Field of the Invention
The transferred-arc plasma cutting process has become standard for the routine cutting of metals of thickness ranging from sheet metal to about 4 inches. This invention concerns an improvement of the basic process to allow reliable cutting of metals of much much greater thickness.
Background of the Invention
The depth cutting ability of the transferred-arc depends primarily on how far the arc column extends beyond the end of the plasma torch. Looking at it another way, thick sections of metal can only be cut satisfactorily when the arc is made to extend to, or near, the bottom of the cut.
The depth to which the arc column can be made to extend is a function of three variables. There must be sufficient voltage to sustain an elongated arc. There must be sufficient gas velocity to force the arc well down into the kerf being cut. The cutting speed should be adjusted to provide the necessary kerf width allowing the arc column to reach its full depth capability.
The optimization of these three variables rests mainly in operating the equipment at much greater voltage than currently practiced. Such voltage increase is proportioned between that needed to increase the plasma gas enthalpy and that providing sufficient voltage to allow full penetration of the arc column to, or near, the full depth of cut.
A better understanding of the principles governing the invention may be obtained from FIGS. 1 and 2 directed to prior art practice.
A conventional plasma cutting torch 10 is shown in FIG. 1. Torch 10 is comprised of three major components, a hollow cylindrical metal body piece 10 containing an annular gas passage space 15 and a narrow nozzle passage or bore 14a of a nozzle 14. A cathode electrode (usually thoriated tungsten) 12 is properly positioned by an electrical insulating element 11 within one end of the hollow torch body piece 10', with its arcing end 12a adjacent to the entry to nozzle passage 14a. Arc column 13 passes with the plasma gas through and out of nozzle bore 14a to strike workpiece 16 which forms the anode of the circuit. A potential difference is set up between the anode and cathode as shown. Gas jet velocities are extremely high and with the intense arc heating of workpiece 16, a kerf 19 forms from the advancing cut face 17. Molten metal 18 is ejected as shown.
If nozzle bore 14a is too long, or if insufficient gas flow is used, the phenomenon of "double arcing" occurs. The arc, rather than taking the higher voltage path axially through nozzle passage 14a, dips into the conducting metal of body piece 10', passes there-through, and completes the circuit to workpiece 16 as shown by heavy line 20.
"Double arcing" limits the useful nozzle 14 to lengths usually less than 1/2 inch. The amount of heating realized by the gas passing concurrently with the arc through nozzle passage 14a is a function of the voltage drop of the arc along that path. For a highly swirling flow of nitrogen (vortex flow) entering space 15, tangentially via pipe 22 and through a narrow nozzle passage 23, the voltage gradient can be over 200 volts/inch of arc length. Thus, a nozzle length of 1/4 inch provides a 50 volt contribution to the power relationship V.times.A where V is voltage and A the current in amperes. V.times.A represents the amount of heat passing from the arc into the flowing nitrogen. Assuming a current of 400 amperes, 20 KW of gas heating results.
The level of gas heating determines the exit gas velocity from the nozzle 14. The higher the gas velocity, the greater the penetrating power of the jet 13 to cut through thick metal sections. Also, the arc foot is swept deeper into the kerf 19 allowing thicker sections to be cut. Anode heating of the workpiece 16 contributes approximately 8 KW of heat to the cutting process. Assuming the efficiency of convective heating from the hot gas and plasma to be 20%, the gaseous jet 13 contributes about 5 KW. So long as anode heating is relied upon as the major heating factor, metals of only modest thickness can be cut by the method illustrated in FIG. 1.
FIG. 2 illustrates the problems involved when only inadequate arc voltages are available when cutting a thick metal section. Assuming the same torch 10 and operating conditions as shown in FIG. 1, the arc column 13 extends slightly over halfway through the metal workpiece 25. The top half of the metal workpiece 25 thickness illustrates the appearances of a good kerf 26, as shown by nearly parallel lines. Immediately below, at an abrupt change 27, only a badly melted rough section 28 appears. Shortly beyond line 27 no further cutting is possible. For the conditions used, a practical maximum depth-of-cut is thickness "d".
