Synchronizing data between disparate schemas using composite version

[0001] This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/237,549, filed Sep. 6, 2002, which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/118,598, filed Apr. 8, 2002, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/282,249, filed on Apr. 6, 2001 and to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/282,131, filed on Apr. 6, 2001.

[0002] The entire teachings of the above applications are incorporated herein by reference.

[0003] This application relates generally to handheld computing devices and more specifically to synchronizing data between a handheld device and a server.

[0004] In today's corporate business environments, networked information systems are ubiquitous. Almost as universal is the ability to have data and programs from the computer network available on a mobile device. The most common such devices are laptop computers, but more recently handheld computing devices have begun to proliferate. An example of such an environment is the health care industry. While a networked computer system keeps track of all patient information, doctors have begun to utilize handheld computing devices to view and edit patient data while making rounds. After doing so for a period of time, the doctor will then synchronize the handheld device to a server coupled to the information network. The synchronization process includes the uploading of data from the handheld device to the server, as well as the downloading of data from the server to the handheld device. It can also include updating of software. An example of such a system is that which is offered by PatientKeeper, Inc. The PatientKeeper systems are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/356,543, titled Device for Automating Billing Reimbursement, by inventors Matthew D. Barnhart, Stephen S. Hau, Yuri Ostrovsky and MinPont Chien, filed on Jul. 19, 1999 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/356,751, titled System for Automating Billing Reimbursement, by inventors Matthew D. Barnhart, Stephen S. Hau, Patrick McCormick, George A. Madrid, Craig A. Fields and Sanjay S. Vakil, filed on Jul. 19, 1999, the teachings of which are incorporated herein by reference.

[0005] A problem presented by the synchronization process is that data is often changed or updated on the server or network one or more times between synchronizations and is often changed on the handheld device as well. Thus, a problem in keeping data on a plurality of handheld devices and a server properly synchronized is tracking and maintaining the correct version of the data on the multitude of handheld devices. An additional problem is that the objects that are used by the handheld device may not directly map to the objects on the repository in a trivial way.

[0006] The problem of synchronizing handheld devices is similar to the problem of replicating data between multiple distributed copies of a datastore and a single master repository. In order to do this, the version of each object on the distributed copies must be maintained. When a synchronization occurs, information which has changed on the distributed copy must be duplicated in the repository and vice versa.

[0007] In order to improve the speed of the synchronization, only changed objects should be movedthose which have a different version number in the repository than on the handheld device. To reduce the amount of data flowing to/from the handheld device, the data required to determine what has changed should already be stored in the repositorythus the repository continuously tracks the state of the handheld as of the last synchronization.

[0008] The foregoing and other objects, features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following more particular description of preferred embodiments of the invention, as illustrated in the accompanying drawings in which like reference characters refer to the same parts throughout the different views. The drawings are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principles of the invention.

[0009] FIG. 1 shows a diagram of the synchronization process.

[0010] FIG. 2 shows a flow chart of the synchronization process.

[0011] A description of preferred embodiments of the invention follows.

[0012] A description of preferred embodiments of the invention follows.

[0013] Throughout this description, the term repository refers to the master datastore. This is most often one or more databases stored on a server connected to an information network, but as will be seen the methods of synchronization described herein can be applied to any situation where a master set of data is to be distributed to a plurality of devices.

[0014] There are actually three separate problems that are simultaneously solved by the synchronization server of the present invention (temporarily ignoring administration issues):

[0015] 1. Versioning: tracking and maintaining the appropriate version of information for incoming objects from the repository with each instance of the handheld datastore;

[0016] 2. Refactoring: converting repository objects into new objects suitable for sending to the handheld

[0017] 3. Minimizing dataflow to and from the handheld.

[0018] In addition, the architecture described herein utilizes interim objects (also referred to as PK Objects) which isolate handheld formats from repository formats and vice versa. This means that two conversions of the data occur for data to be passed from the Repository to a handheld device. The first is from Repository Objects to PK Objects and the second is from PK Objects to Handheld Objects.

