US 4,775,949 AGrant
Weigh Feeding System With Stochastic Control
Issue Date:1988-10-04
•10 Claims
•11 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A weigh feeding system using a stochastic controller wherein the weight of material is sensed, and an estimate of the mass flow state of the material being discharged is created by use of a Kalman filter process. Plant noise processes and measurement noise processes, which affect the measured weight signal, are modeled as stochastic processes and are used, in combination with the sensed weight signal, to calculate the estimated mass flow state. The noise model is modified to account for severe disturbances. The estimated mass flow state signal is used to calculate a motor feedback signal which, in turn, is used to control the speed of the discharge apparatus. In this manner, the mass flow of the material actually being discharged is driven to a desired mass flow with minimum error variance in the presence of unavoidable plant and measurement noise.
Metadata
Assignee
- K-Tron International, Inc.
Inventor
- Paul R. Kalata
Application Information
Application Number:US 8794308
Filing Date:1986-06-27
Priority Date:1986-06-27
Art Unit:234
Classifications
IPC:
G01G 1300B67D 514
Field of Search:
364177340222510;567;568;465;46659;60;63;64;66;71;114;119;121-1236731;56;58;59
Patent Drawings (11 sheets)
Description
A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise serves all copyright rights whatsoever.
This invention pertains to weigh feeding systems.
The present invention uses a Kalman filtering process to develop filtered estimates of the actual weight state and the mass flow state. These filtered estimates are used, in combination with modeling and classification of the plant and measurement noise processes which affect the weight measurements, to control the actual mass flow state. The class of noise is determined, and a stochastic model for each class is created. The estimated mass flow signal is produced based on the measured weight and the stochastic models of the individual noise processes affecting the system. The noise process models are modified according to the magnitude of their effects and probability of occurrence.
The estimated mass flow state signal is then compared with a desired mass flow set-point, and the resultant error signal is used to control a discharge actuator to produce the desired mass flow.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a loss-in-weight feeding system embodying the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a schematic of a model of a discrete-time loss-in-weight system.
FIG. 3 is a schematic of a model of a discrete-time loss-in-weight system, a Kalman filter to estimate mass flow and a motor control signal processor according to the present invention.
FIGS. 4A-4C are flowcharts of the computational steps performed by the weight signal processor of the present invention.
FIG. 5 is a flow chart of the computational steps performed by the motor controller of the present invention.
FIGS. 6A-6F are graphs of the operation of a weight feeding system according to the present invention.
FIG. 7 is a tabular representation of the graphs of FIGS. 6D and 6E.
FIG. 8 is another graph of the operation of a weigh feeding system according to the present invention.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment
In the present weigh feeding system, solid or liquid material stored in a hopper or other container is discharged by a conventional discharge actuator such as a screw feeder, conveyor, pump, valve or the like as appropriate. The discharge actuator is driven by an electric motor. The system also includes a weight sensing device, such as a scale, for sensing the weight of the material in the hopper or the material being discharged, and for producing a signal indicative of the sensed weight state. The signal produced by the weight sensing device is applied to a weight signal processor which, in turn, produces a signal which is an estimate of the weight rate state or mass flow state of material being discharged. The estimate of mass flow state is then used, in a feedback loop, to control the motor to drive the estimated mass flow state to a desired set-point mass flow.
Referring to FIG. 1, material stored in hopper 10 is discharged by feed screw 11 driven by feed screw motor 12. Scale 13 measures the combined weight of hopper 10, feed screw 11 and motor 12 to produce a measured weight signal W.sub.m. It will be understood that in a conveyer weigh feeder, scale 13 would sense the weight of material being discharged upon at least a portion of the length of the conveyer. Signal W.sub.m is applied to weight signal processor 14 in computer 15 which produces an estimate, W.sub.r, of the mass flow state of material based upon the measured weight W.sub.m. An operator enters a desired mass flow set-point W.sub.rd through control panel 16. The estimated mass flow state W.sub.r is compared with the desired mass flow W.sub.rd by summing junction 17 to produce an error signal state W.sub.re. The error signal state is used by motor controller 18 to calculate a motor control signal I.sub.M which is applied to motor drive 19. The estimated mass flow state W.sub.r, and the actual mass flow, are thus driven to the desired set-point W.sub.rd.
