Background of the Invention
1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to clamping apparatus, and more particularly relates to new and improved clamping apparatus for clamping the ends of the strings of a game ball racket in the frame of the racket with non-uniform clamping pressure to reduce the tendency of the strings to yield or rupture along their clamped lengths due to the combination of the clamping pressure and the tensile stress produced in the clamped lengths of string due to stringing and racket play.
2. Description of the Prior Art
As is known to those skilled in the art, and as disclosed in British specification No. 23,260 date of application Oct. 31, 1908; British specification No. 887,526 date of application Dec. 19, 1958; and U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,495; clamping apparatus have been used to clamp the ends of individual game ball strings to the frame of the game ball racket. Such clamping apparatus, for example as disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 3,994,495 includes a pair of opposed tapered wedges or ferrule halves for being wedgingly received within a tapered passageway formed in the frame of the game ball racket to clamp the end of a game ball string to the racket frame.
As is further known to those skilled in the art, such prior art clamping apparatus apply uniform clamping pressure along the clamped length of the string, and as is still further known to those skilled in the art, game ball strings clamped by such prior art clamping apparatus have a tendency to rupture at the point where such strings exit the clamping apparatus, which critical point is referred to herein as the pulled or forward end of the clamped length of the string.
Further, and as is also known to those skilled in the art, upon the game ball string being clamped tensile stress is produced in the clamped length of the string due to stringing and due to the string impacting with a game ball during racket play. Such tensile stress produced in the clamped length of the string decreases from a maximum at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of the string to a minimum at the rearward or free end of the clamped length of string.
As is still further known to those skilled in the art, a significant factor in determining whether or not a member in stress, such as the clamped length of the string, will yield or rupture, is the equivalent (combined) stress which is a function of the tensile stress and the compressional stress produced in the member at each point therealong. Thus, it will be understood that the equivalent stress in the clamped length of the string will be maximum at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string where the tensile stress is maximum and where the compressional stress produced in the clamped length of string is also high due to the uniform clamping pressure which causes the compressional stress to be of a uniform maximum value along the entire clamped length of string. It is believed, as is taught in detail below, that it is the combined effect of the maximum tensile stress and high compressional stress present at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string which causes the tendency of the string to rupture at this critical point.
Summary of the Invention
It is the primary object of the present invention to provide clamping apparatus which applies non-uniform clamping pressure to the clamped length of the game ball string whereby the compressional stress produced in the clamped length of string due to clamping pressure will be minimum where the tensile stress produced therein is maximum and wherein such compressional stress will be maximum where such tensile stress is minimum, and hence the point along the clamped length of string where the compressional stress is maximum will not cause rupture.
Clamping apparatus embodying the present invention and providing such non-uniform clamping pressure includes clamping apparatus for engaging the clamped length of string in graduated contact to thereby apply non-uniform clamping pressure to said clamped length of string which clamping pressure is minimum at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string where the tensile stress produced therein due to stringing and play is maximum and which clamping pressure increases to a maximum at the free or rearward end of the clamped length of string where the tensile stress produced there is minimum. Thus, by providing minimum clamping pressure where the tensile stress produced in the clamped length of string is maximum, the tendency of the string to rupture at this critical point is reduced.
Description of the Drawings
FIGS. 1 and 2 are diagrammatic illustrations of clamping apparatus known to the prior art;
FIG. 3 is a graph illustrating the tensile stress and clamping pressure produced by the prior art clamping apparatus;
FIGS. 4 and 5 are diagrammatic illustrations of an embodiment of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention;
FIG. 6 is a graph illustrating the tensile stress and clamping pressure produced by the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention;
FIGS. 7(a) and 7(b) are diagrammatic illustrations of a string held by uniform clamping pressure of the prior art clamping apparatus;
FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b) are diagrammatic illustrations of a string held by non-uniform clamping pressure as provided by the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention;
FIG. 9 shows a knurled grommet useful in the present invention;
FIG. 10 is a graph illustrating the uniform clamping pressure provided by the prior art clamping apparatus and the non-uniform clamping pressure applied by the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention;
FIG. 11 is a graph illustrating the respective tensile stresses and equivalent stresses produced by the prior art clamping apparatus applying uniform clamping pressure and the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention applying non-uniform clamping pressure;
FIG. 12 is a diagrammatic illustration of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention showing the manner in which the gripping teeth reduce the tendency of the clamped string to rupture;
FIGS. 13, 14 and 15 are diagrammatic illustrations showing the manner in which the gripping teeth provided on the inner surfaces of the opposed tapered wedges of the present invention may be configured alternatively;
FIG. 16 is a detailed drawing of an embodiment of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention;
FIGS. 17, 18 and 19 are detailed drawings of an embodiment of a single, tapered wedge of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention;
FIGS. 20-24 are detailed drawings of an alternate embodiment of a tapered wedge of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention;
FIGS. 25(a) and (b) are respectively side and end views of a wedge insertion tool useful in inserting the wedges of the present invention.
