US 6,180,546 B2Grant

Saline soluble inorganic fibers

Issue Date:2001-01-30

•9 Claims

•3 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

Disclosed is use of a vitreous inorganic fiber in the knowledge that it has a composition meeting the criterion that the calculated sum of the free energies of hydration of the compounds that would or could be present at equilibrium (on the basis of knowledge, informed belief or reasonable assumption) is more negative than −10 kcal/100 grams of composition. Such compositions are saline soluble.

Metadata

Assignee

The Morgan Crucible Company plc

Inventors

Gary Anthony Jubb
Jean-Louis Martin

Application Information

Application Number:US 09/262,378

Filing Date:1999-03-04

Priority Date:1992-01-17

Art Unit:7

Classifications

IPC:

C03C 1306

Field of Search:

501 35501 36501 38501 8

Patent Drawings (3 sheets)

Description

[0002] This application is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/899,005 filed Jul. 23, 1997, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,994,247 issued on Nov. 30, 1999, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/535,587 filed Sep. 28, 1995, now abandoned, which is a continuation of U.S. Ser. No. 08/039,086, filed Apr. 9, 1993, now abandoned, which claims priority to International Application No. PCT/GB93/00085, filed Jan. 15, 1993, which claims priority to GB 92 00993.5, filed Jan. 17, 1992 and GB 92 24612.3, filed Nov. 24, 1992.

[0003] This invention relates to saline soluble, non-metallic, amorphous, inorganic oxide, refractory fibrous materials.

[0004] Inorganic fibrous materials are well known and widely used for many purposes (e.g. as thermal or acoustic insulation in bulk, mat, or blanket form, as vacuum-formed shapes, as vacuum formed boards and papers, and as ropes, yarns or textiles; as a reinforcing fibre for building materials; as a constituent of brake blocks for vehicles). In most of these applications the properties for which inorganic fibrous materials are used require resistance to heat, and often resistance to aggressive chemical environments.

[0005] Inorganic fibrous materials can be either glassy or crystalline. Asbestos is an inorganic fibrous material one form of which has been strongly implicated in respiratory disease.

[0006] It is still not clear what the causative mechanism is that relates some asbestos with disease but some researchers believe that the mechanism is mechanical and size related. Asbestos of a critical size can pierce cells in the body and so, through long and repeated cell injury, have a bad effect on health.

[0007] Whether this mechanism is true or not regulatory agencies have indicated a desire to categorise any inorganic fibre product that has a respiratory fraction as ‘hazardous’, regardless of whether there is any evidence to support such categorisation. Unfortunately for many of the applications for which inorganic fibres are used, there are no realistic substitutes.

[0008] Accordingly there is a demand for inorganic fibres that will pose as little risk as possible (if any) and for which there are objective grounds to believe them safe.

[0009] A line of study has proposed that if inorganic fibres were made that were sufficiently soluble in physiological fluids that their residence time in the human body was short; then damage would not occur or at least be minimised. As the risk of asbestos-linked disease appears to depend very much on the length of exposure this idea appears reasonable. Asbestos is extremely insoluble.

[0010] As intercellular fluid is saline in nature the importance of fibre solubility in saline solution has long been recognised. If fibres are soluble in physiological saline solution then, provided the dissolved components are not toxic, the fibres should be safer than fibres which are not so soluble. The shorter the time a fibre is resident in the body the less damage it can do. H. Förster in ‘The behaviour of mineral fibres in physiological solutions’ (Proceedings of1982 WHO IARC Conference, Copenhagen, Volume 2, pages 27-55(1988)) discussed the behaviour of commercially produced mineral fibres in physiological saline solutions. Fibres of widely varying solubility were discussed.

[0011] International Patent Application No. WO087/05007 disclosed that fibres comprising magnesia, silica, calcia and less than 10 wt % alumina are soluble in saline solution. The solubilities of the fibres disclosed were in terms of parts per million of silicon (extracted from the silica-containing material of the fibre) present in a saline solution after 5 hours of exposure. The highest value revealed in the examples had a silicon level of 67 ppm. In contrast, and adjusted to the same regime of measurement, the highest level disclosed in the Förster paper was equivalent to approximately 1 ppm. Conversely if the highest value revealed in the International Patent Application was converted to the same measurement regime as the Förster paper it would have an extraction rate of 901,500 mg Si/kg fibre—i.e. some 69 times higher than any of the fibres Förster tested, and the fibres that had the highest extraction rate in the Förster test were glass fibres which had high alkali contents and so would have a low melting point. This is convincingly better performance even taking into account factors such as differences in test solutions and duration of experiment.

[0012] International Patent Application No. WO089/12032 disclosed additional fibres soluble in saline solution and discusses some of the constituents that may be present in such fibres.

[0013] European Patent Application No. 0399320 disclosed glass fibres having a high physiological solubility.

[0014] Further patent specifications disclosing selection of fibres for their saline solubility are European 0412878 and 0459897, French 2662687 and 2662688, PCT WO086/04807 and WO090/02713.

[0015] The refractoriness of the fibres disclosed in these various prior art documents varies considerable. The maximum service temperature of any of these disclosed fibres (when used as refractory insulation) is up to 815° C. (1500° F.).

[0016] Service temperature for refractory insulation is definable in many ways but to be consistent with the above mentioned International Patent Applications this application shall mean by service temperature that temperature at which the fibre shows acceptable shrinkage (maximum of 5% linear shrinkage after exposure to temperature for 24 hours) and at which the fibre has not appreciably suffered through excessive sintering or softening.

[0017] There is a demand for physiologically soluble fibres having a service temperature of greater than 815° C., particularly for such fibres having a service temperature above 900° C.

[0018] Testing for physiological solubility and safety can be done by inhalation studies on, e.g. rats. However such studies are extremely time consuming and costly. A study can take of the order of 2½ years from start and can easily cost £1 million per study. A cheaper alternative is to test for solubility in physiological or like fluids in vitro.

