US 6,093,326 AGrant

Method for the Fractionation of Molasses

Issue Date:2000-07-25

•45 Claims

•4 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

The invention relates to a method for the fractionation of molasses using a chromatographic simulated moving bed system in which the liquid flow is effected in a single direction in a system comprising at least two chromatographic partial packing material beds. In the method of the invention, the product or products are recovered during a multi-step sequence comprising the following phases: feeding phase of molasses, eluting phase and recycling phase. The liquid present in the partial packing material beds with their dry solids profile is recycled in the recycling phase in a loop comprising one, two or several partial packing material beds.

Metadata

Assignee

Danisco Finland Oy

Inventors

Heikki Heikkila
Goran Hyoky
Jarmo Kuisma

Application Information

Application Number:US 9259031

Filing Date:1997-09-09

Priority Date:1993-01-26

Art Unit:173

Classifications

IPC:

B01D 1508

Field of Search:

210127635;656;659;198.246.2;46.3;55

Patent Drawings (4 sheets)

Description

The present invention relates to a method for the fractionation of molasses using a chromatographic simulated moving bed system in which the liquid flow is effected in a single direction in a system comprising at least two chromatographic partial packing material beds. Fractionation of molasses denotes fractionation of various vegetable-derived by-products of the food and fermenting industries, such as beet and cane molasses, stillage, vinasse, slop, wood molasses, corn steep water, wheat, barley and corn molasses (hydrolyzed C starch). In the method of the invention, the product or products are recovered during a multi-step sequence comprising the following phases: feeding phase of molasses, eluting phase and recycling phase.

The liquid present in the partial packing material beds with their dry solids profile is recycled in the recycling phase in a loop comprising one, two or several partial packing material beds.

These phases are employed to form sequences comprising several process steps. In accordance with the invention, a sequence preferably comprises five to ten steps. A step comprises for example

a molasses feeding phase and/or feeding of an eluant liquid and recovery of the product or products, or

an eluting phase with recovery of a product or products, or

recycling phase and eluting phase with recovery of a product or products, or

two or more recycling phases.

Sequences comprising said steps are repeated five to seven times to reach an equilibrium.

Typically from three to twelve, preferably three to six chromatographic partial packing material beds are employed. A loop may comprise one, two or several partial packing material beds. Strongly acid cation exchange resin is preferably used as the column packing material.

The simulated moving bed system has been developed and introduced by UOP (United Oil Products), U.S.A., at, the beginning of the 1960's, initially for petrochemical applications (U.S. Pat. No. 2,985,589). Today several simulated moving bed methods for a number of different applications are known (U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,706,812, 4,157,267, 4,267,054, 4,293,346, 4,312,678, 4,313,015, 4,332,623, 4,359,430, 4,379,751, 4,402,832, 4,412,866, 4,461,649, 4,533,398 and 5,127,957, and published European application 0,279,946).

The simulated moving bed system enables separating performances that are many times higher, and lower dilution of the products (consumption of eluent) than in the batch method.

The simulated moving bed method is either continuous or sequential.

In a continuous simulated moving bed method, all flows are continuous. These flows are: feeding of feed solution and eluent liquid, recycling of liquid mixture and recovery of products (usually only two). The flow rate for these flows may be adjusted in accordance with the separation goals (yield, purity, capacity). Normally, 8 to 20 partial packing material beds are combined into a single loop. In accordance with the abovementioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,402,832, the recycling phases have been applied to the recycling of dilute fractions. The feed and product recovery points are shifted cyclically in the downstream direction. On account of the feed of eluent liquid and feed solution (and on account of recovery of products) and the flow through the packing material bed, a dry solids profile is formed. Ingredients having a lower migration rate in the packing bed are concentrated at the downstream end of the dry solids profile, and respectively ingredients having a higher migration rate at the upstream end. Feeding points for feeding solution and eluent liquid and recovery points for product or products are shifted gradually at substantially the same rate at which the dry solids profile moves in the bed. The product or products are recovered substantially from the upstream and downstream end of the dry solids profile, and the feed solution is fed approximately to the maximum point of the dry solids profile and the eluent liquid approximately to the minimum point of the dry solids profile. Part of the separated product fraction is recycled on account of the continuous cyclic flow and as only part of the dry solids profile is removed from the packing material bed.

The cyclical shifting of the feed and recovery points is performed by using feed and recovery valves disposed along the packing material bed at the upstream and downstream end of each partial packing material bed. If it is desired to recover product fractions of high purity, short phase times and a plurality of partial packing material beds must be employed (the apparatus has corresponding valves and feed and recovery equipment).

In a sequential simulated moving bed method, not all flows are continuous. In a sequential simulated moving bed method the flows are: feeding of feed solution and eluent liquid, recycling of liquid mixture and recovery of products (two to four or more products; e.g. betaine as a third fraction in beet molasses separation and monosaccharides in cane sugar separation). The flow rate and the volumes of the different feeds and product fractions may be adjusted in accordance with the separation goals (yield, purity, capacity). The method comprises three basic phases: feeding, elution, and recycling. During the feed phase, a feed solution and possibly also an eluent liquid is fed into predetermined partial packing material beds, and simultaneously two or even three product fractions are recovered. During the eluting phase, eluent liquid is fed into a predetermined partial packing material bed, and during said phases one or even two product fractions are recovered in addition to the residue. During the recycling phase, no feed solution or eluent liquid is fed into the partial packing material beds and no products are recovered.

