US 4,033,916 AGrant
Ternary Flame-Retarded Compositions Including Iron Oxide
Issue Date:1977-07-05
•13 Claims
Abstract
New flame-retarded rubber and plastic compositions are disclosed which are economical to produce and which exhibit increased flame-retardance, improved mechanical properties and reduced toxicity. Generally, these new compositions comprise a copolymer of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber or a terpolymer of acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene, a bromine- or chlorine-containing organic fire-retardant additive, and an iron oxide.
Metadata
Assignee
- Uniroyal Inc.
Inventor
- William Paul Whelan, Jr.
Application Information
Application Number:US 6121470
Filing Date:1975-09-10
Priority Date:1974-10-17
Art Unit:141
Classifications
IPC:
C08K 322
Field of Search:
26045.75 P;45.7 R;45.95 G;28.5 A;28.5 B;28.5 R;874;880
Patent Drawings
This patent does not have any drawings.
Description
The below-named halogen compounds are among those utilized in the Examples:
"Cloran": 1,2,3,4,9,9-hexachloro-1,4,4a,5,6,7,8,8a-octahydro-1,4-methanonaphthalene- 6,7-dicarboxylic anhydride.
Dechlorane 602.RTM. Hooker Chemical Corp.: a cycloaliphatic chloride; melting point, 290.degree.-293.degree. C.; density (gms/cc) at 25.degree. C.= 2.0; chlorine content (%)= 69.4.
Polyvinyl chloride: Marvinol 23, a general purpose resin of medium molecular weight, having an intrinsic viscosity (ASTM D-1243-66)= 0.93, a specific gravity of 1.40 and an oil absorption, cc/gm (ASTM D-281) of 0.9.
Testing of the specimens was carried out as follows:
1. Oxygen Index: ASTM Method D-2863, "Flammability of Plastics Using the Oxygen Method." Oxygen Index is the minimum concentration of oxygen, expressed as percent by volume, in a slowly rising mixture of nitrogen and oxygen, that will just support the combustion of a material burning under equilibrium conditions of candle-like burning. Higher Oxygen Index indicates decreased relative flammability. Since the method provides a continuous numerical scale for the assignment of relative flammability ratings, it is especially appropriate for illustrating differences in the degree of flame retardation provided by additives and additive combinations. ".DELTA.OI" in all Examples represents the increase in the Oxygen Index provided by the additive or combination over that of the base polymer.
2. Horizontal Burning Rate and Vertical Burning Test performance were determined in substantial accordance with the procedures below, with indicated departures as to number of specimens tested and elimination of preconditioning as appropriate:
a. Horizontal: ASTM D-635-63, "Test for Flammability of Rigid Plastics." Three or more specimens of the dimensions indicated were employed per test. Compositions which failed to burn to the 4-inch mark are designated in the Examples as "SE" (self-extinguishing), while compositions which failed to burn to the 1-inch mark are designated "NB" (non-burning).
b. Vertical: UL Subject 94 Vertical Burning Test for Classifying Materials 94-V-0, 94-V-1, or 94-V-2. Five 5".times. 1/2" slab specimens, in the thickness indicated, of each composition were tested in "as prepared" condition.
Example 1
This Example illustrates the powerful flame retardant effect provided by combinations of an iron oxide with a halogen compound in a suitable polymer, as shown in (g)-(j), in contrast to the weak effect of the iron oxide or halogen compound alone, as shown in (a)-(f).
Rubber A and Rubber B are acrylonitrile/butadiene copolymer rubbers having respectively 32.5% and 44.5% by weight of acrylonitrile. The NBR compositions were compounded in a conventional manner on a rubber mill, and were cured with the following system:
Zinc oxide= 5 pph
Stearic acid= 1 pph
Mbts= 2.1 pph
Monex= 0.4 pph
Sulfur= 2.5 pph
Slab samples were compression molded for 30 minutes at 330.degree. F. Moldings were cooled prior to removal from the press, and specimens were cut to size for testing.
Example 2
This Example demonstrates the operability of other iron oxides in combination with a halogen compound in ABS resin and includes test data for antimony trioxide to illustrate the higher effectiveness of the iron oxides.
Example 3
This Example demonstrates the high effectiveness of an iron oxide in combination with a halogen compound in flame-retarding NBR rubber compositions in comparison to the effect of the halogen compound either alone or in combination with antimony trioxide. "Chlorowax 70," a chlorinated paraffin, is a commercial product containing about 70% by weight chlorine and having a specific gravity of 1.65. "MBTS" denotes benzothiazyl disulfide and "Monex" is a commercial product containing tetramethylthiuram monosulfide.
The test data above reveal that ferric oxide augments the flame-retardant effect of the chlorine or bromine compounds more effectively than does antimony trioxide (it being noted also that much less of the ferric oxide was used in relation to the amount of antimony trioxide), and that this advantage is obtained in rubbers of both high and low nitrile content.
Example 4
This Example demonstrates that the high effectiveness of the iron oxide/halogen compound combinations in flame-retarding the polymer compositions is also manifested in horizontal burning tests. In the data listed below, the specimen used measured 5".times. 1/2".times. 1/8", and "NB" denotes non-burning, i.e., the flame failed to reach the 1-inch starting line for burning rate determinations.
