Background of the Invention
This invention relates to an echo cancelling circuit for use in a long-distance telephone network and, in particular, in a long-distance conference communication system.
Recently, a long-distance conference communication teleconference system has been developed which is suitable for a conference concurrently held at distant locations, namely, auditoria geographically spaced from one another. Such a system is very effective for saving money, time, and labor of participants attending the conference.
In general, an echo canceller circuit is coupled to a telephone transmitter, a telephone receiver, a sending path, and a receiving path. The circuit receives a send-in signal from the transmitter and sends a send-out signal to a remote party through the sending path. The circuit furthermore receives a receive-in signal from the remote party through the receiving path. The receive-in signal is supplied to the receiver for reproduction of the voice of the remote party. The signal supplied to the receiver will be called a receive-out signal. The circuit is for preventing a part of the receive-in signal from being sent back to the remote party as an echo signal in the send-out signal.
When such an echo cancelling circuit is used in a long-distance conference system, a microphone is used in place of the telephone transmitter. A loudspeaker is used in lieu of the telephone receiver so that the attendants in a particular auditorium can listen to the speech of a speaker in a remote auditorium.
With this system, it should be considered that the loudspeaker is unfavorably acoustically coupled to the microphone. Even a disagreeable howling takes place when the loudspeaker is acoustically closely coupled to the microphone. Such a howling is comparatively readily avoided in a known manner.
In addition to avoiding the howling, it is required in the system to weaken acoustic coupling between the loudspeaker and the microphone. This is because an increasing number of the loudspeakers and the microphones are arranged in the system with an increase of the auditoria and, as a result, acoustic coupling in a total system is apt to become strong.
Furthermore, when each auditorium is spaced far from the others and is, in particular, communicable through a satellite with one another, a speaker's voice sent from one microphone in a near-end auditorium is returned back to the near-end auditorium, as so called an echo electric signal, through acoustic coupling between the loudspeaker and the microphone at a far-end auditorium. Such an echo electric signal is reproduced into an acoustic noise about one second after the speaker's voice is sent.
Acoustic coupling between the loudspeaker and the microphone should be related to reverberation of a phonic sound in each auditorium. Such reverberation induces a reverberation electric signal into a send-in signal sent from the microphone. The reverberation electric signal usually lasts for a considerably long duration as compared with the echo electric signal. If the reverberation electric signal was completely suppressed or cancelled in each auditorium, the echo electric signal would not be returned back from the far-end auditorium to a near-end auditorium.
In a conventional conference communication system, a voice switch has been used to suppress the reverberation electric signal. As will later be described with reference to a few of several figures of the accompanying drawing, the voice switch comprises a first variable attenuator between a microphone and a sending path, a second variable attenuator between a loudspeaker and a receiving path, and a comparator for carrying out comparison between a send-in signal and a receive-in signal. The first and the second attenuators are controlled in accordance with a result of comparison at the comparator. With the voice switch, the reverberation electric signal is favorably removed by adjusting the first and the second attenuators as long as a total attenuation of the voice switch is comparatively small. However, when the total attenuation becomes large, an audio electric signal is widely varied in level. Such a variation brings about a phenomenon like a fading.
Alternatively, it may be possible to utilize, as an echo cancelling circuit for the conference communication system, an echo canceller used in a long-distance telephone network. However, the echo canceller has a serious problem to be solved in order to apply the echo canceller to the conference communication system, as will later be described with reference to a few figures of the accompanying drawing.
Summary of the Invention
It is an object of this invention to provide an echo cancelling circuit which is capable of effectively removing a reverberation lasting a comparatively long term.
It is another object of this invention to provide an echo cancelling circuit of the type described, which is capable of keeping natural conversations.
It is a further object of this invention to provide an echo cancelling circuit of the type described, which is effectively applicable to a conference communication system.
