US 4,811,557 AGrant
Double Air-Fuel Ratio Sensor System Having Improved Exhaust Emission Characteristics
Issue Date:1989-03-14
•6 Claims
•20 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
In a double air-fuel sensor system including two air-fuel ratio sensors upstream and downstream of a catalyst converter provided in an exhaust gas passage, an air-fuel ratio correction amount is calculated in accordance with the outputs of the upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors, thereby obtaining an actual air-fuel ratio. The speed of renewal of the air-fuel ratio correction amount is higher when output of the downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state than when the output of the downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state.
Metadata
Assignee
- Toyota Jidosha Kabushiki Kaisha
Inventors
- Atsuo Okumura
- Takayuki Demura
Application Information
Application Number:US 1057073
Filing Date:1987-10-08
Priority Date:1986-10-13
Art Unit:342
Classifications
IPC:
F02D 4114
Field of Search:
12360364440;489;589274;276;285431.05
Patent Drawings (20 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
(1) Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a method and apparatus for feedback control of an air-fuel ratio in an internal combustion engine having two air-fuel ratio sensors upstream and downstream of a catalyst converter disposed within an exhaust gas passage.
(2) Description of the Related Art
Generally, in a feedback control of the air-fuel ratio sensor (O.sub.2 sensor) system, a base fuel amount TAUP is calculated in accordance with the detected intake air amount and detected engine speed, and the base fuel amount TAUP is corrected by an air-fuel ratio correction coefficient FAF which is calculated in accordance with the output of an air-fuel ratio sensor (for example, an O.sub.2 sensor) for detecting the concentration of a specific component such as the oxygen component in the exhaust gas. Thus, an actual fuel amount is controlled in accordance with the corrected fuel amount. The above-mentioned process is repeated so that the air-fuel ratio of the engine is brought close to a stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.
According to this feedback control, the center of the controlled air-fuel ratio can be within a very small range of air-fuel ratios around the stoichiometric ratio required for three-way reducing and oxidizing catalysts (catalyst converter) which can remove three pollutants CO, HC, and NO.sub.X simultaneously from the exhaust gas.
In the above-mentioned O.sub.2 sensor system where the O.sub.2 sensor is disposed at a location near the concentration portion of an exhaust manifold, i.e., upstream of the catalyst converter, the accuracy of the controlled air-fuel ratio is affected by individual differences in the characteristics of the parts of the engine, such as the O.sub.2 sensor, the fuel injection valves, the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve, the valve lifters, individual changes due to the aging of these parts, environmental changes, and the like. That is, if the characteristics of the O.sub.2 sensor fluctuate, or if the uniformity of the exhaust gas fluctuates, the accuracy of the air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount FAF is also fluctuated, thereby causing fluctuations in the controlled air-fuel ratio.
To compensate for the fluctuation of the controlled air-fuel ratio, double O.sub.2 sensor systems have been suggested (see: U.S. Pat. Nos. 3,939,654, 4,027,477, 4,130,095, 4,235,204). In a double O.sub.2 sensor system, another OP.sub.2 sensor is provided downstream of the catalyst converter, and thus an air-fuel ratio control operation is carried out by the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor in addition to an air-fuel ratio control operation carried out by the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor. In the double O.sub.2 sensor system, although the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor has lower response speed characteristics when compared with the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor, the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor has an advantage in that the output fluctuation characteristics are small when compared with those of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor, for the following reasons:
(1) On the downstream side of the catalyst converter, the temperature of the exhaust gas is low, so that the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor is not affected by a high temperature exhaust gas.
(2) On the downstream side of the catalyst converter, although various kinds of pollutants are trapped in the catalyst converter, these pollutants have little affect on the downstream side O.sub.2 sensor.
(3) On the downstream side of the catalyst converter, the exhaust gas is mixed so that the concentration of oxygen in the exhaust gas is approximately in an equilibrium state.
Therefore, according to the double O.sub.2 sensor system, the fluctuation of the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor is compensated for by a feedback control using the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor. Actually, as illustrated in FIG. 1, in the worst case, the deterioration of the output characteristics of the O.sub.2 sensor in a single O.sub.2 sensor system directly effects a deterioration in the emission characteristics. On the other hand, in a double O.sub.2 sensor system, even when the output characteristics of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor are deteriorated, the emission characteristics are not deteriorated. That is, in a double O.sub.2 sensor system, even if only the output characteristics of the downstream-side O.sub.2 are stable, good emission characteristics are still obtained.
In the above-mentioned double O.sub.2 sensor system, for example, an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter such as a rich skip amount RSR and/or a lean skip amount RSL is calculated in accordance with the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor, and an air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF is calculated in accordance with the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor and the air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter (see: U.S. Ser. Nos. 831,566 and 848,580). As explained above, since the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor has low response speed characteristics, the mean air-fuel ratio on the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor is already deviated greatly from the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio to the rich side when the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor is switched from the lean side to the rich side. Thus, the HC and CO emissions are increased. Similarly, the mean air-fuel ratio on the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor is already deviated greatly from the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio to the lean side when the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor is switched from the rich side to the lean side. Thus, the NO.sub.x emission is increased. In the double O.sub.2 sensor system, however, the renewal speed .DELTA.RS of the air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter is always definite, regardless of the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor, and accordingly, the catalytic cleaning rate .eta. as shown in FIG. 2 is not considered. That is, as shown in FIG. 2, when the controlled air-fuel ratio is deviated from a window W defined by an optimum cleaning rate .eta..sub.0 to the lean side, the cleaning rate .eta. of the NO.sub.X emission is remarkably reduced. Note that, when the controlled air-fuel ratio is deviated from the window W to the rich side, the cleaning rates of the HC and CO emissions are also reduced, however, this reduction is smaller than the above-mentioned reduction of the cleaning rate of the NO.sub.X emission.