[0019] FIG. 1 shows a high level diagram of the synchronization process. The interim objects described in the previous paragraph are not shown in this diagram. The arrows 23 represent the flow of data, which occurs from left to right in FIG. 1. Objects R1 at 3, R2 at 5, R3 at 7 and R4 at 9 are generated through a query to the repository 1. Each object has two fragments, a version number and some data. These objects are used to construct H1 at 13, H2 at 15, H3 at 17, and H4 at 19, all of which are to be placed on the handheld 21. In this diagram, R1 R4 are Source objects and H1 H4 are Targets. In order to capture whether a source object has changed, each target object maintains the version of the source object from which it was derived. If the version is different, then the source object has changed and may then be updated accordingly.

[0020] FIG. 1 shows three possible distribution patterns for data between a repository and a plurality of handheld devices. The first is Single Source, Single Target, which is when data from a single source object is sent to a single target object. In this case of transforming R1 at 3 to H1 at 13 where H1 is simply a copy, or a strict subset of the data in R1. The data mapping is straightforward and the versioning information is simply copied to H1. Thus, VH1F(VR1) or the version of object H1 is a function of the version of object R1. Any time that R1 changes, H1 needs to be updated.

[0021] The next distribution pattern is Single Source, Multiple Targets, which is when data from a single source object is sent to more than one target object. This situation is only slightly more complex than Single Source, Single Target, since the targets are still a strict subset of the data in the source. In this example, objects H2 at 15 and H3 at 17 are each a derivative of the data in R2 at 5. The data mapping is straightforward and the versioning information is simply copied to H2 and H3. Thus, VH2VH3F(VR2) or the version of object H2 is equal to that of H3 and is a function of the version of the object R2. Anytime that R2 changes, both H2 and H3 need to be updated.

[0022] The last distribution pattern is Multiple Sources, Single Targets, which is when data from more than one source object is sent to a single target object. This situation is more complex than the previous two. In this example, target object H4 at 19 is composed of data from both of the source objects R3 at 7 and R4 at 9. The data mapping may be straightforward but the versioning in H4 must contain versioning information about both R3 and R4. Thus, VH4F(VR3,VR4) (VH4VR3VR4). Anytime that either R3 or R4 change, H4 needs to be updated.

[0023] Data that is moved between the Repository 1 and the Handheld 21 goes through two transforms and two mappings. One transform/mapping pair converts between Repository instances and PK Objects. The other transform/mapping pair converts between PK Objects and Handheld instances. Both of these are similar implementations of this approach.

[0024] FIG. 2 shows a flow diagram of the synchronization process. The process starts with the handheld device initiating the synchronization at step 30. Alternatively, the synchronization server can initiate the process if the handheld device happens to already be in communication with the server. The next step 32 involves the identifying of the data objects in the repository which are to be sent to the handheld device. This can be accomplished by the handheld device specifically requesting certain data, or certain data can be predetermined as needing to be sent to the handheld. The synchronization server then checks at step 34 the version information of the data stored in the repository as well as the version information of the data already on the handheld device, if applicable (i.e. it is not new data to the handheld device). The synchronization server then determines at 36 if the handheld data needs to be updated, and if so, retrieves at 38 the data from the repository. The synchronization server then converts at 40 the repository data in an interim data object, such as a PK Object as will be descibed later, and the PK Object is then converted at step 42 into an object suitable for sending to the handheld device. The synchronization server then transmits the handheld data object to the handheld device at step 46 and updates at step 48 all of the version information which corresponds to the transaction. An alternative to steps 40 and 42 is step 44, in which repository data is converted directly from repository data to handheld data.

[0025] While the above described process was shown for the downloading of repository data to a handheld device, it is readily apparent that the process can apply in the reverse, namely for the uploading of data from a handheld device to the repository.

[0026] The processes of versioning the data objects and refactoring, or converting data between repository objects, PK Objects and handheld objects, will now be described in further detail. Versioning requires the storage of the version number of every object on every handheld device. This is can result in a large amount of data. However, it can be stored in a simple set of tables with a relatively small number of fields. The table is referred to as the Repository Object Table (ROT), which stores versioning information about objects being served up from the repository. It is useful in several situations:

[0027] 1. if there is a difference between the current version of the object and the version last provided to the synchronization server;

[0028] 2. if a root or parent object is deleted, one can easily find all the children to delete them as well because the ROT stores the versions of the object's parent and root objects; and

[0029] 3. to determine whether the latest version of the software has been successfully processed by the synchronization server

