US 5,282,201 AGrant
Dynamic Packet Routing Network
Issue Date:1994-01-25
•99 Claims
•23 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A digital data communications apparatus includes first and second processing groups, each made up of a plurality of processing cells interconnected by an associated bus. An element (RRC) transfers information packets generated by the processing cells between the first and second processing groups. The RRC includes an input for receiving packets from the bus of the first processing group, as well as first and second outputs for outputting packets to the buses of the first and second groups, respectively. A control element routes packets received at the input to a selected one of the outputs based upon a prior history of routings of the datum referenced in that information packet (or requests for that data) between said first and second processing groups.
Metadata
Assignee
- Kendall Square Research Corporation
Inventors
- Steven J. Frank
- Henry Burkhardt, III
- James B. Rothnie
- David I. Epstein
- Stephen W. Morss
- Dana R. Kelly
- Paul A. Binder
Application Information
Application Number:US 5217989
Filing Date:1990-05-10
Priority Date:1987-12-22
Art Unit:263
Classifications
IPC:
H04L 1256H04L 1246
Field of Search:
37085.9;85.12;85.13;85.14;85.15;85.1;85.8;94.1;94.3;95.2;60;60.1
Patent Drawings (23 sheets)
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to digital data communications networks and more particularly to packet switched networks for use, for example, with high-speed distributed multiprocessing systems.
Multiple instruction/multiple data (MIMD) parallel processing computers can be categorized according to address space, memory organization and memory hierarchy. With respect to the former, a system may be characterized as utilizing a single or a multiple address space. A single address space is commonly referred to as shared memory and implies implicit communication as part of any memory access. A multiple private address spaces implies explicit communication by, for example, message passing.
Memory organization may be characterized as centralized or distributed. In a system based on centralized memory, a common memory element is centrally located, with access time to any physical memory location being the same for all processors. In a distributed memory system, on the other hand, system memory is divided into modules with some placed near each processor.
Memory hierarchy may be characterized as static, mixed or dynamic. A hierarchy is classified as static where system data is divided among local and/or global memory units, with each datum having an explicitly assigned address based at least in part on the locale of the unit in which it is stored. In a fully dynamic system, on the other hand, individual datum are not assigned physical memory location-based addresses by which they are accessed. Mixed memory hierarchies contain static local and/or global memory, where a portion of the memory hierarchy is dynamic (e.g., a cache memory) and another portion is static.
The art provides a number of architectures where a single address space, i.e., shared memory, is organized in a centralized manner. Processing units in such systems communicate via high-bandwidth shared buses or switching networks. A problem with such architectures is that the shared memory forms a bottleneck, impeding system performance, except in instances where there are relatively few processors.
To avoid this problem, Frank et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,622,631, discloses a multiprocessing system in which a plurality of processors, each having an associated private memory, or cache, share data contained in a main memory element. Data within that common memory is partitioned into blocks, each of which can be owned by any one of the main memory and the plural processors. The current owner of a data block is said to have the correct data for that block.
While the solution suggested in the aforementioned patent permits an increase in the number of processors which can be supported without a bottleneck, the centralized memory system is not scalable.
In order to achieve scalability, a distributed memory organization must be used since it theoretically allows parallel high bandwidth access to memory to grow in proportion to the number of processor and memory modules. The art provides two alternative programming models for such an organization: the multiple address space model and the single address space module. Both models present a dilemma for computer system designers and programmers.
From the programmers viewpoint, the single address architecture is a simpler programming model since data movement is implicit in memory operations. Whereas, in the multiple address architecture explicit message passing is required for a multiple address architecture. The multiple address architecture, moreover, requires explicit data localization, explicit memory allocation and deallocation, explicit replication and explicit coherency to produce a correct parallel program. These aspects are theoretically handled implicitly in a single address architecture.
As discovered by designers in the prior art, from a hardware perspective simultaneous access to a single address space, i.e., a logically shared memory, is prohibitively expensive. This is due to the complexity of the switching network, as well as the lack and potential complexity of a general high performance solution for memory coherency. In consequence, most scalable distributed memory systems such as Intel/IPSC have historically implemented a multiple address architecture.
The performance of a single address architecture is dependent on the memory hierarchy. A static memory hierarchy requires the programmer to explicitly manage the movement of data for optimal performance in a manner similar to the multiple address architecture. Two examples of a distributed memory organization which implement a single address architecture using a static memory hierarchy are the BBN Butterfly and IBM RP3. Such implementations require the programmer to explicitly manage coherency.
Mixed hierarchies necessarily include communication bottlenecks which limit scalability, while still requiring the programmer to partially manage data movement. One such hierarchical approach is disclosed by Wilson Jr. et al, United Kingdom Patent Application No. 2,178,205, wherein a multiprocessing system is said to include distributed cache memory elements coupled with one another over a first bus. A second, higher level cache memory, attached to the first bus and to either a still higher level cache or to the main system memory, retains copies of every memory location in the caches, if any, and system main memory, in turn, retain copies of each memory location of cache below them. The Wilson Jr. et al processors are understood to transmit modified copies of data from their own dedicated caches to associated higher level caches and to the system main memory, while concurrently signalling other caches to invalidate their own copies of that newly-modified data.
Notwithstanding solutions proposed by the prior art, none has achieved a high performance, fully dynamic, coherent shared memory programming environment with unlimited scalability.
An object of this invention is to provide such a system. More particularly an object of the invention is to provide a multiple instruction/multiple data parallel processing system utilizing a shared memory addressing model and a distributed organization with improved coherency.
A further object is to provide a fully dynamic memory hierarchy achieving high performance within a distributed system utilizing a shared memory address model.
A still further object is to provide an improved digital data communications network.
Yet another object is to provide a packet switch network for use, for example, in high-speed distributed multiprocessing systems.
Still another object is to provide an improved switching mechanism for use in routing data and data requests through a digital communications network.
SUMMARY
These and other objects are attained by the invention which provides an improved digital data communications network, packet switch and associative directory for use, for example, with a multiprocessing computer system.
In one aspect, the system includes two groups of processing cells and a routing cell that transfers digital information packets between those groups based upon the identity of data referenced in the packets and data requested by or allocated to a first one of those processing groups, or routed between both groups.
Each processing group has a plurality of processing cells, e.g., central processing units and associated local cache memories, that communicate by transferring data and request packets over an associated group bus. The individual cells have allocated to them data or data copies identifiable by unique descriptors. Cache control units in the processing cells generate packets requesting data, as well as those providing data or data copies in response to such requests. Each packet includes a descriptor corresponding to the requested or supplied data.
The routing element includes first input and output sections connected with the bus of the first processing group, along with second input and output sections connected to the bus of the second processing group, for receiving and transmitting packets to the cells of those groups. Request and response packets received at the first and second inputs are routed to one or both of the outputs according to whether the data identified by the descriptors in those packets are allocated to cells of the first processing group.
To facilitate determining where to route packets received by the routing cell, an associative memory-based directory stores a list of descriptors corresponding to data allocated to cells of the first processing group. The directory additionally stores a list of descriptors of data requested by those cells and routed to the second processing group for handling, as well as a list of descriptors of data requested by cells in the second group and routed to the first for handling. Along with these descriptors, the directory maintains information about the access state of the data. This includes, for example, invalid, read-only, non-exclusive ownership, exclusive ownership, and atomic states, in addition to pending states.
According to related aspect of the invention, the aforementioned second processing group itself includes a plurality of further processing groups, themselves interconnected via routing cells and network buses and each comprising a plurality of processing cells interconnected by intra-group buses. By way of example, in a two-level system, each of further groups is associated with a routing cell that selectively transfers information packets to and from the individual group buses. A higher-level bus, referred to below as a level:1 bus, connects these further routing cells with the routing cell associated with the first processing group.
In another related aspect, the invention provides a hierarchical digital data communications network having a plurality of packet transfer levels, each including a plurality of transfer segments made up of interconnected processing cells. The cells have allocated to them data, or data copies, each identifiable by a unique descriptor. The cells also include cache control units that can generate request and response packets referencing data by their respective descriptors. The number of transfer segments decreases at each higher transfer level, there being only one segment at the highest level.
Within the network, routing cells provide communications between the processing cells at each level with those of the higher levels. The routing cells, which transfer information packets between the transfer level segments, selectively route request packets based upon the association of data requested in that packet and the cells of the descendant transfer segments. Particularly, these routing cells route to higher transfer segments those packets requesting data that is not associated with a descendant segment, while routing to lower segments those packets requesting data that is associated with a descendant segment.
According to another aspect of the invention, a request packet can include a requestor-ID field identifying the processing cell that generated the request. A cell generating a response to that request copies the requestor-ID into the response packet. The routing cells route such a response packet back to the requestor in accord with the value of the requestor-ID field.
In addition, the routing cells can route to one requesting processing cell a response packet that includes data requested in a previous, unrelated packet--that is, a request packet generated by another cell. Thus, for example, a response packet containing a read-only copy of a datum requested independently by two processing cells may be routed to both, notwithstanding that the requestor-ID of only one of them is included in the response packet.
These and other aspects of the invention are discussed in the detailed description which follows in the attached drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENT
A fuller understanding of the invention may be attained by reference to the drawings, in which:
FIG. 1 depicts the structure of a preferred multiprocessing system constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 2A depicts a preferred memory configuration providing data coherence in a multiprocessing system of the type shown in FIG. 1;
FIG. 2B illustrates datum movement in conjunction with an ownership request by processing cell which does not already have access to that datum in a preferred multiprocessing system constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 3 depicts a preferred configuration for an exemplary level:0 segment of FIG. 1;
FIG. 4 depicts a preferred structure for processing cells used in practice of the invention;
FIG. 5 depicts a preferred structure of a cache directory in a processing cell constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 6 depicts a preferred ring routing cell constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 7 depicts a preferred ring interconnection unit for a ring routing cell used in practice of the invention;
FIGS. 8 and 9 depict the organization of a routing directory constructed in accord with a preferred practice of the invention;
FIG. 10 depicts a format of routing directory entries used in a preferred practice of the invention;
FIG. 11A depicts a preferred structure of the InterRingBuffer section of a ring routing cell constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 11B depicts a preferred arrangement of InterLinkDram buffers in a ring routing cell constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 12 depicts a preferred InterRingLink frame format used in a system constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 13 illustrates a preferred request routing sequence in a system constructed in accord with the invention;
FIGS. 14A and 14B depict a preferred invalidate sequence in a system constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 15 depicts a preferred deallocate sequence used in a system constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 16 depicts a full ring freeze in a system constructed in accord with the invention;
FIG. 17 is a table showing RDU:0 states in an alternative embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 18 is a table showing RDU:1 states in an alternative embodiment of the invention; and
FIGS. 19A-19D depict preferred and alternate ring interleaving embodiments of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE ILLUSTRATED EMBODIMENT
Overview
A preferred digital data processing system utilizing a switching network constructed in accord with the invention comprises a plurality of processing cells arranged in a hierarchy of rings, each including one or more routing interconnects coupled by way of a ring-like bus to zero, one or more processing cells. Routing cells linking the interconnects provide pathways for selectively transferring information packets between the rings. Directories in the routing cells track data (and requests) transferred through the associated cells, thereby determining routing pathways for subsequent routing of subsequent packets.
In one preferred embodiment, the processing cells include central processing units coupled with local memory elements, or caches, each having a physical data and control signal store, a directory, and a control element. Groups of cells are interconnected along unidirectional intercellular bus rings, forming units referred to as segments. These segments together form a larger unit referred to as "information transfer level:0."
Communications between cells of different level:0 segments are carried out over higher level information transfer levels, e.g., information transfer level:1 and information transfer level:2. These higher levels are themselves made up of one or more segments, each comprising a plurality of routing cells coupled via a unidirectional bus ring. Each routing cell is connected with an associated segment of the next lower information transfer level. These connected lower segments are referred to as "descendants."
Every information transfer level includes fewer segments than the next lower level. Apart from the single segment of the system's highest level, signals are transferred between segments of each information transfer level via segments of the next higher level.
The routing cells each include a directory of descriptors corresponding to the data allocated to the memory elements of the descendant segments. By way of example, a routing cell connecting a level:0 segment to a level:1 segment includes a directory of all data allocated to cells in that level:0 segment, while a routing cell connecting a level:1 segment to a level:2 segment includes a directory of data allocated to all cells in the level:0 segments connected to that level:1 segment.
Along with descriptors, the directories store the access states of data allocated in the descendant segments. These states include, among others, an ownership state, a read-only state, and an invalid state. The ownership state, like the atomic state, is associated with datum which can be modified only by the local processor; however, unlike atomic state data, ownership state data can be accessed--e.g., for generating read-only copies--by other processing cells. The read-only state is associated with data which may be read, but not modified, by the local central processing unit. The invalid state is associated with invalid data copies.
In this regard, it will be appreciated that a preferred digital data processing system constructed in accord with the invention does not utilize a main memory element, i.e., a memory element coupled to and shared by the multiple processing cells. Rather, data is distributed, both on exclusive and shared bases, among the local memory elements associated with each of those processors. Modifications to datum stored exclusively in any one processing cell need not be communicated along the network to the other processing cells. As a result, only that data which the cells dynamically share is transmitted on network, i.e., along the ring buses and routing cells, thereby reducing bus contention and bottlenecks.
The routing cell directories also store descriptors corresponding to data requested in packets routed by the associated routing cells. As above, along with these descriptors, the directories store pending state information indicating requested access states of the data.
In view of the above, it will be appreciated that the contents of the routing cell directories--to wit, the allocated data and pending request lists--reflect the prior history of routings of data and data requests routed between the processing groups.
The routing cells use their directories of descriptors and states to determine whether specific information packets travelling along the level segments should be passed onwards to other processing cells in the segment in which the packet originated or, instead, routed upwards or downwards to other segments.
To further understand this routing function, it will be appreciated that in a preferred multiprocessor system constructed in accord with the invention, data access requests are handled within the processing cell that originated them whenever possible. Particularly, a controller coupled with each memory monitors the cell's internal bus and responds to local processor requests by comparing the request with descriptors listed in a local cache directory. If found, matching data from the cache itself is transmitted back along the internal bus to the requesting processor.
In the event a datum request cannot be resolved locally, the processing cell generates an information request packet that is transferred by a local cache control unit to local ring bus. As that packet travels along the ring, control elements of processing cells adjacent the requester check their own directories, passing the requested data, if found, in a response packet.
When an unresolved request passes the routing element of the segment to which the requesting processing cell belongs, that element too checks its directory. If that directory shows that the requested data is present in local ring in the proper access state, the routing cell permits the request packet to continue along the local ring bus. If not, the routing cell extracts the packet and passes to the associated level:1 segment.
The unresolved request packet travels along the level:1 segment in a similar fashion, i.e., it is compared with the directories of the associated level:1 routing cells. If one of those directories lists the requested data in the proper access state in a descendant level:0 segment, the request is passed to that segment. Otherwise, the request packet may pass to a higher level, if any, in the hierarchy or be returned to the requester unresolved.
Packets containing requested data are routed back to requesting cells by differing mechanisms. A first mechanism relies on the address, or ID, of the requesting cell. Here, each requesting cell includes within its request packet an ID uniquely identifying that cell. Once that packet reaches the responding cell, that cell copies the requestor-ID, along with the datum and corresponding descriptor, into the response packet. As the response packet travels along the segments rings, the routing cells examine the requestor-ID to determine whether the requesting cell is in a descendant or parent segment and route the packet accordingly.
A second mechanism is used in conjunction with response packets that include data requested by processing cells but not specifically generated in response to those requests. By way of example, the mechanism applies in instances where two or more requesting cells generate requests for read-only copies to a specific datum held in a remote cell.
Presuming, in accord with one preferred practice of the invention, that the network prevents at least some, but not all, of those requests from reaching a processing cell having a copy of that datum, the responding cell generates response packets bearing only the requestor-ID of a request packet that reached it.
As the response packet is routed along the network, routing cells compare the packet's descriptor and access-state information with pending request entries in their directories. If that comparison reveals that routing cell previously received a request for datum of the type in the packet, that packet (or a copy thereof) may be routed to one of the requesting cells. In this manner, a single packet containing, for example, a read-only copy of a datum may effectively serve as a response to a plurality of outstanding read-only requests.
System Structure
FIG. 1 depicts a preferred multiprocessing system utilizing a communications network constructed in accord with the invention. The illustrated system 10 includes three information transfer levels: level:0, level:1, and level:2. Each information transfer level includes one or more level segments, characterized by a bus element and a plurality of interface elements. Particularly, level:0 of the illustrated system 10 includes six segments, designated 12A, 12B, 12C, 12D, 12E and 12F, respectively. Similarly, level:1 includes segments 14A and 14B, while level:2 includes segment 16.
Each segment of level:0, i.e., segments 12A, 12B, . . . 12F, comprise a plurality of processing cells. For example, segment 12A includes cells 18A, 18B and 18C; segment 12B includes cells 18D, 18E and 18F; and so forth. Each of those cells include a central processing unit and a memory element, interconnected along an intracellular processor bus (not shown). In accord with the preferred practice of the invention, the memory element contained in each cells stores all control and data signals used by its associated central processing unit.
As further illustrated, each level:0 segment may be characterized as having a bus element providing a communication pathway for transferring information packets between the cells of the segment. Thus, illustrated segment 12A is characterized by bus 20A, segment 12B by 20B, segment 12C by 20C, et cetera. As described in greater detail below, digital information packets are passed between the cells 18A, 18B and 18C of exemplary segment 12A by way of the memory elements associated with each of those cells. Specific interfaces between those memory elements and the bus 20A are provided by cell interface units 22A, 22B and 22C, as shown. Similar direct communication pathways are established in segments 12B, 12C and 12D between their respective cells 18D, 18E, . . . 18R by cell interface units 22D, 22E, . . . 22R, as illustrated.
As shown in the illustration and noted above, the remaining information transfer levels, i.e., level:1 and level:2, each include one or more corresponding level segments. The number of segments in each successive segment being less than the number of segments in the prior one. Thus, level:1's two segments 14A and 14B number fewer than level:0's six 12A, 12B . . . 12F, while level:2, having only segment 16, includes the fewest of all. Each of the segments in level:1 and level:2, the "higher" levels, include a bus element for transferring packets within the respective segments. In the illustration, level:1 segments 14A and 14B include bus elements 24A and 24B, respectively, while level:2 segment 16 includes bus element 26.
The routing cells themselves provide a mechanism for transferring information between associated segments of successive levels. Routing cells 28A, 28B and 28C, for example, provide a means for transferring information to and from level:1 segment 14A and each of level:0 segments 12A, 12B and 12C, respectively. Similarly, routing cells 28D, 28E and 28F provide a means for transferring information to and from level:1 segment 14B and each of level:0 segments 12D, 12E and 12F, respectively. Further, routing cells 30A and 30B provide an information transfer pathway between level:2 segment 16 and level:1 segments 14A and 14B, as shown. As discussed in further detail below, the routing cells each comprise two like processing sections.
The routing cells interface their respective segments via interconnections at the bus elements. Thus, routing cell 28A interfaces bus elements 20A and 24A at ring interconnects 32A and 34A, respectively, while element 28B interfaces bus elements 20B and 24B at ring interconnects 32B and 34B, respectively, and so forth. Similarly, routing cells 30A and 30B interface their respective buses, i.e., 24A, 24B and 26, at ring interconnects 36A, 36B, 38A and 38B, as shown.
FIG. 1 illustrates further a preferred mechanism interconnecting remote levels and cells in a digital data processing system constructed in accord with the invention. Cell 18R, which resides at a point physically remote from bus segment 20F, is coupled with that bus and its associated cells (18P and 18O) via a fiber optic transmission line, indicated by a dashed line. A remote interface unit 19 provides a physical interface between the cell interface 22R and the remote cell 18R. The remote cell 18R is constructed and operated similarly to the other illustrated cells and includes a remote interface unit for coupling the fiber optic link at its remote end.
In a like manner, level segments 12F and 14B are interconnected via a fiber optic link from their parent segments. As indicated by dashed lines, the respective sections of the routing cells 28F and 30B are physically separated, yet coupled for example by a fiber optic link. With respect to routing unit 28F, for example, a first part is linked directly via a standard bus interconnect with routing interface 34F of segment 14B, while a second part is linked directly with routing interface 32F of segment 12F. As above, a physical interface between the routing unit parts and the fiber optic media is provided by a remote interface unit (not shown).
FIG. 2A illustrates a preferred mechanism for maintaining data coherence in a multiprocessing system of the type described above. The illustrated system includes plural central processing units 40(A), 40(B) and 40(C) coupled, respectively, to associated memory elements 42(A), 42(B) and 42(C). Communications between the processing and memory units of each pair are carried along buses 44A, 44B and 44C, as shown. Network 46, representing the aforementioned level segments and routing cells, transfers information packets (passed to the network 46 over buses 48(A), 48(B) and 48(C)) between the illustrated processing cells 42A-42C.
In the illustrated embodiment, the central processing units 40A, 40B and 40C each include an access request element, labelled 50A, 50B and 50C, respectively. These access request elements generate requests for access to data stored in the memory elements 42A, 42B and 42C. Among access requests signals generated by elements 50A, 50B and 50C is the ownership-request, representing a request for exclusive, modification access to a datum stored in the memory elements. In a preferred embodiment, access request elements 50A, 50B and 50C comprise a subset of an instruction set implemented on CPU's 40A, 40B and 40C. This instruction subset is described below.
The memory elements 40A, 40B and 40C include control elements 52A, 52B and 52C, respectively. Each of these control units interfaces a data storage area 54A, 54B and 54C via a corresponding directory element 56A, 56B and 56C, as shown. Stores 54A, 54B and 54C are utilized by the illustrated system to provide physical storage space for data and instruction signals needed by their respective central processing units. Thus, store 54A maintains data and control information used by CPU 40A, while stores 54B and 54C maintain information used by central processing units 40B and 40C, respectively. The data maintained in each of the stores are identified by unique descriptors corresponding to system addresses. Those descriptors are stored in address storage locations of the corresponding directory. While the descriptors are considered unique, multiple copies of some descriptors may exist among the memory elements 42A, 4B and 42C where those copies themselves identify copies of the same data element.
Access requests generated by the central processing units 40A, 40B and 40C include, along with other control information, a descriptor or SVA ("system virtual address") request portion matching that of the requested datum. The control elements 52A, 52B and 52C respond to access requests generated their respective central processing units 40A, 40B and 40C by determining whether the requested datum is stored in the corresponding storage element 54A, 54B and 54C. If so, that item of information is transferred for use by the requesting processor. If not, the control unit 52A, 52B, 52C transmits a packet including the request to the network 46 along lines 48A, 48B and 48C.
The control units 52A-52C also monitor the network 46 to determine whether they can satisfy remote access requests (i.e., requests received from other processing cells). As above, these control units compare the descriptor and state of an access request received on the network 46 with descriptors stored in their directories. If the requested datum is found in the requested state, it is transferred in a response packet back onto the network 46 for routing to the requesting unit. If a requested datum does not reside in any of the system's processing cells, the operating system can search the system peripheral devices.
Data coherency is maintained by cooperative action of the processing cells in response to data requests and transfers. More particularly, concurrent with generation of an ownership-access request packet by a first processing cell, the associated memory allocates in its store physical space to hold the requested data. Likewise, concurrent with the transfer of a requested datum from the processing cell in which it was previously stored, the associated memory deallocates physical storage space which had been previously allocated for storage of the requested datum.
These cooperative actions are illustrated in FIGS. 2A and 2B. In the first of those drawings, DATUM(0), DATUM(1) and DATUM(2) are retained in the store of the memory element 42A partnered with CPU 40A. Descriptors "foo," "bar" and "bas" which correspond, respectively, to those data stored in directory 56A. Each such descriptor includes a pointer indicating the location of its associated information signal in the store 42A.
The memory element 42B partnered to CPU 40B stores DATUM(3) and DATUM(2). Corresponding to each of those data elements are descriptors "car" and "bas," retained in directory 56B. DATUM(2), and its descriptor "bas," are copied from store 42A and, therefore, retain the same labels.
The system illustrated in FIG. 2A does not store any data in the memory element 54C partnered to CPU 40C.
FIG. 2B illustrates how a datum moves in conjunction with an ownership for it by processing cell which does not already have access to that datum. In particular, the illustration depicts the movement of DATUM(0) following issuance of an unresolved request for ownership for it by the processing cell made up of CPU 40C and memory 42C. At the outset, concurrent with the request, the control unit 52C allocates physical storage space in the store 54C of memory element 42C. A response packet generated by memory 42A transfers the requested data, DATUM(0), from store 54A, where it had previously been stored, to the requestor's store 54C. Concurrently the control unit 52A deallocates that space in store 54A which had previously held the requested datum. At the same time, the control unit 52A effects invalidation of the descriptor "foo" in directory 56A (where it had previously been used to identify DATUM(0) in store 54A), while control unit 52C reallocates that same descriptor in directory 56C, where it will subsequently be used to identify the signal in store 54C.
In addition to descriptors, the memory elements 42A-42C assign access state information to the data and control signals in their respective stores. These access states, which include the invalid, read-only, ownership and atomic states, govern the manner in which data may be accessed by specific processors. A datum which is stored in a memory element whose associated CPU maintains modification access over that datum is assigned an ownership state. While, a datum which is stored in a memory element whose associated CPU does not maintain priority access over that datum is assigned a read-only state. Further, a purported datum which associated with "bad" data is assigned the invalid state.
A further appreciation of preferred structures for maintaining memory coherence in a digital data processing system constructed in accord with the invention may be had by reference to the above-cited related applications, e.g., U.S. Ser. No. 136,930 and U.S. Ser. No. 370,287.
FIG. 3 depicts a preferred configuration for exemplary level:0 segment 12A of FIG. 1. The segment 12A includes processing cells 18A, 18B and 18C interconnected by cell interconnects 22A, 22B and 22c along bus segment 20A. Routing unit 28A provides an interconnection between the level:0 segment 12A and if parent, level:1 segment 14a of FIG. 1. This routing unit 28A is coupled along bus 20A by way of cell interconnect 32A, as shown. The structure of illustrated bus segment 20A, as well as its interrelationship with cell interconnects 22A, 22B, 22C and 32A, may be fully appreciated by reference to the above-cited related applications, e.g., U.S. patent application Ser. No. 509,480, filed Apr. 13, 1990.
FIG. 4 depicts a preferred structure for an exemplary processing cell 18A of the illustrated embodiment. The illustrated processing cell 18A includes a central processing unit 58 coupled with external device interface 60, data subcache 62 and instruction subcache 64 over processor bus 66 and instruction bus 68, respectively. A more complete understanding of the circuitry illustrated in this drawing may be attained by reference to the above-cited related patent applications, e.g., Ser. Nos. 136,930, filed Dec. 22, 1987, 509,480, filed Apr. 13, 1990, 370,325, filed Jun. 22, 1989, and 499,182, filed Mar. 26, 1990.
The Memory System
As discussed above, a multiprocessing system 10 constructed in accord with a preferred embodiment of the invention permits access to individual data elements allocated to processing cells 18A, 18B, . . . 18R by reference to a unique descriptor, based on a system virtual address (SVA), associated with each datum. In the illustrated system 10, implementation of this capability is provided by the combined actions of the processing cell memory units in connection with their transfer of request and response packets over the network 46. In the discussion which follows, this is collectively referred to as the "memory system."
A complete understanding of the structure and operation of the memory system may be attained through recognition of its architectural features, enumerated below:
(1) Data Storage--The memory in each cache is divided into pages, each of which may be dynamically assigned to some page of SVA space. The memory system maintains usage and status information about the data in each cache to facilitate efficient migration to and from secondary storage.
(2) Data Locality--The memory system keeps data recently referenced by a processor in the subcache or cache in the same cell of that processor.
(3) Data Movement--The memory system moves data to the cache of the processor referencing it.
(4) Data Sharing--The memory system keeps copies of SVA data in more than one cache to facilitate efficient data sharing by parallel programs.
(5) Data Coherence--The memory system implements the strongly ordered coherent memory model and the transaction model.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that a system is "sequentially consistent" if the result of any execution is the same as if the operations of all the processors were executed in some sequential order, and the operations of each individual processor appear in this sequence in the order specified by its program.
Moreover, storage accesses are considered "strongly ordered" if accesses to data by any one processor are initiated, issued and performed in program order and; if at the time when a store by processor I is observed by processor K, all accesses to data performed with respect to I before the issuing of the store must be performed with respect to K. By contrast, storage accesses are weakly ordered if accesses to synchronizing variables are strongly ordered and; if no access to synchronizing variable is issued in a processor before all previous data accesses have been performed and; if no access to data is issued by a processor before a previous access to a synchronizing variable has been performed.
A coherent system with strong ordering of events is sequentially consistent.
