US 12,577,641 B2Grant
Wear resistant alloy
Issue Date:2026-03-17
•17 Claims
•2 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
An alloy produced by powder metallurgy including a non-amorphous matrix. The alloy consists of, in weight % (wt. %): C 0-0.15, Si 0-2.5, Mn 0-15, Cr 0-25, Mo 4-35, B 0.2-2.8, optional elements, balance Fe and/or Ni apart from impurities. The alloy comprises 3-35 volume % hard phase particles, the hard phase particles comprises at least one of borides, nitrides, carbides and/or combinations thereof, at least 90% of the hard phase particles have a size of less than 5 μm, and at least 50% of the hard phase particles have a size in the range of 0.3-3 μm.
Metadata
Assignee
- UDDEHOLMS AB
Inventor
- Magnus Tidesten
Application Information
Application Number:US 17/645,856
Filing Date:2021-12-23
Priority Date:2014-12-17
Art Unit:1733
Classifications
IPC:
C22C38/12C22C19/03C22C33/02C22C38/02C22C38/04C22C38/06C22C38/22C22C38/24C22C38/32C22C38/44C22C38/48C22C38/54
Field of Search:
C22C 38/12C22C 38/22C22C 38/32C22C 38/44C22C 38/54C22C 33/02C22C 33/0207C22C 33/0228C22C 33/0257C22C 33/0261C22C 33/0264C22C 33/0278C22C 33/0285C22C 33/0292
Patent Drawings (2 sheets)
Description
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/527,233, filed on May 16, 2017, which is a national stage entry from International Patent Application No. PCT/SE2015/051352, filed on Dec. 15, 2015, which claims priority to Swedish Patent Application No. 1550965-6, filed on Jul. 3, 2015, and European Patent Application No. 14198569.7, filed on Dec. 17, 2014, the entire contents of all of which are incorporated herein by reference.
FIELD OF THE INVENTION
[0002] The invention relates to a wear resistant Fe- and/or Ni-based alloy. The alloy is alloyed with boron in order to form hard phase particles.
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION
[0003] Nitrogen and vanadium alloyed powder metallurgy (PM) tool steels attained a considerable interest because of their unique combination of high hardness, high wear resistance and excellent galling resistance. These steels have a wide rang of applications where the predominant failure mechanisms are adhesive wear or galling. Typical areas of application include blanking and forming, fine blanking, cold extrusion, deep drawing and powder pressing. The basic steel composition is atomized, subjected to nitrogenation and thereafter the powder is filled into a capsule and subjected to hot isostatic pressing (HIP) in order to produce an isotropic steel. A high performance steel produced in this way is described in WO 00/79015 A1.
[0004] Although the known steel has a very attractive property profile there is a continuous strive for improvements of the tool material in order to further improve the surface quality of the products produced as well as to extend the tool life, in particular under severe working conditions, requiring a good resistance against galling and abrasive wear at the same time. In many applications it is a desire that the material also should be corrosion resistant.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0005] The object of the present invention is to provide powder metallurgy (PM) produced alloy having an improved property profile for advanced forming applications.
[0006] Another object of the present invention is to provide a powder metallurgy (PM) produced alloy having a composition and microstructure leading to improvements in the surface quality of products produced by the use of the alloy in tools and moulds.
[0007] The foregoing objects, as well as additional advantages are achieved to a significant measure by providing an alloy having a composition and microstructure as set out in the claims.
[0008] The invention is defined in the claims.
DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENT(S) OF THE INVENTION
[0009] The present invention relates to an alloy comprising a hard phase consisting mainly of multiple borides containing Fe and/or Ni in a Fe- and/or Ni-based matrix. Preferably, the matrix is hardenable. The double boride is of the type M2M′B2, where M and M′ stand for metals of the multiple boride. Said boride forming elements are generally selected from Cr, Mo, W, Ti, V, Nb, Ta, Hf and Co. In the present case M is Mo and M′ is Fe and/or Ni. However, the boride may contain substantial amounts of one or more of the other boride forming elements. However, in the following the double boride will be referred to as Mo2FeB2 for the Fe-based alloys although the boride also may contain Ni and one or more of the above mentioned boride forming elements. Similarly, in the Ni-based alloys the double boride will be referred to as Mo2NiB2. The size of the hard phase particles may be determined by microscopic image analysis. The size thus obtained is the diameter corresponding to the diameter of a circle with the same projected area as the particle, the Equivalent Circle Diameter (ECD).
