US 5,712,134 AGrant

Method of Producing a Cell Carrying an Excess of Mammalian Centromeres

Issue Date:1998-01-27

•11 Claims

•18 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

DNA fragments and methods for obtaining them are disclosed which when put into mammalian cells together with a dominant marker gene are able to generate functional centromeres. The sequences can be used to form probes for these centromeres. Cell lines containing the functional centromeres are also provided. Methods are taught for isolating mammalian centromeric DNA as well as for producing cell lines carrying an excess of mammalian centromeres linked to a dominant selectable marker gene.

Metadata

Assignee

The Biological Research Center of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences

Inventor

Gyula Hadlaczky

Application Information

Application Number:US 3752712

Filing Date:1995-01-19

Priority Date:1990-05-09

Art Unit:184

Classifications

IPC:

C12N 1509

Field of Search:

43593591;172.3;172.242

Patent Drawings (18 sheets)

Description

Background of the Invention

The centromere is a specialized region of the eukaryotic chromosome. It is the site of kinetochore formation, a structure which allows the precise segregation of chromosomes during cell division. In addition to this, a possible structural role in the higher-order organization of eukaryotic chromosomes has also been suggested (Hadlaczky (1985), Internatl. Rev., 94:57-76).

The isolation and cloning of centromeres is crucial, not only to understanding their molecular structure and function, but also for the construction of stable artificial chromosomes. Taking advantage of the existence of centromere-linked genes, functional centromeres of lower eukaryotes (yeast) have been successfully isolated (Blackburn, et al. (1984) Ann. Rev. Biochem., 53:163-194; Clarke, et al. (1985), Ann. Rev. Genet., 19:29-56). The combination of a functional centromere with telomeres, which stabilize the chromosome ends, permitted the construction of yeast artificial chromosomes (Murray, et al. (1983) Nature, 305:189-193; Burke, et al. (1987), Science, 236:806-812). This initiated a new era in the study of chromosome function and in genetic manipulation.

Higher eukaryotes (e.g., mammals), in contrast to yeast, contain repetitive DNA sequences which form a boundary at both sides of the centromere. This highly repetitive DNA interacting with certain proteins, especially in animal chromosomes, creates a genetically inactive zone (heterochromatin) around the centromere. This pericentric heterochromatin keeps any selectable marker gene at a considerable distance, and thus repetitive DNA prevents the isolation of centromeric sequences by chromosome "walking."

Thus there is a need in the art for methods of isolating higher eukaryotic centromeric DNA. Isolation of such DNA is necessary for construction of artificial mammalian chromosomes. Use of such chromosomes could overcome problems inherent in present techniques for introduction of genes to mammalian cells, including the concomitant creation of insertional mutations, size limitations on introduced DNA, and imperfect segregation of plasmid vectors.

Summary of the Invention

It is an object of the present invention to provide a method for isolating centromeric DNA from a mammal.

It is another object of the invention to provide a DNA element which will insure faithful segregation of inserted DNA in meiosis and mitosis.

It is yet another object of the invention to provide a DNA element for formation of vectors to insert large amounts of DNA into mammalian cells.

It is still another object of the invention to provide a DNA element which binds mammalian centromere proteins.

These and other objects are provided by one or more of the embodiments described below.

In one embodiment a non-human cell line is provided that contains an excess of centromeres.

In another embodiment a nucleic acid probe is provided which hybridizes to a DNA molecule having the sequence shown in FIG. 1.

In yet another embodiment a method of isolating centromeric DNA from a mammal is provided comprising:

isolating metaphase chromosomes of a mammalian cell line;

fragmenting the chromosomes to form a suspension containing chromosome fragments;

incubating the suspension with human serum containing anti-centromere antibodies to bind chromosome fragments to the antibodies;

separating antibody-bound chromosome fragments from the suspension; and

deproteinizing said bound fragments to provide a preparation of centromeric DNA.

In still another embodiment a method is provided of producing a cell carrying an excess of mammalian centromeres, comprising:

cotransfecting cells with: (1) DNA carrying mammalian centromeric DNA; and (2) DNA carrying a dominant selectable marker;

selecting cells which express the dominant selectable marker;

detecting cells which carry an excess of mammalian centromeres.

These and other embodiments will be described in more detail below. The present invention thus provides the art with methods to access and isolate the important centromeric DNA of mammalian cells. In particular, a human DNA fragment CM8 is provided which can be used to create artificial chromosomes for gene therapy.

Brief Description of the Drawings

FIG. 1 provides the sequence of a 13,863 bp fragment of DNA identified in a .lambda. Charon 4A human genomic library.

FIG. 2 shows the results of agarose gel electrophoresis of DNA fragments obtained by immunoprecipitation.

Lanes A and B: DNA isolated from chromosome fragments remaining unbound to anti-centromere Sepharose.

Lanes C and D: DNA isolated from chromosome fragments bound to anti-centromere Sepharose. Note the presence of a population of high molecular weight DNA fragments. Samples of lanes B and D were treated with 100 .mu.g/ml RNase-A prior to electrophoresis.

Lane M: .lambda. HindIII marker.

FIG. 3 shows a restriction map of the human genomic DNA insert of CM8 .lambda. Charon 4A clone. The arrow shows the position of a 300 bp Alu repeat deficient in the flanking direct repeat sequences.

FIG. 4 shows the results of in situ hybridization with .sup.3 H-thymidine labelled CM8 DNA to human metaphase chromosomes.

Panel A: Preferential localization of silver grains at the centromeres of human chromosomes (arrowheads).

Panel B: Diagram showing the distribution of silver grains (.circle-solid.) on 131 metacentric chromosomes. Numbers indicate the frequency of silver grain localization to certain regions of the chromosomes.

FIG. 5 shows the detection of dicentric and minichromosome of the EC3/7 cells by indirect immunofluorescence (panels A and B) with anti-centromere antibodies, and by in situ hybridization with biotin labelled CM8 probes (panel C) and with a 1 kb SmaI/BglII fragment of APH-II gene (panel D).

Panels E and F: DNA staining with Hoechst 33258;

Panels G and H: DNA staining with propidium iodide. Panels E-H correspond to A-D, respectively. Arrowheads point to dicentric and minichromosomes.

FIG. 6 shows the duplication of the extra centromere in the EC3/7 cell line.

Panels A-C: In situ hybridization with biotin labelled CM8 probe.

Panels D-F: Corresponding DNA staining of A-C, respectively.

FIG. 7 demonstrates the colocalization of the integrated DNA sequences with the centromere region detected by immunostaining with anti-centromere serum (Panels A and D) and subsequent in situ hybridization with biotin labelled CM8 (panel B) and APH-II probe (panel E) on the same metaphases of the EC3/7 cells.

Panels C and F: DNA staining.

Detailed Description

It is the discovery of the present invention that a segment of human DNA can be isolated and introduced into mouse cells and result in a a functional centromere. The functional centromeres containing DNA of the present invention are preferably linked to a dominant selectable marker. This can be a resistance marker, such as the aminoglycoside-3' phosphotransferase-II which provides resistance to G418 (Sigma). Other such markers known in the art may be used.

