US 5,803,906 AGrant

Method and System for Providing Animal Health Histories and Tracking Inventory of Related Drug Usage

Issue Date:1998-09-08

•18 Claims

•9 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

A computer-based system for providing up-to-date health histories of animals, for example, in a feedlot. The system includes indicia elements associated with each animal for identifying the animal and a data entry device coupled to a computer for reading the indicia elements to identify the animal to the computer. The data entry means also communicates to the computer treatment data comprising the animal's physical condition and any treatment administered to the animal. The computer is programmed to record the identity and associated treatment data and collect the data with previous data to provide the animal's health history. The system also displays the identified animal's prior health history at the animal's location for the operator's benefit, which location is typically an animal hospital remote from the computer's location. The system may include a second data entry device for determining the net amount of drugs taken for animal treatment from an inventory. The computer is programmed to compare the net amount taken against the amount administered in treatment as communicated by the first data entry device to determine a difference in the amounts.

Metadata

Assignee

Micro Chemical, Inc.

Inventors

William C. Pratt
William D. McKillip

Application Information

Application Number:US 2262924

Filing Date:1994-04-11

Priority Date:1987-08-12

Art Unit:376

Classifications

IPC:

A61B 502C06F 1514

Field of Search:

600128119300903;904;898108

Patent Drawings (9 sheets)

Description

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

This invention relates generally to systems for providing individual health histories of animals, for example, in a cattle feedlot operation. More particularly, this invention relates to such a system wherein the identity of each animal and data representing the physical condition and treatment administered to each animal is recorded, made available at the animal's location, and accumulated with earlier data to provide an up-to-date health history of each animal.

Large scale cattle feedlot operations are commonly employed to feed cattle prior to slaughter. Typically, the cattle of a particular owner are identified by a lot number for keeping track of the goods and services provided for the cattle while in the care of the feedlot. Each individual head is further identified with a unique number such as by tag for keeping track of individual treatments required, such as drugs dispensed for each particular sickness, and for monitoring the physical condition of each animal. Through these identifying numbers, the feedlot operation can maintain a health history for each animal in each lot and charge the cattle owner for feed, drugs, and services provided for each head.

This system, although simple to implement, is slow and fraught with error because of the manual effort required to gather and record the data. Typically, data is manually recorded twice. At an animal hospital on the feedlot, cattle are observed and treated if necessary. An operator records in writing the physical condition of each animal, any observed sickness, and the drug treatment administered. This written record is then transferred to a clerk to be entered into a cumulative history. Both recordings are subject to error. Compounding the problem is the the potential for illegible entries, incomplete entries, and lost entries. For example, often cold, adverse weather conditions at a feedlot make it difficult for an operator to grip the pen for writing and also interfere with the flow of ink through the instrument. Moreover, the manual recording and rerecording are lengthy and consequently the cumulative health history is often several days out of date.

These problems associated with manual entry of data are well known, and attempts have been made to minimize the errors in several aspects of feedlot operations. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,288,856 to Linseth discloses an apparatus for separately feeding animals which have not gained sufficient weight. The Linseth apparatus is adapted to weigh each animal as it is walked through a weigh station. An operator reads the identification number that appears on an ear tag of the animal and enters the number into a keyboard connected to a computer. The animal is then weighed and the amount entered into the computer. The computer has stored within its memory different weight ranges for cattle, which the computer compares with the weight of the animal weighed. Each range is related to a gate that leads to a different feeding pen. The computer determines the weight range in which the animals lies and opens the appropriate gate to direct the animal to the desired feeding pen. The procedure is then repeated for reevaluation of the animal after a period of feeding. The Linseth apparatus, however, still requires manual entry of information and lacks any means for creating and displaying at the animal's location a cumulative history of the animal's physical condition and treatment administered.

Other apparatus have addressed individual monitoring of an animal's consumption. U.S. Pat. No. 4,461,240 to Ostler, for example, discloses a monitoring apparatus that dispenses a preselected amount of feed to a cow identified by a transmitter around its neck. The feeding station includes a receiver-transmitter in communication with a computer that has stored within its memory a feeding schedule for the animal. The computer determines how much feed is to be dispensed to each animal individually. The operator can thereby control how much each animal eats and monitor if in fact the prescribed amount of food is consumed. But the apparatus is limited in its ability to monitor and control the feeding of cattle.

U.S. Pat. No. 4,409,950 to Byrne et al. similarly discloses an animal food consumption monitor. Each animal bears a tag that includes a miniature transmitter which transmits a signal identifying the animal. The feed station for the animal includes a receiver for identifying the animal before it begins consuming feed. With the animal identified, the food in the station hopper is weighed before and then after the animal feeds to determine the amount consumed. The data on the amount and type of food consumed is then stored for later retrieval. The Byrne monitor, like the Ostler apparatus, identifies the animal without manual effort. But, again, it provides no on-site, up-to-date history of the animal's health.