Finnish Patent Application 882740 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,127,957) discloses a method for recovery of betaine and sucrose from beet molasses using a sequential simulated moving bed method, the chromatographic system therein comprising at least three chromatographic partial packing material beds connected in series and adapted for the flow of liquids in a single direction in partial packing material beds, in which method betaine and sucrose are separated during the same sequence comprising:

molasses feeding phase, in which a molasses feed solution is fed into one of said partial packing material beds and in which eluent water is fed substantially simultaneously into another partial packing material bed,

feeding phase of eluent water, and

recycling phase,

these phases being repeated either once or several times during the sequence.

A novel sequential simulated moving bed method has now been developed, which is particularly suitable for the fractionation of molasses. The novel method yields a purer sucrose solution with a better yield and/or capacity.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 shows a flow chart of the pilot plant of Example 1.

FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of the pilot plant of Example 2.

FIG. 3 shows a flow chart of the pilot plant of Example 3.

DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

In the novel method, the liquid flow is arranged in a single direction in a system comprising at least two partial packing material beds, and the product is/products are recovered during a multi-step sequence. The partial packing material bed usually comprises one column. The sequence comprises feeding, eluting and recycling phases. During the recycling phase, the liquid in the partial packing material beds with their dry solids profile is recycled in a loop comprising one, two or several partial packing material beds.

Therefore, in the novel method recycling is employed in a novel way. In the recycling phase one, two or three or even more separate successive loops are formed. For example, the number of columns being four, the loop preferably comprises two columns. The loop may be closed or "open", i.e., when liquid is recycled in the other loop, eluent liquid can be fed into the other loop and the product fraction can be recovered therefrom. During feed and elution, the flow through the packing material beds may be effected between successive loops, the flows conveying material from one loop to another. During the recycling phase, the loop is closed and separated from the other loops. One separate dry solids profile is recycled in each loop.

Molasses is rich in various coloured components (colourants) which were difficult to remove completely enough by the earlier methods. Separate colour-removing phases were needed, or two-step crystallization had to be used to obtain a colourless product. The novel method according to the invention affords even 90% or greater colour removal in the molasses fractionating phase alone. The major part of the colour is separated already in the column group of that loop to which the feed solution is supplied, and it will not essentially contaminate the column groups of the second (or third) loop. Continuous and stable colour removal is achieved. When a batch method or conventional simulated moving bed methods (continuous or sequential), for instance, are employed, colour removal is normally only 75-80% in continuous long-term separation.

Also the separation of non-sugars, i.e. salts, is efficient when the method of the invention is used, and thus the sucrose content of the sugar fraction obtained from the separation can be very high, usually in advantageous cases in excess of 92-95% on the dry solids. The majority of the salts are separated already in the column group of that loop to which the feed solution is supplied, and thus the ion exclusion is more complete in the following loops. The result is a more symmetrical, sharper and higher sucrose peak, in other words, better separation of sucrose is achieved. When the batch method or conventional simulated moving bed methods (continuous or sequential), for instance, are employed, the sucrose content of the sugar fraction is in advantageous cases usually about or below 90-92% on the dry solids.

A strongly acid, gel-type cation exchange resin (e.g. "Zerolit 225", "Finex" or "Purolite") preferably in the sodium or potassium form is used as a packing for the columns.

Prior to the chromatographic fractionation, the feed solution (beet molasses) is preferably diluted with water to 20-65% by weight, softened with sodium carbonate and finally filtered using diatomaceous earth as a filtering aid. Prior to feed into separation columns, the molasses solution is heated to 40-85.degree. C. and even to 95.degree. C.

Water preferably at 40-85.degree. C. is used for the elution.

The flow rate of the liquid in the columns is 0.5-10 m.sup.3 /h/m.sup.2, even 20 m.sup.3 /h/m.sup.2.

The following examples illustrate the novel sequential simulated moving bed method for the fractionation of molasses. These examples shall not be regarded as restricting the scope of the invention, as they are only examples of employing the method according to the invention to recover sucrose and betaine from beet molasses.

EXAMPLE 1

A pilot plant scale chromatographic test apparatus was employed. The apparatus included four columns, feed pumps, recycling pumps, eluent water pumps, flow and pressure regulators, and inlet and outlet valves for the different process streams. The flowchart is shown in FIG. 1.

The columns were packed with a strongly acid cation exchange resin ("Purolite"). The resin had a polystyrene/divinylbenzene backbone and was activated with sulphonic acid groups; the mean spherule size was about 0.36 mm. The resin had a DVB content of 5.5%. Initially the resin had been regenerated to sodium form, and during the run it was balanced with cations from the feed molasses.

Test Conditions

The feed solution consisted of beet molasses wherefrom calcium had been removed by adding sodium carbonate (pH 9) and filtering the precipitate off using diatomaceous earth as an aid.

The separation of sucrose and betaine was performed by an eight-step sequence in which each column had its specific function. As shown in FIG. 1, steps 5, 6 and 7 each comprise one recycling phase and one feeding phase for eluent water, and step 8 two recycling phases. The duration of the sequence was 79 minutes and the sucrose yield 84.0% (on the amount of sucrose fed).

Step 1: Molasses was fed (feeding phase) into column 1 at flow rate 50 l/h, and the residue fraction was eluted from the downstream end of the column. Simultaneously water was supplied (eluting phase) to column 2 at a flow rate 90 l/h, and a recycling fraction and sucrose were eluted from column 4. Said recycling fraction was used to dilute the raw material (molasses).

Step 2: Feeding of molasses into column 1 and elution of residue from the downstream end of column 1 were continued. Simultaneously water was supplied to columns 2 and 4 at a flow rate 90 l/h, the residue fraction was eluted from column 3, and the elution of sucrose was continued from column 4.

Step 3: Water was fed into columns 1 (50 l/h) and 4 (90 l/h), and the residue fraction was eluted from columns 1 and 3.

Step 4: Water was fed into column 2 at a rate 90 l/h, and the residue fraction was eluted from column 3.

