Blank From Which a Dental Implant Can Be Machined, and a Method of Making the Blank

The present invention relates to a blank from which a dental implant for use in dental restoration techniques can be made, and a method of making the blank.

The present invention relates to the economical production of a blank, preferably made at least partly of a ceramic material, which can be used to fabricate an implant for use in dental restoration. Cavities in teeth are commonly filled or restored by using amalgam, which is the least expensive method, or by using some more elaborate approach such as an inlay, a crown or a more complex structure, which all require access to a laboratory and at least two sessions with the patient.

Copending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 643 755 filed Aug. 23, 1984, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference, discloses a method and apparatus by which, in one session, a ceramic implant can automatically be custom formed and thereafter used to restore the tooth to its original shape and function. The present invention relates to an improved blank from which an implant can be machined by an apparatus of the type disclosed in U.S. Ser. No. 643,755.

Several objectives are to be attained by the present invention. The blank should be well adapted for use in the particular environment, namely a dentist's office. This calls for features which facilitate mass production of the blank, which facilitate ease of handling by the dentist or his/her aide, and which assure the requisite accuracy in the end product.

These and other objects and purposes of the invention are met by providing a blank which includes a part made of a ceramic material. To make the ceramic part, alumina or, as is more common in the dental setting, silica is pressed to the desired shape and then baked. This produces the desired mechanical strength, but leads to very loose dimensional tolerances, because the parts often shrink and/or deform drastically. It should also be noted that trimming after baking requires special machinery and excessive handling time, typically rendering any trimming procedure uneconomical. In addition, since the blank needs to be supported in the machine, preferably by a quick fastening chuck having for example a friction grip, a second part which is a support stub is attached to the ceramic portion and is adapted to be gripped by the chuck. This stub can, for example, be mass produced on an automatic lathe from an elongate rod. The inventive blank thus includes a first part made from the material for the implant and a second part having the dimensional tolerances required for easy support.

The support stub can optionally be provided with certain structural features which enhance the process of fabricating the ultimate implant from the blank. In this respect, it must be kept in mind that the fabrication of inlays or crowns right in the dentist's office and in a single session involves the following considerations:

1. Each implant is a custom shaped piece unique to the particular patient.

2. There is no time for test runs; the implant has to fit properly after only one pass through the milling machine.

3. Different blanks required by the differing shape and/or function of different types of teeth have to be machined in a random order established by the needs of successive patients.

4. Insertion and handling is done manually, without any special tools.

In contrast, in an industrial environment, a machine is generally set up to make a large series of identical parts, and the process is always initialized by a test run. Once a first part comes out of the machine, it is carefully measured and then the machine and/or the tools are adjusted as required in order to attain the desired accuracy and finish. For a dentist, this trial and error procedure, which can last anywhere from 5 to 20 minutes, is highly undesirable.

Moreover, the shape of any tool will alter with wear, and something must be done to compensate for this effect. In industry, a gauge is periodically used on the machine to calibrate it and thus compensate for wear. According to the invention, the blank itself has structure which permits it to act as a gauge, so that calibration can be accomplished in an automatic fashion. In particular, according to the invention, calibration can be accomplished by touching the tool to a specific region of the blank which has known and accurate dimensions and can thus serve as a reference for the machine. The fact that touching has occurred is most easily noted by detecting a drop in the rotational speed of the tool, for example by using an optical or magnetic sensor.

Not just one but several such regions can be provided. By sequentially touching and sensing these regions on the blank, a code representing information about the shape and/or physical properties of the blank can be sensed. In the case of very hard alumina, often used for stress bearing structures, the machine can be told to precede the actual shaping by a scrub cycle. In the event no blank has been inserted, a situation expected to occasionally occur in the sometimes tense dental environment, the tool will touch nothing within a specified range and the machine can then alert the operator that a blank must be inserted. As an additional feature facilitating manual handling, the blank should be adapted to be secured in the machine chuck rapidly and without the need for extra tools such as a screwdriver or wrench.

Furthermore, it is desirable to design the blank in a way which allows its insertion only in a unique angular position. This feature makes it possible to use a blank which approximately resembles the end product, and to thus minimize wear on and run time of the machine.

