Background of the Invention
The present invention relates to an automotive headlight which is used to secure the visual range in fog, rain, and snow.
Usually, this kind of lighting apparatus has such a structure that the filament (2) of the lamp bulb (1) is placed horizontally at the focus of the reflector (3) in the form of a paraboloid of revolution and the diffuser lens (4) is placed in the horizontal direction at the front of the reflector, as shown in FIGS. 1 and 2.
In such a structure, a multiplicity of points (p.sub.1)-(p.sub.8) are assumed on the reflector (3). They are (p.sub.1) at lower part, (p.sub.2) at diagonally left lower part, (p.sub.3) at left part, (p.sub.4) at diagonally left upper part, (p.sub.5) at upper part, (p.sub.6) at diagonally right upper part, (p.sub.7) at right part, and (p.sub.8) at diagonally right lower part. The respective independent light distribution patterns of the filament (2) at these points (p.sub.1)-(p.sub.8) are as shown in FIG. 1 when the lens (4) is removed. In other words, if the light reflected at each point (p.sub.1)-(p.sub.8) on the reflector (3) is projected on a vertical screen at a certain distance, with the front lens (4) removed, the shape of the filament (2) will be seen on the screen. Usually, these light distribution patterns (P.sub.1)-(P.sub.8) overlap each other on the screen. This state is shown in FIG. 3. The square corner part (5) of each pattern (P.sub.1)-(P.sub.8) is due to radiation of the leg (2') of the filament (2).
In FIG. 1, the samples of the light distribution patterns (P.sub.1)-(P.sub.8) have been extracted from the eight points (p.sub.1)-(p.sub.8) on the reflector (3). In actuality, the reflector (3) is an aggregate of an infinite number of points, and consequently the overlapped light distribution patterns are much more complex than FIG. 3. However, samples extracted from eight points are considered to represent the same light distribution patterns extracted from a multiplicity of points in view of the fact that the reflector (3) is a paraboloid of revolution and the sample points are equally spaced at the same radii from the focus, or the position of the filament.
The overlapped light distribution patterns (P.sub.1)-(P.sub.8) as shown in FIG. 3 become as shown in FIG. 4 when diffused in a long, narrow strip in the horizontal direction by the front lens (4). The light distribution pattern (6) as shown in FIG. 4 has a disadvantage that the upper part (6.sub.1) to (6.sub.2) is dim and flat. When a headlight (7) having the light distribution pattern (6) is mounted on an automobile, the beam of the light is separated into two parts as shown in FIG. 5. Thus, if such a headlight (7) is mounted in such a manner that the upper edge (6.sub.1) reaches the required distance (x), then the farthest edge (6.sub.2) of the light flux of the required illumination reaches only the distance (y), resulting in a shortage of illumination. If the headlight (7) is positioned upward in order to get necessary illumination, then the headlight will cause dazzle to the driver in a car running in the opposite direction. This phenomenon results from the fact that the upper edges (6.sub.1)(6.sub.2) do not coincide with each other and a dim part is formed at the overlapped light distribution patterns (P.sub.1)-(P.sub.8) as shown in FIG. 3. This phenomenon is enhanced by the fact that the filament (2) of the lamp bulb (1) does not necessarily coincide with the focus of the reflector (3) or the filament (2) is not accurately horizontal.
One way of obviating such an undesirable phenomenon is to lower a little the diagonal light distribution patterns (P.sub.2) (P.sub.4) (P.sub.6) (P.sub.8) which project beyond a certain line in FIG. 3. In order to accomplish this, a part of the front lens (4) through which these light distribution patterns pass should be formed into a refracting part which becomes thicker downward as shown in FIG. 7. Then, the above-mentioned light distribution patterns (P.sub.2) (P.sub.4) (P.sub.6) (P.sub.8) would be lowered a little and all the upper edges would coincide with each other. However, the lens cutting as mentioned above could not accomplish the expected objective, because the lens cutting as shown in FIG. 7 gives rise to upward diffused light at the stepped part (8). This upward diffused light is extremely harmful for a small headlight about 15 cm in diameter which should illuminate the road several tens of meters ahead with sufficient illumination to permit the driver to confirm any obstacles, and yet should not cause dazzle to the driver in a car running in the opposite direction.