[0019] Testing of an inorganic fibre for solubility in physiological solutions is not so time consuming, but there is currently no way of predicting which systems will produce such soluble fibres. Therefore anyone seeking to find such soluble fibres has to work on a trial and error basis assisted by what is commonly known as ‘chemical intuition’ but is equally commonly known as ‘a hunch’. Such trial and error testing is laborious and time consuming. Further, once a fibre is found that is soluble there is no guarantee that it will be usable at useful service temperatures.

[0020] Accordingly there is a demand for a method of predicting whether a fibre will have a reasonable solubility in physiological solutions, and further there is a demand that such a test should preferably give an indication as to expected service temperature.

[0021] Shrinkage of inorganic refractory fibres occurs through two mechanisms; the first is viscous flow of the fibre material. Most inorganic refractory fibres are glasses and so may be defined as liquids having an exceedingly high viscosity (but still liable to flow). By their nature fibres are elongate and so have a high surface area per unit volume. As the reduction of surface area is a means of reducing the surface energy of a material, when the glass becomes fluid enough it will flow so as to reduce surface area. This flow results in a coarsening and shortening of the fibres and so to shrinkage, and in the extreme results in disruption of the fibres into separate particles.

[0022] The second mechanism leading to shrinkage is that at elevated temperatures glasses may crystallise to form one or more crystal phases. Usually these crystal phases have a smaller molar volume than the glasses from which they crystallise and so shrinkage results. Some fibres are known for which the molar volume of the crystalline form exceeds that of the glass (for example Al₂O₃/SiO₂glassy fibres may crystallise to form mullite crystals). In these cases the expansion due to crystallisation may oppose the shrinkage caused by viscous flow.

[0023] If shrinkage through viscous flow occurs at a much lower temperature than crystallisation then the crystallisation may not be able to compensate for such shrinkage.

[0024] There is a demand for a fibre in which both viscous flow and crystallisation occur at as high and as similar a temperature as possible, and preferably in which the expansion due to crystallisation closely matches the shrinkage due to viscous flow so that the net effect is as close to zero shrinkage as possible.

[0025] When used as refractory insulation inorganic refractory fibres are used in several forms. The fibres may be supplied as a bulk material, but in this form the fibres are difficult to handle for many applications. Alternatively the fibre may be supplied as a blanket. Blanket fibre is generally made by a process of sucking fibre from air onto a conveyor to form a blanket. Because the fibres tend to be aligned parallel to the conveyor surface they can separate easily. Accordingly the blanket fibres are secured together by adding a binder to lock the fibres together, or by needling the blanket, or both. In needling needles are passed through the thickness of the blanket to push and draw fibres to lie transverse to the blanket and so tie the fibres together. Because binders are usually resins, such as phenolic resins, they burn off on first firing. There is a desire to reduce the amount of such binders used both because of possible health implications in handling, and because the combustion products may affect the strength of the fibres. Thus needled blanket is usually preferred.

[0026] The fibres may also be supplied as blocks, generally made from assembled layers of inorganic fibre blanket.

[0027] For some fibres needling is not possible. Crystalline fibres are generally too brittle to stand the stresses involved. For the fibres known in the industry as glass fibres (which are generally used for low temperature applications) the amount of ‘shot’ (unfiberised glass particles) present is generally too high to allow needling as the shot damages the needles. There is no needled blanket on the market that has a maximum service temperature in the range 900° C.-1200° C. There are needled blankets having a higher maximum service temperature but these use expensive fibres in comparison with other fibres usable (with the aid of binders) as blanket in the temperature range 900° C.14 1200° C.

[0028] Accordingly there is a demand for needled fibre blanket formed from inexpensive materials, being soluble in saline solutions, and having a maximum service temperature in the range 900° C.-1200° C.

[0029] As stated previously refractory oxide fibres are made by several methods all of which involve the formation of a melt of oxides and the subsequent fiberisation of the melt by e.g. spinning or blowing.

[0030] The melt of oxide material is often formed by electrical discharge melting of the constituent raw materials. The applicants, in manufacture of a CaO/MgO/SiO₂refractory oxide fibre encountered problems due to the necessity of handling CaO. These problems were discovered to be due to the moisture content of CaO as commercially available. One of the problems of use of CaO is the outgasing that results upon melting and this led at the least to a porous melt pool which caused fluctuations in the melt current; in the extreme the outgasing was explosive. Additionally use of CaO appeared to cause accelerated attack on the melt electrodes. Also CaO is a difficult and corrosive material to handle.

[0031] Accordingly there is a need for a process that minimises the use of CaO.

[0032] Accordingly the present invention provides the following features both independently and in combination:

[0033] A. Use of a vitreous inorganic fibre in the knowledge that it has a composition meeting the criteria either: that the calculated sum of the free energies of hydration of the compounds that would or could be present at equilibrium (on the basis of knowledge, informed belief or reasonable assumption) is more negative than −10 kcal/100 grams (−418.4 kJ/kg) of composition; or that the percentage of non-bridging oxygens is more than 30%. Such compositions tend to be saline soluble.

[0034] B. Use of such a vitreous inorganic fibre in the knowledge that it has a composition meeting the criterion that the ratio of glass modifiers to network formers is less than a critical value (for SiO₂based compositions the critical value is 1). Such compositions tend to be glass formers.

[0035] C. The invention also encompasses fibres selected by adopting such criteria as a test for solubility and glass formation.

[0036] D. Use as saline soluble fibres having a shrinkage of less than 3.5% when exposed to 1000° C. for 24 hours and/or 800° C. for 24 hours, of vitreous fibres having a composition comprising (in weight %):

[0037] and being essentially free of fluxing components such as alkali metals and boron oxide.

[0038] E. In one such usage the first crystalline material resulting on crystallisation has the crystal structure of diopside and has the composition consisting essentially of:

[0039] F. In a second such usage the first crystalline material resulting on crystallisation has the crystal structure of wollastonite/pseudowollastonite and has the composition consisting essentially of:

[0040] G. The fibres used in such manner may further be used as needled blankets.

