This invention relates generally to osteotomy guides to facilitate making cuts in a bone. More particularly, the invention relates to an improved method and apparatus for correcting deformities in a bone or joint by making a pair of intersecting, angularly-displaced cuts to excise a wedge-shaped piece of bone.
Background
An osteotomy is a surgical procedure involving dividing or cutting a piece out of a bone to correct a bone or joint deformity. Such deformities may result from age, injury, birth defect and/or disease, such as arthritis. A particularly common deformity susceptible to treatment by osteotomy is a varus or valgus displacement of the knee joint, more commonly referred to as a knock-kneed or bow-legged condition, respectively. This condition can be corrected by a tibial osteotomy procedure. A second common type of deformity, frequently caused by overly tight shoes, involves a twisting in of the big toe toward the rest of the foot, known as a hallux valgus deformation. A hallux valgus deformity can frequently be successfully treated by a metatarsal osteotomy to realign the metatarsal.
Angular deformations, such as described above, can be corrected by one of two major osteotomy techniques. In the first of the techniques, the angular alignment of a bone is altered by making a cylindrical profile cut through the bone where the realignment is to be effected. The severed sections of a bone cut in this fashion can be pivoted relative to one another about the axis of the cylindrical cut, while maintaining substantially complete bone contact at the cut. The surgeon must position the bone sections in the desired alignment and stabilize the bone while it heals. Both the stabilization and the alignment can be problematic when this method is employed.
A second technique for correcting angular deformations involves the removal of a cuneiform or wedge-shaped section of bone extending substantially, but not completely, across the bone generally transverse to its long axis. By leaving a small amount of bone at the apex of the wedge, a hinge-like articulation is created, which stabilizes the bone as the gap, which results when the wedge is removed, is closed. By precisely controlling the wedge angle, the desired angular correction is reliably established. In the prior art, the desired angular correction is typically determined pre-operatively by measurements from X-rays of other imaging techniques, and in some cases, by simple visual estimation. The predetermined correction angle is used to set the guide, which is then used to make the cuts.
Several varieties of osteotomy guides for making cuneiform osteotomies are shown in the prior art. U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,627,425 and 4,750,481 to Reese disclose a system to make a second cut at a predetermined angle relative to a first cut. The system employs a flat follower pivotally connected to a saw guide. After making the first cut, the follower is set and secured at the desired predetermined angle relative to the guide and inserted into the first cut. By placing the follower in the first cut, the guide is automatically placed so that the second cut occurs at the desired predetermined angle relative to the first cut.
Numerous references, such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,349,018, 4,421,112, 4,565,191, 5,112,334 and 5,246,444, disclose devices that provide two angularly displaced guides, one for each cut, along which both cuts are made without repositioning the device. As with the guide and follower systems described above, such devices require that the surgeon predetermine the desired correction angle.
Either of the above described mechanisms for guiding the cuts at predetermined angles are generally able to accurately establish the cut locations once the wedge angle is set. The primary source of error in such systems thus becomes determining the angle at which to set the devices. Measurements from X-rays of the affected bone or bones are probably the most common method of determining the correction angle. Unfortunately, determining the correct angle from an X-ray is dependent on taking the X-ray from the proper angle relative to the bone or bones. Thus, in the case of the tibial osteotomy, if the patients leg is rotated slightly about its longitudinal axis, i.e., the foot turned in or out, the apparent angle between the tibia and femur may be altered. It is likewise apparent that visual estimation of the correction angle is subject to considerable error.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide an osteotomy guide with which it is not necessary to determine preoperatively the desired correction angle.
It is another object of the current invention to provide an osteotomy method in which the correction is automatically established during the osteotomy.
Yet another object of the current invention is to provide an osteotomy method in which the correction angle is determined during the surgery by reference to anatomical landmarks.
One more object of the present invention is to provide an osteotomy guide with a structure suitable for use in determining the correction angle for an osteotomy.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a simple, easy to use osteotomy guide and surgical technique that together result in a rapid and precise osteotomy.
