US 5,146,557 AGrant
User Interface for a Golf Green and a Golf Putt Modelling System
Issue Date:1992-09-08
•18 Claims
•9 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
The present user interface for a golf green and golf putt modelling system includes actuators which allow a user to select camera positions and illumination of a golf green. The user also may select, using the interface, a location of a golf ball and a golf cup on the green. The interface also displays the path trajectories of the golf ball on the green.
Metadata
Assignee
- General Electric Company
Inventors
- Boris Yamrom
- William E. Lorensen
Application Information
Application Number:US 5598796
Filing Date:1990-07-27
Priority Date:1990-07-27
Art Unit:231
Classifications
IPC:
G06F 314
Field of Search:
364434273340395410;518;522307;252DIG. 28;185 B;32 R;32 H;176 L;176;185 A;185 R720-725161
Patent Drawings (9 sheets)
Description
A portion of this disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the fascimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.
The present invention relates to a user interface, and more specifically, relates to a user interface for facilitating interaction between a system user and a golf green/golf putt modelling system.
Related Applications
The present application is related to commonly assigned, copending U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 07/546,623 (RD-19,077), 07/546,272 (RD-20,241 and 07/546,282 (RD-20,242), respectively, entitled System For Three-Dimensional Display of a Golf Green, System For Three-Dimensional Display of a Golf Putt and System For Three-Dimensional Display of a Golf Green Putting Difficulty Map.
Background of the Invention
A golf green is an area of short grass typically bounded by a fringe area. The fringe area is a grassy area wherein the grass is taller than the grass which forms the green. The fringe area is more resistant to ball movement than the green. Somewhere within the green area, a cup is placed. The cup has a diameter larger than the diameter of a golf ball, and the opening of the cup is disposed at ground level. More particularly, a plane parallel to the cup opening typically is parallel to the portion of the green immediately adjacent the cup, and the cup is substantially disposed within the ground.
There are no physical objects, e.g., trees, on the green, however, a green surface typically has slopes and/or a variety of topographies. A golfer, therefore, can "sink a putt", i.e., putt a golf ball in the cup, from any point on a green so long as the golfer properly compensates for the green's topography. Compensating for green topography by proper selection of ball direction and velocity is the challenge facing a golfer in a putting context.
Many people familiar with the sport of golf believe that golf tournaments often are determined by putting on a green. Indeed, a golfer's putting performance usually is critical to winning a golf tournament.
To bring golf tournaments to television viewers, television networks such as the National Broadcasting Company strategically locate cameras throughout a golf course. Around the golf greens, and in order to avoid interfering with fans in stands around the green, cameras typically are placed at an elevation above the green and above the fans.
The imaged topography of a golf green which can be provided by cameras placed high above a green differs significantly from an actual golf green topography seen by a golfer. In most viewing situations, an image created by a camera disposed high above the green shows the golf green as a flat surface. A golf green, however, typically has many subtle variations that affect the roll, i.e., speed and direction, of the putted golf ball. The "flat green" TV image can result from a combination of diffuse lighting from the sun and high camera angles. As a result of the "flat green" TV image, it is almost impossible for a TV viewer to visualize the actual topography of a green and curvature of a putt on the green.
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a user interface for a golf green and golf putt modelling system.
Summary of the Invention
The present user interface for a golf green and golf putt modelling system includes actuators which allow a user to select camera positions and illumination of a golf green. The user also may select, using the interface, a location of a golf ball and a golf cup on the green. The interface also displays the path trajectories of the golf ball on the green. Copending and commonly assigned patent applications describe display of a golf green, golf putt, and a golf green putting difficulty map. The present invention is specifically directed to a user interface which may be utilized with those systems.
The present user interface provides a user with flexibility in selecting cup and ball position and also provides a user with flexibility to select illumination and camera position around the green.
