Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of force-sensing transducers. More specifically, however, the field of this invention includes force-sensing transducers useful in automotive control systems requiring force detection in multiple directions. The invention is preferably embodied in a unitary structure having a planar T-shaped force-sensing body comprised of a base beam and a cantilever beam. Means are provided in operative association with the base and cantilever beams to sense the respective strain thereof and hence detect forces acting on the body in directions substantially within and orthogonal to, respectively, the plane of the base and cantilever beams (as will be discussed in greater detail below).
Background and Summary of the Invention
Most of today's automobiles are equipped with closed-loop, electronic controls supported by on-board microcomputers so as to perform a variety of control functions. Thus, for example, electronic controls are provided to optimize fuel economy and engine operation, meet emission control requirements and to provide for more comfortable and/or safe driving characteristics for the automobile (e.g., such as those characteristics provided by antilocking and/or antiskid braking systems, positive traction systems, suspension adjustment systems and the like). These latter systems are dependant upon the ability of the electronic control loop to sense accurately forces acting upon the automobile system under control and then to exhibit the desired rate-responsiveness in order to exercise adequate control. As more sophisticated electronic control schemes have evolved, it is the sensors which have become performance limiting factors due principally to the inability of sensor fabrication technology to keep pace with the development of integrated automobile control systems.
Recently, however, "micromachining" techniques for forming structural three-dimensional devices from silicon have emerged as a cost-effective means of producing high quality (i.e., sufficiently sensitive) force sensors/transducers useful for the automotive industry. Thus, silicon micromachining techniques have been employed to form force transducers in the form of diaphragms, cantilever beams, microbridges and the like. (See, for example, Lee et al., "Silicon Micromachining Technology For Automotive Applications", SAE Publication No. SP655, February, 1986, the entire content of which is expressly incorporated hereinto by reference.)
It is necessary in many automotive applications (e.g., antiskid braking systems, traction control systems, and the like) for the sensor/transducer to be capable of not only sensing the magnitude of the force acting upon the automobile (i.e., so that the correct amount of control is exercised over the system), but also to be capable of sensing the direction of such forces Conventional force-sensing transducers (i.e., so-called accelerometers which detect acceleration/deceleration forces), and particularly those formed of silicon by micromachining techniques, are typically only capable of sensing forces in one direction. This inability of conventional force-sensing transducers thus necessitates the use of redundant sensors/transducers, each oriented in a particular operative direction in which forces are to be sensed. While such a redundant arrangement may be satisfactory to perform the intended function of providing the control system with force-sensing capabilities in multiple directions, it would obviously be more satisfactory if a single force-sensing transducer was available to sense forces in multiple directions. It is towards attaining such a unitary, multidirectional force-sensing transducer that the present invention is directed.
By way of the present invention, a force-sensing transducer useful in automotive control systems requiring force detection in multiple directions is provided and is preferably embodied in a unitary silicon structure having a planar T-shaped force-sensing body comprised of a base beam and a cantilever beam. Means, such as thin film piezoelectric resistor elements, are provided in operative association with the base and cantilever beams so as to sense respective strains thereof and hence detect forces acting on the body in directions substantially within, and orthogonally to, the plane of the force-sensing body, respectively.
The transducer of the present invention is conveniently fabricated by means of well-known silicon micromachining techniques and thus can be produced economically in fairly small sizes thereby lending themselves for use in a variety of applications, including closed-loop automobile control systems. These and other objects and advantages of this invention will become more clear to the reader after carefully reviewing the detailed description which follows.
Brief Description of the Accompanying Drawings
Reference will hereinafter be made to the accompanying drawings in which like reference numerals throughout the various Figures denote like structural elements, and wherein;
FIG. 1 is a schematic perspective view of a particularly preferred embodiment of the bidirectional force-sensing transducer according to the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic cross-sectional elevational view of the transducer shown in FIG. 1 taken along line 2--2 therein; and
FIG. 3 is a perspective view of an alternative embodiment of the bidirectional force-sensing transducer.
Detailed Description of the Preferred Exemplary Embodiment
The multidirectional force-sensing transducer 10 of this invention is shown in accompanying FIGS. 1 and 2. The transducer 10 is conveniently formed from a unitary block 12 of silicon (i.e., a silicon chip or wafer of the type conventionally used in integrated circuit technology) utilizing silicon micromachining techniques. Briefly, silicon micromachining techniques involve photolithographic pattern transfer (i.e., so as to define, in this particular instance, base and cantilever beams 14, 16, respectively) followed by three-dimensional silicon etching (e.g., either isotropic or, more preferred due to its highly accurate etching directionality, anisotropic etching processes). Since these silicon micromachining techniques are notoriously well known, it is unnecessary here to describe them in greater detail. It is sufficient to note that when such micromachining techniques are employed, the transducer 10 usually will include an etch-stop doped layer 18 of silicon in which an etch-stop dopant (e.g., boron) has been diffused, and it is in association with this layer 18 in which the base and cantilever beams 14, 16, respectively, are formed. Thus, when employing silicon micromachining techniques, a trough 20 will be formed in the silicon block 12 via known silicon-etching techniques in such a manner that it "undercuts" both base beam 14 and cantilever beam 16 (see FIG. 2) formed in association with etch-stop doped layer 18 which is resistant to such etching.
