US 5,745,229 AGrant

Apparatus for Determining Optical Characteristics of an Object

Issue Date:1998-04-28

•36 Claims

•16 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

Color measuring systems and methods are disclosed. Perimeter receiver fiber optics are spaced apart from a central source fiber optic and receive light reflected from the surface of the object being measured. Light from the perimeter fiber optics pass to a variety of filters. The system utilizes the perimeter receiver fiber optics to determine information regarding the height and angle of the probe with respect to the object being measured. Under processor control, the color measurement may be made at a predetermined height and angle. Various color spectral photometer arrangements are disclosed. Translucency, fluorescence and/or surface texture data also may be obtained. Audio feedback may be provided to guide operator use of the system. The probe may have a removable or shielded tip for contamination prevention.

Metadata

Assignee

LJ Laboratories, L.L.C.

Inventors

Wayne D. Jung
Russell W. Jung
Alan R. Loudermilk

Application Information

Application Number:US 5818516

Filing Date:1996-01-02

Priority Date:1996-01-02

Art Unit:255

Classifications

IPC:

G01B 1130G01J 351G01N 2164G01N 2147

Field of Search:

356402;405;406;407;416;425;445;446;73;417;371

Patent Drawings (16 sheets)

Description

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to devices and methods for measuring the color of objects, and more particularly to devices and methods for measuring the color of teeth, fabric or other objects or surfaces with a hand-held probe that presents minimal problems with height or angular dependencies.

Background of the Invention

Various color measuring devices such as spectrophotometers and calorimeters are known in the art. To understand the limitations of such conventional devices, it is helpful to understand certain principles relating to color. Without being bound by theory, Applicants provide the following discussion.

The color of an object determines the manner in which light is reflected from the surface of the object. When light is incident upon an object, the reflected light will vary in intensity and wavelength dependent upon the color of the surface of the object. Thus, a red object will reflect red light with a greater intensity than a blue or a green object, and correspondingly a green object will reflect green light with a greater intensity than a red or blue object.

One method of quantifying the color of an object is to illuminate it with broad band spectrum or "white" light, and measure the spectral properties of the reflected light over the entire visible spectrum and compare the reflected spectrum with the incident light spectrum. Such instruments typically require a broad band spectrophotometer, which generally are expensive, bulky and relatively cumbersome to operate, thereby limiting the practical application of such instruments.

For certain applications, the broad band data provided by a spectrophotometer is unnecessary. For such applications, devices have been produced or proposed that quantify color in terms of a numerical value or relatively small set of values representative of the color of the object.

It is known that the color of an object can be represented by three values. For example, the color of an object can be represented by red, green and blue values, an intensity value and color difference values, by a CIE value, or by what are known as "tristimulus values" or numerous other orthogonal combinations. It is important that the three values be orthogonal; i.e., any combination of two elements in the set cannot be included in the third element.

One such method of quantifying the color of an object is to illuminate an object with broad band "white" light and measure the intensity of the reflected light after it has been passed through narrow band filters. Typically three filters (such as red, green and blue) are used to provide tristimulus light values representative of the color of the surface. Yet another method is to illuminate an object with three monochromatic light sources (such as red, green and blue) one at a time and then measure the intensity of the reflected light with a single light sensor. The three measurements are then converted to a tristimulus value representative of the color of the surface. Such color measurement techniques can be utilized to produce equivalent tristimulus values representative of the color of the surface. Generally, it does not matter if a "white" light source is used with a plurality of color sensors (or a continuum in the case of a spectrophotometer), or if a plurality of colored light sources are utilized with a single light sensor.

There are, however, difficulties with the conventional techniques. When light is incident upon a surface and reflected to a light receiver, the height of the light sensor and the angle of the sensor relative to the surface and to the light source also affect the intensity of the received light. Since the color determination is being made by measuring and quantifying the intensity of the received light for different colors, it is important that the height and angular dependency of the light receiver be eliminated or accounted for in some manner.

One method for eliminating the height and angular dependency of the light source and receiver is to provide a fixed mounting arrangement where the light source and receiver are stationary and the object is always positioned and measured at a preset height and angle. The fixed mounting arrangement greatly limits the applicability of such a method. Another method is to add mounting feet to the light source and receiver probe and to touch the object with the probe to maintain a constant height and angle. The feet in such an apparatus must be wide enough apart to insure that a constant angle (usually perpendicular) is maintained relative to the object. Such an apparatus tends to be very difficult to utilize on small objects or on objects that are hard to reach, and in general does not work satisfactorily in measuring objects with curved surfaces.

The use of color measuring devices in the field of dentistry has been proposed. In modern dentistry, the color of teeth typically are quantified by manually comparing a patient's teeth with a set of "shade guides." There are numerous shade guides available for dentists in order to properly select the desired color of dental prosthesis. Such shade guides have been utilized for decades and the color determination is made subjectively by the dentist by holding a set of shade guides next to a patient's teeth and attempting to find the best match. Unfortunately, however, the best match often is affected by the ambient light color in the dental operatory and the surrounding color of the patient's makeup or clothing and by the fatigue level of the dentist.

Similar subjective color quantification also is made in the paint industry by comparing the color of an object with a paint reference guide. There are numerous paint guides available in the industry and the color determination also often is affected by ambient light color, user fatigue and the color sensitivity of the user. Many individuals are color insensitive (color blind) to certain colors, further complicating color determination.

In general, color quantification is needed in many industries. Several, but certainly not all, applications include: dentistry (color of teeth); dermatology (color of skin lesions); interior decorating (color of paint, fabrics); the textile industry; automotive repair (matching paint colors); photography (color of reproductions, color reference of photographs to the object being photographed); printing and lithography; cosmetics (hair and skin color, makeup matching); and other applications in which it useful to measure color in an expedient and reliable manner.

With respect to such applications, however, the limitations of conventional color measuring techniques typically restrict the utility of such techniques. For example, the high cost and bulkiness of typical broad band spectrometers, and the fixed mounting arrangements or feet required to address the height and angular dependency, often limit the applicability of such conventional techniques.

Moreover, another limitation of such conventional methods and devices are that the resolution of the height and angular dependency problems typically require contact with the object being measured. In certain applications, it may be desirable to measure and quantify the color of an object with a small probe that does not require contact with the surface of the object. In certain applications, for example, hygienic considerations make such contact undesirable. In the other applications such as interior decorating, contact with the object can mar the surface (such as if the object is coated with wet paint) or otherwise cause undesirable effects.

In summary, there is a need for a low cost, hand-held probe of small size that can reliably measure and quantify the color of an object without requiring physical contact with the object, and also a need for methods based on such a device in the field of dentistry and other applications.

Summary of the Invention

In accordance with the present invention, devices and methods are provided for measuring the color of objects, reliably and with minimal problems of height and angular dependence. A handheld probe is utilized in the present invention, with the handheld probe containing a number of fiber optics. Light is directed from one (or more) light source fiber optics towards the object to be measured, which in certain preferred embodiments is a central light source fiber optic (other light source arrangements also may be utilized). Light reflected from the object is detected by a number of light receiver fiber optics. Included in the light receiver fiber optics are a plurality of perimeter fiber optics. In certain preferred embodiments, three perimeter fiber optics are utilized in order to take measurements at a desired, and predetermined height and angle, thereby minimizing height and angular dependency problems found in conventional methods. In certain embodiments, the present invention also may measure translucence and fluorescence characteristics of the object being measured, as well as surface texture and/or other surface characteristics.

The present invention may include constituent elements of a broad band spectrophotometer, or, alternatively, may include constituent elements of a tristimulus type calorimeter. The present invention may employ a variety of color measuring devices in order to measure color in a practical, reliable and efficient manner, and in certain preferred embodiments includes a color filter array and a plurality of color sensors. A microprocessor is included for control and calculation purposes. A temperature sensor is included to measure temperature in order to detect abnormal conditions and/or to compensate for temperature effects of the filters or other components of the system. In addition, the present invention may include audio feedback to guide the operator in making color measurements, as well as one or more display devices for displaying control, status or other information.

With the present invention, color measurements may be made with a handheld probe in a practical and reliable manner, essentially free of height and angular dependency problems, without resorting to fixtures, feet or other undesirable mechanical arrangements for fixing the height and angle of the probe with respect to the object.

Accordingly, it is an object of the present invention to address limitations of conventional color measuring techniques.

It is another object of the present invention to provide a method and device useful in measuring the color of teeth, fabric or other objects or surfaces with a hand-held probe of practical size that does not require contact with the object or surface.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a color measurement probe and method that does not require fixed position mechanical mounting, feet or other mechanical impediments.

It is yet another object of the present invention to provide a probe and method useful for measuring color that may be utilized with a probe simply placed near the surface to be measured.

It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a probe and method that are capable of determining translucency characteristics of the object being measured.

It is a further object of the present invention to provide a probe and method that are capable of determining surface texture characteristics of the object being measured.

It is a still further object of the present invention to provide a probe and method that are capable of determining fluorescence characteristics of the object being measured.

Finally, it is an object of the present invention to provide a probe and method that can measure the area of a small spot singulary, or that also can measure irregular shapes by moving the probe over an area and integrating the color of the entire area.

