US 4,907,048 AGrant

Double Implanted LDD Transistor Self-Aligned With Gate

Issue Date:1990-03-06

•11 Claims

•6 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

An improved double implanted and aligned LDD transistor comprising a gate having a central alignment member and a pair of outboard alignment members having portions contiguous with the gate oxide layer. A lightly doped junction is aligned with the central alignment members and a heavily doped junction is aligned with the outboard alignment members.

Metadata

Assignee

Xerox Corporation

Inventor

Tiao-Yuan Huang

Application Information

Application Number:US 1236938

Filing Date:1987-11-23

Priority Date:1987-11-23

Art Unit:253

Classifications

IPC:

H01L 2978H01L 2702H01L 2348

Field of Search:

35723.3;23.4;23.9;41;71

Patent Drawings (6 sheets)

Description

Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an improved LDD transistor which avoids spacer induced degradations and exhibits reduced hot-electron effects and short-channel effects, and to several methods for its fabrication.

Background of the Invention

Recently, semiconductor device miniaturization has been driven toward smaller and smaller devices, in the sub-micron range, by means of advanced silicon fabrication technologies. As this miniaturization trend continues toward higher integration density in VLSIs and improved performance, the devices approach physical limits predicted by operating principles. For example, since reduction in device dimensions is not usually accompanied by a corresponding reduction in source-to-drain voltage, higher electric fields can be expected to be generated across the channel. Therefore, in devices with an effective channel length of 1 .mu.m or less, simply scaling down the device dimensions, without changing the supply voltage, generally results in deteriorated performance and often causes device failure. In order to overcome degraded performance, various constraints are imposed on device design.

One of the most important problems to overcome in realizing submicron VLSIs is the hot-electron effects. On the one hand, it is desirable to decrease the channel length in order to obtain faster devices and to increase packing density. On the other hand, unless reduction in device dimensions is accompanied by a corresponding reduction in the supply voltage, higher electric fields will be generated in the substrate. Such intensified electric fields cause deterioration in device reliability. Alternatively, suitable design modifications may be introduced into the device to overcome or mitigate the effect of the intensified electric field.

It is well known that one of the severest limitations imposed on the miniaturization of transistors in VLSIs is the very high electric field across the channel, which causes hot-carrier injection into the gate oxide. Under the influence of the very high electric field, carriers (electrons or holes) originating from the channel current, which gain sufficient energy, may be injected into the gate oxide in the vicinity of the drain. These trapped carriers cause device instabilities, such as threshold voltage shift and transconductance degradation.

The device illustrated in FIG. 1 represents a conventional transistor 10 wherein n+ implanted source 12 and drain 14 junction regions in semiconductor substrate 16 are self aligned with gate 18 located upon a thin gate oxide layer 20. (It should be understood that although I will be referring almost exclusively to n doped regions, p doping is also comprehended.) Absent a reduction in the supply voltage, the likelihood of the above-described hot-electron effects is increased as dimensions are reduced and the source and drain get closer.

One solution that has been successful in reducing the electric field peak has been the addition of lightly doped n- regions between the n+ regions and the channel which cause some of the channel electric field to drop therein. In recent years various device processes, such as double-diffused drain (DDD) and lightly-doped drain (LDD), have been developed to incorporate the n- regions. These have been widely studied to ascertain their effect on alleviating hot-electron effects in short channel n-type MOSFETs. It should be noted that although the nomenclature of these design techniques refers to changes in the drain region, the MOSFET devices are generally symmetrical and the similar changes are made in both the source and drain regions.

A device 22 made by the DDD fabrication method is illustrated in FIG. 2. It includes a semiconductor substrate 24 upon which are deposited a thin gate oxide 26, such as SiO.sub.2, and a conductive semiconductor gate 28, which may be made of polycrystalline silicon (polysilicon or poly). The source and drain junction regions each include a first lightly doped (n-) implant 30 of a fast diffusing material, such as phosphorus, which is self aligned with the edge of the gate 28, which serves as a mask for this purpose. The source and drain also include a second, more heavily doped (n+) implant 32 of a slower diffusing material, such as arsenic, which is also self aligned with the same edge of the gate 28. After the dopant implants have been introduced, a long (1 hour), high temperature (>1000.degree. C.), drive-in is utilized to diffuse the dopant materials into the substrate and to electrically activate them. Because of their differential rates of diffusion, the faster diffusing phosphorus will be driven deeper into the substrate and also will be driven laterally further beneath the gate than the slower diffusing arsenic.