Also, in order to improve the emission characteristics, it is possible for the renewal speed of the air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter to be increased regardless of the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor, however, this does not make effective use of a double O.sub.2 sensor system and creates a problem in that the controlled air-fuel ratio is rapidly changed, thus reducing the drivability. Further, in order to reduce the NO.sub.X emission, it is also possible for the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) to be increased; the compression ratio reduced; or the ignition timing retarded, however, this invites combustion malfunctions, thus also reducing the drivability.
Summary of the Invention
It is an object of the present invention to provide a double air-fuel ratio sensor system having improved exhaust emission characteristics especially for the NO.sub.X emission, and having improved drivability characteristics.
According to the present invention, in a double air-fuel sensor system including two air-fuel ratio sensors upstream and downstream of a catalyst converter provided in an exhaust gas passage, an air-fuel ratio correction amount is calculated in accordance with the outputs of the upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors, thereby obtaining an actual air-fuel ratio. The speed of renewal of the air-fuel ratio correction amount is higher when the output of the downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state than when the output of the downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state. That is, the renewal speed of the air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter is asymmetrical with respect to the output of the downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor. As a result, when the controlled air-fuel ratio is deviated from the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio to the lean side, the controlled air-fuel ratio is quickly returned to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, thus reducing the NO.sub.X emission.
Brief Description of the Drawings
The present invention will be more clearly understood from the description as set forth below with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a graph showing the emission characteristics of a single O.sub.2 sensor system and a double O.sub.2 sensor system;
FIG. 2 is a graph showing the cleaning rate of three-way catalysts;
FIG. 3 is a schematic view of an internal combustion engine according to the present invention;
FIGS. 4, 4A-4C, 6, 6A-6D, 7, 9, 9A-9C, 10, and 12 are flow charts showing the operation of the control circuit of FIG. 3;
FIGS. 5A through 5D are timing diagrams explaining the flow chart of FIG. 4;
FIGS. 8A through 8G are timing diagrams explaining the flow charts of FIGS. 4, 6, and 7;
FIGS. 11A through 11H are timing diagrams explaining the flow charts of FIGS. 4, 9, and 10.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
In FIG. 3, which illustrates an internal combustion engine according to the present invention, reference numeral 1 designates a four-cycle spark ignition engine disposed in an automotive vehicle. Provided in an air-intake passage 2 of the engine 1 is a potentiometer-type airflow meter 3 for detecting the amount of air drawn into the engine 1 to generate an analog voltage signal in proportion to the amount of air flowing therethrough. The signal of the airflow meter 3 is transmitted to a multiplexer-incorporating analog-to-digital (A/D) converter 101 of a control circuit 10.
Disposed in a distributor 4 are crank angle sensors 5 and 6 for detecting the angle of the crankshaft (not shown) of the engine 1.
In this case, the crank-angle sensor 5 generates a pulse signal at every 720.degree. crank angle (CA) while the crank-angle sensor 6 generates a pulse signal at every 30.degree. CA. The pulse signals of the crank angle sensors 5 and 6 are supplied to an input/output (I/O) interface 102 of the control circuit 10. In addition, the pulse signal of the crank angle sensor 6 is then supplied to an interruption terminal of a central processing unit (CPU) 103.
Additionally provided in the air-intake passage 2 is a fuel injection valve 7 for supplying pressurized fuel from the fuel system to the air-intake port of the cylinder of the engine 1. In this case, other fuel injection valves are also provided for other cylinders, but are not shown in FIG. 3.
Disposed in a cylinder block 8 of the engine 1 is a coolant temperature sensor 9 for detecting the temperature of the coolant. The coolant temperature sensor 9 generates an analog voltage signal in response to the temperature THW of the coolant and transmits that signal to the A/D converter 101 of the control circuit 10.
Provided in an exhaust system on the downstream-side of an exhaust manifold 11 is a three-way reducing and oxidizing catalyst converter 12 which removes three pollutants CO, HC, and NO.sub.X simultaneously from the exhaust gas.
Provided on the concentration portion of the exhaust manifold 11, i.e., upstream of the catalyst converter 12, is a first O.sub.2 sensor 13 for detecting the concentration of oxygen composition in the exhaust gas. Further, provided in an exhaust pipe 14 downstream of the catalyst converter 12 is a second O.sub.2 sensor 15 for detecting the concentration of oxygen composition in the exhaust gas. The O.sub.2 sensors 13 and 15 generate output voltage signals and transmit those signals to the A/D converter 101 of the control circuit 10.
Reference 16 designates a throttle valve, and 17 an idle switch for detecting whether or not the throttle valve 16 is completely closed.
The control circuit 10, which may be constructed by a microcomputer, further comprises a central processing unit (CPU) 103, a read-only memory (ROM) 104 for storing a main routine and interrupt routines such as a fuel injection routine, an ignition timing routine, tables (maps), constants, etc., a random access memory 105 (RAM) for storing temporary data, a backup RAM 106, a clock generator 107 for generating various clock signals, a down counter 108, a flip-flop 109, a driver circuit 110, and the like.
Note that the battery (not shown) is connected directly to the backup RAM 106 and, therefore, the content thereof is not erased even when the ignition switch (not shown) is turned off.
