US 4,673,225 AGrant
Anti-Lock Brake Control System
Issue Date:1987-06-16
•4 Claims
•5 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A brake control system is described that prevents a wheel lockup condition by identifying the brake pressure that produces the maximum possible braking effort during each brake pressure application period and applying the identified pressure after an incipient wheel lockup condition is sensed. Constants in an expression estimating the braking effort are adaptively adjusted to compensate for changes in system parameters over time.
Metadata
Assignee
- General Motors Corporation
Inventor
- Alexander Kade
Application Information
Application Number:US 8275076
Filing Date:1986-02-10
Priority Date:1986-02-10
Art Unit:264
Classifications
IPC:
B60T 860B60T 866
Field of Search:
303188364100;106;105;109;DIG. 3;DIG. 4181 C;181 A426
Patent Drawings (5 sheets)
Description
Background of the Invention
This invention relates to an anti-lock control system for vehicle wheel brakes.
When the brakes of a vehicle are applied, a braking force between the wheel and the road surface is generated that is dependent upon various parameters including the road surface condition and the amount of slip between the wheel and the road surface. For a given road surface, the force between the wheel and the road surface increases with increasing slip values to a peak force occurring at a critical wheel slip value. As the value of wheel slip increases beyond the critical slip value, the force between the wheel and the road surface decreases. Stable braking results when the slip value is equal to or less than the critical slip value. However, when the slip value becomes greater than the critical slip value, braking becomes unstable resulting in sudden wheel lockup, reduced vehicle stopping distance and a deterioration in the lateral stability of the vehicle.
U.S. application Ser. No. 789,576 filed on Oct. 21, 1985 and assigned to the assignee of this invention describes a wheel lock control system for preventing the wheels of a vehicle from locking up while being braked. In this system, the wheel brake pressure that results in the wheel slip being at the critical slip value and which produces the maximum braking force between the tire and the road surface is identified. When an incipient wheel lockup condition is detected, the brake pressure so identified is then applied to the wheel brake so as to substantially continuously establish the critical slip value between the wheel and the road surface resulting in the maximum possible braking effort.
The brake pressure producing the critical slip value and therefore the maximum braking force is identified in the above system by repeatedly calculating the braking force between the wheel and the road surface during braking based on an equation defining the motion of a free body consisting of the wheel, tire and the brake. This equation utilizes measured values and system constants that are based on, for example, brake lining coefficient of friction and area and wheel radius. The brake pressure corresponding in time to the peak calculated force is stored. When an incipient wheel lockup is detected indicating that the critical wheel slip value and therefore the peak braking force between the wheel and road surface has been exceeded, the stored brake pressure that produced the peak braking force is reestablished to establish a braking condition in which the wheel slip is substantially at the critical slip value for the existing road-tire interface condition.
As long as the relationship between the constants assumed in the equation for determining the braking force are correct, the wheel brake pressure establishing the maximum braking force between the tire and the road surface is accurately determined. However, the constants and their relationship establishing optimum braking for a new vehicle may not remain optimum over the life of the vehicle or for all braking conditions. For example, the brake lining coefficient of friction may vary with use and with operating conditions such as temperature and the tire characteristics may change with wear. These variations in the parameters upon which the constants were based may affect the determination of the peak braking force and therefore the brake pressure establishing the critical slip value.
It would therefore be desirable to adjust the constants as the parameters upon which they were based change so that the brake pressure establishing the critical slip value during wheel lock control braking is accurately determined over the life of the vehicle and for all braking conditions.
Summary of the Invention
In accord with this invention, the constants based on brake system and wheel parameters that are utilized in the above-described wheel lock control system in determining the braking force between the wheel and the road surface during braking are adaptively adjusted during wheel lock controlled braking to compensate for changes in the brake system and wheel parameters. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, during wheel lock control braking the wheel lock control system repeatedly identifies the brake pressure producing the maximum calculated braking force by ramping the brake pressure following each brake pressure application and storing the brake pressure producing the maximum calculated braking force. The relationship between the constants used to calculate the braking force are adaptively adjusted based on the time required for the ramped brake pressure to cause an incipient wheel lockup condition so as to compensate for changes in the brake system parameters during braking or over the life of the vehicle.
Description of the Drawings
The invention may be best understood by reference to the following description of a preferred embodiment and the drawings in which:
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating the brake force coefficient between a wheel and a road surface as a function of the percentage slip between the wheel and road surface for two road surface conditions;
FIG. 2 is a general diagram of the braking system for controlling the brakes in accord with the principles of this invention;
FIG. 3 is a longitudinal cross-sectional view of the actuator of FIG. 2 for modulating the brake pressure to prevent wheel lockup;
FIG. 4 is a diagram of the electronic controller of FIG. 2 that is responsive to brake system parameters for controlling the brake pressure to inhibit wheel lockup in accord with the principles of this invention; and
FIGS. 5 thru 9 are diagrams illustrating the operation of the engine controller of FIG. 4.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment
A wheel under the influence of braking has two major torques acting on it: brake torque and tire torque. Brake torque arises from the application of brake pressure through the brake mechanism and tire torque is generated by the friction of the tire-road interface as wheel slip occurs. Brake torque T.sub.b is assumed to be proportional to brake pressure P.sub.b with a brake gain constant k.sub.0 dependent upon brake system parameters such as the coefficient of friction of the brake linings and is defined by the expression
Tire torque T.sub.t is related to the brake force coefficient .mu. between the tire and the road surface, the normal load N on the tire and the wheel rolling radius R and is defined by the expression
For the free body consisting of the brake, wheel, and tire, the equation of motion is
where the constant k.sub.1 is the wheel moment of inertia that is dependent upon wheel and tire characteristics and .omega. is the wheel angular acceleration. When the difference between the tire torque and the brake torque is positive, the wheel accelerates; and when negative, the wheel decelerates.