The method of isolating centromeric DNA of the present invention can be applied to any higher eukaryote, especially mammals. Preferably a human cell line will be employed. Metaphase chromosomes are isolated according to techniques known in the art. The chromosomes are then fragmented. Endonuclease digestion and mechanical shearing can be used to fragment the chromosomes. Desirably the majority of the fragments will be in the size range of less than 1 .mu.m and some chromosomes will remain unbroken. Unbroken chromosomes can be readily removed from the preparation by centrifugation at about 1,500 g for about 10 minutes.

A human serum containing anti-centromere autoantibodies can be employed in the method of the invention. This is available from patients with CREST syndrome. Alternative sources of antibody may be used, such as monoclonal or animal derived polyclonal sera containing anti-centromere antibodies. The antibodies are incubated with the preparation of chromosome fragments under conditions where antibody-antigen complexes form and are stable. It is convenient if the antibodies are bound to a solid support. Preferably a support such as Protein-A Sepharose CL4B (Pharmacia) is used to facilitate separation of bound from unbound chromosomal fragments. However other methods to accomplish this goal can be used, as are known in the art, without employing an antibody bound to a solid support.

The DNA fragments comprising centromere DNA are liberated from the antibodies and centromeric proteins by a deproteinization treatment. Ultimately the DNA is purified from all proteins, by degrading the proteins and extracting them from the chromosome fragment preparation. Any such treatment known in the art may be used including but not limited to proteases and organic solvents such as proteinase K and phenol.

The centromeric DNA fragments can be used for any purpose or application known in the art. For example, they can be labelled and used as probes; they can be ligated to vectors to clone or all part of the sequences; and they can be used to purify centromeric proteins by attachment to a solid support.

In one particular embodiment of the invention the centromeric DNA fragments are used to probe a library of genomic DNA from humans or other mammals for clones which hybridize. Hybridizing clones can be analyzed for their ability to perform functions which centromeric DNA possesses. One such function is to bind to centromeric proteins. Another such function is to form a structure in cells which can be cytologically detected using appropriate immunestaining with anti-centromere antibodies which particularly stain centromeres.

According to another method oi the present invention a cell carrying an excess of mammalian centromeres is formed. The cell may be human or other mammalian. The centromere may comprise DNA isolated from the same or a different mammalian species as the cell. The method involves cotransfection of a cell with two DNA molecules: one is a DNA carrying centromeric DNA; the other is a DNA carrying a dominant selectable marker. Preferably these two DNA molecules contain sequences which allow concatamer formation, for example phage DNAs such as .lambda. phage. The first DNA molecule may be isolated from a library of genomic DNA using, for example, as a probe the centromeric fragments taught above. Alternatively the first DNA molecule may result from cloning the centromeric fragments taught above into a phage, for example .lambda., after manipulations to create fragments of the appropriate sizes and termini. The second DNA molecule is readily within the reach of those of skill in the art, for example a .lambda. phage carrying a drug resistance marker.

It is believed to be desirable to employ .lambda. phage DNA because it concatemerizes, however the absolute necessity of this has not been determined. Further, even if this property is necessary, other viral DNAs or DNA constructs may be able to supply this iunction. Such other means of achieving concatemerization are aiso contemplated within this method.

After cotransfection, cells are selected which express the dominant selectable marker, for example by growth in amounts of G418 which are cytotoxic for the cells without the marker. This selected population of cells is further screened to detect cells with an excess of mammalian centromeres. This screening can be done by standard cytogenetic techniques, as well as by immunostaining with anti-centromere antibodies. Desirably the lambda, marker, and centromeric DNA (from the .lambda. clone) will all be localized at the site of the extra centromere. This can be determined by in situ hybridization studies, which are well known in the art.

One cell line made by the methods described above is EC3/7 which has been deposited at the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures, Porton Down, U.K. under accession no. 90051001, on May 10, 1990, under the conditions of the Budapest Treaty.

The sequence of the DNA insert in the lambda phage which was used to make the EC3/7 cell line, (referred to as CM8) was determined by standard techniques and is shown in FIG. 1. The sequence does not correspond to any in DNA sequence banks.

The present invention also contemplates nucleic acid probes, preferably of at least 10 nucleotides, which hybridize to a DNA molecule having the sequence shown in FIG. 1. One such molecule is CM8, the lambda phage clone from which the sequence was derived. Probes can be radiolabeled, biotin labeled or even unlabeled, for example, depending on the use for which they are desired.

The following examples do not limit the invention to the particular embodiments described, but are presented to particularly describe certain ways in which the invention may be practiced.

Example 1

This example demonstrates the isolation of human DNA from centromeres.

Human colon carcinoma cell line (Colo 320) was grown as a stispension in RPMI medium supplemented with 10% foetal calf serum (FCS). Metaphase chromosomes of Colo 320 cells were isolated by our standard method (Hadlaczky, et al. (1982), Chromosomes, 86:643-659). Isolated metaphase chromosomes were resuspended in 1 ml of buffer (105 mM NaCl, 50 mM Tris-HCl pH 7.5, 10 mM MgCl.sub.2, 5 mM 2-mereaptoethanol) at a concentration of 1 mg/ml DNA and digested with 500 u EcoRI restriction endonuclease for 1 h. The suspension was diluted with 4 ml of IPP buffer (500 mM NaCl, 10 mM Tris-HCl, 0.5% NP-40, pH 8.0) and sonicated for 5.times.50 s with an MSE 5-70 sonicator. This treatment resulted in a suspension containing chromosome fragments and a few (.ltoreq.1%) unbroken small chromosomes. The suspension was centrifuged at 1500 g for 10 min to remove unbroken chromosome fragments. The supernatant contained only small (.ltoreq..sub.-- 1 .mu.m) chromosome fragments as judged by light microscopy.

Two hundred fifty mg of Protein-A Sepharose CL4B (Pharmacia) was swollen in IPP buffer and incubated with 500 .mu.l human anti-centromere serum LU851 (Hadlaczky, et al. (1989), Chromosoma, 97:282-288) diluted 20-fold with IPP buffer. Suspension of sonicated chromosome fragments (5 ml) was mixed with anti-centromere Sepharose (1 ml) and incubated at room temperature for 2 h with gentle rolling. After 3 subsequent washes with 25 ml IPP buffer the Sepharose was centrifuged at 200g for 10 min.

Isolation of DNA from the immunoprecipitate was carried out by Proteinase-K treatment (Merck, 100 .mu.g/ml) in 10 mM Tris-HCl, 2.5 mM EDTA,. pH 8.0 containing 1% SDS, at 50.degree. C. overnight, followed by repeated phenol extractions and precipitation with isopropanol. All general DNA manipulations were done according to (Maniatis, et al. (1982) Molecular Cloning--A Laboratory Manual (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.).

Results of electrophoresis of immunoprecipitated and supernatant DNA are shown in FIG. 2. The bulk of DNA from chromosome fragments which did not bind to the anti-centromere Sepharose (supernatant) ranged from several hundred base pairs to 5 kb (FIG. 2, lanes A and B), while DNA from chromosome fragments which bound to the anti-centromere Sepharose contained an additional population of high molecular weight (9-20 kb) fragments (FIG. 2, lanes C and D). This distribution of fragments sizes is consIstent with the notion that the centromeric DNA is in the structurally most stable region of mammalian chromosomes (Hadlaczky, et al. (1981), Chromosoma, 81:557-567), thus rendering this DNA relatively resistant to enzymetic digestion and mechanical shearing.