An echo cancelling circuit to which this invention is applicable is responsive to a send-in and a receive-in signal for producing a send-out signal. The send-in and the receive-in signals have a common lower frequency band and a common higher frequency band. The send-in signal includes a reverberation signal substantially during each interval of time during which an audio signal sent from a remote party is dominant in the receive-in signal. According to this invention, the echo cancelling circuit comprises first means responsive to the send-in signal for separately producing a first low frequency input component and a first high frequency input component which are representative of the send-in signal in the lower and the higher frequency bands, respectively, and second means responsive to a circuit input signal for producing a second low frequency input component. The circuit input signal has the common lower and higher frequency bands. The second low frequency input component is representative of the circuit input signal in the lower frequency band. The circuit further comprises third means for supplying the receive-in signal to the second means as the circuit input signal, a self-adaptive echo canceller responsive to the first and the second low frequency input components for self-adaptively cancelling the reverberation signal in the lower frequency band to produce an output signal component, and fourth means responsive to the output signal component and the first high frequency input component for producing the send-out signal.
Brief Description of the Drawing
FIG. 1 shows a block diagram of a combination of a self-adaptive echo canceller with an acoustic coupling circuit for use in pointing out a problem induced from the combination;
FIG. 2 is a graphical representation of a frequency distribution of an audio electric signal;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an echo cancelling circuit according to a first embodiment of this invention;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram of an echo cancelling circuit according to a second embodiment of this invention;
FIG. 5 is a block diagram of an echo cancelling circuit according to a third embodiment of this invention; and
FIG. 6 shows a block diagram of a combination of a specialized acoustic coupling circuit with an echo cancelling circuit according to the instant invention.
Description of the Preferred Embodiments
Referring to FIG. 1, a self-adaptive echo canceller 10 is for use in combination with an acoustic coupling circuit 11 in order to point out defects resulting from a mere combination of the adaptive echo canceller 10 with the acoustic coupling circuit 11.
The adaptive echo canceller 10 has a send-in terminal 12, a send-out terminal 13, a receive-in terminal 14, and a receive-out terminal 15. The send-out and the receive-in terminals 13 and 14 are to be connected to sending and receiving paths 16 and 17, respectively, on which send-out and receive-in signals indicated at e and x appear, respectively.
Coupled to the send-in and the receive-out terminals 12 and 15, the acoustic coupling circuit 11 comprises a microphone 18 and a loudspeaker 19. When a speaker 21 makes a speech, his voice is transferred into an output acoustic signal by the microphone 18 to be supplied as a send-in signal y through an amplifier (unnumbered) to the send-in terminal 13. On the other hand, a receive-out signal is supplied from the receive-out terminal 15 through an amplifier (unnumbered) to the loudspeaker 19. The receive-out signals depicted at the same reference character as the receive-in signal x because the receive-in signal x is sent as the receive-out signal without any modification. The microphone 18 will herein be referred to, together with the accompanying amplifier, as an acoustic transmitter 18. Likewise, a combination of the loudspeaker 19 and the accompanying amplifier will be called an acoustic receiver 19.
When the acoustic coupling circuit 11 is located in a predetermined space, such as in an auditorium, the acoustic output signal inevitably results in an acoustic reverberation signal at the microphone 18 as depicted by a curved line drawn with an arrowhead from the acoustic receiver 19 to the acoustic transmitter 18. As a result, the acoustic transmitter 18 produces a reverberation electric signal as a part of the send-in signal y. Inasmuch as the reverberation electric signal alone is produced, during absence of the acoustic output signal, the reverberation electric signal will be designated by y.
It is known in the art that the adaptive echo canceller 10 comprises a transversal filter circuit 25 having a characteristic substantially equal to that of the acoustic coupling circuit 11. Responsive to the receive-in signal x, the transversal filter circuit 25 self-adaptively simulates the reverberation electric signal y from the receive-in signal x to produce a simulator output signal y. The simulator output signal y may be called a simulated reverberation signal and designated by y.
The simulated reverberation signal y and the reverberation electric signal y are supplied to a subtractor 26 to calculate a difference between the simulated reverberation signal y and the reverberation electric signal y. As a result, the subtractor 26 produces as the send-out signal e a difference signal representative of the difference. The send-out signal e is sent through the sending path 16 to a remote party.