Combining expressions 1 and 3, tire torque T.sub.t is defined as
As can be seen, the tire torque can be calculated from the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1, the value of brake pressure P.sub.b which can be measured and .omega. which can be determined by differentiating the value of measured wheel speed.
The brake friction coefficient term .mu. of the tire torque T.sub.t is a nonlinear function of the magnitude of slip between the wheel and the road surface during braking and is dependent upon the road surface condition. FIG. 1 illustrates the brake friction coefficient as a function of percentage-wheel slip for two road surface conditions. For a given road surface, it can be seen that as wheel slip is increased in response to increased brake torque T.sub.b, the brake friction coefficient and therefore the tire torque T.sub.t increases until a critical slip value at which the brake friction coefficient and the tire torque are at a maximum. A further increase in wheel slip results in a decrease in the brake friction coefficient and tire torque. The maximum tire torque resulting in a maximum braking effort for a given road surface is achieved when the brake torque T.sub.b produces the critical wheel slip value. When the braking effort produces a wheel slip exceeding the critical slip value, the braking operation becomes unstable and typically results in sudden wheel lockup which in turn results in increased stopping distance and a deterioration in the steering and lateral stability of the vehicle.
The brake control system identifies the value of the braking pressure P.sub.b that produces the maximum tire torque T.sub.t. This is accomplished by continuously calculating the tire torque value T.sub.t of equation (4) during braking. Any time the calculated value is larger than any previously calculated value, the value of the braking pressure P.sub.b is stored so that the brake pressure producing the maximum tire torque is known. When an incipient wheel lock is detected, the brake pressure is dumped to allow the wheel speed to recover and the brake pressure is thereafter reapplied to the stored value or a predetermined fraction thereof (such as 0.9) to establish a braking condition in which the wheel slip is substantially at the critical slip value for the existing road surface condition. This results in substantially the maximum possible tire torque and minimum stopping distance for the road surface condition.
The brake pressure is then ramped up according to a predetermined rate schedule while determining the brake pressure producing the maximum tire torque as above and until an incipient wheel lock is again detected at which time the brake pressure is again dumped to allow the wheel speed to recover. Thus, the cycle is continuously repeated to repeatedly identify and apply the brake pressure resulting in the maximum braking effort. The ramp rate of the brake pressure is selected to force a reidentification of the brake pressure resulting in the maximum braking effort at intervals ranging between, for example, 0.25-0.5 seconds for all road surface conditions.
If the relationship or ratio of the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 in the expression (4) are chosen for a new vehicle, the relationship may not remain optimum over the life of the vehicle or for all braking conditions. If the relationship should change, an improper estimation of the tire torque results which in turn results in the determined brake pressure producing the maximum braking effort being offset from the actual pressure producing maximum braking effort.
For example, if the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is greater than the optimal ratio, a brake pressure will be identified that results in a wheel slip greater than the critical slip value. Upon the establishment of this pressure, an immediate wheel lockup condition will result. This condition can be recognized by a short time period (less than 0.25 seconds in one embodiment) between successive dumps of the brake pressure in response to detected incipient wheel lockup conditions. On the other hand, if the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is less than the optimal ratio, a brake pressure will be identified that results in a wheel slip less than the critical slip value and therefore less than optimum braking effort. This condition can be recognized by a long time period (greater than 0.5 seconds in one embodiment) between successive dumps of the brake pressure in response to detected incipient wheel lockup conditions caused by ramping the brake pressure after each reapplication of pressure following wheel recovery.
This invention determines a variation of the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 from the optimum ratio my monitoring the time period between successive dumps of the brake pressure (the time of one brake pressure dump-apply cycle) in response to detected incipient wheel lockup conditions. If the time period (or a succession of them) are outside of a predetermined range such as 0.25-0.5 seconds, the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 are adjusted in direction to cause the time periods of the brake pressure dump-apply cycles to be within the predetermined range. This assures an identification and reapplication of a brake pressure producing substantially the critical slip value and therefore maximum braking effort for all braking conditions and over the life of the vehicle.
A general overview of the wheel lock control system of this invention is illustrated in FIG. 2. The control of the brake of a single wheel is illustrated, it being understood that the control of the brakes of the remaining wheels of the vehicle are identical thereto. A standard wheel brake 10 for a wheel 11 is actuated by controlled hydraulic pressure from one of two sources. The primary source is a motor driven actuator 12 and the secondary source is a standard master cylinder 14 controlled directly by the vehicle brake pedal 16. A normally open electromagnetic valve 18 is energized when the actuator 12 is operative to control the hydraulic pressure to the brake 10 so as to decouple the master cylinder 14 and brake pedal 16 from the hydraulic pressure output of the actuator 12. This prevents pressure feedback to the vehicle operator while brake pressure is controlled by the actuator 12. When the electromagnetic valve 18 is deenergized, the hydraulic pressure to brake 10 may be modulated directly by the brake pedal 16 and master cylinder 14.
The valve 18 is deenergized only during limited vehicle operating conditions such as low vehicle speed or during failed conditions of the primary hydraulic pressure source to permit brake pressure modulation by the master cylinder 14. At all other times, the valve 18 is energized to decouple the master cylinder 14 from the braking system.
