US 5,552,283 AGrant

Method, Reagents and Kit for Diagnosis and Targeted Screening for P53 Mutations

Issue Date:1996-09-03

•60 Claims

•2 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

Rapid and cost effective diagnosis of p53 mutations of a sample of patients is achieved by employing a selected plurality of diagnostic tools, in a hierarchy of increasing accuracy and cost per tool, in which each tool detects essentially no false positives. Diagnostic tests that may be included among the plurality of tests selected include, in order of increasing accuracy and cost: (a) immunoassays, (b) analysis of DNA from a patient sample by quantitative amplification of p53 exons using amplification primers complementary to intron regions flanking each exon and examination of the length or quantity of each amplified fragment for nucleotide insertions or deletions relative to the normal p53 gene. Preferably, the amplification primers are multiplexed so that more than one DNA fragment is amplified in a single vessel, using sets of primers which provide gene fragments of distinctive lengths when used to amplify a normal p53 gene; and (c) analysis of DNA from a patient sample by DNA sequencing of the p53 gene beginning with the sequencing of those regions most likely to harbor point mutations, and proceeding to sequence regions less likely to harbor point mutations.

Metadata

Assignee

Visible Genetics Inc.

Inventors

Eleftherios Diamandis
James M. Dunn
John K. Stevens

Application Information

Application Number:US 3883817

Filing Date:1995-02-14

Priority Date:1994-07-08

Art Unit:187

Classifications

IPC:

C12Q 168C12P 1934C07H 2102C07H 2104

Field of Search:

4355366;91.2;7.2-7.9;7.123.1;24.3;31;33

Patent Drawings (2 sheets)

Description

Background of the Invention

This application relates to a method, reagents and kit for diagnosis and targeted screening of mutation in p53 protein and mutation in the gene coding for the p53 protein (herein the "p53 gene") Such mutations are collectively referred to herein as "p53 mutations".

The evidence for the tumor suppressor activity of wild-type p53 is now extensive. Since its discovery in 1979 when it was found to be complexed with the SV40 large T antigen in SV40-transformed rodent cells the significance of p53 has slowly come to light. The protein appears to act as a transcription factor, and may be responsible for apoptosis of pre-cancerous cells. (Ziegler et al., "Sunburn and p53 in the onset of skin cancer", Nature 372: 773-776 (1994)) The DNA sequence of the 11 exons of the p53 gene is now known and close to 1000 papers were published on p53 in 1993.

P53 mutations are significant because they are found in an enormous variety of tumors. Among common tumors, about 70% of colorectal cancers, 50% of lung cancers, and up to 40% of breast cancers carry p53 gene mutations. p53 is also linked to cancers of the blood and lymph nodes, including Hodgkin's disease, T cell lymphoma and certain kinds of leukemia. Moreover, aberrant forms of the p53 gene are correlated with more aggressive tumors, metastasis and lower 5-year survival rates. Such reports have emerged for cancers of the colon, lung, cervix, bladder, prostate, breast and skin.

The serious consequences of p53 mutations mandates a method for detection and diagnosis of such mutations which is rapid and accurate and that can be performed at the earliest stage of tumor development. Toward this end, immunoassays and DNA assays for p53 mutations are known in the art. To date, however, neither method has been able to identify p53 mutations with a high degree of specificity and accuracy in a cost effective fashion. Those immunoassays that have been published identify only a small portion of those patients actually thought to be carrying the mutation.

Two general techniques of immunoassay have been employed. The first technique is an indirect method which detects anti-p53 antibodies that arise in some patients who have p53 mutations. Immunoassay tests for detecting anti-p53 antibodies in patient sera are currently based on radioactive labeling, immunoprecipitation and immuno-blotting. All these methods are qualitative and time consuming and thus not suitable for screening large number of samples. (Angelopoulou et al., "Autoantibodies against the p53 tumor suppressor gene product quantified in cancer patient serum with time-resolved immunofluorometry", Cancer J6(6): 315-321 (1993)).

The second technique of immunoassay directly detects mutant p53 protein. Such methods have been disclosed in at least two publications. Bartek et al. disclosed an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay for p53 which was applied for the measurement of p53 in tumor tissue extracts (Oncogene, 6:1699-1703 (1991)). Hassapoglidou et al. developed a monoclonal antibody useful for direct detection of mutant p53. (Oncogene 8:1501-1509 (1993).)

DNA analysis of p53 mutations has been reported using at least two techniques. First, single stranded conformational polymorphism was used to detect mutant p53 by Kuypers et al. ("Detection of point mutations in DNA using capillary electrophoresis in a polymer network", J. Chromatography 621:149-56 (1993)) and by Felix et al ("Absence of hereditary p53 mutations in 10 familial leukemia pedigrees", J Clin Invest 90:653-8 (1992)). Second, actual genomic DNA sequencing diagnosis was performed on relatively small groups of patients by Toguchida et al. ("Prevalence and spectrum of germline mutations of the p53 gene among patients with sarcoma", N Engl J Med 326:1301-8 (1992)) and by Malkin et al. ("Germline mutations of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene in children and young adults with second malignant neoplasms", N Engl J Med 326:1309-15 (1992)). The cDNA sequence of a larger group of patients (over 400) was reported in a Pharmacia LKB meeting publication (Andell et al. "A new approach in automated DNA sequencing to analyse the p53 gene in a large number of breast cancer patients", Pharmacia LKB meeting literature, 1994) These rapid DNA-based techniques have been used to detect mutations, but because they are so labor intensive, that large-scale screening tests are impractical (Harris et al., "Clinical implications of the p53 tumor-suppressor gene", N Engl J Med 329:1318-1327 (1993)).

Thus, the existing methods of diagnosis have been frustratingly unsatisfactory. Researchers have used either immunoassay or DNA analytical methods to diagnose p53 mutation, even though such tests result in numerous false negatives. A method is required for rapid and cost effective diagnosis of p53 mutation in the millions of individuals who develop potentially life threatening malignancies each year.

It is an object of this invention to provide a method for rapid and cost effective diagnosis of p53 mutations in a sample of patients.

It is a further object of this invention to provide DNA sequencing and amplification primers specific for analysis of the p53 gene from a patient sample.

It is a further object of this invention to provide kits of DNA oligonucleotides for amplification and sequencing of the p53 gene of a patient.

It is a further object of this invention to provide a method of generating a p53 mutation report which is used to provide appropriate genetic counseling to the patient and family upon whom the test is performed.

Summary of the Invention

In accordance with the present invention, rapid and cost effective diagnosis of p53 mutations of a sample of patients is achieved by employing a selected plurality of diagnostic tools, in a hierarchy of increasing accuracy and cost per tool, in which each tool detects essentially no false positives. Diagnostic tests that may be included among the plurality of tests selected include, in order of increasing accuracy and cost:

(a) immunoassays, particularly immunoassays for anti-p53 antibodies present in a patient sample;

(b) analysis of DNA from a patient sample by quantitative amplification of p53 exons using amplification primers complementary to intron regions flanking each exon and examination of the length or quantity of each amplified fragment for nucleotide insertions or deletions relative to the normal p53 gene. Preferably, the amplification primers are multiplexed so that more than one DNA fragment is amplified in a single vessel, using sets of primers which provide gene fragments of distinctive lengths when used to amplify a normal p53 gene; and

(c) analysis of DNA from a patient sample by DNA sequencing of the p53 gene beginning with the sequencing of those regions most likely to harbor point mutations, and proceeding to sequence regions less likely to harbor point mutations.

