v % of citric acid and related acids; and

[0024] h. 0.1-15.0 v/v % of a mixture of any of the above chemicals.

[0025] The chemical is preferably selected from a preferred group including the isopropyl alcohol, the propylene carbonate, the ethylene glycol, the ozone, the hydrogen fluoride, the ammonium hydroxide, and the citric acid, or a mixture thereof.

[0026] The chemical is alternatively selected from an alternative group including the alcohols related to the isopropyl alcohol, the carbonates related to the propylene carbonate, the glycols related to the ethylene glycol, the fluorides related to the hydrogen fluoride, the hydroxides related to the ammonium hydroxide, and the acids related to the citric acid, or a mixture selected from these chemicals and the preferred group.

[0027] The post-CMP cleaning process continues with recirculation of the supercritical carbon dioxide and with mixing, i.e., agitating, thereof inside the pressure chamber until the CMP residue is removed, typically from one-half to five minutes, in a fourth process step 26. The pressure chamber is then flushed with pure supercritical carbon dioxide or liquid carbon dioxide to remove all traces of any remaining chemicals, in a fifth process step 28. Finally, the chamber is vented to atmosphere and the wafer is removed, in a sixth process step 30. At this point, an optional rinse in DI (deionized) or ultra pure water may be performed to finish the cleaning process.

[0028] The present invention uses the supercritical carbon dioxide in combination with the small amount of a chemical admixture to remove the CMP residue from the surfaces of the semiconductor devices in a post-CMP cleaning system. The post-CMP cleaning system includes a wafer process chamber, a pump, a sensor system, a pressure and flow regulating system, and a recovery chamber. The wafer process chamber holds the semiconductor wafer or semiconductor wafers. The pump is capable of compressing liquid carbon dioxide beyond the critical point. The sensor system measures temperature, pressure and flows. The pressure and flow regulating system connects a carbon dioxide source to the wafer chamber at the desired conditions. The recovery chamber collects solid and liquid material exhausted from the wafer chamber.

[0029] The post-CMP cleaning system preferably includes a temperature control system for heating the wafer process chamber.

[0030] The post-CMP cleaning system preferably includes a chemical introduction system for adding precise amounts of the chemical into the supercritical carbon dioxide process stream.

[0031] The post-CMP cleaning process of the present invention includes the following steps. The wafer is placed in the wafer process chamber. The post-CMP cleaning system is preferably purged with inert gas or the carbon dioxide. Alternatively, the post-CMP cleaning system is not purged. Next, the post-CMP cleaning system is pressurized with the carbon dioxide to achieve supercritical conditions. A desired amount of the chemical is added into the carbon dioxide, which forms chemical laden supercritical carbon dioxide. The chemical-laden supercritical carbon dioxide is contacted with the wafer. The wafer process chamber is preferably flushed using the supercritical carbon dioxide to remove contaminants. Alternatively, the wafer process chamber is flushed using the liquid carbon dioxide. The post CMP cleaning system is then depressurized to allow removal of the wafer.

[0032] The post-CMP cleaning process results in the wafer surface having a defect level that is much lower than current cleaning methods, which utilize mechanical contact of the wafer with roller or brush equipment.

[0033] The post-CMP cleaning process removes the CMP residue from semiconductors, bare silicon wafers, metallic covered wafers, and memory storage devices. It will be readily apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that the post-CMP cleaning process removes the CMP residue from other substrates, including other semiconductor substrates, that have been polished or planarized in the CMP process.

[0034] It will be readily apparent to one skilled in the art that other various modifications may be made to the preferred embodiment without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

We claim:

1. A method of removing a chemical mechanical polishing residue from a surface of a substrate comprising the steps of:

a. placing the substrate, with the chemical mechanical polishing residue on the surface of the substrate, within a pressure chamber;

b. pressurizing the pressure chamber;

c. introducing supercritical carbon dioxide and a solvent into the pressure chamber;

d. agitating the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent within the pressure chamber until the chemical mechanical polishing residue is removed from the semiconductor substrate; and

e. flushing the pressure chamber.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, propylene carbonate, ethylene glycol, ozone, hydrogen fluoride, ammonium hydroxide, citric acid, and a mixture thereof.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein a volume ratio of the solvent to the supercritical carbon dioxide is within the range and including 0.001 and 15.0 percent.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the chemical mechanical polishing residue includes chemical mechanical polishing chemicals and chemical mechanical polishing abrasive particles.

