US 6,095,651 AGrant
Method and Apparatus for Improving Vision and the Resolution of Retinal Images
Issue Date:2000-08-01
•168 Claims
•3 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A method of and apparatus for improving vision and the resolution of retinal images is described in which a point source produced on the retina of a living eye by a laser beam is reflected from the retina and received at a lenslet array of a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor such that each of the lenslets in the lenslet array forms an aerial image of the retinal point source on a CCD camera located adjacent to the lenslet array. The output signal from the CCD camera is acquired by a computer which processes the signal and produces a correction signal which may be used to control a compensating optical or wavefront compensation device such as a deformable mirror. It may also be used to fabricate a contact lens or intraocular lens, or to guide a surgical procedure to correct the aberrations of the eye. Any of these methods could correct aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism, allowing improved vision and improved imaging of the inside of the eye.
Metadata
Assignee
- University of Rochester
Inventors
- David R. Williams
- Junzhong Liang
Application Information
Application Number:US 3463095
Filing Date:1999-07-02
Priority Date:1998-05-04
Art Unit:377
Classifications
IPC:
A61B 300
Field of Search:
351600606607128205;211;212;219;221;246;2471087;10;11;12;13;17;13088;89898
Patent Drawings (3 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
The present invention is directed to a method of and an apparatus for improving vision and the resolution of retinal images. More particularly, the present invention is directed to a method of and an apparatus for measuring and correcting the wave aberration of the eye such that the measured data can be used to develop corrective optical elements for improving the optical quality of the eye.
Despite significant advances in spectacle and contact lens design, current ophthalmic lenses still can only correct defocus and astigmatism. Spectacles and contact lenses leave uncorrected additional aberrations such as spherical aberration, coma, and a host of irregular aberrations. These high order aberrations of the eye not only blur images formed on the retina, which impairs vision, but also blur images taken of the living human retina. There have been two obstacles that prevent the use of specially-designed optical elements to correct aberrations beyond defocus and astigmatism in the eye. First, quantitative measurement of the irregular aberrations of the eye has not been possible. Second, a mechanism to correct the monochromatic aberrations of the eye other than defocus and astigmatism has not been demonstrated.
Subjective refractive methods of optometrists and objective autorefractors measure defocus and astigmatism only. They cannot measure the complete wave aberration of the eye, which includes all aberrations left uncorrected by conventional spectacles. The objective aberroscope disclosed by Walsh et al. in the Journal of the Optical Society of America A, Vol. 1, pp. 987-992 (1984) provides simultaneous wave aberration measurements of the entire pupil but cannot sample the pupil with a spacing finer than about 0.9 mm (See Charman in Optometry and Vision Science, Vol. 68, pp. 574-583 (1991)). Moreover, rapid, automated computation of the wave aberration has not been demonstrated with this method.
Recently, one of the co-inventors herein, together with others, developed an apparatus to measure the wave aberration of the eye. In a report entitled "Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor", Liang et al., J. Opt. Soc. Am. A., volume 11, number 7, pp. 1-9, July 1994, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein, the authors disclosed a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor that they used to measure the-wave aberrations of the human eye by sensing the wavefront emerging from the eye produced by the retinal reflection of a focused light beam on the fovea. Using the system disclosed therein, the authors were able to measure only up to fourth order polynomial functions. The wavefront fitting with polynomials up to fourth order does not provide a complete description of the eye's aberrations. That description is generally insufficient to accurately compute the optical performance of the eye. This instrument was not equipped to remove unwanted light reflected from other surfaces, such as lenses and the cornea of the eye.
There has also been a previous attempt to correct the monochromatic aberrations of the eye beyond defocus and astigmatism, with the goal of improving the axial resolution of the confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope. Bartsch et al., in Vision Science and its Applications, 1994, Technical Digest Series, Vol. 2 (Optical Society of America, Washington, D.C.) pp. 134-137 (1994) used a fundus contact lens to null the refraction at the first surface of the cornea. That approach, however, suffers from the fundamental problem that the wave aberration of the eye depends on the combined effects of refractive index variations throughout the eye's optics. Possibly for that reason, an attempt to use a fundus contact lens to increase the axial resolution of a confocal scanning laser ophthalmoscope showed only modest improvement.
Another approach is to use a deformable mirror, a device that has successfully compensated for atmospheric turbulence in ground-based telescopes. A deformable mirror was previously proposed for use in a confocal laser scanning ophthalmoscope in conjunction with the human eye in U.S. Pat. No. 4,838,679 to Bille, but no method to measure the wave aberration of the eye was proposed or disclosed. Dreher, Bille, and Weinreb, in Applied Optics, Vol. 28, pp. 804-808 demonstrated the only usage of a deformable mirror for the eye, but only corrected the astigmatism of the eye, which is no better than the correction provided by conventional ophthalmic lenses. The use of an optical element to correct monochromatic aberrations higher than second order has never been achieved. In both those systems, no appropriate method for measuring the eye's high order aberrations was disclosed. Bille et al., in Noninvasive Diagnostic Techniques in Ophthalmology, edited by Masters, B. R., Springer-Verlag, pp. 528-547 (1990) proposed the use of a wavefront sensor in conjunction with a deformable mirror, but a working system was never disclosed or realized.
Summary and Objects of the Invention
In view of the foregoing, it is apparent that there exists a need in the art for a method of and an apparatus for producing ophthalmic optical elements that provide improved or supernormal vision over that which is currently available, as well as high resolution retinal images. It is, therefore, a primary object of the present invention to provide a method of and an apparatus for accurately measuring higher order aberrations of the eye and for using the data thus measured to compensate for those aberrations with a customized optical element.
It is also an object of the present invention to provide an improved wavefront sensor which rejects light reflected from structures other than the retina and which is capable of providing a complete measurement of the eye's aberrations.
It is a further object of the present invention to utilize such an improved wavefront sensor in combination with a deformable mirror to correct the wave aberration in a feedback manner such that the subject achieves normal or supernormal vision.