The weight sensor is, of course, subject to random and systematic instrument and phenomenon errors. The sensor produces erroneous results not only because of internal electronic noise, but also because of the physical inertia of the sensor as well as effects of external electronic noise.
In addition, the physical plant including the material hopper, feed screw and motor are also susceptible of disturbance. These plant disturbance processes include: vibrational noise due to the mechanical movement of the feeding screw or material mixer contained within the hopper; varying or non-uniform output feed due to lumpy material or non-uniform screw discharge; refilling of the hopper with material at times and at refill rates that are uncertain; unintentional aperiodic superimposed hopper disturbances such as bumping the feeder, or dropping or lifting extraneous weights such as tools; and periodic and aperiodic disturbances of the hopper due to environmental effects such as wind, neighboring machines or passing vehicles.
In general then, a weight measurement yields only crude information about a loss-in-weight feeding system's behavior and, by itself, may be unsatisfactory for assessing the system's states and ultimately controlling the mass flow.
The mathematical model of a discrete-time material discharge system is shown in FIG. 2. The actual weight state of material at time k+1 is produced by summing junction 21 which provides the sum of the actual weight state at time k, W(k), the plant noise process affecting the weight at time k, w.sub.1 (k), the effect of the motor control on the weight, u.sub.1 (k), and the actual mass flow state at time k, W.sub.r (k), multiplied by the sampling time T. This multiplication by T represents a time integration of mass flow state, W.sub.r. Actual weight state signal W(k+1) is applied to delay block 22 to produce actual weight state signal W(k). The measured weight signal W.sub.m (k) is produced by summing junction 23 which adds measurement noise process n(k) to actual weight state signal W(k).
The actual mass flow state at time k+1, W.sub.r (k+1), is produced by summing junction 24 which provides the sum of the actual mass flow state at time k, W.sub.r (k), the effect of the motor control on the mass flow, u.sub.2 (k), and the mass flow plant noise process w.sub.2 (k). The mass flow state at time k, W.sub.r (k) is produced from the actual mass flow state W.sub.r (k+1) via delay block 26.
The block diagram of FIG. 2 is a schematic representation of the following mathematical equations:
where:
k=1, 2, 3, . . .
W(k) is the actual weight state at time k;
W.sub.r (k) is the actual mass flow state at time k;
W.sub.m (k) is the weight measurement at time k;
T is the time period between samples;
u.sub.1 (k) is the effect of the motor control on the actual weight state;
u.sub.2 (k) is the effect of the motor control on the actual mass flow state;
n(k) is the measurement noise;
w.sub.1 (k) is the plant weight noise perturbation; and
w.sub.2 (k) is the plant mass flow noise perturbation.
Weight state W and mass flow state W.sub.r are known as state variables, and the mass flow state is the time derivative of the weight state (i.e., the weight is the integral of the mass flow). The only state variable sensed is the weight W which can only be sensed indirectly from the noise corrupted signal W.sub.m. It is to be noted that noise processes n, w.sub.1 and w.sub.2 are unavoidable and are always present in the system. Controlling, via u.sub.1 and u.sub.2, the discharge using only measured weight signal W.sub.m in ignorance of the plant and measurement noise processes, will invariably result in an inferior system.
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of a real discrete-time material discharge system connected to a block diagram of a discrete-time weight signal processor and motor controller according to the present invention. Elements identical to those in FIGS. 1 and 2 bear the same numeral identifier. The weight signal processor uses a Kalman filtering process to develop a filtered estimate of the actual weight state W(k) and a filtered estimate of the mass flow state W.sub.r (k). The estimate of mass flow state W.sub.r (k) is used, by motor controller 18, as shown schematically in FIG. 3 and in detail in FIG, 5, to calculate motor control signal I.sub.M and motor controls u.sub.1 (k) and u.sub.2 (k). Motor controls u.sub.1 (k) and u.sub.2 (k) are the mathematical affects on actual weight state W(k) and actual mass flow state W.sub.r (k), respectively, and are used in the prediction process of estimated weight state W(k) and estimated mass flow state W.sub.r (k).