5. A method of removing a chemical mechanical polishing residue from sub-micron surface features of a semiconductor substrate comprising the steps of:

a. placing the semiconductor substrate, with the chemical mechanical polishing residue on the sub-micron surface features of the semiconductor substrate, within a pressure chamber;

b. pressurizing the pressure chamber;

c. introducing supercritical carbon dioxide and a solvent into the pressure chamber;

d. agitating the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent within the pressure chamber until the chemical mechanical polishing residue is removed from the sub-micron surface features; and

e. flushing the pressure chamber.

6. The method of claim 5 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, propylene carbonate, ethylene glycol, ozone, hydrogen fluoride, ammonium hydroxide, citric acid, and a mixture thereof.

7. The method of claim 6 wherein a volume ratio of the solvent to the supercritical carbon dioxide is within the range and including 0.001 and 15.0 percent.

8. The method of claim 5 wherein the chemical mechanical polishing residue includes chemical mechanical polishing chemicals and chemical mechanical polishing abrasive particles.

9. A method of removing a chemical mechanical polishing residue from a surface of a substrate comprising the steps of:

a. introducing supercritical carbon dioxide and a solvent to the substrate with the chemical mechanical polishing residue on the surface of the substrate; and

b. maintaining the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent in contact with the substrate until the chemical mechanical polishing residue is removed from the substrate.

10. The method of claim 9 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, propylene carbonate, ethylene glycol, ozone, hydrogen fluoride, ammonium hydroxide, citric acid, and a mixture thereof.

11. The method of claim 9 wherein a volume ratio of the solvent to the supercritical carbon dioxide is within the range and including 0.001 and 15.0 percent.

12. The method of claim 9 wherein the chemical mechanical polishing residue includes chemical mechanical polishing chemicals and chemical mechanical polishing abrasive particles.

13. A method of removing a chemical mechanical polishing residue from sub-micron surface features of a semiconductor substrate comprising the steps of:

a. introducing supercritical carbon dioxide and a solvent to the semiconductor substrate with the chemical mechanical polishing residue on the sub-micron surface features of the semiconductor substrate;

b. maintaining the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent in contact with the semiconductor substrate until the chemical mechanical polishing residue is removed from the sub-micron surface features.

14. The method of claim 13 wherein the solvent is selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, propylene carbonate, ethylene glycol, ozone, hydrogen fluoride, ammonium hydroxide, citric acid, and a mixture thereof.

15. The method of claim 14 wherein a volume ratio of the solvent to the supercritical carbon dioxide is within the range and including 0.001 and 15.0 percent.

16. The method of claim 13 wherein the chemical mechanical polishing residue includes chemical mechanical polishing chemicals and chemical mechanical polishing abrasive particles.

17. An apparatus for removing a chemical mechanical polishing residue from sub-micron surface features of a semiconductor substrate comprising:

a. a pressure chamber configured for receiving the semiconductor substrate with the chemical mechanical polishing residue on the sub-micron surface features of the semiconductor substrate;

b. means for pressurizing the pressure chamber;

c. means for introducing supercritical carbon dioxide and a solvent into the pressure chamber, the solvent being selected from the group consisting of isopropyl alcohol, propylene carbonate, ethylene glycol, ozone, hydrogen fluoride, ammonium hydroxide, citric acid, and a mixture thereof;

d. means for agitating the supercritical carbon dioxide and the solvent within the pressure chamber until the chemical mechanical polishing residue is removed from the sub-micron surface features; and

e. means for flushing the pressure chamber.