Studies of the DDD devices indicate that while they are satisfactory in some respects, i.e. they do reduce somewhat the channel electric field E.sub.max, their inherently deeper junctions, caused by the dopant being driven downwardly into the substrate, degrade the short channel effects by causing punchthrough and threshold voltage falloff of the transistor. The length (L.sub.n -) of the n- buffer region 30 between the n+ junction 32 and the channel region 34 should be accurately controlled to precisely modify the channel electric field E.sub.max. However, this is not possible with this technique because it relies upon the diffusion of atoms for locating their rest positions. Furthermore, while the electrical field may be reduced by interposition of a lightly doped region, this technique inherently requires high dopant doses in the n- region in order to allow the remote diffusion to occur.

The LDD device 36, shown in FIG. 3, was developed to overcome the disadvantages of the DDD. It includes a semiconductor substrate 38 upon which is deposited a gate oxide layer 40 and a gate 42. Lightly doped, n- source and drain junctions 44 are implanted into the substrate to be self aligned with the edges of the gate 42 which serves as a mask. Then, insulating outboard spacers 46, preferably made of SiO.sub.2 are deposited adjacent the gate to define L.sub.n -, and the heavily doped n+ source and drain junctions 48 are implanted into the substrate 38 to be self aligned with the outboard edges of the spacers 46. It can be seen that the resultant structure has certain similarities with the DDD, particularly in the location of the n- region. However, a high drive in temperature is not needed because L.sub.n - is set by the spacer width and may be accurately controlled.

Studies of the LDD devices also indicate a critical defect in this structure, attributable to the remote location of the n+ junction from the edge of the gate. This defect mechanism, known as spacer induced degradation, causes electrons to be trapped in the oxide of the n-/SiO.sub.2 spacer interface and induces a positive charge adjacent the surface of the n- at that interface. The positive charge causes a high series resistance and prevents depletion of the n- region. As a possible cure for this defect, it has been suggested to increase the dopant dose in the n- region. However, doing so would cause the n- region to be very similar to the n+ region and the channel electric field would not be lowered significantly. Another suggested cure has been the introduction of a long, high temperature drive-in step to laterally drive the n+ into closer alignment with the gate edge. Unfortunately, this will also drive the n- regions deeper and closer together, further reducing the channel length and increasing the short-channel effects.

It is the object of the present invention to provide a MOSFET design which provides self alignments for both n+ and n- source-drain implants while avoiding spacer induced degradations.

It is a further object of this invention to provide a MOSFET design which offers an excellent structure for CMOS processes in which minimum thermal processing is necessary.

Summary of the Invention

The LDD transistor of my invention may be constructed, in one form, by providing a semiconductor substrate supporting a gate oxide layer and gate/mask means, wherein the gate/mask means includes a central alignment means and an outboard alignment means, the outboard alignment means being contiguous with the gate oxide layer. Lightly doped source and drain regions have their facing ends in alignment with side walls of the central alignment means and heavily doped source and drain regions have their facing ends in alignment with side walls of the outboard alignment means.

