US 10,713,629 B1Grant
Systems and methods for digital signature detection
Issue Date:2020-07-14
•19 Claims
•9 Drawing Sheets
Abstract
A system, method and computer-readable medium are provided to enable digital bank endorsement. A digital image of a back side of a check may be placed in a computer memory. Appropriate coordinates for a bank endorsement may be determined. A bank endorsement may be automatically generated. The digital image may then be electronically altered by overlaying, merging, or rendering text of the generated bank endorsement. A modified digital image may be combined with an image of the front side of the check and stored and/or exported to check clearing operations.
Metadata
Assignee
- United Services Automobile Association (USAA)
Inventor
- Reynaldo Medina, III
Application Information
Application Number:US 16/414,220
Filing Date:2019-05-16
Priority Date:2007-09-28
Art Unit:2666
Classifications
IPC:
G06Q20/04G06K9/00G06K9/62G06Q20/40G07C9/35
Field of Search:
G06Q 20/042G06Q 20/40G06Q 20/3825G06Q 20/0425G06Q 20/4014G06Q 20/00G06K 9/00154G06K 9/00449G06K 9/00442G06K 9/38G06K 9/00161G07D 7/00H04N 1/00034H04N 2201/3233G07C 9/35
Patent Drawings (9 sheets)
Description
Cross-Reference to Related Applications
[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/738,340, filed Jun. 12, 2015, pending, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/864,569 (now U.S. Pat. No. 9,058,512), each of which is hereby incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. This application is related by subject matter to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/864,602 (abandoned) and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/864,626 (abandoned).
Background
[0002] Check usage has undergone global decline as a result of faster, cheaper, and more secure electronic payment systems. Checks have not disappeared entirely however. In several major economies including the United States, checks remain widely used. The Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (“Check 21”) was enacted by the United States federal government on Oct. 28, 2003 and took effect exactly one year later. The law allows a recipient of a check to create a digital version, thereby eliminating any need for further handling of the physical document.
[0003] A check made and cleared in the United States typically follows the following cycle: the maker of the check first writes the check, signs the front of the check, and gives it to the payee. The payee then endorses the check by signing the back side of the check, and gives the check to a receiving bank, e.g. a bank at which the payee may have a deposit account. The receiving bank stamps the check on the back side with a bank endorsement, and presents the check to the drawee. The drawee is a financial institution at which the maker holds an account, and the drawee is therefore legally obliged to honor the check.
[0004] The portion of the above described cycle occurring after receipt of the check by the receiving bank is referred to herein as clearing the check. After Check 21, the receiving bank may convert the front and back sides of the check into digital images. The images thus acquired may be presented to the drawee instead of the physical check.
[0005] Because check processing has become increasingly mechanized, and to further reduce check processing costs and improve check clearing speed under Check 21, there is a need in the industry to provide effective technologies for digital signature detection on checks.
Summary
[0006] The described embodiments contemplate systems, methods and computer-readable media with computer-executable instructions for digital signature detection on checks. In one embodiment, a method for detecting a signature on a check is contemplated. The method includes loading a check image into a computer memory, then determining a signature window location on the check image. A process counts a number of pixels in the signature window to acquire a signature window pixel count. The signature window pixel count can then be compared to a minimum pixel threshold and a maximum pixel threshold. If the count is below the minimum threshold, the presence of a signature is unlikely. Similarly, if the count is above the maximum threshold, the presence of a signature is unlikely. Additional comparisons and analysis may be performed in some embodiments. Finally, a detection flag may be set to true when the signature window pixel count is, for example, greater than the minimum pixel threshold and less than the maximum pixel threshold.
[0007] In another exemplary embodiment, a method for detecting a signature on a check comprises determining whether a check image is a business check image or a personal check image, using common characteristics that can be used to distinguish such images. When the check is a business check, a business check signature detection process is applied. Alternatively, when the check is a personal check, a personal check signature detection process is applied.
[0008] In a third exemplary embodiment, a method for detecting a signature on a check comprises loading a check image and determining signature window locations for a first signature window on a first end of said check image, and for a second signature window on a second end of said check image, said second end being opposite from said first end. The method may next count a number of pixels in said first and second signature windows to acquire first and second signature window pixel counts. The first signature window pixel count can be compared to said second signature window count, and a detection flag may be set to true when the first signature window pixel count differs from said second signature window pixel count.
[0009] Additional advantages and features of the invention are described below.
Brief Description of the Drawings
[0010] The foregoing summary, as well as the following detailed description of preferred embodiments, is better understood when read in conjunction with the appended drawings. Exemplary embodiments are provided for the purposes of illustration; however the embodiments are not limited to the specific methods and instrumentalities disclosed. In the drawings:
[0011] FIG. 1 illustrates a schematic diagram showing a signature detection process.
[0012] FIG. 2 illustrates an exemplary networked computer system as may implement certain aspects of check signature detection as disclosed herein.
[0013] FIG. 3 illustrates an exemplary computer as may be connected to a network such as that of FIG. 2 .
[0014] FIG. 4 illustrates an exemplary method, system, and computer readable media comprising steps and/or subsystems and instructions as may be implemented in a signature detection process.
[0015] FIG. 5 illustrates steps and/or subsystems and instructions as may be implemented in addition to those illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 6 .
[0016] FIG. 6 illustrates steps and/or subsystems and instructions as may be implemented in addition those illustrated in FIGS. 4 and 5 .
[0017] FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary check image.
[0018] FIG. 8 illustrates a schematic diagram for a deposit at home transaction.
Detailed Description
[0019] Certain specific details are set forth in the following description and figures to provide a thorough understanding of various embodiments. Certain well-known details often associated with computing and software technology are not set forth in the following disclosure, however, to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the various embodiments. Further, those of ordinary skill in the relevant art will understand that they can practice other embodiments without one or more of the details described below. Finally, while various methods are described with reference to steps and sequences in the following disclosure, the description as such is for providing a clear implementation of embodiments, and the steps and sequences of steps should not be taken as required to practice this invention.
[0020] FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram showing a signature detection process 120 in an exemplary context of processing a check deposit. While the illustrated context is a likely context for exemplary embodiments, it is also possible that the systems and methods disclosed will be applied in other contexts.
[0021] In the exemplary context illustrated in FIG. 1 , check image(s) 100 are loaded into deposit processing 110 at a receiving bank. As part of deposit processing 110, signature detection 120 can be called. Signature detection 120 may, for example, detect the presence of an endorsement signature on an image of a back side of a check. A notification can be provided by signature detection 120 to deposit processing 110, indicating an endorsement signature is detected or not detected. Similarly, signature detection 120 may be configured to scan for a payor signature on an image of a front side of a check, and notify deposit processing 110 of the presence or absence of such signature.
[0022] Deposit processing 110 may proceed according to information received from signature detection 120. For example, in one embodiment, deposit processing 110 may abort a deposit transaction if signature detection 120 indicates no endorsement and/or payor signature, or may proceed with a deposit transaction if signature detection 120 indicates the presence of such signatures. However, this result is not required in all embodiments. For example, in certain scenarios it may be beneficial for deposit processing 110 to proceed with a transaction even if signature detection 120 does not detect an endorsement signature. Instead of aborting a transaction, the transaction may be flagged for later analysis, or may be otherwise handled in a more secure mode.
[0023] If deposit processing 110 proceeds with a transaction, check images 130, which may be the same as images 100 or a modified version of images 100, may be, for example, sent to a drawee bank in a check clearing operation pursuant to Check 21. It is also possible that deposit processing 110 and signature detection 120 are performed upon receipt of images 100 by a drawee bank, in which case the end result may be transferring funds to the receiving bank instead of sending images to a drawee.
[0024] Exemplary aspects of signature detection 120 are elaborated further below with reference to FIGS. 4-7 . FIGS. 2 and 3 provide an exemplary network and computing device which may be configured to implement aspects of the embodiments, and FIG. 8 illustrates systems and methods for supporting an exemplary deposit at home transaction which may be utilized in connection with the signature detection technologies disclosed herein.
[0025] Referring now to FIG. 2 , an exemplary networked computing environment is provided as may be used in connection with various embodiments. One of ordinary skill in the art can appreciate that networks can connect any computer or other client or server device, or in a distributed computing environment. In this regard, any computer system or environment having any number of processing, memory, or storage units, and any number of applications and processes occurring simultaneously is considered suitable for use in connection with the systems and methods provided.
[0026] Distributed computing provides sharing of computer resources and services by exchange between computing devices and systems. These resources and services include the exchange of information, cache storage and disk storage for files. Distributed computing takes advantage of network connectivity, allowing clients to leverage their collective power to benefit the entire enterprise. In this regard, a variety of devices may have applications, objects or resources that may implicate the processes described herein.
[0027] FIG. 2 provides a schematic diagram of an exemplary networked or distributed computing environment. The environment comprises computing devices 271, 272, 276, and 277 as well as objects 273, 274, and 275, and database 278. Each of these entities 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277 and 278 may comprise or make use of programs, methods, data stores, programmable logic, etc. The entities 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277 and 278 may span portions of the same or different devices such as PDAs, audio/video devices, MP3 players, personal computers, etc. Each entity 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277 and 278 can communicate with another entity 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277 and 278 by way of the communications network 270. In this regard, any entity may be responsible for the maintenance and updating of a database 278 or other storage element.
[0028] Network 270 may itself comprise other computing entities that provide services to the system of FIG. 2 , and may itself represent multiple interconnected networks. Each entity 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277 and 278 may contain discrete functional program modules that might make use of an API, or other object, software, firmware and/or hardware, to request services of one or more of the other entities 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277 and 278.
[0029] It can also be appreciated that an object, such as 275, may be hosted on another computing device 276. Thus, although the physical environment depicted may show the connected devices as computers, such illustration is merely exemplary and the physical environment may alternatively be depicted or described comprising various digital devices such as PDAs, televisions, MP3 players, etc., software objects such as interfaces, COM objects and the like.
[0030] There are a variety of systems, components, and network configurations that support distributed computing environments. For example, computing systems may be connected together by wired or wireless systems, by local networks or widely distributed networks. Currently, many networks are coupled to the Internet, which provides an infrastructure for widely distributed computing and encompasses many different networks. Any such infrastructures, whether coupled to the Internet or not, may be used in conjunction with the systems and methods provided.
[0031] A network infrastructure may enable a host of network topologies such as client/server, peer-to-peer, or hybrid architectures. The “client” is a member of a class or group that uses the services of another class or group to which it is not related. In computing, a client is a process, i.e., roughly a set of instructions or tasks, that requests a service provided by another program. The client process utilizes the requested service without having to “know” any working details about the other program or the service itself. In a client/server architecture, particularly a networked system, a client is usually a computer that accesses shared network resources provided by another computer, e.g., a server. In the example of FIG. 2 , any entity 271, 272, 273, 274, 275, 276, 277 and 278 can be considered a client, a server, or both, depending on the circumstances.
[0032] A server is typically, though not necessarily, a remote computer system accessible over a remote or local network, such as the Internet. The client process may be active in a first computer system, and the server process may be active in a second computer system, communicating with one another over a communications medium, thus providing distributed functionality and allowing multiple clients to take advantage of the information-gathering capabilities of the server. Any software objects may be distributed across multiple computing devices or objects.
[0033] Client(s) and server(s) communicate with one another utilizing the functionality provided by protocol layer(s). For example, HyperText Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is a common protocol that is used in conjunction with the World Wide Web (WWW), or “the Web.” Typically, a computer network address such as a hostname which resolves to a Internet Protocol (IP) address can be used to identify the server or client computers to each other. A network address is also sometimes referred to as a URL address. Communication can be provided over a communications medium, e.g., client(s) and server(s) may be coupled to one another via TCP/IP connection(s) for high-capacity communication.
[0034] An exemplary general purpose computer as may be utilized in conjunction with embodiments is illustrated in FIG. 3 . Device electronics 300 are illustrated in FIG. 3 , and a schematic blowup 302 is provided to illustrate an exemplary internal architecture of the device. Computing architecture 302 includes one or more processors or processing units 304, a system memory 306, and a bus 308 that couples various system components including the system memory 306 to processors 304.
[0035] The bus 308 represents one or more of any of several types of bus structures, including a memory bus or memory controller, a peripheral bus, an accelerated graphics port, and a processor or local bus using any of a variety of bus architectures. The system memory 306 includes read only memory (ROM) 312 and random access memory (RAM) 310. A basic input/output system (BIOS) 314, containing the basic routines that help to transfer information between elements within computing device 300, such as during start-up, is stored in ROM 312.
[0036] Computing architecture 302 further includes persistent memory such as a hard disk drive 326, and may include a magnetic disk drive 318 for reading from and writing to a removable magnetic disk 320, and an optical disk drive 322 for reading from or writing to a removable optical disk 324 such as a CD ROM or other optical media. The hard disk drive 326, magnetic disk drive 318, and optical disk drive 324 are connected to the bus 308 by appropriate interfaces. The drives and their associated computer-readable media provide nonvolatile storage of computer-readable instructions, data structures, program modules and other data for computing device 300. Although the exemplary environment described herein employs a hard disk, a removable magnetic disk 318 and a removable optical disk 324, other types of computer-readable media such as magnetic cassettes, flash memory cards, digital video disks, random access memories (RAMs), read only memories (ROMs), and the like, may also be used in the exemplary operating environment.
[0037] A number of program modules may be stored on the hard disk 326, magnetic disk 318, optical disk 324, ROM 312, or RAM 310, including an operating system 327, one or more application programs 328, other program modules 330, and program data 332. Such program modules combined with computer 300 electronics are referred to herein as “components” and/or “subsystems” of the system illustrated in FIG. 3 , because when combined in this way computer hardware and program module become an integrated physical system designed to carry out the purpose of the program module.
[0038] A user may enter commands and information into computing device 300 through input devices such as a keyboard 334 and a pointing device 336. An image capture device 346 may also be coupled to the general purpose computer 300 as an input device. Other input devices 338 may include a microphone, joystick, game pad, satellite dish, or the like. These and other input devices are connected to the processing unit 304 through interfaces 340 that are coupled to the bus 308. A monitor 342 or other type of display device is also connected to the bus 308 via an interface 324, such as a video adapter 324.
[0039] Generally, the data processors of computing device 300 are programmed by means of instructions stored at different times in the various computer-readable storage media of the computer. Programs and operating systems may be distributed, for example, on floppy disks, CD-ROMs, or electronically, and are installed or loaded into the secondary memory of a computer. At execution, the programs are loaded at least partially into the computer's primary electronic memory 306.
[0040] Computing device 300 may operate in a networked environment using logical connections to one or more remote computers 348, such as one or more server computers, routers, network PCs, and so forth, which typically include many or all of the elements described above relative to computing device 300. The remote computer 348 may run remote application programs 358 which may operate in concert with application programs 328 that execute on the computer 300. For example, a software component may, in one embodiment, execute pursuant to commands from a remote application program 358. The software component may of course also operate in a more autonomous manner, performing certain tasks and then communicated data as necessary back to the remote application programs 358.
[0041] When used in a LAN networking environment, a computer 300 is connected to a local network 350 through a network interface or adapter 354. When used in a WAN networking environment, computing device 300 typically includes a modem 356 or other means for establishing communications over the wide area network 352, such as the Internet. The modem 356, which may be internal or external, can be connected to the bus 308 for example via a serial port interface, or by sending a signal to a wireless router which then broadcasts and receives wireless signals to and from a wireless card that is connected to the computer 300.
[0042] In a networked environment, program modules depicted relative to the computing device 300, or portions thereof, may be stored in the remote memory storage device. It will be appreciated that the network connections shown are exemplary and other means of establishing a communications link between the computers may be used.
[0043] Referring now to FIG. 4 , a flowchart is illustrated comprising elements that correspond to steps of a method, components and/or subsystems included in a computer system, or instructions stored on a computer readable medium, depending on the precise embodiment. For simplicity, FIG. 4 will be generally discussed as a method.
[0044] FIGS. 4-6 comprise a variety of steps, not all of which are required in particular embodiments. Instead, the steps of FIG. 4 include a variety of steps that may be combined in different ways so as to satisfy the requirements of particular scenarios.
[0045] In general, FIGS. 4, 5, and 6 contemplate the use of a plurality of approaches for detecting the presence of a signature on a check. If a first approach fails, a next approach may be attempted, then a third approach, and so on. Attempting multiple approaches upon failure is preferred (though not required) in processing check deposits, because failing a deposit transaction frustrates the customer and necessitates additional processing by the financial institution. The various exemplary methods for signature detection are discussed below, after the following brief discussion of preliminary processing steps 401-407 as may be carried out in some embodiments.
[0046] Steps 401-407 may be incorporated into signature detection process 120 in FIG. 1 , and may be carried out as part of deposit processing 110. The process starts 401, and check image(s) 100 are received and/or generated 402. Check image(s) may include a single image of a front and back of a check, separate images for the front and back, and/or simply an image of the front alone or the back alone. In one exemplary embodiment, such images may be received in a deposit at home transaction as described below. In another exemplary embodiment, such images may be generated for example by scanning a front and back of a check.
[0047] Check image(s) may be converted from a first format to another, e.g., from grayscale to binary format 403. In one embodiment, check image(s) are converted from a Joint Photographic Experts Group (JPEG) format to a Tag Image File Format (TIFF).
[0048] Check images may be oriented 404. Orienting a check comprises determining certain check image features, e.g., width and height, then rotating the check image to a desired orientation. For example, if a horizontal orientation is desired, then the check can be oriented so that the longest dimension of the check is horizontal. If a vertical orientation is desired, the check can be oriented so that the longest dimension of the check is vertical.
[0049] Check image dimensions may be acquired 405, along with other features of a check image as desired. For example, checks often comprise certain standardized dimensions. Business checks are typically a standard size that is somewhat larger in width and height than the standard size for personal checks. By acquiring check image dimensions, information can be ascertained regarding sizing and location of signature detection window(s). Signature detection window(s) are region(s) of interest (ROI) in counting pixels on the check image. FIG. 7 illustrates an exemplary check image 700 comprising dimensions 723 and 724, as well as other features 721 and 722 as may be used in positioning signature detection windows 711 and 712, discussed in greater detail below.
[0050] A check image may be filtered 406. For example, if the check image(s) are dark, a filter can be applied to lighten the image. The opposite may also be performed.
[0051] Minimum and maximum pixel count thresholds may be set. These thresholds may be set globally for all checks, or semi-globally for all checks of a certain type, e.g., business versus personal. These thresholds may also be set dynamically on a check-by check basis. Pixel count thresholds define thresholds for number of dark pixels in a signature detection window. In general, when a signature is present, the signature detection window may comprise some number of dark pixels that is within a determinable range. The minimum and maximum pixel count thresholds define the outer limits of this range.
[0052] In one embodiment, minimum and maximum pixel count thresholds are set based on experimental data acquired from a particular signature detection system. These thresholds are then applied to all checks processed by the particular system. One exemplary system utilizes the following thresholds:
[0053]
| Check Type | Min Pixel Threshold | Max Pixel Threshold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Personal Check | 1000 | 50000 | |
| Business Check | 2000 | 50000 | |
| Machine Printed | 3000 | 50000 | |
| Business Check | |||
[0054] In another embodiment, the thresholds can be set dynamically, for example by sampling areas of a check image, then finding a sample with a highest pixel count and a sample with a lowest pixel count. An average pixel count across the samples may also be calculated. These three values—high, low, and average, may be utilized in one exemplary embodiment to determine appropriate thresholds. For example, a value between the low value and average value may be selected as a minimum pixel count threshold and a value between the high value and average value may be selected as a maximum pixel count threshold.
[0055] Steps 408-416 represent any of a plurality of approaches as may be used to detect the presence of a signature. In general these methods may comprise loading a check image into memory 408, determining a signature window location 409, counting pixels in the signature window 410, storing the pixel count 411, comparing the pixel count 412 to either another pixel count from another signature detection window, or to the pixel count thresholds, determining pixel density 413 as an optional error correction and accuracy measure, setting a detection flag 414, freeing image memory 415, and returning the value of the detection flag 416, e.g., to the deposit processing 110 in FIG. 1 .
[0056] In a first embodiment, determining a signature window location 409 can be accomplished by using Optical Character Recognition (OCR) to identify a check feature, and to choose a signature window location based on the location of said check feature. For example, referring to FIG. 7 , OCR can be applied to locate the text feature 722 by looking for all or a portion of the word “endorse.” Once found, the signature detection window 711 location can be determined by placing the window beneath the text feature 722 as illustrated.