It is likewise a primary object of the present invention to provide a method of and an apparatus for producing high resolution retinal images which allow the imaging of microscopic structures the size of single cells in a human retina.
Briefly described, these and other objects of the invention are accomplished by providing a system for receiving light reflected from a retina of an eye. The wavefront in the plane of the pupil is recreated in the plane of a lenslet array of a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor. Each of the lenslets in the lenslet array is used to form an aerial image of the retinal point source on a CCD camera located adjacent to the lenslet array. The wave aberration of the eye, in the form of a point source produced on the retina by a laser beam, displaces each spot by an amount proportional to the local slope of the wavefront at each of the lenslets. The output from the digital CCD camera is sent to a computer which then calculates the wave aberration and provides a signal to a deformable mirror. Following an iterative procedure, the deformable mirror ultimately acquires a shape that is identical to the wave aberration measured at the outset, but with half the amplitude. This deformation is the appropriate one to flatten the distorted wavefront into a plane wave, which improves image quality.
In its method aspects, the system of the present invention, using the computer, first acquires the CCD image, as described above. Then, the computer computes the centroid of the spot formed by each of the lenslets of the wavefront sensor. Shifts in each focus spot in the x and y directions are calculated and then used as the slope data to fit with the sum of the first derivatives of 65 Zernike polynomials, using a least squares procedure, to determine the weight for each polynomial.
Then, the Zernike polynomials are weighted with the calculated coefficients. The 65 polynomials in the wavefront fit include all Zernike modes with radial power less than or equal to 10, except for the piston term.
The weighted Zernike polynomials are then added together, to result in the reconstructed wave aberration. The wave aberration is then evaluated at the locations of the actuators of a deformable mirror in order to produce the correction signal which is sent by the computer to the wavefront compensation device or deformable mirror as discussed above. Such a feedback loop continues to receive the reconstructed wave aberration results, feeding back an appropriate correction signal, until the RMS of the reconstructed wave aberration signal reaches an asymptotic value, at which point, the deformable mirror has been deformed such that it will compensate for all the detected aberrations of the eye.
When the reconstructed wave aberration signal reaches its asymptotic value, the final aberration signal (including all of the previously generated signals up until the RMS error reaches the asymptotic value) can be used to produce contact lenses to correct for all of the monochromatic aberrations of the human eye or for surgical procedures.
The present invention can also be used to provide high resolution images of the retina. The system for producing such images uses a krypton flash lamp which is designed to illuminate a retinal disk to provide an image of the retina which is reflected by the deformable mirror onto a lens and through an aperture such that the reflected image of the retina is focused onto a second CCD camera. The signals generated by the camera are acquired in a manner similar to that described above in connection with the first CCD camera and are stored for later use in the computer.
With these and other objects, advantages, and features of the invention that may become hereinafter apparent, the nature of the invention may be more clearly understood by reference to the following detailed description of the invention, the appended claims and to the drawings attached herein.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of the system of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a diagram of a flow chart of a method for the present invention for use in fabricating contact lenses or providing retinal images using the apparatus shown in FIG. 1;
FIGS. 3a-3d show the wave aberration and the corresponding point spread functions before and after adaptive compensation using the system of the present invention, respectively; and,
FIG. 4 shows the Zernike decomposition of the wave aberration of the eye before and after adaptive compensation, showing that the invention can correct not only second order aberrations (defocus and astigmatism) but also high-order aberrations.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown, in schematic diagram form, the apparatus of the present invention which can be used to both improve visual performance and to provide high resolution retinal images of eyes. The apparatus of the present invention, as shown in FIG. 1, measures the aberrations of the eye using a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor and then corrects them in a closed feedback loop with a compensating optical component such as a deformable mirror.
To measure the eye's wave aberration, a point source is produced on the retina by a laser 102. The light from the laser 102, is controlled by a shutter (not shown). The laser light passes through a spatial filter 104 and is collimated by an achromatic doublet lens 106. The collimated laser beam is reflected by the polarizing beamsplitter 110, passes through the lenses 112 and 116, and is incident onto a deformable mirror 118. The laser beam reflected from the deformable mirror 118 is focused by the lens 120, passes through the lens 122 and the second beamsplitter 124 and reaches the eye 100 at a diameter of about 1.5 mm at the pupil. The lens of the eye 100 focuses the laser beam on its retina 101. Possible myopia or hyperopia of the tested eye is corrected by movement of the eye 100 and the lens 122 with respect to the lens 120.
The light reflected from the retina 101 forms a distorted wavefront at the pupil, which is recreated in the plane of the deformable mirror 118 by the lenses 122 and 120, and also in the plane of the lenslet array of a Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor 148 by the lenses 116 and 112. The pupil is conjugate with a two-dimensional array of lenslets 148. Each of the lenslets in the array 148 forms an aerial image of the retinal point source on the CCD camera 146. The CCD camera 146 sends the digitized image to the computer 150 where it is stored in RAM or on magnetic or other storage media.
Aberrations displace each spot by an amount proportional to the local slope of the wavefront at each lenslet. The slope of the wavefront can be determined from the displacement of these spots relative to a known aberration-free reference. The wavefront sensor 154 measures the local slopes in both the x and y directions at 217 locations simultaneously across the dilated pupil. From the array of slopes, the wave aberration is reconstructed as described later herein.
The beamsplitter 110 which forms part of the wavefront sensor 154 is preferably configured as a polarizing beamsplitter in order to remove unwanted light reflected from the first surface of the cornea of the eye 100 and other optical elements, such as lenses 112, 116. 120, and 122. Such light would otherwise interfere with the operation of the wavefront sensor 154 and would make automatic procedures for measuring the wave aberration more difficult.
The wavefront sensor 154 of the present invention provides a much more complete measurement of the aberrations of the eye than has been possible before in part because a large number of samples in the pupil of the eye are used. Using the apparatus of the present invention, it has been found that the eye 100 contains complex aberrations that are not corrected by spectacles or contact lenses, and that such aberrations are significant when the pupil is large. Even aberrations of order 5 and greater, which the present wavefront sensor 154 is the first to measure, has significant impact on the eye's optical quality. Moreover, the higher order aberrations are stable over time. Such stability is important because it shows that the aberrations can be corrected using a static optical corrector, such as a custom-made contact lens.