[0041] H. Preferably the fibres of the general composition and compositions A and B mentioned above have a SiO₂content (expressed as a weight percentage of the constituents SiO₂, CaO and MgO) of greater than 60%.

[0042] I. The present invention further provides a method for the manufacture of refractory oxide fibres containing calcium and silicon by the formation of an oxide melt containing calcium and silicon characterised in that all or part of the calcium and all or part of silicon is provided by a calcium silicate.

Brief Description of Drawings

[0043] The invention is illustrated by way of example in the following description and with reference to the drawings in which:

[0044] FIG. 1 is a three-axis phase diagram indicating the crystalline phases in the system SiO₂/CaO/MgO (Phase Diagrams for Ceramists, The American Ceramic Society, 1964) a key to this diagram is at the end of the specification;

[0045] FIG 2 is a three-axis composition plot of the projection onto the SiO₂/CaO/MgO phase field of compositions comprising SiO₂, CaO, MgO and Al₂O₃;

[0046] FIG. 3 is a temperature/time plot of the firing regime used in a series of cyclic exposure tests of experimental compositions;

[0047] FIG. 4 is a plot of log (total solubility) v calculated free energy of hydration for a series of fibres.

[0048] FIG. 5 is a plot of log (total solubility) v % non-bonding oxygens for a series of fibres (see below).

[0049] A series of fibres were made of the compositions shown in Table 1. These fibres were melt spun by using a vertical spinning system of the type known for making inorganic fibres. Also shown in Table 1 are the compositions of some comparative commercially available inorganic oxide fibres and glass fibres.

[0050] The fibres SW-A, SW-A1, SW-A2, SW-B1, SW-B2 and SW-B3 were tested for solubility by the following method.

[0051] The fibre was first chopped in the following manner. 2.5 g of fibre (deshotted by hand) was liquidised with 250 cm³of distilled water in a domestic Moulinex (Trade Mark) food blender for 20 seconds. The suspension was then transferred to a 500 cm³plastic beaker and allowed to settle after which as much liquid as possible was decanted and the remaining liquid removed by drying in an oven at 110° C.

[0052] The solubility test apparatus comprised a shaking incubator water bath, and the test solution had the following composition:

[0053] The above materials were diluted to 1 litre with distilled water to form a physiological-like saline solution.

[0054] 0.500 grams±0.0003 grams of chopped fibre was weighed into a plastic centrifuge tube and 25 cm³of the above saline solution added. The fibre and saline solution was shaken well and inserted into the shaking incubator water bath maintained at body temperature (37° C.±1° C.). The shaker speed was set at 20 cycles/minute.

[0055] After the desired period (usually 5 hours or 24 hours) the centrifuge tube was removed and centrifuged at ≈4500 revs/minute for approximately 5 minutes. Supernatant liquid was then drawn off using a syringe and hypodermic needle. The needle was then removed from the syringe, air expelled from the syringe, and the liquid passed through a filter (0.45 micron cellulose nitrate membrane filter paper [WCN type from Whatman Labsales Limited]) into a clean plastic bottle. The liquid was then analysed by atomic absorption using a Thermo Jarrell Ash Smith - Hiefje II machine.

[0056] The operating conditions were:

[0057] The procedure and standards adopted for determining the above elements were as set out below.

[0058] SiO₂can be determined without dilution up to 250 ppm concentration (1 ppm≡1 mg/Litre). Above this concentration an appropriate dilution was made volumetrically. A 0.1% KCl solution (0.1 g in 100 cm³) was added to the final dilution to prevent ionic interference. NB If glass apparatus is used, prompt analysis is necessary.

[0059] From a stock solution of 1000 ppm pure ignited silica (99.999%) (fused with Na₂CO₃at 1200° C. for 20 minutes in a platinum crucible (0.2500 g SiO₂/2 g Na₂CO₃) and dissolved in dilute hydrochloric acid (4 molar) made up to 250 cm³with distilled water in a plastic volumetric flask) the following standards were produced:

[0060] Add 0.1% KCl to each standard before making to 100 cm³.

[0061] Aluminium may be measured directly from the sample without dilution. Standards of 1.0, 5.0 and 10.0 ppm Al may be used. For calibration readings are multiplied by 1.8895 to convert from Al to Al₂O₃.

[0062] A standard Al atomic absorption solution (e.g. BDH 1000 ppm Al) was bought and diluted using an accurate pipette to the desired concentration. 0.1% KCl was added to prevent ionic interference.

[0063] Calcium may require dilutions on the sample before determination can be carried out (i.e. ×10 and ×20 dilutions). Dilutions must contain 0.1% KCl.

[0064] A standard Ca atomic absorption solution (e.g. BDH 1000 ppm Ca) was diluted with distilled water and an accurate pipette to give standards of 0.5, 4.0 and 10.0 ppm. 0.1% KCl is added to prevent ionic interference. To convert readings obtained from Ca to CaO a factor of 1.4 was used.

[0065] Magnesium may require dilutions on the sample before determinations can be made (i.e. ×10 and ×20). Add 0.1% KCl to each dilution. To convert Mg to MgO multiply by 1.658.

[0066] A standard Mg atomic absorption solution (e.g. BDH 1000 ppm Mg) was diluted with distilled water and an accurate pipette to give standards of 0.5, 1.0 and 10.0 ppm Mg. 0.1% KCl was added to prevent ionic interference.

[0067] All stock solutions were stored in plastic bottles.

[0068] The results of the tests are indicated in Table 2.

[0069] Fibres with the best solubility (SW-A2 and SW-B3) were then tested, after annealing at varying temperatures, and compared with the comparative examples of Table 1. The results are shown in Table 3.

[0070] It can be seen that for the SW-A2 fibre, with increasing annealing temperature, the silica solubility drops progressively. In contrast the SW-B3 composition shows no loss in solubility up to 800° C. and although a reduction in solubility is shown above that temperature it is not as dramatic as for SW-A2. Despite this difference in solubility it is to be noted that only the needled GF fibre shows a comparable silica solubility and that material melts at 700° C.

