US 12,600,799 B2Grant

Anti-IgG nanobodies

Issue Date:2026-04-14

•11 Claims

•17 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

The present invention relates to novel anti-IgG nanobodies, particularly nanobodies directed against rabbit or mouse IgG. Further, the invention relates to the use of said nanobodies and methods for producing them.

Metadata

Assignee

MAX-PLANCK-GESELLSCHAFT ZUR FÖRDERUNG DER WISSENSCHAFTEN E.V.

Inventors

Dirk Görlich
Tino Pleiner

Application Information

Application Number:US 16/754,847

Filing Date:2018-10-11

Priority Date:2017-10-11

Art Unit:1678

Classifications

IPC:

C07K16/42

Field of Search:

C07K 16/42C07K 2317/22C07K 2317/33C07K 2317/569C07K 2317/92

Patent Drawings (17 sheets)

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

[0001] This application is a 35 U.S.C. 371 National Phase Entry Application from PCT/EP2018/077751, filed Oct. 11, 2018, which claims the benefit of European Patent Application No. 17195992.7 filed on Oct. 11, 2017, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein in its entirety by reference.

SEQUENCE LISTING

[0002] The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted via EFS-Web and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. The Sequence Listing, created on May 29, 2025, is named “2923-1357_20250110_ST25.txt” and is 101,946 bytes in size.

DESCRIPTION

[0003] The present invention relates to novel anti-IgG single-domain antibodies, particularly single-domain antibodies directed against rabbit or mouse IgG. Further, the invention relates to the use of said single-domain antibodies and methods for producing them.

[0004] Mouse and rabbit antibodies are fundamental tools for numerous basic research techniques as well as medical diagnostic assays. The detection or immobilization of these primary antibodies is most often performed indirectly via polyclonal anti-IgG secondary antibodies. Yet, the need for a continuous supply of anti-IgG sera requires keeping, immunizing, bleeding and eventually sacrificing large numbers of goats, sheep, rabbits, or donkeys, which is not only costly but also a major animal welfare and ethical problem (Shen, 2013; Reardon, 2016). Furthermore, every new batch of serum contains another heterogeneous mixture of antibodies, which need to be affinity-purified on IgG columns and then depleted (by pre-adsorption) of nonspecific and crossreacting antibodies. Moreover, the success of this procedure has to be laboriously quality controlled each time. The large size of secondary antibodies (˜10-15 nm; 150 kDa) is also a disadvantage, since it limits tissue penetration and introduces a considerable label displacement, reducing the obtainable image resolution by super-resolution fluorescence microscopy methods (Ries et al., 2012; Szymborska et al., 2013; Pleiner et al., 2015). Their non-recombinant nature further precludes genetic engineering i.e. tagging or fusion to reporter enzymes.

[0005] Why then, have recombinant anti-IgG detection reagents not yet replaced polyclonal secondary antibodies? The major issue is regarding signal strength. The signal in traditional immunofluorescence, for example, is amplified by: (i) multiple secondary IgG molecules binding to distinct epitopes of a primary antibody; (ii) a large IgG tolerating many labels per molecule; and (iii) by their bivalent binding mode exploiting avidity for high affinity target recognition. In the light of these facts, it appears very challenging to achieve comparable signal levels with a small, monovalent and monoclonal reagent.

[0006] Yet, we considered single-domain antibodies derived from camelid heavy-chain antibodies (Hamers-Casterman et al., 1993; Arbabi Ghahroudi et al., 1997; Muyldermans, 2013), as perhaps the best candidates for such reagents. Due to their small size (˜3×4 nm; 13 kDa), the possibility of their renewable production as recombinant fusion proteins, as well as favorable biophysical properties, single-domain antibodies attracted considerable attention as powerful tools in cell biology (Helma et al., 2015), structural biology (Desmyter et al., 2015) and as future therapeutic agents (Van Bockstaele et al., 2009; Kijanka et al., 2015). They are particularly useful for super-resolution imaging (Ries et al., 2012; Szymborska et al., 2013; Pleiner et al., 2015; Göttfert et al., 2017; Traenkle and Rothbauer, 2017). The resolving power of some of the best microscopes reported to date (e.g. ˜6 nm by Balzarotti et al., 2017; ˜ 10-20 nm by Huang et al., 2016 or Xu et al., 2012) may be reduced due to the offset between fluorescent label and target introduced by primary and secondary antibodies (20-30 nm). Site-specifically labeled single-domain antibodies represent a promising solution to this problem, since they can place fluorophores closer than 2 nm to their antigen and, despite their small size, even tolerate up to three dyes (Pleiner et al., 2015).

[0007] In this study, we describe the generation of a comprehensive toolbox of Nanobodies® (lg single variable domains) against all mouse IgG subclasses and rabbit IgG. This work required very extensive optimizations of our routine Nanobody® (single domain antibody) selection efforts, such as a time-stretched and thus affinity-enhancing immunization scheme, subsequent affinity maturation including off-rate selections, as well as testing and improving “200 initial candidates. When labeled site-specifically with fluorophores, the resulting Nanobodies® (single domain antibodies) performed remarkably well in Western Blotting and immunofluorescence. In contrast to polyclonal secondary antibodies, they even allow a single-step multicolor labeling and co-localization. Moreover, we show that anti-IgG Nanobodies® can be conjugated to horseradish peroxidase (HRP) or expressed as fusions to ascorbate peroxidase (APEX2) (Lam et al., 2015) and thus used for enhanced chemiluminescence Western blotting or colorimetric ELISAs or immuno-EM detection. These monoclonal recombinant Nanobodies® are thus perfect substitutes for conventional animal-derived polyclonal secondary antibodies. We envision that they can be engineered to enable a more versatile use of the plethora of existing antibodies and even allow the development of more sophisticated antibody-based diagnostic tests.

[0008] A first aspect of the invention relates to a single-domain antibody directed against rabbit IgG comprising

- [0009] (a) a CDR3 sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2, or
- [0010] (b) a CDR3 sequence which has an identity of at least 80%, particularly at least 90% to a CDR3 sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2.

[0011] In a particular embodiment, the single-domain antibody comprises

- [0012] (a) a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2, or
- [0013] (b) a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences which has an identity of at least 80%, particularly at least 90% to a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2.

[0014] In a further particular embodiment, the single-domain antibody comprises a sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2, or a sequence which has an identity of at least 70%, particularly at least 80% and more particularly at least 90% to a sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2.

[0015] A further aspect of the invention relates to a single-domain antibody directed against mouse IgG comprising

- [0016] (a) a CDR3 sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34, or
- [0017] (b) a CDR3 sequence which has an identity of at least 80%, particularly at least 90% to a CDR3 sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34.

[0018] In a particular embodiment, the single-domain antibody comprises

- [0019] (a) a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34, or
- [0020] (b) a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences which has an identity of at least 80%, particularly at least 90% to a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34.

[0021] In a further particular embodiment, the single-domain antibody comprises a sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34 or a sequence which has an identity of at least 70%, particularly at least 80% and more particularly at least 90% to a sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34.

[0022] Still a further aspect of the present invention is a reagent for detecting, isolating and/or purifying IgG, particularly rabbit or mouse IgG comprising at least one single-domain antibody as described above.

[0023] Still a further aspect of the invention is a method for detecting, isolating and/or purifying IgG, particularly rabbit and/or mouse IgG, comprising binding of at least one single-domain antibody as described above to IgG.

[0024] In a preferred embodiment, the single-domain antibody is specifically directed to one of the following groups of types of IgG molecules and epitopes:

- [0025] rabbit IgG Fab fragment
- [0026] rabbit IgG Fc fragment
- [0027] mouse IgG kappa light chain or mouse IgG lambda light chain
- [0028] mouse IgG1, e.g. IgG1 Fc fragment, IgG1 hinge region, or IgG1 Fab fragment
- [0029] mouse IgG1/IgG2a, e.g. IgG1/IgG2a Fab fragment
- [0030] mouse IgG1/IgG2a/IgG2b, e.g. IgG1/IgG2a/IgG2b Fab fragment
- [0031] mouse IgG2a, e.g. IgG2a Fc fragment or IgG2a hinge region
- [0032] mouse IgG2a/2b, e.g. IgG2a/IgG2b Fc fragment
- [0033] mouse IgG2b, e.g. IgG2b Fab fragment
- [0034] mouse IgG3, e.g. IgG3 Fc fragment
- [0035] mouse IgG2a/3, e.g. IgG3 Fc fragment

[0036] Specific embodiments of preferred anti-IgG single-domain antibodies are shown in Tables 1 and 2. Table 1 indicates isotype, epitope and species specificity of particular single-domain antibodies of the present invention.

[0037]

TABLE 1

SEQ ID	Nb ID	Isotype specificity	Epitope	Species specificity


1	TP896	N/A	Fab	Rabbit only
2	TP897	N/A	Fc	Rabbit, Guinea pig, Human (weak)
3	TP974	Kappa chain	—	Mouse, Guinea pig (weak)
4	TP1079	Kappa chain	—	Mouse, Guinea pig (weak)
5	TP1170	Kappa chain	—	Mouse, Guinea pig (weak)
6	TP975	Kappa chain	—	Mouse only
7	TP1014	Lambda chain	—	Mouse, Rat, Rabbit (weak)
8	TP1107	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat, Human (weak)
9	TP878	IgG1	Fc	Mouse only
10	TP879	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat
11	TP1104	IgG1	Fc	Mouse only
12	TP881	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat (weak)
13	TP882	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat
14	TP883	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat, Human (weak)
15	TP884	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat (weak)
16	TP894	IgG1	Fc	Mouse only
17	TP895	IgG1	Fc	Mouse only
18	TP885	IgG1	Hinge (?)	Mouse, Rat
19	TP886	IgG1	Fab (κ + λ)	Mouse only
20	TP887	IgG1/IgG2a	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
21	TP888	IgG1/IgG2a	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
22	TP889	IgG1/IgG2a	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
23	TP890	IgG1/IgG2a	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
24	TP1106	IgG1/IgG2a/IgG2b	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
25	TP1129	IgG2a	Fc	Mouse only
26	TP921	IgG2a	Fc	Mouse only
27	TP922	IgG2a	Fc	Mouse only
28	TP923	IgG2a	Fc	Mouse only
29	TP926	IgG2a	Hinge (?)	Mouse only
30	TP925	IgG2a/2b	Fc	Mouse only
31	TP979	IgG2b	Fab (κ only)	Mouse, Guinea pig
32	TP984	IgG2b	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
33	TP924	IgG3	Fc	Mouse, Rabbit
34	TP929	IgG2a/3	Fc	Mouse, Rabbit (weak)

N/A = not applicable; Fab = Fragment antigen-binding; Fc = Fragment crystallisable; κ = kappa light chain; λ = lambda light chain.

[0038] Table 2 indicates the amino acid sequences as well as the individual framework portions, i.e. framework 1, 2, 3 and 4, and CDR sequences, i.e. CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences of particular single-domain antibodies of the present invention, i.e., SEQ ID NO:35 to SEQ ID NO:271.

[0039]

TABLE 2

					FW
	FWI		CDR1		II		CDR2
SEQ	SEQ		SEQ		SEQ		SEQ
ID	ID	FW I	ID	CDR1	ID	FW II	ID	CDR2

1	66	QVQLVESGGGLAQPGGSLRLSCAVS	67	GFRFSFYQMT	68	WVRQAPGKGLEWVA	69	DINSAGGT

2	72	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGDSLRLSCVAS	73	GRSLDGATMR	74	WYRQAPGKEREFVA	75	GIFWDEIG

3	78	QVQLVESGGGWVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	79	GFTFSSYAMS	80	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	81	AIDTGGGY

4	85	QVQLVESGGGLVLPGGSLRLSCVAS	86	GFTFSDTAMM	87	WVRQAPGKGREWVA	88	AIDTGGSS

5	91	QVQLVESGGGWVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	92	GFTFSDTAMM	93	WVRQAPGKGREWVA	94	AIDTGGGY

6	97	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	98	GFTFSNYDMS	99	WVRQAPGKGLEWVS	100	AISSGGGS

7	103	QVQLVESGGGEVQAGGSLRLSCAAS	104	GRTFSRNVMG	105	WFRQAPGKEREFLA	106	AINWSGNS

8	109	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	110	GFTFSDTWMN	111	WVRQAPGKGLYWIS	112	AINPDGGN

9	115	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGGSLRLSCAAS	116	GSIFSINAMA	117	WYRHRPGMQRERVA	118	AISSGGT

10	121	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCVVS	122	GGTMNAYAIG	123	WFRQAPGKEREAVS	124	CITSNSKY

11	127	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCTAS	128	GFTFSDSPMT	129	WARQAPGKRLEWVS	130	TISSDGEK

12	133	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAF	134	GFTFSNYYMN	135	WVRQAPGKGLEWIS	136	GINSGGGT

13	139	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLTLSCATS	140	GFSLDYYSIG	141	WFRQAPGKEREGVS	142	CISSTGGS

14	145	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	146	GFTLDYYAIG	147	WFRQAPGKEREGVA	148	CITSSEGS

15	151	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLTLSCVIS	152	GFRMDIATMS	153	WVRQAPGKGLEWVA	154	GIINYRNF

16	157	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAVS	158	GLTLDFKGIG	159	WFRQAPGKEREGVS	160	CINPSDSS

17	163	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	164	GFTLDYYAIG	165	WFRQAPGKEHEGVS	166	CISPSGGS

18	169	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGGSVRLSCAAS	170	GFTFSSYYMT	171	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	172	AINTGGDA

19	175	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	176	GFTFANYYMS	177	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	178	AINTLGGK

20	181	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGGSLRLSCAAS	182	GRTFSTYIMG	183	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	184	AITWIGGS

21	187	QVQLVESGGGLVQDGGSLRLSCAAS	188	GRTFSVYAMG	189	WFRQAPGKEREFVA	190	AISWIGGS

22	193	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGDSLRLSCTAS	194	GRTFSTYAMG	195	WFRQAPGKEREFVA	196	AISWIGGS

23	199	QVQLVESGGEAVQTGGSLRLSCAAS	200	GRTFSTYLMG	201	WFRQAPGKEREFVA	202	AISWIGGS

24	205	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLYCAAS	206	GRTDTTYALG	207	WFRQPPGKERQFVA	208	SITWIGGA

25	211	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCVAS	212	GFTFSSAYMS	213	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	214	TISTGGGI

26	217	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCVAS	218	GFTFSSAYMS	219	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	220	TISTGGGI

27	224	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	225	GFTFSSYYMS	226	WVRQAPGKGLEWVS	227	DISTDGGR

28	230	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGESLTLSCAAS	231	GFTFSNVAMS	232	WVRQAPRKGLEWVS	233	SISSDGGR

29	236	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGGSLRLSCAAS	237	ETIFSINVMG	238	WFRQAPGKERELVA	239	KISSVGS

30	242	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	243	ETIFSINVMG	244	WFRQAPGKERELVA	244	SISSDGGR

31	248	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	249	GFTLDYYAIG	250	WFRLAPGKEREGVS	251	CISSSGGS

32	254	QVQLVESGGGLVQGGGSLRLSCAAS	255	RSIFSINAMG	256	WYRQALGKERELVA	257	AISSGGS

33	260	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	261	GFTFSSYAMT	262	WVRQAPGKGLEWVG	263	DINGVGNY

34	266	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	267	GFTLDYYAIG	268	WFRQAPGKEREGVS	269	CISSSSGR

	FW				FW
	III		CDR3		IV
SEQ	SEQ		SEQ		SEQ
ID	ID	FW III	ID	CDR3	ID	FW IV

1	70	TYYADSVKGRFAISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAK	35	GKFPVESRRHGGTAQWDEYDY	71	WGQGTRVTVSS

2	76	TEYADTAKGRFTISRDNAKNTIYLQMTNLRSEDTAMYYCNG	36	LVFGGEY	77	WGQGTQVTVSS

3	82	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLSPEDTALYYCAT	83	TYSGNYYSDYTIGNSDY	84	RGQGTLVTVSS

4	89	TYYADSVQGRFTISRDSAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTARYYCAK	37	TYSGNYYSNYTVANYGT	90	TGRGTLVTVSS

5	95	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTARYYCAK	37	TYSGNYYSNYTVANYGT	96	TGRGTLVTVSS

6	101	TYYVDSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAT	38	GSGPAFRLSGGSWSPRGDGS	102	RGQGTLVTVSS

7	107	IGYRDSVKGRFTASRDNVNNTLYLRMNNLKPEDTAVYYCAA	39	RGSSDYDVAMQGHEYTY	108	WGQGTQVTVSS

8	113	TAYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNMVYLQMDNLRPEDTAMYYCAK	40	GWVRLPDPDLV	114	RGQGTQVTVSS

9	119	TSYADSVKGRFTISRDNARDTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAMYYCAA	41	CPGDYTSTICNSDGMDY	120	WGKGTLVTVSS

