FIELD OF THE INVENTION
This invention relates to an apparatus for separating material particles, especially liquid droplets from gases.
THE PRIOR ART
The prior art employs apparatuses for separating fine material particles from gases having a plurality of parallel zigzag or sinously shaped profiles spaced apart in parallel with each other.
Inventor's prior art patents U.S. Pat. No. 3,849,095 of Nov. 19, 1974 and Canadian Pat. No. 828,547 of Dec. 2, 1969 are made of record.
In such apparatuses, the profiles have a collection pocket, opening to the direction of the gas flow or serrations on the downstream side. Therefore the flow pattern itself in distorted, because of the sudden change of direction in the profiles or because of the position of a collection pocket. Thus, a high energy loss is caused by the turbulence of gas flow and difficulty arises in the separation of particles from gas.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
An object of the present invention is to provide an improved apparatus comprising a plurality of waved profiles, a wave of which comprises at least three circular arcs, placed apart in parallel with each other to form gas passages of gas therebetween. A first separation chamber is formed with a tongue-like blade, which is projected on a central convex of each wave against gas flow in the gas passage. A plurality of serrations is formed on the central concave of each wave of said profile. Thereby the material particles are separated from the gas passing through the gas passages.
Another object of this invention is to provide an improved apparatus comprising a plurality of waved profiles, a wave of which consists of at least three circular arcs, placed apart in parallel with each other to form gas passages therebetween. A first separating chamber is formed with a tongue-like blade, which is projected on a central convex of each wave of said profile against gas flow in the gas passage, a plurality of serrations is formed on a central concave of each wave of said profile; a second separating chamber is formed with a ]-shaped thin plate on the convexed side behind said serrations; and a third separating chamber is formed with a projection on the concave side opposite to said second separating chamber; thereby the material particles are separated from the gas passing through the passages. Preferred embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to the accompanying drawings, as follows.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a transverse sectional view of a plurality of profiles arranged in parallel and vertical with regard to an embodiment of present invention.
FIG. 2 is a cross-sectional view of the profile in FIG. 1.
FIG. 3 is a transverse sectional view of a plurality of profiles arranged in parallel and vertical with regard to another embodiment of the present invention, and
FIG. 4 is a cross-sectional view of the profile in FIG. 3.
DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS
Preferred embodiment 1
A wave profile 1, as shown in FIG. 1 and FIG. 2, is shaped with three circular arcs, a 1st arc 2a, 2nd arc 3, and a 3rd arc 4. With reference to a tangent 5 contacting with the 1st arc 2 and the 3rd arc 4, the parallel component of distance between the centre of the crest of the 2nd arc 3 and the upstream end 6 (contact point on the 1st arc) is L-2. The height of the apex 8 on the circular convex 37 shaped with the 2nd arc (the perpendicular component on the tangent 35) is H-2. The wave-like profile is shaped continuously with the 1st arc 2, a straight line 9 and 2nd arc 3, and the 3rd arc 4. The 1st separating chamber 10 is of semi-circular shape, having a blade 11 combined with a 4th arc 12 and a tangent 13, which contacts the 4th arc 12 and the 2nd arc 3, and a opening 15 at parallel component L-2 of distance from the upstream end 6.
A plurality of serration 17 is provided on the circular concave side opposite to the 1st separating chamber 10, and is extended along the gas duct 16 up to a downstream end 18 of the serrations at parallel component L-3 of distance from the upstream end 6.
Each dimension ratio divided by wave effective length L-0 which is defined by length of the tangent 5 from the upstream end 6 to the downstream end 19, is as follows
A parallel component for the purposes of this disclosure means a component parallel to the tangent 5.
The serrations 47 are spaced 1.about.3 mm apart, 0.1.about.1 mm deep and 1.about.3 mm wide. The plurality of profiles 1 are arranged in vertical and parallel and spaced apart at a distance B, of which dimension ratio divided by the wave effective length L-0 is 0.1.about.0.2.
The cross-sectional area of the gas duct 16 defined between the profiles 1 is minimum at throat 21 formed between the inside of the 2nd arc 3 and the outside of blade 14, and continuously enlarged in direction to upstream or downstream. The gas entraining a lot of particles, such as liquid droplet, is driven into a plurality of vertical and parallel profiles, and then deflected in direction to the throat 21. However the particles are moved straight by inertia force, a part of the particles are separated into the 1st separating chamber 10. In the next step, the gas stream is deflected again, at the throat 21, and the particles are moved to the radial direction by centrifugal force, and impinged to concave 22, of the profile 1 and catched in the serrations 17 without reentrainment by gas stream. The particles, such as liquid droplet, then flow down along the serrations 17. Thus, the apparatus of this invention has a large separation efficiency.