An electronic controller 20 is responsive to the outputs of a brake pedal force sensor 22 providing a signal that is a measure of the operator applied brake pedal force F, a wheel speed sensor 24 that provides a signal that is a measure of wheel speed .omega., and a pressure sensor 26 that provides a signal that is a measure of the hydraulic brake pressure P.sub.b applied to the brake 10 from the master cylinder 14 or the actuator 12. The electronic controller 20 is responsive to those signals to (a) energize the valve 18 when the wheel speed exceeds a value corresponding to a low vehicle speed such as 3 mph, (b) control the actuator 12 so as to apply a hydraulic pressure P.sub.b to the brake 10 that is proportional to the brake force F times a gain constant G for providing power assist during normal braking conditions, and (c) limit the pressure P.sub.b applied to the brake 10 to a value that results in the maximum possible tire torque T.sub.t for the road surface condition to prevent wheel lockup and to provide for the shortest possible stopping distance, lateral vehicle stability and controllable vehicle steering.
Referring to FIG. 3, the actuator 12 in the preferred embodiment includes a DC torque motor 28 whose output shaft drives an input gear 30 which in turn rotatably drives an output gear 32. The drive member 34 of a ball screw actuator is secured for rotation with the output gear 32. The drive member 34 engages and axially positions the driven member 36 of the ball screw actuator. The driven member 36 drives a piston 38 to control the hydraulic pressure output of the actuator 12. In summary, the torque output of the motor 28 is translated to a directly related hydraulic pressure P.sub.b output of the actuator 12 that is applied to the brake 10.
The actuator 12 may also take other forms. For example, it may take the form of a duty cycle modulated solenoid having an armature applying a controlled force to the piston 38. Additionally, the motor 28 current may be used as a measure of the brake pressure P.sub.b in place of the sensor 26 since the torque output of the motor 28 and therefore the hydraulic pressure P.sub.b is related to the motor current.
As specifically illustrated in FIG. 4, the electronic controller 20 in the present embodiment takes the form of a digital computer 40 and a motor control circuit 41. The digital computer is standard in form and includes a central processing unit (CPU) which executes an operating program permanently stored in a read-only memory (ROM) which also stores tables and constants utilized in controlling the hydraulic pressure input to the brake 10. Contained within the CPU are conventional counters, registers, accumulators, flag flip flops, etc. along with a clock which provides a high frequency clock signal.
The computer 40 also includes a random access memory (RAM) into which data may be temporarily stored and from which data may be read at various address locations determined in accord with the program stored in the ROM. A power control unit (PCU) receives battery voltage and provides regulated power to the various operating circuits in the electronic controller 20.
The computer 40 further includes an input/output circuit (I/O) that in turn includes a discrete output section controlled by the CPU to provide a control signal to the valve 18. In controlling the brake 10, the computer outputs a digital signal to the motor control circuit 41 via the I/O representing a desired value of the hydraulic brake pressure. The motor control circuit 41 converts the digital signal representing the desired pressure to an analog signal which is compared with the actual measured value of the brake pressure P.sub.b. By standard closed loop adjustment that may include both proportional and integral terms, the motor 28 current is controlled so that the actual measured brake pressure P.sub.b is made equal to the desired pressure.
The I/O also includes an input counter section which receives a pulse output from the wheel speed sensor 24 having a frequency representing wheel speed. Wheel speed is then determined by counting clock pulses between wheel speed pulses.
An analog-to-digital unit (ADU) is included which provides for the measurement of analog signals. The analog signals representing conditions upon which the hydraulic brake pressure to the brake 10 is based are supplied to the ADU. In the present embodiment, those signals include the brake pressure value P.sub.b from the pressure sensor 26 and the output of the brake pedal force sensor 22 providing a measure of the pedal force F. The analog signals are sampled and converted under the control of the CPU and stored in ROM designated RAM memory locations.
The operation of the electronic controller 20 in controlling the hyraulic brake pressure to the brake 10 in accord with the principles of this invention is illustrated in the FIGS. 5-9. Referring first to FIG. 5, when power is first applied to the system such as when the vehicle ignition switch is rotated to its "on" position, the computer program is initiated at point 42 and then proceeds to a step 44 where the computer 40 provides for system initialization. For example, at this step initial values stored in the ROM are entered into ROM designated RAM memory locations and counters, flags and timers are initialized.
After the initialization step 44, the program proceeds to a step 46 where the program allows interrupts to occur and then to a background loop 48 which is continuously repeated. This loop may include, for example, diagnostic routines. In the preferred embodiment of this invention, an interrupt is provided by the CPU at 5 millisecond intervals during which the routines for establishing the hydraulic brake pressure P.sub.b are executed.
Referring to FIG. 6, the 5 millisecond interrupt routine for controlling the vehicle brake 10 is illustrated. This routine is entered at step 50 and proceeds to a step 52 where the last measured wheel speed is saved and the new values of wheel speed, brake pedal force and brake line pressure are read and stored in ROM designated RAM memory locations.
Next at step 53, a timing register timing the time t.sub.n between successive dumps of the brake pressure in response to sensed incipient wheel lockup conditions is incremented. As will be described, this time is used in the adaptive adjustment of the constants of equation (4) in accord with this invention.
At step 54, the program determines whether or not the operator is commanding brake application. The brakes are considered applied if the value of the brake pedal force F is greater than zero. If the brakes are not applied, the program proceeds to a step 56 where a brake pressure command value P.sub.c is set equal to zero. Also at this step, the speed of the vehicle as represented by the speed .omega..sub.v of a hypothetical unbraked wheel is set equal to the wheel speed measured at step 52. Since the brakes are not applied, the wheel slip is substantially at zero so that the actual and hypothetical wheel speeds can be equated.