The present invention includes a multitude of amplification and sequencing primers. These primers, taken individually or as part of kits for the detection of p53 mutations represent a further aspect of the present invention. Particularly preferred primers constitute sets that are compatible for coamplification and that produce amplified DNA fragments of distinctive lengths from other fragments amplified in the same set.

The information obtained in the test is used to generate a report which is used to provide appropriate genetic counseling to the patient and family upon whom the test is performed. The generation of such reports, which may be in the form of a printed report, an electronic communication, such as a facsimile or electronic mail (e-mail) transmission, or a posting of a data entry in a computer record relating to the patient, is a further aspect of the present invention.

Brief Description of the Drawings

FIG. 1 is a schematic representation of the hierarchy of p53 diagnosis as provided by the invention; and

FIG. 2A and 2B outline two methods of immunoassay for the presence of anti-p53 antibodies in patient sera.

Detailed Description of the Invention

The present invention relates to a method for the identification of p53 mutations, a method for generating reports for providing counseling to patients and families of patients with p53 mutations, and to oligonucleotide primers and kits useful in practicing these methods. The present invention utilizes the hierarchical approach which is disclosed generally in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/271,946.

The method for identification of p53 mutations in a sample of patients is based upon using diagnostic tools 1) in a hierarchy of increasing accuracy and cost per tool; and 2) in which each tool is of extremely high specificity and detects essentially no false positives. A sample which exhibits a positive result establishes the presence of a p53 mutation and a patient report can be prepared on this basis. A sample which exhibits a negative result is thereafter subjected to a more costly, but more accurate test to determine if a mutation is present.

Thus, as shown in FIG. 1, an example of such a hierarchy comprises, in order, an immunoassay step; a DNA fragment length/quantity analysis; and DNA sequencing. In the exemplary results shown in FIG. 1, the first step has the advantage of low cost, but detects a positive result in only 15% of the patients. The second level of the test hierarchy is of moderate cost, but because of its increased accuracy it detects a positive result in 30% (26 of 85) of the patients who tested negative using the immunoassay. This means that the more expensive DNA Sequencing analysis need only be performed on 59% of the original patients. Thus, the use of the hierarchical approach leads to a substantial reduction in the average cost of the test while providing high levels of accuracy for every patient, by having eliminated from the test pool those samples that are known to be positive.

Immunoassay Procedures

As illustrated in FIG. 1, the first level in the hierarchy of p53 diagnosis may be an immunoassay. Because of the relatively low cost of immunoassay, it may be advantageously used to eliminate a significant number of patients from the sample pool prior to proceeding to the next level of the hierarchy. Methods of immunoassay that can be employed at this first stage have been discovered by many researchers. The following list of papers all include methods for identifying p53 mutations by immunoassay, though by no means is this list exclusive, and a practitioner skilled in the art may know of alternative methods of p53 immunoassay:

Angelopoulou et al., "Autoantibodies against the p53 tumor suppressor gene product quantified in cancer patient serum with time-resolved immunofluorometry", Cancer J 6 (6): 315-321 (1993).

Bartek et al., Oncogene 6:1699-1703 (1991).

Crawford et al., "Detection of antibodies against the cellular protein p53 in sera from patients with breast cancer", Int J Cancer 30:403-8 (1982).

Caron De Froentel et al., "Presence of circulating antibodies against cellular protein p53 in a notable proportion of children with B-cell lymphoma", Int J Cancer 185-9 (1987).

Christopoulos et al., "Oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes: new biochemical tests." CRC Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci 29: 269-305 (1992).

Davidoff et al., "Immune response to p53 is dependent upon p53 HSP70 complexes in breast cancers", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 89: 3439-42 (1992).

Hassapoglidou et al., "Antibodies to the p53 tumor suppressor gene product quantified in cancer patient serum with a time-resolved immunofluorometric technique", Clin Biochem 25:445-9 (1992).

Hassapoglidou et al., "Quantification of p53 protein in tumor cell lines, breast tissue extracts and serum with time-resolved immunofluorometry", Oncogene 8: 1501-1509 (1993).

Labrecque et al., "Analysis of the anti-p53 antibody response in cancer patients", Cancer Res 53:3468-71 (1993).

Schlichtholz et al., "The immune response to p53 in breast cancer patients is directed against immunodominant epitopes unrelated to the mutational hot spot", Cancer Res 52:6380-84 (1992).

Volkmann et al., "The humoral immune response to p53 in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma is specific for malignancy and independent of the alpha-fetoprotein status", Hepatology 18:559-565 (1993). Winter et al., "Development of antibodies against p53 in lung cancer patients appears to be dependent on the p53 mutation", Cancer Res 52:4168-74 (1992).

In selecting an immunoassay for use in the present method, it should be understood that some immunoassays only detect small subsets of p53 mutations, while other immunoassays can detect a wide variety of p53 mutations. In order to reduce the cost of diagnosis, it is advantageous to take into account the scope of detection of each immunoassay and select an immunoassay which provides highly specific detection for the greatest number of p53 mutations as the analytical start point. If desired, a second immunoassay may be used after the first immunoassay if it will identify other types of mutations not found by the first immunoassay. This selection and sequential ordering of immunoassays may continue until the patient pool is reduced to eliminate essentially all patients reasonably diagnosed with immunoassay techniques before going on to other, more expensive and more accurate assays.

DNA Analysis

The next level in the hierarchy of this invention test those patient samples which did not prove positive for p53 mutation based on immunoassay, be subjected to more accurate and more costly analysis. DNA analysis of patient samples is an non-limiting example of such an analysis. Within the general class of DNA analysis, however, there is a hierarchy of methods, each level in the hierarchy providing increasing accuracy but at increased cost. At the top end of this hierarchy (most accurate and expensive) is DNA sequencing. DNA sequencing provides the maximum degree of accuracy because each base in DNA from the sample is identified and compared to the wild-type sequence. DNA analysis also provides the option of methods which are lower in the hierarchy than DNA sequencing but which offer greater accuracy than immunoassay procedures. A non-limiting example of such a test is an assay for DNA fragment length/quantity mutations. This fragment analysis can be used as an intermediate level in a three (or more) level hierarchy, or it can be used as the first level of a hierarchy in place of the immunoassay tests described above.

Fragment Analysis

As illustrated in FIG. 1, level two of the hierarchy of this invention may be DNA fragment length/quantity analysis. In this test, one or more exons of the p53 gene are quantitatively amplified using primers designed to create amplification products of known length and the lengths and/or quantity of the amplified fragments are determined. If there is a variance between the length of any amplified exon, and the normal length of that exon, this is an indication of an insertion or deletion mutation in that exon. The quantity of amplified material from amplification of a sample exon may also reflect the loss of genetic material. In particular, by comparing the quantity of amplified materials produced to standards amplified from a null allele (0 copies of p53), a hemizygous standard (1 copy of p53), a wild type standard (2 copies of p53) and a trisomy standard (3 copies of p53), the nature of the mutation may be further investigated.