[0071] The user is primarily concerned with the solubility of the fibre as received as it is in this condition that most handling occurs; as received both SW-A2 and SW-B3 fibres have extremely high solubility. Even after exposure to 800° C. and 1000° C. these fibres have solubilities much higher than other high temperature use fibres.

[0072] To investigate the reasons underlying the difference in solubilities after high temperature annealing between the SW-A2 and SW-B3 fibres qualitative X-ray diffraction was done on the fibres. The results are indicated in Table 4 and it can be seen that the SW-B3 fibre forms pseudowollastonite and wollastonite, whereas the SW-A2 fibre forms diopside. It appears therefore that the crystalline diopside has a lower solubility in physiological saline solution than the crystalline pseudowollastonite and wollastonite material precipitated from the SW-B3 fibre.

[0073] Various of the fibres were then tested for their shrinkage characteristics. Table 5 shows the results of Shrinkage tests on all the test fibres and on some of the comparative fibres. These results were obtained by proposed ISO standard ISO/TC33/SC2/N220 (equivalent to British Standard BS 1920, part 6,1986) with some modifications to account for small sample size. The method in summary comprises the manufacture of vacuum cast preforms, using 75 g of fibre in 500 cm³of 0.2% starch solution, into a 120×65 mm tool. Platinum pins (approx 0.1-0.3 mm diameter) were placed 100×45 mm apart in the 4 corners. The longest lengths (L1 & L2) and the diagonals (L3 & L4) were measured to an accuracy of ±0.01 mm using a travelling microscope attached to a steel rule with a vernier scale. The samples were placed in a furnace at temperature and left for 24 hours. The shrinkage values are given as an average of the 4 measurements.

[0074] It can be seen that in SW-A, SW-A1, SW-A2, SW-B1, SW-B2 and SW-B3, owing to the increase in molar volume on crystallisation, the linear shrinkage at the maximum service temperature is less than 3.5%.

[0075] Table 6 shows the results of a further series of shrinkage tests made in the same way.

[0076] To ascertain the applicability of these tests to long term usage a series of cyclic shrinkage tests were undertaken on the materials and the heating schedule used for these cyclic tests is shown in FIG. 3.

[0077] The results of the tests are shown in Tables 7 & 8 (the two figures given for SW-B3 are due to slight differences in chemical analysis [the fibre at the end of a production run of fibre tends to have slightly differing composition to that at the beginning of a production run of fibre]).

[0078] As a further comparison with the above discussed materials a melt was made comprising 55% SiO₂, 29.9% CaO and 18.6% MgO. Fibres made using this composition had a maximum service temperature of 700° C. and melted at 800° C.

[0079] As these results were encouraging the applicants conducted a further and extensive series of tests, concentrating on the SW-A2 and SW-B3 compositions, to ascertain the reproducibility of these results and the boundaries of the useful compositions.

[0080] Table 9 (three pages) below gives the compositions of a series of melts, ranked on silica content, and showing the shrinkage figure after exposure to 1000° C. for 24 hours (1st column) and 800° C. for 24 hours (2nd column). These shrinkages were measured by the same method as the shrinkages given above but measurements were made with a travelling microscope with a digital linear scale accurate to ±5 μm. It can clearly be seen that all fibres with a silica content of less than 58% have a shrinkage at 1000° C. of greater than 3.5% save two (B3-3 and 708). These fibres, together with some fibres with a silica content of greater than 58% although showing a reasonable figure at 1000° C., show a very poor figure at 800° C. Compositions with an SiO₂content of greater than 70% appear to fiberise poorly. This may be because such compositions have two liquids in the melt as may be appreciated from FIG 1.

[0081] There are several anomalies, namely compositions B3-6A, A2-25, A2-24, A2-23, B3-2A, B3-3A, A2-19, and 932. All of these have an SiO₂content of >58% but a high shrinkage.

[0082] On the assumption that the minimum silica level for satisfactory shrinkage varies with MgO content the applicants have determined that fibres with a silica content (in weight percent) that fail to meet the following expression do not have satisfactory shrinkages at either or both 800° C. and 1000° C.:

[0083] The applicants have further found that the Al₂O₃content is important. From their studies it appears that the maximum Al₂O₃content lies somewhere between 2.57% and 3.97%. The applicants have found that with increasing alumina levels the first material to crystallise is calcium aluminate and this possibly forms a liquid phase that assists flow and hence shrinkage.

[0084] Table 10 shows, for the same compositions as Table 9, 24 hour solubilities for each major constituent. It can be seen that all of the compositions have high solubilities.

[0085] As mentioned above use of CaO in forming calcium containing fibres is inconvenient and can be hazardous. The applicants investigated use of mixed oxide materials that would avoid the handling of CaO. A fibre was made by admixture of magnesia with silica and wollastonite (CaSiO₃).

[0086] The raw materials used to make the melt comprised:

[0087] Pennine Darlington Heavy Magnesia (#200)

[0088] Partek's Finnish Low Iron Wollastonite (#200) (U.K. agent—Cornelius Chemical Co., Romford, Essex)

[0089] Hepworth Mineral's Redhill T washed silica sand

[0090] These constituents were mixed as 78.65% Wollastonite; 19.25% SiO₂; and 3.6% MgO. This gave 0.4-0.5% of the final melt as Al₂O₃.

[0091] It was surprisingly found that in producing a melt using these constituents the current requirements were only two-thirds that for the use of the raw oxides.

[0092] Fibre was produced by blowing (although spinning and other methods can be used). 2 runs were performed with different blowing conditions.

[0093] Chemical analysis was undertaken by the Analytical Department at the applicant's subsidiary Morgan Materials Technology (hereinafter called M²T) using wet chemical techniques. Fibre diameters were measured using M²T's Galai particle analyser, with shape analysis software. Typically 40,000 fibres were analysed for each run.

[0094] The first result of note was the speed of melt reaction when using wollastonite as compared with lime. Also the current was seen to be very stable throughout the growth of the melt. If the current was lost whilst pulling the electrodes apart the current could be restored simply by pushing them back together again. This was not possible with the runs using lime.