Although the apparatus described above and others in the prior art offer some improvements in feedlot operations, they do not address the problem of maintaining up-to-date health histories of the physical condition and the drug treatment of the animals. Such histories are critical in determining the progress of a sick animal as well as keeping track of the cost of drugs for each animal. The manual method is thus still preferred for this purpose.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

An object, therefore, of the invention is to provide an improved method and system for providing the health histories of animals.

Another object of the invention is to provide such a system which is portable to the animals' location.

Still another object of the invention is to provide such a system that avoids the need for manually identifying each animal to be treated and manually recording the physical condition and treatment administered.

Yet another object of the invention is to provide such a system that provides at the animals' location up-to-date health histories for each animal observed and treated by the system.

Yet another object of the invention is to provide such a system that compares the net amount of drugs taken for treatment from a drug inventory against the amount of drugs actually administered from the inventory to determine the difference in amounts.

To achieve these objects, a system according to the invention includes computer means for recording the identity of each animal and treatment data associated with the animal. This data comprises the physical condition of the animal and drug treatments administered to the animal. Each animal to be treated bears indicia means such as a bar coded ear tag or radio transmitter tag which can be read by data entry means such as a bar code scanner or antenna, respectively, to communicate the identity of the animal to the computer means. A bar coded menu sheet is also provided which can be read by the bar code scanner to communicate the treatment data associated with the animal at the time of treatment.

In one embodiment of the invention, the computer means comprises a host computer for storing the health histories of the animals and a portable unit for locating near an animal to be treated. The portable unit is adapted to record treatment data each time the animal is treated and to later transfer the data to the host computer for inclusion in the health history of the animal.

In a second embodiment of the invention, the computer means comprises a remote terminal connected directly to the host computer for transmitting data to the host computer without the need for recording and later transfer. This embodiment may be used where AC power is available.

The computer means may also track drug inventory for treatment of the animals and with a second data entry means for communicating to the computer means the removal and restocking of drugs from the inventory. The computer means is adapted to compare the net amount of drugs taken from the inventory as communicated by the second scanner against the amount of drugs used in treatment as communicated by the first scanner to determine a difference in the amounts.

In the method of the invention, a data terminal is provided at the location of the animal. An operator identifies the animal to the terminal, which displays the prior health history. If treatment is necessary, the operator enters data representing the drug treatment to be administered to the animal. Treatment data is then transferred to a host computer for accumulation with treatment data earlier recorded. The accumulated data comprises the health history of the animal. The updated history is then transferred from the host computer back to the data terminal.

The present invention eliminates the manual entry of this data and thus avoids the associated drawbacks of prior entry methods and systems.

The foregoing and other objects, features, and advantages of the invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of a preferred embodiment which proceeds with reference to the accompanying drawings.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is an illustration of a portable hospital unit included in a first embodiment of a system according to the invention.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of the portable hospital unit shown in FIG. 1.

FIG. 3 is an illustration of the portable hospital unit in communication with a host computer included in the system.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of the animal health computer of FIG. 3.

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of a second embodiment of the system according to the invention.

FIG. 6 is a flowchart illustrating the programming of the host computer.

FIG. 7A is a flowchart illustrating in more detail a portion of the hospital/processing menu within the programming of the host computer.

FIG. 7B is a flowchart illustrating in more detail a second portion of the hospital/processing menu within the programming of the host computer.

FIG. 8A is a flowchart illustrating a portion of the programming of the portable unit.

FIG. 8B is a flowchart illustrating a second portion of the programming of the portable unit.

FIG. 8C is a flowchart illustrating a third portion of the programming of the portable unit.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

The System--First Embodiment

Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown an animal 10 and an operator 12 in an area of a cattle feedlot referred to as an animal hospital 14. An animal 10 may be brought to the hospital 14 for a check on its physical condition, for treatments that are administered to all animals in a particular lot, and if an animal is to be individually treated for sickness. Typically, the animal hospital 14 includes a cattle chute and a head gate (not shown) for holding the animal stationary while its weight and temperature are checked and any drugs are administered.

