US 5,069,074 AGrant
Apparatus and Method for Measuring the Mass Flow Rate of Material Flowing Through at Least One Vibrating Conduit
Issue Date:1991-12-03
•14 Claims
•6 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
An improved method and apparatus for processing sensory input signals of the type obtained from Coriolis mass flow rate sensors and the like including differencing circuitry responsive to inputs received from two motion pick-up devices and operative to generate a "difference" signal which is directly proportional to the difference therebetween, summing circuitry responsive to the signals generated by the two pick-ups and operative to develop a "sum" signal which is proportional to the sum thereof, integrator circuitry for reducing the frequency dependency by one order and shifting the phase of the sum signal by 90 degrees, and dividing circuitry for dividing the integrated sum signal by the difference signal to develop an output signal which is directly proportional to the rate of mass flowing through a conduit to which the two pick-up devices are attached.
Metadata
Assignee
- Exac Corporation
Inventors
- Alan M. Young
- E. Ronald Blake
Application Information
Application Number:US 3774007
Filing Date:1989-07-10
Priority Date:1987-07-22
Art Unit:261
Classifications
IPC:
G01F 184
Field of Search:
73364861.37;861.38510
Patent Drawings (6 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to an apparatus and a method for measuring the mass flow rate of material flowing through at least one vibrating conduit and more specifically relates to Coriolis type mass flow meters, and, more particularly, to an improved method and circuit for processing two electrical signals obtained from motion detectors coupled to one or more tubular conduits carrying a flowing mass and driven or excited so as to experience Coriolis acceleration.
2. Brief Description of the Prior Art
Numerous techniques are known in the prior art for processing the information that can be obtained by measuring the Coriolis forces or the effects therefrom induced in a straight, bent, or looped conduit. For example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,329,019, 3,355,944, and 3,485,098, the velocity of conduit displacement on opposite sides of a "drive" point is measured and the difference therebetween is read using an alternating current voltmeter calibrated to provide an indication of mass flow rate.
However, as will be pointed out below, the use of the difference between two velocity signals as a means of indicating mass flow rate involves a factor of w corresponding to the drive frequency. If the drive frequency is not constant, errors in determining mass flow rate result. Also, under resonant operation, the drive frequency w varies with fluid density, and such variations result in substantial mass flow rate measurement error. In the above-cited prior art documents, this source of error was not recognized.
Further, in the above-cited prior art documents, the driving means were controlled with a signal that was proportional to the sum of the two "velocity" signals measured.
However, it has been found in the use of similar circuits that, as circuit components age, or if such components are replaced, or the conduit driving means (e.g. magnet and/or coil) are replaced, the sum of the velocity signals will not provide for constant drive level. Thus, errors in the mass flow rate measurement will result in direct proportion to changes in drive amplitude, and flow meter recalibration will be necessary.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,660,421 and 4,655,089 teach the detection of non-linear variation of phase shift with mass flow rate, a technique which although effective, is undesirable from a signal processing view point. U.S. Pat. No. 4,655,089 also explains how the time difference method disclosed in U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450 and in U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,422,338 and 4,491,025 fails to properly take into account problems associated with drive frequency variations. Each of the systems disclosed in the above-mentioned patents can be adversely affected by excessive vibrational noise or hydraulic noise creating spurious signals in the motion detectors, and such noise will excite unwanted resonant vibratory modes in the tubular conduits which contribute adversely to signal measurement.
In an attempt to provide an accurate measurement at or near the oscillation mid-plane, U.S. Pat. No. 4,422,338 requires the use of analog sensors which are linearly representative of the actual motion over the full range of motion, a limitation that adds both cost and complexity to the design.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,132,512 and 3,276,257 disclose methods of processing analog signals obtained from "velocity" pick-up devices, but require additional signal inputs obtained from a driving motor, or other velocity pick-ups, to provide reference signals for its signal processing. Besides requiring a pair of sensing coils and a pair of reference coils, U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,132,512 and 3,276,257 connect the sensory coils in series opposing fashion, a technique that requires precise matching of sensing pick-ups to obtain no flow rate signal at zero flow.
Summary of the Invention
It is, therefore, an object of the present invention to provide a novel method and apparatus for measuring mass flow rate using information contained from two sensors affixed to a vibrated conduit and which has no frequency dependency and no adverse dependency on fluid density.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus of the type described which will not have its calibration adversely affected by changes in drive level caused by aging, drifting component parameters.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus of the type described in which a continuous output signal is provided that varies linearly with mass flow rate.
Yet another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus of the type described which is not adversely affected by external mechanical or internal hydraulic noise or resonant modes of operation at frequencies in proximity to the operating frequency of the device.
A still further object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus of the type described which does not require motion pick-up devices that respond linearly throughout their entire range of measurement.
Still another object of the present invention is to provide a method and apparatus of the type described which does not require the generation of additional signals to provide reference inputs.