Once the wave aberration is measured, as described above, it is compensated with a device conjugate with the pupil of the eye 100 that can control the phase of the light at different points in the pupil. As will be further described in detail in connection with FIG. 2, the computer 150, under software control, produces a correction signal which is fed back to the deformable mirror 118. The deformable mirror 118, which is available as model no. RX-170407-C from Xinetics, Inc., is conjugate with the pupil of the eye 100 and will be deformed to compensate for the wave aberration of the eye. The deformable mirror 118 contains an aluminized glass faceplate with 37 actuators mounted in a square array on the back surface. Alternatively, a liquid crystal device, a micro-machined mirror, a bimorph mirror, or other suitable device could be used in place of the deformable mirror 118.
The apparatus of FIG. 1 is used as follows. The computer 150 starts the measurement process by opening the pathway of the laser beam from the laser 102. The light returning from the retina 101 is used to measure the wave aberration. The Hartmann-Shack wavefront sensor 148 provides a measurement of the eye's wave aberration, from which the deformable mirror 118 is driven to correct it. The process is repeated with the computer 150 generating suitable signals to cause the deformable mirror 118 to continue deforming until the RMS error in the measured wave aberration reaches an asymptotic value, although other criteria might be used. At that point, the deformable mirror 118 has taken the appropriate shape to provide wavefront compensation for the aberrations of the eye.
Also at that point, the final correction signal generated by the computer 150 can be provided to a contact lens fabrication system 152 used to fabricate contact lenses which would duplicate the wavefront compensation characteristics of the deformable mirror 118. As would be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art, such contact lenses would be custom ground for each eye for which compensation is to be provided.
Turning now to FIG. 2, there is shown in diagrammatic flow chart form the steps performed by the software resident in the computer 150 for utilizing the data obtained from the CCD device 146. At Step 1, the digital image is acquired by the computer 150 from the CCD camera. Each image consists of 512 pixels by 512 pixels at 12 bits. Then, at Step 2, the computer 150 computes the centroid of the spot formed by each lenslet of the wavefront sensor. The centroid of each spot specifies its position. By comparing the positions of corresponding spots in a reference pattern and in the pattern obtained from the eye, the shifts in each focus spot in both the x and y directions can be calculated.
Next, at Step 3, the slope data are fit with the sum of the first derivatives of 65 Zernike polynomials, using a least squares procedure to determine the weight for each polynomial, similar to that discussed by Liang et al. in their report referenced above, though their method included no polynomials beyond fourth order.
Then, at Step 4, the Zernike polynomials are weighted with the coefficients calculated at Step 3. The 65 polynomials in the wavefront fit include all Zemike modes with radial power less than or equal to 10, except for the piston term. The first order Zemike modes are the linear terms. The second order modes are the quadratic terms, which correspond to the familiar aberrations, defocus, and astigmatism. The third order modes are the cubic terms, which correspond to the coma and coma-like aberrations. The fourth order modes contain spherical aberrations as well as other modes. The fifth to tenth order modes are the higher-order, irregular aberrations. Local irregularities in the wavefront within the pupil are represented by these higher-order Zernike modes.
The weighted Zernike polynomials are added together at Step 5 to obtain the reconstructed wave aberration. The wave aberration is evaluated at the locations of the actuators of the deformable mirror 118 to produce a correction signal at Step 6, which is then sent by the computer 150 to the wavefront compensation device which, as shown in FIG. 1, is preferably a deformable mirror 118. The feedback loop continues to receive the reconstructed wave aberration results, feeding back an appropriate correction signal until the RMS error in the reconstructed wave aberration signal reaches an asymptotic value. At that point, the deformable mirror 118 has been deformed such that, when the eye looks through it, it will compensate for all of the detected aberrations of the eye 100.
As is known to those of ordinary skill in the art, spectacles and contact lenses are available to correct vision, but they only correct defocus and sometimes astigmatism in the eye. Even normal eyes have other aberrations that are not corrected by conventional spectacles or contact lenses. The wavefront sensor 154 of the present invention is capable of automatically measuring those aberrations. Thus, using the adaptive optics system of FIG. 1 allows correction of monochromatic aberrations of the human eye beyond defocus and astigmatism. Accordingly, the adaptive optics system of FIG. 1 provides unprecedented optical quality in human eyes, both for improved vision and for providing sharper pictures of the retina.
FIGS. 3a-3d are graphs of data from the wavefront sensor showing that the adaptive optics system of the present invention successfully corrects the aberrations of the eye. FIGS. 3a and 3b show, for one subject, the wavefront error versus pupil position without adaptive compensation and with adaptive compensation, respectively, using the present invention. In a test in which four subjects were measured, adaptive compensation reduced the peak to valley wavefront error across a 6 mm pupil by a factor of 4, on average.
FIGS. 3c and 3d show the point spread function (PSF), computed from the wave aberration, without adaptive compensation and with adaptive compensation, respectively. Adaptive compensation increased the Strehl ratio, which is proportional to the peak intensity of the PSF, from 0.09 to 0.47. The average increase for all four eyes measured was nearly 4 fold, from 0.06 to 0.23. After compensation, the PSF for the subject shown has a full-width at half height (FWHH) of 2.0 microns, close to the value of 1.9 microns expected from diffraction alone. The present invention provides what is believed to be the best optical quality ever achieved in the human eye.
FIG. 4 is a graph of the RMS wavefront error, averaged across 4 eyes associated with each Zernike order of the wave aberration. The RMS wavefront error is reduced by adaptive compensation for Zernike orders up to fifth order. Spectacles, contact lenses and one previous attempt to use a deformable mirror to correct the eye's aberrations have only corrected second order aberrations (defocus and astigmatism).