As indicated in FIG. 1, the system of the invention in this embodiment includes a portable hospital unit 16 that can be transported to the hospital 14 for use by the operator 12. This portability enables the operator to care for cattle with a single unit at several hospitals located around the feedlot rather than at a single hospital to which all cattle must be directed. Coupled to the portable unit 16 is a means for entering data into the unit such as an optical character reader, which in this first embodiment comprises a portable bar code scanner 18 available from a number of sources including the MSI Data Corporation under the name SYMBOLTEC LS8100. The scanner 18, which is stored in a holster 20 mounted to a side of the unit 16, is adapted to read indicia means such as an ear tag 22 bearing optical characters such as a bar code for uniquely identifying each animal. Rather than having to write down the animal's identifying number on a sheet, therefore, the operator 12 need only scan the ear tag 22 and the identifying number is electronically read and accurately recorded within the unit 16. The portable unit also includes a character menu sheet 24 that bears optical characters such as bar codes corresponding to treatment data comprising the observed physical condition of the animal as well as drug treatments that may be administered. The sheet 24 is mounted behind a clear plastic door of the unit 16 and includes bar codes on the sheet's left and right margins. The bar codes on the left margin are for entering identification numbers of drugs, numerical quantities, and menu selection steps during program execution. The bar codes on the right margin are for entering sickness codes, sex of the animal, and commands for scrolling through the prior health history, for entering data and for quitting after observation or treatment is concluded. The operator can thus enter the identity of the animal and treatment data by simply scanning the menu sheet 24 with the scanner 18. The treatment data is recorded along with the animal's identifying number within the unit 16. Visual feedback to the operator 12 of the prior health history and the data just entered is provided by a display device such as video monitor 25. The monitor 25 also displays the program prompts provided to the operator 12 by the unit 16 for entering the data, as will be described in detail hereafter.

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram showing the elements within the chassis of the unit 16. The scanner 18 is connected via a spring cord to a conventional laser interface module 26 such as MSI Data Corporation Model 1365 for communicating data represented by optical characters to a portable terminal 28. The data terminal 28 is of conventional design such as a PDTIII available from the MSI Data Corporation and includes a microprocessor, associated memory for storing an instruction program and for recording data, a keyboard 29 for data entry, and a display 30 for displaying executing programs and recorded data. The keyboard 29 is reached through the door opening of the unit 16 and is an alternative to the scanner 18 for entering data that is not bar coded, such as the time and date of treatment and the lot number of the animal, or if the scanner malfunctions. Also shown in the schematic is an optional liquid crystal display (LCD) screen 32 connected to the terminal 28 through a reset switch 34, a power switch 35, and a selector switch 36. The reset switch 34 reinitializes the module 26. The switch 35 controls power to the scanner 18 and LCD screen 32 to electrically disconnect them when not required by the operator. The selector switch 36 directs the data that is entered via the scanner 18 into the terminal 28 to either the LCD screen 32 (visible through the transparent door of unit 16 above the menu sheet 24) or to the video monitor 25 via a serial data connector 38 such as an RS232 port. These additional display devices are optionally available because of the difficulty in reading the display 30 from a distance. The LCD screen 32 is normally selected by a single operator while the monitor 25 is usually employed when a crew is working in the hospital 14 and a number of the members must view the display simultaneously. The power source for the unit 16 is a battery 40 which is charged through a power supply line via the connector 38.

Referring to FIG. 3, the data treatment recorded by the unit 16 is periodically transferred to a host computer 50 remote from the animal hospital 14 to update the health histories of observed and treated animals. The host computer 50 is intended for collecting data on feedlot operations in general and maintains the cumulative health history of each animal in the feedlot. The portable unit 16 when transferring the data is coupled to the host computer 50 via a conducting cable 52. The computer 50 in turn is adapted to collect the treatment data recorded within the portable unit 16 and produce an accumulation of such data associated with each animal. This accumulation of data comprises the animal's health history. After the current data is transferred, the computer 50 is programmed to transfer to unit 16 in return the up-to-date health history of each animal as well as current feedlot information, such as newly established lot numbers. The cable 52 also includes the power supply line for charging the battery 40 within the unit 16.

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the elements comprising the computer 50. The computer itself is of conventional design and includes a video monitor 54 for displaying data and a keyboard 56 for data entry. The computer 50 includes an interface board 58 for receiving data entered via a second bar code scanner 62 and a second laser interface module 64. The interface board 58 transfers the data to and from a central microprocessor 66 equipped with internal memory and disk drives. Data and instruction programs stored in memory and on disk can be viewed on monitor 54. The computer 50 is also connected to a printer 68 for printing the health histories and other related documents. Power is supplied to the computer through a conventional power supply 72. The power supply 72 is also coupled to a battery charger 74 which supplies power for the unit 16. The up-to-date animal health histories, programming, and other feedlot information are transmitted as serial data from the computer 50 along with power to the unit 16 via a connector 76 coupled to the cable 52.

The host computer 50 serves a number of functions in addition to collecting treatment data to produce health histories for each animal treated. One related function is tracking inventory of drugs for treatment of the animals. Referring again to FIG. 4, computer 50 is located adjacent to a drug room 77 which stores drug inventory. Each drug container 78 is labeled with a bar code 79 for identifying the drugs therein and a menu sheet 80 is present for entering the amount of drugs within each container when removed for drug treatment and the amount remaining in each container when returned for restocking or when additional amounts are added to inventory. The computer 50 is programmed to compare the net amount of drugs taken from the inventory as communicated by the scanner 62 against the amount of drugs used in treatment in the animal hospital 14 as communicated by the scanner 18. The difference between the two amounts over a predetermined time can thereby be determined for monitoring loss due to breakage, theft, etc. This difference, as well as the comparable amounts, are printed at request as a drug usage report as will be described.

