Oral therapy for the treatment of allergies and method of manufacture

[0002] The present application is a continuation application of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/472,711, filed Jun. 5, 1995, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/329,685, filed Oct. 26, 1994, now U.S. Pat. No. 5,609,871; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/178,503, filed Jan. 7, 1994, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/994,932, filed Dec. 22, 1992, now abandoned; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/719,160, filed Jun. 21, 1991, now abandoned.-

[0003] Immune response in mammals, including humans, is most predictably induced by parenteral (injectable) administration of a protein antigen. Oral administration of a protein antigen is usually an ineffective route of immunization. Indeed, oral administration of a protein may be immunosuppressive rather than immunogenic (Mowat, A. M. 1987, “The Regulation of Immune Responses to Dietary Protein Antigens,” Immunol. Today,8:93). Thus, development of a method for efficient oral immunization would be extremely desirable. Immunization has beneficial therapeutic effects in many areas of clinical medicine. Specifically, antimicrobial vaccines consisting of bacteria, viruses and their products are beneficial in preventing and combating infections. Also, allergy immunotherapy, a treatment in which injections of small doses of allergens results in alleviation of allergy symptoms, is important in therapy of inhalant allergies, venom allergies and anaphylaxis. Finally, treatment of autoimmune diseases with autoantigens or their components can alleviate the autoimmune diseases, as discussed in PCT application WO92/06708. Luciano Adorini, et al., Approaches Toward Peptide Based Immunotherapy of Autoimmune Diseases Springer Seminar in Immunopathology Immunoprotein(1992) 14:187-199. Further, rejection of transplanted organs can be reduced by injection of MHC Class I and Class II antigens. Mohamed H. Sayegh, et al., Induction of Immunity and Oral Tolerance With Polymorphic Class II Major Histocompatibility Complex in the Rat, Proc. Nat. Acad. Sc. USA (1992) 89 7762-7766.

[0004] Collectively, we refer to these proteins as therapeutic since they exert a therapeutic effect through activating the immune system of humans and mammals. These immunotherapeutic proteins are all susceptible to proteolytic enzymatic digestion and other denaturing and degrading processes such as acid pH digestion.

[0005] Immunization by oral administration of therapeutic proteins has been quite ineffective in the past. It is believed that these proteins are damaged or destroyed by gastric and intestinal juices, thus losing their immunogenicity by the time they reach the lymphoid (immune) tissue in the gastrointestinal tract.

[0006] The present invention is premised on the realization that an orally administrable therapeutic protein can be formed by microencapsulating a therapeutic protein with a coating which is insoluble under acid conditions and resistant to proteolytic digestion. Such conditions are encountered in the mammalian stomach and part of the small intestines. Preventing exposure to acid and proteolytic digestion preserves antigenic structure of the protein and its ability to immunize.

[0007] The present invention is further premised on the realization that by microencapsulating the protein under totally aqueous conditions without employing any nonaqueous solvents, the structure and the immunogenicity of the protein remains intact.

[0008] More particularly, the present invention is premised on the realization that the therapeutic proteins should be coated with an acid stable coating under totally aqueous conditions so that they can pass through the stomach without being digested and then released intact into the small intestines where they can exert their therapeutic and/or immunological activity. In a preferred embodiment, the enteric coating is a water emulsion of ethylacrylate methylacrylic acid copolymer, or hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose acetate succinate (HPMAS).

[0009] The objects and advantages of the present invention will be further appreciated in light of the following detailed description and drawings.