In the lower portion of FIG. 3 is signal processor 14, summing junction 17 and motor controller 18 shown in FIG. 1. The signal processor is configured as a Kalman filter whose structure is identical to the mathematical model of the real system. Summing junctions 27 and 28 perform the function of summing junctions 21 and 24 in the real system. Delay blocks 29 and 31 model the functions of real delay blocks 22 and 26, respectively.
Summing junction 32 provides the difference between measured weight W.sub.m (k) and estimated weight state W(k). This difference, W.sub.m (k), also known as the measurement residual, is multiplied by gain K.sub.w (k) and applied to summing junction 27 in calculating the next weight state estimate W(k+1). W.sub.m (k) is also multiplied by gain K.sub.W.sbsb.r (k) and applied to summing junction 28 in calculating the next mass flow state estimate W.sub.r (k+1). Gains K.sub.W and K.sub.W.sbsb.r are known as the Kalman gains and are variable according to the error covariance of the estimated weight state W and estimated mass flow state W.sub.r relative to the real values of W and W.sub.r, while taking into account noise processes n, w.sub.1 and w.sub.2. Details of the calculation of Kalman gains K.sub.W and K.sub.W.sbsb.r are presented below referring to FIGS. 4A-4C.
Since the effects of the noise processes n, w.sub.1 and w.sub.2 are used in the calculation of the Kalman gains, it is important not only to identify the various noise sources and their effect on the state variables W and W.sub.r, but also to model their magnitudes and to include the magnitudes into the Kalman gain calculation.
Each noise process is modeled as a zero mean, white process with the following noise covariances: ##EQU1## where: .sigma..sup.2.sub.n is the variance of the measurement noise process;
.sigma..sup.2.sub.w1 is the variance of the plant noise process affecting the weight;
.sigma..sup.2.sub.w2 is the variance of the plant noise process affecting the mass flow; and
.sigma..sup.2.sub.w1,w2 is the covariance of plant noise processes w.sub.1 and w.sub.2.
As mentioned above, plant noise processes w.sub.1 and w.sub.2 are the weight noise perturbation and mass flow noise perturbation, respectively. In a practical system, mass flow noise perturbation w.sub.2 is a regular noise process due to, for example, lumpy or non-uniform material being fed. Weight noise perturbations w.sub.1 is an irregular process due to highly unpredictable sources, such as vibrations from passing vehicles, or physical impact with the material hopper. Measurement noise process n is also a regular noise process due to random and systematic measurement instrument and discharge system phenomenon errors. For example, vibrations from the feed screw or material mixer, in addition to weight sensor inaccuracies, contribute to measurement noise process n.
Variance, .sigma..sup.2.sub.n is determined experimentally or emperically from an actual system. For example, the material discharge system is operated without loss in weight and variance .sigma..sup.2.sub.n is calculated from a series of weight measurements W.sub.m (k). The variance, .sigma..sup.2.sub.w.sbsb.2, is calculated from machine operational specifications. for example, if the desired mass flow deviation (.sigma..sub.W.sbsb.d) is specified, .sigma..sub.w.sbsb.2 is set proportional to .sigma..sub.W.sbsb.d.
In contrast, plant noise process w.sub.1, being unpredictable, is modeled as having variance A, where A is determined from the magnitude of the sensed measurement residual. Details of this process and calculation of A are described below with reference to FIG. 4B.
Finally, since the plant noise processes are typically not correlated, .sigma..sup.w.sub.2.sbsb.1.sub., w.sbsb.2 is equal to 0.
The plant noise covariance matrix Q(k) is determined in the following manner. First, Q(k) is set equal to Q.sub.o. where: ##EQU2## Next, A is calculated from the magnitude of the measurement residual and the probability of occurrence of that magnitude of residual. Then Q(k) is replaced by Q.sub.1 where: ##EQU3##
Referring to FIGS. 4A-4C, the process steps executed by signal processor 14 (FIG. 1) are shown. After the process is started, the following parameters are initialized in step 41.
W.sub.rd --the desire mass flow set point;
.sigma..sub.n --the standard deviation of measurement noise n;
.sigma..sub.w.sbsb.d --the desired standard deviation of mass flow;
T--the weight signal (W.sub.m) sampling period;
G--the gain constant of the motor controller;
.sigma..sub.m --the time constant of the screw motor;
T.sub.d --the communication delay associated with the feed screw motor; and
FF--the feed factor of the feed screw motor.