The organization of SVA space within the illustrated system is a major departure from ordinary virtual memory schemes. Conventional architectures include a software controlled page-level translation mechanism that maps system addresses to physical memory addressor generates missing page exceptions. In these schemes, the software is responsible for multiplexing the page table(s) among all the segments in use. In the architecture of the illustrated system, there is no software controlled page-level translation mechanism. The memory system can handle a significant portion of the address space management normally performed by software in conventional architectures. These management responsibilities include:
(1) maintaining page usage and status information,
(2) reusing old pages,
(3) synchronizing and ensuring coherence of shared data access amongst multiple processors,
(4) migrating data and copies of data on a subpage basis from place to place in the system to keep data nearest to the processors that are using it most frequently,
(5) directly implementing a sparse representation of the entire SVA space, by migrating the SVA of data along with the data, and
(6) moving the page between referencing cells (no fixed home for a page).
The illustrated system's processors, e.g., processors 40A, 40B, 40C, communicate with the memory system via two primary logical interfaces. The first is the data access interface, which is implemented by the load and store instructions. In data access mode, the processor presents the memory system with an SVA and access mode information, and the memory system attempts to satisfy that access by finding the subpage containing the data and returning it.
The second logical interface mode is control access, which is implemented by memory system control instructions. In control access, the processor instructs the memory system to perform some side effect or return some information other than the actual data from a page. In addition to the primary interfaces, system software uses control locations in SPA space for configuration, maintenance, fault recovery, and diagnosis.
Hierarchy
The memory system implements a hierarchy of storage. In the illustrated, preferred embodiment, each processing cell contains a central processing unit (or CEU) which has a subcache that stores 0.5 MBytes of data. Those processing cells also include caches, which store 32 MBytes of data. Moreover, a preferred level:0 having, for example, 15 processing cells stores a total of 480 MBytes. While, a preferred level:1 having, for example, 32 level:0's has a total of 15360 MBytes.
Cache Structure
The memory system stores data in units of pages and subpages. Each individual cache describes 32 Mbytes of SVA space, subdivided into 2048 pages. Pages contain 2.sup.14 (16384) bytes, divided into 128 subpages of 2.sup.7 (128) bytes. The memory system allocates storage in the caches on a page basis, and each page of SVA space is either entirely represented in the system or not represented at all. The memory system shares data between caches in units of subpages.
When a page of SVA space is resident in the system, the following are true:
(1) One or more caches allocates a page of storage to the page, each subpage of the page is stored on one or more of the caches with space allocated, but
(2) Each cache with space allocated for a page may or may not contain a copy of all of the page's subpages.
The associations between cache pages and SVA pages are recorded by each cache in its cache directory. Each cache directory is made up of descriptors. There is one descriptor for each page of memory in a cache. At a particular time, each descriptor is said to be valid or invalid. If a descriptor is valid, then the corresponding cache memory page is associated with a page of SVA space, and the descriptor records the associated SVA page address and state information. If a descriptor is invalid, then the corresponding cache memory page is logically not in use. There is no explicit validity flag associated with a descriptor; a descriptor may be considered invalid if the anchor and held fields are both clear, and there are no valid subpages present for the SVA page.
Each cache directory acts as a content-addressable memory. This permits a cache to locate a descriptor for a particular page of SVA space without an iterative search through all of its descriptors. Each cache directory is implemented as a 16 way set-associative memory with 128 sets. All of the pages of SVA space are divided into 128 equivalence classes, each associated with a cache directory set. A descriptor for a page can only be stored in the set of a cache directory that corresponds to the page's equivalence class. The equivalence class is selected by SVA[20:14]. At any given time, a cache can describe no more than 16 pages with the same value for SVA[20:14], since there are 16 elements in each set.
Subpages and Data Sharing
When a page is resident in the memory system, each of its subpages is resident in one or more of the caches. When a subpage is resident in a cache, the descriptor (in that cache) for the containing SVA page records the presence of that subpage in one of several states. The state of the subpage in a cache determines two things:
(1) What operations that cache's local processor may perform on the data present in the subpage; and
(2) What responses, if any, that cache makes to requests for that subpage received over the levels from other caches.
The states of subpages in caches change over time as programs request operations that require particular states. A set of transition rules specify the changes in subpage states that result from processor requests and inter-cache level communications.
In order for a processor to complete an instruction or data reference, several conditions must be simultaneously satisfied:
(1) For instruction references, the subblock containing the data must be present in the instruction subcache. For most data operations, the subblock containing the data must be present with the appropriate state in the data subcache;
(2) The subpage containing the data must be present in the local cache; and
(3) The local cache must hold the subpage in the appropriate state.
If the data is not present with the required state in the subcache, but is present in the local cache with correct state, the CEU obtains the data from the cache. If the local cache does not have the data in the correct state, it communicates over the levels to acquire a copy of the subpage and/or to acquire the necessary state for the subpage. If the cache fails to satisfy the request, it returns an error indication to the processor, which signals an appropriate exception.
The instruction set includes several different forms of load and store instructions that permit programs to request subpage states appropriate to the expected future data reference pattern of the current thread of control, as well as protocol between different threads of control in a parallel application. This section first describes the states and their transitions in terms of processor instructions and their effect on the caches.
Subpage States
The subpage states and their transition rules provide two general mechanisms to programs:
(1) They transparently implement the strongly ordered sequentially consistent model of memory access for ordinary load and store accesses by the processors of the system; and
(2) They provide a set of transaction primitives that are used by programs to synchronize parallel computations. These primitives can be applied to a variety of traditional and non-traditional synchronization mechanisms.
The basic model of data sharing is defined in terms of three classes of subpage states: invalid, read-only, and owner. These three classes are ordered in strength according to the access that they permit. invalid states permit no access. Read-only state permits load and instruction-fetch access. There are several owner states: all permit load access and permit the cache to respond to a data request from the interconnect; some permit store access. Only one cache may hold a particular subpage in an owner state at any given time. The cache that holds a subpage in an owner state is called the owner of the subpage. Ownership of each subpage moves from cache to cache as processors request ownership via store instructions and special load instructions that request ownership.
The sections below describe the state classes and how they interact to implement the strongly ordered sequentially consistent model of memory access.
Invalid States
When a subpage is not present in a cache, it is said to be in an invalid state with respect to that cache. If a processor requests a load or store to a subpage which is in an invalid state in its local cache, then that cache must request a copy of the subpage in some other state in order to satisfy the data access. There are two invalid states: invalid-descriptor and invalid.
When a particular cache has no descriptor for a particular page, then all of the subpages of that page are said to be in invalid-descriptor state in that cache. Thus, subpages in invalid-descriptor state are not explicitly represented in the cache.
When the CEU references a subpage in invalid-descriptor state, the local cache must allocate one of the descriptors (in the correct set) to the SVA. After the descriptor allocation is complete, all subpages in the page have invalid state.
When the local cache has a descriptor for a particular page, but a particular subpage is not present in that cache, then that subpage is in invalid state. The local cache will attempt to obtain the subpage data by communicating with other caches.
Read-Only State
There is only one read-only state: read-only. Any number of caches may hold a particular subpage in read-only state, provided that the owner of the subpage holds the subpage in non-exclusive state. If the owner of the subpage has any other state (i.e. an exclusive-ownership state, one of: exclusive, atomic, or transient-atomic), then no read-only copies can exist in any cell. The CEU cannot modify a subpage which is in read-only state.
Owner States
There are two basic owner state types: non-exclusive and exclusive-ownership. When a particular cache holds a particular subpage in non-exclusive state, then some other caches may be holding that subpage in read-only state. programmatically, non-exclusive state is the same as read-only state. The CEU cannot modify a subpage which is in non-exclusive state. Non-exclusive state is basically a book-keeping state used by the memory system; it defines the ownership of the subpage.
The exclusive-ownership states are exclusive, atomic, and transient-atomic. When a particular cache holds a particular subpage in an exclusive-ownership state, then no other cache may hold a read-only or non-exclusive copy of the subpage. If the local cache has a subpage in an exclusive-ownership state, the CEU can modify subpage data provided that the STT grants write access to the segment and the descriptor.no.sub.-- write flag is clear.
Atomic State
Atomic state is a stronger form of ownership than exclusive state. Subpages only enter and leave atomic state as a result of explicit requests by programs.
Fundamentally, atomic state can be used to single-thread access to any subpage in SVA space. When a processor executes a gsp.nwt (get-subpage, no-wait) instruction to request that a subpage enter atomic state, the instruction will only complete normally if the subpage is not in atomic state already. Thus, atomic state on a subpage can be used as a simple lock. The lock is locked when the gsp.nwt instruction completes normally by first obtaining the subpage in exclusive state and then changing state from exclusive to atomic. The lock is unlocked by executing the rsp (release-subpage) instruction. The rsp instruction requires that the subpage exist in some cache with atomic or transient-atomic state. The local cache obtains the subpage and then changes the subpage from atomic or transient-atomic state to exclusive state. (If the subpage has transient-atomic state, the operation is more complex, but the effect is programmatically the same.)
It is important to note that atomic state is associated only with a subpage; there is no association with a particular operating system process (typically a user program) or to a particular cell. It is possible for a process to execute a gsp instruction to get a subpage in atomic state and subsequently be switched by system software so that it continues execution on another cell. That process continues execution on the second cell and eventually executes an rsp instruction to release the subpage. Between those two instructions, the there will only be a single copy of the subpage in the entire memory system, and it will be in atomic or transient-atomic state. As various processors execute instructions which reference the subpage, that single valid copy will move from cell to cell. It is also possible for a particular process to get atomic state, and another process to release atomic state.
Atomic state is simply an additional flag associated with a subpage; it is possible to implement protocols which use atomic state in addition to the data state of the subpage. Just as a protocol which is implemented using only data can have errors, it is possible for an atomic-state protocol to be defective. The hardware does not impose any checking on the use of atomic state beyond access control imposed by the STT and descriptor.no.sub.-- atomic.
Transient-Atomic State
The gsp.nwt instruction always completes within its defined execution time, but it can succeed or fail (depending upon the current state of the subpage in the memory system). A second form of the instruction is gsp.wt (get-subpage, wait), which will not complete until the subpage is obtained in exclusive state and changed to atomic state. The gsp.wt instruction relieves the programmer of the burden of determining whether or not the gsp instruction was successful. If the subpage is already in atomic or transient-atomic state when a processor executes gsp.wt, the processor will stall until the subpage is released, obtained by the local cache, and changed back from exclusive state to atomic or transient-atomic state. Use of the gsp.wt instruction can reduce the number of messages sent between caches as a cell waits for the opportunity to `lock the lock`.
Transient-atomic state is used automatically by the memory system to allow gsp.wt to function efficiently. Its use is entirely transparent to the programmer. If a subpage is in atomic state and another cache executes gsp.wt on that subpage, that subpage enters transient-atomic state in the holding cache. When the subpage is later released with an rsp instruction, the transient-atomic state forces the subpage to be expelled onto the interconnect in a special release state. The releasing caches changes its own state for the subpage to invalid. Any cache which is executing a gsp will see the subpage and accept it. The accepting cache will then be able to complete its gsp instruction and the subpage will enter transient-atomic state in that cache. This operation will happen for each succeeding gsp and rsp until such time as an expelled subpage is not accepted by any other cache. At that time, the cache performing the release will change its subpage state back from invalid state (set when the subpage was released) back to exclusive state.
It is also possible that the packet with release state will be accepted by a cache whose CEU is performing a load or store instruction. The original cache sees that the subpage was accepted, and leaves its subpage in invalid state. The accepting cache allows its CEU to execute a single instruction before it retracts the subpage, sets its own subpage state to invalid, and sends the subpage out with release state. The cache which was executing the load or store is now the owner of the page, for purposes of this release. As before, if no other cache accepts the data, this cache will change the subpage state to exclusive state and retain ownership.
Preferably, there is no limit to the time which a gsp.wt instruction may wait. The process which has issued the instruction will wait until the subpage is released. The instruction may be interrupted by various XIU signals; when such an event occurs, the CCUs abandon the attempt to gain atomic access. If the subpage is released in the interim, and there is no other requestor, it will change from transient-atomic state release state and finally to exclusive state. Since the typical system software action is to service the interrupt and restart the interrupted instruction, the CCU will again issue the request. It may succeed or be forced to wait, as before.
State Transition
This section provides some examples of subpage data and state flow.
The basic mechanism by which data moves from some owning cache to other caches is by instruction fetches and the execution of load and store instructions by the processors local to those other caches. The different load and prefetch instructions permit programs to request that their local cache acquire read-only or an exclusive-ownership state; a store instruction always requires that the subpage have an exclusive-ownership state. In some circumstances, a cache may acquire a read-only copy of a subpage as it passes by on the interconnect. The post-store-subpage (pstsp) instruction broadcasts a read-only copy of a subpage to all interested caches. Finally, the owning cache may send ownership state on the interconnect as part of recombining a page (described later).
Instruction fetches and load instructions can result in the local cache requesting a read-only copy of the subpage. This request is answered by the cache which owns the subpage. If the owning cache has the subpage in non-exclusive state, it supplies a read-only copy to the requesting cache, but does not change its own state. If the owning cache has the subpage in exclusive state, it changes its own subpage state to non-exclusive and then supplies the read-only copy to the requester. If the owning cache has the subpage in atomic or transient-atomic state, it supplies the subpage with that state and invalidates its own copy.
When a cache requests exclusive-ownership, the owning cache yields its copy of the subpage. If the subpage is owned with non-exclusive state, it is possible that there are read-only copies in other caches. All such caches react to the exclusive-ownership request by invalidating their read-only copies.
When a cache acquires a subpage with an exclusive-ownership state in order to satisfy a store instruction, it does not grant ownership or a read-only copy to another cache until the store instruction is complete. This rule provides the strongly ordered nature of the memory system, in that it ensures readers of a memory location see modifications in the order that they are made.
When a subpage is in atomic state it may change to transient-atomic state, but it will never change to any other state as a result of any load or store instruction. If some other cache requests the subpage, it will always obtain the subpage in atomic or transient-atomic state. After the subpage has been released to exclusive state, the transitions between exclusive and non-exclusive state may again occur, and read only copies may exist when the subpage is owned non-exclusively.
When a particular subpage is in invalid state in a particular cache (i.e., a descriptor is already allocated, but the particular subpage is not present), and a copy of that subpage is available on the information transfer level interconnection due to a request from some other cache, the cache with invalid state will acquire a read-only copy of the subpage. The effect of this mechanism is to accelerate parallel computations, since it can remove the latency associated with requesting a copy of a subpage from another cache.
It is important to note that the basic mechanisms provide the strongly ordered memory access model to programs that use simple load and store instructions. Programs may use the forms of the load, store, and prefetch instructions that request particular states in order to improve their performance, and it is expected hat in many cases compilers will perform the necessary analysis. However, this analysis is optional.
In simple transactions, subpage atomic state is used purely as a lock. The data in the subpage is not relevant. Some of the more sophisticated forms of synchronization mechanisms make use of the data in a subpage held in atomic state. One technique is to use atomic state on a subpage as a lock on the data in that subpage. Programs take one or more subpages into atomic state, manipulate their contents, and release them.
Data Copying Strategy
The interaction among states is a tradeoff between time, cache space, and information transfer level bandwidth spent when a load waits for a copy from another cache and the time and bandwidth spent invalidating copies in other caches when a store or gsp instruction is executed. When there are many read-only copies of a subpage in the system, then the chances that a read will find the data already in the local cache are increased. However, if there are any read-only copies in the system, then the owner must first invalidate those copies (by sending a single message) when modifying the subpage. The following heuristics attempt to dynamically distinguish between multiple read/writer sharing from single read/writer access on a short-term basis.
Multiple read/writer sharing is multiple read-only copies with high temporal locality and write updates with lower temporal locality. Retaining read-only copies is most efficient since multiple copies are read multiple times between updates. The modifying CEU can gain an exclusive-ownership state with a single information transfer level operation; it can then broadcast the changed data using the pstsp instruction to distribute the data to interested caches.
Single read/writer access is multiple read-only copies with low temporal locality and write updates with much higher locality. Retaining read-only copies is less efficient since copies are updated multiple times between reads. A single read/write copy (exclusive-ownership state) does not require a information transfer level operation for writes.
The strategy for balancing these considerations is as follows:
(1) When a copy of a subpage is sent across the information transfer levels to satisfy a request, any cache that has a descriptor for the page but no copy of the subpage picks up a read-only copy from the message. This mechanism accelerates applications with high locality of reference.
(2) When a cache with non-exclusive or read-only state needs to update a subpage, every other cache with a copy of the subpage invalidates that copy and exclusive ownership moves to the modifying cell. The modifying cell can use pstsp to broadcast the change. Any subsequent attempt by another cache to read the subpage can result in copies being distributed to interested caches.
Cache Layout
A preferred organization of a cache directory is shown in FIG. 5. When a reference to an SVA is made, the cache must determine whether or not it has the required information. This is accomplished by selecting a set within the cache, and then examining all the descriptors of that set. SVA[20:14] selects a set. In the general architecture, each of the descriptors in the selected set is simultaneously compared against SVA[63:21]. In a preferred embodiment having a 240 Mbyte SVA space, this implies a comparison with SVA[39:21]. If one of the elements of the set is a descriptor for the desired page, the corresponding comparator will indicate a match. The index in the set of the matching descriptor, concatenated with the set number, identifies a page in the cache.
If more than one descriptor matches, the cache signals a multiple descriptor.sub.-- match exception. If no descriptor matches, the cache allocates a descriptor and requests data from the interconnect. It is possible that either the allocation or data request will fail, and the cache will indicate an error to the CEU.
The use of SVA[20:14] to select a set is effectively a hash function over SVA addresses. System software must assign SVA addresses so that this hash function gives good performance in common cases. There are two important distribution cases: referencing many pages of a single segment and referencing the first page of many segments. This set selector produces good cache behavior for contiguous groups of pages, since 128 contiguous pages will reside in 128 distinct sets. However, this selector will produce poor hashing behavior for many pages with the same value in SVA[20:14]. System software can avoid the latter situation by varying the logical origin of data within segments. For example, each per-process user stack can be started at a different segment offset.
Contents of a Descriptor
When a cell responds to a request for a subpage, it supplies the subpage data and the values of certain descriptor fields in the local cache. When the response returns to the requestor it either copies those fields to descriptor fields (if it has no other valid subpages) or logically ors those field into descriptor fields. Some descriptor fields are never supplied by the responder nor updated by the requestor.
In a preferred embodiment, the descriptor fields are defined as follows:
It is possible for flags in descriptors to be incorrect or out-of-date. There are two reasons for this: latency between a CEU and its local CCUS, and latency between the CCUs of different cells. The former can occur when a page which was previously unmodified is modified by the CEU. Until the modified subblock leaves the subcache, the local CCUs are not aware that a modification has occurred. The latter can occur because many caches may each contain a descriptor for a particular SVA page, and a state change affected by one cache is not automatically broadcast to all other caches.
Because there is no valid bit associated with a descriptor, a descriptor always has the tag of some SVA page. However, if all the cache descriptors which have tags denoting a particular SVA page have no valid subpages in their descriptors, then the SVA page does not exist in the memory system. Similarly, if no cache descriptor has a tag denoting a particular SVA page, then that page does not exist in the memory system. It is possible to read the descriptor fields for such a page, but since the SVA page has logically been destroyed, the field values are not valid.
For example, consider two caches with descriptors for a page; cache A has all the subpages in exclusive state, and descriptor.modified is clear; no other cache has a descriptor for the page. The CEU of cell B executes a store instruction to modify subpage data. CEU B requests the subpage with an exclusive-ownership state from its local cache. The cache allocates a descriptor for the page and then requests the subpage using the ring. The owner (cell A) responds by yielding exclusive ownership to cell B. After the subpage arrives, cell B copies descriptor.modified (which is clear) from the response. Then the CEU of B loads a subblock from the subpage into its data subcache and modifies the subblock. At this point, the CEU subcache indicates that the subblock has been modified, but the local cache still shows the subpage as unmodified. At some later time, CEU B will send the subblock data from its subcache to the local cache. This can occur because the CEU requires the subcache block for other data, because the CEU is using idle cycles to write-back modified subblocks, or because some other cell has requested the subpage. Then the cell B cache sets the descriptor.modified flag. Throughout this time, descriptor.modified is clear on cell A.
As a second example, assume that the system software running on cell A now destroys the SVA page. The page is destroyed by gathering up all subpages in exclusive state in cache A and then altering A's descriptor such that the SVA page no longer has any valid subpages. However, cache B still has a descriptor for the page. Fields such as descriptor.modified are meaningless. Even if some other cache subsequently recreates the SVA page, cache B's descriptor will be out of date until the first subpage arrives.
System software must ensure that the SVA page is really present in the memory system when it attempts to use descriptor information. One method of accomplishing this is to always set the page anchor and obtain at least one valid subpage in the local cache. To be absolutely certain that the modified and atomic.sub.-- modified fields are not set, software must first obtain every subpage in exclusive state. The anchor prevents any other cache from asynchronously acquiring any subpage already obtained. When the operation is complete, system software clears descriptor.anchor in the local cache. Then other cache requests for subpages of that page will again be honored.
System software also needs to ensure that an SVA page does not really exist in the memory system before it creates the page. As noted above, the simple existence of a descriptor with the correct tag value does not indicate that the SVA page actually exists in the memory system. Software can verify non-presence by setting the page anchor and then attempting to fetch a subpage with exclusive state. If the fetch succeeds, software has lost a race, and the page exists in the memory system. Otherwise, software can create the page using the mpdw instruction to establish the SVA page address with all subpages owned exclusively. Note that there still needs to be a software interlock against the simultaneous use of mpdw for this purpose.
Cache Descriptor Usage and Replacement
The caches of the illustrated system 10 can be used by system software as part of a multilevel storage system. In such a system, physical memory is multiplexed over a large address space via demand paging. The caches include features that accelerate the implementation of a multi-level storage system in which software moves data between the caches and secondary storage in units of SVA pages.
All of the caches together make up a system's primary storage. However, for some purposes, it is necessary to consider each individual cache as an independent primary store. This is because each cache can only hold a limited number of SVA pages: 2048 pages in each cache, and 16 in any particular set. There are several automatic and manual mechanisms to balance the utilization of the caches.
Each cache maintains LRU state for all of the resident pages. The LRU data is maintained separately for each of the 128 sets of the descriptor associative memory, and orders the 16 pages in the set according to their approximate time of last reference.
Each cache maintains an LRU.fwdarw.MRU ordering of the descriptors in each set. The ordering is maintained in descriptor.LRU.sub.-- priority. Each of the descriptors in a set has a value from 0 (MRU) to 15 (LRU) in descriptor.LRU.sub.-- priority. Conceptually, when a page is referenced it moves to MRU and all of the pages from MRU down to the referenced page's old LRU priority then move down one step towards LRU. A descriptor is made MRU:
(1) on any load from the local CEU, including increasing subcache state strength
(2) on any store from the local CEU
(3) on any local CEU writeback which unsubcaches
(4) following an XCACHE operation (the cache requests that the local CEU change subcache state)
(5) after deallocation from a local CEU subcache
A CEU instruction may reference an SVA page which is not present in the local cache (it is in invalid-descriptor state). The cache must allocate a descriptor, as described below, and then issues a request to the interconnect for the particular subpage which is required by the CEU. If the corresponding page is resident elsewhere in the system, the requesting cache will copy certain descriptor fields and the referenced subpage data from the responding cache. Eventually, this process of allocating descriptors will fill up the elements of a particular cache set.
Each cache has capabilities for automatically reusing certain descriptors by changing an SVA page to invalid-descriptor state in the cache. As a background activity, the caches also automatically move owned subpages to other caches. All of these automatic actions can be tuned or disabled by system software, and are inhibited when descriptor.held and/or descriptor.anchor is set. The following subsections describe the descriptor reclamation and background data movement activities of the caches.
Sometimes, there will be one or more descriptors in a cache set which have no valid subpages. This situation can arise as a result of requests generated by other caches, or as a result of recombining activity (described below). For example, assume that a cache descriptor has only one valid subpage, for which it has exclusive state. If some other cache requests ownership of the subpage, this cache no longer has any valid subpages of the page. If descriptor.held and descriptor.anchor are clear in this cache, then this descriptor can be reused when the CEU references some other page which has invalid-descriptor state in the same set of this cache.
A cache will automatically drop a page which has all subpages in read-only or invalid state (a read-only page), provided that no subpage is subcached. This is possible because no information is lost by the memory system when it destroys read-only copies. The cache has configuration options to totally disable copy dropping or to restrict it to a partial range of descriptors, according to LRU ordering.
A cache will automatically drop a page which has all subpages in some exclusive-ownership state and which has descriptor.modified and descriptor.atomic.sub.-- modified both clear. The fact that the cache has exclusive ownership of all subpages guarantees that no other cache has ownership or a copy of some portion of the data state, and allows this cache to destroy data state without communicating with any other cache. The fact that descriptor.modified and descriptor.atomic.sub.-- modified are both clear indicates that no data or atomic state change (including transition from atomic state to transient-atomic state as the result of a gsp.wt instruction) has occurred since the SVA page was created or last polled by system software. The memory system presumes that system software has a copy of the page data and atomic state on secondary storage which can be used to recreate the SVA page, and destroys the page. The cache has configuration options to totally disable pure page dropping or to restrict it to a partial range of descriptors, according to LRU ordering. Note that system software must never asynchronously clear descriptor.atomic.sub.-- modified if any subpage is in transient-atomic state.
Note that setting descriptor.held does not guarantee that the individual subpages will be present in the local cache. Further, simply setting descriptor.held for a page does not prevent some other cache from destroying the page. System software must take explicit action to prevent hardware from automatically dropping a pure page (e.g. set descriptor.modified).
Recombining is an operation whereby an owned subpage is expelled from a cache onto the interconnect and other caches are given an opportunity to accept ownership state. Any accepting cache must already have a descriptor allocated for the containing page; a cache will not allocate a descriptor in order to accept the ownership of a subpage being recombined. The goal of page recombining is to reduce the total number of descriptors which are allocated for a particular SVA page.
A cache issues a recombine message to recombine a subpage. If the recombine messages fail to find another cache to take over the page, the recombining cache retains the data. In effect, it has found itself as the target of the recombine. If some other cache accepts ownership (which may be non-exclusive, exclusive, atomic or transient-atomic state), the issuing cache changes its subpage state to invalid.
The caches will automatically attempt to recombine subpages as a background activity while memory refresh is occurring. At each refresh interval, the cache examines a particular set, and searches for an acceptable descriptor. The descriptor must have no subcached subpages, must own some subpage, and must not have all subpages in exclusive-ownership state. If such a page is found, the cache issues a recombine message for some owned subpage. The cache has configuration options to totally disable background recombining or to restrict it to a partial range of descriptors, according to LRU ordering. Background recombining makes it more likely that the cache will be able to allocate a descriptor for a newly referenced SVA page, instead of causing a line-full error.
The CEU also provides an instruction whereby system software may attempt the expulsion of an owned subpage. The subpage must not be subcached, but no other restrictions are imposed before the cache attempts to expel ownership.
Since pages below the working set point are less likely to be referenced, most of the recombines that actually move data will move it from a cell which is not referencing the data to a cell which is.
When a new descriptor in a set is needed, the cache proceeds in order through as many of the following actions as needed to find a usable descriptor:
(1) find an invalid descriptor
(2) invalidate a read-only copy
(3) destroy a pure SVA page
(4) Signals a line.sub.-- full exception if it cannot allocate a descriptor by the means described above.
The individual steps are explained below:
Find an Invalid Descriptor
If an invalid descriptor exists it can be used immediately. This requires:
all subpages are in invalid state, and
descriptor.held and descriptor.anchor are both clear
no subpage of the page is described by a PRT entry
Invalidate a Read-Only Copy
If ctl$ccu.sub.-- lru.sub.-- config.cde is 1, the cache attempts to identify a descriptor which contains only read-only copies of subpages. It searches from LRU to MRU, looking for any page which has:
all subpages in read-only or invalid state, and
no subcached subpages, and
an LRU value which is greater or equal to ctl$ccu.sub.-- lru.sub.-- config.cdl, and
descriptor.held and descriptor.anchor both clear, and
no subpage of the page is described by a PRT entry
If an acceptable descriptor is found, all subpages are changed to invalid state and the descriptor is used.
Drop a Pure SVA Page
If ctl$ccu.sub.-- lru.sub.-- config.pde is 1, the cache attempts to identify an SVA page which can be destroyed (removed entirely from the memory system). It searches from LRU to MRU, looking for a page which has:
all subpages in (various) exclusive-ownership states, and
no subcached subpages, and
descriptor.modified and descriptor.atomic modified both clear, and
LRU value which is greater or equal to ctl$ccu.sub.-- lru.sub.-- config.pdl, and
descriptor.held and descriptor.anchor both clear, and
no subpage of the page is described by a PRT entry
If an acceptable descriptor is found, all subpages are changed to invalid state (thereby destroying the SVA page), and the descriptor is used.
To reduce the probability that a line.sub.-- full exception will occur, the cache periodically attempts to reduce its ownership of subpages within less-recently-used pages. These actions are independent of descriptor allocation operations, and occur during RAM refresh.
