Durable Etalon Based Output Coupler

Techniques for decreasing the bandwidth of the output of lasers are well known. Several such techniques used on excimer lasers are discussed by John F. Reintjes at pages 44-50 in Laser Handbook, Vol. 5, North-Holland Physics Publishing, Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. These techniques include the utilization of gratings, including echelle gratings for wavelength selection. Use of beam expanding prisms ahead of the grating can increase the effectiveness of the grating.

A prior art narrow band excimer laser is shown in FIG. 1. The resonance cavity of excimer laser 2 is formed by output coupler 4 (which is a partially reflecting mirror) and echelle grating 16. A portion of the laser output beam 20 (having a cross section of about 3 mm in the horizontal direction and 20 mm in the vertical direction) exits the rear of laser chamber 3. This portion of the beam is expanded in the horizonal direction by prisms 8, 10 and 12 and reflected by mirror 14 onto echelle grating 16. Mirror 14 is pivoted to select the narrow band output for laser 2. Grating 16 is arranged in Littrow configuration so that the selected narrow band of wavelengths is reflected back off mirror 14 and back through prisms 12, 10 and 8 and into chamber 3 for amplification. Light at wavelengths outside the selected narrow band is disbursed so that this disbursed out-of-band light is not reflected back into the laser chamber. Total beam expansion for this laser is about 20.times.. The beam has a horizontal polarization (P-polarization for the prisms with entrance surface arranged vertically). Typical KrF lasers operating in a pulse mode may have a cavity length of about 1 m and produce pulses having a duration of about 15 to 25 ns. Thus, photons within the resonance cavity will make, on the average, about 3 to 5 round trips within the cavity. On each round trip, about 90 percent of the beam exits at the output coupler and about 10 percent is sent back for further amplification and line narrowing. The beam is repeatedly line narrowed as it passes through the line narrowing module.

With this prior art arrangement, the bandwidth of the excimer laser is reduced from its natural bandwidth of about 300 pm (full width half maximum or FWHM) to about 0.8 pm for KrF lasers and about 0.6 pm for ArF lasers. Another important measure of the pulse quality is referred to as the "95% integral". This is the spectral width of the portion of the pulse containing 95% of the pulse energy. Prior art KrF laser can provide "95% integral" values of around 3 pm over the lifetime of the laser and prior art ArF lasers can provide 95% integral values of about 1.5 pm.

Some applications of KrF and ArF lasers, however, require greater narrowing of the bandwidth. For example, some micro lithography applications require smaller bandwidths such as FWHM values of 0.5 pm and 0.4 pm for KrF and ArF, respectively, and 95% integral values of 2.0 pm and 1.0 pm, respectively. The output beam of the ArF laser is about 193 nm. Very few optical materials can survive substantial exposure to this energetic light. Optical coatings for this wavelength are expensive and often short lived. The problem is even more severe for beams at shorter wavelengths such as the beam from F.sub.2 lasers.

One prior art line narrowing method is to add an etalon within the resonance cavity. In this case, the etalon is operated in a transmissive mode and the light is additionally line narrowed as it passes through the etalon. In such system one should use a relatively high finesse etalon, with a finesse value f of about 1 or higher which produces sharp fringe patterns. The finesse value f is determined by the equation:

where r is the reflectivity of the etalon surfaces. The dependence of etalon transmission spectrum on r is shown graphically in FIG. 2 which is extracted from page 298 of Fundamentals of Optics by Jenkins and White, published by McGraw Hill. From FIG. 2, it is obvious why prior art transmissive etalons used for line narrowing have surfaces with reflectance of about 50% to 80% (see curves B and C of FIG. 2). FIG. 2 also shows that it would not be practical to use curve A-type low finesse etalon as its line-narrowing efficiency in this prior art arrangement would be very low. Prior art high finesse etalons used with diffraction gratings should enhance the line-narrowing capabilities provided by diffraction grating, which, in general, improves the laser line-width. The major disadvantages of this technique are that the many reflections within the etalon tend to heat up the etalon producing thermal distortions and that the tuning of the etalon synchronously with the grating presents a real technical challenge and is difficult to accomplish in practice.

What is needed is a better technique for line narrowing and tuning of KrF and ArF excimer lasers as well as F.sub.2 lasers.