The System--Second Embodiment

FIG. 5 shows a second embodiment of the system for possible use where a continuous source of power such as AC power is available in the hospital 14. The system includes a remote "dumb" terminal comprising the scanner 18, the video display 25, and a keyboard 75, all in communication with the host computer 50 through a node 83 that includes communication ports and a power supply. The terminal acts an extension of host computer 50, relaying treatment data to the computer in real time and displaying the up-to-date health histories transferred to the display from the host computer. This real time communication, when possible, avoids the need for physically moving the portable unit to the host computer and the delay in updating the prior health histories of the animals.

FIG. 5 also shows data entry means such as a transmitter-receiver antenna 85 and indicia means such as transponder 87 attached to an ear for identifying the animal 10. The antenna is preferably of a type similar to an RDREO1, integrater reader available from Allflex International and the tag is preferably a transponder of the type similar to an EID ear tag also available from Allflex International. The antenna is mounted along side the cattle chute 89 and emits a signal that reaches the transponder 87 when animal 10 passes by the antenna 85. The tag 87 in response emits a unique signal identifying the animal, which is electronically "read" by the antenna 87 and communicated to the host computer 50 via a computer interface unit 91 such as a CIUMO1 from Allflex International. Alternatively, the transponder 87 may be an active transmitter that continuously emits a radio signal for reception by a passive antenna 85. This means for automatically identifying the animal avoids the delay associated with the operator having to move to each animal for identifying it by scanning the ear tag. The entry of treatment data, however, is handled in the same manner as in the first embodiment, with the scanner 18 utilized to scan bar codes on menu sheet 24 corresponding to physical conditions and any drug treatment administered to the animal. The keyboard 75, however, is available if data cannot be entered via the antenna 85 or scanner 18.

Method of Operation

The computer 50 and data terminal 28 within unit 16 are programmed in BASIC, according to the method illustrated in the flowcharts of FIGS. 6 through 8. FIG. 6 shows the options pertinent to the present invention and available to the operator upon logging onto the computer 50. A main menu (81) appears with three options. An inventory menu (82) is selected for working with the drug inventory; a hospital/processing menu (84) is selected for working with the cattle feedlot records; or the procedure for monitoring the removal and restocking of drugs is selected as drugs are to be used, such as in the animal hospital 14. With this third option, the operator scans the bar code 79 of the containers 78 that contain drugs required for treatment. He is then prompted to specify the purpose of the drug (86), specify the cattle lots the drug is being used for (88), and to enter the drug amounts removed and restocked (90). This data is used to adjust the book inventory stored within the computer's memory (92). The entry of data is indicated by "carriage returns" (CR).

The inventory menu option (82) is selected for monitoring the inventory. For example, one choice thereunder is to print the daily inventory report, with the book inventory, restocking information, and transactions grouped by product (94). Another option is to manually adjust the inventory in case of a breakage of drugs within the inventory (96). Other options include monitoring the difference between physical inventory as determined by a count and book inventory as determined by the checking in and checking out of drugs previously described. From the inventory menu (82), the operator can also enter the physical inventory for comparison against the book inventory (98). The difference between physical inventory and book inventory of each product (100) can then be presented. The actual physical usage as determined by a physical inventory of the drugs can be compared with the amount administered (102). The totals can then be adjusted as appropriate (104). The operator can additionally print the net amount taken from inventory for drug treatment against the amount recorded from the portable unit 16 (105) as administered.

The third option of the main menu (81), the hospital/processing menu (84), enables the operator to set up new lots for cattle brought into the feedlot and to prepare group drug treatments known as processing orders and hospital treatments which are administered to the animals. Referring now to FIG. 7B, a first option is a lot number menu (106) appearing at the right of the figure and is selected whenever a new cattle lot is to be set up (108). This menu allows the operator to add header information to the lot (110), change the header information (112), or review the lots presently within the feedlot operation (114). The lot menu (106) also includes an option for deleting a cattle lot (116) after the cattle within the lot have been shipped from the feedlot.

A second option under the hospital processing menu is a processing order menu (118). Within this menu is a command for adding a processing order (120). First, a number is assigned to a unique combination of drugs to be administered as the processing order or treatment (122). The drugs desired are then selected (124), and the dosages per head or per 100 pounds are entered (126). The selection of drugs and dosages are then repeated until the processing order is complete (127). The menu (118) also permits the operator to print a list of current processing orders (128) or delete an existing processing order (130). An operator can also view a present processing order (132) and change it if desired (134) by changing the drugs or their amounts (136).

Referring now to FIG. 7A, a third option under the hospital/processing menu (84) is a hospital treatment menu (137). Hospital treatments differ from processing orders in that hospital treatments are normally intended for specific sicknesses and include a combination of drugs for treating that sickness. Processing orders, on the other hand, are not directed to specific sicknesses and are typically administered to all cattle in a lot, outside the animal hospital 14. The hospital treatment menu (137) includes basically the same selections as in the processing order menu (118) and for brevity descriptions of the selections therein are not repeated here.