[0010] FIG. 1 is a graph depicting anti-OVA (hen egg albumin) IgG antibody titers of mice fed hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose acetate succinate (HPMAS) coated OVA containing microspheres or ground coated OVA microspheres or OVA in solution;

[0011] FIG. 2 is a graph depicting the release of hen egg albumin (OVA) from enteric coated microspheres after two hours in solutions at various pH;

[0012] FIG. 3 is a graph depicting OVA released over time from enteric coated microspheres in solutions at gastric (1.2), or intestinal pH (6.8);

[0013] FIG. 4 is a graph showing IgG antibody response to OVA in naive mice following the feeding with OVA (1 milligram per day for 3 days) as enteric coated microspheres or OVA in solution;

[0014] FIG. 5 is a graph showing the anti-diphtheria toxoid titer in mice primed with diphtheria toxoid and fed enteric coated diphtheria toxoid microspheres primed with diphtheria toxoid without subsequent immunization; and

[0015] FIG. 6 is a graph showing IgG antibody titers of mice fed enteric coated microspheres containing OVA or OVA and aluminum hydroxide.

[0016] According to the present invention, an orally administrable therapeutic agent such as a protein or protein containing virus or bacteria is formed by microencapsulating the therapeutic protein with an enteric~ coating. This is generally referred to as the therapeutic protein.

[0017] The therapeutic agents are dispersed in an aqueous solution. The aqueous solution is then sprayed onto nonpareils. Subsequently the microspheres are coated with a water emulsion of a polymer which upon solidification is acid resistant. This protects the therapeutic protein as it passes through the stomach and releases it into the small intestines where it can act upon the lymphoid tissue.

[0018] For purposes of the present invention, “therapeutic protein” will include allergenic proteins and digested fragments thereof. These include pollen allergens from ragweed, rye, Junegrass, orchard grass, sweet vernal grass, redtop grass, timothy grass, yellow dock, wheat, corn, sagebrush, bluegrass, California annual grass, pigweed, bernuda grass, Russian thistle, mountain cedar, oak, box elder, sycamore, maple, elm, etc., dust and mites, bee venom, food allergens, animal dander, and insect venoms.

[0019] Further, any of these allergens digested according to the method disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,469,677, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, are also suitable for use in the present invention. This basically proteolytic enzymatic digestion of allergens. Accordingly, polypepfides formed by such proteolytic enzymatic digestion are also suitable for use as therapeutic proteins for use in the present invention.

[0020] Therapeutic proteins include microbial vaccines which include viral, bacterial and protozoal vaccines and their various components such as surface antigens. These include vaccines which contain glycoproteins, proteins or peptides derived from these proteins. Such vaccines are prepared from Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Neisseria meningitidis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Salmonellae species, Shigellae species, Escherichia coli, Klebsiellae species, Proteus species, Vibrio cholerae, Helicobacter pylori, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Haemophilus influenzae, Bordetella pertussis, Branhamella catarrhalis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Legionella pneumophila, Pneumocystis carinjii Treponema pallidumand Chlamydiae species, tetanus toxoid, diphtheria toxoid, influenza viruses, adenoviruses, paramyxoviruses, rubella viruses, polioviruses, hepatitis viruses, herpesviruses, rabies viruses, HIV-1 viruses, HIV-2 viruses, and papilloma viruses. Other therapeutic proteins include those used for the treatment of autoimmune disease and to prevent transplant rejection.

[0021] In obtaining bacteria preparations, it is preferable to employ lyophilized bacteria which can be purchased or obtained by growing the bacteria, killing them with heat, washing them, followed by lyophilization.

[0022] Autxoimmune disease is a disease in which the body produces an immunogenic response to some constituent of its own tissue. An autoimmune disease can be classified into those which predominantly affect one organ, such as hemolytic anemia and chronic thyroiditis, and those in which the autoimmune disease process is diffused through many tissues, such as multiple sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematosus, and arthritis. Exemplary autoimmune diseases and corresponding auto antigens include:

[0023] One of the primary problems with transplanting organs is rejection of the organs. The immune system of the recipient can be treated to reduce rejection by use of a therapeutic protein. The therapeutic protein itself is the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) protein. MHC proteins are divided into two major groups: MHC I and MHC II. Either or both may serve as a therapeutic protein, as well as peptides derived therefrom, i.e., fragments or synthetic peptides derived from known amino acid sequences of the protein.