[0010] The importance of the separate elements and their interaction with each other as well as the limitations of the chemical ingredients of the claimed alloy are briefly explained in the following. All percentages for the chemical composition of the steel are given in weight % (wt. %) throughout the description. The upper and lower limits of the individual elements may be freely combined within the limits set out herein.
Carbon (0-2.5%)
[0011] Carbon need not be present in Ni-based alloys. However, in many Fe-based alloys carbon need to be present. Low carbon contents like≤0.15%, ≤0.05%, ≤0.03 or even≤0.01% are used in different types of stainless steels. The lower limit may therefore be set to 0.005%, 0.01%, 0.02% or 0.03%. Carbon may be included in an amount of 0.02-0.9%, 0.05-0.5%, 0.05-0.2% or 0.05-0.25%, in particular to form fine precipitated NbC in Alumina Forming Austenitic (AFA) stainless steels. On the other hand, the minimum of carbon may in many tool steels be set to 0.1% or 0.2%, 0.3% or 0.35%. The upper limit for carbon is 2.5%. Carbon is important for the formation of carbides and for the hardening in tool steels. Preferably, the carbon content is adjusted in order to obtain 0.4-0.6% C dissolved in the matrix at the austenitizing temperature resulting in a high strength matrix after quenching. The austenitizing temperature is preferably 1080-1120° C. In any case, the amount of carbon should be controlled such that the amount of carbides of the type M23C6, M7C3, M6C, M2C and MC in the steel is limited. The upper limit may therefore be set to 2.1%, 1.5%, 1.3%, 1.0%, 0.8%, 0.6%, 0.5% or 0.45%.
Chromium (0-25%)
[0012] Chromium is commonly present in Ni- and Fe-based alloys. The lower limit is 0%.
[0013] However, in Fe-based alloys Chromium is in many applications present in contents of at least 0.5%, 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 3% or 3.5% in order to provide a sufficient hardenability. Cr is preferably higher for providing a good hardenability in large cross sections during heat treatment. If the chromium content is too high, this may lead to the formation of undesired carbides, such as M7C3. In addition, this may also increase the propensity of retained austenite in the microstructure. For achieving a good hardenability it is desirable to have at least 2% Cr, preferably 2.5%, 3%, 3.5% or 4% dissolved in the matrix. For stainless applications it is preferable that the alloy contains at least 11%, 12% or 13% Cr in the matrix. The lower limit may be set to 3.1%, 3.2%, 3.4%, 3.6%, 3.8%, 4.0% or 4.2%. The upper limit may be set to 7.0%, 6.5%, 6.0%, 5.4%, or 4.6%. On the other hand, chromium contents of more then 10%, preferably more than 12% are used for stainless applications. The upper limit for stainless alloys is 25% and may be set to 20%, 19%, 18%, 17%, 16%, 15%, 14% or 13%.
Molybdenum (4-35%)
[0014] Mo is the main element forming the hard boride. In the present invention, a high amount of Molybdenum is used in order to obtain a desired precipitation of the boride Mo2FeB2 in an amount of 3-35 vol. %. Molybdenum shall be present in an amount of at least 4%. The lower limit may be 5%, 6%, 7%, 8%, 9%, 10%, 11%, 12%, 13%, 14%, 15%, 16%, 17%, 18%, 19% or 20%. The upper limit is 35% in order to avoid problem with brittleness. The upper limit may be set to 34%, 33%, 32%, 31%, 30%, 29%, 28%, 27%, 26%, 25%, 24%, 23% or 22%. Preferred ranges include 8-32%, 12-30% and 15-25%. Mo is also known to have a very favourable effect on the hardenability is essential for attaining a good secondary hardening response. For this reason it is preferred that the amount of Mo remaining in the matrix after quenching from 1100° C. is 1.5-2.5%. However, too much Mo dissolved in the matrix after hardening may result in too high an amount of retained austenite and a reduced hardness. For this reason it is desirable to balance the Mo content to the Mo-containing hard boride phases such that the matrix does not contain more than 4% or 3.5% dissolved Mo, preferably not more than 3.2% Mo. A preferred range of dissolved Mo may be set to 2.1-3.1%. For this reason the ratio Mo/B may preferably be adjusted to the range 7-18, more preferably 9-12. Another reason for balancing the ratio Mo/B is to avoid to much surplus of Molybdenum, which may lead to the formation of the hexagonal phase M2C, where M mainly is Mo and/or V. The amount of the phase M2C may be limited to ≤1.5 vol. %, preferably ≤1 vol. % or even ≤0.5 vol. %.