The present invention provides a durable etalon based output coupler. The output coupler is especially useful for ultraviolet lasers such as an ArF excimer laser or F.sub.2 laser. The principal elements of the output coupler are two prisms aligned so that a first face of one of the two prisms is parallel to a first face of the other prism and together they create a Fabri-Perot etalon. Reflection of light from these surfaces is used to create a partial beam feedback to the laser. The second face of each prism of the output coupler is aligned in such a way that the beam enters and exists the prism at a Brewster's angle or approximately at Brewster's angle. In a preferred embodiment designed for an ArF laser with a 193 nm output beam the prisms are comprised of CaF.sub.2 and they are bathed in nitrogen at about one atmosphere. For this embodiment Brewster's angle is about 57 degrees and the apex angle of each prism is about 34 degrees.

The light from the laser preferably is polarized the plane of incidence; therefore this light will not be reflected from the entrance surface of the prism. Because of refraction in the prism, however, the light will exit from the prism at an angle of 90 degrees--this is an angle required for the etalon OC to reflect the light back to the laser. The portion of the light reflected from the inside parallel surfaces of both prisms will go back to the laser. The light exits the first prism at the same Brewster angle, with no reflection losses. The transmitted portion of the beam will go through the second prism, and again, will exit it at Brewster angle of about 57 degrees with no reflection. This preferred etalon output coupler has no coatings on either of its surfaces (neither reflective coatings nor anti-reflective coatings). Therefore, there are no coating losses or lifetime limitations due to failure of these coatings.

In a preferred embodiment, the device is used as an output coupler for line narrowed ArF excimer laser having a grating based line narrowing module. The etalon based output coupler is adjusted to preferentially reflect light at or near the spectral maximum produced by the grating. Substantial improvement in line narrowing results from the amplification in the laser resonance chamber of light at or near the grating spectral maximum which is preferentially reflected by the etalon based output coupler. A method is disclosed for tuning the etalon based output coupler to match the wavelength selected by the grating based line narrowing module.

FIG. 1 shows a prior art line-narrowed laser.

FIG. 2 shows the percent of light transmitted by an etalon as a function of the reflectance of the two inner etalon surfaces.

FIG. 3 shows first preferred embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 4 shows some features of line-narrowed laser with etalon output coupler and diffraction grating based line-narrowing module.

FIG. 5 shows a diffraction grating-based line-narrowing module.

FIG. 6 shows a reflectivity of the etalon OC in dependence on wavelength.

FIG. 7 shows relative positions of maximum reflectivity for line-narrowing module and etalon OC.

FIG. 8 is a sketch of preferred tunable etalon output coupler.

FIG. 9 is a drawing of alternative preferred embodiment.

FIG. 10 shows the high resolution etalon spectrometer.

FIG. 11 is a flowchart showing how to correct a misalignment.

FIGS. 12A, B and C demonstrate a gross misalignment.

FIGS. 13A, B and C demonstrate a gross misalignment.

FIGS. 14A, B and C demonstrate a small misalignment.

FIGS. 15A, B and C demonstrate a small misalignment.

FIG. 16 shows asymmetry of the spectrum.

A first preferred embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 3. This embodiment shows a durable etalon based output coupler 164 used with an ArF laser chamber 63 having a line narrowing module 67 with a tuning mirror 74, grating 76 and a three prism beam expander comprising prisms 68, 70 and 72. In this preferred embodiment, the prism material is CaF.sub.2 and the prisms enclosed in a nitrogen atmosphere at just slightly above 1.0 atmosphere as shown in FIG. 8. Referring now to FIG. 8, the beam 102 enters the first prism 164A at an angle of about 57 degrees which is close to Brewster's angle. Therefore, for the beam 102 polarized in the plane of incidence, there will be no reflection from the first surface 165A of prism 164A. The apex angle of prism 164A is 34 degrees. Therefore, because of refraction of the beam 102 on surface 165A, the propagation direction of beam 102 is changed, so it will cross the second surface 166A of prism 164A at an angle of 90 degrees. The position of the prism is finely aligned so that this angle is exactly 90 degrees. The beam 102 enters the second prism 164B at exactly the same 90 degree angle with surface 166B as surfaces 166A and 166B are parallel to each other. Beam 102 will have another refraction at the second surface 165B of prism 164B, so that the existing beam will make a Brewster's angle of about 57 degrees with the surface 165B. The apex angle of prism 164B is again about 34 degrees. None of the surfaces of prisms 164A and 164B has any coatings. Windows 98 and 99 are positioned at angle close to Brewster's angle if no reflection is desired from them. Or, as shown in FIG. 8, if a window (in this case window 98) is used to sample a portion of the beam 102, the angle could be a little less than Brewster's angle. Therefore, the preferred embodiment has no coatings on any of its surfaces.

