US 12,617,876 B2Grant

Process for avoiding phase separation during solution polymerization of ethylene-1-butene copolymers

Issue Date:2026-05-05

•14 Claims

•1 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

The present invention relates to a process for polymerizing ethylene-1-butene copolymers in a solution polymerization process by firstly modelling polymer systems for solution polymerization of ethylene-1-butene copolymers and then transferring pressure and temperature conditions from said modelled polymer systems to a solution polymerization process to ensure that the polymerized ethylene-1-butene copolymer is completely solved in the solvent during the polymerization process.

Metadata

Assignee

Borealis AG

Inventors

Mohammad Al-Haj Ali
Noureddine Ajellal

Application Information

Application Number:US 17/792,003

Filing Date:2021-01-07

Priority Date:2020-01-16

Art Unit:1766

Classifications

IPC:

C08F2/06C08F210/02C08F210/08

Field of Search:

C08F 2/06C08F 210/02C08F 210/08C08F 2800/20C08F 210/16

Patent Drawings (1 sheets)

Description

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

[0001] This patent application is the U.S. national phase of International Application No. PCT/EP2021/050147, filed on Jan. 7, 2021, which claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 20152180.4, filed Jan. 16, 2020, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties for all purposes.

[0002] The present invention relates to a process for polymerizing ethylene-1-butene copolymers in a solution polymerization process by firstly modelling polymer systems for solution polymerization of ethylene-1-butene copolymers and then transferring pressure and temperature conditions from said modelled polymer systems to a solution polymerization process to ensure that the polymerized ethylene-1-butene copolymer is completely solved in the solvent during the polymerization process.

TECHNICAL BACKGROUND

[0003] The production of linear low density polyethylene (LLDPE) is typically carried out in solution polymerization. In this type of polymerization, ethylene monomer, optional comonomers and a polymerization catalyst are dissolved in an inert hydrocarbon solvent and polymerized to form an ethylene based polymer. The polymer properties thereby are usually adapted by altering the ethylene and comonomer ratios. In solution polymerization it is important to keep the solution homogenous through the polymerization process, i.e. that through the complete polymerization process the solution is maintained a single phase liquid system in order to ensure the productivity of the process. In a two phase liquid system (L-L system) the monomers would enrich in one liquid phase and the produced ethylene based polymer would enrich in the second liquid phase. In order to maintain the polymerization process in a single phase liquid system the polymerization conditions, especially polymerization temperature and pressure, need to chosen accordingly. FIG. 1 shows a typical phase diagram with the different phases depending on the polymerization pressure and temperature. FIG. 1 is taken and adapted from FIG. 2 of EP 1 339 756 B 1. The border between the single phase liquid region and the two phase L-L region is marked by the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) curve, also identified as cloud-point curve. The LCST curve shows the p, T conditions of the transfer from the single phase liquid region to the two phase liquid region (L-L region). Thereby, the LCST curve in not only affected by the polymerization conditions but also by the monomer and comonomer ratios and the polymer concentration in the solution.

[0004] During the polymerization process changes in the conditions regarding the temperature, pressure or polymer concentration inside the equipment, especially the polymerization reactor or the downstream heat exchanger, can cause phase separation, especially if these changes happen uncontrolled. These changes then can easily cause disturbances in the polymerization process. It is thus essential to understand how a change of the polymerization conditions can effect the phase system in the process and which measured need to be taken to maintain a single phase liquid system during operation.

[0005] For each solution polymerization for polymerizing a low density polyethylene with a specific set of polymer properties the polymerization conditions need to be experimentally determined in order to ensure maintenance of a single phase liquid system not only in the polymerization reactor but also in the downstream processing steps, especially the downstream heat exchanger.

[0006] Experimental determination of the polymerization conditions afford elaborate series experiments for each and every set of the monomer and comonomer ratios and the polymer concentration in the solution. It is therefore of interest to establish thermodynamic models or mathematical correlations which describe such polymer systems that show single phase liquid regions in the p, T phase diagrams in correlation to the monomer and comonomer ratios and the polymer concentration in the solution.

[0007] Such models and correlations would significantly reduce preparatory work before establishing a solution polymerization process and thus would significantly reduce production costs, would allow for faster adaptation of solution polymerization processes and would increase production safety by reducing unexpected disturbances of the polymerization process.

[0008] The present invention proposes a process for polymerizing ethylene-1-butene copolymers in a solution polymerization process by firstly modelling polymer systems for solution polymerization of ethylene-1-butene copolymers and then transferring pressure and temperature conditions from said modelled polymer systems to a solution polymerization process to ensure that the polymerized ethylene-1-butene copolymer is completely solved in the solvent during the polymerization process.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

[0009] The present invention relates to a process for polymerizing ethylene-1-butene copolymers in a solution polymerization process by firstly modelling polymer systems for solution polymerization of ethylene-1-butene copolymers and then transferring pressure and temperature conditions from said modelled polymer systems to a solution polymerization process, comprising the steps of

[0010] a) Determining the cloud points on the LCST curve for two or more model compositions of a specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of a specific grade and solvent, whereby the model compositions differ in their weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer;
[0011] b) Developing a correlation for interpolating cloud points for compositions of said specific ethylene-1-octene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade and solvent with different weight amounts of at least one of the ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade from the cloud points determined for said model compositions;
[0012] c) Predicting phase separation for said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade by interpolating the cloud points from said correlation for a composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade with given weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer;
[0013] d) Selecting pressure and temperature conditions, which in the predicted phase separation data show that the ethylene-1-butene copolymer is completely solved in the solvent;
[0014] e) Adjusting at least one parameter selected from the process temperature and pressure in at least one solution polymerization reactor, and optionally the first heat exchanger downstream from the at least one solution polymerization reactor, to said selected pressure and temperature conditions during a solution polymerization process of an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, and
[0015] f) Polymerizing ethylene monomer and 1-butene monomer in a solvent in said at least one solution polymerization reactor at the adjusted process temperature and/or pressure in the presence of a polymerization catalyst to obtain an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, which is completely solved in said solvent.

[0016] Further, the present invention relates to the use of a correlation for interpolating cloud points from the cloud points on the LCST curve determined for two or more model compositions of a specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of a specific grade and solvent, whereby the model compositions differ in their weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer for adjusting at least one of the parameters selected from the process temperature and pressure, and maintaining a single phase liquid system during a solution polymerization process for polymerizing an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade.

Definitions

[0017] The lower critical solution temperature (LCST) is the critical temperature below which the components of a mixture are miscible for all compositions. In a phase diagram the LCST is plotted as a P,T (pressure, temperature) curve of the lower critical solution temperature showing the P,T conditions of phase transfer from single liquid phase to liquid-liquid two phase (phase separation). Said LCST curve is also known as cloud point curve.

[0018] The cloud point is the point on the LCST curve showing for a given lower critical solution temperature (LCST) the pressure of phase separation.