Briefly, a preferred embodiment of the present invention includes differencing circuitry responsive to inputs received from two motion pick-up devices and operative to generate a "difference" signal which is directly proportional to the difference therebetween, integrator circuitry for reducing the frequency dependency by one order and shifting the phase of the difference signal by 90 degrees, summing circuitry responsive to the signals generated by the two pick-ups and operative to develop a "sum" signal which is proportional to the sum thereof, and dividing circuitry for dividing the integrated difference signal by the sum signal to develop an output signal which is directly proportional to the rate of mass flowing through a conduit to which the two pick-up devices are attached.
In accordance with the present invention, "velocity measurements" are utilized to provide highly accurate mass flow rate measurements. This is in contrast to the teaching of U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450 wherein it is indicated that "velocity measurements" provide "at best only minimal results".
More specifically, in distinguishing U.S. Pat. No. 3,485,098, U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450 teaches that the disclosed method and apparatus "is specifically structured to minimize or obviate the forces generated by the two non-measured opposing forces, i.e., velocity track and acceleration of mass. This effort has been successful to the point where such forces are present in cumulative quantities of less than 0.2% of the torsional spring force".
In contrast to U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450, the present invention provides a way of measuring mass flow rate even in the presence of substantial competing forces. For example, the driving oscillation of the conduit introduces inertial accelerations that vary from zero (when the conduit(s) is at its rest position) to values that exceed the magnitude of the mass flow induced Coriolis forces by many orders of magnitude when the conduit is at its extremes of motion.
Additionally, helical conduits such as those disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,660,421 are subjected to additional forces resulting from fluid hydrostatic pressure and centrifugal forces that can cause the helical conduit to experience forces causing it to "twist" or distort. Such forces would adversely impair the accuracy of mass flow measurement if such a conduit, or other conduit of a three-dimensional nature, were employed within scope of the teaching of U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450.
In further contrast to U.S. Reissue Pat. 31,450, the present invention provides a new way of measuring mass flow rate throughout the oscillation cycle of a vibrating conduit without the limitation of having to minimize the "non-measured opposing forces" of U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450.
An important advantage of the present invention is that a signal processing circuit is provided wherein the response characteristics of the two pick-up devices need not be precisely matched in harmonic content.
Another advantage of the present invention is that it provides a circuit having the ability to reject extraneous electrical noise introduced into the motion pick-ups from electrical, mechanical, and/or hydraulic noise sources.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention will no doubt become apparent to those skilled in the art after having read the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments which are illustrated in the several figures of the drawing. It goes, further, without saying that any of the features, explained above or below, can be used in the combinations, specifically described or alone, or in any other conceivable combination, without thus leaving the scope of the present invention. Further, it should be stressed that if the present description refers to "signals", these may be both analog or digital signals unless otherwise explicitly stated.
The invention shall now be described with respect to various embodiments, depicted in the following drawings where:
In the Drawing
FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically illustrating the principle operative components of a Coriolis mass flow meter;
FIG. 1A is a diagram schematically illustrating the principle operative components of an alternative Coriolis mass flow meter;
FIG. 2 is a block diagram generally illustrating the circuit and processing method of the present invention;
FIG. 2A is a block diagram generally illustrating the circuit and processing method of the alternative embodiment of the present invention shown in FIG. 1A;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram schematically illustrating a preferred embodiment of a signal processing method and apparatus in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a diagram schematically illustrating the functional components of a lock-in amplifier (L.I.A.) of the type used in the embodiment of FIG. 3;
FIG. 5 is a diagram illustrating a portion of the circuit of FIG. 3 wherein a differentiator of the sum signal is substituted for the integrator of the difference signal. The L.I.A. outputs will be the same as FIG. 3.
FIGS. 6, 7 and 8 illustrate alternative circuit arrangements for accomplishing the signal division function shown in FIG. 2;
FIG. 9 is a block diagram illustrating an alternative embodiment of a portion of the present invention; and
FIG. 10 is a block diagram illustrating an alternative embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiments
Referring now to FIG. 1 of the drawing, there is shown, in simplified form, a Coriolis mass flow rate measurement device including a sensor tube 10 which can be of any configuration, but for purposes of illustration is shown as a cross-over loop of the type disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,660,421. It is to be understood, however, that any tube configuration can be utilized. As illustrated, the sensor 10 includes an elongated, generally helically wound cross-over loop 12, each end of which is suitably affixed to a mounting, as indicated at 14 and 16, respectively. Coupled to the drive portion 18 of the loop 12 is a magnetic drive source D for exciting the loop and causing it to vibrate up and down as depicted by the arrow 20.
Coupled to the leftmost loop extremity 22 and rightmost loop extremity 24 are magnetic pick-up devices P.sub.1 and P.sub.2, respectively, which, in the preferred embodiment, are "velocity-type" pick-ups.