Practically, digital operation is carried out in the adaptive echo canceller to accurately accomplish the simulation. For this purpose, the receive-in signal x and the send-in signal y are given through analog-to-digital converters, respectively, and the send-out signal e is produced through a digital-to-analog converter, although omitted from this figure for simplicity of illustration.
It is known in the art that the transversal filter 25 comprises a sequence of delay circuits and a plurality of gain controllers, each having a variable gain control coefficient. Herein, let each coefficient be represented by h.sub.i (i=0, 1, 2, . . . , or N-1) and that the receive-in signal x at a time or sampling point j, by x.sub.j. The simulated reverberation signal y.sub.j at the time point j is given by: ##EQU1## where x.sub.j-i represents a time point i sampling points prior to the time point j under consideration.
The simulated reverberation signal y.sub.j is given by calculation of N times of multiplications and (N-1) times of additions. This means that the above-mentioned calculation is carried out at every sampling point j.
A characteristic of the acoustic coupling circuit 11 is dependent on movement of attendants or equipment in the auditorium. Specifically, the acoustic coupling circuit 11 is variable with time as regards the characteristic between the loudspeaker 19 and the microphone 18. Therefore, each of the coefficients should be controlled in the transversal filter 25 to adjust a characteristic of the filter 25 to that of the acoustic coupling circuit 11. According to gradient algorithm, a new coefficient h.sub.i.sup.N is calculated with reference to a former coefficient h.sub.i.sup.F and is given by:
where g represents a normalizing factor dependent on electric power of the term of x.sub.j-i.
It is readily understood from Equation (2) that the new coefficient h.sub.i.sup.N is given by adding a certain value to the former coefficient h.sub.i.sup.F. In other words, the former coefficient h.sub.i.sup.F is modified into the corresponding new coefficient. Such modification should be carried out at each sampling point j as regards every one of the coefficients, N in number. Thus, the illustrated echo canceller can cancel the reverberation electric signal and an echo electric signal, known in the art, by self-adaptively adjusting each coefficient of the transversal filter 25.
The adaptive echo canceller needs the calculation shown in Equation (1) and the modification shown in Equation (2) at each sampling point.
It is assumed that an audio electric signal, such as the receive-in signal, the send-in signal, and the reverberation electric signal, has a frequency band not higher than f (Hz). It is known in the art that a sampling signal should have a sampling frequency fs not less than 2f (Hz) and, as a result, has a sampling period T equal to 1/fs (second).
Herein, every factor of the filter 25 corresponds to an impulse response appearing during each sampling period T. When the filter 25 has the factors equal in number to N, it can represent an impulse response having a total time length equal to TN. A reverberation time is defined by a duration during which a reverberation is reduced to -60 dB. The reverberation time reaches to about several hundreds of milliseconds even when sound or acoustic absorption is applied to an auditorium to some extent. In other words, the longest impulse response becomes several hundreds of milliseconds.
Herein, let the impulse response of the filter 25 be neglected after 200 milliseconds. Even in this case, the number of N would become 2000 when the sampling frequency is 10 kHz, namely, the sampling period T is 100 microseconds.
As mentioned above, the filter should carry out about two thousand times of individual calculations of a pair of multiplication and addition in accordance with Equation (1) and, moreover, the modification of two thousands of the coefficients in accordance with Equation (2).
This means that each of the calculations should be performed during 50 nanoseconds in the filter. Implementation of such a filter is considerably difficult. Even if the realization is possible, the filter inevitably become complicated and can not be readily used.
It is possible to limit the impulse response to a duration shorter than 200 milliseconds. In this method, modification of each coefficient becomes incomplete by adverse affection of the impulse response appearing after the response is cut off.
Anyway, the adaptive echo canceller 10 has not been utilized satisfactorily for the time being when applied to the long-distance conference communication system.
Referring to FIG. 2, a curve graphically shows a frequency distribution of an audio electric signal, which may be the send-in signal or the receive-in signal, as illustrated by spectra of electric power. The audio electric signal includes a lower frequency component and a higher frequency component within an audio frequency band divisible at a predetermined frequency of, for example, 1.7 kHz into a lower and a higher frequency band, respectively. As shown in FIG. 2, the lower frequency component has a considerably higher intensity than the higher frequency component.
