Method for the administration of dynamic objects in a means programmed object-oriented

[0002] The present invention is directed to a method for the administration of dynamic objects in a programmed object-oriented means wherein static and dynamic objects can be instanced and the dynamic objects can be erased, whereby like objects can be allocated to a class. Instancing of an object refers to forming a logical object reference that includes an object manager, the dynamic object and process identification parameters.

[0003] Important properties of object-oriented programming are described in H. Becker, Siemens A G, “Objektorientierte Softwareentwicklung”, InformationstechnikIT34 (1992) 2. An object thereby represents a limited program with clearly defined functions or, respectively, methods and properties. Like objects, that is, objects having the same functions or, respectively methods and properties, are described in the form of a class description, that is, are assigned to a class. Static or dynamic objects can be instanced within such classes, whereby static objects are permanently present in the system and dynamic objects can be instanced during a program run and can in turn be erased. The instancing and erasing of dynamic objects is initiated by an event from a process ranking higher than the objects or by another dynamic or static object (especially when building and dismantling object chains). Given an employment of object-oriented programs in communication equipment, particularly in switching systems, dynamic objects or, respectively, chained dynamic objects are constantly instanced and subsequently erased during the course of a call setup and cleardown between communication equipment connected to the switching system. Given a connection set up by a plurality of dynamic objects, instances occur wherein dynamic objects are erased almost simultaneously from both sides of a connection (for example, given an approximately simultaneous cleardown of the connection by both communication terminal equipment). Given a chain of dynamic objects in a connection set up between two communication terminal equipment, this means, for example, that objects of this chain are erased without the other objects receiving knowledge of this. When a dynamic object then attempts to address another, erased dynamic object, this leads to collisions that ultimately result in the crash of the system or, respectively, of the communication equipment.

[0004] It is an object of the present invention to avoid the collisions between dynamic objects and erased dynamic objects.

[0005] The present invention is a method for the administration of dynamic objects in a means programmed object-oriented wherein static and dynamic objects can be instanced by a higher-ranking process or by instanced dynamic objects and the dynamic objects can be erased, whereby like objects can be allocated to a class.

[0006] Important aspects of the inventive method are as follows. A statically instanced object manager is provided for every class of dynamic objects covering like objects. An instancing of a dynamic object is initiated using the respective object manager, whereby a logical object reference that identifies a respectively instanced dynamic object is formed for every dynamic object and stored in the respective object manager. An erasing of a dynamic object is initiated using the respective object manager, whereby the allocated logical object reference in the respective object manager is erased. The dynamic objects are respectively called via the allocated object manager using the logical object reference. The object manager attached to a class, that is, to a type of like dynamic objects represents an additional instance in which there is knowledge about instanced and erased dynamic objects. Since the dynamic objects are called using this additional instance (for example, given an information exchange between dynamic objects) collisions in view of calling erased dynamic objects can be avoided.

[0007] The logical object reference is advantageously formed by a manager identification that defines the respective object manager and by an object identification that defines the respective object, whereby a process identification can be added to the manager and object identification given a means with multi-process operation. The manager identification within a process is thereby unambiguously, statically assigned by the appertaining object manager and the object identification within a class is unambiguously, dynamically assigned by the appertaining object manager. A process identification is statically assigned once in the system.

[0008] In an advantageous communication chaining of a dynamic object initiating the instancing of a further dynamic object and of the further, instanced dynamic object, the logical object reference formed in the instancing is communicated via the respective object manager to the dynamic object that initiates the instancing and the logical object reference of the dynamic object that initiates the instancing is communicated via the respective object manager to the further, instanced dynamic object. Such a chaining is implemented given an instancing of a dynamic object by another dynamic object. Alternatively, further chainings of a dynamic object with another dynamic object are possible for the higher-ranking process, whereby the dynamic objects thereby affected are informed of the respective logical object reference. The respective dynamic objects are called using these logical object references.

[0009] A logical identification is thereby allocated to the instanced object and the object initiating the instancing is informed thereof, whereupon the logical object reference of the object that initiates the instancing is transmitted to the instanced object and, given a communication between the instanced dynamic objects, the objects are called using this logical object reference. Both the instanced as well as the erased objects are known in the object manager of a class and, given a call of an erased dynamic object by another object, the other dynamic object is informed of this erasure. A further significant advantage of the inventive object manager may be seen therein that this can also be employed in an information exchange between the dynamic objects and leads to an enhancement of the addressing reliability between the dynamic objects.

[0010] The means is especially advantageously represented by a communication equipment, particularly a processor-controlled telecommunication system. In telecommunication systems, chains of dynamic objects can be instanced and erased during the course of a call setup and cleardown without having the initially cited collisions occurring with respect to the calling of dynamic objects that have already been erased. This means a considerably certain, that is, malfunction-free operation of, in particular, telecommunication systems.

[0011] The features of the present invention which are believed to be novel, are set forth with particularity in the appended claims. The invention, together with further objects and advantages, may best be understood by reference to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in the several Figures of which like reference numerals identify like elements, and in which:

[0012] FIG. 1 depicts a chain of instanced dynamic objects;

[0013] FIG. 2 depicts an instancing of a dynamic object by another dynamic object; and

[0014] FIG. 3 depicts the information exchange between two chained dynamic objects.

[0015] FIG. 1 partially shows a memory SP of a telecommunication system TK wherein three dynamic objects O1 . . . O3 are instanced during the course of a call setup between two connected communication terminal equipment (not shown). The plurality of instanced objects O1 . . . O3 is defined by way of example, whereby five or more dynamic objects are usually instanced.

[0016] Let it be assumed for the exemplary embodiment that the first and the third dynamic object O1,O3 represent like dynamic objects and, consequently, a statically instanced object manager MA of the type A is allocated to these two dynamic objects O1,O3. The two rectangles MA shown in FIG. 1 together represent the object manager MA and are intended to indicate that this object manager MA manages the first and third dynamic object O1,O3.