Brief Description of the Drawings

The present invention may be more fully understood by a description of certain preferred embodiments in conjunction with the attached drawings in which:

FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 2 is a diagram illustrating a cross section of a probe in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a diagram illustrating an arrangement of fiber optic receivers and sensors utilized with a preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 4A to 4C illustrate certain geometric considerations of fiber optics;

FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate the light amplitude received by fiber optic light receivers as a function of height from an object;

FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a color measuring method in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate a protective cap that may be used with certain embodiments of the present invention;

FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate removable probe tips that may be used with certain embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 9 illustrates a fiber optic bundle in accordance with another preferred embodiment of the present invention;

FIGS. 10A, 10B, 10C and 10D illustrate and describe other fiber optic bundle configurations that may be used in accordance with yet other preferred embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 11 illustrates a linear optical sensor array that may be used in certain embodiments of the present invention;

FIG. 12 illustrates a matrix optical sensor array that may be used in certain embodiments of the present invention;

FIGS. 13A and 13B illustrate certain optical properties of a filter array that may be used in certain embodiments of the present invention;

FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate examples of received light intensities of receivers used in certain embodiments of the present invention; and

FIG. 15 is a flow chart illustrating audio tones that may be used in certain preferred embodiments of the present invention.

Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments

The present invention will be described in greater detail with reference to certain preferred embodiments.

With reference to FIG. 1, an exemplary preferred embodiment of a color measuring system and method in accordance with the present invention will be described.

Probe tip 1 encloses a plurality of fiber optics, each of which may constitute one or more fiber optic fibers. In a preferred embodiment, the fiber optics contained within probe tip 1 includes a single light source fiber optic and three light receiver fiber optics. The use of such fiber optics to measure the color of an object will be described later herein. Probe tip 1 is attached to probe body 2, on which is fixed switch 17. Switch 17 communicates with microprocessor 10 through wire 18 and provides, for example, a mechanism by which an operator may activate the device in order to make a color measurement. Fiber optics within probe tip 1 terminate at the forward end thereof (i.e., the end away from probe body 2). The forward end of probe tip 1 is directed towards the surface of the object to be measured as described more fully below. The fiber optics within probe tip 1 optically extend through probe body 2 and through fiber optic cable 3 to light sensors 8, which are coupled to microprocessor 10.

It should be noted that microprocessor 10 includes conventional associated components, such as memory (programmable memory, such as PROM, EPROM or EEPROM; working memory such as DRAMs or SRAMs; and/or other types of memory such as non-volatile memory, such as FLASH), peripheral circuits, clocks and power supplies, although for clarity such components are not explicitly shown. Other types of computing devices (such as other microprocessor systems, programmable logic arrays or the like) are used in other embodiments of the present invention.

In the embodiment of FIG. 1, the fiber optics from fiber optic cable 3 end at splicing connector 4. From splicing connector 4, each of the three receiver fiber optics used in this embodiment is spliced into at least five smaller fiber optics (generally denoted as fibers 7), which in this embodiment are fibers of equal diameter, but which in other embodiments may be of unequal diameter (such as a larger or smaller "height/angle" or perimeter fiber, as more fully described herein). One of the fibers of each group of five fibers passes to light sensors 8 through a neutral density filter (as more fully described with reference to FIG. 3), and collectively such neutrally filtered fibers are utilized for purposes of height/angle determination (and also may be utilized to measure surface characteristics, as more fully described herein). Four of the remaining fibers of each group of fibers passes to light sensors 8 through color filters and are used to make the color measurement. In still other embodiments, splicing connector 4 is not used, and fiber bundles of, for example, five or more fibers each extend from light sensors 8 to the forward end of probe tip 1. In certain embodiments, unused fibers or other materials may be included as part of a bundle of fibers for purposes of, for example, easing the manufacturing process for the fiber bundle. What should be noted is that, for purposes of the present invention, a plurality of light receiver fiber optics (such as fibers 7) are presented to light sensors 8, with the light from the light receiver fiber optics representing light reflected from object 20. While the various embodiments described herein present tradeoffs and benefits that may not have been apparent prior to the present invention (and thus may be independently novel), what is important for the present discussion is that light from fiber optics at the forward end of probe tip 1 is presented to color sensors 8 for color measurement and angle/height determination, etc.

Light source 11 in the preferred embodiment is a halogen light source (of, for example, 5-100 watts, with the particular wattage chosen for the particular application), which may be under the control of microprocessor 10. The light from light source 11 reflects from cold mirror 6 and into source fiber optic 5. Source fiber optic 5 passes through to the forward end of probe tip 1 and provides the light stimulus used for purposes of making the measurements described herein. Cold mirror 6 reflects visible light and passes infra-red light, and is used to reduce the amount of infra-red light produced by light source 11 before the light is introduced into source fiber optic 5. Such infra-red light reduction of the light from a halogen source such as light source 11 can help prevent saturation of the receiving light sensors, which can reduce overall system sensitivity. Fiber 15 receives light directly from light source 11 and passes through to light sensors 8 (which may be through a neutral density filter). Microprocessor 10 monitors the light output of light source 11 through fiber 15, and thus may monitor and, if necessary compensate for, drift of the output of light source 11. In certain embodiments, microprocessor 10 also may sound an alarm (such as through speaker 16) or otherwise provide some indication if abnormal or other undesired performance of light source 11 is detected.

The data output from light sensors 8 pass to microprocessor 10. Microprocessor 10 processes the data from light sensors 8 to produce a measurement of color and/or other characteristics. Microprocessor 10 also is coupled to key pad switches 12, which serve as an input device. Through key pad switches 12, the operator may input control information or commands, or information relating to the object being measured or the like. In general, key pad switches 12, or other suitable data input devices (such as push button, toggle, membrane or other switches or the like), serve as a mechanism to input desired information to microprocessor 10.

Microprocessor 10 also communicates with UART 13, which enables microprocessor 10 to be coupled to an external device such as computer 13A. In such embodiments, color data provided by microprocessor 10 may be processed as desired for the particular application, such as for averaging, format conversion or for various display or print options, etc. In the preferred embodiment, UART 13 is configured so as to provide what is known as a RS232 interface, such as is commonly found in personal computers.

Microprocessor 10 also communicates with LCD 14 for purposes of displaying status, control or other information as desired for the particular application. For example, color bars, charts or other graphic representations of the color or other collected data and/or the measured object or tooth may be displayed. In other embodiments, other display devices are used, such as CRTs, matrix-type LEDs, lights or other mechanisms for producing a visible indicia of system status or the like. Upon system initialization, for example, LCD 14 may provide an indication that the system is stable, ready and available for taking color measurements.

Also coupled to microprocessor 10 is speaker 16. Speaker 16, in a preferred embodiment as discussed more fully below, serves to provide audio feedback to the operator, which may serve to guide the operator in the use of the device. Speaker 16 also may serve to provide status or other information alerting the operator of the condition of the system, including an audio tone, beeps or other audible indication (i.e., voice) that the system is initialized and available for taking measurements. Speaker 16 also may present audio information indicative of the measured data, shade guide or reference values corresponding to the measured data, or an indication of the status of the color measurements.

Microprocessor 10 also receives an input from temperature sensor 9. Given that many types of filters (and perhaps light sources or other components) may operate reliably only in a given temperature range, temperature sensor 9 serves to provide temperature information to microprocessor 10. In particular, color filters, such as may be included in light sensors 8, are sensitive to temperature, and operate reliably only over a certain temperature range. In certain embodiments, if the temperature is within a usable range, microprocessor 10 may compensate for temperature variations of the color filters. In such embodiments, the color filters are characterized as to filtering characteristics as a function of temperature, either by data provided by the filter manufacturer, or through measurement as a function of temperature. Such filter temperature compensation data may be stored in the form of a look-up table in memory, or may be stored as a set of polynomial coefficients from which the temperature characteristics of the filters may be computed by microprocessor 10.

In general, under control of microprocessor 10, which may be in response to operator activation (through, for example, key pad switches 12 or switch 17), light is directed from light source 11, and reflected from cold mirror 6 through source fiber optic 5 (and through fiber optic cable 3, probe body 2 and probe tip 1) and is directed onto object 20. Light reflected from object 20 passes through the receiver fiber optics in probe tip 1 to light sensors 8 (through probe body 2, fiber optic cable 3 and fibers 7). Based on the information produced by light sensors 8, microprocessor 10 produces a color measurement result or other information to the operator. Color measurement or other data produced by microprocessor 10 may be displayed on display 14, passed through UART 13 to computer 13A, or used to generate audio information that is presented to speaker 16. Other operational aspects of the preferred embodiment illustrated in FIG. 1 will be explained hereinafter.

