US 6,089,097 AGrant

Elongated Pressure Sensor for a Pressure Transmitter

Issue Date:2000-07-18

•38 Claims

•16 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

A transmitter in a process control system transmits a pressure over a process control loop. The transmitter includes I/O circuitry, compensation circuitry and an absolute pressure sensor. The I/O circuitry transmits information over the process control loop. Compensation circuitry receives a pressure related signal and responsively controls the I/O circuitry to transmit pressure information on the loop. The absolute pressure sensor includes a cavity which deforms as the sensor deflects in response to an applied pressure. A sensor in the cavity provides the pressure related signal to the compensation circuitry in response to the deformation.

Metadata

Assignee

Rosemount Inc.

Inventors

Roger L. Frick
Bennett L. Louwagie
Adrian C. Toy

Application Information

Application Number:US 8079994

Filing Date:1997-03-03

Priority Date:1995-02-28

Art Unit:285

Classifications

IPC:

G01L 912

Field of Search:

73361324756;724;718;716;717;720;727;721283.4661;662;668

Patent Drawings (16 sheets)

Description

Background of the Invention

The present invention relates to the process control industry. In particular, the invention relates to a pressure sensor in a pressure transmitter.

Pressure transmitters in process applications measure pressure of a process and responsively communicate the information over a two-wire process application loop, for example a 4-20 mA current loop. Pressure sensors in transmitters typically comprise some type of a pressure responsive structure which has a deflectable diaphragm that moves in response to applied pressure. These structures can be used to measure both absolute and differential pressure. As used herein, a differential pressure sensor is a sensor which measures a relatively small pressure differential (such as that generated across an orifice in a flow tube or between two different heights in a fluid filled container) over a relatively wide absolute pressure range. In a typical prior art transmitter, to measure differential pressure, two different pressures are applied to opposing sides of the structure causing a relative deformation in the structure which is measured. Measurement of the deformation, for example, can be by measuring a change in electrical capacitance due to movement of capacitor plates carried on the structure or by change in resistance of a resistive strain gauge.

Highly accurate absolute pressure sensors have been desired. However, it has been difficult to obtain an absolute pressure sensor which can deliver an accurate output over a wide pressure range, from 0.4 psi to 4000 psi for example. It would also be desirable to measure differential pressure with two absolute pressure sensors because this is mechanically much simpler than it is to mechanically couple two pressures to a differential pressure sensor. Additionally, an over-pressure in a such a differential pressure sensor can damage the differential pressure sensor.

However, it has been difficult to obtain absolute pressure sensors with sufficient accuracy to allow differential pressures in the 0.4 psi to 40 psi range to be measured in a device which must withstand static or line pressure extremes of as much as 4000 psia. For example, 0.01% of 4 psid requires 0.00001% of 4000 psia (10.sup.-7 or 0.1 ppm).

Typical known pressure sensors used in process applications have unit-to-unit variations in sensitivity to sensed pressure as well as unit-to-unit variations in undesired responses to extraneous parameters such as temperature. This can be a particular problem when the outputs of two absolute or gauge pressure sensors are combined to provide an output representing differential pressure or when the sensor is used over a large pressure range. Additionally, mechanical stress associated with mounting the sensor to the pressure transmitter results in relatively large errors in pressure measurement.

Summary of the Invention

A pressure transmitter in a process control application for transmitting pressure on a process control loop includes an absolute pressure sensor. The absolute pressure sensor has a cavity therein in which cavity walls deform or are placed under stress as the walls respond to applied pressure. The pressure sensor includes a support structure which provides stress isolation. A sensor coupled to the cavity walls provides a pressure related output signal. In one embodiment, the sensor and support structure are integral with one another such that there are no joints between the sensor structure and the support structure. The material and dimensions of the pressure sensor are selected such that the pressure related signal is very accurate and may be used over a wide pressure range or in pairs as differential pressure sensors. In one embodiment, the pressure sensor comprises single crystal sapphire in an elongated shape and is adapted for immersion directly in process fluid.

Brief Description of the Drawings

FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a pressure transmitter.

FIG. 2 is a cut-away perspective view of an insert which carries a pressure sensor.

FIG. 3 is a cross-sectional perspective view of a pressure sensor.

FIG. 4 is a graph which illustrates operation of the present invention.

FIG. 4A is a graph of stress attenuation versus L/W for a pressure sensor.

FIG. 5 is a displacement plot of one-quarter of a pressure sensor where l/T equals 1.0.

FIG. 6 is a cross sectional view of another embodiment of the pressure sensor.

FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of a pressure sensor.

FIG. 8 is a cross-sectional view of the pressure sensor of FIG. 7.

FIG. 9 is a top plan view of a top substrate of the pressure sensor of FIG. 7.

FIG. 10 is a top plan view of a bottom substrate of the pressure sensor of FIG. 7.

FIG. 11 is a schematic diagram of circuitry for measuring capacitance of a pressure sensor.

FIG. 12 is a cross-sectional view of a sensor body.

FIG. 13 is a bottom plan view of the sensor body of FIG. 12.

FIG. 14 is a cross-sectional view of a sensor body.

FIG. 15 is a bottom plan view of the sensor body of FIG. 14.

FIGS. 16A through 16G show cross-sectional views of various embodiments of the invention.

FIGS. 17A and 17B show two embodiments of capacitor plates.

FIG. 18 is a graph of bonding temperature as a percent of melting point temperature versus bonding strength as a percent of material strength.

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

FIG. 1 shows pressure transmitter 50 having transmitter body 52, sensor body 54 and flange 55. Sensor body 54 includes pressure sensors 70 A and 70 B which measure absolute pressure P1 and absolute pressure P2, respectively, of process fluid. Transmitter body 52 includes transmitter (I/O) circuitry 60 which sends information related to pressures P1 and P2 over a two-wire process control loop, such as a 4-20 mA current loop. Circuit board 57 couples sensor circuit board 58 to sensors 70A and 70B and receives electrical signals related to pressures P1 and P2. Circuitry on sensor circuit board 58 digitizes and processes these signals, and communicates pressure information to transmitter circuitry 60 using data bus 62. Inserts 67 A and 67 B carry sensors 70A and 70B. A process barrier 71 forms cavity 75 and prevents pressures P1 and P2 from escaping sensor body 54 should insert 67A or 67B fail. Cavity 75 may be a vacuum or filled with an inert gas. Feed-throughs 73A, 73B and 73C provide electrical pathways across barrier 71 between circuit boards 57 and 58.

FIG. 2 is a cut-away perspective view of insert 67A which carries sensor 70A. In one embodiment, insert 70A comprises alumina. Additionally, sensor 70A should be small relative to housing 54 and positioned relatively close to sensor 70B to reduce thermal variations and thereby improve accuracy. This is achieved because the thermal time constant of the sensor is significantly less than the thermal time constant of the housing to minimize temperature gradients within the sensing element.