The number of exons tested in step two of the hierarchy is a matter of choice for the user. For example, if after repeated testing on patient samples it is found that length or quantity mutations are rarely found in certain exons, it is preferable to test these exons last, after testing other exons to see if a mutation sufficient to cause the disease is detected, before incurring the expense to test these less likely exons. In testing these other exons, the user may choose to test them one at a time, or in one multiplexing group at a time. Alternatively, the user may choose to test all exons simultaneously at once.

When a length mutation is detected in this step of the hierarchy, it is not necessary to perform additional tests on the patient sample to complete the identification process. Preferably, however, the sequence of the mutated exon will be determined as part of the second level of the hierarchy to confirm that the mutation detected can in fact be a cause of the observed disease.

Again, all those samples that prove positive for a length or quantity mutation are eliminated from the patient sample, and patient reports may be made for each patient eliminated. However, if no mutation is detected at this level of the hierarchy, then a more accurate and costly analysis must be undertaken. DNA sequence analysis is a non-limiting example of such a level.

The primers used to amplify the sample DNA for fragment analysis are oligonucleotides of defined sequence selected to hybridize selectively with particular portions of the p53 gene, generally introns. Each primer has bound to it a detectable label. A preferred example of such a label is fluorescein, which is a standard label used in nucleic acid sequencing systems using laser light as a detection system. Other detectable labels can also be employed, however, including other fluorophores, radio-labels, chemical couplers such as biotin which can be detected with streptavidin-linked enzymes, and epitope tags such as digoxigenin detected using antibodies available from Boehringer-Mannheim.

While considerable variation is possible in the sequence of the primers used in amplifying the exons as part of the method of the present invention, the primers used in amplification and the conditions of the amplification are preferably optimized for use in the present invention. Looking first at the primers used, it will be understood that in order to avoid the possibility of false positive results the primer pair, i.e., the combination of the 5'-primer and the 3'-primer for any given exon must be unique to the p53 so that only the p53 gene will be amplified. This means that the primer sequences will be generally somewhat longer than the minimum which can be used as an amplification primer. Preferred primers are from 18 to 23 nucleotides in length, without internal homology or primer-primer homology. It is also desirable for the primers to form more stable duplexes with the target DNA at the primers' 5'-ends than at their 3'-ends, because this leads to less false priming. Stability can be approximated by GC content, since GC base pairs are more stable than AT pairs, or by nearest neighbor thermodynamic parameters. Breslauer et al., "Predicting DNA duplex stability from base sequence", Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. USA 83:3746-3750 (1986). In addition, to ensure complete amplification of each exon, the two primers of a pair are preferably selected to hybridize in the introns immediately flanking the exon to be amplified using the primer pair.

Additional factors apply to the selection of primers for multiplexed amplification of exons, i.e., where several exons are amplified concurrently in a single reaction mixture. These factors are discussed in Rylchik, W., Selection of Primers for Polymerase Chain Reaction", in Methods in Molecular Biology, Vol. 15: PCR Protocols: Current Methods and Applications, White, B. A. ed., Humana Press, Totowa, N.J., 1993. Briefly, applying these factors, primer pairs are selected by position, similarity of melting temperature, internal stability, absence of internal homology or homology to each other, i.e., they won't stick to each other or to themselves, and the 3'-end will not form a stable hairpin loop back on itself.

Thus, in the present case, the goal is to have sets of primer pairs with approximately the same thermal profile, so that they can be effectively coamplified together. This goal can be achieved by having groups of primer pairs with approximately the same length and the same G/C content. In addition, it is preferred that the length of the gene region between the primer binding sites on a normal p53 gene differ for each exon to be multiplexed as a group. Differences of only one base in length are sufficient, provided a high resolution gel capable of resolving one base differences is used in analyzing the amplification products. However, greater differences in length are preferred.

To evaluate compatibility of primers for use in coamplification, it is desirable to determine the predicted melting temperature for each primer. This can be accomplished in several ways. For example, the melting temperature, Tm can be calculated using either of the following equations:

where [Na] is the concentration of sodium ions, and the is in number percent, or

where A, T, G, and C represent the number of adenosine, thymidine, guanosine and cytosine residues in the primer. In general, primers for coamplification should be selected to have predicted melting temperatures differing by less than 4.degree. C.

DNA Sequence Analysis

FIG. 1 illustrates that the final element of the hierarchy of p53 diagnosis is DNA sequencing. DNA sequence analysis involves determining the sequence of the exons to locate the mutation.

Sequencing is expensive and so it may be desirable to use a sub-hierarchy within this level of testing to reduce the likelihood of having to sequence all of the exons. In this case a suitable sub-hierarchy will be determined by identifying those exons wherein mutations are most likely to occur. Mutational hotspots have been identified at codons 175, 245, 248, 249,273 and 282, which correspond to exon 5 for the first listed hotspot, exon 6 for the second three listed hotspots and exon 7 for the latter two hotspots. (Harris CC. p53: At the Crossroads of Molecular Carcinogenesis and Risk Assessment. Science 1993; 262: 1980-1981.) In accordance with this sub-hierarchy, the first exons sequenced are those which are easy to sequence and which contain hotspots. Next, if no mutation is found, hotspot exons are sequenced which are hard to sequence (i.e. are found empirically to give less clear results when treated similarly to other exons). Finally, the remaining exons are sequenced in descending order of the odds of finding a mutation based on prior epidemiological studies. (The order of sequencing of the exons may change as patient data accumulates on the location of point mutation hotspots.) If no mutation has been detected after all the exons have been sequenced, then it is concluded that there is no mutation in the test sample and a report is generated accordingly.

A preferred method for DNA sequencing as part of the method of the invention involves amplifying the exon of interest and then determining its sequence. Amplification of each exon may be performed using the same primers employed for fragment length analysis, although the detectable label included for the fragment analysis is not necessary for amplification prior to sequencing. In this case, however, multiplexed amplification cannot be used since only a single amplification product is desired.

The determination of the sequence of the amplified material may be carried out in any manner. A preferred approach, however, is the well-known Sanger method involving a template-dependent primer extension reaction in the presence of dideoxy chain terminating nucleotides. For this method, a sequencing primer is used which hybridizes to one chain of the amplified DNA. In general, sequencing primers are nested inside the amplification primers, although the amplification primers could be used for sequencing purposes if desired.

The amplification and sequencing primers used in the present invention are advantageously packaged as kits for the detection of mutations in the p53 gene. The primers may be packaged individually within the kit, or as mixtures of primers, sometimes referred to as "primer cocktails," which are useful in a single reaction vessel. Such kits may contain a single pair of primers, useful for quantitative amplification of a single exon, or multiple pairs of primers useful for amplification of multiple exons. Such kits may further include amplification and/or sequencing primers for one or more exons. Such kits may also include reagents other than primers for use in the amplification reaction, such as a polymerase and buffers, but this is optional.

Preferred kits in accordance with the invention comprise a plurality of primer pairs useful in the co-amplification of a plurality of exons of the p53 gene. Primer pairs in such kits are selected to have a common melting temperature and to produce amplification products having differing lengths.

The following non-limiting examples illustrate applications of the invention.