Example 2

This example demonstrates the use of the high molecular weight immunoprecipitated DNA as a hybridization probe to screen a genomic DNA library.

The high molecular weight DNA was isolated from the agarose gel described in Example 1, by electroelution, labelled with .sup.32 P-dATP by random oligonucleotide priming (Feinberg, et al. (1983), Anal. Biochem., 132:6-13) and used as a probe for screening a .lambda. Charon 4A human genomic library (Maniatis, et al. (1978), Cell, 15: 687-701). A hybridizing clone (CM8) was obtained which contains a 14 kb human DNA insert. The restriction map of this insert for some restriction endonucleases is shown in FIG. 3. Southern hybridization of parts of the 14 kb insert to human lymphocytic genomic DNA indicates that the 14 kb insert represents a continuous piece of DNA in the genome and is not the ligation product of a number of fragments.

Example 3

This example demonstrates that the copy number of the 14 kb insert of clone CM8 is consistent with it being present on each chromosome in the human genome.

Southern blotting experiments were performed in which a single copy DNA probe (XV2C) (Estivill, et al. (1987), Nature, 326:840-845) and the central XhoI-EcoRI fragment of the CM8 insert (FIG. 2) simultaneously hybridized with serial dilutions of human peripheral lymphocyte DNA. The probes were labelled by random oligonucleotide priming (Feinberg, et al. (1983), Anal. Blochem., 132:6-13). By comparing the signal of the CM8 probe to the known single copy probe, the copy number of CM8 was estimated to be 16-32 per haploid genome.

Example 4

This example shows the use of the CM8 DNA as a probe to human metephase chromosomes.

Radioactive in situ hybridization with .sup.3 H-thymidine labelled CM8 DNA to human (Colo 320) metaphase chromosomes was performed according to the method of Pinkel, et al. (1986), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83:2934-2938. A preferential centromeric localization of silver grains was observed (FIG. 4).

In non-radioactive in situ hybridization according to the method of (Graham, et al. (1973), Virology, 52:456-467), using biotin-labelled subfragments or the whole CM8 insert it was not possible to detect a positive hybridization signal by our standard method. Furthermore, using a hybridization method which is suitable for single copy gene detection with a biotin-labelled probe (Lawrence, et al. (1988), Cell, 52:51-61), apart from the typical R-band like Alu hybridization pattern (Korenberg, et al. (1988), Cell, 53:391-400), no specific hybridization signal was detected on any of the chromosomes with the whole 14 kb CM8 insert. Possible explanations for this negative result are that these sequences are virtually inaccessible to the hybridization probe, due to their compact packing in the midst of the centromere structure, and that the biotin system is less sensitive than the radioactive one.

Example 5

This example discloses the sequence of the human CM8 clone.

The sequence of the human genomic insert of .lambda. CM8 was determined using the dideoxy method (Sanger, et al. 1980), J. Mol. Biol., 143:161-178; Biggin, et al. (1983), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80:3963-3965). See FIG. 1.

The sequence of the 13,863 bp human CM8 clone was compared with a complete nutleft acid data bank (MicroGenie, Beckman) and showed no homology to any known sequence. However, a 300 bp Alu repeat deficient in the flanking direct repeat sequences was found in the 2.5 kb EcoRI-XhoI fragment (FIG. 3), which explains the Alu type in situ hybridization pattern.

Example 6

This example demonstrates the use of the CM8 DNA to form centromeres in mammalian celis.

In order to detect any in vivo centromere iunction of the CM8 DNA, it was introduced with the selectable APH-II gene into mouse LMTK.sup.- fibroblast cells. The mouse fibroblast cells were maintained as a monolayer in F12 medium supplemented with 10% FCS. The calcium phosphate method (Harper, et al. (1981), Chromosoma, 83:431-439) was used to transfect the cells with 20 .mu.g .lambda. CM8 and 20 .mu.g .lambda. gtWESneo DNA per Petri dish (80 mm). A 2 minute glycerol shock was used. The .lambda.gt WESneo was made by cloning the pAG60 plasmid (Colbere-Garapin, et al. (1981), J. Mol. Biol., 150:1-14) into a .lambda. gtWES (Leder, et al. (1977), Science, 196:175-177) bacteriophage vector.

The whole .lambda. CM8 and .lambda. gt WESneo constructions were used for transfections for two reasons. First, to separate the marker gene from the CM8 sequences, in order to avoid inactivating the APH-II gene, a process which may occur during centromere formation. Second, .lambda. DNA is capable of forming long tandem arrays of DNA molecules by concatamerization. Concatamerization was postulated as being necessary to form centromeres since, in S. pombe 4 to 15 copies of conserved sequence motifs form centromeres (Chikashige, et al. (1989), Cell, 57:739-751). Considering these two facts a multiplication of the putative centromerie DNA by concatamerization might increase the chance of centromere formation.

Transformed celks were selected on growth medium containing 400 .mu.g/ml G418 (Genticin, Sigma). Individual G418 resistant clones were analyzed. The presence of human sequences in the transformed clones was monitored using Southern blots probed with subfragments of the CM8 insert. Screening for excess centromeres was achieved by indirect immunofluorescenee using human anti-centromere serum LU851 (Hadlaezky, et al. (1989), Chromosoma, 97:282-288). The chromosomal localization of "foreign" DNA sequences was determined by in situ hybridization with biotin labelled probes.

Eight transformed clones have been analyzed. All of the clones contained human DNA sequences integrated into mouse chromosomes. However, only two clones (EC5/6 and EC3/7) showed the regular presence of dicentrie chromosomes. Individual cells of clone EC5/6 carrying di-, tri-, and multicentromerie chromosomes exhibited extreme instability. In more than 60% of the cells of this cell line the chromosomal localization of the integrated DNA sequences varied from cell to cell. Due to this instability, clone EC5/6 was deemed to be unsuitable. However, cells of clone EC3/7 were stable, carrying either a dicentric (85%) or a minichromosome (10%). Centromeres of dicentric chromosomes and minichromosomes were indistinguishable from the normal mouse centromeres by immunostaining with anti-centromere antibodies (FIG. 5A and B).

Example 7

This example shows that the newly introduced DNA in the EC3/7 cell line contributes to centromere formation.

In situ hybridization with biotin labelled CM8, APH-II gene, and .lambda. phage DNA were carried out. Chromosomes were counterstained with propidium iodide (Pinkel, et al. (1986), Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83:2934-2938) for in situ hybridization experiments while in indirect immunofluorescence with DNA binding dye, Hoechst 33258 used. All observations and microphotography were made by using an Olympus AHBS Vanox microscope. Forte 400 Professional black and white, and Fujicolor 400 Super HG colour film were used for photographs.

Without exception these three probes hybridized onto the same spots: either on the distal centromere of the dicentric chromosome (FIG. 5C) or on the centromere of the minichromosome (FIG. 5D). In less than 5% of the EC3/7 cells an alternative localization of the hybridization signal was found. These included cells with more than one integration site, cells without a detectable signal, or cells where the hybridization was found on chromosomes other than that identified as the dicentric chromosome.