FIG. 3 shows sensor 70A in accordance with one embodiment. Sensor 70A includes upper substrate 72 and lower substrate 74 which form cavity 76 therebetween. FIG. 3 shows overall length L, thickness T, width W, minimum cavity width w of the deflecting structure of the sensing cavity and central deflection y due to applied pressure P.

Typical prior art sensors have a ratio of maximum to minimum pressure range which can be accurately sensed of about 100:1. This is primarily limited by non--repeatable errors in the structure and noise. Further, prior art sensors are typically limited by the use of materials with imperfect elasticity, inadequate stress isolation and poor signal-to-noise ratio of the sensing element. For example, metal based pressure sensors; have problems with hysteresis, material creep and relaxation. Ceramic based sensors are formed of a matrix of crystals typically bonded with silicon glass and also exhibit these problems. Glass-based sensors are subject to instability due to phase changes and viscosity of the glass. It has been recognized that single crystal materials have superior elastic properties and that sensors based on such materials can have improved accuracy. Single crystal diaphragm sensors have also been used, however they have typically been placed under high tensile stress due to internal pressurization. Additionally, this type of sensor typically includes glass or metal structural elements and uses a low strength bonding material such as glass frit, solder or epoxy. Further, this type of sensor has typically had inadequate stress isolation.

Additionally, typical prior art sensors have used an oil fill, such as silicon oil, for use with over-pressure protection mechanisms. The oil fill is also used when coupling a corrosion resistant isolation diaphragm to the pressure sensor. These sensors are subject to failure due to loss of fill fluid. Typical prior art isolating diaphragms have been form formed in metal and are used to keep particles and corrosive materials away from the pressure sensor. These diaphragms must be thin in order to minimize errors, however this makes the diaphragm particularly fragile and limits life of the diaphragm. Further, different diaphragm materials are required for different applications and there is no metal which can be used universally.

The present disclosure sets forth a pressure sensing structure formed of a single crystal material. Joints in the material are formed using fusion bonding such that they are substantially free of foreign materials which could lead to inaccuracies. The structure may be surrounded by process fluid which applies pressure to the structure. This is possible because the structure is formed of a corrosion resistant material. The brittle material is deformed- by compression which provides a higher ratio of working stress-to-error stress and therefore a higher signal-to-noise ratio. This results because brittle materials are stronger in compression than in tension. This configuration causes the sensor to be less sensitive to corrosion of the outer surface because the output is less dependent on the cube of thickness and more closely linearly related to thickness. Placement of the structure in the process fluid improves reliability because the isolation diaphragms and oil fill are eliminated. An elongated shaft provides stress isolation and is formed of the same single crystal material to help reduce errors. Electrical leads are provided through the elongated shaft and isolated from process fluid. A path through the shaft can also be used to apply a reference pressure. In one embodiment, corrosion resistant material such as sapphire is used and an internal sensor is used which allows the oil fill and isolating diaphragms to be eliminated. In one embodiment, matched sensors are used as dual sensors to measure differential pressure, which helps reduce errors common to the two sensors. Capacitance sensing is desirable because it provides a stable, low noise signal. Capacitors have no inherent thermal noise and they have a high gauge factor with a correspondingly high output which minimizes the noise contribution of electronic detection circuitry. They also have excellent zero stability and very low zero temperature coefficients. These factors make it practical to detect the very low pressure changes in a high pressure sensor that are encountered in a differential pressure transmitter based on two independent sensing elements. Improved pressure resolution is achieved by use of electronic circuitry.

It is well known that the deflection y due to bending in a diaphragm is proportional to ##EQU1## where w is the effective minimum width of the diaphragm and T is its thickness ##EQU2## The sensor output is therefore highly dependent on dimensional variations.

It is known that deflection due to shear in a diaphragm proportional to w.sup.2 /T. ##EQU3## This reduces the variation in output versus sensor dimensions but this variation can be further reduced by relying on "bulk" deflection as defined below.

The deflection y of cavity 76 will depend on the effects of bending deflection, shear deflection and "bulk" deflection. Assuming that W/w equals a constant which is greater than 2, this can be expressed as follows: ##EQU4## where: K.sub.1 ="bulk" deflection constant for material;

K.sub.2 =shear deflection constant for material;

K.sub.3 =bending deflection constant for material;

w=sensor width;

P=external pressure;

y=central deflection of cavity 76 due to applied pressure P;

w=width of cavity 76;

T=thickness at slot 76 of sensor 70 (for a square cross section, T=W/2);

t=depth of cavity 76;

L=sensor length which is much greater than sensor width W and sensor thickness T;

E=Young's modulus; and

G=shear modulus.

Equation 1 illustrates that shear and bending deflection on cavity 76 are dependent on cavity width w and sensor thickness T.

The term "bulk" deflection as used herein describes the K.sub.1 P/E component of Equation 1, where y is directly proportional to width w of cavity 76. (y.varies.w) Therefore, bulk deflection is highly accurate and desirable in determining pressure and is substantially independent of variations in thickness T such as those which occur with corrosion. One aspect of the present invention includes providing a pressure sensor having dimensions such that bulk mode deflection component of total deflection of the sensor is increased.

FIG. 4 is a graph of Equation 1 which shows total deflection and its individual components: bulk deflection, shear deflection and bending deflection. When w/T is between 1 and 4, shear deflection predominates total deflection. As w/T gets smaller, the contribution of shear deflection relative to bulk deflection gets smaller. For w/T less than 1.0, bulk deflection is the predominant factor contributing to total deflection of sensor 70A due to applied pressure. Thus, one aspect of the invention includes pressure sensors having a ratio of w (cavity width) divided by T (thickness from an outer surface to an inner surface) of less than or equal to about 1.0. For shear deflection to exceed bending deflection w/T should be less than 4.0. In one embodiment, the ratio of w/T is: 0.05<w/T<1.0. The minimum w/T value is determined by how small w can be practically made and inaccuracies due to thermal gradients as T is made large.

It is desirable to minimize tensile stresses in sensors made of brittle materials because this reduces the possibility of failure due to cracking of the sensor. One aspect of the invention includes surrounding the sensor with the measured pressure and suitably dimensioning the sensor such that the hydrostatic compressive stress can be made to exceed the tensile bending stresses. Since the stresses are generally additive, the entire structure can be kept in compression. This occurs when w/T is less than about 2.3.