10	125	TNYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKSTAYLQMNSLEPEDTAVYYCAA	42	AQFFNDGHQYCPNPNY	126	WGQGTQVTVSS

11	131	IGYRDAVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCLN	43	VVLVGREV	132	FSNGTLVTVSS

12	137	TAYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAK	44	GAVRLVAGALRPAD	138	WGQGTQVTVSS

13	143	TNYVDSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTGVYYCAA	45	YRRSGAYCTSGGQDY	144	WGKGTLVTVSS

14	149	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	46	AVTYASCNEYDY	150	SGQGTQVTVSS

15	155	TWYSDSVKGRFTISTDTAKSEVYLQMNSLKSEDTAVYYCAH	47	GGSDTATSRAI	156	RGQGTQVTVSS

16	161	AAYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNNLQPEDTAVYYCVA	48	FEQKNIYCSGYSLTLSARGVMDH	162	WGKGTLVTVSS

17	167	TNYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYSCVA	49	VARGTWGRGGVDRTTDQAMCIPR	168	WGKGTQVTVSS
				DPSVDF

18	173	TRYAESVKGRFTISRDNAKNMLYLQMNSLKPEDTALYYCGR	50	VPGYSDYRQGYDY	174	RGQGTLVTVSS

19	179	TKYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKSTLYLQMNSLKPEDTALYYCAR	51	EVTYYSGTYXLFGTKQEYDY	180	RGQGTQVTVSS

20	185	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDYAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	52	QMKFQITTMDSDYDY	186	WGQGTQVTVSS

21	191	TYSADSVKGRFTISREYAKNTLYLQMNSLRPEDTAVYYCAA	53	IFHREITTVPRKYDY	192	WGQGTQVTVSS

22	197	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDYAENTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	54	STMRSIDFYVTDFGS	198	WGQGTLVTVSS

23	203	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDYAENTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	55	TFKWEVTTTPDGYDY	204	WGQGTQVTVSS

24	209	TNYAASVKGRFTISKDLGTNTFNLQMNSLTPDDTAVYYCAA	56	AVVRQWPNAHQGAYDY	210	WGQGTQVTVSS

25	215	VNYADSVKGRFAISRDNAKNTLYLQMNKLKPEDTALYYCAS	57	NKGPHYHSDYFDSNLYDF	216	WGQGTLVTVSS

26	221	VNYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNKLKPEDTALYYCAS	222	NKGPHYYSDYFDSNQYDF	223	WGQGTQVTVSS

27	228	TLYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTALYFCAR	58	EGWEDTITEEPNDENY	229	WGKGTLVTVSS

28	234	TLYAASVKGRFTVSRDNAKNTLTLQMDSLKAEDTAVYYCTE	59	EEGGT	235	RGQGTQVTVSS

29	240	TYYADPVKGRFTISRDDTKNTLSLQMNSLKPEDTAMYYCAA	60	CARCFFVPRMTSAAAYGY	241	WGQGTQVTVSS

30	246	TTYGDSVQGRFTSSRDNAKNTAYLQMNHLKPEDTAVYYCAA	61	VRLSRGYLCRNYDMDY	247	WGKGTQVTVSS

31	252	TNYADSVKGRFTISRNNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAL	62	GVGDGSSCPDSAYEYAY	253	WGQGTQVTVSS

32	258	TYYVDSVKGRFTISRDHVKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAMYYCAA	63	LQSWGSYPHDDY	259	WGQGTQVTVSS

33	264	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNNLKPEDTAVYYCAP	64	GGAATVVGGPYDY	265	WGQGTQVTVSS

34	270	TDYVDSVKGRFTISRDNARNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	65	LERATMCPRDPTWYDY	271	WGQGTQVTVSS

[0040] In its broadest sense, the single-domain antibody of the invention is defined by the presence of at least one CDR3 loop which, as such, is capable of mediating efficient binding to the target molecule. In many cases, CDR1 and/or CDR2 sequences may be varied e.g. by loop grafting, without detrimentally affecting the target specificity. The CDR3 sequence of a single-domain antibody of the invention is defined as a sequence having an identity on the amino acid level of at least 80%, particularly of at least 90% and more particularly of at least 95% with a CDR3 sequence shown in any one of SEQ ID NOs 1-34. In a special embodiment, the CDR3 sequence of the single-domain antibody is as defined in any one of SEQ ID NOs 1-34.

[0041] In a more specific embodiment, the single-domain antibody of the present invention is defined by a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOs 1-34 or a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences having a sequence identity on the amino acid level of at least 80%, of at least 90% or at least 95% to a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOs 1-34.

[0042] In an even more specific embodiment, the single-domain antibodies of the invention have an amino acid sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOs 1-34 or an amino acid sequence having an identity of at least 70%, at least 75%, at least 80%, at least 85%, at least 90% or at least 95% on the amino acid level to an amino acid sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 34. In particular, the single-domain antibodies of the invention have an amino acid sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NOS 1-34.

[0043] The single-domain antibodies of the present invention are characterized by a high binding specificity to different IgG subclasses, in particular to the four mouse IgG subclasses, e.g. to the mouse IgG1 subclass, mouse IgG2a subclass, mouse IgG2b subclass and/or mouse IgG3 subclass, or to the rabbit IgG subclass. For example, single-domain antibodies of the present invention recognizing mouse IgG1 subclass molecules may be selected from single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 8-24. In particular, anti-mouse single-domain antibodies specifically targeting mouse IgG1 molecules may be selected from single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 8-19. Further, single-domain antibodies of the present invention recognizing mouse IgG2a isotype molecules may be selected from the single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 20-30 and 34. In particular, anti-mouse single-domain antibodies specifically targeting IgG2a molecules may be selected from single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 25-29. Nanobodies® of the present invention which recognize mouse IgG2b subclass molecules are selected from single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 24 and 30-32, whereby single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 31 and 32 specifically bind to mouse IgG2b subclass molecules. The present invention also provides single-domain antibodies which recognize mouse IgG3 subclass molecules, selected from the single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 32 and 33, whereby SEQ ID NO: 33 specifically recognizes mouse IgG3 subclass molecules. Nanobodies® of the present invention may also be able of binding specifically to the mouse light chain, independently of the heavy chain of the IgG subclass (single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 3-7). For example, specific anti-kappa chain single-domain antibodies of the invention may be selected from single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 3-6.

[0044] Preferred embodiments of preferred anti-IgG single-domain antibodies of the invention specific for particular IgG subclasses are shown in Table 3:

[0045]

TABLE 3

Grouping	Group
Feature	Name	SEQ ID No.	Group Description

Binding to	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse IgG1
a particular	IgG1	3-24
IgG subclass	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse IgG2a
	IgG2a	20-30, 34
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse IgG2b
	IgG2b	24, 30-32
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No. 32	Binding to Mouse IgG3
	IgG3	and 33
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse Light
	light chain	3-7	chain independently of
			heavy chain subclass
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse Kappa
	Kappa chain	3-6	chain independently of
			heavy chain subclass

[0046] The single-domain antibodies of the present invention are further characterized by high binding specificity for different binding regions of the IgG molecules, e.g. specifically targeting epitopes on the mouse kappa and/or lambda light chain or the mouse Fc, hinge or Fab fragment on the IgG molecules. Some of single-domain antibodies may have mixed specificities, e.g. may be mouse Fab-binders, which target an interface between a kappa and/or lambda light chain and an IgG, e.g. IgG1, IgG2a or IgG2b, heavy chain. For example, single-domain antibodies of the present invention specifically binding to an epitope comprising a portion of the K and/or A light chain of mouse IgG molecules may be selected from single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 3-7, 19-24 and 31-32. Anti-IgG single-domain antibodies of the present invention specifically targeting an epitope on the Fc fragment of mouse IgG molecules may be selected from single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 8-17, 25-28, 30 and 33-34. In particular, single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 8-17 target to a mouse IgG1 Fc fragment, single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 25-28, 30 and 34 bind to mouse IgG2a Fc fragment and single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NOs: 33 and 34 recognize an epitope location on the Fc fragment of IgG3 subclass molecules.

[0047] Table 4 indicates preferred embodiments of preferred anti-IgG single-domain antibodies targeting specific epitope regions on particular IgG sbtype molecules:

[0048]

TABLE 4

	Group
Grouping Feature	Name	SEQ ID No.	Group Description

Binding to a particular	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
region on IgG	IgG1 Fab	3-7, 20-24	IgG1 Fab fragment
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
	IgG1 Fc	8-17	IgG1 Fc fragment
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
	IgG2a FC	25-28, 30, 34	IgG2a Fc fragment
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
	IgG2a Fab	20-24	IgG2a Fab fragment
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
	IgG2b Fab	31-32	IgG2b Fab fragment

[0049] The single-domain antibodies of the present invention can be characterized by a high target affinity and/or a very low off-rate. The target affinity may be in the range from low nanomolar to sub-picomolar, preferably below 10 nM, below 1 nM or below 100 pM as measured by quantitative phage display. This is supported by the following experimental observations. When titrating target IgG down to subpicomolar concentration, a stoichiometric phage retrieval during anti-IgG single-domain antibody selections was observed, arguing for a non-affinity limited process. Off-rate selections using high excesses of competitor IgG showed no significant Nanobody®-IgG complex dissociation over a course of 4 h. Similarly, we observed no spectral intermixing during one-step co-immunolocalizations with differentially labeled, pre-formed IgG-Nanobody® complexes. Due to their low off-rate, the anti-IgG single-domain antibodies remain bound to their target even after extended washing procedures.

[0050] Further, the single-domain antibodies of the present invention can be characterized by a weak crossreactivity to IgGs from other species, e.g. from rat, guinea pig or from humans. According to a preferred embodiment of the invention the single-domain antibodies show a crossreaction of 15% or less, preferably of 10% or less, more preferably of 5% or less to IgGs from other species, in particular to IgGs from rats, guinea pigs or humans, especially to IgGs from humans. In a very preferred embodiment of the invention the single-domain antibodies are exclusively specific to rabbit and/or mouse IgG molecules and show no crossreaction to IgGs from other species, in particular to human IgGs. The crossreactivity of the anti-IgG single-domain antibodies of the present invention is measured by conventional methods, such as fluorescent dot blots or ELISA. A specificity profiling dot blot assay of the anti-IgG single-domain antibodies of the present invention to analyze their crossreaction to IgG from other species is described in Example 1.5 and FIG. 1—supplement 1a.

[0051] The single-domain antibodies of the invention may be genetically modified, e.g. by incorporating an additional cysteine residue at the N-terminus and/or at the C-terminus and/or other surface-exposed positions within the framework region. This facilitates coupling to heterologous moieties via the SH-side chain of cysteine.

[0052] Further, the present invention refers to conjugates of the above single-domain antibodies. Such conjugates may be genetic fusions, wherein the Nanobody® is conjugated via peptide bonds to a heterologous peptide or protein sequence. Examples of heterologous protein sequences are peroxidases such as class I peroxidases, e.g. APEX2, or phosphatases (e.g. lambda phosphatase; alkaline phosphatase), or luciferase.

[0053] On the other hand, the conjugate may comprise heterologous moieties, e.g. proteinaceous moieties and/or non-proteinaceous moieties coupled to amino acid side chains, e.g. thiol, amino, guanidino, carboxy or hydroxy groups on amino acid side chains, or other reactive groups such as azide or alkyne groups on modified amino acid side chains, and/or to the N- or C terminus by non-peptidic bonds. Suitable conjugation partners are labelling groups, e.g. enzyme reporter groups as described above or fluorescent labelling groups, solid phase-binding groups such as streptavidin or biotin.

[0054] In a preferred embodiment, one, two or three labelling groups, e.g. fluorescent labelling groups may be coupled to the side chain of cysteine residues. In a further specific embodiment, one, two or three enzyme reporter groups such as horseradish peroxidase or phosphatases may be coupled to the side chain of cysteine residues.

[0055] In a further preferred embodiment, one, two or three labelling groups, e.g. fluorescent labelling groups may be coupled to the side chain of lysine residues. In a further specific embodiment, one, two or three enzyme reporter groups such as horseradish peroxidase or phosphatases may be coupled to the side chain of lysine residues.

[0056] A further aspect of the present invention relates to a nucleic acid molecule encoding a single-domain antibody as indicated above. The nucleic acid may be a double stranded or single stranded nucleic acid, e.g. DNA or RNA. The nucleic acid molecule encoding the single-domain antibody may be an operative linkage with an expression control sequence, in particular with an expression control sequence which is heterologous to a native single-domain antibody expression control sequence.

[0057] The nucleic acid molecule can be incorporated in a prokaryotic or eukaryotic vector suitable for transfecting or transforming hosts, e.g. host cells, e.g. bacterial cells such as E. coli, or eukaryotic host cells, e.g. yeast cells (e.g. S. cerivisiae or Pichia pastoris), insect cells or mammalian cells, e.g. cultured mammalian cells (e.g. HEK-293, HeLa or CHO cells). For this purpose, the nucleic acid molecule may have a codon-optimized sequence with regard to expression in the desired host. Suitable non-human host organisms include multicellular organisms, e.g. mammals, such as mice, rabbits, rats. Suitable types of vectors include plasmids, phages, phagemids, viruses etc. as known to the skilled person. In a preferred embodiment, the vector is a prokaryotic expression vector.

[0058] Still a further aspect of the invention is a recombinant cell or recombinant non-human organism transformed or transfected with a nucleic acid molecule or a vector as indicated above. Preferably, the cell or non-human organism is capable of expressing the single-domain antibody of the invention.

[0059] The single-domain antibodies of the present invention are particularly suitable for detection, purification and/or isolation of IgG molecules. Specific embodiments include purification and/or isolation of IgG from biological fluids such as blood, plasma, serum or all culture supernatant, detection, purification and/or isolation of IgG-antigen-complexes, immunofluorescence procedures including indirect one-step-immunofluorescence, e.g. by premixing of anti-IgG single-domain antibodies with primary antibodies, indirect one-step co-localisations, e.g. by using different primary antibodies with differently labelled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies, immunoblots with labelled, e.g. fluorescence-labelled and/or enzyme-labelled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies, immunoassays, e.g. in the ELISA format, with labelled, e.g. enzyme-labelled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies etc. Further, the single-domain antibodies can also be used as intracellular antibodies, i.e. intrabodies.

[0060] The single-domain antibodies of the invention may be used alone or as combinations comprising several different single-domain antibodies, e.g. a single-domain antibody directed against an Fc fragment of a specific IgG subtype such as mouse IgG1 may be combined with a single-domain antibody directed against the same IgG subtype such as mouse IgG1, but against a different epitope, e.g. Fab, hinge etc. Alternatively, combinations of single-domain antibodies directed against different subtypes of IgG, e.g. IgG1 and IgG2a, preferably each carrying a different reporter and/or labelling group, are provided. These combinations of compatible single-domain antibodies provide strong signal amplification and may be used for immunostaining, e.g. in multi-colour immunostaining (co-localizations of multiple targets) or immunoblotting detecting e.g. two or more antigens at the same time.

[0061] Thus, the invention encompasses combinations of several single-domain antibodies.