The other options under the hospital/processing menu (84) include an option (138) at the left of FIG. 7A enabling the operator to assign and record treatments for the animals without entering the data through the portable unit 16. This option minimizes data entry where it is known that all cattle in a given lot will receive a specified treatment. The option (138) includes a command for updating the figures for drugs used in each hospital treatment (140). A similar option (142) allows the operator to assign one or more drugs or processing orders to one or more lots. The operator can print the processing sheet for each order (144) and also has the ability to update figures in the orders for the drugs used (146).

Just as he can assign drugs and treatments to lots, the operator has the option of deleting and editing treatments (148). These options include deleting previously assigned treatments (150), editing existing treatments for a given animal (152), and entering new hospital treatments for a given animal (154).

Communication via cable 52 with the portable unit 16 is also handled through the hospital/processing menu (84). The menu (84) allows the operator to print the daily hospital report (156) of the animals treated as well as receive the day's hospital treatment from the portable (158). The daily treatments are stored on disk in appropriate lot files (160). The operator can also print the day's hospital and processing activity with cost information (162). The updated health history and new lot numbers are then be downloaded into the portable unit 16 to keep it current (164). The program also updates in memory the amount of drugs used in treating each animal (166).

One concern of feedlots is the shipping of cattle not yet suitable for consumption. A further option under the menu (84) allows the operator to check when a lot may be shipped (168) by entering the lot number and estimated shipping date (170). Animals that are not ready for shipping within the lot are then displayed by number (172).

Referring again to FIG. 7B, an operator selects the report/printout menu option (174) whenever a report on treatments administered for each lot is required. Under menu (174), an operator can print a treatment report which indicates all hospital treatments between any two given dates (176). The operator may also print the lot reports which indicate all treatment with drug cost, both processing and hospital, administered to a specified lot since a lot was created (178). A third selection is for summarizing information on each lot by simply printing the header (180).

One other option shown allows the operator under menu (84) to enter the sickness names such as bloat, prolapse, etc., that will be recognized by the portable unit 16 and will appear on menu sheet 24 (186). If the sickness codes are changed at the hospital/processing menu, the menu sheet 24 is also updated.

The treatment data recorded in the portable unit 16 during a treatment session is entered in response to prompts from the instructional program stored within the terminal 28. FIGS. 8A-8C illustrate the operation of this program. Referring to FIG. 8A, the program prompts the operator 12 on the display such as video monitor 25 to enter the date and time of treatment via the keyboard 29 (200). A main menu (202) then appears on the monitor 25, which gives the operator several choices. One choice allows the operator to include and exclude various prompts and verifications of entered data which appear throughout the figure. Deletion of verifications, shown in these flowcharts, may be made by experienced operators who known the program operation well. The second choice commands the unit 16 to transfer its data to the host computer 50. A third choice allows for the entry of treatment data initially.

The operator thus begins treatment with this third choice by scanning the appropriate number on the menu sheet 24. He is then prompted to scan the ear tag of the animal to be treated or key in the tag number to identify the animal to the unit 16 (203). If he scans the tag, the number is automatically verified (204). If keyed in, the ear tag number is then displayed so that the operator may visually verify his entry (205) before scanning a CR. Once the ear tag has been verified, the program checks to see if the animal is new or has a previous treatment history (206). If the animal does have a record, the monitor 25 displays the last treatment for the animal (208). The operator can then scroll through previous treatments (210) via commands on menu sheet 24 to determine the health history of the animal (212). The operator can also quit the program by scanning the quit command on the menu sheet 24. The quit option is always available throughout the program, though not repeatedly shown in the figure for clarity. All data entered before the quit command is invoked is recorded. On the other hand, the operator can always "bail out" of the program if trouble develops therein by scanning the numerals 9999. No data entered during a treatment session is saved if the operator "bails out."

If no previous treatments have been administered, the operator enters the lot number through keyboard 29 (213) and scans the CR. The program then compares the lot number with those stored in memory. If it is a new lot number, the program alerts the operator that it is included and prompts for reentry. Entering the same number a second time establishes the lot number. The program then prompts the operator to verify his entry (214), which he does by a CR scan.

The operator is then prompted to enter a sickness code (216), such as a respiratory or intestinal condition, appearing on the menu sheet 24. The code is then displayed momentarily for the operator's verification (220). If the sickness code entered indicates the animal is dead (222), this data is stored immediately (224) and the treatment session is ended. If the animal is merely sick, however, the operator is prompted for the severity of the illness and enters a severity code number in response such as 1, 2, or 3 (226) from the menu sheet 24.