[0019] An ethylene-1-butene copolymer of a specific grade is an ethylene-1-butene copolymer having a specific set of properties selected from 1-butene content, density, melt flow rate, weight average molecular weight, number average molecular weight, molecular weight distribution, modality etc., which is usually polymerized using a solution polymerization process with specific polymerization conditions and a specific polymerization catalyst.

[0020] In thermodynamics, an equation of state (EoS) is a thermodynamic equation relating state variables, which describe the state of matter under a given set of physical conditions, such as pressure, volume, temperature (PVT). Equations of state are useful in describing the properties of fluids and mixtures of fluids, and/or solids.

[0021] Perturbed-chain statistical associating fluid theory (PC-SAFT) equation is an equation of state that is based on statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT). Like other SAFT equations of state, it makes use of statistical mechanical methods (in particular perturbation theory). However, unlike earlier SAFT equations of state that used spherical particles as a reference, it uses a hard chain reference fluid (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC-SAFT).

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES

[0022] FIG. 1 shows a binary phase diagram as P,T curves of a multi-component system such as a polymer composition. The LCST curve, also known as cloud point curve shows the phase separation curve between the single liquid phase and the two liquids-L-L-phase.

[0023] FIG. 2 shows a P,T diagram for the polymerization of an exemplary ethylene-1-butene copolymer in a solution process showing interpolated cloud point curves for compositions comprising 15 wt % of said exemplary ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the composition.

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

[0024] The present invention relates to a process for polymerizing ethylene-1-butene copolymers in a solution polymerization process by firstly modelling polymer systems for solution polymerization of ethylene-1-butene copolymers and then transferring pressure and temperature conditions from said modelled polymer systems to a solution polymerization process, comprising the steps of

[0025] a) Determining the cloud points on the LCST curve for two or more model compositions of a specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of a specific grade and solvent, whereby the model compositions differ in their weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer;
[0026] b) Developing a correlation for interpolating cloud points for compositions of said specific ethylene-1-octene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade and solvent with different weight amounts of at least one of the ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade from the cloud points determined for said model compositions;
[0027] c) Predicting phase separation for said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade by interpolating the cloud points from said correlation for a composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade with given weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer;
[0028] d) Selecting pressure and temperature conditions, which in the predicted phase separation data show that the ethylene-1-butene copolymer is completely solved in the solvent;
[0029] e) Adjusting at least one parameter selected from the process temperature and pressure in at least one solution polymerization reactor, and optionally the first heat exchanger downstream from the at least one solution polymerization reactor, to said selected pressure and temperature conditions during a solution polymerization process of an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, and
[0030] f) Polymerizing ethylene monomer and 1-butene monomer in a solvent in said at least one solution polymerization reactor at the adjusted process temperature and/or pressure in the presence of a polymerization catalyst to obtain an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, which is completely solved in said solvent.

[0031] In a first step of the inventive method the cloud points of model compositions are determined on the LCST curve. Thereby, the cloud points are P,T points in a P,T phase diagram in which phase separation from one phase liquid systems to two phase L-L-liquid systems are observed.

[0032] For determining the cloud points model compositions of a specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade are produced. Said ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade is the grade for which the phase separation conditions shall be predicted by means of the inventive method.

[0033] The ethylene-1-butene copolymer preferably is a linear low density ethylene butene copolymer, more preferably a very low linear low density ethylene-1-butene copolymer, and most preferably an ethylene-1-butene plastomer.

[0034] Thereby, a plastomer is a polymer which combines the qualities of elastomers and plastics, such as rubber-like properties with the processing abilities of plastic.

[0035] The ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade preferably has a density of from 850 kg/m³to 960 kg/m³, more preferably from 855 kg/m³to 950 kg/m³and most preferably from 860 kg/m³to 940 kg/m³, determined according to ISO 1183D.

[0036] Further, the ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade preferably has a melt flow rate 1V1FR2, determined according to ISO 1133 at a load of 2.16 kg and a temperature of 190° C. of from 0.1 to 100 g/10 min, more preferably from 0.5 to 75 g/10 min and most preferably from 1.0 to 50 g/10 min.

[0037] The melting point (measured with DSC according to ISO 11357-3) of the ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade is below 145° C., preferably below 140° C., more preferably below 135° C. and most preferably below 130° C.

[0038] Furthermore the ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade has a glass transition temperature Tg (measured with DMTA according to ISO 6721-7) of below −25° C., preferably below −30° C., more preferably below −35° C.

[0039] The ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade preferably has an ethylene content from 60.0 to 95.0 wt %, preferably from 65.0 to 90.0 wt % and more preferably from 70.0 to 88.0 wt %.

[0040] The molecular mass distribution Mw/Mn of the ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade is most often below 4.0, such as 3.8 or below, but is at least 2.0. It is preferably between 3.5 and 2.0.

[0041] The ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade is produced in a solution polymerization process, which can be a one stage or two stage solution polymerization process.

[0042] Preferably said ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade is prepared by high temperature solution polymerization process at temperatures higher than 100° C.

[0043] Such a process is essentially based on polymerizing the monomer and a suitable comonomer in a liquid hydrocarbon solvent in which the resulting polymer is soluble. The polymerization is carried out at a temperature above the melting point of the polymer, as a result of which a polymer solution is obtained. This solution is flashed in order to separate the polymer from the unreacted monomer and the solvent. The solvent is then recovered and recycled in the process.

[0044] Preferably the solution polymerization process is a high temperature solution polymerization process, using a polymerization temperature of higher than 100° C. Preferably the polymerization temperature is at least 110° C., more preferably at least 150° C. The polymerization temperature can be up to 250° C., preferably up to 220° C. The pressure in such a solution polymerization process is preferably in a range of 10 to 300 bar, preferably 15 to 275 bar and more preferably 20 to 250 bar.

[0045] The solvent is preferably a liquid hydrocarbon solvent, more preferably a C_5-12-hydrocarbon which may be unsubstituted or substituted by C_1-4alkyl group such as pentane, methyl pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane and hydrogenated naphtha. More preferably unsubstituted C₆-C₁₀-hydrocarbon solvents are used.

[0046] The solvent can also comprise mixtures of said hydrocarbon solvents.

[0047] Suitably, the ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade is polymerized in the presence of a polymerization catalyst, which is selected from vanadium oxide catalysts or single-site catalysts, e.g. metallocene or constrained geometry catalysts. Especially preferred are single-site catalysts, such as metallocene or constrained geometry catalysts and mostly preferred are metallocene catalysts.

[0048] The model compositions are usually prepared by solving ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade in a solvent.

[0049] The solvent is preferably a liquid hydrocarbon solvent, more preferably a C_5-12-hydrocarbon which may be unsubstituted or substituted by C_1-4alkyl group such as pentane, methyl pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane and hydrogenated naphtha. More preferably unsubstituted C₆-C₁₀-hydrocarbon solvents are used.

[0050] It is especially preferred that the same solvent is used as in the solution polymerization process for producing said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade.