If ctl$ccu.sub.-- lru.sub.-- config.bre is set, the CCU searches up from LRU looking for any page which has:
some subpages in ownership state
some subpage not in an exclusive-ownership state
no subcached subpages
an LRU value with is greater or equal to ctl$ccu.sub.-- lru.sub.-- config.brl
descriptor.held and descriptor.anchor both clear
no subpage of the page is described by a PRT entry
If an acceptable descriptor is found, the cache issues a recombine message to the interconnect.
System software can monitor the LRU behavior of pages within individual caches to establish a `working-set point` for each cache line. Descriptors with lower LRU values are in the working set and descriptors with higher LRU values are not in the working set. Repeated examination of the descriptor tags, LRU values and subpage state can be used to determine the working-set point.
When a modified (or atomic.sub.-- modified) page leaves the logical working set, system software can take action to purify the page so that the descriptor will be reallocatable in the near future.
If the descriptor holds relatively few subpages in ownership states, then software can attempt to recombine those subpages to other caches using the mrcsp (recombine-subpage) instruction. Otherwise, it might decide to obtain the entire SVA page and purify or destroy it.
As the working set changes, system software can modify the configuration parameters which control the cache. The parameters for pure-dropping, copy-dropping, and background recombines can be altered to ensure that hardware actions are consistent with software working-set policy.
The typical use of secondary storage is that each SVA page has a corresponding page allocated in secondary storage, extending the caching model L- provided by hardware. A page originally `exists` only in secondary storage, and is encached in the memory system when it is referenced by a program. If the page is modified (data state or atomic state) while in the memory system, then the copy of the page on secondary storage must be updated before the containing memory system page can be re-used for some other SVA. Such modifications can be detected by examining the descriptor.modified and descriptor.atomic.sub.-- modified fields. The operation of updating secondary storage is call `purifying` the SVA page. System software typically purifies SVA pages which are below the working set point, so that the cache space will be quickly available for other SVA pages.
Only some of the cells in the system have a physical connection to the disk drive which provides secondary storage for an SVA page. The appropriate I/O-capable cell must be able to obtain page data during the I/O operation. System software can ensure this by allocating and holding a descriptor on the I/O-cell before issuing the I/O commands. After the purification is complete, system software can clear the descriptor.modified and descriptor.atomic.sub.-- modified flags or destroy the SVA page. The actual protocols used can be much more complex, depending upon whether or not the system allows programs to access the page during the purification attempt.
In general, system software must not clear descriptor.atomic.sub.-- modified if any subpage has transient-atomic state unless the memory system is otherwise prevented from destroying the page. e.g. if all descriptors have the held flag set, or if descriptor.modified is set, the memory system will not destroy the page.
When a particular set of a particular cache is full, there is no reason for software to assume that the entire memory system is correspondingly full. Thus, it is desirable for software to respond to a full set by moving a page from that set to the corresponding set of another cache.
In order to use memory efficiently, software must use some strategy for identifying an appropriate page to remove from a full set, and an appropriate target cache, if any, for the page. The caches include facilities that accelerate a class of strategies for this page replacement. To accelerate software's selection of a page for replacement within a set, each cache approximately orders the pages from Most Recently Used (MRU) to Least Recently Used (LRU). When a page is referenced, it moves to MRU. As other pages are referenced thereafter, it ages toward LRU. The LRU information accelerates strategies that replace the least recently used page.
Processor Data Accesses
A processor makes data requests to its local cache to satisfy load and store instructions and co-execution unit operations. A cache makes requests to its local processor to force the processor to invalidate its copy of a subpage in subcache.
Load and Store Instructions
A processor passes load and store instructions to its local cache as requests when the subblock containing the referenced address is not present in the subcache in the required state. The different types of load and store instructions pass information to the local cache about the access patterns of the following instructions. For example, if the sequence of the instructions is a load followed by a store, and the subpage containing the data item is not yet resident in the local cache, it is more efficient to acquire ownership for the load than to get a read-only copy for the load instruction and then communicate over the information transfer levels a second time to acquire ownership for the store instruction.
The state of subblocks in the subcaches does not always reflect the state of the corresponding subpage in the cache. The instruction subcache always obtains a read-only copy of data. The data subcache may hold a subblock in read-only or exclusive state. The subcache can only have exclusive state if the cache has an exclusive-ownership state and descriptor.no.sub.-- write is not set. The subcache does not distinguish between exclusive, atomic, and transient-atomic subpage states. When the subcache has a subblock in exclusive state, the CEU can execute store instructions by simply placing the new data in the subcache. For all store instructions except st64.nsc, if the subblock is not described by the subcache, or has invalid or read-only state, then the CEU must request exclusive state from the local cache prior to completing a store instruction. If descriptor.no.sub.-- write is set or the subpage is not present in the memory system, a fault will occur.
When a request for a subpage arrives from another cache, the owning cache must respond. If any part of the subpage is in the data subcache, the local cache must ensure that it obtains any modifications which might be present only in the subcache. The cache also causes the CEU to change subcache state for the subblock to read-only or invalid, depending upon the request. In certain cases, the cache will also ensure that the instruction subcache invalidates its read-only copy of the subpage.
It is important to distinguish between the units of subcache management (blocks and subblocks) and the units of cache management (pages and subpages). Data travels between a CEU and its local cache in subblocks. Data travels between caches in subpages. There are two subblocks per subpage.
The different forms of load and store instructions are described below. Each description begins with a brief summary of the semantics of the instruction, and continues with an overview of subcache and cache actions.
Subpage Atomic State Instructions
The subpage atomic instructions are the program interface to the get and release operations described above. These instructions exist in several forms to permit precise tuning of parallel programs.
Other Subpage Instructions
`Manual` Control of the Memory System
As described above, the memory system is designed to support a virtual memory system with automatic data sharing and LRU maintenance. However, software can take explicit control of the memory system for special applications.
In normal use, all processors share SVA space, and data automatically moves from cache to cache in response to instructions (and control operations). Software can dedicate some or all of the memory on a cache to its local, unshared use. Such a system must partition SVA space among the caches, and use explicit control operations to move such data from cache to cache.
By setting descriptor.held in every descriptor, system software can prevent the cache from ever moving or destroying a page to make room for another page. The system software can then handle exceptions or perform explicit destroys as needed to multiplex each cache's memory.
In automatic mode, the memory system can configured as a shared memory multiprocessor. When various automatic features are disabled, the memory system can be configured to emulate more loosely coupled message-oriented architectures. Messages can be passed by references to special SVA ranges. Manual control of the memory system can be used to enforce a specific memory model more closely.
Memory System Control Instructions
Control operation permit the processor to directly manipulate the memory system. There are two classes of control instructions: data movement and page state control. The data movement control instructions move pages and subpages of data from cache to cache in the hierarchy. The page state control instructions manipulate page descriptors.
CEU instructions result in cache commands which execute synchronously or asynchronously, depending upon the command. A CEU cache instruction occupies an entry in the cache PRT (a hardware table) while it is in progress. The PRT has four entries, so a maximum of four cache instructions may execute in parallel. Most CEU instructions result in assignment of a PRT entry which remains in use until the request is satisfied, providing synchronous behavior. For example, load/store instructions execute synchronously, so that certain software-controlled exceptions (such as missing page or unwriteable page) can be predictably resolved. The pcsp (prefetch-cache-subpage) and pstsp (post-store-subpage) instructions operate asynchronously, as described in following subsections.
Synchronous errors typically result in the CEU executing the trap sequence.
Asynchronous errors result from actual hardware errors or are provoked by a request from some other cache. Such errors are reported by memory-system interrupts.
Prefetch Instruction
The prefetch instructions request that a copy of a subpage be acquired on the local cache in a specified state. Pcsp prefetches a subpage. The cache allocates a PRT entry when this instruction is detected. If the subpage is already present, the PRT entry is freed and the pcsp completes. Otherwise, the cache issues a request, and then indicates instruction completion to the CEU, which proceeds asynchronously. When the message returns as a request or response, the cache accepts data (if present), and frees the PRT entry. There is no indication to the CEU that the data has arrived.
Post-Store Subpage Instruction
The pstsp instruction requests that a copy, of a subpage be circulated on the interconnect so that any caches having a descriptor for the Containing page may acquire a read-only copy of the subpage. Pstsp references a subblock within a subpage. If the subblock is subcached with exclusive state and is modified in the subcache, the CEU requests a post-store action from the local cache; otherwise, the pstsp instruction has no effect. The cache allocates a PRT entry, and requests the subpage data from the CEU. The cache then submits the post-store message to the interconnect, frees the PRT entry, and indicates instruction completion to the CEU. The CEU proceeds asynchronously. When the message returns to the issuing cache, it is discarded.
Fetch Subpage Instruction
The mfsva instructions permits system software to fetch a subpage in read-only or exclusive-ownership state, specifying the SVA location of the subpage. This saves system software the effort of establishing a DSTT translation, as is required by pcsp.
Flush Subcached Subpage Instruction
The mflsp instruction causes the cache to ensure that the specified subpage is not subcached in the local CEU. If the subpage is in invalid-descriptor state or invalid state, no descriptor is allocated and the subpage is not requested via the interconnect.
Recombine Subpage Instruction
The mrcsp instruction allows system software to reduce the number of active descriptors for a page by causing ownership to migrate to another cache. Unlike the background recombine activity of the cache, this instruction is not controlled by cache configuration parameters.
The page state control instructions operate on individual pages of SVA space.
Anchor Descriptor Instruction
The mpsa instruction provides an anchored descriptor in the local cache for an SVA page. If the descriptor already existed prior to the mpsa, its anchor flag is set. Otherwise, the cache allocates a descriptor and then sets the anchor flag. Page state control operations require that an anchored descriptor for the SVA page be present on the local cache.
Write Descriptor Instruction
The mpdw instruction is used to create and destroy SVA pages, and to change descriptor flags of existing SVA pages. mpdw requires that system software first obtain an anchored descriptor for the page, using the mpsa instruction. The following discussion assumes that an anchored descriptor exists on the local cache.
Creating an SVA page
Following the mpsa, the descriptor exists, but all subpages are in invalid state. System software executes mpdw specifying that all subpage states should be set to exclusive. This causes a message to be sent on the interconnect so that any interested ring members may note the creation of the page.
The SVA page now exists, although its data values are undefined. Software must initialize the page using store instructions or 1/0 before allowing the user to reference the page. For this reason, software will typically create a page at an SVA location inaccessible to user programs, initialize the page data, and then change the address of the SVA page as described below. The page is released for general use by executing an mpdw instruction which clears the anchor.
Destroying an SVA page
After the mpsa, system software must obtain all subpages in exclusive state. This is done using mfsva instructions. Software then executes mpdw specifying that all subpages should be changed to invalid state. This instruction causes a message to be sent on the interconnect so that any interested ring members may note the destruction of the page. The SVA page is destroyed by this operation. Software releases the descriptor for reuse by executing a second mpdw which clears the anchor.
Change Descriptor Fields
The mpdw instruction is used to change various fields in a local descriptor. It can set or clear the modified, atomic.sub.-- modified, no.sub.-- write, no.sub.-- atomic, and held fields and can clear the anchor field. mpdw can also change the tag, and thus the SVA space address associated with the descriptor. (Since the index of the descriptor forms part of the SVA, the new tag is in the same cache set, by definition.)
To ensure memory system consistency, system software must obey certain rules when altering the fields or tag of a descriptor. mpdw requires that descriptor.anchor be set (although the instruction itself may result in clearing descriptor.anchor). Various sequences require that all subpages be present in the local cache with an exclusive-ownership state. This is accomplished by setting descriptor.anchor and executing mfsva.ex for each subpage. Various sequences require that all subpages be unsubcached in the local cache. This is accomplished by executing mflsp for each subpage which might be subcached in the local CEU. (Executing mfsva.ex ensures that a subpage is not subcached in by the CEU of any other cell.)
The following list give the restrictions which are in force for each flag and the tag.
(1) anchor is set and typically cleared as part of any descriptor tag or flag modification. It may be left set for any duration, but in a shared-memory system, it is cleared as soon as possible.
(2) held can be modified to hold or unhold a descriptor on a particular cell without restriction.
(3) changing atomic.sub.-- modified and no.sub.-- atomic requires that all subpages be in an exclusive-ownership state in the local cache.
(4) clearing modified and setting no.sub.-- write require that all subpages be in unsubcached in the local cache. This ensures that the local subcache does not have any subblock in exclusive state nor does it have any modified subblock. When changing modified no.sub.-- write, system software may decide whether or not the change should be perceived by all cells which reference the page. Effecting a global change requires that all subpages be in an exclusive-ownership state in the local cache. System software will typically make a global change when it clears the modified flag. Effecting a local change does not require that any subpage be present in an exclusive-ownership state; however, this results in delayed perception of the new state.
(5) changing the SVA page number by changing the tag requires that all subpages be in an exclusive-ownership state and unsubcached on the executing cell.
Changing single bit fields is accomplished with a single mpdw.desc instruction. This instruction contains the new value of the changed flag, the old values for the other flags and the tag. Unless system software has some special reason to keep the page anchored, it clears the anchor flag.
Changing the SVA page number of a descriptor is logically the same as destroying the old page and then creating a new page which happens to have the same data. The sequence is:
(1) anchor a descriptor for the old SVA page and obtain each subpage in an exclusive-ownership state. If any subpage has atomic or transient-atomic state, it will be acquired by the executing cell. Once all subpages have been acquired, any access to the old SVA page will take a missing.sub.-- page fault.
(2) determine the atomic state of each subpage. This is most rapidly accomplished by executing gsp.nwt on each subpage, and examining the resulting @MEM indicator. Any cell which already executing a gsp.wt for a subpage of the old SVA will eventually take a timer interrupt; when the gsp.wt is restarted, it will take a missing.sub.-- page fault.
(3) use mpdw.alli to change all subpages to invalid state. This instruction causes the local CCUs to inform the local CIUs and the RRC (if any) that the SVA page is being destroyed. Even though all subpages are changed to invalid state, the data remains in the local CCUS.
(4) use mpdw.desc to change the tag and set flags to desired state. The new anchor flag must be set.
(5) use mpdw.allx to change all subpages to exclusive state. This instruction causes the local CCUs to inform the local CIUs and the RRC (if any) that an SVA page is being created. The old data is now perceived to be present in exclusive state.
(6) restore saved atomic state of each subpage. For each subpage which was in atomic state, issue a gsp.nwt.
(7) use mpdw.desc to clear the anchor flag.
The uses of descriptor.no.sub.-- write include: prevention of inadvertent modification of certain data; support for copy.sub.-- on.sub.-- write/copy.sub.-- on.sub.-- access protocols; debugger watchpoints. In the first case, no.sub.-- write is set and remains set. In the second case, when a program attempts to modify a page, system software can respond by making a copy of the page available to the other users and then clearing no.sub.-- write. Software can make this change local or global; in the former case, no.sub.-- write faults may continue to occur on other cells which reference the page. Finally, debugger watchpoints are intended to detect the modification of a particular region of context address space, e.g., find out where a global variable is being destroyed. System software can implement this by setting no.sub.-- write for the page, and trapping every modification attempt. For modifications outside the watched range, system software can anchor the page, clear no.sub.-- write, modify the data, unsubcache the data, set no.sub.-- write, and proceed. It is also possible to implement watchpoint support by making global changes to no.sub.-- write.
Find Page Local--LRU Lookup Instruction
The mfp1 instruction searches a specified set in the LRU space of the cache for a descriptor that matches a specified set of criteria. The search begins with the descriptor at LRU position 15, and proceeds upward until the criteria are met.
Instruction and Data System Address Space Split
To ensure correct operation, the cache must know when a subpage is also present in a CEU subcache. This permits the cache to request subcache invalidation when some request from the interconnect (or even the local CEU) requires a subpage state change.
As part of this mechanism, the CEU communicates with the cache when it changes subcaching status. However, the cache does not maintain per-subcache information. As a consequence, the same subpage of SVA space must not simultaneously appear in both subcaches. In general, this results in a system software restriction that the same SVA region cannot be used as both instructions and data. Self-modifying programs or programs where code and data are part of the same context address segment are not supported.
System software must take special care in the following cases:
(1) changing an instruction, as when inserting or removing a breakpoint
(2) reading an instruction, as part of trap analysis or program disassembly by a debugger
(3) reading a page from an I/O device which will become an instruction page
To read an instruction as data, system software must:
(1) construct a DSTT entry which describes the SVA
(2) ensure the subpage is not present in the instruction subcache (use mflsp)
(3) read the instruction as data (use ld64.nsc)
(4) invalidate the DSTT entry.
To write an instruction subpage as data, system software must:
(1) construct a DSTT entry which describes the SVA
(2) ensure the subpage is not present in any instruction subcache (use mpsa to anchor the page, and mfsva.ex to invalidate the subpage in all other caches and subcaches)
(3) fetch the containing subblock (use ld64.nsc)
(4) modify the subblock and write the instruction as data (use st64.nsc)
(5) release the page anchor.
(6) invalidate the DSTT entry.
Instruction pages are typically pure and do not need to be written from SVA space to an I/O device as part of system SVA space management. Before writing an instruction page, system software must:
(1) ensure the subpage is not present in any instruction subcache (use mpsa to anchor the page, and mfsva.ex to invalidate the subpage in all other caches and subcaches). If this cell will never execute this instruction page, this step is not required.
(2) perform the I/O
(3) ensure that the page is not present in the data subcache (use mflsp). If this cell will never execute this instruction page, this step is not required.
(4) release the page anchor.
When reading an instruction page from an I/O device into SVA space, system software must:
(1) create the page (use mpsa to allocate and anchor the page, mpdw to complete page creation)
(2) perform the I/O
(3) ensure that the page is not present in the data subcache (use mflsp). If this cell will never execute this instruction page, this step is not required.
(4) clear the descriptor modified flag, set any other descriptor attributes such as subpage atomic state, and descriptor.no.sub.-- write.
(5) release the page anchor.
RRC Organization and Data Structures
A preferred RRC constructed in accord with the invention is organized into two independent banks, with each bank connected to a single subring. The banks of one to four RRCs are interleaved based on low order page address and the configured degree of interleaving. Interleaving is statically configured during system configuration. An RRC connected to Ring:0 is referred to as RRC:0 and a RRC connected to Ring:1 is referred to as RRC:1.
For a single Ring:1 configuration both the RRC:0 and RRC:1 are interleaved based on SVA[14]. FIG. 19a depicts one preferred such configuration.
For a dual Ring:1 configuration with one RRC:0 (TwoRing:1/1), the single RRC:0 is interleaved based on SVA[14] and two Ring:1 RRCs are interleaved based on SVA[15:14]. FIG. 19B depicts one preferred such configuration.
For a dual Ring:1 configuration with two RRC:0s (TwoRing:1/2), the RRC:0s are interleaved based on SVA[15:14] and two RRC:1s are interleaved based on SVA [15:14]. FIG. 19C depicts one preferred such configuration.
For a four Ring:1 configuration, the two RRC:0s are interleaved based on SVA[15:14] and four Ring:1 RRCs are interleaved based on SVA[15:14]. FIG. 19D depicts one preferred such configuration.
Multiple RRC:0s are on a single Ring:0 for TwoRing:1/2 and FourRing:1 configurations. Multiple RRC:1s are configured on separate Ring:1s for TwoRing:1/1, TwoRing:1/2 and FourRing:1 configurations.
FIG. 6 depicts a preferred Ring Routing Cell pair (RRC pair or RRCP) constructed in accord with the invention. The pair comprises RRC:0 and RRC:1 which are connected by a single communication line, e.g., bus, optical transmission connection, referred to as the InterRingLink. The downlink RRC is the opposite RRC of an RRC Pair. RRC Pairs which are connected to the same Ring:0 are referred to as an RRC Array (RRC Array). When discussing a cell or a Ring:0, the local RRC or RRC pair are the RRC(s) or RRC Pair(s) which are co-resident on the same Ring:0. A remote RRC or RRC pair are all those RRCs which are not local.
Each RRC bank consists of three sections, Routing Interconnect, Routing Directory and InterRingBuffer. The Routing Interconnect implements the RRC portion of ring interconnect, provides an interface to the Routing Directory and interfaces the ring to the RRC internal RoutingBus by means of insert and extract buffers. The RoutingBus consists of two 32 bit paths. Packets from the extract buffer are transferred to the InterRingDram Buffer or IBU over the RoutingToLink Bus. Packets are transferred from the IBU to the RI insert buffer over the RoutingToRing Bus. The IBU also transfers packets to the InterRingDramBuffer for error logging over the RoutingToLink Bus.
The Routing Directory contains an entry for all allocated pages within the Ring:0 which the RRC pair is connected. The Routing Directory consists of an Routing Directory Unit (RDU) and the actual ram based directory. The RDU controls the directory access sequence and contains the routing rules. For each packet, the Routing Interconnect passes pkt.addr, pkt.command and fifo status to the Routing directory. The Routing Directory returns a routing command, and instructions to update packet command to the Routing Interconnect. Ring related interleaving is specified by RduMasterConfig location.
The InterRingBuffer buffers incoming packets from the Ring Interconnect extract buffer and interfaces to the InterRingLink. The InterRingBuffer consists of the InterRing BufferUnit (IBU), InterRing Dram Buffer (IDB) and InterRingLink Interface. The IDB buffers all packets from the Routing Interconnect until the packet has been transmitted over InterRingLink to the downlink RRC and an acknowledge has been returned. The IDB also contains the RRC ErrorQueue. The IBU buffers and formats outgoing InterRingLink packets, provides error checking and buffer for InterRingLink incoming packets and controls the IDB. The InterRingLink interface converts the 32 bit wide IBU outgoing packet and incoming packet interfaces to or from the physical link format.
RRC banks can be configured to connect to separate InterRingLinks or share a single InterRingLink. In dual InterRingLink configuration, the InterRingLinks are completely independent. In single InterRingLink configuration, both RRC banks share a single InterRingLink. InterRingLinkIn is connected to the IBUs of both RRC banks. The RRC banks arbitrate to share InterRingLinkOut. The IBU interleave configurations and packet address determine which bank incoming packets are routed to.
RRC conforms to the UCS system fault detection strategy. All buses are parity or ecc protected. Parity or ECC is passed through chips, rather than regenerated whenever possible. All dram and large sram data structures are ecc protected. Single bit soft or hard errors are corrected without causing a fatal system error (requires system reboot) and in a software transparent manner if possible. Data links expecting high error rates (InterRingLink) provide software transparent frame level operation. Frame level operation ensures error free transmission of frames, including retransmission when errors are detected.
Routing Interconnect
RI Structure
Each Routing Interconnect (RI) interfaces a RRC bank to a subring, RRC internal Routing Bus and Routing Directory. The RI is implemented as two Routing Interconnect Units (RIUs). A preferred RIU constructed in accord with the invention is illustrated in FIG. 7. Each RIU interfaces to half of 16 byte wide ring and to half of 8 byte wide routing bus. The two RIUs pass the address and command field of packet to Routing Directory and the Routing Directory returns a packet routing command, new packet command and error status.
Each packet consists of ten, 16 byte double words (20 words) while on the ring. Each long packet (contains data) is stored in 9 words in each RIU extract buffer and 10 words in insert buffer. Each short packet (no data) is stored in 1 word in each RIU extract buffer and 2 words in insert buffer. RIU0 and RIU1 interface to RingData[63:0] RingData[127:64] respectively. RIU0 and RIU1 extract buffers interface to RoutingToLink[15:0] and RoutingToLink [31:16] respectively. RIU0 and RIU1 insert buffers interface to RoutingToRing[15:0] and RoutingToRing[31:16] respectively.
The RingIn to RingOut portion of RIU consists of a 6 stage shift register. Packets can be copied or extract from the shift register into the extract buffer and packets from the insert buffer can be inserted into the shift register. The insert and extract buffers are managed with a fifo discipline.
RI Operations
The Ring Interconnect routes from two sources to two destinations. The sources are previous Ring Interconnect and Insert Buffer. Packets from previous Ring Interconnect are referred to as Ring packets and packets from insert buffer are referred to as Insert packets. The destinations are next Ring Interconnect and Extract Buffer. Packets going to next Ring Interconnect are referred to as Ring Packets and packets going to extract buffer are referred to as Extract Packets. Insert packets are supplied to the insert buffer and extract packets are sourced from the extract buffer by the InterRing Buffer Unit (IBU).
The address and command fields of the packet are passed to the Routing Directory and the Routing Directory returns a packet routing command. The RI buffers all packets until the packet routing command is available. The assertion of RingEmpty field indicates the Ring packet is empty. Non-empty ring packets are always processed instead of insert packets. If the Ring packet is Empty and the insert buffer is not empty, the next insert buffer packet is processed by the Ring Interconnect.
The command from Routing Directory consists of a packet routing, packet field, extract buffer, and insert buffer commands.
The packet routing commands for all packets are pass and empty. The packet pass command specifies the Ring Interconnect should pass throughout the packet unaltered to the next Ring Interconnect. The packet empty command specifies that the Ring Interconnect empties the packet by setting RingEmpty signal and packet command CmdEmpty field. All packets for which CmdRequestId field match Ring Interconnect CellNumber field are unconditionally emptied, the Routing Directory command is not required. This allows RingEmpty signal to be set earlier than possible when waiting for command from Routing Directory.
The extract buffer commands are no.sub.-- push and push. The no.sub.-- push command specifies that the extract buffer does not store the current packet. The push command specifies that the current ring packet is copied into the extract buffer.
The insert buffer commands are no.sub.-- pop and pop. The no.sub.-- pop command specifies that the top insert buffer packet has not been inserted. The pop command specifies that the insert buffer top packet has been processed and is popped.
The packet field command specifies which outgoing packet command fields are modified. The packet command fields which can be modified are shown in the following table. All fields, except pkt.Freeze are within pkt.command[31:0].
A packet is extracted by an empty packet routing command and push extract buffer command. A packet is copied by a pass packet routing command and a push extract buffer command.
Extract Buffer Management
The extract buffer holds a combination of short (2 words) and long (18 words) packets which equals 512 words. This yields a maximum of 28 long, or 256 short or a combination of long/short packets. An extract buffer management flow control algorithm is required since the peak subring packet rate exceeds the rate the IBU can empty the extract algorithm. The control algorithm is based on the principle of maximizing forward progress in conjunction with reducing system loading. Prioritizing the allocation of system resources to completing requests in progress achieves both of these goals since completing a request simultaneously reduces system loading and achieves most efficient forward progress. The control algorithm is based on categorizing packets and using the Ring flow control mechanisms.
Empty space in Ring Extract Buffer is divided into four regions by two configurable pointers, ExtractAllThreshold and ExtractRspThreshold. The current region is selected by the number of empty words remaining in the Extract Buffer. The regions going from empty to full are: ExtBuf:All, ExtBuf.NonOpt, ExtBuf:PendReq and ExtBuf:Full. Extract Buffer State is maintained on a per RRC bank basis. The boundaries of these regions are configurable by software. Ring packets are grouped into three mutually exclusive categories for Extract Buffer management:
These packet categories are handled in the four extract buffer regions as follows:
In ExtBuf:All region, between empty and ExtractAllThreshold, all packets which would normally be copied into the extract buffer are copied. Within ExtBuf:NonOpt region, between ExtractAllThreshold and ExtractRspThreshold, all non-optional and response packets which would normally be copied into the extract buffer are copied. All optional packets are passed. The extract buffer and RRC sheds optional load as it becomes more fully subscribed. Within the ExtBuf:pendReq region, between ExtractRspThreshold and full, only packets relating to RRC pending request are accepted. All optional packets and non-optional (includes new incoming requests) packets are busied by assertion of responder busy (rsp.sub.-- busy) or invalidator.sub.-- busy (inv.sub.-- busy). The RRC sheds both optional load and new requests to relieve the overload situation.
If the extract buffer is full, the RIU will pass optional packets, assert responder busy or invalidator.sub.-- busy to non-optional requests. If the packet is a response to a request originated by this RRC, then the packet is left on the ring and pkt.cmd.timestamp field is cleared. Since only packets relating to RRC pending requests are accepted in the third region the packet will be copied on the subsequent traversals(s) around the Ring. The fact that the packet is on its second revolution is transparent to all cells within the Ring. If the packet not the response to an request originated by this RRC, but a packet that will satisfy the pending request (snarf), the pending request state is transitioned to Pend4:Reissue state.
Routing Directory
Routing Directory Organization
The Routing Directory consists of an Routing Directory Unit (RDU) and the actual ram based directory. The RDU controls the directory access sequence and contains the routing rules. The preferred implementation of the rules hardcodes SPA rules and allows SVA rules to be loaded during RRC initialization.
