Ruthenium Coated Cathodes

1. Field of the Invention

This invention relates to improved cathodes for use with electrolytic cells used in the electrolysis of aqueous alkali metal halide solution for the production of halogen and caustic.

2. Description of the Prior Art

The electrolysis of aqueous alkali metal halide solution such as solutions of sodium chloride or potassium chloride is conducted on a vast commercial scale. The electrolysis of alakli metal chlorides to produce elemental chlorine and alkali metal hydroxides is conducted in two general types of cells--the diaphragm and the mercury cathode cell. In the diaphragm cell, the cell is divided into two compartments--the anode compartment and the cathode compartment--which are separated by a porous or semiporous diaphragm which is usually made of asbestos or by an ion exchanger-type membrane. The cathode is of perforated metal and the asbestos diaphragm is in contact with the cathode. The anode, which until recently was usually made of carbon or graphite, is disposed centrally in the anode compartment.

In operating each of the above-described cells one was confronted with a common problem, namely, that during the course of the electrolysis, the carbon or graphite electrode gradually eroded or decomposed. Consequently, great interest was developed in a dimensionally stable anode that would be free of the objectionable characteristics of the graphite or carbon electrode. The dimensionally stable anodes which were developed are typically of titanium or similar valve metal and coated with a platinum metal or ruthenium oxide alone or in combination with other oxides and compounds. During the development of the improved anodes for the various electrolytic cells little or no attention has been given to the cathode employed in the cells which, as mentioned above, typically is a ferrous metal material.

Improvement in the cathode is desirable inasmuch as there is a voltage loss at the cathode in addition to a voltage loss at the anode of these electrolytic cells. Inasmuch as these cells consume tremendous amounts of electricity even a small amount, such as a tenth of a volt, of savings in electrical energy at either the cathode or the anode is of tremendous economic advantage and importance to the producer. Hindering the desire for better cathodes is the fact that the operating conditions of the cathode, e.g., high caustic concentration, heat, conductivity and purity of brine requirements and the like, are very deleterious to many materials which might otherwise be considered for such use.

In accordance with this invention there is provided in an electrolytic cell for the production of halogen and caustic from aqueous alkali metal halide solutions wherein the cell is equipped with anodes and cathodes separated by a diaphragm or ion exchange membrane, the improvement which comprises a composite cathode comprising a metal substrate having on at least a portion thereof an intermediate coating with cobalt and over said intermediate coating an outer or over coating of ruthenium. Additionally, between the metal substrate and cobalt layer can be interposed a secondary layer of a metal selected from the group consisting of nickel, platinum, palladium and rhodium.

In a diaphragm-type cell for the production of chlorine, the typical metal cathode has been of woven wire mesh construction. Ferrous metal cathodes of this type are well known and described in some detail in the textbook Chlorine, Its Manufacture Properties and UsesJ. S. Sconce, Editor, American Chemical Society Monograph No. 154, Reinhold Publishing Company, New York, N.Y., (1962) at page 90 et seq. which is incorporated herein by reference. Flat cathodes are also known, for instance see U.S. Pats. Nos. 1,464,689 and 3,335,079. Perforated and/or expanded metal sheet cathodes are also known. Any of the foregoing configurations of metal cathodes are suitable for the purpose of this invention. While commercially the metal of choice has been a ferrous metal, other metals, such as copper, nickel, etc., can also be employed in this invention.

The ruthenium is applied as a thin coating to the cathode. The thickness of the coating can vary consistent with cell efficiency improvement sought, the economics of fabrication and the like. While theoretically a continuous mono-molecular layer of ruthenium will suffice, because of porosity a layer of from several microns up to about 0.001 inch in thickness is desirable and, more preferably, the thickness is about 0.0001 to about 0.001 inches. The coating can be applied by electro-depositing on the base structure from a plating solution or chemideposited by forming a liquid film containing the ruthenium on the ferrous metal and the drying of the film as is well known in the plating arts. Additionally, vacuum deposition, cladding, powder deposition, sintering, ionic plating, sputtering, different kinds of spraying and the like techniques can be used to apply the ruthenium coating. The coating can be applied to either one side only or both sides (or faces) of the cathode as desired depending on the configuration of the electrolytic cell wherein the cathode is to be employed.

The rusting and undercutting of ferrous metal substrates is a well known phenomenon. In an electrolytic cell the electrolyte containing Cl.sup.- and/or OCl.sup.- ions is very corrosive and the ferrous metal starts corroding immediately. Thus, it is necessary to provide an intermediate coating between the ruthenium and the cathode so as to avoid rusting and undercutting which is occasioned and to provide a better bond between the ruthenium coating and the cathode. The intermediate coat is of cobalt. It has also been found advantageous, though not required, to provide a secondary coat between the cathode and the intermediate coat. The secondary coating is selected from the group of nickel, platinum, palladium and rhodium. The intermediate and secondary coat, if present, are deposited on the cathode in the same manner as that described for the ruthenium coating. It is advantageous to deposit the intermediate layer in such a manner that the cathode surface area will increase substantially.