[0057] In another embodiment, determining a signature window location 409 can be accomplished by analyzing the check image to detect a graphical check feature, and to choose a signature window location based on the location of the graphical check feature. For example, referring to FIG. 7 , image analysis can be applied to locate the horizontal line feature 721 by looking for horizontal lines spanning a substantial portion of the dimension of the check as illustrated. Once a horizontal line is found, the signature detection window 711 location can be determined by placing the window above the horizontal line feature 721 as illustrated.
[0058] In another embodiment, determining a signature window location 409 can be accomplished by analyzing the check image to detect a graphical check feature, and to choose a signature window location based on the location of the graphical check feature. For example, referring to FIG. 7 , image analysis can be applied to locate the horizontal line feature 721 by looking for horizontal lines spanning a substantial portion of the dimension of the check as illustrated. Once a horizontal line is found, the signature detection window 711 location can be determined by placing the window above the horizontal line feature 721 as illustrated.
[0059] The above embodiments may be combined for example as illustrated in FIG. 5 . Referring to FIG. 5 , it can be determined after steps 501 and 502 whether a check image is a business check image or a personal check image 503. This determination can be made for example using gathered information about the check, e.g. check dimension information. In one embodiment, for example, a height dimension greater than 16 centimeters, or 1264 pixels, indicates a business check, while smaller checks are usually personal checks. The presence or absence of a horizontal line 721 as illustrated in FIG. 7 may also be used.
[0060] In one exemplary embodiment, a further distinction may be made between machine printed business checks and ordinary business checks. This distinction may be made in the same way, based on gathered information about the check. For example, depending on check image orientation, a vertical or horizontal line count greater than four is a feature frequently observed on only machine printed business checks, and not ordinary business checks as will be appreciated by those of skill in the check printing and identification industry.
[0061] When it is determined that an image is a business check image, a business check signature detection process 504 may be applied. For example, the business check signature detection process 504 may comprise steps 505 and 506, involving detecting a horizontal line 505 to determine a signature window location as described above, then counting pixels in the signature window 506, as well as remaining steps 511-516 which correspond to steps 411-416.
[0062] When it is determined that an image is a personal check image, a personal check signature detection process 507 may be applied. For example, the personal check signature detection process 504 may comprise steps 505 and 506, involving performing OCR 508 to determine a signature window location as described above, then counting pixels in the signature window 509, as well as remaining steps 511-516 which correspond to steps 411-416.
[0063] Furthermore, the if the business check signature detection process 504 is performed and fails, i.e., does not detect the presence of a signature, then another method such as that utilized in the personal check signature detection process 507 may be applied, and vice versa. If both methods fail, then yet another method, for example the method illustrated in FIG. 6 and/or a method that utilizes entropy thresholds instead of pixel count thresholds. In an exemplary method utilizing entropy thresholds, when entropy a signature window is above a certain value, then it may be surmised that a signature is present, because this indicates the pixels are more ordered than they are randomly distributed. Conversely, when entropy is low, the is less likely to be a signature, because pixels are distributed throughout the signature detection window without being condensed in certain areas, e.g., corresponding to the handwritten lines of a signature. This method can be used in conjunction with the various other approaches described herein.
[0064] Referring back to FIG. 4 , in another embodiment, determining a signature window location 409 can be accomplished as illustrated in FIG. 6 . Also, the embodiment illustrated in FIG. 6 may be utilized as the business check signature detection process or as the personal check signature detection process of FIG. 5 , by replacing for example steps 504, 505, and 506 or steps 507, 508, and 509 with steps 601, 602, and 603.
[0065] In the embodiment of FIG. 6 , determining signature window locations can be accomplished by determining a first and second signature window locations 602. For example, as illustrated in FIG. 7 , a first signature window 711 can be placed on one end of a check image 700, as shown, and a second signature window 712 can be placed on an opposite end of check image 700. The locations of the windows 711 and 712 can thus be determined from the dimensions 723, and 724 of the check image 700. The pixels in both the first and second signature windows may be counted 603. Later, when comparing pixel counts as illustrated in step 412 of FIG. 4 , instead of comparing a pixel count to threshold information as with the other described embodiments, the pixel counts from the first and second pixel windows may be compared to each other. If there is a sufficient difference in the pixel counts, e.g., as determined from experimental data for a particular system, then the presence of a signature may be presumed.
[0066] Also, as with the processes illustrated in FIG. 5 , the embodiment of FIG. 6 may deploy another method of signature detection upon failure, in exemplary step 604, or may skip 605 to error correction such as step 413 in FIG. 4 , or set flag steps as in 414 of FIG. 4 .
[0067] Returning to FIG. 4 , step 413 contemplates determining pixel density as one mode for establishing a potential reason for failure and/or establishing a confidence level in a signature detection result. High pixel density generally correlates to the counted pixels being clustered together, while low pixel density correlates to pixels being spread apart. A signature will have a higher pixel density than background “noise” that spreads black pixels across an entire signature detection window, but lower pixel density than, for example, an image of a large black ink blot. Threshold density levels can be determined through experimentation for particular systems and can be applied as needed.
[0068] The following pseudo code illustrates exemplary method steps, instructions on computer readable media, and/or computer subsystem components as may be utilized in one embodiment. The following parameters are utilized in this pseudo code:
-
- [0069] strImage identifies a check image file. For example: “C:\\my_check_back.tif”
- [0070] pixel_count is a placeholder for a pixel count.
- [0071] detection_flag is a placeholder for an integer set or reset upon completion of a signature detection process. For example, if the flag is 1, then a signature was detected. If the flag is 0, then the signature was not detected.
- [0072] image_analysis identifies is a folder containing an image analysis program used in supporting aspects of the invention requiring image analysis.
[0073] The following pseudo code may be utilized:
[0074]
| long DetectEndorsment(char * strImage, int * pixel_count, int * |
| detection_flag, char * image_analysis) |
| { |
| Set minimum pixel threshold. |
| Set the maximum pixel threshold. |
| Load check image from the file path pointed by strImage. |
| Set virtual image resolution to 200 dpi. |
| Make the virtual horizontal image vertical in memory. |
| //1. Detection by means of character recognition// |
| Save the Image. |
| ReadEndorseWord(strImage, EndorseResult, image_analysis); |
| Set the minimal amount of correct letters of the word “ENDORSE” |
| If(EndorseResult is not empty) |
| { |
| Count the number of (non repeating) letters returned from the |
| OCR function |
| ReadEndorseWord. |
| If(the minimum amount of letters of the word “Endorse” is |
| reached) |
| { |
| Rotate Virtual Image Right 90 degrees in memory to make |
| horizontal. |
| Count the number of pixels in the signature detection |
| window. |
| } |
| If(the image is a personal check) |
| { |
| If(pixel count is greater than personal check minimum pixel |
| threshold and less than personal check maximum pixel |
| threshold) |
| { |
| Assign detection_flag to true. |
| Assign the pixel count read for the signature to |
| pixel_count. |
| Free Image memory |
| Return appropriately |
| } |
| } |
| // 2. Detection using horizontal lines// |
| If(A business check) |
| { |
| Retrieve horizontal lines. |
| If (target line found) |
| { |
| Rotate appropriately. |
| Count pixels in signature detection window. |
| Free memory. |
| De-initialize API by terminating Instance ID. |
| Return appropriately. |
| } |
| } |
| // 3. Detection by comparing opposite sides// |
| If(the image is a business check) |
| { |
| If (left side signature window pixel count and right count are |
| below the business minimum pixel threshold) |
| { |
| Then there is no signature |
| Free memory |
| Return Appropriately |
| } |
| If(left side signature window pixel count is greater than the right |
| count and above the business minimum pixel threshold and the |
| right count is below the business minimum pixel threshold) |
| { |
| The signature was detected on the left side |
| Free memory |
| Return appropriately. |
| } |
| If(right side signature window pixel count is greater than the left |
| count and the right count is above the business minimum pixel |
| threshold and the left count is below the business minimum pixel |
| threshold) |
| { |
| The signature is on the right side |
| Free memory |
| Return appropriately. |
| } |
| } |
| // 4. General detection for Personal Checks// |
| If(a personal check) |
| { |
| If(left side signature window pixel count is greater than the right |
| count and greater than the personal check minimum pixel |
| threshold and the right count is less than the personal check |
| minimum pixel threshold) |
| { |
| Signature is on the left side |
| Free memory |
| Return Appropriately |
| } |
| If(right side signature window pixel count is greater than the left |
| count and greater than the personal check minimum pixel |
| threshold and the left count is below the personal check |
| minimum pixel threshold) |
| { |
| Signature in on the right side |
| Free memory |
| Return Appropriately |
| } |
| If(both the left and the right side signature window pixel counts |
| are greater than the personal check minimum pixel threshold) |
| { |
| Filter the image. |
| Count the left and right signature area. |
| If(left side signature window pixel count is greater than the |
| right count and greater than the personal check minimum |
| threshold) |
| { |
| The signature is on the left side |
| Free Memory. |
| Return Appropriately. |
| } |
| If(right side signature window pixel count is greater than |
| the left count and greater than the personal check minimum |
| pixel threshold) |
| { |
| The Signature is on the right side |
| Free Memory |
| Return Appropriately |
| } |
| If(left side signature window pixel count is greater than the |
| right count and greater then the personal cheek minimum |
| pixel threshold and the right count is less than the personal |
| check minimum pixel threshold) |
| { |
| Signature is on the left side |
| Free Memory |
| Return Appropriately |
| } |
| If(right side signature window pixel count is greater than |
| the left count and greater than the personal check minimum |
| pixel threshold and the right count is less than the personal |
| check minimum pixel threshold) |
| { |
| Signature is on the right side. |
| Free Memory |
| Return Appropriately |
| } |
| } |
| } |
| // 5. Default // |
| Unable to detect |
| Free Memory |
| Return Appropriately |
| } |
[0075] The embodiments may be implemented in the context of a deposit at home transaction. Exemplary deposit at home technologies are described, for example, in U.S. patent application Ser. Nos. 11/321,025 and 11/591,014. Future systems may emerge allowing individuals to remotely deposit checks using, for example, a customer controlled home telephone or customer controlled general purpose consumer. Such remote deposit systems may prove advantageous for banks and bank customers alike, in part because they are adapted for today's mobile lifestyles experienced at least by individuals in military, government, and private sector careers, and in part because they successfully leverage electronic communications advances allowing unprecedented automation, speed, and security in deposit transactions.
[0076] FIG. 8 is generally directed to a variety of aspects of a system for processing remote deposit of checks as contemplated for use in connection with various embodiments. FIG. 8 illustrates an example system in which the described embodiments may be employed. System 800 may include account owner 810, e.g., a bank customer who may be located, for example, at the customer's private residence. The account owner 810 may be utilizing a customer-controlled, general purpose computer 811. A general purpose computer 811 is generally a Personal Computer (PC) running one of the well-known WINDOWS® brand operating systems made by MICROSOFT® Corp., or a MACINTOSH@ (Mac) brand computer, running any of the APPLE® operating systems. General purpose computers are ubiquitous today and the term should be well understood. A general purpose computer 811 may be in a desktop or laptop configuration, and generally has the ability to run any number of applications that are written for and compatible with the computer's operating system. A particular advantage of a system as illustrated in FIG. 8 is its ability to operate in conjunction with electronics that today's consumers actually use, such as a general purpose computer, a scanner, and a digital camera.
[0077] General purpose computer 811 may also be “customer-controlled.” A common example of a customer-controlled computer would be a typical computer located in a private residence. The owner of such a computer typically has the power to install programs and configure the computer as they wish, subject to certain security restrictions that may be imposed by the hardware or software manufacturers. A customer-controlled computer need not be located in a private residence, however. For example, computers in college dormitories, in workplace offices, and so forth may also be considered to be “customer-controlled.”
[0078] One of the applications that may run on a general purpose computer 811 is a browser. Common browsers in use today are, for example, the INTERNET EXPLORER® made by MICROSOFT® Corp., the FIREFOX® browsers distributed via the MOZILLA® open source project, and the NETSCAPE NAVIGATOR® browsers also distributed via the MOZILLA® open source project. Browsers generally allow users to point to a Uniform Resource Locator (URL), and thereby retrieve information such as a web page. For example, a browser application on computer 811 could retrieve a web page that is kept at server 831, and display the web page to the account owner 810, as is generally known and appreciated in the industry and by the general public.
[0079] Another application, or set of applications, that may run on a general purpose computer 811 comprises “virtual machine” technologies such as the JAVA® virtual machine software distributed by SUN MICROSYSTEMS® Corp, and .NET® Framework distributed by MICROSOFT® Corp. In general, such applications facilitate execution of computer programs in a variety of computing environments. For example, a JAVA® applet is a computer program (which may be alternatively referred to herein as a “software component”) that can execute on any computer running the JAVA® virtual machine software. The applet may be provided to virtual machine software in a “source code” format, and may be compiled by a “just in time” compiler, so as to put the applet in a form that can be executed by the hardware associated with the particular computing device. These technologies are known in the art and may be utilized in connection with a system as illustrated in FIG. 8 .
[0080] An image capture device 812 may be communicatively coupled to the computer 812. Image capture device may be, for example, a scanner or digital camera. Computer 811 may comprise software that allows the user to control certain operations of the image capture device 812 from the computer 811. For example, modern scanner users may be familiar with the TWAIN software often used to control image capture from a computer 811. Similarly, digital cameras often use software that allows users to move images from the camera to a computer 811, and may also provide additional functions, such as photo editing functions including crop and rotate.
[0081] Financial institutions 830, 840 and 850 may be any type of entity capable of processing a transaction involving a negotiable instrument. For example, financial institutions 830, 840 and 850 may be a retail bank, investment bank, investment company, regional branch of the Federal Reserve, clearinghouse bank and/or correspondent bank. A negotiable instrument is usually a type of contract that obligates one party to pay a specified sum of money to another party. By way of example, and not limitation, negotiable instruments may include a check, draft, bill of exchange, promissory note, and the like.
[0082] Financial institution 830 is illustrated as associated with a server 838. Financial institution 830 may maintain and operate server 838 for the purposes of communicating with customers such as 810. Alternatively, such server may be maintained and operated by one or more third party vendors who act under the instructions of the financial institution 830, but possess skills and resources that may be more effective in competent operation of electronics. Such arrangements are well known in the industry and in this case the server 838 is nonetheless considered to be “associated” with the financial institution 830.
[0083] Account owner 810 may be an individual who owns account 860, which may be held at financial institution 830. As such, account owner 810 may be described as a customer of financial institution 830. Account 860 may be any type of account for depositing funds, such as a savings account, checking account, brokerage account, and the like. Account owner 810 may communicate with financial institution 830 by way of communication network 820, which may include an intranet, the Internet, a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN), a public switched telephone network (PSTN), a cellular network, a voice over internet protocol (VoIP) network, and the like. Account owner 810 may communicate with financial institution 830 by phone, email, instant messaging, facsimile, and the like.
[0084] In one contemplated embodiment, network 820 is a publicly accessible network such as the Internet, which can presently be accessed from many private residences and many public places such as college campuses, airports, coffee shops, and restaurants throughout the United States as well as many other countries of the world. A variety of technologies are available to establish secure connections over such a public network, so that data transmitted between computer 811 and a server 838 associated with the institution 830 remains either inaccessible or indecipherable by third parties that may intercept such data.
[0085] Financial institutions 830, 840 and 850 may communicate with each other via a network 825. Network 825 may be a publicly accessed network such as 820. Alternatively, network 825 may have certain characteristics that differ from network 820, due to the different requirements of bank-to-bank communications. For example, certain security features and access restrictions may be more important in bank-to-bank communications.
[0086] In an embodiment, account owner 810 may wish to deposit a check that is drawn from payor account 870 at financial institution 850. Account owner 810 may deposit the check into customer account 860 by converting the check into electronic data, e.g., an image, and sending the data to financial institution 830. Various embodiments described herein may be carried out by financial institution 830 electronics such as server 838 upon receipt of a check image from computer 811. However, those of skill in computing and software technologies will appreciate that functionality can be distributed across a variety of devices and therefore some of the method steps, subsystems, and computer readable media may in some embodiments be located outside of the range of what would be considered financial institution 830 electronics, e.g., might be located at computer 811 or elsewhere in the network 820.
[0087] Account owner 810 may convert the check into a digital image by scanning the front and/or back of the check using image capture device 812. Account owner810 may then send the image to financial institution 830. Sending the image may be referred to as “presenting” the check. Upon receipt of the image, financial institution 830 may credit the funds to account 860 in a “soft post” operation. In a soft post operation, the funds appear to be available for use by a customer, and may in fact be available for use, but at the very least some indication is retained to note that the funds have not actually been received from the payor bank. When the funds are received from the payor bank, the “soft post” is converted to a “hard post” and the indication is removed, along with any further restriction on the use of the funds. Financial institution 830 may clear the check by presenting the digital image to an intermediary bank, such as a regional branch of the Federal Reserve, a correspondent bank and/or a clearinghouse bank.
[0088] For example, the check may be cleared by presenting the digital image to financial institution 840, which may be a regional branch of the Federal Reserve, along with a request for payment. Financial institution 830 and 850 may have accounts at the regional branch of the Federal Reserve. As will be discussed in greater detail below, financial institution 830 may create a substitute check using the image provided by account owner 810 and present the substitute check to financial institution 840 for further processing. Upon receiving the substitute check, financial institution 840 may identify financial institution 850 as the paying bank (e.g., the bank from which the check is drawn). This may be accomplished using a nine-digit routing number located on the bottom left hand corner of the check. A unique routing number is typically assigned to every financial institution in the United States. Financial institution 840 may present the substitute check to financial institution 850 and request that the check be paid. If financial institution 850 verifies the check (i.e., agrees to honor the check), financial institution 840 may then settle the check by debiting funds from financial institution 850 and crediting funds to financial institution 830. Financial institution 850 may then debit funds from account 870.
[0089] It will be appreciated that the preceding examples are for purposes of illustration and explanation only, and that an embodiment is not limited to such examples. For example, financial institution 850 may be a correspondent bank (i.e., engaged in a partnership with financial institution 830). Thus, financial institution 830 may bypass the regional branch of the Federal Reserve and clear the check directly with financial institution 850. In addition, account 860 and account 870 may both be held at financial institution 830, in which case the check may be cleared internally.
[0090] In addition to the specific implementations explicitly set forth herein, other aspects and implementations will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and illustrated implementations be considered as examples only, with a true scope and spirit of the following claims.
Claims
The invention claimed is:
1. A processor-implemented method for detecting a signature, comprising:
using a processor for:
receiving an image of a negotiable instrument in an image memory;
converting the negotiable instrument image from a first digital image format to a second digital image format;
detecting a type of the negotiable instrument in the second digital image format, wherein detecting the type of the negotiable instrument comprises:
determining whether the negotiable instrument image is a business check image or a personal check image;
in response to determining that the negotiable instrument image is a business check image, accessing a business check image minimum pixel count threshold; and
in response to determining that the negotiable instrument image is a personal check image, accessing a personal check image minimum pixel count threshold, wherein the business check image minimum pixel count threshold is different from the personal check image minimum pixel count threshold;
selecting a signature window location technique to apply to the negotiable instrument image based on the detected type of the negotiable instrument;
determining a signature window location using the selected signature window location technique;
counting a number of dark pixels in the determined signature window location in the negotiable instrument image to generate a signature window pixel count;
comparing the signature window pixel count to a minimum pixel count threshold for the detected type of negotiable instrument; and
determining a potential signature error when the signature window pixel count is less than the minimum pixel count threshold for the detected type of negotiable instrument.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein in response to determining that the negotiable instrument image is a business check image, accessing a business check image pixel count threshold range; and
in response to determining that the negotiable instrument image is a personal check image, accessing a personal check image pixel count threshold range.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein in response to determining that the negotiable instrument image is the business check image, the potential signature error is determined when the signature window pixel count is outside a business check image pixel count range; and
wherein in response to determining that the negotiable instrument image is the personal check image, the potential signature error is determined when the signature window pixel count is outside a personal check image pixel count range, wherein the personal check image pixel count range is greater than the business check image pixel count range.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein detecting the type of the negotiable instrument comprises detecting a size of the negotiable instrument in the negotiable instrument image in the second digital image format.
5. The method of claim 4, wherein in response to detecting the type of the negotiable instrument to be a business check, analyzing the negotiable instrument image for a presence of a graphical feature and determining the signature window location to be adjacent the graphical feature.
6. The method of claim 5, wherein in response to detecting the type of the negotiable instrument to be a personal check, performing optical character recognition on the negotiable instrument image and identifying a predetermined word; and
determining the signature window location to be adjacent the predetermined word.
