US 5,589,291 AGrant
Stabilized Rechargeable Cell in MSE
Issue Date:1996-12-31
•5 Claims
•2 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
Method is provided for preparing a stabilized rechargeable cell having a negative electrode and a molten salt electrolyte (MSE) while avoiding problems of chloroaluminate cell systems which are not air stable. The cell of the present invention thus employs an LiBF.sub.4 /EMI.sub.BF4 MSE and a negative electrode of an inert substrate. On charging such cell, Li metal plates out on the electrode, which metal would immediately be attacked by such MSE. However a small amount of water is added to the MSE which, forms a lithium salt on the surface of such metal and protects it from attack by the MSE. However such protective film is permeable to Li.sup.+ ions. This means that on continuing to charge such cell, the LI.sup.+ ions flow from the MSE through the protective film and build up as more Li metal on the negative electrode, under the protective film. On discharge of such cell, the Li metal becomes Li.sup.+ ions which can pass through the protective lithium salt film. Accordingly employing a suitable cathode, the rechargeable cell of the invention can operate at high voltage, with a cycling efficiency of over 60%. Also the electrolyte of such cell has a variable temperature range, a high inherent conductivity and is air stable.
Metadata
Assignee
- The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Air Force
Inventors
- Richard T. Carlin
- Joan Fuller
Application Information
Application Number:US 6137466
Filing Date:1996-02-22
Priority Date:1995-06-26
Art Unit:111
Classifications
IPC:
H01M 1036
Field of Search:
429101;163;218;223;224;112;199
Patent Drawings (2 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to a method for making a stabilized rechargeable cell employing a lithium metal negative electrode in a molten salt electrolyte (MSE), particularly with an MSE of relatively low temperature.
2. The Prior Art
It is known to stabilize lithium electrodes in a secondary cell that employs a chloroaluminate-molten salt electrolyte system.
That is, lithium deposition and stripping is known employing EMIC/AlCl.sub.2 /LiCl (EMIC=1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium chloride) room-temperature molten salt following addition of a proton source such as EMIHCl.sub.2 or triethanolamine-hydrogen chloride. However, the chloroaluminate system has several disadvantages which limits its use as an electrolyte for high energy density batteries: (1) the concentration of proton required for a stable lithium deposit is difficult to maintain for extended lengths of time and (2) the melt is not air stable and must be handled under inert conditions.
That is, if the cell is not properly sealed and leaks, the chloride in the melt will react with moisture in the air and form HCl, a corrosive gas.
Yet it would be desirable to utilize the advantages that low temperature molten salts offer (e.g., excellent electrochemical window, high conductivity and variable temperature range) but eliminate some of the previously mentioned problems for the chloroaluminate system.
By "low temperature" as used herein is meant temperatures below 100.degree. C., including room temperature of about 20.degree. C.
That is, it would be advantageous to use a lithium metal electrode in an MSE secondary or rechargeable cell for high voltage potential at, e.g. room temperature.
In the prior art relative to rechargeable cells having a molten salt electrolyte and a lithium electrode, one finds references such as U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,076,905 (1978) and 4,116,780 (1978) both to Sammells and U.S. Pat. No. 4,304,825 to Basu (1981). In each of these references, the lithium electrode is combined with another material, either as an alloy of silicon and boron or intercalated in graphite, with no suggestion of being able to employ a lithium metal electrode in a molten salt electrolyte for a rechargeable or secondary cell.
Accordingly there is a need and market for such a secondary cell that overcomes the above prior art shortcomings.
There has now been discovered such secondary cell wherein the lithium electrode can be charged and discharged repeatedly, while protecting the lithium electrode from reaction and erosion by the MSE, to gain advantage of the wide electrode chemical window attendant such cell system.
Summary of the Invention
Broadly the present invention provides a method for preparing a stabilized rechargeable cell having a negative electrode and a molten salt electrolyte (MSE) which includes:
a) adding BF.sub.4.sup.- anions to EMI.sup.+ cations to obtain a melt of EMIBF.sub.4 in the MSE,
b) adding LiBF.sub.4 to the melt,
c) adding H.sub.2 O to the melt,
d) applying a charging potential to the negative electrode to drive Li.sup.+ ions from the melt to plate out as Li metal on the negative electrode and
also to form a lithium salt film on the surface of the Li metal that protects such metal from reacting with the melt, which film is permeable to Li.sup.+ ions and,
e) continuing to apply the charging potential to drive Li.sup.+ ions from the melt through the film, to plate out more Li metal on the negative electrode and build up same under the film.