[0062] In one embodiment, the combination comprises at least 2 single-domain antibodies, e.g. 2 or 3 single-domain antibodies each recognizing the same type of IgG molecules, e.g. mouse IgG1, mouse IgG2a or rabbit IgG, wherein individual single-domain antibodies of said combination bind to non-overlapping epitopes on the IgG molecules, e.g. respectively to the kappa and/or lambda light chain or to the Fab, Fc or hinge fragment of the IgG molecules. For example, a combination of single-domain antibodies recognizing mouse IgG1 may be selected from the single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NO: 5 and 8, SEQ ID NO: 8 and 19, SEQ ID NO: 18 and 19 and SEQ ID NO: 5 and 18 or single-domain antibodies comprising at least the CDR3 sequences thereof. A combination of single-domain antibodies recognizing mouse IgG2a may be selected from the single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NO: 5 and 25 or single-domain antibodies comprising at least the CDR3 sequences thereof. A combination of single-domain antibodies recognizing rabbit IgG may be selected from the single-domain antibodies of SEQ ID NO: 1 and 2 or single-domain antibodies comprising at least the CDR3 sequences thereof. The simultaneous use of combinations of two or more of such single-domain antibodies results in an adequate signal amplification in applications like immunofluorescence and immunoblotting.

[0063] Table 5 indicates preferred embodiments of combinations of anti-IgG single-domain antibodies of the invention directed to the same IgG subtype molecules but individually binding to non-overlapping epitopes on the IgG molecules:

[0064]

TABLE 5

Grouping	Group
Feature	Name	SEQ ID No.	Group Description

Additive	Boost	SEQ ID No. 5	Mouse Kappa chain and IgG1
Signal	mouse IgG1	and SEQ ID	Fc Binder, non-
Strength		No. 8	overlapping epitopes
	Boost	SEQ ID No. 8	Mouse IgG1 Fc and IgG1
	mouse IgG1	and SEQ ID	Fab Binder, non-
		No. 19	overlapping epitopes
	Boost	SEQ ID No. 18	Mouse IgG1 Hinge and IgG1
	mouse IgG1	and SEQ ID	Fab Binder, non-
		No. 19	overlapping epitopes
	Boost	SEQ ID No. 5	Mouse Kappa chain and IgG1
	mouse IgG1	and SEQ ID	Hinge Binder, non-
		No. 18	overlapping epitopes
	Boost	SEQ ID No. 5	Mouse Kappa chain and IgG2a
	mouse	and SEQ ID	Fc Binder, non-
	IgG2a	No. 25	overlapping epitopes
	Boost rabbit	SEQ ID No. 1	Rabbit IgG Fab and Fc Binder,
	IgG	and SEQ ID	non-overlapping
		No. 2	epitopes

[0065] Further, the invention encompasses combinations of single-domain antibodies which recognize IgG molecules of different types without cross-reaction, e.g. a single-domain antibody recognizing mouse IgG1 and/or a single-domain antibody recognizing mouse IgG2a and/or a single-domain antibody recognizing rabbit IgG as described above. When appropriately labeled, such a combination of single-domain antibodies can be used for colocalizations in immunofluorescence or multiplexing in immunoblotting.

[0066] The single-domain antibodies of the invention may also be provided as a preformed immune complex with an IgG antibody directed against an antigen of interest. Due to their high target affinity and/or low off-rate, the immunocomplexes are stable and can be preformed before use. The immunocomplexes may be used alone or as combinations comprising several different immunocomplexes, e.g. immunocomplexes comprising different IgG antibodies each complexed with a specific single-domain antibody. The single-domain antibodies may be directed against the same IgG subtype or against different IgG subtypes. Thus, combinations of different preformed complexes, preferably each carrying a different reporter and/or labelling group, are provided. These complexes and combinations may be used for immunostaining, e.g. in multi-colour immunostaining or immunoblotting.

[0067] Thus, the invention encompasses combinations comprising differently labeled versions of the same single-domain antibody, each bound to different IgG molecules of the same type, but recognize different antigens. Such combinations of pre-formed immune complexes may be used for colocalizations in immunofluorescence or multiplexing in immunoblotting.

[0068] The single-domain antibodies of the present invention can be produced in bacteria such as E. coli. They provide reproducible quality, since they are defined by means of their sequence, thus obviating the use of immune sera, i.e. varying mixtures of polyclonal antibodies.

[0069] The single-domain antibodies of the present invention have advantageous properties in view of known anti-IgG single-domain antibodies, e.g. as commercially available from Abcam. These advantages are demonstrated in the present examples.

[0070] Further, the invention is explained in more detail by the following figures and examples:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0071] FIG. 1.

[0072] Characterization of the anti-IgG single-domain antibody toolbox.

[0073] (a) Overview of selected anti-IgG single-domain antibodies identified according to the invention. The obtained single-domain antibodies were characterized for IgG subclass specificity, epitope location on Fab or Fc fragment and species crossreactivity (FIG. 1—figure supplement 1). The protein sequences of all anti-IgG single-domain antibodies can be found in Table 2. Nb=Nanobody®; CDR3=Complementarity-determining region 3; Gp=Guinea pig; Hs=Human; K=kappa light chain; λ=lambda light chain; Fab=Fragment antigen-binding, Fc=Fragment crystallizable.

[0074] (b) IgG subclass reactivity profiling of selected anti-mouse IgG single-domain antibodies representing all identified specificity groups. The indicated IgG species were spotted on nitrocellulose strips and the strips blocked with 4% (w/v) milk in 1×PBS. Then 300 nM of the indicated tagged single-domain antibodies were added in milk. After washing with 1×PBS, bound single-domain antibodies were detected using a fluorescent scanner. Note that the signal strength on poylclonal IgG depends on the relative abundance of the specific subclass (e.g. IgG2b and IgG3 are low-abundant) or light chain (kappa: lambda ratio=99:1). TP885 and TP926 showed no detectable binding to polyclonal Fab or Fc fragment and might bind to the hinge region. MBP=maltose binding protein; poly=polyclonal.

[0075] FIG. 1—figure supplement 1.

[0076] Species crossreactivity profiling and native target IgG isolation.

[0077] (a) Crossreactivity profiling of anti-IgG single-domain antibodies. Using the same Dot blot assay as described in FIG. 1b, the crossreactivity of anti-IgG single-domain antibodies to polyclonal IgG from the indicated species was determined.

[0078] (b) Isolation of polyclonal rabbit IgG from rabbit serum. Anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibodies TP896 and TP897 carrying an N-terminal Avi-SUMOStar tag were biotinylated and immobilized on magnetic Streptavidin beads. After incubation with crude rabbit serum and washing, Nanobody®-bound polyclonal rabbit IgG was specifically eluted via SUMOStar protease cleavage in physiological buffer. Empty beads served as negative control.

[0079] (c) Isolation of anti-Nup62 mouse IgG1 kappa mAb A225 from hybridoma supernatant with anti-mouse IgG1 single-domain antibodies TP881 and TP885 as described in a. The asterisk indicates the SUMOStar protease used for elution.

[0080] FIG. 2.

[0081] Application of peroxidase-linked anti-IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0082] (a) A twofold dilution series of Xenopus laevis egg extract was blotted and probed with anti-Nup62 mouse IgG1 mAb A225. It was then decorated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-conjugated goat anti-mouse polyclonal IgG (5 nM) or anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (5 nM) and detected via enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL). Similarly, a rabbit polyclonal antibody targeting Nup54 was decorated with HRP-conjugated goat anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG or anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897 (5 nM).

[0083] (b) A twofold dilution series of Xenopus egg extract was blotted on nitrocellulose and probed with an anti-Nup62 mouse IgG1 monoclonal antibody (upper panel). It was then detected either via HRP-conjugated anti-mouse IgG1 single-domain antibody ab193651 (Abcam, United Kingdom, used at 1:3,500 dilution, ˜5 nM) or 5 nM anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107. For this, TP1107 was conjugated to maleimide-activated HRP (#31485, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) via a C-terminal cysteine by incubating both in equimolar amounts for 1 h at room temperature. The blot was developed using Enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL). (Lower panels) A twofold dilution series of Xenopus egg extract was blotted on nitrocellulose and probed with polyclonal rabbit antibodies against Nup54 or Nup107. They were then detected either via HRP-conjugated anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody ab191866 (Abcam, United Kingdom, used at 1:3,500 dilution, ˜5 nM) or 5 nM anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897. TP897 was conjugated to HRP as described above and the blot developed by ECL.

[0084] (c) Oxidation of the fluorogenic ELISA substrate Amplex™ UltraRed. A dilution series of pure HRP or recombinant anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107-Ascorbate peroxidase (APEX2) fusion was incubated with Amplex™ UltraRed and H₂O₂. Oxidation leads to formation of the fluorescent compound resorufin. The obtained data were fitted with a four-parameter logistic regression. The inflection points of the curves can be used to compare attainable sensitivity. A.U.=arbitrary units.

[0085] FIG. 2—figure supplement 1.

[0086] Anti-IgG single-domain antibody conjugation to HRP and fusion to APEX2.

[0087] (a) Anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 with a C-terminal cysteine was conjugated to maleimide-activated horseradish peroxidase (HRP) by incubation of equimolar amounts for 1 h at room temperature.

[0088] (b) Expression of anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107-ascorbate peroxidase (APEX2) fusion in E. coli. After binding to nickel beads via the N-terminal His₁₄-bdNEDD8-tag, untagged fusion protein was eluted by on-column bdNEDP1 cleavage (Frey and Görlich, 2014).

[0089] FIG. 3.

[0090] Western blotting with infrared dye labeled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0091] (a) A twofold dilution series of Xenopus laevis egg extract was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting. The indicated rabbit polyclonal antibodies were used to detect nucleoporins (Nups). These primary antibodies were then decorated either via IRDye® (near-infrared fluorescent dye) 800-labeled goat anti-rabbit polyclonal IgG (1:5,000; LI-COR Biosciences, USA) or anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897 (10 nM). Blots were analyzed with an Odyssey Infrared Imaging System (LI-COR Biosciences, USA).

[0092] (b) (Left panel) A twofold dilution series of HeLa cell lysate was analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western Blotting. The indicated mouse IgG1 mAbs were decorated either via IRDye® 800-labeled goat anti-mouse polyclonal IgG (1:1,340, 5 nM, LI-COR Biosciences, USA) or anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (5 nM). (Right panel) A twofold dilution series of Xenopus egg extract was blotted and probed with anti-Nup62 mouse IgG1 mAb A225. It was then detected either via IRDye® 800-labeled goat anti-mouse polyclonal IgG (5 nM), anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (5 nM), anti-mouse IgG1 Fab single-domain antibody TP886 (5 nM), anti-mouse kappa chain single-domain antibody TP1170 (2.5 nM), a combination of TP1107 and TP886 or TP1107 and TP1170. Blue pixels indicate signal saturation.

[0093] (c) A dilution series of filamentous bacteriophages was blotted and probed with an anti-minor coat protein pill mouse IgG2a mAb. It was then decorated either via IRDye® 800-labeled goat anti-mouse polyclonal IgG (2.5 nM) or anti-mouse kappa chain single-domain antibody TP1170 (2.5 nM).

[0094] FIG. 4.

[0095] Imaging with anti-IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0096] (a) Immunofluorescence with anti-mouse IgG1 single-domain antibodies. HeLa cells were stained with the indicated mouse IgG1 kappa mAbs. These primary antibodies were then detected with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-mouse polyclonal antibody, anti-mouse IgG1 Fab single-domain antibody TP886 (SEQ ID NO:19) or anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (SEQ ID NO:8). A combination of TP886 (SEQ ID NO:19) and TP1107 (SEQ ID NO:8) yielded increased staining intensities. Laser intensities used to acquire the anti-IgG single-domain antibody images were normalized to the intensity used to acquire the anti-mouse polyclonal antibody image (RLI=relative laser intensity is used here as a measure of fluorescence signal strength).

[0097] (b) Immunofluorescence with anti-mouse IgG2a single-domain antibodies. HeLa cells were stained with the indicated mouse IgG2a mAbs. These primary antibodies were then detected with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-mouse polyclonal antibody, anti-mouse IgG2a Fc single-domain antibody TP1129 (SEQ ID NO:25) or anti-kappa chain single-domain antibody TP1170 (SEQ ID NO:5). A combination of TP1129 (SEQ ID NO:25) and TP1170 (SEQ ID NO:5) yielded increased staining intensities. (c) Immunofluorescence with anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897 (SEQ ID NO: 2). HeLa cells were stained with the indicated rabbit antibodies. These primary antibodies were then detected with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit polyclonal antibody or anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897 (SEQ ID NO:2). (d) Multicolor-staining of Hela cells. Hela cells were incubated with the indicated mouse IgG1, mouse IgG2a or rabbit IgG antibodies. These primary antibodies were detected via anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (SEQ ID NO:8), anti-mouse IgG2a Fc single-domain antibody TP1129 (SEQ ID NO:25) or anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897 (SEQ ID NO:2), respectively, labeled with the indicated Alexa dyes. The upper two panels show dual and the lower panel shows a triple co-localization.

[0098] FIG. 4—figure supplement 1.

[0099] Immunofluorescence with anti-mouse IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0100] (a-b) Images for a given mAb or polyclonal antibody were acquired under identical settings and pixel intensities are represented via a false-color lookup table. (a) HeLa cells were stained with the indicated mouse IgG1 mAbs. These primary antibodies were then detected with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-mouse polyclonal antibody or a combination of anti-mouse IgG1 Fab single-domain antibody TP886 and anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (SEQ ID NO:8). (b) Hela cells were stained with the indicated mouse IgG2a mAbs. These primary antibodies were then detected with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-mouse polyclonal antibody or a combination of anti-mouse IgG2a Fc single-domain antibody TP1129 and anti-kappa chain Nanobody® TP1170 (SEQ ID NO:5).

[0101] (c) Protein sequence alignment of anti-mouse IgG2a single-domain antibody TP921 (SEQ ID NO:26; and the corresponding Framework I “SEQ ID NO:217,” CDR1 “SEQ ID NO: 218,” Framework II “SEQ ID NO:219,” CDR2 “SEQ ID NO:220,” Framework III “SEQ ID NO:221,” CDR3 “SEQ ID NO:222,” and Framework IV “SEQ ID NO:223”) and the variant TP1129 (SEQ ID NO:25; and the corresponding Framework I “SEQ ID NO: 211,” CDR1 “SEQ ID NO:212,” Framework II “SEQ ID NO:213,” CDR2 “SEQ ID NO: 214,” Framework III “SEQ ID NO:215,” CDR3 “SEQ ID NO:57,” and Framework IV “SEQ ID NO:216”) obtained after affinity maturation. Hela cells were stained with a mouse IgG2a mAb targeting Lamin A/C. The mAb was detected via TP921 (SEQ ID NO:26) or TP1129 (SEQ ID NO:25) labeled with a single Alexa 488 dye and the images acquired under identical settings.

[0102] (d) Protein sequence alignment of anti-mouse kappa chain single-domain antibody TP974 (SEQ ID NO:3; and the corresponding Framework I “SEQ ID NO:78,” CDR1 “SEQ ID NO:79,” Framework II “SEQ ID NO:80,” CDR2 “SEQ ID NO:81,” Framework III “SEQ ID NO:82,” CDR3 “SEQ ID NO:83,” and Framework IV “SEQ ID NO: 84”) and the variant TP1170 (SEQ ID NO:5; and the corresponding Framework I “SEQ ID NO:91,” CDR1 “SEQ ID NO:92,” Framework II “SEQ ID NO: 93,” CDR2 “SEQ ID NO:94,” Framework III “SEQ ID NO:95,” CDR3 “SEQ ID NO: 37,” and Framework IV “SEQ ID NO:96”) obtained after DNA shuffling and affinity maturation. Hela cells were stained with a mouse IgG2a mAb targeting Lamin A/C. The mAb was detected via TP974 (SEQ ID NO:3) or TP1170 (SEQ ID NO: 5), both labeled with two Alexa 488 dyes.

[0103] (e) Hela cells were stained with the indicated mouse IgG1 kappa mAbs. These primary antibodies were then detected with Alexa 647-labeled goat anti-mouse polyclonal antibody, anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (SEQ ID NO: 8) or anti-mouse kappa chain Nanobody® TP1170 (SEQ ID NO:5). A combination of TP1107 (SEQ ID NO:8) and TP1170 (SEQ ID NO:5) yielded increased staining intensities, see (f) for identical settings scan. RLI=relative laser intensity (as defined in FIG. 4a).

[0104] FIG. 5.