Step 5: Recycling (recycling phase) in columns 1 and 2 at a rate 90 l/h; simultaneously water was supplied to column 3 at a rate 70 l/h and the betaine fraction was eluted from column 4.

Step 6: Water was fed into column 1 at a rate 90 l/h and the residue fraction was eluted from column 2; simultaneous recycling in columns 3 and 4 at a rate 70 l/h.

Step 7: Recycling in columns 1 and 2 at a rate 90 l/h.

Step 8: Recycling in columns 1 and 2 at a rate 90 l/h and in columns 3 and 4 at a rate 40 l/h.

After the sequence was completed, the process control program was continued and it returned to step 1. By repeating this sequence five to seven times, an equilibrium was reached in the system. The run was continued in a state of equilibrium, and product fractions with a constant composition were recovered and analyzed (cf. Tables 1 and 2).

The progress of the separation process was monitored with a density meter, a meter for optical activity, and a conductivity meter, and the separation was controlled by a microprocessor whereby precisely defined volumes and flow rates of feeds, recycled liquid and product fractions were controlled employing quantity/volume measuring, valves and pumps.

Table 1 shows the volumes of the feeds, recycled liquid and product fractions, and Table 2 shows the compositions of molasses and the product fractions. The sucrose and betaine fractions were recovered from column 4. Table 5 shows the colours of the molasses, residues and product fractions.

EXAMPLE 2

A pilot plant scale chromatographic test apparatus was employed. The apparatus included three columns, feed pumps, recycling pumps, eluent water pumps, flow and pressure regulators, and inlet and outlet valves for the different process streams. The flowchart is shown in FIG. 2.

The columns had been packed with a strongly acid cation exchange resin ("Purolite"). The resin had a polystyrene/divinylbenzene backbone and was activated with sulphonic acid groups; the mean spherule size was about 0.36 mm. The resin had a DVB content of 5.5%. Initially the resin had been regenerated to sodium form, and during the run it was balanced with cations from the feed molasses.

Test Conditions

The feed solution consisted of beet molasses wherefrom calcium had been removed by adding sodium carbonate (pH 9) and filtering the precipitate off using diatomaceous earth as an aid.

The separation of sucrose and betaine was performed by a five-step sequence in which each column had its specific function. As shown in FIG. 2, steps 2 and 3 each comprise one recycling phase and one feeding phase for eluent water, and step 5 two recycling phases. The duration of the sequence was 100 minutes and the sucrose yield 87.3% (on the amount of sucrose fed).

Step 1: Molasses was fed into column 1 at flow rate 45 l/h, and residue was eluted from the same column (downstream end of the column); simultaneously water was supplied to column 2, and a recycling fraction and sucrose fraction were eluted from column 3 at a flow rate 85 l/h.

Step 2: Water was fed into column 2 at a rate 110 l/h, and the residue fraction was eluted from column 1; simultaneous recycling in column 3 at a rate 25 l/h.

Step 3: Recycling in columns 1 and 2 at a rate 110 l/h; simultaneously water was supplied to column 3 at a rate 35 l/h and the betaine fraction was eluted from the same column.

Step 4: Water was fed into column 1 at a rate 110 l/h and into column 3 at a rate 35 l/h, and the residue fraction was eluted from columns 2 and 3.

Step 5: Recycling in columns 1 and 2 at a rate 110 l/h and in column 3 at a rate 25 l/h.

Table 3 shows the volumes of the feeds, recycled solution and product fractions, and Table 4 shows the compositions of molasses and the product fractions. Table 5 shows the colours of the molasses, residues and product fractions.

EXAMPLE 3

The columns were packed with a strongly acid cation exchange resin ("Finex"). The resin had a polystyrene/divinylbenzene backbone and was activated with sulphonic acid groups; the mean spherule size was about 0.36 mm. The resin had a DVB content of 5.5%. Initially the resin had been regenerated to sodium form, and during the run it was balanced with cations from the feed molasses.

Test Conditons

The feed solution consisted of beet molasses wherefrom calcium had been removed by adding sodium carbonate (pH 9) and filtering the precipitate off using diatomaceous earth as an aid.

The separation of sucrose and betaine was performed by a five-step sequence in which each column had its specific function. As shown in FIG. 3, step 3 comprises one recycling phase and step 5 three recycling phases. The duration of the sequence was 111 minutes and the sucrose yield 81.9% (on the amount of sucrose fed).

Step 1: Molasses was fed into column 1 at a flow rate 35 l/h, and the recycling fraction and sucrose fraction were eluted from column 3.

Step 2: Water was fed into column 1 at a flow rate 70 l/h and the sucrose and recycling fractions were eluted from column 3.

Step 3: Recycling in column 1 at a flow rate 70 l/h; simultaneously water was supplied to column 2 at a flow rate 40 l/h and the betaine fraction was eluted from column 3.

Step 4: Water was fed into columns 1, 2 and 3 at flow rates 70, 75 and 40 l/h, the residue fractions were eluted from columns 1, 2 and 3, and the elution of the betaine fraction was continues from column 3.

Step 5: Recycling in columns 1, 2 and 3 at flow rates 22, 75 and 45 l/h.

Table 6 shows the volumes of the feeds, recycled solutions and product fractions, and Table 7 shows the compositions of the molasses and product fractions.