Following entry of the animal's identity and sickness diagnosis, the operator may be prompted for other physical conditions such as the animal's temperature. Referring to FIG. 8B, he enters the temperature (232) in response, and it is displayed by the program for operator verification. The last recorded temperature is also displayed (234). The program then prompts the operator for the animal's destination, and the operator enters the pen type and particular pen number by scanning the corresponding numbers on the menu screen 24 (240, 242). These pen types include home pens, recovery pens, or hospital pens such as hospital 14.

Following the intended destination, the operator is prompted to enter numbers identifying the drug or hospital treatment to be administered to the animal (244). Each individual drug and hospital treatment has a unique identification number. If the number entered by the operator is greater than 1000, i.e., has four digits, then the program determines that an individual drug is to be administered (246). The identification number is then checked against a stored list to determine if it is valid (248). The operator is alerted if the number is invalid, and he may attempt reentry (250). Once a valid identification number has been entered, the program checks to determine if the drug requires a withdrawal date (252). Certain drugs require that the animal be kept in the feedlot for a period of time after it is administered a drug to prevent undesired side effects to consumers. The program has stored within it the time period for each drug and calculates from the treatment data the earliest release date of the animal thereafter. If the drug has a withdrawal problem, the information is displayed (254) and the operator is given the opportunity to reconsider administering the drug (256). If no withdrawal date is displayed or if the operator chooses to administer the drug in any event, the program then prompts the operator to enter the number of units to be administered (258). The amount entered is checked against an allowable dosage range to protect the animal from an overdose. The portable unit 16 then verifies the number of units to be administered (260). This drug treatment data is stored within the memory of the terminal 28 for later transfer to the computer 50 (262). The operator is then queried if more treatments are to be given the animal in the present treatment session (264).

Administering and recording hospital treatments are similar to the steps followed for individual drugs. Returning to step (246) and then referring to FIG. 8C, an entered number less than 1000, i.e., two digits, is first verified by the operator as a hospital treatment number (266) via a scanned CR. The program then checks to see if the number entered is a valid treatment number (268). The operator is alerted if the number is invalid (270). If the number is valid, the program then determines if there is a withdrawal problem with this treatment (272) and displays the appropriate information if such problem exists (274). The operator again has the option to proceed or choose another treatment or drug (276). The program also determines whether the treatment has a weight dependent dosage (278). If so, the program prompts the operator to enter the animal's weight (280), which must fall within a predetermined range to be accepted as valid. The entered weight is then verified by the operator (282) via a scanned CR, and the program calculates and displays the dosages to be administered (284). The operator at this point can accept or reject the treatment as calculated (286). If accepted and administered, the amount of treatment is then stored (288).

The operator is then prompted to determine if further drugs or treatment is to be administered to the particular animal (290) in this treatment session. If treatment is finished, all data is then stored within the memory of the terminal 28 and the operator proceeds to examine the next animal. Once treatment is concluded, the operator quits the program (292).

At the conclusion of the day or other predetermined reporting period, the unit 16 is carried to the location of the computer 50 and the two connected by cable 52. Referring again to FIG. 8A, the operator then initiates data transfer via the main menu of the program within the unit 16 (202). The appropriate commands are first selected on the host computer 50 (156-160). The operator then enters a transfer command in response to a prompt (294), and the data is transferred (296). The transferred data is collected to update the health histories of the animals treated in that session. The updated health histories are then transferred back to the terminal 28 for review and display in steps (208) through (212).

Where the "dumb" terminal is employed in place of the portable unit 16, the instructional program illustrated in FIGS. 8A-C is stored within the memory of the host computer 50. No recording of data for later transfer, however, is required.

Having illustrated and described the principles of the invention in a preferred embodiment, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the invention can be modified in arrangement and detail without departing from such principles. For example, although the invention is described in the context of a feedlot, it is not so limited. I claim all modifications coming within the spirit and scope of the following claims.

Claims

We claim:

1. A method of providing drug treatment to animals which are selected from a group of retained animals, the method comprising the following steps: entering a selected animal's identity into a computer; in response to entry of the animal's identity, providing through the computer the animal's health and drug treatment history to assist in diagnosing the condition of the identified animal; diagnosing the condition of the identified animal; entering the diagnosed condition into the computer; selecting a drug treatment having a withdrawal period which may be administered to the animal based at least in part on the animal's health and drug treatment history and the animal's diagnosed condition; entering the drug treatment into the computer; providing through the computer withdrawal information for the drug treatment for determining whether the drug treatment should be administered; and if desired, administering the drug treatment to the animal.

2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing through the computer withdrawal information comprises providing information as to when or whether the animal may be released.

3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing through the computer withdrawal information comprises displaying withdrawal information on a video screen.

4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of providing through the computer withdrawal information comprises providing a release date.