Each of the inside parallel surfaces of the prisms has a reflectivity of about 4 percent for normal 193 nm light. These surfaces reflect a portion of beam 102 back to the laser.

More generally where the prism material has an index of refraction n.sub.m and the adjacent gas has an index of refraction n.sub.a, the apex angle .varies. of the prism is such that ##EQU1## if the prism material is CaF.sub.2 with n.sub.m =1.50153 and the surrounding gas is nitrogen at about one atmosphere with an n.sub.a =1.0003, then, .varies.=33.67 degrees.

As stated above, the preferred etalon output coupler has a reflectivity of the plates of about 4% for normal 193 nm light. In this embodiment, the gas is nitrogen with an n of 1.0003. The gap size is about 9 mm and the wavelength is about 193 nm. In this case, the total reflectivity of the etalon is determined by an interference of the light waves reflected from both parallel surfaces and is shown in FIG. 6 as a function of wavelength. For comparison curve A in FIG. 2 shows transmission of the same etalon. The minimum reflection is about 0% and the maximum is about 15%. If one of the reflection peaks is matched to the grating maximum, then about 15% of the light at the grating maximum is reflected back to the laser (85% is transmitted). Substantially all of the portion of the beam which is higher or lower in wavelength than the grating maximum by about 1 pm are not reflected at all. Higher reflectivity of etalon output coupler at one wavelength and its reduced reflectivity at other wavelengths, will cause the laser to preferably generate light at the wavelength of higher reflectivity. Therefore, the etalon output coupler works as a line narrowing device. Light which deviates from the grating maximum by about 2 pm would be reflected at about 15%. However, the grating is effective in controlling about 95% of the light to within about 1.5 pm of the grating maximum. Therefore, for the best line-narrowing, one of the maximums of the etalon reflection should be at the same wavelength as the maximum reflection of the grating in line narrowing module as shown in FIG. 7. In this case, the laser will generate at the central wavelength .lambda..sub.0, and it will have the minimum line-width as wavelength selection effect of the etalon adds to the wavelength selection effects of the grating.

Positions of etalon peaks are determined by: ##EQU2## where: N=is interference order, which can be any positive integer value .lambda..sub.n =is the position of the peak corresponding to an etalon interference order, N, in the gap

n= refractive index of the gas between the plates, and

d=size of the gap.

For example, if n=1.0003 and d=9 mm, then an N=93,147 will give a peak at 193.3009 nm, while N=93,099 will give a peak at 193.4006 nm. Each increment of N, by one, will produce a new peak shifted by approximately 2 pm. Because there is a large number of peaks, each separated by approximately 2 pm from its closest neighbor, there is always a peak available close to any position of the grating. Thus, it is a fairly simple matter to tune the grating to an etalon peak.

Alternatively, as follows from equation (2), if we fix the value of N, the position of the peak corresponding to that N can be slightly changed by changing either n or d. This way, the etalon can be tuned, so that one of its peaks matches position of the grating. Both techniques for etalon tuning are known in the prior art. n value can be changed by changing pressure of the gas between the plates, as the refractive index n and gas pressure are related according to:

where k is a coefficient depending on gas and wavelength. For Nitrogen, for example, k=3.94.10.sup.-7 /Torr. So a pressure change of about 1 Torr will shift the peak by about 0.1 pm.

Another way to shift peaks is to change d using, for example, piezoelectric adjusters which can precisely move one plate relatively to another. For example, a change in the gap of about 0.01 micron will shift the peak by about 0.215 pm.

Preferably, when the laser wavelength needs to be changed from .lambda..sub.0 the mirror 74 (FIG. 3), is pivoted to a very slightly different angle, thus moving the maximum of diffraction grating reflection to a different wavelength .lambda..sub.0 '. The etalon output coupler then needs to be tuned also, so that the new center wavelength .lambda..sub.0 ' coincides with one of the etalon maximums. This as explained above can be done by changing the nitrogen pressure inside the etalon or by changing the spacing between the prisms.