[0095] Runs 1 and 2 indicate the respective x-ray fluorescence analyses for each run.

[0096] Accordingly it appears to be the case that by using what are cheaper ingredients than the pure oxides one can obtain a fibre that has as high a performance as using purer oxides and at much improved energy costs and safety. It is to be noted that this feature of the invention is not limited to saline soluble fibres and any oxide fibre that contains both calcium and silicon can advantageously be made with a calcium silicate, wollastonite being merely an example of such a silicate.

[0097] The previous description is directed towards high temperature usage of particular saline soluble fibres. The following is directed towards the prediction and use of saline soluble fibres. A series of fritted glass melts were made of the compositions shown in Tables 11A and 11B and quenched in water. Solubilities of the various components of the quenched melt were measured by the previously described method of atomic absorption. The solubilities were normalised to a specific surface area of 0.25 m²/gram of fibre.

[0098] The free energy of hydration was calculated by normalising the chemical analysis to 100 weight %; making the assumption that simple silicates (MSiO₃/M₂SiO₃) are present and calculating the free energy of hydration contribution of each species; and summing to get the total free energy of hydration. The data in Tables 11A & 11B is also presented in FIG. 4. It can be seen that the fibres lie on a generally straight line bar four groups of materials that will be explained below.

[0099] Table 11 shows in each column the following:

[0100] Fibre reference

[0101] Composition

[0102] Molar ratios

[0103] Moles/100 grams of melt

[0104] Species assumed (see below)

[0105] Calculated free energy of hydration of assumed species (kcal/100 grams)(see below)

[0106] Calculated free energy of hydration of assumed species (kJ/kg) (see below)

[0107] Solubility data (# indicates not measured [see below])

[0108] Specific surface area

[0109] Normalised solubility data

[0110] log normalised solubility

[0111] The base data on which calculation of the free energy of hydration was done is set out in Tables 12 which indicates free energies of hydration taken from the literature in the units kcal/mol and kJ/mol.

[0112] Although calculations were undertaken assuming the presence of the simplest silicates choice of other silicates (such as disilicates) does not appear to change the calculations much. For example given below is the calculation for an assumed composition which shows only minor differences for the free energy of hydration calculated.

[0113] The applicants have found that when the free energy of hydration is more negative than −10 kcal/100 grams (−418.4 kJ/kg) of composition the composition showed high solubility. The compositions where this relationship broke down were those for which the total solubility was not available (for example those materials containing sodium, where any dissolved sodium would be swamped by the sodium in the saline solution) or where the free energy of hydration of the most likely species present was not available from the literature.

[0114] As a test of this technique the two examples of European Patent No. 0399320 were examined. The disclosed examples had the compositions:

[0115] Using the above method of calculation Composition 1 had a free energy of hydration of −11.6 kcal/100 grams (−485.3 kJ/kg) whereas Composition 2 had a free energy of hydration of −5.8 kcal/100 grams (−242.6 kJ/kg). This would suggest that composition 1 would be a saline soluble fibre, and hence physiologically safer than an insoluble fibre; whereas Composition 2 would be predicted to be a relatively insoluble fibre and hence less safe. This is what is disclosed in EP 0399320, the fibres of Composition 2 having a longer lifetime in studies in which the fibres were introduced interperitoneally into rats.

[0116] As mentioned above this predictive test can fail under some circumstances. To avoid these difficulties the applicants looked to a different predictive technique, namely the assessment of the amount of non-bridging oxygens present. This is calculated by normalising the chemical analysis to 100 weight %; calculating the molar percentage of each oxide; summing the oxygen-weighted contribution of each oxide to get the total number of oxygens; summing the weighted contribution of each oxide of non-bridging oxygens (see below); and taking the ratio of non-bridging oxygens to the total number of oxygens. The applicants have found that when this figure exceeds 30% the fibres are soluble.

[0117] To explain the term non-bridging oxygen one must look to the structure of glasses. Glasses are very stiff liquids and to form usually require the presence of a material that can form a network (usually an oxygen-bridged network). The network may be modified by constituents that contribute non-bridging parts to the network and open the structure of the network and so prevent crystallisation. These materials are usually referred to as network-formers and modifiers respectively.

[0118] The terms modifier and network former are well known in the glass industries. Network formers are materials such as SiO₂, P₂O₅, B₂O₃and GeO₂which can form an interconnected network to form the glassy phase. Modifiers are substances such as CaO, Na₂O, and K₂O which alter the network and have effects on such properties as viscosity and melting point. There are some intermediate materials (such as Al₂O₃, TiO₂, PbO, ZnO and BeO) which can act as both network formers and modifiers depending on the environment and on the amount present.

[0119] In the above mentioned test, for calculating the non-bridging oxygens, one ignores the network formers and calculates the contribution of each other oxide. The contribution of each oxide depends on the geometry and charge of each cation in the glass. As examples typical contributions are as follows:

[0120] Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Sr²⁺ and other divalent network modifier cations contribute 2 non-bridging oxygens

[0121] K⁺, Na⁺ and other monovalent network modifier cations contribute 1 non-bridging oxygen

[0122] Al³⁺, Ti³⁺ and other intermediate cations contribute −1 non-bridging oxygen (i.e these oxides reduce the number of non-bridging oxygens)

[0123] ( Ti⁴⁺ is reduced to Ti³⁺ in most glasses when present in relatively small quantities)

[0124] Table 13 shows, for the compositions of Table 11, the calculated figure for non-bonding oxygens and these figures are reproduced in FIG. 5. It can be seen that the plot of FIG. 5 is more linear than that of FIG. 4. Compositions with greater than 30% non-bridging oxygens show high solubility.

[0125] To illustrate the method the calculation for one example (the first shown in Table 13) is given below:

[0126] As an example one can look to European Patent Specification No. 0399320 referred to above. Using this method in relation to that specification Composition 1 has a non-bridging oxygen percentage of 48.2% whereas Composition 2 has a non-bridging oxygen percentage of 19.6%, again predicting that Composition 1 is more soluble than Composition 2.