Example 1

In order to determine the presence or absence of p53 mutations in a sample of patients, the following hierarchy of tests was performed.

Level 1: Immunoassay: Detection of anti-p53 antibodies.

The two methods of Angelopoulou and Diamandis (1993, supra) were employed to detect anti-p53 antibodies in a patient sample. FIG. 2 A illustrates the principle of Method A for anti-p53 antibody quantification in patient sera. In the presence of such antibodies, a "sandwich" is formed between a mouse monoclonal anti-p53 antibody and human anti-p53 antibodies, resulting in high fluorescence readings. FIG. 2 B illustrates the principle of Method B for p53 antibody quantification in patient sera. The left-hand panel shows that in the absence of anti-p53 antibodies in human serum, the added p53 antigen is measured as shown, giving rise to fluorescence. The right-hand panel shows that when anti-p53 antibodies are present in patient serum, they block the added p53 antigen, resulting in low fluorescence. No sandwich can be formed between the mouse monoclonal and rabbit polyclonal anti-p53 antibodies. ALP=alkaline phosphatase; FSAP=fluorosalicyl phosphate; FSA=fluorosalicylate; Ab=antibody.

Instrumentation and Materials--For measuring liquid-phase Tb3+fluorescence in white microtiter wells, a Cyberfluor 615 Immunoanalyzer time resolved fluorometer was used as described elsewhere (Christopoulous et al., supra; Papanastasiou-Diamandi et al., "Ultrasensitive thyrotropin immunoassay based on enzymatically amplified time-resolved fluorescence with a terbium chelate", Clin Chem 38:545-48 (1992)). The phosphate ester of 5-fluorosalicylic acid (FSAP) was obtained from CyberFluor Inc., Toronto, Canada. TbCl3.6H2O was from GfS Chemicals, Columbus Ohio., U.S.A. All other chemicals were form Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, Mo., U.S.A. unless otherwise stated.

Solutions--The enzyme substrate buffer was a 0.1 mol/L Tris solution, pH 9.1, containing 0.1 mol NaCl and 1 mmol MgCl.sub.2 per liter. The stock FSAP substrate solution was a 10.sup.-2 mol/L solution in 0.1 mol/L NaOH. Fresh FSAP substrate working solutions were prepared just before use by dilution (10-fold) of the stock in the enzyme substrate buffer. The cell lysis buffer was a 20 mmol/L Tris solution, pH 8.1, containing 150 mmol NaCl, 10 g Nonidet P-40, 0.5 mmol phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, 2 mg leupeptin and 2 mg aprotinin per liter. The developing solution was a 1 mol/L Tris base solution containing 0.4 mol NaOH, 3 mmol EDTA and 2 mmol TbCl.sub.3.6H.sub.2 O per liter (no pH adjustment). The washing solution was a 5 mmol/L Tris buffer, pH 7.80, containing 0.5 g Tween 20 and 150 mmol NaCl per liter. The coating antibody solution was a 50 mmol/L Tris buffer, pH 7.80, containing 0.5 g sodium azide per liter. The CM-1 antibody diluent was a 50 mmol/l Tris buffer, pH 7.80. containing 60 g bovine serum albumin (BSA) per liter. The goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin alkaline phosphatase conjugate (GARRIg-ALP) diluent was a 50 mmol/l Tris buffer, pH 7.80, containing 60 g BSA, 0.5 mol KCl and 100 ml goat serum per liter.

The cell lines used in this study were colon carcinoma Colo 320 HSR(+) (Murakami et al., "Detection of aberrations of the p53 alleles and the gene transcript in human tumor cell lines by single-strand confomation polymorphism analysis", Cancer Res 51:3356-61 (1991)); pancreatic carcinoma MIA PaCa-2 (Barton et al. "Abnormalities of the p53 tumor suppressor gene in human pancreatic cancer", Br J Cancer 64:1076-82 1991)); breast carcinoma T-47D (Bartek et al., "Genetic and immunochemical analysis of mutant p53 in human breast cancer cell lines", Oncogene 5:893-9 (1990)); and human erythroleukemia OCI M2 (Singerland et al., "Mutations of the p53 gene in human acute myelogenous leukemia", Blood 77:1500-7 (1991)).

These cell lines were cultured as described elsewhere; they all have p53 gene mutations and overproduce mutant p53 protein (Hassapoglidou et al., 1993, supra). Recombinant wild type p53 protein, produced as described elsewhere (Wang et al., "The murine p53 blocks replication of SV40 DNA in vitro by inhibiting the initiation functions of SV40 large T antigen", Cell 57:379-92 (1989)), was a gift by Dr. Carol Prives, Columbia University, New York.

Lysates from cell lines producing p53, or recombinant p53 were diluted in a 50 mmol/L Tris buffer, pH 7.80, containing 60 g of BSA per liter for Method A and in 100% goat serum for Method B. The mouse monoclonal anti-p53 capture antibody (Pab240) diluent was a 50 mmol/L Tris buffer, pH 7.80, containing 60 g BSA and 0.5 mol KCl per liter. Serum samples were diluted in a serum diluent which is the same as the Pab240 diluent but supplemented with 10% normal goat serum and 2% normal mouse serum. The goat anti-human immunoglobulin-alkaline phosphatase conjugate (GAHIg-AALP) diluent was the same as the GARIg-ALP diluent.

The mouse anti-p53 monoclonal antibody Pab240 was produced as a tissue culture supernatant from a cell line donated to us by Dr. D. P. Lane, University of Dundee, U.K. Its antibody concentration was approximately 30 micrograms/ml. The rabbit polyclonal anti-p53 antibody, CM-1 , was obtained from Dimension Labs, Mississauga Ontario. The goat anti-rabbit and goat anti-human antibodies, conjugated to alkaline phosphatase, and the goat anti-mouse antibody, Fc fragment specific (GAMIg), all approximately 1 mg/ml, were obtained from Jackson Imunoresearch, West Grove, Pa.

Patient Sera--Sera from cancer patients were stored at -70.degree. C. until analysis. Sera used were from patients with breast (n=105), ovarian (n=72), colon (n=77) and pancreatic cancer (n=46). For correlation studies 38 p53 antibody-positive sera from patients with the above malignancies was used plus sera from prostate, lymphoma, lung and multiple myeloma patients.

Procedures:

Cell Lysis--Cells from each cell line were grown until they reached approximately 1.times.10.sup.6 cells/ml or 90% confluency. The cell pellet from a 15 ml culture was lysed in 300 microliters lysis buffer, for 30 min, on ice. The cell extract was centrifuged at 12,000.times.g for 10 min and the pellet discarded. The lysate was used within two hours. Total protein was measured in the lysates with the bicinchoninic acid (BCA) assay, commercially available from Pierce Chemical Co., Rockford Ill. Lysates typically contained 1-3 mg of protein per ml.