Description of the Preferred Embodiment
Referring now to FIG. 1, there is shown a diagrammatic illustration of the above-noted prior art clamping apparatus for clamping the end of a game ball racket string 10 in the frame F of a game ball racket. As also noted above, such prior art clamping apparatus typically includes a pair of opposed, tapered wedges W1 and W2 for being wedgingly received within the tapered passageway 11 formed in the grommet G and extending through the frame F of the game ball racket. The opposed tapered wedges W1 and W2 are provided with the conical outer surfaces S1--S1 and cylindrical inner surfaces S2--S2. The tapered passageway 11 extending through the grommet G is defined by the conical inner surface S3 of the grommet G.
It will be noted that the conical inner surface S3 of the grommet G defining the tapered passageway 11 forms an included angle A1 with respect to the centerline 12 of the string 10 and upon the inner surfaces S2--S2 of the tapered wedges W1 and W2 being aligned substantially parallel with the outer surface of the string 10 as shown in FIG. 1, the conical outer surfaces S1--S1 of the wedges W1 and W2 also form an included angle A2 with respect to the centerline 12 of the string 10. In such prior art clamping apparatus, it will be noted that the included angle A1 formed by the tapered passageway 11 is equal to the included angle A2 formed by the outer surfaces of the wedges W1 and W2. Hence, as illustrated diagrammatically in FIG. 2, upon the wedges W1 and W2 being wedgingly received within the tapered passageway 11 of the grommet G, the conical outer surfaces S1--S1 of the wedges align with the inner surface S3 of the grommet G and the cylindrical inner surfaces S2--S2 of the wedges are forced inwardly parallel to each other whereby the inner surfaces S2--S2 apply uniform clamping pressure 14 to the clamped length of the string L as shown in FIG. 3. Upon the string 10 being placed in tension due to stringing and due to the string impacting with a game ball during play, tensile stress 16, as noted above, is produced in the clamped length of string L which tensile stress 16 is maximum at the forward or pulled end 18 of the clamped length of string L and which tensile stress decreases to a minimum at the rearward or free end 20 of the clamped length of string L.
As also noted above, and as well known to those skilled in the art, upon the string 10 being clamped in the frame F of a game ball racket by such prior art clamping apparatus, the string 10 has a tendency to rupture at the forward or pulled end 18 of the clamped length of string L. It is believed that such tendency to rupture at this point is due to the combined effect of the tensile stress 16 which is maximum at this point and the clamping pressure 14 which, being uniformly applied to such clamped length of string L, is also maximum at this point.
As further noted above, if clamping apparatus could be provided which applies non-uniform clamping pressure to the clamped length of string L which non-uniform clamping pressure is minimum at the forward or pulled end 18 of the clamped length of string L and which increases to a maximum at the rearward or free end 20 of the clamped length of string L, the combined effect of the tensile stress 16 and clamping pressure 14 at the pulled or forward end 18 of the clamped length of string L would be reduced and hence the tendency of the string 10 to rupture at the forward or pulled end 18 of the clamped length of string L would also be reduced. Such non-uniform clamping pressure is applied by the clamping apparatus of the present invention as will be taught in detail below.