Brief Description of the Drawings
These and other objects of the present invention, together with further features and advantages thereof, will become apparent from the following detailed specification when read together with the accompanying drawing, in which:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart representing a sequence of method steps for generating a three-dimensional image of a golf green;
FIG. 2 is an example of a file containing golf green elevation and position data;
FIGS. 3A-B illustrate interior points of a golf green;
FIG. 4 illustrates a test for determining whether a point is inside a polygon;
FIG. 5 illustrates perimeter polygons for a golf green;
FIG. 6 illustrates interior and perimeter points of a golf green;
FIGS. 7A-B illustrate perspective views of a golf green; and
FIG. 8 illustrates a user interface in accordance with the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Drawings
Referring now more particularly to the drawings, FIG. 1 is a flow chart 100 illustrating a sequence of process steps for generating a 3-D image of a golf green. More particularly, subsequent to starting operations as indicated at 102, elevation information for the golf green must be acquired as indicated at a step 104. To obtain the elevation information, surveyors, using a theodolite, may measure elevation of points laid out on a uniform grid on the green. The x,y locations of the perimeter of the green also are measured. The elevation data may be obtained, for example, in two foot intervals. The data are then entered into an ASCII computer file. An example of such a file is shown in FIG. 2. The elevation and perimeter data, of course, may be obtained in many other ways.
Once the elevation data and green perimeter data is obtained, operations continue to produce, on a computer display, a set of connected polygons representing the surface of the golf green. Examples of connected polygons for interior points are shown in FIGS. 3A-B. Using polygons to represent three-dimensional shapes is discussed in Foley et al., "Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics", Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1982, at pgs. 505-536, which pages are incorporated herein by reference. In FIG. 3A, the polygons are quadrilaterals whereas in FIG. 3B the polygons are triangles. Polygons also may be produced for a skirt around the green. The skirt, which may be imaged as vertical polygons that follow the green perimeter, enhances the 3-D image of the green. The following steps create the polygonal model from the elevation and perimeter data.
As indicated at 106 in FIG. 1, a parametric cubic spline operation is performed on the perimeter points. Parametric cubic spline techniques are well-known and typically are utilized for creating a smooth curve between points. Cubic spline techniques, for example, are set forth in Elementary Numerical Analysis, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1972, at pgs. 233-241, which pages are incorporated herein by reference, and in the above incorporate pages from "Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics".
Next, as indicated at a step 108, each point that is on the green is tagged. The points are tagged by checking each point against the perimeter polygon created in step 106. To find whether a point is inside a polygon, a ray from the point in question to a point at infinity, in say, the x direction is created. The number of times the ray intersects the edges of the polygon is counted, and if the ray intersects the edges of the polygon an even number of times, the point in question is outside the polygon. If the ray intersects the edges of the polygon an odd number of times, the point in question is an interior point. FIG. 4 shows three points, two outside the polygon and one inside the polygon.
Once it is known which points are on the green and which points are off the green, polygons for interior, perimeter, and skirt points are created as indicated at a step 110. Interior polygons are points which have all their points inside the perimeter while perimeter polygons have some points inside and some outside the perimeters. Interior polygons are created from the interior points at higher quadrilaterals or triangles such as shown in FIGS. 3A-B. Perimeter and skirt polygons are clipped against the survey-provided perimeter data. Clipping algorithms are well-known such as the clipping algorithm set forth in Pavlidis, Algorithms For Graphics and Image Processing, Computer Science Press, 1982, beginning at page 338. Polygon clipping also is described in the hereinabove referenced "Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics", at pgs. 450-455, which are incorporated herein by reference. Perimeter polygons are shown in FIG. 5 and a green model with both interior and perimeter points is shown in FIG. 6.
The perception of depth, i.e., elevation changes, on a physical display screen may accomplished by a combination of techniques. Simulated light sources can be arbitrarily placed at various locations around the golf green and the light intensity from these sources calculated in quantitative form. Shadows cast by the surface polygons when illuminated by light sources add realism by producing a sense of depth. Constant shading calculates a single light intensity value for shading an entire polygon. To produce a more "smooth" shaded surface, a technique known as Gouraud shading, which interpolates the light intensity across an individual polygon, also may be used. Texture mapping also provides additional golf green realism by creating a "grass" look. The combination of light sources, shading techniques, and texture mapping provides an improved image of the green topography. These and other shading techniques are described in "Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics" at pgs. 575-590, which pages are incorporated herein by reference.
