Background of the Invention
Acrylates have been employed as binder ingredients for solid propellant compositions. Acrylates which have been copolymerized with acrylic acid have also been employed as a copolymerized binder system. Taken an additional step further, acrylates have been employed as a member of a terpolymer system for a propellant binder system. As an example, a terpolymer comprised of butadiene, carboranyl methacrylate (CMA), and acrylic acid was disclosed and claimed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,914,206 by Chester W. Huskins and assigned to The United States of America as represented by the Secretary of the Army. The burning rate of the propellant containing CMA of about 75% of the terpolymer (or of about 15% CMA of the propellant composition based on 20% use of the terpolymer) resulted in a burning rate of about 3.5 inches per second as compared to a burning rate of about 0.25 inches per second for 0% CMA, both measured at 1000 psia. Thus, the terpolymer served as a combination binder and burning rate catalyst for the solid propellant compositions to achieve improved burning rate.
Thus, the polymeric systems employing an acrylate have proven to be useful as a binder for solid propellants. They are compatible with a wide variety of propellant ingredients such as the carboranes, difluoroamio compounds, oxidizers, and additives. These propellents employing acrylates are easily cured with epoxy type curing agents. The mechanical properties have been of acceptable values for propellants subjected to average accelerations. The burning rates have also been of acceptable values in the range of about 14 inches per second at 1000 psia and in the range of about 22 inches per second at 2000 psia.
Because of the acceptability of acrylates for their intended uses, improvements in the specific impulse due to the use of an energetic acrylate in the binder system would offer an additional advantage.
Therefore, an object of this invention is to provide an energetic acrylate for use in a solid propellant composition to yield a higher specific impulse and a higher burning rate for the propellant composition.
Another object of this invention is to provide a high energy, high performance, ultrahigh-burning rate composite propellant which employs an energetic acrylate copolymerized with acrylic acid as the binder system.
Summary of the Invention
The binder system of this invention begins with the preparation of 2-azidoethanol (N.sub.2 CH.sub.2.CH.sub.2 OH) by an established procedure followed by conversion of the 2-azidoethanol to 2-azidoethyl acrylate by continuously removing the water as the compound is formed. The final binder ingredient which is a copolymer of 2-azidoethyl acrylate-acrylic acid is prepared by an addition schedule which is followed by refluxing the complete mixture overnight.
The preferred energetic binder which is a copolymer of about 95 parts 2-azidoethyl acrylate to about 5 parts of acrylic acid is employed in an amount of about 3 to about 8 weight percent of the propellant composition. The burning rate increase of about 45 percent is achieved when about 4.25 weight percent of the energetic binder is used in place of about 3.06 weight percent of ethyl acrylate. This increase is achieved with a 1.2 weight percent decrease in ammonium perchlorate oxidizer which makes the increase due to the energetic binder even more impressive.
The energetic binder of this invention is employed in a composite propellant composition with a plasticizer of TVOPA, a curative and crosslinker of ERL-4221, a carboranyl burning rate catalyst, graphite linter, aluminum powder, aluminum flake, ammonium perchlorate, and lecithin processing aid.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment
The energetic binder of this invention is a copolymer of 2-azidoethyl acrylate and acrylic acid. The starting compound 2-azidoethanol (N.sub.3 CH.sub.2.CH.sub.2 OH) is prepared in accordance with the procedure reported by:
Forster & Furz J. Chem. Soc. 93, 1867 (1908)
Fagley, Klein, & Albrecht, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 75, 3104 (1953) and was found to have the following characteristics:
The conversion of 2-azidoethanol into 2-azidoethyl acrylate is accomplished by continuously removing the water as it is formed. One technique consists of heating acrylic acid (72 g, 1 mol) with a moderate excess of 2-azidoethanol (96 g, 1.1 mol) and a third component immiscible with water and capable of forming an azeotrope, (benzene, 300 ml). A small proportion of toluenesulfonic acid (0.1%) may be added to accelerate the rate of esterification. The azeotrope is distilled out continuously during the esterification, and condensed in a device which permits the removal of the water layer. The non-aqueous portion of the distillate is returned to the reactor.
The preferred method for the manufacture of the 2-azidoethyl acrylate-acrylic acid copolymer involves an incremental addition procedure which appears in Table I and which consists of initially charging the solvent (ethyl acetate) and the polymerization initiator (benzoyl peroxide) to a stainless steel reactor. These are heated to reflux, and the first increment (usually about 40%) of the monomer is then added. (This point is considered to be time zero insofar as sequencing of the procedure is concerned). The remaining monomers are added in four equal increments at specific times. After addition is complete, the complete mixture is refluxed overnight.
Table II presents the typical characteristics of the product: 2-azidoethyl acrylate-acrylic acid copolymer.
The sample is prepared for analysis using the following procedures: the copolymer solution is added slowly to a non-solvent, such as pentane or methanol, to precipitate the copolymer. Low molecular weight species (<2000) remain in solution, and usually comprise of less than 2% of the total specimen (by weight). These species need to be removed, otherwise, they would have an undesirable effect on the value obtained for the number average molecular weight. The solution is then decanted, and the precipitated copolymer collected and dried. Three solutions of the polymer (0.5, 0.10, and 0.05 g/5 ml) are then prepared in benzene solution. The apparent mean average molecular weight of the sample is determined for each concentration; and then it is plotted against each concentration. Extrapolation of the curve to zero concentration gives the mean average molecular weight of the sample. The highest molecular weight measurable on this machine is 20,000.
Table III contains a comparison of difluoroamino-based, ultrahigh-burning rate propellants which contain ethyl acrylate and 2-azidoethyl acrylate.
The use of 2-azidoethyl acrylate-acrylic acid copolymer in a composite propellant composition provides multiple benefits. These benefits readily recognized from the data of Table III include an improvement in the theoretical specific impulse, an improvement in the burning rate, and a lowering of the pressure exponent. Other benefits that would be attractive for certain uses include a lower end-of-mix viscosity and a higher density which permits more deliverable energy per pound of propellant, if required, or reduced weight of propellant to achieve the same deliverable amount of thrust as compared to the propellant employing ethyl acrylate.