Fuel Injection System for Diesel Engines

The present invention relates to a fuel injection system for direct injection diesel engines with a depression in the tops of the pistons, said invention comprising a first injection pump with a regulator and accompanying first injector for each cylinder, said injectors being disposed to spray the fuel in a zone around the center axis of the respective piston depression.

Modern diesel engines with injection systems of the above type give off large amounts of harmful substances, due to the fact that these conventional injection systems cannot be optimized both for low and high compression. The systems are designed for high compression, resulting in a high level of hydrocarbon emissions at low compression.

One purpose of the present invention is to achieve a fuel injection system which makes possible a reduction of the engine's harmful emissions. A further purpose of the invention is to achieve an injection system which will make possible the combustion of an engine fuel with a low cetane number, methanol for example, to contribute to said reduction of the harmful emissions.

This is achieved according to the invention, in an injection system of the type described in the introduction, by providing the system with a second injection pump with a regulator and accompanying second injectors for each cylinder, said second injectors being disposed to inject fuel obliquely from the side into the respective piston depression in a direction counter to the rotation of the intake air before the fuel from the first injectors is injected.

In an injection system of this type, the first pump and injectors can be optimized for high compression and the second pump and injectors for low compression. By injecting diesel fuel through the latter obliquely counter to the air rotation in the piston depression, a rapid retarding of the fuel is achieved which is thereby carried by the air in the combustion chamber with minimal mixing in an annular zone around the center of the piston depression. The high concentration of fuel drops in this zone creates especially favorable conditions for compression ignition due to the fact that the fuel-air mixture does not become too lean during the ignition delay period. Only a small portion on the edges of the zone has time to be mixed with air to such an extent that the air-fuel mixture lies outside the limits for ignition. This is illustrated by the fact that if only the second injectors inject fuel at idle, the hydrocarbon emission is reduced by 90% down to 50 ppm HC compared with the same engine with an ordinary injection system.

Another result of the high concentration of fuel in this zone is that the combustion is quickly retarded by lack of oxygen. This reduction of the speed of combustion results in a very low noise level and reduction of the high noise frequencies which otherwise characterize diesel combustion. Combustion with reduced oxygen supply produces soot, so only a limited amount of fuel can be injected via the second nozzle in order to avoid excessively high levels of exhaust smoke.

This zone of hot gases and glowing soot particles which is created upon combustion of the fuel from the second injectors initiates the combustion of the fuel from the first injectors when these begin operating at high compression. For this reason, the last-mentioned fuel can be a fuel with a low cetane number, methanol for example. The subsequent combustion of the fuel from the first injectors, which are designed for maximum dispersion of the fuel in the combustion air, produces low nitrogen oxide emission since there is no spontaneous combustion of large quantities of air-fuel mixture, collected during an ignition delay period with locally high temperatures as a result.

Tests with diesel-methanol fuel have revealed very low emissions of nitrogen oxides and black smoke. With diesel-diesel fuel, the emission of black smoke can be reduced if no fuel is injected through the second injectors at high compression.

The invention will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings showing examples, in which

FIG. 1 shows a schematic view from above of a diesel engine provided with a fuel injection system according to the invention, and

FIGS. 2-4 are full scale projections from above and from two sides of a piston depression illustrating the injection directions for the fuel.

The engine shown in FIG. 1 has a first injection pump 1 with a regulator 2. The pump is a conventional row pump, which via delivery pipes 3 feeds fuel to first injectors 4 with four-hole nozzles. The pump 1 is driven in a conventional manner by the engine crankshaft via a gear transmission and a shaft 5.

The engine is also provided with a second injection pump 6 with a regulator. In the example shown, the pump 6 is a distributor pump, which via delivery pipes 7 feeds fuel to second injectors 8, which are provided with one-hole nozzles. Pump 6 is also driven by the engine crankshaft via a gear transmission. A linkage 9 connects the regulator of pump 6 to the regulator 2 of pump 1 and to a gas pedal 10. The pump 6 has two volume settings. The greater injection volume is used only when starting and warming up, the lower when driving. The pump 6 also has an r.p.m.-dependent adjuster to adjust the fuel injection timing.

The injection angle of the first pump 1 is set about ten degrees of rotation of the crank shaft later than the second pump 6, so that the fuel from pump 1 does not disturb the ingnition delay and the ignition of the fuel from pump 6. The two pump regulators are connected via linkage 9 in such a way that at low compression (idle) only pump 6 injects fuel and as the compression increases pump 6 first increases to its full compression volume (the set injection volume for driving), and then pump 1 increases to the injection volume which is required for the desired compression. When compression is reduced, pump 1 decreases first.

The injection system described here consists of two individual injection systems, the second of which is used to inject a small amount of fuel with high cetane number, diesel fuel for example, to reduce the hydrocarbon emission at low compression and initiate combustion, while the first system is used to inject the fuel volume which is required for the compression in question. The latter fuel can be diesel fuel or a fuel with low cetane number such as an alcohol, methanol for example.

To achieve a suitable fuel-air mixture to achieve the above-mentioned advantageous characteristics, the fuel from the second system must be oriented in an annular zone around the center. For this purpose, the second injectors 8 are disposed in such a way that the fuel is injected counter to the rotation of the intake air in the depression of the piston. This is illustrated in FIGS. 2-4, in which A is a depression in the top of a piston shown in full scale, B designates the injection direction of the second injectors 8, C designates the injection direction of the first injectors 4, and D designates the direction of rotation of the intake air. In FIG. 2 the left-hand dot-dash circle indicates the placement of the intake valve and the right-hand circle indicates the placement of the exhaust valve. The upper wall of the combustion chamber lies in the plane of the x-y axes.

FIGS. 2-4 illustrate the conditions in an engine used for testing. The first injectors 4 had four-hole nozzles, which injected the fuel in a uniform distribution around the vertical center axis z of the depression A, as indicated by the arrows C. The second injectors 8 injected the fuel through one-hole nozzles in a direction which is indicated by the arrow B. Optimal results, with reduction of hydrocarbon emissions by 90% at idle for example, were obtained when the projection of arrow B (the direction of injection) onto the cross sectional plane of the piston, as shown in FIG. 2, is tangent to a circle whose radius r is about 4/10 of the radius of the piston depression, and when the angle .alpha. with said plane was about 15.degree.. When fuel was injected closer to the center of the depression (reduction of r) the amount of soot increased, while hydrocarbon emission increased with injection farther from the center (increase of r). Depending on engine type, r can be 0.35-0.45 times R and .alpha. be about 10.degree.-20.degree..