FIG. 8 depicts the organization of a Routing Directory constructed in accord with a preferred practice of the invention. The Routing Directory contains an entry for all allocated pages within the Ring:0 which the RRC pair is connected. A single routing directory entry is required for SVA pages allocated in more than a single Local Cache. The Routing Directory is organized as a three level btree for each of 128 subdirectories. A subdirectory contains an entry for all allocated pages within a single Local Cache set, as specified by SVA[20:14]. A subdirectory can describe a maximum of 2.sup.10 pages, which supports a maximum of 64 Ring:0 Cells. Each Cell's Local Cache contains 128 sets, each set containing 16 pages.
Ring:0 subrings are normally configured to interleave subpage transfer based on cache set lsb, SVA[14]. Thus half of the Routing Directory can be associated with each Ring:0 subring (Ring:0.sub.A, Ring:0.sub.B).
The L1Entry is indexed by SVA[39:25]. An L1Entry is statically assigned to each 2.sup.4 pages within a set. Each valid L1Entry specifies a pointer to a dynamically allocated L2Entry. A maximum of 2.sup.10 L2Entries are available. Unallocated L2Entries are organized into a singly linked free list. The Index.sub.i L2Free List pointer points to the first L2 free list entry. Each L2Entry in free list contains a pointer to the next L2Free list entry. The last L2 free list entry contains a null pointer. Each L2Entry contains 16 subentries. Each valid L2Subentry contains a pointer to a dynamically allocated L3Entry. A maximum of 2.sup.10 L3Entries are available. Each L3Entry describes a single page. Unallocated L3Entries are organized into a singly link free list. The Index.sub.i L3Free List pointer points to the first L3 free list entry. Each L3Entry in free list contains a pointer to the next L3Free list entry. The last L3 free list entry contains a null pointer. Each L3Entry consists of 16 L3Subentries, each of which describe subpage state for eight subpages.
Routing Directory Structure
FIG. 9 depicts the structure of a Routing Directory constructed in accord with a preferred practice of the invention. The Routing Directory is physically organized into L1, L2 and L3 tables for each subring. The L1 Table is addressed by concatenation of SVA[20:14] (set number) and SVA[39:25] (index1). SVA[39:25,20:14] is referred to as index1. Each L2Entry consists of a L2subentry and L2V. The L2subentry is addressed by a concatentation of SVA[20:14], L1Table[index1].12ptr and SVA[24:21] (index2). The L2V is addressed by concatenation of SVA[20:14] and L1Table[index1].12ptr. The L2V field is interpreted as level2 subentry valid field if the L2Entry is valid and is interpreted as level2 NextFree list entry pointer if L2Entry is invalid. Each L3Entry consists of a L3subentry and L3Valid. The L3subentry is addressed by a concatenation of SVA[20:14], L2Table.12sub[index2].ptr and SVA[13:10] (index3). An individual subpage state is addressed by a concatenation of SVA[20:14], L2Entry.12sub[index2].ptr, SVA[13:10] and SVA[9:7] (indexsp). The L3V field is interpreted as level3 subentry valid field if the L3Entry is valid and is interpreted as levels NextFree list entry pointer if L2Entry is invalid.
A c-like description of the table structure of one bank is shown below.
FIG. 10 depicts formats of Routing Directory entries in a preferred ring routing cell constructed in accord with the invention.
Level1 Entry
L1Entry contains a L2Entry pointer (12ptr), L2 pointer valid bit (11 valid) and L1 check bits (11check). the 12ptr is used to address L2Entry as described above. L1valid set indicates a valid 12ptr and clear indicates an invalid 12ptr. L1check consists of a 5 bit single bit correct and double bit detect ECC code.
Level2 Subentry
L2Subentry contains a L3Entry pointer (13ptr) and L2 check bits (11check). The 13ptr is used to address L3Entry as described above. L2check consists of a 5 bit single bit correct and double bit detect ECC code.
Level2 VEntry
The L2VEntry has two formats, one for use as L2VEntry (L2V.Valid) and the second if part of L2 free list (L2V.Invalid). L2V.valid consists of an array of 16 valid bits and 5 ecc check bits. L2V.valid.12valid[n] set indicates a valid L2Subentry[n] and clear indicates an invalid L2Subentry[n].
L2V.invalid consists of NextFree L2 entry, unused field and ecc check field. L2V.invalid.NextFree is used to address the next L2 free list entry. NextFree high order bit clear indicates a null pointer.
Level3 Subentry
L3Subentry contains 8 subpage state fields pointer (L3Subentry.SpState) and check bits (L3Subentry check). L3Subentyr.check consists of a 8 bit single bit correct and double bit detect ECC code.
Level3 VEntry
The L3VEntry has two formats, one for use as L3VEntry (L3V.Valid) and the second if part of L3 free list (L3V.Invalid). L3V.valid consists of an array of 16 valid bits, created, OwnerLimit, PagePend and ecc check field. L3V.valid.13valid[n] corresponds to L3Subentry[n] and is a function of L3V.created:
L3V.valid.OwnerLimit is set or cleared by software to limit ownership of subpages within the page to the Local Ring:0. When clear, specifies that any Ring:0 can own the subpages. When set, specifies that only cells within the Local Ring:0 can own subpages in nonexclusive, exclusive, atomic or transcient atomic states. Remote Ring:0s can receive read only copies. A page fault is signalled by the RRC to ownership requests when OwnerLimit is set. Recombine requests will not propagate beyond Local Ring:0 when OwnerLimit is set. Cleared during RRC descriptor allocation.
L3V.valid.PagePend indicates that an RRC page deallocate sequence is in progress when set.
L3V.invalid consists of NextFree L3 entry, unused field and ecc check field. L2Vinvalid.NextFree is used to address the next L3 free list entry. NextFree high order bit clear indicates a null pointer.
Routing Directory Operations
There are eight possible RRC routing directory operations. These operations occur within a single packet time. All packet types cause a single operation to execute.
Level1 Miss lookup operation
Level2 Miss lookup operation
Normal lookup operation
Deallocate Level3 Subentry
Deallocate Level2 Subentry
SpA Access
Refresh
SVA Look-up Operations
All Lookup Operations proceed through five steps, subdirectory selection, Level1 table lookup, Level2 table lookup, Level3 table lookup and Level3 subpage state modification. The level2 and level3 entries might be required to be allocated in order to complete lookup operation.
Normal Lookup Operation
A normal lookup operation occurs when the Level 1 table indicates that the level2 entry is valid and the Level2 table indicates that the level3 entry is valid.
The L1EntryAddr,L2EntryAddr and L3EntryAddr are calculated as described under Routing Directory Structure. L1EntryAddr.fwdarw.11valid being set indicates the level2 pointer is valid. The concatenation of SVA[20:14] and L1Entry[index1].ptr specifies the L2Entry, since the subdirectory is implied by the 10 bit pointer. The level2 subentry (L2EntryAdrr.fwdarw.12sub[index2]) is indexed by SVA[24:21]. L2Entry.12v[index2] being set indicates the level3 pointer (L2EntryAdrr.fwdarw.12sub[index2].ptr) is valid. The concatentation of SVA[20:14] and L2Entry[index2].ptr specifies the L3Entry, since the subdirectory is implied by the 10 bit pointer. The level3 subentry (L3EntryAdrr.fwdarw.13sub[index3]) is indexed SVA[13:10]. Each level3 subentry contains subpage state for eight subpages, indexed by SVA[9:7]. Index3 refers to SVA[13:10] and Indexs refers to SVA[9:7]. L3Entry.valid[index3] and L3Entry.created specifies whether the corresponding subentry is valid and default subpage state if invalid.
The subpage state is then presented to Routing Directory Rules which generate the new subpage state to be stored in L3EntryAdrr.fwdarw.13sub[index3].SpState[indexs].
Level1 Miss Operation
A Level1 Miss lookup operation occurs when the Level 1 table lookup indicates that the level2 entry pointer is invalid. The level1 miss lookup operation allocates a level2 entry and level3 entry to allow the Routing Directory to describe the page and subpage state of the request SVA. A level 1 miss is caused by the first reference within a Ring:0 to a page within an address range denoted by SVA[39:25]. If the packet command is ciu.sub.-- ex.sub.-- summary, the request is part of a page create operation.
The Level2 Free list head is pointed to by the L2 Free List pointer. The free list head L2Entry.NextFree specifies the pointer to the next free Level2 Entry. The level2 free list head is allocated as a Level2 Entry by writing LevelEntry.pointer with level2 free list pointer and setting L1Entry.valid. Level2 free list pointer is updated by writing Level2 free list pointer with level2 free list head, L2Entry.NextFree. L2Entry.12v.12valid[SVA[24:21]] is set and the remaining valid bits are cleared.
If the L2FreeListPointer is null, a Routing directory fault is signalled. This error can only occur if the corresponding Ring:0 has allocated greater than 2.sup.10 unique pages within a single subdirectory or the RRC has failed to allocate or deallocate level2 entries correctly. 2.sup.10 unique pages corresponds to 64 processor cells (2.sup.10 pages/2.sup.4 pages per cell).
Level2 Miss Operation
A Level2 Miss lookup operation occurs when the Level2 table lookup indicates that the level2 entry pointer is invalid. The level2 miss lookup operation allocates a level3 entry to allow the Routing Directory to describe the page and subpage state of the request SVA. A level2 miss is caused by the first reference within a Ring:0 to a page within an address range denoted by SVA[39:21]. If the packet command is ciu.sub.-- ex.sub.-- summary, the request is part of a page create operation.
The Level3 Free list head is pointed to by the L3FreeListPointer. The free list head, L3Entry.NextFree specifies the pointer to the next free L3 Entry. The level3 free list head is allocated as a L3Entry by writing L2Entry.12sub[index2].13ptr with level3 free list pointer. L3 free list pointer is updated by writing L3 free list pointer with levels free list head L3Entry.NextFree. L3Entry.13v.13valid[SVA[13:10]] is set and the remaining valid bits are cleared. L3Entry.13sub(SVA[13:10])].SpState[SVA[9:7]] is set to proper subpage.sub.-- state and the remaining seven subpage.sub.-- states are set to invalid. If the packet command is ciu.sub.-- ex.sub.-- summary, L3Entry.13v.Valid.created is set.
SVA Deallocate Operations
SVA Deallocate Operations are initiated by the packet commands ciu.sub.-- inv.sub.-- sum.sub.-- alloc, ciu.sub.-- pure.sub.-- inv.sub.-- sum.sub.-- alloc and RrcDeallocDesc. All deallocate operations Proceed through five steps, subdirectory selection, Level1 table lookup, Level2 table lookup, update Level2 entry to deallocate Level3 entry. If all level2 subentries are invalid, then the Level2Entry is also deallocated.
Deallocate Level3 Entry Operation
A deallocate Level3 Entry operation is executed if all level2 subentries are not invalid after the level3 entry is deallocated. The following operation is executed if the Packet command is ciu.sub.-- inv.sub.-- summary:
The following operation is executed if the packet command is ciu.sub.-- wr.sub.-- descriptro.data or ciu.sub.-- inv.sub.-- sum.sub.-- allocate.data:
Deallocate Level2 Entry Operation
A deallocate Level2 Entry operation is executed if all level2 subentries are invalid after the level3 entry is deallocated.
SPA Operation
SPA operation is initiated by two packet commands, spa.sub.-- read.sub.-- request and spa.sub.-- write.sub.-- request. There are two types of SPA operations, SpaDirect and SpaLookup.
The SpaDirect operation preforms a spa read or write based of the directly on the spa location specified in the packet address. Spa.sub.-- write.sub.-- request data is supplied in Pkt.DataWord0. Spa.sub.-- read.sub.-- request response data is supplied in Pkt.DataWord0.
The SpaLookup operation is used to emulate the RDU lookup and deallocate operations under controlled conditions from spa address space. The Pkt.Address location offset and ctl$RiuLookupCommand.SubAddr forms the emulated SVA and the remainder of ctl$RiuLookupCommand forms the emulated packet command. The RDU uses the emulated packet command and emulated to perform a normal lookup or deallocate operation. The results of the SpaLookup operation can be examined by access to L2FreeListPointer, L3FreeListPointer and SpaDirect locations.
Refresh Operation
Refresh is accomplished in a distributed manner by each RRC independently controlling it refresh. A single refresh requires one packet processing time. Thus refresh can only be performed during empty, or frozen packets, since these packet require no processing. The RRC attempts perform refresh in the background by using all empty, frozen and invisible packet times for refresh.
The three dram based data structures, L1Table, L2PTable and L3SubpageState require refresh. During a refresh operation one of 512 rows is refreshed in each of the data structures.
ECC Correct Operation
When the RRC detects a correctable ECC error, additional packet times are required to correct the data structure. Ring freezing is used to allow multiple packet times for the correction and re-lookup.
When a correctable ECC error is detected, the RRC initiates Full-1 Ring Freeze method, since the ECC error is not know early in packet processing. The first packet is handled as described in Extract Buffer Full section and the remaining packets are marked frozen for one revolution. The corrected data structure re-written, saved in RDU and then used to reprocess the packet which cause the ecc error after one Ring revolution. Only RRC originated packets will be processed, non-originated packets are extracted by another cell within the Ring. Saving the corrected packet allows RRC originated packets to be correctly processed for single bit (correctable) hard errors.
Routing Directory Initialization
RRC hardware does not automatically initialize the Routing Directory. All Level1Entries, Level2Subentries and Level3Subentries must be initialized to invalid. Level2 and Level3 FreeListPointers and free lists must be initialized to indicate all entries and subentries are free.
InterRing Buffer
The InterRingBuffer buffers incoming packets from the Ring Interconnect extract buffer and interfaces to the InterRingLink. A preferred structure of the InterRingBuffer is shown in FIG. 11A. The InterRingBuffer also controls the RRC Bank buffer management. The InterRingBuffer consists of the InterRing BufferUnit (IBU), InterRing Dram Buffer (IDB) and InterRingLink Interface.
InterRing Buffer Structure
IBU
The IBU buffers and formats outgoing InterRingLink packets, provides error checking and buffering for InterRingLink incoming packets and controls the InterRing Dram Buffer. The Outgoing Buffer contains 72 words, which holds a maximum of 4 long packets and the Incoming Buffer holds 72, words for maximum of 4 long packets. The sizing of the Incoming Buffer is dependent on the InterRingLink rate and absolute delay (length and switching delay). The 72 word Incoming Buffer is sized for a 10 km maximum length, directly connected 1 gbit/sec link. Short packets consume 2 words and long packets consume 18 words of Outgoing or Incoming Buffers. The Outgoing and Incoming buffers are managed with fifo discipline.
InterRingDramBuffer
The InterRing Dram Buffer IDB contains the Ring Packet Queue (RPQ) and RRC ErrorQueue. A configuration for the InterRingDram queues in a preferred ring routing cell constructed in accord the invention is shown in FIG. 11B. The RPQ buffers all packets from Routing Interconnect unit until the packet has been transmitted over InterRingLink to the downlink RRC and an acknowledge has been returned. When the Extract Buffer and the Outgoing Buffer are full, the Extract Buffer-packets are emptied into the IDB until the Outgoing Buffer can accept them. The RPQ is organized as a circular queue. RPQPushPointer points to the first free word for queueing the next packet from the Extract Buffer. The RPQPopPointer points to the first word of the next packet to be transmitted over the InterRingLink. The PRQCommitPointer points to the first word of oldest packet which has not be acknowledged by downlink RRC. Packets between RPQPushPointer and RPQPopPointer are queued to be transmitted over the InterRingLink. Packets between RPQPopPointer and RPQCommitPointer are waiting for acknowledgement from the downlink RRC. If RPQPushPointer equals RPQPopPointer, the there are no queued packets in the RPQ for transmission on InterRingLink. If RPQPopPointer equals PRQCommitPointer, all transmitted packets have been acknowledge. If Ring Packet Queue overflows, a fatal error is indicated by IbuMasterConfig.RPQFull.
The IDB also contains the RRC ErrorQueue. The RRC places an entry in the ErrorQueue for each RRC detected error. Each ErrorQueue entry consists of the packet corresponding to the error (if any) and one word of error information. EQPushPointer points to the first free words for queueing the next error entry. The EQPopPointer points to the first word of the least recent queued error. If EQPopPointer equals EQPushPointer, the RRC ErrorQueue is empty. The EQPopPointer is not modified by the RRC, it is only modified by SPA access. IbuMasterConfig.EQFull is set when the RRC ErrorQueue overflows. The RRC continues normal operations but new errors are not logged.
InterRingLink Interface
The InterRingLink interface converts the 32 or 40 bit wide IBU outgoing packet and incoming packet interfaces to or from the physical link format.
RRC Buffer Management
Each RRC pair logically manages a pair of buffers with fifo discipline, one in each direction between the Ring:0 and Ring:1 (see FIG. 11B). A RRC bank manages 5 buffers, 3 buffers between the Ring and the outgoing InterRingLink and 2 buffers between the incoming InterRingLink and the Ring. A packet copied from the Ring of uplink RRC bank, passes through the Extract Buffer, optionally throughout Ring Packet Buffer, through InterRingLink Outgoing Buffer, and is then transmitted over the InterRingLink. The packet then passes through the InterRingLink Incoming Buffer and Insert Buffer of downlink RRC bank. Packets traveling in the opposite direction are copied from the Ring of downlink RRC bank, pass through the Extract Buffer, Ring Packet Buffer and InterRingLink Outgoing buffer. The packet then passes through the InterRingLink Incoming Buffer and Insert Buffer of uplink RRC bank.
The Extract and Insert buffer provide rate adjustment between the Ring and RRC Routing Bus. The Incoming and Outgoing buffers provide rate adjustment between the InterRingLink and the RRC Routing Bus. The Ring Packet Queue handles possible overflow of these buffers by being able to store the maximum number of pending packets and prevents deadlock between the RRC pair. The buffers are sized such that the Ring Packet Queue is used infrequently for buffering between Extract and InterRingLink outgoing buffers. The Ring Packet Queue is also used to log all packets transmitted over InterRingLink, in the event that re-transmission is required due to link errors.
The preferred RRC bank implementation provides an independent path between the Extract buffer and InterRingLink Outgoing Buffer and between the InterRingLink Incoming Buffer and the Insert Buffer. When the InterRingLink Incoming buffer is not empty and the Insert Buffer is not full, the IBU transfers a packet from the Incoming to Insert buffer.
When the Extract buffer is not empty, InterRingDram Queue is empty and the InterRingLink Outgoing buffer is not full, the IBU transfers a Packet from the Extract to the Outgoing buffer. If the Outgoing buffer is full, the packet is transferred from the Extract buffer to the InterRingDram Queue. Packets contained in InterRingDram Queue are always transferred to Outgoing buffer before any Packets from Extract buffer.
InterRingLink Packet Protocol and Format
The InterRingLink packet protocol and format is required to be applicable across a range of link rates for multiple generations of UCS computers. The protocol and format should span interconnection distances from 25 meters within a single room to 10,000 km over tariffed telecommunication networks. The format should be compatible with emerging telecommunications standards, such as SONET. It is heavily based on simplified concepts borrowed from SDLC protocol; see Communications Architecture for Distributed Systems, R. J. Cypser, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1978 or Telecommunications Networks: Protocols, Modeling and Analysis, Mischa Schwartz, Addison Wesley, 1987. FIG. 12 depicts a preferred InterRingLink frame format used in a ring routing cell constructed in accord with the invention.
Acknowledgements and Retransmissions
The connection between an RRC Pair is full duplex, consisting of two unidirectional InterRingLinks. Because of the uncertain reliability of the InterRingLinks, a very positive and definite acknowledgement is call for at the link level. The transmitter RRC receives an positive acknowledgement over the incoming InterRingLink for each packet transmitted over outgoing InterRingLink. Waiting for an acknowledgement prior to transmitting the next packet leads to very low efficiency. The IBU attaches a sequence number to each transmitted packet so that up to 2.sup.16 packets can be outstanding prior to the first acknowledge. Because of the duplex capability, two independent sets of sequence numbers are used, one for each direction of packet flow. This permits the recovery of one InterRingLink to proceed independent of the sequence numbers of the other InterRingLink between the RRC pair and avoids possible timing ambiguities. Only data packets are sequenced checked.
Two sequence numbers are maintained by each IBU. The IbuXmitSeqNum, operated modulo 2.sup.16, provides a count for each data transfer packet that is transmitted from the IBU. The IbuRcvSeqNum, also modulo 2.sup.16, is incremented once for each valid in-sequence, error-free data packet that is received by that IBU. When one IBU sends its IbuRcvSeqNum to the downlink IBU, it will served to indicate the next data packet that is expected and to acknowledge all data packets received up to, but not including the value indicated by the packet receive sequence number. Each subsequent IbuRcvSeqNum transmitted reconfirms that all preceding messages have been accepted. Multiple data packets can be acknowledged in a single packet.
Packet Format
InterRingLink packet format consists of five fields, Frame Start, Preamble, Ring Packet, CRC and Frame End. The Frame Start and Frame End fields are link specific framing fields and are added and stripped off InterRingPacket by InterRingLink Interface.
The Frame Start and Frame End fields are dependent on the type of physical link.
The PreAmble which specifies an link control command, a sequence acknowledge field, a Transmit frame sequence number (TFSN) and the received frame sequence number (RFSN). Control commands define the number of words and content of Ring Packet subfield.
Commands are divided into sequenced and nonsequenced commands. The sequence numbers for the link to be incremented by the RRC pair for sequenced frames. Sequence numbers for the link are not incremented for nonsequenced frames.
Transmit Frame Sequence Number (TFSN) represents the sequence number of the frame. Each. successive sequenced frame has its sequence number incremented by one. The InterRingLink used mod 2.sup.16 sequence numbering. When the transmitter reaches its maximum sequence number, it is forced to stop transmitting until a frame in the reverse direction is received, acknowledging an outstanding packet. The receive frame sequence number (RFSN) acknowledges the receipt of RFSN-1 and any frames preceding that number not already acknowledged. RFSN indicates that the receiver is expecting sequenced frame number RFSN. The transmitting IBU buffers all frames not yet acked positively. Once acked positively the frame can be purged and its sequence number reused.
The InterRingLink, like HDLC, provides both a "piggy-back" feature, with the ack function embedded in a frame transmitted in the reverse direction. Multiple frames can be acknowledged in a single frame. The three possible acknowledges are tabulated as follows:
Idle command that specifies that the Ring packet field is null, but the remainder of preamble and checksum field are valid. The initialize request, initialize sequence and initialize acknowledge commands are used to initialize and synchronize sequence number protocol between IBUs at each end of InterRingLink. Initialize sequence indicates the transmit IBU has reset its sequence numbers. The receiving RRC should reset sequence number, Ring Packet Queue, clear IbuMasterConfig.RPQFull and transmit a reset acknowledge control command Packet. Initialize request causes the downlink IBU to reset sequence number, Ring Packet Queue, clear IbuMasterConfig.RPQFull and transmit a initialize sequence packet. The short packet and long packet commands indicate that the Ring Packet field contains a short or long packet respectively.
The InterRingLink uses two mechanisms for error recovery.
1--Reject recovery. This is assume to be always used where possible to speed up InterRingLink recovery. However, it can be used only once for a given frame. It cannot be invoked on repeats of that frame.
2--Timeout recovery. This must always be used in addition to reject recovery. Without timeout recovery, an isolated sequenced frame or the last in a sequence of frames could not be recovered if garbled. In addition, since a reject recovery may be used only once per sequence frame, multiple losses of a given frame must be handled through a timeout.
Link packet errors include:
Incorrect checksum
Out of sequence transmit packet number
Clock recovery error
Link framing error
The RNR acknowledge provides flow control when the incoming buffer is full. For optimal use of InterRingLink bandwidth, the minimum incoming buffer size is the number of frames received during a round trip InterRingLink delay.
The Cyclic Redundancy Field (CRC) is calculated from Preamble and RingPacket fields.
IB Operations
The IBU buffer management control executes the following IB operations to transfer packets between the 5 RRC buffers.
Ring Interconnect Packet
A packet from the Extract Buffer is transferred over the Routing Bus to both the Ring Packet Queue and stored starting at the location specified by RPQPushPointer. The pointer is incremented by 18 words for both short and long packets. If the Ring Packet is empty (RPQPushPointer equals RPQPopPointer) and Outgoing buffer is not full, the packet is also pushed into the Outgoing buffer and RPQPopPointer is incremented. IbuXmitSeqNum is incremented by one for each data packet transmitted on InterRingLink.
Ring Interconnect Packet from Dram Buffer
A packet is transferred from the Ring Packet Queue to the Outgoing buffer when the Ring Packet Queue is not empty and the Outgoing Buffer is not full. The RPQPopPointer is incremented by 32 words.
InterRingLink Packet
A packet is transferred from the Incoming Buffer to the Insert Buffer. The count IbuRcvSeqNum is incremented by one.
InterRing Dram Buffer Refresh
A refresh sequence is performed on InterRing Dram when the IRBRefreshCount overflows. The refresh interval is set by IRBRefreshInterval. Refresh takes top priority over other Routing Bus operations.
InterRingLink Retry
Each packet received over the InterRingLink specifies the last error free packet received and whether an error was detected. If the acknowledge indicates no errors, the RPQCommitPointer and CommitPktNumber locations are updated in the following manner:
1--RPQCommitPointer=RPQCommitPointer+(RcvPktSeqNum-CommitPktNum) * 32
2--CommitPktNum=RcbPktSeqNum
When a reject packet is received, the IBU must resend all packets with sequence numbers after RPQCommitPointer through RPQPushPointer. Ibis is accomplished by adjusting the RPQPopPointer.
1--RPQCommitPointer=RPQCommitPointer+(RcvPktSeqNum-CommitPktNum) * 32
2--CommitPktNum=PktRcvSeqNum
3--RPQPopPointer=PktRcvSeqNum
4--Store received error packet in ErrorQueue
Error Log
For any error detected by the RI, RDU and IB within RRC, the corresponding packet and 2 words of error status are recorded in the RRC ErrorQueue. The packet should also be queue in Ring Packet Queue if it is being transmitted to downlink RRC.
SPA Read/Write InterRing Dram
Read or written through InterRingDram locations. Note that if Outgoing Buffer becomes full or RRC detects errors, the InterRingDram is modified.
Ring:1 Operations
This section which follows describes preferred RRC operations in context of the multi-level memory system hierarchy described above. The RRC can be viewed as a packet switch, which routes packets based on rules which are a function of Packet type and RRC directory based subpage state. First the subpage, page and RRC based states and pending states are described. Next, the an description of key rules concepts and sequences are given. Next complete subpage rules are provided. Page and special operations are then described. Complete rules encompassing page operations, special operations and subpage operations
Originating Conventions
FIG. 13 illustrates a typical request sequence and defines the location terminology used in this section. The Originating Ring:0 is the Ring:0 contains the requestor cell, which issued the original request packet (step 1). If the requested subpage is not valid within the originating (or local) Ring:0, RRC:0 extracts the packet and forwards it to the local RRC:1. The locally originated request is then inserted by the local RRC:1 onto Ring:1 (step 3). An RRC:1, connected to a remote Ring:0, which holds a valid copy of the requested subpage then extracts the remotely originated request (step 4). The remotely originated request is then inserted onto the remote Ring:0 by RRC:0 (step 5). The responding cell extracts the request and inserts a response (step 6). The remotely originated request is extracted by the RRC:1 (step 7) and forwarded to the partner RRC:1. This RRC:1, called the responding RRC:1, inserts the response packet onto the Ring:1 (step 8). The packet travel around the Ring:1 to the originating RRC:1 and it is extracted (step 9). The packet is forwarded to the originating Ring:0s RRC:0 and inserted onto Ring:0 (step 10). The request sequence is then completed by the originating (requestor) cell extracting the packet (step 11).
The packet is processed by RRCs eight times during this typical sequence. The two RRC:0s and two RRC:1s interpret the packet in eight unique ways based on packet source and packet origin as shown in the table below. The RRC operations and rules are structured based on these eight combinations of RRC, packet source and packet origin.
For most part RRC:0 locally originated packet rules are analogous to RRC:1 remotely originated packet rules. From the point of view of a local Ring:0, the local RRC:0 makes the remainder of the system logically appear as a single cell to locally originated requests. From the point of view of the Ring:1 the local RRC:1 makes the local Ring:0 logically appear as a single cell to remotely originated requests.
The pkt.RequestorId and RiuCellAddress are compared to determine if the request is locally originated.
RRC Subpage State Description--Preferred Embodiment
Subpage and pending request state are stored in the RRC pair for all subpages which are present in any cache within the Ring:0 or for which a request is pending to or from a nonlocal Ring:0. RRC:0 stores pending states, for requests from a remote Ring:0s. The RRC:1 stores pending state for local requests which are pending to a remote Ring:0. Both RRC:0 and RRC:1 store subpage state. RRC:0 and RRC:1 subpage state is consistent, except during intervals when the subpage state is being updated. The rules and pending states properly handle all window cases. Subpage States for a preferred practice of the invention are set forth immediately below.
RDU:0 (RduState0) Enumeration
RDU:0 state consists of two independent fields and a reserved field. Subpage state field describes the collective state of all subpages present within the local Ring:0. Pend field describes whether any remotely originated requests to this Ring:0 are pending. The individual states are described in the following sub-sections.