Boron (0.2-2.8%)
[0015] Boron, which is the main hard phase-forming element, should be at least 0.2% so as to provide the minimum amount of 3% hard phase Mo2FeB2. The amount of B is limited to 2.8% for not making the alloy to brittle. The lower may be set to 0.3%, 0.4%, 0.5%, 0.6%, 0.7%, 0.8%, 0.9%, 1.0%, 1.1%, 1.2%, 1.3%, 1.4%, 1.5%, 1.6%, 1.7%, 1.8%, 1.9% or 2.0%. The upper limit may be set to 2.7%, 2.6%, 2.5%, 2.4%, 2.3% or 2.2%.
Tungsten (≤22%)
[0016] Tungsten may be present in an amount of up to 22% because high contents W are often used in Ni-based alloys, high speed steels (HSS) and in T-type tool steels. The effect of tungsten is similar to that of Mo. However, for attaining the same effect it is necessary to add twice as much W as Mo on a weight % basis. Tungsten is expensive and it also complicates the handling of scrap metal. In Fe-based alloys the maximum amount may therefore be limited to 3%, 2.5%, 2%, 1.9%, 1.8%, 1.7%, 1.6%, 1.5%, 1%, 0.5% or 0.3%.
Vanadium (≤15%)
[0017] Vanadium forms evenly distributed primary and secondary precipitated carbides of the type MC. In the inventive steel M is mainly vanadium but Cr and Mo may be present to some extent. The maximum addition of V is restricted to 15% and the preferred maximum amount is 5%. However, in the present case V is mainly added for obtaining a desired composition of the steel matrix before hardening. The addition may therefore be limited to 2.0%, 1.5%, 1.0%, 0.9%, 0.8%, 0.7%, 0.6% or 0.5%. The lower limit may be set to 0.05%, 0.1%, 0.12%, 0.14%, 0.16%, 0.15% or 0.2%. A preferred range is 0.1-0.5% V.
Niobium (≤15%)
[0018] Niobium is similar to vanadium in that it forms MC. However, for attaining the same effect it is necessary to add twice as much Nb as V on a weight % basis. Nb also results in a more angular shape of the MC. Hence, the maximum addition of Nb is restricted to 15% and the preferred maximum amount is 5%. The upper limit may be set to 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.3%, 0.1% or 0.05%. Niobium may be included to form fine precipitated NbC in Alumina Forming Austenitic (AFA) stainless steels. The preferred content is then 0.1-1.5%.
Silicon (≤2.5%)
[0019] Silicon may used for deoxidation. Si also increases the carbon activity and is beneficial for the machinability. For a good deoxidation, it is preferred to adjust the Si content to at least 0.1%. Si is therefore preferably present in an amount of 0.1-2.5%. The lower limit may be set to 0.15%, 0.2%, 0.25%, 0.3%, 0.35% or 0.4%. However, Si is a strong ferrite former and should be limited to 2.5%. The upper limit may be set to 1.5%, 1%, 0.8%, 0.7% or 0.6%. A preferred range is 0.2-0.8%. Si is not desired in high amount in certain alloys like some types of aluminium alloyed stainless steels. The upper limit may therefore also be set to 0.6%, 0.5%, 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.1% or 0.05%.
Manganese (0-15%)
[0020] Mn is an austenite former and increases the solubility for nitrogen in the alloy. Mn may therefore be present in amounts of up to 15%. Manganese contributes to improving the hardenability of steel and together with sulphur manganese contributes to improving the machinability by forming manganese sulphides. Manganese may therefore be present in a minimum content of 0.1%, preferably at least 0.2%. At higher sulphur contents manganese prevents red brittleness in the steel. The upper limit may be set to 10%, 5%, 2.5%, 1.5%, 1.2%, 1.0%, 0.8% or 0.6%. However, preferred ranges are 0.2-0.8% and 0.2-0.6% in Fe-based alloys.