[0105] One-step immunostaining of Hela cells with anti-IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0106] (a) The indicated mouse IgG1 mAbs were pre-incubated with an equal amount of Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-mouse secondary antibody or a combination of anti-mouse IgG1 Fab single-domain antibody TP886 (SEQ ID NO:19) and anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (SEQ ID NO:8). Likewise, the anti-LAP2 rabbit polyclonal antibody was pre-incubated either with Alexa 488-labeled goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody or anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897 (SEQ ID NO: 2). The resulting mixes were then applied to fixed and blocked Hela cells. After washing, the cells were directly mounted for imaging. For every primary antibody, images were acquired under identical settings and pixel intensities are represented via a false-color lookup table.

[0107] (b) Multicolor-staining of HeLa cells with mouse IgG1 subclass mAbs. The indicated mouse IgG1 mAbs were separately pre-incubated with Alexa 488, Alexa 568 or Alexa 647-coupled anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (SEQ ID NO: 8) and then mixed before staining Hela cells in a single step. Washed cells were directly mounted for imaging.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Examples

1. Methods

1.1 Alpaca Immunization

[0108] Two female alpacas, held at the Max Planck Institute for Biophysical Chemistry, were immunized 4 times with 1.0 mg polyclonal mouse or rabbit IgG at 3 week intervals. The anti IgG project turned out to be the so far most challenging single-domain antibody project in the lab, because we aimed at an extremely low off-rate for imaging and blotting applications. We therefore resumed immunizations after a 12 months (rabbit IgG) or an 8 months break (mouse IgG). Single-domain antibodies obtained after these late immunizations still showed very clear phage enrichment (>1000-fold) even with femtomolar concentrations of the IgG baits. We therefore assume that they have very high affinity.

1.2 Selection of Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

[0109] The generation of single-domain antibody immune libraries and the selection of antigen-specific single-domain antibodies by phage display from these libraries were performed as previously described (Pleiner et al., 2015). IgG was biotinylated at accessible lysines by addition of a 4× molar excess of NHS-PEG₁₂-biotin (Iris Biotech GmbH, Germany) for 2 h at room temperature in 1×PBS. Then the reaction was quenched and the excess of unreacted biotin separated from biotinylated IgG via buffer exchange into 50 mM Tris/HCl PH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl using PD-10 Desalting columns (GE Healthcare, USA).

1.3 Expression and Purification of Untagged Single-Domain Antibodies

[0110] Single-domain antibodies with engineered cysteines were expressed in the cytoplasm of E. coli NEB express F′ (New England Biolabs, USA). A 50 ml preculture (2YT medium containing 50 μg/ml Kanamycin) was grown overnight at 28° C. The culture was then diluted with fresh medium to 250 ml. After 1 h of growth at 25° C., protein expression was induced for 3-5 h by adding 0.2 mM IPTG. After addition of 1 mM PMSF and 10 mM EDTA to the culture, bacteria were harvested by centrifugation, resuspended in lysis buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl PH 7.5, 300 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, 5 mM DTT) and then lysed by sonication. The lysate was cleared by ultracentrifugation for 1.5 h (T647.5 rotor, Sorvall, 38,000 rpm) at 4° C. Single-domain antibodies with engineered cysteines carried an N-terminal His₁₄-bdNEDD8-tag and were affinity purified via Ni²⁺ chelate affinity chromatography. After washing with two column volumes (CV) of lysis buffer and one CV of maleimide-labeling buffer (100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 1 mM EDTA, 250 mM Sucrose), untagged single-domain antibodies were eluted by on-column cleavage with 500 nM bdNEDP1 protease (Frey and Görlich, 2014) in maleimide-labeling buffer for 45 min at 4° C. and labeled immediately with fluorophores. For longer storage, 10 mM DTT or TCEP were included in the maleimide-labeling buffer to keep cysteines reduced. Purified single-domain antibodies were aliquoted and frozen in liquid nitrogen

1.4 Site-Specific Fluorescent Labeling of Single-Domain Antibodies with Engineered Cysteines

[0111] The fluorescent labeling of single-domain antibodies with maleimide dyes was described in detail before (Pleiner et al., 2015). Briefly, stored single-domain antibodies were thawed and the buffer was exchanged again to Maleimide-labeling buffer to remove the reducing agent, using either illustra NAP-5 or PD-10 desalting columns (GE Healthcare). For a standard labeling reaction, 5-10 nmoles of single-domain antibody were rapidly mixed with 1.2× molar excess of fluorescent dye per cysteine on the single-domain antibody and incubated for 1.5 h on ice. Free dye was separated from labeled single-domain antibody by buffer exchange to Maleimide labeling buffer on illustra NAP-5 or PD-10 desalting columns. Quantitative labeling was quality controlled by calculating the degree of labeling (DOL). Fluorescently labeled single-domain antibodies were always aliquoted, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at −80° C. until further use.

1.5 Dot Blot Assay for Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibody Specificity Profiling

[0112] For profiling the binding of anti-IgG single-domain antibodies to different IgG subclasses and to analyze their crossreaction to IgG from other species, a dot blot assay was performed. Nitrocellulose membrane was cut in strips and different IgGs (500 ng for polyclonal total IgG, Fab and Fc fragments; ˜ 250 ng for monoclonal IgG in 1 μl) were spotted. Strips were blocked with 4% milk (w/v) in 1×PBS for 30 min at room temperature. Then, single-domain antibodies were added at ˜300 nM in 1 ml milk for 30 min. After washing two times with 1×PBS for 10 min each, bound single-domain antibodies were detected at 488 nm in a fluorescence scanner (Starion FLA-9000, Fujifilm, Japan). The following IgGs were used: IgG1 kappa mAb A225 (Cordes et al., 1995); IgG1 lambda (#010-001-331, Rockland, USA); IgG2a kappa (#02-6200, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA); IgG2b kappa (#02-6300, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA); IgG3 kappa (#401302, BioLegend, USA); polyclonal IgG Fab fragments (#010-0105, Rockland, USA); polyclonal IgG Fc fragments (#31205, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Polyclonal IgG of the following species were used: rabbit (self-made, affinity-purified from serum); mouse (#18765); rat (#14131); goat (#15256); sheep (#15131); human (#14506, all Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and guinea-pig (#CR4-10, Sino Biological, China).

1.6 Native Isolation of IgG with Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

[0113] Polyclonal rabbit IgG from serum or mouse mAbs from hybridoma cell culture supernatant were isolated natively with anti-IgG single-domain antibodies. For this, 0.3 nmoles of biotinylated single-domain antibodies carrying a N-terminal His₁₄-Biotin acceptor peptide-(GlySer)₉-SUMOStar-(GlySer)₉-tag were immobilized on 1 mg magnetic Dynabeads™ MyOne™ Streptavidin T1 (monosized, monodispersed, superparamagnetic beads, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA). Excess biotin binding sites were quenched with biotin-PEG-COOH (#PEG1053, Iris Biotech, Germany). The beads were then incubated with 1 ml pre-cleared (10 min, 16,000 g at 4° C.) serum or hybridoma supernatant for 30 min at 4° C. After washing two times with wash buffer (50 mM Tris/HCl, 300 mM NaCl), Nanaobody®-bound IgG was eluted by addition of 50 μl 0.5 μM SUMOStar protease (Liu et al., 2008) in wash buffer for 20 min on ice. An aliquot of the eluate was then analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Coomassie staining.

1.7 Western Blotting

[0114] Bacteriophage protein III was detected with a mouse anti-pIII IgG2a mAb (#E8033S, New England Biolabs, USA). Mouse mAbs used for detection of human proteins in HeLa cell lysate were the following products: anti-Skp1 (clone H-6, #sc-5281, Santa Cruz Biotechnology, USA), anti-a-tubulin (clone DM1A, #T6199, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and anti-Histone H3 (clone 96C10, #3638, Cell Signaling Technologies, USA). Polyclonal goat anti-mouse IgG coupled to IRDye® 800CW (#925-32210; LI-COR Biosciences, USA) was used to detect primary mouse antibodies at a dilution of 1:1340 (5 nM). Polyclonal rabbit antibodies against Xenopus laevis nucleoporins Nup98, Nup93, Nup54 and Nup88 were prepared in the lab (Hülsmann et al., 2012). Polyclonal goat anti-rabbit IgG coupled to IRDye® 800CW (#925-32211; LI-COR Biosciences, USA) was used to detect primary rabbit antibodies at the lowest suggested dilution of 1:5,000. Anti-mouse IgG1 Fab single-domain antibody TP886 (5 nM), anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 (5 nM) and anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897 (10 nM) were labeled with a single IRDye® 800CW maleimide (#929-80020, LI-COR Biosciences, USA) via a C-terminal cysteine and used at the indicated concentrations in 4% (w/v) milk in 1×PBS. Polyclonal goat anti-mouse-HRP conjugate was from DakoCytomation (Denmark) and used at 1:1,000 dilution (5 nM). Anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 was conjugated to maleimide-activated HRP (#31485, Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) via a C-terminal cysteine by mixing both in equimolar amounts and incubation for 1 h at room temperature. The conjugate was used at 5 nM in 4% (w/v) milk in 1×PBS. The ECL solution was self-made and contained 5 mM Luminol (#A4685, Sigma-Aldrich, USA), 0.81 mM 4-lodophenylboronic acid (#471933, Sigma-Aldrich, USA) and 5 mM freshly added H₂O₂in 0.1 M Tris/HCl PH 8.8.

1.8 Amplex™ UltraRed Assay

[0115] APEX2 was derived from pTRC-APEX2 (Addgene plasmid #72558), which was a gift from Alice Y. Ting (Lam et al., 2015). The anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107-APEX2 fusion was expressed from pTP1135 with an N-terminal His₁₄-bdNEDD8-tag in E. coli NEB express F′ (New England Biolabs, USA) for 6 h at 25° C. in the presence of 1 mM of the heme precursor 5-aminolevulinic acid (#A3785, Sigma-Aldrich, USA). Following lysis, the protein was purified by nickel chelate affinity chromatography and eluted by cleavage with 500 nM bdNEDP1 protease (Frey and Görlich, 2014) in 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 7.5, 150 mM NaCl, 250 mM sucrose. The final assay mix contained 160 UM Amplex™ UltraRed, 160 PM H₂O₂in either 100 mM Citrate pH 6.6, 150 mM NaCl (optimal pH for APEX2) or 100 mM potassium phosphate pH 6.0, 150 mM NaCl (optimal pH for HRP). 50 μl of this mix was used per reaction. Anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107-APEX2 was titrated from 167 nM to 470 fM in a 1.8-fold dilution series and 2 μl of each dilution added to 50 μl reaction mix in triplicates. HRP (#31490, Thermo Scientific, USA) was titrated from 31 nM to 5 fM in a 2.4-fold dilution series and 2 μl per dilution added to 50 μl reaction mix in triplicates. The 96-well plate containing these reactions was incubated at room temperature for 30 min and then resorufin fluorescence was measured at 590 nm (530 nm excitation) in a Bio-Tek Synergy HT Multi-Detection Microplate Reader (BioTek Instruments Inc., USA).

1.9 Immunofluorescence

[0116] Hela cells grown on glass coverslips were fixed for 10 min at room temperature with 3% (w/v) paraformaldehyde (PFA) and then washed two times with 1×PBS for 5 min each. Residual PFA was quenched by incubation with 50 mM NH₄Cl in 1×PBS for 5 min. After two washes with 1×PBS for 5 min each, the cells were permeabilized with 0.3% (v/v) Triton-X-100 for 3 min. Then the cells were washed three times quickly with 1×PBS and blocked for 30 min with 1% (w/v) BSA in 1×PBS (blocking buffer). Following blocking, the coverslips were stained with primary antibody, which was diluted in blocking buffer, in a humid chamber for 1 h at room temperature. The coverslips were then washed two times in 1×PBS for 15 min each and added again to a humid chamber for incubation with secondary antibody or anti-IgG single-domain antibody diluted in blocking buffer. Afterwards, the cells were washed two times in 1×PBS for 15 min each and the coverslips mounted with Slow Fade Gold (Thermo Fisher Scientific, USA) for imaging on a Leica TCS SP5 confocal microscope equipped with hybrid detectors (Leica, Germany). For methanol fixation, the cells were incubated with −20° C.-cooled methanol for 6 min at room temperature, washed two times in 1×PBS for 5 min each and then blocked in blocking buffer. The staining was performed as described above.

1.10 Antibodies for Immunofluorescence

[0117] The following rabbit antibodies were used for immunofluorescence on Hela cells: anti-Lap2 polyclonal antibody (1:100 dilution, #14651-1-AP, Proteintech, UK); anti-Ki-67 mAb clone D3B5 (1:200 dilution, #9129, Cell Signaling Technologies, USA). The following mouse mAbs were used for immunofluorescence on Hela cells: anti-Vimentin mAb clone V9 (1:10 dilution of Hybridoma supernatant, kind gift of Mary Osborn); anti-Ki-67 mAb clone B56 (1:50 dilution, #556003, BD Bioscience, USA); anti-TPR mAb 203-37 (1:500 dilution, Matritech Inc., USA; (Cordes et al., 1997)); anti-Cytochrome (Cyt) c mAb clone 6H2-B4 (1:50 dilution, #556432, BD Bioscience, USA); anti-Lamin A/C mAb clone 4C11 (1:50 dilution, #4777T, Cell Signaling Technologies, USA); anti-CD44 mAb clone 156-3C11 (1:200 dilution, #3570T, Cell Signaling Technologies, USA). Polyclonal goat anti-rabbit IgG (#111-545-003) and goat anti-mouse IgG (#115-545-003, Jackson ImmunoResearch, USA) coupled to Alexa Fluor® 488 (fluorescent dye) were used as secondary antibodies at 1:150 dilution (“33 nM). Anti-IgG single-domain antibodies were labeled with maleimide Alexa Fluor® dyes at engineered surface cysteines (Pleiner et al., 2015) and used at 20 nM. The used single-domain antibodies had the following degree of labeling: TP886-Alexa 488=1.9, TP1107-Alexa 488=2.7, TP1107-Alexa 647=2.2, TP1129-Alexa 488=2.5, TP1129-Alexa 568=2.0, TP1079-Alexa 488=2.2, TP897-Alexa 488=2.2.

2. Results

2.1 a Comprehensive Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibody Toolbox

[0118] We immunized two alpacas separately with polyclonal mouse or rabbit IgG and used chemically biotinylated mouse monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) of defined subclasses as well as rabbit IgGs for phage display selections of single-domain antibodies from the resulting immune libraries. First results with the initially obtained anti-IgG single-domain antibodies were rather disappointing, i.e. we experienced dim and noisy signals in immunofluorescence as well as in Western blots. We reasoned that an increase in affinity and specificity might yield improved reagents and therefore re-immunized the animals after a one-year pause. For this, we used IgGs pre-bound to multivalent particulate antigens expected to provide strong T-helper cell epitopes. Moreover, we increased the stringency of the subsequent phage display selections by lowering the bait concentration down to the femtomolar range, which should not only select per se for sub-nanomolar binders, but also bring displayed single-domain antibodies in direct competition with each other, because the number of bait molecules was up to 1000-fold lower than the number of displaying phages. Finally, we performed in vitro affinity maturations by random mutagenesis and further rounds of phage display, this time also combined with off-rate selections. In this way, we obtained a large toolkit of anti-rabbit and anti-mouse IgG single-domain antibodies (FIG. 1a).