Patent Citations (120)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US2617719	1952-11-01	Stewart	Applicant
US3890176	1975-06-01	Bolon	Applicant
US3900551	1975-08-01	Bardoncelli et al.	Applicant
US4029517	1977-06-01	Rand	Applicant
US4091643	1978-05-01	Zucchini	Applicant
US4341592	1982-07-01	Shortes et al.	Applicant
US4474199	1984-10-01	Blaudszun	Applicant
US4475993	1984-10-01	Blander et al.	Applicant
US4601181	1986-07-01	Privat	Applicant
US4693777	1987-09-01	Hazano et al.	Applicant
US4749440	1988-06-01	Blackwood et al.	Applicant
US4788043	1988-11-01	Kagiyama et al.	Applicant
US4838476	1989-06-01	Rahn	Applicant
US4865061	1989-09-01	Fowler et al.	Applicant
US4879004	1989-11-01	Oesch et al.	Applicant
US4923828	1990-05-01	Gluck et al.	Applicant
US4924892	1990-05-01	Kiba et al.	Applicant
US4944837	1990-07-01	Nishikawa et al.	Applicant
US4960140	1990-10-01	Ishijima et al.	Applicant
US4983223	1991-01-01	Gessner	Applicant
US5011542	1991-04-01	Weil	Applicant
US5013366	1991-05-01	Jackson et al.	Applicant
US5068040	1991-11-01	Jackson	Applicant
US5105556	1992-04-01	Kurokawa et al.	Applicant
US5143103	1992-09-01	Basso et al.	Applicant
US5158704	1992-10-01	Fulton et al.	Applicant
US5174917	1992-12-01	Monzyk	Applicant
US5185058	1993-02-01	Cathey, Jr.	Applicant
US5185296	1993-02-01	Morita et al.	Applicant
US5193560	1993-03-01	Tanaka et al.	Applicant
US5213619	1993-05-01	Jackson et al.	Applicant
US5215592	1993-06-01	Jackson	Applicant
US5225173	1993-07-01	Wai	Applicant
US5236602	1993-08-01	Jackson	Applicant
US5237824	1993-08-01	Pawliszyn	Applicant
US5261965	1993-11-01	Moslehi	Applicant
US5266205	1993-11-01	Fulton et al.	Applicant
US5267455	1993-12-01	Dewees et al.	Applicant
US5274129	1993-12-01	Natale et al.	Applicant
US5288333	1994-02-01	Tanaka et al.	Applicant
US5290361	1994-03-01	Hayashida et al.	Applicant
US5294261	1994-03-01	McDermott et al.	Applicant
US5304515	1994-04-01	Morita et al.	Applicant
US5306350	1994-04-01	Hoy et al.	Applicant
US5313965	1994-05-01	Palen	Applicant
US5316591	1994-05-01	Chao et al.	Applicant
US5334332	1994-08-01	Lee	Applicant
US5334493	1994-08-01	Fujita et al.	Applicant
US5337446	1994-08-01	Smith et al.	Applicant
US5352327	1994-10-01	Witowski	Applicant
US5355901	1994-10-01	Mielnik et al.	Applicant
US5356538	1994-10-01	Wai et al.	Applicant
US5368171	1994-11-01	Jackson	Applicant
US5370740	1994-12-01	Chao et al.	Applicant
US5377705	1995-01-01	Smith, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5401322	1995-03-01	Marshall	Applicant
US5403621	1995-04-01	Jackson et al.	Applicant