Immunoassay Procedure, Method A--This method is a modification of an assay previously published (Hassapoglidou 1992, supra). White, opaque, 12-well microtiter strips (from Dynatech laboratories, Alexandria, Va.) were coated with goat anti-mouse immunoglobulin diluted 500-fold in the coating antibody diluent (100 microliters/200 ng/well, overnight incubation at room temperature). This indirect coating is superior to direct coating with the Pab240 antibody. The wells were then washed six times with an automatic washer and used for the assay as follows: 50 microliters of cell lysate (diluted 10-fold in the cell lysate diluent) and 100 microliters of mouse monoclonal anti-p53 antibody Pab240 (diluted 20-fold in the PAb240 diluent) were added and incubated for 3 h with shaking at 37 C (air oven). After 6 washes, 100 microliter/well of serum sample (diluted 10-fold in the serum sample diluent, in duplicate) and incubate for 1 h with shaking, at room temperature. After six washes, 100 microliters/well of an alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-human immunoglobulin G-antibody (diluted 15,000 fold in the GAHIg-ALP diluent) was added. The wells were incubated for 1 h with shaking at room temperature and washed six times. 100 microliters/well of the diluted FSAP substrate solution was added and incubated for 10 min with shaking at room temperature. 100 microliters/well of the developing solution, was added, mixed for 1 min and the fluorescence was measured on a Cyperfluor 615TM immunoanalyzer.

Each assay run was accompanied by a parallel run to assess any nonspecific binding effects. This run was identical to the procedure described above but the cell lysate was replaced by the lysate diluent. Sera were considered positive for antibodies only if the signal with the lysate exceed the signal without the lysate by a factor of 1.7 (Hassapoglidou 1992, supra).

Immunoassay Procedure Method B--Microtiter strips were coated as in Method A. Patient serum (200 microliters) was then incubated in tubes with 20 microliters of a 10-fold diluted cell lysate from Colo 320 HSR (+) cells, for 30 min at room temperature. The p53-supplemented sera (50 microliters, in duplicate) were then added to goat anti-mouse IgG-coated wells along with 100 microliters/well of mouse monoclonal anti-p53 antibody Pab240, diluted 20 fold as in Method A. The wells were incubated at 37 C for 3 h with shaking and washed six times. 100 microliters/well of the rabbit anti-p53 polyclonal antibody (CM-1) diluted 5,000 fold in the CM-1 antibody diluent was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with shaking. After washing six times 100 microliters/well of the alkaline phosphatase-labeled goat anti-rabbit immunoglobulin (GARIg-ALP) diluted 5000-fold in the GARIg-ALPP antibody diluent was added and incubated for 1 h at room temperature with shaking. The wells were washed six times and the procedure continued as in Method A from the point of adding the FSAP substrate solution. Each serum sample was also assayed without the addition of the Colo 320 HSR(+) cell lysate to assess the background signal. Sera were considered positive for antibodies only if the fluorescence signal in the presence of serum was less than 50% of the fluorescence signal obtained with a 6% BSA solution as sample.

Quantification--Due to the lack of a suitable standard solution, an arbitrary system to calibrate Methods A and B was devised. Among the highly p53 antibody-positive sera one was selected and arbitrarily defined to have a concentration of 20,480 Units/L. This serum sample as then used in dilutions to construct calibration curves for assays A and B from which the concentration of the other samples was calculated.

The results of the test identified the presence of anti-p53 antibodies in 15-16% of ovarian and colon cancer patients. Antibody prevalence was between 5-8% in patients with lung and breast tumors. There was a relatively low prevalence of detectable anti-p53 antibodies (3-4%) in patients with pancreatic and prostate cancer and in patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma. In patients with other malignancies (hepatoma, melanoma, leukemia, Kaposi's sarcoma and testicular carcinoma) the p53-antibody prevalence was similar to that of non-cancer patients (less than 2%).

Patient reports were prepared for those samples which demonstrated positive results. All those test samples which were not positive for the p53 mutation in the protein immunoassay were then analyzed at the next level in the hierarchy of the invention.

Level 2: DNA Fragment Length/Quantity Analysis

DNA is prepared from the patient sample using a Qiagen QIAamp Kit according to accompanying directions. Briefly, an aliquot of the blood sample, or a lymphocyte-containing fraction thereof, is combined with Proteinase K, mixed, and allowed to incubate to lyse the cells. Ethanol is added and the lysate is transferred to a QIAamp spin column from which DNA is recovered after several washings.

Quantitative fragment length and amount analysis is performed to assay for 1) the presence of insertion or deletion mutations; and 2) whether the patient is homozygous or heterozygous for the insertion or deletion mutation. To perform the analysis, the genomic DNA is amplified in three sets using multiplexing amplification primers. Each 50 microliter multiplexed PCR reaction contains 0.5 micrograms genomic DNA, 150 ng or each primer, 3.6 mM each dNTP, 42.5 micrograms Bovine Serum Albumin, 5 units Taq polymerase in a buffer containing 10% DMSO, 16 mM (NH.sub.4)2SO.sub.4, 6.7 mM MgCl.sub.2, 6.8 micro Molar EDTA (pH 8.0) and 1 mM .beta.-mercaptoethanol. The reaction mixture was initially incubated at 94 degrees C for 5 minutes and then subjected to 30 cycles of PCR in a Perkin-Elmer/Cetus thermocycler as follows: Denaturation: 94 degrees C, 30 seconds Annealing: 60, 62 or 64 degrees C (depending on whether primer set A, B, or C is being amplified, respectively) for 50 secs. Extension: 70 degrees C, 60 seconds; final extension at 72 degrees for 3 minutes

The amplification of the eleven exons of the p53 gene is advantageously carried out in three multiplex pools. In multiplex pool A, exons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9, 10 and 11 are amplified (along with a control sequence). The members of this pool are selected because they all use a hybridization temperature of 60.degree. C., and none of the expected fragment lengths will overlap in an electrophoresis gel. One of each pair of primers is labeled at the 5 prime end with an identifiable marker such as fluorescein, rhodamine or cyanine. The primers are:

These primers result in amplified products with normal fragment lengths of 331bp for exon 1, 162 bp for exon 3, 382 bp for exon 4, 268 bp for exon 5, 247 bp for exon 6, 209 bp for exon 9, 390bp for exon 10, and 256 bp for exon 11. The control sequence produces a further fragment having a length which should not correspond to any of the expected lengths.

In multiplex pool B, exons 2 and 8 are amplified (along with a control sequence). The members of this pool are selected because they all use a hybridization temperature of 62.degree. C, and none of the expected fragment lengths will overlap in an electrophoresis gel. One of each pair of

These primers result in amplified products with normal fragment lengths of 261 bp for exon 2 and 320 bp for exon 8. The control sequence produces a further fragment having a length which should not correspond to any of the expected lengths.

Finally, in multiplex pool C, only exon 7 is amplified (along with a control sequence). The primers for exon 7 require a hybridization temperature of 64.degree. C. unlike any of the other amplification primers. One of the pair of primers is labeled at the 5 prime end with an identifiable marker such as fluorescein, rhodamine or cyanine. The primers are:

These primers result in an amplified product with a normal fragment length of 286 bp. The control sequence produces a further fragment having a length which should not correspond to this expected length.

After amplification, the products from each amplification reaction are denatured and loaded into a polyacrylamide gel for electrophoretic separation. In the preferred embodiment, electrophoretic separation takes place in a semi-automated electrophoresis apparatus such as in a Pharmacia A.L.F..TM. automated sequencer. In another embodiment, electrophoretic separation takes place in a microgel disclosed in U.S. patent application 08/332,577, which is incorporated herein by reference. In either embodiment, the amplification products migrate through the gel at a rate determined by their length and are detected using the fluorescence of the fluorescent molecule (either fluorescein, rhodamine or cyanine) which was attached to the primers.