The down counter 108, the flip-flop 109, and the driver circuit 110 are used for controlling the fuel injection valve 7. That is, when a fuel injection amount TAU is calculated in a TAU routine, which will be later explained, the amount TAU is preset in the down counter 108, and simultaneously, the flip-flop 109 is set. As a result, the driver circuit 110 initiates the activation of the fuel injection valve 7. On the other hand, the down counter 108 counts up the clock signal from the clock generator 107, and finally generates a logic "1" signal from the carry-out terminal of the down counter 108, to reset the flip-flop 109, so that the driver circuit 110 stops the activation of the fuel injection valve 7. Thus, the amount of fuel corresponding to the fuel injection amount TAU is injected into the fuel injection valve 7.
Interruptions occur at the CPU 103 when the A/D converter 101 completes an A/D conversion and generates an interrupt signal; when the crank angle sensor 6 generates a pulse signal; and when the clock generator 107 generates a special clock signal.
The intake air amount data Q of the airflow meter 3 and the coolant temperature data THW of the coolant sensor 9 are fetched by an A/D conversion routine(s) executed at every predetermined time period and are then stored in the RAM 105. That is, the data Q and THW in the RAM 105 are renewed at every predetermined time period. The engine speed Ne is calculated by an interrupt routine executed at 30.degree. CA, i.e., at every pulse signal of the crank angle sensor 6, and is then stored in the RAM 105.
The operation of the control circuit 10 of FIG. 3 will be now explained.
FIG. 4 is a routine for calculating a first air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount FAF1 in accordance with output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 executed at every predetermined time period such as 4 ms.
At step 401, it is determined whether or not all of the feedback control (closed-loop control) conditions by the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 are satisfied. The feedback control conditions are as follows:
(i) the engine is not in a starting state;
(ii) the coolant temperature THW is higher than 50.degree. C.;
(iii) the power fuel incremental amount FPOWER is 0; and
(iv) the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is in an activated state.
Note that the determination of activation/nonactivation of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is carried out by determining whether or not the coolant temperature THW.gtoreq.70.degree. C., or by whether or not the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is once swung, i.e., once changed from the rich side to the lean side, or vice versa. Of course, other feedback control conditions are introduced as occasion demands. However, an explanation of such other feedback control conditions is omitted.
If one of more of the feedback control conditions is not satisfied, the control proceeds to step 427, in which the amount FAF1 is caused to be 1.0 (FAF1=1.0), thereby carrying out an open-loop control operation. Note that, in this case, the amount FAF1 can be a value or a mean value immediately before the open-loop control operation. That is, the amount FAF1 or a mean value FAF1 thereof is stored in the backup RAM 106, and in an open-loop control operation, the value FAF1 or FAF1 is read out of the backup RAM 106.
Contrary to the above, at step 401, if all of the feedback control conditions are satisfied, the control proceeds the step 402.
At step 402, an A/D conversion is performed upon the output voltage V.sub.1 of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13, and the A/D converted value thereof is then fetched from the A/D converter 101. Then at step 403, the voltage V.sub.1 is compared with a reference voltage V.sub.R1 such as 0.45V, thereby determining whether the current air-fuel ratio detected by the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is on the rich side or on the lean side with respect to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio.
If V.sub.1 .ltoreq.V.sub.R1, which means that the current air-fuel ratio is lean, the control proceeds to step 404, which determines whether or not the value of a delay counter CDLY is positive. If CDLY>0, the control proceeds to step 405, which clears the delay counter CDLY, and then proceeds to step 406. If CDLY.ltoreq.0, the control proceeds directly to step 406. At step 406, the delay counter CDLY is counted down by 1, and at step 407, it is determined whether or not CDLY>TDL. Note that TDL is a lean delay time period for which a rich state is maintained even after the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is changed from the rich side to the lean side, and is defined by a negative value. Therefore, at step 407, only when CDLY>TDL does the control proceed to step 408, which causes CDLY to be TDL, and then to step 409, which causes a first air-fuel ratio flag F1 to be "0" (lean state). On the other hand, if V.sub.1 >V.sub.R1, which means that the current air-fuel ratio upstream of the catalyst converter 12 is rich, the control proceeds to step 410, which determines whether or not the value of the delay counter CDLY is negative. If CDLY<0, the control proceeds to step 411, which clears the delay counter CDLY, and then proceeds to step 412. If CDLY.gtoreq.0, the control directly proceeds to 412. At step 412, the delay counter CDLY is counted up by 1, and at step 413, it is determined whether or not CDLY>TDR. Note that TDR is a rich delay time period for which a lean state is maintained even after the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is changed from the lean side to the rich side, and is defined by a positive value. Therefore, at step 413, only when CDLY>TDR does the control proceed to step 414, which causes CDLY to the TDR, and then to step 415, which causes the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 to be "1" (rich state).
Next, at step 416, it is determined whether or not the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is reversed, i.e., whether or not the delayed air-fuel ratio detected by the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is reversed. If the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is reversed, the control proceeds to steps 417 to 419, which carry out a skip operation.
At step 417, if the flag F1 is "0" (lean) the control proceeds to step 418, which remarkably increases the correction amount FAF1 by a rich skip amount RSR. Also, if the flag F1 is "1" (rich) at step 417, the control proceeds to step 419, which remarkably decreases the correction amount FAF1 by a lean skip amount RSL.
On the other hand, if the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is not reversed at step 416, the control proceeds to step 420 to 422, which carries out an integration operation. That is, if the flag F1 is "0" (lean) at step 420, the control proceeds to step 421, which gradually increases the correction amount FAF1 by a rich integration amount KIR. Also, if the flag F1 is "1" (rich) at step 420, the control proceeds to step 422, which gradually decreases the correction amount FAF1 by a lean integration amount KIL.
The correction amount FAF1 is guarded by a minimum value 0.8 at steps 423 and 424. Also the correction amount FAF1 is guarded by a maximum value 1.2 at steps 425 and 426. Thus, the controlled air-fuel ratio is prevented from becoming overlean or overrich.
