Field of the Invention
This invention relates to signal to noise ratio enhancement for electromagnetic signal receivers of pulsed signals and, more particularly but not limited, to apparatus and techniques for eliminating electronic phase noise within receivers of pulsed RF systems. The invention also relates to a pulse delay circuit useful in a noise suppressor of a radar system and in a RF pulse storing device of an electronic decoy system.
Background
Electromagnetic energy receivers are known devices that detect RF energy, including RF energy in the microwave frequency spectrum. In one application such receivers are incorporated within conventional radar systems to receive and detect reflected radar signals. A predominant class of radar transmitters generates and emits electronic pulses; that is, RF pulses having a predetermined duration or width and other measurable electrical characteristics. In operation of the radar those RF pulses are propagated into space by the transmitting antenna. Typically these pulses are generated at a preset pulse repetition frequency, or, simply PRF. Should the emitted pulse be incident upon an electromagnetic energy reflecting object within the space, such as the metal surface of an aircraft moving through the space, a portion of the incident pulse is reflected back to and is received by the radar system's receiving antenna. The antenna couples the received RF pulse to the receiver, which processes the pulse and, in conjunction with the radar system's display apparatus, displays information from which intelligence concerning the movement and position of that object is communicated to persons operating the detection system.
"Noise" exists in all such electronic systems. The noise, more appropriately electronic noise, is a limiting factor in the electronic systems ability to detect and process received RF signals. If the energy level of the electronic noise in the system gets higher and higher with respect to the energy level of the received RF pulses, a point is reached at which it is no longer possible to recover the received RF pulse from the noise. The detection sensitivity of RF receiver is thus determined by the noise within the receiver. It is the suppression of a dominant portion of that kind of noise which the present invention addresses.
A typical radar receiver includes a "front end" that receives incoming RF signals picked up at the antenna and couples them to an RF mixer. The RF mixer combines the RF input signal with another signal supplied by a local oscillator within the receiver to generate an intermediate frequency or "IF" signal. The IF signal is processed; that is, amplified, filtered, and like conventional treatment. Following a stage of video detection the signal is again processed to finally be applied to the display apparatus, whether of an audio or visual type.
Radar systems may be either noncoherent or coherent. The latter kind can offer better signal to noise ratio and, hence, is often preferred, despite the increased complexity and cost of the circuitry. It is well known to those familiar with the art that in a coherent system, integration or summing of N pulses gives an N-fold improvement in the signal-to-noise, S/N, ratio, whereas in non-coherent system only an improvement of .sqroot.N can be obtained.
The radar receiver's IF signal contains basically two internal noise components; the semi-conductor noise; that is, the "shot" noise from the RF mixer and/or the field effect transistor, typically used in modern front ends; and, secondly, the noise produced by the receiver's local oscillator. The noise signals are internal to the system. Of the two types, the noise contributed by the local oscillator is invariably dominant.
Until recently the receiving system sensitivity was limited by so called "radar clutter" which is the various RF signals reflected from objects within the radar's field of view that are not of interest, such as ground clutter (reflections from vegetation, buildings, etc.) for an air-to-air radar, while the interest is reversed for a terrain following radar. The use of more selectives highly directional transmitting and/or receiving antennas, with lower side lobes, and the use of more sophisticated signal processing techniques, such as the use of improved signal processing algorithms in digital equipment associated with present day radar receivers, eliminates much of the clutter. The signal to clutter ratio can thus be pushed below the receivers signal to noise ratio in a number of modern radar systems. Hence, the sensitivity of the receiver is then limited by the level of electronic noise.
Noise suppression in RF receivers improves the receiving systems ability to detect and process reflected RF energy. Moreover noise suppression at the receiver is useful even if the existing noise level specifications are retained. Thus, for example, the transmitter noise specification can be significantly relaxed if noise suppression at the receiving end of the system suppresses the transmitted electronic noise. With a lesser noise specification for the transmitter, favorable design changes may be made to the transmitter portion of the system that incorporates additional or different features or technologies that otherwise could not presently be employed because they produce too much noise. For example, an injection or phase locked IMPATT transmitter, a relatively high powered RF device for its size, can be replaced with a free running IMPATT transmitter, which is a rather "noisy" device. This results in a lower cost transmitter having greater performance features in respects other than noise, particularly those having improved frequency agility characteristics.
A principle object of the invention is to eliminate phase noise in received RF pulsed signals. An ancillary object of the invention is to reduce the phase noise limitations of transmitters by suppressing any phase noise introduced into the transmitting signal at the receiver so as to provide a more versatile and/or economic transmitter in a transmitter receiver system combination, such as used in a radar system.
In attaining the foregoing objects, applicant's have discovered a novel pulse delay circuit. In that circuit means are provided to generate copies of the RF pulsed signal to form a train of contiguous pulses, thereby effectively retaining a copy of the RF input pulse over a prescribed time interval. The pulse delay circuit has application as an element of the principal invention and in other applications as well, including, but not limited to, electronic decoys in Electronic Warfare applications. Accordingly it is an ancillary object of the invention to provide an pulse delay circuit of novel and inexpensive structure. A still further object is to provide a pulse delay circuit that permits manufacture of low cost electronic decoys.
Summary
In accordance with the invention means are provided in RF transmitting and receiving apparatus to store a copy of the RF signal pulse transmitted by the system transmitter including the signal's phase noise. The signal copy is then mixed in a high frequency electronic RF mixer with a small fraction of the transmitted original RF signal, which is a signal reflected by an object back to the receiver's antenna after the lapse of an interval of time. It is found that the RF mixer produces an intermediate frequency signal output that is free of the phase noise carried by the transmitted signal. In a more specific aspect to the invention the copy of the signal is stored in a delay and recirculating type storage system. Suitably the signal copy is retained for the appropriate duration under control of circuits associated with the receiver, which circuits automatically specify time intervals, such as the range gating circuits used in conventional radar systems. In a related invention the RF pulse storage system is employed in a receiver to reduce electronic noise passed through the receiver. Input pulses are effectively "increased" in width allowing for use of a more narrow bandpass filter than otherwise, the effect of which is to reduce broadband noise.