US5417768	1995-05-01	Smith, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5456759	1995-10-01	Stanford, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5470393	1995-11-01	Fukazawa	Applicant
US5482564	1996-01-01	Douglas et al.	Applicant
US5494526	1996-02-01	Paranjpe	Applicant
US5500081	1996-03-01	Bergman	Applicant
US5501761	1996-03-01	Evans et al.	Applicant
US5514220	1996-05-01	Wetmore et al.	Applicant
US5522938	1996-06-01	O'Brien	Applicant
US5526834	1996-06-01	Mielnik et al.	Applicant
US5533538	1996-07-01	Marshall	Applicant
US5547774	1996-08-01	Gimzewski et al.	Applicant
US5550211	1996-08-01	DeCrosta et al.	Applicant
US5580846	1996-12-01	Hayashida et al.	Applicant
US5589105	1996-12-01	DeSimone et al.	Applicant
US5632847	1997-05-01	Ohno et al.	Applicant
US5635463	1997-06-01	Muraoka	Applicant
US5637151	1997-06-01	Schulz	Applicant
US5641887	1997-06-01	Beckman et al.	Applicant
US5656097	1997-08-01	Olesen et al.	Applicant
US5665527	1997-09-01	Allen et al.	Applicant
US5679169	1997-10-01	Gonzales et al.	Applicant
US5679171	1997-10-01	Saga et al.	Applicant
US5683977	1997-11-01	Jureller et al.	Applicant
US5688879	1997-11-01	DeSimone	Applicant
US5700379	1997-12-01	Biebl	Applicant
US5726211	1998-03-01	Hedrick et al.	Applicant
US5739223	1998-04-01	DeSimone	Applicant
US5783082	1998-07-01	DeSimone et al.	Applicant
US5798438	1998-08-01	Sawan et al.	Applicant
US5804607	1998-09-01	Hedrick et al.	Applicant
US5868856	1999-02-01	Douglas et al.	Examiner
US5868862	1999-02-01	Douglas et al.	Applicant
US5872257	1999-02-01	Beckman et al.	Applicant
US5873948	1999-02-01	Kim	Applicant
US5881577	1999-03-01	Sauer et al.	Applicant
US5893756	1999-04-01	Berman et al.	Examiner
US5896870	1999-04-01	Huynh et al.	Examiner
US5908510	1999-06-01	McCullough et al.	Applicant
US5944996	1999-08-01	DeSimone et al.	Applicant
US5976264	1999-11-01	McCullough et al.	Applicant
US5980648	1999-11-01	Adler	Applicant
US6017820	2000-01-01	Ting et al.	Applicant
US6024801	2000-02-01	Wallace et al.	Applicant
US6100198	2000-08-01	Grieger et al.	Examiner
EP283740A2	1988-09-01		Applicant
EP391035	1990-10-01		Applicant
EP536752A2	1993-04-01		Applicant
EP572913A1	1993-12-01		Applicant
EP587168A1	1994-03-01		Applicant
EP726099A2	1996-08-01		Applicant
JP60-192333	1985-09-01		Applicant
JP62-125619	1987-06-01		Applicant
JP1045131	1989-02-01		Applicant
JP2-148841	1990-06-01		Applicant
JP2-304941	1990-12-01		Applicant
JP7142333	1995-06-01		Applicant
JP727711	1996-02-01		Applicant
JP8222508	1996-08-01		Applicant
WO302345A2	1989-02-01		Applicant
WO370233A1	1990-05-01		Applicant
WO90/06189	1990-06-01		Applicant
WO90/13675	1990-11-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (52)