It will be appreciated, however, that any other suitable type of pick-up could be utilized, such as those of the "position" or "acceleration" type, for example. Additionally, it will be appreciated that pick-up devices P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 need not be located at opposing or "symmetrically opposite" positions on the conduit 10.
Drive energy for unit D, typically in the form of an alternating voltage, is provided by an electronic drive control and monitoring system 26 which also receives signals generated by the pick-ups P.sub.1 and P.sub.2, and in response thereto develops mass flow rate information for recording or display.
As is well-known in the prior art, in response to the oscillatory forces applied to the loop 12 by drive unit 10, corresponding motion will be transmitted to the loop extremities 22 and 24, and such motion will be detected by the pick-up units P.sub.1 and P.sub.2. As is also well-known, with mass flowing through the loop 12, signals generated by the respective pick-up units will differ by an amount which is related to the mass flow rate of material passing through the loop 12.
As indicated above, it has historically been the practice to measure either time difference of passage of the tube motion sensing points through a mid-plane of oscillation, as disclosed in U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450, U.S. Pat. No. 4,422,338, or U.S. Pat. No. 4,491,025; or to measure the phase shift between the two sensed signals, as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,660,421; or to measure the voltage difference between the outputs of the two sensors as a measure of mass flow rate when the input to drive D is held constant, as taught in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,329,019, 3,355,944, and 3,485,098. However, as pointed out above, such measurement techniques are all subject to certain disadvantages.
In FIG. 2 of the drawing, a novel signal processing circuit and method in accordance with the present invention is illustrated generally in block diagram form, and includes a differencing component 30, a summing component 32, an integrating component 34, and a dividing component 36. As suggested by the drawing, the differencing component 30 responds to the voltage signals V.sub.1 and V.sub.2 generated by pick-up units P.sub.1 and P.sub.2, and develops a difference signal
The difference signal V.sub.3, is then integrated over a period of time by the integrating component 34 to develop a voltage ##EQU1##
At the same time, summing component 32 responds to the voltages V.sub.1 and V.sub.2 and develops a sum voltage
The voltages V.sub.4 and V.sub.5 are then input to the dividing component 36 that in turn develops an output voltage
which is directly proportional to mass flow rate. However, as contrasted with prior art techniques, such signal is not subject to error caused by disturbances of the type discussed above.
As an illustration of the concept of the present invention, consider the following:
Under no-flow conditions and with an excitation voltage
where
w=the driving or excitation frequency applied to the drive "point" D and
A.sub.e ="excitation" or drive amplitude at the location of the pick-ups P.sub.1 and P.sub.2
the voltage signals generated by the pick-ups P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 of the velocity type will be equal to each other and to the excitation voltage, as represented by
However, when mass flow is flowing through the tube 10, it can be shown that
where
A.sub.r =the "response amplitude" (i.e., the "Coriolis" amplitude) at the location of pick-ups P.sub.1 and P.sub.2.
Assuming the tubular conduit structure obeys Hooke's Law in response to Coriolis forces, it can also be shown that
where
k is a proportionality factor (that can be temperature-dependent) and Q.sub.m is the mass flow rate to be determined.
Now, from equations (6) and (7), V.sub.3 and V.sub.4 can be defined as
it can be seen that V.sub.6 is directly related to Q.sub.m, i.e.
In the case where conduit of FIG. 1 is excited in a "torsional mode" using driving means D.sub.1 and D.sub.2 i.e., in an oscillatory fashion as indicated by the arrow 15 in FIG. 1A of the drawing, the resulting oscillatory response to mass flow rate is indicated by arrow 19. In response to such motion the detectors P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 produce signals that are opposite in phase, i.e., V.sub.1 =-V.sub.2 in equation (5). It thus follows that in processing the signals to develop a signal proportional to mass flow rate one would divide the integrate sum signal by the difference signal as shown by the block diagram of FIG. 2A.
With reference to FIG. 1A, it is understood that detectors P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 could be located at other spaced positions on either side of the center point 17.
Alternatively, the same function could be accomplished by reversing the coil winding direction of one of the coils in the detectors P.sub.1, P.sub.2 in FIGS. 1 and 2.
It will thus be appreciated that the system represented by the block diagrams of FIGS 2 and 2A are purely analog in nature and involve no timing measurements.
The following discussion is relative to the type of oscillatory excitation depicted in FIG. 1. It is understood, however, that a similar description could be given relative to the type of oscillatory excitation depicted in FIG. 1A.
The heart of the present invention begins with the use of the difference signal V.sub.3 =V.sub.1 -V.sub.2.
Although the nature, character and information content of the signal V.sub.3 is completely analogous to the output of the difference amplifier designated by 92 in FIG. 2 of U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,355,944 and 3,485,098, the additional processing performed by the present invention on this difference signal, i.e. the integration and division of the integrated result by the sum of V.sub.1 and V.sub.2 constitutes a substantial improvement over the method of the two aforementioned U.S. citations by eliminating the otherwise adverse effects that fluid density variations and drive amplitude and frequency variations have on the accuracy with which the mass flow rate Q.sub.m can be determined.