The foregoing and additional objects and advantages of the invention together with the structure characteristic thereof, which was only briefly summarized in the foregoing passages, becomes more apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading the detailed description of a preferred embodiment, which follows in this specification, taken together with the illustration thereof presented in the accompanying drawings.
Description of the Drawings
In the drawings:
FIG. 1 presents in block diagram form an improved coherent pulsed transmitter-receiver radar system containing the invention;
FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a standard RF mixer circuit which is used to define the variables used in the equations presented in this specification; FIGS. 2a, 2b and 2c illustrate input signal wave forms and the notation convention used to describe representative signal parameters;
FIG. 3 illustrates the Pulsed Signal Delay Line circuit in schematic diagram form;
FIGS. 3a and 3b illustrate the waveform envelopes as a function of time in two positions in the circuit of FIG. 3;
FIGS. 3c and 3d illustrate the waveforms corresponding to those of FIGS. 3a and 3b when finite pulse rise and fall times are taken into account;
FIG. 4 illustrates a additional embodiment of a Pulse Delay Line System using the circuit of FIG. 2 as one element;
FIGS. 5a and 5b illustrate the signal evolution as a function of time at different positions in the circuit of FIG. 4;
FIG. 6 is a Pulse Delay Line System of the kind illustrated in FIG. 4 but which incorporates "slow" switches;
FIG. 7 illustrates the signal evolution at different positions in the Pulse Delay Line System described by FIG. 6;
FIG. 8 is an accessory circuit that electronically fills in the "gaps" in the output pulse train occurring in operation of the circuit described in FIG. 6;
FIG. 9 shows the signal evolution at different positions in the embodiment of FIG. 8;
FIG. 10 illustrates a practical embodiment of a novel RF delay line system using fiber optic components, that is incorporated in the embodiments containing delay lines; and
FIG. 11 shows the narrowing of pulses passing repeatedly through a switch or similar switches with a finite rise and fall time.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Embodiment
A typical pulsed coherent radar that incorporates the invention is represented in block diagram form in FIG. 1 to which reference is made. The blocks of the diagram graphically represent known electronic elements. Although those elements are complex in nature, the details of their construction are known to those skilled in the art and are not necessary to an understanding of the invention. Except for the block identified as the Pulse Delay System (PDS), therefore, the details of construction of the blocks are not further described. The less skilled reader may, however, wish to consult the technical literature for further details.
An antenna 1 is "duplexed" and serves as both the transmitting and receiving antenna on a "time shared" basis. The antenna is coupled to duplexer 3, a known device which passes transmitted RF to the antenna and the latter propagates the applied high power RF energy into space. In the presence of that transmitted high power RF, the duplexer blocks RF energy from passing to the RF receiver, a portion of which contains the Low Noise Amplifier, "LNA", 5. This action effectively shuts off the input to the radar's receiving section for the duration of the transmitted pulse to protect the receiving components from damage. Considering first the elements of the transmitting section, a crystal oscillator 7 provides a highly stable low frequency reference. Typically this type of oscillator may be installed in a constant temperature environment or "oven" to ensure high stability.
The crystal oscillator signal is coupled to the Master Oscillator 9. In turn the master oscillator generates the signals of the frequencies the system requires by conventional frequency synthesis techniques, such as frequency multiplication, phase locked loops, mixing and the like. The Master Oscillator's continuous wave (CW) output signals, in this case one at the transmit frequency, F.sub.o, and another at the intermediate frequency, F.sub.if, are phase locked to the crystal oscillator signal. A sample of the transmitter output signal, which is a pulsed signal with carrier frequency F.sub.o, is taken and input to the Up-converter 13 together with the other Master Oscillator signal with frequency F.sub.if. This results in a pulsed output signal from the Up-converter having a carrier frequency F.sub.o +F.sub.if, that is the sum of the two input frequencies. This signal is input to the pulse delay system 17, a novel circuit that is more fully described elsewhere in this specification. The pulse delay system provides "clones" of the upconverted RF signal and supplies that reproduction to the input of RF mixer 19 for a required interval of time determined by the host system.
System Controller 2 provides the control among the transmitting, receiving, and display circuits. At an appropriate time and during each cycle of operation the controller commands the transmit function by supplying a start signal to modulator 15. The latter generates the modulating pulse of appropriate duration which is applied to transmitter 11. These pulses turn the latter on and off to define at the output of transmitter 11 a high power RF pulse of frequency F.sub.o. That high power pulse is coupled to the input of duplexer 3, the function of which was earlier described.
Transmitter 11 amplifies the low power RF signal supplied by the master oscillator to the power level required and supplies the RF energy to duplexer 3 which in turn completes a path through to the antenna from which the RF energy is propagated into space. In traveling through space the transmitted pulse may be incident upon a reflective object and reflected, as is more fully described hereafter. When the RF pulse ends, the duplexer is un-blocked and couples RF received at antenna 1 to low noise amplifier 5. This RF may be a pulse reflected from a remote object by way of example. Pulse delay system 17 receives the input pulse, representative of the transmitted pulse, as up converted by upconverter 13 and through a unique circuit operation, more fully hereinafter described, regenerates or effectively stores that RF pulse for a prescribed period of time, up to the transmitter's pulse repetition time, thereby maintaining a copy of the transmitted signal present and available throughout that interval at an input of mixer 19. Effectively the pulse delay system supplies a contiguous train of copies of the frequency upconverted transmitted pulse to the local oscillator input of the RF mixer. These copies contain the same essential phase noise that appears in the transmitted pulse and, hence, is also carried by the received pulse. There is coherency in phase, hence, this phase noise appearing in both signal inputs to the RF mixer is cancelled as shown by equations 1, 2 and 3.