Claims

We claim:

1. A method for the fractionation of molasses selected from the group consisting of beet molasses, cane molasses, stillage, vinasse wood molasses, wheat molasses, barley molasses, corn molasses, and solutions derived from any of the preceding, comprising the steps of: recovering at least one product during a multi-step sequence in two or more loops, each loop being different than the other loop, and each loop comprising one or more chromatographic beds, columns, or parts thereof separate and distinct from the other loop, said loops comprising at least a first loop and a second loop; a step comprising at least one of the following phases, a feeding phase, an eluting phase and a recycling phase, wherein liquid present in each loop comprises a separate defined dry solids profile, and said dry solids profile is recycled in the recycling phase of the loop; said method further comprising feeding a feed solution comprising said molasses into said first loop, fractionating said feed solution comprising said molasses in said first loop into at least two fractions by a chromatographic simulated moving bed process; feeding a liquid comprising at least one of said two fractions from said first loop into said second loop, and fractionating said fraction from said first loop in said second loop by chromatographic fractionation into at least two other fractions; and wherein at least one of said fractions comprises a product fraction said product fraction comprising a greater percentage concentration by weight on a dry solids basis of said product than said molasses, and said product fraction comprising a greater percentage concentration by weight on a dry substance basis of said product than said other fractions in said loops.

2. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a step comprises at least one of a molasses feeding phase, one or more feeding phases of an eluant liquid, and a recovery phase of at least one product.

3. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a step includes one or more recycling phases, and a feeding phase for eluent liquid and a product recovery phase.

4. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the product is selected from the group consisting of sucrose and betaine.

5. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein at least one step comprises a plurality of recycling phases.

6. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a multi-step sequence comprises five to ten steps.

7. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein a multi-step sequence comprising said steps is repeated five to seven times in order to reach an equilibrium in the system, and the method is continued in the state of equilibrium reached.

8. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the system comprises three to twelve chromatographic beds.

9. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein each loop comprises a series of columns containing a cation exchange resin.

10. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein a strongly acid cation exchange resin comprises said beds.

11. A method as claimed in claim 10, wherein said strong cation exchange resin is in monovalent form.

12. A method as claimed in claim 11, wherein said monovalent form is selected from the group consisting of sodium, potassium and mixtures thereof.

13. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the flow rate of the liquid in the beds is 0.5-20 m.sup.3 /h/m.sup.2.

14. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the temperature of the feed solution and eluant water about 40-95.degree. C.

15. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the feed solution dry solids content is 20-80% by weight.

16. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the flow rate in the beds is 0.5-10 m.sup.3 /h/m.sup.2.

17. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the feed solution is 20 to 65% by weight dry solids.

18. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the system comprises three to six chromatographic beds.

19. A method as claimed in claim 1, wherein the temperature of the feed and eluant is about 40 to 85.degree. C.

20. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the simulated moving bed process in said first loop is selected from the group consisting of a continuous simulated moving bed process and a sequential moving bed process.

21. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the chromatographic fractionation in said second loop comprises a batch method.

22. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein the chromatographic fractionation in said second loop is selected from the group consisting of a continuous simulated moving bed process and a sequential simulated moving bed process.

23. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said product fraction is recovered from said second loop.

24. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein one of said fractions comprises a betaine fraction and said betaine fraction comprises a greater percentage concentration of betaine by weight on a dry solids basis than said other fractions in said loops.

25. A method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said first loop is connected in series to said second loop.

26. A method for separating sucrose and betaine from a liquid derived from molasses in a chromatographic system, comprising the steps of: establishing a flow of liquid derived from molasses and eluent through a chromatographic system in a multi-step sequence, each step including at least one phase selected from the group consisting of a feeding phase, an eluting phase and a recycling phase; operating at least two recycling loops within the multi-step sequence so that the liquid present in the recycling loops forms a separate dry solids profile; and, recovering sucrose and betaine during the multi-step sequence; said loops including at least a first loop and a second loop, said first loop being connected in series to said second loop, said first loop being different than said second loop, and each of said loops comprising a different series of chromatographic beds, columns, or parts thereof; said method including chromatographically processing a feed comprising said liquid derived from molasses in said first loop by fractionating said feed in said first loop into at least two fractions by a chromatographic simulated moving bed process; chromatographically processing at least one of said two fractions from said first loop in said second loop by fractionating a stream comprising said fraction from said first loop in said second loop into at least two other fractions by chromatographic fractionation; one of said fractions comprising a betaine fraction, said betaine fraction comprising a greater percentage concentration by weight on a dry solids basis of said betaine than said feed, and said betaine fraction comprising a greater concentration by weight of betaine than said other fractions in said loops; and one of said fractions comprising a sucrose fraction, said sucrose fraction comprising a greater percentage concentration by weight on a dry solids basis of said sucrose than said liquid, and said sucrose fraction comprising a greater percentage concentration by weight of sucrose than said other fractions in said loops.

27. A method as claimed in claim 26, wherein one of said fractions is selected from the group consisting of a residue fraction and a raffinate fraction.

28. A method as claimed in claim 26 wherein the simulated moving bed process in said first loop is selected from the group consisting of a continuous simulated moving bed process and a sequential moving bed process.

29. A method as claimed in claim 26 wherein the chromatographic fractionation in said second loop comprises a batch method.

30. A method as claimed in claim 26 wherein the chromatographic fractionation in said second loop is selected from the group consisting of a continuous simulated moving bed process and a sequential simulated moving bed process.