[0051] The amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the model composition is preferably in the range of from 10 wt % to 45 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 12 to 40 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 14 to 35 wt %, based on the total amount of the model composition.

[0052] The amount of ethylene monomer in the model composition is preferably in the range of from 0.1 wt % to 10.0 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 0.5 to 8.0 wt %, most preferably in the range of from 0.8 to 6.0 wt %, based on the total amount of the model composition.

[0053] The amount of 1-butene monomer in the model composition is preferably in the range of from 0.1 wt % to 20.0 wt %, more preferably in the range of 0.5 to 17.5 wt %, and most preferably in the range of from 0.8 wt % to 15.0 wt %, based on the total amount of the model composition.

[0054] In one embodiment, the model compositions can further comprise nitrogen in an amount of from 0.05 wt % to 2.50 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 0.08 wt % to 1.50 wt %, most preferably in the range of from 0.10 wt % to 1.00 wt %, based on the total amount of the model composition.

[0055] Thereby, the model compositions can further comprise different weight amounts of nitrogen.

[0056] It is preferred that the model compositions do not comprise nitrogen.

[0057] It is preferred that the model compositions consist of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, solvent and optionally nitrogen, more preferably of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade and solvent.

[0058] By reducing the components of the model compositions to the main components of a polymerization composition in a polymerization reactor, i.e. ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, solvent and optionally nitrogen, the influence of minor components, such as catalyst, oligomers or chain transfer agent, if present, on the cloud points is neglected. It has, however, been found that a good correlation between the cloud points of said model compositions and the real polymerization compositions is obtained.

[0059] The cloud points of two or more model compositions of one ethylene-1-butene copolymer of a specific grade are determined. Thereby, the cloud points of two or three or more model compositions of one ethylene-1-butene copolymer of a specific grade can determined

[0060] In one embodiment the cloud points of preferably two or three model compositions are determined. These model compositions differ in their weight amounts of only one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer.

[0061] It is preferred that in the at least two model compositions one model composition has a weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer at the lower end of the preferred range and one model composition has a weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer at the higher end of the preferred range. The lower end of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 10 wt % to 25 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 12 wt % to 22 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 14 wt % to 20 wt %. The upper end of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 25 wt % to 45 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 27 wt % to 42 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 28 wt % to 40 wt %. In the case of a possible third model composition, said third model composition preferably has a weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the middle of the preferred range. The middle of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 16 wt % to 28 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 18 wt % to 26 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 21 wt % to 25 wt %.

[0062] In another embodiment the cloud points of preferably more than two model compositions, preferably four to 20 model compositions are determined. These model compositions differ in their weight amounts of more than one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer, preferably in their weight amounts of at least the ethylene-1-butene copolymer, more preferably in their weight amounts of all of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer.

[0063] It is preferred that the more of two model compositions of said embodiment different groups of model compositions are prepared in which one of the three weight amounts are varied, whereas the other two of the three weight amounts are kept constant.

[0064] It is preferred that when varying the weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer in those model compositions one model composition has a weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer at the lower end of the preferred range and one model composition has a weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer at the higher end of the preferred range. The lower end of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 10 wt % to 25 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 12 wt % to 22 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 14 wt % to 20 wt %. The upper end of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 25 wt % to 45 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 27 wt % to 42 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 28 wt % to 40 wt %. In the case of a possible third model composition, said third model composition preferably has a weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the middle of the preferred range. The middle of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 16 wt % to 28 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 18 wt % to 26 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 21 wt % to 25 wt %.

[0065] It is further preferred that when varying the weight amount of ethylene monomer in those model compositions one model composition has a weight amount of ethylene monomer at the lower end of the preferred range and one model composition has a weight amount of ethylene monomer at the higher end of the preferred range. The lower end of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 0.1 wt % to 3.5 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 0.5 wt % to 3.0 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 0.8 wt % to 2.0 wt %. The upper end of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 3.0 wt % to 10.0 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 4.0 wt % to 8.0 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 4.5 wt % to 6.0 wt %. In the case of a possible third model composition, said third model composition preferably has a weight amount of ethylene monomer in the middle of the preferred range. The middle of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 1.5 wt % to 4.5 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 2.0 wt % to 4.0 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 2.5 wt % to 3.5 wt %.

[0066] It is additionally preferred that when varying the weight amount of 1-butene monomer in those model compositions one model composition has a weight amount of 1-butene monomer at the lower end of the preferred range and one model composition has a weight amount of 1-butene monomer at the higher end of the preferred range. The lower end of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 0.1 wt % to 9.0 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 0.5 wt % to 6.0 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 0.8 wt % to 4.0 wt %. The upper end of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 9.0 wt % to 20.0 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 9.5 wt % to 17.5 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 10.0 wt % to 15.0 wt %. In the case of a possible third model composition, said third model composition preferably has a weight amount of 1-butene monomer in the middle of the preferred range. The middle of the preferred range thereby is preferably in the range of from 1.5 wt % to 9.0 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 2.5 wt % to 8.0 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 4.0 wt % to 7.0 wt %.

[0067] The cloud points of said model compositions are preferably determined by varying one of the parameters of temperature and pressure of each model composition, while keeping the other of said parameters constant and detecting phase separation. Thereby, in one embodiment a temperature is selected as constant parameter and the pressure of the model composition is increased and reduced.

[0068] In another embodiment a pressure is selected as constant parameter and the temperature of the model composition is increased and reduced.

[0069] Phase separation can be detected by means of visual determination methods such as a Cailletet apparatus as discussed e.g. in Nagy et al., High pressure phase equilibria in the systems linear low density polyethylene+n-hexane and linear low density polyethylene+n-hexane+ethylene: Experimental results and modelling with the Sanchez-Lacombe equation of state, J. of Supercritical Fluids 37 (2006) 115-124 and Nagy et al., High-pressure phase equilibria in the system linear low density polyethylene+isohexane: Experimental results and modelling, J. of Supercritical Fluids 40 (2007) 125-133, or an optical variable volume cell as discussed e.g. in Chen et al., Density-Tuned Polyolefin Phase Equilibria. 2. Multicomponent Solutions of Alternating Poly(ethylene-propylene) in Subcritical and Supercritical Olefins. Experiment and SAFT Model, Macromolecules 25 (1992). 4987-4995 and Chen et al. Density-Tuned Polyolefin Phase Equilibria. 1. Binary Solutions of Alternating Poly(ethylene-propylene) in Subcritical and Supercritical Propylene, 1-Butene and 1-Hexene. Experiment and Flory-Patterson Model, Macromolecules 25 (1992), 3089-3096 or an optical high-pressure cell as discussed in de Loos et al., Fluid Phase Equilibria in the System Polyethylene+Ethylene. Systems of Linear Polyethylene+Ethylene in High Pressure, Macromolecules 16 (1983), 111-117.