The correction amount FAF1 is then stored in the RAM 105, thus completing this routine of FIG. 4 at steps 428.
The operation by the flow chart of FIG. 4 will be further explained with reference to FIGS. 5A through 5D. As illustrated in FIG. 5A, when the air-fuel ratio A/F is obtained by the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13, the delay counter CDLY is counted up during a rich state, and is counted down during a lean state, as illustrated in FIG. 5B. As a result, a delayed air-fuel ratio corresponding to the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is obtained as illustrated in FIG. 5C. For example, at time t.sub.1, even when the air-fuel ratio A/F is changed from the lean side to the rich side, the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F' (F1) is changed at time t.sub.2 after the rich delay time period TDR. Similarly, at time t.sub.3, even when the air-fuel ratio A/F is changed from the rich side to the lean side, the delayed air-fuel ratio F1 is changed at time t.sub.4 after the lean delay time period TDL. However, at time t.sub.5, t.sub.6, or t.sub.7, when the air-fuel ratio A/F is reversed within a shorter time period than the rich delay time period TDR or the lean delay time period TDL, the delay air-fuel ratio A/F' is reversed at time t.sub.8. That is, the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F' is stable when compared with the air-fuel ratio A/F. Further, as illustrated in FIG. 4D, at every change of the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F' from the rich side to the lean side, or vice versa, the correction amount FAF is skipped by the skip amount RSR or RSL, and in addition, the correction amount FAF1 is gradually increased or decreased in accordance with the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F'.
Air-fuel ratio feedback control operations by the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 will be explained. There are two types of air-fuel ratio feedback control operations by the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15, i.e., the operation type in which a second air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF2 is introduced thereinto, and the operation type in which an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter in the air-fuel ratio feedback control operation by the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is variable. Further, as the air fuel ratio feedback control parameter, there are nominated a delay time period TD (in more detail, the rich delay time period TDR and the lean delay time period TDL), a skip amount RS (in more detail, the rich skip amount RSR and the lean skip amount RSL), an integration amount KI (in more detail, the rich integration amount KIR and the lean integration amount KIL), and the reference voltage V.sub.R1.
For example, if the rich delay time period becomes longer than the lean delay time period (TDR>(-TDL)), the controlled air-fuel becomes richer, and if the lean delay time period becomes longer than the rich delay time period ((-TDL)>TDR), the controlled air-fuel ratio becomes leaner. Thus, the air-fuel ratio can be controlled by changing the rich delay time period TDR1 and the lean delay time period (-TDL) in accordance with the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15. Also, if the rich skip amount RSR is increased or if the lean skip amount RSL is decreased, the controlled air-fuel ratio becomes richer, and if the lean skip amount RSL is increased or if the rich skip amount RSR is decreased, the controlled air-fuel ratio becomes leaner. Thus the air-fuel ratio can be controlled by changing the rich skip amount RSR and the lean skip amount RSL in accordance with the output downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15. Further, if the rich integration amount KIR is increased or if the lean integration amount KIL is decreased, the controlled air-fuel ratio becomes richer, and if the lean integration amount KIL is increased or if the rich integration amount KIR is decreased, the controlled air-fuel ratio becomes leaner. Thus, the air-fuel ratio can be controlled by changing the rich integration amount KIR and the lean integration amount KIL in accordance with the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15. Still further, if the reference voltage V.sub.R1 is increased, the controlled air-fuel ratio becomes richer, and if the reference voltage V.sub.R1 is decreased, the controlled air-fuel ratio becomes leaner. Thus, the air-fuel ratio can be controlled by changing the reference voltage V.sub.R1 in accordance with the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15.
There are various merits obtained by the control of the air-fuel ratio feedback control parameters by the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15. For example, when the delay time periods TDR and TDL are controlled by the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15, it is possible to precisely control the air-fuel ratio. Also, when the skip amounts RSR and RSL are controlled by the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15, it is possible to improve the response speed of the air-fuel ratio feedback control by the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15. Of course, it is possible to simultaneously control two or more kinds of the air-fuel ratio feedback control parameters by the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15.
A double O.sub.2 sensor system into which a second air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF2 is introduced will be explained with reference to FIGS. 6 and 7.
FIG. 6 is a routine for calculating a second air-fuel ratio feedback correction amount FAF2 in accordance with the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 executed at every predetermined time period such as 1 s.
At steps 601 through 605, it is determined whether or not all of the feedback control (closed-loop control) conditions by the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 are satisfied. For example, at step 601, it is determined whether or not the feedback control conditions by the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 are satisfied. At step 602, it is determined whether or not the coolant temperature THW is higher than 70.degree. C. At step 603, it is determined whether or not the throttle valve 16 is open (LL="0"). At step 604, it is determined whether or not the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 has been once changed from the lean side to the rich side or vice versa. At step 605, it is determined whether or not a load parameter such as Q/Ne is larger than a predetermined value X.sub.1. Of course, other feedback control conditions are introduced as occasion demands. However, an explanation of such other feedback control conditions is omitted.
If one or more of the feedback control conditions is not satisfied, the control proceeds directly to step 621, thereby carrying out an open-loop control operation. Note that, in this case, the amount FAF2 or a mean value FAF2 thereof is stored in the backup RAM 106, and in an open-loop control operation, the value FAF2 or FAF2 is read out of the backup RAM 106.