Summary of the Invention
The above objects are best realized by providing an osteotomy guide with a saw guide and an alignment member to be mounted on a pivot pin at the apex of a wedge of bone to be removed. The saw guide establishes a cut plane and guides a cutting device as it cuts through the bone in the cut plane. The alignment member projects in a direction generally normal or transverse to the cut plane and provides a reference for the alignment steps in the osteotomy procedure as described below. The saw guide and alignment member are either permanently or selectively coupled to one another for common pivotal motion about the pivot pin.
The present method of carrying out the osteotomy involves aligning the alignment member with a predetermined anatomical landmark and making a first cut. After the first cut is made the alignment member is pivoted about the pivot pin, together with the saw guide which is coupled to it, into alignment relative to a second anatomical landmark. By choosing an appropriate landmarks, the saw guide will automatically be placed so that the angle between the cuts results in the proper correction.
These and other advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent when consideration is given to the following detailed description and the accompanying drawings.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIGS. 1a-c depict an osteotomy to remove a wedge-shaped piece of a bone.
FIG. 2 is a perspective view of an osteotomy guide assembly according to the present invention.
FIG. 3 is an exploded view of the assembly of FIG. 2.
FIG. 4 shows the assembly of FIG. 2 mounted on a patient's foot.
FIG. 5 illustrates the steps and corrective effect of the invented osteotomy method.
FIG. 6 is a partial cutaway side view of another embodiment of an osteotomy guide assembly according to the present invention.
FIG. 7 shows how a drill guide is used to install a pivot pin for use in the invented osteotomy method.
FIG. 8 is an end view of the assembly of FIG. 6.
FIG. 9 is a perspective view of the assembly of FIG. 6 as mounted on a patient's tibia.
FIGS. 10a-c illustrate the tibial osteotomy process of the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
The steps involved in performing a cuneiform osteotomy are generally illustrated in FIGS. 1a-1c. As shown in FIG. 1a, first cut 10 is made in a bone 12 generally transverse to the long axis of the bone. First cut 10 extends substantially through the bone, leaving a portion of the bone intact to serve as a cortical hinge 14. A second cut 16 is made in bone 12 at an angle 18 relative to first cut 10. Angle 18 determines the angular correction yielded in the bone. The two cuts 10, 16 intersect at an apex 20 of a wedge-shaped piece 22 of bone 12. After cuts 10, 16 are made, wedge 22 is removed and bone 12 is bent at cortical hinge 14 to close the resultant gap 24.
A preferred embodiment of an osteotomy guide assembly according to the present invention particularly adapted for metatarsal osteotomies is illustrated generally at 30 in FIG. 2. Guide assembly 30 includes three major components: guide member 32, alignment member 34 and locking member 36. Guide member 32 has a generally elongate form and includes a handle portion 38 disposed toward one end and a saw guide 40 disposed toward the opposite end. Saw guide 40 is formed by two spaced-apart elongate fingers 42 separated by a planar slot 44 which is adapted to receive a saw blade 46. Saw blade 46, being slightly narrower than slot 44 can move freely up and down and back and forth therein, but is constrained to cut in a cut plane 48 established by slot 44. An elongate threaded stud 50 projects outwardly from guide member 32 between handle 38 and saw guide 40. See FIG. 3. The axis of stud 50 is generally perpendicular to the elongate axis of guide member 32 and parallel to cut plane 48 established by slot 44.
Alignment member 34 is made up of an elongate alignment bar 52 connected at one end to a circular collar 54 adapted to be placed over stud 50 and thereby pivotally connect alignment member 34 to guide member 32. Bar 52 includes a number of transverse locking holes 56 through which small pins or screws (not shown) can be installed to secure the bar to the bone while the cut is being made. A profile template 58, the use of which is described below, is slidably attached to move back and forth along the length of bar 52.
Locking member 36 has an elongate, generally cylindrical, central region 60 and a lower end 62 with an internally threaded cavity 63 for threaded engagement with stud 50. At the upper end of locking member 36 is a knob 64 to facilitate finger tightening of locking member 36 on stud 50. Until locking member 36 is tightened on stud 50 to clamp collar 54 between lower end 62 and guide member 32, alignment member 34 is free to pivot about stud 50 relative to saw guide 40. Tightening locking member 36 on stud 50 fixes the relative orientation of saw guide 40 and alignment member 34.