Nickel
[0021] Nickel may be used as balance to make Ni-based products having Mo2NiB2 as the dominating hard phase. However, in the Fe-based alloys Ni is optional and may preferably be present in an amount of not more than 25%, 20% or 15%. It gives the steel a good hardenability and toughness. Nickel can be used for forming an intermetallic phase together with Al and is therefore used for precipitation strengthening in maraging steels. In addition, Ni is indispensible in AFA-alloys and is then often present in amounts in the range of 10-30%. Because of the expense, the nickel content in many steels is limited. Accordingly, the upper limited may be set to 5%, 2%, 1.0% or 0.3% in the Fe-based alloys.
Iron
[0022] Iron may be used as balance to make Fe-based products having Mo2FeB2 as the dominating hard phase. However, in the Ni-based alloys Fe is optional and may be present in an amount of not more than 15%. The upper limit may be 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4% or 3%.
Copper (≤5.0%)
[0023] Cu is an optional element, which may contribute to increasing the hardness and the corrosion resistance of the steel. The upper limit may be 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.9%, 0.7%, 0.5%, 0.3% or 0.1%. However, it is not possible to extract copper from the steel once it has been added. This drastically makes the scrap handling more difficult. For this reason, copper is normally not deliberately added.
Cobalt (≤20%)
[0024] Co is an optional element, which may be present in an amount of not more than 20% %. Co dissolves in iron (ferrite and austenite) and strengthens it whilst at the same time imparting high temperature strength. Co increases the Ms temperature. Co can substitute mainly Fe in the Mo2FeB2 boride. Cobalt is often used in high speed steels. However, Co is expensive. The upper limit may therefore be set to 8%, 7%, 6%, 5%, 4% or 3%. A preferred maximum content is 2%. However, scrap handling will be more difficult. For this reason, Co need not be deliberately added.
Ti, Ta, Zr, Hf, Y and REM
[0025] These elements can form borides, nitrides oxides and/or carbides and may be present in the alloy in the claimed ranges for one or more purposes such as altering the composition of the hard phases, improving the oxidation resistance. REM stands for Rare Earth Metals and includes the elements having the atomic number 21 or 57-71. However, for many applications none of these elements are deliberately added.
Phosphorous
[0026] P is an impurity element and a solid solution strengthening element. However, P tends to segregate to the grain boundaries, reduces the cohesion and thereby the toughness. P is therefore normally limited to ≤0.05%.
Sulphur (≤0.5%)
[0027] S contributes to improving the machinability of the steel. At higher sulphur contents there is a risk for red brittleness. Moreover, a high sulphur content may have a negative effect on the fatigue properties of the steel. The steel shall therefore contain ≤0.5%, preferably ≤0.03%.
Nitrogen (≤0.5%)
[0028] Nitrogen is an optional component. N can be present in solid solution but may also be found in the hard phase particles together with B and C. The upper limit may be 0.4%, 0.3%, 0.2%, 0.15%, 0.1%, 0.05% and 0.03%.
Aluminium (≤7%)
[0029] Aluminium is an optional component. Al can be added in order to deoxidise the alloy, for forming intermetallic compounds or for providing oxidation resistance. In particular, Aluminium can be used in ferritic alloys of the type FeCrAl or FeCrAlY as well as in Alumina Forming Austenitic (AFA) stainless steels. In the latter type of alloys the minimum content may be set to 0.8%, 1.0%, 1.2%, 1.4%, 1.6% or 2%. The lower limit for deoxidation may be set to 0.005%, 0.01% or 0.03%. If Al is used for forming a protective surface layer of alumina, then the lower limit may be set to 1%, 1.5%, 2%, 2.5% or 3%. The upper limit is 7% but may be set to 6%, 5%, 4.5%, 4% or 3.5%.
[0030] The steel may be used in powder form for additive manufacturing (AM), in particular by use of commercial units for laser melting or electron beam melting. It can thus be used for providing a wear resistant cladding on a substrate. The powder can also be used for flame spraying or the like.