7. A processor-implemented method for detecting a signature, comprising:
using a processor for:
receiving an image of a negotiable instrument in an image memory;
converting the negotiable instrument image from a first digital image format to a second digital image format;
detecting a type of the negotiable instrument in the second digital image format;
selecting a signature window location technique to apply to the negotiable instrument image based on the detected type of the negotiable instrument;
determining a signature window location using the selected signature window location technique;
counting a number of dark pixels in the determined signature window location to generate a signature window pixel count;
comparing the signature window pixel count to a pixel count threshold range;
determining a potential signature error when the signature window pixel count is outside the pixel count threshold range; and
wherein comparing the signature window pixel count to the pixel count threshold range comprises dynamically determining a maximum pixel count threshold by:
sampling pixel counts from multiple areas in the negotiable instrument image;
determining, from amongst the multiple areas sampled, a highest pixel count and a lowest pixel count;
averaging the highest pixel count and the lowest pixel count to generate an average pixel count; and
selecting the maximum pixel count threshold to be between the highest pixel count and the average pixel count.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein comparing the signature window pixel count to the pixel count threshold range further comprises:
comparing the signature window pixel count to the maximum pixel count threshold, and
wherein the potential signature error is determined when the signature window pixel count is greater than the maximum pixel count threshold.
9. The method of claim 7, further comprising:
determining a minimum pixel count threshold dynamically; and
comparing the signature window pixel count to the minimum pixel count threshold and the maximum pixel count threshold, and
wherein the potential signature error is determined when the signature window pixel count is greater than the maximum pixel count threshold or less than the minimum pixel count threshold.
10. The method of claim 7, wherein a first signature window location technique is associated with detecting that the type of the negotiable instrument is a personal check, wherein the first signature window location technique comprises the processor using optical character recognition to identify a predetermined word on the negotiable instrument and positioning a signature window location adjacent the predetermined word.
11. The method of claim 10, wherein a second signature window location technique is associated with detecting that the type of the negotiable instrument is a business check, wherein the second signature window location technique comprises the processor identifying a graphical check feature and positioning the signature window location adjacent the graphical check feature.
12. The method of claim 11, wherein the graphical check feature comprises a horizontal line.
13. A system for detecting a signature on a negotiable instrument, the system comprising:
a memory including processor-executable instructions; and
a processor in communication with the memory and configured, when executing the processor-executable instructions, to:
receive an image of a negotiable instrument in an image memory;
convert the negotiable instrument image from a first digital image format to a second digital image format;
detect a type of the negotiable instrument in the second digital image format, wherein to detect the type of the negotiable instrument the processor is configured to:
determine whether the negotiable instrument image is a business check image or a personal check image;
in response to determining that the negotiable instrument image is a business check image, access a business check image minimum pixel count threshold; and
in response to determining that the negotiable instrument image is a personal check image, access a personal check image minimum pixel count threshold, wherein the business check image minimum pixel count threshold is different from the personal check image minimum pixel count threshold;
select a signature window location technique to apply to the negotiable instrument image based on the detected type of the negotiable instrument;
determine a signature window location using the selected signature window location technique;
count a number of dark pixels in the determined signature window location to generate a signature window pixel count;
compare the signature window pixel count to a minimum pixel count threshold for the detected type of the negotiable instrument; and
determine a potential signature error when the signature window pixel count is less than the minimum pixel count threshold for the detected type of negotiable instrument.
14. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor is further configured to access a maximum pixel count threshold based on the detected type of the negotiable instrument.
15. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor, when executing the processor-executable instructions, is configured to, in response to determining that the negotiable instrument is a business check, analyze the negotiable instrument image for a presence of a graphical feature and determine the signature window location to be adjacent the graphical feature.
16. The system of claim 13, wherein the processor, when executing the processor-executable instructions, is configured to, in response to determining that the negotiable instrument is a personal check:
perform optical character recognition on the negotiable instrument image and identify a predetermined word; and
determining the signature window location to be adjacent the predetermined word.
17. The system of claim 13, wherein a first signature window location technique is associated with detecting that the type of the negotiable instrument is a personal check, wherein the first signature window location technique comprises the processor using optical character recognition to identify a predetermined word on the negotiable instrument and positioning a signature window location adjacent the predetermined word.
18. The system of claim 17, wherein a second signature window location technique is associated with detecting that the type of the negotiable instrument is a business check, wherein the second signature window location technique comprises the processor identifying a graphical check feature and positioning the signature window location adjacent the graphical check feature.
19. The system of claim 18, wherein the graphical check feature comprises a horizontal line.
Patent Citations (1080)
| Patent | Date | Inventor | Cited By |
|---|---|---|---|
| US1748489(A) | 1930-02-01 | McCarthy et al. | Applicant |
| US2292825(A) | 1942-08-01 | Dilks et al. | Applicant |
| US3005282(A) | 1961-10-01 | Christiansen | Applicant |
| US3341820(A) | 1967-09-01 | Grillmeier, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US3576972(A) | 1971-05-01 | Wood | Applicant |
| US3593913(A) | 1971-07-01 | Bremer | Applicant |
| US3620553(A) | 1971-11-01 | Donovan | Applicant |
| US3648242(A) | 1972-03-01 | Grosbard | Applicant |
| US3800124(A) | 1974-03-01 | Walsh | Applicant |
| US3816943(A) | 1974-06-01 | Henry | Applicant |
| US4002356(A) | 1977-01-01 | Weidmann | Applicant |
| US4027142(A) | 1977-05-01 | Paup et al. | Applicant |
| US4060711(A) | 1977-11-01 | Buros | Applicant |
| US4070649(A) | 1978-01-01 | Wright, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US4128202(A) | 1978-12-01 | Buros | Applicant |
| US4136471(A) | 1979-01-01 | Austin | Applicant |
| US4205780(A) | 1980-06-01 | Burns | Applicant |
| US4264808(A) | 1981-04-01 | Owens | Applicant |
| US4305216(A) | 1981-12-01 | Skelton | Applicant |
| US4321672(A) | 1982-03-01 | Braun | Applicant |
| US4346442(A) | 1982-08-01 | Musmanno | Applicant |
| US4417136(A) | 1983-11-01 | Rushby et al. | Applicant |
| US4433436(A) | 1984-02-01 | Carnes | Applicant |
| US4454610(A) | 1984-06-01 | Sziklai | Applicant |
| USRE31692(E) | 1984-10-01 | Tyburski et al. | Applicant |
| US4523330(A) | 1985-06-01 | Cain | Applicant |
| US4636099(A) | 1987-01-01 | Goldston | Applicant |
| US4640413(A) | 1987-02-01 | Kaplan | Applicant |
| US4644144(A) | 1987-02-01 | Chandek | Applicant |
| US4722444(A) | 1988-02-01 | Murphy et al. | Applicant |
| US4722544(A) | 1988-02-01 | Weber | Applicant |
| US4727435(A) | 1988-02-01 | Otani | Applicant |
| US4737911(A) | 1988-04-01 | Freeman | Applicant |
| US4739411(A) | 1988-04-01 | Bolton | Applicant |
| US4774574(A) | 1988-09-01 | Daly et al. | Applicant |
| US4774663(A) | 1988-09-01 | Musmanno | Applicant |
| US4790475(A) | 1988-12-01 | Griffin | Applicant |
| US4806780(A) | 1989-02-01 | Yamamoto | Applicant |
| US4837693(A) | 1989-06-01 | Schotz | Applicant |
| US4890228(A) | 1989-12-01 | Longfield | Applicant |
| US4896363(A) | 1990-01-01 | Taylor et al. | Applicant |
| US4927071(A) | 1990-05-01 | Wood | Applicant |
| US4934587(A) | 1990-06-01 | McNabb | Applicant |
| US4960981(A) | 1990-10-01 | Benton | Applicant |
| US4975735(A) | 1990-12-01 | Bright | Applicant |
| US5022683(A) | 1991-06-01 | Barbour | Applicant |
| US5053607(A) | 1991-10-01 | Carlson | Applicant |
| US5077805(A) | 1991-12-01 | Tan | Applicant |
| US5091968(A) | 1992-02-01 | Higgins et al. | Applicant |
| US5122950(A) | 1992-06-01 | Benton et al. | Applicant |
| US5134564(A) | 1992-07-01 | Dunn et al. | Applicant |
| US5146606(A) | 1992-09-01 | Grondalski | Applicant |
| US5157620(A) | 1992-10-01 | Shaar | Applicant |
| US5159548(A) | 1992-10-01 | Caslavka | Applicant |
| US5164833(A) | 1992-11-01 | Aoki | Applicant |
| US5175682(A) | 1992-12-01 | Higashiyama et al. | Applicant |
| US5187750(A) | 1993-02-01 | Behera | Applicant |
| US5191525(A) | 1993-03-01 | LeBrun | Applicant |
| US5193121(A) | 1993-03-01 | Elischer et al. | Applicant |
| US5220501(A) | 1993-06-01 | Lawlor | Applicant |
| US5227863(A) | 1993-07-01 | Bilbrey et al. | Applicant |
| US5229589(A) | 1993-07-01 | Schneider | Applicant |
| US5233547(A) | 1993-08-01 | Kapp et al. | Applicant |
| US5237158(A) | 1993-08-01 | Kern et al. | Applicant |
| US5237159(A) | 1993-08-01 | Stephens | Applicant |
| US5237620(A) | 1993-08-01 | Deaton et al. | Applicant |
| US5257320(A) | 1993-10-01 | Etherington et al. | Applicant |
| US5265008(A) | 1993-11-01 | Benton | Applicant |
| US5268968(A) | 1993-12-01 | Yoshida | Applicant |
| US5283829(A) | 1994-02-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US5321816(A) | 1994-06-01 | Rogan | Applicant |
| US5345090(A) | 1994-09-01 | Hludzinski | Applicant |
| US5347302(A) | 1994-09-01 | Simonoff | Applicant |
| US5350906(A) | 1994-09-01 | Brody | Applicant |
| US5373550(A) | 1994-12-01 | Campbell | Applicant |
| US5383113(A) | 1995-01-01 | Kight et al. | Applicant |
| US5419588(A) | 1995-05-01 | Wood | Applicant |
| US5422467(A) | 1995-06-01 | Graef | Applicant |
| US5444616(A) | 1995-08-01 | Nair et al. | Applicant |
| US5444794(A) | 1995-08-01 | Uhland, Sr. | Applicant |
| US5455875(A) | 1995-10-01 | Chevion et al. | Applicant |
| US5475403(A) | 1995-12-01 | Havlovic et al. | Applicant |
| US5504538(A) | 1996-04-01 | Tsujihara | Applicant |
| US5504677(A) | 1996-04-01 | Pollin | Applicant |
| US5528387(A) | 1996-06-01 | Kelly et al. | Applicant |
| US5530773(A) | 1996-06-01 | Thompson | Applicant |
| US5577179(A) | 1996-11-01 | Blank | Applicant |
| US5583759(A) | 1996-12-01 | Geer | Applicant |
| US5590196(A) | 1996-12-01 | Moreau | Applicant |
| US5594225(A) | 1997-01-01 | Botvin | Applicant |
| US5598969(A) | 1997-02-01 | Ong | Applicant |
| US5602936(A) | 1997-02-01 | Green | Applicant |
| US5610726(A) | 1997-03-01 | Nonoshita | Applicant |
| US5611028(A) | 1997-03-01 | Shibasaki | Applicant |
| US5630073(A) | 1997-05-01 | Nolan | Applicant |
| US5631984(A) | 1997-05-01 | Graf et al. | Applicant |
| US5668897(A) | 1997-09-01 | Stolfo | Applicant |
| US5673320(A) | 1997-09-01 | Ray et al. | Applicant |
| US5677955(A) | 1997-10-01 | Doggett | Applicant |
| US5678046(A) | 1997-10-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US5679938(A) | 1997-10-01 | Templeton | Applicant |
| US5680611(A) | 1997-10-01 | Rail | Applicant |
| US5691524(A) | 1997-11-01 | Josephson | Applicant |
| US5699452(A) | 1997-12-01 | Vaidyanathan | Applicant |
| US5734747(A) | 1998-03-01 | Vaidyanathan | Applicant |
| US5737440(A) | 1998-04-01 | Kunkler | Applicant |
| US5748780(A) | 1998-05-01 | Stolfo | Applicant |
| US5751842(A) | 1998-05-01 | Riach | Applicant |
| US5761686(A) | 1998-06-01 | Bloomberg | Applicant |
| US5784503(A) | 1998-07-01 | Bleecker, III et al. | Applicant |
| US5830609(A) | 1998-11-01 | Warner | Applicant |
| US5832463(A) | 1998-11-01 | Funk | Applicant |
| US5838814(A) | 1998-11-01 | Moore | Applicant |
| US5848185(A) | 1998-12-01 | Koga et al. | Applicant |
| US5859935(A) | 1999-01-01 | Johnson et al. | Applicant |
| US5863075(A) | 1999-01-01 | Rich | Applicant |
| US5870456(A) | 1999-02-01 | Rogers | Applicant |
| US5870724(A) | 1999-02-01 | Lawlor | Applicant |
| US5870725(A) | 1999-02-01 | Bellinger et al. | Applicant |
| US5878337(A) | 1999-03-01 | Joao | Applicant |
| US5889884(A) | 1999-03-01 | Hashimoto et al. | Applicant |
| US5893101(A) | 1999-04-01 | Balogh et al. | Applicant |
| US5897625(A) | 1999-04-01 | Gustin | Applicant |
| US5898157(A) | 1999-04-01 | Mangili et al. | Applicant |
| US5901253(A) | 1999-05-01 | Tretter | Applicant |
| US5903878(A) | 1999-05-01 | Talati | Applicant |
| US5903881(A) | 1999-05-01 | Schrader | Applicant |
| US5910988(A) | 1999-06-01 | Ballard | Applicant |
| US5917931(A) | 1999-06-01 | Kunkler | Applicant |
| US5924737(A) | 1999-07-01 | Schrupp | Applicant |
| US5926548(A) | 1999-07-01 | Okamoto | Applicant |
| US5930778(A) | 1999-07-01 | Geer | Applicant |
| US5937396(A) | 1999-08-01 | Konya | Applicant |
| US5940844(A) | 1999-08-01 | Cahill | Applicant |
| US5982918(A) | 1999-11-01 | Mennie | Applicant |
| US5987439(A) | 1999-11-01 | Gustin et al. | Applicant |
| US6012048(A) | 2000-01-01 | Gustin et al. | Applicant |
| US6014454(A) | 2000-01-01 | Kunkler | Applicant |
| US6021202(A) | 2000-02-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US6021397(A) | 2000-02-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US6023705(A) | 2000-02-01 | Bellinger et al. | Applicant |
| US6029887(A) | 2000-02-01 | Furuhashi | Applicant |
| US6030000(A) | 2000-02-01 | Diamond | Applicant |
| US6032137(A) | 2000-02-01 | Ballard | Applicant |
| US6038553(A) | 2000-03-01 | Hyde | Applicant |
| US6053405(A) | 2000-04-01 | Irwin et al. | Applicant |
| US6059185(A) | 2000-05-01 | Funk et al. | Applicant |
| US6064753(A) | 2000-05-01 | Bolle et al. | Applicant |
| US6064762(A) | 2000-05-01 | Haenel | Applicant |
| US6072941(A) | 2000-06-01 | Suzuki et al. | Applicant |
| US6073119(A) | 2000-06-01 | Borenmisza-Wahr | Applicant |
| US6073121(A) | 2000-06-01 | Ramzy | Applicant |
| US6085168(A) | 2000-07-01 | Mori | Applicant |
| US6086708(A) | 2000-07-01 | Colgate | Applicant |
| US6089450(A) | 2000-07-01 | Koeple | Applicant |
| US6089610(A) | 2000-07-01 | Greene | Applicant |
| US6092047(A) | 2000-07-01 | Hyman et al. | Applicant |
| US6097834(A) | 2000-08-01 | Krouse | Applicant |
| US6097845(A) | 2000-08-01 | Ng et al. | Applicant |
| US6097885(A) | 2000-08-01 | Rayner | Applicant |
| US6105865(A) | 2000-08-01 | Hardesty | Applicant |
| US6128603(A) | 2000-10-01 | Dent et al. | Applicant |
| US6141339(A) | 2000-10-01 | Kaplan et al. | Applicant |
| US6145738(A) | 2000-11-01 | Stinson et al. | Applicant |
| US6148102(A) | 2000-11-01 | Stolin | Applicant |
| US6149056(A) | 2000-11-01 | Stinson et al. | Applicant |
| US6151409(A) | 2000-11-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US6151423(A) | 2000-11-01 | Melen | Applicant |
| US6151426(A) | 2000-11-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US6159585(A) | 2000-12-01 | Rittenhouse | Applicant |
| US6170744(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US6178270(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Taylor et al. | Applicant |
| US6178409(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Weber et al. | Applicant |
| US6181837(B1) | 2001-01-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US6188506(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Kaiserman | Applicant |
| US6189785(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Lowery | Applicant |
| US6192165(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Irons | Applicant |
| US6195694(B1) | 2001-02-01 | Chen et al. | Applicant |
| US6199055(B1) | 2001-03-01 | Kara | Applicant |
| US6236009(B1) | 2001-05-01 | Emigh et al. | Applicant |
| US6243689(B1) | 2001-06-01 | Norton | Applicant |
| US6278983(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Ball | Applicant |
| US6282523(B1) | 2001-08-01 | Tedesco et al. | Applicant |
| US6282826(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Richards | Applicant |
| US6293469(B1) | 2001-09-01 | Masson et al. | Applicant |
| US6304860(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Martin | Applicant |
| US6310647(B1) | 2001-10-01 | Parulski et al. | Applicant |
| US6314452(B1) | 2001-11-01 | Dekel | Applicant |
| US6317727(B1) | 2001-11-01 | May | Applicant |
| US6328207(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Gregoire et al. | Applicant |
| US6330546(B1) | 2001-12-01 | Gopinathan et al. | Applicant |
| US6339658(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Moccagatta | Applicant |
| US6339766(B1) | 2002-01-01 | Gephart | Applicant |
| US6351553(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Hayosh | Applicant |
| US6351735(B1) | 2002-02-01 | Deaton et al. | Applicant |
| US6354490(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Weiss et al. | Applicant |
| US6363162(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Moed | Examiner |
| US6363164(B1) | 2002-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US6390362(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Martin | Applicant |
| US6397196(B1) | 2002-05-01 | Kravetz | Applicant |
| US6408084(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Foley | Applicant |
| US6411725(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Rhoads | Applicant |
| US6411737(B2) | 2002-06-01 | Wesolkowski et al. | Applicant |
| US6411938(B1) | 2002-06-01 | Gates et al. | Applicant |
| US6413305(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Mehta | Applicant |
| US6417869(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Do | Applicant |
| US6425017(B1) | 2002-07-01 | Dievendorff | Applicant |
| US6429952(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Olbricht | Applicant |
| US6439454(B1) | 2002-08-01 | Masson et al. | Applicant |
| US6449397(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Che-chu | Applicant |
| US6450403(B1) | 2002-09-01 | Martens et al. | Applicant |
| US6463220(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Dance et al. | Applicant |
| US6464134(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Page | Applicant |
| US6469745(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Yamada et al. | Applicant |
| US6470325(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Leemhuis | Applicant |
| US6473519(B1) | 2002-10-01 | Pidhirny et al. | Applicant |
| US6502747(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Stoutenburg et al. | Applicant |
| US6505178(B1) | 2003-01-01 | Flenley | Applicant |
| US6546119(B2) | 2003-04-01 | Ciolli et al. | Applicant |
| US6574377(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Cahill et al. | Applicant |
| US6574609(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Downs | Applicant |
| US6578760(B1) | 2003-06-01 | Otto | Applicant |
| US6587837(B1) | 2003-07-01 | Spagna | Applicant |
| US6606117(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Windle | Applicant |
| US6609200(B2) | 2003-08-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US6611598(B1) | 2003-08-01 | Hayosh | Applicant |
| US6614930(B1) | 2003-09-01 | Agnihotri et al. | Applicant |
| US6643416(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Daniels | Applicant |
| US6647136(B2) | 2003-11-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US6654487(B1) | 2003-11-01 | Downs, Jr. | Applicant |
| US6661910(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US6669086(B2) | 2003-12-01 | Abdi et al. | Applicant |
| US6672452(B1) | 2004-01-01 | Alves | Applicant |
| US6682452(B2) | 2004-01-01 | Quintus | Applicant |
| US6695204(B1) | 2004-02-01 | Stinson | Applicant |
| US6711474(B1) | 2004-03-01 | Treyz et al. | Applicant |
| US6726097(B2) | 2004-04-01 | Graef | Applicant |
| US6728397(B2) | 2004-04-01 | McNeal | Applicant |
| US6738496(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Van Hall | Applicant |
| US6742128(B1) | 2004-05-01 | Joiner | Applicant |
| US6745186(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Testa et al. | Applicant |
| US6754640(B2) | 2004-06-01 | Bozeman | Applicant |
| US6755340(B1) | 2004-06-01 | Voss et al. | Applicant |
| US6760414(B1) | 2004-07-01 | Schurko et al. | Applicant |
| US6760470(B1) | 2004-07-01 | Bogosian et al. | Applicant |
| US6763226(B1) | 2004-07-01 | McZeal | Applicant |
| US6781962(B1) | 2004-08-01 | Williams | Applicant |
| US6786398(B1) | 2004-09-01 | Stinson et al. | Applicant |
| US6789054(B1) | 2004-09-01 | Makhlouf | Applicant |
| US6796489(B2) | 2004-09-01 | Slater et al. | Applicant |
| US6796491(B2) | 2004-09-01 | Nakajima | Applicant |
| US6806903(B1) | 2004-10-01 | Okisu et al. | Applicant |
| US6807294(B2) | 2004-10-01 | Yamazaki | Applicant |
| US6813733(B1) | 2004-11-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US6829704(B2) | 2004-12-01 | Zhang | Applicant |
| US6844885(B2) | 2005-01-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US6856965(B1) | 2005-02-01 | Stinson | Applicant |
| US6863214(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Garner et al. | Applicant |
| US6870947(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Kelland | Applicant |
| US6873728(B2) | 2005-03-01 | Bernstein et al. | Applicant |
| US6883140(B1) | 2005-04-01 | Acker | Applicant |
| US6898314(B2) | 2005-05-01 | Kung et al. | Applicant |
| US6902105(B2) | 2005-06-01 | Koakutsu | Applicant |
| US6910023(B1) | 2005-06-01 | Schibi | Applicant |
| US6913188(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Wong | Applicant |
| US6922487(B2) | 2005-07-01 | Dance et al. | Applicant |
| US6931255(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Mekuria | Applicant |
| US6931591(B1) | 2005-08-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US6934719(B2) | 2005-08-01 | Nally | Applicant |
| US6947610(B2) | 2005-09-01 | Sun | Applicant |
| US6957770(B1) | 2005-10-01 | Robinson | Applicant |
| US6961689(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Greenberg | Applicant |
| US6970843(B1) | 2005-11-01 | Forte | Applicant |
| US6973589(B2) | 2005-12-01 | Wright | Applicant |
| US6983886(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Natsukari et al. | Applicant |
| US6993507(B2) | 2006-01-01 | Meyer | Applicant |
| US6996263(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US6999943(B1) | 2006-02-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US7003040(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Yi | Applicant |
| US7004382(B2) | 2006-02-01 | Sandru | Applicant |
| US7010155(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Koakutsu et al. | Applicant |
| US7010507(B1) | 2006-03-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US7016704(B2) | 2006-03-01 | Pallakoff | Applicant |
| US7027171(B1) | 2006-04-01 | Watanabe | Applicant |
| US7028886(B1) | 2006-04-01 | Maloney | Applicant |
| US7039048(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Monta | Applicant |
| US7046991(B2) | 2006-05-01 | Little | Applicant |
| US7051001(B1) | 2006-05-01 | Slater | Applicant |
| US7058036(B1) | 2006-06-01 | Yu | Applicant |
| US7062099(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US7062456(B1) | 2006-06-01 | Riehl et al. | Applicant |
| US7062768(B2) | 2006-06-01 | Kubo | Applicant |
| US7072862(B1) | 2006-07-01 | Wilson | Applicant |
| US7076458(B2) | 2006-07-01 | Lawlor et al. | Applicant |
| US7086003(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Demsky | Applicant |
| US7092561(B2) | 2006-08-01 | Downs, Jr. | Applicant |
| US7104443(B1) | 2006-09-01 | Paul et al. | Applicant |
| US7113925(B2) | 2006-09-01 | Waserstein | Applicant |
| US7114649(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Nelson | Applicant |
| US7116446(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Maurer | Applicant |
| US7117171(B1) | 2006-10-01 | Pollin | Applicant |
| US7120461(B2) | 2006-10-01 | Cho | Applicant |
| US7131571(B2) | 2006-11-01 | Swift et al. | Applicant |
| US7139594(B2) | 2006-11-01 | Nagatomo | Applicant |
| US7140539(B1) | 2006-11-01 | Crews | Applicant |
| US7163347(B2) | 2007-01-01 | Lugg | Applicant |
| US7178721(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Maloney | Applicant |
| US7181430(B1) | 2007-02-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US7184980(B2) | 2007-02-01 | Allen-Rouman et al. | Applicant |