The products of each amplification set are separated in a different lane of the gel, unless molecules which fluoresce at different wavelengths have been used as labels on the primers, in which case the products may be run in the same lane, and distinguished by wavelength of fluorescence emission. The fragment sizes and amounts are compared to the expected sizes of the normal gene fragments. If length mutation is detected, then the sample is concluded to contain a mutation in the p53 gene. If the amount of amplified fragment is 25% or more below or above the amount of the wild type fragment (using the amount of control fragment as a standard of comparison), then the sample is concluded to contain an LOH (loss of heterozygosity) or gene amplification mutation, respectively. A patient report was prepared for those samples that are identified as having a fragment length or quantity mutation. Where no length or quantity mutation is detected, then the sample was re-examined using the next and final level of the hierarchy. Level 3: DNA Sequence Analysis

The group of patient samples that have proven negative for p53 mutations under the protein immunoassay and the fragment length/quantity analysis may be re-examined for point mutations in the DNA sequence.

DNA from an individual patient is purified as in the fragment length/quantity analysis, above. Exon containing fragments of the p53 gene are amplified using primers and conditions listed in Table 1. The primers are the same as those used in the fragment length/quantity analysis. However, in some cases the primers are used in different combinations. For example, because exons 5 and 6 lie in reasonably close proximity on genomic DNA, it is adequate for amplification to use the primer at the 5 prime end of exon 5 and at the 3 prime end of exon 6, and to amplify both exons together on a single fragment. The resulting amplified fragment is suitable for sequencing either exon 5 or exon 6. The same situation is found with exons 3 and 4.

Once the sets of exons are amplified, DNA sequencing reactions may be performed on the amplified sample. Dideoxy sequencing primers have been developed for both strands of each exon (except exon 3 which has only one sequencing primer) of the p53 gene, and are listed below:

The primers are generally nested inside the amplification primers, i.e. closer to the exon, although in some cases the preferred sequencing primer is in fact the amplification primer. The 5 prime sequencing primer provides the sequence from the sense strand; the 3 prime sequencing primer provides the sequence from the anti-sense strand of the p53 gene. Only one of these primers needs to be used to obtain sequence from the exon in question. The preferred primer is marked with an asterisk in the list above. The preferred primer for sequencing is conjugated to a fluorescent molecule such as fluorescein, rhodamine or cyanine for detection, although other forms of detectable labels, including labeled nucleotides or dideoxynucleotides may be employed.

Dideoxy DNA sequencing is performed using the well known method of Sanger et al., "DNA sequencing with chain terminating inhibitors", Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 74:5463-5467 (1977), as modified for use with Sequenase.TM. Version 2.0 (United States Biochemical Corporation, Cleveland Ohio) Products of the DNA sequencing reaction are analyzed using a semi-automated electrophoresis apparatus as in the DNA fragment length/quantity analysis described above.

Current epidemiological data was used to determine which gene fragments are preferably sequenced first. Mutations have been detected in all exons, but are extremely rare in exon 1 and in the 3'-end of exon 11. It is therefore preferable to sequence exons 2-10 ahead of exons 1 and 11. Currently the preferred order of sequencing begins with exon 6, then 7, then 5. The remaining exons are sequenced in turn.

Samples wherein mutations are detected relative to the wild-type p53 gene are recorded and reported to the individual patient's file. Where no mutation is identified, another exon containing fragment of the individual sample is sequenced. Again mutations are identified and reported. If, after sequencing all the exon containing fragments of the gene, there are no mutations identified, it is concluded that the individual sample contains no p53 mutation.

All final results of testing are reported to the patient file. The report is communicated to the patient by electronic transmission or written report, or both.

Example 2

A second embodiment of the p53 assay skips the protein immunoassay level and begins with the preparation of DNA from a patient blood sample. Genomic DNA is prepared from a blood sample as in Example 1 and it is assayed according to the DNA measurement procedures of Example 1, including fragment length/quantity analysis and DNA sequence analysis. Patient reports are prepared when diagnosis of the presence or absence of p53 mutation is determined.

Claims

We claim:

1. A method for testing a patient sample for a disease-associated mutation in the p53 gene, comprising the steps of: (a) selecting a hierarchy of assay techniques comprising at least a first and final assay, said first assay being selected to provide a test for the presence or absence of the disease-associated mutation with essentially no false results indicating the presence of a mutation and said final assay being selected to provide a test for the presence or absence of the disease associated mutation with essentially no false results indicating the presence or absence of a mutation; (b) analyzing the patient sample using the first assay; and, if the result of the first assay did not unambiguously indicate the presence of a disease-associated mutation, (c) analyzing the patient sample using the final assay.

2. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first assay is an immunoassay.

3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the immunoassay detects the presence of anti-p53 antibodies.

4. A method according to claim 1, wherein the final assay determines the nucleic acid sequence of at least one exon of the p53 gene.

5. A method according to claim 4, wherein the exons are analyzed by sequence analysis in an order determined by the frequency of disease-associated point mutations within the exons, and wherein the sequences of exons having a lower frequency of point mutations are determined only if no mutation is detected by the sequencing of exons having a higher frequency of point mutations.

6. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 1 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the exon 1 is sequence using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: CGGATTACTT GCCCTTACTT GTCA [SEQ 1] and CCCCAGCCCC AGCGATTTT [SEQ 2]. ______________________________________

8. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 2 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

9. A method according to claim 8, wherein exon 2 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: CCAGGGTTGG AAGCGTCTC [SEQ 23] and GCTAGGGGGC TGGGGTTGG [SEQ 24]. ______________________________________

10. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 3 of the p53 gene is sequence.

11. A method according to claim 10, wherein exon 3 is sequenced using a sequencing primer as follows: ATGGGTGAAA AGAGCAGT [SEQ 25]. ______________________________________

12. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 4 of pg53 gene is sequenced.

13. A method according to claim 12, wherein exon 4 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: GGGGCTGAGG ACCTGGTC [SEQ 26] and ATACGGCCAG GCATTGAA [SEQ 27]. ______________________________________

14. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 5 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

15. A method according to claim 14, wherein exon 5 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: CACTTGTGCC CTCACTTT [SEQ 28] and CCTGGGGACC CTGGGCAA [SEQ 29]. ______________________________________

16. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 6 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

17. A method according to claim 16, wherein exon 6 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: TGGTTGCCCA GGGTCCCC [SEQ 30] and CCACTGACAA CCACCC [SEQ 31]. ______________________________________

18. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 7 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

19. A method according to claim 18, wherein exon 7 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: CTCCCCTGCT TGCCACA [SEQ 32] and TCAGCGGCAA GCAGAGG [SEQ 33]. ______________________________________

20. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 8 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

21. A method according to claim 20, wherein exon 8 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: ATGGGACAGG TAGGACC [SEQ 34] and CATAACTGCA CCCTTGG [SEQ 35]. ______________________________________

22. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 9 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

23. A method according to claim 22, wherein exon 9 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: GGAGGAGACC AAGGGTGC [SEQ 36] and GGAAACTTTC CACTTGA [SEQ 37]. ______________________________________

24. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 10 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

25. A method according to claim 24, wherein exon 10 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: CCATCTTTTA ACTCAGGT [SEQ 38] and CATGAAGGCA GGATGAG [SEQ 39]. ______________________________________

26. A method according to claim 4, wherein exon 11 of the p53 gene is sequenced.

27. A method according to claim 26, wherein exon 11 is sequenced using a sequencing primer selected from among the following primers: AGACCCTCTC ACTCATG [SEQ 40] and CAAGCAAGGG TTCAAAG [SEQ 41]. ______________________________________

28. A method according to claim 1, wherein the first assay comprises quantitative amplification of at least one p53 exon using amplification primers complementary to intron regions flanking each exon to produce amplified fragments, and examination of the length or quantity of each amplified fragment for nucleotide insertions or deletions relative to the normal p53 gene.