Once the correction has been achieved, the apparatus of the present invention can be used to provide the subject with supernormal retinal image quality, in which case the subject views visual imagery through the deformable mirror 118. A six-fold improvement in vision, as measured with contrast sensitivity for fine gratings, for individuals looking through the present apparatus has been achieved. Individuals can see very high frequency gratings through the adaptive optics system that are above the resolution limit in normal viewing without adaptive optics.
Alternatively, once the correction has been achieved, the apparatus of the present invention shown in FIG. 1 can also be used to provide high resolution images of the retina 101. A krypton flash lamp 138 is imaged onto the eye's pupil by the lenses 134, 132, 130, and 120 after passing through the beamsplitter 124. The lamp 138 delivers a 4 msec flash, thereby illuminating a retinal disk on the retina 101 that is 1 degree in diameter. A narrow band interference filter 136 shapes the spectral output of the lamp 138.
The image of the retina 101 passes through the beamsplitter 124 and the lenses 122 and 120, is reflected by the deformable mirror 118, which has already been shaped to compensate for the eye's aberrations, and passes through the lens 116. The light is then reflected by the mirror 114 onto the lens 140 and through an aperture 141, where the reflected image is focused by the lens 142 onto the CCD device 145. The electrical signals corresponding to the light captured by the CCD camera 145 may be acquired in a manner similar to the light acquisition system which acquires the data from the CCD camera 146 and then be stored for later use in the computer 150. The images may then be shown on a monitor (not shown) connected to the computer 150 and/or sent to a suitable printing device (not shown) connected to the computer 150.
Using the apparatus of the present invention, single cells in the living human retina have been routinely resolved for the first time. The adaptive optic system of the present invention provides a non-invasive technique with which to study the normal and pathological living retina at a microscopic spatial scale. The theoretical limit of the transverse resolution of fundus imaging is proportional to the diameter of the dilated pupil. If adaptive compensation were complete for an 8 mm pupil, for example, the transverse resolution would be increased 3.2 times over that for a 2.5 mm pupil, a typical pupil diameter used by currently available fundus cameras.
The axial resolution, which is critical in optical in-depth sectioning of the retina, grows as the square of the pupil diameter. Therefore, complete adaptive compensation across an 8 mm pupil could theoretically increase the axial resolution of a confocal ophthalmoscope by a factor of 10 over an instrument with a 2.5 mm exit pupil. The full-width at half-height (FWHH) of the PSF in depth is 27 microns, which approaches that of optical coherence tomography, but provides the additional advantage of high transverse resolution not possible with optical coherence tomography alone.
The success of the apparatus of the present invention establishes that it can also be used to improve vision by reshaping the eye's optics, as in laser refractive surgery, or by fabricating customized optical elements such as contact lenses or intraocular lenses. As shown, FIGS. 1 and 2, the final correction signal can be provided to a contact lens or intraocular lens fabrication system or laser refractive surgical procedure 152 instead of the deformable mirror 118. As would be obvious to those of ordinary skill in the art, such contact lenses, intraocular lenses, or surgical correction would be customized for each eye for which compensation is to be provided. Additional aberrations besides defocus and astigmatism could be corrected with either an open or a closed loop system.
The invention described herein allows for the first complete description of the aberrations of the human eye combined with a demonstrated method to correct these aberrations. The applications of the present invention are four-fold. First, the invention can be utilized to provide a more accurate measure of the aberrations of the unaided eye. Second, the present invention can be used to evaluate the benefit of various techniques to correct the aberrations of the eye, such as custom glasses, custom contact lenses, and surgical procedures. Third, the present invention can be used to improve vision in optical instruments such as telescopes and binoculars, custom glasses, custom contact lenses, and with surgical procedures such as photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Fourth, the invention can be utilized to improve the axial and transverse resolution of images of the living retina. Current fundus cameras suffer from the problem that, in the prior art, the aberrations of the eye limit its resolution, a limit that has remained since the invention of the ophthalmoscope.
Although only a preferred embodiment is specifically illustrated and described herein, it will be appreciated that many modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings and within the purview of the appended claims without departing from the spirit and intended scope of the invention.
Claims
Post-issuance certificates present
The text shown below may not reflect later post-issuance changes.
What is claimed is:
1. Apparatus for use in performing laser surgery on the living eye to correct for aberrations of the living eye, comprising: means for generating a reflected point source image of the retina of said living eye; means for receiving said reflected point source image and for converting said point source image to corresponding digital signals; a digital data processor for calculating wave aberrations of the eye, using said digital signals; and means connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations from said digital data processor for performing laser surgery of said living eye.
2. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said means connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations comprises a laser for performing refractive surgery of the living eye.
3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye.
5. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said means connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations comprises a laser for performing photoablative surgery of said living eye.
7. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
8. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
9. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
10. The apparatus of claim 6, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
11. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said means connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations comprises a laser for performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
13. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
14. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
15. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
16. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye.
17. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
18. Apparatus for use in performing surgery on a living eye, said apparatus comprising: a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array for receiving a reflected point source of the retina of said living eye and for creating an image of the retinal point source; a camera located adjacent to said lenslet array for viewing said image of said retinal point source formed on each of said plurality of lenslets of said lenslet array; a digital data processor connected to receive output signals from said camera and for converting said output signals to digital signals representative of said retinal point source images, said digital data processor further calculating wave aberrations of said eye using said representative digital signals; and surgical equipment connected to receive said calculated wave aberrations from said digital data processor for use in performing surgery on said living eye.
19. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein said surgical equipment comprises a laser for performing refractive surgery on said living eye.
20. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
21. The apparatus of claim 20, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
22. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the surgery comprises refractive surgery on a cornea of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
23. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the surgery comprises refractive surgery on a cornea of the living eye.
24. The apparatus of claim 19, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
25. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein said surgical equipment comprises a laser for performing photoablative surgery on said living eye.
26. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
27. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein said surgical equipment comprises a laser for performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on said living eye.
28. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
29. The apparatus of claim 25, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
30. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
31. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
32. The apparatus of claim 27, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
33. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
34. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye.
35. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the surgery comprises refractive surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye.
36. The apparatus of claim 18, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
37. Apparatus for fabricating contact or intraocular lenses for correcting for wave aberrations of the living eye, comprising: means for generating a reflected point source image of a retina of said living eye; means for receiving said reflected point source image and for converting said point source image to corresponding digital signals; a digital data processor for calculating wave aberrations of the eye using said digital signals; and at least one of a contact lens and intraocular fabrication system connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations from said digital data processor for fabricating at least one contact or intraocular lens to provide wavefront compensation for wave aberrations of said living eye.
38. The apparatus of claim 37, wherein said at least one of a contact lens and intraocular fabrication system comprises a system for customizing an optical element.
39. The apparatus of claim 38, where said system for customizing an optical element customizes a lens.
40. The apparatus of claim 37, wherein the calculated wave-aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
41. The apparatus of claim 37, wherein said means for generating comprises a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array for receiving said reflected point source image of said retina.
42. The apparatus of claim 41, wherein said lenslet array is configured such that it is capable of providing resolution for at least fifth order aberrations.
43. Apparatus for use in detecting wave aberrations of a living eye and for fabricating a lens to correct said aberrations, the apparatus comprising: means for generating a reflected point source image of a retina of said living eye; means for receiving said reflected point source image and for converting said reflected point source image to corresponding digital signals; a digital data processor for (i) calculating the wave aberrations of the eye, using said digital signals, and (ii) producing a control signal representing the calculated wave aberrations; and means connected to receive the control signal from said digital data processor for fabricating said lens to correct said wave aberrations.
44. The apparatus of claim 43, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
45. The apparatus of claim 43, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
46. The apparatus of claim 43, wherein said means for fabricating said lens comprises at least one of a contact and intraocular lens fabrication system.
47. The apparatus of claim 46, wherein said at least one of a contact and intraocular lens fabrication system comprises a system for customizing an optical element.
48. The apparatus of claim 47, where said system for customizing an optical element customizes a lens.
49. The apparatus of claim 43, wherein said means for generating comprises a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array for receiving said reflected point source image of said retina.
50. The apparatus of claim 49, wherein said lenslet array is configured such that it is capable of providing resolution for at least fifth order aberrations.
51. Apparatus for use in performing surgery on the living eye, said apparatus comprising: means for generating a reflected point source image of said retina of said living eye; an optical device for receiving said reflected point source image of said retina and for converting said reflected point source image to corresponding digital signals; a digital data processor for receiving said corresponding digital signals for calculating wave aberrations of the eye using said digital signals and for generating a correction signal representative of said calculated wave aberrations; a compensating optical device for reflecting an image of said retina and for receiving said correction signal, said compensating optical device being adjusted using said correction signal such that wavefront correction for said calculated wave aberrations is provided for said living eye; and means connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations from said digital data processor for performing surgery of said living eye.
52. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein said means connected for receiving the wave aberrations comprises a laser for performing refractive surgery of the living eye.
53. The apparatus of claim 52, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
54. The apparatus of claim 52, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
55. The apparatus of claim 52, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye.
56. The apparatus of claim 52, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
57. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein said means connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations comprises a laser for performing photoablative surgery of said living eye.
58. The apparatus of claim 57, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
59. The apparatus of claim 57, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
60. The apparatus of claim 57, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
61. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein said means connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations comprises a laser for performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
62. The apparatus of claim 61, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
63. The apparatus of claim 61, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
64. The apparatus of claim 57, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
65. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
66. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
67. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye.
68. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
69. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein said digital data processor performs a feedback loop of (i) calculating the wave aberrations of the eye, using said digital signals, and (ii) produces said correction signal for controlling said compensating optical device to correct for the calculated wave aberrations until the calculated wave aberrations are reduced to an asymptotic level.
70. The apparatus of claim 51, wherein said optical system comprises a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array.
71. Apparatus for use in detecting wave aberrations of a living eye and for fabricating a lens to correct said wave aberrations, said apparatus comprising: an optical system, comprising a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array, for receiving a reflected point source image of said retina and for creating an image of the retinal point source; a camera located adjacent to said lenslet array for viewing said image of the retinal point source formed on each of said plurality of lenslets of said lenslet array to form output signals; and a digital data processor connected to receive said output signals from said camera, said digital data processor further (i) calculating said wave aberrations of the eye, using said output signals, and (ii) producing a control signal representing the calculated wave aberrations; and means connected to receive the control signal from said digital data processor for fabricating said lens.
72. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order aberrations.
73. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order aberrations.
74. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein said means connected to receive the control signal comprises at least one of a contact and intraocular lens fabrication system for customizing an optical element.
75. The apparatus of claim 74, where said system for customizing an optical element customizes a lens.
76. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
77. The apparatus of claim 71, wherein said means for generating comprises a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array for receiving said reflected point source image of said retina.
78. The apparatus of claim 77, wherein said lenslet array is configured such that it is capable of providing resolution for at least fifth order aberrations.
79. Apparatus for generating high resolution images of the retina of the living eye, said apparatus comprising: means for generating a reflected point source image of said retina of said living eye; an optical device for receiving said reflected point source image of said retina and for converting said reflected point source image to corresponding digital signals; a digital data processor for receiving said corresponding digital signals for calculating wave aberrations of the eye using said digital signals and for generating a correction signal representative of said calculated wave aberrations; a compensating optical device for reflecting an image of said retina and for receiving said correction signal, said compensating optical device being adjusted using said correction signal such that wavefront correction for said calculated wave aberrations is provided for said living eye; and means for receiving said reflected image of said retina from said compensating optical device after said compensating optical device has corrected said image of said retina for said calculated wave aberrations.
80. The apparatus of claim 79, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
81. The apparatus of claim 79, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
82. The apparatus of claim 79, wherein said digital data processor performs a feedback loop of (i) calculating the wave aberrations of the eye, using said digital signals, and (ii) produces said correction signal for controlling said compensating optical device to correct for the calculated wave aberrations until the calculated wave aberrations are reduced to an asymptotic level.