In FIG. 3, a block diagram more specifically illustrating an actual implementation of the present invention is likewise depicted in simplified form. In this embodiment, the outputs of the two velocity pick-ups labeled P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 are amplified by gain stages designated U.sub.1 and U.sub.2. As suggested by the variable resistor R, the gain factor of each input channel is adjusted to compensate for unequal detected velocity signals so that the amplifier outputs have approximately equal amplitudes. These two signals are then presented both to a difference amplifier U.sub.3 and to a sum amplifier U.sub.4. Although there may be some gain associated with the difference amplifier U.sub.3 and the sum amplifier U.sub.4, the difference signal output by U.sub.3 is proportional to the difference between the two input voltages, and the sum signal output by U.sub.4 is proportional to the sum of the two input voltages.
The difference signal is then further processed by integration using an integrating amplifier designated U.sub.5, and the integrated difference signal is presented to a first lock-in amplifier U.sub.7. In the sum channel, the sum signal output by U.sub.4 is presented to a second lock-in amplifier U.sub.8. The two lock-in amplifiers (U.sub.7 and U.sub.8) share a common reference signal derived by taking the output of the summing amplifier U.sub.4 and inputting it to a 0-Volt biased comparator U.sub.6 to obtain a square wave, the frequency of which is the same of that of the sum signal. The square wave is then used as a reference input for both lock-in amplifiers. It should, perhaps, be pointed out that although the preferred embodiment includes two lock-in amplifiers U.sub.7 and U.sub.8, the amplifier U.sub.8 could be replaced by a precision rectifier or peak detector, or the like.
One way of viewing the operation of a lock-in amplifier is that it is like a very narrow-band, frequency selective rectifier. Any frequencies present in the signal other than the frequency of the reference, such as additional signals due to external mechanical noise or hydraulic pulsations in the meter that would normally cause extraneous signals to be present in the motion sensing pick-ups P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 will be rejected by the lock-in amplifiers. The signals output by the lock-in amplifiers or direct current voltages are further amplified by the buffer stages U.sub.9 and U.sub.10 and then converted to proportional frequencies by voltage-to-frequency converters designated U.sub.11 in the difference channel and U.sub.12 in the sum channel.
Counters U.sub.13 and U.sub.14 are used to accumulate counts of each cycle output from the voltage-to-frequency converters U.sub.11 and U.sub.12, and the counter outputs are interfaced to a micro-processor MP which effectively divides the contents in counter 13 by the content in counter U.sub.14. This is to say that the number N.sub.1 stored in counter U.sub.13 is divided by the number N.sub.2 stored in counter U.sub.14, and this ratio is related linearly to mass flow rate. The output of processor MP is then input to a suitable read-out device RD which provides an output signal that is presented as either a current, a voltage, a frequency, or a read-out on a visible display.
In FIG. 4, a schematic illustration is provided of the principle operative components of a lock-in amplifier as an aid to understanding certain benefits achieved through the use of such amplifier in the present invention.
Basically, a lock-in amplifier is a phase sensitive detector which can be considered to include a gain stage 50 including matched resistors R.sub.1 and R.sub.2, for gain=-100, a gain reversing switch 52 and an RC filter 54. The position of the switch is determined by the polarity of a reference input. If the signal input at 56 is a noise-free sinusoid and is in phase with the reference signal applied at 58, the output of the amplifier 52 will be a full-wave-rectified sinusoidal waveform. The signal is filtered by the low-pass filter 54. The output will be proportional to the value of the output of amplifier 52. However, if the input signal and the reference signal are shifted in phase by 90 degrees, the filtered output of amplifier 52 will be zero. Thus, the output of the integrator will be proportional to the RMS value of the fundamental component of the input signal, and to the cosine of the phase angle between the input signal and the reference. The total transfer function of the lock-in amplifier is, therefore,
where .phi. is the phase angle between the reference signal and the input signal.
Since the gain reversing amplifier and the output filter transfers the signal information from its input frequency to a direct current voltage, the time constant of the filter can be made as long as necessary to provide the narrow band-width required to reject noise accompanying the signal. The noise will not add to the output signal, since it will tend to cause symmetrical deviations about the true value of the signal in the output.
Voltage-to-frequency converters U.sub.11 and U.sub.12 are typically voltage controlled oscillators, the output frequency of which varies in proportion to the input voltage. Other types of "converters" such as integrating (dual-slope) analog-to-digital (A-to-D) converters or ratiometric A-to-D converters could also be employed for this function.
In a Coriolis mass flow measuring device, there can be hydraulic noise present in the form of pulsations of the fluid passing through the flow meter, and there can be unwanted electrical signals picked up by the wiring. The ability of the lock-in amplifier to reject electrical noise of a mechanical nature that might be present in the pipe in which the flow meter is installed, and to selectively pass through only those signals at the same frequency as the reference, and attenuate (by cos.phi.) those that are not in-phase with the reference, even if they are of the same frequency, allows the present invention to deal with much higher levels of vibration and noise than that of a purely digital phase measurement system.
