Background of the Invention
The invention refers to a process according to the preamble of Patent Claim 1 and a device or apparatus for the implementation of this process according to the preamble of Patent Claim 3.
The known processes and devices of this type are designed so that each individual measuring point is connected with the central evaluation station, e.g., a data processing device with a monitor, via a separate transmission line used by it only and the individual measuring points are interrogated or polled one after the other via the lines at the location of the evaluation station.
This state of the art requires a very large installation expenditure.
The problem forming the basis for the invention is to create a process according to the preamble of Patent Claim 1 that makes possible reliable interrogation of the individual measuring points with a much lower installation expenditure than the above-mentioned processes required for its realization and a device for the implementation of this process.
The problem above is solved with the object of Patent Claim 1 and with the object of Patent Claim 3.
With the process according to the invention, only one single line with a few wires is required for the longest link from the group of measuring points belonging together to the central evaluation station, since the measuring points of this group are assembled at the network device which, controlled from the central evaluation station, produces the connection to the individual measuring points in a predetermined sequence, whereby the network device is connected with an output of the central evaluation station, for which a single line with a few wires, in principle with only two, is sufficient.
Even in cases when there are several groups of measuring points belonging together, only one single cable with these few wires is required between these groups and/or between the individual network devices assigned to them in each case and one of these network devices to the central evaluation station when operating according to the process according to the invention.
Patent Claim 2 is concerned with a preferred design of the process according to Patent Claim 1.
Patent Claim 3 is concerned with a device suited for implementation of the process according to the invention and Patent claims 4 to 6 refer to preferred designs of the device according to Patent Claim 3.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment
The invention will be described in more detail below with the help of the drawing using a design example. The only figure in the drawing depicts the circuit diagram of a device according to the invention for the implementation of the process according to the invention, having three network devices V.sub.1, V.sub.2, and V.sub.3.
Each of the network devices V.sub.1 -V.sub.3 in each case has a decimal counter Z.sub.1 -Z.sub.3 (e.g. of type 4014) wired in the way shown in the drawing so that the circuit configuration operates like a multiplexer with four parallel inputs "a", "b", "c" and "out" and with the serial terminal "IN" to lines L.sub.1 or L.sub.2 or L.sub.3.
Switch signals S are transmitted on Lines L.sub.1 L.sub.2, L.sub.3 from the central evaluation station AE, e.g. a program-controlled data processing system possibly having a monitor, in the manner discussed in more detail in the following text, first to the first network device V.sub.1 connected directly to the evaluation station, then through this to the second network device V.sub.2, and finally through the first and the second network device to the third network device V.sub.3. In this respect, the terminals IN of the network devices V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3 represent inputs for the switch signals S.
Measuring signals I are also transmitted via Lines L.sub.1 -L.sub.3, however, from the measuring points to the evaluation station AE and for these the terminals IN of the individual network devices V.sub.1, V.sub.2, and V.sub.3 represent outputs. The transferring or establishing of a connection between the evaluation station AE and in turn with the different measuring points, first of group G.sub.1, then of the second group G.sub.2, and then of the third group G.sub.3, as well as the transmission of the measuring signals I from the respective measuring point to the evaluation station AE takes place as follows:
Starting from the idle state, in which no connection exists between the evaluation station AE and the measuring points, 1, 2, 3 of the three groups G.sub.1, G.sub.2, and G.sub.3, the abrupt application of--relatively low-resistance--direct current from the evaluation station AE to the terminal IN of the first network device V.sub.1 causes, due to the special protection circuit of the counter Z.sub.1 in the manner shown in the drawing, a connection to be established through the network device V.sub.1 from the evaluation station AE to only its input "a", so that the direct current from the evaluation station AE is now applied to this input. This direct current is very resistant so that the state is reflected at the measuring point in the size of the load-dependent current, that flows from the measuring point via the terminal a from V.sub.1 to evaluation station AE, and this current represents measuring signal I. The current measuring signal I can have any waveform.