With reference to FIG. 2, a preferred embodiment of the fiber optic arrangement presented at the forward end of probe tip 1 will now be described. As illustrated in FIG. 2, a preferred embodiment of the present invention utilizes a single central light source fiber optic, denoted as light source fiber optic S, and a plurality of perimeter light receiver fiber optics, denoted as light receivers R1, R2 and R3. As is illustrated, a preferred embodiment of the present invention utilizes three perimeter fiber optics, although in other embodiments two, four or some other number of receiver fiber optics are utilized. As more fully described herein, the perimeter light receiver fiber optics serve not only to provide reflected light for purposes of making the color measurement, but such perimeter fibers also serve to provide information regarding the angle and height of probe tip 1 with respect to the surface of the object that is being measured, and also may provide information regarding the surface characteristics of the object that is being measured.

In the illustrated preferred embodiment, receiver fiber optics R1 to R3 are positioned symmetrically around source fiber optic S, with a spacing of about 120 degrees from each other. It should be noted that spacing t is provided between receiver fiber optics R1 to R3 and source fiber optic S. While the precise angular placement of the receiver fiber optics around the perimeter of the fiber bundle in general is not critical, it has been determined that three receiver fiber optics positioned 120 degrees apart generally may give acceptable results. As discussed above, in certain embodiments light receiver fiber optics R1 to R3 each constitute a single fiber, which is divided at splicing connector 4 (refer again to FIG. 1), or, in alternate embodiments, light receiver fiber optics R1 to R3 each constitute a bundle of fibers, numbering, for example, at least five fibers per bundle. It has been determined that, with available fibers of uniform size, a bundle of, for example, seven fibers may be readily produced (although as will be apparent to one of skill in the art, the precise number of fibers may be determined in view of the desired number of receiver fiber optics, manufacturing considerations, etc.). The use of light receiver fiber optics R1 to R3 to produce color measurements in accordance with the present invention is further described elsewhere herein, although it may be noted here that receiver fiber optics R1 to R3 may serve to detect whether, for example, the angle of probe tip 1 with respect to the surface of the object being measured is at 90 degrees, or if the surface of the object being measured contains surface texture and/or spectral irregularities. In the case where probe tip 1 is perpendicular to the surface of the object being measured and the surface of the object being measured is a diffuse reflector, then the light intensity input into the perimeter fibers should be approximately equal. It also should be noted that spacing t serves to adjust the optimal height at which color measurements should be made (as more fully described below), and also ensures that the light reflected into receiver fiber optics R1 to R3 is at an angle for diffuse reflection, which helps to reduce problems associated with measurements of "hot spots" on the surface of the object being measured.

In one particular aspect of the present invention, area between the fiber optics on probe tip 1 may be wholly or partially filled with a non-reflective material and/or surface (which may be a black mat, contoured or other non-reflective surface) . Having such exposed area of probe tip 1 non-reflective helps to reduce undesired reflections, thereby helping to increase the accuracy and reliability of the present invention.

With reference to FIG. 3, a partial arrangement of light receiver fiber optics and sensors used in a preferred embodiment of the present invention will now be described. Fibers 7 represent light receiving fiber optics, which transmit light reflected from the object being measured to light sensors 8. In a preferred embodiment, sixteen sensors (two sets of eight) are utilized, although for ease of discussion only 8 are illustrated in FIG. 3 (in this preferred embodiment, the circuitry of FIG. 3 is duplicated, for example, in order to result in sixteen sensors). In other embodiments, other numbers of sensors are utilized in accordance with the present invention.

Light from fibers 7 is presented to sensors 8, which in a preferred embodiment pass through filters 22 to sensing elements 24. In this preferred embodiment, sensing elements 24 include light-to-frequency converters, manufactured by Texas Instruments and sold under the part number TSL230. Such converters constitute, in general, photo diode arrays that integrate the light received from fibers 7 and output an AC signal with a frequency proportional to the intensity (not frequency) of the incident light. Without being bound by theory, the basic principle of such devices is that, as the intensity increases, the integrator output voltage rises more quickly, and the shorter the integrator rise time, the greater the output frequency. The outputs of the TSL230 sensors are TTL or CMOS compatible digital signals, which may be coupled to various digital logic devices.

The outputs of sensing elements 24 are, in this embodiment, asynchronous signals of frequencies depending upon the light intensity presented to the particular sensing elements, which are presented to processor 26. In a preferred embodiment, processor 26 is a Microchip PIC16C55 microprocessor, which as described more fully herein implements an algorithm to measure the frequencies of the signals output by sensing elements 24.

As previously described, processor 26 measures the frequencies of the signals output from sensing elements 24. In a preferred embodiment, processor 26 implements a software timing loop, and at periodic intervals processor 26 reads the states of the outputs of sensing elements 24. An internal counter is incremented each pass through the software timing loop. The accuracy of the timing loop generally is determined by the crystal oscillator time base (not shown in FIG. 3) coupled to processor 26 (such oscillators typically are quite stable). After reading the outputs of sensing elements 24, processor 26 performs an exclusive OR ("XOR") operation with the last data read (in a preferred embodiment such data is read in byte length). If any bit has changed, the XOR operation will produce a 1, and, if no bits have changed, the XOR operation will produce a 0. If the result is non-zero, the input byte is saved along with the value of the internal counter (that is incremented each pass through the software timing loop). If the result is zero, the systems waits (e.g., executes no operation instructions) the same amount of time as if the data had to be saved, and the looping operation continues. The process continues until all eight inputs have changed at least twice, which enables measurement of a full 1/2 period of each input. Upon conclusion of the looping process, processor 26 analyzes the stored input bytes and internal counter states. There should be 2 to 16 saved inputs (for the 8 total sensors of FIG. 3) and counter states (if two or more inputs change at the same time, they are saved simultaneously). As will be understood by one of skill in the art, the stored values of the internal counter contains information determinative of the period of the signals received from sensing elements 24. By proper subtraction of internal counter values at times when an input bit has changed, the period may be calculated. Such periods calculated for each of the outputs of sensing elements is provided by processor 26 to microprocessor 10 (see, e.g., FIG. 1). From such calculated periods, a measure of the received light intensities may be calculated.

It should be noted that the sensing circuitry and methodology illustrated in FIG. 3 have been determined to provide a practical and expedient manner in which to measure the light intensities received by sensing elements 24. In other embodiments, other circuits and methodologies are employed (other exemplary sensing schemes are described elsewhere herein).

As discussed above with reference to FIG. 1, one of fibers 7 measures light source 11, which may be through a neutral density filter, which serves to reduce the intensity of the received light in order maintain the intensity roughly in the range of the other received light intensities. Three of fibers 7 also are from perimeter receiver fiber optics R1 to R3 (see, e.g., FIG. 2) and also may pass through neutral density filters. Such receiving fibers 7 serve to provide data from which angle/height information and/or surface characteristics may be determined.

The remaining twelve fibers (of the preferred embodiment's total of 16 fibers) of fibers 7 pass through color filters and are used to produce the color measurement. In a preferred embodiment, the color filters are Kodak Sharp Cutting Wratten Gelatin Filters, which pass light with wavelengths greater than the cut-off value of the filter (i.e., redish values), and absorb light with wavelengths less than the cut-off value of the filter (i.e., bluish values). "Sharp Cutting" filters are available in a wide variety of cut-off frequencies/wavelengths, and the cut-off values generally may be selected by proper selection of the desired cut-off filter. In a preferred embodiment, the filter cut-off values are chosen to cover the entire visible spectrum and, in general, to have band spacings of approximately the visible band range (or other desired range) divided by the number of receivers/filters. As an example, 700 nanometers minus 400 nanometers, divided by 11 bands (produced by twelve color receivers/sensors), is roughly 30 nanometer band spacing.

With an array of cut-off filters as described above, and without being bound by theory or the specific embodiments described herein, the received optical spectrum may be measured/calculated by subtracting the light intensities of "adjacent" color receivers. For example, band 1 (400 nm to 430 nm)=(intensity of receiver 12) minus (intensity of receiver 11), and so on for the remaining bands. Such an array of cut-off filters, and the intensity values that may result from filtering with such an array, are more fully described in connection with FIGS. 13A to 14B.

In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the specific characteristics of the light source, filters, sensors and fiber optics, etc., are normalized/calibrated by directing the probe towards, and measuring, a known color standard. Such normalization/calibration may be performed by placing the probe in a suitable fixture, with the probe directed from a predetermined position (i.e., height and angle) from the known color standard. Such measured normalization/calibration data may be stored, for example, in a look-up table, and used by microprocessor 10 to normalize or correct measured color or other data. Such procedures may be conducted at start-up, at regular periodic intervals, or by operator command, etc.

What should be noted from the above description is that the receiving and sensing fiber optics and circuitry illustrated in FIG. 3 provide a practical and expedient way to determine the intensity by color of the light reflected from the surface of the object being measured.

It also should be noted that such a system measures the spectral band of the reflected light from the object, and once measured such spectral data may be utilized in a variety of ways. For example, such spectral data may be displayed directly as intensity-wavelength band values. In addition, tristimulus type values may be readily computed (through, for example, conventional matrix math), as may any other desired color values. In one particular embodiment useful in dental applications (such as for dental prostheses), the color data is output in the form of a closest match or matches of dental shade guide value(s). In a preferred embodiment, various existing shade guides (such as the shade guides produced by Vita Zahnfabrik) are characterized and stored in a look-up table, and the color measurement data are used to select the closest shade guide value. In still other embodiments, the color measurement data are used (such as with look-up tables) to select materials for the composition of paint or ceramics such as for prosthetic teeth. There are many other uses of such spectral data measured in accordance with the present invention.