[0031] The alloy produced by powder metallurgy, preferably by gas atomizing, and has a non-amorphous matrix, the alloy consists of in weight % (wt. %):
[0032]
| C | 0-2.5 | |
| Si | 0-2.5 | |
| Mn | 0-15 | |
| Mo | 4-35 | |
| B | 0.2-2.8 | |
| Cr | 0-25 | |
| V | ≤15 | |
| Nb | ≤15 | |
| Ti | ≤5 | |
| Ta | ≤5 | |
| Zr | ≤5 | |
| Hf | ≤5 | |
| Y | ≤3 | |
| Co | ≤20 | |
| Cu | ≤5 | |
| W | ≤22 | |
| S | ≤0.5 | |
| N | ≤0.5 | |
| Al | ≤7 | |
| REM | ≤0.5 | |
[0033] balance Fe and/or Ni apart from impurities, the alloy comprises 3-35 volume % hard phase particles of at least one of borides, nitrides, carbides and/or combinations thereof, preferably, at least 60% of the hard phase particles consist of Mo2FeB2 or Mo2NiB2. At least 90% of the hard phase particles have a size of less than 5 μm and at least 50% of the hard phase particles have a size in the range of 0.3-3 μm. It is preferred that the Mo/B ratio is adjusted to the range of 7-18 and that the matrix of the alloy does not contain more than 4% Mo. The steel composition and heat treatment can be selected to give the steel a ferritic, a martensitic, an austenitic or a duplex austenitic/ferritic matrix. The amount of retained austenite in a martensitic matrix may be restricted to 15 vol. %, 10 vol. %, 5 vol. % or 2 vol. %.
Example 1
[0034] 10 kg of an alloy having the composition (in wt. %) given below was melted in a laboratory furnace and subjected to Ar-gas atomizing.
[0035]
| C | 0.3 | |
| Si | 0.3 | |
| Mn | 0.3 | |
| Mo | 19 | |
| B | 2.1 | |
| Fe balance. | ||
[0036] The powder was sieved to <500 μm, filled in steel capsules having a diameter of 63 mm and a height of 150 mm. HlPing was performed at a temperature of 1150° C., the holding time was 2 hours and the pressure 110 MPa. The cooling rate was <1° C./s. The material thus obtained was forged at 1130° C. to the dimension 20×30 mm. Soft annealing was performed at 900° C. with a cooling rate of 10° C./h down to 750° C. and thereafter cooling freely in air. Hardening was performed by austenitizing at 1100° C. for 30 minutes followed by quenching in water followed by tempering. The result of the hardness testing after tempering is given in Table 1.
[0037] The amount of the hard phase was found to be 24 vol. % and the borides were found to have a small size. The area fraction of borides in different size classes is given in Table 2 below.
[0038]
| TABLE 1 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Hardness as a function of the tempering | ||
| temperature after hardening from 1100° C. | ||
| Tempering temperature | Hardness | |
| (° C.) | HRC | |
| 200 | 60 | |
| 300 | 56 | |
| 400 | 54 | |
| 500 | 53 | |
| 525 | 53 | |
| 550 | 54 | |
| 600 | 49 | |
[0039]
| TABLE 2 | ||
|---|---|---|
| Size distribution of the borides. | ||
| Size range (μm) | Area fraction (%) | |
| 0-1 | 6.3 | |
| 1-2 | 13.5 | |
| 2-3 | 4.0 | |
| 3-4 | 0.2 | |
[0040] The microstructure is shown in FIG. 1 . The high area fraction and the uniform distribution of the Mo2FeB2 borides results in a material having excellent anti-galling properties such that it would be possible to dispense with surface treatments like PVD, CVD and TD.
Example 2
[0041] An alloy having the composition given below was produced as described in Example
[0042]
| C | 0.32 | |
| Si | 0.44 | |
| Mn | 0.3 | |
| Mo | 19 | |
| B | 2 | |
| Cr | 11 | |
| V | 0.26 | |
| Fe balance. | ||
[0043] The amount of the hard phase Mo2FeB2 was found to be 25.1 vol. % and the borides were found to be fine and uniformly distributed in the matrix. The composition of the matrix after hardening was calculated with Termo-Calc software using the steel database. The matrix was found to contain 12.3% Cr and 2.8% Mo, which indicate a good corrosion resistance.
Example 3
[0044] An alloy having the composition given below was produced as described in Example 1 but Nitrogen gas was used for the atomizing.