The reader should understand that this etalon is considerably different from the more conventional "transmissive" etalon. In the latter case, the reflectivity of the parallel plates is chosen between 20% and 99% of the light, and the line-narrowing is done for the transmitted light through the etalon. The multiple reflections (about 3 to 50) of the light between the parallel plates greatly increases the light intensity inside the etalon, thus causing a number of serious problems when high power laser operation is required. Such problems include, for example, thermal distortions of the beam, failure of the reflective coatings, etc. All these problems are insignificant in the etalon output coupler of the present invention because there is very little multiple reflection of the light between the parallel plates. Instead, substantially single reflection from one plate interferes with substantially single reflection from the other plate. Moreover, the preferred reflectivity value of 4 percent can be achieved by using uncoated plates made of fused silica or CaF.sub.2, using the Fresnel reflection from the etalon surfaces. This reduces the probability of etalon failure due to coating failure and increases the etalon output coupler lifetime.

FIG. 8 shows a preferred tunable etalon design. The etalon 164 comprises prisms 164A and 164B separated by three fused silica spacers (not shown) optically contacted to the plates using well known prior art techniques. The etalon is tuned by increasing or decreasing nitrogen pressure in pressure chamber volume 92 using nitrogen from a 30 psi source 93, inlet valve 94 and outlet valve 95 controlled by electronic drivers 96 and 97 which are in turn controlled by processor 86 as shown in FIG. 4 or FIG. 9. Light from the laser enters through CaF.sub.2 windows 98. Part of the beam is reflected back toward the laser as described above and most of the light is transmitted through CaF.sub.2 window 99 as the output beam. Reflection from the incoming and outgoing surfaces of each of the prisms is approximately zero. About 2% of the light from the laser is reflected by mirror 98 to spectrometer 100 which analyzes the spectrum and reports the results to processor 86 (not shown). The reader should note that the etalon described here can be used in the other configurations shown in FIGS. 4 and 9 with obvious minor modifications.

A preferred alignment technique is shown in FIG. 4. The laser spectrum is analyzed to derive information on misalignment of the etalon output coupler relative to line-narrowing module. First, the laser beam spectrum is analyzed by spectrometer 80 to first look for two separate peaks in the light reflected back toward the chamber from the etalon output coupler 64. Two peaks (a large one and a small one) would result from gross misalignment of the output coupler and the line narrowing module. If there is only one peak, this means that any misalignment is only minor. In this case, the spectrum is analyzed to look for a distortion which would result from a small misalignment. If misaligned, the output coupler is tuned to match the wavelength selected by the grating. This is preferably done by increasing the gas pressure between the etalon plates or by changing the spacing between the two etalon plates.

As shown in FIG. 4, the laser is first approximately tuned to a desired wavelength using a prior art wavemeter 84 as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,025,445 or 5,420,877 to tune the grating based line narrowing module with tuning mirror 74. At the output side of the laser a small portion (such as about 2 percent) of the light reflected by etalon 64 is directed by beam splitter 78 to spectrometer 80 which measures the spectrum of this reflected light. Spectrometer 80 could be any prior art spectrometer capable of spectral measurement in the 248 nm range (for KrF) or the 193 nm range (for ArF) with accuracies in the range of 0.1 pm or better. Such spectrometers are described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,025,445 or U.S. Pat. No.5,420,877 which are incorporated herein by reference. In the process of tuning the etalon output coupler 64 to the grating based line narrowing module, there are two cases to consider: the etalon is grossly misaligned, and the etalon is slightly misaligned. Lets consider the case of gross misalignment first. In this case, the position of the closest maximum of the etalon is shifted from the position of diffraction grating maximum by a value, comparable with the width of the maximum itself. It should be pointed out, that because there are a multitude of the etalon maximum peaks, the maximum misalignment of the etalon cannot be more than half of the etalon free spectral range. In the preferred embodiment of ultra-narrow ArF excimer laser the etalon FSR is about 2 pm. Therefore, the maximum misalignment of the etalon is about 1 pm. FIG. 12A shows a position of grating maximum, and positions of the etalon maximums are depicted in FIG. 12B for a large misalignment, where the closest etalon maximum is shifted by about 0.75 pm in the direction of longer wavelengths relative to the spectrum. FIG. 12C shows the generated laser spectrum in this situation as would be measured by spectrometer 80. This spectrum is a result of convolution of the etalon reflection curve and grating reflection curve, with this convolution taken to the power equal to the average number of round trips of the light in the cavity, which is about 2. The spectrum has a stronger peak and a weaker peak. The stronger peak is at longer wavelength values as compared to the smaller peak. The spacing between the peaks is about 1 to 1.5 pm. FIGS. 13A, B and C show the situation where closest etalon maximum is shifted by 0.75 pm towards the shorter wavelengths relative to the grating maximum. This situation is symmetrical to the one shown in FIG. 12C, but now the larger peak is at shorter wavelength values as compared to smaller peak.