The signal received by the Low Noise Amplifier, LNA, is generally shifted in frequency from the transmitted frequency by an amount of frequency, f.sub.d, the Dopplar shift, due to the relative movement between transmitter and reflecting object. The output of LNA 5 is applied to the RF port of the mixer 19, together with the output of PDS 17 that serves as a local oscillator signal to the mixer. The resultant mixed signal is then applied to the input of IF amplifier 21.
The elements 5, 19 and 21 form a superheterodyne receiving system. The mixer's output signal, the intermediate frequency (IF), is amplified, processed (filtered, etc.) and then applied to a video detection circuit which in FIG. 1 is considered to be part of the Signal Processor 23 and is not separately illustrated. In turn the signal processor supplies signals to the system controller and through that controller to display 25.
As those skilled in the art recognize the antenna may be scanning various areas of the environment, either mechanically or electronically. Those aspects, however, are not relevant to an understanding of the invention. Hence, the description is continued without further describing antenna movement and its control, recognizing that systems incorporating the invention may include such kinds of antenna control. Moreover, range gating, a system function familiar to those skilled in the art, is in the schematic of FIG. 1 assumed as a part of the signal processor 23.
FIG. 2 is a block diagram representation of a RF mixer circuit and the application to the mixer of the various RF pulses occurring in the operation of the circuit of FIG. 1, the notation of which is used in demonstrating the mathematical proof of the results discovered. As depicted in the figure, a received RF pulse V.sub.r (t), which may be Doppler shifted in frequency from the transmitted RF pulse, is applied to one input of mixer 19'. A copy of the transmitted RF pulse V.sub.l (t) is applied to the local oscillator input of RF mixer 19'. The copy was stored, that is delayed, for a time interval determined by the operation of the aforedescribed circuits. The output of mixer 19' is a series of pulsed IF signals which are passed through a low pass filter 39', the output of which is the base band signal V.sub.bb (t), that is usually called "the" IF output, which is applied to appropriate circuits. It is shown in the related set of equations 1, 2 and specifically equation 3 that the noise term is cancelled out in the IF signal if the local oscillator signal is given the same delay as the received signal V.sub.r (t) at the RF port of the mixer. In the convention adopted in the drawings for the mixer, the filters are not separately identified in the other figures. It is understood that such element is implicit in the function of the mixer in order to output the stated signal.
Each RF pulse consists of numerous cycles in the amplitude of the signal represented by the sinusoidal waveform of FIG. 2a occurring at the high frequency rate established at the transmitter. For convenience in connection with this description only the envelope of that sinusoidal waveform is illustrated, such as is represented in FIG. 2b. The envelope of the RF pulse presented in FIG. 2c illustrates the notational convention used in this description. The modulating pulse is described as G(t, .tau..sub.p, .tau..sub.r) in FIG. 2c, where .tau..sub.p represents the width or duration of the pulse and .tau..sub.r represents the pulse repetition time or simply PRF, the duration between the start of successive pulses.
The foregoing elements are shown in the context of the radar system apparatus illustrated in FIG. 1. In this the output of the low noise amplifier 5 and the output of pulse delay system 17 serve to output the pulse signals corresponding to V.sub.r (t) and V.sub.l (t), respectively and mixer 19 serves as the corresponding element to mixer 19' and low pass filter 39'.
The relationship is mathematically demonstrated. The transmitted signal is represented by equation 1:
where .tau..sub.p is the pulse width, .tau..sub.r is the pulse repetition time, .OMEGA..sub.0 is the carrier frequency, .epsilon.(t) is the amplitude noise term the absolute value of which is much smaller than V.sub.0, and .phi.(t) is the phase noise term the absolute value of which is much less than one radian.
where .delta. is a system constant multiplied by the factor .sqroot.(.sigma./R.sup.4); .sigma. is the target cross section, R is the range, and .tau. is the delay time, which is equal to 2R/c, c representing the velocity of light.
With the mixer's conversion loss denoted by L.sub.c, the IF voltage may be mathematically characterized:
After the IF signal is filtered by the low pass filter associated with the RF mixer, which eliminates the high frequency components of the signal, the IF voltage, V.sub.if, yields V.sub.bb (t), the base band signal:
The elements in the expression .phi.(t) and .phi.(t-.tau.) represent the noise terms. If .phi.(t) equals .phi.(t-.tau.) the noise terms in equation 4 cancel. By delaying the generated pulse signal according to the invention the factor .phi.(t) becomes equal to .phi.(t-.tau.) and the phase noise is cancelled.
The delay system referenced as element 17 in FIG. 1 is constructed to the circuit arrangement presented in FIG. 3, by way of example, to which reference is made. As illustrated in the block diagram in FIG. 3 from the coupling port of directional coupler C.sub.1, a pulse signal is supplied to the input of an RF amplifier A.sub.1, and the amplified output is connected to the input port of a directional coupler C.sub.2, the coupling output port of which is connected to a delay line. The coupler, delay line, switch and attenuator form part of a feedback loop for amplifier A.sub.1. Directional coupler C.sub.1 completes the signal loop back to the input of amplifier A.sub.1 through its coupling port. The output of the directional coupler C.sub.2 is applied to a limiting amplifier A.sub.2. The signal evolution with time at each of position 1 and the output is shown in FIGS. 3a and 3b, using the notational convention previously given by FIG. 2b.