83. The apparatus of claim 79, wherein said optical device comprises a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array.
84. The apparatus of claim 79, wherein said compensating optical device is one of a deformable mirror, liquid crystal device, micro-machined mirror and bimorph mirror.
85. An optical instrument for performing refractions of the living eye, comprising: means for generating a reflected point source image of the retina of said living eye; means for receiving said reflected point source image and for converting said point source image to corresponding digital signals; a digital data processor for calculating wave aberrations of the eye so as to include at least fifth order modes, using said digital signals; and means connected to receive the calculated wave aberrations from said digital data processor for performing refraction of said living eye.
86. A method for performing laser surgery on the living eye to correct for aberrations of the living eye, comprising: generating a reflected point source image of the retina of said living eye; receiving said reflected point source image and converting said point source image to corresponding digital signals; calculating wave aberrations of the eye, using said digital signals; and receiving the calculated wave aberrations for performing laser surgery of said living eye.
87. The method of claim 86, wherein said step of performing laser surgery comprises performing laser refractive surgery of the living eye.
88. The method of claim 87, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
89. The method of claim 87, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
90. The method of claim 87, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye.
91. The method of claim 87, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
92. The method of claim 86, wherein said step of performing laser surgery comprises performing laser photoablative surgery of said living eye.
93. The method of claim 92, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
94. The method of claim 92, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
95. The method of claim 92, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
96. The method of claim 92, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
97. The method of claim 86, wherein said step of performing laser surgery comprises performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
98. The method of claim 97, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
99. The method of claim 97, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
100. The method of claim 86, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
101. The method of claim 86, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
102. The method of claim 86, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye.
103. The method of claim 86, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
104. A method for performing surgery on a living eye, said method comprising the steps of: providing a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array for receiving a reflected point source of the retina of said living eye and for creating an image of the retinal point source; locating a camera adjacent to said lenslet array for viewing said image of said retinal point source formed on each of said plurality of lenslets of said lenslet array; receiving output signals from said camera and converting said output signals to digital signals representative of said retinal point source images, and further calculating wave aberrations of said eye using said representative digital signals; and connecting surgical equipment to receive said calculated wave aberrations for use in performing surgery on said living eye.
105. The method of claim 104, wherein said step of performing surgery on said living eye comprises performing laser refractive surgery.
106. The method of claim 105, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
107. The method of claim 105, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
108. The method of claim 105, wherein the surgery comprises refractive surgery on a cornea of the living eye.
109. The method of claim 105, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
110. The method of claim 104, wherein said step of performing surgery on said living eye comprises performing laser photoablative surgery on said living eye.
111. The method of claim 110, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
112. The method of claim 110, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
113. The method of claim 110, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
114. The method of claim 104, wherein said step of performing surgery on said living eye comprises performing laser photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) on said living eye.
115. The method of claim 114, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
116. The method of claim 114, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
117. The method of claim 114, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
118. The method of claim 104, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
119. The method of claim 104, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye.
120. The method of claim 104, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
121. A method for fabricating contact or intraocular lenses for correcting for wave aberrations of the living eye, comprising: generating a reflected point source image of a retina of said living eye; receiving said reflected point source image and converting said point source image to corresponding digital signals; calculating wave aberrations of the eye using said digital signals; and connecting at least one of a contact and intraocular lens fabrication system to receive the calculated wave aberrations for fabricating at least one contact and intraocular lens to provide wavefront compensation for wave aberrations of said living eye.
122. The method of claim 121, wherein said at least one of a contact and intraocular lens fabrication system comprises a system for customizing an optical element.
123. The method of claim 122, where said system for customizing an optical element customizes a lens.
124. The method of claim 121, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
125. The method of claim 124, wherein said lenslet array is configured such that it is capable of providing resolution for at least fifth order aberrations.
126. The method of claim 121, wherein said step of generating comprises using a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array for receiving said reflected point source image of said retina.
127. A method for detecting wave aberrations of a living eye and for fabricating a lens to correct said aberrations, comprising the steps of: generating a reflected point source image of a retina of said living eye; receiving said reflected point source image and converting said reflected point source image to corresponding digital signals; (i) calculating the wave aberrations of the eye, using said digital signals, and (ii) producing a control signal representing the calculated wave aberrations; and receiving the control signal for fabricating said lens to correct for said wave aberrations.
128. The method of claim 127, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
129. The method of claim 127, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
130. The method of claim 127, wherein said step of fabricating said lens comprises fabricating at least one of a contact lens and intraocular lens.
131. The method of claim 130, wherein said step of fabricating said at least one of a contact lens and intraocular lens comprises customizing an optical element.
132. The method of claim 131, where said step of customizing an optical element comprises customizing a lens.
133. The method of claim 127, wherein said step of generating comprises providing a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array for receiving said reflected point source image of said retina.
134. The method of claim 133, wherein said lenslet array is configured such that it is capable of providing resolution for at least fifth order aberrations.
135. A method for performing surgery on the living eye, said method comprising: generating a reflected point source image of said retina of said living eye; receiving said reflected point source image of said retina and converting said reflected point source image to corresponding digital signals; receiving said corresponding digital signals for calculating wave aberrations of the eye using said digital signals and generating a correction signal representative of said calculated wave aberrations; providing a compensating optical device for reflecting an image of said retina and for receiving said correction signal, and adjusting said compensating optical device using said correction signal such that wavefront correction for said calculated wave aberrations is provided for said living eye; and receiving the calculated wave aberrations for performing surgery of said living eye.
136. The method of claim 135, wherein said method is used for performing laser refractive surgery of the living eye.
137. The method of claim 136, wherein said step of receiving the calculated wave aberrations comprises performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
138. The method of claim 136, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
139. The method of claim 136, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye.
140. The method of claim 136, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on a cornea of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
141. The method of claim 135, wherein said step of receiving the calculated wave aberrations comprises performing laser photoablative surgery of said living eye.