The invention also provides a stabilized rechargeable cell which includes:
a) an MSE melt of LiBF.sub.4 /EMIBF.sub.4,
b) a lithium metal negative electrode and
c) a lithium salt protective film deposited on the lithium metal surface of said electrode, which film is permeable to Li.sup.+ ions.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The invention will become more apparent from the following detailed specification and drawings in which;
FIG. 1 is an elevated fragmentary schematic view of a secondary or rechargeable cell embodying the present invention and
FIGS. 2, 3, 4 and 5 are fragmentary elevation schematic views of a portion of a negative electrode according to the present invention, during charging thereof.
Description of Preferred Embodiments
Referring in more detail to the drawings, secondary cell 10 has housing 12 containing MSE 14, negative electrode 16, positive electrode 18, conductor 20, ammeter 21 and voltmeter 22, as shown in FIG. 1.
Thus as indicated in FIG. 1, an inert substrate or collector electrode 16 is inserted into a molten salt electrolyte (MSE) 14 containing Li.sup.+ ions and an H.sub.2 O additive as solutes. The low-temperature molten salt electrolyte includes 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium (EMI.sup.+) and BF.sub.4.sup.- as anion and cation respectively. The anion and cation of the molten salt electrolyte are not shown in the Figures. Also dissolved in the MSE melt is LiBF.sub.4 (in saturation) to provide a source for Li.sup.+ ions to plate out on the negative electrode per FIGS. 1-5.
Thus as shown in FIG. 3, the Li.sup.+ ion is electrochemically reduced to Li at the inert electrode 16 (Li.sup.+ +e.sup.- .fwdarw.Li), producing a thin film of lithium metal 24. Then per FIG. 4, during the electrochemical reduction of Li, the H.sub.2 O solute reacts with the surface of the Li plated electrode 16 to form a stabilizing film thereon.
That is, where H.sub.2 O is added to an (EMI)(BF.sub.4) molten salt electrolyte containing lithium ions, the stabilizing film is most likely lithium hydroxide or lithium oxide per the reactions:
These reactions produce a thin film of insoluble Li.sub.2 O and/or LiOH, at the surface of the Li metal that prevents reaction of such metal with the cation or anion (not shown) of
2) Li is oxidized to Li.sup.+ which escapes to the molten salt electrolyte 14 by breakdown of the stabilizing film 26. This mechanism causes the underlying metallic Li deposit to come into direct contact with the molten salt electrolyte 14. In this case the thin stabilizing film must reform during charging and when metallic Li remains after a partial discharge. This is not the preferred mechanism for Li anodization but is included in the scope of the invention.
Thus in the secondary cell of the invention, a low-temperature MSE is employed which is desirably a melt of EMIBF.sub.4 saturated with LiBF.sub.4. To such MSE, is added a small amount of water as an electrode-stabilizing, film-forming additive as noted above.
As indicated in FIG. 1, various positive electrodes can be used in the secondary cell of the invention which electrodes include Li.sub.x CoO.sub.2, Li.sub.x NiO.sub.2, Li.sub.x Mn.sub.2 O.sub.4, Li.sub.x TiS.sub.2, other transition metal chalcogenides, a BF.sub.4.sup.- graphite intercalation cathode and electrochemically active conducting polymers.
The following example serves to illustrate the method and stabilized rechargeable MSE cell of the invention and should not be construed in limitation thereof.
Example I
An EMIBF.sub.4 melt was prepared by combining equimolar quantities of EMIC and AgBF.sub.4 in water. The solution was stirred for two hours and the resulting AgCl was filtered and set aside for recycling. The clear solution was rotoevaporated down to a clear oil. The resulting EMIBF.sub.4 was placed in a vacuum oven at 80.degree. C. for 24-48 hrs. A final molten salt product the molten salt electrolyte. The thin film also prevents further reaction of Li metal with H.sub.2 O. Only a thin surface film is required to protect the Li metal deposit; thus only a low concentration of H.sub.2 O (or other stabilizer additive) is required to produce the stabilizing film.
Then per FIG. 5, further reduction of Li.sup.+ to Li, proceeds by transport of the Li.sup.+ ion through the thin film 26 of Li.sub.2 O/LiOH. The stabilizing film is not permeable to the molten salt electrolyte ions nor to the H.sub.2 O additive.