As those skilled in the art appreciate, the described elements in this delay circuit are of conventional structure, except for the novel delay line described elsewhere in this specification. The circuit elements receive electrical operating current from conventional power supply circuits, not illustrated. The limiting amplifier A.sub.2 and the like amplifiers used in the embodiments subsequently presented serve a signal conditioning function. Thus RF pulses of different voltage levels input to the amplifier are all output from those amplifiers as signals of equal levels as graphically illustrated by comparing FIG. 3a and FIG. 3b. The loop gain of the feedback circuit for amplifier A.sub.1 is less than unity. That insures that the amplifier circuit is electronically stable and does not lapse into oscillation. A loop gain of minus 1 db usually provides adequate stability in the system.
When an RF pulse of a given pulse width, .tau..sub.p, is applied at input port of directional coupler C.sub.1 and switch S is closed, which is the condition illustrated in FIG. 3, the output of amplifier A.sub.1, marked pos. 1 in the figure, is a defined train of contiguous pulses of decreasing amplitude levels, such as illustrated in FIG. 3a, if the round trip delay time of a RF pulse through amplifier, feedback loop and back to the amplifier equals the RF signal pulse width. The amplitude decay of the successive pulses is a consequence of the stability conditions imposed in the circuit in which the closed loop gain is less than one. The number of pulses in the train is purposely limited in accordance with a specific aspect of the invention. If the pulse loops around too many times, the pulse amplitude of the pulses that appear later in time are too low and although the signal to noise ratio in the circuit is still excellent, the signal conditioning (amplitude leveling) function of limiting amplifier A.sub.2 cannot be maintained. When the input voltage falls below the range at which limiting action occurs, a practical consideration for the limiting amplifier, the circuit cannot function properly.
As earlier described the illustration in FIG. 2b is the envelope of the RF waveform shown in FIG. 2a. The RF signal carries within itself any phase noise appearing in the original transmitted RF pulse.
In practice amplifiers with 30 to 40 db gain and a 5 db maximum noise figure are fairly standard and serve as a suitable choice for amplifier A.sub.1. In a preferred specific embodiment the number of pulse "round trips" about this feedback loop is limited in number, specifically by way of example, to ten. Hence, the signal that exits the circuit at output of C.sub.2 is a replication of the input pulse with time separation determined by the delay time and with decreasing amplitude such as was illustrated in FIG. 3a. In the cases discussed the separation is zero. As a result the output of limiting amplifier A.sub.2 is the contiguous train of pulses of uniform level as presented in FIG. 3b.
The foregoing description of operation for convenience assumed an infinitely short pulse rise and fall time. In practice the rise and fall times are finite. Thus the waveform envelopes appearing at position 1 and at the output in the circuit of FIG. 3 is more nearly represented in practice by the waveforms presented in FIGS. 3c and 3d in which the rise time is represented as t.sub.r and the fall time as t.sub.f. The relationship between the consecutive pulses is such that t1<t2<t3<t4< . . . < or equal to the duration t.sub.r +t.sub.f.
Switch S is controlled by the system controller in the radar system via control and power leads not illustrated. The switch is opened by that circuit after a preset period of less than the radar system's pulse repetition time. The switch is reclosed on the start of the next radar pulse.
The pulse delay system of FIG. 3 may be employed as one delay element or building block of a more extensive delay circuit in order to extend or "bootstrap" the delay times that can be made available. The embodiment illustrated schematically in FIG. 4 creates large delays for pulsed RF signals and, as shown, uses two of the delay circuits previously described. Theoretically in this modification a single input pulse can be made to circulate in the circuit almost indefinitely. Two Pulsed Signal Delay Lines (PSDL) of the kind earlier described in connection with FIG. 3, the first built around amplifier A.sub.1 and the second built around amplifier A.sub.3, bounce the RF pulse back and forth between the two delay line circuits, in what may be termed a "ping-pong" mode of operation.
The first or "upper" PSDL illustrated in FIG. 4 includes a first amplifier A.sub.1 and a delay feedback loop between the amplifier's output and input. The delay feedback loop includes the directional coupler C.sub.3, the delay line DL1, the electronic switch S.sub.1, attenuator R.sub.1 and directional coupler C.sub.2. The second or "lower" PSDL is of like circuit and contains amplifier A.sub.3, shown in the lower part of the figure, and a directional coupler C.sub.5, delay line DL2, switch S.sub.2, attenuator R.sub.2 and directional coupler C.sub.4. Each delay feedback loop has a gain less than one and a delay time equal to the width or duration of the input pulse as was the design in the embodiment of FIG. 3.
The inputs and respectively the outputs of the upper and lower PSDL's are coupled to each others input via power splitters PS1 and PS2 and switches S.sub.3 and S.sub.4. Splitters PS1 and PS2 are also connected to power combiner PC1. The output of the power combiner is coupled to the input of limiting amplifier A.sub.5 and that amplifier supplies the output signal of the PDS of FIG. 4.
The output of splitter PS1 is coupled in series with the Switch S.sub.3, which is normally open and interrupting the electrical circuit, to the input of amplifier A.sub.3 through the directional coupler C.sub.4. The output of amplifier A.sub.3 in this circuit is coupled into the feedback loop via the directional coupler C.sub.5 as in the prior embodiment and to the input of limiting amplifier A.sub.4. The output of the limiting amplifier A.sub.4 is coupled to the second signal splitter PS2 and the splitter in turn has one output connected to the second input to power combiner PC1 and the other output is connected with switch S.sub.4, which is normally open and interrupting the circuit or path, through a fifth directional coupler C.sub.1 to the input of amplifier A.sub.1.
As shown the output of combiner PC1 is connected to amplifier A.sub.5 and the output of the latter serves as the output of the circuit. Various positions in the circuit are labeled as pos.1, pos.2 pos. 3, pos. 4, and pos. 5 and are discussed hereinafter in connection with the operation of the embodiment and the FIGS. 5a and 5b depicting waveforms at those locations.