[0119] All single-domain antibodies were extensively characterized for subclass specificity, epitope location on Fab or Fc fragment and crossreactivity to IgGs from other species (Table 1, FIG. 1b, FIG. 1—figure supplement 1a). Their full protein sequences are listed in Table 2. Notably, we identified single-domain antibodies against all four mouse IgG subclasses and the sole rabbit IgG subclass. Strikingly, many anti-mouse IgG single-domain antibodies target IgG1, which represents the most abundant subclass of commercially available mouse mAbs (˜62-64%), followed by IgG2a (˜22-24%) and the less frequent IgG2b (˜13%) and IgG3 (˜1-2%). Since the vast majority (˜99%) of mouse mAbs possess a kappa light chain, anti-kappa chain single-domain antibodies promised to be the most broadly useful tools and we therefore actively selected for such binders by swapping the IgG heavy chain subclass during sequential selection rounds. For the identification of binders targeting the rare lambda chain, we had to pre-deplete the single-domain antibody immune library of heavy chain and kappa chain-binders. Some of the identified single-domain antibodies have mixed specificities, e.g. multiple mouse Fab-binders target an interface between kappa light chain and IgG1 or IgG2a heavy chain. Most anti-mouse IgG single-domain antibodies are exclusively mouse-specific, while others additionally crossreact with rat IgG (FIG. 1—figure supplement 1a). The anti-rabbit IgG single-chain antibody TP897 also efficiently recognizes guinea pig IgG. All single-domain antibodies were produced by cytoplasmic expression in E. coli, mostly with an N-terminal His-NEDD8-tag for purification by Ni(II) chelate affinity capture and proteolytic release (Frey and Görlich, 2014). They were further equipped with ectopic cysteines for subsequent maleimide labeling reactions (Pleiner et al., 2015). Without further optimization, we typically obtained yields of 15 mg per liter of bacterial culture, which already suffices for a million immunofluorescence stains or 200 liters of Western blotting solution (see below).

[0120] We first assessed if the anti-IgG single-domain antibodies were specific and could purify their IgG target from its common source. Anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibodies TP896 and TP897 isolated polyclonal rabbit IgG from crude rabbit serum with high specificity (FIG. 1—figure supplement 1b). Likewise, anti-mouse IgG single-domain antibodies TP881 and TP885 could purify an IgG1 mAb from hybridoma cell culture supernatant (FIG. 1—figure supplement 1c). Notably, Nanobody®-bound IgG was released under physiological conditions using SUMOStar protease cleavage (Pleiner et al., 2015). The main virtue of this approach is perhaps not to purify IgGs from sera, but to perform immune-affinity purifications of antigens or antigen complexes that have been pre-bound to the primary antibodies. In contrast to traditional IPs, this approach allows to release the purified complexes under fully native conditions.

2.2 Western Blotting with Horseradish Peroxidase-Conjugated Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

[0121] We next tested the performance of anti-IgG single-domain antibodies as detection reagents in Western Blotting, which is a major application for secondary antibodies. A popular mode of signal detection in Western Blotting is enhanced chemiluminescence (ECL) in which antibody-horseradish peroxidase (HRP) conjugates are used. HRP is a heme-containing enzyme that catalyzes the oxidation of luminol in the presence of H₂O₂to yield bright chemiluminescence, which is greatly increased by phenol-derived enhancers. We conjugated maleimide-activated HRP to anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-chain antibody TP1107 via a C-terminal cysteine (FIG. 2—figure supplement 1a) and used the resulting conjugate in ECL Western Blotting. The Nanobody®-HRP conjugate is functional and outperformed a polyclonal secondary antibody-HRP conjugate from a commercial supplier (FIG. 2a). The anti-rabbit IgG single-chain antibody TP897 could also be linked to HRP and the resulting conjugate was functional and specific.

2.3 Comparison with Commercially Available Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

[0122] Commercially available anti-mouse IgG1 or anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibodies designated as ab193651 and ab191866 (Abcam, United Kingdom) were compared with anti-mouse IgG1 single-chain antibody TP1107 and anti-rabbit IgG single-chain antibody TP897 as HRP conjugates (FIG. 2b). The single-domain antibodies of the invention provide a substantially higher sensitivity when used at equal concentrations.

2.4 Recombinant Ascorbate Peroxidase Fusion to Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

[0123] Due to its stability and the breadth of its catalyzed colorimetric or chemiluminescent reactions that allow strong signal amplification, HRP is the most preferred enzyme for conjugation to secondary antibodies. However, it still has to be isolated from horseradish roots as a mixture of different isoforms, cannot be made in a practical scale and with a useful specific activity in E. coli (Krainer and Glieder, 2015), and it fails entirely as a genetic fusion to bacterially expressed single-domain antibodies. As an alternative, we tested the engineered APEX2 ascorbate peroxidase (Martell et al., 2012; Lam et al., 2015) as a fusion partner of the anti-mouse IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107. The TP1107-APEX2 fusion was not only well-expressed and soluble in E. coli (FIG. 2—figure supplement 1b), but also, it was active and efficiently catalyzed the oxidation of the initially colorless substrate Amplex™ UltraRed to the highly fluorescent resorufin (FIG. 2b). In line with previous reports (Lam et al., 2015), HRP seemed slightly more efficient than APEX2 in catalyzing this reaction. Nonetheless, low femtomole amounts of TP1107-APEX2 could be detected, suggesting its applicability e.g. in ELISA assays as well for immunohistochemistry and enzymatic antigen-localization in immunoelectron microscopy applications.

2.5 Western Blotting with Infrared Fluorophore-Linked Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

[0124] A convenient alternative to peroxidase conjugation or fusion is the labeling of secondary antibodies with infrared fluorescent dyes. In fact, infrared fluorescent Western blotting has emerged as a superior alternative to classical ECL. It offers high signal-to-noise ratios, allows straightforward quantification due to signal linearity over many orders of magnitude and even enables the simultaneous dual color detection of multiple proteins. We thus labeled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies site-specifically with the infrared fluorophore IRDye® 800 at a C-terminal cysteine (Pleiner et al., 2015). The anti-rabbit IgG single-domain antibody TP897 alone performed just as well as a commercial polyclonal anti-rabbit IgG secondary antibody, when it was used with rabbit polyclonal antibodies to detect various nucleoporins (Nups) in a Xenopus egg extract (FIG. 3a). Similarly, the anti-mouse IgG1 Fc-specific single-domain antibody TP1107 gave comparable or even higher signal intensities than a polyclonal anti-mouse IgG secondary antibody in Western Blotting on HeLa cell lysate (FIG. 3b). Combinations of TP1107 with the compatible anti-mouse IgG1 Fab-specific single-domain antibody TP886 or the anti-mouse kappa chain Nanobody® TP1170 provided a clearly better detection sensitivity than the polyclonal secondary antibody. TP1170 allows sensitive detection of IgG2a subclass mAbs, as shown here for the detection of the bacteriophage minor coat protein pill (FIG. 3c). We routinely found infrared fluorophore-labeled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies to yield higher detection sensitivity than their HRP-conjugated counterparts. When combined with the compatible IRDye® 680, dual color blots using e.g. mouse and rabbit primary antibodies are easily possible (not shown). In contrast to polyclonal secondary antibodies, IRDye®-labeled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies give also a clean and strong signal when pre-bound to primary antibodies before application. This makes a separate incubation with the secondary antibody dispensable and saves up to 2 h processing time per blot. We explored such a one-step staining strategy in more detail below for immunofluorescence.

2.6 Single and Multi-Color Imaging with Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

[0125] We next sought to assess the performance of the anti-IgG single-domain antibodies as detection reagents in conventional indirect immunofluorescence. For this, cells are incubated sequentially with primary and secondary antibodies with intervening washing steps. Fluorophore-linked polyclonal secondary antibodies are routinely used for detection, since they can bind primary antibodies at multiple sites and thus deliver many fluorophores to enable large signal amplification. In contrast, individual anti-IgG single-domain antibodies target only a single epitope per antibody (or two for symmetrical binding sites) and we therefore expected only modest signal amplification. Strikingly however, the anti-IgG1 single-domain antibodies TP886 and TP1107, which specifically target IgG1 Fab and Fc fragment, respectively, not only performed well in Western Blotting, but also were well-behaved imaging reagents. For maximum brightness, we labeled these single-domain antibodies with 2-3 fluorophores each at defined cysteines (Pleiner et al., 2015) and used them individually for the detection of mouse IgG1 mAbs in an indirect Hela cell immunostaining (FIG. 4a). Surprisingly, both were only slightly dimmer than the polyclonal mixture of anti-mouse secondary antibodies. We assume that the excellent single-domain antibody signal is also due to less steric hindrance as compared to the much larger conventional secondary antibody. When both single-domain antibodies were used in combination, we detected increased signal strengths that often were directly comparable to those obtained with the secondary antibody (e.g. for Vimentin or Ki-67) (see also FIG. 4—figure supplement 1a). Importantly, despite a high labeling density with (the always somewhat sticky) fluorophores, we observed no detectable background staining with these anti-IgG single-domain antibodies. This probably relates to the fact that the affinity of our single-domain antibodies is very high, which allows their use at rather low nanomolar concentrations. The poor performance of the first anti-IgG single-domain antibody generation indeed suggests that such excellent signal to noise ratio is not a trivial feature for a monovalent detection reagent.

[0126] For the detection of IgG2a subclass mAbs, we used a combination of two single-domain antibodies, TP1129 and TP1170 (FIG. 4b, FIG. 4—figure supplement 1b). The IgG2a-specific single-domain antibody TP1129 targets an epitope on the Fc-fragment and was obtained after affinity maturation of a lower affinity precursor (FIG. 4—figure supplement 1c). Likewise, the kappa chain-specific Nanobody® TP1170 is an affinity-optimized variant, obtained after error-prone PCR, DNA shuffling and affinity selection (FIG. 4—figure supplement 1d). TP1170 also proved effective in combination with the anti-IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 for the detection of IgG1 kappa mAbs (FIG. 4—figure supplement 1e and 1f). The anti-rabbit IgG Fc single-domain antibody TP897 can be used for the detection of polyclonal and monoclonal rabbit IgG (FIG. 4c).

[0127] The presented single-domain antibodies are specific for their respective IgG subclass, as shown in the specificity profiling dot blot assay (FIG. 1b). We exploited this for multicolor imaging of Hela cells with different IgG subclasses (FIG. 4d). Mouse IgG1, mouse IgG2a and rabbit IgG-specific single-domain antibodies did not show any cross-reaction and consequently allowed for clean co-localization experiments. Even triple co-localizations were readily possible.

2.7 Rapid One-Step Immunostaining and Co-Localization

[0128] The main reasons for separate incubation steps of primary and secondary IgGs in indirect immunofluorescence and Western blotting are the large size, as well as the bivalent and polyclonal nature of conventional secondary antibodies. If primary and secondary antibodies are pre-incubated, large oligomeric complexes form, which in immunofluorescence cannot easily penetrate into cells to reach their target and thus create background and poor signal (see FIG. 5a). In contrast, anti-IgG single-domain antibodies are monovalent and therefore do not crosslink primary antibodies. This allows streamlining the conventional immunostaining procedure to a single step. The primary antibodies are simply pre-incubated with fluorescently labeled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies and then applied to cells together. After washing, the cells can be directly mounted for imaging. In such a workflow, anti-IgG single-domain antibodies perform exceptionally well (FIG. 5a). This time-saving protocol is also suitable for co-localization studies combining mouse and rabbit IgGs or combining mouse mAbs of different sub-classes.

[0129] If the off-rate of the IgG pre-bound single-domain antibodies were negligible over the staining period, then an exchange between the different pre-formed complexes would also be negligible. This would also make it unnecessary to use different IgG subclasses for multicolor imaging. We thus tested a multicolor staining workflow of Hela cells relying solely on IgG1 subclass mAbs (FIG. 5b). For this, we labeled anti-IgG1 Fc single-domain antibody TP1107 with either Alexa 488, Alexa 568 or Alexa 647 maleimide and pre-incubated it with different IgG1 mAbs. The separately pre-incubated mixes were then combined and applied to Hela cells for staining in one-step. Strikingly, we obtained clean dual and even triple co-localizations. In order to preclude an intermixing of colors, unlabeled TP1107 can be added in excess to the final mix and cells can be post-fixed after staining and washing.

3. Discussion

[0130] Due to the absence of more sustainable alternatives in the past, the great usefulness of polyclonal secondary antibodies in basic research certainly justified their animal-based production. However, in order to guarantee their constant supply to an ever-growing market, the producing companies had to dramatically increase their livestock, aim for very high antibody titres using aggressive hyper-immunization strategies causing strong side effects and increase the frequency and volume of collected bleedings. It is therefore not surprising that the global industrial scale production of antibodies causes severe animal welfare and ethical problems. The magnitude of these problems recently surfaced in the Santa Cruz Biotechnology scandal (Shen, 2013; Reardon, 2016).

[0131] Ideally, one should replace all animal immunization by selecting binders from synthetic libraries (Gray et al., 2016; Moutel et al., 2016; McMahon et al., 2017; Zimmermann et al., 2017). Yet, with a purely synthetic approach it is still not straightforward to obtain high-affinity binders. Further, the synthetic strategy is typically also inferior in terms of binder-specificity, because it lacks the stringent selection against self-reactivity that happens in antigen-exposed animals. The requirement for specificity is particularly high for secondary antibodies. We therefore see the here applied approach of using an immune library for binder selection as the best possible compromise. Since it is generally sufficient to obtain a few good single-domain antibodies out of a small blood sample containing ˜100 million lymphocytes, and since we found ways of further improving the initially found ones in vitro, there was no need for any hyper-immunization aiming at high titers. Importantly, once ideal single-domain antibodies are identified, they are defined by their sequence and they can be renewably produced in E. coli at constant quality and without any further animal involvement. Since polyclonal secondary antibody production accounts for the largest share of immunized animals in the world, the anti-IgG single-domain antibodies described in this study have the potential to make a great step forward towards reducing animal use and further contribute to a future of standardized recombinant antibodies (Marx, 2013; Bradbury and Pluckthun, 2015a; Bradbury and Plückthun, 2015b).

[0132] We expect that our anti-IgG single-domain antibodies will replace polyclonal secondary antibodies in many of their applications, e.g. in Western blotting and immunofluorescence. For both applications, their site-specific and quantitative modification with fluorophores via maleimide chemistry creates superior reagents with predictable label density and position. Furthermore, the precise targeting of primary mouse antibodies at the kappa chain with a specific Nanobody® could substantially reduce the label displacement in super-resolution microscopy. In the future, we will also explore the direct coupling of anti-IgG single-domain antibodies with engineered cysteines onto colloidal gold particles for electron microscopy, which also suffers from the large linkage error introduced by bulky secondary antibodies.

[0133] Due to their monovalent and monoclonal nature, anti-IgG single-domain antibodies do not crosslink primary antibodies and we exploited this for a one-step immunostaining workflow that saves valuable hands-on time and can also be extended to Western blotting. We envision that for routine stainings, preformed complexes of primary antibodies and labeled single-domain antibodies can be prepared as stock solutions or simply bought from commercial suppliers. Due to the high affinity of the described single-domain antibodies, the same strategy also enables multicolor immunostainings based on a single IgG subclass, which could also be relevant for flow cytometry sorting of specific cell types. This would be a cheaper and more flexible alternative to differentially labeled primary antibodies, it does not pose the risk of inactivating an antigen-binding site and it can easily be done if only small amounts of primary antibody are available.

[0134] Further, since the DNA sequences of these anti-IgG single-domain antibodies are essentially synthetic building blocks, they can be genetically appended to the multitude of available tags, fluorescent proteins or enzymes to generate fusion proteins with novel functions for tailored applications in basic research and medical diagnostics, and also become valuable tools for immunology to study Fc or B cell receptors and downstream signaling cascades. Furthermore, anti-IgG single-domain antibodies equipped with protease-cleavable affinity tags (Pleiner et al., 2015) will allow the native isolation of any antibody-target complex e.g. for structural studies by cryo-EM or functional assays. Even though the here presented anti-IgG single-domain antibody toolbox is already highly optimized, we will continue to extend it by identifying new single-domain antibodies that decorate complementary binding sites and thus allow a further signal enhancement, and combine them with additional functional elements. In any case, it will be an open resource for all interested labs.