[0017] The second dynamic object O2 belongs to a different type (type B in the exemplary embodiment) of dynamic object. Consequently, an object manager MB of type B is allocated to this and to other dynamic objects of type B that are not shown. The connection V between the three dynamic objects O1 . . . O3 indicates a chaining that shall be set forth in greater detail with reference to FIG. 2.

[0018] A logical object reference LOR1 . . . 3 is stored in the two object managers MA,MB for each appertaining, instanced dynamic object O1 . . . O3. A stored logical object reference LOR1 . . . 3 means that a dynamic object O1 . . . O3 of the respective type is instanced in the memory SP. For unambiguous identification, a logical object reference LOR1 . . . 3 is formed at least by a manager identification mi and by an object identification oi. A manager identification mi is represented by a memory address or by memory area addresses (not shown ) with which the beginning of the respective object manager program in the memory SP or in the memory area in which the respective object manager program is stored is determined. The respective object manager O1 . . . O3 is called using the memory or memory area addresses. Analogous thereto, the object identification oi is represented by a memory address or by memory area addresses by means of which the respective dynamic object O1 . . . O3 is called by the respective object manager O1 . . . O3. The process identification pi is provided given multi-process operation and is likewise represented by a memory address or by memory area addresses that identify the respective program in the memory SP that realizes a process.

[0019] By way of example, both the instancing as well as the chaining of the second dynamic object according to FIG. 1 by or, respectively, with the first dynamic object O1 according to FIG. 1 is described in FIG. 2. Let it be assumed for the exemplary embodiment that the first dynamic object O1 is already instanced by a higher-ranking process (not shown ) of the telecommunication system TK and is allocated to the object manager MA of FIG. 1.

[0020] The instancing of the second dynamic object O2 is initiated by communicating a initialization request IA and the logical object reference LOR1 of the first dynamic object O1 to the object manager MB identified by the manager identification mi recited in the object reference LOR1 (let an object manager MB of type B be assumed for the exemplary embodiment). After the reception of the initialization request IA, the second dynamic object O2 is instanced in the object manager MB, whereby this second dynamic object O2 represents a object manager O2 of type B. In the instancing of the second dynamic object O2, a logical object reference LOR2 (including the manager, object and, potentially, a process identification pi, mi, oi) is independently formed for this by the object manager MB and is stored in the allocated object manager MB.

[0021] The chaining of the two dynamic objects O1,O2 is effected in that the object manager MB communicates the communicated logical object reference LOR1 to the second dynamic object O2 and the logical object reference LOR2 for the second dynamic object O2 formed in the instancing to the first dynamic object O1 and this is stored therein. The stored logical object references LOR1, LOR2 are respectively utilized for calling the dynamic objects O1, O2 in an information exchange. The chaining of the two dynamic objects O1,O2 is indicated by the connection V.

[0022] An information exchange between the first and second dynamic objects according to FIG. 1 or, respectively, FIG. 2 is explained with reference to FIG. 3. Let it be assumed for the exemplary embodiment that the dynamic objects O1,O2 shown in FIG. 2 are instanced and the respective logical object references LOR1,LOR2 are stored in the allocated object managers MA,MB. Let it also be assumed for the exemplary embodiment that the first dynamic object O1 should communicate an information i or, respectively, an information object IO to the second dynamic object O2. An information object IO1 represents a dynamic information object IO1 instanced by a dynamic object O1 . . . O3 and in which information i or, respectively, data to be communicated are deposited.

[0023] The information exchange between the first and the second dynamic objects O1, O2 is initiated in that the logical object reference LOR2 of the second dynamic object O2 and, subsequently, the information i to be communicated or (insofar as an information packet IO1 is present) the dynamic information object IO1 that has been formed is communicated from the first dynamic object O1 to the object manager MB allocated to the second dynamic object O2. The version with a dynamic information object IO1 is indicated in FIG. 3 by a label limited by brackets.

[0024] A check is subsequently carried out in the object manager MB to determine whether a logical object reference LOR2 like that to be communicated is stored in a table T. Given positive check results, that is, at least one corresponding logical object reference LOR2 is stored, the information i or, respectively, the dynamic information object IO1 is forwarded to the second dynamic object O2 and is processed thereat.

[0025] When it is found in the check that no logical object reference LOR2 is stored in the table T of the object manager MB, then the communicated information i or, respectively, the information object IO1 are discarded. Additionally, an information (usually an error information) can be communicated to the first dynamic object O1 initiating the information exchange, the lack of a logical object reference LOR2 being communicated to the first dynamic object O1 therewith. The logical object reference LOR2 is no longer stored in the table T of the object manager MB insofar as this, for example, has already been erased by another object, for example the third dynamic object O3 of FIG. 1. An erasure can also have been implemented by the allocated process.

[0026] An erasure of a dynamic object O1 . . . O3 by another dynamic object O1 . . . O3 or by a higher-ranking process is initiated via the object manager MA,MB. During the course of the information exchange, the dynamic object to be erased is informed of the planned erasure by the respective dynamic object and the dynamic object to be erased informs the object manager that it is to be erased during the course of a message exchange. The erasure of the respective dynamic object is initiated by the allocated object manager, whereby, given an erasure of the respective dynamic object, the allocated logical object reference stored in the allocated object manager is erased. The erase procedure for, for example, the second dynamic object O2 is indicated in FIG. 3 by the specification of an erase message am.

[0027] The invention is not limited to the particular details of the method depicted and other modifications and applications are contemplated. Certain other changes may be made in the above described method without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention herein involved. It is intended, therefore, that the subject matter in the above depiction shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.