In the following description of basic operation of the circuit of FIG. 4 it is assumed that the pulse rise and fall time and the switches' rise and fall time can be ignored. That is, the rise and fall times of the transmitted pulses and the transition time of the switches are very much smaller than the pulse width, .tau..sub.p. However, these rise and fall times are finite for greater preciseness and are taken into account later in this description. The operation is described in conjunction with FIG. 5a, which shows the evolution of the RF pulse train with time with a minimum of three recirculations for each PSDL and references the waveforms illustrated to the various positions within the circuit of FIG. 4 at which the waveforms appear.
A single RF pulse is applied to the input of the PDS of FIG. 4 is coupled to the upper PSDL and circulates in that system for the requisite number of cycles, N where N is any whole number selected by the designer between 3 and 10 in the example given. The pulse may represent the frequency upconverted RF pulse as in the system of FIG. 1 or may represent pulses in connection with the applications described later in this description. Preferably the number of pulse circulations is set dynamically by the system controller. An example in which N is equal to three is depicted in the signal evolution diagram of FIG. 5a and a further example in which N equals five is depicted in the signal evolution diagram of FIG. 5b. The maximum number recommended is 10 for reasons previously given.
After the pulse signal has circulated the requisite N times in the upper PSDL, switch S.sub.1 is operated and opens to break the pulse circulation circuit in the upper PSDL at the end of the Nth pulse, halting that circulation, and, concurrently switch S.sub.3 is operated and closes at the start of the Nth pulse to couple, "ping", the last pulse of the upper PSDL to the input of the lower PSDL, where switch S.sub.2 also closes at the start of the Nth pulse. The pulse circulates in the lower PSDL the requisite N times after which switch S.sub.2 is energized and opens to break the pulse circulation in the lower PSDL, halting the feedback action, and, switch S.sub.4 is energized and closes to couple or hand off the last pulse back, the "pong" in the "ping-pong" pulse handling operation, to the input of the upper PSDL. Thereafter the entire process repeats under control of the system controller.
The total number of times the pulse circulates, the effective duration in which the original pulse is effectively stored, depends upon the ratio of pulse repetition time to pulse width of the host system containing the PDS. The system must terminate the circulation of pulses before the host system is to generate the next pulse for propagation, which in the context of the given radar system, is the generation and transmission of the next outbound RF pulse.
At or prior to that time a condition is reached in which switch S.sub.1 opens while switch S.sub.3 does not close preventing the "hand off" of the pulse by the upper PSDL to the lower PSDL or, alternatively, switch S.sub.2 opens and switch S.sub.4 does not close in the lower PSDL to prevent the pulse from being "handed over" by the lower PSDL to the upper PSDL. The PDS then awaits receipt of another pulse at the input to reinitiate operation.
The signal evolution is described by FIG. 5a, where N is equal to 3, and, alternatively, is described by FIG. 5b, where N is equal to 5. These figures present in somewhat greater detail graphically the signal at each of the positions in FIG. 4 labeled positions 1 through 5. Considering FIG. 5a the signal at pos. 1, which is the output of amplifier A.sub.1 in the upper PSDL, and the signal at pos. 3, which is the output of amplifier A.sub.3 in the lower PSDL, are each a train of pulses of decreasing amplitude. These pulses are the input to the corresponding limiting amplifiers A.sub.2 and A.sub.4 to provide the associated train of constant level pulses at pos. 2 and pos. 4, respectively, in FIG. 5a. These signals are combined at pos. 5 at the output of the power combiner to give the contiguous pulse signals of alternating levels which are the input to limiting amplifier A.sub.5 in FIG. 4. Finally a constant amplitude train of contiguous pulses appears at the output of limiting amplifier A.sub.5.
In applications with short pulse trains, the limiting amplifiers A.sub.2 and A.sub.4 may in principle be omitted. However, inasmuch as the power splitters have at best only very limited isolation for signals traveling in the reverse direction, which may create unacceptable feedback levels of the signals of one PSDL into the other, the elimination of the amplifiers is not desired. The two limiting amplifiers, A.sub.2 and A.sub.4, desirably enhance this reverse isolation.
FIGS. 5a and 5b also prescribe the timing and operation of the switches. Switches S.sub.1, S.sub.2, S.sub.3 and S.sub.4 are represented by a "1" in the closed circuit condition and by a "0" in the open circuit condition. FIG. 5b shows the RF pulses in the same positions within the circuit and switch conditions for the switches, as appeared in FIG. 5a, except the pulse trains in the PSDL's consist of five pulses; N is equal to five. Control means not illustrated in detail provides the energy to operate the switches at the appropriate time described in the timing diagrams. The timing diagrams indeed define the schedule to be supplied by the control means in the particular embodiments illustrated. As those skilled in the art appreciate, the timing schedule is sufficient definition of that control element.
If the foregoing pulse delay circuit of FIG. 4 is used in the radar system, such as the radar system of FIG. 1 the circuit provides a properly delayed pulse that is used as a local oscillator signal for each of the contiguous range gates that the radar system requires to cover its operating range.
The switches used in all the embodiments of the applicable figures are electronic switches; more specifically they are either PIN switches or FET switches. With either kind of switch the state of the switch, that is whether it is open or closed is controlled by a pulsed bias signal. This has some bearing in any practical embodiment. The bias signal and the RF signal have a large, but finite, isolation from each other. This can also be stated by saying that there is a large but finite transimpedance between the bias port and the RF port of the switch and the transimpedance is mainly capacitive. As the PIN switch has been known for a much longer time than the FET switch, a certain terminology has come into being that was coined by PIN switch designers. The term refers to one consequence of the finite transimpedance, namely "DC feed thru". This terminology is, perhaps, a misnomer; it describes the fact that rise times of bias pulses for fast switches are so high that the content of the higher harmonic signals associated with that fast rise time are not negligible in the frequency spectrum of interest around the RF signal. Those harmonic signals, sometimes referred to as "video feedthrough", would detract from the operation of the invention if they are of a noticeable level. However, what is noticeable in one system may not be noticed in another as those skilled in the art appreciate.