Contrary to the above, if all of the feedback control conditions are satisfied, the control proceeds to step 606. At step 606, an A/D conversion is performed upon the output voltage V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15, and the A/D converted value thereof is then fetched from the A/D converter 101. Then, at step 507, the voltage V.sub.2 is compared with a reference voltage V.sub.R2 such as 0.55V, thereby determining whether the current air-fuel ratio detected by the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 is on the rich side or on the lean side with respect to the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Note that the reference voltage V.sub.R2 (=0.55V) is preferably higher than the reference voltage V.sub.R1 (=0.45V), in consideration of the difference in output characteristics and deterioration speed between the O.sub.2 sensor 13 upstream of the catalyst converter 12 and the O.sub.2 sensor 15 downstream of the catalyst converter 12. However, the voltage V.sub.R2 can be voluntarily determined.
At step 607, if the air-fuel ratio is lean, the control proceeds to step 608 which resets a second air-fuel ratio flag F2. Alternatively, the control proceeds the step 609, which sets the second air-fuel ratio flag F2.
Next, at step 610, it is determined whether or not the second air-fuel ratio flag F2 is reversed, i.e., whether or not the air-fuel ratio detected by the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 is reversed. If the second air-fuel ratio flag F2 is reversed, the control proceeds to steps 611 to 613 which carry out a skip operation. That is, if the flag F2 is "0" (lean) at step 611, the control proceeds to step 612, which remarkably increases the second correction amount FAF2 by a skip amount RS2. Also, if the flag F2 is "1" (rich) at step 611, the control proceeds to step 613, which remarkably decreases the second correction amount FAF2 by a skip amount RS2'. In this case, the skip amount RS2 is larger than the skip amount RS2'. For example,
On the other hand, if the second air-fuel ratio flag F2 is not reversed at step 610, the control proceeds to steps 614 to 616, which carry out an integration operation. That is, if the flag F2 is "0" (lean) at step 614, the control proceeds to step 615, which gradually increases the second correction amount FAF2 by an integration amount KI2. Also, if the flag F2 is "1" (rich) at step 614, the control proceeds to step 616, which gradually decreases the second correction amount FAF2 by an integration amount KI2'. In this case, the integration amount KI2 is larger than the integration amount KI2'. For example,
Therefore, the speed of the deviation of the controlled air-fuel ratio to the rich side is higher than the speed of the deviation of the controlled air-fuel ratio to the lean side.
Note that the skip amount RS2 (RS2') is larger than the integration amount KI2 (KI2').
The second correction amount FAF2 is guarded by a minimum value 0.8 at steps 617 and 618, and by a maximum value 1.2 at steps 619 and 620, thereby also preventing the controlled air-fuel ratio from becoming overrich or overlean.
The correction amount FAF2 is then stored in the backup RAM 106, thus completing this routine of FIG. 6 at step 621.
FIG. 7 is a routine for calculating a fuel injection amount TAU executed at every predetermined crank angle such as 360.degree. CA. At step 701, a base fuel injection amount TAUP is calculated by using the intake air amount data Q and the engine speed data Ne stored in the RAM 105. That is,
where .alpha. is a constant. Then at step 702, a warming-up incremental amount FWL is calculated from a one-dimensional map stored in the ROM 104 by using the coolant temperature data THW stored in the RAM 105. Note that the warming-up incremental amount FWL decreases when the coolant temperature THW increases. At step 703, a final fuel injection amount TAU is calculated by
where .beta. and .gamma. are correction factors determined by other parameters such as the voltage of the battery and the temperature of the intake air. At step 704, the final fuel injection amount TAU is set in the down counter 107, and in addition, the flip-flop 108 is set to initiate the activation of the fuel injection valve 7. Then, this routine is completed by step 705. Note that, as explained above, when a time period corresponding to the amount TAU has passed, the flip-flop 109 is reset by the carry-out signal of the down counter 108 to stop the activation of the fuel injection valve 7.
FIGS. 8A through 8G are timing diagrams for explaining the two air-fuel ratio correction amounts FAF1 and FAF2 obtained by the flow charts of FIGS. 4, 6, and 7. In this case, the engine is in a closed-loop control state for the two O.sub.2 sensors 13 and 15. When the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 3 is changed as illustrated in FIG. 8A, the determination at step 403 of FIG. 4 is shown in FIG. 8B, and a delayed determination thereof corresponding to the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is shown in FIG. 8C. As a result, as shown in FIG. 8D, every time the delayed determination is changed from the rich side to the lean side, or vice versa, the first air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF1 is skipped by the amount RSR or RSL. Otherwise, the first air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF1 is gradually changed by the amount KIR or KIL.
On the other hand, when the output of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 is changed as illustrated in FIG. 8E, the determination at 608 of FIG. 6 corresponding to the second air-fuel ratio flag F2 is shown in FIG. 8F. As a result, as shown in FIG. 8G, every time the determination is changed from the rich side to the lean side, or vice versa, the second air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF2 is skipped by the skip amount RS2 or RS2'. Alternatively, the second air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF2 is gradually changed by the integration amount KI2 or KI2'. In this case, as illustrated in FIG. 8G, since RS2.gtoreq.RS2' and KI2>KI2', the renewal speed of the second air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF2 is higher when the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor indicates a lean state than when the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor indicates a rich state, thus reducing the NO.sub.X emission.
A double O.sub.2 sensor system, in which an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter of the first air-fuel ratio feedback control by the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor is variable, will be explained with reference to FIGS. 9 and 10. In this case, the skip amounts RSR and RSL as the air-fuel ratio feedback control parameters are variable.
FIG. 9 is a routine for calculating the skip amounts RSR and RSL in accordance with the output V.sub.2 of the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 executed at every predetermined time period such as 1 s.