Guide assembly 30 is pivotally mounted on a metatarsal 66 on a pivot pin 68. See FIGS. 4 and 5. During the operation, the surgeon chooses a location where a wedge of bone 70 from metatarsal 66 is to be removed to correct the deformity. The surgeon then drills a portion of pin 68 into the metatarsal at the apex of wedge 22. A pivot bore 72 extends axially through stud 50 and guide member 32 to fit over the portion of pin 68 projecting out of metatarsal 66. This allows guide assembly to pivot about pin 68 and results in the axis of pin 66 lying in the cut plane established by slot 44. The axis of pin 68, therefore, determines the plane in which the angular correction is effected, that plane being perpendicular to the axis of the pin. Pin 68 also serves as a stop to prevent saw blade 46 from cutting entirely through the bone. This is important because the narrow portion of bone left at the apex of wedge 22 serves as a hinge when the bone is bent to remove the deformity.
The use of guide assembly 30 in a metatarsal osteotomy is illustrated in FIG. 5. After guide assembly 30 is mounted on pin 68, alignment bar 52 and profile template 58 are adjusted so that profile template 58 lies over the distal end of metatarsal 66 as shown by the solid lines in FIG. 5. The outline of profile template 58 is adapted to closely match the outside profile of the distal end of metatarsal 66 to facilitate precise alignment of bar 52 with metatarsal 66. Once profile template 58 is properly placed, alignment bar 52 is secured to metatarsal 66 by placing one or more screws or pins through locking holes 56.
After alignment bar 52 is secured in place, the surgeon, using handle 38, pivots slot 44 into position at the desired location for the first cut. When slot 44 is properly located, locking member 36 is tightened, thereby fixing the orientation between alignment bar 52 and cut plane 48 established by slot 44. Slot 44 is then used to guide saw blade 46 as the first cut is made in the cut plane established by the slot. It should be noted that it is not critical that the orientation between alignment bar 52 and saw guide 40 be adjustable. Being able to choose the position of the first cut independent of the position of bar 52 merely allows the surgeon additional flexibility as to the orientation of the wedge relative to the longitudinal axis of the metatarsal. The important constraint is that the alignment between bar 52 and cut plane 48 established by saw guide 40 not change between the cuts.
In order to align slot 44 for the next cut, any pins or screws holding alignment bar 52 to metatarsal 66 are removed, thereby allowing guide assembly 30 to pivot freely on pin 68. The surgeon, without loosening locking member 36, pivots alignment bar 52 about pin 68 until profile template 58 lies over the desired final position of the distal end of metatarsal 66 as shown by the dashed lines in FIG. 5. The final position is chosen to set the correct spacing between metatarsal 66 and the adjacent metatarsal bone. Alignment bar 52 is then secured to metatarsal 66, and a second cut is made through slot 44 in cut plane 48 established thereby.
The two cuts sever wedge 70 from metatarsal 66. Wedge 70 is removed and metatarsal 66 is then bent to close the wedge-shaped gap left when wedge 70 was removed. Bone screws, staples or other types of fixation are applied to hold the gap closed while healing takes place.
Another embodiment of an osteotomy guide assembly according to the present invention is shown at 100 in FIG. 6. Guide assembly 100 is adapted to perform high tibial osteotomies and is pivotally mounted to the proximal end of a tibia 102 on a pivot pin 104.
As shown in FIG. 7 pivot pin 104 is installed on tibia 102 with the aid of a drill guide 106. Drill guide 106 insures that the pivot pin axis is perpendicular to the axis of tibia 102 and includes a cylindrical body 108 with an axial bore 110 and a lower end 112 with a number of grip points 114. A shoulder flange 116 is formed on body 108 on the end opposite lower end 112. An alignment rod 118 is fixed to shoulder flange 116 and extends radially and perpendicularly relative to the axis of bore 110.
The surgeon, after selecting the site for the osteotomy, places lower end 112 of drill guide 106 on tibia 102 at the apex of the wedge of bone to be removed. The action of grip points 114 against tibia 102 prevents lower end 112 from slipping on the surface of tibia 102 during subsequent alignment and drilling. In conjunction with the positioning of lower end 112, alignment rod 118 is adjusted to extend parallel to the longitudinal axis of tibia 102. The surgeon also tips body 108 so that the axis of bore 110 is perpendicular to the axis of flexion of the knee.