The present invention deals with electronic noise. That noise is typically many orders of magnitude below the signal level. Hence, it does not take very much additional signal to markedly change the signal to noise ratio. Unfortunately it is not practical and is often insufficient for the switch designer to simply increase the rise time of the bias pulse in order to increase the switching device's switching speed. Device changes in the FET's or PIN diodes structure must be incorporated as well. Those device changes further reduce the transimpedance of the device, thereby compounding any "DC feed thru" problem as the switching speeds are increased.
For a Pulse Delay Line System in a system with narrow pulse widths, that is pulse widths less than about one microsecond, one needs to modify the circuits, such as the circuit of FIG. 4, to accommodate "slow" switches to suppress DC feed thru. A circuit implementing slow switches is shown in FIG. 6 in which like elements to that of FIG. 4 are given the same number primed. As schematically illustrated in FIG. 6 the circuit is essentially identical symbolically to that of FIG. 4, except that each of the links between the outputs of the delay circuit and the inputs of the other of the associated pair of delay circuits contains a delay line in series therewith with a delay time equal to the RF pulse width. Specifically delay line DL3 is connected between one output of splitter PS1' and the switch S.sub.3 ' and a delay line DL4 is connected between the output of splitter PS2' and switch S.sub.4 '.
This embodiment allows switches with rise and fall times of a duration up to the RF pulse width itself. This is accomplished by using a delay of twice the RF pulse width, namely 2.tau..sub.p, in delay lines DL1' and DL2'. The PSDL's now produce a train of pulses in which the pulses are separated by .tau..sub.p, thus allowing the switches to start opening/closing as appropriate in the aforedescribed operation and thereafter reach the fully open/closed state, respectively, well before and well after the pulse actually reaches the witch. During the passage of the pulse through the switch, the switch is fully open, hence there is minimum loss, but more importantly minimal distortion (pulse narrowing (FIG. 11), etc.).
The signal evolution in the circuit of FIG. 6 is described by FIG. 7 in the same manner as was previously done in FIGS. 5a and 5b. FIG. 7 represents the highest "ping-pong" frequency which, given the above limitations, should be avoided. The lower the ping-pong frequency the less switching per second and thus less of the minimal noise contribution that even a slow switch, at least in principle, contributes. It is also clear from the timing sequences of the switches, that it is necessary to have at least a "dead" time of 3.tau..sub.p in duration between the pulse trains of each individual PSDL. Again reference is made to FIG. 7. The figure illustrates the signals at circuit locations Pos. 1 through Pos. 5 in FIG. 6; Pos. 5 shows there are gaps between the output pulses.
Applying this output signal to an accessory circuit as depicted in FIG. 8 fills the gaps of the signal so to speak. The accessory circuit includes a splitter PS5 having two outputs, one of which is coupled through a delay line DL5, with delay equal to the RF pulse width, to one input of a power combiner PC5 and the other of which is connected through to the power combiners second input. The output of combiner PC.sub.5 is connected to the input of limiting amplifier LA5, which forms the output of the circuit. By coupling position 5 of the circuit of FIG. 6 to the input of splitter PS5 in this accessory circuit the output at amplifier LA5 is essentially continuous. The signal evolution diagram is presented in FIG. 9 and shows the signal variation with time at each of positions 1, 2 and 3 and the output in the accessory circuit of FIG. 8 when connected as described to the circuit of FIG. 6. The output is shown to be again a series of contiguous pulses.
In the pulse delay circuits presented in FIGS. 3, 4 and 6 the elements serve to store or, more appropriately, circulate the RF pulse supplied to the input of the circuit and continue to do so until the described switches terminate the process. Thus the "clone" signal or copy is present at the circuit's output over an extended interval. In the system of FIG. 1, the output of pulse delay system 17 supplies this RF output continuously and that RF output is present when the reflected pulse arrives through LNA 5 to the second input of the RF mixer. In this sense the delay circuit delays the input RF pulse; or is viewed as holding the input RF pulse available for the desired interval. In the figures the delay line was represented by a loop symbol. Although various delay lines may be employed in the embodiments, a delay line of novel structure makes the invention a practical embodiment of small size and wide RF bandwidth.
The practical implementation of the delay line used in the circuit of FIGS. 3, 4, 6 and 8 is represented in FIG. 10. A modulated diode laser 71 has an input, to which in this arrangement an RF pulse is supplied, such as the pulse input from the coupler C.sub.2 in FIG. 3. The RF pulse amplitude modulates the diode laser. The laser's modulated light output is coupled to the input end of a fiber optic cable 73; that cable has an output end that couples the light output to photodetector 75. The electrical output of the photodetector in turn is amplified by amplifier 77, which outputs an RF pulse. This outputted pulse is then connected in circuit with switch S in FIG. 3.
Diode laser transmitters are commercially available that are capable of modulation up to a frequency of 10 Ghz, such as that provided by the Ortel Company of Alhambra, Calif. The signal transfer loss of the system, including a two decibel maximum signal loss per kilometer due to a multimode fiber optic cable (much less for single mode cable), is less than 36 decibels, which is for a large part due to RF mismatch loss. Theoretically this number can be reduced to 15 dB (including 2 dB cable loss) with proper RF matching circuits. This signal loss is easily compensated for by the amplification provided by a low noise RF amplifier, such as is provided in FIG. 4 by A.sub.1 in FIG. 3. The amplitude noise level, often called AM noise, of the laser transmitter is typically minus 140 dBc (dB below carrier) and thus contributes negligibly to the signal noise. Phase noise of the light carrier is not detected by the photo detector and therefore does not need to be considered. Companies have reported diode lasers, which can be modulated up to 26 Ghz.
