US 2005/0106357 A1Application

Sheet having a rough feel

Publication Date:2005-05-19

•18 Claims

•11 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

The present invention relates to a sheet having a rough surface feel on at least one of its sides, said sheet being coated on one or both sides with a layer comprising incompressible particles that are not flat and not very angular. It also relates to the process for manufacturing said sheet and to its use as a paper or plastic printing medium, a paper or plastic package, a cover intended for bookbinding, or a board or plastic box.

Metadata

Inventor

Thierry Mayade

Application Information

Application Number:US 10/497,529

Filing Date:2002-12-04

Priority Date:2001-12-04

Patent Drawings (11 sheets)

Description

[0001] The present invention relates to a sheet having a rough feel.

[0002] It also relates to the process for manufacturing the sheet and to the use of this sheet.

[0003] The Applicant was interested in particular in providing a sheet which, without being very rough or abrasive, nevertheless has a certain granular aspect that can only be sensed by touch, its surface appearing perfectly smooth to the naked eye.

[0004] Research into a certain rough feel remains, to the knowledge of the Applicant, an unexplored field in the paper industry, in thin-film plastics, in packaging or in publishing in general.

[0005] This is because, until now, research carried out in these fields had on the contrary been applied to giving a sheet softness or velvety characteristics.

[0006] Thus, in Patent FR 2 791 368, the Applicant has protected a sheet having a feel allowing a specific characteristic of the contents of a package to be recalled, in particular for packaging cosmetic products.

[0007] The aim of the Applicant is to provide a sheet with a rough but pleasant feel, that is to say one on which one's finger does not catch.

[0008] The sheets must furthermore be able to be printed on, have whiteness features and be able to be handled, for example.

[0009] The Applicant has sought particles that meet these objectives.

[0010] The Applicant has discovered two broad categories of particles:

- [0011] those for which the abrasive role predominates and which have an angular microscopic finish and a somewhat homogeneous distribution on the surface of the sheet, such as alumina or corundum; and
- [0012] those for which the spacer and abrasion resistance role is sought, and which have a more rounded microscopic finish and a more bulky form, such as starch.

[0013] In its research into a rough feel, the Applicant focused as a priority on using particles from the latter category mentioned, so as to reduce as far as possible the catching of one's fingers on the sheet thus covered.

[0014] It has found that the rough effect results in fact from several causes:

- [0015] the particle size of the particles used, that is to say their size distribution;
- [0016] the shape of the particles used;
- [0017] the amount of particles deposited; and
- [0018] the distribution of the particles used on the sheet.

[0019] It has also found that the most beneficial results are obtained by coating a paper or plastic sheet using a layer of nongelatinized starch particles, and preferably potato starch particles.

[0020] By looking in a scanning electron microscope, it is easy to see that the potato starch grains are of almost spherical or oval shape, possess a mean size distribution of 28 micrometers and consist of coarse but not very numerous particles.

[0021] The Applicant has also been able to show that the “rough” feel is not obtained with all types of starch, in particular that coating with corn starch grains does not give the desired rough sensation.

[0022] The explanation stems from the fact that the particles are small, their mean diameter lying below 15 micrometers, and their particle size distribution being rather little differentiated.

[0023] Corn starch grains therefore spread out as a uniform layer, following the relief of the sheet to which they are applied.

[0024] From these various analyses, the Applicant has drawn a number of conclusions, allowing the type of particles that can be used to be restricted.

[0025] Firstly, the particles must be sufficiently coarse to be able to be flush with the layer, so as to be perceived by the handler.

[0026] Next, the particles must not be very angular, so as to create a slightly rough, but pleasant, feel.

[0027] In particular, the silica or corundum grains such as those employed for manufacturing abrasives are not suitable for the desired feel, the particles having a fractured geometry that is too aggressive.

[0028] Preferably, the particles will have a relatively spherical and bulky geometry, which also excludes particles in flake form, such as talc.