[0070] Phase separation can also be detected by means of light scattering technology as discussed e.g. in Folie et al., Phase Equilibria in High-pressure Polyethylene Technology, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 34 (1996), 1501-1516 or Szydlowski et al. A neqw apparatus for the detection of phase quilibira in polymer solvent systems by light scattering, Rev. Sci. Instrum. 63 (1992) 1717-1725.

[0071] These methods are well established in the art for determining phase separation in polyethylene systems and are equally suitable for determining phase separation in the method of the present invention.

[0072] Preferably, the cloud points are determined for the model compositions of one ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade over a temperature span of from 100° C. ° C. to 250° C., more preferably over a temperature span of from 110° C. to 250° C., still more preferably over a temperature span of from 150° C. to 220° C.

[0073] Thereby, for each of the two or more different model compositions of one ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade the cloud points can be determined over narrower temperature spans, such as a temperature span of from 160° C. to 220° C. and most preferably from 170° C. to 190° C. It is, however, preferred that the temperature spans of the two or more different model compositions of one ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade overlap to the overall temperature span of from 100° C. to 250° C.

[0074] The temperature span of from 100° C. to 250° C. ensures that the usual range of temperatures which occur during the solution polymerization process and the downstream separation steps is covered by the determined cloud points. This allows a more accurate prediction of phase separation in the method of the present invention.

[0075] It is preferred that for the model compositions of one ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade five or more, preferably six or more, more preferably seven or more and most preferably 8 or more cloud points are determined. The upper limit of the number of cloud points to be determined is usually not higher than 50. These cloud points are preferably determined over the above mentioned temperature range.

[0076] From the determined cloud points a correlation for interpolating cloud points for compositions of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade and solvent with different weight amounts of at least one of the ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade is developed.

[0077] By means of such a correlation it is possible to predict cloud points and as a consequence phase separation for compositions of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade with different weight amounts of at least one of the ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade at different process temperatures and/or process pressures. These weight amounts are thereby the weight amounts of the ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade of the different model compositions.

[0078] Such a correlation is usually a mathematical correlation.

[0079] Usually such correlations are established from models selected from free energy models, equation of state (EoS) models or polynomial models.

[0080] Free energy models or also known as activity coefficient models are models in which the activity coefficients of the components in a system are estimated. Activity coefficients are correlation factors that account for deviations of real systems from that of an ideal solution (solution with thermodynamic properties analogous to this of a mixture of ideal gases, in which the enthalpy of mixing is zero, the vapor pressure obeys Raoult's law and the activity coefficient of each component is one). Suitable free energy models are Flory-Huggins, UNIFAC and their modifications. Flory-Huggins is a lattice model, which is based on a theory where fluids are mixtures of molecules and holes that ate bonded to sites on a lattice. This model is especially suitable for modeling polymer systems, but has its flaws especially when the polymer is in supercritical fluid at high pressure (Flory, Thermodynamics of Heterogeneous Polymers and Their Solutions, J. Chem. Phys. 12 (1944) 425-438, Maloney et al. Solubility of Ethylene in Liquid, Low-Density Polyethylene at Industrial-Separation Pressures, Ind. Eng. Chem., Process Des. Dev., 15 (1976) 2016-220).

[0081] UNIFAC (UNIQUAC Functional-group Activity Coefficients) is a semi-empirical system for the prediction of non-electrolyte activity in non-ideal mixtures. UNIFAC uses the functional groups present on the molecules that make up the liquid mixture to calculate activity coefficients. By using interactions for each of the functional groups present on the molecules, as well as some binary interaction coefficients, the activity of each of the solutions can be calculated, whereby the activity coefficient is split up into a combinatorial term and a residual term. Several modifications of the UNIFAC model were developed such as new-UNIFAC, modified Flory-Huggins or entropic FV, which differ in the form of the combinatorial term or residual term, or alternatively by the type of parameter table they use (UNIFAC and related group-contribution models for phase equilibria, Fluid Phase Equilibria 52 (1989) 135-150, Kontogeorgis et al., Prediction of Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium for Binary Polymer Solutions with Simple Activity Coefficient Models, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. (1995) 1823-1834).

[0082] The most suitable free energy model is the entropic FV model which accurately can predict cloud points on the LCST curve.

[0083] Equation of state (EoS) models such as Sanchez-Lacombe, polymer Sako-Wu-Prausnitz (SWP), statistical associating fluid theory (SAFT) and its modifications such as perturbed chain SAFT (PC-SAFT) or perturbed hard sphere chain (PHSC) are typically used for estimating thermodynamic properties of polymer systems (Pedrosa et al. Phase Equilibria Calculations of Polyethylene Solutions from SAFT-Type Equations of State, Macromolecules 39 (2006), 4240-4246).

[0084] Sanchez-Lacombe is a lattice fluid model and an extension of the Flory-Huggins theory and the free volume concept is included to this compressible lattice model. In contrary to the Flory-Huggins model the vacant sites are occupied by additional components. This model was used for modelling polyethylene+ethylene and polyethylene+n-hexane systems and fit well with the experimental cloud point data (Gauter et al., Modeling polyethylene-solvent mixtures with the Sanches-Lacombe equation, Fluid Phase Equilibria 183-184 (2001) 87-97).

[0085] SWP is a cubic equation of state (EoS) model, which can be applied for modelling polymer solutions which is based on an equation in which the pressure depends on the gas constant, the molar volume and three pure component parameters. These component parameters are correlated to physical properties of the components. The SWP equation of state model is applicable e.g. to high pressure polyethylene technology such as the high pressure polymerization of LDPE (Tork et al., Modelling of high-pressure phase equilibria using Sako-Wu-Prausnitz equation of state I. Pure-components and heavy n-alkane solutions, Fluid phase Equilibria 163 (1999) 61-77, Tork et al., Modelling of high-pressure phase equilibria using Sako-Wu-Prausnitz equation of state II. Vapour-liquid equilibria and liquid-liquid equilibria in polyolefin systems, Fluid phase Equilibria 163 (1999) 79-98).

[0086] PHSC is an equation of state (EoS) hard-sphere model, which is based on the thermodynamic perturbation theory. PHSC utilizes a reference fluid that consists of hard spheres in chains and was further developed based on the Chiew EoS model for athermal hard-sphere chains and van der Waals type perturbation term (Song et al. Liquid-Liquid Phase Diagrams for Binary Polymer Solutions from a Perturbed Hard-Sphere-Chain Equation of State, Chemical Engineering Science 47 (1994) 2765-2775). PHSC has the advantage that the segment diameters in a chain molecules do not have to be equal which allows modelling of LCST curves for binary mixtures that contain copolymers in which the spheres have different diameters. SAFT is also an equation of state (EoS) hard-sphere model, which is based on the thermodynamic perturbation theory. SAFT is rather similar to PHSC but uses the so-called cluster integral approximation and is algebraically more complicated that PHSC. SAFT includes particularly the intramolecular association, the chain length and branching along with the repulsion and dispersion forces. In SAFT the molecules are a sum of three different term, the reference term, the chain term and the association term. SAFT is applicable for chain like molecules. The SAFT model has may different modifications such as polar-SAFT, SAFT-HS, simplified SAFT, SAFT-LJ, copolymer SAFT, soft-SAFT, SAFT-VR, SAFT1, SAFT-BACK crossover SAFT and PC-SAFT. These modifications mainly differ in the used reference term (Pedrosa et al. Phase Equilibria Calculations of Polyethylene Solutions from SAFT-Type Equations of State, Macromolecules 39 (2006), 4240-4246).