In less than 0.5% of the cells a tandem array of the hybridization signal was observed on the dicentric chromosomes (FIG. 6A-C), suggesting that the additional centromere was capable of autonomous "duplication." At least some of these duplicated centromeres appeared to be functional. This was indicated by the existence of a minichromosome with double centromeres. Both centromeres of this minichromosome showed positive immunostaining with anti-centromere antibodies (FIG. 7A). Minichromosomes carrying double centromeres might be breakage products of multicentromeric chromosomes.

Indirect immunofluorescence of mouse metaphase cells was performed as described by Hadlaczky, et al. (1989), Chromosoma, 97:282-288. When indirect immunofluorescence and in situ hybridization were performed on the same metaphases, mitotic cells were resuspended in a glycine-hexylene glycol buffer (Hadlaczky, et al. (1989), Chromosoma, 97:282-288), swollen at 37.degree. C. for 10 min followed by cytocentrifugation and fixation with cold (-20.degree. C.) methanol. After the standard immunostaining (Hadlaczky, et al. (1989), Chromosoma, 97:282-288) metaphases were photographed, then coverslips were washed off with phosphate buffered saline and slides were fixed in ice-cold methanol-acetic acid, air-dried and used for in situ hybridization.

To demonstrate the integration of the human CM8 clone sequence and the APH-II gene in the centromere region, immunostaining of centromeres with anti-centromere antibodies followed by in situ hybridization with CM8 and APH-II probes was carried out on the same metaphase plates of EC3/7 cells. The in situ hybridization signals with both biotin-labelled CM8 and APH-II probes showed a colocalization with the immunostained centromeric region of the chromosomes carrying additional centromeres (FIG. 7).

Example 8

This example describes the stability of the EC3/7 cell line.

Forty-six independent subclones derived from a single cell were isolated and analyzed. Each of the subclones carried the dicentric chromosome. The percentage of minichromosome-containing cells varied between 2% and 30% in different subclones. We were unable to isolate a subclone which carried the additional centromere exclusively in a minichromosome. This result suggested that the minichromosomes were unstable and they can be regarded as the products of regular breakages of the dicentric chromosomes.

A preliminary analysis by immunostaining of EC3/7 cells (103 metaphases) cultured for 46 days in non-selective medium showed that 80.6% of the cells contained either a dicentric (60.2%) or a minichromosome (20.4%). Subsequent in situ hybridization with biotin labelled probes proved the presence of the "foreign" DNA in the additional centromere. These results indicate that no serious loss or inactivation of the additional centromeres had occurred during this period of culture under non-selective conditions.

Example 9

This example shows that the CM8 insert concatamerized to form the functioning centromere of cell line EC3/7.

DNA of the EC3/7 cell line and human lymphoeyte DNA were digested with restriction endonueleases and probed with subfragments of the CM8 insert in a Southern hybridization experiment. Comparing the intensity of the hybridization signal with EC3/7 DNA to that with the human DNA, the minimum number of integrated human sequences in the additional centromere was estimated to be .gtoreq.30. The copy number of CM8 in human lymphocytic DNA was determined as described above in Example 3.

Claims

Certificate of Correction present

The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.

I claim:

1. A method of producing a mammalian cell containing an excess of functional centromeres, comprising: (a) cotransfecting cells with a DNA fragment comprising human DNA and a DNA fragment encoding a dominant selectable marker, wherein the cotransfected human DNA fragment comprises CM8, (b) growing the cells and selecting cells that express the dominant selectable marker; (c) detecting among the cells that express the dominant selectable marker those cells with an excess of mammalian centromeres.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the human DNA fragment comprises the sequence of nucleotides set forth in FIG. 1.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the cells that express the dominant selectable marker and have an excess of mammalian centromeres are cells that have all of the identifying characteristics of the cells deposited at the European Collection of Animal Cell Cultures (ECACC) under accession no. 90051001.

4. The method of claim 1, wherein the human DNA is contained in the clone .lambda.CM8 and the selectable marker is encoded by .lambda.gtWESneo.

5. A method of producing mammalian cells containing a dicentric chromosome, comprising: (a) cotransfecting cells with a DNA fraqment comprising human DNA and a DNA fraqment encoding a dominant selectable marker, wherein the human DNA fragment comprises the human DNA in the clone .lambda.CM8; (b) growing the cells under selective conditions and selecting cells that express the dominant selectable marker; (c) detecting among the cells that express the dominant selectable marker those cells with an excess of mammalian centromeres that include a chromosome with two centromeres.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the transfected DNA comprising human DNA comprises the sequence of nucleotides set forth in FIG. 1.

7. A method of producing mammalian cells containing a minichromosome that contains heterologous DNA, comprising: (a) cotransfecting cells with a DNA and a DNA fragment comprising human DNA and a DNA fragment encoding a dominant selectable marker, wherein the human DNA fragment comprises the human DNA in the clone .lambda.CM8; (b) growing the cells under selective conditions and selecting cells that express the dominant selectable marker; (c) detecting among the cells that express the dominant selectable marker those cells with an excess of mammalian centromeres that include a minichromosome, wherein the minichromosome is smallest chromosome in the cell.

8. The method of claim 7, wherein the transfected DNA comprising human DNA comprises the sequence of nucleotides set forth in FIG. 1.

9. A method of producing a mammalian cell containing an excess of centromeres, comprising: (a) cotransfecting cells with a DNA fragment comprising the sequence of nucleotides set forth in FIG. 1 and a DNA fragment encoding a dominant selectable marker; (b) growing the cells and selecting cells that express the dominant selectable marker; (c) detecting among the cells that express the dominant selectable marker those cells with an excess of mammalian centromeres.

10. The method of claim 9, wherein the selectable marker encodes aminoglycoside-3' phosphotransferase-II.

11. A method of producing a mammalian cell containing an excess of functional centromeres, comprising: cotransfecting cells with a DNA fragment comprising human DNA and a DNA fragment encoding a dominant selectable marker, wherein the human DNA comprises the sequence of nucleotides set forth in FIG. 1.

Patent Citations (62)