[0024] A second component which can be added to the therapeutic protein is a stabilizing agent. Stabilizing agents provide physical protection for the protein. Generally these stabilizing agents are therapeutically inactive water soluble sugars such as lactose, mannitol and trehalose. These act to protect the therapeutic antigen during the coating process and passage through the gastrointestinal tract.

[0025] To form orally administrable microcapsules for use in the present invention, an aqueous solution of the therapeutic protein and the optional stabilizing agent is formed. The aqueous solution will include generally from about 0.5 to about 10% by weight of the therapeutic protein with about 1% being preferred, and from about 1% to about 10% by weight of the stabilizing agent with about 5% being preferred. It is desirable to add 1-10% of polyvinylpyrrolidone to bind the therapeutic protein to the nonpareil and act as a bioadhesive agent for the protein during the passage through the gastrointestinal tract.

[0026] Nonpareils are small, round particles of pharmaceutically inert materials. Generally nonpareils formed from the combination of sucrose and starch are preferred. One such brand is Nupareils which is sold by Ingredient Technology Corporation. The preferred size is 30-35 mesh.

[0027] The nonpareils are coated with the aqueous solution of the therapeutic protein, the stabilizing agent, and bioadhesive agent to provide a coating of 1-30% by weight on a solids basis. Glatt brand powder coater granulators such as the GPCG-1, GPCG-5, or GPCG-60 fluid bed coaters are suitable for use in this application. Coating conditions and times will vary depending on the apparatus and coating viscosity. But, generally all coating steps must be conducted at less than 50° C., preferably less than 35° C. to avoid denaturing the protein.

[0028] The protein coated microspheres are dried and subsequently coated with an acid stable polymer (enteric coating). Generally, the coating will be applied in the same manner as the protein with the same equipment.

[0029] The coating composition used in the present invention is preferably a water based emulsion polymer. The preferred coating is an ethylacrylate methacrylic acid copolymer sold under the trademark Eudragit L 30D manufactured by Rhom Pharma. This has a molecular weight of about 250,000 and is generally applied as a 30% aqueous solution. An alternate coating is hydroxypropylmethyl cellulose acetate succinate.

[0030] The coating composition can be combined with a plasticizer to improve the continuity of the coating. There are several well known plasticizers typically used. Triethyl-citrate (TEC) sold by Morfley Inc. is preferred. This can form about 1-30% of coating composition. Although plasticizers can be liquid, they are not considered to be solvents since they lodge within the coating altering its physical characteristics. They do not act to dissolve the protein. Any plasticizer which dissolves or denatures the protein would be unacceptable.

[0031] Talc (3.0% of coating composition) can also be added to prevent sticking between the particles if desired. Also, an antifoaming agent (0.0025 % of coating composition) such as sorbitan sesquioleate (Nikko Chemicals Company Limited) or silicone can be added. Both the talc and antifoaming agent are added only if needed.

[0032] The microspheres coated with the therapeutic protein and optional stabilizing and bioadhesive agents, are dried and are then coated with the enteric coating as previously described. The coating solution is about 30% polymer, 0-30% plasticizer, 0 to 3% talc and 0 to 0.0025% antifoaming agent and water. It is important that there be no organic solvents including alcohols and even glycols present in the coating composition. The presence of these solvents during coating application can denature the therapeutic protein. The coating is conducted in the same equipment used to coat the nonpareils with therapeutic protein. The temperature for this coating should be about 30° C. but less than 50° C.

[0033] In an alternate embodiment of the present invention, a therapeutically acceptable water dispersible aluminum compound such as aluminum sulfate or aluminum hydroxide are added to the aqueous dispersion or solution of protein prior to coating onto the nonpareil. This acts to increase immunogenicity of the proteins. Generally 1% to 10% of aluminum compound is added.