[0127] There is a further criterion which a composition must meet for it to form vitreous fibres, namely that it be capable of forming a glass. The applicants have found a simple test. If the ratio of modifiers to network formers is less than a critical value (for SiO₂based glasses, 1) the composition will generally form a glass. For the purpose of this test reasonable results are obtained if such intermediate materials are treated as networkers. Table 14 shows for a series of compositions in each column:

[0128] Fibre reference (N.B. these are not the same fibres as shown in tables 9 & 10)

[0129] Composition

[0130] Molar ratios

[0131] Ratio of glass modifiers to network formers

[0132] Free energy of hydration of raw oxides

[0133] Melting Point

[0134] X-ray diffraction results

[0135] Solubility data (# indicates not measured)

[0136] Specific surface area

[0137] Normalised solubility data

[0138] Arbitrary ranking as to solubility and glass forming ability

[0139] Indication as to whether melting point above 1500° C.

[0140] It should be emphasised that this test is a screening one rather than a wholly predictive one as there are several circumstances that may lead to its failure. Among these circumstances are compound formation and inability to quench fast enough to form glass.

[0141] Having adopted these tests as a screening method there follows a further step to ascertain whether the composition will form a vitreous fibre. This last step is best examined experimentally as fibre forming ability is a complex function of many physical characteristics, e.g. viscosity, which are often difficult to measure.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. A method of insulating an article comprising:

(A) disposing on, in, near or around the article thermal insulation which is a refractory insulating material having a maximum service temperature greater than 900° C. and comprising vitreous fibers having a composition comprising SiO₂, CaO, MgO, and optionally Al₂O₃, wherein:

(a) Sio₂is present in an amount (1) greater than 58% by weight SiO₂, if the amount of MgO in the composition is in the range 0 through 10 percent by weight; or (2) greater than the sum of (58 +0.5 (weight percent of MgO-10)) percent by weight SiO₂, if the amount of MgO in the composition is greater than 10 percent by weight;

(b) an amount up to 42 percent by weight CaO;

(d) 0 to less than 3.97 percent by weight Al₂O₃;

wherein the refractory insulation material has a maximum service temperature greater than 900° C.; wherein the refractory insulation material has a shrinkage of less than 3.5 percent when exposed to a temperature of 1000° C. for 24 hours, and has a shrinkage of less than 3.5 percent when exposed to a temperature of 800° C. for 24 hours; and

wherein the refractory insulation material is essentially free of alkali metal oxide and boron oxide fluxing components; and

(B) repeatedly exposing said insulated article to a temperature of 1000° C. or more and cooling to below 1000° C.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the amount of SiO₂is less than 70 percent by weight.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the vitreous fibers crystallize as wollastonite, pseudowollastonite, or a mixture thereof after exposure to a temperature of 1000° C., and wherein said wollastonite, pseudowollastonite, or mixture thereof comprises:

(a) 60 through 67 percent by weight SiO₂;

(b) 26 through 35 percent by weight CaO;

(d) 0 through 3.5 percent by weight Al₂O₃.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the vitreous fibers comprise:

(a) a maximum of 71.24 percent by weight SiO₂;

(b) 4.46 through 34.49 percent by weight CaO;

(d) 0 through 2.57 percent by weight Al₂O₃.

5. The method of claim 1, wherein the vitreous fibers further comprise:

(e) 0 through 0.65 percent by weight Na₂O;

(f) 0 through 0.13 percent by weight K₂O;

(g) 0.08 through 0.4 percent by weight Fe₂O₃; and

(h) 0 through 1.23 percent by weight ZrO₂.

6. The method of claim 1, further comprising forming said vitreous fibers into a bulk, blanket, block, or vacuum-formed form.

7. The method of claim 1, further comprising exposing said insulated article to a temperature above around 1000° C.

8. The method of claim 6 wherein said vitreous fibers are formed into a needled blanket.

9. The method of claim 1, wherein the vitreous fibers crystallize as diopside after exposure to a temperature of 1000° C., and wherein said diopside comprises:

(a) 59 through 64 percent by weight SiO₂;

(b) 19 through 23 percent by weight CaO;

(d) 0 through 3.5 percent by weight Al₂O₃.