[0029] Finally, the particles must not be deformable.

[0030] Thus, materials such as rubber or expanded microspheres are not suitable because of their compressible and elastic character, giving the coated sheet a sticky feel and one that is not rough.

[0031] From this standpoint, certain starch grains seem to provide a preferential solution as regards their suitability for meeting the abovementioned conditions, and because of their cost, their availability in the natural state, and their recyclability.

[0032] To be specific, the invention relates to a sheet having a rough surface feel on at least one of its sides, said sheet being coated on one or both sides with a layer comprising incompressible microscopic particles that are bulky and have a rounded shape.

[0033] In particular, the invention is characterized in that the particles have a weight-average diameter of greater than 25 micrometers and preferably less than 200 micrometers.

[0034] In particular, the invention is characterized in that the particles have an almost spherical shape.

[0035] Preferably, the particles are nongelatinized starch grains, especially potato starch grains.

[0036] According to one particular case, the particles may also be glass microspheres, or ground plastic, the plastic preferably being a polyamide, a polyester, a polyolefin or a PVC.

[0037] The invention is particularly characterized in that the distribution of the particles on the surface is between 20 and 250 particles per mm². This distribution may in particular be determined by topological analysis of the surface of the sheet obtained.

[0038] Preferably, the grammage of the sheet obtained will be between 50 and 500 g/m².

[0039] According to one embodiment, the weight of the layer on each coated side is between 3 and 30 g/m²by dry weight, preferably between 5 and 18 g/m²by dry weight.

[0040] In particular, the invention is characterized in that said layer comprises:

- [0041] 100 parts by dry weight of said particles;
- [0042] from 5 to 300 parts, preferably from 10 to 50 parts, by dry weight of a binder; and
- [0043] from 0 to 500 parts by dry weight of fillers.

[0044] In particular, the binder is chosen from styrene butadiene latices, acrylic latices, vinyl latices, dissolved starches, polyvinyl alcohol, proteins, especially casein, gelatin or soya protein, nitrocellulose, plastisol, glycerophthalic resins, epoxide resins, polyesters.

[0045] In particular, the fillers are chosen from calcium carbonate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, barium sulfate, precipitated or pyrogenic silica, plastic pigments.

[0046] Other ingredients, such as waxes, rheology modifiers, antifoams, spreading agents, bactericides or fungicides, etc. may also be used in the coating composition.

[0047] These ingredients will not change the surface structure of the material and consequently the tactile effect obtained.

[0048] According to a final embodiment, the sheet possesses a dynamic friction coefficient measured according to the NF Q 03-082 standard on blotting paper of less than 0.5.

[0049] The invention also relates to the process for coating a sheet.

[0050] According to one particular case, the sheet coating process is characterized in that it comprises the following steps:

- [0051] a) at least one side of the sheet is treated with a composition in aqueous medium, comprising:
  - [0052] 100 parts of incompressible microscopic particles that are bulky and have a rounded shape,
  - [0053] from 5 to 200 parts by dry weight, preferably from 10 to 50 parts by dry weight, of binder,
  - [0054] from 0 to 500 parts by dry weight of fillers;
- [0055] b) the sheet obtained is dried.

[0056] According to one particular case of the process, step a) is carried out using a coating device chosen from roll coaters, of the helio or reverse roll type, which correspond to reverse roll coaters, trailing blade coaters, air knife coaters, film-transfer size presses, curtain coaters.

[0057] According to another particular case, step a) is carried out using a spray device.

[0058] According to another variant, the sheet coating process is characterized in that it comprises the following steps:

- [0059] a) at least one side of the sheet is coated with a varnish comprising:
  - [0060] 100 parts of incompressible microscopic particles that are bulky and have a rounded shape,
  - [0061] from 5 to 200 parts by dry weight, preferably from 10 to 50 parts by dry weight, of binder,
  - [0062] from 0 to 500 parts by dry weight of fillers;
- [0063] b) the sheet obtained is dried.