From step 56, the program proceeds to a step 58 where a D-flag is reset to condition the program to execute an identification routine (illustrated in FIG. 7) which identifies the brake pressure producing the critical wheel slip value and therefore the maximum possible braking effort and which establishes the identified brake pressure following the sensing of an incipient wheel lockup condition. As will be described, the D-flag is set when an incipient wheel lockup condition is sensed to condition the program to execute a dump routine (illustrated in FIG. 8) to dump the brake pressure and allow the wheel speed to recover. Also at step 58, the maximum allowable brake line pressure P.sub.m is set equal to a calibration constant K.sub.p such as 1500 psi and a RAM memory location storing the value of the maximum calculated tire torque value T.sub.tm is set equal to zero. Thereafter, the program exits the 5 millisecond interrupt routine and returns to the background loop 48 of FIG. 5.
The foregoing steps 52 thru 58 are continuously repeated at 5 millisecond intervals as long as the vehicle operator does not command brake application. However, when a force F is applied to the brake pedal, the program proceeds from step 54 to a series of steps that provide an estimation of the value of vehicle speed .omega..sub.v as represented by the speed of a hypothetical unbraked wheel. It is noted that the initial value of vehicle speed was set equal to the actual wheel speed at step 56 prior to operation of the brake pedal 16. This series of steps begins at step 59 where the wheel speed rate of change .omega. is determined from the old value of wheel speed saved at step 52 and the new value stored at step 52. The determined rate of change of wheel speed is then compared with a constant deceleration of 1 g at step 60. The 1 g deceleration value represents the maximum possible vehicle deceleration. When wheel deceleration is less than 1 g, it is assumed that the vehicle is decelerating at the same rate as the wheel 11. If, however, the wheel deceleration exceeds 1 g, it is assumed that the vehicle deceleration remains at the maximum value of 1 g.
If the wheel deceleration is less than or equal to 1g, the program proceeds from step 60 to a step 62 where .omega. is compared to zero. If the comparison indicates wheel deceleration, the program proceeds to step 64 where the vehicle speed rate of change .omega..sub.v is set equal to the actual measured rate of change of wheel speed. If, however, the comparison at step 62 indicates no change in wheel speed or wheel acceleration, the program proceeds to a step 66 where the vehicle speed rate of change .omega..sub.v is set equal to zero.
Returning to step 60, if it is determined that the wheel deceleration is 1 g or greater, the program proceeds to a step 68 where .omega..sub.v is set equal to the maximum possible vehicle deceleration of 1 g.
From the respective steps 64, 66 or 68, the program proceeds to a step 70 where vehicle speed is estimated. This estimation is based on an initial value of vehicle speed .omega..sub.v-1 determined during the previous execution of the interrupt routine and the rate of change of vehicle speed determined at step 64, 66 or 68 over the 5 millisecond interval .DELTA.t between interrupt periods.
From step 70, the program proceeds to step 72 where the actual wheel speed measured at step 52 is compared to the vehicle speed determined at step 70. If the wheel speed is equal to or greater than the vehicle speed (which cannot occur during braking of the wheel), the value of vehicle speed is corrected at step 74 by setting the vehicle speed equal to wheel speed and the initial vehicle speed .omega..sub.v-1 to be used at step 70 in the next execution of the interrupt routine is set equal to wheel speed. If at step 72 the wheel speed is determined to be less than the vehicle speed, the program proceeds to a step 76 where the initial vehicle speed .omega..sub.v-1 to be used at step 70 during the next execution of the interrupt routine set equal to the value of vehicle speed determined at step 70.
Following step 74 or step 76, the program proceeds to a step 78 where the vehicle speed is compared to a calibration constant such as 3 mph. If the vehicle speed is less than 3 mph, the program proceeds to a step 80 where the commanded brake line pressure P.sub.c is set equal to the value of the brake pedal force F times a gain constant G for providing power assisted braking. Thereafter, the program proceeds to a step 82 where the valve 18 of FIG. 2 is deenergized and then to the step 58 previously described.
If the vehicle speed is greater than 3 mph, the program proceeds from step 78 to step 84 where the valve 18 is energized to decouple the master cylinder 14 from the actuator 12. Brake application is thereafter provided solely via the actuator 12 as controlled by the electronic controller 20. From step 84, the program proceeds to a step 86 where the state of the D-flag is sampled. If the D-flag is reset to condition the program to execute the identify routine, the program proceeds to a step 88 where the identify routine is executed.
If step 86 determines that the D-flag is set, the program is conditioned to execute a dump routine, and the program proceeds to a step 90 where the dump routine is executed. During this routine, the pressure to the brake 10 is dumped to allow the speed of the wheel 11 to recover from an incipient lockup condition. Following the steps 88 or 90, the program exits the 5 millisecond interrupt routine of FIG. 6 and returns to the background loop 48 of FIG. 5.
Referring to FIG. 7, the identify routine 88 of FIG. 6 is illustrated. This routine (A) provides for power assisted braking, (B) identifies the brake line pressure producing the critical wheel slip corresponding to the maximum possible braking force between the tire and the road surface, (C) senses an incipient wheel lockup condition and conditions the program to execute the dump routine to allow wheel recovery from the lockup condition, (D) reestablishes the brake line pressure to the identified pressure producing the critical slip value, (E) adaptively reduces the brake line pressure until a stable braking pressure is identified if the pressure originally identified results in unstable braking due to system parameter changes and (F) adaptively changes the constants in the expression used to estimate the tire torque.