The above discussion in FIGS. 2-5 show a charging sequence of the negative electrode 16. On discharge, Li.sup.+ ions are formed beneath the film 26 at FIG. 5 and flow in the opposite direction from arrow 25, which ions preferably flow through the stabilizing film 26 without breach thereof.
Thus the stabilized deposit of Li metal 24, shown in FIGS. 4 and 5, is available for anodization (discharge) and can function as the anode in a battery cell containing an appropriate cathode in a suitable MSE, as discussed below.
The Anodization of Li to Li.sup.+ can follow two mechanisms:
1) Li is oxidized to Li.sup.+ which is transported back through the stabilizing film 26, to the electrolyte solution, 14, eg. the reverse of FIG. 5. In this case the thin stabilizing film 26 remains intact and the rechargeable battery anode 16 functions by the forward and reverse directions of the process shown in FIG. 5. This is the preferred mechanism for Li anodization. of about 20 g of EMIBF.sub.4 melt resulted. About 0.36 g of LiBF.sub.4 was added to the 20 g (about 15 mL) EMIBF.sub.4 melt, giving a saturated solution containing ca 0.1M Li.sup.+. Cyclic voltammetry at an inert Pt electrode (area=0.02 cm.sup.2) showed no deposition or stripping of metallic lithium; only the irreversible reduction of the EMI.sup.+ organic cation was seen at -2.2 V versus an Al/Al(III) reference electrode.
Then a small amount of water was added. That is, after addition of 10 .mu.L H.sub.2 O (40 mM), the EMI.sup.+ reduction was suppressed and the reversible deposition-stripping of metallic lithium was observed at -3.0 V with a cycling efficiency of 56%.
Thus, adding a few microliters of water provided a protective lithium salt film over the lithium metallic electrode and resulted in the appearance of lithium deposition and stripping waves at -3 V. Cycling efficiencies were indicated at greater than 60% for the above negative electrode having a Pt substrate. A similar cycling efficiency was found when the negative electrode had a tungsten substrate.
The LiBF.sub.4 /EMIBF.sub.4 molten salt system of the invention is a promising electrolyte for high voltage rechargeable lithium batteries. Because the anodic limit is greater than +2 V for this electrolyte, a 5 V battery is possible if the lithium couple at -3 V is combined with appropriate cathodic material.
Accordingly the above low temperature MSE or melt of the invention has many of the salient features of the prior art chloroaluminate system, i.e. a wide electrochemical window (>4 V), a variable temperature range and high inherent conductivity. In addition however, it is air stable (without the HCl-forming problems of the above prior art system) and LiBF.sub.4 has considerable solubility in the melt of the invention.
For further information on the LiBF.sub.4 /EMIBF.sub.4 melt in the secondary cell of the present invention, attention is directed to a Paper published by J. Fuller et al, designated Abstract No. 15, published in Extended Abstracts, Vol. 95-1, by the Electrochemical Society (1995) entitled "Lithium Anode Studies in a Tetrafluoroborate Molten Salt Electrolyte", which Paper is incorporated herein by reference.
Accordingly the secondary cell of the present invention employs a low temperature MSE that has a wide electrochemical window that can lead to 5 V rechargeable, high energy batteries.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A stabilized rechargeable cell comprising, a) an MSE melt of LiBF.sub.4 /EMIBF.sub.4 b) a lithium metal negative electrode and c) a lithium salt protective film deposited on the lithium metal surface of said electrode, which film is permeable to Li.sup.+ ions.
2. The rechargeable cell of claim 1, wherein said MSE melt has equimolar amounts of EMI.sup.+ and BF.sub.4.sup.-, which melt is saturated with LiBF.sub.4.
3. The cell of claim 1 wherein said protective film is selected from the group consisting of Li.sub.2 O, LiOH and a combination thereof.
4. The cell of claim 1 wherein said negative electrode has an inert substrate selected from the group consisting of Pt, Tu, and C.
5. The cell of claim 1 having an anode selected from the group consisting of Li.sub.x CoO.sub.2, Li.sub.x NiO.sub.2, Li.sub.x Mn.sub.2 O.sub.4, Li.sub.x TiS.sub.2, other transition metal chalcogenides, a BF.sub.4.sup.- graphite intercalation cathode and electrochemically active conducting polymers.