[0064] The invention also relates to the use of a sheet as described above for manufacturing a paper or plastic printing medium, a paper or plastic package, a cover intended for bookbinding, or a board or plastic box.

[0065] The present invention will be explained further by means of examples accompanied by corresponding figures.

[0066] FIGS. 1A and 1B show scanning electron micrographs of a sheet of paper coated with potato starch grains with a 50× and 750× magnification, respectively.

[0067] FIG. 1C shows the same sheet, but seen in section at 1000× magnification.

[0068] FIGS. 2A and 2B show a sheet of paper coated with corn starch grains at 50× and 750× magnification, respectively.

[0069] FIG. 2C shows the same sheet seen in section at 1000× magnification.

[0070] FIGS. 3A and 3B show a sheet of paper coated with potato starch grains and calcium carbonate as filler at 50× and 750× magnification, respectively.

[0071] FIG. 3C shows the same sheet seen in section at 1000× magnification.

[0072] FIGS. 4A and 4B show a sheet of paper coated with silica particles at 50× and 750× magnification, respectively.

[0073] FIG. 4C shows the same sheet seen in section at 1000× magnification.

[0074] FIG. 5 shows a sheet of paper coated with expanded thermoplastic microspheres, of the EXPANCEL 820® type sold by Expancel at 500× magnification.

[0075] FIG. 6 shows a sheet of paper coated with glass microspheres at 500× magnification.

[0076] FIG. 7 shows a sheet of paper coated with alumina particles at 500× magnification.

[0077] FIG. 8 shows a sheet of paper coated with wheat starch grains at 500× magnification.

[0078] As seen above, by coating a paper with potato starch particles, the Applicant has succeeded in obtaining the “pleasant” rough feel that it sought, whereas this result is not obtained with corn starch grains.

[0079] By comparing FIGS. 1A, 1B and 2A, 2B, corresponding to the two types of starch mentioned above respectively, it is apparent that the distribution, the shape and the size of the grains allow this difference to be explained.

[0080] In the case of potato starch, the starch has a somewhat heterogeneous distribution on the sheet, small grains either aggregating around coarser grains or being deposited in an isolated and random fashion on the sheet.

[0081] In the case of corn, this distribution is however completely homogeneous on the sheet, the grains possessing relatively similar sizes and forming a finely grained thin layer on the paper.

[0082] Comparing FIGS. 1C and 2C shows what a handler's finger will perceive when it is moved over the surface of the coated paper.

[0083] In the first case, his finger will pass from a hollow to a bump quite frequently, the height separating them being at least 25 micrometers.

[0084] In the second case, his finger will pass from one grain peak to another grain peak, the distance separating them being at most 10 micrometers.

[0085] Below about ten micrometers, it is difficult for a handler to appreciate the graininess of the surface and have any sensation of roughness.

[0086] The Applicant has also been able to observe an increased feeling of roughness by adding fillers, especially calcium carbonate.

[0087] FIGS. 3A, 3B and 3C clearly show this aspect of the invention, since it may be seen that there is an unchanged distribution of the potato starch grains, but the appearance of these grains themselves is completely different.

[0088] In fact, calcium carbonate—a particle close to one micrometer in size—covers the surface of the starch grains, which thus lose their surface smoothness and become more catching to the touch.

[0089] FIGS. 4A, 4B and 4C identify another case that the Applicant has intentionally excluded, that of a paper coated with angular silica particles.

[0090] In particular, FIG. 4C shows the very angular and uneven character of the silica particles, this being incompatible with a pleasant rough feel.

[0091] Although the sheet obtained nevertheless has a low degree of roughness, it owes this only to the small proportion of silica particles added and to the low relief thus created.

[0092] However, this feel does not correspond to the pleasant “rough” feel sought by the Applicant.

[0093] FIG. 5 for its part shows the surface of a sheet covered with expanded thermoplastic microspheres of the EXPANCEL type.