142. The method of claim 141, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
143. The method of claim 141, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
144. The method of claim 141, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
145. The method of claim 141, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
146. The method of claim 135, wherein said step of receiving the calculated wave aberrations comprises performing photorefractive keratectomy (PRK).
147. The method of claim 146, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
148. The method of claim 146, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
149. The method of claim 146, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye.
150. The method of claim 146, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea and a retina of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
151. The method of claim 135, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
152. The method of claim 135, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
153. The method of 135, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye.
154. The method of claim 135, wherein the surgery comprises surgery on at least one of a cornea, a lens, a retina, a layer behind the retina and a ciliary body of the living eye and the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
155. The method of claim 135, wherein said step of performing a feedback loop comprises (i) calculating the wave aberrations of the eye, using said digital signals, and (ii) producing said correction signal for controlling said compensating optical device to correct for the calculated wave aberrations until the calculated wave aberrations are reduced to an asymptotic level.
156. The method of claim 135, wherein said optical system comprises a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array.
157. A method for detecting wave aberrations of a living eye and fabricating a lens to correct said wave aberrations, said method comprising: providing an optical system, comprising a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array, for receiving a reflected point source image of said retina and for creating an image of the retinal point source; locating a camera adjacent to said lenslet array for viewing said image of the retinal point source formed on each of said plurality of lenslets of said lenslet array to form output signals; and receiving said output signals from said camera, and (i) calculating said wave aberrations of the eye, using said output signals, and (ii) producing a control signal representing the calculated wave aberrations; and receiving the control signal for fabricating said lens.
158. The method of claim 157, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order aberrations.
159. The method of claim 157, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order aberrations.
160. The method of claim 157, wherein said at least one of a contact and intraocular lens fabrication system receives said control signal for customizing an optical element.
161. The method of claim 160, where said step of customizing an optical element customizes a lens.
162. The method of claim 157, wherein said lenslet array is configured such that it is capable of providing resolution for at least fifth order aberrations.
163. A method for generating high resolution images of the retina of the living eye, said method comprising: generating a reflected point source image of said retina of said living eye; receiving said reflected point source image of said retina and for converting said reflected point source image to corresponding digital signals; receiving said corresponding digital signals for calculating wave aberrations of the eye using said digital signals and generating a correction signal representative of said calculated wave aberrations; providing a compensating optical device for reflecting an image of said retina and for receiving said correction signal, said compensating optical device being adjusted using said correction signal such that wavefront correction for said calculated wave aberrations is provided for said living eye; and receiving said reflected image of said retina from said compensating optical device after said compensating optical device has corrected said image of said retina for said calculated wave aberrations.
164. The method of claim 163, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least third order wave aberrations.
165. The method of claim 163, wherein the calculated wave aberrations comprise at least fifth order wave aberrations.
166. The method of claim 163, further performing a feedback loop of (i) calculating the wave aberrations of the eye, using said digital signals, and (ii) producing said correction signal for controlling said compensating optical device to correct for the calculated wave aberrations until the calculated wave aberrations are reduced to an asymptotic level.
167. The method of claim 163, wherein said step of generating comprises providing a plurality of lenslets which form a lenslet array for receiving said reflected point source image of said retina.
168. A method for performing refractions of the living eye, comprising: generating a reflected point source image of the retina of said living eye; receiving said reflected point source image and converting said point source image to corresponding digital signals; calculating wave aberrations of the eye so as to include at least fifth order modes, using said digital signals; and receiving the calculated wave aberrations from said digital data processor for performing refraction of said living eye.
Patent Citations (57)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US4523821 | 1985-06-01 | Lang et al. | |
| US4632528 | 1986-12-01 | Yoshino et al. | |
| US4721379 | 1988-01-01 | L'Esperance | |
| US4764930 | 1988-08-01 | Bille et al. | |
| US4838679 | 1989-06-01 | Bille | |
| US4848340 | 1989-07-01 | Bille et al. | |
| US4881808 | 1989-11-01 | Bille et al. | |
| US4991953 | 1991-02-01 | Pflibsen et al. | |
| US5062702 | 1991-11-01 | Bille | |
| US5114628 | 1992-05-01 | Hofer et al. | |
| US5139022 | 1992-08-01 | Lempert | |
| US5159361 | 1992-10-01 | Cambier et al. | |
| US5177511 | 1993-01-01 | Feuerstein et al. | |
| US5184157 | 1993-02-01 | Ichihashi et al. | |
| US5198845 | 1993-03-01 | Triller | |
| US5202709 | 1993-04-01 | Ichihashi et al. | |
| US5214456 | 1993-05-01 | Gersten | |
| US5229889 | 1993-07-01 | Kittell | |
| US5233174 | 1993-08-01 | Zmek | |
| US5243367 | 1993-09-01 | Spellitz et al. | |
| US5258791 | 1993-11-01 | Penny et al. | |
| US5293871 | 1994-03-01 | Reinstein et al. | |
| US5404884 | 1995-04-01 | Lempert | |
| US5442412 | 1995-08-01 | Frey et al. | |
| US5452031 | 1995-09-01 | Ducharme | |
| US5473392 | 1995-12-01 | Klopotek | |
| US5474548 | 1995-12-01 | Knopp et al. | |
| US5475452 | 1995-12-01 | Kuhn et al. | |
| US5491524 | 1996-02-01 | Hellmuth et al. | |
| US5493391 | 1996-02-01 | Neal et al. | |
| US5502518 | 1996-03-01 | Lieberman | |
| US5512965 | 1996-04-01 | Snook | |
| US5512966 | 1996-04-01 | Snook | |
| US5548354 | 1996-08-01 | Kasahara et al. | |
| US5570142 | 1996-10-01 | Lieberman | |
| US5581347 | 1996-12-01 | Le Saux et al. | |
| US5592246 | 1997-01-01 | Kuhn et al. | |
| US5629765 | 1997-05-01 | Schmutz | |
| US5632742 | 1997-05-01 | Frey et al. | |
| US5722427 | 1998-03-01 | Wakil et al. | |
| US5735283 | 1998-04-01 | Snook | |
| US5740803 | 1998-04-01 | Gray et al. | |
| US5777719 | 1998-07-01 | Williams et al. | |
| US5784146 | 1998-07-01 | Nanjo et al. | |
| US5822035 | 1998-10-01 | Bille | |
| US5841511 | 1998-11-01 | D'Souza et al. | |
| US5847804 | 1998-12-01 | Sarver et al. | |
| US5861955 | 1999-01-01 | Gordon | |
| US5949521 | 1999-09-01 | Williams et al. | |
| US6007204 | 1999-12-01 | Fahrenkrug et al. | |
| DEX4222395A1 | 1994-01-01 | ||
| JPX5-146409 | 1993-06-01 | ||
| JPX6327634 | 1994-11-01 | ||
| WOXWO87/05205 | 1987-09-01 | ||
| WOXWO92/01417 | 1992-02-01 | ||
| WOXWO95/28989 | 1995-11-01 | ||
| WOXWO98/27863 | 1998-07-01 |
Non-Patent Literature (29)
- "Extensions of Low-Cost Adaptive Optics: Imaging of Space-Objects, the Retina and Power Projection,"Industrial Sensors & Actuators, dated Dec. 1993 (actual publication date, if any, unknown), pp. 1, 10 and 15.