The identify routine is entered at point 92 and proceeds to a step 94 where the value of the tire torque T.sub.t is calculated in accord with the equation (4) from the wheel deceleration determined at step 59, the brake line pressure measured at step 52 and the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1. From step 94, the program proceeds to steps 96 and 98 that function to identify the brake pressure producing the maximum value of tire torque. At step 96, the tire torque calculated at step 94 is compared with the largest previously calculated value T.sub.tm stored in memory. If the value calculated at step 94 is greater than the stored value, the program proceeds to a step 98 where the stored value T.sub.tm is set equal to the larger value calculated at step 94. Also at this step, a stored value of brake line pressure P.sub.bm is set equal to the brake line pressure P.sub.b measured at step 52. Therefore, the stored value P.sub.bm represents the brake line pressure corresponding in time to the maximum calculated value of tire torque stored at step 98.
The foregoing sequence of steps 96 and 98 are repeated with each execution of the identify routine as long as the tire torque is increasing so that the brake line pressure resulting in the maximum calculated value of tire torque is always known. If step 96 should determine that the calculated value of tire torque T.sub.t is less than the stored maximum calculated value T.sub.tm, step 98 is bypassed. This will occur when the brake pressure P.sub.b results in a wheel slip that exceeds the critical value which in turn results in a decrease in the tire torque. The stored value of brake pressure P.sub.bm then represents the brake line pressure establishing the critical wheel slip value and therefore the maximum braking effort. As will be described, this stored brake line pressure is utilized after an incipient wheel lock condition is detected to reestablish a braking condition that produces substantially the critical wheel slip value.
The program next determines whether or not an incipient wheel lock condition exists as represented by excessive wheel deceleration or excessive wheel slip. At step 100, the rate of change in wheel speed determined at step 59 is compared with a deceleration reference value such as 10 g which, if exceeded, indicates that braking has become unstable and an incipient wheel lockup condition exists. If step 100 does not detect an incipient wheel lockup condition, the program proceeds to step 102 where the ratio .omega./.omega..sub.v is compared with a reference value S.sub.m which represents a wheel slip value that exceeds the largest possible critical wheel slip value for any road surface condition. A ratio less than S.sub.m indicates that braking has become unstable and an incipient wheel lockup condition exists.
If neither of the steps 100 and 102 detects an incipient wheel lockup condition, the program proceeds to a step 104 where the value of the operator requested brake pressure that is equal to the applied pedal force F times the power assist gain factor G is compared with a maximum allowable brake line pressure P.sub.m. If the product is less than the maximum value, the program proceeds to a step 105 where an adaptive identifier enable flag is reset to disable the adaptive identifier routine that adaptively adjusts the ratio of the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1. The program then executes a step 106 where the commanded brake pressure value P.sub.c is adjusted toward the operator requested pressure in accord with a first order lag filter equation to provide power assisted braking. Thereafter, the program exits the identify routine and returns to the background loop 48.
If at step 104 it is determined that the operator requested brake pressure is greater than the maximum allowable pressure P.sub.m, the program proceeds to a pressure ramp routine where, through repeated executions of the identify routine, the maximum allowable brake pressure P.sub.m and the commanded brake line pressure P.sub.c are ramped up until step 104 detects that the maximum allowable brake pressure has become greater than the operator requested pressure or, if the operator requested brake pressure results in an unstable braking condition, until the commanded brake pressure results in an incipient wheel lockup condition at which time the brake pressure establishing the critical slip value has been identified by the steps 96 and 98. As will be described, the brake pressure so identified is then used to reestablish the commanded brake pressure after the wheel recovers from the incipient lockup condition. The result of the ramping of the brake pressure is a periodic low frequency reidentification of the brake pressure producing the critical wheel slip value. This enables the system to adapt to increasing values of the brake friction coefficient resulting from changes in the tire-road surface interface. Further, as will be described, the time required to ramp the pressure to a value causing an incipient lockup condition is used to adaptively adjust the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 of equation (4).
The routine for ramping the brake pressure begins at a step 108 where the value of a time t.sub.1 in a RAM timing register is compared to zero. The initial value of time t.sub.1 establishes a delay in the ramping of the commanded brake pressure P.sub.c. Thereafter, the time t.sub.1 functions in establishing the ramp rate. If the time t.sub.1 is greater than zero, the program proceeds to a step 110 where the time t.sub.1 is decremented. Thereafter, at step 112, the program proceeds to adjust the commanded brake pressure P.sub.c toward a predetermined fraction of the maximum allowable brake pressure P.sub.m in accord with a first order lag filter equation. By setting the maximum allowable brake pressure P.sub.m to the stored pressure P.sub.bm after an incipient wheel lockup condition is sensed (as will be described), the commanded pressure established at step 112 will be the predetermined fraction of the pressure producing the critical wheel slip. In one embodiment, the predetermined fraction is 0.9 so that the resultant brake pressure produces substantially the critical wheel slip value.
As long as an incipient wheel lock condition is not detected and the operator requested brake pressure is greater than the maximum allowable brake line pressure P.sub.m, the steps 108 thru 112 are repeated at the five millisecond interrupt interval until t.sub.1 has been decremented to zero. After t.sub.1 has been decremented to zero, the program proceeds from step 108 to step 114 where the time t.sub.2 in a RAM timing register is compared to zero. If the time t.sub.2 is greater than zero, the program proceeds to a step 116 where the time t.sub.2 is decremented.
Following step 116 or step 114, the program proceeds to a step 118 where the maximum allowable brake pressure P.sub.m is incremented and the time t.sub.1 is set equal to K.sub.n (t.sub.2 +1). Thereafter, the steps 114 thru 118 will be bypassed upon repeated execution of the identify routine until t.sub.1 is again decremented to zero. From this it can be seen that the maximum allowable brake pressure P.sub.m is periodically incremented at intervals determined by K.sub.n and t.sub.2. When t.sub.2 is decremented to zero, the maximum allowable brake line pressure P.sub.m is incremented with each K.sub.n executions of the identify routine.