It is therefore, an object of my invention to provide an improved transferred arc plasma cutting process and apparatus which permits reliable use of arc voltages double, triple, or more than those currently in use, and which greatly reduces, the tendency to "double-arc" and this forms the key to successful cutting of thick metal sections.
Brief Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is a vertical cross-sectional view of a conventional plasma cutting torch.
FIG. 2 is a schematic, sectional view of the torch of FIG. 1, attempting to cut a thick section of metal.
FIG. 3 is a vertical sectional view of an improved, transferred plasma-arc cutting torch forming a preferred embodiment of the invention.
FIG. 4 is a vertical sectional view of a plasma-transferred plasma-arc cutting torch utilizing additional, secondary and tertiary gas nozzle sections in an improved, transferred arc plasma cutting torch forming yet another embodiment of the present invention.
In the drawings, like elements bear like numerical designation.
Description of Preferred Embodiments
In FIG. 3, a composite transferred arc-plasma torch 1 is shown comprising the torch body piece 10' of FIG. 1 with arc voltage increasing means added. The appended parts to body piece 10' include any annular electrically insulating piece 35 and a second nozzle piece 36. Again, for simplicity, required water cooling means are not shown. Such arc lengthening results from the use of a secondary vortex flow of gas passing into the narrow cylindrical separating zone 41, formed by annular piece 35 through tangential hole 40 from tube 39. Secondary arc passage 37a, of secondary nozzle 37 is a diameter nearly equivalent to primary nozzle passage 14a. There is created, an intense gas vortex with a narrow core section of reduced diameter. The high-velocity plasma gas exiting from torch 10 at nozzle 14 penetrates well down nozzle 37 and is further extended by the secondary gas flow within zone 41. It has been found that the secondary nozzle 37 can be made much longer than the primary nozzle 14. As an example, for a primary nozzle 14 length of 1/4 inch, secondary nozzle 37 lengths up to 1 inch are possible without causing "double-arcing". For the case of FIG. 1, the arc voltage drop transferred to KW to the plasma gas. Using a secondary nozzle of 1 inch length increases the total heating of the gas passing through the torch to about 100 KW. As gas exit velocity is a function of mass flow and gas enthalpy, the exit velocity increases by a factor of nearly 4 for the case where the primary and secondary nozzles have bores of the same diameter. The plasma gases of jet 38 are well into the supersonic range as shown by shock-diamonds 42.
Assuming that the process of FIG. 1 is powered by an operating voltage of 160 volts (a representative value in use today) and that the internal voltage drop due to cathode and plasma gas heating are 10 volts and 50 volts, respectively, the voltage available beyond the torch is about 100 volts. In the open atmosphere the voltage gradient of the arc column is about 50 volts per inch. Thus, arc column 13 can be expected to reach through a kerf 30 depth of 2 inches provided that the kerf width is adequately wide to preclude earlier anode action. (The anode heating drop of about 20 volts has not been included in this calculation. Its presence makes the maximum depth of cut somewhat less.)
Using the torch geometry of FIG. 3 with a current of 400 amperes and an operating voltage of 600 volts, the torch 1 voltage drop is 260 volts (10 at the cathode and 250 along the arc column in nozzles 14 and 37.) The voltage remaining available for arc extension into the kerf is 340 volts. At 50 volts per inch, assuming a jet velocity capable of stretching the arc to the bottom of the kerf, a maximum "clean kerf" depth-of-cut of nearly 7 inches results.
The comparisons above are made on a basis of the same current flow of 400 amperes to the respective torches 15 of FIG. 1 and 1 of FIG. 3. The method of the invention operates at a power increase of 3.75 over that of the conventional torch. Maximum available conventional operating voltages are 200 volts. To achieve the equivalent power level of 240 KW (400 amperes at 600 volts of the invention case) a conventional torch 10 would have to operate at a current of 1,200 amperes. Such current levels are extremely difficult to handle. However, when used and compared to the example for FIG. 1, the "clean kerf" depth-of-cut will increase to about 3 inches. Maximum depth-of-cut "d" will be 4 to 5 inches. For FIG. 3, "d" approaches 8 to 9 inches, a significant improvement over the "prior art" of FIG. 1.