- C. Labjuhn, et al., Astigmatismuskorrektur durch Laserthermokeratoplastik (LTK)--Ein Ansatz fur die Korrektur des hohen Astigmatismus nach Perforierender keratoplastik, Contactologia 18 D (1996), pp. 175-183.
- Cohen, Kenneth L. et al., Assessment of the Power and Height of Radial Aspheres Reported by a Computer-assisted Keratoscope, American Journal of Ophthalmology, vol. 119, No. 6, Nov. 30, 1994, pp. 723-732.
- Corbett, Melanie C. et al., The Topography of the Normal Cornea, Eur J Implant Ref Surg, vol. 6, Oct. 1994, pp. 286-297.
- Maeder, Anthony J. et al., Accurate 3D corneal surface measurement using an automated mapping approach, Mar. 1995, pp. 328-334.
- Salmon, Thomas O. & Horner, Douglas G., Comparison of Elevation, Curvature, and Power Descriptors for Corneal Topographic Mapping, 1995, pp. 800-808.
- Pavlopoulos, Georgios P. et al., The Effect of Artificial Tears on Computer-assisted Corneal Topography in Normal Eyes and After Penetrating Keratoplasty, Jun. 1995, pp. 712-722.
- Roberts, Cynthia, Characterization of the Inherent Error in a Spherically-Biased Corneal Topography System in Mapping a Radially Aspheric Surface, Mar./Apr. 1994, pp. 103-111.
- Thornton, Spencer P., Clinical evaluation of corneal topography, 1993, pp. 198-202.
- Rabinowitz, Yaron S. et al., Computer-Assisted Corneal Topography in Keratoconus, Nov./Dec. 1989, pp. 400-408.
- Wilson, Steven E. et al., Accuracy and Precision of the Corneal Analysis System and the Topographic Modeling System, 1992, pp. 28-35.
- Bogan, Stephen, J. et al., Computer-Assisted Videokeratography of Corneal Topography After Radial Keratotomy, Jun. 1991, pp. 834-841.
- Bogan, Stephen, J. et al., Classification of Normal Corneal Topogaphy Based on Computer-Assisted Videokeratography, Jul. 1990, pp. 945-949.
- Reidy, James J. et al., The Corneal Topography of Epikeratophakia, Jan./Feb. 1990, pp. 26-31.
- Dingeldein, Steven A. et al., The Topography of Normal Corneas, Apr. 1989, pp. 512-518.
- McDonnell, Peter J. et al., Topographic Analysis and Visual Acuity After Radial Keratotomy, Dec. 1983, pp. 692-695.
- McDonnell, Peter J. et al., Corneal Topographic Changes after Radial Keratotomy, Jan. 1989, pp. 45-49.
- Kiely, P.M. et al., The mean shape of the human cornea, 1982, pp. 1027-1040.
- Bafna, S. et al., Corneal Power Calculated by the Paraxial Formula and Snell's Law in Normal Corneas, Feb. 15, 1996, pp. 2589-B434.
- Matallana, M. et al., 3-D Video Corneal Topography True Elevation Mapping, Feb. 15, 1996, pp. 2590-B435.
- Aoyama, Y. et al., Quantitative evaluation of corneal astigmatism using computed corneal topography and newly developed software, Feb. 15, 1996, pp. 2591-B436.
- Gelikkol, G. et al., Neural Network Analysis of Videokeratography Following Excimer Laser Photorefractive Keratectomy, Feb. 15, 1996, pp. 2592-B437.
- Liang et al., Objective measurement of wave aberrations of the human eye with the use of a Hartmann-Shack wave-front sensor, Journal Optical Society of America, Jul. 1994, vol. 11, No. 7, pp. 1-9.
- Walsh et al., Objective technique for the determination of monochromatic aberrations of the human eye, Journal Optical Society of America, Sep. 1984, vol. 1, No. 9, pp. 987-992.
- Williams, D. R., Adaptive Optics for High Resolution Retinal Imaging, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, p. 1055.
- Charman, W.N., Wavefront Aberration of the Eye: A Review, Optometry and Vision Science, American Academy of Optometry, vol. 68, No. 8, opp. 574-583.
- Bartsch, et al., Resolution Improvement of Confocal Scanning Laser Tomography of Human Fundus, Retinal Imaging Laboratory, Shiley Eye Center-Department of Opthalmology, University of California San Diego, pp. 134-137.
- Dreher et al., Active optical depth resolution improvement of laser tomographic scanner, Applied Optics, Feb. 15, 1989, vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 804-808.
- Bille et al., Scanning Laser Tomography of the Living Human Eye, Chapter 28, pp. 528-547.