31. A method for processing a feed solution derived from beet molasses, comprising the steps of: chromatographically fractionating a feed solution comprising diluted beet molasses in a first loop into at least two fractions in a multi-step sequence comprising a feeding phase in said first loop, an eluent water phase in said first loop, a recycling phase in said first loop, and a recovery phase of fractions in said first loop; chromatographically fractionating at least one of said fractions from said first loop in a second loop into at least two other fractions in a multi-step sequence comprising a feeding phase wherein a stream derived from one of said fractions from said first loop is fed into said second loop, an eluent water phase in said second loop, a recycling phase in said second loop, and a recovery phase of fractions in said second loop; one of said fractions comprising a betaine fraction, said betaine fraction comprising a greater percentage concentration by weight on a dry solids basis of said betaine than said feed solution, said betaine fraction comprising a greater concentration by weight on a dry solids basis of said betaine than said stream fed into said second loop, and said betaine fraction comprising a greater concentration by weight of betaine than said other fractions in said loops; one of said fractions comprising a sucrose fraction, said sucrose fraction comprising a greater percentage concentration by weight on a dry solids basis of said sucrose than said feed solution, said sucrose fraction comprising a greater concentration by weight on a dry solids basis of sucrose than said stream fed into said second loop, and said sucrose fraction comprising a greater concentration by weight on a dry solids basis of sucrose than other fractions in said loops; each loop comprising a series of columns, beds, or parts thereof, said second loop having at least one column, bed, or part thereof, separate and apart from said first loop; said first and second loops being connected in series to each other, and said first loop being different than said second loop; and each loop having a different dry solids profile.

32. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein chromatographically fractionating in each loop is selected from the group consisting of: a sequential chromatographic simulated moving bed process and a continuous chromatographic simulated moving bed process.

33. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein one of said fractions is selected from the group consisting of a residue fraction and a raffinate fraction.

34. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said fraction from said first loop that is fed and fractionated in said second loop comprises sucrose and betaine.

35. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said sucrose fraction is recovered from said second loop.

36. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said betaine fraction is withdrawn from said second loop.

37. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said loops are selected from the group consisting of closed loops, open loops, and combinations thereof.

38. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said loops comprise successive loops.

39. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said columns comprise one or more partial packing material beds.

40. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein during a step said loops are in the same or different phases.

41. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said fraction from said first loop is fed to said second loop when said first and second loops are open.

42. A method as claimed in claim 31, wherein said bed comprises a cation exchange resin.

43. A method as claimed in claim 31, where said feed comprises 20%-65% beet molasses by weight on a dry solids basis.

44. A method as claimed in claim 43, wherein said feed is heated to 40.degree.-95.degree. C. before being fed to said first loop.

45. A method as claimed in claim 43, wherein there are three successive loops.

Patent Citations (166)