TABLE 1
ROT Fields
User_id	identifies the user associated with this
	info (write Repository)
R_Object_type	uniquely identifies the type of the object
	(write Repository)
R_Object_id	uniquely identifies the specific instance
	of the object (write Repository)
R_Parent_type	uniquely identifies the type of the
	parent of this object (write Repository)
R_Parent_id	uniquely identifies the parent object of
	this object (write Repository)
R_Root_type	uniquely identifies the type of the root
	of this object (write Repository)
R_Root_id	uniquely identifies the root object for
	this object (write Repository)
Latest_R_version	the version of the object contents (write
	Repository)
Latest_R_key	a unique identifier for the object
	contents (write Repository)
R_version	the version of the object contents last
	provided to Pk sync server (write
	Repository)
R_key	a unique identifier for the object
	contents
Busy	Determines whether a sync was interrupted
	while this object was active
Deleted	This value will be written to TRUE by
	Repository when this object is to be
	removed

[0030] Table 1 describes the fields in the Repository Object Table. Most of these fields are used to identify the object correctly and, when it is a child object, identify all of the other objects it is related to through its parent. The composite of Latest_R_version and Latest_R_key is used to specify the latest version of the object that is available from the repository. The composite is used because the key may not be unique (hash collision), or the versioning may not be available or reliable. Similarly, the composite of R_version and R_key is used to specify the version of the object that was most recently sent from the repository. When Latest_R_version/Latest_R_key does not correspond to R_version/R_key, there is a new version of the object located in the Repository.

[0031] Once it is detennined that data needs to be transferred from the Repository to the Handheld, the data must be converted, or refactored, from Repository Objects to PK Objects. This is accomplished with the Repository Pk Instance Mapping Table (R PK). This table maps the relationship between Repository Objects and PK Objects. For each user, each relationship between a Repository Object and a PK Object appears as a single record in this table.

TABLE 2
Repository PK Instance Mapping (R PK)
User_id	identifies the user associated with this
	info
R_Object_type	uniquely identifies the type of the source
	object
R_Object_id	uniquely identifies the specific instance
	of the source object
PK_Object_type	uniquely identifies the type of the source
	object
PK_Object_id	uniquely identifies the specific instance
	of the source object
PK_Parent_type	uniquely identifies the type of the
	parent of this object
PK_Parent_id	uniquely identifies the parent object of
	this object
Latest_R_version	the version of the latest repository
	object contents
Latest_R_key	a unique identifier for the latest
	repository object contents
R_version	the version of the repository object
	contents used to generate this PK Object
R_key	a unique identifier for the repository
	object contents used to generate this PK
	Object
PK_version	the version of the object contents last
	provided to Pk sync server
PK_key	a unique identifier for the object
	contents
Busy	Determines whether a sync was interrupted
	while this object was active
Deleted	This value will be written to TRUE by
	Repository when this object is to be
	removed

[0032] The Latest_R_key is a hash value of the data in the Latest_R_Object to allow one to quickly find this object if it is stored within a cache. Again, the combination of Latest_R_Key and Latest_R_Version is used to uniquely identify the object that the PK server has most recently received from the Repository. By contrast, R_Version/R_Key is the version that was used to generate this instance of the PK_Object. These values will be copied from the Repository Object Table when the PK_Object is generated. Also, note that a single PK_Object can have multiple entries in this table one for each R_Object from which it was generated. Similarly, a single R_Object will have one entry for each PK_Object that uses it.

[0033] As described before, the second mapping that must occur is the conversion from PK Objects to Handheld Objects. Table 3 maps the relationship between PK Objects and Handheld Objects. For each user, each relationship between a PK Object and a Handheld Object appears a single record in this table.

TABLE 3
PK Objects to Handheld Objects Mapping Table (PK HH)
User_id	identifies the user associated with this
	info
PK_Object_type	uniquely identifies the type of the source
	object
PK_Object_id	uniquely identifies the specific instance
	of the source object
HH_Object_type	uniquely identifies the type of the source
	object
HH_Object_id	uniquely identifies the specific instance
	of the source object
HH_Parent_type	uniquely identifies the type of the
	parent of this object
HH_Parent_id	uniquely identifies the parent object of
	this object
HH_Root_type	uniquely identifies the type of the root
	of this object
HH_Root_id	uniquely identifies the root object for
	this object
Latest_PK_version	the version of the latest repository
	object contents
Latest_PK_key	a unique identifier for the latest
	repository object contents
PK_version	the version of the repository object
	contents used to generate this PK Object
PK_key	a unique identifier for the repository
	object contents used to generate this PK
	Object
HH_version	the version of the object contents last
	provided to Pk sync server
HH_key	a unique identifier for the object
	contents
Busy	Determines whether a sync was interrupted
	while this object was active
Deleted	This value will be written to TRUE by
	Repository when this object is to be
	removed