| US7185805(B1) | 2007-03-01 | McShirley | Applicant |
| US7197173(B2) | 2007-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7200255(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7204412(B2) | 2007-04-01 | Foss, Jr. | Applicant |
| US7207478(B1) | 2007-04-01 | Blackson et al. | Applicant |
| US7216106(B1) | 2007-05-01 | Buchanan | Applicant |
| US7219082(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Forte | Applicant |
| US7219831(B2) | 2007-05-01 | Murata | Applicant |
| US7240336(B1) | 2007-07-01 | Baker | Applicant |
| US7245765(B2) | 2007-07-01 | Myers et al. | Applicant |
| US7249076(B1) | 2007-07-01 | Pendleton | Applicant |
| US7252224(B2) | 2007-08-01 | Verma | Applicant |
| US7257246(B1) | 2007-08-01 | Brodie et al. | Applicant |
| US7266230(B2) | 2007-09-01 | Doran | Applicant |
| US7277191(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Metcalfe et al. | Applicant |
| US7290034(B2) | 2007-10-01 | Budd | Applicant |
| US7299970(B1) | 2007-11-01 | Ching | Applicant |
| US7299979(B2) | 2007-11-01 | Phillips | Applicant |
| US7313543(B1) | 2007-12-01 | Crane | Applicant |
| US7314163(B1) | 2008-01-01 | Crews et al. | Applicant |
| US7321874(B2) | 2008-01-01 | Dilip | Applicant |
| US7321875(B2) | 2008-01-01 | Dilip | Applicant |
| US7325725(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Foss, Jr. | Applicant |
| US7328190(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US7330604(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Wu et al. | Applicant |
| US7331523(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Meier et al. | Applicant |
| US7336813(B2) | 2008-02-01 | Prakash et al. | Applicant |
| US7343320(B1) | 2008-03-01 | Treyz | Applicant |
| US7349566(B2) | 2008-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7349585(B2) | 2008-03-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US7356505(B2) | 2008-04-01 | March | Applicant |
| US7369713(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Suino | Applicant |
| US7377425(B1) | 2008-05-01 | Ma | Applicant |
| US7379978(B2) | 2008-05-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US7383227(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Weinflash et al. | Applicant |
| US7385631(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Maeno | Applicant |
| US7386511(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Buchanan | Applicant |
| US7388683(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Rodriguez et al. | Applicant |
| US7391897(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7391934(B2) | 2008-06-01 | Goodall et al. | Applicant |
| US7392935(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Byrne | Applicant |
| US7401048(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Rosedale | Applicant |
| US7403917(B1) | 2008-07-01 | Larsen | Applicant |
| US7406198(B2) | 2008-07-01 | Aoki et al. | Applicant |
| US7419093(B1) | 2008-09-01 | Blackson et al. | Applicant |
| US7421107(B2) | 2008-09-01 | Lugg | Applicant |
| US7421410(B1) | 2008-09-01 | Schechtman et al. | Applicant |
| US7427016(B2) | 2008-09-01 | Chimento | Applicant |
| US7433098(B2) | 2008-10-01 | Klein et al. | Applicant |
| US7437327(B2) | 2008-10-01 | Lam | Applicant |
| US7440924(B2) | 2008-10-01 | Buchanan | Applicant |
| US7447347(B2) | 2008-11-01 | Weber | Applicant |
| US7455220(B2) | 2008-11-01 | Phillips | Applicant |
| US7455221(B2) | 2008-11-01 | Sheaffer | Applicant |
| US7460108(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Tamura | Applicant |
| US7460700(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Tsunachima et al. | Applicant |
| US7461779(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Ramachandran | Applicant |
| US7461780(B2) | 2008-12-01 | Potts | Applicant |
| US7464859(B1) | 2008-12-01 | Hawkins | Applicant |
| US7471818(B1) | 2008-12-01 | Price | Applicant |
| US7475040(B2) | 2009-01-01 | Buchanan | Applicant |
| US7477923(B2) | 2009-01-01 | Wallmark | Applicant |
| US7480382(B2) | 2009-01-01 | Dunbar | Applicant |
| US7480422(B2) | 2009-01-01 | Ackley et al. | Applicant |
| US7489953(B2) | 2009-02-01 | Griffin | Applicant |
| US7490242(B2) | 2009-02-01 | Torres | Applicant |
| US7497429(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Reynders | Applicant |
| US7503486(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Ahles | Applicant |
| US7505759(B1) | 2009-03-01 | Rahman | Applicant |
| US7506261(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Statou | Applicant |
| US7509287(B2) | 2009-03-01 | Nutahara | Applicant |
| US7512564(B1) | 2009-03-01 | Geer | Applicant |
| US7519560(B2) | 2009-04-01 | Lam | Applicant |
| US7520420(B2) | 2009-04-01 | Phillips | Applicant |
| US7520422(B1) | 2009-04-01 | Robinson et al. | Applicant |
| US7536354(B1) | 2009-05-01 | deGroeve et al. | Applicant |
| US7536440(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Budd | Applicant |
| US7539646(B2) | 2009-05-01 | Gilder | Applicant |
| US7540408(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Levine | Applicant |
| US7542598(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7545529(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Borrey et al. | Applicant |
| US7548641(B2) | 2009-06-01 | Gilson et al. | Applicant |
| US7566002(B2) | 2009-07-01 | Love et al. | Applicant |
| US7571848(B2) | 2009-08-01 | Cohen | Applicant |
| US7577614(B1) | 2009-08-01 | Warren et al. | Applicant |
| US7587066(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Cordery et al. | Applicant |
| US7587363(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Cataline | Applicant |
| US7590275(B2) | 2009-09-01 | Clarke et al. | Applicant |
| US7599543(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7599888(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Manfre | Applicant |
| US7602956(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7606762(B1) | 2009-10-01 | Heit | Applicant |
| US7609873(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Foth et al. | Applicant |
| US7609889(B2) | 2009-10-01 | Guo et al. | Applicant |
| US7619721(B2) | 2009-11-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7620231(B2) | 2009-11-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7620604(B1) | 2009-11-01 | Bueche, Jr. | Applicant |
| US7630518(B2) | 2009-12-01 | Frew et al. | Applicant |
| US7644037(B1) | 2010-01-01 | Ostrovsky | Applicant |
| US7644043(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Minowa | Applicant |
| US7647275(B2) | 2010-01-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US7668363(B2) | 2010-02-01 | Price | Applicant |
| US7672022(B1) | 2010-03-01 | Fan | Applicant |
| US7672940(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Viola | Applicant |
| US7676409(B1) | 2010-03-01 | Ahmad | Applicant |
| US7680732(B1) | 2010-03-01 | Davies et al. | Applicant |
| US7680735(B1) | 2010-03-01 | Loy | Applicant |
| US7689482(B2) | 2010-03-01 | Lam | Applicant |
| US7697776(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Wu et al. | Applicant |
| US7698222(B1) | 2010-04-01 | Bueche, Jr. | Applicant |
| US7702588(B2) | 2010-04-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US7714778(B2) | 2010-05-01 | Dupray | Applicant |
| US7720735(B2) | 2010-05-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US7734545(B1) | 2010-06-01 | Fogliano | Applicant |
| US7743979(B2) | 2010-06-01 | Fredman | Applicant |
| US7753268(B1) | 2010-07-01 | Robinson et al. | Applicant |
| US7761358(B2) | 2010-07-01 | Craig et al. | Applicant |
| US7766244(B1) | 2010-08-01 | Field | Applicant |
| US7769650(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Bleunven | Applicant |
| US7778457(B2) | 2010-08-01 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Applicant |
| US7792752(B1) | 2010-09-01 | Kay | Applicant |
| US7792753(B1) | 2010-09-01 | Slater et al. | Applicant |
| US7793833(B2) | 2010-09-01 | Yoon et al. | Applicant |
| US7810714(B2) | 2010-10-01 | Murata | Applicant |
| US7812986(B2) | 2010-10-01 | Graham et al. | Applicant |
| US7818245(B2) | 2010-10-01 | Prakash et al. | Applicant |
| US7831458(B2) | 2010-11-01 | Neumann | Applicant |
| US7856402(B1) | 2010-12-01 | Kay | Applicant |
| US7865384(B2) | 2011-01-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US7873200(B1) | 2011-01-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US7876949(B1) | 2011-01-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US7885451(B1) | 2011-02-01 | Walls et al. | Applicant |
| US7885880(B1) | 2011-02-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US7894094(B2) | 2011-02-01 | Nacman et al. | Applicant |
| US7895054(B2) | 2011-02-01 | Slen et al. | Applicant |
| US7896232(B1) | 2011-03-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US7900822(B1) | 2011-03-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US7903863(B2) | 2011-03-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US7904386(B2) | 2011-03-01 | Kalra et al. | Applicant |
| US7912785(B1) | 2011-03-01 | Kay | Applicant |
| US7935441(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Tononishi | Applicant |
| US7949587(B1) | 2011-05-01 | Morris et al. | Applicant |
| US7950698(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Popadic et al. | Applicant |
| US7953441(B2) | 2011-05-01 | Lors | Applicant |
| US7958053(B2) | 2011-06-01 | Stone | Applicant |
| US7962411(B1) | 2011-06-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US7970677(B1) | 2011-06-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US7974899(B1) | 2011-07-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US7978900(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Applicant |
| US7979326(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Kurushima | Applicant |
| US7987231(B2) | 2011-07-01 | Karkanias | Applicant |
| US7996312(B1) | 2011-08-01 | Beck et al. | Applicant |
| US7996314(B1) | 2011-08-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US7996315(B1) | 2011-08-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US7996316(B1) | 2011-08-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US8000514(B2) | 2011-08-01 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Applicant |
| US8001051(B1) | 2011-08-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US8045784(B2) | 2011-10-01 | Price et al. | Applicant |
| US8046301(B1) | 2011-10-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US8060442(B1) | 2011-11-01 | Hecht et al. | Applicant |
| US8065307(B2) | 2011-11-01 | Haslam et al. | Applicant |
| US8091778(B1) | 2012-01-01 | Block et al. | Applicant |
| US8116533(B2) | 2012-02-01 | Kiplinger et al. | Applicant |
| US8159520(B1) | 2012-04-01 | Dhanoa | Applicant |
| US8203640(B2) | 2012-06-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US8204293(B2) | 2012-06-01 | Csulits et al. | Applicant |
| US8235284(B1) | 2012-08-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US8266076(B2) | 2012-09-01 | Lopez et al. | Applicant |
| US8271385(B2) | 2012-09-01 | Emerson et al. | Applicant |
| US8290237(B1) | 2012-10-01 | Burks et al. | Applicant |
| US8313020(B2) | 2012-11-01 | Ramachandran | Applicant |
| US8320657(B1) | 2012-11-01 | Burks et al. | Applicant |
| US8332329(B1) | 2012-12-01 | Thiele | Applicant |
| US8351677(B1) | 2013-01-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US8351678(B1) | 2013-01-01 | Medina, III | Applicant |
| US8358826(B1) | 2013-01-01 | Medina et al. | Applicant |
| US8364563(B2) | 2013-01-01 | Choiniere, Sr. | Applicant |
| US8369650(B2) | 2013-02-01 | Zanfir et al. | Applicant |
| US8374963(B1) | 2013-02-01 | Billman | Applicant |
| US8391599(B1) | 2013-03-01 | Medina, III | Applicant |
| US8392332(B1) | 2013-03-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US8401962(B1) | 2013-03-01 | Bent et al. | Applicant |
| US8422758(B1) | 2013-04-01 | Bueche, Jr. | Applicant |
| US8433127(B1) | 2013-04-01 | Harpel et al. | Applicant |
| US8433647(B1) | 2013-04-01 | Yarbrough | Applicant |
| US8452689(B1) | 2013-05-01 | Medina, III | Applicant |
| US8464933(B1) | 2013-06-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US8538124(B1) | 2013-09-01 | Harpel et al. | Applicant |
| US8542921(B1) | 2013-09-01 | Medina | Applicant |
| US8548267(B1) | 2013-10-01 | Yacoub et al. | Applicant |
| US8559766(B2) | 2013-10-01 | Tilt et al. | Applicant |
| US8582862(B2) | 2013-11-01 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Applicant |
| US8611635(B1) | 2013-12-01 | Medina, III | Applicant |
| US8660952(B1) | 2014-02-01 | Viera et al. | Applicant |
| US8699779(B1) | 2014-04-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US8708227(B1) | 2014-04-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US8731321(B2) | 2014-05-01 | Fujiwara et al. | Applicant |
| US8732081(B1) | 2014-05-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US8751345(B1) | 2014-06-01 | Borzych et al. | Applicant |
| US8751356(B1) | 2014-06-01 | Garcia | Applicant |
| US8751379(B1) | 2014-06-01 | Bueche, Jr. | Applicant |
| US8799147(B1) | 2014-08-01 | Walls et al. | Applicant |
| US8837806(B1) | 2014-09-01 | Ethington et al. | Applicant |
| US8843405(B1) | 2014-09-01 | Hartman et al. | Applicant |
| US8959033(B1) | 2015-02-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US8977571(B1) | 2015-03-01 | Bueche, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US8990862(B1) | 2015-03-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US9009071(B1) | 2015-04-01 | Watson et al. | Applicant |
| US9036040(B1) | 2015-05-01 | Danko | Applicant |
| US9058512(B1) | 2015-06-01 | Medina, III | Applicant |
| US9064284(B1) | 2015-06-01 | Janiszeski et al. | Applicant |
| US9129340(B1) | 2015-08-01 | Medina, III et al. | Applicant |
| US9159101(B1) | 2015-10-01 | Pollack et al. | Applicant |
| US9177197(B1) | 2015-11-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US9177198(B1) | 2015-11-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US9224136(B1) | 2015-12-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US9286514(B1) | 2016-03-01 | Newman | Applicant |
| US9311634(B1) | 2016-04-01 | Hildebrand | Applicant |
| US9336517(B1) | 2016-05-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US9390339(B1) | 2016-07-01 | Danko | Applicant |
| US9401011(B2) | 2016-07-01 | Medina, III et al. | Applicant |
| US9424569(B1) | 2016-08-01 | Sherman et al. | Applicant |
| US9569756(B1) | 2017-02-01 | Bueche, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US9619872(B1) | 2017-04-01 | Medina, III et al. | Applicant |
| US9626183(B1) | 2017-04-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US9626662(B1) | 2017-04-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US9779392(B1) | 2017-10-01 | Prasad et al. | Applicant |
| US9779452(B1) | 2017-10-01 | Medina et al. | Applicant |
| US9785929(B1) | 2017-10-01 | Watson et al. | Applicant |
| US9792654(B1) | 2017-10-01 | Limas et al. | Applicant |
| US9818090(B1) | 2017-11-01 | Bueche, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US9886642(B1) | 2018-02-01 | Danko | Applicant |
| US9892454(B1) | 2018-02-01 | Pollack et al. | Applicant |
| US9898778(B1) | 2018-02-01 | Pollack et al. | Applicant |
| US9898808(B1) | 2018-02-01 | Medina, III et al. | Applicant |
| US9904848(B1) | 2018-02-01 | Newman | Applicant |
| US9946923(B1) | 2018-04-01 | Medina | Applicant |
| US10013605(B1) | 2018-07-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US10013681(B1) | 2018-07-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US10181087(B1) | 2019-01-01 | Danko | Applicant |
| US10235660(B1) | 2019-03-01 | Bueche, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US10325420(B1) | 2019-06-01 | Moon | Applicant |
| US10354235(B1) | 2019-07-01 | Medina | Applicant |
| US10373136(B1) | 2019-08-01 | Pollack et al. | Applicant |
| US10380559(B1) | 2019-08-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US10621559(B1) | 2020-04-01 | Oakes, III et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0004235(A1) | 2001-06-01 | Maloney | Applicant |
| US2001/0014881(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Drummond | Applicant |
| US2001/0016084(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Pollard et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0018739(A1) | 2001-08-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US2001/0027994(A1) | 2001-10-01 | Hayashida | Applicant |
| US2001/0037299(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Nichols et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0042171(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Vermeulen | Applicant |
| US2001/0042785(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Walker | Applicant |
| US2001/0043748(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Wesolkowski et al. | Applicant |
| US2001/0047330(A1) | 2001-11-01 | Gephart | Applicant |
| US2001/0054020(A1) | 2001-12-01 | Barth et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0001393(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US2002/0013767(A1) | 2002-01-01 | Katz | Applicant |
| US2002/0016763(A1) | 2002-02-01 | March | Applicant |
| US2002/0016769(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Barbara et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0023055(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Antognini et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0025085(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Gustafson et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0026418(A1) | 2002-02-01 | Koppel et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0032656(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US2002/0038289(A1) | 2002-03-01 | Lawlor et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0040340(A1) | 2002-04-01 | Yoshida | Applicant |
| US2002/0052841(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Guthrie | Applicant |
| US2002/0052853(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Munoz | Applicant |
| US2002/0065786(A1) | 2002-05-01 | Martens et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0072974(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Pugliese | Applicant |
| US2002/0075524(A1) | 2002-06-01 | Blair | Applicant |
| US2002/0084321(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Martens | Applicant |
| US2002/0087467(A1) | 2002-07-01 | Mascavage, III et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0107767(A1) | 2002-08-01 | McClair et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0107809(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Biddle et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0116329(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Serbetcioglu | Applicant |
| US2002/0116335(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Star | Applicant |
| US2002/0118891(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Rudd | Applicant |
| US2002/0120562(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Opiela | Applicant |
| US2002/0120582(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Elston et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0120846(A1) | 2002-08-01 | Stewart et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0129249(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Maillard et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0130868(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US2002/0133409(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Sawano et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0138445(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Laage te al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0138522(A1) | 2002-09-01 | Muralidhar | Applicant |
| US2002/0147798(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Huang | Applicant |
| US2002/0150279(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Scott | Applicant |
| US2002/0150311(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Lynn | Applicant |
| US2002/0152160(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Allen-Rouman et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0152161(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Aoike | Applicant |
| US2002/0152164(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Dutta | Applicant |
| US2002/0152165(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Dutta et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0152169(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Dutta et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0152170(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Dutta | Applicant |
| US2002/0153414(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Stoutenburg et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0154127(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Vienneau et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0159648(A1) | 2002-10-01 | Alderson et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0169715(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Ruth et al. | Applicant |
| US2002/0171820(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Okamura | Applicant |
| US2002/0178112(A1) | 2002-11-01 | Goeller | Applicant |
| US2002/0186881(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US2002/0188564(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Star | Applicant |
| US2002/0195485(A1) | 2002-12-01 | Pomerleau et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0005326(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Flemming | Applicant |
| US2003/0009420(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Jones | Applicant |
| US2003/0015583(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Abdi et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0018897(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Bellis, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0023557(A1) | 2003-01-01 | Moore | Applicant |
| US2003/0026609(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Parulski | Applicant |
| US2003/0038227(A1) | 2003-02-01 | Sesek | Applicant |
| US2003/0050889(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Burke | Applicant |
| US2003/0053692(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Hong et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0055756(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Allan | Applicant |
| US2003/0055776(A1) | 2003-03-01 | Samuelson | Applicant |
| US2003/0072568(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Lin et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0074315(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Lam | Applicant |
| US2003/0075596(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Koakutsu | Examiner |
| US2003/0075916(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Gorski | Applicant |
| US2003/0078883(A1) | 2003-04-01 | Stewart et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0081824(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Mennie | Applicant |
| US2003/0086615(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Dance et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0093367(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Allen-Rouman et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0093369(A1) | 2003-05-01 | Ijichi et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0102714(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Rhodes et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0105688(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Brown et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0105714(A1) | 2003-06-01 | Alarcon-Luther et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0126078(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Vihinen | Applicant |
| US2003/0126082(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Omura et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0130940(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Hansen et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0132384(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Sugiyama et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0133608(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Bernstein et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0133610(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Nagarajan et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0135457(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Stewart et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0139999(A1) | 2003-07-01 | Rowe | Applicant |
| US2003/0159046(A1) | 2003-08-01 | Choi et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0167225(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Adams | Applicant |
| US2003/0177448(A1) | 2003-09-01 | Levine et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0187790(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Swift et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0191615(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Bailey | Applicant |
| US2003/0191869(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Williams | Applicant |
| US2003/0200107(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Allen et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0200174(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Star | Applicant |