Patent	Date	Inventor
US4518584	1985-05-01	Mark et al.
US4608339	1986-08-01	Yoakum et al.
US4684611	1987-08-01	Schilperoort et al.
US4686186	1987-08-01	Sugden
US4784737	1988-11-01	Ray et al.
US4806476	1989-02-01	Coons et al.
US4873191	1989-10-01	Wagner et al.
US4935350	1990-06-01	Patel et al.
US4970162	1990-11-01	Aksamit
US4997764	1991-03-01	Dalla Favera
US5019034	1991-05-01	Weaver et al.
US5144019	1992-09-01	Rossi et al.
US5149796	1992-09-01	Rossi et al.
US5162215	1992-11-01	Bosselman et al.
US5215914	1993-06-01	Lo et al.
US5223263	1993-06-01	Hostetler et al.
US5240840	1993-08-01	Feinberg et al.
US5240846	1993-08-01	Collins et al.
US5260191	1993-11-01	Yang
US5266600	1993-11-01	Tenmyo et al.
US5272262	1993-12-01	Rossi et al.
US5288625	1994-02-01	Hadlaczky
US5292658	1994-03-01	Cormier et al.
US5298429	1994-03-01	Evans et al.
US5324655	1994-06-01	Kriegler et al.
US5354674	1994-10-01	Hodgson
US5358866	1994-10-01	Mullen et al.
US5364761	1994-11-01	Ariga
US5396767	1995-03-01	Suzuki
US5409810	1995-04-01	Larder et al.
US5413914	1995-05-01	Franzusoff
US5418155	1995-05-01	Cormier et al.
US5424409	1995-06-01	Ely et al.
US5434086	1995-07-01	Collins et al.
US5436392	1995-07-01	Thomas et al.
US5449604	1995-09-01	Schellenberg et al.
US5453357	1995-09-01	Hogan
US5461032	1995-10-01	Krapcho et al.
US5468615	1995-11-01	Chio et al.
US5468634	1995-11-01	Liu
US5470708	1995-11-01	Yang et al.
US5470730	1995-11-01	Greenberg et al.
US5482928	1996-01-01	De Bolle et al.
US5489520	1996-02-01	Adams et al.
US5491075	1996-02-01	Desnick et al.
US5496731	1996-03-01	Xu et al.
US5501662	1996-03-01	Hofmann
US5501967	1996-03-01	Offringa et al.
US5503999	1996-04-01	Jilka et al.
EPX240373	1987-10-01
EPXA-240373	1987-10-01
EPX254315	1988-01-01
EPX350052	1990-01-01
EPX375406	1990-06-01
EPX473253	1992-03-01
WOX9100358	1991-01-01
WOX9419456	1994-09-01
WOX9500178	1995-01-01
WOX9507643	1995-03-01
WOX9514769	1995-06-01
WOX9520044	1995-07-01
WOX9532297	1995-11-01

Non-Patent Literature (188)