29. A method according to claim 28, wherein two or more exons are coamplified in a single amplification reaction mixture.

30. A method according to claim 29, wherein exons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

31. A method according to claim 30, wherein the exons are coamplified using primers of the sequence: CGGATTACTT GCCCTTACTT GTCA [SEQ 1] CCCCAGCCCC AGCGATTTT [SEQ 2] CATGGGACTG ACTTTCTGCT [SEQ 3] GGACCGCAAG GGGGACTGT [SEQ 4] CTGGTCCTCT GACTGCTCTT TTCA [SEQ 5] AAAGAAATGC AGGGGGATAC GG [SEQ 6] TCTTCACTTG TGCCCTGACT [SEQ 7] CAGCCCTGTC CTCTCTCCAG [SEQ 8] CTGGGGCTGG AGAGACGACA [SEQ 9] GGAGGGCCAC TGACAACCA [SEQ 10] GCGGTGGAGG AGACCAAGG [SEQ 11] AACGGCATTT TGAGTGTTAG AC [SEQ 12] TGATCCGTCA TAAAGTCAAA CAA [SEQ 13] GTGGAGGCAA GAATGTGGTT A [SEQ 14] GGCACAGACC CTCTCACTCA T [SEQ 15] and TGCTTCTGAC CCACACCTAT T [SEQ 16]. ______________________________________

32. A method according to claim 29, wherein exons 2 and 8 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

33. A method according to claim 32, wherein the exons are coamplified using primers of the sequence: ACCCAGGGTT GGAAGCGTCT [SEQ 17] GACAAGAGCA CAAAGTCAGT CC [SEQ 18] GACAAGGGTG GTTGGGAGTA GATG [SEQ 19] and GCAAGGAAAG GTGATAAAAG TGAA [SEQ 20]. ______________________________________

34. A method according to claim 1, wherein the hierarchy of assay techniques selected further comprises an intermediate assay effective to detect at least some mutations which are not detected using the first assay, but which is not a test which provides essentially no false results indicating the absence of a mutation.

35. A method according to claim 34, wherein the intermediate assay comprises quantitative amplifications of p53 exons using amplification primers complementary to intron region flanking each exon to produce amplified fragments, and examination of the length or quantity of each amplified fragment for nucleotide insertion or deletions relative to the normal p53 gene.

36. A method according to claim 35, wherein two or more exons are coamplified in a single amplification reaction mixture.

37. A method according to claim 36, wherein exons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

38. A method according to claim 37, wherein the exons are coamplified using primers of the sequence: CGGATTACTT GCCCTTACTT GTCA [SEQ 1] CCCCAGCCCC AGCGATTTT [SEQ 2] CATGGGACTG ACTTTCTGCT [SEQ 3] GGACGGCAAG GGGGACTGT [SEQ 4] CTGGTCCTCT GACTGCTCTT TTCA [SEQ 5] AAAGAAATGC AGGGGGATAC GG [SEQ 6] TGTTCACTTG TGCCCTGACT [SEQ 7] CAGCCCTGTC GTCTCTCCAG [SEQ 8] CTGGGGCTGG AGAGACGACA [SEQ 9] GGAGGGCCAC TGACAACCA [SEQ 10] GCGGTGGAGG AGACCAAGG [SEQ 11] AACGGCATTT TGAGTGTTAG AC [SEQ 12] TGATCCGTCA TAAAGTCAAA CAA [SEQ 13] GTGGAGGCAA GAATGTGGTT A [SEQ 14] GGCACAGACC CTCTCACTCA T [SEQ 15] and TGCTTCTGAC GCACACCTAT T [SEQ 16]. ______________________________________

39. A method according to claim 36, wherein exons 2 and 8 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

40. A method according to claim 39, wherein the exons are coamplified using primers of the sequence: ACCCAGGGTT GGAAGCGTCT [SEQ 17] GACAAGAGCA GAAAGTCAGT CC [SEQ 18] GACAAGGGTG GTTGGGAGTA GATG [SEQ 19] and GCAAGGAAAG GTGATAAAAG TGAA [SEQ 20]. ______________________________________

41. A method for testing a plurality of patients for a disease-associated mutation in the p53 gene comprising the steps of: (a) performing an immunoassay on samples obtained from each of the plurality of patients, by combining a portion of sample with a specifically immunoreactive substance which forms an immunological reaction product by binding to p.hoarfrost.protein or anti-p53 antibodies and monitoring for formation of the immunological reaction product, (b) separating the samples into a first set which tested positive in the immunoassay for formation of the immunological reaction product and a second set which tested negative in the immunoassay for formation of the immunological reaction product; and (c) performing a DNA analysis which produces essentially no false results indicating the presence of a mutation in the p53 gene on samples from the second set, but not on samples from first set.

42. A method according to claim 41, wherein the DNA analysis performed comprises the steps of determining the sequence of DNA in at least one exon of the p53 gene on each patient sample in the second set, and comparing the sequence determined with the wild-type sequence of the p53 gene.

43. A method according to claim 41, wherein the DNA analysis performed comprises the steps of: amplifying at least one exon of the p53 gene to produce amplification fragments and comparing the length and quantity of the amplification fragments to standard values for the amplified exon determined for wild-type p53; separating the samples of the second set into a first subset and a second subset, wherein the first subset contains samples where the length or quantity of the amplification fragments differed from the standard value and the second subset contains samples where neither the length nor quantity differed from the standard value; and determining the sequence of DNA in at least one exon of the p53 gene on each patient sample in the second subset, and comprising the sequence determined with the wild-type sequence of the p53 gene.

44. A method according to claim 43, wherein at least some of the exons are coamplified in a single amplification reaction mixture.

45. A method according to claim 44, wherein exons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

46. A method according to claim 44, wherein exons 2 and 8 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

47. A method for testing a plurality of patients for a disease-associated mutation in the p53 gene comprising the steps of: (a) amplifying at least one exon of the p53 gene to produce amplification fragments and comparing the length and quantity of the amplification fragments to standard values for the amplified exon; (b) separating the samples into a first set and a second set, wherein the first set contains samples where the length or quantity of the amplification fragments differed from the standard value and the second set contains samples where neither the length nor quantity differed from the standard value; and determining the sequence of DNA in at least one exon of the p53 gene on each patient sample in the second set, and comparing the sequence determined with the wild-type sequence of the p53 gene.

48. A method according to claim 47, wherein at least some of the exons are coamplified in a single amplification reaction mixture.