Where, for the example of FIG. 1, anode heating of 8 KW outweighs gas heating of 5 KW, a switch in the relative importance of these values results when using the extended arc lengths of the invention. At 400 amperes (assuming a 20 v anode drop) anode heating amounts to 8 KW once again. The gas jet contains 100 KW (400 amperes at a torch arc column voltage drop of 250 volts). A heating efficiency of 20% (heat transferred from the jet to the workpiece) amounts to 20 KW workpiece heating. (In these analyses additional gas heating beyond the torch exit as well as the entrainment of atmospheric air have been ignored.)
Although the examples are described as rough analyses, actual use of the extended-arc method leads to dramatic advances in the cutting of thick metal sections. At a given power level, the reduced current levels lead to increased operating reliability. The increase in depth capability, for a given power level does lead to slower cutting speeds. However, this can only be a disadvantage where conventional equipment performs well, i.e., thinner metal thickness where wider kerf widths can be tolerated.
I have found that the secondary nozzle 36, if much longer than 1 inch, can "double-arc" as in the manner shown in FIG. 1 by dark line 20. The use of primary 14 and secondary 37 nozzles, (FIG. 3) is good to about 400 operating volts. For 600 volts, a tertiary nozzle 51 of FIG. 4 is preferred, FIG. 4. In FIG. 4, the bore 54 of secondary nozzle 52 of torch 2 is of a diameter larger than that optimizing cutting action. If allowed to discharge to the atmosphere by removing nozzle 51, the flow jet would be sub-sonic with the arc centered well away from the bore walls by the vortex flow. In the improved transferred arc-plasma torch 2 of FIG. 4, the schematic representation illustrates the use of the primary torch body 50 which may correspond to torch 10 of the FIG. 1 embodiment in which, the cathode electrode 12 is mounted by an electrically insulating cap or end piece 11 to middle body 10 upon a cylindrical form which body 10' of cylindrical form which body 10' includes a nozzle 14 aligned with the tip of the cathode electrode at 12. A passage indicated generally at 23 opens tangentially at 23a to annular space 15 about the cathode electrode 12 with the primary gas forming the initial plasma flow discharging axially from nozzle 14.
An annular electrically insulating piece 35 separates the metal secondary nozzle piece 52 from the metal torch body 10' and forms a radially enlarged cylindrical space of secondary nozzle 54 or chamber 41. Chamber 41 receives a tangential flow of secondary gas via port 40 and which exits with the primary gas plasma flow via the secondary nozzle 37, through the secondary nozzle bore 38. Mounted to the metal secondary nozzle piece 52, is a further tertiary nozzle piece 51 which forms a tertiary nozzle 55 whose bore 56 is of a diameter smaller than secondary nozzle bore 59. A second, annular insulating piece 53 is mounted at opposite ends to the secondary nozzle piece 52 and tertiary nozzle piece 51 to form a chamber 59. In the narrow cylindrical gap which separates the secondary and tertiary nozzle pieces 52, 51, at chamber 59, a whirling flow of tertiary gas is introduced via tangential tertiary gas inlet port 57. With nozzle 55 having a nozzle bore 56 smaller than the nozzle bore 58 of the secondary nozzle 54, the exiting transfer arc gas flow is supersonic.
In this case, the work piece 60 functions as the anode electrode for the transferred arc torch, and the transferred arc 61 is capable of cutting a metal workpiece 60 whose thickness may be in excess of nine inches, providing a clean kerf 62. In the prior art representation of FIGS. 1 and 2 and in the illustrated embodiments of the invention at FIGS. 3 and 4, the electrical circuit for setting up the transferred-arc plasma jet, of extended length is represented solely by the appropriate cathode and anode connections to the negative and positive sides of an appropriate dc electrical source such as a battery (as a schematic representation only) for the cathode electrode, and anode electrode respectively.
Another embodiment of the invention is the use of the transferred plasma arc to a workpiece in the form of an electrically conducting rod or wire. The wire is rapidly melted, atomized, and sprayed at high velocity to impact against a surface to form a coating on that surface.
While the invention has been illustrated and described in detail in the drawings and foregoing description with respect to preferred embodiments, the same is to be considered as illustrative and not restrictive in character. It should be understood that only the preferred embodiments have been shown and described and that all changes and modifications that come within the spirit of the invention desire to be protected.