Patent	Date	Inventor
US2007971	1935-07-01	Jackson
US2375165	1945-05-01	Nees et al.
US2519573	1950-08-01	Hoglan
US2524414	1950-10-01	Wolfrom et al.
US2586295	1952-02-01	Brown et al.
US2588449	1952-03-01	Young et al.
US2818851	1958-01-01	Khym et al.
US2845136	1958-07-01	Robinson
US2868677	1959-01-01	Kopke
US2890972	1959-06-01	Wheaton
US2937959	1960-05-01	Reents et al.
US2949389	1960-08-01	Murtaugh et al.
US2985589	1961-05-01	Broughton
US3021374	1962-02-01	Radzitzky
US3044904	1962-07-01	Serbia
US3044905	1962-07-01	Lefevre
US3044906	1962-07-01	Lefevre
US3134814	1964-05-01	Sargent et al.
US3174876	1965-03-01	Stark
US3214293	1965-10-01	Mountfort
US3230167	1966-01-01	Golay
US3250058	1966-05-01	Baddour et al.
US3268605	1966-08-01	Boyd, Jr.
US3298527	1967-01-01	Wright
US3305395	1967-02-01	Scallet et al.
US3374606	1968-03-01	Baddour
US3398512	1968-08-01	Perkins, Jr. et al.
US3407574	1968-10-01	Perkins, Jr. et al.
US3411342	1968-11-01	Lievmann
US3416961	1968-12-01	Mountfort et al.
US3420709	1969-01-01	Barrett, Jr. et al.
US3436897	1969-04-01	Crowley
US3453811	1969-07-01	Crowley
US3468607	1969-09-01	Sloane et al.
US3471329	1969-10-01	Quietensky et al.
US3474908	1969-10-01	Catravas
US3479248	1969-11-01	Nobile
US3480665	1969-11-01	Nagy
US3483031	1969-12-01	Lauer et al.
US3493497	1970-02-01	Pretorius et al.
US3494103	1970-02-01	Mir
US3494104	1970-02-01	Royer
US3513023	1970-05-01	Kusch et al.
US3522172	1970-07-01	Pretorius et al.
US3539505	1970-11-01	Lauer et al.
US3558725	1971-01-01	Kohno et al.
US3579380	1971-05-01	Friese
US3607392	1971-09-01	Lauer et al.
US3619369	1971-11-01	Onishi et al.
US3632656	1972-01-01	Unver
US3692582	1972-09-01	Melaja
US3694158	1972-09-01	Lauer et al.
US3704168	1972-11-01	Hara et al.
US3706812	1972-12-01	Derosset
US3730770	1973-05-01	Zievers et al.
US3732982	1973-05-01	Dunnill et al.
US3743539	1973-07-01	Kroyer et al.
US3756855	1973-09-01	Duchateau et al.
US3796657	1974-03-01	Pretorius et al.
US3814253	1974-06-01	Forsberg
US3817787	1974-06-01	Hertzen et al.
US3826905	1974-07-01	Valkama et al.
US3835043	1974-09-01	Geissler et al.
US3884714	1975-05-01	Schneider et al.
US3928062	1975-12-01	Yamauchi
US3928193	1975-12-01	Melaja et al.
US3959519	1976-05-01	Johnson
US3982003	1976-09-01	Mitchell et al.
US4001112	1977-01-01	Barker et al.
US4008285	1977-02-01	Melaja et al.
US4075406	1978-02-01	Melaja et al.
US4096036	1978-06-01	Liu et al.
US4143169	1979-03-01	Skock et al.
US4145230	1979-03-01	Madsen et al.
US4157267	1979-06-01	Odawara
US4182633	1980-01-01	Ishikawa et al.
US4208284	1980-06-01	Pretorius et al.
US4218438	1980-08-01	Callender et al.
US4259186	1981-03-01	Boeing et al.
US4267054	1981-05-01	Yoritomi
US4293346	1981-10-01	Landis
US4312678	1982-01-01	Landis
US4313015	1982-01-01	Broughton
US4332623	1982-06-01	Ando
US4359430	1982-11-01	Heikkila
US4366060	1982-12-01	Leiser et al.
US4368268	1983-01-01	Gong
US4379751	1983-04-01	Yoritomi
US4391649	1983-07-01	Shimizu et al.
US4402832	1983-09-01	Gerhold
US4404037	1983-09-01	Broughton
US4405455	1983-09-01	Ando et al.
US4412366	1983-11-01	Rock et al.
US4412866	1983-11-01	Schoenrock
US4426232	1984-01-01	Neuzil et al.
US4451489	1984-05-01	Beale et al.
US4461649	1984-07-01	Neuzil
US4482761	1984-11-01	Chao et al.
US4498991	1985-02-01	Oroskar
US4518436	1985-05-01	van der Poel
US4519845	1985-05-01	Ou
US4533398	1985-08-01	Neuzil
US4599115	1986-07-01	Ando et al.
US4631129	1986-12-01	Heikkila
US4636315	1987-01-01	Allen, Jr.
US4666527	1987-05-01	Ito et al.
US4724006	1988-02-01	Day
US4732687	1988-03-01	Muller et al.
US4837315	1989-06-01	Kukprathipanja
US4857642	1989-08-01	Kulprathipanja
US4873111	1989-10-01	Aaltonen et al.
US4938804	1990-07-01	Heikkila et al.
US4955363	1990-09-01	Harju et al.
US4970002	1990-11-01	Ando et al.
US4976865	1990-12-01	Sanchez et al.
US4980277	1990-12-01	Junnila
US4990259	1991-02-01	Kearney et al.
US5032156	1991-07-01	Luder et al.
US5081026	1992-01-01	Heikkila et al.
US5084104	1992-01-01	Heikkila et al.
US5102553	1992-04-01	Kearney et al.
US5122275	1992-06-01	Rasche
US5124133	1992-06-01	Schoenrock
US5127957	1992-07-01	Heikkila
US5198120	1993-03-01	Masuda et al.
US5387347	1995-02-01	Rothchild
US5482631	1996-01-01	Saska et al.
US5494525	1996-02-01	Heikkila et al.
US5637225	1997-06-01	Heikkila et al.
US5730877	1998-03-01	Heikkila et al.
US5770061	1998-06-01	Heikkila et al.
US5773052	1998-06-01	Virtanen et al.
US5795398	1998-08-01	Hyoky et al.
CAX754511	1967-03-01
EPX10769A2	1980-05-01
EPX101304A2	1984-02-01
EPX279946A2	1988-08-01
EPX345511A3	1989-12-01
EPX663224A1	1995-07-01
FIX68526	1985-06-01
FIX75503	1988-03-01
FIX77845	1989-01-01
FIX86416	1992-05-01
FIX875655	1998-06-01
DEX2300492	1973-07-01
DEX2362211	1975-06-01
DEX2511904	1976-09-01
DEX4041414A1	1991-06-01
JPX39-5429	1964-04-01
RUX445270	1976-06-01
RUX1072818	1981-02-01
ZAX32855	1998-02-01
SUX4614225/13	1980-02-01
GBX715774	1954-09-01
GBX1448524	1976-09-01
GBX1326765	1976-09-01
GBX2240053	1991-07-01
WOXWO81/02420	1981-09-01
WOXWO81/00014	1981-09-01
WOXWO81/02420	1982-06-01
WOXWO82/04265	1982-12-01
WOXWO82/00712	1982-12-01
WOXWO91/08815	1991-06-01
WOXWO94/17213	1994-08-01
WOXWO98/32514	1998-07-01
WOXWO98/30724	1998-07-01

Non-Patent Literature (52)