SubpageState:Inv
Indicates there is no valid copy of subpage within the Ring:0.
SpState:Ro
SpState:Ro indicates that one or more caches within the Ring:0 might contain a read only copy of the subpage, but none contains owner state. Under certain circumstances, the RRC pair has recorded read only state (SpState:Ro) for a subpage, but the subpage is invalid (SpState:Inv) within the Ring:0, since no read only copies exist in any of the cells.
SpState:Nex
SpState:Nex indicates the subpage owner, and zero or more read only copies of subpage exist within the local Ring:0. Zero or more read only copies might exist in remote Ring:0s. If no read copies exist outside the local Ring:0, the first invalidate, or recombine which indicates that no remote read only copies exist causes a subpage state transition to exclusive. Remote RRCs did not signal when they deallocate descriptors.
SpState:Ex
SubpageState:Ex indicates that there are no valid copies of subpage outside of the local Ring:0. The local Ring:0 contains an exclusive owner and no read only copies or a nonexclusive owner with zero or more read only copies. The RRC:0 records all local cell exclusive ownership states, exclusive, atomic, and transient-atomic as exclusive.
Pending:None
PendingNone request state indicates that there is no remotely originated pending activity to the local Ring:0 relating to the corresponding subpage.
Pend1:Ro
Pend1:Ro indicates that one remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request to the local Ring:0 is pending. Additional remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests are returned to the partner RRC:1 with RspBsy set, until the request is closed out.
Pend1:Owner
Pend1:Owner indicates that one or more remotely originated ownership or invalidation requests to the local Ring:0 is pending. In addition one or more remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests might also be pending. All remotely originated ownership, read only and invalidation requests are forwarded to the Ring:0, when in this state. Ownership requests are sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex, sva.sub.-- get and sva.sub.-- getw. Invalidations requests are write.sub.-- inv and lookahead invalidates.
RDU:1 (RduState1) Enumeration
RDU:1 state consists of three independent fields and a reserved field. Subpage state field describes the collective state of all subpages present within the local Ring:0. Pend field describes whether any locally originated requests to Ring:1 are pending. Pend1 field describes whether the pending request might need to be reissued due to the RRC:1 missing a remotely originated ownership packet that wasn't extracted to satisfy a pending request and a missing page (snarf). Individual states are described in the following sub-sections.
SubpageState:Inv
Indicates there is no valid copy of subpage within the Ring:0.
SpState:Ro
SpState:Ro indicates that one or more caches within the Ring:0 might contain a read only copy of the subpage, but none contains owner state. Under certain circumstances, the RRC pair has recorded read only state (SpState:Ro) for a subpage, but the subpage is invalid (SpState:Inv) within the Ring:0, since no read only copies exist in any of the cells.
SubpageState:Owner
SubpageState:Owner indicates that the subpage is owned exclusively (Ex) or nonexclusively (Nex) within the local Ring:0. The local Ring:0 contains an exclusive owner and no read only copies or a non-exclusive owner with zero or more read only copies. The RRC:1 records all local cell ownership states, non-exclusive, exclusive, atomic, and transient-atomic as owner.
Pending:None
PendingNone request state indicates that there is no locally originated pending activity to the Ring:1 relating to the corresponding subpage and pending field.
Pend:Ro
Pend:Ro indicates that one locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request to Ring:1 is pending. Additional locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests are returned to the partner RRC:0 with RspBsy set, until the request is closed out.
Pend:Owner
Pend:Owner indicates that one or more locally originated ownership or invalidation requests to Ring:1 are pending. In addition one or more locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests might also be pending. All locally originated ownership, read only and invalidation requests are forwarded to the Ring:0, when in this state. Ownership requests are sva.sub.-- read ex, sva.sub.-- get and sva.sub.-- getw. Invalidations requests are write.sub.-- inv and lookahead invalidates.
Pend1:ReIssue
Pend1:ReIssue indicates that the RRC:1 might have missed a potential non-RRC:1 originated response packet to an RRC:1 originated request. Pend1:Reissue state is used by RRC:1 to prevent spurious missing.sub.-- page error (page fault) by differentiating between the case of a remotely originated ownership packet that wasn't extracted to satisfy a pending request and a missing page (snarf). If the RRC:1 originated request returns without a response and Pend1:ReIssue then the returning request is busied by the RRC causing the requesting processor cell or RRC to reissue the request, thereby preventing a spurious page fault. Pend1:Reissue is cleared when no locally originated requests are outstanding or during the first ownership (with data) response.
RRC Subpage State Description--Alternative Embodiment I
Described below are subpage states used in a first alternate embodiment of the invention.
RDU:0 (RduState0) Enumeration
RDU:0 state consists of four independent fields. Subpage state field describes the collective state of all subpages present within the local Ring:0. Pending1 field describes whether any remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro, sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex, or write.sub.-- invalidate requests to this Ring:0 are pending. Pending2 field describes whether a remotely originated sva.sub.-- get request is pending. Pending3 field describes whether a remotely originated sva.sub.-- getw (get and wait) request is pending and whether additional getw requests were issued while this request was pending. Multiple sva.sub.-- getw requests are recorded to properly signal transient atomic state to requesting cache.
The three pending fields independently recorded a maximum of one remotely originated pending request of each type per subpage. Multiple requests of the same type to the same subpage are returned with busy status to the partner RRC:1 until the pending request has been closed out. The individual states are described in the following sub-sections.
SubpageState:Inv
Indicates there is no valid copy of subpage within the Ring:0.
SpState:Ro
SpState:Ro indicates that one or more caches within the Ring:0 might contain a read only copy of the subpage, but none contains owner state. Under certain circumstances, the RRC pair has recorded read only state (SpState:Ro) for a subpage, but the subpage is invalid (SpState:Inv) within the Ring:0, since no read only copies exist in any of the cells. When no read only copies exist, read only subpage state is adjusted to invalid subpage state, by the first locally originated request, remotely originated invalidate or remotely originated read only request.
SpState:Nex
SpState:Nex indicates the subpage owner, and zero or more read only copies of subpage exist within the local Ring:0. Zero or more read only copies might exist in remote Ring:0s. If no read copies exist outside the local Ring:0, the first invalidate, or recombine which indicates that no remote read only copies exist causes a subpage state transition to exclusive. Remote RRCs did not signal when they deallocate descriptors.
SpState:Ex
SubpageState:Ex indicates that there are no valid copies of subpage outside of the local Ring:0. the Ring:0 contains an exclusive owner and no read only copies or a non-exclusive owner with zero or more read only copies. The RRC:0 records all local cell exclusive ownership states, exclusive, atomic, and transient-atomic as exclusive.
Pending[1,2,3]:None
Pending None request state indicates that there is no remotely originated pending activity to the local Ring:0 relating to the corresponding subpage and pending field.
Pend1:Ro
Pend1:Ro indicates that a remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request to the local Ring:0 is pending. Additional remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request are returned to the partner RRC:1 with RspBsy set, until the request is closed out.
Pend1:Ex
Pend1:Ex indicates that a remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex request to the local Ring:0 is pending. A preceding remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request might be pending. Additional remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex requests are returned to the partner RRC:1 with RspBsy set, until the request is closed out.
Pend1:OwnerInv
Pend1:OwnerInv indicates that a remotely originated write.sub.-- invalidate or lookahead invalidate (write.sub.-- invalidate.lookahead, sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex.lookahead, sva.sub.-- get.lookahead or sva.sub.-- getw.lookahead) request to the local Ring:0 is pending. A preceding remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request might be pending. Subsequent lookahead invalidates from Ring:1 are emptied. Subsequent remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex or write.sub.-- inv requests are busied. Since each subpage has a single owner and only the owner can issue a write.sub.-- invalidate request, additional write invalidates in this state indicate an error condition. Subsequent sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests are marked RspBsy and duplicate.data packets are emptied.
Pend2:Get
Pend2:Get indicates that a remotely originated sva.sub.-- get request to the local Ring:0 is pending. Subsequent remotely originated sva.sub.-- get requests are returned to the originating cell with pkt.data set, which indicates subpage is already atomic, until the request is closed out. The subpage might not yet be atomic, but will be before the subsequent request is completed.
Pend3:Getw
Pend3:Getw indicates that one or more remotely originated sva.sub.-- getw requests to the local Ring:0 are pending. Unlike all other read requests, all getw requests are forwarded when in this state, rather than ensuing request being busied. When a getw response from Ring:0 indicates the page is already atomic (getw.data.RspBsy), Pend3:Atomic state is recorded.
Pend3:Atomic
Indicates that ownership packet is required to satisfy a pending getw request for atomic ownership. The owning cache is guaranteed to be in transient atomic state (tat). Subsequent remotely originated getw or get requests can be returned indicating the subpage is already atomic. Subsequent Ring:0 ownership packets (release.data or sva.sub.-- read ex.data) are extracted, forwarded to Ring:1, for forwarding to other Ring:0s which are pending atomic (RRC:1 Pend3:Atomic).
Pend3:Atomic is set under two conditions. First, when a getw response indicates the page is already atomic. Second when a remotely initiated release.data enters a Ring:0, Pend3:Atomic is set, so that the RRC:0 can extract a subsequent release.data for forwarding to other Ring:0s which are pending atomic (RRC:1 Pend3:Atomic). The release.data could be locally originated if a cell within the Ring:0 acquired atomic ownership from the remotely originated release.
RDU:1 (RduState1) Enumeration
RDU:1 state consists of six independent fields. Subpage state field describes the collective state of all subpages present within the local Ring:0 and whether an owner invalidation is in progress. Pend1a field describes whether a locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request is pending on Ring:1. Pend1b field describes whether a locally originated sva.sub.-- read ex request is pending on Ring:1. Pend2 field describes whether a locally originated sva.sub.-- get request is pending. Pend3 field describes whether one locally originated sva.sub.-- getw request is pending an whether additional getw requests were issued while this request was pending. Multiple sva.sub.-- getw requests are recorded to Properly signal transient atomic state to requesting cache. Pend5 field describes whether the pending request might need to be reissued due to the RRC:1 missing a remotely originated ownership packet that wasn't extracted to satisfy a pending request and a missing page (snarf).
The five pending fields independently recorded a maximum of one locally originated pending request of each type per subpage. Multiple requests of the same type are returned with busy status to the partner RRC until the pending request has been closed out. The individual states are described in the following sub-sections.
SubpageState:Inv
Indicates there is no valid copy of subpage within the Ring:0.
SpState:Ro
SpState:Ro indicates that one or more caches within the Ring:0 might contain a read only copy of the subpage, but none contains owner state. Under certain circumstances, the RRC pair has recorded read only state (SpState:Ro) for a subpage, but the subpage is invalid (SpState:Inv) within the Ring:0, since no read only copies exist in any of the cells. When no read only copies exist, read only subpage state is adjusted to invalid subpage state, by the first locally originated request, remotely originated invalidate or remotely originated read only request.
SubpageState:Owner
SubpageState:Owner indicates that the subpage is owned exclusively (Ex) or non-exclusively (Nex) within the local Ring:0. The local Ring:0 contains an exclusive owner and no read only copies or a non-exclusive owner with zero or more read only copies. The RRC:1 records all local cell ownership states, non-exclusive, exclusive, atomic, and transient-atomic as owner.
SubpageState:OwnerInvalidating
Pend1:OwnerInv indicates that a locally originated write.sub.-- invalidate request to the Ring:1 is pending. Since each subpage has a single owner and only the owner can issue a write.sub.-- invalidate request, additional write.sub.-- invalidates in this state indicates an error condition. Invalidates implied by sva.sub.-- read ex, get or getw are recorded as Pend1b:Ex, Pend2:Get, or Pend3:Getw states respectively. Subsequently locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests are marked RspBsy and duplicate.data packets are emptied.
Pending[1a,1b,2,3]:None
Pending:None request state indicates that there is no locally originated pending activity to the Ring:1 relating to the corresponding subpage and pending field.
Pend1a:Ro
Pend1:Ro indicates that a locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request to the Ring:1 is pending. Additional locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests are returned to the partner RRC:0 with RspBsy set, until the request is closed out.
Pend1b:Ex
Pend1:Ex indicates that a locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex request to the Ring:1 is pending. Additional remotely originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex requests are returned to the Partner RRC:0 with RspBsy set, until the request is closed out.
Pend2:Get
Pend2:Get indicates that a locally originated sva.sub.-- get request to the Ring:1 is pending. Subsequent remotely originated sva.sub.-- get requests are returned to the local originating cell with pkt.data set, which indicates subpage is already atomic, until the request is closed out. The subpage might not yet be atomic, but will be before the subsequent request is completed.
Pend3:Getw
Pend3:Getw indicates that one or more locally originating sva.sub.-- getw requests to the local Ring:0 are pending. Unlike all other read requests, all getw requests are forwarded when in this state, rather than ensuing request being busied. When a getw response from Ring:1 indicates the page is already atomic (getw.data.RspBsy), Pend3:Atomic state is recorded.
Pend3:Atomic
Indicates that ownership packet is required to satisfy a pending getw request for atomic ownership. The owning cache is guaranteed to be in transient atomic state (tat). Subsequent remotely originated getw or get requests can be returned indicating the subpage is already atomic. Subsequent Ring:0 ownership packets (release.data or sva.sub.-- read ex.data) are extracted, forwarded to Ring:1, for forwarding to other Ring:0s which are pending atomic (RRC:1 Pend3:Atomic). Pend3:Atomic does not guarantee that one or more getw requests are still pending.
Pend3:Atomic is set under two conditions. First, when a getw response indicates the page is already atomic. Second when a remotely initiated release.data enters a Ring:0, Pend3:Atomic is set, so that the RRC:0 can extract a subsequent release.data for forwarding to other Ring:0s which are pending atomic (RRC:1 Pend3:Atomic). The release.data could be locally originated if a cell within the Ring:0 acquired atomic ownership from the remotely originated release.
Pend4:ReIssue
Pend4:ReIssue indicates that the RRC:1 might have missed a potential non-RRC:1 originated response packet to an RRC:1 originated request. Pend4:ReIssue state is used by RRC:1 to prevent spurious missing page.sub.-- error (page fault) by differentiating between the case of a remotely originated ownership packet that wasn't extracted to satisfy a pending request and a missing page (snarf). If the RRC:1 originated request returns without a response and Pend4:ReIssue then the returning request is busied by the RRC causing the requesting processor cell or RRC to reissue the request, thereby preventing a spurious page fault. Pend4:ReIssue is cleared when no locally originated requests are outstanding or during the first ownership (with data) response.
RRC Subpage State Description--Alternative Embodiment II
Described below are subpage states used in a second alternative embodiment of the invention.
Subpage State
RRC related information of subpage states is described here.
Invalid (Inv)
Invalid subpage state indicates that there is no valid copy of subpage within the Ring:0.
Read Only (Ro)
Read only state indicates that one or more caches within the Ring:0 might contain a read only copy of the subpage. It is possible that no local cache contains a read only copy of the subpage when the RRC has recorded read only state. If the last cache which held a particular subpage deallocated the descriptor, but another cache within the Ring:0 has a descriptor for same SVA Page allocated, the RRC will not be immediately notified and will temporarily maintain read only state. Another case is when a recombine.nex.data leaves a Ring:0, the RRC under rare circumstances (pending read only request, P1Ro for instance), has to assume that a read only copy might exist within the Ring:0. Normally the assertion of recombine.nex.inv.sub.-- busy indicates a read only copy of the subpage exists. When no read only copies exist, read only subpage state is adjusted to invalid subpage state, by the first invalidate or remote read only request.
NonExclusive (Nex)
Non-exclusive state indicates the subpage owner, zero or more read only copies of subpage exist within the local Ring:0. Zero or more read only copies might exist in remote Ring:0s. If no read copies exist outside the local Ring:0, the first invalidate, or recombine which indicates that not remote read only copies exist causes a subpage state transition to exclusive. Remote RRCs did not signal when they deallocate descriptors.
Exclusive (Ex)
Exclusive state indicates that there are no valid copies of subpage outside of the local Ring:0. The local Ring:0 contains an exclusive or non-exclusive owner and zero or more read only copies. The RRC records all local cell exclusive ownership states, exclusive, atomic, and transient-atomic as exclusive.
Pending Request Subpage State
Pending request state indicates the type of pending request, whether additional requests have been merged, whether the request needs to be reissued or whether the request has been completed and the RRC is wait for the original request to be returned. The value of 0 or 1 for # indicates pending Ring:0 or Ring:1 request state respectively.
PendNone (P#None)
PendingNone request state indicates that there is no pending activity relating to the corresponding subpage.
PendWait (P#Wait)
PendingWait indicates that a read request (sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- {ro,nex,ex},get,getw) is still pending, but a response or merged response has already been issued. When the returning request packet is received, the packet is emptied and the pending request is closed out. If the returning request packet contains data and ownership, an error should be signalled.
PendWaitMergeRo (P#WaitMrgRo)
PendingWaitMergeRo indicates that a read request is still pending and one or more sva.sub.-- read ro.nodata packet(s) have been merged while waiting for the returning request. A second request cannot be issued until the first request is closed out. When the returning request packet is received, the packet is emptied, the pending request is closed out and a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request is usually issued. If the returning request packet contains data and ownership, an error should be signalled.
PendWaitMergeEx (P#WaitMrgEx)
PendWaitMergeEx indicates that a read request is still pending and one or more sva.sub.-- read ex.nodata packets(s) have been merged while waiting for the returning request. Since the pending state always recognizes the strongest request merged, this state also includes zero or more merged sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro packets. A second request cannot be issued until the first request is closed out. When the returning request packet is received, the packet is emptied, the pending request is closed out and a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex request is usually issued. If the returning request packet contains data and ownership, an error should be signalled.
PendWaitMergeAt (P#WaitMrgAt)
PendWaitMergeAt indicates that a read request is still pending and one or more {get,getw}.nodata packet(s) have been merged while waiting for the returning request. Since the pending state always recognizes the strongest request merged, this state also includes zero or more merged sva.sub.-- read {ro,ex} packets. A second request cannot be issued until the first request is closed out. When the returning request packet is received, the packet is emptied, the pending request is closed out and a getw request is usually issued. If the returning request packet contains data and ownership, an error should be signalled.
PendReissue (P#Rei)
PendReissue indicates that a read request is Pending and the request should be reissued when it returns. This state is usually entered when an event detect while the request is pending indicates that the request will be returned without a response or the response will return with stale data. For example, if a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro is pending and an invalidate is detected, the returned data might be stale. Sometime pendreissue state is entered to allow a local Ring:0 transaction to complete prior to moving ownership to a remote Ring:0.
PendReissueMergeRo (P#ReiMrgRo)
PendReissueMergeRo indicates that a read request is pending and the request should be reissued when it returns and one or more sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro.nodata packet(s) have been merged while waiting for the returning request. Since the pending state always recognizes the strongest request merged, this state also includes zero or more merged sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro packets. A second request cannot be issued until the first request is closed out. When the returning request packet is received, the packet is emptied, the stronger of the merged sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro or the pending request is reissued.
PendReissueMergeEx (P#ReiMrgEx)
PendReissueMergeEx indicates that a read request is pending and the request should be reissued when it returns and one or more sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex.nodata packet(s) have been merged while waiting for the returning request. Since the pending state always recognizes the strongest request merged, this state also includes zero or more merged sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro packets. A second request cannot be issued until the first request is closed out. When the returning request packet is received, the packet is emptied, the stronger of the merged sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex or the pending request is reissued.
PendReissueMergeEx (P#ReiMrgAt)
PendReissueMergeAt indicates that a read request is pending and the request should be reissued when it return and one or more {get,getw}.nodata packet(s) have been merged while waiting for the returning request. Since the pending state always recognizes the strongest request merged, this state also includes zero or more merged sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- {ro,ex} packets. A second request cannot be issued until the first request is closed out. When the returning request packet is received, the packet is emptied, the getw request is reissued.
PendRo (P#Ro)
PendRo indicates that a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request is pending. A sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex request received while in any pending ro state, causes a transition to ReissueMergeEx pending state.
PendRoMergeRo (P#RoMrgRo)
PendRoMergeRo indicates that a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request is pending and one or more sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro.nodata packet(s) have been merged while waiting for the returning request.
When the returning request is received, the packet is marked as merged. A sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex request received while in any pending ro state, causes a transition to ReissueMergeEx pending state.
PendEx (P#Ex)
PendEx indicates that a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex request is pending.
PendExMerge (P#ExMrg)
PendExMerge indicates that a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex request is pending and an sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- {ro,ex} request has been merged. When the returning request is received, the packet is marked as merged.
PendExMergeAt (P#ExMrgAt)
PendExMerge indicates that a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex request is pending and an get or getw request has been merged. When the returning request is received, the packet is marked as merged.
PendAtomic (P#At)
PendAtomic indicates that a get or getw request is pending or th at a getw.nodata response has been returned.
PendAtomic (P#AtMrg)
PendAtomic indicates that a get or getw request is pending or that a getw.nodata response has been returned and a get,getw or sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- {ro,ex} request has been merged. When the returning request is received, the packet is marked as merged.
PendRecombine (P#Rec)
PendRecombine indicates a recombine.data.{tat,at,ex,nex} is pending from the local Ring:0. PendRecombine is only used in RDU:1.
PendMrsp (P1Mrsp)
PendMrsp indicates that a response which includes merged request(s) from this Ring:0 is currently on the Ring:0. Merged requests from this Ring:0 would be indicated by Rdu:1 pending states P0RoMrg*, P0ExMrg* or P0AtMrg. While in PendMrsp additional sva.sub.-- read requests are emptied to satisfy Cell transaction completion criteria.
PendMrspMrgRo (P#MrspMrgRo)
PendMrspMrgRo indicates that a response which includes merged request(s) from this Ring:0 is currently on the Ring:0 and a remote sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro request has been merged during this interval.
PendMrspMrgEx (P#MrspMrgEx)
PendMrspMrgEx indicates that a response which includes merged request(s) from this Ring:0 is currently on the Ring:0 and a remote sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex and sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests has been merged during this interval.
PendMrspMrgA (P#MrspMrgAt)
PendMrsPMrgEx indicates that a response which includes merged request(s) from this Ring:0 is currently on the Ring:0 and a remote get or getw and sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex or sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro requests has been merged during this interval.
PendInvalidate (pInv)
PendInvalidate indicates that a pending write.sub.-- invalidate, write.sub.-- invalidate.lookahead is pending. Invalidates implied by sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- {ro,ex}, get or getw are recorded as PendRo, PendEx, or PendAt states.
RDU:0 State (RduState.sub.0) Enumeration
RduState.sub.0 stores Ring:0 subpage state and Ring:1 pending request (from remote Ring:0s) state. Illegal combinations of Ring:0 subpage state and Ring:1 pending State are shown as dashes. Each RduState.sub.1 is named by postfixing the Ring:1 pending state name to Ring:0 subpage state.
A table showing RDU:0 pending states used in this alternate embodiment is shown in FIG. 17.
RDU:1 State (RduState1) Enumeration
RduState.sub.1 stores Ring:1 subpage state and Ring:0 pending request (from remote Ring:0s) state. Illegal combinations of Ring:0 subpage state and Ring:0 pending State are shown as dashes. Each RduState.sub.1 is named by postfixing the Ring:1 Pending state name to Ring:0 subpage state.
A table showing RDU:1 states used in this alternate embodiment is shown in FIG. 18.
Page State
The description in the sections which follow assumes use of the preferred (as opposed to the alternate) subpage states.
OwnerLimit
OwnerLimit is set or cleared by software to limit ownership of subpages within the page to the Local Ring:0. It is stored in both RRC:0 and RRC:1. When clear, OwnerLimit specifies that any Ring:0 can own the subpages. When set, specifies that only cells within the Local Ring:0 can own subpages in non-exclusive, exclusive, atomic or transcient atomic states. Remote Ring:0s can receive read only copies. When OwnerLimit is set, a page fault is signalled to ownership requests by the RRC returning the request with InvBsy and RspBsy clear. Recombine requests will not propagate beyond Local Ring:0 when OwnerLimit is set. Default state for RRC descriptor allocation is clear.
DupLimit
DupLimit specifies the conditions which causes a duplicate.data to be forwarded from the local Ring:0 to Ring:1. DupLimit is stored by RRC:0.
Dup:CondForward
Duplicate.data packets within the page are conditionally forwarded by RRC:0 to Ring:1, if the Page is not exclusively owned by the local Ring:0. Dup:CondForward is default state for RRC descriptor allocation.
Dup:AllForward
Duplicate.data is always forwarded by RRC:0 to Ring:1.
Pending Request Page State
Some pending RRC operations effect how the RRC handles SVA requests to any subpage within a page. The Pending request page state field in corresponding Level3vEntry specifies this pending information.
Page:None
No pending page level RRC operation is in progress for the corresponding descriptor. Page:None is default state for RRC descriptor allocation.
Page:PendDeallocate
Within the RRC:0 indicates that the RRC pair is in the process of determining whether the descriptor should be deallocated or that RRC:1 is being signalled to deallocate the descriptor. Within the RRC:1 indicates the RRC pair is in the process of deallocating the descriptor.
The RRC descriptor transitions into Page:PendDeallocate in response to a single cell indicating that it is deallocating this descriptor. If the descriptor is not present in any cell within the Ring:0, RRC:0 and RRC:1 deallocate the descriptor. Other page level packets, such as ciu inv.sub.-- sum.nodata, ciu.sub.-- inv.sub.-- sum.sub.-- allocate.no.sub.-- data and ciu ex.sub.-- sum.nodata are busied while in this state. Remotely originated subpage requests are busied by RRC:0 and RRC:1. Locally originated subpage requests are uneffected in RRC:0, since the requesting local cache has an allocated descriptor will prevent the RRC pair from deallocating its descriptor. Locally originated subpage requests are busied by RRC:1, since the RRC pair has committed to deallocate the descriptor. The descriptor will be subsequently re-allocated on the next request after the page has been deallocated.
Other RRC State
The following state fields are stored on a per RRC or per RRC bank basis. These state fields globally apply to all subpages and pages, unless otherwise stated.
Extract Buffer State
Empty space in Ring Extract Buffer is divided into four regions by two configurable pointers, ExtractAllThreshold and ExtractRspThreshold. The current region is selected by the number of empty words remaining in the Extract Buffer. The regions going from empty to full are: ExtBuf.All, ExtBuf:NonOpt, ExtBuf:PendReq and ExtBuf:Full. Extract Buffer State is maintained on a per RRC bank basis. The boundaries of these regions are configurable by software. Ring packets are grouped into three mutually exclusive categories for Extract Buffer management:
These packet categories are handled in the four extract buffer regions as follows:
ExtBuf:All
ExtBuf:All region is between empty and ExtractAllThreshold. All packets are accepted in the ExBuf.All region.
ExtBuf:NonOpt
ExtBuf:NonOpt region is between ExtractAllThreshold and ExtractResponseThreshold. Nonoptional and Response packets are accepted in this region. No signalling within the packet is required when optional packets are not accepted.
ExtBuf:PendReq
ExtBuf:PendReq region is between ExtractResponseThreshold and extract buffer full. Only response packets are accepted in this region. Nonoptional packets are rejected by the assertion of RspBsy and InvBsy. No signalling within the packet is required when optional packets are not accepted.
ExtBuf:Full
ExtBuf:Full region is when the extract buffer is full. No packets can be accepted in this region. Nonoptional packets are rejected by the assertion of RspBsy and InvBsy. No signalling within the packet is required when optional packets are not accepted. A locally originated packet, is passed with pkt.TimeStamp clear. The packet will be extracted by this RRC on a subsequent Ring revolution. For remotely originated response packets, not carrying data, set both RspBsy and InvBsy. Remotely originated response packets with read only data are passed. Remotely originated ownership response packets are passed and RRC:1 transitions to Pend1:ReIssue.
Pend1:Reissue state is used by RRC:1 to prevent spurious missing.sub.-- page.sub.-- error (page fault) by differentiating between the case of a remotely originated ownership packet that wasn't extracted to satisfy a pending request and a missing page. When set Pend1:Reissue indicates that the RRC:1 might have missed a potential non-RRC originated response packet to an RRC originated request. If the RRC:1 originated request returns without a response and Pend1:ReIssue then the returning request is busied by the RRC causing the requesting processor cell or RRC to reissue the request, thereby preventing a spurious page fault. RRC:0 uses the SpState field to prevent missing.sub.-- page.sub.-- error. The RRC:0 SpState field records whether a read only copy or ownership is within the Ring:0 to satisfy the request. If the RRC:0 originated request returns without a response and a sufficient copy or ownership exists within the Ring:0, the request is reissued.
Ring Freeze State
In addition to the following states, the RRC must keep track of the first and last packet marked frozen.