[0087] In PC-SAFT the reference term is a hard chain fluid instead of a hard sphere fluid. As a consequence a new dispersion term was developed which is dependent on the chain length of the polymer molecule. PC-SAFT has been used for modelling copolymer systems (Gross et al., Perturbed-chain SAFT: An Equation of State Based on a Perturbation Theory for Chain Molecules, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 40 (2001) 1244-1260, Gross et al. Modeling Copolymer Systems Using the Perturbed-Chain SAFT Equation of State, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 42 (2003) 1266-1274).

[0088] The most suitable EoS model is the PC-SAFT model which accurately can predict cloud points on the LCST curve of copolymer systems.

[0089] Polynomial models can use polynomial regression in which the relationship between the independent variable x and the dependent variable y is modelled as an nth degree polynomial in x. Polynomial regression fits a nonlinear relationship between the value of x and the corresponding conditional mean of y, denoted E(y|x). In the method of the present invention polynomial regression can be used to fit the relationship of the LCST with the cloud point pressure as E(p|T) for modeling LCST curves.

[0090] Thereby, the polynomial model is developed from the trend lines of the determined cloud points.

[0091] In another embodiment polynomial models can use analysis of variance (ANOVA) models. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) is a collection of statistical models and their associated estimation procedures (such as the “variation” among and between groups) used to analyze the differences among group means in a sample. The ANOVA is based on the law of total variance, where the observed variance in a particular variable is partitioned into components attributable to different sources of variation. In the method of the present invention ANOVA models are used especially for two-way analysis of variance when studying the effect of multiple factors, such as a 3-way ANOVA with factors x, y and z. In such a 3-way ANOVA with factors x, y and z, the ANOVA model includes terms for the main effects (x, y, z) and terms for interactions (xy, xz, yz, xyz). All terms require hypothesis tests. 3-way ANOVA can be used for e.g. modelling the variance of the cloud point pressure over the weight amounts of ethylene monomer (wt %(C2)) and ethylene-1-butene copolymer (wt %(PE)) at a given LCST and weight amount of 1-butene monomer (wt %(C4)).

[0092] Preferably, in such a correlation the cloud point pressure is given as a polynomial function of the temperature and the weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer.

[0093] In a binary system such as a P-T diagram it is thereby preferred that several polynomial functions are given as P,T polynomial function whereby each P,T polynomial function represents the function for a given weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer.

[0094] In a tertiary system three parameters of pressure (P), temperature (T), weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer (wt %(PE)), weight amount of ethylene monomer (wt %(C2)) and weight amount of 1-butene monomer (wt %(C4)) are varied as polynomial functions for given values of the two other parameters.

[0095] Suitable tertiary systems are e.g. a P, wt %(PE), wt %(C2) diagram it is thereby preferred that several polynomial functions are given as P, wt %(PE), wt %(C2) polynomial function whereby each P, wt %(PE), wt %(C2) polynomial function represents the function for a given temperature and given weight amount of 1-butene monomer

[0096] In the present invention all different models as discussed above can be used for establishing correlations for interpolating cloud points from the cloud points determined for said model compositions.

[0097] In one embodiment the correlation is used for establishing binary P,T curves of cloud point pressures at given LCSTs for different weight ratios of ethylene-1-butene copolymer.

[0098] In another embodiment the correlation is used for establishing tertiary p, wt %(PE), wt %(C2) curves of cloud point pressures at given weight ratios of ethylene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer for different LCSTs and weight ratios of 1-butene monomer.

[0099] It is preferred that a polynomial model is used for establishing a correlation for interpolating cloud points from the cloud points determined for said model compositions.

[0100] In the process of the present invention phase separation for said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade is predicted by interpolating the cloud points from said correlation for a composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade with given weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer.

[0101] The composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade usually is the polymerization composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade in one of the different stages of the solution polymerization process such as the polymerization stage in the solution polymerization reactor or the post-reactor stages such as the down-stream heat exchanger.

[0102] The polymerization composition usually comprises ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, solvent, polymerization catalyst and optional other components such as chain transfer agent.

[0103] The solvent is preferably a liquid hydrocarbon solvent, more preferably a C_5-12-hydrocarbon which may be unsubstituted or substituted by C_1-4alkyl group such as pentane, methyl pentane, hexane, heptane, octane, cyclohexane, methylcyclohexane and hydrogenated naphtha. More preferably unsubstituted C₆-C₁₀-hydrocarbon solvents are used.

[0104] The solvent can also comprise mixtures of said hydrocarbon solvents.

[0105] The given weight amounts of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer are suitably those of the polymerization composition in one of said different stages of the solution polymerization process, which is of interest, such as the polymerization stage in the solution polymerization reactor or the post-reactor stages such as the down-stream heat exchanger.

[0106] The amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the polymerization composition is preferably in the range of from 10 wt % to 45 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 12 to 40 wt % and most preferably in the range of from 14 to 35 wt %, based on the total amount of the polymerization composition.

[0107] The amount of ethylene monomer in the polymerization composition is preferably in the range of from 0.1 wt % to 10.0 wt %, more preferably in the range of from 0.5 to 8.0 wt %, most preferably in the range of from 0.8 to 6.0 wt %, based on the total amount of the polymerization composition.

[0108] The amount of 1-butene monomer in the polymerization composition is preferably in the range of from 0.1 wt % to 20.0 wt %, more preferably in the range of 0.5 to 17.5 wt %, and most preferably in the range of from 0.8 wt % to 15.0 wt %, based on the total amount of the polymerization composition.

[0109] It is preferred that the weight amount of at least one of, most preferably all of the ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer is given.

[0110] It is preferred that phase separation is predicted using the developed correlation for different weight amounts of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer over a temperature span of from 100 to 250° C.

[0111] The correlation can thereby be selected for the binary P,T curves for given weight ratios of ethylene-1-butene copolymer or the tertiary P, wt %(PE), wt %(C2) curves as discussed above.

[0112] Thereby, it is preferred that the tertiary P, wt %(PE), wt %(C2) curves for given temperatures and weight ratios of 1-butene monomer are used.

[0113] In said tertiary P, wt %(PE), wt %(C2) system for each temperature and weight ratio of 1-butene monomer a distinct P, wt %(PE), wt %(C2) curve is given which represents the modelled LCST curve of the composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade at a given LCST and weight ratio of 1-butene monomer.

