Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to determining an electrical input characteristic, such as input impedance, of a device under test.
Background of the Invention
When analyzing the transmission of electrical (including electromagnetic) power to a device or network, it is often necessary or desirable that the impedance of the device or network be known. In addition to the input impedance, however, various other input characteristics which also indicate how the device or network responds to the application of power thereto may be sought as well. Such other input characteristics are normally related to impedance in some way.
The reflection coefficient for a device under test provides a vector ratio between power reflected from the device under test and power incident upon the device under test. The more specific voltage reflection coefficient represents the vector ratio between the electric field reflected from the device under test relative to the electric field of the incident wave thereto. Both of these reflection coefficients related to a device under test are functions of impedance. For example, where a source of impedance Z.sub.I provides power along a uniform line to the device under test which has an impedance Z.sub.II, the voltage reflection coefficient is defined by the expression:
The standing wave ratio (SWR) is, in turn, a function of the reflection coefficient. That is, if a device under test has a reflection coefficient p, the SWR of a uniform transmission line is defined by the expression:
Accordingly, with the above sample definitions of the reflection coefficient and standing wave ratio, it is noted that these input characteristics are defined primarily by the input impedance of the device under test.
In reviewing technology pertaining to prior apparatus or method, it is recognized that prior technology does not teach the determining of input impedance of a device under test from power-related measurements made by the device under test itself. Similarly, no prior apparatus or method teaches the determining of other input characteristics--such as the reflection coefficient or standing wave ratio--from power-related measurements made by the device under test.
In order to determine the input impedance, reflection coefficient, or standing wave ratio of a device under test (apparently even those which make power-related measurements), prior technology has required separate measuring circuits to evaluate the input characteristics of the device under test.
Moreover, in prior techniques, the use of vector voltmeters, phase determining devices, and the like were employed when input characteristic determinations were sought.
Summary of the Invention
The present invention provides unique apparatus and method for determining an impedance-dependent input characteristic of a device under test based on electrical measurements made by the device under test. The device under test is included in a specified network and the electrical measurements are made when the network is in each of several different, selectable configurations.
Preferably, a source of constant (or known) power is split to direct power into either of two legs where (a) one leg includes a first fixed impedance with a variable impedance in series therewith and (b) the other leg includes a second fixed impedance with the device under test in series therewith. Separate amplitude measurements are made by the device under test when the variable impedance is selectively (a) an open circuit, (b) a closed circuit, and (c) an impedance matched to the first fixed impedance. Three separate amplitude measurements--each with the variable impedance in a different condition--are combined to define the amplitude and phase of an input characteristic of the device under test.
It is thus an object of the invention to determine a sought input characteristic (in vector form) of the device under test from three amplitude measurements made by the device under test, thereby obviating the need for a vector voltmeter, phase determining device, or the like. This object is achieved by realizing that three amplitude measurements of the same power-related variable, made by the device under test with the variable impedance in each of its three respective conditions, add vectorially to equal zero at least substantially. By combining the three measurements as connected vector quantities, a triangle is formed from which phase angles can be determined.
In a first embodiment, a Thevenin source is connected across two terminals. Also connected across the terminals is (a) a first leg having a first fixed impedance in series with a variable impedance which is selectively an open circuit, a short circuit, or an impedance matched with the first fixed impedance and (b) a second leg having a second fixed impedance in series with the device under test. The two legs are in parallel and represent a bridge without any additional detector or meter. By making a measurement of current through the device under test when the variable impedance is in each of its three conditions, three amplitude measurements result which can be processed with other known quantities to yield a value for the impedance of the device under test.
A further object of the invention relates to the determining of a particular input characteristic for a given device under test. In an elemental network the input impedance is preferably determined whereas the reflection coefficient is preferably determined in a system based on scattering parameters. In any case, the input characteristic represents response to the application of power to the device under test.
Description of the Drawings
FIG. 1 is an illustration of the invention depicted in elemental network firm.
FIG. 2 is a phase diagram relating to the FIG. 1 illustration.
FIG. 3 is an illustration of the invention depicted in scattering parameter form.
FIG. 4 is a phase diagram relating to the FIG. 3 illustration.
FIGS. 5, 6, and 7 are illustrations of specific embodiments of equipment implementing the invention.