In Step 42, the variance, .sigma..sup.2.sub.w.sbsb.2, is calculated from the desired standard deviation of mass flow, .sigma..sub.w.sbsb.d. This is an iterative calculation based on the known steady state relationship between the desired mass flow error variance (.sigma..sup.2.sub.w.sbsb.r =.sigma..sup.2.sub.w.sbsb.d) and the parameters T, .sigma..sup.2.sub.n and .sigma..sup.2.sub.w.sbsb.2. The iterative calculation is shown in the routine spanning lines 4999-5220 of the source code listing submitted herewith. In step 43 the following variables are all initially set to 0:
W.sub.cp --weight control signal;
u.sub.1, u.sub.2 --motor controls affecting weight and mass flow, respectively.
Also in step 43, feed screw motor signal, I.sub.M, is initialized at a desired level so that the motor is initially moving at a desired speed. In the alternative, signal I.sub.M may be initialized to 0 so that the motor is initially stationary.
In step 44, counter k is set to 0, and control is transferred to step 45 where the first weight sample W.sub.m (1) is taken. Control is then transferred to decision block 46 where, if k+1 is greater than 2, indicating that the filter has already been initialized, control is transferred to the process steps of FIG. 4B. Otherwise, control is transferred to decision block 47 where, if k+1 is not equal to 2, control is transferred to block 48 and counter k is incremented. Another weight sample is then taken in block 45. If decision block 47 decides that k+1 is equal to 2, control is transferred to block 49 where filter initialization is begun.
In block 49, the initial weight state estimate, W, is set to the measured weight at time k=2. In addition, the initial mass flow state estimate, W.sub.r, is set to the difference between the first two weight measurements divided by sampling period T. Thus, the initial estimates for weight and mass flow states are found using the last weight signal and its simple time derivative. Also in block 49, the predicted estimate of weight state at time k=3 is set to the estimated weight state at time k=2 plus T times the estimated mass flow state at a time k=2, and the predicted estimate of mass flow state at time k=3 is set to the estimated mass flow state at time k=2.
After the estimates and predictions of weight and mass flow states are initialized in block 49, control is transferred to block 51 where the four entries of the error covariance matrix P are initialized.
The error covariance matrix P takes the form: ##EQU4## where: .sigma..sup.2.sub.W is the variance of the weight error;
.sigma..sup.2.sub.W.sbsb.r is the variance of the mass flow error; and
.sigma..sup.2.sub.W, W.sbsb.r is the covariance of the weight and mass flow errors.
After error covariance matrix P is initialized in block 51, control is transferred to block 48 where counter k is incremented and another weight sample is taken in block 45. Once the filter is initialized, k+1 will be greater than 2 and decision block 46 will transfer control to block 56 of FIG. 4B.
In block 56, plant noise covariance matrix Q(k) is set to Q.sub.0 and control is transferred to block 57 where error covariance matrix P is updated using the matrix equation:
where:
P(k+1.vertline.k) is the prediction of error covariance matrix P at time k+1 given measurements up to and including time k;
P(k.vertline.k) is the error covariance matrix P at time k given measurements up to and including time k; ##EQU5## F' is the transpose of F; and Q(k) is the plant noise covariance matrix at time k.
It should be noted that the diagonal elements of the P matrix (.sigma..sup.2.sub.W and .sigma..sup.2.sub.W.sbsb.r) are a measure of the performance of the estimation process. Although theoretically impossible, if the variance of the weight error .sigma..sup.2.sub.W, and the variance of the mass flow error, .sigma..sup.2.sub.W.sbsb.r, are both zero, the estimates are perfect, i.e., the same as the real states. As a practical matter, only minimization of these error variances is realizable.
Control is then transferred to block 58 where the measurement residual is calculated using the equation:
where:
W.sub.m (k+1.vertline.k) is the measurement residual at time k+1 given measurements up to and including time k;
W.sub.m (k+1) is the weight measurement at time k+1; and
W(k+1.vertline.k) is the estimated weight state at time k+1 given measurements up to and including time k.
Control is then transferred to block 59 where the measurement residual variance is calculated using the matrix equation:
where:
H=[1 0];
H' is the transpose of H;
P(k+1.vertline.k) is calculated in block 57; and
R(k+1) is the measurement noise variance at time k+1 (actually .sigma..sup.2 n).