Although fiber optic systems of the described configuration have been used for communication purposes in which there is propagation transmission time, it is not believed that such an arrangement has been employed in a system in which the purpose or function of the arrangement is to create a delay for a RF or microwave signal. Accordingly the specific arrangement is a regarded as a novel RF/microwave delay line. For other systems requiring multiple pulse width capability, the fiber optic line can be tapped by inserting directional couplers terminated by photo detectors.
A practical embodiment of radar or decoy systems incorporating the pulse delay system must meet size and weight limitations imposed by the vehicle that is to carry it. One such vehicle is a missile, such as an air to air missile. Typical air to air missiles are generally cylindrical in shape and have approximately a six inch diameter. In a 50/125 multi mode fiber optic cable, the outer cable diameter is 125 micrometers. Hence, one layer of cable on a six inch diameter form provides a coil with 97 meters per inch of coil length. If the coil is made 10 layers deep, the coil thickness measures approximately 1.25 millimeters, approximately 5 hundredth of an inch and there is provided 970 meter cable/inch. This provides approximately 5 microseconds delay per inch of missile length. Pulse widths up to ten microseconds can easily be accommodated, such delay capabilities cover all airborne radar missiles. As far as is known no existing technology can offer the enormous RF bandwidth for comparable size and weight as the proposed fiber optic delay line and the foregoing demonstrates the practicality of use with such vehicles.
It should be noted that all RF and optical components used in the disclosed system, except for the fiber optic cable, can presently be built as a monolithic structure using existing technology. The size of the complete delay system; that is, microwave and optical integrated circuits and delay line is determined almost exclusively by the fiber optic cable coil.
FIG. 11 illustrates the narrowing in the width of the pulse as the pulse passes through a switch. With each transit through the switch, the pulse width reduces as indicated by the first through fourth passes.
Although the delay line system is described as an element of the noise suppressor system, it has independent use in other applications. Another example of a signal-to-noise improvement application of the described Pulse Delay System (PDS) is pulse broadening. It is known and may be shown that the optimum frequency bandpass for a pulsed signal is approximately equal to the inverse of the pulse width. The contiguous pulse trains, previously described, may be considered as a "stretching" of the input pulse in the time domain. As the pulse width is increased the required bandpass is decreased. Thus by stretching the RF pulse as described a more narrow band filter than before may be used, thereby blocking passage of more of the broad band electronic noise which reduces electronic noise in the system. Reducing the noise for a given signal strength enhances the signal to noise ratio. The contiguous RF pulse train the PDS generates means in effect that the output pulse is broadened with respect to the input pulse, even in the case that the pulse train is decaying, that is with no limiting amplifiers or signals below limiting threshold. The broadening of the signal in the time domain has as a consequence the narrowing of the signals' spectrum in the frequency domain. As the noise is broad band, the narrowing of the signals' frequency spectrum means better signal to noise ratio can be obtained by passing the signal through a narrower bandpass filter after pulse broadening. The signal-to-noise improvement is directly proportional to the bandwidth ratio of the optimum bandpass filter used for the input pulse to the bandwidth of the optimum bandpass filter for the output pulse. It is known that the optimum bandpass filter for RF pulses has a frequency bandwidth approximately equal to the inverse of the pulse width.
A slight reduction can be expected in the improvement ratio because at the boundaries of the contiguous pulse are the rise and fall time gaps, such as was earlier illustrated in FIG. 6 which means that there still is a higher frequency component in the output signal, the energy in which will be lost.
An advantage of this technique is that the S/N ratio for one received pulse can be improved. Standard techniques to improve S/N ratio's in pulsed systems are based on integration of a number of different pulses either by coherent or noncoherent integration (summing of sequentially received RF pulses. It is noted that these two techniques, pulse broadening and pulse integration, can be used concurrently.
Thus consider a receiver system that contains a front end for receiving RF pulses, a conversion system, such as the superhetrodyne type, for mixing that received RF in an RF mixer with another RF signal generated in a local oscillator or master oscillator to produce an intermediate frequency signal, an IF signal, that is sent through a bandpass filter and then amplified by IF amplifiers, passed through another bandpass filter and further processed by the conventional circuits to detect and display the received signal and/or information contained in the signal, such as where the RF is modulated and carries information in the modulation. The PDS described, such as the version illustrated in FIG. 3, may be placed in circuit following the derivation of the IF signal and perform the pulse stretching described on the IF frequency pulse. Such a circuit necessarily includes the control for the switch in the feedback circuit so as to interrupt the feedback circuit after a predetermined number of passages of the pulse through that circuit, for example ten pulses. The values of the bandpass filter succeeding that stage containing the PDS may be changed to make it more narrow so as to pass a more limited range of frequencies than possible in the conventional receiver system not containing the described Pulse Delay System.
The PDS may be connected alternatively to the RF stage, prior to the IF stage, in the described system as an alternative. However, as those skilled in the art appreciate, it is easier and far less complex to process or modify RF signals in the lower IF frequency range than at the higher RF frequencies in which transmissions are made, Moreover, although the aforedescribed receiver is described as having one IF stage, it may have two, three or more IF stages as is conventional and as an alternative arrangement, the Pulse Delay System may be connected to the output of any such IF stages to stretch the pulse at those points in the receiver instead.