Description of the Invention
A. Elemental Network Description
In FIG. 1, an elemental network 100 is shown in accordance with a preferred embodiment of the invention. The network 100 includes a bridge circuit 102 extending between two terminals A and B. Also connected across the terminals A and B is a constant output source 104. Specifically, an "ideal" voltage generator 106 (with a zero impedance) in series with all or part of an impedance 108 (Z1) represents a levelled source (104) in Thevenin form.
The output of the source 104 is split between two legs of the bridge circuit 102. The first leg includes a first fixed impedance 110 (Z3) and a selectably variable impedance 112 (ZB). The second leg includes a second fixed impedance 114 (Z2) and a device under test 116 having an impedance ZA.
The variable impedance 112 (ZB) can be selectably changed between a short circuit state, an open circuit state, or a matched impedance state in which ZB=Z3. The device under test 116 is a device which measures the amplitude of the current flowing through the device under test 116. Alternatively, however, the device under test 116 may be designed to measure the voltage amplitude across or the magnitude of power dissipated in the device under test 116. Regardless of which power-related variable (i.e. voltage, current, or power) is measured by the device under test 116, an input characteristic of the device under test 116 can be determined from amplitude measurements made when the impedance 112 (ZB) is in (a) an open circuit state, (b) a short circuit state, or (c) a matched impedance state. That is, an input characteristic relating to the response of the device under test 116 when power is applied thereto can be determined. Specifically, the input impedance ZA, the reflection coefficient p, or the standing wave ratio (for power or voltage or the like) at the input to the device under test 116 can be determined from three amplitude measurements (of the same power-related variable) with the impedance 112(ZB) being in one selected state after another.
Any of the above-noted input characteristics are determinable because the three amplitude measurements when added together as vector amplitudes are, at least to a good approximation, equal to zero. Hence, phase angles are readily determinable as well as the amplitudes of the input impedance, reflection coefficient, or standing wave ratio.
Referring again to FIG. 1, the current I through the impedance ZA of the device under test 116 is measured. When the impedance 112 (ZB) is an open circuit, I and I.sub.o ; when the impedance 112 (ZB) is a short circuit, I is I.sub.s ; and when the impedance 112 (ZB) is a matched impedance, I is I.sub.T.
Analysis of the circuit in FIG. 1 indicates that: ##EQU1##
Recognizing also that:
or the three vector quantities form a closed triangle, the law of cosines may be applied to determine the phase angles between V/I.sub.S, V/I.sub.0 and 2V/I.sub.T pairs. This is illustrated in FIG. 2.
Letting the phase angle of V/I.sub.0 represent a zero reference, the phase angle of V/I.sub.S =180.degree.-T where T represents one angle of triangle and is determined by the expression: ##EQU2## The phase angle of 2V/I.sub.T =S where ##EQU3## I.sub.0, I.sub.S, and I.sub.T are of course known from the measurements made by the device under test 116.
If Z.sub.1, Z.sub.2 and Z.sub.3 are known, Z.sub.A may be calculated as follows: ##EQU4## In the particular case where Z.sub.1 =Z.sub.2 =Z.sub.3 =Z.sub.0 as would be the case where Z.sub.2 and Z.sub.3 are the elements of a power splitter and Z.sub.1 the source impedance of a generator matched to the characteristic impedance Z.sub.0. ##EQU5## The phase angle of I.sub.0 /I.sub.S is 180.degree.-T from equation (6) and the phase angle of I.sub.0 /I.sub.T is S from equation (7).
Similar calculations may also be generated were voltage or power measurements used to determine ZA.
B. Scattering Parameter Description
An alternative manner of viewing the present invention is by considering conventional scattering parameters for a three-port system 200 having a constant amplitude, a.sub.1, wave incident upon a first port 202 with a load .GAMMA..sub.A at the second port 204 and with a load .GAMMA..sub.B at the third port 206. Power into the system from each respective port i (where i=1, 2, 3,) is identified as a.sub.i ; power passing out from each port being represented by b.sub.i.
In FIG. 3, the port 206 is adapted to have a selected state; either a short circuit, an open circuit, or a matched impedance state in which .GAMMA..sub.B =0. At port 204 is the device under test which measures, in this embodiment, power at port 204. Specifically, an expression (s.sub.21 a.sub.1 /b.sub.A) where b.sub.A is the power entering the port 204 from the system is determined for each state of port 206 as set forth below.
