Electronic Copy Analysis

This invention relates to an apparatus for determining copy quality and, more particularly, an apparatus for comparing a copy to its original and thus measure the copy quality of a copier/duplicator.

According to the prior art such as that shown in the U.S. Pat. No. 3,546,377 issued to John Troll on June 12, 1968, an apparatus having two vidicons with delayed scanning means may be used to scan a sample and a standard profile, respectively. As disclosed, the two vidicon outputs are synchronized in time and compared through a differential comparator. A comparator signal output which is above a predetermined threshold is employed to indicate the lack of coincidence and rejection of the sample.

It is a general object of the present invention to provide an improved video means comparing for a copy to its original and a specific object of the present invention to provide simplified and improved means for comparing and analyzing the quality of a copy to its original.

The objects of the present invention are achieved by utilizing a vidicon and a partially reflecting - partially transmitting mirror positioned so as to permit the simultaneous viewing of the original document and the reproduced document. Apparatus is provided for comparing the difference in the signals between the superimposed document and for analyzing the difference to provide a signal related to the copy quality.

These and other features of the invention will be understood upon reading the following description along with the drawings.

FIG. 1 is a schematic drawing of the apparatus according to the present invention, and

FIG. 2 illustrates several wave forms useful in explaining the operation of the apparatus shown in FIG. 1.

According to the present invention, the copy comparison and analysis apparatus is based upon a measured and identified difference of degradation between a standard test pattern and a copy of this pattern.

Referring to FIG. 1, a standard test pattern A is viewed by a television camera or vidicon 3 at a suitable resolution. A 50% transmission/50% reflection mirror 5 is so positioned that a copy A' of the standard pattern A is exactly superimposed on the image of the standard pattern A.

The standard test pattern A and the copy A' are illuminated by two light sources 7 and 7' in succession so that a complete TV picture frame is obtained first from the pattern A and then the copy A'. The video signal at the output of the TV camera 3 is sampled by suitable gates 9 and 11 in succession so that the video output of the vidicon 3 for the standard pattern A is gated through the gate 9 when the standard pattern A is illuminated and the video output of the vidicon 3 for the copy A' is phase inverted by a phase inverter 13 and gated through the gate 11 when the copy A' is illuminated. While the gates 9 and 11 are shown symbolically as coincidence gates, other suitable means such as field effect transistor amplifiers configured to function as coincidence gates could be used.

The operation of the gates 9 and 11 and the lights 7 and 7' may be synchronized as follows. Two AC switches 14 and 14' and the two gates 9 and 11 are actuated by two enabling signals (FIG. 2, curves B and C) produced in succession by a suitable means such as a flip flop 16. The flip flop 16 may be triggered in a well known manner by a train of pulses (FIG. 2, curve A) having a suitable repetition rate timed to coincide with the rate at which it is desired for the video camera 3 to obtain picture frames of the pattern A and then the copy A'. For the AC switches 14 and 14', a suitable arrangement such as a photodiode switch may be used although any other suitable AC switches could be used.

The output of the gate 9 is connected to a delay means 15 which introduces a necessary delay so that the video image signals from both the standard pattern A and the copy A' coming through via the gates 9 and 11 respectively appear simultaneously at a comparator 17. The comparator 17 may be of any suitable design such as a balance potentiometer. The output of the comparator 17 is then applied to a video monitor 19 of conventional design which is biased to the center of a gray scale. As evident from the foregoing, the output of the comparator 17 appearing at the input to the monitor consists of the composite of the "white" modulated image from the standard pattern A and "black" modulated image from the copy A'. By accurately aligning the copy and the standard and by controlling the image contrast, the two modulated images are allowed to cancel each other out if no difference exists. However, if a degradation has taken place during the copy process so that there exists defects in the copy, then the defects will be displayed in the form of a different signal on the monitor. By analyzing the difference using suitable technique such as computer analysis technique based on communication and information theories, quantified measures of the differences can be obtained, permitting identification of the defects in or quality of the copy.

While the copy comparison and analysis means of the present invention is illustrated with a specific embodiment, various modifications and changes may be made thereto by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope thereof.