5. A method of providing drug treatment to animals which are selected from a group of retained animals, the method comprising the following steps: entering a selected animal's identity into a computer; in response to entry of the animal's identity, providing through the computer the animal's health and drug treatment history to assist in diagnosing the condition of the identified animal; diagnosing the condition of the identified animal; entering the diagnosed condition into the computer; selecting a drug treatment having a withdrawal period which may be administered to the animal based at least in part on the animal's health and drug treatment history and the animal's diagnosed condition; entering the drug treatment into the computer; and providing through the computer withdrawal information for the drug treatment.

6. A method of providing drug treatment to selected individual animals which are removed from a group of retained animals to a drug treatment location for specific treatments by an operator, the method comprising: moving a selected individual animal to be treated to the drug treatment location; entering into a computer the animal's identity; in response to entry of the animal's identity, providing the animal's health and drug treatment history, if any, to assist the operator in making a diagnosis; diagnosing the condition of the animal to be treated; entering into the computer the diagnosed condition as an addition to the animal's health history, if any; providing a list at the drug treatment location of available drug treatments; evaluating the animal's health and drug treatment history and the animal's diagnosed condition and, based on such information, the operator's judgment, and the list of drug treatments, selecting a drug treatment for the animal; and following the selection of a drug treatment requiring a withdrawal period, performing one or more withdrawal period related calculations in the computer using data entered into the computer.

7. The method of claim 6 including displaying on a video monitor the additional information available in the computer.

8. The method of claim 6 including wherein the step of performing one or more withdrawal period related calculations in the computer includes performing calculations within the computer using selected shipping information.

9. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of performing one or more withdrawal period related calculations in the computer includes performing calculations within the computer using a selected withdrawal period.

10. The method of claim 6 including providing withdrawal information for the selected drug treatment to an operator if the drug treatment selected may affect the release of the animal.

11. The method of claim 6 including providing withdrawal information to an operator.

12. The method of claim 6 wherein the additional information is provided to an operator.

13. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of performing one or more withdrawal period related calculations in the computer includes performing calculations within the computer using selected treatment information.

14. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of performing one or more withdrawal period related calculations in the computer includes performing calculations within the computer using a time related to the animal's release.

15. A method of providing drug treatment to animals which are selected from a group of retained animals, the method comprising the following steps: entering a selected animal's identity into a computer; diagnosing the condition of the identified animal; entering the diagnosed condition into the computer; selecting a drug treatment having a withdrawal period which may be administered to the animal based at least in part on the animal's diagnosed condition; entering the drug treatment into the computer; and providing through the computer withdrawal information for the drug treatment.

16. The method of claim 15 wherein the step of entering a selected animal's identity into a computer is performed at the animal's location.

17. The method of claim 15 wherein the step of diagnosing the condition of the identified animal is performed at the animal's location.

18. The method of claim 15 wherein the step of entering the drug treatment into the computer is performed at the animal's location.

Patent Citations (20)

Patent	Date	Inventor
US3626377	1971-12-01	Markley
US3848112	1974-11-01	Weichselbaum et al.
US4049950	1977-09-01	Byrne et al.
US4135241	1979-01-01	Stanis et al.
US4288856	1981-09-01	Linseth
US4290114	1981-09-01	Sinay
US4336589	1982-06-01	Smith et al.
US4360125	1982-11-01	Martindale et al.
US4461240	1984-07-01	Ostler
US4463706	1984-08-01	Meister et al.
US4503808	1985-03-01	McAlister
US4589372	1986-05-01	Smith
US4604847	1986-08-01	Moulding et al.
US4617876	1986-10-01	Hayes
US4686624	1987-08-01	Blum et al.
US4712511	1987-12-01	Zamzow et al.
US4733354	1988-03-01	Potter et al.
US4838275	1989-06-01	Lee
US4839806	1989-06-01	Goldfischer et al.
US5315505	1994-05-01	Pratt et al.

Non-Patent Literature (47)