49. A method according to claim 48, wherein exons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

50. A method according to claim 48, wherein exons 2 and 8 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

51. A method for generating a patient report on the presence or absence of p53 mutation comprising the steps of (a) obtaining a sample of patient tissue; (b) performing an immunoassay on the sample by combining a portion of sample with a specifically immunoreactive substance which forms an immunological reaction product by binding to p53 protein or anti-p53 antibodies and monitoring for formation of the immunological reaction product, wherein the presence or absence of an immunological reaction product is indicative of the presence of a mutation; (c) performing a DNA analysis which produces essentially no false resulting indicating the presence of a mutation in the p53 gene on the sample if the no mutation was detected using the immunoassay; and (d) generating a report indicating whether a mutation was found in the sample.

52. A method according to claim 51, wherein the DNA analysis performed comprises the steps of determining the sequence of DNA in at least one exon of the p53 gene and comparing the sequence determined with the wild-type sequence of the p53 gene.

53. A method according to claim 51, wherein the DNA analysis performed comprises the steps of: amplifying at least one exon of the p53 gene to produce amplification fragments and comparing the length and quantity of the amplification fragments to standard values for the amplified exon, wherein a difference in the length or quantity of the amplification fragments is indicative of the presence of a mutation; and if no mutation was detected based on the length and quantity of the amplification fragment, determining the sequence of DNA in at least one exon of the p53 gene and comparing the sequence determined with the wild-type sequence of the p53 gene.

54. A method according to claim 53, wherein at least some of the exons are coamplified in a single amplification reaction mixture.

55. A method according to claim 54, wherein exons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

56. A method according to claim 54, wherein exons 2 and 8 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

57. A method for generating a patient report on the presence or absence of p53 mutation comprising the steps of (a) obtaining a sample of patient tissue; (b) amplifying at least one exon of the p53 gene to produce amplification fragments and comparing the length and quantity of the amplification fragments to standard values for the amplified exon wherein a difference in the length or quantity of amplification fragments is indicative of a mutation; (c) if no mutation was detected based on the length and quantity of amplification fragments, determining the sequence of DNA in at least one exon of the p53 gene on each patient sample in the second set, and comparing the sequence determined with the wild-type sequence of the p53 gene; and (d) generating a report indicating whether a mutation was found in the sample.

58. A method according to claim 57, wherein at least some of the exons are coamplified in a single amplification reaction mixture.

59. A method according to claim 58, wherein exons 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 9 and 10 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

60. A method according to claim 58, wherein exons 2 and 8 of the p53 gene are coamplified.

Patent Citations (22)

Patent	Date	Inventor
US4016043	1977-04-01	Schuurs et al.
US4172124	1979-10-01	Koprowski
US4474893	1984-10-01	Reading
US4563419	1986-01-01	Ranki et al.
US4582788	1986-04-01	Erlich
US4683194	1987-07-01	Saiki et al.
US4683195	1987-07-01	Mullis et al.
US4683202	1987-07-01	Mullis
US4811218	1989-03-01	Hunkapiller
US4823007	1989-04-01	Hanson
US4879214	1989-11-01	Kornher et al.
US4971903	1990-11-01	Hyman
US5062942	1991-11-01	Kambara et al.
US5091652	1992-02-01	Mathies et al.
US5119316	1992-06-01	Dam et al.
US5122345	1992-06-01	Tabor et al.
US5137806	1992-08-01	LeMaistre et al.
US5227292	1993-07-01	White et al.
US5403707	1995-04-01	Atwood et al.
EPX390323	1990-10-01
WOX92/00311	1992-01-01
WOX94/00643	1994-01-01

Non-Patent Literature (23)

Lambkin et al., "Variations in Immunohistochemical Detection of p53 Protein Overexpression in Cervical Carcinomas with Different Antibodies and Methods of Detection", J. Pathology 172:13-18 (1994).
Baas, et al. "An Evaluation of Six Antiboides for Immunohistochemistry of Mutant p53 Gene Product in Archival Colorectal Neoplasms", J. Pathology 172:5-12 (1994).
Hall et al., "p53 in Tumour Pathology: Can We Trust Immunohistochemistry--Revisited?", J. Pathology 172:1-4 (1994).
Rychlik, W., "Selection of Primers for Polymerase Chain Reaction", Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 15: PCR Protocols: Current Methods and Applications, pp. 31-40 (1993).
Frebourg et al., "The Importance of p53 Gene Alterations in Human Cancer: Is There More Than Circumsatntial Evidence?", J. Nat'l Cancer Inst. 85:1554-1557 (1993).
Angelopoulou et al., "Prevalence of Serum Antibodies Against the p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene Protein in Various Cancers," Int. J. Cancer 58:480-487 (1994).
Donehower et al., "The Tumor Suppressor p53", Biochim. Biophys. Acta 1155:181-205 (1993).
Hassapoglidou et al., "Antibodies to the p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene Product Quantified in Cancer Pateint Serum with a Time-resolved Immunofluorometric Technique", Clin. Biochem. 25:445-449 (1992).
Harris et al, "Clinical Implications of the p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene", New Engl. J. Med. 329:1318-1327 (1993).
Breslauer et al., "Predicting DNA Duplex Stability from the Base Sequence", Proc. Nat'l Acad. Sci. 83:3746-3750 (1986).
Malkin et al., "Germline Mutations of the p53 Tumor-Suppressor Gene in Chiuldren and Young Adults with Second Malignant Neoplasms", New Engl. J. Med. 326:1309-1315 (1992).
Eisenstein, B. I., "The Polymerase Chain Reaction", N. Engl. J. Med. 322:178-183 (1990).
Erickson, D., "Diagnosis by DNA", Scientific American 267:116 (1992).
Toguchida et al., "Prevalence and Spectrum of Germline Mutations of the p53 Gene Among Patients With Sarcoma", New Engl. J. Med. 326:1301-1308 (1992).
Hatcher et al., "Heteroduplex Formation: A Potential Source of Genotyping Error from PCR Products", Prenatal Diagnosis 13:171-177 (1993).
Hassapoglidou et al., "Quantification of p53 Protein in Tumor Cell Lines, breast Tissue Extracts and Serum with Time-resolved Immunoflurometry", Oncogene 8:1501-1509 (1993).
Angelopoulou et al., "Autoantibodies against the p53 Tumor Suppressor Gene Product Quantified in Cancer Pateint Serum with Time-Resolved Immunoflurometry", The Cancer J. 6:315-321 (1993).
Ziegler et al., "Sunburn and p53 in the Onset of Skin Cancer", Nature 372:773-776 (1994).
Runnebaum et al., "Mutations in p53 as potentialmolecelar markers for human breast cancer." Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88:10657-10661 (1991).
Chamberlain et al. "Detection of Gene Deletions Using Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reactions." Methods in Molecular Biology, Protocols in Human Molecular Genetics 9:299-319 (1991).
Dunn et al. "Tumor Suppressor Genes." Cellular Biochemistry Supp. 18c:199 (1994).
Runnebaum et al. PNAS 88:10657-10661 1991.
Kohler et al. Society of Gynecologic Oncologists Twenty Third Annual Meeting p. 40 1992.

Abstract

Description