Flybys from a tee, over a fairway, then to a green, i.e., a ball's eye view, may be utilized to give a viewer a feel for a green's relative orientation to the tee. Moving around the green with the simulated camera, lets the viewer study the green's complex topography. The simulated camera can be placed at the player's ball location to show the viewer what the player is seeing. Movement around a green, a tee, and a fairway may be activated using well-known techniques such as transformation matrices described in "Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics" at pgs. 245-266, which pages are incorporated herein by reference. Using transformation matrices, the relative perspective of a green may also be changed as illustrated in FIG. 7A without a skirt and in FIG. 7B with a skirt.
In an actual implementation, two input files were created for a golf greens: an elevation file and a perimeter file. The elevation file contained survey readings at two foot intervals. For a constant y, the x elevations were contained in the file with the first and last on-green points denoted by an asterisk (*). The base elevation can be changed at any time using the e=keyword in the file.
A format of the elevation file is as follows:
e=13.369 sets reference elevation
y=6 sets current y coordinate
24 8.409 gives x and elevation
36*9.357 gives x and elevation. The * indicates that this is either the first or last point on the green for a given y reading.
The format of the perimeter file is as follows:
n.times.x y where n is the point # and x,y are the coordinates of the perimeter point.
Two geometry output files were created: one maintaining the polygons for the golf green itself and another containing polygons for a skirt around the green. The skirt starts at the edge of the green and extends in the negative z direction to z=0. The skirt adds 3-D cues to the golf green representation. A scalar file is also created that has the elevations as the scalar parameters.
The polygon representation of the green can be displayed on a conventional 3-D graphics rendering device. Graphics workstations such as a Stellar GS 2000, a HP 9000S300, or a Sun workstation, may be utilized.
A computer graphics interface, in accordance with the present invention, provides user interface "widgets" on a computer display which are attached to "actions", i.e., lists of statements in an interpreted language, such that when an appropriate widget is selected by the pointing device (a mouse), the associated "actions" are fired, or executed. The user interface screen and controls are shown in FIG. 8. An example of a widget is the slider or ball or pin position. The left window displays the wireframe display of a green, a ball, and a pin with a flag. It also displays footprints and a putter head besides the ball. The right window is a control panel.
The green can be viewed from different points in space by a virtual camera that is controlled by a pointing device (a mouse). The rest of the interactions are performed through the control panel on the right. Using various widgets in this panel, the user can:
(1) Change the position of the ball on the green through its X and Y coordinate sliders.
(2) Change the position of the hole and the pin through X and Y coordinate sliders.
Whenever the ball or the hole position is changed, the virtual camera is placed in a natural player's position so that the ball and the hole are in the field of view. Three widgets immediately show suggested speed, direction, and distance from the ball to the hole.
(3) Change the initial putt speed and direction with arrow widgets. There are footprints and a putter head displayed beside the ball, thus each time direction is changed, the feet and the putter move accordingly. Zero direction corresponds to the straight line direction from the ball to the hole.
(4) Select "Putt" button and see the trajectory of the ball on the green that has been calculated based on the defined initial speed and direction.
(5) Select "Continue" button and see that the ball is placed at the end of a trajectory, and then the virtual camera is adjusted to the new position.
(6) Select "Perfect Putt" and watch as the boundary problem is solved using shooting method, which is hereinafter explained, with intermediate trajectories displayed while the solution is searched. When the solution is finally found, two text widgets display the chosen initial speed and direction. The user can change the speed and the direction data for the ball to be close to the perfect ones and can analyze the sensitivity of the solution to the initial conditions.
(7) Select four predefined viewing positions by using arrows in the viewing subpanel. Possible choices are one step to the left, one step to the right, bending the knees position, and looking from above.
(8) Change illumination by turning on and off toggles corresponding to four lights placed in the corners of a rectangle around the green.
(9) Select "Stop" button and enable direct message communication with the system's parser via standard input.
(10) Toggle "Help" button. In help mode the user sees user interface descriptions in a separate pop-up window while moving the pointer over the widgets.