[0034] The PK_key is a hash value of the data in the PK_Object to allow one to quickly find this object if it is stored within the cache. Again, the combination of Latest_PK_Key and Latest_PK_Version is used to uniquely identify the object that the PK server has most recently generated from the PK Object. By contrast, PK_Version/PK_Key is the version that was used to generate this instance of the HH_Object. These values will be copied from the R PK Instance Mapping Table when the HH_Object is generated. Also, note that a single HH_Object can have multiple entries in this table one for each PK_Object that from which it is generated. Similarly, a single PK_Object will have one entry for each HH_Object that uses it. Typically, PK Objects and Handheld Objects will correlate, typically generating a single entry per Handheld Object in this table.

[0035] The invention will be further demonstrated with the following examples which will walk through the steps of various synchronization scenarios. In these examples, simple mapping corresponds to a single source and single or multiple targets at each stage of the mapping (R_Object to PK_Object to HH_Object). A complex mapping is a multiple source to single target example.

[0036] Two important assumptions are as follows:

[0037] 1. a collection of PK_Objects can be generated directly from a collection of R_Objects, and a collection of HH_Objects can be generated directly from a collection of PK_Objects; and

[0038] 2. the necessary set of R_Objects or PK_Objects (respectively) can be identified from the collection of PK_Objects.

[0039] Furthermore, these examples are written to do a class at a time, but actually can do all of the steps at once for each object.

[0040] In the Repository:

[0041] 1. Repository responds to read (or read_new) with a collection of new objects

[0042] 2. in ROT, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, new entries are created with the appropriate R_Object identifiers

[0043] 3. in ROT, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Key are set to the correct value

[0044] 4. in ROT, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, R_Version and R_Key are left at zero

[0045] 5. in ROT, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, Busy is set to TRUE

[0046] In the Repository Translator:

[0047] 6. the collection of PK_Objects is derived from the collection of R_Objects

[0048] 7. in R PK, for collection of PK_Objects, for this User_id, new entries are created with the appropriate PK_Object, R_Object and parent identifiers

[0049] 8. in R PK, for collection of PK_Objects, for this User_id, Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Key are set to the correct value

[0050] 9. in R PK, for collection of PK_Objects, for this User_id, R_Version and R_Key are left at zero

[0051] 10. in R PK, for collection of PK_Objects, for this User_id, PK_Version and PK_Key are left at zero

[0052] 11. in R PK, for collection of PK_Objects, for this User_id, Busy is set to TRUE

[0053] In the Handheld Translator:

[0054] 12. the collection of HH_Objects is derived from the collection of PK_Objects

[0055] 13. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, new entries are created with the appropriate HH_Object, PK_Object and parent identifiers

[0056] 14. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, Latest_PK_Version and Latest_PK_Key are set to the correct value

[0057] 15. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, PK_Version and PK_Key are left at zero

[0058] 16. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, HH_Version and HH_Key are left at zero

[0059] 17. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, Busy is set to TRUE

[0060] 18. collection of HH_Objects is sent to handheld

[0061] 19. get positive response from HH

[0062] 20. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, HH_Version and HH_Key are set to Latest_HH_Version and Latest_HH_Key, update HH_UID, clear Busy

[0063] 21. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, PK_Version and PK_Key are set to Latest_PK_Version and Latest_PK_Version, clear Busy

[0064] In the Repository Translator:

[0065] 22. in R PK, for collection of PK_Objects, for this User_id, R_Version and R_Key are set to Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Version, clear Busy

[0066] 23. in ROT, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, R_Version and R_Key are set to Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Version, clear Busy

[0067] 24. Done.

[0068] In the Repository:

[0069] 1. Repository responds to read to the repository returns collection of updated objects

[0070] 2. in ROT, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, entries with appropriate R_Object identifiers have Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Key set to the updated incoming value

[0071] 3. in ROT, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, Busy is set to TRUE

[0072] In the Repository Translator:

[0073] 4. in R PK, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Key are set to the updated value.