Now, when the direct current from AE applied to IN of V.sub.1 is abruptly interrupted for a short time, the connection to input a from V.sub.1 is interrupted, due to the special protective circuit of Z.sub.1 shown in the drawing, and instead of this is established to input b of V.sub.1, because the counter Z.sub.1 is switched through in each case to the next terminal in the sequence a, b, c, out due to this voltage interruption. In the transferring from a to b and finally to c, another one of the three measuring points 1, 2, 3 of the group G.sub.1 is connected to the evaluation station AE. The voltage interruption that follows on the terminal IN from V.sub.1 is transmitted on, however via the terminal out of V.sub.1 to the terminal IN of V.sub.2 as an abrupt voltage rise and now causes the establishment of a connection from IN to V.sub.2 to its input a, so that now the measuring point 1 of group G.sub.2 is switched through via V.sub.2 through V.sub.1 to the central evaluation unit AE. Each additional voltage interruption from AE subsequently has an effect on only V.sub.2 because, due to the special protective circuit of the counter Z.sub.1 from V.sub.1 using the method shown in the drawing, this counter discontinues switching as soon as the connection between IN and out of V.sub.1 has been established. The following voltage interruptions and/or switch signals S now successively affect the transfer of the connection first from a to b, then from b to c and finally from c to out of V.sub.2 in the same manner as this occurred previously in the case of V.sub.1, so that now in turn measuring points 2 and 3 of group G.sub.2 are connected with the central evaluation station AE and their measuring signals I can be supplied to these and after the transfer from c to out of G.sub.2, the additional switch signals S from AE through V.sub.1 and V.sub.2 go through and the same effects are produced on V.sub.3 as on V.sub.1 and V.sub.2 previously.
With the help of the input-side time constants set in V.sub.1, V.sub.2 and V.sub.3, the result is that all network devices are reset to the idle state when the voltage from AE fails for a longer period of time. In this idle state, all network devices V.sub.1 -V.sub.3 are prepared for the establishment of a connection in each case to the first input a, as soon as the first abrupt voltage rise occurs at its terminal IN.
Thus, it is clear that all nine measuring points (three of group G.sub.1, three of group G.sub.2, and three of group G.sub.3) can be successively interrogated through switch signal S from AE, whereby the long distance between the measuring point groups and the evaluation station AE are bridged in each case by a single, if necessary, two-wire line L.sub.1, L.sub.2 and L.sub.3 and each measuring point requires transmission line l.sub.1, l.sub.2 and l.sub.3, provided for it only, only for the short link to the network device V.sub.1 assigned to it.
Instead of cables, in principle once-channel transmission media, such as radio, light beam, etc. can also be used, whereby the cable connection is of special importance due to its immunity to faults.
The measuring points in the design example described could be, for example, measuring points on three machines to which one of the three network devices V.sub.1, V.sub.2 and V.sub.3 is assigned in each case, so that the measuring points located on the respective machine must be led in each case only to the network point also located on the machine and in each case only one single--if necessary a two-wire--line is required for the three measuring points from the network device the evaluation point AE, whereby only the last group G.sub.3 uses its line L.sub.3 alone, while wiring runs L.sub.2 and L.sub.1 are used twice or three times since L.sub.2 also transmits the signals that come from L.sub.3 and L.sub.1 also transmits the signals from L.sub.2.
As compared to the known single connection of each measuring point to the central evaluation station AE, the required expenditure for transmission media, i.e. for the use of cables, in particular the installation expenditure, is decreased substantially and, in addition, operations security is increased considerably with the invention.
The design example was described above for three measuring points each for each network device V.sub.1, V.sub.2, V.sub.3. It is clear that the number of measuring points for each network device can be configured in practically any way within broad limits, if necessary, using several interconnected counters, also that the number of network devices can be selected as desired within broad limits and also that the number of measuring points can vary from network device to network device.
As already stated, in the design example described transfer occurs with switch signals S in the form of voltage interruption and/or voltage jumps and the transmission of information takes place, so to speak, as a status signal in the form of current signals. In principle, however, other signal forms could also be used for the switch signal and for the information signal, e.g. coded signals, with network devices designed accordingly.