It is known that certain objects such as human teeth may fluoresce, and such characteristics also may be measured in accordance with the present invention. A light source with an ultraviolet component may be used to produce more accurate color data of such objects. In certain embodiments, a tungsten/halogen source (such as used in a preferred embodiment) may be combined with a UV light source (such as a mercury vapor, xenon or other fluorescent light source, etc.) to produce a light output capable of causing the object to fluoresce. Alternately, a separate UV light source, combined with a visible-light-blocking filter, may be used to illuminate the object. Such a UV light source may be combined with light from a red LED (for example) in order to provide a visual indication of when the UV light is on and also to serve as an aid for the directional positioning of the probe operating with such a light source. A second measurement may be taken using the UV light source in a manner analogous to that described earlier, with the band of the red LED or other supplemental light source being ignored. The second measurement may thus be used to produce an indication of the fluorescence of the tooth or other object being measured. With such a UV light source, a silica fiber optic (or other suitable material) typically would be required to transmit the light to the object (standard fiber optic materials such as glass and plastic do not propagate UV light in a desired manner, etc.).

As described earlier, the present invention utilizes a plurality of perimeter receiver fiber optics spaced apart from and around a central source fiber optic to measure color and determine information regarding the height and angle of the probe with respect to the surface of the object being measured, which may include surface characteristic information, etc. Without being bound by theory, a principle underlying this aspect of the present invention will now be described with reference to FIGS. 4A to 4C.

FIG. 4A illustrates a typical step index fiber optic consisting of a core and a cladding. For this discussion, it is assumed that the core has an index of refraction of no and the cladding has an index of refraction of n.sub.1. Although the following discussion is directed to "step index" fibers, it will be appreciated by those of skill in the art that such discussion generally is applicable for gradient index fibers as well.

In order to propagate light without loss, the light must be incident within the core of the fiber optic at an angle greater than the critical angle, which may be represented as Sin.sup.-1 {n.sub.1 /n.sub.0 }, where n.sub.0 is the index of refraction of the core and n.sub.1 is the index of refraction of the cladding. Thus, all light must enter the fiber at an acceptance angle equal to or less than phi, with phi=2.times.Sin.sup.-1 {.sqroot.(n.sub.0.sup.2 -n.sub.1.sup.2)}, or it will not be propagated in a desired manner.

For light entering a fiber optic, it must enter within the acceptance angle phi. Similarly, when the light exits a fiber optic, it will exit the fiber optic within a cone of angle phi as illustrated in FIG. 4A. The value .sqroot.(n.sub.0.sup.2 -n.sub.1.sup.2) is referred to as the aperture of the fiber optic. For example, a typical fiber optic may have an aperture of 0.5, and an acceptance angle of 60.degree..

Consider using a fiber optic as a light source. One end is illuminated by a light source (such as light source 11 of FIG. 1), and the other is held near a surface. The fiber optic will emit a cone of light as illustrated in FIG. 4A. If the fiber optic is held perpendicular to a surface it will create a circular light pattern on the surface. As the fiber optic is raised, the radius r of the circle will increase. As the fiber optic is lowered, the radius of the light pattern will decrease. Thus, the intensity of the light (light energy per unit area) in the illuminated circular area will increase as the fiber optic is lowered and will decrease as the fiber optic is raised.

The same principle generally is true for a fiber optic being utilized as a receiver. Consider mounting a light sensor on one end of a fiber optic and holding the other end near an illuminated surface. The fiber optic can only propagate light without loss when the light entering the fiber optic is incident on the end of the fiber optic near the surface if the light enters the fiber optic within its acceptance angle phi. A fiber optic utilized as a light receiver near a surface will only accept and propagate light from the circular area of radius r on the surface. As the fiber optic is raised from the surface, the area increases. As the fiber optic is lowered to the surface, the area decreases.

Consider two fiber optics parallel to each other as illustrated in FIG. 4B. For simplicity of discussion, the two fiber optics illustrated are identical in size and aperture. The following discussion, however, generally would be applicable for fiber optics that differ in size and aperture. One fiber optic is a source fiber optic, the other fiber optic is a receiver fiber optic. As the two fiber optics are held perpendicular to a surface, the source fiber optic emits a cone of light that illuminates a circular area of radius r. The receiver fiber optic can only accept light that is within its acceptance angle phi, or only light that is received within a cone of angle phi. If the only light available is that emitted by the source fiber optic, then the only light that can be accepted by the receiver fiber optic is the light that strikes the surface at the intersection of the two circles as illustrated in FIG. 4C. As the two fiber optics are lifted from the surface, the proportion of the intersection of the two circular areas relative to the circular area of the source fiber optic increases. As they near the surface, the proportion of the intersection of the two circular areas to the circular area of the source fiber optic decreases. If the fiber optics are held too close to the surface, the circular areas will no longer intersect and no light emitted from the source fiber optic will be received by the receiver fiber optic.

As discussed earlier, the intensity of the light in the circular area illuminated by the source fiber increases as the fiber is lowered to the surface. The intersection of the two cones, however, decreases as the fiber optic pair is lowered. Thus, as the fiber optic pair is lowered to a surface, the total intensity of light received by the receiver fiber optic increases to a maximal value, and then decreases sharply as the fiber optic pair is lowered still further to the surface. Eventually, the intensity will decrease essentially to zero (assuming the object being measured is not translucent, as described more fully herein), and will remain essentially zero until the fiber optic pair is in contact with the surface. Thus, as a source-receiver pair of fiber optics as described above are positioned near a surface and as their height is varied, the intensity of light received by the receiver fiber optic reaches a maximal value at a critical height h.sub.c.

Again without being bound by theory, an interesting property of the critical height h.sub.c has been observed. The critical height h.sub.c is a function primarily of the geometry of fixed parameters, such as fiber apertures, fiber diameters and fiber spacing. Since the receiver fiber optic in the illustrated arrangement is only detecting a maximum value and not attempting to quantify the value, its maximum is independent of the surface characteristics. It is only necessary that the surface reflect sufficient light from the intersecting area of the source and receiver fiber optics to be within the detection range of the receiver fiber optic light sensor. Thus, red or green or blue or any color surface will all exhibit a maximum at the same critical height h.sub.c. Similarly, smooth reflecting surfaces and rough surfaces also will have varying intensity values at the maximal value, but generally speaking all such surfaces will exhibit a maximum at the same critical height h.sub.c. The actual value of the light intensity will be a function of the color of the surface and of the surface characteristics, but the height where the maximum intensity value occurs in general will not.

Although the above discussion has focused on two fiber optics perpendicular to a surface, similar analysis is applicable for fiber optic pairs at other angles. When a fiber optic is not perpendicular to a surface, it generally illuminates an elliptical area. Similarly, the acceptance area of a receiver fiber optic generally becomes elliptical. As the fiber optic pair is moved closer to the surface, the receiver fiber optic also will detect a maximal value at a critical height independent of the surface color or characteristics. The maximal intensity value measured when the fiber optic pair is not perpendicular to the surface, however, will be less than the maximal intensity value measured when the fiber optic pair is perpendicular to the surface.

Referring now to FIGS. 5A and 5B, the intensity of light received as a fiber optic source-receiver pair is moved to and from a surface will now be described. FIG. 5A illustrates the intensity of the received light as a function of time. Corresponding FIG. 5B illustrates the height of the fiber optic pair from the surface of the object being measured. FIGS. 5A and 5B illustrate (for ease of discussion) a relatively uniform rate of motion of the fiber optic pair to and from the surface of the object being measured (although similar illustrations/analysis would be applicable for non-uniform rates as well).

FIG. 5A illustrates the intensity of received light as the fiber optic pair is moved to and then from a surface. While FIG. 5A illustrates the intensity relationship for a single receiver fiber optic, similar intensity relationships would be expected to be observed for other receiver fiber optics, such as, for example, the multiple receiver fiber optics of FIGS. 1 and 2. In general with the preferred embodiment described above, all fifteen fiber optic receivers (of fibers 7) will exhibit curves similar to that illustrated in FIG. 5A.

FIG. 5A illustrates five regions. In region 1, the probe is moved towards the surface of the object being measured, which causes the received light intensity to increase. In region 2, the probe is moved past the critical height, and the received light intensity peaks and then falls off sharply. In region 3, the probe essentially is in contact with the surface of the object being measured. As illustrated, the received intensity in region 3 will vary depending upon the translucence of the object being measured. If the object is opaque, the received light intensity will be very low, or almost zero (perhaps out of range of the sensing circuitry). If the object is translucent, however, the light intensity will be quite high, but in general should be less than the peak value. In region 4, the probe is lifted and the light intensity rises sharply to a maximum value. In region 5, the probe is lifted further away from the object, and the light intensity decreases again.