Steps 901 through 910 are the same as steps 601 through 610 of FIG. 6. That is, if one or more of the feedback control conditions is not satisfied, the control proceeds directly to step 923, thereby carrying out an open-loop control operation. Note that, in this case, the amounts RSR and RSL or the mean values RSR and RSL thereof are stored in the backup RAM 106, and in an open-loop control operation, the values RSR and RSL or RSR and RSL are read out of the backup RAM 106.
Contrary to the above, if all of the feedback control conditions are satisfied, the second air-fuel ratio flag F2 is determined by the routine of steps 906 through 909.
At step 910, it is determined whether or not the second air-fuel ratio F2 is "0". If F2="0", which means that the air-fuel ratio is lean, the control proceeds to steps 911 through 916, and if F2="1", which means that the air-fuel ratio is rich, the control proceeds to steps 917 through 922.
At step 911, the rich skip amount RSR is increased by a definite value .DELTA.RSR to move the air-fuel ratio to the rich side. At steps 912 and 913, the rich skip amount RSR is guarded by a maximum value MAX which is, for example, 7.5%.
At step 914, the lean skip amount RSL is decreased by the definite value .DELTA.RSL to move the air-fuel ratio to the rich side. At steps 915 and 916, the lean skip amount RSL is guarded by a minimum value MIN which is, for example, 2.5%.
On the other hand, if F2="1" (rich), at step 917, the rich skip amount RSR is decreased by a definite value .DELTA.RSR' to move the air-fuel ratio to the lean side. At steps 918 and 919, the rich skip amount RSR is guarded by the minimum value MIN. Further, at step 920, the lean skip amount RSL is decreased by the definite value .DELTA.RSL' to move the air-fuel ratio to the rich side. At steps 921 and 922, the lean skip amount RSL is guarded by the maximum value MAX.
According to the present invention,
The skip amounts RSR and RSL are then stored in the backup RAM 106, thereby completing this routine of FIG. 9 at step 923.
In FIG. 9, the minimum value MIS is a level by which the transient characteristics of the skip operation using the amounts RSR and RSL can be maintained, and the maximum value MAX is a level by which the drivability is not deteriorated by the fluctuation of the air-fuel ratio.
Thus, according to the routine of FIG. 9, when the delayed output of the second O.sub.2 sensor 15 is lean, the rich skip amount RSR is gradually increased, and the lean skip amount RSL is gradually decreased, thereby moving the air-fuel ratio to the rich side. Conversely, when the output of the second O.sub.2 sensor 15 is rich, the rich skip amount RSR is gradually decreased, and the lean skip amount RSL is gradually increased, thereby moving the air-fuel ratio to the lean side. In this case, the speed at which the controlled air-fuel ratio is moved to the rich side is higher than the speed at which the controlled air-fuel ratio is moved to the lean side, since
FIG. 10 is a routine for calculating a fuel injection amount TAU executed at every predetermined crank angle such as 360.degree. CA. At step 1001, a base fuel injection amount TAUP is calculated by using the intake air amount data Q and the engine speed data Ne stored in the RAM 105. That is,
where .alpha. is a constant. Then at step 1002, a warming-up incremental amount FWL is calculated from a one-dimensional map by using the coolant temperature data THW stored in the RAM 105. Note that the warming-up incremental amount FWL decreased when the coolant temperature THW increases. At step 1003, a final fuel injectional amount TAU is calculated by
where .beta. and .gamma. are correction factors determined by other parameters such as the voltage of the battery and the temperature of the intake air. At step 1004, the final fuel injection amount TAU is set in the down counter 108, and in addition, the flip-flop 109 is set to initiate the activation of the fuel injection valve 7. This routine is then completed by step 705. Note that, as explained above, when a time period corresponding to the amount TAU has passed, the flip-flop 109 is reset by the carry-out signal of the down counter 108 to stop the activation of the fuel injection valve 7.
FIGS. 11A through 11H are timing diagrams for explaining the air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF1 and the skip amounts RSR and RSL obtained by the flow charts of FIGS. 4, 9 and 10. FIGS. 11A, 11B, 11C, 11D, and 11E are the same as FIGS. 8A, 8B, 8C, 8E, and 8F, respectively. As shown in FIGS. 11F and 11G, when the determination at step 907 is lean, the rich skip amount RSR is rapidly increased at the speed of .DELTA.RSR and the lean skip amount RSL is rapidly decreased at the speed of .DELTA.RSL, and when the determination at step 907 is rich, the rich skip amount RSR is slowly decreased at the speed of .DELTA.RSR' and the lean skip amount RSL is slowly increased at the speed of .DELTA.RSL'. In this case, the skip amounts RSR and RSL are changed within a range of from MAX to MIN. As a result, as shown in FIG. 11H, the air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF1 is gradually increased by the integration amount KIL when the output V.sub.1 of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 indicates a rich state, and the amount FAF1 is gradually increased by the integration amount KIR when the output V.sub.1 of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 indicates a lean state. Also, when the output V.sub.1 of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is switched from the rich side to the lean side, or vice versa, the amount FAF1 is skipped by the skip amount RSR or RSL.
Therefore, as shown in FIG. 11H, the mean value of the air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF1 is increased, thus enriching the mean value of the controlled air-fuel ratio.
In FIG. 12, which is a modification of FIG. 4, a delay operation different from that of FIG. 4 is carried out. That is, at step 1201, if V.sub.1 .ltoreq.V.sub.R1, which means that the current air-fuel ratio is lean, the control proceeds to steps 1202 which decreases a delay counter CDLY by 1. Then, at steps 1203 and 1204, the first delay counter CDLY is guarded by a minimum value TDR. Note that TDR is a rich delay time period for which a lean state is maintained even after the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is changed from the lean side to the rich side, and is defined by a negative value.