REFERENCES

[0135] Arbabi Ghahroudi, M., Desmyter, A., Wyns, L., Hamers, R. & Muyldermans, S. (1997) Selection and identification of single domain antibody fragments from camel heavy-chain antibodies. FEBS Lett, 414, 521-526.
[0136] Balzarotti, F., Eilers, Y., Gwosch, K. C., Gynnå, A. H., Westphal, V., Stefani, F. D., Elf, J. & Hell, S. W. (2017) Nanometer resolution imaging and tracking of fluorescent molecules with minimal photon fluxes. Science, 355, 606-612.
[0137] Bates, M., Dempsey, G. T., Chen, K. H. & Zhuang, X. (2012) Multicolor super-resolution fluorescence imaging via multi-parameter fluorophore detection. Chemphyschem, 13, 99-107.
[0138] Bates, M., Huang, B., Dempsey, G. T. & Zhuang, X. (2007) Multicolor super-resolution imaging with photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Science, 317, 1749-1753.
[0139] Bradbury, A. & Plückthun, A. (2015a) Reproducibility: Standardize antibodies used in research. Nature, 518, 27-29.
[0140] Bradbury, A. R. & Pluckthun, A. (2015b) Getting to reproducible antibodies: the rationale for sequenced recombinant characterized reagents. Protein Eng Des Sel, 28, 303-305.
[0141] Cordes, V. C., Reidenbach, S. & Franke, W. W. (1995) High content of a nuclear pore complex protein in cytoplasmic annulate lamellae of Xenopus oocytes. Eur J Cell Biol, 68, 240-255.
[0142] Cordes, V. C., Reidenbach, S., Rackwitz, H. R. & Franke, W. W. (1997) Identification of protein p270/Tpr as a constitutive component of the nuclear pore complex-attached intranuclear filaments. J Cell Biol, 136, 515-529.
[0143] Desmyter, A., Spinelli, S., Roussel, A. & Cambillau, C. (2015) Camelid nanobodies: killing two birds with one stone. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 32C, 1-8.
[0144] Frey, S. & Görlich, D. (2014) A new set of highly efficient, tag-cleaving proteases for purifying recombinant proteins. J Chromatogr A, 1337, 95-105.
[0145] Göttfert, F., Pleiner, T., Heine, J., Westphal, V., Görlich, D., Sahl, S. J. & Hell, S. W. (2017) Strong signal increase in STED fluorescence microscopy by imaging regions of subdiffraction extent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 114, 2125-2130.
[0146] Gray, A. C., Sidhu, S. S., Chandrasekera, P. C., Hendriksen, C. F. & Borrebaeck, C. A. (2016) Animal-Friendly Affinity Reagents: Replacing the Needless in the Haystack. Trends Biotechnol, 34, 960-969.
[0147] Hamers-Casterman, C., Atarhouch, T., Muyldermans, S., Robinson, G., Hamers, C., Songa, E. B., Bendahman, N. & Hamers, R. (1993) Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature, 363, 446-448.
[0148] Helma, J., Cardoso, M. C., Muyldermans, S. & Leonhardt, H. (2015) Nanobodies and recombinant binders in cell biology. J Cell Biol, 209, 633-644.
[0149] Huang, B., Babcock, H. & Zhuang, X. (2010) Breaking the diffraction barrier: super-resolution imaging of cells. Cell, 143, 1047-1058.
[0150] Huang, F., Sirinakis, G., Allgeyer, E. S., Schroeder, L. K., Duim, W. C., Kromann, E. B., Phan, T., Rivera-Molina, F. E., Myers, J. R., Irnov, I., Lessard, M., Zhang, Y., Handel, M. A., Jacobs-Wagner, C., Lusk, C. P., Rothman, J. E., Toomre, D., Booth, M. J. & Bewersdorf, J. (2016) Ultra-High Resolution 3D Imaging of Whole Cells. Cell, 166, 1028-1040.
[0151] Hülsmann, B. B., Labokha, A. A. & Görlich, D. (2012) The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model. Cell, 150, 738-751.
[0152] Kijanka, M., Dorresteijn, B., Oliveira, S. & van Bergen en Henegouwen, P. M. (2015) Nanobody-based cancer therapy of solid tumors. Nanomedicine (Lond), 10, 161-174.
[0153] Krainer, F. W. & Glieder, A. (2015) An updated view on horseradish peroxidases: recombinant production and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 99, 1611-1625.
[0154] Lam, S. S., Martell, J. D., Kamer, K. J., Deerinck, T. J., Ellisman, M. H., Mootha, V. K. & Ting, A. Y. (2015) Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nat Methods, 12, 51-54.
[0155] Liu, L., Spurrier, J., Butt, T. R. & Strickler, J. E. (2008) Enhanced protein expression in the baculovirus/insect cell system using engineered SUMO fusions. Protein Expr Purif, 62, 21-28.
[0156] Martell, J. D., Deerinck, T. J., Sancak, Y., Poulos, T. L., Mootha, V. K., Sosinsky, G. E., Ellisman, M. H. & Ting, A. Y. (2012) Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy. Nat Biotechnol, 30, 1143-1148.
[0157] Marx, V. (2013) Calling the next generation of affinity reagents. Nat Methods, 10, 829-833.
[0158] McMahon, C., Baier, A. S., Zheng, S., Pascolutti, R., Ong, J. X., Erlandson, S. C., Hilger, D., Ring, A. M., Manglik, A. & Kruse, A. C. (2017) Platform for rapid nanobody discovery in vitro. bioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/151043.
[0159] Moutel, S., Bery, N., Bernard, V., Keller, L., Lemesre, E., de Marco, A., Ligat, L., Rain, J. C., Favre, G., Olichon, A. & Perez, F. (2016) NaLi-H1: A universal synthetic library of humanized nanobodies providing highly functional antibodies and intrabodies. Elife, 5,
[0160] Muyldermans, S. (2013) Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies. Annu Rev Biochem, 82, 775-797.
[0161] Pleiner, T., Bates, M., Trakhanov, S., Lee, C. T., Schliep, J. E., Chug, H., Böhning, M., Stark, H., Urlaub, H. & Görlich, D. (2015) Nanobodies: site-specific labeling for super-resolution imaging, rapid epitope-mapping and native protein complex isolation. Elife, 4, e11349.
[0162] Reardon, S. (2016) US government issues historic $3.5-million fine over animal welfare. Nature, doi: 10.1038/nature.2016.19958.
[0163] Ries, J., Kaplan, C., Platonova, E., Eghlidi, H. & Ewers, H. (2012) A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies. Nat Methods, 9, 582-584.
[0164] Rust, M. J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. (2006) Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods, 3, 793-795.
[0165] Sahl, S. J., Hell, S. W. & Jakobs, S. (2017) Fluorescence nanoscopy in cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
[0166] Shen, H. (2013) Discovery of goat facility adds to antibody provider's woes. Nature, doi: 10.1038/nature.2013.12203.
[0167] Szymborska, A., de Marco, A., Daigle, N., Cordes, V. C., Briggs, J. A. & Ellenberg, J. (2013) Nuclear pore scaffold structure analyzed by super-resolution microscopy and particle averaging. Science, 341, 655-658.
[0168] Traenkle, B. & Rothbauer, U. (2017) Under the Microscope: Single-Domain Antibodies for Live-Cell Imaging and Super-Resolution Microscopy. Front Immunol, 8, 1030.
[0169] Van Bockstaele, F., Holz, J. B. & Revets, H. (2009) The development of nanobodies for therapeutic applications. Curr Opin Investig Drugs, 10, 1212-1224.
[0170] Weber, K., Rathke, P. C. & Osborn, M. (1978) Cytoplasmic microtubular images in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue culture cells by electron microscopy and by immunofluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 75, 1820-1824.
[0171] Xu, K., Babcock, H. P. & Zhuang, X. (2012) Dual-objective STORM reveals three-dimensional filament organization in the actin cytoskeleton. Nat Methods, 9, 185-188.
[0172] Zimmermann, I., Egloff, P., Hutter, C., Stohler, P., Bocquet, N., Hug, M., Siegrist, M., Svacha, L., Gera, J. & Gmuer, S. (2017) Synthetic single domain antibodies for the conformational trapping of membrane proteins. bioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/168559.

SEQUENCE LISTING

[0173] As filed Jul. 17, 2025, and as accepted without errors in communication from the Patent Office Aug. 14, 2025.

Claims

The invention claimed is:

1. A combination comprising a plurality of different single domain antibodies or a plurality of different immune complexes comprising a single domain antibody bound to an IgG antibody, wherein the single domain antibodies are selected from a combination of several single domain antibodies recognizing the same type of IgG molecules, which bind to non-overlapping epitopes on said IgG molecules,

wherein the single domain antibodies are selected from:

(i) single domain antibodies directed against rabbit IgG of SEQ ID NOs. 1 or 2; or

(ii) single domain antibodies directed against mouse IgG of SEQ ID NOs. 3-34.

2. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the single domain antibodies are selected from a combination of

(i) single domain antibodies of SEQ ID NO. 5 and SEQ ID NO. 8,

(ii) single domain antibodies of SEQ ID NO. 8 and SEQ ID NO. 19,

(iii) single domain antibodies of SEQ ID NO. 18 and SEQ ID NO. 19,

(iv) single domain antibodies of SEQ ID NO. 5 and SEQ ID NO. 18,

(v) single domain antibodies of SEQ ID NO. 5 and SEQ ID NO. 25, or

(vi) single domain antibodies comprising the sequences as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 and SEQ ID NO. 2.

3. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the single domain antibodies are selected from a combination of 2 or 3 single domain antibodies.

4. The combination according to claim 1, wherein the same type of IgG molecules are selected from the group consisting of mouse IgG1, mouse IgG2a and rabbit IgG.

5. The combination according to claim 1, wherein said non-overlapping epitopes on said IgG molecules are epitopes on different regions on said IgG molecules.

6. The combination according to claim 5, wherein said different regions on said IgG molecules are selected from the group consisting of a light chain, a κ and/or λ light chain, and a Fc or hinge fragment of said IgG molecules.

7. The combination according to claim 5, wherein said epitopes are on the light chain of said IgG molecules.

8. The combination according to claim 5, wherein said epitopes are on the κ and/or λ light chain of said IgG molecules.

9. The combination according to claim 5, wherein said epitopes are on the Fc or hinge fragment of said IgG molecules.

10. A combination comprising a plurality of different single domain antibodies or a plurality of different immune complexes comprising a single domain antibody bound to an IgG antibody, wherein the single domain antibodies are selected from a combination of several single domain antibodies recognizing the same type of IgG molecules, which bind to non-overlapping epitopes on said IgG molecules,

wherein at least one single domain antibody of said combination

(i) is directed against rabbit IgG of SEQ ID NOs. 1 or 2; or

(ii) is directed against mouse IgG of SEQ ID NOs. 3-34.

11. A combination comprising a plurality of different single domain antibodies comprising a single domain antibody bound to an IgG antibody, wherein the single domain antibodies are selected from a combination of several single domain antibodies recognizing the same type of IgG molecules, which bind to non-overlapping epitopes on said IgG molecules,

wherein the single domain antibodies are selected from a combination of:

(i) the single domain antibodies comprising amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO. 5 and SEQ ID NO. 8;

(ii) the single domain antibodies comprising the amino acid sequence of SEQ ID NO. 8 and SEQ ID NO. 19;

(iii) the single domain antibodies comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO. 18 and SEQ ID NO. 19;

(iv) the single domain antibodies comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO. 5 and SEQ ID NO. 18;

(v) the single domain antibodies comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO. 5 and SEQ ID NO. 25; or

(vi) the single domain antibodies comprising the amino acid sequences of SEQ ID NO:1 and SEQ ID NO:2.

Patent Citations (4)

Patent	Date	Cited By
WO1/44301(A1)	2001-06-01	Applicant
WO2/48193(A2)	2002-06-01	Applicant
WO2/48193(A3)	2002-06-01	Applicant
WO2009/011572(A1)	2009-01-01	Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (47)