(11) Select "Exit" button to terminate the simulation.
The user interface is implemented in the C programming language on a Stellar graphics computer. The window-based user interface widgets are implemented with the HP X widget set.
Once a mathematical description of the green surface is provided as described above, the motion of the golf ball on the green can be predicted. More particularly, knowing the velocity and direction of the ball, the final ball location can be predicted. The optimum putting velocity and direction to putt the ball into the hole can also be provided.
More particularly, assume that a green surface is defined in 3-D coordinate space by the equation:
where z is the altitude of a surface point and x and y are plane coordinates of its projection on horizontal plane. In this notation, the horizontal plane will have equation S(x,y)=const. for all x and y. A sliding body, which may be modeled as having no dimensions, i.e. a geometrical point, will be susceptible to three forces, namely, its weight P, the normal reaction of surface N, and friction Fr. For the resulting force F, the Second Newtonian law of motion provides:
where a is acceleration of the body and m is its mass. Let n=n(x,y,z) be a normal vector to the surface s at a point (x,y,z), where z is equal to s(x,y). Several relations hold for forces P,N, and Fr. First,
where <a*b> notation is used for scalar product of two vectors a and b. This is true because of Third Newtonian Law (this force is opposite to the force of body pressure on surface). Secondly, Fr is equal to:
where k is friction coefficient, .vertline.N.vertline. is the length of a vector N, and V is velocity vector. Literally, friction force is proportional to normal reaction, coefficient of friction, and its direction is opposite to velocity vector. Now, rewrite am=F in the form:
To arrive at a convenient form, transform previous vector notation into coordinate notation. Let a=(a.sub.x, a.sub.y, a.sub.z), n=(n.sub.x, n.sub.y, n.sub.z), V=(v.sub.x, v.sub.y, v.sub.z), and P=(0, 0, -mg) (remember that P is directed vertically down and z axes is up, here g is acceleration of free fall). Now, after elimination of m, the last vector equation can be presented by three equations for each coordinate component: ##EQU1##
Equations (6)-(8) now can be transformed to a first order system. Assume that an independent variable is time t and position of a body, e.g., a golf ball, is (x.sub.1,x.sub.2,x.sub.3). For a velocity (v.sub.x,v.sub.y,v.sub.z), the following will provide a solution for variables (x.sub.4,x.sub.5,x.sub.6): ##EQU2## The symbol "'" is used to indicate derivative.
Using the above differential equations, an initial value problem can be solved. That is, given an initial velocity and direction, and given the initial position, i.e., x-y coordinates, of the golf ball on the green, the ball trajectory and the final position of the golf ball on the green can be determined and displayed. Initial value problems are discussed in Elementary Numerical Analysis, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1972, at pgs. 327-372, which pages are incorporated herein by reference.
The above equations also provide that a boundary value problem can be addressed. That is, knowing the initial placement of the golf ball and hole, determine a direction and velocity for the ball so that the ball's final position is in the cup. Boundary value problems also are discussed in Elementary Numerical Analysis at pgs. 373-387, which pages are incorporated herein by reference. In the present system, the system makes an initial guess
If the green is not flat, the initial guess, of course, will not result in a successful putt, i.e., the ball will not be in the cup. The present system then automatically determines a next direction and velocity for another attempt. For example, if the initial guess resulted in the ball's final position being to the right and short of the cup, the system will make a next guess where the ball direction is incrementally changed to the left of the cup and at an incremental increase in velocity. A ball final position is determined for this next guess.
The process continues until the ideal putt is found. If the ideal putt is not found after a predetermined number of tries, the present system will flatten the green by one half, and the process continues until the ideal putt for a half flat green is found. Once this putt is found, the green topography is scaled back with the initial guess being the ideal putt for the flattened green.
In this manner, the system continues to iterate through putt attempts until the ideal putt is found. Since the process is performed on a computer, the actual time required to perform the process is short.