Note that, in this case, if CDLY>0, then the delayed air-fuel ratio is rich, and if CDLY.ltoreq.0, then the delayed air-fuel ratio is lean.
Therefore, at step 1205, it is determined whether or not CDLY.ltoreq.0 is satisfied. As a result, if CDLY<0, at step 1206, the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is caused to be "0" (lean). Otherwise, the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is unchanged; that is, the flag F1 remains at "1".
On the other hand, if V.sub.1 >V.sub.R1, which means that the current air-fuel ratio is rich, the control proceeds to step 1208 which increases the first delay counter CDLY1 by 1. Then, at steps 1209 and 1210, the first delay counter CDLY is guarded by a maximum value TDL. Note that TDL is a lean delay time period for which a rich state is maintained even after the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is changed from the rich side to the lean side, and is defined by a positive value.
Then, at step 1211, it is determined whether or not CDLY>0 is satisfied. As a result, if CDLY>0, at step 1212, the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is caused to be "1" (rich). Otherwise, the first air-fuel ratio flag F1 is unchanged; that is, the flag F1 remains at "0".
The operation by the flow chart of FIG. 12 will be further explained with reference to FIGS. 13A through 13D. As illustrated in FIGS. 13A, when the air-fuel ratio A/F is obtained by the output of the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13, the delay counter CDLY is counted up during a rich state, and is counted down during a lean state, as illustrated in FIG. 13B. As a result, the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F' is obtained as illustrated in FIG. 13C. For example, at time t.sub.1, even when the air-fuel ratio A/F is changed from the lean side to the rich side, the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F is changed at time t.sub.2 after the rich delay time period TDR. Similarly, at time t.sub.3, even when the air-fuel ratio A/F is changed from the rich side to the lean side, the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F' is changed at time t.sub.4 after the lean delay time period TDL. However, at time t.sub.5, t.sub.6, or t.sub.7, when the air-fuel ratio A/F is reversed within a smaller time period than the rich delay time period TDR or the lean delay time period TDL, the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F' is reversed at time t.sub.8 ; that is, the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F' is stable when compared with the air-fuel ratio A/F. Further, as illustrated in FIG. 13D, at every change of the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F' from the rich side to the lean side, or vice versa, the correction amount FAF1 is skipped by the skip amount RSR or RSL, and in addition, the correction amount FAF1 is gradually increased or decreased in accordance with the delayed air-fuel ratio A/F'.
Note that, in this case, during an open-control mode, the rich delay time period TDR is, for example, -12 (48 ms), and the lean delay time period TDL is, for example, 6 (24 ms).
Also, the first air-fuel ratio feedback control by the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 is carried out at every relatively small time period, such as 4 ms, and the second air-fuel ratio feedback control by the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15 is carried out at every relatively large time period, such as 1 s. That is because the upstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 13 has good response characteristics when compared with the downstream-side O.sub.2 sensor 15.
Further, the present invention can be applied to a double O.sub.2 sensor system in which other air-fuel ratio feedback control parameters, such as the integration amounts KIR and KIL, the delay time periods TDR and TDL, or the reference voltage V.sub.R1, are variable.
Still further, a Karman vortex sensor, a heat-wire type flow sensor, and the like can be used instead of the airflow meter.
Although in the above-mentioned embodiments, a fuel injection amount is calculated on the basis of the intake air amount and the engine speed, it can be also calculated on the basis of the intake air pressure and the engine speed, or the throttle opening and the engine speed.
Further, the present invention can be also applied to a carburetor type internal combustion engine in which the air-fuel ratio is controlled by an electric air control value (EACV) for adjusting the intake air amount; by an electric bleed air control valve for adjusting the air bleed amount supplied to a main passage and a slow passage; or by adjusting the secondary air amount introduced into the exhaust system. In this case, the base fuel injection amount corresponding to TAUP at step 701 of FIG. 7 or at step 1001 or FIG. 10 is determined by the carburetor itself, i.e., the intake air negative pressure and the engine speed, and the air amount corresponding to TAU at step 703 of FIG. 7 or at step 1003 of FIG. 10.
Further, a CO sensor, a lean-mixture sensor or the like can be also used instead of the O.sub.2 sensor.
As explained above, according to the present invention, since the air-fuel ratio correction amount FAF2 or the air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter is asymmetrically controlled, the NO.sub.X emission is remarkably reduced.
Claims
We claim:
1. A method for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an internal combustion engine having a catalyst converter for removing pollutants in the exhaust gas thereof, and upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors disposed upstream and downstream, respectively, of said catalyst converter, for detecting a concentration of a specific component in the exhaust gas, comprising the steps of: calculating an air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the outputs of said upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors; increasing a speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio correction amount when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and adjusting an actual air-fuel ratio in accordance with said air fuel ratio correction amount; wherein said air-fuel ratio correction amount calculating step comprises the steps of: calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter in accordance with the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor; and calculating said air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor and said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter; said increasing step increasing the speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter is defined by a lean skip amount by which said air-fuel ratio correction amount is skipped down when the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor is switched from the lean side to the rich side and a rich skip amount by which said air-fuel ratio correction amount is skipped up when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor is switched from the rich side to the lean side.
2. A method for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an internal combustion engine having a catalyst converter for removing pollutants in the exhaust gas thereof, and upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors disposed upstream and downstream, respectively, of said catalyst converter, for detecting a concentration of a specific component in the exhaust gas, comprising the steps of: calculating an air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the outputs of said upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors; increasing a speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio correction amount when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and adjusting an actual air-fuel ratio in accordance with said air-fuel ratio correction amount; wherein said air-fuel ratio correction amount calculation step comprises the step of: calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter in accordance with the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor; and calculating said air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor and said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter; said increasing step increasing the speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and; wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter is determined by a rich delay time period for delaying the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor switched from the lean side to the rich side and a lean delay time period for delaying the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor switched from the rich side to the lean side.