Stress isolation of sensor 70A is also achieved. Stress due to mounting sensor 70A to housing 54 causes a force to be exerted on the sensor (in addition to the force due to applied pressure) and introduces an error into pressure measurements. The elongated structure reduces the effects of mounting stress to provide accurate measurement of differential pressures and a wide operating span. Generally, mounting stress attenuates distal to the mount as sensor length L increases. Any mounting stress errors must be sufficiently attenuated over length L to achieve the desired pressure error. FIG. 4A is a graph which shows a relationship between stress attenuation and L/W for the sensor of FIG. 3. The vertical axis of FIG. 4A shows the ratio of the stress at the mounting point (.sigma..sub.MOUNT) to the measured stress due to the mounting stress (.sigma..sub.MEASURED) A change in the mounting stress (.DELTA..sigma..sub.MOUNT) causes an error in the pressure measurement due to the change in mounting stress at the pressure sensor (.DELTA..sigma..sub.MEASURED). In one embodiment, a 0.01% accuracy is required such that when measuring a pressure of 4 psi the error due to mounting stress must be less than 4.times.10.sup.-4 psi. A typical .DELTA..sigma..sub.MOUNT value is 400 psi such that the attenuation of the mounting stress must be 4.times.10.sup.-4 psi/by 400 psi=10.sup.-6. As shown in FIG. 4A, this occurs at approximately L/W of 4. In an embodiment in which two sensors are used for differential pressure measurement and they are matched within 10% accuracy, .sigma..sub.MEASURED/.sigma..sub.MOUNT is reduced by a factor 10 such that L/W is approximately 3. In one embodiment, L/W is between 3 and 5.

FIG. 5 is a cross-sectional view showing a displacement plot for sensor 70A. FIG. 5 shows one-quarter of the cross section of sensor 70A. In FIG. 5, sensor thickness T is approximately equal to cavity width w. An applied pressure P of 4500 psi displaces sensor 70A. In FIG. 5, about half the deflection is due to shear tension and about half is due to "bulk" deflection. This is shown in FIG. 4 where shear and bulk deflection meet. If sensor 70 were entirely in bulk mode compression, sensor 70 would retain its rectangular shape as pressure was applied. The shape distortion is due primarily to shear deflection.

FIG. 6 is a cross sectional view of sensor 120 including elongated portion 122 and end portion 124 which form cavity 125 having width w. In one embodiment, cavity 125 is square. Dimensions T, W and L are also shown in FIG. 6. End portion 124 carries capacitive plate 128 which forms a capacitor with plate 126 carried on portion 122. Conductors 130 and 132 connect to plate 126 and 128, respectively.

Pressure P causes cavity 125 to deform, thereby changing the capacitance between plates 126 and 128.

FIG. 7 is a cross-sectional view of pressure sensor 200. Pressure sensor 200 includes top substrate 202 and lower substrate 204. Via hole 203 extends through substrate 202 for coupling to electrical conductors in cavity 205. FIG. 8 shows top guard conductor 210, top capacitor conductor 212, top guard conductor 214, bottom guard conductor 216, bottom capacitor conductor 218 and bottom guard conductor 220.

FIG. 9 is a top plan view of substrate 202 in which electrical conductors on the under side of substrate 202 are visible therethrough. FIG. 9 shows capacitor plate 222 connected to conductor 212 and surrounded by guard 224 which connects to conductors 214 and 210. FIG. 9 also shows vias 203 and 226 which extend through substrate 202 to conductors 210 and 212, respectively.

FIG. 10 is a top plan view of bottom substrate 204 in which electrical conductors carried on the underside of substrate 204 are visible therethrough. In the example, substrate 204 is sapphire. FIG. 10 shows capacitor plate 228 which capacitively interacts with capacitor plate 222. Plate 228 is surrounded by electrical guard 230 and temperature sensor 232. Guard 230 shields plate 228 from stray capacitance and temperature probe 232 changes resistance based upon temperature. This provides temperature measurement of sensor 200, and allows compensation of pressure measurements based upon temperature for increased accuracy. Bonding is preferably fusion bonding, also known as direct fusion bonding, or wafer bonding in which flat, polished surfaces are mated and are bonded with the application of heat. Etching is with POCl.sub.3 gas at 900 to 1100.degree. C. with an SiO.sub.2 mask. It is desirable to align the crystal structure of the substrates such that the resulting crystal structure is substantially continuous after bonding. Further, the fusion bond should be made at a temperature as close as possible to the melting point. For this reason, the electrode material should be capable of withstanding the high fusion bond temperatures. For example, chrome, tungsten, tantalum, platinum and iridium allow bond temperatures in the 1300.degree. C. to 1700.degree. C. range so that bond strength is maximized and healing of discontinuities in the crystal can occur. A typical bonding time is one hour. Other conductors include metal silicides such as molybdenum silicide.

In a differential pressure transmitter, a temperature difference between the two sensors will cause an error. Acceptable performance will require that the difference be less than about 1.degree. F. and that the difference be measured to a precision of better than about 0.1.degree. F. and compensated. In a typical application, this will require that the sensor spacing be less than 0.5 inches.

A temperature gradient within a sensing element will also cause an error. Acceptable performance will require that the temperature difference between the inside and outside of the sensor be less than about 0.001.degree. F. and that the sensors be closely matched. A sensor width or thickness of greater than about 0.25 inches will place unreasonable demands on sensor matching in a typical application.

FIG. 11 is a simplified schematic diagram of circuitry 250 for sensing differential pressure using two absolute pressure sensors having pressure responsive capacitors C.sub.1 and C.sub.2 carried therein. Each pressure sensor includes guard electrodes 252 which form capacitors connected to earth ground 253 of transmitter 50. The housing of the transmitter thus provides a shield or guard to stabilize the capacitance signal and prevent electrical noise from being coupled into the circuit. In addition, a guard electrode can be formed on the exterior surface of the sensor or the interior surface of the ceramic inserts shown in FIG. 1. Electrical isolation can be provided to accommodate 4-20 mA circuits that have connections to earth ground in other places. Capacitor C.sub.1 is driven by square wave generator 254 and capacitor C.sub.2 is driven by square wave generator 256. The negative input of low noise differential amplifier 258 is connected to the undriven plates of capacitors C.sub.1 and C.sub.2, and the positive input of differential amplifier 258 is connected to electrical ground. Differential amplifier 258 has negative feedback through capacitor C.sub.1 and has charge .DELTA.Q from capacitor C.sub.1 and C.sub.2 flowing in and out of the negative input. The output of differential amplifier 258 is a square wave representative of differential capacitance which is converted into a digital format by A/D converter 260. In circuit 250, .DELTA.Q is given as:

And, the amplifier output is:

C.sub.I should be selected to be approximately equal to (C.sub.1 -C.sub.2)/2 at maximum differential pressure, for example, 1 pF. Additionally, to compensate for manufacturing variations, it is desirable to have separate gain adjustments for each sensor.

Additionally, circuitry should be included to measure C.sub.1, C.sub.2 or C.sub.1 +C.sub.2, independently, in order to compensate for variations in output due to common mode or line pressure. Circuitry for detecting capacitance output is set forth in U.S. Pat. No. 5,083,091, entitled "Charge Balanced Feedback Measurement Circuit," commonly assigned with the present application.

The output from converter 260 is provided to interface circuitry 262. Interface 262 is connected to a 4-20 mA current loop and provides the digital signal from A/D converter 260 to current loop 264 in either a digital or analog format. Interface 262 also provides power to circuitry 250 from loop 264. Interface 262 is also capable of receiving commands, such as those pursuant to the HARTS communications standard.

