Portable Upright Scuba Cylinder Retention Rack

This invention relates to scuba diving and in particular a device for the transportation and storage of scuba cylinders.

None.

The preferred method of storing or transporting a scuba cylinder is in the vertical position. Previously, mechanisms designed for securing scuba cylinders during transportation or storage involved placing the cylinder in a horizontal position on a type of block to prevent its rolling about, or in a permanently mounted vertical rack. The horizontal position is not suitable for long term storage of a cylinder due to corrosion, and requires much needed floor space during transportation. The vertical position provides better protection for the cylinder, easier access, and takes up less floor space, however, a permanently secured rack can become obtrusive when not in use, and is not easily moved to another place where it may be useful.

This invention allows the scuba cylinders to be transported or permanently stored in the vertical position, reducing cylinder corrosion, vulnerability, and also taking up less space. The rack is very easily moved out of the way or to another place where it may be needed, such as from a pickup to a boat or the home. This is accomplished simply by pushing down on the top of it, thus compressing the spring, and allowing the entire unit to be removed without the need for tools.

FIG. 1 is a perspective drawing of the separated components of the invention. These components are the Base, Spring, and the Headpiece. The Base consists of a hollow vertical tube open at the top end and connected at the bottom to a relatively shallow box structure with holes large enough to accept the bottom of a cylinder. The Headpiece consists of a vertical tube, either solid or closed at the ends, connected perpendicular to a flattened structure which has concave crescent shaped depressions on the forward side, and an edge holder on the back side. The Spring is the intermediate piece and fits inside the tube of the Base.

FIG. 2 is a perspective drawing that shows the invention in use in the bed of a pickup.

FIG. 3 is a rear view perspective drawing of the headpiece and features the edge holder.

FIG. 4 is a perspective drawing that illustrates another possible method of operation with a slight variation of components. It utilizes one continuous tube attached to the Base that contains a spring and slider type edge holder.

The Base should be placed in the desired setup location, such as in the bed of a pickup or a boat etc., near where a permanent mounting edge exists, with the Base upright and the attached tube at the rear of the unit. The Spring provides the necessary expanding action and should be placed in the vertical tube of the Base. Position the vertical tube of the Headpiece in the tube of the Base so that the concave surfaces of the Headpiece are facing forward and align vertically with the rear of the holes in the Base. Press down on the Headpiece which will compress the Spring and force the upper tube inside the lower one. Slide the entire unit back and line up edge holder on the rear of Headpiece with the permanent edge of vehicle or other mounting fixture. Release downward pressure on the Spring so unit expands and catches the edge holder on the permanent edge. Now the scuba cylinder(s) can be placed upright into the unit so that the bottom of the cylinder is trapped by the hole in the Base, and the midsection of the cylinder is cradled by the concave surfaces of the Headpiece. A rubber strap is then connected to either side of the Headpiece, thus securing the cylinder(s). The above description is specific to one preferred embodiment of this invention and as FIG. 4 illustrates, there are other variations possible, such as only being capable of handling one cylinder at a time, or a simple channel cut into the Headpiece instead of having an edge holder, or even changing the expansion mechanism from a spring to hydraulic pressure, or a screw method. Different materials such as plastic, aluminum or steel may also be incorporated into different parts. Therefore, the scope of the invention should not be determined solely by the embodiment illustrated, but by the appended claims and their legal equivalents.