Therefore, if a double peak is detected, the appropriate correction will depend on the relative position of the larger and smaller peaks. If the larger peak is at longer wavelength values as compared to the smaller peak, the nitrogen pressure of etalon output coupler should be decreased by about 6 Torr to shift the etalon peaks by about -0.6 pm. (Notice that an increase in the pressure of about 14 Torr would also align the OC and the grating.)

The largest ratio of the magnitude of larger and smaller peaks, which can still be identified as a double peak structure is determined by the noise level in the system. In the experiments, done by the Applicant, the minimum amplitude of the smaller peak, which could still be reliably identified as a double peak structure was set at about 5% relative to the maximum amplitude of the peak.

As controller 86 (FIG. 4) corrects the gross misalignment of etalon and diffraction grating, the smaller peaks get smaller and smaller, and at some point it is no longer detectable. This situation is shown in FIGS. 14A, B and C and FIGS. 15A, B and C. FIGS. 14A, B and C show the case, when the closest etalon maximum is shifted to the shorter wavelengths by about 0.45 pm relative to the grating maximum. FIG. 14C shows the laser spectrum in this situation. The spectrum does not have second bumps, but does have an asymmetry in it, with the extended tail going into the shorter wavelength region. FIG. 15C shows the case when the OC maximum is shifted towards longer wavelength relative to the grating maximum by about 0.45 pm. This produces an asymmetric spectrum with an extended tail into the longer wavelength region.

This asymmetry of the spectrum is analyzed by controller 86 (FIG. 4) and used to generate the etalon correction signal. If asymmetry extends towards longer wavelengths, like in FIG. 15C, the pressure in the etalon output coupler should be reduced very slightly to slightly reduce the wavelengths of the etalon maximums. If, the asymmetry extends towards the shorter wavelengths, the pressure in the etalon output coupler should be increased slightly. This would provide a very accurate control of the etalon tuning, allowing the peak of the etalon to be tuned to within about 0.1 pm or better relative to the peak of diffraction grating. There are many ways known in the prior art to analyze the asymmetry of the spectrum. In the preferred embodiment, the assymetry is determined at 10% level as shown in FIG. 16. In this technique, three values are used: position of the maximum, and positions at 10% level on both sides from the maximum. Then the distances a and b are calculated, where a is the distance between the maximum and the 10% level position on the shorter wavelength side of the spectrum, and b is the distance between the maximum and the 10% level position on the longer wavelength side of the spectrum. The asymmetry h of the spectrum is then calculated as

The value of asymmetry h is used by controller 86 (FIG. 4) to control the pressure in the EOC. This value is compared with the target value h.sub.0 and allowable error h.sub.err. If h<h.sub.0 -h.sub.err, then the pressure should be increased, if h>h.sub.0 +h.sub.err, then pressure should be reduced. Otherwise, etalon is considered tuned to the laser. For example, the value h.sub.0 can be set to 0, and h.sub.err can be set to 0.05 (about 5% asymmetry). Spectrum, shown in FIG. 16 has a=0.346 pm and b=0.461 pm. That means, its assymetry value is h=0.143, which is larger than h.sub.0 +h.sub.err, which means, the pressure of the etalon output coupler should be reduced (by about 1 Torr). The reduction of the pressure will shift the etalon maximum towards the shorter wavelengths, which will reduce the asymmetry of the spectrum. The asymmetry of the spectrum is measured again, and correction can be repeated if needed. The flow chart implementing this algorithm is shown in FIG. 11.

Another embodiment of the present invention is shown in FIG. 9. In this embodiment, only one spectrometer 84 is used, which provides the data for symmetry analysis as well as control of the laser absolute wavelength and its bandwidth. The laser wavelength is selected using a prior art technique of pivoting mirror 74 until the laser peak wavelength is at the desired value as measured by spectrometer 84 which may be configured as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,025,445 and 5,420,877 to measure both absolute wavelength and spectral shape. The symmetry analysis of the spectrum and the etalon tuning is done in a manner similar to the first embodiment.