| US2003/0202690(A1) | 2003-10-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0212904(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Randle et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0217005(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Drummond et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0218061(A1) | 2003-11-01 | Filatov | Applicant |
| US2003/0225705(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Park et al. | Applicant |
| US2003/0231285(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Ferguson | Applicant |
| US2003/0233278(A1) | 2003-12-01 | Marshall | Applicant |
| US2003/0233318(A1) | 2003-12-01 | King et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0010466(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US2004/0012496(A1) | 2004-01-01 | De Souza | Applicant |
| US2004/0013284(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Yu | Applicant |
| US2004/0017482(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Weitman | Applicant |
| US2004/0024626(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Bruijning | Applicant |
| US2004/0024708(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Masuda | Applicant |
| US2004/0029591(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Capman et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0030741(A1) | 2004-02-01 | Wolton et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0044606(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Buttridge et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0057697(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Renzi | Applicant |
| US2004/0058705(A1) | 2004-03-01 | Morgan | Applicant |
| US2004/0066031(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Wong | Applicant |
| US2004/0069841(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Wong | Applicant |
| US2004/0071333(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Douglas et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0075754(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Nakajima et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0076320(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Downs, Jr. | Applicant |
| US2004/0078299(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Down-Logan | Applicant |
| US2004/0080795(A1) | 2004-04-01 | Bean et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0089711(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Sandru | Applicant |
| US2004/0093303(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Picciallo | Applicant |
| US2004/0093305(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Kight | Applicant |
| US2004/0103057(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Melbert et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0103296(A1) | 2004-05-01 | Harp | Applicant |
| US2004/0109596(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Doran | Applicant |
| US2004/0110975(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Osinski et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0111371(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Friedman | Applicant |
| US2004/0117302(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Weichert | Applicant |
| US2004/0122754(A1) | 2004-06-01 | Stevens | Applicant |
| US2004/0133511(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0133516(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0138974(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Shimamura | Applicant |
| US2004/0148235(A1) | 2004-07-01 | Craig et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0158549(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Matena | Applicant |
| US2004/0165096(A1) | 2004-08-01 | Maeno | Applicant |
| US2004/0170259(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Park | Applicant |
| US2004/0184766(A1) | 2004-09-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0201741(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Ban | Applicant |
| US2004/0210515(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Hughes | Applicant |
| US2004/0210523(A1) | 2004-10-01 | Gains et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0225604(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Foss, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0228277(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Williams | Applicant |
| US2004/0236647(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Acharya | Applicant |
| US2004/0236688(A1) | 2004-11-01 | Bozeman | Applicant |
| US2004/0240722(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Tsuji et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0245324(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US2004/0247199(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Murai et al. | Applicant |
| US2004/0248600(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Kim | Applicant |
| US2004/0252679(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Williams | Applicant |
| US2004/0260636(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Marceau | Applicant |
| US2004/0267666(A1) | 2004-12-01 | Minami | Applicant |
| US2005/0001421(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Luth et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0010108(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Rahn et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0015332(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Chen | Applicant |
| US2005/0015342(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Murata et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0021466(A1) | 2005-01-01 | Buchanan et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0030388(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Stavely et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0033645(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Duphily | Applicant |
| US2005/0033685(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Reyes | Applicant |
| US2005/0033690(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Antognini et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0033695(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Minowa | Applicant |
| US2005/0035193(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Gustin | Examiner |
| US2005/0038746(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Latimer et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0038754(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Geist | Applicant |
| US2005/0044042(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Mendiola | Applicant |
| US2005/0044577(A1) | 2005-02-01 | Jerding | Applicant |
| US2005/0049950(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US2005/0071283(A1) | 2005-03-01 | Randle et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0075969(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Nielson et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0075974(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Turgeon | Applicant |
| US2005/0077351(A1) | 2005-04-01 | De Jong | Applicant |
| US2005/0078336(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Ferlitsch | Applicant |
| US2005/0080725(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Pick | Applicant |
| US2005/0082364(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Alvarez et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0086140(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Ireland | Applicant |
| US2005/0086168(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Alvarez | Applicant |
| US2005/0089209(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Stefanuk | Applicant |
| US2005/0091161(A1) | 2005-04-01 | Gustin | Applicant |
| US2005/0096992(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Geisel | Applicant |
| US2005/0097019(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Jacobs | Applicant |
| US2005/0097046(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Singfield | Applicant |
| US2005/0097050(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Orcutt | Applicant |
| US2005/0108164(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Salafia | Applicant |
| US2005/0108168(A1) | 2005-05-01 | Halpin | Applicant |
| US2005/0115110(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Dinkins | Applicant |
| US2005/0125338(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Tidwell et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0125360(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Tidwell et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0127160(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Fujikawa | Applicant |
| US2005/0131820(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Rodriguez | Applicant |
| US2005/0143136(A1) | 2005-06-01 | Lev et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0149436(A1) | 2005-07-01 | Elterich | Applicant |
| US2005/0168566(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Tada | Applicant |
| US2005/0171899(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Dunn | Applicant |
| US2005/0171907(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Lewis | Applicant |
| US2005/0177494(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Kelly et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0177499(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Thomas | Applicant |
| US2005/0177510(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Hilt et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0177518(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US2005/0182710(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US2005/0188306(A1) | 2005-08-01 | Mackenzie | Applicant |
| US2005/0203430(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Williams et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0205661(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Taylor | Applicant |
| US2005/0209961(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Michelsen | Applicant |
| US2005/0213805(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Blake et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0216410(A1) | 2005-09-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0218209(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Heilper et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0220324(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Klein et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0228733(A1) | 2005-10-01 | Bent et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0244035(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Klein et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0252955(A1) | 2005-11-01 | Sugai | Applicant |
| US2005/0267843(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Acharya et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0268107(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Harris et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0269412(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Chiu | Applicant |
| US2005/0273368(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Hutten et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0278250(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Zair | Applicant |
| US2005/0281448(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Lugg | Applicant |
| US2005/0281471(A1) | 2005-12-01 | LeConte | Applicant |
| US2005/0281474(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Huang | Applicant |
| US2005/0289030(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US2005/0289059(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Brewington et al. | Applicant |
| US2005/0289182(A1) | 2005-12-01 | Pandian et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0002426(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Madour | Applicant |
| US2006/0004660(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Pranger | Applicant |
| US2006/0015450(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Guck et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0015733(A1) | 2006-01-01 | O'Malley et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0017752(A1) | 2006-01-01 | Kurzweil et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0025697(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Kurzweil | Applicant |
| US2006/0039628(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0039629(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Li et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0041506(A1) | 2006-02-01 | Mason et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0045321(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Yu | Applicant |
| US2006/0045374(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Kim et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0045379(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Heaney, Jr. et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0047593(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Naratil | Applicant |
| US2006/0049242(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Mejias et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0053056(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Alspach-Goss | Applicant |
| US2006/0059085(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Tucker | Applicant |
| US2006/0064368(A1) | 2006-03-01 | Forte | Applicant |
| US2006/0080245(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Bahl | Applicant |
| US2006/0085357(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Pizarro | Applicant |
| US2006/0085516(A1) | 2006-04-01 | Farr et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0102704(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Reynders | Applicant |
| US2006/0103893(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Azimi et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0106691(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Sheaffer | Applicant |
| US2006/0106717(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Randle | Applicant |
| US2006/0108168(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Fischer et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0110063(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Weiss | Applicant |
| US2006/0112013(A1) | 2006-05-01 | Maloney | Applicant |
| US2006/0115110(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Rodriguez | Applicant |
| US2006/0115141(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Koakutsu et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0118613(A1) | 2006-06-01 | McMann | Applicant |
| US2006/0124730(A1) | 2006-06-01 | Maloney | Applicant |
| US2006/0144924(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Stover | Applicant |
| US2006/0144937(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Heilper et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0144950(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Johnson | Applicant |
| US2006/0159367(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Zeineh et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0161499(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Rich et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0161501(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Waserstein | Applicant |
| US2006/0164682(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Lev | Applicant |
| US2006/0166178(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Driedijk | Applicant |
| US2006/0167818(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Wentker et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0181614(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Yen et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0182331(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Gilson et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0182332(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Weber | Applicant |
| US2006/0186194(A1) | 2006-08-01 | Richardson et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0202014(A1) | 2006-09-01 | VanKirk et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0206506(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Fitzpatrick | Applicant |
| US2006/0208059(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Cable et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0210138(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Hilton et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0212391(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Norman et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0212393(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US2006/0214940(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Kinoshita | Applicant |
| US2006/0215204(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Miyamoto et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0215230(A1) | 2006-09-01 | Borrey et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0221198(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Fry et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0222260(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Sambongi et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0229976(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Jung | Applicant |
| US2006/0229986(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Corder | Applicant |
| US2006/0238503(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Smith | Applicant |
| US2006/0242062(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Peterson | Applicant |
| US2006/0242063(A1) | 2006-10-01 | Peterson | Applicant |
| US2006/0248009(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Hicks et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0249567(A1) | 2006-11-01 | Byrne | Applicant |
| US2006/0274164(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Kimura et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0279628(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Fleming | Applicant |
| US2006/0282383(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Doran | Applicant |
| US2006/0289630(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Updike et al. | Applicant |
| US2006/0291744(A1) | 2006-12-01 | Ikeda et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0002157(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Shintani et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0013721(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Vau et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0016796(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Singhal | Applicant |
| US2007/0019243(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Sato | Applicant |
| US2007/0022053(A1) | 2007-01-01 | Waserstein | Applicant |
| US2007/0027802(A1) | 2007-02-01 | VanDeburg et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0030357(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Levien et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0031022(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Frew | Applicant |
| US2007/0038561(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Vancini et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0041629(A1) | 2007-02-01 | Prakash et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0050292(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Yarbrough | Applicant |
| US2007/0053574(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Verma et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0058851(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Quine | Applicant |
| US2007/0063016(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Myatt | Applicant |
| US2007/0064991(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Douglas et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0065143(A1) | 2007-03-01 | Didow et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0075772(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Kokubo | Applicant |
| US2007/0076940(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Goodall et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0076941(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Carreon et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0077921(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Hayashi | Applicant |
| US2007/0080207(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Williams | Applicant |
| US2007/0082700(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Landschaft | Applicant |
| US2007/0084911(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Crowell | Applicant |
| US2007/0086642(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Foth | Applicant |
| US2007/0086643(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Spier | Applicant |
| US2007/0094088(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Mastie | Applicant |
| US2007/0094140(A1) | 2007-04-01 | Riney et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0100748(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Dheer | Applicant |
| US2007/0110277(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Hayduchok et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0118472(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Allen-Rouman et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0122024(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Haas et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0124241(A1) | 2007-05-01 | Newton | Applicant |
| US2007/0127805(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Foth et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0129955(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Dalmia | Applicant |
| US2007/0131758(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Mejias et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0136198(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Foth et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0138255(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Carreon et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0140545(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Rossignoli | Applicant |
| US2007/0140594(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Franklin | Applicant |
| US2007/0143208(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Varga | Applicant |
| US2007/0150337(A1) | 2007-06-01 | Hawkins et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0154098(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Geva et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0156438(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Popadic et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0168265(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Rosenberger | Applicant |
| US2007/0168283(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Alvarez et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0171288(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Inoue | Applicant |
| US2007/0172107(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0172148(A1) | 2007-07-01 | Hawley | Applicant |
| US2007/0175977(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Bauer et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0179883(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Questembert | Applicant |
| US2007/0183000(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Eisen et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0183652(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Backstrom et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0183741(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Lerman et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0194102(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Cohen | Applicant |
| US2007/0198432(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Pitroda et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0203708(A1) | 2007-08-01 | Polycn et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0206877(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Wu et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0208816(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Baldwin et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0214086(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Homoki | Applicant |
| US2007/0217669(A1) | 2007-09-01 | Swift et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0233525(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Boyle | Applicant |
| US2007/0233585(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Ben Simon et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0235518(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Mueller et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0235520(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0241179(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Davis | Applicant |
| US2007/0244782(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Chimento | Applicant |
| US2007/0246525(A1) | 2007-10-01 | Smith et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0251992(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Sharma et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0255652(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Tumminaro | Applicant |
| US2007/0255653(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Tumminaro | Applicant |
| US2007/0255662(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Tumminaro | Applicant |
| US2007/0258634(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Simonoff | Applicant |