Control then passes to decision block 60 where flag j is tested to decide if, during the present cycle, variance A has already been calculated by traversing the loop shown in FIG. 4B. If variance A has not yet been calculated this cycle, control is transferred to block 61 where variable x is set to the measurement residual W.sub.m (k+1.vertline.k) divided by a constant q and the standard deviation of the measurement residual (the square root of the variance calculated in block 59). Constant q is preferably in the range of 3.ltoreq.q.ltoreq.5, however, values outside of this range are acceptable without departing from the scope of the invention.
An adaptive distribution function f(x) is also calculated in block 61 by the equation:
where:
Values outside of this range are acceptable without departing from the scope of the invention. The exact values of q and a depend upon the particular weigh feeder used and are determined experimentally in order to minimize the various elements of the error covariance matrix P during normal operation, and to minimize the deletarious effects of aperiodic hopper disturbance (such as refill).
f(x) represents the probability that the cause of the present measurement residual is a source outside of that indicated by the previous error covariance matrix P(k+1.vertline.k) (calculated in block 57), and due to measurement noise n(k) and mass flow noise w.sub.2 (k).
Control then passes to block 62 where variance A is calculated as the product of the adaptive distribution function, f(x), multiplied by the square of the measurement residual divided by 12. This results in a uniform distribution for A.
Control then passes to block 63 where matrix Q(k) is set equal to Q.sub.1, and flag j is set equal to 1 in block 64 before returning control to block 57.
Then, using the new value for Q(k), the error covariance matrix is recalculated in block 57, the measurement residual is recalculated in block 58 and the measurement residual variance is recalculated in block 59. Next, since flag j is now 1, control passes from block 60 to block 65 where counter j is reset to 0. Control is then transferred to block 66 of FIG. 4C.
Referring to FIG. 4C, the filter gains K are calculated in block 66 using the matrix equation:
where: ##EQU6##
K.sub.w (k+1) is the weight Kalman gain at time k+1;
K.sub.w.sbsb.r (k+1) is the mass flow Kalman gain at time k+1; and
all other variables have been previously defined or calculated.
The predicted weight state W and predicted mass flow state W.sub.r, at time k+1 given measurements up to and including time k+1, are then calculated in block 67 using the equations:
where all variables have been previously defined and calculated.
Control is then transferred to block 68 where error covariance matrix P is updated. The matrix I appearing in the equation in block 68 is the identity matrix. All other variables have been previously defined and calculated.
Control is then transferred to block 69 where new predictions for estimated weight state W and mass flow state W.sub.r are calculated for time k+2 given measurements up to and including time k+1, using the following equations:
where:
u.sub.1 (k+1) is the value of the motor control applied at time k+1 which is predicted to affect the weight state at time k+2;
u.sub.2 (k+1) is the value of the motor control applied at time k+1 which is predicted to affect the mass flow state at time k+2; and
where all other variables have been previously defined and calculated.
Control is then transferred to block 71 where the motor control is updated. The details of the processing steps performed within block 71 are shown in FIG. 5.
Upon exiting block 71, control is returned to block 48 (FIG. 4A) where counter k is incremented and the entire loop is retraced. It should be noted that, since the time necessary to traverse the loop may vary slightly from cycle to cycle, sampling period T is changed slightly from period to period. In the preferred embodiment, T is in the range of 0.75.ltoreq.T.ltoreq.2.0 seconds although time periods outside of this range also produce acceptable results. Recalculation of T each cycle is illustrated in FIG. 6F.
Referring to FIG. 5, in block 72, mass flow error signal, W.sub.re, is calculated as the difference between desired mass flow set point, W.sub.rd, and the mass flow state estimate, W.sub.r, previously calculated in block 69 of FIG. 4C. Control is then transferred to block 73 where weight rate control signal, W.sub.rc, is calculated as the product of gain, G, and mass flow error, W.sub.re. Motor signal I.sub.M is then adjusted by weight rate control signal, W.sub.rc, divided by feed factor FF. Feed factor FF is used to convert the mass flow state variable to the motor speed signal in order to compensate for the nonlinear relationship between motor signal I.sub.M and motor speed.