Basta, N., “Supercritical Fluids: Still Seeking Acceptance,” Chemical Engineering, vol. 92, No. 3, Feb. 24, 1985, p. 14.Applicant
Guan, Z. et al., “Fluorocarbon-Based Heterophase Polymeric Materials. 1. Block Copolymer Surfactants for Carbon Dioxide Applications,” Macromolecules, vol. 27, 1994, pp. 5527-5532.Applicant
International Journal of Environmentally Conscious Design & Manufacturing, vol. 2, No. 1, 1993, p. 83.Applicant
Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol. 72, No. 6, pp. 872-874.Applicant
Ziger, D.H. et al., “Compressed Fluid Technology: Application to RIE Developed Resists,” AIChE Journal, vol. 33, No. 10, Oct. 1987, pp. 1585-1591.Applicant
Kirk-Othmer, “Encyclopedia of Chemical Terminology,” 3rd ed., Supplement vol., “Alcohol Fuels to Toxicology,” 1984, pp. 872-893.Applicant
“Cleaning with Supercritical CO2,” NASA Tech Briefs, MFS-29611, Marshall Space Flight Center, Alabama, Mar. 1979.Applicant
“Los Alomos National Laboratory,” Solid State Technology, pp. S10 & S14, Oct. 1998.Applicant
“Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Resist Remover, SCORR, the path to least photoresistance,” Los Alomos National Laboratry, 1998.Applicant
Takahashi, D., “Los Alomos Lab finds way to cut chip toxic waste,” Wall Street Journal, Jun. 22, 1998.Applicant
Supercritical CO2 process offers less mess from semiconductor plants, Chemical Engineering Magazine, pp. 27 & 29, Jul. 1998.Applicant
Sun, Y.P. et al., “Preparation of polymer-protected semiconductor nanoparticles through the rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solution,” Chemical Physics Letters, pp. 585-588, May 22, 1998.Applicant
Jackson, K. et al., “Surfactants and Microemulsions in Supercritical Fluids” in “Supercritical Fluid Cleaning,” Noyes Publications, Westwood, NJ, pp. 87-120, Spring 1998.Applicant
Kryszewski, M., “Production of Metal and Semiconductor Nanoparticles in Polymer Systems,” Polimery,, pp. 65-73, Feb. 1998.Applicant
Bakker, G.L. et al., “Surface Cleaning and Carbonaceous Film Removal Using High Pressure, High Temperature Water, and Water/CO2 Mixtures,” J. Eletrochem. Soc, vol. 145, No. 1, pp. 284-291, Jan. 1998.Applicant
Ober, C.K. et al., “Imaging polymers with supercritical carbon dioxide,” Advanced Materials, vol. 9, No. 13, pp. 1039-1043, Nov. 3, 1997.Applicant
Russick, E.M. et al., “Supercritical carbon dioxide extraction of solvent from micromachined structures,” Supercritical Fluids—Extraction and Pollution Prevention, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 670, pp. 255-269, Oct. 21, 1997.Applicant
Dahmen, N. et al., “Supercritical fluid extraction of grinding and metal cutting waste contaminated with oils,” Supercritical Fluids—Extraction and Pollution Prevention, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 670, pp. 270-279, Oct. 21, 1997.Applicant
Wai, C.M., “Supercritical fluid extraction: metals as complexes,” J. Chromatograhy A, vol. 785, PP 369-383, Oct. 17, 1997.Applicant
Xu, C. et al., Submicron-sized spherical yttrium oxide based phosphors prepared by supercritical CO2-assisted aerosolization and pyrolysis, Appl. Phys. Lett., vol. 71, No. 12, Sep. 22, 1997.Applicant
Tomioka, Y. et al., “Decomposition of tetramethylammonium (TMA) in a positive photoresist developer by supercritical water,” Abstracts of Papers 214th ACS Natl Meeting, American Chemical Society, Abstract No. 108, Sep. 7, 1997.Applicant
Klein, H. et al., “Cyclic organic carbonates serve as solvents and reactive diluents,” Coatings World, pp. 38-40, May 1997.Applicant
Buhler, J. et al., Liner array of complementary metal oxide semiconductor double-pass metal micromirrors, Opt. Eng., vol. 36, No. 5, pp. 1391-1398, May 1997.Applicant
Jo, M.H. et al., Evaluation of SiO2 aerogel thin film with ultra low dielectric constant as an intermetal dielectric, Microelectronic Engineering, vol. 33, pp. 343-348, Jan. 1997.Applicant
McClain, J.B. et al., “Design of nonionic surfactants for supercritical carbon dioxide,” Science, vol. 27, Dec. 20, 1996.Applicant
Znaidi, L. et al., “Batch and semi-continuous synthesis of magnesium oxide powders from hydrolysis and supercritical treatment of Mg(OCH3)2, ” Materials Research Bulletin, vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 1527-1535, Dec. 1996.Applicant
Tadros, M.E., “Synthesis of titanium dioxide particles in supercritical CO2, ” J. Supercritical Fluids, vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 172-176, Sep. 1996.Applicant