FIG. 1 is a perspective view of a blank which embodies the invention and which includes a piece of raw material and an attached stub;

FIG. 2 is a perspective view similar to FIG. 1 of an alternative embodiment of the blank of FIG. 1 which is adapted for mass production;

FIG. 3 is a sectional end view of a reference surface section of the blank of FIG. 2; and

FIG. 4 is a perspective view of a further alternative embodiment of the blank of FIG. 1.

FIG. 1 shows a first version of the inventive blank. A part of machinable raw material 1, preferably ceramic silica, has been obtained by a baking process. This process yields a coarse contour which cannot easily be held by a simple gripping mechanism. A support stub 2 has therefore been cemented to the raw part 1 and establishes a common axis 3. The stub 2 has a reference section 4 which is a substantially cylindrical surface machined with great accuracy. This surface 4 can be used as a reference to calibrate the milling machine. Since the blank typically does not possess rotational symmetry, a radially facing keying surface 5 has been provided on the stub to permit a defined angular orientation of the blank to be established with respect to the machine. A groove 6 can further facilitate the gripping of the stub. In order to minimize wear on and run time of the milling machine, the blank can optionally be shaped to more closely resemble the final implant. For example, for the common case of a two lobed inlay, the blank could be shaped as shown in FIG. 4, the blank of FIG. 4 being identical to that of FIG. 1 except for the provision of a groove 7 in one side thereof.

Since it is desirable to tailor the blank for mass production, a refinement of the stub suitable for mass production is shown in FIG. 2. In FIG. 2, the coarse part 1 is identical to that of FIG. 1, but the stub 2 has, instead of the keying surface 5, a keying slot 15 which extends axially the full length of the stub 2'. This modification allows the stub 2' to be made from a preslotted rod using an automatic lathe. The functional features present in the embodiment of FIG. 1 have thus been maintained, while the fabrication has been simplified.

The size of the reference section, designated here by reference numeral 14, has been enlarged. This not only provides a larger bonding surface for securing the part 1 to the stub 2', but also permits additional features to be incorporated into the blank. FIG. 3 is a sectional view of the reference section 14 of the stub 2' of FIG. 2, which has an embedded code. The keying slot 5, which in FIG. 3 is located at twelve o'clock, ensures a predetermined angular orientation of the blank relative to the milling machine. Once the blank has been inserted, the machine will rotate the blank in steps of 45 degrees in a counterclockwise direction, which will initially bring the reference surface 41 to the twelve o'clock position. The machine will now slowly lower its milling tool, for example a grinding disc, while constantly monitoring the tool's rotational speed. As soon as there is contact between the tool and the stub, a distinct drop in tool speed will occur. (Contact could alternatively be sensed electrically). The speed drop indicates that the operating surface of the tool is now in contact with the reference surface 41 and, since the distance of the tool from the axis 3 is necessarily equal to the radius of the reference surface 41, the actual radius of the tool, which decreases with wear, can be determined. Note that this radial zeroing of the tool axis must be done with high accuracy, since any error is directly reflected in the final product. The angular orientation, of course, is defined precisely enough by the keying slot 15. The axial position of the tool relative to the blank is not critical.

Different blanks of various shapes and/or materials may be needed, some requiring a different machining routine. While it is conceivable that the operator could preset the machine each time for each specific blank, it is of greater convenience to let the blank carry the necessary information about itself. This can be accomplished in the following fashion. After the tool touches surface 41 it is retracted slightly and allowed to regain some or all of its free running speed. The blank is then rotated another 45 degrees so as to present reference surface portion 42. By advancing the tool and again sensing its speed, the machine can determine whether the radius of surface portion 42 is equal to or less than the radius of surface portion 41. For the sake of example, it is assumed that the machine can discriminate between these two different radiuses and thus read a binary code. For example, if the smaller radius represents a binary "1" and the larger radius a binary "0", then when the machine successively senses the radiuses of the surface portions 42 to 47 in FIG. 3 it will read a binary code of "101100". Different such binary codes can represent different characteristics of respective blanks.