Fz:None
Fz:None indicates that the RRC is not in Ring Freeze sequence.
Fz:SingleEccErr
Indicates a correctable Ecc error has been detected during the lookup sequence corresponding to this packet time. Start of Ring:1 Freeze sequence. Always transitions to Fz:Freeze during the next packet time. The corresponding packet is handled as described under Extract Buffer full section.
Fz:Freeze
Indicates that the RRC is in a Ring Freeze sequence. All packets not Previously marked frozen, are marked frozen.
Fz:UnFreeze
Indicates that the RRC has ended a Ring Freeze sequence. All packets previously marked frozen, are marked unfrozen and processed normally by the RRC. Any condition which initiates a Ring Freeze sequence, would transitions to Fz:SingleEccErr or Fz:Freeze states.
Rules Tables Basics
Ownership
The foundation of strong ordering is based on the rules ownership concept. Each subpage in memory system has a single owner. For the value of a subpage to be modified, the owner must be exclusive meaning all copies of the subpage has been invalidated. When read only copies of a subpage exist, the owner is non-exclusive and cannot modify the subpage. The subpage ownership can be transferred dynamically between caches, with the owning cache being the dynamic home for the subpage.
The memory system and RRC specifically is based on the property of inclusion. The RRC directory keeps track of the state of all subpages within the Ring:0 and the state of all pending requests entering or leaving a Ring:0.
Other Concepts
Owner and Invalidation Requests
All owner requests and write invalidate requests go all the way to the owning cell regardless of what other requests are outstanding. All owner requests and invalidates will cause an RRC to go to Pend:Owner when the packet is inserted onto the Ring. That is, the RRC:1 goes to Pend:Owner when the packet is inserted onto Ring:1 and the RRC:0 goes to Pend:Owner when it inserts the packet onto Ring:0.
An RRC will transition from Pend:Owner to Pend:None when:
1--An owner carrying packet is extracted by the RRC.
2--An RRC:0 with SPState: (Inv.vertline.Ro) extracts a remote owner requests or invalidate with pkt.!InvBsy.
3--An RRC with SpState:Owner extracts a locally originated invalidate with pkt.!InvBsy.
4--Page destruction always sets SpState:Inv and Pend:None for all subpages within the page in the local RRC:0 and RRC:1 and all remote RRC:1s with the page allocated. All pending state is cleared, so that page faults can be signaled to other pending requests (the requests would hang busy or timeout otherwise).
Read Only Requests
Locally originated read only requests are only inserted by the local RRC:1 if the RC:1 is not Pend:Ro. This is an optimization to avoid flooding too many identical requests onto Ring:1 and eventually the responder. Instead of inserting a such a request, the RRC:1 will extract it and set Pkt.RspBsy. The RRC:0 at the responder, however, does not bounce back read only requests in this way. Instead the read only request are inserted on the Ring:0.
The RRC transitions from Pend:Ro to Pend:None when an owner carrying packet or read only data carrying packet is extracted by the RRC.
A packet carrying read only data is "killed" when it passes an RRC in Pend:Owner state. An sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro packet is "killed" by setting pkt.RspBsy and a duplicate is emptied.
Clearing and Interpretation of Packet Busy Bits
RspBsy can always be cleared when responding with data to a request packet.
InvBsy is always clear when leaving the originating Ring:0, since the RRC:0 will not extract the packet if pkt.InvBsy. The RRC will pass the packet and set pkt.InvBsy,RspBsy to cause the request to be reissued. InvBusy is always clear, when a remote ownership request or invalidate is enters a emote Ring:0, since an RRC:1 will not extract a request if pkt.InvBsy. The RRC:1 will pass the packet and set pkt.InvBsy.RspBsy to cause the request to be reissued. The lookahead will actually continue and initiate invalidates on the remain Ring:0s with SpState:Ro.
Use of Packet RRC Bit
Used by sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro, recombines and release to indicate that the packet should be reissued by the originating cell or RRC if the request is not completed. Pkt.rrc is used in two manners.
Pkt.rrc is used to allow a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro.no.sub.-- data or recombine.data request to traverse the entire Ring:0, to allow the request to completed locally, rather than the RRC:0 prematurely extracting the packet. Pkt.rrc is set when a locally originated sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro.no.sub.-- data or recombine.data passes the RRC:0. If the request has not been completed (sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro.data or recombine.no.sub.-- data) prior to returning to the originating cell, the originating cell passes the packet. The RRC:0 extracts the packet with rrc set and processes the request normally.
When an RRC:0 or RRC:1 can't extract a non-originated recombine.data or release.data to satisfy a pending request (called snarf) it sets rrc bit so that the packet can be re-circulated. If the release.data returns to the originating cell, it must be re-issued. If the release.data is extracted by another cell, no action is required, since another release will be issued since transient atomic subpage state is preserved (tat). The recombine.data should not be extracted by any cell and is passed by the originating CIU, effecting a reissue.
Pkt.rrc is always initialized to clear and passed by CCU and CIU. It is cleared by RRC:0, when locally originated packet is extracted.
Invalidation Method
Several types of packets cause invalidation of read only copies. Write.sub.-- invalidate causes an explicit invalidation and sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex, get, and getw packets cause implicit invalidation in addition to a read request. All invalidates are guaranteed to remove all read only copies based on two methods. First is that the invalidate packet causes all read only copies it passes to be invalidated. Secondly, when a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro passes a request with a pending invalidate, the requestor asserts rsp.sub.-- busy to indicate the data in packet has been invalidated and to prevent a spurious page fault. When a duplicate.data passes a request with a pending invalidate, the packet is emptied. The first method invalidates all cells or RRCs and the second method prevents stale read only data from propagating to cells which have already been invalidated.
In order to maintain strong sequential consistency and strong ordering of events, all copies of subpage A must be invalidated prior to the invalidator updating and distributing subpage B. If the invalidate were processes serially by each Ring:0, the invalidation time would be the sum of the Ring transit times of all Ring:0s with copies of the subpage. If the invalidate were just copied by each RRC:1, invalidates of subpage A are not guaranteed to complete prior to the original invalidator updating subpage B and distributing it to processors which have not yet invalidated subpage A. Strong ordering of events is violated since all processors do not see the changes to subpages A and B in the same order.
A technique called invalidate lookahead is used to invalidate all Ring:0s in parallel, but maintain a strong ordering of events. When an invalidate packet reaches the first RRC:1, which would extract the packet, the packet is copied and forwarded to Ring:0 and a lookahead packet is spawned on on Ring:1 by setting lookahead mode in Ring:1 packet. The lookahead packet is copied by each RRC:1 in SpState:Ro to invalidate its read only copy prior to the real request packet reaching it. When the original request packet reaches subsequent RRC:1s, the packet is passed at Ring:1 speed, since the invalidate has previously completed due to the lookahead packet. The lookahead packet is always considered a short packet.
FIGS. 14A and 14B depict a preferred Ring:1 Invalidate Sequence. Write.sub.-- invalidate is extracted from a Ring:0 (step 2) when RDU:0 Spstate is Nex and a sva.sub.-- (read.sub.-- ex,get,getw)) is extracted from a Ring:0 when the RDU:0 SpState is not Ex. The packet is forwarded to RRC:1 and inserted onto Ring:1 (step 3). The first RRC:1 which owns or has a read only copy of the subpage, copies the packet, it changes lookahead mode to no.sub.-- lookahead and forwards the packet to the Ring:0 (step 5). The passed Ring:1 packet create lookahead mode is unchanged. Subsequent RRC:1s with read only state, copy the invalidate.lookahead packet (steps 6,7,8,9). The invalidate.sub.-- lookahead is passed to Ring:0, inserted and Pend1State transitions to OwnInv. When the Ring:0 invalidation is complete, SpState transitions to inv, Pend State transitions to none, the packet is returned to RRC:1, RDU:1 SpState is updated to inv and the lookahead packet is emptied (steps 13,14,15,16).
Meanwhile, when the first RRC:1 and corresponding Ring:0 have completed the invalidation or ownership response, the packet is inserted in no.sub.-- lookahead state back onto Ring:1 (step 12). When this no.sub.-- lookahead packet encounters the subsequent RRC:1s (and corresponding Ring:0s) which have previously completed the invalidation due to the lookahead packet, the packet can be passed at full Ring:1 speed (steps 17,18,19,20). If the actual invalidate arrives before the invalidate lookahead is complete, the actual invalidate also traverses the Ring:0. When the lookahead packet reaches the requesting RRC:1, the packet is emptied (step 11). When the no.sub.-- lookahead or create.sub.-- lookahead packet reaches the requesting RRC:1, it is extracted and forwarded to the requesting Ring:0 (step 22) and returned to the requestor (step 24).
False RRC SpState:Ro
Under certain circumstances, the RRC pair has recorded read only state (SpState:Ro) for a subpage, but the subpage is invalid (SpState:Inv) within the Ring:0, since no read only copies exist in any of the cells. The RRC pair deallocates the descriptor only when the last Cache within a Ring:0 deallocates the corresponding descriptor. When a Cache deallocates a descriptor, the state of the subpages within the Cache are invalid or read only. When the Cache deallocates the descriptor, read only copies are just deleted, but the RRC is not notified of the individual read only subpage involved. Thus when a cache within a Ring:0 deallocates the descriptor, with other Caches within the Ring:0 having the descriptor allocated and the only read only copy of the subpage within the Ring:0 is deleted, the RRC falsely still records read only state for the subpage. Another example is when a recombine with non-exclusive packet state leaves a Ring:0, the RRC:0 and RRC:1 must record SpState:Ro, in case a read only copy exists within the Ring:0.
False read only state is corrected by the RRC:1 picking up copy of read only data packets when in SpState:(InvRo).
Duplicate distribution
Read only copies of subpages are distributed to multiple Caches in two manners. Copies are distributed implicitly by any RRC:1 or Cache copying a remotely originated packet with read only data when the descriptor is locally allocated and the SpState:(Inv.vertline.Ro). Thus the number of read only requests are reduced, since copies are distributed to all Ring:0s connected to RRC:1s which the read only data carrying packet passes on Ring:1.
Duplicate.data packets are forwarded from the originating Ring:0 based on DupLimit. If Dup:CondForward, duplicate packets are conditionally forwarded by RRC:0 to Ring:1, if the page is not exclusively owned by the local Ring:0. If Dup:AllForward, duplicate packets are always forwarded by RRC:0 to Ring:1. Ring:1 duplicate.data packets are copied by a remote RRC:1 when it has a descriptor allocated for the corresponding page within its local Ring:0 and the Extract Buffer is in the ExtBuf:All region.
Pkt.pcopy is set by RRC:1 to indicate the packet was copied from Ring:1. Packets which are copied from Ring:1 with Pcopy set, are not required to be returned to RRC:1 or Ring:1 and are emptied by RRC:0 after successfully traversing Ring:0.
Recombine
Recombine.data packets are forwarded from the originating Ring:0 if no other cell within the Ring:0 accepts the recombine. The RRC:1 determines the packet must be forwarded out of the originating Ring:0 in a similar manner to locally originated Ro request with false RRC SpState:Ro case. On the first pass of the recombine.data, the RRC:0 sets pkt.RRC. If the recombine.nodata returns to the originating cell, the recombine is extracted and closed out. If the recombine.data.rrc returns to the originating cell, the cell passes the packet. The RRC:0 then extracts the recombine.data.rrc and forwards it the local RRC:1 for insertion onto Ring:1.
Ring:1 recombine.data packets are extracted by a remote RRC:1 when it has a descriptor allocated for the corresponding page within its local Ring:0 and the Extract Buffer is in the Extbuf:All region. Recombine.data can also be used to satisfy any pending request.
Release
When a locally originated release is inserted onto a Ring:, Pend:Owner state is recorded so that a subsequent release can be routed back to the originating Ring:0 to satisfy possible pending getw requests with prior already atomic response. When a remotely originated release is inserted onto a Ring:0, Pend:Owner state is recorded so that a subsequent release can be routed back to the Ring:1.
Page Faults
Page faults are detected in a Ring:1 system by a request completely traversing the Ring:1, without any RRC detecting a descriptor match. The packet.nodata indicates a page fault condition by RspBsy clear and InvBsy clear. The packet is then extracted by the originating RRC:1 and returned to Ring:0 and then the requesting cell.
When a page fault occurs, the local RRC1 will be left in Pend:Owner or Pend:Ro. This condition must be cleared by system software prior to creation of the page. Execution of a mpdw.invsum instruction from the any cell within the fault (after the page has been anchored of course) will cause a CiuInvSum packet to be issued.
Page Operations
Page Allocate
A descriptor is allocated by the local cell prior to any cell SVA request. The RRC pair allocates a descriptor when the first locally originated request packet (always nodata) is received from the local Ring:0. If a page fault was signalled to a request, the descriptor remains allocated in the cell and RRC pair. One or more descriptors can be allocated for pages not present in the memory system. A descriptor must be allocated for the page to be created. The following table specifies the default state of an allocated descriptor:
Page Deallocate
Local cache and local RRC pair descriptors are only deallocated by the CiuInvSumAlloc.nodata, CiuPureInvSumAlloc.nodata or RrcDeallocDesc.nodata packets. These three packets will be referred to as deallocate packets. If the deallocate packet indicates that no other caches within the Ring:0 have the page allocated, the local RRC pair deallocates the descriptor corresponding to the page. RRC:0 transitions to Page:PendDealloc while it is determining if the descriptor should be deallocated to prevent race conditions between multiple deallocate packets and other page oriented packets. If no other cells have allocated descriptors for the Page, the RRC Pair deallocates the descriptor. Both RRCs must be in Page:PendDeallocate state prior to either RRC deallocating the descriptor. The local RRC pair does not signal remote RRCs that descriptors have been deallocated. First the deallocation sequence is described, then interactions with subpage and page operations are discussed.
The deallocate sequence is initiated by the CCU sending a CiuLoadDropReg packet to the CIU. The packet address and CCU prt entry correspond to the page to be deallocated. The CIU processes the packet by loading the address into its dropping register, extracting the packet to return it to the CCU. When loaded with a valid address, the CIU dropping register causes the CIU to assert RspBsy to requests for owned subpages and ignore all other page or subpage address which matches the dropping register. Dropping register match overrides cache group match.
When the CCU receives the returned CiuLoadDropReg packet, it deallocates the old descriptor by writing the new descriptor in its place, deallocates the prt entry and issues a CiuInvSumAlloc packet if the deallocated page is not pure. If the deallocated page is pure, CiuPureInvSumAlloc packet is issued. The deallocate packet address is the page address to be deallocated (pkt.address[5:0] contains the CCU descriptor group) and dataword0 contains the page address being allocated. A pending CEU request can be processed, even at the newly allocated address, since no prt is required for the deallocate packet. The mrdd (RRC deallocate descriptor) instruction causes the CCU to issue a RrcDeallocDesc packet without allocating a prt.
FIG. 15 depicts a preferred deallocate sequence used in a system constructed in accord with the invention. The CIU processes the CiuInvSumAlloc or CiuPureInvSumAlloc packet by deallocating the old descriptor by writing the newly allocated descriptor in its place, setting all subpages of new allocated page to invalid (using summaries), setting dropping register to invalid and inserting the packet (step 1). The CIU processes the RrcDeallocDesc packet by inserting the packet without any modification to CIU directory state.
As the deallocate packet traverses the Ring:0, RspBsy is asserted by any CIU which has the descriptor allocated (steps 2,4,6).
The RRC:0 empties the CiuInvSumAlloc or RrcDeallocDesc request if RspBsy is asserted, indicating that the descriptor is allocated in other caches within the Ring:0 (step 3). If RspBsy is not asserted, the RRC:0 the deallocate packet must now completely traverse the Ring:0 to check all local caches for this page being allocated, since the packet has only traversed the portion of the Ring:0 between the deallocating cache and the RRC:0. The RRC:0 passes the packet, setting the RRC bit, clearing RspBsy and InvBsy and transitions to Page:PendDeallocate. The RRC bit is used to indicate that the packet has passed the RRC:0. If the RRC cannot process the packet due to refresh or ecc error it sets InvBsy and processes the deallocate packet on the next revolution. Subsequent deallocate.!RRC packets received, while PagePendDeallocate are emptied, since the cells which issued these deallocate packets will not assert RspBsy on the current revolution of the first deallocate packet. The reason that the RRC:0 negates RspBsy on the first deallocate packet is handle the window where a cell which issued the subsequent deallocate packet asserted RspBsy on the first partial revolution of the first deallocate packet.
If the deallocate packet is CiuPureInvSumAlloc, the RRC:0 extracts the packet, sets pkt.cmd.sub.-- pend.sub.-- dealloc and forwards the packet to the local RRC:1 skipping to step 8 (RRC:1 processing). CiuPureInvSumAlloc can only be issued by a cell which owns all subpages within the page, guaranteeing that any other allocated descriptors have all subpages invalid. Thus the RRC:0 skips sending the CiuPureInvSumAlloc packet around the Ring to determine if any cells have the page allocated. The page will be allocated by the RRC is one of the cells within the Ring:0 subsequently requests a subpage within the page.
All remotely originated packets received from Ring:1 when in Page:PendDealloc state, are returned unmodified to the Ring:1. If a sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro packet is returned(Ring:0 state was SpState:Ro), another Ring:0 will supply a copy of the subpage. A recombine.data is returned since the cell and RRC pair descriptors are about to be deallocated. Page destroy sequences always set all subpages to invalid prior to deallocation, so that SpState:{Nex,Ex} will not be present.
If the configuration does not contain an RRC, both InvBsy and RRC will be negated. The original requestor empties the deallocate packet if packet.request.sub.-- id matches cell.sub.-- address, !InvBsy and !RRC (step 5).
The RRC:0 empties the deallocate.RRC packet after it full Ring: traversal (step 7), if caches have indicated the page is allocated by asserting RspBsy. Negation of RspBsy indicates that no caches within the Ring:0 have the page allocated. The RRC:0 extracts the deallocate packet, sets pkt.cmd.sub.-- pend.sub.-- dealloc and forwards the packet to the local RRC:1. Both RRC:0 and RRC:1 must be in Page:PendDealloc prior to the descriptor being deallocated to prevent race conditions.
The RRC:1 processes the packet by transitioning to Page:PendDealloc, sets pkt.cmd.sub.-- dealloc.sub.-- page, extracts the packet and forwards the packet back to RRC:0 (step 8). All remotely originated packets received from Ring:1 when in Page:PendDealloc state, are returned unmodified to the Ring:1.
The RRC:0 processes the packet by deallocating the descriptor, transitioning to Page:None, extracts the packet and forwards the packet back to RRC:1 (step 9). The RRC:1 processes the returning packet by also deallocating the descriptor, transitioning to Page:None, and emptying the packet.
Page and subpage oriented packets are handled specially when in Page:PendDeallocate state. Other page level packets, such as CiuInvSum.nodata, CiuInvSumAllocate.no.sub.-- data and CiuExSum.nodata are busied. Remotely originated subpage requests are busied by RRC:0 and RRC:1. Locally originated subpage requests are uneffected in RRC:0, since the requesting local cache has an allocated descriptor will prevent the RRC pair from deallocating its descriptor. Locally originated subpage requests are busied by RRC:1, since the RRC pair has committed to deallocate the descriptor. The descriptor will be subsequently re-allocated on the next request after the page has been deallocated. Locally originated packets which are forwarded by RRC:0 between steps 7 through 9, will also be busied by the RRC:1. Locally originated requests processed after step 9 by RRC:0, are guaranteed to be processed after step 10 by RRC:1, and the descriptor will be re-allocated.
Page Create
The memory system assumes that system software guarantees that an existing page in memory is not created. System software must also guarantee that a page is not simultaneously created by more than one cache. Memory System hardware does not immediately detect these conditions.
Mpsa instruction provides an anchored descriptor in the local cache for an SVA page. If the descriptor already existed prior to the mpsa, its anchor flag is set. Otherwise, the local cache allocates a descriptor as described under page deallocate/reallocate section above.
The local cache then issues a ciu.sub.-- ex.sub.-- sum.nodata packet in as a result of a mpdw.allex instruction and transitions all subpages within the page to owned. The RRC:0 extracts the ciu.sub.-- ex.sub.-- sum.nodata packet, allocates the descriptor if necessary and forwards the request to RRC:1. If Page:PendDealloc, the RRC:0 passes the request and sets pkt.InvBsy. RRC:1 extracts the packet, allocates the descriptor if necessary, transitions all subpages to SpState:Owner and forwards the request back to RRC:0. RRC:0 inserts the packet, and transitions all subpages within the page to SpState:Ex. The originating CIU extracts the packet, returns the packet to the CCU and the CCU returns completion status to the local processor.
A mpdw instruction is then issued to clear the anchor bit.
Page Destruction Issues
Pages can be destroyed in three manners. Any time a page is destroyed, all subpages within the page must be exclusively owned by the local Cache. First, when pure pages are deallocated, they are destroyed. The CiuPureInvSumAlloc packet indicates that a pure page is being deallocated. Secondly, when a descriptor's address is changed, the old page is destroyed, but the contents of the old page are present in the new page. The RrcDeallocDesc packet indicates that the local RRCs should dealloc the page. Thirdly, the page and its contents are explicitly destroyed. The CiuInvSum packet indicates that the local RRCs should set all subpages to invalid state.
When a page is destroyed, the CiuPureInvSumAlloc, RRcDeallocDesc and CiuInvSum packets traverse the Ring:1 to clear out any remote pending or Reissue state for the page. Three separate packet types are required, since the local Cache and RRC actions for the three cases are different.
Page Destroy
Mpsa instruction provides an anchored descriptor in the local cache for an SVA page. If the descriptor already existed prior to the mpsa, its anchor flag is set. Otherwise, the local cache allocates a descriptor as described under page deallocate/reallocate section above.
The mfsva instruction is used to cause the local cache to obtain exclusive ownership of all subpages.
The local cache then issues a ciu.sub.-- inv.sub.-- sum.nodata packet in as a result of a mpdw.allinv instruction and transitions all subpages within the page to invalid. The RRC:0 extracts the ciu.sub.-- inv.sub.-- sum.nodata packet, and forwards the request to RRC:1. If Page:PendDealloc, the RRC:0 passes the request and sets pkt.InvBsy. RRC:1 extracts the packet, transitions all subpages to SpState:Inv and forwards the request back to RRC:0. RRC:0 inserts the packet, and transitions all subpages within the page to SpState:Inv. The originating CIU extracts the packet, returns the packet to the CCU and the CCU returns completion status to the local processor.
The page destroy sequence and ciu.sub.-- inv.sub.-- sum.no data in particular do not deallocate the local cache or local RRC pair descriptors. The local cache and local RRC pair descriptors are not deallocated until the descriptor is reused.
Change Descriptor
Change descriptor page address is logically a destroying the old page followed by creating a new page which happens to have the same data. The memory system assumes that system software guarantees that an existing page in memory is not created. System software must also guarantee that a page is not simultaneously created by more than one cache. Memory System hardware does not immediately detect these conditions.
Change descriptor used three instructions, mpdw, mrdd and mrwd. Mpdw instruction side effects the local cell (CCU and CIU) only and is not inserted on the Ring:0.
The RRC Deallocate Descriptor (mrdd) instruction from the CCU reserved memory system opcodes. The CCU issues a RrcDeallocDesc.nodata packet when decoding this instruction from the CEU. !m0 supplies the page address to be deallocated, in an identical manner to other memory system instructions. The CIU inserts this packet onto the Ring:0. The RRC copies the packet and initiates a deallocation sequence. If the RRC is unable to copy or process the packet, it sets packet.RspBsy (responder busy). The CIU extracts the returning RrcDeallocDesc.nodata packet and passes it to the CCU. If RspBsy is set the request is reissued by the CCU. If RspBsy is clear, the CCU returns a successful completion status to the CEU. If an RRC:0 is not configured, the returning packet, RrcDeallocDesc.nodata.!RspBsy, is identical to the original request, and causes the CCU to return a successful completion status to CEU. This instruction has no effect on CCU or CIU data structures. The addition of this instruction is transparent to the CEU.
The RRC Write Descriptor (mrwd) instruction from the CCU reserved memory system opcodes. The CCU issues a RrcWrDesc.nodata packet when decoding this instruction from the CEU. !m0 supplies the page address to be allocated, in an identical manner to other memory system instructions. The CIU inserts this packet onto the Ring:0. The RRC:0 extracts the packet. The local RRC:1 allocates the descriptor if required, sets the descriptor all exclusive, writes RRC resident descriptor bits (ownerlimit) and extracts the packet, sending it back to the Ring:0. The RRC:0 allocates the descriptor if required, sets the descriptor all exclusive, writes RRC resident descriptor bits (ownerlimit) and inserts the packet onto Ring:0. If the RRCs are unable to process the packet, packet.RspBsy is set. The CIU extracts the returning RrcWrDesc.nodata packet and passes it to the CCU. If RspBsy is set the request is reissued by the CCU. If RspBsy is clear, the CCU returns a successful completion status to the CEU. If an RRC:0 is not configured, the returning packet, RrcWrDesc.nodata.!RspBsy, is identical to the original request, and causes the CCU to return a successful completion status to CEU. This instruction has no effect on CCU or CIU data structures. The addition of this instruction is transparent to the CEU.
The change descriptor sequence is:
1--Anchor old page (mpsa).
2--Gather all subpages of old page with exclusive ownership.
3--Deallocate RRC descriptor (mrdd) (old page).
4--Write new RRC descriptor (mrwd) (new page).
5--Write new descriptor in cell and clear anchor bit (mpdw).
Mrdd and mrwd instructions are not required if the tag portion of descriptor is not being changed. Additionally, gathering all subpages with exclusive ownership might not be required to change some descriptor bits as discussed above. Atomic and transient atomic state are preserved in the Cell. The RRC subpage state only records non-exclusive and exclusive ownership with atomic and transient atomic falling in the later category. The RRC does maintain pending getw state which is lost by the change sequence. The getw requestor(s) will timeout.
RDU:0 Page Operations Rules
Allocation rules are enumerated under RDU:0 Basic Rules.
RDU:1 Page Operations Rules
Allocation rules are enumerated under RDU:1 Basic Rules.
Special Operations
RRC Extract Buffer Full
An Extract Buffer flow control algorithm is required since the peak packet rate exceeds the rate the RRC can empty the buffer. The control algorithm is based on the principle of maximizing foreward progress in conjunction with reducing system loading. Prioritizing the allocation of system resources to completing requests in progress achieves both of these goals since completing a request simultaneously reduces system loading and achieves most efficient forward progress.
A packet which cannot be extracted or copied into the Extract Buffer is handled based on whether the packet is Originated by this RRC. If the packet is not originated by this RRC, it is handled based on whether the packet does not carry data, carries read only data or carries ownership. The packet busy bits, RspBsy and InvBsy (conveniently situated late in the packet), and SpState and Pend1 subpage state fields are used to cause the standard protocol to do the right thing.
For all packets which were originated by this RRC, pkt.TimeStamp is cleared so that the packet can circle the Ring again.
For all packets which were not originated by this RRC, pkt.TimeStamp is also cleared so that the packet can circle the Ring if necessary. All page operations are considered as nodata request packets. For packets not carrying data, both RspBsy and InvBsy are set. RspBsy and nodata are set for sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro.data responses and duplicates are emptied. Ownership packets are passed and RRC:1 transitions to Pend1:ReIssue. Pend1:Reissue state is used by RRC:1 to prevent spurious missing.sub.-- page.sub.-- error (page fault) by differentiating between the case of a remotely originated ownership packet that wasn't extracted to satisfy a pending request and a missing page. When set Pend1:Reissue indicates that the RRC:1 might have missed a potential non-RRC originated response packet to an RRC originated request. If the RRC:1 originated request returns without a response and Pend1:ReIssue then the returning request is busied by the RRC causing the requesting processor cell or RRC to reissue the request, thereby preventing a spurious page fault. RRC:0 uses the SpState field to prevent missing.sub.-- page.sub.-- error. The RRC:0 SpState field records whether a read only copy or ownership is within the Ring:0 to satisfy the request. If the RRC:0 originated request returns without a response and a sufficient copy or ownership exists within the Ring:0, the request is reissued.
The following paragraphs analyze the behavior of all cases.
RRC:0 From Ring:1; and RRC:1 From Ring:0
Packets received by RRC:1(0) from Ring:0(1) are usually inserted onto the Ring:1(0). Under certain circumstance the packet is re-routed back to the other RRC. This is accomplished by immediately extracting the inserted packet. An example is a locally originated request of the same type as a pending request (sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ex while in Pend1:Ro) processed in RRC:1. RspBsy is asserted and the request is returned to the local Ring:0.
If the Extract Buffer cannot accept the re-routed packet, it is held in the insert buffer until the extract buffer is not full and an empty packet is available. The rules notation insert.extract, indicates a re-routed packet which follows this behavior.