A spectrometer 132 for analyzing symmetry of laser spectrum is shown in FIG. 10. Beam 120 is sampled from beam 102 generated by the laser using beam splitter 98 as shown in FIG. 8. This beam 120, as shown in FIG. 10, is focused onto diffusor 124 using a lens 122. The spectrum is analyzed with a high finesse etalon 126. This preferred embodiment of the present invention uses an etalon with a finesse of about 35 and free-spectral range FSR=5 pm. Such an etalon is available from a number of companies, for example, Lumonics, Inc., Nepean, Canada. The light transmitted through the etalon is then focused on a photo diode array 130 using lens 128. The PDA 130 registers the fringe pattern and transfer the information to controller 86 (FIGS. 4 and 9). A preferred procedure for analyzing the symmetry in the preferred embodiment is as shown below:

Step 1. Acquire N frames of data where N is typically between 1 and 10.

Step 2. Add all N frames together to generate array D.

Step 3. Determine video floor value in dark region of data D.sub.-- dark .

Step 4. Find fringe peak in the standard predetermined range D.sub.1 to D.sub.2 for both left and right sets of fringes. D.sub.-- peak left and D.sub.-- peak right.

Step 5. If either left or right peaks is not found in the range D.sub.1 -D.sub.2 increase the search range D1-D2 to a maximum range D.sub.1-- max-D.sub.2-- max and search again.

Step 6. If no fringe found, report error. Go to Step 1 and acquire next N frames.

Step 7. Calculate the position of center pixel D.sub.-- center as 0.5 (D.sub.-- peak left+D.sub.-- peak right).

Step 8. If D.sub.-- center deviates by more than predetermined value from normal center pixel position, report error. Go to Step 1 and acquire N frames.

Step 9. Do sliding window averaging of array D with M average. M is set between 1 and 10.

Step 10. Using array calculated in Step 9, start from D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right and scan down (towards center pixel) through D[n] until D[n] is less than 0.67.times.(D[D.sub.-- peak right]--D.sub.-- dark). Do linear interpolation and calculate the first crossing point for 0.67 level D.sub.-- peak right.sub.-- 67%.sub.-- 1.

Step 11. Repeat Step 10 going up (away from center pixel) from D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right and calculate the second crossing point for 0.67 level D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right.sub.-- 67%.sub.-- 2.

Step 12. Repeat Step 10 going up but use level=0.135 (D[D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right]-D.sub.-- dark). Calculate crossing point of 0.135 level D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right.sub.-- 13.5%.sub.-- 2.

Step 13. Repeat. Step 12 going down and calculate D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right.sub.-- 13.5%.sub.-- 1.

Step 14. Calculate symmetry of the right peak: h right (=((D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right.sub.-- 13.5%.sub.-- 2 -D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right.sub.-- 67%.sub.-- 2)--(D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right.sub.-- 67%.sub.-- 1-D.sub.-- peak.sub.-- right.sub.-- 13.5%.sub.-- 1))/2.

Step 15. Repeat Steps 10 through 14 for the left peak D.sub.-- left and calculate h.sub.-- left.

Step 16. Calculate average symmetry h=1/2.multidot.(h.sub.-- left+h.sub.-- right).

Although this very narrow band laser has been described with reference to a particular embodiment, it is to be appreciated that various adaptations and modifications may be made. For example, the high resolution grating spectrometer can be used to analyze special symmetry and/or absolute wavelength and bandwidth measurements. Also, the symmetry can be analyzed using different techniques, including using different levels and/or using integrated parameters, such as left and right spectral integral, the central maximum can be calculated as a middle point at some level, such as 50% or 90% level, etc. Also, this invention can be used with many lasers in addition to KrF, ArF, and other excimer lasers, as well as with F.sub.2 molecular gas laser. The techniques described for use on a KrF laser which operates at a nominal wavelength can also be applied to ArF lasers; however, the optics must be designed for 193 nm. In addition, to pressure-tuned etalons and piezoelectric-tuned etalons, there are commercially available etalons which are compression-tuned using mechanical force to widen or narrow the gap between the plates of the etalon. Etalons with reflectances other than 4% could be used. In some applications, it may not be necessary to tune the etalon and an etalon with a fixed spacing and fixed index of refraction could be used. In this case, the grating would be tuned with mirror 76 to match one of the etalon reflection peaks. Preferably, however, the reflectance of the reflecting surfaces should be between about 1 and about 20%. Persons skilled in the art will recognize that the grating based line narrowing module described above could be replaced with many other prior art line narrowing modules, such as modules comprised of a plurality of prisms and a totally reflecting mirror, a diffraction grating without beam expanders, and a diffraction grating and a totally reflecting mirror. Transmissive etalons could also be included in the line narrowing module. Therefore, the invention is only to be limited by the appended claims.