The base and cantilever beams 14, 16, respectively, need not, however, be formed in association with an etch-stop doped layer 18 integral with the silicon block 12. Thus, the present invention may employ any suitable fabrication technique which defines the boundaries of base and cantilever beams 14, 16, respectively, while yet render them resistive to subsequent etching and undercutting of silicon block 12. And it is conceivable that etching or any other silicon removal technology could be utilized without forming an integral layer in the silicon block 12 in which the base and cantilever beams 14, 16, respectively, are formed. Suffice it to say that the transducer designer may select any fabrication expedient to form the base and cantilever beams 14, 16, respectively, in accordance with the principles of this invention.
The transducer 10 is fabricated (as mentioned above) so as to expose open areas 22, 24 and 26 in layer 18 which thereby establish the mutually orthogonal base and cantilever beams 14, 16, respectively--the beams 14 and 16 collectively forming a T-shaped force-sensing body 27 spaced above the floor 28 of trough 20. As is seen particularly in FIG. 1, the base beam 14 is integrally rigidly connected to the remainder of layer 18 (and hence to the silicon block 12) at each of its ends 14a and 14b. The cantilever beam 16, on the other hand, is integrally connected to the base beam 14 at its end 16a while its free end 16b is unconnected to any surrounding structure (thereby being "cantilever" in form). The cantilever beam 16, moreover extends orthogonally from, and lies within the same plane as, base beam 14.
The axial length of cantilever beam 16 is chosen so as to provide the desired resonancy (that is to say, to provide the desired deflection in response to applied forces). The resonancy of cantilever beam 16 can, in addition to the selection of beam length, be adjusted by affixing a weighted mass 30 (e.g., by means of depositing a desired thickness of metal) to free end 16b. The length of beam 16, the weight of mass 30, and the relative positioning of mass 30 along beam 16 may all be selected by the transducer designer so as to achieve desired specific performance characteristics.
Resistive elements R.sub.1, R.sub.2, and R.sub.3 are operatively associated with the transducer 10. More particularly, resistive element R.sub.1 is operatively associated with cantilever beam 16 while resistive elements R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 are operatively associated with base beam 14. Resistive elements R.sub.1, R.sub.2, and R.sub.3 are each preferably a "tin film" type piezoresistor. That is, regions of layer 18 (i.e., corresponding in location to the resistive elements R.sub.1, R.sub.2, and R.sub.3 shown in FIG. 1) may be diffused (i.e., doped) in accordance with well known techniques (see, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 4,071,838 entitled "Solid State Force Transducer and Method of Making Same" issued to Barry Block on Jan. 31, 1978, the entire content of this prior patent being expressly incorporated hereinto by reference) so as to provide such regions with any desired resistivity and thus provide for the sensitivity of transducer 10. The resistive elements are electrically connected to external circuitry (not shown) via metallized land regions 32.
As can be appreciated, a force acting orthogonally with respect to the collective plane of beams 18 and 20 (i.e., orthogonal to the planar T-shaped force-sensing body 27 in the direction of arrow F.sub.1 in FIGS. 1 and 2) will cause cantilever beam 16 to be strained thereby altering the resistivity of element R.sub.1 while the resistivity of elements R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 is substantially unaffected. Conversely, a force parallel to the plane of beams 14 and 16 (i.e., parallel to the plane of T-shaped force-sensing body 27 in the direction of arrow F.sub.2 in FIG. 1) will cause a moment arm to be exerted upon base beam 14 by means of cantilever beam 16 and thus will compress/stretch a respective one of elements R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 in dependance upon the force direction while having negligible effect on element R.sub.1. Any effect on element R.sub.1 (when T-shaped body 27 experiences a force in the direction of arrow F.sub.2) and elements R.sub.2 and R.sub.3 (when T-shaped body 27 experiences a force in the direction of arrow F.sub.1) can, however, be electronically ignored by means of suitable circuity not shown.
A support beam 34 may optionally be provided opposite of cantilever beam 16 in such a manner that it spans the open area 22, as shown in FIG. 3. Preferably, support beam 34 is, like beams 14 and 16, integrally formed in layer 18 via micromachining techniques described previously. Support beam 34, if necessary, adds further structural support to the otherwise T-shaped force sensing body 27 comprised of base and cantilever beams 14, 16, respectively.
While the invention has been described in connection with what is presently considered to be the most practical and preferred embodiment, it is to be understood that the invention is not to be limited to the disclosed embodiment, but on the contrary, is intended to cover various modifications and equivalent arrangements included within the spirit and scope of the appended claims.