The Software Catalog--Microcomputers, Spring 1984.
The Information Aspect of Merchandising Your Feedlot, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 23 No. 8, Aug. 1985.
The Consultant's Role in Feedlot Practice, Alvin J. Edwards, D.V.M., as presented to Eleventh Annual American Association of Bovine Practitioners, Baltimore, Maryland, Dec. 13, 1978.
Seminar Speakers to Provide Valuable Insight, CALF News.
A Review of the Etiological Factors Associated with the Bovine Respiratory System, Merwin Frey, D.V.M., Ph.D., Department of Veterinary Science, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Apr., 1980.
Computer User Confirms Value for Management Decisions, CALF News, vol. 21 No. 8, Aug. 1983.
Computer School Phase One, November 7-9.
Computer Assisted Management Operations Manual with Sample Printouts, 1984.
Computer, The Bovine Proceedings--No. 12, Apr. 1980.
Rough Draft of a Hospital Record Without Economic Considerations, Aug. 12, 1986, Veterinary Research & Consulting Services.
Applied Statistics and Computer Usage Related to Feedlot Animal Health, Academy of Veterinary Consultants, Amarillo, Texas, Jun. 7, 1985.
Herd Health--A Textbook of Health and Production Management of Agricultural Animals, O.M. Radostits, D.V.M., M.Sc., D.C. Blood, O.B.E., M.V.Sc., W.B. Saunders Company, 1985.
Safe, Effective and Legal Treatment of Routines, Dr. Al Edwards, Feedlot Management, Oct. 1980.
Preventing Drug Problems in the Feedlot: A Guide for Managers and Veterinarians, Alvin J. Edwards, D.V.M., Ph.D., The Bovine Practitioner--No. 16, Nov., 1981.
Equipment for Farm Use in the National Cooperative Dairy Herd Improvement Program, K.R. Butcher, North Carolina University and D.W. Webb, University of Florida, National Cooperative Dairy Herd Improvement Program, 1985.
Date Finder/Schedulator, Gierstad Cattle Co., Copyright 1985.
Feedlot Health Program, Alvin J. Edwards, D.V.M., Ph.D., 1985.
DHI Provo News, Nov., 1985.
The Software Catalog--Minicomputers 1984.
Making the Complex Simple, Jeff Jackson, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 24 No. 4, Apr. 1986.
AGNET: Serving the Cattle Industry for Over a Decade, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 24 No. 5, May 1986.
Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 23 No. 4, Apr. 1985.
Texas Christian University advertisement, CALF News, vol. 23 No. 3, Mar. 1985.
The Computer Seminar--In Review, Steve Dittmer, Midwest Editor, CALF News, vol. 21 No. 1, Jan. 1983.
Important Attributes of a Computer System, Jay O'Brien, CALF News, vol. 21 No. 4, Apr. 1983.
Tools of the Trade, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 23, No. 6, Jun. 1985.
Chernobyl--Perhaps, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 24, No. 8, Aug. 1986.
Computer Judgements on the Feedlot, CALF News, vol. 22, No. 8, Aug. 1984.
Clustering of fatal fibrinous pneumonia (shipping fever) in feedlot calves within transport truck and feedlot pen groups, Carl. S. Ribble, Mohamed M. Shoukri, Alan H. Meek, S. Wayne Martin, Preventive Veterinary Medicine 21, 1994.
XIIIth World Congress on Diseases of Cattle, Durban Republic of South Africa, World Buriatrics Association, Proceedings vol. I, Sep. 17-21, 1984.
Fourteenth World Congress on Diseases of Cattle, Dublin, Ireland, Aug. 26-29, 1986.
So You're Looking for a Computer System, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 23 No. 5, May 1985.
Flyer announcing computer seminar-Aug. 26 & 27, 1985.
Attitudes and Expectations, Steve Meyer, Turnkey Computer Systems, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Gieger, CALF News, vol. 23 No. 7, Jul. 1985.
Business and Fun at Seminar, Champ Gross, West Coast Editor, CALF News, vol. 23 No. 10, Oct. 1985.
Cattle, Computers and Financial Management, Cal Siegfried and The Search, CALF News, vol. 24 No. 1, Jan. 1986.
Managing Feedlot Operating Efficiency, Chet Fields, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 24 No. 2, Mar. 1986.
Online, Monthly Newsletter from Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc., Customer Survey, Jun., 1986.
Computer Application for the Food Animal Practitioner, Bechtol & Jordan, Animal Health and Nutrition, Oct., 1985.
Cattle Feedlot Health Management, David T. Bechtol, B.S., D.V.M., Current Veterinary Therapy, Food Animal Practice, W.B. Saunders Company, 1981.
Record Keeping: Key to Successful Feedlot Health Programs, David T. Bechtol, D.V.M., Norden News, vol. 56, No. 1, 1981.
Use of Computers in Cow-Calf Herd Management, Garrett R. Oetzel, D.V.M., M.S., Robert G. Mortimer, D.V.M., M.S., The Bovine Proceedings, No. 18, Apr. 1986.
Potential impact of on-farm microcomputers on livestock management and veterinary practice, Anthony C. Bywater, Ph.D. and William J. Goodger, D.V.M., Ph.D., JAVMA, vol. 186, No. 3, Feb. 1, 1985.
Wherefrom Good Hardware and Software?, Steve Myers, Turnkey Computer Systems, Computer Management col. edited by B.J. Geiger, CALF News, vol. 24 No. 2, Feb. 1986.
Alvin J. Edwards, D.V.M., Ph.D.; The Personal Aspect of a Feedyard Health Program; College of Veterinary Medicine, Kansas State University (1980).
Proceedings of International Conference on Veterinary Preventive Medicine and Animal Production; Austrian Veterinary Journal; (Nov. 1985).
Affidavit of Stephen W. Meyers; United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas Amarillo Division; Civ. No. 2:94-CV-293-J; Micro Chemical, Inc. v. Lextron, Inc. and Turnkey Computer Systems, Inc. (May 1995).

Abstract

Description