Additionally, besides the ability to reject noise introduced into the motion pick-ups P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 from electrical, mechanical or hydraulic sources, it is possible that in the design of the motion pickups P.sub.1 and P.sub.2, their harmonic response characteristic may not be precisely matched. As a result, the harmonic distortion developed by one of the pick-ups can be different from that developed by the other. This consideration is of particular concern in the case where each of the two waveforms input to the difference amplifier have different harmonic distortion. Thus, the differences in harmonic distortion between P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 can provide a substantial contribution to the difference between the P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 signals.
Because the contribution of the fundamental to the difference signal has been minimized (by gain adjustment of U.sub.2 as discussed above), the presence of harmonic distortion can create a non-linearity in the response of V.sub.6 versus mass flow rate for the circuit shown in FIG. 2. However, inclusion of a lock-in amplifier in both the difference channel and the sum channel effectively rejects all of the harmonic distortion present, so that linearity is improved from a response standpoint without having the added expense of designing pick-ups that are linear over their range of motion. Accordingly, the lock-in amplifier accomplishes many objectives in addition to the rejection of electrical/electronic noise introduced from mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical sources.
In FIG. 5 of the drawing, an alternative embodiment of the circuit shown in FIG. 2 is illustrated, wherein instead of using the integrator U.sub.5 in the circuit between difference amplifier U.sub.3 and lock-in amplifier U.sub.7, a differentiator U.sub.5 is used in the circuit connecting the output of summing amplifier U.sub.4 and the input to lock-in amplifier U.sub.8. It will be appreciated that the result of either embodiment is the same.
In FIG. 6, another implementation of the circuit of FIG. 2 is suggested, wherein instead of the voltage-to-frequency and counter circuits U.sub.11 -U.sub.13 and U.sub.12 -U.sub.14, analog-to-digital conversion circuits are used to convert the analog outputs of buffers U.sub.9 and U.sub.10 into digital signals which can be processed by the processor.
Another alternative configuration is shown in FIG. 8, wherein the outputs of U.sub.9 and U.sub.10 are fed into a ratiometric analog-to-digital converter to develop the output signal to be displayed by the read-out device.
FIG. 7 discloses still another alternative configuration for the FIG. 2 circuit wherein the output of buffers U.sub.9 and U.sub.10 are fed into a divider, and the output of the divider is fed into a voltage-to-current or voltage-to-frequency converter, the output of which is then displayed by the read-out.
As pointed out above, the objective of the signal processing method of the present invention is to manipulate the signals from the two motion pick-ups P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 so as to obtain a signal which is proportional to A.sub.r /w A.sub.e. An alternative way to accomplish this is to divide the difference signal V.sub.3 by the sum signal V.sub.4 together with a measurement of frequency w. Because the difference and sum signals are in time quadrature, the reference signal for the lock-in amplifier must be shifted 90 degrees in phase using an integrator or differentiator as shown in FIG. 9. As illustrated, this alternative embodiment provides means for dividing the difference signal, which is proportional to N.sub.1, by the sum signal, which is proportional to N.sub.2, and then divides the result by a frequency w to obtain a value N.sub.1 /wN.sub.2 which relates linearly to the mass flow rate.
In FIG. 10, an alternative embodiment of the invention is depicted, wherein instead of using the integrator shown in FIG. 2, the voltages V.sub.3 and V.sub.4 are input to a first divider which divides V.sub.3 by V.sub.4 to develop a voltage V.sub.5 =V.sub.3 /V.sub.4. This voltage and a frequency value proportional to the drive frequency w are input to a second divider which develops an output voltage V.sub.6 =V.sub.5 /w which is proportional to the mass flow rate. It will, of course, be appreciated that an appropriately programmed microprocessor could be substituted for the two dividers and develop the voltage V.sub.6 in response to the inputs V.sub.3, V.sub.4, and w.
As discussed above, the approach taught by U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,485,098, 3,355,944 and 3,329,019 presents the difference between signals obtained from two velocity pick-ups to an alternating current voltmeter and controls the drive amplitude of the driving means with the sum of the same two signals obtained from pick-ups. Of the two readily apparent shortcomings of the subject matter of the three aforementioned citations, one is indicated by equation (9) above. More specifically, in the difference voltage V.sub.3 it can be seen that there is a frequency factor of w introduced in its amplitude. This factor is the frequency of the driving voltage, and if there is any variation in that driving frequency, such variation will appear as an error in the indicated mass flow rate.
If the flow meter is operating at resonance, the drive frequency will naturally vary with fluid density. Thus, in addition to there being an unwanted dependency on drive frequency, the drive frequency under resonant operation will vary with fluid density and produce an unacceptable error.