Brief Description of the Drawings

FIG. 1 is a side sectional view of a conventional single implant MOSFET device,

FIG. 2 is a side sectional view of a conventional double-diffused drain, double implanted MOSFET device,

FIG. 3 is a side sectional view of a conventional lightly-doped drain, double implanted MOSFET device,

FIG. 4 is a side sectional view of an inverse-T gate LDD transistor device, in accordance with my invention,

FIGS. 5a through 5f show the salient process steps in the fabrication of the device of FIG. 4,

FIG. 6 is a side sectional view of an LDD transistor device with a conductive spacer, in accordance with my invention,

FIG. 7 is a side sectional view of an inverse-T gate LDD transistor device having a stacked gate, in accordance with my invention, and

FIG. 8 is a side sectional view of an inverse-T gate LDD transistor device having a sandwiched stacked gate, in accordance with my invention,

FIGS. 9a and 9b show the preliminary process steps of an alternate method for producing the inverse-T gate LDD transistor device shown in FIG. 7, and

FIG. 10 is a side sectional view of the inverse-T gate LDD transistor device of FIG. 4 having been SALICIDED.

Description of the Preferred Embodiments

In FIGS. 4, 6, 7 and 8 there are illustrated several embodiments of my invention. In the transistor of each embodiment, the substrate 50 has implanted therein lightly doped n- source and drain regions 52, establishing a channel 54, and heavily doped n+ source and drain regions 56. A gate insulating layer 58 overlies the substrate. I have uniquely designed the gates to mask the dopant implantation process so as to accurately establish the length L.sub.n - of the lightly doped implant and to prevent spacer induced degradation. Clearly, optimizing the implant locations and the junction depth is critical for the device designer. As the dimension L.sub.n - is increased, the maximum electric field (E.sub.max) and the likelihood of the hot electron effect decreases. However, this increase in length also carries with it a higher overlap capacitance which slows the device.

In these configurations of my device, the dopant profile can be simply and accurately controlled without resorting to a thermal drive-in step. Annealing serves two functions in device processing with regard to dopant implants. It is used to alter the dopant profile both laterally and in depth, and it electrically activates the implanted ions. In the process of my invention, accurate dopant profiles are achieved by the selection of appropriate masking and implantation energy, so that annealing is only required for dopant activation. Therefore, rapid thermal annealing (RTA) may be accomplished, by subjecting the device to a very high temperature for a very short time, e.g., 1000.degree. C. for 10 seconds. This step will not enable significant diffusion to occur. Thus, my process is compatible with CMOS fabrication, in which both n and p channel devices are formed upon the same wafer, because the p-type dopant, boron, is a faster diffuser than the n- type dopants, arsenic or phosphorus. It should be clear that as applied to a CMOS wafer, a lower temperature anneal would be required for the p-type devices. The RTA parameters of time and temperature are insufficient to appreciably drive even the boron.

The device of FIG. 4 includes a gate/mask 60 upon the thin oxide layer 58, in the form of an inverse T. It comprises a thick central trunk 62, whose width is selected to define the length (L.sub.C) of the channel 54, and a pair of thin outboard legs 64, the trunk and legs being made of conductive material, preferably a heavily doped silicon. Insulating spacers 66, preferably made of SiO.sub.2, overlie the thin outboard legs 64, thereby adding substantial thickness to those portions.

A series of essential fabrication steps for making the transistor device of FIG. 4 is illustrated in FIGS. 5a through 5f.

FIG. 5a: a photoresist pattern 68 has been deposited upon a conductive layer 70 overlying the thin gate oxide layer 58 atop substrate 50. The layer 70 is preferably a heavily doped silicon, in either the polysilicon, microcrystalline or amorphous form and about 3500.ANG. thick.

FIG. 5b: layer 70 is partially removed, as by etching, leaving a thick central trunk 62. Instead of removing the entire layer, as for a conventional LDD transistor, it is thinned to leave an outboard layer 72 of about 200 to 1000.ANG.. Care must be taken so as not to overthin the conductive layer.

FIG. 5c: if an n-type device is desired, a phosphorus (n-) dose is implanted through the outboard layer 72, as indicated by arrows A, to form the lightly doped junctions 52. Implantation may not occur through the thick central trunk 62 which serves to mask the channel region 54.

FIG. 5d: sidewall spacers 66 are formed by depositing an insulating layer, such as CVD SiO.sub.2, and anisotropically etching it so that the outboard extent of the spacers defines the length L.sub.n-.