FIGS. 12 and 13 show another embodiment having sensor body 300 which carries pressure sensors 200A and 200B. FIG. 12 is a side cross-sectional view of sensor body 300 and FIG. 13 is a bottom plan view of body 300. Body 300 includes circuit boards 57 and 58 connected by wires through feed-throughs 73A, 73B and 73C through process barrier 71. Sensors 200A and 200B are carried in alumina insert 302. Process barrier 71 forms chamber 75 which may be a vacuum or filled with an inert gas. A groove 304 extends around alumina insert 302 and provides thermal and stress isolation. Mounting holes 306 are used to couple body 300 to a conduit (not shown). In another embodiment, a bond between the sensor and the transmitter body is a fusion bond.

FIGS. 14 and 15 show sensor body 310 including middle shell 312 which carries alumina insert 314. Sensors 200A and 200B are seated in alumina insert 314 which also carries ASIC chip 316. ASIC chip 316 performs the same functions as circuit board 57. Groove 318 provides stress isolation for insert 314 and sensors 200A and 200B. Process barrier 320 seals shell 312 and provides a second barrier to process fluid. Cavity 322 in shell 312 may carry a vacuum or inert gas. Feed-throughs 324 provide a path for electric connections from ASIC chip 316 to circuit board 326. The design shown in FIG. 3 allows the sensor assembly to be tested prior to welding shell 312 into sensor body 310. High temperature operations (such as brazing the sensor to the alumina insert) can be conducted before mounting the sensor assembly in the housing.

In one embodiment, a pressure sensor of the invention has dimensions as follows:

A typical capacitance for the sensor is 42 pF at zero psi.

In one embodiment, parameters of a pressure sensor are as follows:

FIGS. 16A through 16G show cross-sections of a pressure sensor in accordance with one aspect of the invention. FIG. 16A shows a rectangular structure in which all interior angles are 90.degree.. FIG. 16B shows a hexagonal sensor structure in which all interior angles are 60.degree.. A rhombus structure is shown in FIG. 16C in which two inner angles are 60.degree. and two angles are 30.degree.. FIG. 16D shows a triangular structure in which all interior angles are 60.degree.. The structures shown in FIG. 16A through 16D are convenient structures for sapphire because they tend to lie along planes of a sapphire crystal. FIG. 16E shows a sensor 340 in which a rounded portion 342 is coupled to a rectangular portion 344. Cavity 346 is formed in rectangular portion 344. FIG. 16F shows another embodiment in which the cavity is formed in the rounded portion. Various alternatives are also available including rounding both portions, such as shown in FIG. 16G. A round cross section is desirable because it can be closely fit into a round hole and can be sealed with a round O-ring. It can be fabricated by machining a square structure with a diamond grinding wheel.

FIGS. 17A through 17B show example configurations of the electrodes for capacitive plates. Electrode instability causes errors in capacitive pressure sensors which have small gaps. Residual stress causes the pressure sensor structure to warp. Further, dimensional changes in the electrode surface change the gap dimension t. These changes can be caused by oxidation and reduction or migration of atoms on the opposing surfaces. FIGS. 17A and 17B show examples of a solution to this problem in which the capacitor plates are broken apart into strips having widths and spacings which result in a capacitance that is substantially equal to a solid electrode. For example, if the substrate has a dielectric constant of 10 times the gap dielectric constant, then the spacings could be about 10 times the gap dimension and the widths could be less than about the gap dimension. This reduces the amount of material available to warp the sensor structure. Further, the strips can be configured so that most of the electrical flux emerges from the back side of the electrodes. As the back side of the electrode is in contact with sapphire, it is protected from surface effects and will provide a stable capacitance even if the inside surface changes dimensions. FIGS. 17A and 17B show two example configurations which increase the amount of flux emanating from the back side of the electrodes. Variations on this embodiment include providing guard electrodes (298) which overlie each plate electrode and shield each plate electrode. Although these plates are spaced apart, they are similar to a continuous capacitor plate because of their spacing and relative size.

In one embodiment, the capacitor electrodes are implanted into the surface of the substrate. This provides electrode stability by protecting the electrode and helping to reduce the amount of the change in the capacitance over time. A sapphire substrate is implanted with V ions at a dose of 1.times.10.sup.18 ions/cm.sup.2 and an energy level of 200 KeV. This changes the resistivity of the sapphire from very highly resistant to about 15 Ohms/sq. The implanting process concentrates most of the V approximately 1000 .ANG. beneath the original sapphire surface. An example of an implanted electrode 300 is shown in phantom in FIG. 17B.

FIG. 18 is a graph of bonding temperature as a percent of melting point temperature versus bond strength as a percent of material strength. For maximum stability and accuracy, it is desirable to have the bond strength as close as possible to the material strength so that the sensor structure behaves as a unitary body. In one embodiment of the invention, bonding temperature is the range indicated at 350 in FIG. 18. Sapphire, quartz or silicon can be used in forming a pressure sensor, and their melting points are 2050.degree. C., 1723.degree. C. and 1415.degree. C., respectively. The desired range 350 shown in FIG. 18 is from a temperature of about 68% of the melting point absolute temperature. In one embodiment, bonding temperature should not exceed about 95% of-the melting point temperature. The desired fusion bond as used herein is a bond having a strength which is substantially the same as the strength of the underlying crystal material, and is formed by the application of heat with substantially no foreign material in the bond.

Although the present invention has been described with reference to preferred embodiments, workers skilled in the art will recognize that changes may be made in form and detail without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. Single crystal materials include sapphire, silicon, quartz, ruby and diamond. Generally, these are materials with low hysteresis which are highly stable thereby providing little creep. In general, materials with higher melting points will be more stable thus, sapphire is one preferred material. The cavity of the sensor can be a vacuum or filled with a fluid or gas. The electrodes can include conductors such as metals, metal oxides or doped semiconductors and can be protected with an insulating dielectric material such as quartz. In another embodiment, the stress isolation structure is formed of a polycrystalline material. Further, the bonding can be formed with or without the use of pressure.

Claims

Certificate of Correction present

The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.

What is claimed is:

1. A pressure transmitter for use in an industrial process control system for transmitting pressure on a process control loop, the transmitter comprising: I/O circuitry coupling to the loop for transmitting information on the loop; compensation circuitry receiving a pressure related signal and responsively controlling the I/O circuitry to transmit pressure information on the loop; a transmitter housing containing the I/O circuitry and the compensation circuitry; a mounting portion in the housing formed of a mounting portion material; a process barrier in the housing positioned between the I/O circuitry and the compensation circuitry which isolates the I/O circuitry from the compensation circuitry and the mounting portion; an elongated member formed substantially of a brittle, corrosion-resistant material which is different from the mounting portion material and is coupled to the mounting portion at a proximal end and having a passageway extending therethrough; a pressure responsive portion at a distal end of the elongated member for immersion in a fluid which is at a pressure related to the process fluid pressure and deforming in response to process fluid pressure; and a sensor coupled to the pressure responsive portion and having an electrical connection to the compensation circuitry through the passageway of the elongated portion and a sealed feed-through in the process barrier, wherein the sensor and electrical connection are isolated from process fluid by the elongated member; wherein the elongated member and pressure responsive portion include fusion bonds which are substantially free of foreign material.

2. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the elongated member defines a cavity therethrough for applying a reference pressure to the pressure responsive portion.

3. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 including a second elongated member coupled to the mounting portion and carrying a second pressure responsive portion having a second sensor coupled to the compensation circuitry, wherein the pressure information relates to a differential pressure.

4. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the elongated member and the pressure responsive portion have a width w and a thickness T, and w/T is less than about 4.0.

5. The pressure transmitter of claim 4 wherein the elongated member and the pressure responsive portion have a width w and a thickness T, and w/T is less than about 2.3.

6. The pressure transmitter of claim 5 wherein the elongated member and the pressure responsive portion have a width w and a thickness T, and w/T is less than about 1.0.

7. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 including electrical conductors implanted in the elongated member and providing the electrical connection between the sensor and the compensation circuitry.

8. The pressure transmitter of claim 1 wherein the elongated member has a length L exposed to process fluid and a maximum width W and L/W is greater than about 3.0.

9. A pressure transmitter for use in an industrial process control system for transmitting a process variable related to pressure on a process control loop, comprising: an elongated stress isolated pressure responsive structure of a brittle, corrosion resistant material comprising a first substrate of single crystal material bonded to a second substrate of single crystal material and having a passageway extending through a pressure responsive portion to a distal end; a capacitance sensor coupled to the pressure responsive portion of the pressure responsive structure providing a capacitive output in response to deformation of the pressure responsive portion due to an applied pressure from a process fluid; and transmitter circuitry coupled to the sensor adapted to measure the process variable related to the applied pressure and responsively transmit the process variable on the process control loop; wherein the bond between the substrates is a fusion bond which is substantially free of foreign material and has a bond strength substantially equal to the single crystal material strength and is formed at a temperature between about 65 percent and 95 percent of an absolute temperature corresponding to a melting point of the material.

10. The pressure transmitter of claim 9 wherein the pressure responsive structure has a cavity formed therein with a width w and a thickness T, and w/T is less than about 4.0.

11. The pressure transmitter of claim 9 wherein the passageway provides a reference pressure proximate the capacitance sensor.

12. The pressure transmitter of claim 9 wherein the pressure responsive structure includes electrical conductors extending therethrough able to withstand a temperature used to form the bond.

13. The pressure transmitter of claim 12 wherein the electrical conductors are implanted in the pressure responsive structure.

14. The pressure transmitter of claim 12 wherein the material comprises sapphire.

15. A pressure transmitter for use in an industrial process control system for transmitting a process variable related to pressure of a process fluid on a process control loop, comprising: an elongated pressure responsive structure of a single crystal, corrosion-resistant material, the elongated structure having a width w and a thickness T for coupling to a process fluid; a capacitance sensor coupled to a distal end of the pressure responsive structure providing a capacitive output in response to deformation of the distal end of the pressure responsive structure due to an applied pressure from a process fluid; and transmitter circuitry coupled to the sensor adapted to measure the process variable related to the applied pressure and responsively transmit the process variable on the process control loop; wherein w/T is less than about 4.0 and the elongated pressure responsive structure is bonded together by fusion bonds which are substantially free of foreign material.

16. The pressure transmitter of claim 15 wherein the pressure responsive structure includes more than one substrate and a bond between substrates is a fusion bond which has a strength substantially equal to the single crystal material strength and is formed at a bonding temperature between about 65 percent and about 95 percent of an absolute temperature corresponding to a melting point of the material.

17. The pressure transmitter of claim 16 including electrical conductors in the pressure responsive structure having a melting point greater than the bonding temperature.

18. The pressure transmitter of claim 15 wherein the elongated pressure responsive structure includes a cavity extending therethrough for providing a reference pressure proximate the capacitance sensor.

19. The pressure transmitter of claim 15 including electrical conductors implanted in the pressure responsive structure.

20. The pressure transmitter of claim 15 wherein th pressure responsive structure is coupled to a pressure transmitter housing by a stress isolating structure of the same single crystal, corrosion-resistant material.

21. The pressure transmitter of claim 20 wherein the pressure responsive structure and stress isolating structure are surrounded by and directly exposed to process pressure fluid.

22. The pressure transmitter of claim 15 wherein a joint between the pressure responsive structure and the pressure transmitter housing is a fusion bond.

23. The pressure transmitter of claim 15 wherein the capacitance sensor includes conducting electrodes formed of conducting strips on opposing surfaces of a cavity gap.

24. The pressure transmitter of claim 23 wherein the conducting strips have width and spacing substantially equal or less than a cavity gap spacing.

25. The pressure transmitter of claim 15 wherein the material comprises sapphire.

26. A transmitter for use in an industrial process control system for providing an output related to a differential pressure of a process fluid, comprising: a transmitter body; a first pressure responsive structure formed substantially of a single crystal material coupled to a first process pressure; a first sensing element coupled to the first pressure responsive structure having an output related to the response of the first pressure responsive structure to the first process pressure; a first elongated stress isolation member extending between and coupling the first pressure responsive structure to the transmitter body, the first stress isolation member formed substantially of the single crystal material; a second pressure responsive structure formed substantially of a single crystal material coupled to a second process pressure; a second sensing element coupled to the second pressure responsive structure having an output related to the response of the second pressure responsive structure to the second process pressure; a second elongated stress isolation member extending between and coupling the second pressure responsive structure to the transmitter body, the second stress isolation member formed substantially of the single crystal material; and output circuitry in the transmitter body coupled to the first and second sensing elements for determining the difference in pressure between the first and second process pressures and providing an output related to a differential pressure therebetween; wherein the pressure responsive structures and the elongated stress isolation members included are formed by substrates coupled together by fusion bonds which are substantially free from foreign material.

27. The transmitter of claim 26 wherein the first and second pressure responsive members are exposed directly to the process fluid and the single crystal material is substantially resistant to corrosion due to the process fluid.

28. The transmitter of claim 26 wherein the first and second sensing elements comprise capacitor electrodes and the output is a capacitance related to pressure.

29. The transmitter of claim 26 wherein the first and second pressure responsive structures are coupled to first and second reference pressures and the pressure sensing structures are responsive to a difference between a reference pressure and a process pressure.

30. The transmitter of claim 24 wherein the reference pressures are coupled together and are equal.

31. The transmitter of claim 30 wherein the reference pressures are substantially independent of process pressure.

32. The transmitter of claim 29 wherein the reference pressure is substantially a vacuum.

33. The transmitter of claim 29 wherein the reference pressure is transmitted via a gas.

34. The transmitter of claim 26 wherein the single crystal material is sapphire.

35. The transmitter of claim 26 wherein the first and second pressure responsive structures are maintained at substantially the same temperature by the transmitter housing.

36. The transmitter of claim 35 wherein the pressure responsive structures are spaced apart such that they maintain a temperature differential within a predetermined range over a predetermined temperature gradient in the transmitter housing.