| US2007/0262137(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Brown | Applicant |
| US2007/0262148(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Yoon | Applicant |
| US2007/0268540(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Gaspardo et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0271182(A1) | 2007-11-01 | Prakash et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0278286(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Crowell et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0288380(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Starrs | Applicant |
| US2007/0288382(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Narayanan et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0295803(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Levine et al. | Applicant |
| US2007/0299928(A1) | 2007-12-01 | Kohli et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0002911(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Eisen | Applicant |
| US2008/0010204(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Rackley, III et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0021802(A1) | 2008-01-01 | Pendelton | Applicant |
| US2008/0040280(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Davis et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0046362(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Easterly | Applicant |
| US2008/0052182(A1) | 2008-02-01 | Marshall | Applicant |
| US2008/0059376(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Davis | Applicant |
| US2008/0063253(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Wood | Applicant |
| US2008/0065524(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Matthews et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0068674(A1) | 2008-03-01 | McIntyre | Applicant |
| US2008/0071679(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Foley | Applicant |
| US2008/0071721(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Wang | Applicant |
| US2008/0073423(A1) | 2008-03-01 | Heit et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0080760(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Ronca | Applicant |
| US2008/0086420(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0086421(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Gilder | Applicant |
| US2008/0086770(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Kulkarni et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0091599(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Foss, Jr. | Applicant |
| US2008/0097899(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Jackson et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0097907(A1) | 2008-04-01 | Till et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0103790(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Abernethy | Applicant |
| US2008/0103967(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Ackert et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0113674(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Baig | Applicant |
| US2008/0114739(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Hayes | Applicant |
| US2008/0115066(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Pavley et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0116257(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Fickling | Applicant |
| US2008/0117991(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Peddireddy | Applicant |
| US2008/0119178(A1) | 2008-05-01 | Peddireddy | Applicant |
| US2008/0133411(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Jones et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0140579(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Sanjiv | Applicant |
| US2008/0147549(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Ruthbun | Applicant |
| US2008/0155672(A1) | 2008-06-01 | Sharma | Applicant |
| US2008/0156438(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Stumphauzer et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0162319(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Breeden et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0162320(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Mueller et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0162350(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Allen-Rouman et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0162371(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Rampell et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0177659(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Lacey et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0180750(A1) | 2008-07-01 | Feldman | Applicant |
| US2008/0205751(A1) | 2008-08-01 | Mischler | Applicant |
| US2008/0208727(A1) | 2008-08-01 | McLaughlin et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0214180(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Cunningham et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0219543(A1) | 2008-09-01 | Csulits | Applicant |
| US2008/0245869(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Berkun et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0247629(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Gilder | Applicant |
| US2008/0247655(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Yano | Applicant |
| US2008/0249931(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0249951(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0262950(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Christensen et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0262953(A1) | 2008-10-01 | Anderson | Applicant |
| US2008/0275821(A1) | 2008-11-01 | Bishop et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0301441(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Calman et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0304769(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Hollander et al. | Applicant |
| US2008/0316542(A1) | 2008-12-01 | Mindrum et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0024520(A1) | 2009-01-01 | Drory et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0046938(A1) | 2009-02-01 | Yoder | Applicant |
| US2009/0060396(A1) | 2009-03-01 | Blessan et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0066987(A1) | 2009-03-01 | Inokuchi | Applicant |
| US2009/0076921(A1) | 2009-03-01 | Nelson et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0092309(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Calman et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0094148(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Gilder et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0108080(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Meyer | Applicant |
| US2009/0110281(A1) | 2009-04-01 | Hirabayashi | Applicant |
| US2009/0114716(A1) | 2009-05-01 | Ramachandran | Applicant |
| US2009/0141962(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Borgia et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0164350(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Sorbe et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0164370(A1) | 2009-06-01 | Sorbe et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0166406(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Pigg et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0167870(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Caleca et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0171795(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Clouthier et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0171819(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Emde et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0171825(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Roman | Applicant |
| US2009/0173781(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Ramachadran | Applicant |
| US2009/0185241(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Nepomniachtchi | Applicant |
| US2009/0185737(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Nepomniachtchi | Applicant |
| US2009/0185738(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Nepomniachtchi | Applicant |
| US2009/0190823(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Walters | Applicant |
| US2009/0192938(A1) | 2009-07-01 | Amos | Applicant |
| US2009/0212929(A1) | 2009-08-01 | Drory et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0236413(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Mueller et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0240620(A1) | 2009-09-01 | Kendrick et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0252437(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Li | Applicant |
| US2009/0254447(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Blades | Applicant |
| US2009/0257641(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Liu et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0263019(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Tzadok et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0271287(A1) | 2009-10-01 | Halpern | Applicant |
| US2009/0281904(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Pharris | Applicant |
| US2009/0284637(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Parulski et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0290751(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Ferman et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0292628(A1) | 2009-11-01 | Dryer et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0313167(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Dujari et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0319425(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Tumminaro et al. | Applicant |
| US2009/0327129(A1) | 2009-12-01 | Collas et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0007899(A1) | 2010-01-01 | Lay | Applicant |
| US2010/0027679(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Sunahara et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0030687(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Panthaki et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0047000(A1) | 2010-02-01 | Park et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0057578(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Blair et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0061446(A1) | 2010-03-01 | Hands et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0078471(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Lin et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0082468(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Low et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0082470(A1) | 2010-04-01 | Walach | Applicant |
| US2010/0165015(A1) | 2010-07-01 | Barkley et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0198733(A1) | 2010-08-01 | Gantman et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0225773(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Lee | Applicant |
| US2010/0226559(A1) | 2010-09-01 | Najari et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0260408(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Prakash et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0262522(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0274693(A1) | 2010-10-01 | Bause et al. | Applicant |
| US2010/0312705(A1) | 2010-12-01 | Caruso et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0016084(A1) | 2011-01-01 | Mundy et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0069180(A1) | 2011-03-01 | Nijemcevic et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0106675(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Perlman | Applicant |
| US2011/0112967(A1) | 2011-05-01 | Anderson et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0170740(A1) | 2011-07-01 | Coleman | Applicant |
| US2011/0191161(A1) | 2011-08-01 | Dai | Applicant |
| US2011/0251956(A1) | 2011-10-01 | Cantley et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0280450(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0285874(A1) | 2011-11-01 | Showering et al. | Applicant |
| US2011/0310442(A1) | 2011-12-01 | Popadic et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0045112(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Lundblad et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0047070(A1) | 2012-02-01 | Pharris | Applicant |
| US2012/0062732(A1) | 2012-03-01 | Marman et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0089514(A1) | 2012-04-01 | Kraemling et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0099792(A1) | 2012-04-01 | Chevion et al. | Applicant |
| US2012/0185383(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Atsmon | Applicant |
| US2012/0185388(A1) | 2012-07-01 | Pranger | Applicant |
| US2012/0229872(A1) | 2012-09-01 | Dolev | Applicant |
| US2013/0021651(A9) | 2013-01-01 | Popadic et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0120595(A1) | 2013-05-01 | Roach et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0198071(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Jurss | Applicant |
| US2013/0223721(A1) | 2013-08-01 | Nepomniachtchi et al. | Applicant |
| US2013/0297353(A1) | 2013-11-01 | Strange | Applicant |
| US2014/0032406(A1) | 2014-01-01 | Roach et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0067661(A1) | 2014-03-01 | Elischer | Applicant |
| US2014/0236820(A1) | 2014-08-01 | Carlton et al. | Applicant |
| US2014/0279453(A1) | 2014-09-01 | Belchee et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0039528(A1) | 2015-02-01 | Minogue et al. | Applicant |
| US2015/0090782(A1) | 2015-04-01 | Dent | Applicant |
| CN1897644(A) | 2007-01-01 | Applicant | |
| EP984410(A1) | 2000-03-01 | Applicant | |
| EP1855459(A2) | 2007-05-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2004-23158(A) | 2004-01-01 | Applicant | |
| JP2006-174105(A) | 2006-06-01 | Applicant | |
| KR20040076131(A) | 2004-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO98/37655(A1) | 1998-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO1/61436(A2) | 2001-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2004/008350(A1) | 2004-01-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2006/075967(A1) | 2006-07-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2006/086768(A2) | 2006-08-01 | Applicant | |
| WO2006/136958(A2) | 2006-12-01 | Applicant |
Non-Patent Literature (387)
- Burnett, J. “Depository Bank Endorsement Requirements,” BankersOnline.com, http://www.bankeronline.com/cgi-bin-printview/printview.pl, 2003, downloaded Apr. 2, 2007, 3 pages.Applicant
- Federal Check 21 Act, “new Check 21 Act Effective Oct. 28, 2004: Banks No Longer Will Return Original Cancelled Checks, ” Consumer Union's FAQ's and Congressional Testimony on Check 21, www.consumerlaw.org/initiatives/content/check21_content.html, downloaded Dec. 2005, 20 pages.Applicant
- Federal Reserve Board, “Check Clearing for the 21st Act,” FRB, http://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/truncation/, 2006, downloaded Apr. 2, 2007, 1 page.Applicant
- Masonson, L. “Check Truncation and ACH Trends—Automated Clearing Houses,” Healthcare Financial Management Association, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m3276/is_n7_v47/ai_14466035/print, 1993, downloaded Apr. 2, 2007, 2 pages.Applicant
- RemoteDepositCapture.com, LLC, “Remote Deposit Capture Overview,” RDC Overview, http://remotedepositcapture.com/Overview/RDC_Overview.htm, 2006, downloaded Apr. 2, 2007, 4 pages.Applicant
- Zhang, C.Y. “Robust Estimation and Image Combining,” Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ASP Conference Series, 1995, 77, 5 pages.Applicant
- “Accept “Customer Not Present” Checks,” Accept Check Online, http://checksoftware.com, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).Applicant
- “Adjusting Brightness and Contrast”, www.eaglesoftware.com/adjustin.htm, retrieved on May 4, 2009 (4 pgs).Applicant
- “Best practices for producing quality digital image files,” Digital Images Guidelines, http://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/40247/1/Images-Best_Practice.pdf, downloaded 2007 (2 pgs).Applicant
- “Chapter 7 Payroll Programs,” Uniform Staff Payroll System, http://www2.oecn.k12.oh.us/www/ssdt/usps/usps_user_guide_005.html, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (9 pgs).Applicant
- “Check 21—The check is not in the post”, RedTitan Technology 2004 http://www.redtitan.com/check21/htm (3 pgs).Applicant
- “Check 21 Solutions,” Columbia Financial International, Inc. http://www.columbiafinancial.us/check21/solutions.htm, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs).Applicant
- “Check Fraud: A Guide to Avoiding Losses”, All Net, http://all.net/books/audit/checkfraud/security.htm, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).Applicant
- “Clearing House Electronic Check Clearing System (CHECCS) Operating Rules,” An IP.com Prior Art Database Technical Disclosure, Jul. 29, 2015 (35 pgs).Applicant
- “Compliance with Regulation CC”, http./www/federalreserve.gov/Pubs/regcc/regcc.htm, Jan. 24, 2006 (6 pgs).Applicant
- “Customer Personalized Bank Checks and Address Labels” Checks Your Way Inc., http://www.checksyourway.com/htm/web_pages/faq.htm, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (6 pgs).Applicant
- “Deposit Now: Quick Start User Guide,” BankServ, 2007, 29 pages.Applicant
- “Direct Deposit Application for Payroll”, Purdue University, Business Office Form 0003, http://purdue.edu/payroll/pdf/directdepositapplication.pdf, Jul. 2007 (2 pgs).Applicant
- “Direct Deposit Authorization Form”, www.umass.edu/humres/library/DDForm.pdf, May 2003 (3 pgs).Applicant
- “Direct Deposit,” University of Washington, http://www.washington.edu/admin/payroll/directdeposit.html, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).Applicant
- “Electronic Billing Problem: The E-check is in the mail” American Banker-vol. 168, No. 95, May 19, 2003 (4 pgs).Applicant
- “First Wireless Handheld Check and Credit Card Processing Solution Launched by Commericant®, MobileScape® 5000 Eliminates Bounced Checks, Enables Payments Everywhere,” Business Wire, Mar. 13, 2016, 3 pages.Applicant
- “Frequently Asked Questions” Bank of America, http://www/bankofamerica.com/deposits/checksave/index.cfm?template-Ic_faq_bymail, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (2 pgs).Applicant
- “Full Service Direct Deposit”, www.nonprofitstaffing.com/images/upload/dirdepform.pdf. U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2001, (2 pgs).Applicant
- “How to Digitally Deposit a Check Image”, Smart Money Daily, Copyright 2008 (5 pgs).Applicant
- “ImageNet Mobile Deposit Provides Convenient Check Deposit and Bill Pay to Mobile Consumers,” Miteksystems, 2008 (2 pgs).Applicant
- “It's the easiest way to Switch banks”, LNB, http://www.inbky.com/pdf/LNBswitch-kit10-07.pdf U.S. Pat. No. 7,996,316, as dated 2007 (7 pgs).Applicant
- “Lesson 38—More Bank Transactions”, Turtle Soft, http://www.turtlesoft.com/goldenseal-software-manual.lesson38.htm, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (8 pgs).Applicant
- “Middleware”, David E. Bakken, Encyclopedia of Distributed Computing, Kluwer Academic Press, 2001 (6 pgs).Applicant
- “Mitek Systems Announces Mobile Deposit Application for Apple iPhone,” http://prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories/pl?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/10-01- . . . , Nov. 25, 2008 (2 pgs).Applicant
- “NOVA Enhances Electronic Check Service to Benefit Multi-Lane Retailers,” Business Wire, Nov. 28, 2006, 2 pages.Applicant
- “Personal Finance”, PNC, http://www.pnc.com/webapp/unsec/productsandservice.do?sitearea=/PNC/home/personal/account+services/quick+switch/quick+switch+faqs, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs).Applicant
- “Refractive index” Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia; http://en.wikipedia.org./wiki/refractiveindex.com Oct. 16, 2007 (4 pgs).Applicant
- “Remote check deposit is the answer to a company's banking problem,” Daily Breeze, Torrance, CA, Nov. 17, 2006, 2 pgs.Applicant
- “Remote Deposit Capture”, Plante & Moran, http://plantemoran.com/industries/fincial/Institutions/bank/resources/community+bank+advisor/2007+summer+issue/remote+deposit+capture.htm, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).Applicant
- “Remote Deposit” National City, http://www.nationalcity.com/smallbusiness/cashmanagement/remotedeposit/default.asp; U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (1 pg).Applicant
- “Save on ATM Fees”, RedEye Edition, Chicago Tribune, Chicago, IL Jun. 30, 2007 (2 pgs).Applicant
- “SNB Check Capture: SmartClient User's Guide,” Nov. 2006, 21 pgs.Applicant
- “Switching Made Easy,” Bank of North Georgia, http://www.banknorthgeorgia.com/cmsmaster/documents/286/documents616.pdf, 2007 (7 pgs).Applicant
- “Two Words Every Business Should Know: Remote Deposit,” Canon, http://www.rpsolutions.com/rpweb/pdfs/canon_rdc.pdf, 2005 (7 pgs).Applicant
- “Virtual Bank Checks”, Morebusiness.com, http://www.morebusiness.com/running_yourbusiness/businessbits/d908484987.brc, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (3 pgs).Applicant
- “WallStreetGrapevine.com” Stocks on the Rise: JADG, BKYI, MITK; Mar. 3, 2008 (4 pgs).Applicant
- “What is check Fraud”, National Check Fraud Center, http://www.ckfraud.org/ckfraud.html , U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2007 (12 pgs).Applicant
- “Exchangeable image file format for digital still cameras: Exif Version 2.2,” Standard of Electronics and Information Technology Industries Associate, JEITA CP-3451, Technical Standardization Committee on AV & IT Storage Systems and Equipments, Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association, Apr. 2002 (154 pgs). (retrieved from: http://www.exif.org/Exif2-2.PDF).Applicant
- Affinity Federal Credit Union, “Affinity Announces Online Deposit,” Aug. 4, 2005 (1 pg).Applicant
- Albrecht, W. Steve, “Check Kiting: Detection, Prosecution and Prevention,” The FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Nov. 1, 1993 (6 pgs).Applicant
- Alves, Vander and Borba, Paulo; “Distributed Adapters Pattern: A Design for Object-Oriented Distributed Applications”; First Latin American Conference on Pattern Languages of Programming; Oct. 2001; pp. 132-142; Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (11 pgs).Applicant
- Amber Avalona-Butler / Paraglide, “At Your Service: Best iPhone Apps for Military Lifestyle,” Jul. 9, 2010 (2 pgs).Applicant
- Anderson, Milton M. “FSML and Echeck”, Financial Services Technology Consortium, 1999 (17 pgs).Applicant
- Aradhye, Hrishikesh B., “A Generic Method for Determining Up/Down Orientation of Text in Roman and Non-Roman Scripts,” Pattern Recognition Society, Dec. 13, 2014, 18 pages.Applicant
- Archive Index Systems; Panini My Vision X-30 or VX30 or X30 © 1994-2008 Archive Systems, Inc. P./O. Box 40135 Bellevue, WA USA 98015 (2 pgs).Applicant
- Associate of German Banks, SEPA 2008: Uniform Payment Instruments for Europe, Berlin, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Jul. 2007, Bundesverbankd deutscher banker ev (42 pgs).Applicant
- Automated Merchant Systems, Inc., “Electronic Check Conversion,” http://www.automatedmerchant.com/electronic_check_conversion.cfm, 2006, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Bank Systems & Technology, Untitled Article, May 1, 2006, http://www.banktech.com/showarticle.jhtml? articleID=187003126, “Are you Winning in the Payment World?” (4 pgs).Applicant
- BankServ, “DepositNow: What's the difference?” U.S. Pat. No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (4 pgs).Applicant
- BankServ, Product Overview, http://www.bankserv.com/products/remotedeposit.htm, U.S. Pat. No. 7,970,677, as dated 2006, (3 pgs).Applicant
- Bills, Steve, “Automated Amount Scanning Is Trend in Remote-Deposit,” American Banker, New York, NY, Aug. 30, 2005, (3 pgs).Applicant
- Blafore, Bonnie “Lower Commissions, Fewer Amenities”, Better Investing, Madison Heights: Feb. 2003, vol. 52, Iss 6, (4 pgs).Applicant
- BLM Technologies, “Case Study: Addressing Check 21 and RDC Error and Fraud Threats,” Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jun. 11, 2007, Retrieved from http://www.remotedepositcapture.com/News/june_11_2007.htm on Feb. 19, 2008 (5 pgs).Applicant
- Blue Mountain Consulting, from URL: www.bluemontainconsulting.com, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Apr. 26, 2006 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Board of Governors of the federal reserve system, “Report to the Congress on the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003” Apr. 2007, Submitted to Congress pursuant to section 16 of the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act of 2003, (59 pgs).Applicant
- Braun, Tim, “Camdesk—Towards Portable and Easy Document Capture,” Image Understanding and Pattern Recognition Research Group, Department of Computer Science, University of Kaiserslautern, Technical Report, Mar. 29, 2005 (64 pgs). (Retrieved from: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/93b2/ea0d12f24c91f3c46fa1c0d58a76bb132bd2.pdf).Applicant