[0034] The enteric coated microspheres then can be placed in gel capsules for oral administration to humans. Dosage will depend on the individual and the course of the therapy. Generally, the dosages will be the same as dosages used for treatment when administered by injection. With transplant rejection, the dosage may vary greatly, depending on the patient's immune system. Generally, the dosage will be 0.1 to 100 mg administered daily starting about two weeks prior to transplant in order to induce a state of tolerance to a foreign graft (organ tissue or cell) and may continue post-transplant in order to maintain the tolerant state. Thereafter a lower maintenance dose can be administered daily.

[0035] For autoimmune treatment, the autoantigen, fragment, or analog is introduced orally in an amount of from 0.1 to 1000 mg per day, and may be administered in single dose form or multiple dose form. Preferably, the autoantigen, fragment or analog is administered in an amount of from 0.1 mg to 500 mg per day. As is understood by one skilled in the art, the exact dosage is a function of the autoantigen, the age, sex and physical condition of the patient, as well as other concurrent treatments being administered. Such preparations may be administered to an animal in need of treatment for such autoimmune disease so as to ameliorate, relieve, alleviate, reverse, or lessen the severity of the disease. Such preparations may also be administered to an animal who is predisposed to developing such autoimmune disease so as to prevent the onset of such disease or to lessen the severity of such disease when it does emerge.

[0036] The bacteria and viral dosage, again, is the same as the injected dosage—generally 10 μg to 10 mg. A single dosage should be effective, however repeated lower dosages may be preferred to slowly build up the immunity.

[0037] The invention will be further appreciated in light of these following examples. In many of these examples OVA is tested in mice as a model. Human study with allergens has shown this to be quite indicative of human response. The mouse model is, of course, generally accepted in the study of infectious disease.

[0038] Immunological properties of OVA released from microspheres were tested following oral administration to 6-8 weeks old BDF mice. Control groups of mice were fed with unencapsulated OVA (OVA and lactose) or ground enteric coated microspheres. The enteric coating was hydroxy propyl methyl cellulose acetate succinate sold by Shin Etsu Chemical Company which was applied in an aqueous suspension. (10% HPMCAS, 2.8% TEC, 3.0% talc, 0.0025% Sorbitan Sesquioleate.)

[0039] The OVA preparations were fed to BDF mice as described in FIG. 1. Subsequently the mice were bled and their serum anti OVA IgG antibody levels determined by ETISA (Emguall, E., Perlman, P., 1972, “Enzyme Linked Immunosorbant Assay ELISA III Quantitation of Specific Antibodies by Enzyme Labeled Anti-immunoglobulin in Antigen Coated Tubes,” J. Immunol.,109:129). As shown in FIG. 1, oral administration of encapsulated OVA resulted in significant immune response to the specific antigen. Unencapsulated OVA preparations were poorly immunogenic.

[0040] OVA coated nonpareils were prepared from 20 grams of nonpareils, 1 gram of OVA, 1 gram PVP, and 1 gram of lactose. These were then coated with Eudragit L30D in a total aqueous system (7 grams Eudragit L30D and 23 grams coated nonpareils). These were initially tested to determine resistance to acid pH typically encountered in the gastric juices. As shown in FIG. 2, the OVA was not released until the pH approached 6. At pH 6 to 7, substantially all of the OVA was released. To determine the release of OVA over time, these microspheres were exposed to either intestinal pH of 6.8 or gastric pH of 1.2 (FIG. 3). At the gastric pH of 1.2, virtually none of the OVA was released for 6 hours. However, at pH 6.8, substantially all of the OVA wa s released in a short time. OVA released from the microspheres was tested for antigenicity and immunogenicity. It was demonstrated that the released antigen retained its native structure (ELISA inhibition assay), and was as immunogenic as the untreated OVA (data not shown). Immune responses to all therapeutic antigens described below were always measured against native antigens by ELISA a s say, thus proving that the encapsulatwd antigens retained their native structure.