Brief Summary of the Invention
This invention has been made in order to solve the above-mentioned problems. This invention provides a lens cut that raises the horizontal patterns at the upper and lower parts of the filament up to the upper edge of the diagonal light distribution pattern so that all the upper edges coincide with each other.
In order to raise the horizontal light distribution pattern, a refracting part is formed in the front lens in such a manner that the thickness is gradully increased upward. This makes the upper edge of the light distribution pattern very clear, and permits the effective light to cover the distance (x) sufficiently without causing dazzle to the driver in a car running in the opposite direction. And the diffused light caused by the stepped part points downward without causing any harm.
That part of the lens which corresponds to the part directly under the filament should be made such that the right and left diffusion angles are reduced more than at the other parts. In other words, the diameter R of the diffuser lens should be greater than at the other parts, and the refracting angle in the vertical direction should be greater than at the part directly above. Thus, the light that passes through this part is not diffused to the right and left so much but passes straight, and the light from the part directly under and the light from the part directly above cross each other. The light from the part directly under is intensified more. Therefore, the upper edge of the light distribution pattern becomes clear even when the filament is dislocated a little from the focus.
As will be apparent from the foregoing, the object of this invention is to obtain a light distribution pattern with a clear upper edge by means of a special fashion of lens cutting.
Another object of this invention is to provide a headlight in which the upper edge of the light distribution pattern is not affected even when the filament is dislocated a little.
A further object of this invention to provide a headlight of simple structure that gives an ideal provide a light distribution pattern.
Other objects and advantages of this invention will become readily apparent from the following description.
Brief Description of the Drawing
FIG. 1 is a front view of the reflector, with the lens removed, and light distribution patterns at each part (p.sub.1)-(p.sub.8) on the reflector.
FIG. 2 is a longitudinal sectional view of a headlight as shown in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is light distribution patterns of each part (p.sub.1)-(p.sub.8) as shown in FIG. 1 which are projected on a vertical screen placed at a certain distance.
FIG. 4 a light distribution pattern obtained by diffusing horizontally the light distribution pattern of FIG. 3 by a diffuser lens.
FIG. 5 is a light distribution pattern of a conventional headlight.
FIG. 6 is a light distribution pattern of a headlight according to this invention.
FIG. 7 is a partial longitudinal sectional view of the diffuser lens.
FIG. 8 is a front view of the diffuser lens according to this invention.
FIG. 9 is a longitudinal sectional side elevation of a headlight according to this invention.
FIGS. 10a, 10b, 10c, 10d, and 10e are partially enlarged sectional views along the lines 10a--10a, 10b--10b, 10c--10c, 10d--10d, and 10e--10e, respectively, in FIG. 8.
FIG. 11 is a light distribution pattern projected on a screen of the light distribution pattern at each part obtained when the diffuser lens refracts the light upward.
FIG. 12 is a light distribution pattern obtained by diffusing horizontally the light distribution pattern of FIG. 11 by a diffuser lens.
Detailed Description of the Invention
This invention will be described referring to one example as shown in FIG. 8 and subsequent figures. The same numerals are given to the same parts in the conventional example.
Numeral (3) denotes the reflector of paraboloid of revolution. This reflector (3) is nearly rectangular as viewed from the front, with the upper and lower parts cut off. At the focus of the reflector (3) is provided horizontally on the filament (2) of the lamp bulb (1). At the front of the reflector (2) is provided a rectangular diffuser lens (4), which diffuses light in the lateral (right and left) directions by means of the inside arcs cut vertically at certain intervals. The rate of diffusion in the lateral directions is not the same over the entire surface of the diffuser lens, but is different from part to part as will be mentioned later.