"Separation Processes in the Sugar Industry". Proceedings of S.P.R.I. Workshop on Separation Processes in the Sugar Industry, Edited by Margaret A. Clarke. Sugar Processing Research Insitute Inc., New Orleans, LA Oct., 1996.
"New Development In The Chromatographic Desugarisation Of Beet Molasses", by Francois Rouseet, Applexion, France, published by British Sugar EuroTechLink 97, York England, undated.
"Chromatographic Separation Of Sugar Solutions The Finnsugar Molasses Desugarization Process", by H. J. Hongisto, Technical Department, Finnish Sugar Company, Ltd., Kantvik, finland, presented to the 23.sup.rd Tech. Conf., British Sugar Corp. Ltd, 1976, Part I published in International Sugar Journal, Apr. 1977, pp. 100-104.
"Chromatographic Separation Of Sugar Solutions The Finnsugar Molasses Desugarization Process", by H. J. Hongisto, Technical Department, Finnish Sugar Company, Ltd., Kantvik, Finland, presented to the 23.sup.rd Tech. Conf., British Sugar Corp. Ltd, 1976, Part II published in International Sugar Journal, May 1977, pp. 131-134.
"Ion Exclusion Purification Of Sugar Juices", by Lloyd Norman, Guy Rorabaugh, and Harold Keller, Research Laboratory Manger and General Chemist, Director of Research, Holly Sugar Corporation and Assistant Director, Illinois Water Treatment Company, published by Journal of A. S. S. B. T., vol. 12, No. 5, Apr., 1963, pp. 362-370.
"Chemical Educators Stress Industry Ties" by Ward Worthy and Richard J. Seltzer of C&EN Washington, published Oct. 6, 1975, C&EN.
"Adsorption Separates Xylenes" by Seiya Otani of Toray Industries, Inc., published by Chemical Engineering, Sep. 17, 1973.
"Designing Large-Scale Adsorptive Separations" by E.N. Lightfoot, S.J. Gibbs, A.M. Athalye and T.H. Scholten of Departemnt of Chemical Engineering, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI., published Israel Journal of Chemistry, vol. 30, 1990, pp. 229-237.
"Continuous Chromatographic Separation Of Fructose/Glucose" by Tetsuya Hirota of Mitsubishi Chemical Industries, Ltd., published Sugar y Azucar Jan. 1980.
"Mechanism Of The Separation Of Glucose And Fructose On A Strong-Acid Cation Exchanger" by Charles A. Sauer of Applications Development, Duolite International, Inc., a subsidiary of Diamond Shamrock Corporation, Apr. 23, 1981.
"High Purity Fructose Via Continuous Adsorptive Separation" by D.B. Broughton, H.J. Bieser, R.C. Berg, E.D. Connell, D.J. Korous, and R.W. Neuzil of UOP, Inc., published La Sucrerie Belge, vol. 96-May 1977, pp. 155-162.
"Large-Scale Chromatography: New Separation Tool" by R.S. Timmins, L Mir, and J.M. Ryan of Abcor, Inc., published by Chemical Engineering, May 19, 1969, pp. 170-178.
"The Tasco Chromatographic Separator At Twin Falls Factory" by K. P. Chertudi of The Amalgamated Sugar Company, published by International Sugar Journal, 1991, vol. 93, No. 1106.
"The Amalgamated Sugar Company Raw Juice Chromatographic Separation Process" by Mike Kearney and D. Eugene Rearick of The Amalgamated Sugar Company Research Laboratory, Twin Falls, Idaho, presented at 1995 C.I.T.S. 20.sup.th General Assembly, Munich, Germany, Jun., 1995.
"Production Of Raffinose: A New By-Product Of the Beet Sugar Industry" by K. Sayama, T. Kamada, and S. Oikawa of Nippon Beet Sugar Mfg Co Ltd., Japan, presented at British Sugar plc Technical Conference Eastbourne, 1992.
"Contribution To The Biochemistry And Use Of The Beet Constituent Betaine.," Von W. Steinmetzer 25 (1972) Nr. 2, pp. 48-57.
Finnsugar Bioproducts, Inc. v. The Amalgamated Sugar Company, LLC, et al., Civil Action No. 97-C-8746 (N.D. III.)-Answer and Counterclaims to the Amended and Supplemental Complaint of the Amalgamated Sugar Company, LLC and Amalgamated Research, Inc., undated.
"Engineering Analysis Of Ion Exclusion For Sucrose Recovery from Beet Molasses, Part 1 Experimental Procedures And Data Reduction Techniques" by W.G. Schultz, J.B. Stark and E. Lowe, Western Regional Research Laboratory, Western Utilization Research And Development Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California, 94710 U.S.A., published in the International Sugar Journal, Feb., 1967.
"Engineering Analysis Of Ion Exclusion For Sucrose Recovery From Beet Molasses, Part II Data Analysis And Cost Projection" by W.G. Schultz, J. B. Stark and E. Lowe, Western Regional Research Laboratory, Western Utilization Research And Development Division, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Albany, California, 94710 U.S.A., published by the International Sugar Journal, Apr., 1967.
S.I.T. Paper 373: "The Recovery Of Sugar From Beet Molasses By Ion Exclusion", by James F. Zieverz and C.J. Novotny, Industrial Filter & Pump Mfg. Co., Cicero, Illinois, undated.
"Recovery Of Sugar From Beet Molasses" By the P. & L. Exclusion Process, by H.G. Schneider and J. Mikule of Pfeifer & Langen, Euskirchen, Germany, published in the International Sugar Journal, Part I, pp. 259-264, Sep. 1975.
"Recovery of Sugar From Beet Molasses by The P. & L. Exclusion Process", by H.G. Schneider and J. Mikulse of Pfeifer & Langen, Euskirchen, Germany, published in the International Sugar Journal, Part II, pp. 294-298, Oct., 1975.
Chromatographic Separation of Sugar Solutions: "The Finnsugar Molasses Desugarization Process", Part II, by H. J. Hongisto, Technical Department, Finnish Sugar Company, Ltd., Kantvik, Finland, published by the International Sugar Journal, May 1977, pp. 132-134.
"Trends In the Chromatographic Separation Of Molasses", by Hannu A. Paananen of Cultor Ltd., Finnsugar Bioproducts, Helsinki, Finland, Proceedings of the Workshop on Separation Process in the Sugar Industry, New Orleans, Apr., 1996, pp. 100-119.