Control is then transferred to block 74 where motor controls, u.sub.1 and u.sub.2, are calculated. These calculations represent a model of the control portion of the material discharge system. This is to be distinguished from the model of the estimation or filtering shown in FIG. 3 and in the process steps of FIGS. 4A-4C.
In block 76, past weight control signal, W.sub.cp, is set equal to the weight control signal just calculated, W.sub.rc.
In step 77, calculated motor signal, I.sub.M, is output to a motor controller to control the rate of the material discharge.
It should be emphasized that the Kalman filter process of the present invention is a recursive process which requires very little information be stored and carried over from one calculation time interval to the next. Therefore, the present invention can be readily adapted for use in existing material discharge systems by reprogramming microprocessor program memories, and by using preexisting random access memories.
FIGS. 6A-6F graphically illustrate the operation of an actual weigh feeding system under closed-loop computer control.
The system was started at cycle 0 with the following initial parameters: T=1.3; W.sub.rd =500; FF=0.3; q=3; and a=2. The system was started and run for approximately 100 calculation cycles while feeding semolina. Both natural plant and measurement noise were present. In addition, the system hopper was subjected to the following deliberate outside perturbations:
The ordinate in graphs 6A-6C is in parts per million where one million parts is equal to approximately 150 Kg (the maximum measureable weight of the weight sensor used). In other words, a reading of 600,000 parts per million equals 60% of 150 Kg, or 90 Kg.
In FIG. 6D, the units of motor signal I.sub.M are directly convertable to a motor drive signal, for example, a frequency. The units of mass flow estimate in FIG. 6E are in parts per million per unit time and are directly convertable to Kg/sec.
FIG. 6F illustrates the variability of sample period T from one cycle to the next.
FIG. 7 is a tabular presentation of the graphs of FIGS. 6D and 6E.
FIG. 8 is a graphical display of the same system as that operated to produce the graphs of FIGS. 6A-6F, showing operation with only the natural plant and measurement noise processes present without any outside perturbations.
The following is a commented source code listing of a computer program for computer 15 of the preferred embodiment. This program incorporates the steps shown in the flowcharts of FIGS. 4A-4C and 5. ##SPC1##
While the invention has been described by reference to a specific illustrative embodiment thereof, many changes and modifications of the invention may become apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Claims
I claim:
1. A method of weigh feeding material comprising the steps of: storing a quantity of material; discharging said material; sensing a weight of the stored material or the material being discharged; deriving an estimate of an actual weight state of said weighed material, and an estimate of an actual mass flow state of the material being discharged, from said sensed weight using a model of at least one noise process which causes said sensed weight to differ from the actual weight state; determining a difference between said estimate of said actual weight state and said sensed weight; modifying said noise process model based on a magnitude of said difference and a probability of occurrence of said magnitude of said difference; and controlling said discharge of material using said estimate of said actual mass flow state to maintain said actual mass flow state at a desired mass flow state.
2. A method as recited in claim 1 comprising the further step of repetitively deriving new estimates of the actual mass flow state in accordance with said deriving step using successively modified noise models obtained from repetitively performing said modifying step.
3. A method as recited in claim 2 wherein said at least one noise process model is stochastic and includes a model of at least one plant noise process and a model of at least one measurement noise process.
4. A method as recited in claim 3 wherein said modifying step includes the step of: modifying said plant noise process model.
5. A method for weigh feeding material including the steps of: storing a quantity of material in a container; discharging said material using controllable discharge means; sensing a weight of the stored material or the material being discharged; modeling at least one noise process that causes said sensed weight to differ from an actual weight state of said material to obtain a noise model; calculating an estimated weight state of said weighed material and an estimated mass flow state of the material being discharged using a Kalman filtering process based on said sensed weight and said noise process model; calculating a measurement residual from said estimated weight state and said sensed weight; calculating a standard deviation of said measurement residual; calculating a probability of occurrence of said measurement residual using said standard deviation; modifying said noise process model based on said measurement residual and said probability of occurrence of said measurement residual; controlling said discharging of material using said estimated mass flow state to maintain an actual mass flow state of the material being discharged substantially equal to a desired mass flow state; and repetitively calculating a new estimated mass flow state of the material being discharged in accordance with said calculating step for controlling said discharging of material using successively modified noise process models obtained from repetitively performing said modifying step.