[0114] From said modelled LCST curve the cloud point pressure at a given temperature, such as the polymerization temperature in the solution polymerization reactor or the temperature in the downstream heat exchanger of the solution polymerization process can be predicted for a composition with a given weight amount of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer. For establishing a single phase system at said given temperature and weight amount of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer the pressure needs to be maintained above the cloud point pressure.

[0115] Alternatively, from said modelled LCST curve the LCST at a given pressure, such as the polymerization pressure in the solution polymerization reactor or the pressure in the downstream heat exchanger of the solution polymerization process can be predicted for a composition with a given weight amount of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer. For establishing a single phase system at said given pressure and weight amount of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer the temperature needs to be maintained below the LCST.

[0116] The process further comprises the step of

[0117] d) Selecting pressure and temperature conditions, which in the predicted phase separation data show that the ethylene-1-butene copolymer is completely solved in the solvent.

[0118] During the solution polymerization process of the ethylene-1-butene copolymer the process conditions, suitably temperature, pressure and polymer concentration in the at least one solution polymerization reactor and optionally the downstream process steps such as the downstream heat exchanger, are preferably monitored. When a change of one of said process conditions is observed the process conditions need to be adjusted to ensure that the single phase liquid system in the solution polymerization process is maintained.

[0119] The pressure and temperature conditions in process step d) are preferably selected for the given polymerization system of solution polymerization process using the polymer concentration, ethylene monomer amount and 1-butene monomer amount in the actual solution polymerization process.

[0120] The process further comprises the step of

[0121] e) Adjusting at least one parameter selected from the process temperature and pressure in at least one solution polymerization reactor, and optionally the first heat exchanger downstream from the at least one solution polymerization reactor, to said selected pressure and temperature conditions during a solution polymerization process of an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade.

[0122] By means of process step e) the single phase liquid system in the solution polymerization process can be maintained also during condition changes which ensures that the ethylene-1-butene copolymer is completely solved in the solvent.

[0123] In the process of the present invention phase separation caused by any kind of conditions changes can be predicted in any stage of the solution polymerization process of a specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade and avoided by adjustment step d).

[0124] In the process of the invention smooth operation of the solution polymerization process can be ensured by predicting the conditions in the reactor and the downstream stages such as the heat exchanger, which guarantee a single phase system of the polymerization composition.

[0125] Consequently, consequences of disturbances during polymerization process, such as e.g. poisoning of the polymerization catalyst by impurities, causing a drop of polymer concentration, or a sudden pressure drop, can be predicted and even avoided.

[0126] Control strategies for such disturbances can be developed from these predictions. The process of the present invention can also be used for predicting polymerization conditions of new ethylene-1-butene copolymer grades, especially those which have comparable properties to already established ethylene-1-butene copolymer grades.

[0127] Further, the present invention relates to the use of a correlation for interpolating cloud points from the cloud points on the LCST curve determined for two or more model compositions of a specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of a specific grade and solvent, whereby the model compositions differ in their weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer for adjusting at least one of the parameters selected from the process temperature and pressure, and maintaining a single phase liquid system during a solution polymerization process for polymerizing an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade.

[0128] Preferably said correlation is used for adjusting at least one of the parameters selected from process pressure and temperature during a solution polymerization process of an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade to maintain a single phase liquid system at a given weight amount of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and said ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the polymerization composition based on the predicted phase separation for said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade.

[0129] Thereby, the correlation, the model compositions and the compositions preferably are defined as described above or below.

[0130] Further, the specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade preferably relates to the ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade polymerized in solution polymerization as described above or below.

EXAMPLES

[0131] For illustrating the invention and the application of the invention an exemplary ethylene-1-butene copolymer is polymerized in a high temperature solution copolymerization process by copolymerizing ethylene and 1-butene in the presence of a polymerization catalyst in a solvent.

[0132] The process can be generally described as follows:

[0133] Ethylene and 1-butene are absorbed in the solvent, with the removal of the heat of absorption in a deep cooling unit. From the cooler, the monomer-comonomer solutions are fed to the reactor. The catalyst is fed separately to the reactor. The polymerization is carried out in an agitated, completely liquid-filled vessel under adiabatic conditions. The heat of reaction is absorbed by the pre-cooled reactor feed. The reactor operates at a temperature between 130 and 250° C. and a pressure between 30 and 150 bar. The residence time is less than 10 minutes. Ethylene conversion is maximum 96 percent per pass.

[0134] For said process the cloud points of model compositions are determined as described in the general description over the above described temperature and pressure ranges whereby in the model compositions the weight amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer is varied whereas the weight amounts of ethylene and 1-butene in the solvent are kept constant. Said model compositions consist of ethylene, 1-butene, ethylene-1-butene copolymer and solvent and thus relate to idealized polymerization compositions, for which the influence of other minor components of the real polymerization compositions in the reactor, such as the catalyst, oligomers, chain transfer agents, if present, and so on, on the cloud points are neglected. From said cloud points of the model compositions correlations are established by using one of the models as described in the general description and cloud point curves for the different compositions over the temperature and pressure range are established. FIG. 2 shows the correlated cloud point curve for the composition of the exemplary ethylene-1-butene copolymer compositions comprising 15 wt % of said exemplary ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the composition. The cloud point curves thereby show the temperature and pressure conditions under which phase separation occurs. The area above the respective curve shows the single phase area, whereas the area below the respective curve shows the two phase area.

Example 1: Steady-State Polymerization

[0135] For the exemplary ethylene-1-butene grade the usual polymerization temperature is set to 180° C. and under steady state polymerization conditions a polymer concentration of the exemplary ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the solution reactor is about 15 wt %. This means that for ensuring polymerization in single phase inside the reactor the pressure in the reactor needs to maintained above the pressure of cloud point of said exemplary ethylene-1-butene copolymer at a concentration of 15 wt % and 180° C. in the curve in FIG. 2, which is at least about 57 bar, such as e.g. 60 bar.

Example 2: Disturbances in the Polymerization System

[0136] In a second example an unexpected increase of the polymerization temperature to about 190° C. is recorded due to a disturbance of the system, such as a sudden increase in the catalyst feed rate to the reactor. Said increase from steady state conditions A to conditions B are shown in the P,T diagram of FIG. 2. Thereby, it can be seen that the unexpected temperature increase shifts the operating conditions B into the undesired two phase area, which negatively affects the polymerization reaction and might end up with a shut down.

[0137] Thus, in order to re-establish steady state polymerization conditions and avoid shut down the pressure in the reactor must be increased to a pressure of at least 62 bar, such as to 65 bar and can be lowered again when the polymerization temperature is re-established by 180° C.