From this fact, it is readily understood that the reverberation electric signal comprises a lower and a higher reverberation component in the lower and the higher frequency bands, respectively, while the receive-in signal comprises a lower and a higher receive-in component in the lower and the higher frequency bands, respectively.
Under the circumstances, it may be said that the send-out signal e substantially becomes free from the reverberation electric signal y if the lower reverberation component is completely cancelled in the send-in signal y with the higher reverberation component slightly cancelled therein.
Referring to FIG. 3, an echo cancelling circuit according to a first embodiment of this invention comprises similar parts designated by like reference numerals and is operable with similar signals indicated by like reference symbols. The acoustic coupling circuit is removed from the figure. The illustrated adpative echo canceller 10 comprises a first analog-to-digital converter 31 coupled to the subtractor 26, a second analog-to-digital converter 32 coupled to the transversal filter circuit 25, and a digital-to-analog converter 33 coupled to the subtractor 26. Operation of the converters 31, 32, and 33 will be described later.
A first low pass filter 35 and a first pass filter 36 are supplied through the send-in terminal 12 with the send-in signal including a reverberation electric signal substantially during each interval of time during which an audio signal sent from a remote party is dominant in the receive-in signal. Both of the filters 35 and 36 have a common cutoff frequency at 1.7 kHz. The first low pass filter 35 and the first high pas filter 36 separately produce a first low frequency input component and a first high frequency input component which are representative of the send-in signal y in the lower and the higher frequency bands, respectively. During production of the reverberation electric signal, the lower and the higher reverberation components designated by y.sub.L and y.sub.H, respectively, appear as the first low frequency input component and the first high frequency input component, respectively. Thus, a pair of the filters 35 and 36 may be called first means for producing the lower and the higher reverberation components.
In the illustrated circuit, the receive-in signal x is directly delivered to both of a second low pass filter 40 and a second high pass filter 41 as a circuit input signal having a second low frequency input component and a second high frequency component corresponding to the lower and the higher receive-in components designated at x.sub.L and x.sub.H. An electrical connection or conductor may be called third means for supplying the receive-in signal to the filters 40 and 41 as the circuit input signal. The circuit input signal may often be referred to as an incoming signal hereinafter.
The filters 40 and 41 have the same characteristics as the first low pass filter 35 and the first high pass filter 36, respectively, and produces the lower and the higher receive-in components x.sub.L and x.sub.H, respectively. A combination of the second filters 40 and 41 is operable as second means for separately producing the lower and the higher receive-in components x.sub.L and x.sub.H, namely, the second low frequency input and the second high frequency input components.
Coupled to the first and the second low pass filters 35 and 40, the adaptive echo canceller 10 receives the lower reverberation component y.sub.L and the lower receive-in component x.sub.L at the first and the second analog-to-digital converters 31 and 32, respectively.
Each of the first and the second analog-to-digital converters 31 and 32 is operable in response to a sampling signal SP delivered from a sampling pulse generator 43. A sampling frequency of the sampling signal SP may be equal to about 4 kHz because each of the lower reverberation and the lower receive-in components falls within the lower frequency band which is lower than 2 kHz. Therefore, the sampling period becomes 250 microseconds.
As discussed with reference to FIG. 1, the transversal filter circuit 25 may have the impulse response of 200 milliseconds. Under the condition, the number of the coefficients becomes 800 in the transversal filter circuit 25. Calculation shown in Equation (1) may be, therefore, carried out during 250 microseconds. This means that an individual calculation of a pair of the multiplication and the addition may be completed within about 300 nanoseconds. Such individual calculation is readily accomplished by the use of a conventional circuit device.
Further referring to FIG. 3, each of the lower reverberation component y.sub.L and the lower receive-in component x.sub.L has a level variable with time. Let the levels of the lower reverberation and the lower receive-in components y.sub.L and x.sub.L be called first and second component levels, respectively.