6. A method according to claim 5 wherein said noise process model includes at least one plant noise process model including a variance parameter, and wherein said modifying step further includes the steps of: setting said variance parameter of said at least one plant noise process model proportional to a square of said measurement residual.
7. A method as recited in claim 5 wherein said discharge means actively displaces the material being discharged and said modeling step includes the steps of: operating said discharge means without discharging material; sensing a weight of at least said container; and calculating a variance of the sensed weight.
8. A weigh feeding system comprising: means for storing material; means for discharging material from said means for storing; means for sensing a weight of the stored material or a weight of the material being discharged; means for deriving an estimated weight state of the material being weighed and an estimated mass flow state of the material being discharged from said sensed weight using a noise model of at least one noise process which causes said sensed weight to differ from an actual weight state of the material being weighed; means for calculating a measurement residual equal to a difference between said sensed weight and said estimated weight state; means for modifying said noise model comprising: means for calculating a standard deviation of said measurement residual; means for calculating a distribution function based on a ratio of said measurement residual and said standard deviation; means for calculating a variance of said noise model based on said distribution function and said measurement residual; and means for controlling said means for discharging according to said estimated mass flow state to discharge material from said means for storing at a desired mass flow state.
9. A weigh feeding system as recited in claim 8 wherein said distribution function is calculated according to the equation: where: f(x) is the distribution function; x=W.sub.m /q.sigma..sub.W.sbsb.m ; W.sub.m is the measurement residual .sigma..sub.W.sbsb.m is the standard deviation of the measurement residual; .ltoreq. q.ltoreq.5; and 2.ltoreq.a.ltoreq.4.
10. A weigh feeding system as recited in claim 9 wherein said variance of said noise model is calculated according to the equation: where: A is the variance.
Patent Citations (20)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| USRe32101 | 1986-04-01 | Ricciardi et al. | |
| US3116801 | 1964-01-01 | Bauder et al. | |
| US3463979 | 1969-08-01 | Scobie et al. | |
| US3481509 | 1969-12-01 | Marhauer | |
| US3622767 | 1971-11-01 | Koepcke | |
| US3633009 | 1972-01-01 | Green et al. | |
| US3700490 | 1972-10-01 | Hiyosi et al. | |
| US3767900 | 1973-10-01 | Chao et al. | |
| US3845370 | 1974-10-01 | Mantey | |
| US3876871 | 1975-04-01 | Sinner | |
| US3889848 | 1975-06-01 | Ricciardi et al. | |
| US4167576 | 1980-04-01 | Sanchez | |
| US4301510 | 1981-11-01 | Ricciardi et al. | |
| US4524886 | 1985-06-01 | Wilson et al. | |
| US4528918 | 1985-07-01 | Sato et al. | |
| US4534428 | 1985-08-01 | Mosher et al. | |
| US4545242 | 1985-10-01 | Chan | |
| US4552235 | 1985-11-01 | Brunnschweiler | |
| US4577270 | 1986-03-01 | Sugano et al. | |
| GBX1255541 | 1971-12-01 |
Non-Patent Literature (8)
- Paul R. Kalata, "The Tracking Index: A Generalized Parameter for .alpha.-.beta. and .alpha.-.beta.-.gamma. Target Trackers", IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems, vol. AES-20, No. 2, Mar. 1984, pp. 174-182.
- T. J. Williams et al., "Progress in Direct Digital Control", Instrument Society of America, Pittsburgh, 1969, pp. 53, 69, 92, 93, 255.
- Emanuel S. Savas, Ph.D., "Computer Control of Industrial Processes", 1965, pp. 12-15.
- J. S. Meditch, "Stochastic Optimal Linear Estimation and Control", Boeing Scientific Research Laboratories, pp. 1-394, 1969.
- Andrew P. Sage, et al., "Optimum Systems Control " Second Edition, 1977, pp. 1-413.
- Andrew P. Sage, et al., "Estimation Theory with Applications to Communications and Control", 1971, pp. 1-529.
- Robert F. Stengel, "Stochastic Optimal Control", Theory and Application, 1986, pp. 1-638.
- Stanley M. Shinners, "Control System Design", 1964, pp. 1-523.