- Bruene, Jim; “Check Free to Enable In-Home Remote Check Deposit for Consumers and Small Business”, NetBanker. Com, Financial Insite, Inc., http://www. netbanker.com/2008/02/checkfree_to_enableinhome_rem.html, Feb. 5, 2008 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Bruene, Jim; “Digital Federal Credit Union and Four Others Offer Consumer Remote Deposit Capture Through EasCorp”, NetBanker—Tracking Online Finance,www.netbanker.com/2008/04/digital_federal_credit_union_a.html, Apr. 13, 2008 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Bruno, M., “Instant Messaging,” Bank Technology News, Dec. 2002 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Burnett, J. “Depository Bank Endorsement Requirements,” BankersOnline.com, http://www.bankersonline.com/cgi-bin/printview/printview.pl, Jan. 6, 2003 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Canon, ImageFormula CR-25/CR-55, “Improve Your Bottom Line with Front-Line Efficiencies”, 0117W117, 1207-55/25-1 OM-BSP, U.S. Pat. No. 7,949,587 as dated 2007. (4 pgs).Applicant
- Carrubba, P. et al., “Remote Deposit Capture: A White Paper Addressing Regulatory, Operational and Risk Issues,” NetDeposit Inc., 2006 (11 pgs).Applicant
- Century Remote Deposit High-Speed Scanner User's Manual Release 2006, (Century Manual), Century Bank, 2006, (32 pgs).Applicant
- Chiang, Chuck, The Bulletin, “Remote banking offered”, http://bendbulletin.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060201/BIZ0102/602010327&templ . . . , May 23, 2008 (2 pgs).Applicant
- CNN.com/technology, “Scan, deposit checks from home”, www.cnn.com/2008ITECH/biztech/02/07/check.scanning.ap/index.html, Feb. 7, 2008 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Constanzo, Chris, “Remote Check Deposit: Wells Captures a New Checking Twist”, Bank Technology News Article—May 2005, www.americanbanker.com/btn_article.html?id=20050502YQ50FSYG (2 pgs).Applicant
- Craig, Ben, “Resisting Electronic Payment Systems: Burning Down the House?”, Federal Reserve Bank of Cleveland, Jul. 1999 (4 pgs).Applicant
- Creativepaymentsolutions.com, “Creative Payment Solutions—Websolution,” www.creativepaymentsolution.com/cps/financialservices/websolution/default.html, Copyright 2008, Creative Payment Solutions, Inc. (1 pg).Applicant
- Credit Union Journal, “The Ramifications of Remote Deposit Capture Success”, www.cuiournal.com/orintthis.html?id=20080411 EODZT57G, Apr. 14, 2008 (1 pg).Applicant
- Credit Union Journal, “AFCU Averaging 80 DepositHome Transactions Per Day”, Credit Union Journal, Aug. 15, 2005 (1 pg).Applicant
- Credit Union Management, “When You wish Upon an Imaging System . . . the Right Selection Process can be the Shining Star,” Credit Union Management, Aug. 1993, printed from the internet at <http://search.proquest.com/docview/227756409/14138420743684F7722/15?accountid=14 . . . >, on Oct. 19, 2013 (11 pgs).Applicant
- DCU Member's Monthly—Jan. 2008, “PC Deposit—Deposit Checks from Home!”, http://www.mycreditunionnewsletter.com/dcu/01 08/page1. html, Copyright 2008 Digital Federal Credit Union (2 pgs).Applicant
- De Jesus, A. et al., “Distributed Check Processing in a Check 21 Environment: An educational overview of the opportunities and challenges associated with implementing distributed check imaging and processing solutions,” Panini, 2004, pp. 1-22.Applicant
- De Queiroz, Ricardo et al., “Mixed Raster Content (MRC) Model for Compound Image Compression”, 1998 (14 pgs).Applicant
- Debello, James et al., “RDM and Mitek Systems to Provide Mobile Check Deposit,” Mitek Systems, Inc., San Diego, California and Waterloo, Ontario, (Feb. 24, 2009), 2 pgs.Applicant
- DeYoung, Robert; “The Financial Performance of Pure Play Internet Banks”; Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives; 2001; pp. 60-75; vol. 25, No. 1 (16pgs).Applicant
- Dias, Danilo et al., “A Model for the Electronic Representation of Bank Checks”, Brasilia Univ. Oct. 2006 (5 pgs).Applicant
- Digital Transactions News, “An ACH-Image Proposal for Check Roils Banks and Networks” May 26, 2006 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Dinan, R.F. et al., “Image Plus High Performance Transaction System”, IBM Systems Journal, 1990 vol. 29, No. 3 (14 pgs).Applicant
- Doermann, David et al., “Progress in Camera-Based Document Image Analysis,” Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR 2003) 0-7695-1960-1/03, 2003, IEEE Computer Society, 11 pages.Applicant
- Duvall, Mel, “Remote Deposit Capture,” Baseline, vol. 1, Issue 70, Mar. 2007, 2 pgs.Applicant
- eCU Technologies, “Upost Remote Deposit Solution,” Retrieved from the internet https://www.eutechnologies.com/products/upost.html, downloaded 2009 (1 pg).Applicant
- EFT Network Unveils FAXTellerPlus, EFT Network, Inc., www.eftnetwork.com, Jan. 13, 2009 (2 pgs).Applicant
- ElectronicPaymentProviders, Inc., “FAQs: ACH/ARC, CheckVerification/Conversion/Guarantee, RCK Check Re-Presentment,” http://www.useapp.com/faq.htm, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Federal Check 21 Act, “New Check 21 Act effective Oct. 28, 2004: Bank No Longer Will Return Original Cancelled Checks,” Consumer Union's FAQ's and Congressional Testimony on Check 21, www.consumerlaw.org.initiatives/content/check21_content.html, U.S. Pat. No. 7,873,200, as dated Dec. 2005 (20 pgs).Applicant
- Federal Reserve Board, “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, FRB, http://www.federalreserve.gov/paymentsystems/truncation/, Mar. 1, 2006 (1 pg).Applicant
- Federal Reserve System, “12 CFR, Part 229 [Regulation CC]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks,” Federal Registrar, Apr. 28, 1997, pp. 1-50.Applicant
- Federal Reserve System, “Part IV, 12 CFR Part 229 [Regulation CC]: Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks; Final Rule,” Federal Registrar, vol. 69, No. 149, Aug. 4, 2004, pp. 47290-47328.Applicant
- Fest, Glen., “Patently Unaware” Bank Technology News, Apr. 2006, Retrieved from the internet at URL:http://banktechnews.com/article.html?id=2006403T7612618 (5 pgs).Applicant
- Fidelity Information Services, “Strategic Vision Embraces Major Changes in Financial Services Solutions: Fidelity's long-term product strategy ushers in new era of application design and processing,” Insight, 2004, pp. 1-14.Applicant
- Fisher, Dan M., “Home Banking in the 21st Century: Remote Capture Has Gone Retail”, May 2008 (4 pgs).Applicant
- Furst, Karen et al., “Internet Banking: Developments and Prospects”, Economic and Policy Analysis Working Paper 2000-9, Sep. 2000 (60 pgs).Applicant
- Garry, M., “Checking Options: Retailers face an evolving landscape for electronic check processing that will require them to choose among several scenarios,” Supermarket News, vol. 53, No. 49, 2005 (3 pgs).Applicant
- German Shegalov, Diplom-Informatiker, “Integrated Data, Message, and Process Recovery for Failure Masking in Web Services”, Dissertation Jul. 2005 (146 pgs).Applicant
- Gupta, Amar et al., “An Integrated Architecture for Recognition of Totally Unconstrained Handwritten Numerals”, WP#3765, Jan. 1993, Productivity from Information Technology “Profit” Research Initiative Sloan School of Management (20 pgs).Applicant
- Gupta, Maya R. et al., “OCR binarization and image pre-processing for searching historical documents,” Pattern Recognition, vol. 40, No. 2, Feb. 2007, pp. 389-397.Applicant
- Hale, J., “Picture this: Check 21 uses digital technology to speed check processing and shorten lag time,” Columbus Business First, http://columbus.bizjournals.com/columbus/stories/2005/03/14focus1.html, downloaded 2007 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Hartly, Thomas, “Banks Check Out New Image”, Business First, Buffalo: Jul. 19, 2004, vol. 20, Issue 43, (3 pgs).Applicant
- Heckenberg, D. “Using Mac OS X for Real-Time Image Processing” Oct. 8, 2003 (15 pgs).Applicant
- Herley, Cormac, “Efficient Inscribing of Noisy Rectangular Objects in Scanned Images,” 2004 International Conference on Image Processing, 4 pages.Applicant
- Hildebrand, C. et al., “Electronic Money,” Oracle, http://www.oracle.com/oramag/profit/05-feb/p15financial.html, 2005, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (5 pgs).Applicant
- Hillebrand, G., “Questions and Answers About the Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, 'Check 21,” ConsumersUnion.org, http://www.consumersunion.org/finance/ckclear1002.htm, Jul. 27, 2004, downloaded Oct. 18, 2006 (6 pgs).Applicant
- Iida, Jeanne, “The Back Office: Systems—Image Processing Rolls on as Banks ReapBenefits,” American Banker, Jul. 19, 1993, printed from the internet at <http://search.proquest.com/docview/292903245/14138420743684F7722/14?accountid=14 . . . >, on Oct. 19, 2013 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Image Master, “Photo Restoration: We specialize in digital photo restoration and photograph repair of family pictures”, http://www.imphotorepair.com, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as downloaded Apr. 2007 (1 pg).Applicant
- Investment Systems Company, “Portfolio Accounting System,” 2000, pp. 1-32.Applicant
- JBC, “What is a MICR Line?,” eHow.com, retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about_4684793_what-micr-line.html on May 4, 2009 (2 pgs).Applicant
- Johnson, Jennifer J., Secretary of the Board; Federal Reserve System, 12 CFR Part 229, Regulation CC; “Availability of Funds and Collection of Checks”. U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2009, (89 pgs).Applicant
- Kendrick, Kevin B., “Check Kiting, Float for Purposes of Profit,” Bank Security & Fraud Prevention, vol. 1, No. 2, 1994 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Kiser, Elizabeth K.; “Modeling the Whole Firm: The Effect of Multiple Inputs and Financial Intermediation on Bank Deposit Rates;” FEDS Working Paper No. 2004-07; Jun. 3, 2003; pp. 1-46 (46 pgs).Applicant
- Knestout, Brian P. et al., “Banking Made Easy” Kiplinger's Personal Finance Washington, Jul. 2003, vol. 57, Iss 7 (5 pgs).Applicant
- Kornai Andras et al., “Recognition of Cursive Writing on Personal Checks”, Proceedings of International Workshop on the Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Sep. 1996, (6 pgs).Applicant
- Lampert, Christoph et al., “Oblivious Document Capture and Real-Time Retrieval,” International Workshop on Camera Based Document Analysis and Recognition (CBDAR), 2005 (8 pgs). (Retrieved from: http://www-cs.ccny.cuny.edu/˜wolberg/capstone/bookwarp/LampertCBDAR05.pdf).Applicant
- Levitin, Adam J., Remote Deposit Capture: A Legal and Transactional Overview, Banking Law Journal, p. 115, 2009 (RDC).Applicant
- Liang, Jian et al., Camera-Based Analysis of Text and Documents: A Survey, International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Jun. 21, 2005, 21 pages.Applicant
- Luo, Xi-Peng et al., “Design and Implementation of a Card Reader Based on Build-In Camera,” Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Pattern Recognition, 2004, 4 pages.Applicant
- Masonson, L., “Check Truncation and ACH Trends—Automated Clearing Houses”, healthcare financial management associate, http://www.findarticles.com/p/articles/mLm3276/is_n7_v47/ai_14466034/print, 1993 (2 pgs).Applicant
- Matthews, Deborah, “Advanced Technology Makes Remote Deposit Capture Less Risky,” Indiana Bankers Association, Apr. 2008 (2 pgs).Applicant
- Metro 1 Credit Union, “Remote Banking Services,” hltp://ww\\i.metro1cu.org/metro1cu/remote.html, downloaded Apr. 17, 2007 (4 pgs).Applicant
- Mitek systems, “Imagenet Mobile Deposit”, San Diego, CA, downloaded 2009 (2 pgs).Applicant
- Mitek Systems: Mitek Systems Launches First Mobile Check Deposit and Bill Pay Application, San Diego, CA, Jan. 22, 2008 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Mohl, Bruce, “Banks Reimbursing ATM Fee to Compete With Larger Rivals”, Boston Globe, Boston, MA, Sep. 19, 2004 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Moreau, T., “Payment by Authenticated Facsimile Transmission: a Check Replacement Technology for Small and Medium Enterprises,” CONNOTECH Experts-conseils, Inc., Apr. 1995 (31 pgs).Applicant
- Nelson, B. et al., “Remote deposit capture changes the retail landscape,” Northwestern Financial Review, http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi qa3799/is 200607/ai_n16537250, 2006 (3 pgs).Applicant
- NetBank, Inc., “Branch Out: Annual Report 2004,” 2004 (150 pgs).Applicant
- NetBank, Inc., “Quick Post: Deposit and Payment Forwarding Service,” 2005 (1 pg).Applicant
- NetDeposit Awarded Two Patents for Electronic Check Process, NetDeposit, Jun. 18, 2007, (1 pg).Applicant
- Nixon, Julie et al., “Fiserv Research Finds Banks are Interested in Offering Mobile Deposit Capture as an,” Fiserv, Inc. Brookfield, Wis., (Business Wire), (Feb. 20, 2009), 2 pgs.Applicant
- Online Deposit: Frequently Asked Questions, http://www.depositnow.com/faq.html, Copyright 2008 (1 pg).Applicant
- Onlinecheck.com/Merchant Advisors, “Real-Time Check Debit”, Merchant Advisors: Retail Check Processing Check Conversion, http://www.onlinecheck/wach/rcareal.htm, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Oxley, Michael G., from committee on Financial Services; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, 108th Congress, 1st Session House of Representatives report 108-132, Jun. 2003 (20 pgs).Applicant
- Oxley, Michael G., from the committee of conference; “Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act” 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-291, Oct. 1, 2003 (27 pgs).Applicant
- Palacios, Rafael et al., “Automatic Processing of Brazilian Bank Checks”. U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2002 (28 pgs).Applicant
- Patterson, Scott “USAA Deposit@Home—Another WOW moment for Net Banking”, NextCU.com, Jan. 26, 2007 (5 pgs).Applicant
- Public Law 108-100, 108 Congress; “An Act Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act”, Oct. 28, 2003, 117 STAT. 1177 (18 pgs).Applicant
- Rao, Bharat; “The Internet and the Revolution in Distribution: A Cross-Industry Examination”; Technology in Society; 1999; pp. 287-306; vol. 21, No. 3 (20 pgs).Applicant
- Remotedepositcapture, URL:www.remotedepositcapture.com, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated 2006 (5 pgs).Applicant
- RemoteDepositCapture.com, “PNC Bank to Offer Ease of Online Deposit Service Integrated with QuickBooks to Small Businesses”, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 24, 2006, (2 pgs).Applicant
- RemoteDepositCapture.com, Remote Deposit Capture News Articles from Jul. 6, 2006, “BankServ Announces New Remote Deposit Product Integrated with QuickBooks” (3 pgs).Applicant
- Remotedepsitcapture.com, LLC, “Remote Deposit Capture Overview,” ROC Overview, http://remotedepositcapture.com/overview/RDC_overview.htm, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Mar. 12, 2007 (4 pgs).Applicant
- Richey, J. C. et al., “EE 4530 Check Imaging,” Nov. 18, 2008 (10 pgs).Applicant
- Ritzer, J.R. “Hinky Dinky helped spearhead POS, remote banking movement”, Bank Systems and Equipment, vol. 21, No. 12, Dec. 1984 (1 pg).Applicant
- Rivlin, Alice M. et al., Chair, Vice Chair—Board of Governors, Committee on the Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism—Federal Reserve System, “The Federal Reserve in the Payments Mechanism”, Jan. 1998 (41 pgs).Applicant
- Rose, Sarah et al., “Best of the We: The Top 50 Financial Websites”, Money, New York, Dec. 1999, vol. 28, Iss. 12 (8 pgs).Applicant
- Shelby, Hon. Richard C. (Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs); “Check Truncation Act of 2003”, calendar No. 168, 108th Congress, 1st Session Senate report 108-79, Jun. 2003 (27 pgs).Applicant
- SoyBank Anywhere, “Consumer Internet Banking Service Agreement,” Dec. 6, 2004 (6 pgs).Applicant
- Teixeira, D., “Comment: Time to Overhaul Deposit Processing Systems,” American Banker, Dec. 10, 1998, vol. 163, No. 235, p. 15 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Thailandguru.com: How and where to Pay Bills @ www.thailandguru.com/paying-bills.html, © 1999-2007 (2 pgs).Applicant
- The Automated Clearinghouse, “Retail Payment Systems; Payment Instruments Clearing and Settlement: The Automated Clearinghouse (ACH)”, www.ffiec.gov/ffiecinfobase/booklets/retailretail_02d.html, U.S. Pat. No. 7,900,822, as dated Dec. 2005 (3 pgs).Applicant
- The Green Sheet 2.0: Newswire, “CO-OP adds home deposit capabilities to suite of check imaging products”, www.greensheet.com/newswire.php?newswire_id=8799, Mar. 5, 2008 (2 pgs).Applicant
- Tygar, J.D., Atomicity in Electronic Commerce, In ACM Networker, 2:2, Apr./May 1998 (12 pgs).Applicant
- Valentine, Lisa, “Remote Deposit Capture Hot Just Got Hotter,” ABA Banking Journal, Mar. 2006, p. 1-9.Applicant
- Vaream, Craig, “Image Deposit Solutions: Emerging Solutions for More Efficient Check Processing,” JP Morgan Chase, Nov. 2005 (16 pgs).Applicant
- Wade, Will, “Early Debate on Remote-Capture Risk,” American Banker, New York, NY, May 26, 2004 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Wade, Will, “Early Notes: Updating Consumers on Check 21” American Banker Aug. 10, 2004 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Wallison, Peter J., “Wal-Mart Case Exposes Flaws in Banking-Commerce Split”, American Banker, vol. 167. No. 8, Jan. 11, 2002 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Wells Fargo 2005 News Releases, “The New Wells Fargo Electronic Deposit Services Break Through Banking Boundaries in the Age of Check 21”, San Francisco Mar. 28, 2005, www.wellsfargo.com/press/3282005_check21Year=2005 (1 pg).Applicant
- Wells Fargo Commercial, “Remote Deposit”, www.wellsfargo.com/com/treasury mgmtlreceivables/electronic/remote deposit, Copyright 2008 (1 pg).Applicant
- White, J.M. et al., “Image Thresholding for Optical Character Recognition and Other Applications Requiring Character Image Extraction”, IBM J. RES. Development, Jul. 1983, vol. 27, No. 4 (12 pgs).Applicant
- Whitney et al., “Reserve Banks to Adopt DSTU X9.37/2003 Format for Check 21 Image Services”, American Bankers Association, May 18, 2004, http://www.aba/com/NR/rdonlyres/CBDC1 A5C-43E3-43CC-B733-BE417C638618/35930/DSTUFormat.pdf (2 pages).Applicant
- Wikipedia ®, “Remote Deposit,” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_deposit, 2007 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Windowsfordevices.com, “Software lets camera phone users deposit checks, pay bills”, www.windowsfordevices.com/news/NS3934956670.html, Jan. 29, 2008 (3 pgs).Applicant
- Wolfe, Daniel, “Check Image Group Outlines Agenda,” American Banker, New York, N.Y.: Feb. 13, 2009, vol. 174, Iss. 30, p. 12. (2 pgs).Applicant
- Woody Baird Associated Press, “Pastor's Wife got Scammed—She Apparently Fell for Overseas Money Scheme,” The Commercial Appeal, Jul. 1, 2006, p. A. 1.Applicant
- Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint, dated Aug. 14, 2018, 64 pgs.Applicant
- Leica Digilux 2 Instructions located on the Internet: http://www.overgaard.dk/pdf/d2_manual.pdf (attached as Exhibit 2 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 95 pgs.Applicant
- Sony Digital Camera User's Guide/ Trouble Shooting Operating Instructions, copyright 2005, located on the Internet at: https://www.sony.co.uk/electronics/support/res/manuals/2654/26544941M.pdf (attached as Exhibit 3 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 136 pgs.Applicant
- Panasonic Operating Instructions for Digital Camera/Lens Kit Model No. DMC-L1K, https://www.panasonic.com/content/dam/Panasonic/support_manual/Digital_Still_Camera/English_01-vqt0-vqt2/vqt0w95_L1_oi.pdf (attached as Exhibit 4 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Back N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 129 pgs.Applicant
- Nikon Digital Camera D300 User's Manual, located on the Internet at: http://download.nikonimglib.com/archive2/iBuJv00Aj97i01y8BrK49XX0Ts69/D300_EU(En)04.pdf (attached as Exhibit 5 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 195 pgs.Applicant
- Canon EOS 40D Digital Camera Instruction Manual, located on the Internet at: http://gdlp01.c-wss.com/gds/6/0900008236/01/EOS40D_HG_EN.pdf (attached as Exhibit 6 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 38 pgs.Applicant
- Motorola RAZR MAXX V6 User Manual, located on the Internet at: https://www.phonearena.com/phones/Motorola-RAZR-MAXX-V6_id1680, (attached as Exhibit 7 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 36 pgs.Applicant
- Motomanual for Motorazr, located on the Internet at: https://www.cellphones.ca/downloads/phones/manuals/motorola-razr-v3xx-manual.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 8 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 34 pgs.Applicant
- Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, located on the Internet at: https://www.nokia.com/en_int/phones/sites/default/files/user-guides/Nokia_N95_8GB_Extended_UG_en.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 9 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 77 pgs.Applicant
- Helio Ocean User Manual, located on the Internet at: https://standupwireless.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/Manual_PAN-TECH_OCEAN.pdf (excerpts attached as Exhibit 10 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 76 pgs.Applicant
- HTC Touch Diamond Manual, copyright 2008, (attached as Exhibit 11 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 257 pgs.Applicant
- Automated Clearing Houses (ACHs), Federal Reserve Bank of New York (May 2000) available at: https://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/fedpoint/fed31.html, (attached as Exhibit 12 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 4 pgs.Applicant
- POP, ARC and BOC—A Comparison, Federal Reserve Banks, at 1(Jan. 7, 2009), available on the Internet at: https://web.archive.org/web/20090107101808/https://www.frbservices.org/files/eventseducation/ pdf/pop_arc_boc_comparison.pdf (attached as Exhibit 13 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 3 pgs.Applicant
- David B. Humphrey & Robert Hunt, Getting Rid of Paper: Savings From Check 21, Working Paper No. 12-12, Research Department, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia, (May 2012), available on the Internet at: https://philadelphiafed.org/-/media/research-and-data/publications/working-papers/2012/wp12-12.pdf, (attached as Exhibit 14 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 29 pgs.Applicant
- Jeffrey M. Lacker, Payment System Disruptions and the Federal Reserve Following Sep. 11, 2001, The Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond, (Dec. 23, 2003) (attached as Exhibit 19 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 55 pgs.Applicant
- Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act Foundation for Check 21 Compliance Training, Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, (Oct. 16, 2004), available on the Internet at: https://web.archive.org/web/20041016100648/https://www.ffiec.gov/exam/check21/check21foundationdoc.htm, (excerpts attached as Exhibit 20 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018),11 pgs.Applicant
- Big Red Book, Adobe Systems Incorporated, copyright 2000, (attached as Exhibit 27 from the Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Answer dated Aug. 14, 2018), 45 pgs.Applicant
- Zandifar, A., “A Video-Based Framework for the Analysis of Presentations/Posters,” International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition, Feb. 2, 2005, 10 pages.Applicant
- “Quicken Bill Pay”, Retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 27, 2007 at: <URL:http://quicken intuit.com/quicken-bill-pay-jhtml>, 2 pgs.Applicant
- “Start to Simplify with Check Imaging a Smarter Way to Bank”, Retrieved from the Internet on Nov. 27, 2007, at: <URL: http://www.midnatbank.com/Internet%20Banking/internet_Banking.html>, 3 pgs.Applicant
- Application as filed on Jun. 8, 2018 for U.S. Appl. No. 16/018,868, 39 pgs.Applicant
- Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., CBM2019-0004, Nov. 8, 2018, 180 pgs.Applicant
- “Machine Accepts Bank Deposits”, New York Times, Apr. 12, 1961, 1 pg.Applicant
- Rockwell, The Megapixel Myth, KenRickwell.com, 2008, located on the Internet at: http://kewrockwell.com.tech/mpmyth.htm, 6 pgs.Applicant
- Gates, A History of Wireless Standards, Wi-Fi Back to Basics, Areohive Blog, Jul. 2015, located on the Internet at: http://blog.aerohine.com/a-history-of-wireless-standards, 5 pgs.Applicant
- Apple Reinvents the Phone with iPhone, Jan. 2007, located on the Internet at: https://www.apple.com/newsroom/2007/01/09Apple-Reinvents-the-Phone-with-iPhone/, 4 pgs.Applicant
- Brian Chen et al., iPhone 3GS Trounces Predecessors, Rivals in Web Browser Speed Test, Wired, Jun. 24, 2009, located on the Internet at: www.wired.com/2009.3gs-speed/, 10 pgs.Applicant
- Berman, How Hitchcock Turned a Small Budget Into a Great Triumph, Time.com, Apr. 29, 2015, located on the Internet at: http://time.com/3823112/alfred-hitchcock-shadow-of-a-doubt, 1 pg.Applicant
- Askey, Leica Digilux 2 Review (pts.1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, May 20, 2004, located on the Internet at: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/leicadigilux2, 20 pgs.Applicant
- Askey, Sony Cyber-shot DSC-R1 Review (pts,1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, Dec. 6, 2005, located on the Internet at: http://www.dpreview.com.reviews/sonydscr1, 24 pgs.Applicant
- Askey, Panasonic Lumix DMC-L1 Review (pts.1,3,7), Digital Photography Review, Apr. 11, 2007, located on the Internet at: https://www.dpreview.com/reviews/panasonicdmc11, 24 pgs.Applicant
- Askey, Nikon D300 In-depth Review (pts.1,3,9), Digital Photography Review, Mar. 12, 2008, located on the Internet at: https://www.preview.com/reviews/nikond300, 24 pgs.Applicant