Example 5
This Example demonstrates that the high effectiveness of iron oxide/halogen compound combinations in flame-retarding the polymer compositions is also manifested in vertical burning tests. Comparative data for antimony trioxide are also shown. Dechlorane 602, a commercial fire-retardant, is a cycloaliphatic chloride containing 69.4% chlorine by weight and marketed by Hooker Chemical Corporation.
Example 6
This Example illustrates the greater effectiveness of ferric oxide as compared to compounds of other elements in flame-retarding a polymer composition containing a halogen compound. In the data listed below, "NB" is the same as identified in Example 4, "SE" denotes failure to burn to the 4-inch mark, and the data for stannic oxide hydrate as additive are excerpted from J. Fire & Flammability 3, 136 (1972).
Example 7
This Example demonstrates that the presence of ferric oxide greatly reduces the amount of halogen compound needed for a given degree of flame retardancy in a polymer composition.
Example 8
This Example illustrates the advantages of using ferric oxide in place of antimony trioxide in providing polymer compositions of high flame retardancy and improved impact strength. In the data below, the samples used in the Notched Izod Impact Test were 1/8" compression molded specimens.
Example 9
This Example illustrates that the advantageous effect of ferric oxide over antimony trioxide on the impact strength of ABS compositions containing a halogen compound is retained under increasingly severe processing conditions. In this Example, the samples used were 1/8" compression molded specimens and the ABS compositions, identified by letters "A," "B," "C" and "D," were milled prior to molding under the following conditions: "A," 10 min. at 340.degree. F.; "B," 30 min. at 340.degree. F.; "C," 30 min. at 400.degree. F.; and "D," 60 min. at 400.degree. F.
Example 10
This Example further illustrates that the synergistic effect of ferric oxide in combination with a suitable halogen compound in the polymer is operative over a broad range of concentrations of the halogen compound.
Vertical burning tests of compositions (g) and (h), 1/16" thick specimens, gave the following results:
(g) average specimen burning time per flame application: 12.1 seconds; one of five specimens failed to meet the 30-second burning time test limit.
(h) av. spec. burning time: 2.3 seconds; 94-V-0 rating.
Claims
What is claimed is:
1. A composition comprising an organic polymer selected from the group consisting of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber and a plastic terpolymer of acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene, and: (a) from 1 to 110 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of said organic polymer of a non-polymeric organic additive selected from the group consisting of chlorine-substituted and bromine-substituted aliphatic, aromatic and alicyclic hydrocarbyl compounds having a halogen content in the range of from 35 to 80 weight percent and optionally containing oxygen substituents in the form of hydroxyl, anhydride, ether, carboxyl, ester or phosphate groups and which can alternatively be polymeric when said organic polymer is said plastic terpolymer and which are substantially non-volatile and stable at polymer processing temperatures, and mixtures thereof; and (b) from 0.1 to 50 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of said organic polymer of an iron oxide selected from the group consisting of the anhydrous and hydrated forms of ferric oxide and ferrosoferric oxide and mixtures thereof.
2. A composition comprising an organic polymer selected from the group consisting of acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber and a plastic terpolymer of acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene, and: (a) from 1 to 110 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of said organic polymer of a non-polymeric organic additive selected from the group consisting of chlorine-substituted and bromine-substituted aliphatic, aromatic and alicyclic hydrocarbyl compounds having a halogen content in the range of from 35 to 80 weight percent and optionally containing oxygen substituents in the form of hydroxyl or anhydride groups and which can alternatively be polymeric when said organic polymer is said plastic terpolymer and which are substantially non-volatile and stable at polymer processing temperatures, and mixtures thereof; and (b) from 0.1 to 50 parts by weight per 100 parts by weight of said organic polymer of an iron oxide selected from the group consisting of the anhydrous and hydrated forms of ferric oxide and ferrosoferric oxide and mixtures thereof.
3. The composition of claim 2 in which said organic polymer is acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber.
4. The composition of claim 2 in which said organic polymer is a plastic graft terpolymer of acrylonitrile, butadiene and styrene.
5. The composition of claim 2 in which said organic polymer is said plastic terpolymer and said organic additive is polyvinyl chloride.
6. The composition of claim 2 in which said organic additive is tetrabromobisphenol A.
7. The composition of claim 2 in which said organic additive is hexabromocyclododecane.
8. The composition of claim 2 in which said organic additive is a cycloaliphatic chlorine compound.
9. The composition of claim 2 in which said organic additive is chlorine-containing paraffin wax.
10. The composition of claim 2 in which said iron oxide is ferric oxide.
11. The composition of claim 2 in which said iron oxide is yellow iron oxide.
12. The composition of claim 2 in which said iron oxide is ferrosoferric oxide.
13. The composition of claim 2 in which said iron oxide is a mixture of iron oxides consisting of ferric oxide and ferrosoferric oxide.
Patent Citations (6)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US2902460 | 1959-09-01 | Jennings et al. | |
| US3347822 | 1967-10-01 | Jenkner | |
| US3442980 | 1969-05-01 | Grabowski | |
| US3729436 | 1973-04-01 | Phillips | |
| US3830766 | 1974-08-01 | Praetzel et al. | |
| BE808,311 | 1973-12-01 |