[0094] Examination shows that the particles are mostly small and almost spherical.

[0095] Since the coarse particles are both few in number and relatively soft, the “rough” effect sought is not obtained.

[0096] In contrast, FIG. 6 shows the surface of a sheet covered with glass microspheres.

[0097] Even though the distribution and the shape of the microspheres on the sheet have a certain similarity with the previous case, the feel obtained is completely different because of the hardness of the glass.

[0098] The feel is actually “rough” and not sticky as in the previous case.

[0099] FIGS. 7 and 8 confirm the fact that a pleasant “rough” feel cannot be obtained using alumina or wheat starch.

[0100] This is because, in one case, the excessively angular alumina particles give the surface a prickly character, unpleasant to the touch.

[0101] In the other case, the wheat starch produces a surface quite similar to that of corn starch; consequently, the rough character will practically be imperceptible.

[0102] Examples of coating compositions according to the invention are described below.

Example 1

[0103] A coating composition containing potato starch grains in an amount of 10.7 g/m²was applied to one side of a sheet of a paper medium using a laboratory size press.

[0104] The sheet thus treated was dried at about 150° C.

[0105] The composition containing the starch grains was produced in aqueous medium and contained, by dry weight:

- [0106] 100 parts of HICAT 110 (potato starch) sold by Roquette;
- [0107] 32 parts of ACRONAL S 305 D (latex) sold by BASF;
- [0108] 4.8 parts of AMP 90 (pH regulator) sold by Angus Chemie GmbH; and
- [0109] 6.7 parts of STEROCOLL D (thickener) sold by BASF.

[0110] The sheet shown in FIGS. 1A, 1B, 1C was obtained.

Example 2

[0111] A coating composition containing potato starch grains and calcium carbonate as fillers, in an amount of 22.5 g/m², was applied to one side of a sheet of paper medium using a laboratory size press.

[0112] The sheet thus treated was dried at about 150° C.

[0113] The composition containing the starch grains and calcium carbonate was produced in aqueous medium and contained, by dry weight:

- [0114] 100 parts of HICAT 110 (potato starch) sold by Roquette;
- [0115] 60 parts of HYDROCARB 90 (calcium carbonate) sold by OMYA;
- [0116] 32 parts of ACRONAL S 305 D (latex) sold by BASF;
- [0117] 4.8 parts of AMP 90 (pH regulator) sold by Angus Chemie GmbH; and
- [0118] 6.7 parts of STEROCOLL D (thickener) sold by BASF.

[0119] The sheet shown in FIGS. 2A, 2B, 2C was obtained.

Example 3

[0120] A coating composition containing glass microspheres, in an amount of 47 g/m², was deposited on one side of a sheet of paper medium using a laboratory sizing press.

[0121] The composition containing the glass microspheres was produced in aqueous medium and contained, by dry weight:

- [0122] 100 parts of MICROPERL 050-20-215 (glass microspheres) sold by 3M;
- [0123] 20 parts of ACRONAL S 360 D (latex) sold by BASF; and
- [0124] 2.4 parts of BLANOSE (thickener) sold by Aqualon.

[0125] The sheet shown in FIG. 6 was obtained.

[0126] The Applicant was also concerned to characterize the pleasant rough surface finish of the sheets obtained other than by a tactile appreciation made by a handler taken at random, a method that may be regarded as being too subjective.

[0127] With a concern to provide a specific and nonambiguous numerical value, the Applicant measured the dynamic friction coefficient according to French Standard NF Q 03-082.

[0128] The standard, based on measuring the tensile force needed to initiate and then sustain the movement of one surface over another, may be applied to the evaluation of a sheet of the material to be measured sliding over another (reference) material.

[0129] In its tests, the Applicant therefore chose as reference material a blotting paper, having a grammage of about 275 g/m², corresponding especially to the requirements of the ISO 5269-1 standard in its section 4.4.

[0130] Table I gives the measurements made on various coating compositions, by varying the particles introduced.