Claims

The invention claimed is:

1. A process for polymerizing ethylene-1-butene copolymers in a solution polymerization process by firstly modelling polymer systems for solution polymerization of ethylene-1-butene copolymers and then transferring pressure and temperature conditions from said modelled polymer systems to a solution polymerization process, comprising the steps of

a) determining the cloud points on the LCST curve for two or more model compositions of a specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, and ethylene-1-butene copolymer of a specific grade and solvent, whereby the model compositions differ in their weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, and ethylene-1-butene copolymer;

b) developing a correlation for interpolating cloud points for compositions of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade and solvent with different weight amounts of at least one of the ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade from the cloud points determined for said model compositions;

c) predicting phase separation for said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade by interpolating the cloud points from said correlation for a composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade comprising ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade with given weight amounts of at least one of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer, ethylene-1-butene copolymer;

d) selecting pressure and temperature conditions, which in the predicted phase separation data show that the ethylene-1-butene copolymer is completely solved in the solvent;

e) adjusting at least one parameter selected from the process temperature and pressure in at least one solution polymerization reactor, and optionally the first heat exchanger downstream from the at least one solution polymerization reactor, to said selected pressure and temperature conditions during a solution polymerization process of an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, and

f) polymerizing ethylene monomer and 1-butene monomer in a solvent in said at least one solution polymerization reactor at the adjusted process temperature and/or pressure in the presence of a polymerization catalyst to obtain an ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade, which is completely solved in said solvent.

2. The process according to claim 1, wherein the cloud points on the LCST curve is determined by varying one of the parameters of temperature and pressure of each model composition, while keeping the other of said parameters constant and detecting phase separation.

3. The process according to claim 1, wherein cloud points for each model composition over a temperature span of from 150° C. to 250° C. are determined.

4. The process according to claim 1, wherein the amount of ethylene-1-butene copolymer in the model composition is in the range of from 10 wt % to 45 wt %, based on the total amount of the model composition.

5. The process according to claim 1, wherein the amount of ethylene monomer in the model composition is in the range of from 0.1 wt % to 10.0 wt %, based on the total amount of the model composition.

6. The process according to claim 1, wherein the amount of 1-butene monomer in the model composition is in the range of from 0.1 wt % to 20.0 wt %, based on the total amount of the model composition.

7. The process according to claim 1, wherein the correlation is established from models selected from free energy models, equation of state(ES) models or polynomial models.

8. The process according to claim 1, wherein the correlation is established from a polynomial model, which is developed from the trend lines of the determined cloud points.

9. The process according to claim 1, wherein the correlation is established from a polynomial model in which the cloud point pressure is given as a polynomial function of the temperature and the weight amounts of ethylene monomer, 1-butene monomer and ethylene-1-butene copolymer.

10. The process according to claim 1, wherein phase separation is predicted by utilizing the developed correlation for different temperatures and weight amounts of 1-butene monomer over a span of weight amounts of ethylene-1-butene copolymer of from 10 wt % to 45 wt % and a span of weight amounts of ethylene monomer of from 0.1 wt % to 10.0 wt %, each based on the total amount of the composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade.

11. The process according to claim 1, wherein the weight amount of 1-butene monomer are within the range of from 0.1 wt % to 20.0 wt %, based on the total amount of the composition of said specific ethylene-1-butene copolymer grade.

12. The process according to claim 1, wherein the ethylene-1-butene copolymer of said specific grade is a linear low density ethylene-1-butene copolymer.

13. The process according to claim 1, wherein the polymerization temperature is in the range of from higher than 100° C. to up to 250° C.

14. The process according to claim 1, wherein the polymerization pressure is in the range of 10 to 300 bar.

Patent Citations (74)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US9637602(B2)	2017-05-01	Potter et al.	Applicant
US9670293(B2)	2017-06-01	Reznichenko et al.	Applicant
US9670347(B2)	2017-06-01	Töltsch et al.	Applicant
US9708481(B2)	2017-07-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US9745431(B2)	2017-08-01	Potter et al.	Applicant
US9751962(B2)	2017-09-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US9777142(B2)	2017-10-01	Sandholzer et al.	Applicant
US9802394(B2)	2017-10-01	Cavacas et al.	Applicant
US9828698(B2)	2017-11-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US9890275(B2)	2018-02-01	Sandholzer et al.	Applicant
US9976020(B2)	2018-05-01	Nummila-Pakarinen et al.	Applicant
US10011708(B2)	2018-07-01	Lampela et al.	Applicant
US10030109(B2)	2018-07-01	Boragno et al.	Applicant
US10040930(B2)	2018-08-01	Gloger et al.	Applicant
US10100185(B2)	2018-10-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US10100186(B2)	2018-10-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US10227427(B2)	2019-03-01	Reichelt et al.	Applicant
US10450451(B2)	2019-10-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US10519259(B2)	2019-12-01	Resconi et al.	Applicant
US10870718(B2)	2020-12-01	Denifl et al.	Applicant
US11292900(B2)	2022-04-01	Gahleitner et al.	Applicant
US11299617(B2)	2022-04-01	Prieto et al.	Applicant
US11390732(B2)	2022-07-01	Van Houcke et al.	Applicant
US2016/0185946(A1)	2016-06-01	Sandholzer et al.	Applicant
US2016/0194486(A1)	2016-07-01	Sandholzer et al.	Applicant
US2016/0200838(A1)	2016-07-01	Reznichenko et al.	Applicant
US2016/0208085(A1)	2016-07-01	Gloger et al.	Applicant
US2016/0229158(A1)	2016-08-01	Cavacas et al.	Applicant
US2016/0237270(A1)	2016-08-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2016/0244539(A1)	2016-08-01	Resconi et al.	Applicant
US2016/0272740(A1)	2016-09-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2016/0280899(A1)	2016-09-01	Töltsch et al.	Applicant
US2016/0304681(A1)	2016-10-01	Potter et al.	Applicant
US2016/0311951(A1)	2016-10-01	Reichelt et al.	Applicant
US2016/0311988(A1)	2016-10-01	Potter et al.	Applicant
US2016/0312018(A1)	2016-10-01	Vestberg et al.	Applicant
US2016/0312019(A1)	2016-10-01	Lampela et al.	Applicant
US2016/0347943(A1)	2016-12-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2016/0347944(A1)	2016-12-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2017/0009068(A1)	2017-01-01	Kahlen et al.	Applicant
US2017/0029980(A1)	2017-02-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2017/0137617(A1)	2017-05-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2017/0166711(A1)	2017-06-01	Boragno et al.	Applicant
US2017/0218172(A1)	2017-08-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2017/0313867(A1)	2017-11-01	Lampela et al.	Applicant
US2017/0321048(A1)	2017-11-01	Nummila-Pakarinen et al.	Applicant
US2018/0079875(A1)	2018-03-01	Braun et al.	Applicant
US2018/0194881(A1)	2018-07-01	Denifl et al.	Applicant
US2020/0263015(A1)	2020-08-01	Kniesel et al.	Applicant
US2020/0270434(A1)	2020-08-01	Van Houcke et al.	Applicant
US2020/0277479(A1)	2020-09-01	Jerabek et al.	Applicant
US2020/0308353(A1)	2020-10-01	Jerabek et al.	Applicant
US2020/0347216(A1)	2020-11-01	Kniesel et al.	Applicant
US2020/0392321(A1)	2020-12-01	Gahleitner et al.	Applicant
US2021/0114352(A1)	2021-04-01	Oderkerk et al.	Applicant
US2021/0171749(A1)	2021-06-01	Kumar et al.	Applicant
US2021/0171750(A1)	2021-06-01	Gahleitner et al.	Applicant
US2021/0214527(A1)	2021-07-01	Gahleitner et al.	Applicant
US2021/0214533(A1)	2021-07-01	Kulshreshtha et al.	Applicant
US2021/0238376(A1)	2021-08-01	Kahlen et al.	Applicant
US2021/0253836(A1)	2021-08-01	Gahleitner et al.	Applicant
US2021/0269560(A1)	2021-09-01	Krallis et al.	Applicant
US2021/0324189(A1)	2021-10-01	Prieto et al.	Applicant
US2021/0332227(A1)	2021-10-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2021/0347971(A1)	2021-11-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2022/0033631(A1)	2022-02-01	Gloger et al.	Applicant
US2022/0135779(A1)	2022-05-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2022/0204719(A1)	2022-06-01	Vijay	Applicant
US2022/0227965(A1)	2022-07-01	Ruemer et al.	Applicant
US2022/0251256(A1)	2022-08-01	Wang et al.	Applicant
US2022/0289955(A1)	2022-09-01	Kahlen et al.	Applicant
US2022/0306844(A1)	2022-09-01	Kahlen et al.	Applicant
EP1339756(B1)	2006-08-01		Applicant
WO-2019137634(A1)	2019-07-01		Examiner