Ring Freezing
Freeze bit is used by a cell to freeze all packets on the Ring for a single revolution. Freezing a Ring means that every packet on a Ring is in a state where no member on a Ring can change or copy any information in the packets. A cell freezes a Ring by systematically asserting Freeze bit in every packet that passed by it until every packet on the Ring was frozen. During the freeze time, each cell is free to perform any operation without having to process to any Ring packets. Once each Ring packet has been frozen, the cell unfreezes each packet it had frozen, starting at the first packet it froze, until all packets it froze where unfrozen. If a condition which initiates a Ring Freeze sequence is detected during unfreezing, Ring Freeze sequence is immediately started. The RRC must remember the packets which it previously froze, that are being refrozen. FIG. 16 depicts a full ring freeze. The lightly shaded region depicts packet slots not marked as frozen, while the darkly shaded region depicts those marked as frozen.
To handle multiple cells attempting to freeze a Ring, each cell behaves almost as it would if there were only on cell trying to freeze the Ring. However, the cell must only unfreeze packets which it marked frozen. Therefore each cell must keep track of the packets it marked frozen.
A cell keeps track of which packets it marked frozen by knowing the first and the last packet it marked as frozen. This simplication is possible since the freezing mechanism guarantees that any given cell freezing sequence freezes one contiguous string of packets. Thus the begin and end freeze packets can be maintained using counters rather than a shift register.
Ring freeze can be initiated by two methods, Full Ring Freeze and Full-1 Ring Freeze. Since cmd.Freeze is in the early portion of the packet command, status leading to a Ring freeze must be known early in packet processing. Full ring freeze is when the Freeze bit is used for the first packet to be frozen. When the status required for Ring Freeze is not available early enough in packet processing, Full-1 Ring Freeze method can be used.
Full:1 Ring Freeze method does not freeze the first packet to be frozen. Instead the packet busy bits, RspBsy and InvBsy (conveniently situated late in the packet), and SpState and Pend1 subpage state fields are used to cause the standard protocol to do the right thing (Fz:SingleEccErr state). The remaining packets are marked frozen and unfrozen in the same manner as Full Ring Freeze method.
The first packet is handled in a manner identical to that described in Extract Buffer Full section for packets which cannot be extracted or copied into the extract buffer.
Refresh
Refresh is accomplished in a distributed manner by each RRC independently controling it refresh when enabled by RiuMasterConfig.RefreshEnable. Each 8 msec., 512 refreshes must be performed. The interval between refreshes is 15.6 usec and is specified in Ring clocks by RiuRefreshInterval location.
A single refresh requires one packet processing time. Thus refresh can only be performed during empty, or frozen packets, since these packet require no processing. The RRC attempts perform refresh in the background by using all empty, frozen and invisible packet times for refresh. The RRC keeps track of the number of refreshes it has performed up to a limit of 31 by incrementing RiuRefreshCount.NumRef for each refresh. At the end of each refresh interval NumRef is decremented by one. If NumRef was zero, then a refresh is immediately forced by the RRC using Full Ring Freeze method (NumRef is not incremented for the first frozen packet). All RRCs can store up multiple refreshes equal to the number of formated packets in the Ring. Full Ring Freeze refresh method is only required if the Ring was full utilized for extended periods of time. Otherwise, refresh adds no additional overhead. The refresh interval must be adjusted 0.94 usec (15.6*31/512) to 14.7 usec to account for the effect of saving up, up to 31 refreshes.
ECC Correctable Error
When the RRC detects a correctable ECC error, additional packet times are required to correct the data structure. Ring freezing is used to allow multiple packet times for the correction and re-lookup.
When a correctable ECC error is detected, the RRC initiates Full-1 Ring Freeze method, since the ECC error is not know early in packet processing. The first packet is handled as described in Extract Buffer Full section and the remaining packets are marked frozen for one revolution. The corrected data structure re-written, saved in RDU and then used to reprocess the packet which cause the ecc error after one Ring revolution. Only RRC originated packets will be processed, non-originated packets are extracted by another cell within the Ring. Saving the corrected packet allows RRC originated packets to be correctly processed for single bit (correctable) hard errors.
The RRC sets pkt.RrcFault in the packet corresponding to the correctable ECC error. The RRC also asserts pkt.UnMarkedFault on RRC originated packets when uncorrectable ECC errors are detected.
The requesting processor cell interprets the RrcFault bit in the following manner. The RrcFault bit indicates that an RRC fault was detected and logged by an RRC. If the remaining fault bits (MarkedFault, LocalFault, DescFault, and UnMarkedFault) are clear then the packet request was successfully completed. If the returning packet was busied, the originating cell should signal a fault with RrcAtt status and not retry the request. Other CIUs and CCUs handle this packet normally. If additional fault bits are set, the actions specified by these bits override the actions of RrcFault bit.
RDU:0 Rules
Previously defined RDU:0 Subpage and Page rules are referenced by these rules.
RDU:1 Rules
Previously defined RDU:1 Subpage and Page rules are referenced by these rules.
Ring:0 Rules Assumptions
The following changes are required to packet specification, Ring specification, CCU rules and CIU rules for Ring:N operation.
Cell Descriptor Deallocation
Cell descriptor deallocation has changed.
Write Descriptor
As currently defined, the RRC must perform two operations to implement the write descriptor operation. The RRC deallocates the descriptor at the old SVA and allocates the same descriptor at the new address. These two operations require two packet times with the deallocate address in the packet address field and allocate address in packet dataword0. The new sequence described under the section "Change Descriptor" describes how the two RRC operations required for write descriptor (mpdw) are divided into two separate instructions and CCU requests.
CiuUpdateState
Ciu.sub.-- update.sub.-- state is not required to be sent on Ring, assuming its only use is to change ciu pending state to invalid.
Packet Operations
Three RRC related operations have been added, RrcDeallocDesc, RrcWrDesc and CiuPureInvSumAlloc. The page.sub.-- fault operation has been deleted, since it is not required for Rrc operation. The following table specifies the revised encodings.
Invalidator and Responder Busy
The definition of invalidator busy and responder busy as a function of each packet operation is specified in the table below. On certain operations these bits are also set to indicate that the a cell or Ring:0 has the page allocated (descriptor match). This information is used by RRC:0 to determine whether a page is allocated in any additional cells within the Ring:0 during a cell deallocate sequence.
Packet Subpage State Field
The following table lists valid subpage states as a function of packet operation.
Ring Freezing
Ring freezing is used to handle ECC single bit errors and foreground refresh.
Packet Pcopy
Assign pkt.cmd[33] as Pcopy bit for CIU, RIU and RRC usage. Always initialized to clear by inserting CIU. Always set by RRC:1 to indicate the packet was copied from Ring:1. Packets which are copied from Ring:1 with Pcopy set, are not required to be returned to RRC:1 or Ring:1 and are emptied by RRC:0 after successfully traversing Ring:0.
Packet Freeze
Assign pkt.cmd[32] as Freeze bit for CIU, RIU usage. Always initialized to clear by inserting CIU or RIU. When set indicates that the contents of the packet are ignored by all cells. Must be cleared by the same cell which sets it. When clear, the packet is interpreted normally. Valid for empty and non-empty packets.
Packet Invalidate Lookahead
Change packet.cmd[13] to reserved. Name packet.cmd[28] as cmd.sub.-- lookahead[0] with the following encoding:
Pkt.Lookahead always overrides data to indicate the packet is short.
Packet RRC Bit
Assign packet.cmd[8] as RRC bit. Always initialized to clear and passed by CCU and CIU. Used by sva.sub.-- read.sub.-- ro, recombines and release to indicate that the packet should be reissued if no cell within Ring:0 picks up the subpage.
Packet RrcFault Bit
The definition of RrcFault bit has been changed RCC attention. The RrcFault bit indicates that an RRC fault was detected and logged by an RRC. If the remaining fault bits (MarkedFault, LocalFault, DescFault, and UnMarkedFault) are clear then the packet request was successfully completed. If the returning packet was busied, the originating cell should signal a fault with RrcAtt status and not retry the request. Other CIUs and CCUs handle this packet normally. If additional fault bits are set, the actions specified by these bits override the actions of RrcFault bit.
Packet RrcCmd
Rename pkt.cmd[23:16] to RrcCmd for RRC and RIU usage. RrcCmd is currently used to pass state between RRC:0 and RRC:1 for deallocate sequences.
Cell Treatment of CEU Aborted Requests
Packets which are returned busy, corresponding to CEU aborted CCU requests should not be reissued by the CCU. System error conditions signalled to the local cache, which in turn, signal the local processor, causing an abort are guaranteed to get the local processors and local caches attention without hanging up.
Control Locations
Addressing
SPA space addresses are 64 bits, and are divided into two parts; a cell address and a cell address offset. The cell address specifies a particular cell in the hierarchy of Rings. The offset specifies a particular location within a cell.
Cell Address Structure
A cell address specifies the location of a cell within the three defined levels of the Ring interconnection hierarchy, Ring:2, Ring:1 and Ring:0. The leaf cell address is constructed hierarchically from Ring:2Address, Ring:1Address and Ring:0Address. The three Ring:nAddress fields are used to construct absolute or relative hierarchical addresses to leaf or non-leaf cells.
Referring to the table below, there are three types of Ring:nAddresses; normal address, local address and routing address. A normal address is an absolute reference to one of 128 cells within the level of ring hierarchy. The cccccc field specifies the absolute cell number. A local address is a relative reference within level n-1 of ring the hierarchy. A routing address is used to address non-leaf cells within the hierarchy. The rrrrrr field within the routing address specifies the ring number or routing to Ring:n+1 for non-leaf cell access. Local address and Routing encodings are synonyms.
Cell addressing modes are categorized into leaf cell addressing and non-leaf (RRC) cell addressing. Cell addressing mode is determined by the combination of address types within the Cell Address.
Leaf cell relative mode allows a cell to address itself without knowledge of its actual full Cell Address. Ring:2Addr, Ring:1Addr and Ring:0Addr specify local address. Leaf cell relative to local Ring:0 mode allows a cell to address other cells within its local Ring:0, without knowledge of Ring:1Addr or Ring:2Addr. Ring:0Addr field specifies the leaf cell addressed. Leaf cell relative to local Ring:1 mode allows a cell to address other cells within its local Ring:1, without knowledge of its actual Ring:2Addr. Ring:1Address specifies Ring:0 number within the local Ring:2 and Ring:0Address specifies the cell number within the Ring:0. Leaf cell within a Ring:2 mode allows a specific leaf cell within the system to be accessed with the full cell address. Ring:2Address, Ring:1Address and Ring:0Address fields hierarchically specify the Ring:1, Ring:0 and cell number of the accessed leaf cell.
RRC:1 (non-leaf) pair relative to local Ring:1 mode, allows a non-local RRC:1 pair to be addressed without knowledge of Ring:2Address. Ring:2Addr type is local, Ring:1Addr type is normal to specify a non-leaf cell within Ring:1 and Ring:0Addr type is routing to specify routing. RRC:0 interleave configuration and Ring:0Addr field are used to route the packet to the specified Ring:1. RRC:1 pair mode allows a RRC:1 pair to be addressed by specifying Ring:2Addr and Ring:1Addr. RRC:2 pair mode allows an RRC:2 pair to be addressed by specifying Ring:2Addr, Ring:1Addr routing and Ring:0Addr routing.
SPA[39] controls whether the addressed RRC or its partner is accessed.
Routing of Interconnect Packets (SVA.SPA)
SVA request packets are routed based on RRC directory lookup, packet command, match of pkt.RequestorId and CellAddress, RRC rules and interleave configuration.
SPA request packets are routed based on packet command, match of pkt.Addr[63:40] and cell address, match of pkt.RequestorId and CellAddress and interleave configuration. If pkt.RequestorId and CellAddress match, the packet is a returning response and is forwarded back to the requesting leaf cell. Otherwise if pkt.RequestorId and CellAddress match, the packet is a request for the non-leaf or child leaf cell depending on CellAddress mode.
Packet RequestorId Match and SPA address decode are a function of the Ring level the RRC is connected to.
Interleave configuration parameters are
RduMasterConfig.Ringnterleave,
RduMasterConfig.RingValue, and
IbuMasterConfig.LinkInterleave.
SPA packet requests to leaf cells and non-leaf cells are routed identically. SPA packet requests are routed by an RRC bank based on Interleave Value matching Ring:n Address field of cell address, where n corresponds to the level of the routing RRC. RingInterleave configuration determines which bits from Ring:n Address[3:0] are matched. For non-leaf cell access, RingAddr[3:0] specifies the exact routing path. For leaf cell access, an exact routing path between the requesting and accessed Ring:0s is not required. The routing is based on the cell addressed. Access to non-leaf Ring:2 devices requires that both Ring:0 and Ring:1 fields of cell address be specified.
In configurations where both RRC banks connect to a single InterRingLink, incoming packets are routed to one bank based on IbuMasterConfig.LinkInterleave and a single address bit.
Offset Structure
The offset portion of an SPA selects a particular control register in the RRC pair, SPA[39] specifies whether the addressed RRC or its partner is accessed.
When in each unit, control locations are grouped by type and location offset. The range of locations offsets for each type are specified with its individual description.
cell.sub.-- address[38:32]--Unit Number
Bank A and bank B units are associated with subring A (odd ring number) and B (even ring number) respectively. Units are only accessible when accessed over the subring with which they are associated as specified by the Cell Address Ring:n Addr field.
cell.sub.-- address[31:28]--Location Type
The locations types for unit numbers 0.times.0 and 0.times.2, which address RDUs are:
The locations types for unit numbers 0.times.10 through 0.times.13, which address RIUs are:
The locations types for unit numbers 0.times.1 and 0.times.3, which address IBUs are:
SUMMARY
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the embodiments described above are exemplary only, and that other apparatuses and methods--including modifications, additions and deletions--fall within the scope and spirit of the invention.
By way of example, it will be appreciated that the central processing unit and subcache included within the Processing cells of the illustrated embodiment may be replaced by other logic circuitry capable of operating on, or in conjunction with, data allocated to those cells.
Claims
In view of the foregoing, what we claim is:
1. A digital data communications apparatus comprising A. first and second processing groups, each said group including a plurality of processing cells connected by an associated bus means for transferring signals representative of information packets therebetween, each processing cell i) having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, ii) including CCU means for at least one of generating and receiving signals representative of an information packet including a descriptor of a datum subject to reference, B. first level transfer means for transferring information packets between said first and second processing groups, said first level transfer means including i) first input means, coupled to the bus means of said first processing group, for receiving an information packet therefrom, ii) first output means, coupled to the bus means of said first processing group, for selectively outputting an information packet thereto, iii) second output means, coupled to the bus means of said second processing group, for selectively outputting an information packet thereto, C. said first level transfer means including routing control means, connected to said first input means and to said first and second output means, for routing an information packet received on said first input means to a selected one of said first and second output means based upon prior routings, if any, of the datum referenced in that information packet, or requests for that datum, between said first and second processing groups.
2. An apparatus according to claim 1, wherein said routing control means includes directory means for storing signals representative of prior routings of data, or request therefor, between said first and second processing groups.
3. An apparatus according to claim 2, wherein said routing control means includes means coupled to said directory means for comparing a descriptor in a packet received at said first input means with said directory signals to determine which of said first and second output means to route that packet to.
4. An apparatus according to claim 3, wherein said first level means further includes A. second input means, coupled to the bus means of said second processing group and to said routing control means, for receiving an information packet from said second processing group, and B. said routing control means further includes means for routing an information packet received by said second input means to a selected one of said first and second output means based on prior routings, if any, of the datum referenced in that information packet, or requests for that datum, between said first and second processing groups.
5. A digital data communications apparatus comprising A. first and second processing groups, each said group including a plurality of processing cells connected by an associated bus means for transferring signals representative of information packets therebetween, each processing cell i) having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced ii) including CCU means for at least one of generating and receiving signals representative of an information packet including a descriptor of a datum subject to reference, iii) wherein each such descriptor has a value that is independent of a processing cell in which the corresponding datum is allocated and that is independent of the allocation of other data to that same processing cell, B. first level transfer means for transferring information packets between said first and second processing groups, said first level transfer means including i) first input means, coupled to the bus means of said first processing group, for receiving an information packet therefrom, ii) first output means, coupled to the bus means of said first processing group, for selectively outputting an information packet thereto, iii) second output means, coupled to the bus means of said second processing group, for selectively outputting an information packet thereto, C. said first level transfer means including routing control means, connected to said first input means and to said first and second output means, for routing an information packet received by that input means to a selected one of those output means based upon correspondence between the descriptor in that information packet and data allocated to, or requested for allocation by, one or more processing cells of said first processing group.
6. An apparatus according to claim 5, wherein said routing control means includes directory means for storing signals representative of data allocated to, or requested for allocation by, said first processing group.
7. An apparatus according to claim 6, wherein said routing control means includes means coupled to said directory means for comparing a descriptor in a packet received at said first input means with said directory signals to determine which of said first and second output means to route that packet to.
8. An apparatus according to claim 7, wherein said first level transfer means further includes A. second input means, coupled to the bus means of said second processing group and to said routing control means, for receiving an information packet from said second processing group, and B. said routing control means further includes means for routing an information packet received by said second input means to a selected one of said first and second output means based on correspondence between the descriptor in that information packet and the data allocated to, or requested for allocation by, one or more processing cells of said first processing group.
9. A routing switch apparatus for digital information packets, comprising A. first input means for receiving an information packet from a first processing group, B. first and second output means for transferring said information packet to a respective one of said first processing group and a second processing group, each said processing group comprising a plurality of processing cells coupled by an associated bus means, said first input and output means being coupled to the bus means associated with said first processing group, said second output means being coupled to the bus means associated with said second processing group, each processing cell i) having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, ii) including CCU means for at least one of generating and receiving signals representative of an information packet including a descriptor of a datum subject to reference, ii) wherein each such descriptor has a value that is independent of a processing cell in which the corresponding datum is allocated and that is independent of the allocation of other data to that processing cell, C. first level transfer means for transferring information packets between said first and second processing groups, said first level transfer means including routing control means, connected to said first input means and to said first and second output means, for routing an information packet received by that input means to a selected one of those output means based upon correspondence between the descriptor in that information packet and the datum allocated to, or requested for allocation by, one or more processing cells in said first processing group.
10. An apparatus according to claim 9, wherein said routing control means includes directory means for storing signals representative of data allocated to, or requested for allocation by, said first processing group.
11. An apparatus according to claim 10, wherein said routing control means includes means coupled to said directory means for comparing a descriptor in a packet received at said first input means with said directory signals to determine which of said first and second output means to route that packet to.
12. An apparatus according to claim 11, wherein said first level transfer means further includes A. second input means, coupled to the bus means of said second processing group and to said routing control means, for receiving an information packet from said second processing group, and B. said routing control means further includes means for routing an information packet received by said second input means to a selected one of said first and second output means based on correspondence between the descriptor in that information packet and data allocated to, or requested for allocation by, one or more processing cells of said first processing group.
13. A digital data communications apparatus comprising A. (n) packet transfer levels, each respectively designated level(k), where (k) represents successive integers between (0) and (n-1), inclusive, B. each packet transfer level including a plurality of segments, where the number of segments in each packet transfer level(k), except packet transfer level(0), is less than the number of segments in packet transfer level(k-1), and where packet transfer level(n-1) includes only one such segment, each segment including i) zero, one or more processing cells, each having zero, one or more data, or copies thereof, allocated thereto, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, CCU means for at least one of generating and receiving signals representative of an information packet including a descriptor of a datum subject to reference, wherein each such descriptor has a value that is independent of a processing cell in which the corresponding datum is allocated and that is independent of the allocation of other data to that processing cell, ii) bus means for carrying information packets within that segment, C. each segment of packet transfer level(k), for (k) between (1) and (n-1), inclusive, being referred to as a level(k) segment and including plural first level transfer means for selectively transferring information packets between that level(k) segment and one or more level(k-1) segments associated therewith, said first level transfer means including first input means, coupled to the bus means of that level(k) segment, for receiving an information packet therefrom, first output means, also coupled to the bus means of that level(k) segment, for selectively outputting an information packet thereto, second input means, coupled to the bus means of an associated level(k-1) segment, for receiving an information packet thereto, second output means, coupled to the bus means of that associated level(k-1) segment, for selectively outputting an information packet thereto, where each such associated level(k-1) segment, as well as each descendant thereof, if any, is termed a descendant of that level(k) segment, where the processing cells associated with descendants of a level(k) segment are referred to as a first group of processing cells and said processing cells other than those associated with a descendant of a level(k) segment are referred to as a second group of processing cells, and D. at least one said first level transfer means including routing control means, connected to said first and second input means and to said first and second output means, for routing an information packet received by any of those input means to a selected one of those output means based upon correspondence between the descriptor in that information packet and data allocated to one or more processing cells of the first processing group.
14. An apparatus according to claim 13, wherein said routing control means includes directory means for storing signals representative of data allocated to said first processing group.
15. An apparatus according to claim 14, wherein said routing control means includes means coupled to said directory means for comparing a descriptor in a packet received at said first input means with said directory signals to determine which of said first and second output means to route that packet to.
16. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein A. at least one of said first and second input means is disposed physically remotely from at least one of said first and second output means, and B. said first level transfer means includes remote interface means, coupled to said routing control means and to said at least one remotely disposed input means and to said first and second output means, for selectively transferring an information packet received by said at least one remotely disposed input means to said selected one of said first and second output means.
17. An apparatus according to claim 16, wherein said remote interface means includes fiber optic transmission media for carrying signals representative of said information packets between said at least one remotely disposed input means and said first and second output means.
18. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8, wherein said second processing group comprises A. a plurality of further processing groups, each including a plurality of processing cells connected by an associated bus means for transferring information packets therebetween, B. a plurality of further level transfer means, each associated with a corresponding one of said further processing groups and coupled to the bus means thereof, for selectively transferring information packets therewith, and C. means connected with said first level transfer means and with said further level transfer means for transferring information packets therebetween.
19. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein said directory means includes means for storing allocation state-defining information for at least selected data, or copies thereof, allocated to said first processing group, said allocation state-defining information including at least one of i) an invalid allocation state for an invalid datum allocated to said first processing group, ii) a read-only allocation state for a copy of a datum allocated to and subject to read-only access by a processing cell of said first processing group, no copy of which datum is modifiable by a processing cell of said first processing group, iii) a nonexclusive owner allocation state for a datum allocated to and modifiable by a processing cell of said first processing group, one or more read-only copies of which datum are allocated to other processing cells of said first and second processing groups, and iv) an exclusive owner allocation state for a datum exclusively allocated to and modifiable by a processing cell of said first processing groups, no copies of which datum are allocated to other processing cells of said first and second processing groups.
20. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein said directory means includes a first directory portion for storing signals representative of descriptors corresponding to data for which requests are pending to said first processing group from said second processing group.
21. An apparatus according to claim 20, wherein said directory means includes a second directory portion for storing signals representative of descriptors corresponding to data for which requests are pending to said second processing group from said first processing group.
22. An apparatus according to claim 21, wherein said directory means includes means for storing at least one of said directory portions a signal representative of a descriptor corresponding to a datum for which a request is pending, said storing occurring upon receipt of a first information packet requesting allocation of that datum.
23. An apparatus according to claim 21, wherein at least one of said first and second directory portions includes means for storing pending state-defining information for at least selected data for which requests are pending to at least one of said processing groups, said pending state-defining information including at least one of i) a none-pending pending state for a datum for which no requests are pending, ii) a read-only pending state for a datum for which a read-only allocation request is pending, iii) an ownership pending state for a datum for which an ownership allocation request is pending, or for which an invalidation request is pending, and iv) a reissue pending state for a datum for which a request is pending and for which a response other than one generated in response to that request has issued.
24. An apparatus according to claim 23, wherein said routing control means includes means for updating said first and second directory portions in conjunction with the routing of a request packet between said first and second processing groups.
25. An apparatus according to claim 24, wherein said routing control means includes routing directory unit means, connected to said directory means, for comparing the descriptor included in an information packet received from any of said first and second input means to said directory means to determine if a datum, or a request therefor, is allocated to said first processing group.
26. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 15, wherein at least a processing cell in said first processing group includes means for deallocating from the associated directory means a signal representative of an invalid datum, or copy thereof, for which physical storage space is allocated within that processing cell, and for transferring to the bus means associated with that first processing group a deallocate packet including the descriptor of that datum.
27. An apparatus according to claim 26, wherein said first level transfer means includes polling means responsive to said deallocate packet for determining whether any other processing cells of said first processing group have allocated thereto the datum, or copy thereof, associated with the descriptor in that deallocate packet.
28. An apparatus according to claim 27, wherein A. said polling means includes means for transferring said deallocate packet on the bus means of said first processing group, and B. the processing cells of said first processing group include means for generating a busy signal indicating that they have allocated thereto the datum, or a copy thereof, associated with the descriptor in that deallocate packet.
29. An apparatus according to claim 28, wherein said polling means includes means responsive to an absence of said busy signal upon subsequent receipt of said deallocate packet for deallocating from that directory means said signal representative of the datum, or copy thereof, associated with the descriptor in that deallocate packet.
30. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein said first level transfer means includes multiple request-handling means selectively responsive to receipt, from processing cells in any of said first and second processing groups, of multiple information packets requesting allocation of a datum for transferring an initial one of those multiple information packets to the other of said processing groups and for responding to later received ones of those multiple information packets by generating a signal indicating that a responding processing cell is busy.
31. An apparatus according to claim 30, wherein the processing cells that generated said later received ones of those multiple information packets include means for selectively copying a datum included in a packet responding to said initial one of those multiple information packets.
32. An apparatus according to claim 30, wherein said multiple request-handling means includes at least one of A. means selectively responsive to receipt, from processing cells in any of said first and second processing groups, of multiple information packets requesting read-only allocation of a datum for transferring an initial one of those multiple information packets to the other of said processing groups and for responding to later received ones of those multiple information packets by generating a signal indicating that a responding processing cell is busy, and B. means selectively responsive to receipt, from processing cells of any of said first and second processing groups, of one or more information packets requesting ownership allocation or invalidation of a datum for transferring those packets to the other of said processing groups.
33. An apparatus according to claim 30, wherein said multiple request-handling means includes at least one of A. means selectively responsive to receipt, from processing cells of any of said first and second processing groups, of multiple information packets requesting read-only allocation of a datum for transferring an initial one of those multiple information packets to the other of said processing groups and for responding to later received ones of those multiple information packets by generating a signal indicating that a responding processing cell is busy, B. means selectively responsive to receipt, from processing cells of any of said first and second processing groups, of multiple information packets requesting exclusive ownership of a datum for transferring an initial one of those multiple information packets to the other of said processing groups and for responding to later received ones of those multiple information packets by generating a signal indicating that a responding processing cell is busy, C. means selectively responsive to receipt, from processing cells of any of said first and second processing groups, of multiple information packets requesting, without wait, atomic ownership of a datum for transferring an initial one of those multiple information packets to the other of said processing groups and for responding to later received ones of those multiple information packets by generating a signal indicating that the requested datum is atomically owned, D. means selectively responsive to receipt, from processing cells of any of said first and second processing groups, of multiple information packets requesting, with wait, atomic ownership of a datum for an initial one of those multiple information packets to the other of said processing groups and for responding to subsequently received ones of those multiple information packets, as well as to subsequently received packets requesting atomic ownership without wait, by indicating that the requested datum is atomically owned, and E. reissue means selectively responsive to receipt of an information packet requesting a datum, a response to which packet was not routed to the processing cell which issued that packet, and which information packet was previously issued by the first level transfer means associated with said multiple request-handling means, for generating a signal indicating that a responding processing cell is busy.
34. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein said first level transfer means includes A. multiple request-handling means selectively responsive to receipt, for processing cells of any of said first and second processing groups, of multiple information packets requesting allocation of a datum for transferring an initial one of those multiple information packets to the other of said processing groups and for deleting later issued ones of those multiple information packets, and B. said multiple request-handling means including merge means for associating a merged-state signal with a datum generated in response to said initial one of those multiple packets and for which datum such later issued ones of those multiple information packets have been deleted.
35. An apparatus according to claim 34, wherein said first level transfer means includes means for responding to a response packet including a datum associated with said merged-state signal for including in that packet a merged-response signal for preventing at least the processing cell which issued the initial one of said multiple information packets from deleting that response packet.
36. An apparatus according to claim 35, wherein each of said processing cells includes means responsive to a packet including said merged-response signal for generating a copy of that packet for use by that processing cell and for passing that packet to others of said processing cells.
37. An apparatus according to claim 34, wherein A. said first level transfer means includes means responsive to multiple information packets requesting allocation of a datum in a like access state for transferring at least an initial one of those multiple information packets to said other processing group and for deleting later issued ones of those multiple information packets, and B. said multiple request-handling means including merge means for associating a merged-state signal with a datum generated in response to said initial one of those multiple packets and for which datum such later issued ones of such like requests have been deleted.
38. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 15, wherein the CCU means of at least a requesting one of said processing cells includes A. request means for generating an ownership request information packet representative of a request for ownership allocation of a datum, and B. routing control means for selectively transferring that packet to the bus means of the processing group with which that processing cell is associated.