Another fertile application terrain for Pulse Delay Systems is in Electronic Warfare (EW), which is divided in Electronic Counter Measures (ECM) and Electronic Counter Counter-Measures (ECCM). In these disciplines often a fine distinction is made between a "decoy" and a "deception" device. The first assists the attacker to confuse the defenses and the latter helps the defender to confuse the attacker. That distinction is not relevant to the invention; all such devices are referred to as decoys in the succeeding description.
In the following applications a delay of a single pulse is of import. As a consequence in the PDS the delay time of the delay lines can and will be longer than the longest pulse width that is expected to be applied.
One of the oldest decoys is the so called "Repeater Jammer". This decoy receives a pulsed RF signal, amplifies it and then retransmits it. In the process low level amplitude modulation can be applied to the signal. A decoy of this type can be very effective: the return pulse is relatively of such a high power level compared to a reflected signal that it activates the radar's automatic gain control circuit (AGC), a feature intended to prevent the receiver from being overloaded by a high power signal, and thereby depresses the low level reflected signal, the "echo", of the true target. If the AM modulation frequency is properly chosen, the decoy can cause very large angle tracking errors for conical scan radars.
A traditional problem always has been that as one cannot transmit and receive simultaneously with the transmitter and receiver being at the same location the received signal must be temporarily stored usually in a delay line. One practical technique of obtaining useful delay times is by using acoustic devices, such as SAW (Surface Acoustic Wave) devices, and, more recently, BAW (Bulk Acoustic Wave) devices. Although the performance of these acoustic devices in terms of bandwidth loss and frequency range have improved significantly to the present, that performance pales in comparison to bandwidth and frequency range of the RF/FO (Fiber Optic) delay line.
A simple repeater, in which the signal is not processed in any other way than that being amplified and re-transmitted, is likely to be a very effective decoy to protect important assets (ships, planes) against radar guided missiles, as for example the Exocet missile. Although the missile's radars will be made "smarter" in due time given new counter-counter measures, the present operation systems, which will be in use for many years to come, have a "simple" search radar which locks on the first largest target that it "sees". A calculation bears out that not much power is required by the repeater decoy to imitate a large target, one that has a large radar cross section, especially at close range. Therefore, at relatively little cost a ship can tow a tethered balloon or in the water a paravane, or have remotely piloted vehicles (RPV's) containing ne of these repeater type decoys and an infra red (IR) type decoy. Even if for some reason it is not possible to have a decoy in tow, one or more can be mounted on the ship in such a manner that the radar cross section centroid is put at an area of least possible damage, preventing the midship hits sustained by the naval vessel in the Falkland Islands war and more recently in the Persian Gulf.
There are of course excellent sophisticated "close-in" defense systems against missile attacks, the details of which are not relevant in this invention. All modern capital size naval ships have those sophisticated systems. It is financially and often even physically impossible and also undesirable from an operational viewpoint to equip every ship with such a sophisticated defense system. Decoys of the type described are a very attractive practical alternative. Given the cost of ships, a decoy as described given the perfection of techniques for fabricating integrated optic and microwave devices and resultant lower production costs is a very small fraction of the ships costs. Use of the present invention is even justified for ships that already have missile defenses with decoys since defenses can be overwhelmed.
One may expect that in a future conflict missiles will be launched in swarms and defense saturation must be of concern. Secondly, the system provides a large measure of protection against sneak attacks and even accidental launches from friendly forces. If the U.S. frigate Stark had such a decoy in tow, the error in judgement made by the commanding officer might not have had such disastrous consequences. It would also have prevented the first loss to an Exocet missile of a warship in the Falklands war, because on that occasion the sophisticated defense system closed down. The counter measure system was in the automatic mode and the computer queried it's "look up" table. Based on the table information, the computer decided that the radar that was "painting" the British ship was "friendly". In other words the designer's assumption was that war would be against Russia and not against France. The design criteria completely ignored other armed conflicts, the sale and/or capture of "friendly" systems by the enemy and copying of electronic systems; evidencing one kind of breakdown in the effectiveness of computerized war.
Decoys designed to be reeled out of the tail of an attack aircraft are being investigated. In all these applications, effectiveness, cost size, weight, simplicity of operation and wide frequency coverage are paramount. The proposed Pulse Delay System meets those requirements. It provides a simple and effective means to reproduce and retransmit the incoming radar pulses of the "seeking" radar so as to throw it off course or divert the attackers.
For convenience and to assist in understanding the construction and operation of the disclosed inventions, the delay times of the components, interconnections, amplifiers, etc. are ignored. In practice the delay times of the delay lines have to be reduced to account for other delays and the overall delay time should be as specified as those skilled in the art appreciate. Thus it is understood that when reference is made to the delay time of a circuit and the like such reference does not exclude, but necessarily includes the small delays introduced by these additional circuit elements.
Again for convenience in the prior embodiments all of the RF switches are shown without bias and control lines and as being of the reflective type. In practice it is usually preferable to use absorptive switches to prevent the possibility of resonances in the circuitry due to the high standing waves caused by the reflective switches. The invention is not limited to the details of any one kind of switch and other switches also useful in the various embodiments as developed may be substituted.
The principal invention achieves a reduction in phase noise and allows for greater flexibility in transmitter design. The method taught to accomplish the noise reduction is simple to understand and accomplish. The subsidiary invention provides an inexpensive pulse delay circuit having a wide range of application. One of those other applications is as an element of a low noise receiver as was described.
It is believed that the foregoing description of the preferred embodiment of the invention and the following claims which constitute a part of this description is sufficient in detail to enable one skilled in the art to make and use the invention. However, it is expressly understood that the details of the elements which are presented for the foregoing enabling purpose is not intended to limit the scope of the invention, in as much as equivalents to those elements and other modifications thereof, all of which come within the scope of the invention, become apparent to those skilled in the art upon reading this specification. Thus the invention is to be broadly construed within the full scope of the appended claims.