Brown et al., Mammalian artificial chromosomes, Current Opinion: Genetics d Devt. 6: 281-288 (1996).
Chisari et al., A transgenic mouse model of the chronic hepatitis B surface antigen carrier state, Science 230: 1157-1160 (1985).
Hadlaczky et al., Centromere proteins I. Mitosis specific centromere antigen recognized by anti-centromere autoantibodies, Chromosoma 97:272-288 (1989).
Henikoff et al., Position-effect variegation after 60 years, Trends in Genetics 6: 422-426 (1990).
Kappel et al., Regulating gene expression in transgenic animals, Current Biology, pp. 548-553, (1992).
Klotman et al. Transgenic models of HIV-1, Current Sci Ltd. 9:313-324, (1995).
Larsson et al. Reduced .beta.2-microglobulin mRNA levels in transgenic mice expressing a designed hammerhead ribozyme, Nucleic Acids Research 22:2242-2248, (1994).
Strojek et al. The use of transgenic animal techniques for livestock improvement, Genetic Engineering: Principles and Methods 10:221-246, (1988).
DIALOG Abstract 007268905, citing: EP 0240 373 A1 (1987).
DIALOG Abstract 007389041, citing EP 0254 315 (1988).
Baker et al., Suppression of human colorectal carcinoma cell growth by wild-type p53, Science 249:912-915 (1990).
Biggin et al., Buffer gradient gels and .sup.35 S label as an aid to rapid DNA sequence determination, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 80:3963-3965 (1983).
Blattner et al., Charon phages: Safer derivatives of bacteriophage lambda for DNA cloning, Science 196:16 (1977).
Bostock and Christie, Analysis of the frequency of sister chromatid exchange in different regions of chromosomes of the Kangaroo rat (Dipodomys ordii), Chromosoma 56: 275-287 (1976).
Bostock and Clark, Satellite DNA in large marker chromosomes of methotrexate-resistant mouse cells, Cell 19: 709-715 (1980).
Brewer and Fangman, The localization of replication origins on ARS plasmids in S. cerevisiae, Cell 51: 463-471 (1987).
Brisson and Hohn, 27! Plant virus vectors: Cauliflower mosaic vectors, Methods for Plant Molecular Biology, Weissbach et al., eds. Adacemic Press, N.Y., Section VIII, pp. 437-446 (1988).
Brown, Mammalian artificial chromosomes, Curr. Opin. Genes Dev. 2:479-486 (1992).
Bullock and Botchan, Molecular events in the excision of SV40 DNA from the chromosomes of cultured mammalian cells. In: Gene Amplification., Schimke RT, ed. Cold Spring Harbor, NY: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, pp. 215-224 (1982).
Burhans et al., Identification of an origin of bidirectional DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes, Cell 62: 955-965 (1990).
Burhans and Huberman, DNA replication origins in animal cells--a questionof context? Science 263: 639-640 (1994).
Carrano and Wolff, Distribution of sister chromatid exchanges in the euchromatin and heterochromatin of the Indian muntjac, Chromosoma 53: 361-369 (1975).
Chalfie et al., Green fluorescent protein as a marker for gene expression, Science 263:802-804 (1994).
Chang et al., Ribozyme-mediated site-specific cleavage of the HIV-1 genome, Clin. Biotech. 2:23-31 (1990).
Chen et al., High-efficiency transformation of mammalian cells by plasmid DNA, Mol. Cell. Biol. 7:2745-2752 (1987).
Chen et al., Genetic mechanismof tumor suppression by the human p53 gene, Science 250:1576 (1990).
Chikashige et al., Composite motifs and repeat symmetry in S. pombe centromeres: Direct analysis by integration of Notl restriction sites, Cell 57:739-751 (1989).
Church, Replication of chromatin in mouse mammary epithelial cells grown in vitro, Genetics 52: 843-849 1985.
Colbere-Garapin et al., A new dominant hybrid selective marker for higher eukaryotic cells, J. Mol. Biol. 150:1-14 (1981).
Collins and Newlon, Chromosomal DNA replication initiates at the same origins in meiosis and mitosis, Mol Cell Biol 14: 3524-3534. (1994).
Cooper and Tyler-Smith, The putative centromere-forming sequence of .lambda.CM8 is a single copy sequence and is not a component of most human centromeres, Hum. Mol. Gen. 1(9):753-754 (1992).
Couto et al., Inhibition of intracellular histoplasma capsulatum replication by murine macrophages that produce human defensin, Infect. Immun. 62:2375-2378 (1994).
Cram et al., Polyamine buffer for bivariate human flow cytogenetic analysis and sorting, Methods in Cell Biology 33:377-382 (1990).
Current state of the art, Chromos Molecular Systems--News Release (May 29, 1996) (available at http://www.chromos.com/contents.html).
Cutler, Electroporation: Being developed to transform crops, Ag Biotechnology News 7:3 (Sep./Oct. 1990).
Davidson et al., Improved techniques for the induction of mammalian cell hybridisation by polyethylene glycol, Somatic Cell. Genet. 2:165-176 (1976).
Dean et al. Multiple mutations in highly conserved residues are found in mildly affected cystic fibrosis patients, Cell 61:863-870 (1990).
DePamphilis, Eukaryotic DNA replication: Anatomy of an origin, Ann. Rev. Biochem. 62:29-63 (1993).
Dunckley et al., Retroviral-mediated transfer of a dystrophin minigene into mdx mouse myoblasts in vitro, FEBS Lett. 296:128-34 (1992).
Erlich et al., Recent advances in the polymerase chain reaction, Science 252:1643-1651 (1991).
Fangman and Brewer, A question of time: replication origins of eukaryotic chromosomes, Cell 71: 363-366 (1992).
Farr et al., Generation of a human X-derived minichromosome using telomere-associated chromosome fragmentation, EMBO J. 14:5444-5454 (1995).
Farrel et al., p53 is frequently mutated in Burkitt's lymphoma cell lines, EMBO J. 10:2879-2887 (1991).
Fatyol et al., Cloning and molecular characterization of a novel chromosome specific centromere sequence of Chinese hamster, Nucl. Acids Res. 22:3728-3736 (1994).
Fechheimer et al., Transfection of mammalian cells with plasmid DNa by scrape loading and sonication loading, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:8463-8467 (1987).
Ford and Fried, Large inverted duplications are associated with gene amplification, Cell 45:425-430, (1986).
Fournier, A general high-efficiency procedure for production of microcell hybrids, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78:6349-6353 (1981).
French et al., Construction of a retroviral vector incorporating mouse VL30 retrotransposon-derived, transcriptional regulatory sequences, Anal. Biochem 228:354-355 (1995).
Frohman and Martin, Cut, paste, and save: new Approaches to altering specific genes in mice, Cell 56:145-147 (1989).
Fromm et al., Expression of genes transfered into monocot and dicot plant cells by electroporation, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 82:5824-5828 (1985).
Gillespie et al., Tissue-specific expression of human Cd4 in transgenic mice, Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:2952-2958 (1993).
Gluzman, SV40-transformed simian cells support the replication of early SV40 mutatnts, Cell 23:175-182 (1981).
Goodfellow et al., Techniques for mammalian genome transfer, in Genome Analysis a Practical Approach, K.E. Davies, ed., IRL Press, Oxford, Washington DC. pp. 1-17 (1989).
Graham and van der Eb, A new technique for the assay of infectivity of human adenovirus 5 DNA , Virology 52:456-457 (1973).
Grierson et al., Plant Molecular Biology, 2d Ed., Blackie, London, Ch. 7-9 (1988).
Gritz et al., Plasmid-encoded hygromycin B resistance: The sequence of hygromycin B phosphotransferase gene and its expression in Escherichia coli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Gene 25:179-188 (1983).
Guide to Techniques in Mouse Development, Methods in Enzymology 25:803-932 (1993).
Gunning et al., A human .beta.-actin expression vector system directs high-level accumulation of antisense transcripts, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 84:4831-4835 (1987).
Haase et al., Transcription inhibits the replication of autonomously replication plasmids in human cell, Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:2516-2524 (1994).
Hadlaczky et al., Centromere formation in mouse cells cotransformed with human DNA and a dominant marker gene, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:8106-8110 (1991).
Hadlaczky et al., Protein depleted chromosomes, Chromosoma 81:537-555 (1981).
Hadlaczky et al., Direct evidence for the non-random localization of mammalian chromosomes in the interphase nucleus, Exp. Cell Res. 167:1-15 (1986).
Hadlaczky and Szalay, Mammalian artificial chromosomes: Potential vectors for gene therapy, Abstract from International Symposium on Gene Therapy of Cancer, AIDS and Genetic Disorders, Trieste (Italy) (Apr. 10-13, 1996) (available at http://www.chromos.com/contents.html).
Hadlaczky and Szalay, Mammalian artificial chromosomes: Introduction of novel genes into mammalian artificial chromosomes, Abstract from International Symposium on Gene Therapy of Cancer, AIDS and Genetic Disorders, Trieste (Italy) (Apr. 10-13, 1996) (available at http://www.chromos.com/contents.html).