39. An apparatus according to claim 38, wherein the CCU means of at least a responding processing cell includes A. response means for generating an ownership response information packet representative of a response to said ownership request packet, said response packet including the datum for which ownership allocation is requested, and B. means for transferring that packet to the bus means of the processing group with which the responding processing cell is associated.
40. An apparatus according to claim 39, wherein A. the CCU means of the requesting processing cell includes means responsive to said response packet for allocating physical storage space for the datum in that packet in the associated processing cell, and B. the CCU means of the responding processing cell includes means for deallocating the requested datum from the responding processing unit.
41. An apparatus according to claim 39, wherein A. said request means includes means for generating a request packet having a requester-ID field representative of an identification of the processing cell generating that request packet, B. said response means includes means for generating a response packet having the requester-ID field of the request packet for which it represents a response, and C. said routing control means includes means responsive to the requester-ID field of a response packet for routing that response packet to a processing group in which the processing cell that generated the request was generated.
42. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 15, wherein the CCU means of at least a requesting one of said processing cells includes request means for generating an ownership request information packet representative of a request for ownership allocation of a datum, and for transferring that packet to the bus means of the processing group with which that requesting processing cell is associated.
43. An apparatus according to claim 42, wherein the CCU means of at least a responding one of said processing cells includes response means for generating an ownership response information packet representative of a response to said ownership request packet, said response packet including the datum for which ownership allocation is requested, and for transferring that packet to the bus means of the processing group with which the responding processing cell is associated.
44. An apparatus according to claim 43, wherein the CCU means of the requesting processing cell includes means responsive to said ownership response packet for allocating within that processing cell physical storage space for the requested datum.
45. An apparatus according to claim 44, wherein the CCU means of the responding processing cell includes means for deallocating physical storage space previously allocated to the requested datum within the responding processing cell.
46. An apparatus according to claim 45, wherein said directory means includes means for storing signals representative of descriptors of at least one of i) data, or copies thereof, allocated to processing cells in said first processing group, ii) datum for which a request packet generated by a processing cell in said second processing group has been routed to said first processing group, and iii) datum for which a request packet generated by a processing cell in said first processing group has been routed to said second processing group.
47. An apparatus according to claim 46, wherein said routing control means includes i) routing directory unit means coupled to said directory means for comparing a descriptor of a request packet generated in the first processing group with said directory means to determine whether the datum corresponding to that descriptor is allocated to one or more processing cells of said first processing group, and ii) means responsive to a determination that the datum corresponding to that descriptor is not allocated to said first processing group for routing that request packet to said second processing group, and updating said directory means accordingly.
48. An apparatus according to claim 46, wherein said routing control means includes i) routing directory unit means coupled to said directory means for comparing a descriptor of a request packet generated in the second processing group with said directory means to determine whether the datum corresponding to that descriptor is allocated to said first processing group, and ii) means responsive to a determination that the datum corresponding to that descriptor is allocated to said first processing group for routing that request packet to said first processing group, and updating said directory means accordingly.
49. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein A. at least a first processing cell includes means for storing allocation state-defining information associated with at least selected data, or copies thereof, allocated thereto, said allocation state-defining information including at least i) an atomic ownership state for a datum allocated for priority exclusive access in said first processing cell which another processing cell has not requested to have allocated, ii) a transient atomic ownership state for a datum allocated for priority exclusive access in said first processing cell which another processing cell has requested to have allocated, and B. the CCU means of said first processing cell includes i) means responsive to a request from others of said processing cells for allocation of a datum associated with either of said atomic ownership or transient atomic ownership states for preventing allocation of that datum, or copy thereof, by such requesting processing cells, ii) means responsive to a request from an atomic-requesting one of said other processing cells for priority exclusive allocation of datum associated with said atomic ownership state in said first processing cell for associating that datum with said transient atomic ownership state.
50. An apparatus according to claim 49, wherein said CCU means of said first processing cell includes atomic-transaction termination means for i) associating a datum previously associated with said atomic ownership state with an exclusive ownership state and, thereby, re-enabling response to subsequent requests from others of said processing cells for allocation of that datum, or a copy thereof, ii) selectively generating a release information packet including a datum associated with said transient atomic ownership state and transferring that packet on the associated bus means.
51. An apparatus according to claim 50, wherein said atomic-requesting processing cell includes means responsive to said release packet for allocating the datum included therein.
52. An apparatus according to claim 50, wherein said first processing cell includes means responsive to receipt of said release packet subsequent to initial generation and transfer thereof on said associated bus means for associating the datum included therein with an exclusive ownership state and, thereby, re-enabling response to subsequent requests from others of said processing cells for allocation of that datum, or a copy thereof.
53. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein A. the CCU means of at least one of said processing cells includes means for generating a duplicate data information packet including a copy of a datum allocated to that processing cell, as well as the descriptor corresponding to that datum, and for transferring that packet to the bus means of the processing group with which that processing cell is associated, and B. the CCU means of at least one other of said processing cells includes means responsive to that duplicate data packet for selectively updating a copy of said datum allocated, if at all, to that other processing cell.
54. An apparatus according to claim 53, wherein said first level transfer means includes duplicate data means responsive to a first duplicate data packet received on the bus means associated with said first processing group for generating a second duplicate data packet including a copy of the datum in said initial duplicate data packet, as well as the descriptor corresponding to that datum, and for transferring that second duplicate data packet to said second processing group, and for passing said first duplicate data packet to said first processing group.
55. An apparatus according to claim 53, wherein said first level transfer means includes duplicate data means responsive to a first duplicate data packet received on the bus means associated said second processing group including a copy of a datum allocated in a selected access state to a processing cell in said first processing group for generating a second duplicate data packet including a copy of the datum in said initial duplicate data packet, as well as the descriptor corresponding to that datum, and for transferring that second duplicate data packet to said first processing group, and for passing said first duplicate data packet to said second processing group.
56. An apparatus according to claim 55, wherein said duplicate data means includes means responsive to a first duplicate data packet received on the bus means of said second processing group including a copy of a datum for which at least one of i) a read-only request has been generated by a processing cell in said first processing groups, and ii) an invalid copy is allocated to a processing cell in said first processing group, for generating said second duplicate data packet.
57. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein said routing control means includes means responsive to receipt of an information packet from the bus means associated with any of said first and second processing groups, said packet including a datum or copy thereof for which a request has been generated by a processing cell in the other of said processing groups, for routing to that other processing group an information packet including that datum or copy thereof.
58. An apparatus according to claim 57, wherein said routing control means includes means responsive to receipt of an information packet from the bus means associated with any of said first and second processing groups, said packet including a datum or copy thereof for which a request has been generated by a processing cell in the other of said processing groups, said packet further including a requester-ID signal uniquely identifying that requesting processing cell, for routing to that other processing group that information packet.
59. An apparatus according to claim 57, wherein said routing control means includes snarf means selectively responsive to receipt of an information packet from the bus means associated with said second processing group, said packet including a datum or copy thereof for which at least one of i) a read-only request has been generated by a processing cell in said first processing groups, and ii) an invalid copy is allocated to a processing cell in said first processing group, for generating a duplicate data packet including a copy of that datum and for transferring that duplicate data packet to said first processing group.
60. An apparatus according to claim 57, wherein said routing control means includes snarf means selectively responsive to receipt of an information packet from the bus means associated with said second processing group, said packet including a datum or copy thereof for which any of an ownership request and atomic request has been generated within said first processing group for routing that information packet to said first processing group.
61. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8 or 12 or 15, wherein A. a processing cell in said first processing group includes means for generating a recombine information packet including a datum subject to allocation in another of said processing cells, and for transferring that recombine packet to the bus means associated with said first processing group, and B. at least one of said other processing cells in said first and second processing groups includes recombine means for selectively allocating the datum in said recombine packet.
62. An apparatus according to claim 61, wherein said first level transfer means includes A. polling means for determining whether any of the other processing cells in said first processing group will allocate the datum in said recombine packet prior to transferring that packet to said second processing group, and B. said polling means including means for transferring said recombine packet to said other processing cell in said first processing group on the bus means associated with that group.
63. An apparatus according to claim 62, wherein said first level transfer means includes means responsive to the failure of any of said other processing cells in said first processing group to allocate the datum in said recombine packet to transfer that packet to said second processing group.
64. An apparatus according to claim 63, wherein said routing control means includes means responsive to a recombine packet received on the bus means of said second processing group, said packet including a datum a copy of which is allocated to said first processing group, for routing that recombine packet to said first processing group for emptying by the cell that generated said recombine packet.
65. An apparatus according to claim 4 or 8, wherein A. said second processing group comprises third and fourth processing groups, each including a plurality of said processing cells, the processing cells of each said processing group being connected by an associated bus means for transferring at least information packets therebetween, each processing cell i) including CCU means for at least one of generating and receiving an information packet including a descriptor of a datum subject to reference, ii) having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, B. ring-one bus means, connected to said second input means and said second output means of said first level transfer means, carrying information packets, and C. second and third ones of said level transfer means, each connecting the respective bus means of said third and fourth processing groups to said ring-one bus means.
66. An apparatus according to claim 65, wherein the directory means of the routing control means of each of said first, second and third level transfer means includes means for storing allocation state-defining information for at least selected data, or copies thereof, allocated to the processing cells of the corresponding processing group, said allocation state-defining information including at least an invalid allocation state for an invalid datum allocated to said first processing group.
67. An apparatus according to claim 66, wherein A. a processing cell in said first processing group includes invalidating means for generating and transferring to the bus means associated with said first processing group an invalid-descriptor packet including a descriptor associated with a datum, or copy thereof, to be invalidated in others of said processing cells, B. said first level transfer means includes means for routing said invalid-descriptor packet to said ring-one bus means.
68. An apparatus according to claim 67, wherein at least one of said second and third level transfer means includes A. means responsive to said invalid-descriptor packet received on said ring-one bus means for generating a look-ahead packet including said invalidated descriptor associate with said datum, or copy thereof, to be invalidated and for transferring that look-ahead packet onward on said ring-one bus means, and B. means for substantially concurrently transferring said invalid-descriptor packet to said associated processing group to invalidate a read-only copy of the datum referenced in that invalid-descriptor packet.
69. An apparatus according to claim 68, wherein at least one of said second and third level transfer means includes means responsive to said look-ahead packet received on said ring-one bus means for invalidating a read-only copy of the datum referenced in that look-ahead packet, and for continuing transfer of said look-ahead packet on said ring-one bus means.
70. An apparatus according to claim 69, wherein A. at least one of said second and third level transfer means includes means for routing said invalid-descriptor packet, as indicative of completion of invalidation of a read-only copy, if any, of the datum in that packet in the associated processing group, to said ring-one bus means, B. at least one of the other of said second and third level transfer means includes means responsive to receipt of said invalid-descriptor packet subsequent to receipt of said look-ahead packet on said ring-one bus means for passing that invalid-descriptor packet to said first level transfer means on said ring-one bus means.
71. A digital data communications apparatus comprising A. (n) packet transfer levels, each respectively designated level(k), where (k) represents successive integers between (0) and (n-1), inclusive, B. each packet transfer level including a plurality of segments, where the number of segments in each packet transfer level(k), except packet transfer level(0), is less than the number of segments in packet transfer level (k-1), and where packet transfer level(n-1) includes only one such segment, each segment including i) zero, one or more processing cells, each having zero, one or more data, or copies thereof, allocated thereto, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, each processing cell further having means for generating a signal representative of an information packet, said information packet including one of at least a request packet having a descriptor corresponding to a datum to be allocated, and a response packet comprising a response to a request packet, ii) bus means for carrying information packets within that level(k) segment, C. CCU means coupled to said processing cells for selectively deallocating a datum allocated to a first cell and concurrently allocating that datum exclusively to a second cell, D. each level(k) segment, for (k) between (1) and (n-1), inclusive, including plural routing cells, each connected to the bus means of that segment and to the bus means of an associated level(k-1) segment for selectively transferring information packets between those segments, where each such associated level(k-1) segment, as well as each descendant thereof, is termed a descendant of that level(k) segment, and E. each said routing cell including means for selecting a request packet for transfer between associated level(k) and level(k-1) segments based upon correspondence of the descriptor in that request packet and a datum allocated to a processing cell in a descendant of that level(k) segment.
72. A digital data communications apparatus according to claim 71, wherein said routing cell includes means for selecting for transfer from the associated level(k-1) segment to the associated level(k) segment a request packet, generated by a processing cell in a descendant of that level(k) segment, having a descriptor corresponding to a datum that is not allocated to a processing cell which is a descendant of that level(k) segment.
73. A digital data communications apparatus according to claim 71, wherein said routing cell includes means for selecting for transfer to the associated level(k-1) segment from the associated level(k) segment a request packet that was not generated by a processing cell in that level(k-1) segment, or a descendant thereof, and that includes a descriptor corresponding to a datum that is allocated within a processing cell in that level(k-1) segment, or a descendant thereof.
74. A digital data communications apparatus according to claim 72, wherein said routing cell includes means for selecting for transfer to the associated level(k-1) segment from the associated level(k) segment a response packet directed to a processing cell in that level(k-1) segment, or a descendant thereof.
75. A digital data communications apparatus according to claim 74, wherein said routing cell includes means for selecting for transfer from the associated level(k-1) segment to the associated level(k) segment a response packet directed to a processing cell that is not a descendant of that level(k-1) segment.
76. A digital data communications apparatus according to claim 73, wherein A. the bus means of each said level(k) segment defines a unidirectional flow path for said information packets, and B. each said routing cell includes interface means coupled to the bus means of the associated level(k) and level(k-1) segments for receiving a first information packet from an adjacent upstream portion of an associated bus means, and selectively executing at least one of the following operations: i) transferring that first information packet unchanged to an adjacent downstream portion of that associated bus means ii) modifying that first information packet and transferring it to an adjacent downstream portion of that associated bus means, iii) copying that first information packet to create a second information packet, transferring the second information packet to an associated segment, and iv) emptying that first information packet.
77. A digital data communications apparatus according to claim 76, wherein at least one of said bus means comprises a shift register ring.
78. A digital data communications apparatus according to claim 76, wherein each routing cell includes means for storing a directory of descriptors corresponding to data allocated to the processing cells, if any, in descendants of the associated level(k) segment.
79. A digital data communications apparatus according to claim 78, wherein each said routing cell includes means for comparing a descriptor of a request packet to said directory to determine whether the datum in that request packet is allocated to a processing cell in a descendant of the associated level(k) segment, or a descendant thereof.
80. An improved method for digital data communications comprising the steps of A. providing first and second processing groups, each including a plurality of processing cells interconnected by an associated bus means for carrying information packet-representative signals, each processing cell having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, wherein each such descriptor has a value that is independent of a processing cell in which the corresponding datum is allocated and that is independent of the allocation of other data to that same processing cell, B. generating within one or more of said processing cells signals representative of information packets, each including a descriptor of a datum subject to reference, and selectively transferring one or more of those information packet-representative signal to the bus means associated with said one or more processing cells which generated them, and C. selectively routing said information packets between the bus means associated with each of said first and second processing groups based upon prior routings, if any, of the data, or requests therefor, referenced by the descriptors in those packets between said first and second processing groups.
81. A method according to claim 80 further comprising the step of storing in a directory signals representative of prior routings of data, or requests therefor, between said first and second processing groups.
82. An improved method for digital data communications comprising the steps of A. providing first and second processing groups, each including a plurality of processing cells interconnected by an associated bus means for carrying information packet-representative signals, each processing cell having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, wherein each such descriptor has a value that is independent of a processing cell in which the corresponding datum is allocated and that is independent of the allocation of other data to that same processing cell, B. generating within one or more of said processing cells signals representative of information packets, each including a descriptor of a datum subject to reference, and selectively transferring one or more of those information packet-representative signal to the bus means associated with said one or more processing cells which generated them, and C. selectively routing said information packets between the bus means associated with each of said first and second processing groups based upon correspondence between the descriptor in that information packet and the data allocated to, or requested for allocation by, one or more processing cells of said first processing group.
83. A method according to claim 82 further comprising the step of storing in a directory signals representative of data allocated to, or requested for allocation by, said first processing group.
84. An improved method of digital information packet switching comprising the steps of A. receiving an information packet from a first processing group including a plurality of processing cells interconnected by an associated bus means for carrying information packet-representative signals, each processing cell having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, wherein each such descriptor has a value that is independent of a processing cell in which the corresponding datum is allocated and that is independent of the allocation of other data to that same processing cell, and B. selectively routing said information packet to a respective one of said first processing group and a second processing group based upon correspondence between the descriptor in that information packet and the datum allocated to one or more processing cells of said first processing group, said second processing group including a plurality of processing cells interconnected by an associated bus means for carrying information packet-representative signals, each processing cell having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, wherein each such descriptor has a value that is independent of a processing cell in which the corresponding datum is allocated and that is independent of the allocation of that corresponding datum with respect to other data, if any, allocated to that same processing cell.
85. A method according to claim 84 further comprising the step of storing in a directory signals representative of data or copies thereof routed between said first and second processing groups.
86. An method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, wherein said directory signal-storing step includes the further step of storing in said directory allocation state-defining information for at least selected data, or copies thereof, allocated to said first processing group, said allocation state-defining information including at least one of i) an invalid allocation state for an invalid datum allocated to said first processing group, ii) a read-only allocation state for a copy of a datum allocated to and subject to read-only access by a processing cell of said first processing group, no copy of which datum is modifiable by a processing cell of said first processing group, iii) a nonexclusive owner allocation state for a datum allocated to and modifiable by a processing cell of said first processing group, one or more read-only copies of which datum are allocated to other processing cells of said first and second processing groups, iv) an exclusive owner allocation state for a datum exclusively allocated to and modifiable by a processing cell of said first processing groups, no copies of which datum are allocated to other processing cells of said first and second processing groups.
87. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, wherein said directory signal storing step includes the steps of A. storing in a first directory portion signals representative of descriptors corresponding to datum for which requests are pending to said first processing group from said second processing group, and B. storing in a second directory portion signals representative of descriptors corresponding to data for which requests are pending to said second processing group from said first processing group.
88. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the further steps of A. deallocating a directory signal representative of an invalid datum, or copy thereof, for which physical storage space is allocated within a processing cell, and transferring in conjunction therewith a deallocate packet including the descriptor of that invalid datum, and B. responding to said deallocate packet for deallocating directory signals representative of the datum, or copy thereof, associated with the descriptor in that deallocate packet.
89. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the step of responding to receipt, from processing cells in any of said first and second processing groups, of multiple information packets requesting allocation of a datum for transferring an initial one of said request packets to the other of said processing groups and for responding to later received ones of such request packets by generating a signal indicating that a responding processing cell is busy.
90. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the further steps of A. responding, selectively, to receipt from processing cells of any of said first and second processing groups of multiple information packets requesting allocation of a datum for transferring an initial one of said multiple information packets to the other of said processing groups and for deleting later issued ones of said multiple information packets, and B. associating a merged-state signal with a datum generated in response to said initial one of those multiple packets and for which such later issued ones of said multiple information packets have been deleted.
91. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the further steps of A. generating within one of said processing cells an ownership request information packet representative of a request for ownership allocation of a datum, B. transferring that packet to the bus of the processing group with which that processing cell is associated, C. responding, within another of said processing cells, to said ownership request packet by generating a response packet including the datum for which ownership allocation is requested, and D. transferring that ownership response packet to the bus means of the processing group with which the responding processing cell is associated.
92. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the further steps of A. storing in at least a first processing cell allocation state-defining information associated with at least selected data, or copies thereof, allocated thereto, said allocation state-defining information including at least i) an atomic ownership state for a datum allocated for priority exclusive access in said first processing cell which another processing cell has not requested to have allocated, ii) a transient atomic ownership state for a datum allocated for priority exclusive access in said first processing cell which another processing cell has requested to have allocated, and B. responding to a request from others of said processing cells for allocation of a datum associated with either of said atomic ownership or transient atomic ownership states for preventing allocation of that datum, or copy thereof, by such requesting processing cells, C. responding to a request from an atomic-requesting one of said other processing cells for priority exclusive allocation of a datum associated with said atomic ownership state in said first processing cell for associating that datum with said transient atomic ownership state.
93. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the further steps of A. generating in at least one of said processing cells a duplicate data information packet including a copy of a datum allocated to that processing cell, as well as the descriptor corresponding to that datum, and transferring that packet to the bus means of the processing group with which that processing cell is associated, and B. responding, with at least one other of said processing cells, to that duplicate data packet for selectively updating a copy of said datum allocated, if at all, to that other processing cell.
94. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the further steps of responding to receipt of an information packet from the bus associated with any of said first and second processing groups, said packet including a datum or copy thereof for which a request has been generated by a processing cell in the other of said processing groups, for routing to that other processing group an information packet including that datum or copy thereof.
95. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the further steps of A. generating, in a processing cell in said first processing group, a recombine information packet including a datum subject to allocation in another of said processing cells, and transferring that recombine packet to the bus means associated with said first processing group, and B. selectively allocating, within at least one of said other processing cells in said first and second processing groups, the datum in said recombine packet.
96. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the further steps of A. providing in said second processing group third and fourth processing groups, each including a plurality of said processing cells interconnected by an associated bus means for carrying information packet-representative signals, each processing cell having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, wherein each such descriptor has a value that is independent of a processing cell in which the corresponding datum is allocated and that is independent of the allocation of other data.sub.-- to that same processing cell, B. generating within one or more of said processing cells of said third and forth processing groups signals representative of information packets, each including a descriptor of a datum subject to reference, C. providing a ring-one bus for interconnecting said first, third and fourth processing groups, and D. selectively transferring information packets between the respective busses of each of said first, third and fourth buses.
97. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, comprising the further steps of A. disposing said first and second processing groups at locations physically remote from one another, and B. selectively transferring an information packet received from one of said processing groups to the other, physically remote processing group.
98. A method according to claim 81, 83 or 85, including the steps of A. providing within said second processing group a plurality of further processing groups, each including a plurality of processing cells connected by an associated bus for transferring information packets therebetween, and B. selectively transferring information packets between said further processing groups and said first processing group.
99. A digital data communications apparatus comprising, A. first and second processing groups, each said group including a plurality of processing cells, the processing cells within each of said processing groups being connected by an associated bus means for transferring signals representative of information packets therebetween, each processing cell i) having allocated thereto zero, one or more data or copies thereof, each such datum or copy thereof corresponding to a unique descriptor by which that datum or copy thereof is referenced, ii) including CCU means for at least one of generating and receiving signals representative of an information packet including a descriptor of a datum or copy subject to reference, B. first level transfer means for transferring information packets between said first and second processing groups, said first level transfer means including, first input means, coupled to the bus means of said first processing group, for receiving an information packet therefrom, first output means, coupled to the bus means of said first processing group, for selectively outputting an information packet thereto, second output means, coupled to the bus means of said second processing group, for selectively outputting an information packet thereto, C. said first level transfer means including routing control means, connected to said first input means and to said first and second output means, said routing means including directory means for storing signals representative of descriptors corresponding with at least selected data or copies thereof allocated to said first processing group, said routing means providing for routing an information packet received on said first input means to a selected one of first and second output means based upon correspondence between a descriptor referenced in that information packet and a signal representative of that descriptor in said directory means.
Patent Citations (41)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| USRe28811 | 1976-05-01 | Pierce | |
| US3723976 | 1973-03-01 | Alvarez et al. | |
| US3731002 | 1973-05-01 | Pierce | |
| US4358823 | 1982-11-01 | McDonald | |
| US4432057 | 1984-02-01 | Daniell et al. | |
| US4468733 | 1984-08-01 | Oka et al. | |
| US4510492 | 1985-04-01 | Mari et al. | |
| US4622631 | 1986-11-01 | Frank et al. | |
| US4706080 | 1987-11-01 | Sincoskie | |
| US4714990 | 1987-12-01 | Desyllas et al. | |
| US4758946 | 1988-07-01 | Shar et al. | |
| US4780873 | 1988-10-01 | Mattheyses | |
| US4792895 | 1988-12-01 | Tallman | |
| US4811009 | 1989-03-01 | Orimo et al. | |
| US4864495 | 1989-09-01 | Inaba | |
| US4885742 | 1989-12-01 | Yano | |
| US4888726 | 1989-12-01 | Struger et al. | |
| US4972338 | 1990-12-01 | Crawford | |
| US4980816 | 1990-12-01 | Fukuzawa et al. | |
| US5006978 | 1991-04-01 | Neches | |
| US5025366 | 1991-06-01 | Baror | |
| US5055999 | 1991-10-01 | Frank et al. | |
| US5060186 | 1991-10-01 | Barbagelata et al. | |
| US5101402 | 1992-03-01 | Chiu et al. | |
| US5119481 | 1992-06-01 | Frank et al. | |
| EPX14926 | 1980-02-01 | ||
| EPX214718 | 1987-03-01 | ||
| EPX229932 | 1987-07-01 | ||
| EPX273612 | 1987-07-01 | ||
| EPX233993A | 1987-09-01 | ||
| EPX262750 | 1988-04-01 | ||
| EPX332818 | 1989-01-01 | ||
| EPX312194 | 1989-04-01 | ||
| EPX322117A | 1989-06-01 | ||
| JPX59-103166 | 1984-06-01 | ||
| WOX8808652A | 1988-11-01 | ||
| WOX8909446 | 1989-10-01 | ||
| WOX9000283 | 1990-01-01 | ||
| GBX2065941 | 1981-07-01 | ||
| GBX176918 | 1987-01-01 | ||
| GBX2178205 | 1987-02-01 |
Non-Patent Literature (23)
- Lovett et al., Proceedings '88 Int'l. Conf. on Parrell Proc., v. 1, Penn State Univ. Press (Conf. Aug. 15-19, 1988) pp. 303 et seq.
- Kai Li et al., Proceedings '89 Int'l. Conf. on Parallel Processing, Penn State Univ. Press (Conf. Aug. 8-12, 1989) pp. I-125 et seq.
- Papamarcos et al., Proc. of 11th Annual Symposium on Computer Architecture (Conf. Jun. 5-7, 1984) pp. 348 et seq (IEEE).
- "High Performance/High Availability Interprocessor Communication Method," IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 31, No. 2, Jul. 1988 pp. 41-42.
- Schwartz, Telecommunications Network, "Introduction & Overview" pp. 1-20, Layered Architectures in Data Networks pp. 71-117.
- Haridi et al, "The Cache Coherence Protocol of the Data Diffusion Machine" Parallel Architectures Proceedings, vol. I, pp. 1-18 (1989).
- Proc. of the 6th Annual Phoenix Conf. on Computer and Communications, Feb. 25-27, 1987, pp. 14-17.
- European Search Report for EP 91 30 4493.
- "Multi-Microprocessors: an Overview . . . ," IEEE vol. 26 #2, pp. 216-228.
- "Cm*--A Modular Multi-Microprocessor," Nat'l Comp Confr '77, 637-644.
- Ciepielewsik et al., "A Formal Model for Or-Parallel . . . ", Proc. of the IFIP 9th World Computer Congress (1983) pp. 299-305.
- Censier et al., "A New Solution to Coherence . . . ", IEEE Transaction on Computers, vol. c-27, No. 12 (Dec. 1978) pp. 1112-1118.
- Eggers et al., "Evaluating the Performance of Four . . . ", Proc. of the 16th Annual Int'l Symposium on Computer Archit. (1989) pp. 2-15.
- Gehringer et al., "The Cm* Hardware Architecture", Parallel Proc. the Cm* Experience, Digital Press, pp. 11-28, 432, 438.
- Goodman et al., "The Wisconsin Multicube: A New . . . ", Proc. of the 15th Annual Int'l Symposium on Computer Archit. (1988) pp. 422-431.
- Wilson, Sr. Editor, "Increased CPU Speed Drives Changes in Multiprocessor Cache and Bus Designs", Computer Design, (Jun. 1987) p. 20.
- Ali et al., "Global Garbage Collection for Distributed . . . ", Int'l Jo. of Parallel Programming, vol. 15, No. 5 (1986) pp. 339-387.
- Mizrahi et al., "Introducing Memory into the Switch . . . ", Proc. of the 16th Annual Int'l Symposium on Computer Archit. (1989) pp. 158-166.
- Pfister et al., "The IBM Research Parallel Processor . . . ", IEEE Proc. of the 1985 Int'l Conf. on Parallel Proc. (1985) pp. 764-771.
- Tabak, "Chapter 8 Bus-Oriented Systems", Multiprocessors, Prentice Hall (1990) pp. 92-102.
- Warren et al, "Data Diffusion Machine-A Scalable . . . ", Proceedings of the International Conference on Fifth . . . , 1988, pp. 943-952.
- Hagersten, "Some Issues on Cache-Only Memory Architecture," Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessors. May 1990. p. 12.
- Hagersten et al, "The Data Diffusion Machine and its Data Coherency Protocols", Proceedings of the IFIP, pp. 127-148 (1990).