Conversely, use of the sum signal to control drive frequency presents a second problem to the three aforementioned citations' approach in that if there is any aging of the components, or if the driving means is replaced, for example, the drive level will vary, and as is indicated in equation (8) above, if the excitation amplitude varies, the response amplitude is also going to vary. Accordingly, control of the drive signal based upon a summing of the two input signals can result in calibration errors as components age or are substituted or replaced, or for whatever reason, have characteristics which vary.
These two shortcomings of the prior art are overcome in the present invention by integrating the difference signal to remove the unwanted frequency dependency. Thus, rather than attempting to control the influence that amplitude of the driving signal exerts on the mass flow rate measurement based upon the sum of the two signals, the integrated difference signal is divided by the sum signal.
The above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,460,421 teaches a tangent dependency of the measured phase difference on mass flow rate. This non-linear relationship is undesirable from the standpoint of one wishing to develop a signal that is linear with mass flow rate, a common occurrence, because from electronics engineering standpoint it is easier to deal with linear signals than with non-linear signals. The present invention provides for such a linear relationship.
The teaching of the above-mentioned U.S. Pat. No. 4,655,089 concerns a phase measuring technique for relating phase shift to mass flow rate and indicates that the difference signal approach, using differential velocity measurement or differential voltage measurement, is only linear over a small range of phase shifts that may be no more than 3 degrees. The present invention likewise overcomes the shortcomings taught in this citation regarding velocity difference methods.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,655,089 also explains how the difference method described in U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,422,338 and 4,491,025 fails to properly take into account frequency or frequency variations which can result in mass flow measurement errors. Again, the present invention properly takes into account the effect of frequency on the measured signals and removes that dependency so that there is no problem.
The time difference measurement described in U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,422,338 and 4,491,025 is also an intermittent type of measurement, the accuracy of which can be affected by harmonic distortion in the signals. In U.S. Pat. No. 4,422,338, it is indicated that in order to always "track" the oscillation mid-plane, the motion sensing pick-ups must provide an output that is linear over their entire range of movement. Thus, use of a linear sensor output was required. No such restriction is required in the present invention and no linearity requirements are made on the response characteristics of the pick-ups.
The U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,422,338 and 4,491,025 technique is solely a time based approach that provides an intermittent measurement snap-shot of the condition of the conduit at a particular point in time wherein other non-Coriolis forces are minimized. Rather than providing a measurement of mass flow rate that is in any way of an intermittent nature, the present invention provides a measurement that is of a continuous nature throughout the conduit's oscillation cycle rather than an output that is registered only intermittently throughout the vibration cycle of the conduit. The present invention is thus a fundamentally different approach in terms of the signal processing method itself.
Whereas U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,422,338 and 4,491,025 measure the time difference between the mid-plane crossings of two signals, the present approach determines the electrical potential difference between two detected signals at the same time and makes such determination using a difference amplifier. From that point on, the ability to derive any relative timing information between the two input signals P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 is lost. Furthermore, since the integrated difference signal and the sum signal are always in phase with each other, there is no phase measurement of any kind performed between the outputs of P.sub.1 and P.sub.2 in the present invention.
U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,132,512 and 3,276,257 disclose methods for processing analog signals obtained from "velocity" type pick-ups that respond only to Coriolis induced motion in a circular-shaped conduit, and then require two additional pick-ups that respond only to the driving motion in order to generate a reference signal for the synchronous demodulator used to compare the signals. In the alternative, a reference signal is derived from the electric motor that is used to excite or drive the conduit. The present invention can be distinguished over these two citations in that both the measurement signals and the reference signal, or signals, are obtained from the same pick-ups.
The two aforementioned documents also disclose the connection of two pick-up coils together in series opposing fashion. This is unworkable in practice, because it requires close matching of the response characteristic of the sensors and also requires a conduit structure that behaves in a highly symmetrical manner.
In FIG. 12 of U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450, an embodiment is illustrated including a pair of strain gauges feeding a bridge circuit and an amplifier, and a reference signal is fed into a synchronous demodulator. That scheme is part of a force nulling scheme of which the present invention is in no way involved. Just like in U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,132,512 and 3,276,257, there are provided in U.S. Reissue Pat. No. 31,450 and U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,422,338 and 4,491,025 separate sensing means, or sensing transducers, and yet additional transducers to generate a reference signal. In the present invention, the measurements and reference signals are derived from the same sensors.