As illustrated, two peak intensity values (discussed as P1 and P2 below) should be detected as the fiber optic pair moves to and from the object at the critical height h.sub.c. If peaks P1 and P2 produced by a receive fiber optic are the same value, this generally is an indication that the probe has been moved to and from the surface of the object to be measured in a consistent manner. If peaks P1 and P2 are of different values, then these may be an indication that the probe was not moved to and from the surface of the object in a desired manner, or that the surface is curved or textured, as described more fully herein. In such a case, the data may be considered suspect and rejected. In addition, peaks P1 and P2 for each of the perimeter fiber optics (see, e.g., FIG. 2) should occur at the same critical height (assuming the geometric attributes of the perimeter fiber optics, such as aperture, diameter and spacing from the source fiber optic, etc.). Thus, the perimeter fiber optics of a probe moved in a consistent, perpendicular manner to and from the surface of the object being measured should have peaks P1 and P2 that occur at the same critical height. Monitoring receiver fibers from the perimeter receiver fiber optics and looking for simultaneous (or near simultaneous, e.g., within a predetermined range) peaks P1 and P2 provides a mechanism for determining if the probe is held at a desired perpendicular angle with respect to the object being measured.

In addition, the relative intensity level in region 3 serves as an indication of the level of translucency of the object being measured. Again, such principles generally are applicable to the totality of receiver fiber optics in the probe (see, e.g., fibers 7 of FIGS. 1 and 3). Based on such principles, measurement techniques in accordance with the present invention will now be described.

FIG. 6 is a flow chart illustrating a measuring technique in accordance with the present invention. Step 49 indicates the start or beginning of a color measurement. During step 49, any equipment initialization, diagnostic or setup procedures may be performed. Audio or visual information or other indicia may be given to the operator to inform the operator that the system is available and ready to take a measurement. Initiation of the color measurement commences by the operator moving the probe towards the object to be measured, and may be accompanied by, for example, activation of switch 17 (see FIG. 1).

In step 50, the system on a continuing basis monitors the intensity levels for the receiver fiber optics (see, e.g., fibers 7 of FIG. 1). If the intensity is rising, step 50 is repeated until a peak is detected. If a peak is detected, the process proceeds to step 52. In step 52, measured peak intensity P1, and the time at which such peak occurred, are stored in memory (such as in memory included as a part of microprocessor 10), and the process proceeds to step 54. In step 54, the system continues to monitor the intensity levels of the receiver fiber optics. If the intensity is falling, step 54 is repeated. If a "valley" or plateau is detected (i.e., the intensity is no longer falling, which generally indicates contact or near contact with the object), then the process proceeds to step 56. In step 56, the measured surface intensity (IS) is stored in memory, and the process proceeds to step 58. In step 58, the system continues to monitor the intensity levels of the receiver fibers. If the intensity is rising, step 58 is repeated until a peak is detected. If a peak is detected, the process proceeds to step 60. In step 60, measured peak intensity P2, and the time at which such peak occurred, are stored in memory, and the process proceeds to step 62. In step 62, the system continues to monitor the intensity levels of the receiver fiber optics. Once the received intensity levels begin to fall from peak P2, the system perceives that region 5 has been entered (see, e.g., FIG. 5A), and the process proceeds to step 64.

In step 64, the system, under control of microprocessor 10, may analyze the collected data taken by the sensing circuitry for the various receiver fiber optics. In step 64, peaks P1 and P2 of one or more of the various fiber optics may be compared. If any of peaks P1 and P2 for any of the various receiver fiber optics have unequal peak values, then the color data may be rejected, and the entire color measuring process repeated. Again, unequal values of peaks P1 and P2 may be indicative, for example, that the probe was moved in a non-perpendicular or otherwise unstable manner (i.e., angular or lateral movement), and, for example, peak P1 may be representative of a first point on the object, while peak P2 may be representative of a second point on the object. As the data is suspect, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, color data taken in such circumstances are rejected in step 64.

If the data are not rejected in step 64, the process proceeds to step 66. In step 66, the system analyzes the data taken from the neutral-density-filtered receivers from each of the perimeter fiber optics (e.g., R1 to R3 of FIG. 2). If the peaks of the perimeter fiber optics did not occur at or about the same point in time, this may be indicative, for example, that the probe was not held perpendicular to the surface of the object being measured. As non-perpendicular alignment of the probe with the surface of the object being measured may cause suspect results, in a preferred embodiment of the present invention, color data taken in such circumstances are rejected in step 66. In one preferred embodiment, detection of simultaneous or near simultaneous peaking (peaking within a predetermined range of time) serves as an acceptance criterion for the data, as perpendicular alignment generally is indicated by simultaneous or near simultaneous peaking of the perimeter fiber optics. In other embodiments, step 66 includes an analysis of peak values P1 and P2 of the perimeter fiber optics. In such embodiments, the system seeks to determine if the peak values of the perimeter fiber optics (perhaps normalized with any initial calibration data) are equal within a defined range. If the peak values of the perimeter fiber optics are within the defined range, the data may be accepted, and if not, the data may be rejected. In still other embodiments, a combination of simultaneous peaking and equal value detection are used as acceptance/rejection criteria for the color data, and/or the operator may have the ability (such as through key pad switches 12) to control one or more of the acceptance criteria ranges. With such capability, the sensitivity of the system may be controllably altered by the operator depending upon the particular application and operative environment, etc.

If the data are not rejected in step 66, the process proceeds to step 68. In step 68, the color data may be processed in a desired manner to produce output color measurement data. For example, such data may be normalized in some manner, or adjusted based on temperature compensation or other data detected by the system. The data also may be converted to different display or other formats, depending on the intended use of the color data. In addition, the data indicative of the translucence of the object also may be quantified and/or displayed in step 68. After step 68, the process may proceed to starting step 49, or the process may be terminated, etc.

In accordance with the process illustrated in FIG. 6, three light intensity values (P1, P2 and IS) are stored per receiver fiber optic to make color and translucency measurements. If stored peak values P1 and P2 are not equal (for some or all of the receivers), this is an indication that the probe was not held steady over one area, and the data may be rejected (in other embodiments, the data may not be rejected, although the resulting data may be used to produce an average of the measured color data). In addition, peak values P1 and P2 for the three neutral density perimeter fiber optics should be equal or approximately equal; if this is not the case, then this is an indication that the probe was not held perpendicular or a curved surface is being measured. In other embodiments, the system attempts to compensate for curved surfaces and/or non-perpendicular angles. In any event, if the system cannot make a color measurement, or if the data is rejected because peak values P1 and P2 are unequal to an unacceptable degree, then the operator is notified so that another measurement or other action may be taken (such as adjust the sensitivity).

With a system constructed and operating as described above, color measurements may be taken of an object, with accepted color data having height and angular dependencies removed. Data not taken at the critical height, or data not taken with the probe perpendicular to the surface of the object being measured, etc., are rejected in a preferred embodiment of the present invention. In other embodiments, data received from the perimeter fiber optics may be used to calculate the angle of the probe with respect to the surface of the object being measured, and in such embodiments non-perpendicular or curved surface color data may be compensated instead of rejected. It also should be noted that peak values P1 and P2 for the neutral density perimeter fiber optics provide a measure of the luminance (gray value) of the surface of the object being measured, and also may serve to quantify the color value.

The translucency of the object being measured may be quantified as a ratio or percentage, such as, for example, (IS/P1).times.100%. In other embodiments, other methods of quantifying translucency data provided in accordance with the present invention are utilized.

In another particular aspect of the present invention, data generated in accordance with the present invention may be used to implement an automated material mixing/generation machine. Certain objects/materials, such as dental prostheses, are made from porcelain or other powders/materials that may be combined in the correct ratios to form the desired color of the object/prosthesis. Certain powders often contain pigments that generally obey Beer's law and/or act in accordance with Kubelka-Munk equations when mixed in a recipe. Color and other data taken from a measurement in accordance with the present invention may be used to determine or predict desired quantities of pigment or other materials for the recipe. Porcelain powders and other materials are available in different colors, opacities, etc. Certain objects, such as dental prostheses, may be layered to simulate the degree of translucency of the desired object (such as to simulate a human tooth). Data generated in accordance with the present invention also may be used to determine the thickness and position of the porcelain or other material layers to more closely produce the desired color, translucency, surface characteristics, etc. In addition, based on fluorescence data for the desired object, the material recipe may be adjusted to include a desired quantity of fluorescing-type material. In yet other embodiments, surface characteristics (such as texture) information (as more fully described herein) may be used to add a texturing material to the recipe, all of which may be carried out in accordance with the present invention.

For more information regarding such pigment-material recipe type technology, reference may be made to: "The Measurement of Appearance," Second Edition, edited by Hunter and Harold, copyright 1987; "Principles of Color Technology," by Billmeyer and Saltzman, copyright 1981; and "Pigment Handbook," edited by Lewis, copyright 1988. All of the foregoing are believed to have been published by John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York, N.Y., and all of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

In certain operative environments, such as dental applications, contamination of the probe is of concern. In certain embodiments of the present invention, implements to reduce such contamination are provided.