Hadlaczky et al., Structure of isolated protein-depleted chromosomes of plants. Chromosoma 86:643-659 (1982).
Hadlaczky, Structure of metaphase chromosomes of plants, Internatl. Rev. Cytol. 94:57-76 (1985).
Hall et al., Expression and regulation of Escherichia coli lacZ gene fusions in mammalian cells, J. Mol. Appl. Gen. 2:101-109 (1983).
Handeli et al., Mapping replication units in animal cells, Cell 57 909-920 (1989).
Hanna et al., Specific expresion of the human DC4 gene in mature CD4.sup.+ CD8.sup.- and immature CD4.sup.+ CD8.sup.+ T cells and in macrophages of transgenic mice, Mol. Cell. Biol. 14:1084-1094 (1994).
Harper et al., Localization of single copy DNA sequences on G-banded human chromosomes by in situ hybridization, Chromosoma 83:431-439 (1981).
Hassan et al., Replication and transcription sites are colocalized in human cells. J. Cell. Sci. 107:425-434 (1994).
Hilwig and Gropp, Decondensation of constitutive heterochromatin in L cell chromosomes by a benzimidazole compound ("33258 Hoechst"), Exp Cell Res 81: 474-477 (1973).
Hogan et al., Manipulating the Mouse Embryo: A Laboratory Manual, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, NY, pp. 253-289, see, especially pp. 255-264 and Appendix 3 (1994).
Hollo et al., Evidence for a megareplicon covering megabases of centrome segments, Chromosome Research 4:1-14 (1996) (available at http://www.chromos.com/contents.html).
Holmquist and Comings, Sister chromatid exchange and chromosome organisation based on a bromodeoxyuridine Giemsa-C-banding technique (TC-banding), Chromosoma 52:245-259 (1975).
Hsu and Markvong, Chromosomes and DNA in Mus; Terminal DNA synthetic sequences in three species, Chromosoma 51:311-322 (1975).
Huberman and Riggs, On the mechanism of DNA replication in mammalian chromosomes, J Mol Biol 32:327-341 (1968).
Huberman et al., The in vivo replication origin of the yeast 2 .mu.m plasmid. Cell 51:473-481 (1987).
Huxley, Mammalian artificial chromosomes: a new tool for gene therapy, Gene Therapy, 1:7-12 (1994).
Hyde et al., Correction of the ion transport defect in cystic fibrosis transgenic mice by gene therapy, Nature 362: 250-255 (1993).
Hyrien et al., The multicopy appearance of large inverted duplication and the sequence at the inversion joint suggest a new model for gene amplification, EMBO J 7:407-417 (1988).
Ish-Horowitz et al., Rapid and efficient cosmid cloning, Nucleic Acids Res. 9:2989-2998 (1981).
Jacob et al., On the regulation of DNA replication in bacteria, Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 28:329-348 (1963).
Joy and Gopinathan, Expression of microinjected foreign DNA in the silkworm, Bombex mori, Current Science 66:145-150 (1991).
Keown et al., Methods for introducing DNA into mammalian cells, Meth. Enzymol. 185:527-537 (1990).
Kerem et al., Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: genetic analysis, Science 245:1073-1080 (1989).
Kereso et al., De novo chromosome formations by large-scale amplification of the centromeric region of mouse chromosomes, Chromosome Research 4:1-14 4:226-239 (1996) (available at http:www.chrommos.com/contents.html).
Kitsberg et al., Replication structure of the human b-globin gene domain, Nature 366:588-590 (1993).
Korenberg et al., Human genome organization: Alu, LINES, and the molecular structure of metaphase chromosome bands, Cell 53:391-400 (1988).
Kornberg and Baker, DNA Replication. 2nd. ed., New York: W.H. Freeman and Co, p. 474 (1992).
Lambert et al., Functional complementation of ataxia-telangiectasia group D (AT-D) cells by microcell-mediated chromosome transfer and mapping of the AT-D locus to the region 11q22-23, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:5907-59 (1991).
Lawrence et al. Sensitve, high-resolution chromatin and chromosome mapping in situ: Presence and orientation of two closely integrated copies of EBV in a lmphoma line, Cell 52:51-61 (1988).
Leder et al., EK2 derivatives of bacteriophage lambda useful in the cloning of DNA from higher organisms: The .lambda.gtWES system, Science 196:75-177 (1977).
Liu et al., The pro region of human neutrophil defensin contains a motif that is essential for normal subcellular sorting, Blood 85:1095-1103 (1995).
Locardi et al., Persistent infection of normal mice with human immunodeficiency virus, J. Virol. 66:1649-1654 (1992).
Looney et al., The dihydrofolate reductase amplicons in different methotrexate-resistant Chinese hamster cell lines share at least a 273-kilobase core sequence, but the amplicons in some cell lines are much larger and remarkably uniform in structure, Mol. Cell Biol. 8:5268-5279 (1988).
Lorenz et al., Isolation and expression of a cDNA encoding Renilla reniformis luciferase, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:4438-4442 (1991).
Lorenz et al., Expresion of the Renilla reniformis licuferase gene in mammalian cells, J. Biolum. Chemilum. 11:31-37 (1996).
Ma et al., Sister chromatid fusion initiates amplification of the dihydrofilate reductase gene in Chinese hamster cells, Genes Develop. 7:605-620 (1993).
Ma et al., Organisation and genesis of dihydrofolate reductase amplicons in the genome of a methotrexate-resistant Chinese hamster ovary cell line, Mol. Cell Biol. 8:2316-2327 (1988).
Madan et al., Fluorescence anlaysis of late DNA replication in mouse metaphase chromosomes using BUdR and 33258 Hoechst, Exp. Cell Res. 99:438-444 (1976).
Maniatis et al., The isolation of structural genes from libraries of eucaryotic DNA, Cell 15:687-701 (1978).
Mansour et al., Disruption of the proto-oncogene int-2 in mouse embryo-derived stem cells: a general strategy for targeting mutations to non-selectable genes, Nature 336:348-352 (1988).
Matthews et al., Purification and properties of Renilla reniformis luciferase , Biochemistry 16:85-91 (1977).
Maxwell et al., Regulated expression of a diphtheria toxin A-chain gene transfected into human cells: possible strategy for inducing cancer cell suicide, Cancer Res. 46:4660-4664 (1986).
McGill et al., .lambda.CM8, a human sequence with putative centromeric function, does not map to the centromere but is present in one or two copies at 9qter, Hum. Mol. Gen. 1(9):749-751 (no date available).
Meinkoth and Wahl, Hybridization of nucleic acids immobilized on solid supports, Anal. Biochem. 138:267-284 (1984).
Meyne et al., Distribution of non-telomeric sites of the (TTAGGG).sub.n telomeric sequence in vertebrate chromosomes, Chromosoma 99:3-10, (1990).
Miller, in Experiments in Molecular Genetics, Cold Spring Harbor Press, pp. 352-355 (1972).
Miller, Is the centromeric heterochromatin of Mus musculus late replication? Chromosoma 55:165-170 (1976).
Miller and Rosman, Improved retroviral vectors for gene transfer and expression, Biotechniques 7:980-990 (1989).
Mitani et al., Delivering therapeutic genes--matching approach and application, Trends Biotech. 11:162-166 (1993).
Morgan and French Anderson, Human gene therapy, Annu. Rev. Biochem. 62:191-217 (1993).
Morgenstern et al., Advanced mammalian gene transfer: High titre retroviral vectors with multiple drug selection markers and a complementary helper-free packaging cell line, Nucleic Acids Res. 18:3587-3596 (1990).
Mulligan, The basic science of gene therapy, Science 260:926-932 (1993).
Nabel et al., Site-specific gene expression in vivo by direct gene transfer into the arterial wall, Science 249:1285-1288 (1990).
Nikolaev et al., Microinjection of recombinant DNA into early embryos of the mulberry silkworm Bombyx mori, Mol. Biol. (Moscow) 23:1177-87 (1989).
O'Keefe et al., Dynamic organization of DNA replication in mammalian cell nuclei: Spatially and temporally defined replication of chromosome-specific a-satellite DNA sequences, J. Cell Biol. 116:1095-1110 (1992).
Osborne et al., A mutation in the second nucleotide binding fold of the cystic fibrosis gene, Am. J. Hum. Genetics 48:608-612 (1991).
Paszowski and Saul, 28! Direct gene transfer to plants, Methods for Plant Molecular Biology, Weissbach et al., eds., Academic Press, N.Y., Section VIII, pp. 447-463 (1988).
Perry and Wolff, A new Glemsa method for the differential staining of sister chromatids, Nature 251:156-158 (1974).
Pinkel et al., Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 83:2934-2938 (1986).
Prasher et al., Primary structure of the Aequorea victoria green-fluorescent protein, Gene 111:229-233 (1992).
Praznovszky et al., De novo chromosome formation in rodent cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:11042-11046 (1991).
Priest, Cytogenetics. In Medical Technology Series. R.M. French, M. Eichmam, B. Fiorella, and H.F. Weisberg, eds. (Lea and Febiger, Philadelphia) pp. 189-190 (1969).
Quaster et al., Cell population kinetics in the intestinal epithelium of the mouse, Exp. Cell Res. 17:420-438 (1959).
Report and recommendations of the panel to assess the NIH investment in research on gene therappy, Orkin and Motulsky, co-chairs (Dec. 7, 1995) (available at http://www.nih.gov/news/panelrep.html).