Although the present invention has been described above in terms of various alternative embodiments, it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that additional or alternative embodiments, and alterations and modifications of the illustrated embodiments can be made. It is, therefore, intended that the appended claims be interpreted as covering all such alternatives, alterations, and modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. Apparatus for measuring the mass flow rate of material flowing through at least one vibrating conduit (10), comprising: a pair of driving means (D.sub.1, D.sub.2) for imparting differential oscillatory motion at separate points (22, 24) along the conduit (10); a pair of motion detectors (P.sub.1, P.sub.2) disposed at separate points (22, 24) along the conduit (10) for detecting motion thereof and for developing first and second motion responsive analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2); differencing means (30, U.sub.3) responsive to said first and second analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2) and operative to generate a difference signal (V.sub.3) which is proportional to the voltage difference therebetween; summing means (32, U.sub.4) responsive to said first and second analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2) and operative to generate a sum signal (V.sub.4) which is proportional to the sum of the voltages thereof; integrating means (34, U.sub.5) for integrating said sum signal (V.sub.4); and dividing means (36, U.sub.11 14 U.sub.14, MP) for dividing the integrated sum (V.sub.5) by said difference signal (V.sub.3) to develop an output signal (V.sub.6) proportional to the mass flow rate of material flowing through said conduit (10).
2. The apparatus of claim 1, further comprising: comparator means (U.sub.6) responsive to said sum signal (V.sub.4) and operative to develop a reference signal; and a first lock-in amplifier means (U.sub.7) responsive to said integrated sum signal (V.sub.5) and said reference signal and operative to cause the integrated difference signal input to said dividing means (U.sub.11 -U.sub.14, MP) to be a direct current signal substantially immune to the effects of harmonic distortions produced by mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical characteristics of the preceding signal carrying components.
3. The apparatus of claim 2 further comprising: a second lock-in amplifier means (U.sub.8) responsive to said difference signal (V.sub.3) and said reference signal and operative to cause the difference signal input to said dividing means (U.sub.11 -U.sub.14, MP) to be a direct current signal substantially immune to the effects of harmonic distortions produced by mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical characteristics of the preceding signal carrying components.
4. The apparatus of claim 2, wherein said dividing means (U.sub.11 -U.sub.14, MP) includes: a first voltage-to-frequency converter (U.sub.11) for converting said integrated sum signal (V.sub.5) to a corresponding first alternating signal of a first frequency; a first counter (U.sub.13) responsive to the frequency of said first alternating signal and operative to generate a first digital signal proportional thereto; a second voltage-to-frequency converter (U.sub.12) for converting said difference signal (V.sub.3) to a corresponding second alternating signal of a second frequency; a second counter (U.sub.14) responsive to the frequency of said second alternating signal and operative to generate a second digital signal proportional thereto; and a processor means (MP) responsive to said first and second digital signals and operative to develop an output signal which is proportional to said first digital signal divided by said s second digital signal.
5. The apparatus of claim 3, wherein said dividing means (U.sub.11 -U.sub.14, MP) includes: a first voltage-to-frequency converter (U.sub.11) for converting said integrated difference signal (V.sub.5) to a corresponding first alternating signal of a first frequency; a first counter (U.sub.13) responsive to the frequency of said first alternating signal and operative to generate a first digital signal proportional thereto; a second voltage-to-frequency converter (U.sub.12) for converting said difference signal (V.sub.3) to a corresponding second alternating signal of a second frequency; a second counter (U.sub.14) responsive to the frequency of said second alternating signal and operative to generate a second digital signal proportional thereto; and a processor means (MP) responsive to said first and second digital signals and operative to develop an output signal which is proportional to said first digital signal divided by said second digital signal.
6. The apparatus of claim 1, wherein said dividing means includes: a first analog-to-digital converter for converting said integrated sum signal (V.sub.5) to a corresponding first digital signal; a second analog-to-digital converter for converting said difference signal (V.sub.3) to a corresponding second digital signal; and processor means responsive to said first and second digital signals and operative to develop an output signal which is proportional to said first digital signal divided by said second digital signal.
7. Apparatus for measuring the mass flow rate of materials flowing through at least one vibrating conduit (10), comprising: a pair of driving means (D.sub.1, D.sub.2) for imparting differential oscillatory motion at separate points (22, 24) along the conduit (10); a pair of motion detectors (P.sub.1, P.sub.2) disposed at separate points (22, 24) along the conduit (10) for detecting motion thereof and for developing first and second motion responsive analog voltage signals; differencing means (U.sub.3) responsive to said first and second analog voltage signals and operative to generate a difference signal which is proportional to the voltage difference therebetween; summing means (U.sub.4) responsive to said first and second analog voltage signals and operative to generate a sum signal which is proportional to the sum of the voltages thereof; integrating means for integrating said sum signal; first comparator means (U.sub.5) responsive to the integrated sum and operative to develop a first reference signal; a first lock-in amplifier means (U.sub.7) responsive to said difference signal and said first reference signal and operative to develop a first direct current signal which is substantially immune to harmonic distortions produced by mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical characteristics of the preceding signal carrying components; second comparator means (U.sub.6) responsive to the sum and signal and operative to develop a second reference signal; a second lock-in amplifier means (U.sub.8) responsive to said sum signal and said second reference signal and operative to develop a second direct current signal which is substantially immune to harmonic distortions produced by mechanical, hydraulic, or electrical characteristics of the preceding signal carrying components; and dividing means for dividing said first direct current signal by said second direct current signal to develop an output signal proportional to the mass flow rate of material flowing through said conduit (10).