FIGS. 7A and 7B illustrate a protective cap that may be used to fit over the end of probe tip 1. Such a protective cap consists of body 80, the end of which is covered by optical window 82, which in a preferred embodiment consists of a structure having a thin sapphire window. In a preferred embodiment, body 80 consists of stainless steel. Body 80 fits over the end of probe tip 1 and may be held into place by, for example, indentations formed in body 80, which fit with ribs 84 (which may be a spring clip or other retainer) formed on probe tip 1. In other embodiments, other methods of affixing such a protective cap to probe tip 1 are utilized. The protective cap may be removed from probe tip 1 and sterilized in a typical autoclave, hot steam or other sterilizing system.

The thickness of the sapphire window should be less than the critical height of the probe in order to preserve the ability to detect peaking in accordance with the present invention. It also is believed that sapphire windows may be manufactured in a reproducible manner, and thus any light attenuation from one cap to another may be reproducible. In addition, any distortion of the color measurements produced by the sapphire window may be calibrated out by microprocessor 10.

Similarly, in other embodiments body 80 has a cap with a hole in the center (as opposed to a sapphire window), with the hole positioned over the fiber optic source/receivers. The cap with the hole serves to prevent the probe from coming into contact with the surface, thereby reducing the risk of contamination.

FIGS. 8A and 8B illustrate another embodiment of a removable probe tip that may be used to reduce contamination in accordance with the present invention. As illustrated in FIG. 8A, probe tip 88 is removable, and includes four (or a different number, depending upon the application) fiber optic connectors 90, which are positioned within optical guard 92 coupled to connector 94. Optical guard 92 serves to prevent "cross talk" between adjacent fiber optics. As illustrated in FIG. 8B, in this embodiment removable tip 88 is secured in probe tip housing 93 by way of spring clip 96 (other removable retaining implements are utilized in other embodiments). Probe tip housing 93 may be secured to base connector 95 by a screw or other conventional fitting. It should be noted that, with this embodiment, different size tips may be provided for different applications, and that an initial step of the process may be to install the properly-sized (or fitted tip) for the particular application. Removable tip 88 also may be sterilized in a typical autoclave, hot steam or other sterilizing system. In addition, the entire probe tip assembly is constructed so that it may be readily disassembled for cleaning or repair.

With reference to FIG. 9, a tristimulus embodiment of the present invention will now be described. In general, the overall system depicted in FIG. 1 and discussed in detail elsewhere herein may be used with this embodiment. FIG. 9 illustrates a cross section of the probe tip fiber optics used in this embodiment.

Probe tip 100 includes central source fiber optic 106, surrounded by (and spaced apart from) three perimeter receiver fiber optics 104 and three color receiver fiber optics 102. Three perimeter receiver fiber optics 104 are optically coupled to neutral density filters and serve as height/angle sensors in a manner analogous to the embodiment describe above. Three color receiver fiber optics are optically coupled to suitable tristimulus filters, such as red, green and blue filters. With this embodiment, a measurement may be made of tristimulus color values of the object, and the process described with reference to FIG. 6 generally is applicable to this embodiment. In particular, perimeter fiber optics 104 may be used to detect simultaneous peaking or otherwise whether the probe is perpendicular to the object being measured. In addition, taking color measurement data at the critical height also may be used with this embodiment.

FIG. 10A illustrates an embodiment of the present invention, similar to the embodiment discussed with reference to FIG. 9. Probe tip 100 includes central source fiber optic 106, surrounded by (and spaced apart from) three perimeter receiver fiber optics 104 and a plurality of color receiver fiber optics 102. The number of color receiver fiber optics 102, and the filters associated with such receiver fiber optics 102, may be chosen based upon the particular application. As with the embodiment of FIG. 9, the process described with reference to FIG. 6 generally is applicable to this embodiment.

FIG. 10B illustrates an embodiment of the present invention in which there are a plurality of receiver fiber optics that surround central source fiber optic 240. The receiver fiber optics are arranged in rings surrounding the central source fiber optic. FIG. 10B illustrates three rings of receiver fiber optics (consisting of fiber optics 242, 244 and 246, respectively), in which there are six receiver fiber optics per ring. The rings may be arranged in successive larger circles as illustrated to cover the entire area of the end of the probe, with the distance from each receiver fiber optic within a given ring to the central fiber optic being equal (or approximately so). Central fiber optic 240 is utilized as the light source fiber optic and is connected to the light source in a manner similar to light source fiber optic 5 illustrated in FIG. 1.

The plurality of receiver fiber optics are each coupled to two or more fiber optics in a manner similar to the arrangement illustrated in FIG. 1 for splicing connector 4. One fiber optic from such a splicing connector for each receiver fiber optic passes through a neutral density filter and then to light sensor circuitry similar to the light sensor circuitry illustrated in FIG. 3. A second fiber optic from the splicing connector per receiver fiber optic passes through a Sharp Cutting Wrattan Gelatin Filter and then to light sensor circuitry as discussed elsewhere herein. Thus, each of the receiver fiber optics in the probe tip includes both color measuring elements and neutral light measuring or "perimeter" elements.

FIG. 10D illustrates the geometry of probe 260 (such as described above) illuminating an area on flat diffuse surface 272. Probe 260 creates light pattern 262 that is reflected diffusely from surface 272 in uniform hemispherical pattern 270. With such a reflection pattern, the reflected light that is incident upon the receiving elements in the probe will be equal (or nearly equal) for all elements if the probe is perpendicular to the surface as described above herein.

FIG. 10C illustrates a probe illuminating rough surface 268 or a surface that reflects light spectrally. Spectral reflected light will exhibit hot spots or regions 266 where the reflected light intensity is considerably greater than it is on other areas 264. The reflected light pattern will be uneven when compared to a smooth surface as illustrate in FIG. 10D.

Since a probe as illustrated in FIG. 10B has a plurality of receiver fiber optics arranged over a large surface area, the probe may be utilized to determine the surface texture of the surface as well as being able to measure the color and translucency of the surface as described earlier herein. If the light intensity received by the receiver fiber optics is equal for all fiber optics within a given ring of receiver fiber optics, then generally the surface is diffuse and smooth. If, however, the light intensity of receiver fibers in a ring varies with respect to each other, then generally the surface is rough or spectral. By comparing the light intensities measured within receiver fiber optics in a given ring and from ring to ring, the texture and other characteristics of the surface may be quantified.

FIG. 11 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention in which linear optical sensors and a color gradient filter are utilized instead of light sensors 8 (and filters 22, etc.). Receiver fiber optics 7, which may be optically coupled to probe tip 1 as with the embodiment of FIG. 1, are optically coupled to linear optical sensor 112 through color gradient filter 110. In this embodiment, color gradient filter 110 may consist of series of narrow strips of cut-off type filters on a transparent or open substrate, which are constructed so as to positionally correspond to the sensor areas of linear optical sensor 1 12. An example of a commercially available linear optical sensor 1 12 is Texas Instruments part number TSL213, which has 61 photo diodes in a linear array. Light receiver fiber optics 7 are arranged correspondingly in a line over linear optical sensor 112. The number of receiver fiber optics may be chosen for the particular application, so long as enough are included to more or less evenly cover the full length of color gradient filter 110. With this embodiment, the light is received and output from receiver fiber optics 7, and the light received by linear optical sensor 112 is integrated for a short period of time (determined by the light intensity, filter characteristics and desired accuracy). The output of linear array sensor 112 is digitized by ADC 114 and output to microprocessor 116 (which may the same processor as microprocessor 10 or another processor).

In general, with the embodiment of FIG. 11, perimeter receiver fiber optics may be used as with the embodiment of FIG. 1, and in general the process described with reference to FIG. 6 is applicable to this embodiment.

FIG. 12 illustrates an embodiment of the present invention in which a matrix optical sensor and a color filter grid are utilized instead of light sensors 8 (and filters 22, etc.). Receiver fiber optics 7, which may be optically coupled to probe tip 1 as with the embodiment of FIG. 1, are optically coupled to matrix optical sensor 122 through filter grid 120. Filter grid 120 is a filter array consisting of a number of small colored spot filters that pass narrow bands of visible light. Light from receiver fiber optics 7 pass through corresponding filter spots to corresponding points on matrix optical sensor 122. In this embodiment, matrix optical sensor 122 may be a monochrome optical sensor array, such as CCD-type or other type of light sensor element such as may be used in a video camera. The output of matrix optical sensor 122 is digitized by ADC 124 and output to microprocessor 126 (which may the same processor as microprocessor 10 or another processor). Under control of microprocessor 126, matrix optical sensor 126 collects color data from receiver fiber optics 7 through color filter grid 120.

In general, with the embodiment of FIG. 12, perimeter receiver fiber optics may be used as with the embodiment of FIG. 1, and in general the process described with reference to FIG. 6 also is applicable to this embodiment.

As will be clear from the foregoing description, with the present invention a variety of types of spectral color photometers (or tristimulus-type colorimeters) may be constructed, with perimeter receiver fiber optics used to collect color data essentially free from height and angular deviations. In addition, in certain embodiments, the present invention enables color measurements to be taken at a critical height from the surface of the object being measured, and thus color data may be taken without physical contact with the object being measured (in such embodiments, the color data is taken only by passing the probe through region 1 and into region 2, but without necessarily going into region 3 of FIGS. 5A and 5B). Such embodiments may be utilized if contact with the surface is undesirable in a particular application. In the embodiments described earlier, however, physical contact (or near physical contact) of the probe with the object may allow all five regions of FIGS. 5A and 5B to be utilized, thereby enabling color measurements to be taken such that translucency information also may be obtained. Both types of embodiments generally are within the scope of the invention described herein.