[0131] In view of the results, it may already be stated that the dynamic friction coefficient is higher the rougher the paper obtained.

[0132] In fact, it may be seen that the pleasant “rough” feel sought by the Applicant corresponds to a coefficient Kd of less than 0.5.

[0133] The particles such as thermally expanded microspheres of the EXPANCEL type, the alumina particles, the wheat starch grains or the rubber powder could therefore be excluded.

[0134] This confirms the observations made above.

TABLE I


	Grammage of	Weight of	Value of the
	the medium	coating	friction
Particle type	(in g/m²)	(in g/m²)	coefficient Kd


Potato starch	249	16	0.31
Potato starch +	249	17	0.28
CaCO₃
EXPANCEL	120	2	0.87
Glass microspheres	249	18	0.35
Ground polyamide	249	12	0.41
Alumina	249	15	0.61
Wheat starch	249	13	0.31
Rubber powder	249	31	0.97

Claims

1. A sheet having a rough surface feel on at least one of its sides, said sheet being coated on one or both sides with a layer comprising incompressible microscopic particles that are bulky and have a rounded shape.

2. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein the particles have a weight-average diameter of greater than 25 micrometers and preferably less than 200 micrometers.

3. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein the particles have an almost spherical shape.

4. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein the particles are nongelatinized starch grains, especially potato starch grains.

5. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein the particles are glass microspheres.

6. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein the particles are obtained from grinding a plastic.

7. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein the distribution of the particles on the surface is between 20 and 250 particles per mm².

8. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein said sheet has a grammage of between 50 and 500 g/m².

9. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein the weight of said layer on each coated side is between 3 and 30 g/m²by dry weight, preferably between 5 and 18 g/m²by dry weight.

10. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein said layer comprises:

100 parts by dry weight of said particles;

from 5 to 300 parts, preferably from 10 to 50 parts, by dry weight of a binder; and

from 0 to 500 parts by dry weight of fillers.

11. The sheet as claimed in claim 10, wherein the binder is chosen from styrene butadiene latices, acrylic latices, vinyl latices, dissolved starches, polyvinyl alcohol, proteins, especially casein, gelatin or soya protein, nitrocellulose, plastisol, glycerophthalic resins, epoxide resins, polyesters.

12. The sheet as claimed in claim 10, wherein the fillers are chosen from calcium carbonate, kaolin, talc, titanium dioxide, barium sulfate, precipitated or pyrogenic silica, plastic pigments.

13. The sheet as claimed in claim 1, wherein its dynamic friction coefficient measured according to the NF Q 03-082 standard on blotting paper is less than 0.5.

14. A process for coating a sheet as claimed in claim 1, comprising the following steps:

a) at least one side of the sheet is treated with a composition in aqueous medium, comprising:

100 parts of incompressible microscopic particles that are bulky and have a rounded shape,

from 5 to 200 parts by dry weight, preferably from 10 to 50 parts by dry weight, of binder,

from 0 to 500 parts by dry weight of fillers;

b) the sheet thus obtained is dried.

15. The coating process as claimed in claim 14, wherein step a) is carried out using a coating device chosen from roll coaters, of the helio or reverse roll type, trailing blade coaters, air knife coaters, film-transfer size presses, curtain coaters.

16. The coating process as claimed in claim 14, wherein step a) is carried out using a spray device.

17. A process for coating a sheet as claimed in claim 1, comprising the following steps:

a) at least one side of the sheet is coated with a varnish comprising:

100 parts of incompressible microscopic particles that are bulky and have a rounded shape,

from 5 to 200 parts by dry weight, preferably from 10 to 50 parts by dry weight, of binder,

from 0 to 500 parts by dry weight of fillers;

b) the sheet thus obtained is dried.

18. Method of manufacturing a paper or plastic printing medium, a paper or plastic package, a cover intended for bookbinding, or a board or plastic box, comprising using a sheet as claimed in claim 1.

Abstract