8. Apparatus for measuring the mass flow rate of material flowing through at least one vibrating conduit (10), comprising: a pair of driving means (D.sub.1, D.sub.2) for imparting differential oscillatory motion at separate points (22, 24) along the conduit (10); a pair of motion detectors (P.sub.1, P.sub.2) disposed at separate points (22, 24) along the conduit (10) for detecting motion thereof and for developing first and second motion responsive analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2); differencing means responsive to said first and second analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2) and operative to generate a difference signal (V.sub.3) which is proportional to the voltage difference therebetween: summing means responsive to said first and second analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2) and operative to generate a sum signal (V.sub.4) which is proportional to the sum of the voltage thereof; first dividing means for dividing said difference signal (V.sub.3) by said sum signal (V.sub.4) to develop a corresponding first quotient signal (V.sub.5); means for developing a frequency signal (w) proportional to the frequency at which said conduit (10) is vibrating; and second quotient signal (V.sub.6) which is proportional to the mass flow rate of material flowing through said conduit (10).
9. A method of measuring the mass flow rate of material flowing through at least one conduit (10), comprising the steps of: causing spaced apart portions of said conduit (10) to oscillate in displacement relative to a rest position and out of phase relative to each other; detecting oscillatory motion of at least two separated points (22, 24) along said portions of the conduit (10) and developing corresponding first and second motion responsive analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2) subtracting said first signal (V.sub.2) from said second signal (V.sub.1) to develop a difference signal (V.sub.3) which is proportional to the voltage difference therebetween; adding said first and second signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2) to develop a sum signal (V.sub.4) which is proportional to the sum of the voltages thereof; integrating said signal (V.sub.4) to develop an integrated sum signal (V.sub.5); and dividing the integrated sum signal (V.sub.5) by said sum signal (V.sub.4) to develop an output signal (V.sub.6) proportional to the mass flow rate of material flowing through said conduit (10).
10. The method of claim 9 further comprising the step of synchronously detecting the integrated sum signal (V.sub.5) prior to division by said difference signal (V.sub.3) to remove all signal components not in phase with said sum signal (V.sub.4).
11. The method of claim 10 wherein the integrated and synchronously detected difference signal (V.sub.5) and said sum signal (V.sub.4) are digitized and the digitized difference signal is divided by the digitized sum signals to develop said output signal (V.sub.6).
12. A method for measuring the mass flow rate of material flowing through at least one conduit (10), comprising the steps of: causing spaced apart portions of said conduit (10) to oscillate out of phase with each other and at a frequency (w) relative to a rest position; detecting oscillatory motion of the conduit (10) at separate points (22, 24) along said portion of the conduit (10) and developing first and second motion responsive analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2); subtracting said first signal (V.sub.2) from said second signal (V.sub.1) to develop a difference signal (V.sub.3) which is proportional to the voltage difference therebetween; adding said first and second signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2) to develop a sum signal (V.sub.4) which is proportional to the sum of the voltages thereof; shifting the phase of a signal proportional to said difference signal (V.sub.3) by 90.degree. to develop a reference signal for synchronously detecting said sum signal (V.sub.4) to remove signal components not in phase with said reference signal; dividing the detected sum signal by said difference signal (V.sub.3) to develop a corresponding first quotient signal (V.sub.5); developing as frequency signal proportional to the frequency (w) at which said conduit (10) is caused to oscillate; and dividing said first quotient signal (V.sub.5) by said frequency signal to develop a second quotient signal (V.sub.6) which is proportional to the mass flow rate of material flowing through said conduit (10).
13. A method of measuring the mass flow rate of material flowing through at least one conduit (10), comprising the steps of: causing spaced apart portions of said conduit (10) to oscillate out of phase with each other and at a frequency relative to a rest position; detecting oscillatory motion of said conduit (10) at separate points (22, 24) along said portion of the conduit (10) and developing first and second motion responsive analog voltage signals (V.sub.1, V.sub.2); subtracting said first signal (V.sub.2) from said second signal (V.sub.1) to develop a sum signal (V.sub.4) which is proportional to the sum of the voltages thereof; dividing said sum signal (V.sub.4) by said difference signal (V.sub.3) to develop a corresponding first quotient signal (V.sub.5); developing a frequency signal having a value proportional to the frequency (w) at which said conduit (10) is caused to oscillate; and dividing said first quotient signal (V.sub.5) by said frequency signal to develop a second quotient signal (V.sub.6) which is proportional to the mass flow rate of material flowing through said conduit (10).
14. The method of claim 13, wherein the integrated sum signal (V.sub.5) and the difference signal (V.sub.3) are analog signals and the step of dividing the two signals (V.sub.3, V.sub.5) is accomplished using an electrical signal processing technique.