Referring now to FIG. 4, there is shown an embodiment of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention for applying non-uniform clamping pressure to the clamped length L of the string 10. As illustrated diagrammatically in FIG. 4, the conical outer surfaces S1--S1 of the opposed tapered wedges W1 and W2 form an included angle A2 with respect to the centerline 12 of the string 10 which included angle A2 is greater than the included angle A1 formed by the conical inner surface S3 defining the passageway 11 extending through the grommet G. Hence, as illustrated diagrammatically in FIG. 5, upon the opposed tapered wedges W1 and W2 being wedgingly received within the passageway 11, the outer surfaces S1--S1 of the wedges align with the inner surface S3 of the grommet G and due to the differential taper between the included angles A1 and A2, the cylindrical inner surfaces S2--S2 of the wedges are forced towards each other in non-parallel fashion whereby such cylindrical inner surfaces S2--S2 engage the outer surface of the string 10 in graduated contact as shown in FIG. 5 and apply non-uniform clamping pressure 17 which, as shown in FIG. 6, is minimum at the forward or pulled end 18 of the clamped length of string L where the tensile stress 16 is maximum and which non-uniform clamping pressure 17 increases to a maximum at the rearward or free end 20 of the clamped length of string L where the tensile stress 16 is minimum. It has been found that clamping apparatus embodying the present invention illustrated diagrammatically in FIGS. 4-6 does reduce the tendency of the clamped length of string L to rupture at the forward or pulled end 18 of the clamped length of string L.
While not wishing to be bound by theory, the following is offered as a theoretical explanation for the unexpected beneficial results provided by the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention wherein a differential taper is provided between the included angle A2 formed by the outer surfaces S1--S1 of the wedges W1 and W2 and the included angle A1 formed by the tapered inner surface S3 of the grommet G into which the wedges are wedgingly received. Accordingly, it will be shown that non-uniform clamping pressure applied to the clamped length of string can reduce the maximum values of equivalent (combined) stress in the string below those values of equivalent stress that would be present in a string clamped with uniform clamping pressure, particularly at the critical point of the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L. This reduction in maximum equivalent (combined) stress will tend to reduce the incidence of string rupture or failure during installation of the string and during play with the game ball racket.
First examine two idealized cases. The first case will be where the opposed tapered wedges W1 and W2 and grommet G are configured in accordance with the prior art as shown in FIG. 1 to provide uniform clamping pressure P1 as shown in FIGS. 1 and 7(a). The second case will be where the opposed tapered wedges W1 and W2 are configured in accordance with the teachings of the present invention to apply non-uniform clamping pressure P2 as shown in FIG. 8(a) where as shown, the non-uniform clamping pressure P2 varies linearly from a minimum value of zero at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L to a maximum value of 2P at the rearward or free end of the clamped length of string L.
The tension T(x) at any string cross section at location x along the clamped length of the string L will be: ##EQU1## where d is the string diameter, T.sub.o is the tension in the string at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L, .mu. is the coefficient of friction between the inner surfaces of the wedges W1 and W2 and the string and p(x) is the clamping pressure at location x. Then the tensile stress .sigma..sub.x is given by:
Ignoring the effect of the split between the wedges W1 and W2, the compressive stress at any point along the clamped length of string L is adequately given by
and the shear stress on this surface by
and .tau..sub.xz =.tau..sub.yz =0
Assume the distortion energy or Von Mises Henkey theory predicts onset of yielding. One is therefore interested in computing the maximum equivalent (combined) stress at critical points (i.e., particularly at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L where the tensile stress .sigma..sub.x is greatest) in order to see if yielding is expected. The equivalent (combined) stress .sigma..sub.e is given by
Consider first the uniform clamping pressure case illustrated in FIGS. 7(a) and 7(b). Here
where L is the clamped length of string. At the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L:
For the case where L=0.25", d=0.55", T.sub.o =55 lbs., .mu.=0.5, the stresses will be .sigma..sub.x =21,045 psi, .sigma..sub.z =.sigma..sub.y =-2,315 psi, .tau..sub.xy =1,150 psi and thus the equivalent stress .sigma..sub.e =23,445 psi at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L. At the rearward or free end of the clamped length of string L for the uniform clamping pressure case:
Consider next the non-uniform clamping pressure case illustrated in FIGS. 8(a) and 8(b), there
Then at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L:
.sigma..sub.x =21,045 psi as before but .sigma..sub.y =.tau..sub.xy =0 and therefore
.sigma..sub.e =21,045 psi, a reduction of 10% from the case of uniform clamping pressure.
At the rearward or free end of the clamped length of string L:
or an increase of 100% over the case of uniform clamping pressure.