The first analog-to-digital converter 31 converts the lower reverberation component y.sub.L to a first digital signal representative of a first digital value dependent on the first component level. Likewise, the lower receive-in component x.sub.L is converted by the second analog-to-digital converter 32 to a second digital signal representative of a second digital value dependent on the second component level.
Responsive to the second digital signal, the transversal filter circuit 25 is operable to self-adaptively cancel the lower reverberation component y.sub.L as well as a lower frequency component of an echo signal in the manner described with reference to FIG. 1. More particularly, the transversal filter circuit 25 is supplied, in addition to the second digital signal, with an input digital signal of an input digital value, as will presently become clear. The transversal filter circuit 25 simulates a simulated digital value from the second and the input digital values to produce a simulator output signal representative of the simulated digital value.
Supplied with the first digital signal and the simulator output signal, the subtractor 26 subtracts the simulated digital value from the first digital value to provide a difference digital value and to produce a difference digital signal representative of the difference digital value. The difference digital signal is delivered to the transversal filter circuit 25 as the input digital signal and to the digital-to-analog converter 33.
The digital-to-analog converter 33 converts the difference digital signal to a converted analog component e' in response to the sampling signal SP described before. The converted analog component e' has a level dependent on the difference digital level and falls within the lower frequency band, as is the cases with the lower reverberation component y.sub.L. The converted analog component e' is related to the send-out signal e and may, therefore, be named a lower send-out component.
The illustrated self-adaptive echo canceller 10 may be an echo canceller disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,064,379 issued to Otakar Anthony Horna.
The echo cancelling circuit further comprises a voice switch (collectively depicted at 45) responsive to the higher reverberation component y.sub.H and the higher receive-in component x.sub.H supplied through the first and the second high pass filters 36 and 41. Briefly, the voice switch 45 serves to suppress the higher reverberation component y.sub.H to produce a higher send-out component y.sub.H ' which is equivalent to the remaining part of the send-out signal e and may, therefore, be referred to as suppressor means, although somewhat different from an echo suppressor.
More particularly, the voice switch 45 comprises a comparator 46 responsive to the higher reverberation component y.sub.H and the higher receive-in component x.sub.H for producing a control signal CT. As mentioned heretobefore, the higher reverberation component y.sub.H and the higher receive-in component x.sub.H have the first and the second signal levels, respectively. The control signal CT takes a first and a second control level when the first signal level is lower and not lower than the second signal level, respectively. The first and the second control levels may be a logic "0" level and a logic "1" level, respectively, or may be given by variable analog levels lower and not lower than a reference level appearing when the first and the second signal levels are equal to each other, respectively.
The voice switch 45 further comprises first and second attenuators 51 and 52 coupled to the first and the second high pass filters 36 and 41, respectively. Responsive to the control signal CT and the higher reverberation component y.sub.H of the first signal level, the first attenuator 51 adjusts the first signal level to produce the higher send-out component y.sub.H '. When the control signal CT takes the first and the second control signals, the first attenuator 51 gives the higher send-out component a reduced and a raised (reverberation) level to which the first signal level is reduced and raised relative to each other. In other words, high and low attenuations occurs in the higher reverberation component y.sub.H in response to the first and the second control signals, respectively.
In the voice switch 45, total attenuation of both attenuators may not exceed about 10 dB because the higher reverberation component y.sub.H is not plentiful in comparison with the lower reverberation component y.sub.L. Natural conversation is not adversely affected by adjusting the first and the second attenuators 51 and 52 within the above-mentioned total attenuation.
The higher send-out signal y.sub.H ' is delivered to an adder 53 together with the lower send-out signal e' to produce the send-out signal e. The send-out signal e is substantially free from the reverberation electric signal because a major part of the reverberation electric signal y, namely, the lower reverberation component yL is reduced to about 30 dB by the adaptive echo canceller 10 and a minor part of the reverberation electric signal, namely, the higher reverberation component y.sub.H is suppressed in the above-mentioned manner by the use of the voice switch 45. Thus, a combination of the voice switch 45 and the adder 53 may be called fourth means for producing the send-out signal e.