Following step 118, the program proceeds to step 112 where the commanded brake line pressure P.sub.c is again set as previously described. Repeated executions of the foregoing steps function to ramp the commanded brake pressure P.sub.c exponentially. This increase will be continued until (A) an incipient wheel lock condition is forced so as to force a reidentification of the brake pressure producing the critical slip value via the steps 96 and 98 or (B) the operator requested brake pressure becomes less than the maximum allowable pressure P.sub.m.
If the commanded brake pressure P.sub.c is increased to a point resulting in the wheel slip value becoming greater than the critical slip value, the wheels then quickly approach a lockup condition. This incipient wheel lock condition is detected as previously described at step 100 or step 102. When the incipient wheel lockup condition is detected, the brake line pressure P.sub.bm in memory at that time is the brake line pressure producing the critical wheel slip value and therefore the maximum possible tire torque.
After a wheel lockup condition has been sensed, the program proceeds to a step 120 where the time t.sub.2 is compared with a constant t.sub.k1. As will be seen, these two values will be equal only if a wheel lockup condition is sensed within a predetermined time t.sub.k2 after the brake pressure is reestablished after recovery from an incipient wheel lockup condition. A wheel lockup occurring within this period after reapplication of the brake pressure implies the application of an unstable brake pressure producing an incipient wheel lockup condition. If this condition exists, the program proceeds to a step 122 where the brake pressure P.sub.bm, stored at step 98 and identified as the pressure establishing the critical wheel slip value, is compared with the commanded brake pressure P.sub.c which resulted in the incipient wheel lockup condition. If greater, the program proceeds to a step 124 where the stored value of P.sub.bm is corrected to the commanded pressure P.sub.c. This condition represents an error in the calculation of the tire torque. Since the brake line pressure producing the critical slip value can never be greater than the commanded brake line pressure P.sub.c that resulted in an incipient wheel lock condition, the value of P.sub.bm is reduced to the value of P.sub.c causing the incipient wheel lock condition.
From step 120 if the time t.sub.2 is not equal to t.sub.k1, from step 122 if P.sub.bm is less than P.sub.c, or from step 124, the program proceeds to a step 126 where the D-flag is set to condition the program to execute the dump routine and certain initial conditions for reapplication of brake pressure are established. The initial conditions include setting the maximum allowable brake pressure P.sub.m equal to the stored value of brake pressure P.sub.bm (the brake pressure identified as producing the critical wheel slip value), setting the time t.sub.1 equal to the constant t.sub.k2 and setting the time t.sub.2 equal to the constant t.sub.k1.
Next, at step 127, the program executes the adaptive identifier routine that adaptively adjusts the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 in the equation (4) in accord with the principles of this invention. Then at step 128 the program executes the dump routine. Thereafter, during executions of the 5 ms interrupt routine of FIG. 6, the identify routine is bypassed via the step 86 and the dump routine 90 is executed until the D-flag is again reset.
The dump routine executed at step 128 of the identify routine of FIG. 7 and at step 90 of the interrupt routine of FIG. 6 is illustrated in FIG. 8. This routine is entered at point 130 and proceeds to step 132 where wheel slip represented by the ratio of wheel speed .omega. to the speed .omega..sub.v of the hypothetical unbraked wheel is compared to a constant S.sub.k representing wheel speed approaching vehicle speed. S.sub.k may be, for example, 0.9 representing a wheel slip of 10 percent. If the ratio is less than S.sub.k, the program proceeds to a step 134 where the commanded brake pressure P.sub.c is set to zero to allow the wheel speed to recover from the incipient wheel lockup and toward vehicle speed. When step 132 detects wheel speed recovery, the program proceeds from step 132 to a step 136 where the D-flag is reset to condition the program to execute the identify routine of FIG. 7. Also at this step, the maximum value of calculated tire torque T.sub.tm is set to zero so that the identify routine is conditioned to reidentify the brake pressure establishing the critical wheel slip value. The program then exits the dump routine of FIG. 8 and returns to the background loop 48.
During the following executions of the 5 millisecond interrupt routine of FIG. 6, the program executes the identify routine at step 88 until the D-flag is again set at step 126 after an incipient wheel lockup condition is sensed.
Referring to FIG. 9, the adaptive identifier routine 127 of FIG. 7 is illustrated. This routine is executed each time following the detection of an incipient wheel lockup condition at step 100 or 102 and therefore once during each brake pressure apply-dump cycle during wheel lock controlled braking.
The adaptive identifier routine is entered at point 138 and then proceeds to step 140 where the state of the adaptive identifier enable flag is sampled. This flag is reset at step 105 of the identify routine of FIG. 7 during normal braking prior to any wheel lock controlled braking. Therefore, when the identify routine first detects an incipient wheel lockup condition, the adaptive identifier enable flag is in a reset state. With the flag in this state, the program proceeds to a step 142 where the flag is set after which the time t.sub.n that is incremented at step 53 during the execution of each 5 ms interrupt routine of FIG. 6 is reset to 0. From step 144, the program exits the adaptive identifier routine.
The system as previously described then proceeds to dump the brake pressure to allow the wheel speed to recover from the incipient lockup condition and the brake pressure determined to establish the critical slip value is reestablished. Thereafter, the brake pressure is ramped until an incipient wheel lockup condition is again detected.
During the next execution of the adaptive identifier routine following a detected incipient wheel lockup condition, the program proceeds from step 140 to a step 146 where the time t.sub.n is compared to a calibration constant t.sub.3 which, in one embodiment, may be 0.5 seconds. The time t.sub.n, having been reset to 0 following the last detection of an incipient wheel lockup condition, is the time of one brake pressure dump-apply cycle during wheel lock controlled braking.