Thus, it will be understood that the non-uniform clamping pressure has the beneficial effect of reducing the equivalent stress at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L where this stress is the highest and where reduction is needed because it is at this point that the clamped length of string L first tends to yield or rupture and thus it is at this point where a reduction in equivalent stress is needed. Of course, it will be understood that non-uniform clamping pressure, as compared to uniform clamping pressure, does increase the equivalent stress at the rearward or free end of the clamped length of string L but at this point the shear stress in the clamped length of string L is quite low and therefore an increase in equivalent stress at this point is of no concern.
This is illustrated in FIGS. 10 and 11 showing stresses in a clamped length of string L clamped in a racket frame by opposed tapered wedges. In FIG. 10 there are shown graphs illustrating the application of uniform clamping pressure and non-uniform clamping pressure to the clamped length of string L. Above that figure (FIG. 10), is FIG. 11 which shows plots or graphs of the tensile stresses and equivalent stresses described and calculated above. For example, it will be noted in FIG. 11 that at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L where the tensile stress is the highest and where failure or rupture is most likely, the equivalent stress provided by non-uniform clamping pressure is less than the equivalent stress provided by uniform clamping pressure. And hence, were the material of the string to have its failure strength at the level shown in FIG. 11, it is possible that the application of non-uniform clamping pressure in accordance with the teachings of the present invention could greatly reduce the likelihood of failure or rupture at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string by causing the equivalent stress to be below the failure strength of the string whereas the application of uniform clamping pressure in accordance with the teachings of the prior art could cause the equivalent stress at this critical point to exceed the failure strength of the string material and hence increase the likelihood of string failure or rupture.
The use of non-uniform clamping pressure in accordance with the teachings of the present invention had additional benefits in those embodiments of the present invention wherein the inner surfaces S2--S2 of the wedges W1 and W2 are provided with gripping teeth or are threaded as illustrated in FIG. 12. In the case of the uniform clamping pressure, the teeth or threads bite deeply into the clamped length of string L in the critical point where stress is highest, i.e. at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L. This reduces the cross-sectional area of the string available to resist tension thus raising the tensile stress .sigma..sub.x to a higher value than that predicted by equation (2) above. The yielding resulting from this bite or notch also produces substantial yielding exactly at the noted critical point where stress is highest; this yielding predisposes the string to earlier fatigue or overload failure. Additionally, the bite or notch produced by the deeper bite of the teeth or thread results in a stress combination further raising the stress at the critical point, and thus further decreases fatigue resistance of the string material. These adverse effects are greatly reduced by the application of non-uniform clamping pressure since in accordance with the teachings of the present invention the wedges W1 and W2 engage the clamped length of string L in graduated contact and hence, as illustrated in FIG. 12, the teeth or threads formed on the inner surface of the wedges at the forward end thereof make a much smaller bite or notch in the string at the forward or pulled end of the string where the stress, tensile stress and equivalent stress is the highest.
Referring again to the gripping teeth provided on the inner surfaces S2--S2 of the wedges W1 and W2 of the present invention as disclosed with regard to FIG. 12, and referring now to FIG. 13, it will be further understood that in accordance with the teachings of the present invention the gripping teeth provided on the opposed inner surfaces S1--S2 of the wedges, such as for example the teeth T1 and T2 shown diagrammatically in FIG. 13, may be staggered with respect to each other to decrease the indentation of the teeth into the clamped length of string L and thereby further reduce the tendency of the clamped length of string L to rupture. The gripping teeth T1 and T2 may either be spiral threaded teeth or, in the alternative, may be formed concentrically.
With further regard to the gripping teeth, upon such gripping teeth T1 and T2 being formed as spiralled threads, it will be further understood that in accordance with the teachings of the present invention such teeth may be cross-threaded, as shown diagrammatically in FIG. 14, to decrease the indentation of the teeth into the clamped length of string L and thereby further reduce the tendency of the clamped length of string L to rupture.
An alternate embodiment of the wedges W1 and W2 of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention is shown diagrammatically in FIG. 15 wherein such wedges instead of being provided with a differential taper between the respective included angles A1 and A2 are instead provided on their opposed, cylindrical inner surfaces S2--S2 with gripping teeth of varying length which decrease from a maximum length at the rearward or free end of the clamped length of string L to a minimum length at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L. Thus, upon such wedges being wedgingly received within the grommet G of FIG. 4, due to such opposed gripping teeth being of varying length, the opposed wedges W1 and W2 will engage the clamped length of string L in graduated contact and apply the non-uniform clamping pressure 17 as shown in FIG. 6. The gripping teeth T1 and T2 of the alternate embodiment of the present invention illustrated diagrammatically in FIG. 15 may also be either spiral threaded teeth or may be formed concentrically and may also be staggered as illustrated in FIG. 13 or cross-threaded as illustrated in FIG. 14.