Ari: "Coupled Loop Chromatography" by Mike Kearney of Amalgamated Research, Inc., Presented at the 29.sup.th General Meeting, American Society of Beet Sugar Technologists, Mar. 1977.
"Simulated Moving-Bed Technology In The Sweetener Industry", by D. Eugene Rearick, Michael Kearney, and Dennis D. Costesso of Amalgamated Research, Inc., published in Chemtech, vol. 27, No. 9, pp. 36-40, undated.
"Desurgarisation Of Beet Molasses By the Finnsugar Chromatographic Separation Process", by H. Hongisto, Finnsugar Engineering, undated.
SPRI: "Trends In The Chromatographic Separation of Molasses", by Hannu A. Paananen of Cultor, Ltd., Finnsugar Bioproducts, Helsinki, Finland, presented at the Proceedings of the 1996 Workshop on Separation Process in the Sugar Industry, 1996.
"The Recovery Of Sugar From Beet Molasses By the P. & L. Exclusion-Process", by H. G. Schneider and J. Mikule of Pfeifen & Lange, Euskirchen, Germany, undated.
"Engineered Fractal Cascades For Fluid Control Applications" by Mike Kearney of Amalgamated Research, Inc., Twin Falls, Idaho, undated.
"Control Of Fluid Dymanics With Engineered Fractal Cascades-Adsorption Process Applications", by Mike Kearney, Director, New Technology, Amalgamated Research Inc., Twin Falls Idaho 1997.
"Molasses Exhaustion Session", Keynote Speech Summary, by Mike Kearney, Director, New Technology, Amalgamated Research Inc., published by British Sugar EuroTechLink 97, England, undated.
"Multicomponent Separation Using Simulated Moving Bed Chromatography", by V. Kochergin and M. Kearney of Amalgamated Research, Inc., presented at AIChE Annual Meeting, Los Angeles, Nov. 16-21, 1997, Novel Adsorption-Based Separation Equipment Configuration, AIChE Proceedings, Part 2, pp. 1539-1544.
"Molassesdesugarization with Liquid Distribution Chromatography", by Dr. Mohammad Munir, Zentral-Laboratorium dor Suddautschen Zucker-Aktiengesollschaft, presented at 15.sup.th General Assembly of Commission Internationale Technique de Sucrerie, Vienna, Austria, May 12-16, 1975.
"Ion Exclusion . . . an overlooked ally" by James F. Zievers, C. J. Novotny, and E. A. Selvick of Industrial Filter and Pump Mfg. Co., Cicero, Illinois, published in The Sugar Journal, Feb., 1972, pp. 7-10.
"Ion Exchange For Desugaring Of Molasses And Byproduct Isolation" , by L.H. Ramm-Schmidt, published by B.V. Amaterdam, 1988, printed in Netherlands, pp. 111-126, undated.
"Application Of The Finnsugar-Pfeifer & Langen Molasses Desugarisation Process In A Beet Sugar Factory", by H. J. Hongisto and P. Laakso, undated.
"The Removal Of Color From Sugar Solutions By Adsorbent Resins", by R. I. M. Abrams, Technical manager of Duplite Ion Exchange Resins, Diamond Shamrock Chemical Company, Redwood City, California, published in Sugar y Azuca, 1971, pp. 31-34.
"Simulated Moving Bed Technology Applied To The Chromatographic Recovery Of Sucrose From Suctose Syrups", by Mike Kearney of The Amalgamated Sugar Company, Twin Falls, Idaho, presented at Conference on Sugar Processing Research, Fiftieth Anniversary Conference, San Francisco, California, May 29--Jun. 1, 1990.
Ion Exclusion- An Overlooked Ally: "Ion Exclusion Experiments", by James F. Zievers, C.J. Novotny, and E. A. Selvick of Industrial Filter and Pump Mfg. Co., Cicero, Illinois, Oct. 4, 1970, pp. 12-24.
"Proceedings Of The Research Society Of Japan Sugar Refineries' Technologists", edited by The Research Institute Of The Japan Sugar Refiners' Association, vol. 27, Aug., 1977.
"Purification Of Sugar Products By The Ion Exclusion Process" by D. Gross of Tate & Lyle, Ltd., Research Centre, Keston, Kent, England; presented to the 14.sup.th General Assembly, C.I.T.S, Brussels, 1971.
Processing Equipment: "High-volume chromatography separates the `hard to separate` organic Compounds", Food Engineering, May, 1983.
"Simultaneously Continous Separation of Glucose, Maltose, and Maltotriose Using a Simulated Moving-Bed Adsorber" by Kyu Beom Kin, Shiro Kishihara, and Satoshi Fujii of The Graduate School of Science and Technology, Kobe University, I, Rokkadai, Nada-ku, Kobe 657, Japan Received Sep. 2, 1991.
Chromatographic Separation: "A Sequential Chromatographic Process for the Separation of Glucose/Fructose Mixtures", by P. E. Barker, C. H. Chuah of the Chemical Engineering Department, University of Aston in Birmingham, Gosta Green, Birmingham, The Chemical Engineer, (Aug./ Sep. 1981), pp. 389-393.
"On the Utilization Of Betaine From Sugar Beets" by J.P. Dubois, Raffinerie Tirlementoise, s.a., D-3300 Tienan (Belgium), undated.
S.I.T. Paper #649: "An Audubon Sugar Institute-Applexion Process For Desugarization Of Cane Molasses", by M. Saska, Ch. Pelletan, Mei Di Wu and X. Lancrenon, presented at the 1993 Sugar Industry Technologists Meeting, Jun. 13-16, 1993, Toronto Ontario.
S.I.T. Paper #428: "Liquid Sugar From The Chromatographic Molasses Desugarization Process" by H. J. Hongisto, Finnish Sugar Co., Ltd., Kantvik, Finland, vol. XXXVIII, Publication of Technical Papers and Proceedings of the 38.sup.th Annual Meeting of Sugar Industry Technologists, Inc, Boston, Massachusetts, May 6-9, 1979.
"Desugarisation of Cane Molasses By the Finnsugar Chromatographic Separation Process", By H. Hongisto and H. Heikkila, reprint ISSCT (1977).
"Beet Sugar" by Michael Cleary of Imperial Holly Corporation appearing in Kurk-Othmer, Encyclopedia Of Chemical Technology, Fourth Edition, vol. 23, published by John Wiley & Sons, Wiley-Interscience (1997).
Process Technology: "Separating Sugars And Amino Acids With Chromatography", by Heikki Heikkila, Finnish Sugar Co., Ltd., Chemical Engineering Jan. 24, 1983, pp. 50-52.
"Trends In The Chromatographic Separation Of Molasses", by Hannu A. Paananen, Zuckerind 122 (1997) Nr. 1, pp. 28-33.

Abstract

Description