Additional description will now be provided with respect to cut-off filters of the type described in connection with the preferred embodiment(s) of FIGS. 1 and 3 (such as filters 22 of FIG. 3). FIG. 13A illustrates the properties of a single Kodak Sharp Cutting Wratten Gelatin Filter discussed in connection with FIG. 3. Such a cut-off filter passes light below a cut-off frequency (i.e., above a cut-off wavelength). Such filters may be manufactured to have a wide range of cut-off frequencies/wavelengths. FIG. 13B illustrates a number of such filters, twelve in a preferred embodiment, with cut-off frequencies/wavelengths chosen so that essentially the entire visible band is covered by the collection of cut-off filters.

FIGS. 14A and 14B illustrate exemplary intensity measurements using a cut-off filter arrangement such as illustrated in FIG. 13B, first in the case of a white surface being measured (FIG. 14A), and also in the case of a blue surface being measured (FIG. 14B). As illustrated in FIG. 14A, in the case of a white surface, the neutrally filtered perimeter fiber optics, which are used to detect height and angle, etc., generally will produce the highest intensity (although this depends at least in part upon the characteristics of the neutral density filters). As a result of the stepped cut-off filtering provided by filters having the characteristics illustrated in FIG. 13B, the remaining intensities will gradually decrease in value as illustrated in FIG. 14A. In the case of a blue surface, the intensities will decrease in value generally as illustrated in FIG. 14B. Regardless of the surface, however, the intensities out of the filters will always decrease in value as illustrated, with the greatest intensity value being the output of the filter having the lowest wavelength cut-off value (i.e., passes all visible light up to blue), and the lowest intensity value being the output of the filter having the highest wavelength cut-off (i.e., passes only red visible light). As will be understood from the foregoing description, any color data detected that does not fit the decreasing intensity profiles of FIGS. 14A and 14B may be detected as an abnormality, and in certain embodiments detection of such a condition results in data rejection, generation of an error message or initiation of a diagnostic routine, etc.

Reference should be made to the FIGS. 1 and 3 and the related description for a detailed discussion of how such a cut-off filter arrangement may be utilized in accordance with the present invention.

FIG. 15 is a flow chart illustrating audio tones that may be used in certain preferred embodiments of the present invention. It has been discovered that audio tones (such as tones, beeps, voice or the like such as will be described) present a particularly useful and instructive means to guide an operator in the proper use of a color measuring system of the type described herein.

The operator may initiate a color measurement by activation of a switch (such as switch 17 of FIG. 1) at step 150. Thereafter, if the system is ready (set-up, initialized, calibrated, etc.), a lower-the-probe tone is emitted (such as through speaker 16 of FIG. 1) at step 152. The system attempts to detect peak intensity P1 at step 154. If a peak is detected, at step 156 a determination is made whether the measured peak P1 meets the applicable criteria (such as discussed above in connection with FIGS. 5A, 5B and 6). If the measured peak P1 is accepted, a first peak acceptance tone is generated at step 160. If the measured peak P1 is not accepted, an unsuccessful tone is generated at step 158, and the system may await the operator to initiate a further color measurement. Assuming that the first peak was accepted, the system attempts to detect peak intensity P2 at step 162. If a second peak is detected, at step 164 a determination is made whether the measured peak P2 meets the applicable criteria. If the measured peak P2 is accepted the process proceeds to color calculation step 166 (in other embodiments, a second peak acceptance tone also is generated at step 166). If the measured peak P2 is not accepted, an unsuccessful tone is generated at step 158, and the system may await the operator to initiate a further color measurement. Assuming that the second peak was accepted, a color calculation is made at step 166 (such as, for example, microprocessor 10 of FIG. 1 processing the data output from light sensors 8, etc.). At step 168, a determination is made whether the color calculation meets the applicable criteria. If the color calculation is accepted, a successful tone is generated at step 170. If the color calculation is not accepted, an unsuccessful tone is generated at step 158, and the system may await the operator to initiate a further color measurement.

With unique audio tones presented to an operator in accordance with the particular operating state of the system, the operator's use of the system may be greatly facilitated. Such audio information also tends to increase operator satisfaction and skill level, as, for example, acceptance tones provide positive and encouraging feedback when the system is operated in a desired manner.

As will be apparent to those skilled in the art, certain refinements may be made in accordance with the present invention. For example, a central light source fiber optic is utilized in certain preferred embodiments, but other light source arrangements (such as a plurality of light source fibers, etc.). In addition, lookup tables are utilized for various aspects of the present invention, but polynomial type calculations could similarly be employed. Thus, although various preferred embodiments of the present invention have been disclosed for illustrative purposes, those skilled in the art will appreciate that various modifications, additions and/or substitutions are possible without departing from the scope and spirit of the present invention as disclosed in the claims.

Reference is also made to copending application Ser. No. 08/582,054, filed Jan. 2, 1996, for "Apparatus and Method for Measuring the Color of Teeth," by the inventors hereof, which is hereby incorporated by reference.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. An apparatus for measuring optical characteristics of an object with a probe as the probe is moved with respect to the object, comprising: a probe having a central light source and a plurality of light receivers spaced apart from the central light source, wherein light from the central light source is reflected from the object into the plurality of light receivers; first and second sensors coupled to receive light from the light receivers, wherein at least some of the second sensors measure the value of the intensity of light in predetermined color bands; a processor coupled to receive data from the first and second light sensors; wherein the processor monitors intensity values determined by the first sensors and stores data from the second sensors based on the intensity determinations made by the first sensors, wherein the stored data is indicative of optical characteristics of the object.

2. An apparatus for determining optical characteristics of an object, comprising: a probe movable to be in proximity to the object, wherein the probe provides light to the surface of the object from one or more light sources, and receives light reflected from the object through a plurality of light receivers; first sensors for determining the intensity of reflected light received by more than one of the light receivers; and second sensors for measuring the optical characteristics of the object based on light received by one or more of the light receivers in response to the intensity determinations made by the first sensors, wherein the measurement produces data indicative of the optical characteristics of the object.

3. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the optical characteristics of the object comprise color characteristics.

4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the optical characteristics of the object comprise translucence characteristics.

5. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the optical characteristics of the object comprise fluorescence characteristics.

6. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the optical characteristics of the object comprise surface texture characteristics.

7. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the probe comprises one or more light source fiber optics coupled to a light source and a plurality of light receiver fiber optics coupled to the first and second sensors.

8. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the plurality of light receivers are each spaced a first distance from a first light source on the probe, and wherein the plurality of light receivers are spaced apart from adjacent light receivers on the probe by a second distance.

9. The apparatus of claim 8, wherein the probe comprises three light receivers spaced around the first light source, wherein the light receivers are spaced apart from adjacent light receivers with an angular spacing of about 120 degrees.

10. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the first sensors comprise light measuring sensors measuring the same bandwidth, and wherein the second sensors comprise a color spectrophotometer.

11. The apparatus of claim 10, wherein the second sensors comprise a plurality of filters optically coupled to a plurality of light measuring devices.

12. The apparatus of claim 11, wherein the filters comprise filters that pass light of predetermined frequencies of received light.

13. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the first sensors comprise light measuring sensors measuring the same bandwidth, and wherein the second sensors comprise a color tristimulus measuring device.

14. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein a processor processes the measured data and displays a representation corresponding to the measured data on a display device.

15. The apparatus of claim 14, wherein the processor is coupled to a computer, wherein the computer processes data received from the processor.

16. The apparatus of claim 14, further comprising an audio unit coupled to the processor for generating audio information, wherein the audio information is indicative of the status of the optical characteristics determination.

17. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the probe has a removable cover element.

18. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the removable cover element comprises a shield.

19. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the removable cover element is positioned on the probe prior to measuring the object.

20. The apparatus of claim 17, wherein the removable cover element is sterilized prior to being positioned on the probe.

21. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the probe has a removable tip.

22. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the removable tip is positioned on the probe prior to measuring the object.

23. The apparatus of claim 21, wherein the removable tip is sterilized prior to being positioned on the probe.

24. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein a processor monitors the intensity values determined by the first sensors by: determining a first peak intensity value with one or more of the first sensors as the probe is moved towards the object; and determining a second peak intensity value with one or more of the first sensors as the probe is moved away from the object.

25. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the optical characteristics of the object are determined with the second sensors when the first and second peak intensity values are substantially equal.

26. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the processor: compares the first and second peak intensity values; accepts the data measured by the second sensors if the compared first and second peak intensity values are within a predetermined range; and rejects the data measured by the second sensors if the compared first and second peak intensity values are outside the predetermined range.

27. The apparatus of claim 26, further comprising an audio unit coupled to the processor, wherein the audio unit: generates first audio information if the measured data is accepted; and generates second audio information if the measured data is rejected.