After drill guide 106 is properly aligned, pivot pin 104 is passed through bore 110 and drilled into tibia 102. About two inches of pivot pin 104 are left sticking out of tibia 102.
Guide assembly 100 further includes a guide member 120 as shown in FIGS. 6, 8 and 9. Guide member 120 includes a pivot end 122 through which are formed three pivot holes 124. Pivot holes 124 are adapted to fit over pivot pin 104 and are formed oversize to facilitate installation of member 120 on pin 104.
After member 120 is installed on tibia 102 and pivot pin 104, a pivot shim 126 is installed around pivot pin 104 and within one of pivot holes 124 to eliminate the play between the pin and the hole. Pivot shim 126 includes a cylindrical body 128 with an axial bore 130 and a shoulder flange 13 1 at one end. Shoulder flange 131 prevents shim 126 from passing entirely through hole 122. When installed, cylindrical body 128 fits through hole 122 and pin 104 passes through bore 130. The outside diameter of cylindrical body 128 should closely match the inside diameter of pivots holes 56 and, likewise, the diameters of pin 104 and bore 130 should be equal to each other. This eliminates any play in the pivotal joint between pin 104 and guide member 120.
Extending from pivot end 122 in a direction perpendicular to the axes of pivot holes 124 and across tibia 102 is an elongate cross arm 132. Arm 132 includes a raised portion 134 which holds an alignment tube 136. The axis of tube 136 is perpendicular to both the axis of the holes and the axis of arm 132. Raised portion 134 is positioned on arm 132 so that the axis of tube 136 lies directly over the medial compartment 138 of the knee. Provision of three pivot holes allows guide member 100 to accommodate various bone sizes while still maintaining this alignment. See FIG. 10a. Unless otherwise specified, references to positional relationships will be specified assuming a patient lying prone on their back with legs straight.
The end of arm 132 opposite pivot end 122 curves down around the side of tibia 102 forming an arcuate section 140. Arcuate section 140 includes three locking holes 142. The axes of locking holes 142 run generally radially from the axis of tibia 102. When guide member 120 is properly positioned for each cut, a number of fasteners in the form of pins or screws are driven through locking holes 142 to secure the guide member to the bone during the cut.
A saw guide portion 144 extends from the end of arcuate section 140 down along the side of tibia 102. A planar slot 146 bifurcates saw guide portion 144 along a plane intersecting the axis of pivot pin 104 and perpendicular to the axis of alignment tube 136. Slot 146 is adapted to receive and establish a cut plane 147 for a saw blade. The blade, which is not shown, can move back and forth through, and up and down in, slot 146, but is constrained to move and cut in the plane 147 of slot 146.
After guide member 120 is pivotally mounted on tibia 102, an alignment rod 148 is passed through alignment tube 136 for use in aligning the guide member for each cut. For the first cut, the free end of alignment rod 148 opposite tube 136 is positioned over the head 149 of the patient's femur. This automatically places saw guide 144 in position for the first cut. Under some circumstances, it may be beneficial to use an X-ray to establish the location of head 149. After securing guide member 120 to tibia 102, as described above, the surgeon makes the first cut in the cut plane established by saw guide 144.
The position of the saw guide for the second cut is established by extending alignment rod 148 through tube 136 so that the free end is disposed toward the distal end of tibia 102. See FIG. 10b. The free end of alignment rod 148 is then aligned with the tip 150 of the distal end of tibia 102. Guide member 120 is again secured to tibia 102 and the second cut is made.
As with the metatarsal osteotomy procedure described above, the severed wedge of bone is removed and the bone is bent to close the gap. See FIG. 10c. Some form of stabilization is then applied to fix the bone portions in place during the healing process.
The correct alignment of a leg 152 is illustrated in FIG. 10c. It can be seen that a straight line 154, as viewed from above, extends from the center of head 149 of the femur, through medial compartment 138 of the knee to distal tip 150 of tibia 102. By referring to FIGS. 10a-c it will be seen that the above described process automatically establishes the proper correction angle to create this relationship. If one cut is made at a fixed angle relative to a line between head 149 of the femur and medial compartment 138, and the other cut is made at the same angle relative to a straight line between medial compartment 138 and distal tip 150 of tibia 102, the resultant alignment after the severed wedge is removed will be as shown in FIG. 10c.