Supplied with the higher receive-in component x.sub.H of the second signal level and the control signal CT, the second attenuator 52 is operated in contrast with operation of the first attenuator 51, in order to adjust the second signal level. As a result, the second attenuator 52 produces, as a part of the receive-out signal x', a partial receive-out component x.sub.H ' which takes a raised and a reduced receive-out level to which the second signal level is raised and reduced relative to each other when the control signal CT takes the first and the second control levels, respectively.
The illustrated echo cancelling circuit further comprises an additional adder 54 responsive to the lower receive-in and the partial receive-out components x.sub.L and x.sub.H ' to produce the receive-out signal x". Thus, the adder 53 and the additional adder 54 may be called third and fourth means, respectively.
The voice switch 45 may be a voice switch described in U.S. Pat. No. 3,860,756 issued to Tsuyoshi Shinoi et al.
Instead of the voice switch 45, use is possible of an echo suppressor as described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,005,277 issued to Takashi Araseki et al and assigned to the present assignee. The echo suppressor comprises a comparator similar in operation to that illustrated in conjunction with FIG. 3 and a switch substituted for the first attenuator 51 without the second attenuator 52. Consequently, the higher receive-in component x.sub.H is directly supplied from the second high pass filter 41 to the receive-out terminal 15.
More particularly, the comparator of the echo suppressor supplies a switching signal to the switch circuit when the first signal level is lower than the second signal level. Responsive to the switching signal, the switch circuit produces the higher send-out component in which the higher reverberation component is substantially suppressed. Otherwise, the higher send-out component is kept substantially as it is.
From this fact, it is readily understood that the first and the second attenuators of the voice switch 45 may be considered as switching means, as is the case with the echo suppressor.
Referring to FIG. 4, an echo cancelling circuit according to a second embodiment of this invention comprises similar parts designated by like reference numerals. Like in FIG. 3, the echo cancelling circuit is supplies with the reverberation electric signal y as a part of the send-in signal and with the receive-in signal x to produce the receive-out signal x' and the send-out signal e. The reverberation electric signal y has the lower and the higher reverberation components y.sub.L and y.sub.H in the lower and the higher frequency bands, respectively. The receive-in signal x comprises the lower and the higher receive-in components x.sub.L and x.sub.H in the lower and the higher frequency bands, respectively.
The reverberation electric signal y is divided into the lower and the higher reverberation components y.sub.L and y.sub.H by the first low pass filter 35 and the first high pass filter 36. Thus, a combination of the first filters 35 and 36 may be called a dividing circuit. The lower reverberation component y.sub.L is sent to the adaptive echo canceller 10.
The illustrated echo cancelling circuit comprises the second low pass filter 40 alone without the second high pass filter 41 illustrated in FIG. 3. The second low pass filter 40 is supplied with an incoming receive-in signal x', which will be described later in detail. The incoming receive-in signal x' comprises a lower and a higher incoming component in the lower and the higher frequency bands, respectively.
The lower incoming component is derived by the second low pass filter 40 to be sent to the second analog-to-digital converter 32. Hence, the second low pass filter 40 serves to derive the lower incoming component from the incoming receive-in signal x'.
Responsive to the lower reverberation component y.sub.L and the lower incoming component, the adaptive echo canceller 10 self-adaptively cancels the lower reverberation component y.sub.L as well as a lower echo signal component to produce a reverberation cancelled component as a lower send-out component e'. The illustrated adaptive echo canceller 10 is similar in structure and operation to that illustrated with reference to FIG. 3 except that the lower incoming component is substituted for the lower receive-in component x.sub.L illustrated in FIG. 3. Operation and structure are not described about the adaptive echo canceller 10 any longer.
Anyway, the lower send-out component e' is sent from the digital-to-analog converter to an adder circuit or combiner 56 and is substantially free from the lower reverberation component y.sub.L. In addition, the lower send-out component e' has the level dependent on the difference digital level, as described with reference to FIG. 3.