FIG. 5e: the extent of layer 72 outboard of sidewall spacers 66 may then be removed, leaving outboard legs 64. This completes the definition of the inverse-T gate structure 60.

FIG. 5f: The sidewall spacers 66 atop the outboard legs 64 serve as masks to offset the arsenic (n+) dose, implanted as indicated by arrows B, to form the heavily doped junctions 56. Of course, it should be understood that the n+ implant may be made through the thinned layer 72, and that its extent outboard of the sidewall spacers may be removed as a final step, rather than as described with respect to FIG. 5e.

It should be noted that unlike the conventional LDD, the n+ source/drain implants are self-aligned to the polysilicon gate, eliminating an n+-to-gate offset which gives rise to spacer induced degradations. In contrast to the conventional DDD structure, which normally requires an additional n-drive-in to achieve an approximation of a desired L.sub.n - dimension, the optimum L.sub.n - dimension is readily set, by determining the width of the oxide sidewall spacer 66 (I have made the sidewall spacer 0.22 .mu.m). No post implant drive-in is required and dopant activation may be effected by rapid thermal anneal (RTA). The application of minimum thermal energy allows the junctions to be shallow and the dopant redistribution to be substantially nonexistent, insuring high punch-through immunity.

In the alternative embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6 the gate/mask comprises a central conductive trunk 74 flanked by conductive sidewall spacers 76, both of which may be doped polysilicon. The conductive sidewall spacers effectively extend the gate laterally outwardly so that the self-aligned n+ junctions 56 are aligned to the gate.

The fabrication process may be improved by the modification of forming the gate as a stack of different materials so as to provide inherent etch stops. Even in the preferred FIG. 4 embodiment, great care must be taken to avoid overthinning of the outboard legs 64 when layer 70 is etched. To this end, I propose the structures illustrated in FIGS. 7 and 8. In FIG. 7 the gate stack 78 comprises a thin conductive base layer 80, such as doped polysilicon, upon which may be formed a thick central trunk 82 of another conductive material, such as metal or a silicide. Selection of an appropriate differential etchant will remove only the trunk material and stop at the thin polysilicon. After the n- junction has been implanted through the thin conductive base layer 80, the oxide sidewall spacers 84 will have been added and the n+ junctions will have been implanted in alignment with the sidewall spacers. Alternatively, the thick central trunk 82 may be made of an insulating material, such as SiO.sub.2 or Si.sub.3 N.sub.4, in which case it will be necessary to open a contact to the lower thin conductive base layer 80.

In FIG. 8, the gate stack 86 comprises a thin conductive base layer 88 upon which is formed a thin central dielectric layer 90, such as an oxide or a nitride, and another central conductive layer 92. The sandwiched dielectric layer 90 serves as a differential etch stop. In this manner, by selecting an appropriate first differential etchant, it is possible to stop the top layer (92) etch at the dielectric layer interface, and then to change to a second different etchant to remove the dielectric layer without thinning of the thin conductive base layer 88. As in the FIG. 7 embodiment, after the n- junction has been implanted, the insulating sidewall spacers 94 will have been added and the n+ junctions will have been implanted. If the sandwiched dielectric layer 90 is too thick, and the gate voltage would drop across it to an unacceptable level, the sidewall spacers 94 may be formed of a conductive material so that the gate voltage applied to the top conductive layer 92 of the gate will be bridged to the outboard thin conductive base layer 88.

Another fabrication option for the formation of the central trunk portion of FIG. 7 device is the lift-off method illustrated in FIGS. 9a and 9b. In this method, the substrate 50 supports the thin oxide layer 58 and a thin conductive layer 96. A negatively patterned photoresist layer 98 is deposited upon the conductive layer, leaving a notch 100. Then, a layer of metal is uniformly deposited to the desired thickness. The wafer is then treated with an appropriate solution to remove the photoresist and simultaneously lift off the metal deposited upon its surface, leaving the central trunk 82. This double step is shown in FIG. 9b. Subsequent processing follows the same steps illustrated in FIGS. 5c through 5f.