- Askey, Canon EOS 40D Review (pts.1,4,10), Digital Photography Review, located on the Internet at:http: www.dpreview.com/reviews/canoneos40d, 24 pgs.Applicant
- Joinson et al., Olympus E-30 Review (pts.1,4,8), Digital Photography Review, Mar. 24, 2009, located on the Internet at: www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympus30, 6 pgs.Applicant
- Quinn and Roberds, The Evolution of the Check as a Means of Payment: A Historical Survey, Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta, Economic Review, 2008, 30 pgs.Applicant
- Wausau Financial Systems, Understanding Image Quality & Usability Within a New Environment, 2006, 22 pgs,.Applicant
- iPhone Store Downloads Top 10 Million in First Weekend, Jul. 14, 2008, located on the Internet at: http://www.apple.com/newsroom/2008/07/14iPhone-App-Stire-Downloads-Top-10_Million-in-First-Weekend, 3 pgs.Applicant
- Knerr et al., The A2iA Intercheque System: Courtesy Amount and Legal Amount Recognition for French Checks in Automated Bankcheck Processing 43-86, Impedove et al. eds., 1997, 50 pgs.Applicant
- 149 Cong. Rec. H9289, Oct. 8, 2003, 6 pgs.Applicant
- Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act, H. R. Rep. No. 108-132, Jun. 2, 2003, 20 pgs.Applicant
- ITU-R-M.1225, Guides for Evaluation of Radio Transmission Technologies for IMT-2000, dated 1997, located on the Internet at: https://www.itu.int/dms-pubrec/itu-r/rec/m/R-REC-M,1225-0-199702-I!!PDF-E.pdf, 60 pgs.Applicant
- E. MacKenzie, Photography Made Easy, copyright 1845, 80 pgs.Applicant
- 12 CRF § 229.51 and Appendix D to Part 229 (1-1-05 edition), 3 pgs.Applicant
- Excerpts from American National Standard for Financial Services, ANS, X9.100-140-2004-Specifications for an Image Replacement Document—IRD, Oct. 1, 2004, 16 pgs.Applicant
- Sumits, Major Mobile Milestones—The Last 15 Years, and the Next Five, Cisco Blogs, Feb. 3, 2016, located on the Internet at: https://blogs.cisco.com/sp/mobile-vni-major-mobile-milesrones-the-last15-years-and-the-next-five, 12 pgs.Applicant
- Apple Announces the New iPhone 3GS—The Fastest, Most Powerful iPhone Yet, Jun. 8, 2009, located on the Internet at: http://www.apple.com.rensroom/2009/06/08Apple-Annpounces-the-New-iPhone-3GS-The Fastest-Most-Powerful-iPhone-Yet, 4 pgs.Applicant
- Motomanual, MOTOROKR-E6-GSM-English for wireless phone, copyright 2006, 144 pgs.Applicant
- Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 90 pgs.Applicant
- Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 98 pgs.Applicant
- Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 95 pgs.Applicant
- Petition filed by Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-23 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, dated Nov. 8, 2018, 101 pgs.Applicant
- Patent Disclaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, filed on Mar. 4, 2019, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Patent Disclaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, filed on Feb. 20, 2019, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Patent Disclaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, filed on Mar. 4, 2019, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Patent Disclaimer for U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, filed on Feb. 20, 2019, 2 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 75 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Declaration of Tim Crews in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 8 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Declaration of Matthew Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 14 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List, dated Mar. 19, 2019, 8 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 91 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Declaration of Matthew Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 15 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List Pursuant to 37 CFR 42.63(e), dated Mar. 19, 2019, 8 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper No. 14, dated Apr. 10, 2019, 10 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Declaration of Tim Crews in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 8 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 99 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Declaration of Matthew Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Feb. 20, 2019, 14 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Updated Exhibit List Pursuant to 37 CFR 43.63(e), dated Mar. 19, 2019, 8 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, United Services Automobile Association's (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 103 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Katie Knight Videotape Deposition Transcript, dated Feb. 8, 2019, 27 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779 Matthew A. Calman Declaration, dated Mar. 4, 2019, 15 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779 Peter Alexander, Ph.D., Oral and Videotaped Deposition, dated Jan. 23, 2019, 27 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 147 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Petition for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-3, 5-9, 11-16 and 18 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 93 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00027 U.S. Pat. No. 9,224,136 Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 3 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence, dated Mar. 15, 2019, 74 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 94 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Petition for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-30 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 99 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Petitioner's Updated Exhibit List (as of Apr. 1, 2019) for U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Apr. 1, 2019, 5 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent owner Preliminary Response for U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,681, dated Apr. 8, 2019, 3 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D., dated Mar. 28, 2019, 76 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, Petition for Covered Business Method Review of Claims 1-3, 5-14, 16-29 of U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, dated Mar. 28, 2019, 88 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029 U.S. Pat. No. 10,013,605, Plaintiff United Services Automobile Association (USAA) Preliminary Claim Constructions and Extrinsic Evidence, dated Mar. 15, 2019, 74 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Petition for Inter Parties Review of Claims 109 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, dated Mar. 20, 2019, 56 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Declaration of Peter Alexander, PhD. as filed in the IPR on Mar. 20, 2019, 99 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Notice of Filing Date Accorded to Petition and Time for Filing Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Mar. 27, 2019, 5 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Exhibit B Proposed Claim Constructions for the '571, '090, '779 and '517 Patents, filed on Feb. 28, 2019, 10 pgs,.Applicant
- ABA Routing System Transit Number, Wikipedia, dated Sep. 27, 2006, 3pgs.Applicant
- Accredited Standards Committee Technical Report TR 33/2006, dated Aug. 28, 2006, 75 pgs.Applicant
- ANS X9.100-140-2004, “Specification for an Image Replacement document—IRD”, American Standard for Financial Services, Oct. 1, 2004, 15 pgs.Applicant
- Ansi News, Check 21 Goes Into Effect Oct. 28, 2004, dated Oct. 25, 2004, 1 pg.Applicant
- Ansi, “Return Reasons for Check Image Exchange of IRDS”, dated May 6, 2016, 23 pgs.Applicant
- Ansi, “Specifications for Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data”, dated Jul. 11, 2006, 230 pgs.Applicant
- Ansi X9.7-1999(R2007), Bank Check Background and Convenience Amount Field Specification, dated Jul. 11, 2007, 86 pgs.Applicant
- ASCX9, “Specification for Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data”, date Mar. 31, 2003. 156 pgs.Applicant
- Bankers' Hotline, “Training Page: Learning the Bank Numbering System”, Copyright 2004, 2 pgs.Applicant
- BrainJar Validation Algorithms, archived on Mar. 16, 2016 from BrainJar.com, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Canon White Paper, “Two Words Every Business Should Know—Remote Deposit”, dated 2005, 7 pgs.Applicant
- CBR online, “Diebold launches ATM depository technology”, Oct. 4, 2007, 5 pgs.Applicant
- Cheq Information Technology White Paper, “Teller Scanner Performance and Scanner Design: Camera Position Relative to the Feeder”, dated 2005, 7 pgs.Applicant
- De Jesus, Angie et al., “Distributed Check Processing in a Check 21 Environment”, dated Nov. 2004, 22 pgs.Applicant
- Federal Reserve Adoption of DSTU X9.37/2003, Image Cash Letter Customer Documentation Version 1.8, dated Oct. 1, 2008, 48 pgs.Applicant
- Fielding, R. et al, “RFC-2616—Hypertext Transfer Protocol”, Network Working Group, The Internet Society copyright 1999, 177 pgs.Applicant
- Hill, Simon, “From J-Phone to Lumina 1020: A Complete History of the Camera Phone”, dated Aug. 11, 2013, 19 pgs.Applicant
- Instrument—Definition from the Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, dated Mar. 2, 2019, 1 pg.Applicant
- Instrument—Definition of instrument from the Oxford Dictionaries (British & World English), dated Jul. 2, 2017, 44 pgs.Applicant
- iPhone Application Programming Guide Device Support, dated Apr. 26, 2009, 7 pgs.Applicant
- iPhone Announces the New iPhone 3gs—The Fastest, Most Powerful iPhone Yet, Press Release dated Jun 8, 2009, 4 pgs.Applicant
- Klein, Robert, Financial Services Technology, “Image Quality and Usability Assurance: Phase 1 Project”, dated Jul. 23, 2004, 67 pgs.Applicant
- Lange, Bill, “Combining Remote Capture and IRD Printing, A Check 21 Strategy For Community and Regional Banks”, dated 2005, 25 pgs.Applicant
- Lee, Jeanne, “Mobile Check Deposits: Pro Tips to Ensure They Go Smoothly”, dated Feb. 19, 2016, 6 pgs.Applicant
- Meara, Bob, “State of Remote Deposit Capture 2015: Mobile Is the New Scanner”, Dated May 26, 2015, obtained from the Internet at: https://www.celent.com/insights/57842967, 3 pgs.Applicant
- Meara, Bob, “State of Remote Deposit Capture 2015 Mobile Is the New Scanner”, dated May 2015, 56 pgs.Applicant
- Meara, Bob,“USAA's Mobile Remote Deposit Capture Initiative”, Dated Jun. 26, 2009, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Mitek's Mobile Deposit Processes More Than Two Billion Checks, $1.5 Trillion in Cumulative Check Value, dated Mar. 18, 2018, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Mitek, “Video Release—Mitek MiSnap™ Mobile Auto Capture Improves Mobile Deposit® User Experience at Ten Financial Institutions”, dated Jul. 15, 2014, 2 pgs.Applicant
- NCR, Mobile Remote Deposit Capture (RDC), copyright 2011, 8 pgs.Applicant
- Nokia N90 Review Digital Trends, dated Feb. 11, 2019, obtained from the Internet at: https://www.digitaltrends.com/cell-phone-reviews/nokia-n90-review/,.Applicant
- Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 1 of 3, 67 pgs.Applicant
- Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 2 of 3, 60gs.Applicant
- Nokia N95 8GB User Guide, copyright 2009, (from the Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. IPR2019-00815, filed on Mar. 20, 2019), Part 3 of 3, 53 pgs.Applicant
- Patel, Kunur, Ad Age, “How Mobile Technology Is Changing Banking's Future”, dated Sep. 21, 2009, 3 pgs.Applicant
- Remote Deposit Capture Basic Requirements, dated Aug. 22, 2009, 1 pg.Applicant
- Remote Deposit Capture.com Scanner Matrix, dated Oct. 21, 2011, 3 pgs.Applicant
- Rowles, Tony, USAA-v. Wells Fargo No. 2:16-cv-245-JRGL e-mail correspondence dated Jan. 24, 2019, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Sechrest, Stuart et al., “Windows XP Performance”, Microsoft, dated Jun. 1, 2001, 20 pgs.Applicant
- Spenser, Harvey, “White Paper Check 21 Controlling Image Quality At the Point of Capture”, dated 2004, 7 pgs.Applicant
- Timothy R. Crews list of Patents, printed from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on Feb. 13, 2019, 7 pgs.Applicant
- Van Dyke, Jim, “2017 Mitek Mobile Deposit Benchmark Report”, copyright 2017, 50 pgs.Applicant
- Wausau, “Understanding Image Quality & Usability Within a New Environment”, copyright 2019, 1 pg.Applicant
- Whitney, Steve et al., “A Framework for Exchanging Image Returns”, dated Jul. 2001, 129 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply Brief to Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper No. 15, dated May 1, 2019, 7 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Defendant's Claim Construction Brief and supporting exhibits, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Apr. 25, 2019, 186 pgs.Applicant
- USAA's Opening Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Apr. 11, 2019, 32 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply Brief to Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper 14, dated Apr. 30, 2019, 7 pgs.Applicant
- USAA's Reply to Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Case No. 2:18-cv-245, dated May 2, 2019, 15 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Patent Owner's Sur-Reply Brief Pursuant to Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper 15, dated May 1, 2019, 7 pgs.Applicant
- P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 5, 2019, 190 pgs.Applicant
- Defendant Wells Fargo Back, N.A.'s Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 12, 2019, 32 pgs.Applicant
- Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant's Answer to Defendant and Counterclaims Plaintiff's Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, & Counterclaims, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Apr. 26, 2019, 18 pgs.Applicant
- P.R. 4-3 Joint Claim Construction and Pre-Hearing Statement, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Feb. 28, 2019, 122 pgs.Applicant
- Defendant Wells Fargo Back, N.A.'s Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Complaint, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Mar. 7, 2019, 75 pgs.Applicant
- Plaintiff and Counterclaim Defendant's Answer to Defendant and Counterclaims Plaintiff's Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, & Counterclaims, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Mar. 21, 2019, 36 pgs.Applicant
- USAA's Reply Claim Construction Brief, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated May 2, 2019, 227 pgs.Applicant
- Parties' P.R. 4-5(D) Joint Claim Construction Chart, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated May 9, 2019, 25 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Defendant's Claim Construction Brief and supporting exhibits, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Apr. 25, 2019, 36 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00002 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.208, dated Apr. 26, 2019, 5 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00003 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.208, dated Jun. 3, 2019, 28 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00004 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.208, dated May 15, 2019, 33 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00005 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review 37 C.F.R. § 42.208, dated Jun. 3, 2019, 27 pgs.Applicant
- USAA's Opening Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated May 17, 2019, 32 pgs.Applicant
- Defendant's Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated May 31, 2019, 111 pgs.Applicant
- Plaintiff's Notice of Filing Claim Construction Presentation, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated May 23, 2019, 106 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-01081 U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1, 5-10, 12-14, 17-20 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,336,517, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 78 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-01082 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-13 U.S. Pat. No. 8,977,571, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 75 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-01083 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-18 U.S. Pat. No. 8,699,779, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 74 pgs.Applicant
- Plaintiff's Notice of Decisions Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 6, 2019, 61 pgs.Applicant
- Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 13, 2019, 48 pgs.Applicant
- Parties' P.R.4-5(D) Joint Claim Construction Chart, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 14, 2019, 28 pgs.Applicant
- Defendant's Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated May 31, 2019, 28 pgs.Applicant
- USAA's Reply Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated Jun. 7, 2019, 14 pgs.Applicant
- Wells Fargo's Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne's Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 7 pgs.Applicant
- USAA's Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne's Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 6 pgs.Applicant
- Parties' P.R. 4-5(D) Joint Claim Construction Chart, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated Jun. 18, 2019, 27 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815, Invalidity Chart, uploaded on Jun. 27, 2019, 94 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815, United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 66 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815, Supplemental Invalidity Chart, dated on Jun. 27, 2019, 16 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815, Declaration of Matthew A. Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jun. 27, 2019, 25 pgs.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00027, Declaration of Bharat Prasad, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 32 pgs.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00027, Patent Owner Preliminary Response and Exhibits 2001-1042, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 91 pgs.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00028, United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jul. 8, 2019, 73 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, Declaration of Matthew A. Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jul. 8, 28 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, Malykhina, Elena “Get Smart”, Copyright 2006 by ProQuest Information and Learning Company, 6 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, Palm Treo 700W Smartphone manual, Copyright 2005 by Palm, Inc., 96 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, 00000 C720w User Manual for Windows Mobile Smart Phone, Copyright 2006, 352 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, “Smarter Than Your Average Phone”, Copyright 2006 by Factiva, 4 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, “64 Million Smart Phones Shipped Worldwide in 2006”, Canalys Newsroom, 2006, 3 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, Nokia 9500 Communicator user Guide, Copyright 2006 by Nokia Corporation, 112 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, Robinson, Daniel, “Client Week—Headsets advance at 3GSM”, Copyright 2004 by VNU Business Publications Ltd., 2 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, Burney, Brett “MacBook Pro with Intel processor is fast, innovative”, Copyright 2006 by Plain Dealer Publishing Co., 2 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, 17-inch MacBook Pro User's Guide, Copyright 2006 by Apple Computer, Inc., 144 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, Wong, May “HP unveils new mobile computers”, Copyright 2006 by The Buffalo News, 2 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00028, Jewell, Mark “Cell Phone Shipments Reach Record 208M”, Copyright 2005 by Associated Press, 1 pg.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00028, Lawler, Ryan “Apple shows Intel-based Macs, surge in revenue”, Copyright 2006 by The Yomiuri Shimbun, 2 pgs.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00028, Aspire 9800 Series User Guide, Copyright 2006 by Acer International, 122 pgs.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00028, Dell XPS M1210 Owner's Manual, Copyright 2006 by Dell Inc., 192 pgs.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00028, Estridge, Bonnie “Isyour phone smart enough?: The series that cuts through the technobabble to bring you the best advice on the latest gadgets”, Coyright 2006 by XPRESS—A1 Nsr Media, 3 pgs.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00028, “Motorola, Palm collaborate on smart phone”, Copyright 2000 by Crain Communications, Inc., 1 pg.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00028, Nasaw, Daniel “Viruses Pose threat to “Smart” Cellphones—Computer Programs Could Cripple Devices and Shut Down Wireless Networks”, Copyright 2004 by Factiva, 2 pgs.Applicant
- CBM 2019-00028, Seitz, Patrick “Multifunction Trend Shaking Up the Handheld Device industry; Solid Sales Expected in 2004; PDA, handset, camera—one single, small product can fill a variety of roles”, Copyright 2004 Investor's Business Daily, Inc., 3 pgs.Applicant
- Microsoft Mobile Devices Buyer's Guide, 2012, 4 pgs.Applicant
- Microsoft Mobile Devices Smartphone, 2003, 2 pgs.Applicant
- Plaintiff's Notice of Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-245, dated May 15, 2019, 36 pgs.Applicant
- Defendant's Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated Jun. 24, 2019, 28 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029, United Services Automobile Association (USAA)'s Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jul. 17, 2019, 76 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029, Declaration of Matthew A. Calman in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Jul. 17 2019, 29 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029, Defendant's Claim Construction Brief, filed in Civil Action No. 2:18-CV-366, dated May 31, 2019, 28 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029, Palenchar, Joseph, “PDA Phone Adds WiFi VoIP, Turn-By-Turn GPS Navigation”, Copyright 2006 by Reed Business Information, 2 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029, HP User Guide, Additional Product Information, Copyright 2006 by Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P., 204 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029, Pocket PC User Manual, Version 1, dated May 2006 by Microsoft, 225 pgs.Applicant
- CBM2019-00029, “Dynamism.com: Take tomorrow's tech home today with Dynamism.com: Latest gadgets merge next generation technology with high style design”, Copyright 2006 Normans Media Limited, 2 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815, Federal Reserve Financial Services Retired: DSTU X9.37/2003, Specifications for Electronic Exchange of Check and Image Data, Copyright 2006 by Accredited Standards Committee X9, Inc., dated Mar. 31, 2003, 157 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-01081, Declaration of Peter Alexander, Ph.D, dated Jun. 5, 2019, 135 pgs.Applicant
- Defendant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.'s Second Amended Answer, Affirmative Defenses, and Counterclaims to Plaintiff's Amended Complaint, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-245, dated Aug. 1, 2019, 72 pgs.Applicant
- Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Jul. 29, 2019, 36 pgs.Applicant
- Wells Fargo's Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne's Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Aug. 12, 2019, 7 pgs.Applicant
- USAA's Objections to Magistrate Judge Payne's Claim Construction Memorandum Opinion and Order, United Services Automobile Association v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Civil Action No. 2:18-cv-366, dated Aug. 12, 2019, 10 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Petitioner's Reply Brief to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Pursuant to Authorization Provided in Paper No. 13, dated Aug. 1, 2019, 9 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Petitioner's Supplemental Exhibit List, dated Aug. 1, 2019, 5 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, United Services Automobile Association (“USAA”)'s Sur-Reply in Support of Patent Owner Preliminary Response, dated Aug. 8, 2019, 8 pgs.Applicant
- IPR2019-00815 U.S. Pat. No. 9,818,090, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Parties Review, dated Aug. 26, 2019, 28 pgs.Applicant
- Herley, Cormac, “Recursive Method to Extract Rectangular Objects From Scans”, Microsoft Research, Oct. 2003, 4 pgs.Applicant
- Panini My Vision X Operator Manual, Panini, 2004, (IPR2020-00093, U.S. Pat. No. 9,892,454), 51 pgs.Applicant
- Tochip, E. et al., “Camera Phone Color Appearance Utility”, Matlab at Stanford University, 2007, 25 pgs.Applicant
- Yeo, L.H. et al., “Submission of transaction from mobile workstations in a cooperative multidatabase environment”, IEEE, 1994, (IPR2020-00097, U.S. Pat. No. 7,885,880), 10 pgs.Applicant