Coupled to the adaptive echo canceller 10 and the first high pass filter 36, the adder circuit 56 adds the lower send-out component e' to the higher reverberation component y.sub.H to produce a combiner output signal representative of a combination of the higher reverberation component y.sub.H and the lower send-out component e'. Inasmuch as the higher reverberation component y.sub.H has not been suppressed yet, the combiner output signal accompanies the higher reverberation component y.sub.H.
In FIG. 4, the illustrated voice switch 45 is supplied with the combiner output signal and the receive-in signal x. The voice switch 45 serves to suppress the higher reverberation component accompanied by the combiner output signal by controlling the combiner output signal and the receive-in signal x to supply the sending path with a controlled combiner output signal as the send-out signal e and to supply the second low pass filter 40 with a controlled receive-in signal as the incoming receive-in signal x'. The receive-in signal x' is sent to the receive-out terminal 15 as the receive-out signal.
More particularly, the voice switch 45 comprises the comparator 46, the first attenuator 51, and the second attenuator 52. The comparator 46 compares levels of the combiner output signal and the receive-in signal x to produce a control signal CT. When the level of the combiner output signal is lower and not lower than the level of the receive-in signal x, the control signal CT takes a first and a second control level, respectively. The first attenuator 51 gives high attenuation to the combination signal in response to the first control level. The resultant combiner output signal is reduced in level and produced as the send-out signal e. On the other hand, the first attenuator 51 gives low attenuation to the combiner output signal in response to the second control level and, as a result, the level of the combiner output signal is raised relative to each other.
With the first attenuator 51, the higher reverberation signal is also satisfactorily suppressed during presence of the first control signal.
Responsive to the first and the second control levels, the second attenuator 52 adjusts the receive-in signal x to produce the incoming receive-in signal x'. Specifically, the level of the receive-in signal x is raised and reduced relative to each other when the control signal CT takes the first and the second control levels, respectively. The resultant receive-in signal x is delivered to the second low pass filter 40 as the incoming receive-in signal and to the receive-out terminal 15 as the receive-out signal x'.
In place of the voice switch 45, use is possible of an echo suppressor, as discussed in conjunction with FIG. 3. In this case, the receive-in signal x is directly delivered to the second low pass filter 40 without passing through the second attenuator 52. In other words, the receive-in signal x is sent as the controlled receive-in signal to the second low pass filter 40 and to the receive-in terminal 15. Thus, the receive-in signal x is equivalent to the controlled receive-in signal x' which is not subject to any attenuation.
Referring to FIG. 5, an echo cancelling circuit according to a third embodiment of this invention is similar to that illustrated with reference to FIG. 4 except that a non-adaptive, namely, fixed echo canceller 60 is substituted for the voice switch 45 and is connected to the send-in and the receive-out terminals 12 and 15. Responsive to the reverberation electric signal y supplied through the send-in terminal 12 and the receive-in signal x delivered from the receive-in terminal 14, the non-adaptive echo canceller 60 processes the reverberation electric signal y as will presently be described. The non-adaptive echo canceller 60 produces a reverberation processed signal y'. The reverberation processed signal y' has a lower and a higher processed component in the lower and the higher frequency bands, respectively. The lower and the higher processed signals correspond to the first low frequency input component and the first high frequency input component, respectively, as described with reference to FIG. 3.
As mentioned in conjunction with FIG. 2, the lower reverberation component is considerably plentiful in comparison with the higher reverberation component in the reverberation electric signal y. Therefore, the lower reverberation component is somewhat left in the lower processed component even after passing through the non-adaptive echo canceller 60. This means that the lower processed component includes the lower reverberation component reduced by the non-adaptive echo canceller 60. On the other hand, the higher reverberation component is substantially exempted from the lower processed component by the non-adaptive echo canceller 60.
More particularly, the non-adaptive echo canceller 60 comprises a simulating circuit 61 having a plurality of gain control coefficients each of which is smaller in number than those of the self-adaptive echo canceller 10. Inasmuch as each of the gain control coefficients is constant in the simulating circuit 61, non-adaptive operation is carried out in the non-adaptive echo canceller 60.