[0074] 5. the collection of PK_Objects is generated based on entries in the PK HH table where Latest_R_Version/Latest_R_Key is not equal to R_Version/R_Key, for this User_id

[0075] 6. in R PK, for this User_id, Busy is set to TRUE

[0076] In the Handheld Translator:

[0077] 7. in PK HH, for collection of PK_Objects, for this User_id, Latest_PK_Version and Latest_PK_Key are set to the updated value.

[0078] 8. the collection of HH_Objects is generated based on entries in the PK HH table where Latest_PK_Version/Latest_PK_Key is not equal to PK_Version/PK_Key

[0079] 9. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, Busy is set to TRUE

[0080] 10. collection of HH_Objects is sent to handheld

[0081] 11. get positive response from HH

[0082] 12. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, HH_Version and HH_Key are set to Latest_HH_Version and Latest_HH_Key, update HH_UID, clear Busy

[0083] 13. in PK HH, for collection of HH_Objects, for this User_id, PK_Version and PK_Key are set to Latest_PK_Version and Latest_PK_Version, clear Busy

[0084] In the Repository Translator:

[0085] 14. in R PK, for collection of PK_Objects, for this User_id, R_Version and R_Key are set to Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Version, clear Busy

[0086] 15. in ROT, for collection of R_Objects, for this User_id, R_Version and R_Key are set to Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Version, clear Busy

[0087] 16. Done.

[0088] In the Repository:

[0089] 1. Repository responds to read to the repository returns identifiers for a collection of deleted objects

[0090] 2. in ROT entries with appropriate R_Object identifiers have Latest_R_Version and Latest_R_Key are set to the updated incoming value

[0091] 3. in ROT, for this User_id, Busy is set to TRUE

[0092] 4. in ROT Deleted is set to TRUE, for this User id.

[0093] In the Repository Translator:

[0094] 5. in R PK, for this User_id, for collection of R_Objects, Busy is set to TRUE

[0095] 6. in R PK, for this User_id, Deleted is set to TRUE

[0096] 7. create collection of PK_Objects entries from entries with User_id, PK_Object_ID, DeletedTRUE

[0097] In the Handheld Translator:

[0098] 8. in PK HH, for this User_id, for collection of PK_Objects, Busy is set to TRUE

[0099] 9. in PK HH, for this User_id, Deleted is set to TRUE

[0100] 10. create collection of HH_Objects entries from entries with User_id, HH_Object_ID, DeletedTRUE

[0101] 11. message to delete HH_Objects is sent to handheld

[0102] 12. get positive response from HH

[0103] 13. in PK HH, for this User_id, delete entries for the collection of HH_Objects, where DeletedTRUE and BusyTRUE

[0104] In the Repository Translator:

[0105] 14. in R PK, for this User_id, delete entries for the collection of PK_Objects where DeletedTRUE and BusyTRUE

[0106] 15. in ROT, for this User_id, delete entries for the collection of R_Objects where DeletedTRUE and BusyTRUE

[0107] 16. Done.

[0108] In the Repository:

[0109] 1. Generate list of identifiers for a collection of R_Objects where BusyTRUE, for this User_id

[0110] In the Repository Translator:

[0111] 2. in R PK, for this User_id, for collection of R_Objects, Busy is set to TRUE

[0112] 3. create collection of PK_Objects entries from entries with User_id, BusyTRUE create collection of all busy PK_Objects

[0113] In the Handheld Translator:

[0114] 4. in PK HH, for this User_id, for collection of PK_Objects, Busy is set to TRUE

[0115] 5. in PK HH, for this User_id, entries where BusyTRUE have HH_Version and HH_Key cleared, Busy is cleared

[0116] In the Repository Translator:

[0117] 6. in R PK, for this User_id, entries where BusyTRUE have PK_Version and PK_Key cleared

[0118] 7. in ROT, for this User_id, entries where BusyTRUE have R_Version and R_Key cleared

[0119] 8. Now do an Update.

[0120] Several things can be done to optimize the synchronization process. The first is caching. By caching PK Objects and Handheld Objects, unnecessary and duplicative converting/refactoring of the data objects can be avoided if they remain in the cache. Caching will also help avoid requesting data from the Repository that may not be needed if it is already in the cache. Second, don't ask for refreshes or version numbers that we don't have to: no shared data. Third, send as little to the handheld as possible. Lastly, keep common master objects separate from personal objects for as long as possible

[0121] While this invention has been particularly shown and described with references to preferred embodiments thereof, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.