Points (p.sub.1) to (p.sub.8) are assumed on the reflecting surface of the reflector (3), as in FIG. 1. The major part of the lens is divided into six parts (4.sub.1), (4.sub.2), (4.sub.4), (4.sub.5), (4.sub.6), and (4.sub.8) in correspondence with the parts (p.sub.1), (p.sub.2), (p.sub.4), (p.sub.5), (p.sub.6), and (p.sub.8). The lower part (4.sub.1) and the upper part (4.sub.5) are tapered so that the thickness increases upwardly as shown in FIG. 10d. Similarly, the diagonally left lower part (4.sub.2) and the diagonally right lower part (4.sub.8) are tapered so the thickness increases upwardly as shown in FIG. 10e. These tapered surfaces form refracting parts that refract the light upward.
The refractive index in the vertical direction, or the ratio of the change of the thickness to the length, varies from one part to another. More specifically, it is 0.4/30=0.013 for the lower part (4.sub.1), 0.3/30=0.01 for the upper part (4.sub.5), and 0.3/38=0.0079 for the diagonally left and right parts (4.sub.2) (4.sub.8). The rate of diffusion in the right and left directions, or the curvature radius (R) also varies from one part to another. More specifically, R=17.3 for the lower part (4.sub.1), R=5.2 for the upper part (4.sub.5), R=6.7 for the diagonally left and right lower parts (4.sub.2) (4.sub.8), and R=4.2 for the diagonally left and right upper parts (4.sub.4) (4.sub.6). In addition, R=4.2, R=3.5, and R=3.8 for both ends excluding the central major parts of the lens (4).
The refractive index in the vertical direction for the lower part (4.sub.1) is greater than that for the other parts, and the diffusion rate in the right and left directions is less than that of the other parts. This is because the upper edge of the light distribution pattern (P.sub.1) of the lower part (4.sub.1) forms a clear straight line and therefore the square part (5) of the light distribution pattern (P.sub.5) of the upper part (4.sub.5) and the projected part of the diagonal light distribution patterns (P.sub.2), (P.sub.4), (P.sub.6), and (P.sub.8) should be covered certainly. Thus, considerable effects are obtained if an upward refracting part is formed at the lower part (4.sub.1) only.
The forward end of the lamp bulb (1) is provided with a hood (not shown) to shade the light that passes directly through the diffuser lens (4). Therefore, the central part (4.sub.0) of the diffuser lens (4) is not necessary, and is provided with a cutting which has nothing to do with diffusion in the right and left directions. Usually, this part (4.sub.0) is used for inscription of a trademark.
In such structure, the light emitted from the filament (2) is reflected by each part (p.sub.1)-(p.sub.8) of the reflector, and the reflected parallel light is radiated after refraction by the diffuser lens (4). This diffuser lens (4) performs refraction in the vertical direction and lateral direction simultaneously. For easy understanding, the refraction in the vertical direction alone is discussed. As the light from each part (p.sub.1)-(p.sub.8) passes through the diffuser lens (4), the corresponding light distribution patterns (P.sub.1), (P.sub.2), (P.sub.3), (P.sub.5), (P.sub.7), and (P.sub.8) are refracted upward by the upward refracting parts (4.sub.1), (4.sub.2), (4.sub.5), and (4.sub.8) of the diffuser lens (4). If this light is projected on a vertical screen several tens of meters away, the upper edge (6.sub.0) will form a straight line as shown in FIG. 11. This is changed to the light distribution pattern with distinct upper edge (6.sub.0) as shown in FIG. 12 by the diffusion in the right and left directions.
The step (8) is formed at the upward refracting part of the lens (4), and the light refracted by this step (8) is directed downward and no harmful effect is caused. Rather, it illuminates effectively the road surface near the car.
An automotive headlight of this structure eliminates the upward light completely, and causes no dazzle to the driver in a car running in the opposite direction or causes no ligh film phenomenon even when the sufficient illumination is given to cover the required distance (x).
The reflector (3) and the lens (4) are not limited to rectangular shapes.
Specific numerals were given to the lens (4) in the example, but this invention is not limited to them.