37. The transmitter of claim 26 wherein a process pressure range is greater than 1000 psi and a differential pressure range is less than 30 psi.

38. The transmitter of claim 26 wherein each pressure responsive structure is maintained at a substantially uniform temperature throughout.

Patent Citations (205)

Patent	Date	Inventor
USRe28798	1976-05-01	Herring et al.
US3079576	1963-02-01	Kooiman
US3147085	1964-09-01	Gatti
US3239827	1966-03-01	Werner et al.
US3356963	1967-12-01	Buck
US3387226	1968-06-01	Haisma et al.
US3405559	1968-10-01	Moffatt
US3477036	1969-11-01	Haisma
US3589965	1971-06-01	Wallis et al.
US3645137	1972-02-01	Hazen
US3696985	1972-10-01	Herring et al.
US3743552	1973-07-01	Fa
US3744120	1973-07-01	Burgess et al.
US3750476	1973-08-01	Brown
US3766634	1973-10-01	Babcock et al.
US3834604	1974-09-01	Fendley et al.
US3854892	1974-12-01	Burgess et al.
US3858097	1974-12-01	Polye
US3939559	1976-02-01	Fendley et al.
US3962921	1976-06-01	Lips
US3994430	1976-11-01	Cusano et al.
US4018374	1977-04-01	Lee et al.
US4064549	1977-12-01	Cretzler
US4078711	1978-03-01	Bell et al.
US4084438	1978-04-01	Lee et al.
US4088799	1978-05-01	Kurtin
US4127840	1978-11-01	House
US4128006	1978-12-01	Grabow
US4158217	1979-06-01	Bell
US4196632	1980-04-01	Sikorra
US4202217	1980-05-01	Kurtz et al.
US4208782	1980-06-01	Kurtz et al.
US4216404	1980-08-01	Kurtz et al.
US4222277	1980-09-01	Kurtz et al.
US4236137	1980-11-01	Kurtz et al.
US4257274	1981-03-01	Shimada et al.
US4274125	1981-06-01	Vogel
US4276533	1981-06-01	Tominaga et al.
US4278195	1981-07-01	Singh
US4287501	1981-09-01	Tominaga et al.
US4301492	1981-11-01	Paquin et al.
US4359498	1982-11-01	Mallon et al.
US4366716	1983-01-01	Yoshida
US4389895	1983-06-01	Rud, Jr.
US4410872	1983-10-01	Stecher et al.
US4412203	1983-10-01	Kurtz et al.
US4422125	1983-12-01	Antonazzi et al.
US4422335	1983-12-01	Ohnesorge et al.
US4424713	1984-01-01	Kroninger, Jr. et al.
US4434665	1984-03-01	Adolfsson et al.
US4443293	1984-04-01	Mallon et al.
US4454765	1984-06-01	Lodge
US4456901	1984-06-01	Kurtz et al.
US4479070	1984-10-01	Frische et al.
US4495820	1985-01-01	Shimada et al.
US4497473	1985-02-01	Robyn et al.
US4507973	1985-04-01	Barr et al.
US4517622	1985-05-01	Male
US4525766	1985-06-01	Petersen
US4535219	1985-08-01	Sliwa, Jr.
US4539061	1985-09-01	Sagiv
US4542436	1985-09-01	Carusillo
US4547801	1985-10-01	Haisma et al.
US4558817	1985-12-01	Kiendl
US4572000	1986-02-01	Kooiman
US4586109	1986-04-01	Peters et al.
US4591401	1986-05-01	Neidig et al.
US4598996	1986-07-01	Taniuchi
US4609966	1986-09-01	Kuisma
US4625559	1986-12-01	Carter et al.
US4649070	1987-03-01	Kondo et al.
US4689999	1987-09-01	Shkedi
US4703658	1987-11-01	Mrozack, Jr. et al.
US4753109	1988-06-01	Zabler
US4754365	1988-06-01	Kazahaya
US4764747	1988-08-01	Kurtz et al.
US4773972	1988-09-01	Mikkor
US4774196	1988-09-01	Blanchard
US4780572	1988-10-01	Kondo et al.
US4800758	1989-01-01	Knecht et al.
US4806783	1989-02-01	Anderson
US4810318	1989-03-01	Haisma et al.
US4849374	1989-07-01	Chen et al.
US4852408	1989-08-01	Sanders
US4857130	1989-08-01	Curtis
US4875368	1989-10-01	Delatorre
US4879903	1989-11-01	Ramsey et al.
US4883215	1989-11-01	Goesele et al.
US4901197	1990-02-01	Albarda et al.
US4908921	1990-03-01	Chen et al.
US4929893	1990-05-01	Sato et al.
US4954925	1990-09-01	Bullis et al.
US4971925	1990-11-01	Alexander et al.
US4972717	1990-11-01	Southworth et al.
US4980243	1990-12-01	Milikowski et al.
US4983251	1991-01-01	Haisma et al.
US4994781	1991-02-01	Sahagen
US5001934	1991-03-01	Tuckey
US5005421	1991-04-01	Hegner et al.
US5009689	1991-04-01	Haisma et al.
US5013380	1991-05-01	Aoshima
US5024098	1991-06-01	Petitjean et al.
US5028558	1991-07-01	Haisma et al.
US5050034	1991-09-01	Hegner et al.
US5050035	1991-09-01	Hegner et al.
US5068712	1991-11-01	Murakami et al.
US5084123	1992-01-01	Curtis
US5087124	1992-02-01	Smith et al.
US5094109	1992-03-01	Dean et al.
US5095741	1992-03-01	Bartig et al.
US5113868	1992-05-01	Wise et al.
US5133215	1992-07-01	Lane, III et al.
US5155061	1992-10-01	O'Connor et al.
US5174926	1992-12-01	Sahagen
US5178015	1993-01-01	Loeppert et al.
US5189591	1993-02-01	Bernot
US5189916	1993-03-01	Mizumoto et al.
US5201228	1993-04-01	Kojima et al.
US5214961	1993-06-01	Kojima et al.
US5227068	1993-07-01	Fukiura et al.
US5231301	1993-07-01	Peterson et al.
US5236118	1993-08-01	Bower et al.
US5261999	1993-11-01	Pinker et al.
US5271277	1993-12-01	Pandorf
US5287746	1994-02-01	Broden
US5294760	1994-03-01	Bower et al.
US5314107	1994-05-01	d'Aragona et al.
US5319324	1994-06-01	Satoh et al.
US5326726	1994-07-01	Tsang et al.
US5332469	1994-07-01	Mastrangelo
US5349492	1994-09-01	Kimura et al.
US5381300	1995-01-01	Thomas et al.
US5424650	1995-06-01	Frick
US5437189	1995-08-01	Brown et al.
US5471884	1995-12-01	Czarnocki et al.
US5554809	1996-09-01	Tobita et al.
US5637802	1997-06-01	Frick et al.
CSX153132	1974-05-01
EPX24945A2	1980-09-01
EPX136050A1	1984-08-01
EPX161740A2	1985-02-01
EPX166218A2	1985-05-01
EPX182032A2	1985-09-01
EPX190508A2	1985-12-01
EPX207272A2	1986-05-01
EPX213299A2	1986-06-01
EPX210843A2	1986-07-01
EPX256150A1	1986-08-01
EPX355340A1	1989-07-01
EPX351701B1	1989-07-01
EPX383391A1	1990-02-01
EPX410679A1	1990-07-01
EPX413547A2	1990-08-01
EPX430676A2	1990-11-01
EPX444943A1	1991-02-01
EPX444942A1	1991-02-01
EPX451993A2	1991-03-01
EPX456060A1	1991-04-01
EPX460763A2	1991-06-01
EPX476897A2	1991-09-01
EPX526290A1	1992-07-01
EPX547684A2	1992-12-01
EPX556009A2	1993-02-01
EPX351701B1	1993-06-01
EPX579298A1	1993-06-01
FRX1568487	1969-05-01
FRX2246506	1975-05-01
FRX2455733	1980-11-01
DEX1648764	1971-06-01
DEX2021479	1971-11-01
DEX2221062	1972-11-01
DEX2459612	1975-07-01
DEX3404262A1	1984-09-01
DEX3404262A1	1984-09-01
DEX4011901A1	1991-10-01
DEX4244450A1	1993-07-01
JPX91-311556/43
JPX47-82168	1972-08-01
JPX60-97676	1985-05-01
JPX62-70271	1987-03-01
JPX62-167426	1987-07-01
JPX62-259475	1987-11-01
JPX63-285195	1988-11-01
JPX63-292032	1988-11-01
JPX2-148768	1990-06-01
JPX2-249936	1990-10-01
JPX3-239940	1991-10-01
JPX5-107254	1993-04-01
JPX6-21741	1994-01-01
JPX6-300650	1994-10-01
CHX632891	1982-11-01
SUX463643	1975-10-01
SUX736216	1980-05-01
SUX1398825A1	1988-05-01
SUX1597627A1	1990-10-01
SUX1629763A1	1991-02-01
GBX1069435	1967-05-01
GBX1305885	1973-02-01
GBX2071853	1981-03-01
GBX2168160	1985-11-01
WOXWO83/00385	1983-02-01
WOXWO85/02677	1985-06-01
WOXWO87/07947	1987-12-01
WOXWO87/07948	1987-12-01
WOXWO93/22644	1993-11-01