[0045]
| C | 0.083 | |
| Si | 0.45 | |
| Mn | 0.64 | |
| Mo | 11.1 | |
| B | 1.0 | |
| Cr | 11.3 | |
| Nb | 0.7 | |
| Ni | 15.2 | |
| Al | 2.0 | |
| Fe balance. | ||
[0046] The amount of the hard phase Mo2FeB2 was found to be 12.6 vol. % and the borides were found to be fine and uniformly distributed in the matrix. In addition thereto the amount of MC was found to be 0.6%, where M is mainly Nb. The calculated matrix composition was found to contain 0.02% C, 12.0% Cr, 3% Mo, 17.4% Ni, 2.3% Al and 0.2% Nb. The alloy of this example can thus be classified as a boride reinforced Alumina Forming Austenitic (AFA) stainless steel.
Example 4
[0047] A boride reinforced precipitation hardening stainless steel was produced by gas atomizing. The steel alloy had the following composition (in wt. %):
[0048]
| C | 0.03 | |
| Si | 0.3 | |
| Mn | 0.3 | |
| Mo | 11.0 | |
| B | 1.1 | |
| Cr | 11.4 | |
| Ni | 7.5 | |
| Al | 1.4 | |
| Fe balance. | ||
[0049] The amount of the hard phase Mo2FeB2 was found to be 13.9 vol. % and the borides were found to be fine and uniformly distributed in the matrix. The calculated matrix composition was found to contain 0.035% C, 12.05% Cr, 2.2% Mo, 8.6% Ni and 1.6% Al. This steel is a maraging steel that can be hardened to a desired matrix hardness in the range of 40-52 HRC by aging at temperatures of 525° C. to 600° C. As a result of the highly alloyed matrix the steel was found to have an exceptional corrosion resistance and thus being very suitable mould material for plastic moulding of plastic and rubber containing corrosive additions.
[0050] The alloy of the present invention is useful for a wide range of applications. In particular, the steel is useful in applications requiring very high galling resistance.
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. An alloy produced by powder metallurgy and having a non-amorphous matrix, the alloy consists of in weight % (wt. %):
| C | 0-0.15 | |
| Si | 0-2.5 | |
| Mn | 0-15 | |
| Mo | 4-35 | |
| B | 0.2-2.8 | |
| Cr | 0-25 | |
| V | ≤15 | |
| Nb | ≤15 | |
| Ti | ≤5 | |
| Ta | ≤5 | |
| Zr | ≤5 | |
| Hf | ≤5 | |
| Y | ≤3 | |
| Co | ≤20 | |
| Cu | ≤5 | |
| W | ≤22 | |
| S | ≤0.5 | |
| N | ≤0.5 | |
| Al | ≤7 | |
| REM | ≤0.5 | |
Ni≤25, and
balance Fe apart from impurities,
wherein the alloy comprises 3-35 volume % hard phase particles,
the hard phase particles comprise at least one of borides, nitrides, carbides and/or combinations thereof,
at least 90% of the hard phase particles have a size of less than 5 μm,
at least 50% of the hard phase particles have a size in the range of 0.3-3 μm, and
at least 60% of the hard phase particles consist of Mo2FeB2 or Mo2NiB2.
2. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy fulfills at least one of the following conditions:
the alloy comprises 5-30 volume % hard phase particles,
at least 90% of the hard phase particles have a size of ≤3 μm,
at least 80% of the hard phase particles have a size in the range of 0.3-3 μm,
the alloy has a density of ≥98% of the theoretical density (TD),
the matrix of the alloy does not contain more than 4% Mo, and
the alloy does not contain more than 5 volume % retained austenite.
3. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy fulfills at least one of the following conditions:
| C | 0.005-0.15 | |
| Si | 0.1-1.5 | |
| Mn | 0.1-1.5 | |
| Mo | 8-30 | |
| Ni | ≤25 | |
| B | 0.5-2.5 | |
| Cr | 3-20 | |
| V | ≤5 | |
| Nb | 0.05-1.5 | |
| Ti | 0.05-1.5 | |
| Ta | 0.05-1 | |
| Zr | 0.05-1 | |
| Hf | 0.05-1 | |
| Y | 0.05-1 | |
| Co | ≤8 | |
| Cu | ≤0.5 | |
| W | ≤3 | |
| S | ≤0.03 | |
| N | ≤0.1 | |
| Al | 0.01-4.5 | |
at least 80% of the hard phase particles consist of Mo2FeB2, and/or
the matrix of the alloy does not contain more than 3.8% Mo.
4. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy fulfills at least one of the following conditions:
| Si | 0.2-0.8 | |
| Mn | 0.2-0.8 | |
| Mo | 12-25 | |
| B | 1.8-2.2 | |
| Cr | 3.0-16 | |
| V | 0.1-2.0 | |
| Al | 1.5-3.5 | |
| Nb | 0.3-1.5 | |
| Al | 2-5 | |
| Co | ≤2 | |
at least 90% of the hard phase particles consist of Mo2FeB2,
the matrix of the alloy does not contain more than 3.5% Mo, and
the alloy does not contain more than 2 volume % retained austenite.
5. The alloy according to claim 4, wherein the alloy has an austenitic matrix.
6. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy fulfills at least one of the following conditions:
| C | 0.02-0.15 | |
| Si | 0.2-0.6 | |
| Mn | 0.2-0.6 | |
| Mo | 4-15 | |
| B | 0.2-2.0 | |
| Cr | 10-25 | |
| V | ≤0.7 | |
| Nb | 0.5-1.5 | |
| Ni | 5-25 | |
| Al | 1-4. | |
7. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy fulfills at least one of the following conditions:
| Si | 0.2-0.6 | |
| Mn | 0.2-0.6 | |
| Cr | 10.0-15.0 | |
| V | 0.1-0.5 | |
| N | 0.01-0.07. | |
8. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy fulfills at least one of the following conditions:
| V | 0.2-0.4, and | |
| S | <0.003. | |
9. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises 15-25 volume % hard phase particles and wherein the size of the hard phase particles is ≤4 μm.
10. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy fulfils the following conditions:
| Si | 0.1-2.5, and | |
| Mn | 0.1-2.5, and | |
11. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy has been subjected to atomizing and hot isostatic pressing resulting in that the alloy is isotropic.
12. The alloy according to claim 1, consisting of, in weight % (wt. %):
| C | 0-0.15 | |
| Si | 0-2.5 | |
| Mn | 0-15 | |
| Mo | 4-35 | |
| B | 0.2-2.8 | |
| Cr | 0-25 | |
| Ni | 5-30 | |
| V | ≤15 | |
| Nb | ≤15 | |
| Ti | ≤5 | |
| Ta | ≤5 | |
| Zr | ≤5 | |
| Hf | ≤5 | |
| Y | ≤3 | |
| Co | ≤20 | |
| Cu | ≤5 | |
| W | ≤22 | |
| S | ≤0.5 | |
| N | ≤0.5 | |
| Al | ≤7 | |
| REM | ≤0.5 | |
and
balance Fe apart from impurities.
13. The alloy according to claim 12, wherein the alloy fulfils the following condition:
Ni 10-25.
14. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises a martensitic matrix with retained austenite of up to 15 volume %.
15. The alloy according to claim 1, wherein the alloy comprises a martensitic matrix with retained austenite of 2 to 15 volume %.
16. A tool for punching, forming, blanking, fine-blanking, extrusion, deep drawing, powder pressing or a part or mold used for die casting or plastic molding comprising the alloy of claim 1.
17. An alloy produced by powder metallurgy and having a non-amorphous matrix, the alloy consists of in weight % (wt. %):
| C | 0-0.15 | |
| Si | 0-2.5 | |
| Mn | 0-15 | |
| Mo | 11-35 | |
| B | 0.2-2.8 | |
| Cr | 0-25 | |
| V | ≤15 | |
| Nb | ≤15 | |
| Ti | ≤5 | |
| Ta | ≤5 | |
| Zr | ≤5 | |
| Hf | ≤5 | |
| Y | ≤3 | |
| Co | ≤20 | |
| Cu | ≤5 | |
| W | ≤22 | |
| S | ≤0.5 | |
| N | ≤0.5 | |
| Al | ≤7 | |
| REM | ≤0.5 | |
| Ni | ≤25, | |
and
balance Fe apart from impurities,
wherein the alloy comprises 3-13.9 volume % hard phase particles,
the hard phase particles comprise at least one of borides, nitrides, carbides and/or combinations thereof,
at least 90% of the hard phase particles have a size of less than 5 μm,
at least 50% of the hard phase particles have a size in the range of 0.3-3 μm, and
at least 60% of the hard phase particles consist of Mo2FeB2 or Mo2NiB2.