De Genst et al., “Antibody repertoire development in camelids,” Dev. Comp. Immunol. 2006, vol. 30, pp. 187-198.Examiner
Sircar et al., “Analysis and Modeling of the Variable Region of Camelid Single-Domain Antibodies,” J. Immunol., 2011, vol. 186, pp. 6357-6367.Examiner
Zabetakis et al., “Contributions of the complementarity determining regions to the thermal stability of a single-domain antibody,” PLoS One, 2013, 8(10):e77678, 7 pages.Examiner
Rudikoff et al., “Single amino acid substitution altering antigen-binding specificity,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1982, vol. 79, pp. 1979-1983.Examiner
Zhu et al., “50 Years of Antibody Numbering Schemes: A Statistical and Structural Evaluation Reveals Key Differences and Limitations,” Antibodies, 2024, vol. 13(4):99, pp. 1-23.Examiner
Arbabi Ghahroudi, M., Desmyter, A., Wyns, L., Hamers, R. & Muyldermans, S. (1997) Selection and identification of single domain antibody fragments from camel heavy-chain antibodies. FEBS Lett, 414, 521-526.Applicant
Balzarotti, F., Eilers, Y., Gwosch, K.C., Gynna, A.H., Westphal, V., Stefani, F.D., Elf, J. & Hell, S.W. (2017) Nanometer resolution imaging and tracking of fluorescent molecules with minimal photon fluxes. Science, 355, 606-612.Applicant
Bates, M., Dempsey, G.T., Chen, K.H. & Zhuang, X. (2012) Multicolor super-resolution fluorescence imaging via multi-parameter fluorophore detection. Chemphyschem, 13, 99-107.Applicant
Bates, M., Huang, B., Dempsey, G.T. & Zhuang, X. (2007) Multicolor super-resolution imaging with photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Science, 317, 1749-1753.Applicant
Bradbury, A. & Pluckthun, A. (2015a) Reproducibility: Standardize antibodies used in research. Nature, 518, 27-29.Applicant
Bradbury, A.R. & Pluckthun, A. (2015b) Getting to reproducible antibodies: the rationale for sequenced recombinant characterized reagents. Protein Eng Des Sel, 28, 303-305.Applicant
Cordes, V.C., Reidenbach, S. & Franke, W.W. (1995) High content of a nuclear pore complex protein in cytoplasmic annulate lamellae of Xenopus oocytes. Eur J Cell Biol, 68, 240-255.Applicant
Cordes, V.C., Reidenbach, S., Rackwitz, H.R. & Franke, W.W. (1997) Identification of protein p270/Tpr as a constitutive component of the nuclear pore complex-attached intranuclear filaments. J Cell Biol, 136, 515-529.Applicant
Desmyter, A., Spinelli, S., Roussel, A. & Cambillau, C. (2015) Camelid nanobodies: killing two birds with one stone. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 32, 1-8.Applicant
Frey, S. & Görlich, D. (2014) A new set of highly efficient, tag-cleaving proteases for purifying recombinant proteins. J Chromatogr A, 1337, 95-105.Applicant
Gottfert, F., Pleiner, T., Heine, J., Westphal, V., Gorlich, D., Sahl, S.J. & Hell, S.W. (2017) Strong signal increase in STED fluorescence microscopy by imaging regions of subdiffraction extent. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 114, 2125-2130.Applicant
Gray, A.C., Sidhu, S.S., Chandrasekera, P.C., Hendriksen, C.F. & Borrebaeck, C.A. (2016) Animal-Friendly Affinity Reagents: Replacing the Needless in the Haystack. Trends Biotechnol, 34, 960-969.Applicant
Hamers-Casterman, C., Atarhouch, T., Muyldermans, S., Robinson, G., Hamers, C., Songa, E.B., Bendahman, N. & Hamers, R. (1993) Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature, 363, 446-448.Applicant
Helma, J., Cardoso, M.C., Muyldermans, S. & Leonhardt, H. (2015) Nanobodies and recombinant binders in cell biology. J Cell Biol, 209, 633-644.Applicant
Huang, B., Babcock, H. & Zhuang, X. (2010) Breaking the diffraction barrier: super-resolution imaging of cells. Cell, 143, 1047-1058.Applicant
Huang, F., Sirinakis, G., Allgeyer, E.S., Schroeder, L.K., Duim, W.C., Kromann, E.B., Phan, T., Rivera-Molina, F.E., Myers, J.R., Irnov, I., Lessard, M., Zhang, Y., Handel, M.A., Jacobs-Wagner, C., Lusk, C.P., Rothman, J.E., Toomre, D., Booth, M.J. & Bewersdorf, J. (2016) Ultra-High Resolution 3D Imaging of Whole Cells. Cell, 166, 1028-1040.Applicant
Hülsmann, B.B., Labokha, A.A. & Görlich, D. (2012) The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model. Cell, 150, 738-751.Applicant
Kijanka, M., Dorresteijn, B., Oliveira, S. & van Bergen en Henegouwen, P.M. (2015) Nanobody-based cancer therapy of solid tumors. Nanomedicine (Lond), 10, 161-174.Applicant
Krainer, F.W. & Glieder, A. (2015) An updated view on horseradish peroxidases: recombinant production and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 99, 1611-1625.Applicant
Lam, S.S., Martell, J.D., Kamer, K.J., Deerinck, T.J., Ellisman, M.H., Mootha, V.K. & Ting, A.Y. (2015) Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nat Methods, 12, 51-54.Applicant
Liu, L., Spurrier, J., Butt, T.R. & Strickler, J.E. (2008) Enhanced protein expression in the baculovirus/insect cell system using engineered SUMO fusions. Protein Expr Purif, 62, 21-28.Applicant
Martell, J.D., Deerinck, T.J., Sancak, Y., Poulos, T.L., Mootha, V.K., Sosinsky, G.E., Ellisman, M.H. & Ting, A.Y. (2012) Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy. Nat Biotechnol, 30, 1143-1148.Applicant
Marx, V. (2013) Calling the next generation of affinity reagents. Nat Methods, 10, 829-833.Applicant
McMahon, C., Baier, A.S., Zheng, S., Pascolutti, R., Ong, J.X., Erlandson, S.C., Hilger, D., Ring, A.M., Manglik, A. & Kruse, A.C. (2017) Platform for rapid nanobody discovery in vitro. bioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/151043.Applicant
Moutel, S., Bery, N., Bernard, V., Keller, L., Lemesre, E., de Marco, A., Ligat, L., Rain, J.C., Favre, G., Olichon, A. & Perez, F. (2016) NaLi—H1: A universal synthetic library of humanized nanobodies providing highly functional antibodies and intrabodies. eLife, 5; DOI:10.7554/eLife. 16228.Applicant
Muyldermans, S. (2013) Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies. Annu Rev Biochem, 82, 775-797.Applicant
Pleiner, T. et al., 2015, “Nanobodies: site-specific labeling for super-resolution imaging, rapid epitope-mapping and native protein complex isolation”, DOI:10.7554/eLife. 11349.001.Applicant
Reardon, S. (2016) US government issues historic $3.5-million fine over animal welfare. Nature, doi:10.1038/nature.2016.19958.Applicant
Ries, J., Kaplan, C., Platonova, E., Eghlidi, H. & Ewers, H. (2012) A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies. Nat Methods, 9, 582-584.Applicant
Rust, M.J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. (2006) Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods, 3, 793-795.Applicant
Sahl, S.J., Hell, S.W. & Jakobs, S. (2017) Fluorescence nanoscopy in cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol, vol. 18, 685-701.Applicant
Shen, H. (2013) Discovery of goat facility adds to antibody provider's woes. Nature, doi:10.1038/nature.2013.12203.Applicant
Szymborska, A., de Marco, A., Daigle, N., Cordes, V.C., Briggs, J.A. & Ellenberg, J. (2013) Nuclear pore scaffold structure analyzed by super-resolution microscopy and particle averaging. Science, 341, 655-658.Applicant
Traenkle, B. & Rothbauer, U. (2017) Under the Microscope: Single-Domain Antibodies for Live-Cell Imaging and Super-Resolution Microscopy. Front Immunol, 8, 1030.Applicant
Van Bockstaele, F., Holz, J.B. & Revets, H. (2009) The development of nanobodies for therapeutic applications. Curr Opin Investig Drugs, 10, 1212-1224.(Abstract only).Applicant
Weber, K., Rathke, P.C. & Osborn, M. (1978) Cytoplasmic microtubular images in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue culture cells by electron microscopy and by immunofluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A, 75, 1820-1824.Applicant
Xu, K., Babcock, H.P. & Zhuang, X. (2012) Dual-objective STORM reveals three-dimensional filament organization in the actin cytoskeleton. Nat Methods, 9, 185-188.Applicant
Zimmermann, I., Egloff, P., Hutter, C., Stohler, P., Bocquet, N., Hug, M., Siegrist, M., Svacha, L., Gera, J. & Gmuer, S. (2017) Synthetic single domain antibodies for the conformational trapping of membrane proteins. bioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/168559.Applicant
Tu Zhui et al., “Preparation and characterization of novel lgG affinity resin coupling anti-Fc camelid single-domain antibodies”, Journal of Chromatography B: Biomedical Sciences & Applications, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 983, Jan. 14, 2015, pp. 26-31.Applicant
Els Beghein et al., “Nanobody Technology:A Versatile Toolkit for Microscopic Imaging, Protein-Protein Interaction Analysis, and Protein Function Exploration”, Frontiers in Immunology, vol. 8, Jul. 4, 2017.Applicant
Tino Pleiner et al., “A toolbox of anti-mouse and anti-rabbit IgG secondary nanobodies”, The Journal of Cell Biology : JCB, vol. 217, No. 3, Dec. 20, 2017, pp. 1143-1154.Applicant
Inoue et al., “Affinity transfer to a human protein by CDR3 grafting of camelid VHH,” Protein Science, 2011, vol. 20, pp. 1971-1981.Applicant

Abstract

Description

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

SEQUENCE LISTING

DESCRIPTION

[0008] A first aspect of the invention relates to a single-domain antibody directed against rabbit IgG comprising

- [0009] (a) a CDR3 sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2, or
- [0010] (b) a CDR3 sequence which has an identity of at least 80%, particularly at least 90% to a CDR3 sequence as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2.

[0011] In a particular embodiment, the single-domain antibody comprises

- [0012] (a) a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2, or
- [0013] (b) a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences which has an identity of at least 80%, particularly at least 90% to a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in SEQ ID NO. 1 or 2.

[0015] A further aspect of the invention relates to a single-domain antibody directed against mouse IgG comprising

- [0016] (a) a CDR3 sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34, or
- [0017] (b) a CDR3 sequence which has an identity of at least 80%, particularly at least 90% to a CDR3 sequence as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34.

[0018] In a particular embodiment, the single-domain antibody comprises

- [0019] (a) a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34, or
- [0020] (b) a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences which has an identity of at least 80%, particularly at least 90% to a combination of CDR1, CDR2 and CDR3 sequences as shown in any one of SEQ ID NO. 3-34.

[0024] In a preferred embodiment, the single-domain antibody is specifically directed to one of the following groups of types of IgG molecules and epitopes:

- [0025] rabbit IgG Fab fragment
- [0026] rabbit IgG Fc fragment
- [0027] mouse IgG kappa light chain or mouse IgG lambda light chain
- [0028] mouse IgG1, e.g. IgG1 Fc fragment, IgG1 hinge region, or IgG1 Fab fragment
- [0029] mouse IgG1/IgG2a, e.g. IgG1/IgG2a Fab fragment
- [0030] mouse IgG1/IgG2a/IgG2b, e.g. IgG1/IgG2a/IgG2b Fab fragment
- [0031] mouse IgG2a, e.g. IgG2a Fc fragment or IgG2a hinge region
- [0032] mouse IgG2a/2b, e.g. IgG2a/IgG2b Fc fragment
- [0033] mouse IgG2b, e.g. IgG2b Fab fragment
- [0034] mouse IgG3, e.g. IgG3 Fc fragment
- [0035] mouse IgG2a/3, e.g. IgG3 Fc fragment

[0037]

TABLE 1

SEQ ID	Nb ID	Isotype specificity	Epitope	Species specificity


1	TP896	N/A	Fab	Rabbit only
2	TP897	N/A	Fc	Rabbit, Guinea pig, Human (weak)
3	TP974	Kappa chain	—	Mouse, Guinea pig (weak)
4	TP1079	Kappa chain	—	Mouse, Guinea pig (weak)
5	TP1170	Kappa chain	—	Mouse, Guinea pig (weak)
6	TP975	Kappa chain	—	Mouse only
7	TP1014	Lambda chain	—	Mouse, Rat, Rabbit (weak)
8	TP1107	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat, Human (weak)
9	TP878	IgG1	Fc	Mouse only
10	TP879	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat
11	TP1104	IgG1	Fc	Mouse only
12	TP881	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat (weak)
13	TP882	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat
14	TP883	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat, Human (weak)
15	TP884	IgG1	Fc	Mouse, Rat (weak)
16	TP894	IgG1	Fc	Mouse only
17	TP895	IgG1	Fc	Mouse only
18	TP885	IgG1	Hinge (?)	Mouse, Rat
19	TP886	IgG1	Fab (κ + λ)	Mouse only
20	TP887	IgG1/IgG2a	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
21	TP888	IgG1/IgG2a	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
22	TP889	IgG1/IgG2a	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
23	TP890	IgG1/IgG2a	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
24	TP1106	IgG1/IgG2a/IgG2b	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
25	TP1129	IgG2a	Fc	Mouse only
26	TP921	IgG2a	Fc	Mouse only
27	TP922	IgG2a	Fc	Mouse only
28	TP923	IgG2a	Fc	Mouse only
29	TP926	IgG2a	Hinge (?)	Mouse only
30	TP925	IgG2a/2b	Fc	Mouse only
31	TP979	IgG2b	Fab (κ only)	Mouse, Guinea pig
32	TP984	IgG2b	Fab (κ only)	Mouse only
33	TP924	IgG3	Fc	Mouse, Rabbit
34	TP929	IgG2a/3	Fc	Mouse, Rabbit (weak)

N/A = not applicable; Fab = Fragment antigen-binding; Fc = Fragment crystallisable; κ = kappa light chain; λ = lambda light chain.

[0039]

TABLE 2

					FW
	FWI		CDR1		II		CDR2
SEQ	SEQ		SEQ		SEQ		SEQ
ID	ID	FW I	ID	CDR1	ID	FW II	ID	CDR2

1	66	QVQLVESGGGLAQPGGSLRLSCAVS	67	GFRFSFYQMT	68	WVRQAPGKGLEWVA	69	DINSAGGT

2	72	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGDSLRLSCVAS	73	GRSLDGATMR	74	WYRQAPGKEREFVA	75	GIFWDEIG

3	78	QVQLVESGGGWVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	79	GFTFSSYAMS	80	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	81	AIDTGGGY

4	85	QVQLVESGGGLVLPGGSLRLSCVAS	86	GFTFSDTAMM	87	WVRQAPGKGREWVA	88	AIDTGGSS

5	91	QVQLVESGGGWVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	92	GFTFSDTAMM	93	WVRQAPGKGREWVA	94	AIDTGGGY

6	97	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	98	GFTFSNYDMS	99	WVRQAPGKGLEWVS	100	AISSGGGS

7	103	QVQLVESGGGEVQAGGSLRLSCAAS	104	GRTFSRNVMG	105	WFRQAPGKEREFLA	106	AINWSGNS

8	109	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	110	GFTFSDTWMN	111	WVRQAPGKGLYWIS	112	AINPDGGN

9	115	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGGSLRLSCAAS	116	GSIFSINAMA	117	WYRHRPGMQRERVA	118	AISSGGT

10	121	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCVVS	122	GGTMNAYAIG	123	WFRQAPGKEREAVS	124	CITSNSKY

11	127	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCTAS	128	GFTFSDSPMT	129	WARQAPGKRLEWVS	130	TISSDGEK

12	133	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAF	134	GFTFSNYYMN	135	WVRQAPGKGLEWIS	136	GINSGGGT

13	139	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLTLSCATS	140	GFSLDYYSIG	141	WFRQAPGKEREGVS	142	CISSTGGS

14	145	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	146	GFTLDYYAIG	147	WFRQAPGKEREGVA	148	CITSSEGS

15	151	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLTLSCVIS	152	GFRMDIATMS	153	WVRQAPGKGLEWVA	154	GIINYRNF

16	157	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAVS	158	GLTLDFKGIG	159	WFRQAPGKEREGVS	160	CINPSDSS

17	163	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	164	GFTLDYYAIG	165	WFRQAPGKEHEGVS	166	CISPSGGS

18	169	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGGSVRLSCAAS	170	GFTFSSYYMT	171	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	172	AINTGGDA

19	175	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	176	GFTFANYYMS	177	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	178	AINTLGGK

20	181	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGGSLRLSCAAS	182	GRTFSTYIMG	183	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	184	AITWIGGS

21	187	QVQLVESGGGLVQDGGSLRLSCAAS	188	GRTFSVYAMG	189	WFRQAPGKEREFVA	190	AISWIGGS

22	193	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGDSLRLSCTAS	194	GRTFSTYAMG	195	WFRQAPGKEREFVA	196	AISWIGGS

23	199	QVQLVESGGEAVQTGGSLRLSCAAS	200	GRTFSTYLMG	201	WFRQAPGKEREFVA	202	AISWIGGS

24	205	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLYCAAS	206	GRTDTTYALG	207	WFRQPPGKERQFVA	208	SITWIGGA

25	211	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCVAS	212	GFTFSSAYMS	213	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	214	TISTGGGI

26	217	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCVAS	218	GFTFSSAYMS	219	WVRQAPGKGPEWVS	220	TISTGGGI

27	224	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	225	GFTFSSYYMS	226	WVRQAPGKGLEWVS	227	DISTDGGR

28	230	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGESLTLSCAAS	231	GFTFSNVAMS	232	WVRQAPRKGLEWVS	233	SISSDGGR

29	236	QVQLVESGGGLVQAGGSLRLSCAAS	237	ETIFSINVMG	238	WFRQAPGKERELVA	239	KISSVGS

30	242	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	243	ETIFSINVMG	244	WFRQAPGKERELVA	244	SISSDGGR

31	248	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	249	GFTLDYYAIG	250	WFRLAPGKEREGVS	251	CISSSGGS

32	254	QVQLVESGGGLVQGGGSLRLSCAAS	255	RSIFSINAMG	256	WYRQALGKERELVA	257	AISSGGS

33	260	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	261	GFTFSSYAMT	262	WVRQAPGKGLEWVG	263	DINGVGNY

34	266	QVQLVESGGGLVQPGGSLRLSCAAS	267	GFTLDYYAIG	268	WFRQAPGKEREGVS	269	CISSSSGR

	FW				FW
	III		CDR3		IV
SEQ	SEQ		SEQ		SEQ
ID	ID	FW III	ID	CDR3	ID	FW IV

1	70	TYYADSVKGRFAISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAK	35	GKFPVESRRHGGTAQWDEYDY	71	WGQGTRVTVSS

2	76	TEYADTAKGRFTISRDNAKNTIYLQMTNLRSEDTAMYYCNG	36	LVFGGEY	77	WGQGTQVTVSS

3	82	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLSPEDTALYYCAT	83	TYSGNYYSDYTIGNSDY	84	RGQGTLVTVSS

4	89	TYYADSVQGRFTISRDSAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTARYYCAK	37	TYSGNYYSNYTVANYGT	90	TGRGTLVTVSS

5	95	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTARYYCAK	37	TYSGNYYSNYTVANYGT	96	TGRGTLVTVSS

6	101	TYYVDSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAT	38	GSGPAFRLSGGSWSPRGDGS	102	RGQGTLVTVSS

7	107	IGYRDSVKGRFTASRDNVNNTLYLRMNNLKPEDTAVYYCAA	39	RGSSDYDVAMQGHEYTY	108	WGQGTQVTVSS

8	113	TAYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNMVYLQMDNLRPEDTAMYYCAK	40	GWVRLPDPDLV	114	RGQGTQVTVSS

9	119	TSYADSVKGRFTISRDNARDTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAMYYCAA	41	CPGDYTSTICNSDGMDY	120	WGKGTLVTVSS

10	125	TNYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKSTAYLQMNSLEPEDTAVYYCAA	42	AQFFNDGHQYCPNPNY	126	WGQGTQVTVSS

11	131	IGYRDAVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCLN	43	VVLVGREV	132	FSNGTLVTVSS

12	137	TAYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAK	44	GAVRLVAGALRPAD	138	WGQGTQVTVSS

13	143	TNYVDSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTGVYYCAA	45	YRRSGAYCTSGGQDY	144	WGKGTLVTVSS

14	149	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	46	AVTYASCNEYDY	150	SGQGTQVTVSS

15	155	TWYSDSVKGRFTISTDTAKSEVYLQMNSLKSEDTAVYYCAH	47	GGSDTATSRAI	156	RGQGTQVTVSS

16	161	AAYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNNLQPEDTAVYYCVA	48	FEQKNIYCSGYSLTLSARGVMDH	162	WGKGTLVTVSS