A source code listing for the user interface and including generating a 3-D display of a golf green and a golf putt is provided in Appendix A. The syntax for the source code listing is as follows:
Once interpreted, i.e., executed, in accordance with the above syntax, and compiled in a particular computer system such as a Sun workstation, the source code listings provided in the attached appendix can be utilized for controlling operations of the computer system in accordance with the present invention.
While a preferred embodiment has been illustrated and described herein, it will be obvious that numerous modifications, changes, variations, substitutions and equivalents, in whole or in part, will now occur to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope contemplated by the invention. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention herein be limited only by the scope of the appended claims. ##SPC1##
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A user interface for facilitating interaction between a system user simulating a natural player and a golf green/golf putt modeling system, said interface comprising a screen for display of a simulated golf green and a window display representing a control panel, said green including a display of a golf ball, a putter head and a cup, pointing means for positioning a virtual camera for viewing the green from different points on the green to present a display of the green from the point of viewing, said control panel including means for performing interactions between the putter head and a golf ball in response to control selections by the system user, including a plurality of control elements responsive to said control selections by the system user to effect said interaction, said control elements including a first x and y coordinate slider for selecting and changing the position of the golf ball on the green, a second x and y coordinate slider for selecting and changing the position of the cup on the green and means for placing the virtual camera in a position simulating a position of a natural player so that the ball and the cup are maintained in the field of view whenever a selected position of the ball or cup is changed.
2. A user interface n accordance with claim 1 further comprising means for automatically restoring the field of view of the golf green whenever a selected position of the ball or cup is changed.
3. A user interface in accordance with claim 2 wherein viewing positions are predefined and include, relative to the ball position, one step to the left, one step to the right and directly above the ball.
4. A user interface in accordance with claim 1 further comprising means for selecting illumination of the green.
5. A user interface in accordance with claim 4 wherein said illumination selecting means comprises toggles.
6. A user interface in accordance with claim 1 wherein said interface is to be displayed on a Stellar graphics computer.
7. A user interface in accordance with claim 1, wherein said control panel further comprises means for selecting an initial putt speed and direction of the golf ball.
8. A user interface in accordance with claim 7 further comprising means for initiating a display of a putt trajectory based on the selected initial putt speed and direction.
9. A user interface in accordance with claim 8 further comprising means for displaying the ball on the green at the end of the putt trajectory and adjusting the virtual camera to a new position so that the ball and cup are maintained in the field of view.
10. A user interface in accordance with claim 1 further comprising means for determination of a perfect putt.
11. A user interface in accordance with claim 1 further comprising means for stopping operations and enabling direct message communication with the system via a standard input.
12. A user interface in accordance with claim 1 further comprising means to select help mode operation for displaying interface descriptions in a separate window.
13. A user interface in accordance with claim 1 further comprising means to select termination of the session.
14. A user interface as set forth in claim 1, wherein said control panel further includes means for displaying putting speed and putting direction of the golf ball and distance from the golf ball to the cup and said control elements include user actuated means for changing the putting speed and direction of the golf ball and means for executing a putt.
15. A user interface as set forth in claim 1, where each said first and said second x and y sliders are independent so as to permit separate selections of the corresponding x and y coordinates of the golf ball and the cup.
16. A user interface as set forth in claim 15, where each slider is adapted for horizontal movement across the control panel and further including display means on said control panel for displaying the corresponding x and y coordinates of the sliders in response to positioning of the sliders.
17. A user interface as set forth in claim 1, further including means for displaying a selected direction for the golf ball and said control elements further include user actuated means for changing the direction of the golf ball and means for executing a putt.
18. A user interface as set forth in claim 1, further including means for displaying a selected putting distance and said control elements further include user actuating means for changing the putting speed and means for executing a putt.
Non-Patent Literature (3)
- Yamrom et al., X, Golf, and Object-Oriented Programming, GE Research and Development Center, Technical Information Series, 90CRD099, May, 1990.
- Foley et al., Fundamentals of Interactive Computer Graphics, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, 1982, pp. 245-266, 450-455, 505-536, and 575-590.
- Elementary Numerical Analysis, Second Edition, McGraw-Hill Book Company, 1972, pp. 233-241, 327-372, and 373-387.