Non-Patent Literature (25)

Tom (Tom Cameron et al,: “Phase Equilibrium of Polyethylene and n-Hexane Systems at Different Operating Conditions”,) May 17, 2016 (May 17, 2016)).Examiner
Cameron, Tom, “Phase Equilibrium of polyethylene and n-hexane systems at different operating conditions”, Master's Thesis for Master of Science in Technology, pp. 1-126 (May 17, 2016).Applicant
Chen et al., “Density-Tuned Polyolefin Phase Equilibria. 1. Binary Solutions of Alternating Poly(ethylene-propylene) in Subcritical and Supercritical Propylene, 1-Butene, and 1-Hexene. Experiment and Flory-Patterson Model”, Macromolecules, vol. 25: pp. 3089-3096 (Dec. 17, 1991).Applicant
Chen et al., “Density-Tuned Polyolefin Phase Equilibria. 2. Multicomponent Solutions of Alternating Poly(ethylene-propylene) in Subcritical and Supercritical Olefins. Experiment and SAFT Model”, Macromolecules, vol. 25: pp. 4987-4995 (May 11, 1992).Applicant
Flory, Paul J., “Thermodynamics of Heterogeneous Polymers and Their Solutions”, The Journal of Chemical Physics, vol. 12(11): pp. 425-438 (Oct. 12, 1944).Applicant
Folie et al., “Phase Equilibria in High-Pressure Polyethylene Technology”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 34(5): pp. 1501-1516 (Nov. 29, 1994).Applicant
Fredenslund, Aa., “UNIFAC and Related Group-Contribution Models for Phase Equilibria”, Fluid Phase Equilibria 52, pp. 135-150 (1989).Applicant
Gauter et al., “Modeling polyethylene-solvent mixtures with the Sanchez-Lacombe equation”, Fluid Phase Equilibria 183-184, pp. 87-97 (2001).Applicant
Gross et al., “Perturbed-Chain SAFT: An Equation of State Based on a Pertubation Theory for Chain Molecules”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 40(4): pp. 1244-1260 (Jan. 18, 2001).Applicant
Gross et al., “Modeling Copolymer Systems Using the Perturbed-Chain SAFT Equation of State”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 42(6): pp. 1266-1274 (Feb. 11, 2003).Applicant
Kontogeorgis et al., “Prediction of Liquid-Liquid Equilibrium for Binary Polymer Solutions with Simple Activity Coefficient Models”, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 34(5): pp. 1823-1834 (Jan. 2, 1995).Applicant
De Loos et al., “Fluid Phase Equilibria in the System Polyethylene + Ethylene. 1. Systems of Linear Polyethylene + Ethylene at High Pressure”, Macromolecules, vol. 16(1): pp. 111-117 (Feb. 5, 1982).Applicant
Maloney et al., “Solubility of Ethylene in Liquid, Low-Density Polyethylene at Industrial-Separation Pressures”, Ind. Eng. Chem., Process Des. Dev., vol. 15(1): pp. 216-220 (Sep. 2, 1975).Applicant
Nagy et al., “High pressure phase equilibria in the systems linear low density polyethylene + n-hexane and linear low density polyethylene + n-hexane + ethylene: Experimental results and modelling with the Sanchez-Lacombe equation of state”, J. of Supercritical Fluids 37, pp. 115-124 (Aug. 24, 2005).Applicant
Nagy et al., “High-pressure phase equilibria in the system linear low density polyethylene + isohexane: Experimental results and modelling”, J. of Supercritical Fluids 40, pp. 125-133 (2007).Applicant
Pedrosa et al., “Phase Equilibria Calculations of Polyethylene Solutions from SAFT-Type Equations of State”, Macromolecules, vol. 39(12): pp. 4240-4246 (Apr. 18, 2006).Applicant
Sarfraz, Shahid, “Phase Equilibria and Modelling of Polymer Systems”, Master's Thesis for Master of Science in Technology, pp. 1-106 (May 7, 2018).Applicant
Song et al., “Liquid-Liquid Phase Diagrams for Binary Polymer Solutions from a Perturbed Hard-Sphere-Chain Equation of State”, Chemical Engineering Science, pp. 1-37 (Sep. 1, 1993).Applicant
Szydlowski et al., “A new apparatus for the detection of phase equilibria in polymer solvent systems by light scattering”, Review of Scientific Instruments 63, vol. 2: pp. 1717-1725 (Nov. 4, 1991).Applicant
Tork et al., “Modelling of high-pressure phase equilibria using the Sako-WU-Prausnitz equation of state I. Pure-components and heavy n-alkane solutions”, Fluid Phase Equilibria, vol. 163: pp. 61-77 (May 15, 1999).Applicant
Tork et al., “Modelling of high-pressure phase equilibria using the Sako-Wu-Prausnitz equation of state II. Vapour-liquid equilibria and liquid-liquid equilibria in polyolefin systems”, Fluid Phase Equilibria 163, pp. 79-98 (May 15, 1999).Applicant
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PC-SAFT, “PC-SAFT”, pp. 1-2, retrieved on Oct. 5, 2022.Applicant
European Patent Office, International Search Report issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2021/050147 (Apr. 28, 2021).Applicant
European Patent Office, Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2021/050147 (Apr. 28, 2021).Applicant
The International Bureau of WIPO, International Preliminary Report on Patentability issued in International Application No. PCT/EP2021/050147 (Jul. 19, 2022).Applicant