Non-Patent Literature (62)

L. Romana, P. Thevenard, B. Canut, G. Massouras and R. Brenier, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research B46, "Phase Formation Study in .alpha.-A1.sub.2 O.sub.3 Implanted With Niobium Ions", published by Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. (North-Holland), pp. 94-97 (1990).
L. Shipu, F. Donghui, X. Ning, S. Zhenya and C. Xiaoming, Processing of Advanced Materials, "Surface electrical properties of Ni-implanted sapphire", published by Chapman & Hall, pp. 77-80 (1991).
"Creep of Sensor's Elastic Elements: Metals versus Non-metals", K. Bethe, D. Baumgarten and J. Frank, Nova Sensor--Silicon Sensors and Microstructure, 1990, pp. 844-849.
"Silicon Sensors and Microstructure", J. Brysek, K. Petersen, J. Mallon, Jr., L. Christel, F. Pourahmadi, Nova Sensor, Jun. 1990, pp. 5.4-5.8, 8.21-8.23, 9.9-9.10, 9.13-9.15.
"Silicon Microcavities Fabricated with a New Technique", L. Tenerz and B. Hok, Electronics Letters, vol. 22, No. 11, May 22, 1986, pp. 615-616.
"A Balanced Resonant Pressure Sensor", E. Stemme and G. Stemme, Sensors and Actuators, A21-A23, 1990, pp. 336-341.
"Fabrication of an Implantable Capacitive Type Pressure Sensor", S. Shoji, T. Nisase, M. Esashi and T. Matsuo, Transducers '87, 1987.
"Silicon-to-silicon direct bonding method", M. Shimbo, K. Furukawa, K. Fukuda and K. Tanzawa, J. Appl. Phys., vol. 60, No. 8, Oct. 15, 1986, pp. 2987-298.
"Low-Temperature Preparation of Silicon/Silicon Interfaces by the Silicon-to-Silicon Direct Bonding Method", S. Bengtsson and O. Engstrom, J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 137, No. 7, Jul. 1990, pp. 2297-2303.
"Interface charge control of directly bonded silicon structures", S. Bengtsson and O. Engstrom, J. Appl Phys., vol. 66, No. 3, Aug. 1, 1989, pp. 1231-1239.
"Wafer bonding for silicon-on-insulator technologies", J.B. Lasky, Appl. Phys Lett., vol. 48, No. 1, Jan. 1, 1986, pp. 78-80.
"Small sensitive pressure transducer for use at low temperatures", W. Griffioen and G. Frossati, Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 56, No. 6, Jun. 1985, pp. 1236-1238.
"High-Temperature Healing of Lithographically Introduced Cracks in Sapphire", J. Rodel and A.M. Glaeser, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 73, No. 3, Mar. 1990, pp. 592-601.
"Production of Controlled-Morphology Pore Arrays:Implications and Opportunities", J. Rodel amd A.M. Glaeser, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., vol. 70, No. 8, Aug. 1987, pp. C-172-C-175.
"Silicon-on-Sapphire Pressure Sensor", by C. Qinggui et al., Transducers, (1987), 4 pgs.
"Spectroscopic Study of the Surfaces of Glass Joined by Optical Contact", by V.M. Zolotarev et al., Sov. J. Opt. Technol., (Jun. 1977), pp. 379-380.
Effect of Scale and Time Factors on the Mechanical Strength of an Optical Contact, by S.S. Kachkin et al., Sov. J. Opt. Technol., vol. 56, No. 2, (Feb. 1989), pp. 110-112.
"High Pressure Sensors", Instrument Engineers Handbook Vol. 1, Process Measurement, B. Liptak, Editor, pp. 244-245.
"Silicon on Sapphire: The Key Technology for High-Temperature Piezoresistive Pressure Transducers", by H.W. Keller et al., Transducers, (1987), 4 pgs.
"Optical-Contact Bonding Strength of Glass Components", by S.S. Kachkin et al., Sov. J. Opt. Technol., vol. 47, No. 3, (Mar. 1980), pp. 159-161.
"A Cold High-Vacuum Seal Without Gaskets", by L. Macebo, University of California Lawrence Radiation Laboratory, (Sep. 1, 1962), pp. 1-11.
"Diffusionsschweissen Optischer Bauelemente Aus Quarzglas", by K. Veb et al., Schweisstechnik, Berlin, (1983), pp. 262-264.
"Pressure and Temperature Measurements with Saw Sensors", by D. Hauden et al., 36th Annual Frequency Control Symposium, (1982), pp. 284-289.
"Transient Response of Capacitive Pressure Sensors", by P. Pons et al., Sensors and Actuators, (1992), pp. 616-621. ,k "Analysis and Design of a Four-Terminal Silicon Pressure Sensor at the Centre of a Diaphragm", by M. Bao et al, Sensors and Actuators, (1987), pp. 49-56.
"A Stress and Temperature Compensated Orientation and Propagation Direction for Surface Acoustic Wave Devices", by B. Sinha, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics, and Frequency Control, vol. UFFC-34, No. 1, (Jan. 1987), pp. 64-74.
"Nonlinear Analyses on CMOS Integrated Silicon Pressure Sensors", by K. Suzuki et al., IEEE, (1985), pp. 137-140.
"New Technique for Fusion Bonding and Replication for Large Glass Reflectors", by J.R. Angel, Steward Observatory, University of Arizona, pp. 52-56.
"Pressure Sensitivity in Anisotropically Etched Thin-Diaphragm Pressure Sensors", by S. Clark et al, IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. Ed-26, No. 12, (Dec. 1979), pp. 1887-1896.
"A Model for the Silicon Wafer Bonding Process", by R. Stengl et al., Japanese Journal on Applied Physics, (Oct. 1989), pp. 1735-1741.