According to standard scattering parameter representation:
Equations (12) and (13) may be combined eliminating b.sub.3 which here is not determined so ##EQU6## where b.sub.A represents the power from the system into port 204. If a short circuit is attached to port 206, .gamma.B=-1, b.sub.A =b.sub.S and ##EQU7## If an open circuit is attached at port 206, .GAMMA.B=+1, b.sub.A =b.sub.0 and ##EQU8## If a matched termination is attached at port 206, .GAMMA.B=0, b.sub.A =b.sub.T and ##EQU9## Now, if the general three-port is a good symmetrical power splitter
(where .phi. and .theta. are phase angle magnitudes), then to a good approximation
or the three vector quantities form a closed triangle as in FIG. 4. The law of cosines may be applied to determine the phase angles between s.sub.21 a.sub.1 /b.sub.A', s.sub.21 a.sub.1 /b.sub.S, and s.sub.21 a.sub.1 /b.sub.T pairs. By letting the phase angle of s.sub.21 a.sub.1 /b.sub.0 =0 as a reference, the phase angle of s.sub.21 a.sub.1 /b.sub.S =180.degree.-T where ##EQU10## and the phase angle of s.sub.21 a.sub.1 /b.sub.0 =S where ##EQU11## Because s.sub.22, s.sub.23, and s.sub.33 of the power splitter are known, .GAMMA.A may be calculated.
To a first approximation for an ideal power splitter S.sub.31 =S.sub.21 =1/2 and s.sub.33 =s.sub.23 =s.sub.22 =1/4 then equations (15), (16), and (17) become
A more nearly accurate value may be obtained by substituting measured values of s.sub.22, s.sub.33, s.sub.32 and s.sub.23 for the power splitter into equations (15), (16), (17), (19) and (20) then ##EQU12## where the phase angle of b.sub.0 /b.sub.S is 180.degree.-T from equation (19) and the phase angle of b.sub.0 /b.sub.T is S from equation (20). The equations (26) and (27) may then be solved for .GAMMA.A, the reflection coefficient of the device under test.
C. Specific Embodiments
FIGS. 5 through 7 depict three actual configurations of equipment wherein the invention may be practiced.
In FIG. 5, a source of constant power 300 is provided by a level-controlled source 302, the output from which is adjusted by input from a sensor 304. The output from the level-controlled source 302 passes through a splitter 306 providing a first portion of power to the sensor 304 with a second portion being directed to a second splitter 308. Power along one leg of the second splitter 308 passes through a fixed impedance 310 enroute to a selectable variable impedance 312 which can be either an open circuit, a short circuit, or a matched impedance. Power travelling along the other leg of the second splitter 308 passes through a fixed impedance 314 enroute to a device under test 316.
FIG. 6 shows a constant output source 400 directing power through a splitter 402. Power along one leg of the splitter 402 passes thorugh a fixed impedance 404 enroute to a selectable variable impedance 406 (as in FIG. 5) and power along the other leg passes through a fixed impedance 408 enroute to a device under test 410.
FIG. 7 shows a source 500 directing its output through a splitter 502. One leg of the splitter 502 is coupled to a level sensor 504 output from which enters a level ratio meter 506. The sensor 504 and meter 506 fix the output of the source 500 to be a known, thereby rendering it analogous to a constant source in that both reduce the number of unknown factors in the circuit.
The other leg of the splitter 502 directs power to a second splitter 508 which splits power between two legs. One leg includes a fixed impedance 510 in series with a selectable variable impedance 512 (as in FIG. 5). The second leg includes a fixed impedance 514 in series with a device under test 520.
The devices under test in FIGS. 5, 6, and 7 each measure a power-related amplitude such as voltage, current, or power thereat. Typical devices under test may include any of various alternative configurations including: (a) a power indicator and power sensor; (b) a power sensor or mixer together with an alternator; (c) a power sensor or mixer together with a two-port network; or (d) other similar arrangements.
Other improvements, modifications and embodiments will become apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art upon review of this disclosure. Such improvements, modifications and embodiments are considered to be within the scope of this invention as defined by the following claims.