In order to reduce the series resistance of the transistor it is well known to silicide the gate, source and drain by the SALICIDING (self aligned siliciding) technique. My proposed LDD structure is compatible with SALICIDING. This may be accomplished, as illustrated in FIG. 10, by adding a second insulating spacer 102, such as SiO.sub.2 and then depositing a thin layer of titanium. After a suitable thermal anneal at about 600.degree. C., a highly conductive layer of titanium silicide 104 is formed over the silicon gate, source and drain. A titanium nitride (annealing usually takes place in a nitrogen ambient atmosphere) layer is formed upon the insulating spacers. A suitable solution is used to strip the TiN. In fact, siliciding the gate is actually not necessary, if the central conductive layer is a refractory metal or a silicide material. By using a separate SiO.sub.2 spacer for siliciding source and drain, the silicided source-drain can be offset from the n+/n- interface. This would be very beneficial in easing the current crowding and relieving the high electric field (which would otherwise exists at the n+/n- interface in conventional SALICIDING), thus easing the aggravated hot-electron effects and elastrostatic discharge (ESD) damage observed when conventional SALICIDING is used with a single SiO.sub.2 spacer.

For those who are interested in a more complete review of the experimental results of my invention, the following published papers are hereby incorporated by reference: "A Novel Submicron LDD Transistor With Inverse-T Gate Structure" Huang et al, published in the Proceedings of the International Electron Devices Meeting, Los Angeles, CA, December 7-10, 1986; "A New LDD Transistor With Inverse-T Gate Structure" Huang et al, published in IEEE Electron Device Letters, Vol. EDL-8, No. 4, April 1987; and "Eliminating Spacer-Induced Degradations in LDD Transistors" Huang et al, published in the 3rd International Symposium on VLSI Technology, Systems and Applications, May 1987.

It should be understood that the present disclosure has been made only by way of examples and that numerous other changes in details of construction and the combination and arrangement of elements, as well as other fabrication steps and their sequence of implementation, may be resorted to, without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as hereinafter claimed.

Claims

What is claimed is:

1. An LDD transistor comprising a semiconductor substrate bearing thereon a gate insulating layer and a gate, characterized in that said gate includes a central portion and a pair of outboard portions straddling said central portion, each of said central and outboard portions having laterally spaced alignment edges, first doped source and drain regions in said substrate have their facing ends in alignment with said aligment edges of said central portion, second doped source and drain regions in said substrate having their facing ends in alignment with said alignment edges of said outboard portions, said first doped source and drain regions being more lightly doped than said second doped source and drain regions, and said central portion and said outboard portions each include a conductive region, contiguous with said gate insulating layer, whereby said conductive regions extend from one of said outboard portion alignment edges to the other of said outboard portion alignment edges.

2. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 1 characterized in that said gate comprises an inverse-T shape wherein the distance between said alignment edges of said central portion defines the channel length of said transistor and the distance between said alignment edges of said central and outboard portions defines the length of said lightly doped source and drain regions.

3. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 2 characterized in that said central portion has a thickness dimension, normal to said lateral dimension, which is large enough to prevent the implantation of dopant therethrough into said substrate and said outboard portions include a first section having a thickness dimension which is less than said thickness dimension of said central portion such that dopant may be implanted into said substrate therethrough so that said lightly doped source and drain regions underlie said outboard portions.

4. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 3 characterized in that said outboard portions include a second section overlying said first section and the cumulative thickness of said first and second sections is such as to prevent the implantation of dopant therethrough into said substrate.

5. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 4 characterized in that said central portion and said first section of said outboard portions are conductive and said second section of said outboard portions is insulating.

6. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 4 characterized in that said central portion and said first and second sections of said outboard portions are conductive.

7. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 4 characterized in that said central portion and said second section of said outboard portions are insulating and said first section of said outboard portions is conductive.

8. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 5 characterized in that said central portion and said first section of said outboard portions comprise different conductive materials.

9. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 6 characterized in that said central portion and said first section of said outboard portions comprise different conductive materials.

10. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 4 characterized in that said central portion comprises a stack of layers having different etch characteristics, whereby etching thereof may be accurately controlled.

11. The LDD transistor as defined in claim 10 characterized in that said stack of materials includes an insulating layer sandwiched between conductive layers, and said second section of said outboard portions is conductive.

Patent Citations (22)

Patent	Date	Inventor
US4258465	1981-03-01	Yasui et al.
US4347654	1982-09-01	Allen et al.
US4366613	1983-01-01	Ogura et al.
US4402761	1983-09-01	Feist
US4419809	1983-12-01	Riseman et al.
US4419810	1983-12-01	Riseman
US4488351	1984-12-01	Momose
US4503601	1985-03-01	Chiao
US4532004	1985-07-01	Akiyama et al.
US4536944	1985-08-01	Bracco et al.
US4566175	1986-01-01	Smayling et al.
US4590663	1986-05-01	Haken
US4597824	1986-07-01	Shinada et al.
US4597827	1986-07-01	Nishitani et al.
US4599118	1986-07-01	Han et al.
US4600445	1986-07-01	Horr et al.
US4769686	1988-09-01	Horinchi et al.
US4818715	1989-04-01	Chao
US4837180	1989-06-01	Chao
EPX173953	1986-03-01
JPX62-46570	1987-02-01
GBX2036431	1980-06-01

Non-Patent Literature (12)

Tsang, "Process for Fet With Short Channel Defined by Shallow Extensions of Drain and Source Diffusions", IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, vol. 25, No. 1, Jun. 1982.
Huang et al., "A Novel Submicron LDD Transistor With Inverse-T Gate Structure", Proceedings of the International Election Devices Meeting, Dec. 7-10, 1986.
Huang et al., "A New LDD Transistor With Inverse-T Gate Structure", IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. EDL-8, No. 4., Apr. 1987.
Huang et al., "Eliminating Spacer-induced Degradations in LDD Transistors", 3rd International Symposium on VLSI Technology Systems and Application, May 1987.
Takeda, E., Kume, H., Nakagome, Y., Makino, T., Shimizu, A., and Asai, S., "An As-P.sub.(n+-n-) Double Diffused Drain Mosfet for VLSI's," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-30, No. 6, pp. 652-657, Jun. 1983.
Lee, J., Mayaram, K., and Hu, C., "A Theoretical Study of Gate/Drain Offset in LDD Mosfet's," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. EDL-7, No. 3, pp. 152-154, Mar. 1986.
Takeda, E., Kume, H., Toyable, T., and Asai, S., "Submicrometer MOSFET Structure for Minimizing Hot-Carrier Generation," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-29, No. 4, pp. 611-618, Apr. 1982.
Hsu, F.-C., and Grinolds, H. R., "Structure-Enhanced MOSFET Degradation Due to Hot-Electron Injection," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. EDL-5, No. 3, pp. 71-74, Mar. 1984.
Hui, J., and Moll, J., "Submicrometer Device Design for Hot-Electron Reliability and Performance," IEEE Electron Device Letters, vol. EDL-6, No. 7, pp. 350-352, Jul. 1985.
Tsang, P. J., Ogura, S., Walker, W. W., Shepard, J. F., and Critchlow, D. L., "Fabrication of High-Performance LDDFET's with Oxide Sidewall-Spacer Technology," IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices, vol. ED-29, No. 4, pp. 590-596, Apr. 1982.
Momose, H., Saitoh, M., Shibata, H., Maeda, T., Sasaki, H., Satoh, K. and Ohtani, T., "Performance of CMOS Circuits with LDD-Type NMOSFET's for High Density Static RAMS's," IEDM, Toshiba Corporation, Japan, pp. 304-307, 1984.
Miyamoto, J., Saitoh, S., Momose, H., Shibata, H., Kanzaki, K. and Kohyama, S., "A 1.0um N--Well CMOS/Bipolar Technology for VLSI Circuits," IEDM Toshiba Corporation, Japan, pp. 63-66, 1983.

Abstract

Description