A time t.sub.n greater than t.sub.3 implies an improper estimation of the tire torque by the expression (4) due to a change in the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 from the assumed values. This condition indicates that the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is less than the optimum ratio resulting in a brake pressure being identified that results in a wheel slip less than the critical slip value when reestablished at step 112 of FIG. 7. If t.sub.n is greater than t.sub.3, the program proceeds from step 146 to step 148 where a HI counter counting the number of consecutive times the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is higher than optimum is reset to 0. Next at step 150, a LO counter counting the number of consecutive brake pressure dump-apply cycles the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is lower than optimum is incremented. At step 152 the number in the LO counter is compared to a constant K representing the number of consecutive cycles that t.sub.n must exceed t.sub.3 before the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 are adjusted. If the count is less than K, the program sets t.sub.n to 0 at step 144 to begin timing the next brake pressure dump-apply cycle.
If the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is less than the optimum ratio for K cycles represented by t.sub.n exceeding t.sub.3 for K consecutive cycles, the program proceeds from step 152 to step 154 where the value of the constant k.sub.0 is incremented and the value of the constant k.sub.1 is decremented to increase the ratio so that the tire torque estimated by the expression (4) is closer to the optimum. From step 152 or 154, the program sets the time t.sub.n to zero at step 144 to begin timing the next cycle. Each time wheel lock controlled braking is initiated, the steps 146-154 are repeated until t.sub.n becomes less than t.sub.3 indicating the identification and reapplication of a brake pressure producing substantially the critical slip value and therefore maximum braking effort.
Returning to step 146, if the time t.sub.n is less than t.sub.3, the program proceeds to a step 156 where the LO counter is reset. Thereafter, the time t.sub.n is compared with a constant t.sub.4 at step 158. If t.sub.n is greater than t.sub.4, the ratio of the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 is substantially optimum and the program proceeds to step 144 to set t.sub.n to zero to begin timing the next cycle.
A time t.sub.n less than t.sub.4 implies an improper estimation of the tire torque by the expression (4) due to a change in the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 from the assumed values. This condition indicates that the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is greater than the optimum ratio resulting in a brake pressure being identified that resulted in a wheel slip greater than the critical slip value when reestablished at step 112 of FIG. 7. The wheels immediately decelerate toward lockup which is detected at step 100 or step 102 thereby accounting for the small value of t.sub.n.
If t.sub.n is less than t.sub.4, the program proceeds from step 158 to step 160 where the HI counter counting the number of consecutive brake pressure dump-apply cycles the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is higher than optimum is incremented. At step 162, the number in the HI counter is compared to the constant K representing the number of consecutive cycles that t.sub.n must be less than t.sub.4 before the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 are adjusted. If the count is less than K, the program sets t.sub.n to 0 at step 144 to begin timing the next brake pressure dump-apply cycle.
If the ratio k.sub.0 /k.sub.1 is greater than the optimum ratio for K cycles represented by t.sub.n exceeding t.sub.3 for K consecutive cycles, the program proceeds from step 162 to step 164 where the value of the constant k.sub.0 is decremented and the value of the constant k.sub.1 is incremented to decrease the ratio so that the tire torque estimated by the expression (4) is closer to the optimum. Each time wheel lock controlled braking is initiated, the steps 156-164 are repeated until t.sub.n becomes greater than t.sub.4 indicating the identification and reapplication of a brake pressure producing substantially the critical slip value and therefore maximum braking effort.
From the foregoing, it can be seen that the adaptive identifier routine of FIG. 9 is effective to adjust the constants in the equation (4) for calculating tire torque so as to maintain the duration of the brake pressure dump-apply cycle within a range between time t.sub.3 and t.sub.4 to thereby adjust for changes in the parameters determining the constants.
A brief summary of operation will now be described. At step 58 prior to the operator applying the vehicle brakes and at step 136 prior to brake pressure being reapplied after being dumped by the dump routine of FIG. 8, the stored maximum value T.sub.tm of calculated tire torque is set to zero so that prior to each application of brake pressure, the identify routine is conditioned to identify the brake pressure corresponding in time to the maximum calculated tire torque T.sub.tm.
As the commanded brake pressure P.sub.c is increased via steps 104 and 106 or ramped up via the steps 104 and steps 108 through 118, the stored brake pressure value P.sub.bm is continually updated with each increasing calculated value of tire torque.
When an incipient wheel lockup condition is sensed at step 100 or 102, the stored value of P.sub.bm is the brake pressure that produced the maximum calculated braking effort for the existing tire-road interface condition. The maximum allowable brake pressure P.sub.m is then set equal to the value of P.sub.bm at step 126.
The D-flag is then set at step 126 after which the dump routine of FIG. 8 is repeated during each 5 ms interrupt to dump the brake pressure to allow the wheel speed to recover. When the wheel speed has recovered, the D-flag is reset at step 136 so that the identify routine is then executed during each 5 ms interrupt. When executed, the identify routine reapplies the brake pressure at step 112 to the predetermined fraction of the maximum allowable brake pressure P.sub.m which was previously set equal to the value P.sub.bm that established the critical wheel slip value. After the time t.sub.k2 (the initial value of t.sub.1 set at step 126), the brake pressure is ramped until an incipient wheel lock condition is again detected. While the brake pressure is being reapplied and thereafter ramped, the steps 96 and 98 are functioning to reidentify and store the brake pressure producing the critical wheel slip value.
The foregoing cycle is continually repeated as long as the operator requested pressure is greater than the maximum allowable pressure P.sub.m. The cycle time is slow so that the wheel slip is substantially continuously controlled at the critical value.