[0041] The enterocoated microspheres containing OVA as described above were fed to 6-8 weeks old female BDF mice, (1 mg OVA per day for 3 days in microspheres or alternately in solution). Anti-OVA antibody titer (IgG) of the mice fed OVA microspheres coated with Eudragit L30D rose significantly after the 3 days feeding and continued to rise after a second feeding at day 42. Mice fed OVA in solution did not develop antiOVA antibodies. The results are shown in FIG. 4.

[0042] Diphtheria toxoid was obtained from Lederle Laboratories, Pearl River. Six ml of the toxoid concentrate and 3 gm PVP suspended in 200 ml water were coated onto nonpareils and subsequently coated with a solution of 33.3 gm Eudragit L30D (30% solids) and 1.1 gm triethyl citrate. Microspheres were orally administered to mice. Microspheres containing 1 Lf diphtheria toxoid were fed on days 14, 15, 16, and 27, 28, and 29.) All mice (DF females 6-8 weeks old)were immunized i.p. with 1 Lf units of diphtheria toxoid in alum on day 0. Mice fed diphtheria toxoid microspheres produced significantly increased levels of specific antibodies compared to mice that were just primed (FIG. 5).

[0043] The addition of aluminum hydroxide to a therapeutic protein (OVA) was tested. OVA was adsorbed on aluminum hydroxide by mixing the protein with the aluminum hydroxide in a ratio 1:2 by weight. The mixture was suspended in water and sprayed on non-pareils which were then enteric coated with Eudragit L30D. The conditions of encapsulation were the same as described earlier for OVA encapsulation. The immune response in 6 week old BDF mice to encapsulated OVA-aluminum hydroxide mixture was significantly greater than observed for encapsulated OVA prepared without aluminum hydroxide as determined by measurement of antiOVA lgG antibody titers (FIG. 6).

[0044] E. colibacteria, strain 0120:B8, an enterapathogen, was purchased from ATCC. The bacteria were grown overnight in Difco nutrient broth at 37° C. and subsequently washed three times in sterile saline. The bacteria were killed by heating at 100° C. (boiling water bath) for five minutes. The bacterial killing was verified by lack of growth in nutrient broth. The killed bacteria were washed three times in sterile, distilled water, lyophilized and encapsulated by the technology as described earlier. BDF mice were immunized by oral administration of the encapsulated bacteria and the immune response measured by ELISA.

[0045] An aqueous solution of bovine myelin basic protein is coated onto nonpareils with the addition of lactose and PVP and dried as previously described. The coated nonpareils are coated with Eudragit L30D as previously described.

[0046] The myelin is administered to patients with multiple sclerosis in capsules containing 1 mg of the myelin basic protein daily. This is continued until the patient's disease is in remission.

[0047] An aqueous solution of chicken Collagen II antigen is coated onto nonpareils with the addition of lactose and PVP, which are in turn coated with Eudragit L30D.

[0048] Capsules containing the Collagen II are fed to patients diagnosed with rheumatoid arthritis. The dosage is 0.1 mg per day. Once symptoms are relieved, a lower maintenance dosage can be used.

[0049] An aqueous solution of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins (MHC I and MHC II) are coated onto nonpareils along with lactose and PVP and coated with Eudragit L30D. Capsules containing the coated nonpareils are fed to patients two weeks prior to receiving a transplant. The dosage is 0.1 to 1 mg per day. The dosage requirement is continued indefinitely following transplant.

[0050] The present invention provides an oral treatment modality for a wide variety of conditions such as bacterial and viral infections, as well as treatment of autoimmune disease and prevention of transplant rejection. Denaturation of the therapeutic protein is avoided when coating the protein with an enteric coat. The prevention of denaturation was demonstrated by measuring immune responses to these proteins against native, unmodified antigens. If the antigens were denatured during encapsulation, antibody produced against this molecule would not react with the native antigen. Furthermore, the coating provides protection against low pH and enzymatic degradation enabling delivery of the intact molecule into small intestine. These beneficial effects of orally administered antigens are evidenced by induction of IgG immune response in animals. The efficacy of the immune response can be further enhanced by the addition of an aluminum compound.