The cathodes of this invention provide for an electric current voltage savings in an electrolytic cell on the order of 0.2 to 0.35 volts at about 200 amps. per square foot.

The following examples are included to illustrate the preparation of the coated cathodes of this invention but are not to be considered limiting. Unless otherwise specified all temperatures are expressed in degrees centigrade and all parts are expressed as parts by weight.

At present, steel is used as the cathode material in the chlor-alkali and many other electrolytic cells. The cathodes are fabricated from a wire mesh or screen. In a Hooker cell the cathode screen wire is of approximately 0.078 inch diameter and the screen has 6 wires and 6 openings per inch. In order to examine the advantages offered by the coatings in comparison with the conventionally used steel, the test cathodes were made by depositing the coatings on the conventional material. Thus, the general geometry and the structure of test cathodes were the same as those of the cathode material used in the Hooker's cell. The test and steel (control) cathodes were about 6.25 inches by 1.625 inches in size with a panhandle for electrical connection. The comparison between the test cathodes with experimental coatings and the conventional steel cathode was made by measuring the cathode potentials with respect to a calomel standard half cell and/or measuring the cell voltages. A twin cathode cell in which the test and the control cathodes were incorporated side-by-side in the same plane but separated from each other, a common asbestos diaphragm and a common dimensionally stable anode was used. The diaphragm and the anode were twice the size of the single cathode and disposed parallel to the cathode. The test and control cathodes were also incorporated in separate electrolytic cells for the measurements.

Saturated brine, purified and filtered to remove mainly calcium, magnesium, iron, and suspended matter was used as the electrolyte. The pH of the brine before entering the cell was between 9 and 11. The rate of flow of the catholyte flowing out of the cell and the salt cut was monitored from time to time to check that the cell was not running at extreme conditions. The advantages offered by the coatings in terms of cathodic potential or in terms of hydrogen overpotential were greater than the differences introduced by the usual variations in the flow and concentration in the catholyte. The temperature of the cells was generally 120.degree. to 140.degree. F. but experiments were made in the lower and higher range.

The test cathodes were first coated with cobalt or cobalt plus another metal as indicated (5 to 10 mil thick) and then with ruthenium. The intermediate metal plated cathodes were heated in hydrogen to 500.degree.-1000.degree. C., for one-half to three hours to remove oxides and improve the adhesion of the coating to the steel as well as to the subsequent overcoating, and then cooled in Argon. (Other reducing gases in place of hydrogen and inert gases in place of Argon, e.g., helium or krypton, can be used.) The ruthenium coatings were obtained by electroplating in commercially available baths, e.g., Ruthenex (a sulfuric acid type bath) sold by Selrex Company, Nutley, N.J., using the standard procedure, e.g., 10 amps. per square foot, 70.degree.C. The thickness of the outer (ruthenium) coatings was about 0.0005 inches. It was found that if the ruthenium was coated in two layers with a heat treatment process interposed in between them a more durable surface was obtained. After a partial, thin, initial coat of ruthenium is applied the cathode was heated to about 500.degree. to 1000.degree. C. in a reducing gas (e.g., hydrogen) for one-half to three hours and finally cooled in an inert gas (Argon). Thereafter, a second coat of ruthenium was applied to obtain the desired thickness and obtain a surface more durable against physical damage, e.g., dislodging the coatings in storage, or during or after electrolysis.

Cathodes of other shapes, sizes and geometry can be used as long as they have the ruthenium coating.

Summarized in tabular form below is the test data for a diaphragm-type chlorine cell showing amount of reduction in voltage requirements at various amps. per square foot (hereinafter referred to as ASF) for the cell equipped with the ruthenium coated cathode compared to the other cell equipped with a conventional uncoated cathode. In each case the coated cathode had an intermediate coating and was heat treated before the ruthenium was applied. The diaphragm was deposited asbestos.

The cathodes of this invention utilized in obtaining the test data summarized in Table I below were prepared by plasma spraying cobalt on a woven copper wire cathode. Thereafter, the ruthenium coat was plated in two layers, the first layer being heat treated prior to plating of the second layer of ruthenium.

The test cathodes of this invention utilized in obtaining the test date summarized in Table II below were prepared by plasma spraying the cobalt on the woven ferrous wire cathode and then plating the ruthenium in two layers with an intervening heat treatment step.

The test cathodes of this invention utilized in obtaining the test data summarized in Table III below were prepared by plating the woven ferrous wire cathode with nickel and then with cobalt. The cathode was then heat treated 500.degree. to 1000.degree. C. for one-half hour to three hours in a hydrogen atmosphere first and then in Argon. A thin layer of ruthenium was then plated on the cathode. After again heat treating the cathode a second layer of ruthenium was plated on the cathode.

From the foregoing tables it will be seen that consistent results are obtained depending only on the ASF level. Since commercial cell ASF levels are 100 or more, significant savings in electrical energy is obtained by the use of this invention.

The foregoing examples and methods have been described in the foregoing specification for the purpose of illustration and not limitation. Many other modifications and ramifications will naturally suggest themselves to those skilled in the art based on this disclosure. These are intended to be comprehended as within the scope of this invention.