17	167	TNYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYSCVA	49	VARGTWGRGGVDRTTDQAMCIPR	168	WGKGTQVTVSS
				DPSVDF

18	173	TRYAESVKGRFTISRDNAKNMLYLQMNSLKPEDTALYYCGR	50	VPGYSDYRQGYDY	174	RGQGTLVTVSS

19	179	TKYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKSTLYLQMNSLKPEDTALYYCAR	51	EVTYYSGTYXLFGTKQEYDY	180	RGQGTQVTVSS

20	185	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDYAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	52	QMKFQITTMDSDYDY	186	WGQGTQVTVSS

21	191	TYSADSVKGRFTISREYAKNTLYLQMNSLRPEDTAVYYCAA	53	IFHREITTVPRKYDY	192	WGQGTQVTVSS

22	197	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDYAENTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	54	STMRSIDFYVTDFGS	198	WGQGTLVTVSS

23	203	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDYAENTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	55	TFKWEVTTTPDGYDY	204	WGQGTQVTVSS

24	209	TNYAASVKGRFTISKDLGTNTFNLQMNSLTPDDTAVYYCAA	56	AVVRQWPNAHQGAYDY	210	WGQGTQVTVSS

25	215	VNYADSVKGRFAISRDNAKNTLYLQMNKLKPEDTALYYCAS	57	NKGPHYHSDYFDSNLYDF	216	WGQGTLVTVSS

26	221	VNYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNKLKPEDTALYYCAS	222	NKGPHYYSDYFDSNQYDF	223	WGQGTQVTVSS

27	228	TLYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTALYFCAR	58	EGWEDTITEEPNDENY	229	WGKGTLVTVSS

28	234	TLYAASVKGRFTVSRDNAKNTLTLQMDSLKAEDTAVYYCTE	59	EEGGT	235	RGQGTQVTVSS

29	240	TYYADPVKGRFTISRDDTKNTLSLQMNSLKPEDTAMYYCAA	60	CARCFFVPRMTSAAAYGY	241	WGQGTQVTVSS

30	246	TTYGDSVQGRFTSSRDNAKNTAYLQMNHLKPEDTAVYYCAA	61	VRLSRGYLCRNYDMDY	247	WGKGTQVTVSS

31	252	TNYADSVKGRFTISRNNAKNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAL	62	GVGDGSSCPDSAYEYAY	253	WGQGTQVTVSS

32	258	TYYVDSVKGRFTISRDHVKNTLYLQMNSLKPEDTAMYYCAA	63	LQSWGSYPHDDY	259	WGQGTQVTVSS

33	264	TYYADSVKGRFTISRDNAKNTLYLQMNNLKPEDTAVYYCAP	64	GGAATVVGGPYDY	265	WGQGTQVTVSS

34	270	TDYVDSVKGRFTISRDNARNTVYLQMNSLKPEDTAVYYCAA	65	LERATMCPRDPTWYDY	271	WGQGTQVTVSS

[0044] Preferred embodiments of preferred anti-IgG single-domain antibodies of the invention specific for particular IgG subclasses are shown in Table 3:

[0045]

TABLE 3

Grouping	Group
Feature	Name	SEQ ID No.	Group Description

Binding to	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse IgG1
a particular	IgG1	3-24
IgG subclass	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse IgG2a
	IgG2a	20-30, 34
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse IgG2b
	IgG2b	24, 30-32
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No. 32	Binding to Mouse IgG3
	IgG3	and 33
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse Light
	light chain	3-7	chain independently of
			heavy chain subclass
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse Kappa
	Kappa chain	3-6	chain independently of
			heavy chain subclass

[0047] Table 4 indicates preferred embodiments of preferred anti-IgG single-domain antibodies targeting specific epitope regions on particular IgG sbtype molecules:

[0048]

TABLE 4

	Group
Grouping Feature	Name	SEQ ID No.	Group Description

Binding to a particular	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
region on IgG	IgG1 Fab	3-7, 20-24	IgG1 Fab fragment
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
	IgG1 Fc	8-17	IgG1 Fc fragment
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
	IgG2a FC	25-28, 30, 34	IgG2a Fc fragment
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
	IgG2a Fab	20-24	IgG2a Fab fragment
	All Mouse	SEQ ID No.	Binding to Mouse
	IgG2b Fab	31-32	IgG2b Fab fragment

[0061] Thus, the invention encompasses combinations of several single-domain antibodies.

[0064]

TABLE 5

Grouping	Group
Feature	Name	SEQ ID No.	Group Description

Additive	Boost	SEQ ID No. 5	Mouse Kappa chain and IgG1
Signal	mouse IgG1	and SEQ ID	Fc Binder, non-
Strength		No. 8	overlapping epitopes
	Boost	SEQ ID No. 8	Mouse IgG1 Fc and IgG1
	mouse IgG1	and SEQ ID	Fab Binder, non-
		No. 19	overlapping epitopes
	Boost	SEQ ID No. 18	Mouse IgG1 Hinge and IgG1
	mouse IgG1	and SEQ ID	Fab Binder, non-
		No. 19	overlapping epitopes
	Boost	SEQ ID No. 5	Mouse Kappa chain and IgG1
	mouse IgG1	and SEQ ID	Hinge Binder, non-
		No. 18	overlapping epitopes
	Boost	SEQ ID No. 5	Mouse Kappa chain and IgG2a
	mouse	and SEQ ID	Fc Binder, non-
	IgG2a	No. 25	overlapping epitopes
	Boost rabbit	SEQ ID No. 1	Rabbit IgG Fab and Fc Binder,
	IgG	and SEQ ID	non-overlapping
		No. 2	epitopes

[0070] Further, the invention is explained in more detail by the following figures and examples:

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

[0071] FIG. 1.

[0072] Characterization of the anti-IgG single-domain antibody toolbox.

[0075] FIG. 1—figure supplement 1.

[0076] Species crossreactivity profiling and native target IgG isolation.

[0080] FIG. 2.

[0081] Application of peroxidase-linked anti-IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0085] FIG. 2—figure supplement 1.

[0086] Anti-IgG single-domain antibody conjugation to HRP and fusion to APEX2.

[0089] FIG. 3.

[0090] Western blotting with infrared dye labeled anti-IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0094] FIG. 4.

[0095] Imaging with anti-IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0098] FIG. 4—figure supplement 1.

[0099] Immunofluorescence with anti-mouse IgG single-domain antibodies.

[0104] FIG. 5.

[0105] One-step immunostaining of Hela cells with anti-IgG single-domain antibodies.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Examples

1. Methods

1.1 Alpaca Immunization

1.2 Selection of Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

1.3 Expression and Purification of Untagged Single-Domain Antibodies

1.4 Site-Specific Fluorescent Labeling of Single-Domain Antibodies with Engineered Cysteines

1.5 Dot Blot Assay for Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibody Specificity Profiling

1.6 Native Isolation of IgG with Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

1.7 Western Blotting

1.8 Amplex™ UltraRed Assay

1.9 Immunofluorescence

1.10 Antibodies for Immunofluorescence

2. Results

2.1 a Comprehensive Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibody Toolbox

2.2 Western Blotting with Horseradish Peroxidase-Conjugated Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

2.3 Comparison with Commercially Available Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

2.4 Recombinant Ascorbate Peroxidase Fusion to Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

2.5 Western Blotting with Infrared Fluorophore-Linked Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

2.6 Single and Multi-Color Imaging with Anti-IgG Single-Domain Antibodies

2.7 Rapid One-Step Immunostaining and Co-Localization

3. Discussion

REFERENCES

[0135] Arbabi Ghahroudi, M., Desmyter, A., Wyns, L., Hamers, R. & Muyldermans, S. (1997) Selection and identification of single domain antibody fragments from camel heavy-chain antibodies. FEBS Lett, 414, 521-526.
[0136] Balzarotti, F., Eilers, Y., Gwosch, K. C., Gynnå, A. H., Westphal, V., Stefani, F. D., Elf, J. & Hell, S. W. (2017) Nanometer resolution imaging and tracking of fluorescent molecules with minimal photon fluxes. Science, 355, 606-612.
[0137] Bates, M., Dempsey, G. T., Chen, K. H. & Zhuang, X. (2012) Multicolor super-resolution fluorescence imaging via multi-parameter fluorophore detection. Chemphyschem, 13, 99-107.
[0138] Bates, M., Huang, B., Dempsey, G. T. & Zhuang, X. (2007) Multicolor super-resolution imaging with photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Science, 317, 1749-1753.
[0139] Bradbury, A. & Plückthun, A. (2015a) Reproducibility: Standardize antibodies used in research. Nature, 518, 27-29.
[0140] Bradbury, A. R. & Pluckthun, A. (2015b) Getting to reproducible antibodies: the rationale for sequenced recombinant characterized reagents. Protein Eng Des Sel, 28, 303-305.
[0141] Cordes, V. C., Reidenbach, S. & Franke, W. W. (1995) High content of a nuclear pore complex protein in cytoplasmic annulate lamellae of Xenopus oocytes. Eur J Cell Biol, 68, 240-255.
[0142] Cordes, V. C., Reidenbach, S., Rackwitz, H. R. & Franke, W. W. (1997) Identification of protein p270/Tpr as a constitutive component of the nuclear pore complex-attached intranuclear filaments. J Cell Biol, 136, 515-529.
[0143] Desmyter, A., Spinelli, S., Roussel, A. & Cambillau, C. (2015) Camelid nanobodies: killing two birds with one stone. Curr Opin Struct Biol, 32C, 1-8.
[0144] Frey, S. & Görlich, D. (2014) A new set of highly efficient, tag-cleaving proteases for purifying recombinant proteins. J Chromatogr A, 1337, 95-105.
[0145] Göttfert, F., Pleiner, T., Heine, J., Westphal, V., Görlich, D., Sahl, S. J. & Hell, S. W. (2017) Strong signal increase in STED fluorescence microscopy by imaging regions of subdiffraction extent. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 114, 2125-2130.
[0146] Gray, A. C., Sidhu, S. S., Chandrasekera, P. C., Hendriksen, C. F. & Borrebaeck, C. A. (2016) Animal-Friendly Affinity Reagents: Replacing the Needless in the Haystack. Trends Biotechnol, 34, 960-969.
[0147] Hamers-Casterman, C., Atarhouch, T., Muyldermans, S., Robinson, G., Hamers, C., Songa, E. B., Bendahman, N. & Hamers, R. (1993) Naturally occurring antibodies devoid of light chains. Nature, 363, 446-448.
[0148] Helma, J., Cardoso, M. C., Muyldermans, S. & Leonhardt, H. (2015) Nanobodies and recombinant binders in cell biology. J Cell Biol, 209, 633-644.
[0149] Huang, B., Babcock, H. & Zhuang, X. (2010) Breaking the diffraction barrier: super-resolution imaging of cells. Cell, 143, 1047-1058.
[0150] Huang, F., Sirinakis, G., Allgeyer, E. S., Schroeder, L. K., Duim, W. C., Kromann, E. B., Phan, T., Rivera-Molina, F. E., Myers, J. R., Irnov, I., Lessard, M., Zhang, Y., Handel, M. A., Jacobs-Wagner, C., Lusk, C. P., Rothman, J. E., Toomre, D., Booth, M. J. & Bewersdorf, J. (2016) Ultra-High Resolution 3D Imaging of Whole Cells. Cell, 166, 1028-1040.
[0151] Hülsmann, B. B., Labokha, A. A. & Görlich, D. (2012) The permeability of reconstituted nuclear pores provides direct evidence for the selective phase model. Cell, 150, 738-751.
[0152] Kijanka, M., Dorresteijn, B., Oliveira, S. & van Bergen en Henegouwen, P. M. (2015) Nanobody-based cancer therapy of solid tumors. Nanomedicine (Lond), 10, 161-174.
[0153] Krainer, F. W. & Glieder, A. (2015) An updated view on horseradish peroxidases: recombinant production and biotechnological applications. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol, 99, 1611-1625.
[0154] Lam, S. S., Martell, J. D., Kamer, K. J., Deerinck, T. J., Ellisman, M. H., Mootha, V. K. & Ting, A. Y. (2015) Directed evolution of APEX2 for electron microscopy and proximity labeling. Nat Methods, 12, 51-54.
[0155] Liu, L., Spurrier, J., Butt, T. R. & Strickler, J. E. (2008) Enhanced protein expression in the baculovirus/insect cell system using engineered SUMO fusions. Protein Expr Purif, 62, 21-28.
[0156] Martell, J. D., Deerinck, T. J., Sancak, Y., Poulos, T. L., Mootha, V. K., Sosinsky, G. E., Ellisman, M. H. & Ting, A. Y. (2012) Engineered ascorbate peroxidase as a genetically encoded reporter for electron microscopy. Nat Biotechnol, 30, 1143-1148.
[0157] Marx, V. (2013) Calling the next generation of affinity reagents. Nat Methods, 10, 829-833.
[0158] McMahon, C., Baier, A. S., Zheng, S., Pascolutti, R., Ong, J. X., Erlandson, S. C., Hilger, D., Ring, A. M., Manglik, A. & Kruse, A. C. (2017) Platform for rapid nanobody discovery in vitro. bioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/151043.
[0159] Moutel, S., Bery, N., Bernard, V., Keller, L., Lemesre, E., de Marco, A., Ligat, L., Rain, J. C., Favre, G., Olichon, A. & Perez, F. (2016) NaLi-H1: A universal synthetic library of humanized nanobodies providing highly functional antibodies and intrabodies. Elife, 5,
[0160] Muyldermans, S. (2013) Nanobodies: natural single-domain antibodies. Annu Rev Biochem, 82, 775-797.
[0161] Pleiner, T., Bates, M., Trakhanov, S., Lee, C. T., Schliep, J. E., Chug, H., Böhning, M., Stark, H., Urlaub, H. & Görlich, D. (2015) Nanobodies: site-specific labeling for super-resolution imaging, rapid epitope-mapping and native protein complex isolation. Elife, 4, e11349.
[0162] Reardon, S. (2016) US government issues historic $3.5-million fine over animal welfare. Nature, doi: 10.1038/nature.2016.19958.
[0163] Ries, J., Kaplan, C., Platonova, E., Eghlidi, H. & Ewers, H. (2012) A simple, versatile method for GFP-based super-resolution microscopy via nanobodies. Nat Methods, 9, 582-584.
[0164] Rust, M. J., Bates, M. & Zhuang, X. (2006) Sub-diffraction-limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nat Methods, 3, 793-795.
[0165] Sahl, S. J., Hell, S. W. & Jakobs, S. (2017) Fluorescence nanoscopy in cell biology. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol,
[0166] Shen, H. (2013) Discovery of goat facility adds to antibody provider's woes. Nature, doi: 10.1038/nature.2013.12203.
[0167] Szymborska, A., de Marco, A., Daigle, N., Cordes, V. C., Briggs, J. A. & Ellenberg, J. (2013) Nuclear pore scaffold structure analyzed by super-resolution microscopy and particle averaging. Science, 341, 655-658.
[0168] Traenkle, B. & Rothbauer, U. (2017) Under the Microscope: Single-Domain Antibodies for Live-Cell Imaging and Super-Resolution Microscopy. Front Immunol, 8, 1030.
[0169] Van Bockstaele, F., Holz, J. B. & Revets, H. (2009) The development of nanobodies for therapeutic applications. Curr Opin Investig Drugs, 10, 1212-1224.
[0170] Weber, K., Rathke, P. C. & Osborn, M. (1978) Cytoplasmic microtubular images in glutaraldehyde-fixed tissue culture cells by electron microscopy and by immunofluorescence microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 75, 1820-1824.
[0171] Xu, K., Babcock, H. P. & Zhuang, X. (2012) Dual-objective STORM reveals three-dimensional filament organization in the actin cytoskeleton. Nat Methods, 9, 185-188.
[0172] Zimmermann, I., Egloff, P., Hutter, C., Stohler, P., Bocquet, N., Hug, M., Siegrist, M., Svacha, L., Gera, J. & Gmuer, S. (2017) Synthetic single domain antibodies for the conformational trapping of membrane proteins. bioRxiv, doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/168559.