Patent Citations (115)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US2051279	1936-08-01	Thorndyke	Applicant
US2116303	1938-05-01	Coss	Applicant
US2155107	1939-04-01	Tyler et al.	Applicant
US2308857	1943-01-01	Bowes	Applicant
US2428810	1947-10-01	Powell	Applicant
US2520168	1950-08-01	Powell	Applicant
US2520169	1950-08-01	Powell	Applicant
US2576312	1951-11-01	Minnick	Applicant
US2577431	1951-12-01	Powell	Applicant
US2823416	1958-02-01	Powell	Applicant
US3348956	1967-10-01	Ekdahl	Applicant
US3449137	1969-06-01	Ekdahl	Applicant
US3799836	1974-03-01	Tomic et al.	Applicant
US3887386	1975-06-01	Majumdar	Applicant
US4036654	1977-07-01	Yale et al.	Examiner
US4054472	1977-10-01	Kondo et al.	Applicant
US4055434	1977-10-01	Chen et al.	Applicant
US4153439	1979-05-01	Tomic et al.	Applicant
US4205992	1980-06-01	Mogensen et al.	Applicant
US4238213	1980-12-01	Pallo et al.	Applicant
US4251279	1981-02-01	Ekdahl	Applicant
US4274881	1981-06-01	Langton et al.	Applicant
US4325724	1982-04-01	Froberg	Applicant
US4342581	1982-08-01	Neubauer et al.	Applicant
US4351054	1982-09-01	Olds	Applicant
US4366251	1982-12-01	Rapp	Applicant
US4377415	1983-03-01	Johnson et al.	Applicant
US4437192	1984-03-01	Fujiu et al.	Applicant
US4443550	1984-04-01	Kume et al.	Applicant
US4482541	1984-11-01	Telfer et al.	Applicant
US4555492	1985-11-01	Ekdahl et al.	Applicant
US4615988	1986-10-01	Le Moigne et al.	Applicant
US4661134	1987-04-01	Hartung	Applicant
US4678659	1987-07-01	Drake et al.	Applicant
US4693740	1987-09-01	Noiret et al.	Applicant
US4957559	1990-09-01	Tiesler et al.	Applicant
US5032552	1991-07-01	Nonami et al.	Applicant
US5055428	1991-10-01	Potter	Applicant
US5108957	1992-04-01	Cohen et al.	Applicant
US5121748	1992-06-01	Ditz et al.	Applicant
US5217529	1993-06-01	Tiesler et al.	Applicant
US5248637	1993-09-01	Taneda et al.	Applicant
US5250488	1993-10-01	Thelohan et al.	Applicant
US5312806	1994-05-01	Mogensen	Applicant
US5332699	1994-07-01	Olds et al.	Examiner
AU255803	1963-07-01		Applicant
CA588493	1959-12-01		Applicant
CA2017344	1990-11-01		Applicant
DE1942991	1970-03-01		Applicant
DE2748127	1978-05-01		Applicant
DE2732387	1978-11-01		Applicant
DE3444397	1986-06-01		Applicant
DE3905394	1989-09-01		Applicant
DE4417230	1995-11-01		Applicant
EP19600	1980-11-01		Applicant
EP76677	1983-04-01		Applicant
EP91866	1983-10-01		Applicant
EP135449	1985-03-01		Applicant
EP399652	1990-11-01		Applicant
EP399320	1990-11-01		Applicant
EP412878	1991-02-01		Applicant
EP459897	1991-12-01		Applicant
EP144349	1992-04-01		Applicant
EP546984	1993-06-01		Applicant
EP588251	1994-03-01		Applicant
EP586797	1994-03-01		Applicant
EP585547	1994-03-01		Applicant
EP591696	1994-04-01		Applicant
FI63007	1982-12-01		Applicant
FR1149289	1957-12-01		Applicant
FR1165275	1958-10-01		Applicant
FR1589410	1970-05-01		Applicant
FR2118026	1972-07-01		Applicant
FR2662688	1991-12-01		Applicant
FR2662687	1991-12-01		Applicant
GB520247	1939-04-01		Applicant
GB790397	1958-02-01		Applicant
GB810773	1959-03-01		Applicant
GB1209244	1970-10-01		Applicant
GB1273205	1972-05-01		Applicant
GB1399556	1975-07-01		Applicant
GB1446910	1976-08-01		Applicant
GB2011379	1979-07-01		Applicant
GB2081703	1982-02-01		Applicant
GB2083017	1982-03-01		Applicant
GB2122537	1984-01-01		Applicant
GB2150553	1985-07-01		Applicant
GB2164557	1986-03-01		Applicant
JP49-27620	1974-03-01		Applicant
JP51-13819	1976-02-01		Applicant
JP51-043429A	1976-04-01		Applicant
JP51-133311	1976-11-01		Applicant
JP52-4519	1977-01-01		Applicant
JP56-54252	1981-05-01		Applicant
SE104380	1942-04-01		Applicant
SU276349	1970-07-01		Applicant
SU607807	1978-05-01		Applicant
WO85/02394	1985-06-01		Applicant
WO86/04807	1986-08-01		Applicant
WO87/05007	1987-08-01		Applicant
WO8705007	1987-08-01		Examiner
WO89/12032	1987-12-01		Applicant
WO90/02713	1990-03-01		Applicant
WO90/11756	1990-10-01		Applicant
WO91/11403	1991-09-01		Applicant
WO92/07801	1992-05-01		Applicant
WO92/09536	1992-06-01		Applicant
WO9209536	1992-06-01		Examiner
WO93/15208	1993-08-01		Applicant
WO93/19596	1993-10-01		Applicant
WO93/22251	1993-11-01		Applicant
WO94/14717	1994-07-01		Applicant
WO94/14718	1994-07-01		Applicant
WO95/29135	1995-11-01		Applicant
WO96/01793	1996-01-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (50)