If the road surface friction coefficient should increase while the brake pressure is being limited to prevent wheel lockup, the system automatically adapts to the change via the brake pressure ramp-up function provided by the steps 108 through 118. By ramping the brake pressure, the system is caused to reidentify the brake pressure producing the critical wheel slip value and in so doing, adapts to the change in the tire-road surface interface.
If the road surface friction coefficient should decrease while the brake pressure is being limited to prevent wheel lockup, the commanded brake pressure P.sub.c becomes excessive resulting in the wheel decelerating toward lockup. This incipient lockup condition is sensed at step 100 or 102 and the brake pressure dumped and subsequently reapplied as previously described. During reapplication of the brake pressure, steps 96 and 98 will reidentify the brake pressure producing the maximum calculated braking effort for the new tire-road surface interface condition as the wheel decelerates again toward lockup. This pressure (reduced by the fraction at step 112) is then applied as previously described after the brake pressure is next dumped in response to the sensed incipient wheel lockup.
During wheel lock controlled braking as above described, the adaptive identifier routine of FIG. 9 is executed each time an incipient wheel lockup is sensed to enable the dump routine to dump the brake pressure. Based on the time between each brake pressure dump in response to a sensed impending lockup condition, the adaptive identifier routine adjusts the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 so that the wheel lock control cycle time is maintained within the predetermined range. In this manner, the system adapts to changes in the system constants over time and for varying braking conditions so as to always provide an accurate identification of the brake pressure producing the critical slip value and therefore the maximum braking effort.
The foregoing description of a preferred embodiment for the purpose of explaining the principles of this invention is not to be considered as limiting or restricting the invention since many modifications may be made by the exercise of skill in the art without departing from the scope of the invention.
Claims
The embodiments of the invention in which an exclusive property or privilege is claimed are defined as follows:
1. A wheel lock control system for limiting the brake pressure applied to the brakes of a vehicle wheel brake system, the wheel lock control system comprising: means responsive to predetermined wheel and brake system parameters for estimating the braking force tending to accelerate the wheel during the application of brake pressure; means for cyclically (A) identifying the brake pressure corresponding in time to the maximum estimated brake force following each application of brake pressure, (B) detecting an incipient lockup condition of the wheel, (C) dumping the brake pressure to allow the wheel to recover from the incipient lockup condition, (D) reapplying a brake pressure following recovery from an incipient wheel lockup condition at a value substantially equal to the last identified brake pressure and (E) ramping the brake pressure at a predetermined rate until the brake pressure is again dumped following detection of an incipient lockup condition of the wheel to cause reidentification of the brake pressure corresponding in time to maximum estimated brake force; means for timing the period of each cycle comprised of identifying the brake pressure, detecting an incipient lockup condition, dumping the brake pressure and reapplying a brake pressure; and means for adjusting the response of the means for estimating the braking force to the predetermined wheel and brake system parameters so as to maintain the timed period within a predetermined range representing an identified brake pressure establishing substantially the actual maximum brake force.
2. The wheel lock control system of claim 1 wherein the brake pressure reapplied following recovery from an incipient wheel lockup condition is a predetermined fraction of the last identified value brake pressure.
3. A wheel lock control system for limiting the brake pressure P.sub.b applied to the brakes of a wheel of a vehicle, the wheel lock control system comprising: means for estimating the tire torque T.sub.t tending to accelerate the wheel during the application of brake pressure in accord with the expression where .omega. is the wheel angular acceleration and k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 are constants, the constants and their relationship tending to vary over time and with braking conditions; means for cyclically (A) identifying the brake pressure value P.sub.bm corresponding in time to the maximum estimated tire torque T.sub.t following each application of brake pressure, (B) detecting an incipient lockup condition of the wheel, (C) dumping the brake pressure to allow the wheel to recover from the incipient lockup condition, (D) reapplying a brake pressure following recovery from an incipient wheel lockup condition at a value substantially equal to P.sub.bm and (E) ramping the brake pressure at a predetermined rate until the brake pressure is again dumped following detection of an incipient lockup condition of the wheel to cause reidentification of the brake pressure value P.sub.bm corresponding in time to maximum estimated tire torque T.sub.t ; means for timing the period of each cycle comprised of identifying the brake pressure value P.sub.bm, detecting an incipient lockup condition, dumping the brake pressure and reapplying a brake pressure; and means for adjusting the values of the constants k.sub.0 and k.sub.1 relative to one another in a sense tending to maintain the timed period within a predetermined range representing an identified brake pressure value P.sub.bm establishing substantially the actual maximum tire torque.
4. The method of limiting the brake pressure applied to the brakes of a vehicle wheel comprising the steps of: estimating the tire torque tending to accelerate the wheel during the application of brake pressure in response to predetermined parameters; cyclically (A) storing the value of brake pressure corresponding in time to the maximum tire torque monitored following each application of brake pressure, (B) detecting an incipient wheel lockup condition, (C) dumping the brake pressure to allow recovery from the detected incipient wheel lockup condition, (D) reapplying the brake pressure following a detected incipient wheel lockup condition to substantially the value of the last stored value of brake pressure and (E) ramping the brake pressure until an incipient wheel lockup condition is detected; timing each cycle of storing, detecting, dumping and reapplying; and adjusting the estimation response to the predetermined parameters in a sense tending to maintain the time of each cycle within a predetermined range representing a stored value of brake pressure establishing substantially the actual maximum tire torque.
Patent Citations (4)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3614173 | 1971-10-01 | Branson | |
| US3663069 | 1972-05-01 | Perry et al. | |
| US3674318 | 1972-07-01 | Hickner et al. | |
| US3744852 | 1973-07-01 | Riordan |