It will be also understood that FIG. 15 is also a diagrammatic illustration of a further embodiment of the present invention wherein the opposed gripping teeth T1 and T2 for causing the wedges W1 and W2 to engage the clamped length of string L in graduated contact to apply the non-uniform clamping pressure may be each formed of a spiral thread of varying pitch which decreases from a coarse pitch at the rearward or free end of the clamped length of string L to a light pitch at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L. Such teeth would be formed with a constant pitch diameter, the noted varying pitch thereby providing the varying height of the gripping teeth T1 and T2 as illustrated in FIG. 15.
An actual embodiment of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention is shown in FIGS. 16-19. In the leftward portion of FIG. 16, the wedges W1 and W2 are shown ready for insertion into the grommet G, such wedges being shown in dashed outline, and in the rightward portion of FIG. 16, the wedges W1 and W2 are shown as being wedgingly received within the grommet G to engage the clamped length of string L with graduated contact to apply the non-clamping pressure noted above. It will be understood that in this embodiment the outer conical surfaces S1--S2 of the wedges W1 and W2 are provided with a differential taper with respect to the inner passageway S3 formed in the grommet G as taught in detail above with respect to FIG. 4. The forward end 26 of the grommet G, as shown in FIG. 16, may be provided with a generally annularly shaped strain relief portion 28 defined in cross section, as shown, by a smooth curve extending from the inner surface S3 of the grommet G to the outer surface of the grommet. The strain relief portion 28 is for decreasing bending stresses and reducing fretting in the string 10 upon the string being bent around the forward end 26 of the grommet upon the string impacting with a game ball during play.
Referring now to FIGS. 17-19, there is shown in detail a wedge of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention, for example wedge W1, which illustrates a further teaching of the present invention, namely that the rearward end 30 of such wedges may be provided with opposed flat portions 32--32 provided along the conical outer surface S1. Upon the opposed wedges being wedgingly received within the grommet G as illustrated diagrammatically in FIG. 5, the inner surfaces S2--S2 of the wedges are separated by a plane of separation 36, as illustrated in FIG. 14, whereby it will be understood that the opposed flat portions 32--32 formed at the rearward end 30 of such wedges are generally perpendicular to the plane of separation whereby such opposed flat surfaces 32--32 facilitate the reception of the wedges within the tapered passageway formed in the grommet G.
Referring again to FIG. 5, it will be further understood that in accordance with the teachings of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention the opposed tapered wedges W1 and W2 upon being received within the tapered passageway 11 formed in the grommet G, and upon the outer conical surfaces S1 and S2 of such wedges being provided with the above-noted differential taper with respect to the inner surface S3 formed in the grommet G, the opposed cylindrical surfaces S2--S2 will provide a second tapered passageway as shown in FIG. 5 which increases from a minimum diameter at the rearward or free end of the clamped length of string L to a minimum in diameter at the forward or pulled end of the clamped length of string L whereby such inner surfaces S1--S2 apply the above-noted non-uniform clamping pressure to said clamped length of string L which non-uniform clamping pressure, as illustrated at 17 in FIG. 6, is maximum at the rearward or free end 20 of the clamped length of string L and is minimum at the forward or pulled end 18 of the clamped length of string L. In one embodiment of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention, the included angle A2 defined by the outer conical surfaces S1--S1 of the wedges W1 and W2, illustrated in FIG. 4, is substantially 2.degree. greater than the included angle A1 defined by the tapered inner surface S3 of the grommet G.