Brochure showing Manville Corporation Superwool Product (two pages) No date.Applicant
Brochure showing Morgan Crucible Company Superwood Product (two pages) No date.Applicant
Brochure showing Carborundum Company Insulfrax Product (sixteen pages) No date.Applicant
Brochure re: PARGAS-Platten 1000°C Mineral Wool Plates (three pages) No date.Applicant
“Fiber Glass,” J. Mohr and W. Rowe, pp. 4-23 No date.Applicant
“Prediction of Glass Durability as a Function of Glass Composition and Test Conditions . . . ” C.M. Jantzen, Advances in the Fusion of Glass, 24.1-24.17 No date.Applicant
“Stability of Radioactive Waste Glasses Assessed from Hydration Thermodynamics,” M.J. Plodinec, C.M. Jantzen, and G.G. Wicks No date.Applicant
“Nuclear Waste Glass Durability: 1, Predicting environmental Response from thermodynamic (Pourbaix) Diagrams,” Carol M. Jantzen, Journal of American Ceramic Society, 75(9):2433-2448 (1992) No month.Applicant
“Calcium Aluminate Glass Fibres: Drawing from Supercooled Melts Versus Inviscid . . . ,” F.T. Wallenberger et al., Materials Letters,, 11:229-235 (1991) No month.Applicant
“Chemical Durability of Glass,” Chemistry of Glasses, Chapter 6, 2nd Edition, A. Paul (1990) No month.Applicant
Chemical Abstracts, 110(10):373, Abstract No. 81274q, (equivalent to CN-A-87 108257) (1989) No month.Applicant
“Low-Cost Reinforcing fibres Promise a High Level of Performance,” S.A. Dunn, Modern Plastics International, pp. 50-51 (1989) No month.Applicant
“The Behaviour of Mineral Fibres in Physiological Solutions,” H. Förster, Proceedings of 1982 WhHO IARC Conference, Copenhagen, vol. 2, pp. 27-55 (1988) No month.Applicant
“Chemical Durability,” Glass Science and Technology, Chapter 34, Elsevier (1988) No month.Applicant
“Glass-Water Interactions,” H. Scholze, Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 102:1-10 (1988) No month.Applicant
“The Reactions of MMMF in a Physiological Model Fluid and in Water,” R. Klingholz & B. Steinkopf, Proceedings of 1982 WHO IARC Conference, Copenhagen, vol. 2, pp. 61-68 (1988) No month.Applicant
“Solubility and Durability of Manmade Mineral Fibers in Physiological Fluids,” J. Bauer, et al., (nineteen pages; dated no later than 1988) No month.Applicant
Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction and Materials (ASTM) E119-88) (fourteen pages; 1988) No month.Applicant
“An in vitro Study of the Chemical Durability of Siliceous Fibres,” H. Scholze & R. Conradt, Annals o fOccupational Hygiene, 31, 4B, pp. 683-692 (1987) No month.Applicant
“In vitro Study on Siliceous fibres,” H. Scholze & R. Conradt, Proceedings of 1986 WHO IARC Conference No month.Applicant
“Chemical Durability of Asbestos and of Man-made Mineral Fibres in vivo,” B. Bellman et al., Aerosol Scientist, vol. 17, No. 3, pp. 341-345 (1986) No month.Applicant
“Prediction of Nuclear Waste Glass Durability from Natural Analogs,” C.M. Jantzen, Advances in Ceramics, vol. 20, Nuclear Waste Management II (1986) No month.Applicant
“Thermodynamic Model of Natural, Medieval and Nuclear Waste Glass Durability,” C.M. Jantzen et al., Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids, 67:208-233 (1984) No month.Applicant
“A New Approach to Predicting the Durability of Glasses from Their Chemical Compositions,” R.G. Newton and A. Paul, Glass Technology, 21(6):307-309 (1980).Applicant
“Inviscid Spinning of Filaments via Chemical Jet Stabilization,” R.E. Cunningham, L.F. Rakestraw and S.A. Dunn, American Institute of Chemical Engineers Symposium Series, No. 180, vol. 74, 20-31 (1978) No month.Applicant
“Chemical Durability of Glasses in the Systems SiO2-CaO-Na2O-RmOn,,” H. Ohta and Y. Suzuki, Ceramic Bulletin, vol. 57, No. 6, pp. 602-604 (1978) No month.Applicant
“A Scale of Acidity and Basicity in Glass,” Glass Industry, Kuan-Han Sun (1948) No month.Applicant
“Mineral Wool,” Encylopedia of Chemical Technology, Kirk & Other, vol. 9, p. 124 (copyright 1952) No month.Applicant
“Mineral Wool,” U.S. Bureau of Mines Circular, 6984R, dated Jun. 1939.Applicant
“Multi Component Silicate Glasses,” pp. 28-31 No date.Applicant
“Slag Wools,” pp. 111-127 No date.Applicant
“Preparation and Properties of Barium Ferrite Using Hot-Rolled Mill Scale,” Chien, Yung-Tsen, et al., J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 72, No. 8, pp. 1328-1332 (1989) No month.Applicant
“Advertisement for the Sale of a Fiber Glass Blanket Under the Name New Super Wool™,” published after Sep. 1986 (on or about Jan. 1987.Applicant
“The Dissolution of Asbestos Fibres in Water,” Gronow, J., Clay Minerals, vol. 22, pp. 21-35 (1987) No month.Applicant
“Man-Made Vitreous Fibers: An Overview of Studies on Their Biologic Effects,” Gross, P., Am. Ind. Hyg. Assoc. J., vol. 47, No. 11, 717-723 (1986) No month.Applicant
“Solubility of Asbestos and Man-Made Fibers In Vitro and In Vivo: Its Significance in Lung Disease,” Morgan, A., et al., Environmental Research, vol. 39, pp. 475-484 (1986) No month.Applicant
“Corrosion Phenomena in Glass Fibers and Glass Fiber Reinforced Thermosetting Resins,” Bledzki, A. et al., Composites Science & Technology, Harris and Chou, eds., Elsevier Applied Science Publishers, vol. 23, pp. 263-286 (1985) No month.Applicant
“Fiber Toxicology,” Leinweber, J.P., J. Occupational Medicine, vol. 23, No. 6, pp. 431-434 (1981) No month.Applicant
“Development of a Deoiling Process for Recycling Millscale,” Recycling in the Steel Industry, Proceedings of the 1st Process Technology Conference, vol. 1, pp. 184-187, Washington, D.C., (Mar. 25-26, 1980).Applicant
“Effects of Glass Surface Area to Solution Volume Ration on Glass Corrosion,” Ethridge, E.C. et al., Physics and Chemistry of Glasses, vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 35-40 (1979) No month.Applicant
“Glass Compositions for Glass Fibers,” Moriya, Ichiro, et al., Chemical Abstracts, vol. 89, No. 22, p. 285, Abstract 184615W (1978) No month.Applicant
“Glass for Making Glass Fiber,” Grigor'ev, V.S., et al., Chemical Abstracts, vol. 81, No. 22, Abstract 140076b (1974) No month.Applicant
“Dissolution Kinetics of Magnesium Silicates,” Luce, R.W., et al., Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta., vol. 36, pp. 35-50 (1972) No month.Applicant
“Solubility of Fibres In Vitro and in Vivo,” J.P. Leinwebeer Proceedings of 1982 WHO IARC Conference, Copenhagen, vol. 2, pp. 87-101 (1988) No month.Applicant
“Elements of Ceramics,” Norton, F.H., Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Inc., p. 39 Reading, Massachusetts (1952) No month.Applicant
Carlock, D.E., Ceramic Fibres, Refractories Journal, 58:17-20 (1983) No month.Applicant
Dietrichs & Kronert, Gas Warme International, 30 (1981) No month.Applicant
Ofentechnik Stahl & Eisen, 110(6):115 (1990) No month.Applicant
Keramishe Zeitschriften, 33(9):516 (1981) No month.Applicant
Extract frin DUB V ENV 1094, Part 7, section 7, 9-12 No date.Applicant

Abstract