Patent Citations (26)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US3623849(A) | 1971-11-01 | Benjamin | Examiner |
| US3999952(A) | 1976-12-01 | Kondo | Examiner |
| US4194900(A) | 1980-03-01 | Ide | Examiner |
| US4318733(A) | 1982-03-01 | Ray et al. | Applicant |
| US4362553(A) | 1982-12-01 | Ray et al. | Applicant |
| US4778522(A) | 1988-10-01 | Maki | Examiner |
| US4961781(A) | 1990-10-01 | Morishita et al. | Applicant |
| US5591391(A) | 1997-01-01 | Igarashi et al. | Applicant |
| US5854434(A) | 1998-12-01 | Saito et al. | Applicant |
| US11242581(B2) | 2022-02-01 | Tidesten | Examiner |
| US2013/0266820(A1) | 2013-10-01 | Kusinski | Examiner |
| US2015/0147591(A1) | 2015-05-01 | Cheney | Examiner |
| CN101182620(A) | 2008-05-01 | Applicant | |
| CN101624678(A) | 2010-01-01 | Applicant | |
| CN103014492(A) | 2013-04-01 | Applicant | |
| CN103874774(A) | 2014-06-01 | Applicant | |
| CN107109593(A) | 2017-08-01 | Applicant | |
| GB2187757(A) | 1987-09-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS6244507(A) | 1987-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS6342357(A) | 1988-02-01 | Applicant | |
| JPS63114946(A) | 1988-05-01 | Applicant | |
| JPH02200748(A) | 1990-08-01 | Applicant | |
| JPH07179997(A) | 1995-07-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2002022891(A) | 2002-01-01 | Applicant | |
| RU2360992(C1) | 2009-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO79015(A1) | 2000-12-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (19)
- ASM Tool Steels, pp. 8 and 9, Jan. 1998, “Table 2-2 AISI classification and nominal compositions of major tool steels”.Applicant
- Australian Office Action dated Apr. 27, 2020, for Australian Patent Application No. 2015363754.Applicant
- Brazilian Office Action dated Mar. 18, 2021, for Brazilian Patent Application No. BR112017009295-6.Applicant
- Chinese Office Action dated Jan. 19, 2021, for Chinese Patent Application No. 201911003552.7.Applicant
- European Office Action dated Feb. 2, 2021, for European Patent Application No. 15870463.5.Applicant
- Extended European Search Report for European Patent Application No. 15870463.5, dated Apr. 10, 2018.Applicant
- Indian Office Action dated Nov. 16, 2020, for Indian Patent Application No. 201727021834.Applicant
- International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/SE2015/051352, dated Feb. 18, 2016.Applicant
- Korean Office Action dated Jan. 18, 2021, for Korean Patent Application No. 10-2020-7014647.Applicant
- Office Action and Search Report Taiwanese Patent Application No. 104142470, dated Nov. 30, 2018.Applicant
- Office Action, corresponding Chinese Patent Application No. 201580060666.9, dated May 13, 2019.Applicant
- Office Action, corresponding in Brazilian Patent Application No. BR112017009295-6, dated Sep. 26, 2019.Applicant
- Office Action, corresponding in Chinese Application No. 201580060666.9, dated May 22, 2018.Applicant
- Office Action, corresponding in European Application No. 14198569.7, dated Apr. 11, 2018.Applicant
- Office Action, corresponding Japanese Patent Application No. 2017-529842, dated Jul. 31, 2019.Applicant
- Office Action, corresponding Ukraine Patent Application No. 2017 07445, dated Jan. 16, 2019.Applicant
- Search Report for Ukraine Patent Application No. 2017120907, dated Jul. 24, 2019.Applicant
- Vietnamese Office Action dated Jan. 29, 2021, for Vietnamese Patent Application No. 1-2017-01415.Applicant
- Mexican Office Action dated Mar. 9, 2022, for Mexican Patent Application No. MX/a/2017/006100.Applicant