28. The apparatus of claim 26, wherein the predetermined range may be modified by a user.

29. The apparatus of claim 24, wherein the processor determines an intermediate intensity value with the first sensors at a time intermediate between the time when the first and second peak intensity values are determined, wherein the intermediate intensity value corresponds to the translucence of the object.

30. The apparatus of claim 29, wherein the intermediate intensity value is determined when the probe is in contact or near contact with the object.

31. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the optical characteristics of the object are measured without the probe contacting the object.

32. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the object is measured at a time when a plurality of the first sensors measure peak intensity values as the probe moves with respect to the object.

33. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the object is measured when the probe is at a predetermined distance from the object.

34. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein the object is measured when the probe is at a predetermined distance and angle with respect to the object.

35. The apparatus of claim 14, further comprising a material mixing unit coupled to receive data from the processor, wherein the material mixing unit prepares constituent materials for a second object based on the stored data indicative of the optical characteristics of the object, wherein the constituent materials of the second object are selected based on the stored data.

36. An apparatus for measuring the color of an object with a probe as the probe is moved with respect to the object, comprising: a probe having a central light source and a plurality of light receivers spaced apart from the central light source, wherein light from the central light source reflects into the plurality of light receivers; sensors coupled to receive light from the light receivers, wherein at least some of sensors measure the value of the intensity of light in predetermined color bands; a processor coupled to receive data from the light sensors; wherein the processor monitors the intensity values for one or more of the light receivers and stores data from the sensors at time when the one or more light receivers have a peak intensity value.

Patent Citations (40)

Patent	Date	Inventor
US3327584	1967-06-01	Kissinger
US3436157	1969-04-01	Adler et al.
US3507042	1970-04-01	Hana
US3555262	1971-01-01	Shimada
US3743429	1973-07-01	Kawai
US3748741	1973-07-01	Yerkes, Jr.
US3778541	1973-12-01	Bowker
US3986777	1976-10-01	Roll
US4115922	1978-09-01	Alderman
US4125329	1978-11-01	French et al.
US4184175	1980-01-01	Mullane, Jr.
US4207678	1980-06-01	Jeannette
US4241738	1980-12-01	Lubbers
US4278353	1981-07-01	Ostermayer et al.
US4290433	1981-09-01	Alfano
US4324546	1982-04-01	Heitlinger et al.
US4382784	1983-05-01	Freller
US4411626	1983-10-01	Becker et al.
US4505589	1985-03-01	Ott et al.
US4568191	1986-02-01	Barry
US4616933	1986-10-01	Leveque et al.
US4654794	1987-03-01	O'Brien
US4666309	1987-05-01	Barry et al.
US4823169	1989-04-01	Ogura
US4836674	1989-06-01	Lequime et al.
US4917500	1990-04-01	Lugos
US4988206	1991-01-01	Melleney et al.
US5040940	1991-08-01	Kolodziej et al.
US5229841	1993-07-01	Taranowski et al.
US5383020	1995-01-01	Vieillefosse
US5386292	1995-01-01	Massen et al.
US5392110	1995-02-01	Yojima et al.
US5410410	1995-04-01	Yamazaki et al.
US5428450	1995-06-01	Vieillefosse et al.
US5453838	1995-09-01	Danielian et al.
US5457525	1995-10-01	Ohtsuka et al.
US5461476	1995-10-01	Fournier
US5467289	1995-11-01	Abe et al.
US5469249	1995-11-01	Magyar, Jr. et al.
US5477332	1995-12-01	Stone et al.

Non-Patent Literature (33)

Sorensen et al.; "Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations. Part I: A systematic method for shade determination"; Aug. 1987; pp. 133-139, vol. 58, No. 2, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Sorensen et al.; "Improved color matching of metal-ceramic restorations. Part II:Procedures for visual communication"; Dec. 1987; pp. 669-677, vol. 58, No. 6, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Goodkind et al.; "A comparison of Chromascan and spectrophotometric color measurement of 100 natural teeth"; Jan. 1985; pp. 105-109, vol. 53 No. 1, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Barghi et al.; "Effects of batch variation on shade of dental porcelain"; Nov. 1985; pp. 625-627, vol. 54 No. 5, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Seghi et al.; "Spectrophotometric analysis of color differences between porcelain systems"; Jul. 1986; pp. 35-40, vol. 56 No. 1, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Rosenstiel et al.; "The effects of manipulative variables on the color of ceramic metal restorations"; Sep. 1987; pp. 297-303, vol. 60 No. 3, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Bangtson et al.; "The conversion of Chromascan designations to CIE tristimilus values"; Nov. 1982; pp. 610-617 vol. 48 No. 5, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Schwabacher et al.; "Three-dimensional color coordinates of natural teeth compared with three shade guides"; Oct. 1990; pp. 425-431, vol. 64 No. 4, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Davison et al.; "Shade selection by color vision-defective dental personnel"; Jan. 1990; pp. 97-101 vol. 63 No. 1, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
van der Burgt et al.; "A comparison of new and conventional methods for quantification of tooth color"; Feb. 1990; pp. 155-162, vol. 63 No. 2, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Goldstein et al.; "Repeatability of a specially designed intraoral colorimeter"; Jun. 1993; pp. 616-619, vol. 69 No. 6, Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry.
Pensler; "A New Approach to Shade Selection"; Sep. 1991; pp. 668-675, vol. XII, No. 9, Compend Contin Educ Dent.
O'Keefe et al.; "Color Shade and Matching: The Weak Link in Esthetic Dentistry"; Feb. 1990; pp. 116-120, vol. XI, No. 2, Compend Contin Educ Dent.
Ishikawa et al.; "Trial Manufacture of Photoelectric Colorimeter Using Optical Fibers"; Nov. 1969; pp. 191-197, vol. 10, No. 4, Bull. Tokyo dent. Coll.
Miller et al; "Shade selection and laboratory communication"; May 1993; pp. 305-309, vol. 24, No. 5; Quintessence International.
Kato et al; "The Current State of Porcelain Shades: A Discussion"; Oct. 1984; pp. 559-571, vol. 8, No. 9; Quintessence Of Dental Technology.
Preston et al.; "Light and Lighting in the Dental Office"; Jul. 1978; pp. 431-451, vol. 22, No. 3; Dental Clinics of North America.
Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment; "How to improve shade matching in the dental operatory"; Feb. 1981; pp. 209-210, vol. 102; JADA.
Miller; "Organizing color in dentistry"; Dec. 1987; pp. 26E-40E, Special Issue; JADA.
Rugh et al.; "The Relationship Between Elastomer Opacity, Colorimeter Beam Size, and Measured Colorimetric Response"; Nov./Dec. 1991; pp. 569-576, vol. 4, No. 6; The International Journal of Prosthodontics.
O'Brien et al.; "Coverage Errors of Two Shade Guides"; Jan./Feb. 1991; pp. 45-50, vol. 4, No. 1; The International Journal of Prosthodontics.
Swift et al.; "Colormetric Evaluation of Vita Shade Resin Composites"; 1994; pp. 356-361, vol. 7, No. 4; The International Journal of Prosthodontics.
Sproul; "Color matching in dentistry. Part 1. The three-dimensional nature of color"; Apr. 1973; pp. 416-424, vol. 29, No. 4; J. Prosthet. Dent.
Sproul; "Color matching in dentistry. Part 2. Practical applications of the organization of color"; May 1973; pp. 556-566, vol. 29, No. 5; J. Prosthet. Dent.
Sproul; "Color matching in dentistry. Part 1. Color control"; Feb. 1974; pp. 146-154, vol. 31, No. 2; J. Prosthet. Dent.
Ryther et al.; "Colormetric Evaluation of Shade Guide Variability"; 1993; pg. 215; J. Dent. Res. 72 (IADR Abstracts) Special Issue.
O'Brien et al.; "A New, Small-color-difference Equation for Dental Shades"; Nov. 1990; pp. 1762-1764, vol. 69, No. 11; J. Dent. Res.
Johnston et al.; "Assessment of Appearance Match by Visual Observation and Clinical Colorimetry"; May 1989; pp. 819-822, vol. 68, No. 5; J. Dent. Res.
Seghi et al.; "Performance Assessment of Colorimetric Devices on Dental Porcelains"; Dec. 1989; pp. 1755-1759, vol. 69, No. 11; J. Dent Res.
Seghi; "Effects of Instrument-measuring Geometry on Colorimetric Assessments of Dental Porcelains"; May. 1990; pp. 1180-1183, vol. 69, No. 5; J. Dent. Res.
Seghi et al.; "Visual and Instrumental Colorimetric Assessments of Small Color Differences on Translucent Dental Porcelain"; Dec. 1989; pp. 1760-1764, vol. 68, No. 12; J. Dent. Res.
Johnston et al.; "The Color Accuracy of the Kubelka-Munk Theory for Various Colorants in Maxillofacial Prosthetic Material"; Sep. 1987; pp. 1438-1444, vol. 66, No. 9; J. Dent. Res.
Preston; "Current status of shade selection and color matching"; Jan. 1985; pp. 47-58, vol. 16, No. 1; Quintessence International.

Abstract

Description