The wedges W1 and W2 of the improved clamping apparatus of the present invention may be further provided at the rearward end with an integrally formed handle 40 as shown in detail in FIGS. 20-24 with regard to wedge W1. The handle 40 is for being gripped by an operator to facilitate initial insertion of the wedge into the tapered passageway 11 (FIG. 4) and the handle is for being broken off from the wedge after the wedge is inserted into the grommet passageway 11. More specifically, and as shown in detail in FIG. 20, the handle 40 may include a longitudinally extending portion 41 generally linearly aligned with the wedge W2, a downwardly extending portion 43 and an intermediate portion 45 of reduced cross section, as shown specifically in FIG. 24, interconnecting the longitudinally extending portion 41 with the rearward end of the wedge W1. Further, the longitudinally extending portion 41 may be provided in its upper surface with a groove 47 for partially surrounding the string 10 as illustrated in FIG. 16, to facilitate alignment of the wedge with respect to the string 10. The intermediate portion 45, due to its reduced cross-sectional shape, facilitates the breaking off of the handle 40 from the wedge W2 upon the longitudinally and downwardly extending portions 41 and 43 being bent downwardly or twisted with respect to the wedge W1 to thereby separate the handle 40 from the wedge W1.
Various techniques may be utilized to insert and install the wedges W1 and W2 in the grommet G. The wedges can be installed manually by an operator particularly upon the wedges being provided with the handle 40 as shown in FIG. 20. The string 10 is fed through the grommet G of FIG. 16 and the operator grips the handles 40 (FIG. 20) and aligns the inner surfaces S2--S2 of the wedges with the outer surface of the string to cause the wedges to substantially surround the string. The forward portions of the wedges are than initially manually inserted into the grommet and then upon the string being tensioned the wedges are pulled into the passageway due to the friction between the teeth on the inner surfaces S2--S2 of the wedges and the string whereby the wedges are wedgingly received within the grommet and the string is clamped to the frame F of the game ball racket.
Alternatively, the wedges without the handles 40 can be readily inserted in the grommet G by the insertion tool 40 shown in FIGS. 25 (a) and 26 (b). The insertion tool 40 includes a first member 41 of generally cylindrical shape and of a rigid material such as a suitable metal and which is provided at its forward end with a cylindrical protrusion 42 shown in dashed outline. Surrounding the protrusion 42 and extending beyond is a second member 43 also of generally cylindrical shape and which is of a resilient material such as a silicone rubber. A passageway 43 of circular cross-sections extends through the member 41 and protrusion 42 is for receiving the string 10. The wedges W1 and W2 are manually inserted into the forward end of the tool 40 as indicated by the arrows in FIG. 25 (a) with the rearward ends of the wedges abutting the annular end of the protrusion 42, with the outer conical surfaces S1--S1 of the wedges engaging the inner surface of the resilient member 43 and with the inner surfaces S2--S2 in face-to-face orientation. To clamp the opposite ends of an individual string to the frame of a game ball racket two insertion tools 40 are utilized. One insertion tool is threaded over the long end of a supply of string, which long end will be subsequently tensioned, and the other tool will be used to clamp the short end or free end of the string to the racket frame. Each insertion tool is now loaded as described above. At the short end of the string, the string is inserted between the wedges and the insertion tool is pressed firmly into its grommet to initially seat its wedges; then this tool is removed. At the long end the string is tensioned and then the second tool is pressed firmly into a grommet to initially seat its wedges. External tension is removed and the string cut adjacent to the grommets. The tensioned string slightly contracts which, due to the friction between the wedges and the string, finally seats the wedges in the grommets therely firmly clamping the opposite ends of the string to the frame of the game ball racket.
Referring now to FIG. 9, there is shown a further embodiment of the grommet G of the present invention wherein it will be understood that the outer surface of the grommet may be knurled as shown to provide an interference fit between the grommet and the hole formed in the frame F of the racket through which the grommet is inserted. It has been found that such knurling further assists in maintaining the grommets G in the holes formed in the racket frame F prior to and during insertion of the wedges and during stringing.
With further regard to the drawings, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various relative dimensions and sizes of the elements shown in the drawings have been exaggerated to enhance and further clarify the understanding of the present invention. For example, the relative sizes of the included angles A1 and A2 shown in FIG. 4 have been exaggerated to enhance and clarify an understanding of the differential taper.
Further, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that it is within the spirit and scope of the present invention to provide the wedges W1 and W2 and the grommet G with shapes and configurations other than those shown specifically to cause clamping apparatus to apply non-uniform clamping pressure to the clamped length of string L. Still further, it will be understood that various other modifications and variations may be made in the present invention without departing from the spirit and the scope thereof.