The performances of the apparatus of this invention in comparison with those of prior art are as follows
A limit velocity means for the purposes of this disclosure a maximum velocity without reentrainment of particles. Therefore, the apparatus of this invention make it possible under the same pressure drop to have 1/3.about.1/4 times smaller gas flow area in comparison with the prior art.
In conclusion, a combined use of the 1st separating chamber as well as the serrations on the concave side of the 2nd arc makes it possible to get an improved separation efficiency, in comparison with the prior single use of only a simple separating chamber.
Preferred embodiment 2
A wave-like profile 31, as shown in FIG. 3 and FIG. 4, is shaped with three circular arcs, ie 1st arc 32, 2nd arc 33, and 3rd arc 34. With reference to a tangent 35 contacting with the 1st arc 32, and the 3rd arc 34, the parallel component of distance between the centre of the 2nd arc 33 and the upstream end 36 (contact point on the 1st arc 32) is L-1, the height of apex 38 on the circular convex 37 shaped with the 2nd arc (the perpendicular component on the tangent 35) is H-1. The waved profile is shaped continuously with the 1st arc 32, a straight line 39, the 2nd arc 33, and the 3rd arc 34. The 1st separating chamber 40 is of semicircular shape, having a blade 14 combined with the 4th arc and a tangent 43, which contacts the 4th arc 42 and the 2nd arc 33, and an opening 45 at parallel component L-2 of distance from the upstream end 36.
A plurality of serration 47 is provided on the circular concave side opposite to the 1st separating chamber 40, and is extended along the gas duct 46 up to a downstream end 48 of the serrations at parallel component L-3 of distance from the upstream end 36. Further, the 2nd separating chamber 50 is formed in ] -shape by a thin plate 52 provided on the downstream portion of the concave of the second arc behind the serration 47, opposite to the 1st separating chamber 40, and has an opening 51 in parallel component L-4 of distance from the upstream end 36.
Furthermore, the 3rd separating chamber 53 is formed by a projection 54 on the same side with the 1st separating chamber in parallel component L-5 of distance from the downstream end 49 (contact point of the 3rd arc 34 and the tangent 35).
Each dimension ratio divided by wave effective length L-0, which is defined by length of the tangent 35 from the upstream end 36 to the downstream end 49, is as follows.
Notice
Parallel component means a component is parallel to the tangent 35.
The 2nd separating chamber 50 is formed in 2.about.5 mm with regard to the rectangular outside. The projection 54 of the 3rd separating chamber is 1.about.3 mm high and 0.2.about.3 mm wide.
The serrations 47 are spaced 1.about.3 mm apart, 0.1.about.1mm deep and 1.about.3 mm wide.
The profiles 31 are arranged in vertical and parallel, and spaced part at a distance B, of which dimension ratio divided by the wave effective length L-0 is 0.1.about.0.2. The cross-sectional area of the gas duct 55 defined between the profiles 31 is minimum at the throat 56 formed between the inside of the 2nd arc 33 and the outside of is blade 44, and continuously enlarged in the direction to upstream or downstream.
The gas entraining a lot of particles, such as liquid droplet, is driven into a plurality of vertical and parallel profiles, and then deflected in the direction to the throat 56. However, the particles are moved straight by force of inertia, and a part of the particles are separated into the 1st separating chamber 40. In the next step, the gas stream is deflected again, at the throat 56 and the particles are moved to the radial direction by centrifugal force, and impinged to concave 57 of the profile 31, and caught in the serrations 47 without reentrainment by gas stream. The particles, such as liquid droplet, then flow down along the serrations 47. Furthermore, when the gas flow passing through the throat 56 is decelerated through the enlarged gas duct, a large part of the residual particles is removed by the 2nd separating chamber 50 and other parts are removed by the 3rd separating chamber 53. Thus, the apparatus of this invention has a large separating efficiency.
The performances of the apparatus of this invention in comparison with those of prior art are as follows.
A limit velocity means for purposes of this disclosure the maximum velocity without reentrainment of particles.
Therefore the apparatus of this invention make it possible under the same pressure drop to have 1/3.about.1/4 times smaller gas flow area as well as to separate smaller particles in comparison with the prior art.
In conclusion, a combined use of the 1st, 2nd and 3rd separating chamber as well as the serrations on the concave side of profile make it possible to get an improved separation efficiency, in comparison with the prior single use of only a simple separating chamber.