"Study of the Stressed State of a Sintered Quartz Monoblock", by Y. Lisitsyn et al., Plenum Publishing Corporation, (1986), pp. 643-645.
"Direct Bonding in Patent Literature", by J. Haisma, Philips J. Res., (1995), pp. 165-170.
"Special Issue on Direct Bonding", by J. Haisma et al., Philips Journal of Research, vol. 49, No. 1/2, (1995), pp. 1-182.
"Diversity and Feasiblity of Direct Bonding: A Survey of a Dedicated Optical Technology", by J. Haisma et al., Applied Optics, vol. 33, No. 7, (Mar. 1994), pp. 1154-1169.
"Structure and Morphology of the Reaction Fronts During the Formation of MgAl.sub.2 O.sub.4 Thin Films by Solid State Reaction Between R-cut Sapphire Substrates and MgO Films", by D. Hesse et al., Interface Science, (1994) pp. 221-237.
"Development of a High Temperature Capacitive Pressure Transducer", by R.L. Egger, NASA CR-135282 (Oct. 1977)., pp. 1-114.
"High Temperature Pressure Transducer", Techlink Industry, Techlink No. 2359, (1978), 2 pgs.
"Quartz Capsule Pressure Transducer for the Automotive Industry", by D.Y. Lee et al., SAE Technical Paper Series Society of Automotive Engineers, Inc., (Feb. 1981), 6 pgs.
"Low-Cost High-Sensitivity Integrated Pressure and Temperature Sensor", by P. Pons et al., Sensors and Actuators, (1994), pp. 398-401.
"A New Type of High Performance Device for VLSI Digital System", by X. Xiao-Li et al., Solid State Devices, (1988), pp. 579-582.
"Silicon-On-Insulator By Wafer Bonding and Etch-Back", by W.P. Maszara et al., IEEE SOS/SOI Technology Workshop, (Oct. 1988), 1 pg.
"Silicon Fusion Bonding For Pressure Sensors", by K. Petersen et al., IEEE, (1988), pp. 146-147.
"Wafer Bonding for SOI", by W.P. Maszara et al., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc.. vol. 107, (1988), 2 pgs.
"Silicon-To-Silicon Direct Bonding Method", by M. Shimbo et al., Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 60, No. 8, (Oct. 1986), pp. 2987-2989.
"A Model for the Silicon Wafer Bonding Process", by R. Stengl et al., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 28, No. 10, (Oct. 1989), pp. 1735 & 1741.
"A Small and Stable Continuous Gas Laser", by H.G. Van Bueren et al., Physics Letters vol. 2, No. 7, (Nov. 1962), 2 pgs.
"Direct Bonding of Ceramics and Metals by Means of a Surface Activation Method in Ultrahigh Vacuum", by T. Suga et al., Proceedings of the MRS International Meeting on Advanced Materials, vol. 8, (Jun. 1988), pp. 257-263.
"Silicon-On-Insulator Wafer Bonding-Wafer Thinning Technological Evaluations", by J. Haisma et al., Japanese Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 28, No. 8, (Aug. 1989), 4 pgs.
"Closure and Repropogation of Healed Cracks in Silicate Glass", by T. Michalske et al., Journal of the American Ceramic Society, vol., 68, No. 11, (Nov. 1985), 3 pgs.
"Use of Strain Gauges with a Silicon-On-Sapphire Structure for Thermophysical Experiments", by V.F. Kukarin et al., Plenum Publishing Corporation, (1986) pp. 1085-1087.
"Metrological Characteristics for Sapfir-22D Pressure Sensors", by A.M. Evtyushenkov et al., Plenum Publishing Corporation, (1989), pp. 147-150.
"Low-Temperature Characteristics of the Transducer", Rev. Sci. Instrum., vol. 56, No. 6, (Jun. 1985), pp. 1237-1238.
"The Joining of Ceramics", by A.S. Bahrani, Int. J. for the Joining of Materials, vol. 4, No. 1 (1992), pp. 13-19.
"Chemical Free Room Temperature Wafer to Wafer Direct Bonding", by S. Farrens et al., J. Electrochem. Soc., vol. 142, No. 11, (Nov. 1985), pp. 3949-3955.
"Morphological Evolution of Pore Channels in Alumina", by J. Rodel et al., Ceramic Transactions--Sintering of Advanced Ceramics, vol. 7, (May 1988), pp. 243-257.
"Le Poli Optique, Element De La Construction Des Tubes A Vide (')", by P. Danzin et al., Annales De Radioelectricite, (Jan. 1948), pp. 281-289.
"Strength of Glass Ceramic S0115M and its Joints Based on Optical Contact", by A.I. Busel et al, Plenum Publishing Corporation, (1983), p. 378.
"Bubble-Free Silicon Wafer Bonding in a Non-Cleanroom Environment", by R. Stengl et al., Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Duke University, (1988) p. L2364.
"Boundary Migration of Single Crystal in Polycrystalline Alumina", by M. Kinoshita, Journal of the Ceramic Society of Japan, vol. 82, No. 945, (1974), pp. 295-296.
"Diffusion Bonding of Ceramics", by C. Scott et al., American Ceramic Society Bulletin, (Aug. 1985) pp. 1129-1131.
"Spectroscopic Study of the Surfaces of Glass Joined by Optical Contact", by V.M. Zolotoarev et al., Sov. J. Opt. Technol. vol. 44, No. 6, (Jun. 1977), pp. 379-380.
"Effect of Scale and Time Factors on the Mechanical Strength of an Optical Contact", by S.S. Kachkin et al., Sov. J. Opt. Technol. vol. 56, No. 2, (Feb. 1989), pp. 110-112.
"Optical-Contact Bonding Strength of Glass Components", by S.S. Kachkin et al., Sov. J. Opt. Technol., vol. 47, No. 3 (Mar. 1980), pp. 159-162.

Abstract

Description