Richia and Lo, Introduction of human DNA into mouse eggs by injection of dissected chromosome fragments, Science 245:175-177 (1989).
Riordan et al., Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: cloning and characterization of complementary DNA, Science 245:1066-1072 (1989).
Rogers et al., 26! Gene transfer in plants: Production of transformed plants using Ti plasmid vectors, Methods for Plant Molecular Biology, Weissbach et al., eds., Academic Press, N.Y., Section VIII, pp. 423-436 (1988).
Rommens et al., Identification of the cystic fibrosis gene: chromosome walking and jumping, Science 245:1059-1065 (1989).
Rosenfeld et al., In vivo transfer of the human cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator gene to the airway epithelium, Cell 68:143-155 (1992).
Sambrook et al., Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, vol. 1. 2d Ed., Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Section 2.18 (1989).
Sanes et al., Use of a recombinant retrovirus to study post-implantation cell lineage in mouse embryos, EMBO J. 5(12):3133-3142 (1986).
Sanger et al., Cloning in single-stranded bacteriophage as an aid to rapid DNA sequencing, J. Mol. Biol. 143:161-178 (1980).
Saxon et al., Selective transfer of individual human chromosomes to recipient cells, Mol. Cell. Biol. 1:140-146 (1985).
Schedl et al., A method for the generation of YAC transgenic mice by pronuclear microinjection, Nuc. Acids Res. 21:4783-4787 (1993).
Scientists report a major step in ralizing the commercial potential of engineered artificial chromosomes in significant life sciences sectors, including gene therapy, Chromos Molecular Systems--News Release (May 29, 1996) (available at http://www.chromos.com/contents.html).
Selig et al., Regulation of mouse satellite DNA replication time, EMBO J. 7:419-426 (1988).
Smith et al., Distinctive chromosomal structures are formed vert early in the amplification of CAD genes in Syrian hamster cells, Cell 63:1219-1227 (1990).
Sugden et al., A vector that replicates as a plasmid and can be efficiently selected in B-lymphoblast transformed by Epstein-Barr virus, Mol. Cell. Biol. 5:410-413 (1985).
Sumner, Scanning electron microscopy of mammalian chromosomes from prophase to telophase. Chromosoma 100:410-418 (1991).
Sumner, A simple technique for demonstrating centromeric heterochromatin, Cell Res. 75:304-306 (1972).
Szybalsky et al. Genetic studies with human cell lines, Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 7:75-89 (1982).
Tamura et al., Microinjection of DNA into early embryo of Bombyx mori, Bio Ind. 8:26-31 (1991) (Chemical Abstracts # 114(21)200502z).
Toledo et al., Co-amplified markers alternate in megabase long chromosomal inverted repeats and cluster independently in interphase nuclei at early steps of mammalian gene amplification, EMBO J. 11:2665-2673 (1992).
Tonghua et al., Effects of antisense epidermal growth factor and its receptor retroviral expression vectors on cell growth of human pancreatic carcinoma cell line, Chin. Med. J. (Beijing, Engl. Ed.) 108:653-659 (1995).
Transfection of DNA into eukaryotic cells, Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, vol. 1, Wiley Inter-Science, Supplement 14, Unit 9.1.1-9.1.9 (1990).
Uchimiya et al., Transgenic plants, J. Biotechnol. 12: 1-20 (1989).
Vig and Richards, Formation of primary constriction and heterochromatin in mouse does not require minor satellite DNA, Exp. Cell Res. 201:292-298 (1992).
Wang and Fedoroff, Banding of human chromosomes treated with trypsin, Nature 235:52-54 (1972).
Weinberg, Tumor suppressor genes, Science 254:1138-1146 (1991).
White et al., A frame-shift mutation in the cystic fibrosis gene, Nature 344:665-667 (1990).
Why are MACs in vogue, Chromos Molecular Systems-- News Release (May 29, 1996) (available at http://www.chromos.com/contents.html).
Wigler et a., DNA-mediated transfer of the adenine phosphoribosyltransferase locus into mammalian cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 76:1373-1376 (1979).
Willard and Waye, Hierarchical order in chromosome specific human alpha satellite DNA, Trends Genet. 3:192-198 (1987).
Williams and Blattner, Construction and characterization of the hybrid bacteriophage lambda charon vectors for DNA cloning, J. Virol. 29:555-575 (1979).
Wong et al., Sequence organisation and cytological localization of the minor satellite of mouse, Nucl. Acids Res. 16:11645-11661 (1988).
Yamada et al., Multiple chromosomes carrying tumor suppressor activity for a uterine endometrial carcinoma cell line identified by microcell-mediated chromosome transfer, Oncogene 5:1141-1147 (1990).
Yates et al., Stable replication of plasmids derived from Epstein-Barr virus in various mammalian cells, Nature 313:812-815 (1985).
Yates et al., A cis-acting element from the Epstein-Barr viral genome that permits stable replication of recombinant plasmids in latently infected cells, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 81:3806-3810 (1984).
Yeung et al., Human CD4-major histocompatibility complex class II (Dqw6) transgenic mice in an endogenous CD4/CD8-deficient background: reconstitution of phenotype and humano-restricted function, J. Exp. Med. 180:1911-1920 (1994).
Yurov, Identification and characterization of two distinct polymorphic .alpha.-satellite DNA sequences from centromeric regions of the chromosomes 13 and 21 (A2299), Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 51:1114 (1989).
Yurov, Collection of .alpha.-satellite DNA probes: Highly polymorphic markers for centromeric regions of all human chromosomes (A2298), Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 51:1114 (1989).
Brazolot et al., Efficient transfection of chicken cells by lipofection and introduction of transfected blastoderm cells into the embryo, Mol. Repro. Dev. 30:304-312 (1993).
Dieken et al., Efficient modification of human chromosomal alleles using recombination-proficient chicken/human microcell hybrids, Nature Genet. 12:174-182 (1996).
Etches et al., Chimeric chickens and their use in manipulation of the chicken genome, Poultry Sci. 72:882-889 (1993).
Frasier et al., Efficient incorporation of transfected blastodermal cells into chimeric chicken embryos, Int. J. Dev. Biol. 37:381-385 (1993).
Green et al., Chromosomal region of the cystic fibrosis gene in yeast artificial chromosomes: A model for human genome mapping, Science 250:94-98 (1990).
Jabs et al., Characterization of a cloned DNA sequence that is present at centromeres of all human autosomes and the X chromosome and shows polymorphic variation, Proc. Natl. Acad. 81:4884-4888, (1984).
Le Bolc'h et al., Cationic phosphonolipids as non viral vectors for DNA transfection, Tetrahedron Lett. 36:6681-6684 (1995).
Love et al., Transgenic birds by microinjection, Bio/Technology 12:60-63 (1994).
McLean, Improved Techniques for immortalizing animal cells, TIBTECH 11, 232-238 (1993).
Petitte et al. Production of somatic and germline chimeras in the chicken by transfer of early blastodermal cells, Development 108:185-189 (no date available).
Roth, Artifizielle chromosomen, Natur Wissenschaften 74:78-85, (1987).
Sang, Transgenic chickens--methods and potential applications, TIBTECH 12,415-420 (1994).
Smith et al., Amplification of large artificial chromosomes, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 87:8242-8246, (1990).
von Bodman et al., Expression of multiple eukaryotic cells from a single promoter in Nicotina, Bio/Technology 13: 587-591 (1995).
Waring et al., Nucleotide sequence repitition: A rapidly reassociating fraction of mouse DNA, Science 154:791-794 (1966).
Zang et al., Production of recombinant proteins in Chines hamster ovary cells using a protein-free cell culture medium, Bio/Technology 13: 389-392 (1995).
Bower, D.J. "Constructing a fully defined human Minichromosome: . . . " (Conference abstract) Source: Eur Cong. Biotechnol. (vol. 3 571) 1987.
Carine et al, "Chinese Hamster Cells with a Minichromosome Containing the Centromere Region of Human Chromosome 1", Som. Cell & Mol. Gen., vol. 12, #5, 1986, pp. 479-491.
Solus et al., "Characterization of Single-Copy Probe from Vicinity of Centromere of Human Chromosome 1", Som. Cell & Mol. Gen., vol. 14, No. 4, 1988, pp. 381-391.
Burke, et al., "Cloning of Large Segments of Exogenous DNA into Yeast by Means of Artificial Chromosome Vectors," Science, vol. 236, pp. 806-812 (no date available).
Murray et al., "Construction of Artificial Chromosomes in Yeast," Nature, vol. 305, pp. 189-193, Sep. 15, 1993.
Clarke et al., "The Structure and Function of Yeast Centromeres," Ann. Rev. Genet. 1985, 19:29-56.
Blackburn et al., "The Molecular Structure of Centromeres and Telomeres" Ann. Rev. Biochem., 1984, 53:163-94.
Hadlaczky, et al., "Centromere proteins: I. Mitosis specific centromere antigen recognized by anti-centromere autoantibodies", Chromosoma, 97(4):282-288, 1989.

Abstract

Description