Responsive to the receive-in signal x, the simulating circuit 61 simulates the reverberation electric signal y by the use of the constant gain control coefficients to supply a simulated reverberation signal y to a subtracting circuit 62. The subtracting circuit 62 subtracts the simulated reverberation signal y from the reverberation electric signal y to produce the reverberation processed signal y'.
The simulated reverberation signal y cannot track a variation of acoustic coupling between a loudspeaker and a microphone because the gain control coefficients are constant. Therefore, the simulated reverberation signal y is substantially equivalent to the acoustic reverberation signal directly propagated from the loudspeaker to the microphone. Thus, the non-adaptive echo canceller 60 serves to mainly cancel the reverberation electric signal resulting from the directly propagated acoustic reverberation signal. Taking the above into consideration, it is readily understood that the simulating circuit 61 may be constituted by a mere delay circuit for delaying the receive-in signal x or an analog simulator.
As the non-adaptive echo canceller, use is possible of a blockless echo suppressor disclosed by Akira Miura et al in IEEE Transactions on Communication Technology, Vol. COM-17, No. B 4 (August 1969), pp. 489-495.
The reverberation processed signal y' is supplied to the first low pass filter 35 and the first high pass filter 36 to be separated into the lower and the higher processed components y.sub.L ' and y.sub.H ', respectively.
The receive-in signal x is delivered to the second low pass filter 40 to separate the lower receive-in component and is also delivered to the receive-out terminal 15 as the receive-out signal.
Responsive to the lower processed component y.sub.L ' and the lower receive-in component, the self-adaptive echo canceller 10 self-adaptively cancels the lower reverberation component included in the lower processed component to produce a canceller output signal as the lower send-out signal e'.
The self-adaptive echo canceller 10 is similar in operation and structure to that illustrated with reference to FIG. 3 except that the lower processed component y.sub.L ' is substituted for the lower reverberation component illustrated in FIG. 3. Accordingly, operation and structure will not be described any longer as regards the self-adaptive echo canceller 10.
Coupled to the first high pass filter 36 and the self-adaptive echo canceller 10, the adder 56 adds the lower send-out signal to the higher processed signal y.sub.H ' to produce the send-out signal e.
Incidentally, the constant gain control coefficients may be adjusted in practical use to make them conform with acoustic coupling.
Referring to FIG. 6, an echo cancelling circuit according to a fourth embodiment of this invention comprises an echo cancelling circuit illustrated in either one of FIGS. 3, 4, and 5 as an echo cancelling portion indicated by 100. The echo cancelling portion 100 is connected to a particular acoustic coupling circuit 11. The particular acoustic coupling circuit 11 comprises a loudspeaker 19 similar to that illustrated in FIG. 1. The loudspeaker 19 is connected to the receiving path and supplied with the receive-in signal x for reproducing an acoustic output representative thereof. In addition to the microphone 18 connected to the send-in terminal 12, an additional or auxiliary microphone 65 is nearer to the loudspeaker 19 than the microphone 18 to convert the acoustic output to a local signal. The local signal is supplied to the receive-in terminal 14.
Thus, a combination of the loudspeaker 19 and the auxiliary microphone 65 is operable to supply the receive-in terminal 14 with the receive-in signal as the local signal and, therefore, referred to as third means.
In this structure, the auxiliary microphone 65 directly picks up the acoustic output emitted from the loudspeaker 19. Therefore, the local signal includes a distortion resulting from a non-linear characteristic of the loudspeaker 19. Such a distortion can be eliminated by the echo cancelling portion 100. As a result, the illustrated structure can remove the distortion component in addition to the reverberation electric signal y produced from the microphone 18.
As the auxiliary microphone 65 is nearer to the loudspeaker 19 than the microphone 18, it is possible to prevent the auxiliary microphone 65 from unfavorably picking up any phonic sound produced by the microphone 18.
While this invention has thus far been described in conjunction with a few embodiments thereof, it is readily possible for those skilled in the art to practice this invention in various other manners. For example, use is possible of a center clipper known in the art, instead of the voice switch illustrated in each of FIGS. 3 and 4. In FIG. 3, the comparator 46 may be directly supplied with the reverberation electric signal y and the receive-in signal x without passing through the first and the second high pass filters.