3. A method for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an internal combustion engine having a catalyst converter for removing pollutants in the exhaust gas thereof, and upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors disposed upstream and downstream, respectively, of said catalyst converter, for detecting a concentration of a specific component in the exhaust gas, comprising the steps of: calculating an air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the outputs of said upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors; increasing a speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio correction amount when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and adjusting an actual air-fuel ratio in accordance with said air-fuel ratio correction amount; wherein said air-fuel ratio correction amount calculating step comprises the steps of: calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter in accordance with the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor; and calculating said air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor and said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter; said increasing step increasing the speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and wherein said air fuel ratio feedback control parameter is determined by a reference voltage with which the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor is compared, thereby determining whether the air-fuel ratio is on the rich side or on the lean side.
4. An apparatus for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an internal combustion engine having a catalyst converter for removing pollutants in the exhaust gas thereof, and upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors disposed upstream and downstream, respectively, of said catalyst converter, for detecting a concentration of a specific component in the exhaust gas, comprising: means for calculating increasing the speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio correction amount when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and means for adjusting an actual air-fuel ratio in accordance with said air-fuel ratio correction amount; and wherein said air-fuel ratio correction amount calculating means comprises: means for calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter in accordance with the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor; and means for calculating said air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor and said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter; said increasing means increasing the speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter is defined by a lean skip amount by which said air-fuel ratio correction amount is skipped down when-the output of said upstream side air-fuel ratio sensor is switched from the lean side to the rich side and a rich skip amount by which said air-fuel ratio correction amount is skipped up when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor is switched from the rich side to the lean side.
5. An apparatus for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an internal combustion engine having a catalyst converter for removing pollutants in the exhaust gas thereof, and upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors disposed upstream and downstream, respectively, of said catalyst converter, for detecting a concentration of a specific component in the exhaust gas, comprising: means for calculating an air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the outputs of said upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors; means for increasing the speed of renewal of said air fuel ratio correction amount when the output of said down- stream-side air-fuel ratio sensors indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and means for adjusting an actual air-fuel ratio in accordance with said air fuel ratio correction amount; and wherein said air-fuel ratio correction amount calculating means comprises: means for calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter in accordance with the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor; and means for calculating said air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor and said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter; said increasing means increasing the speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter is determined by a rich delay time period for delaying the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor switched from the lean side to the rich side and a lean delay time period for delaying the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor switched from the rich side to the lean side.
6. An apparatus for controlling an air-fuel ratio in an internal combustion engine having a catalyst converter for removing pollutants in the exhaust gas thereof, and upstream-side and downstream-side air fuel ratio sensors disposed upstream and downstream, respectively, of a catalyst converter, for detecting a concentration of a specific component in the exhaust gas, comprising: means for calculating an air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the outputs of said upstream-side and downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensors; means for increasing the speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio correction amount when the output of said down- stream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and means for adjusting an actual air-fuel ratio in accordance with said air-fuel ratio correction amount; and wherein said air-fuel ratio correction amount calculating means comprises: means for calculating an air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter in accordance with the output of said downstream side air-fuel ratio sensor; and means for calculating said air-fuel ratio correction amount in accordance with the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor and said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter; said increasing means increasing the speed of renewal of said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a lean state to a speed higher than when the output of said downstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor indicates a rich state; and wherein said air-fuel ratio feedback control parameter is determined by reference voltage with which the output of said upstream-side air-fuel ratio sensor is compared, thereby determining whether the air-fuel ratio is on the rich side or on the lean side.
Patent Citations (32)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3939654 | 1976-02-01 | Creps | |
| US4027477 | 1977-06-01 | Storey | |
| US4111162 | 1978-09-01 | Norimatsu et al. | |
| US4130095 | 1978-12-01 | Bowler et al. | |
| US4235204 | 1980-11-01 | Rice | |
| US4475517 | 1984-10-01 | Kobayashi et al. | |
| US4539958 | 1985-09-01 | Ito et al. | |
| US4561400 | 1985-12-01 | Hattori | |
| US4571683 | 1986-02-01 | Kobayashi et al. | |
| JPX52-102934 | 1977-08-01 | ||
| JPX53-103796 | 1978-09-01 | ||
| JPX55-37562 | 1980-03-01 | ||
| JPX57-32772 | 1982-07-01 | ||
| JPX57-32773 | 1982-07-01 | ||
| JPX57-32774 | 1982-07-01 | ||
| JPX58-27848 | 1983-02-01 | ||
| JPX58-48755 | 1983-03-01 | ||
| JPX58-48756 | 1983-03-01 | ||
| JPX58-53661 | 1983-03-01 | ||
| JPX58-72647 | 1983-04-01 | ||
| JPX58-72646 | 1983-04-01 | ||
| JPX58-135343 | 1983-08-01 | ||
| JPX58-152147 | 1983-09-01 | ||
| JPX58-150039 | 1983-09-01 | ||
| JPX58-150038 | 1983-09-01 | ||
| JPX59-32644 | 1984-02-01 | ||
| JPX59-206638 | 1984-11-01 | ||
| JPX60-1340 | 1985-01-01 | ||
| JPX60-26138 | 1985-02-01 | ||
| JPX60-53635 | 1985-03-01 | ||
| JPX61-34330 | 1986-02-01 | ||
| JPX61-53436 | 1986-03-01 |