Courtecuisse, V.G. et al., “Kinetics of the titanium isopropoxide decomposition in supercritical isopropyl alcohol,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 2539-2545, Aug. 1996.Applicant
Gabor, A. et al., “Block and random copolymer resists designed for 193 nm lithography and environmentally friendly supercritical CO2 development,” Dept. Mat. Sci. & Eng. Cornell Univ., SPIE, vol. 2724, pp. 410-417, Jun. 1996.Applicant
Schimek, G.L. et al., “Supercritical ammonia synthesis and characterization of four new alkali metal silver antimony sulfides . . . ,” J. Solid State Chemistry, vol. 123, pp. 277-284, May 1996.Applicant
Gallagher-Wetmore, P. et al., “Supercritical fluid processing: Opportunities for new resist materials and processes,” IBM research Division, SPIE, vol. 2725, pp. 289-299, Apr. 1996.Applicant
Papathomas, K.I. et al., “Debonding of photoresists by organic solvents,” J. Applied Polymer Science, vol. 59, pp. 2029-2037, Mar. 28, 1996.Applicant
Watkins, J.J. et al., “Polymer/metal nanocomposite synthesis in supercritical CO2, ” Chemistry of Materials, vol. 7, No. 11, Nov. 1995.Applicant
Gloyna, E.F. et al., “Supercritical water oxidation research and development update,” Environmental Progress, vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 182-192, Aug. 1995.Applicant
Gallagher-Wetmore, P. et al., Supercritical fluid processing: A new dry technique for photoresist developing, IBM Research Division, SPIE, vol. 2438, pp. 694-708, Jun. 1995.Applicant
Gabor, A.H. et al., “Silicon-containing block copolymer resist materials,” Microelectronics Technology—Polymers for Advanced Imaging and Packaging, ACS Symposium Series, vol. 614, pp. 281-298, Apr. 1995.Applicant
Tsiartas, P.C. et al., “Effect of molecular weight distribution on the dissolution properties of novolac blends,” SPIE, vol. 2438, pp. 261-271, 1995.Applicant
Allen, R.D. et al., “Performance properties of near-monodisperse novolak resins,” SPIE, vol. 2438, pp. 250-260, 1995.Applicant
Wood, P.T. et al., “Synthesis of new channeled structures in supercritical amines . . . ,” Inorg. Chem., vol. 33, pp. 1556-1558, 1994.Applicant
Jerome, J.E. et al., “Synthesis of new low-dimensional quaternary compounds . . . ,” Inorg. Chem., vol. 33, pp. 1733-1734, 1994.Applicant
McHardy, J. et al., “Progress in supercritical CO2 cleaning,” SAMPE Jour., vol. 29, No. 5, pp. 20-27, Sep. 1993.Applicant
Purtell, R. et al., “Precision parts cleaning using supercritical fluids,” J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, vol. 11, No. 4, Jul. 1993.Applicant
Bok, E. et al., “Supercriticial fluids for single wafer cleaning,” Solid State Technology, pp. 117-120, Jun. 1992.Applicant
Adschiri, T. et al., “Rapid and continuous hydrothermal crystallization of metal oxide particles in supercritical water,” J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 75, No. 4, pp. 1019-1022, 1992.Applicant
Hansen, B.N. et al., “Supercritical fluid transport—chemical deposition of films,” Chem. Mater., vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 749-752, 1992.Applicant
Page, S.H. et al., “Predictability and effect of phase behavior of CO2/propylene carbonate in supercritical fluid chromatography,” J. Microl. Sep. vol. 3, No. 4, pp. 355-369, 1991.Applicant
Brokamp, T. et al., “Synthese und Kristallstruktur eines gemischtvalenten Lithium—Tantalnirids Li2Ta3N5, ” J. Alloys and Compounds, vol. 176, pp. 47-60, 1991.Applicant
Hybertson, B.M. et al., “Deposition of palladium films by a novel supercritical fluid transport-chemical deposition process,” Mat. Res. Bull., vol. 26, pp. 1127-1133, 1991.Applicant
Ziger, D.H. et al., “Compressed fluid technology: Application to RIE-developed resists,” AIChE Jour., vol. 33, No. 10, pp. 1585-1591, Oct. 1987.Applicant
Matson, D.W. et al., “Rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solutions: Solute formation of powders, thin films, and fibers,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 26, No. 11, pp. 2298-2306, 1987.Applicant
Tolley, W.K. et al., “Stripping organics from metal and mineral surfaces using supercritical fluids,” Separation Science and Technology, vol. 22, pp. 1087-1101, 1987.Applicant
“Final report on the safety assessment of propylene carbonate,” J. American College of Toxicology, vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 23-51.Applicant

Abstract