The two described osteotomy methods have a common underlying approach of using anatomical landmarks for references to establish the relative angular position between the cuts. In the case of the metatarsal osteotomy, the first landmark is the distal end of the metatarsal. The second landmark is the desired final position of the distal end of the metatarsal, which is determined by reference to the adjacent metatarsal. For the tibial osteotomy, the first landmark is the head of the femur and the second landmark is the tip at the distal end of the tibia.
It will also be appreciated that the method for metatarsal osteotomies described above wherein the alignment member is set over current and desired final positions of some anatomical landmark could be used for tibial osteotomies. For example, the free end of alignment rod 148 could be aligned with the current position of the distal tip of the tibia for one cut and with the desired final position of the distal tip for the second cut.
It should be noted that the order of the cuts is irrelevant to achieving the correct final alignment. Nor is it necessary that the cut plane be perpendicular to the alignment tube and rod. Also, while not preferred, it is possible to carry out the present method with a guide assembly having two separate saw guides, and perhaps separate associated alignment members, pivotally connected to the pivot pin.
For guide assemblies, such as guide assembly 30 for metatarsal osteotomies, in which the orientation between the saw guide and the alignment member can be adjusted, it is not critical that the alignment member be aligned prior to the first cut. Rather, a first configuration must simply be established at some point wherein the alignment member is aligned with the first preselected landmark and the saw guide is positioned at the location of the first cut. It is the relative orientation between the saw guide and the alignment member in the first configuration that is of particular importance. The first cut is made in conjunction with this first configuration such that the saw guide is positioned at the location of the first cut, but indifferent to the relative orientation to the alignment member.
Thus, there are at least two distinct possibilities for how the first cut can be made in conjunction with the step of establishing a first configuration. First, the saw guide can be positioned for the first cut without reference to the alignment of the alignment member. In this case, the first cut is made and the alignment member, with the saw guide still in position for the cut, is afterward aligned with the first anatomical landmark to thereby establish the first configuration. At this point the orientation between the saw guide and the alignment member is preserved by locking the two together with the locking member, thereby preserving the proper relative orientation.
In the second alternative, the alignment member is aligned with the first anatomical landmark and locked to the saw guide, as positioned for the first cut, prior to making the cut. This allows the position of the saw guide to be stabilized by locking the alignment member to the bone, as described above in the context of metatarsal osteotomies.
In either case it is the relative orientation between the saw guide and the alignment member created when the alignment member is aligned with the first anatomical landmark and the saw guide is positioned for the first cut that is duplicated to place the second cut. The location of the second cut is automatically established by aligning the alignment member with the second anatomical landmark while maintaining or recreating the orientation between the alignment member and the saw guide determined in the first configuration. Typically, as in the preferred embodiment, the saw guide and alignment member are pivoted in unison after being locked together. However, the method of maintaining or reestablishing the proper relative orientation is not critical to the practice of the invention and there are many suitable ways in which the desired result could be accomplished.
By using anatomical landmarks, many of the sources of error in prior art methods are eliminated. For instance, when relying on X-rays to establish a correction angle, it is critical that the X-ray be taken from the proper angle with the patient's leg not being rotated. If the angle is incorrect or the patient's leg is rotated, the X-ray will give a false indication of the degree of correction required. It is frequently necessary to take quite a number of X-rays to establish an accurate correction angle. Simple visual estimation of the correction angle is likewise subject to considerable error. The present methods, in contrast, by making direct reference to anatomical landmarks intra-operatively, give the surgeon full control over the position of the patient's leg during the various steps and eliminate all of the guess work from the surgery.
The osteotomy methods and apparatus described above allow the surgeon to establish the amount of angular correction to be effected intra-operatively and without reference to X-rays or other imaging techniques. Use of the described apparatus and methods results in an osteotomy procedure that is faster and simpler, as well as more reliable, than the prior art osteotomy techniques.
It will now be clear that an improvement in this art has been provided which accomplishes the objectives heretofore set forth. While the invention has been disclosed in its preferred form, it is to be understood that the specific embodiment thereof as disclosed and illustrated herein is not to be considered in a limited sense as there may be other forms or modifications which should also be construed to come within the scope of the appended claims.