US 10,565,643 B2Grant

Systems and methods of presenting simulated credit score information

Issue Date:2020-02-18

•16 Claims

•18 Drawing Sheets

Abstract

In an embodiment, a computer system receives credit information relating to a consumer, and calculates a credit score associated with the consumer. The system constructs a credit score scenario user interface. The system maintains a plurality of credit score simulation scenarios, and calculates a plurality of simulated credit scores associated with respective credit score simulation scenarios. The system also constructs a credit score simulation control interface. The system maintains a plurality of credit score simulation parameters, and generates a user interface with a graphical indication of the calculated credit score and a plurality of sliders, each slider being divided into segments that are colored to graphically indicate the likely effect of repositioning the slider within the respective segment. When the user repositions the sliders, the graphical indication of the calculated credit score is adjusted, based on a recalculation of the credit score.

Metadata

Assignee

CONSUMERINFO.COM, INC.

Inventors

Janice Anne Rohn
Julia E. Fegel
Jeffrey Bryan Mahacek
Michael Burger

Application Information

Application Number:US 15/429,592

Filing Date:2017-02-10

Priority Date:2011-12-15

Art Unit:3691

Classifications

IPC:

G06Q40/02G06F3/0484G06Q40/08

Field of Search:

G06Q 40/00G06Q 40/02

Patent Drawings (18 sheets)

Description

Cross-Reference to Related Applications

[0001] This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 13/326,803, filed Dec. 15, 2011, titled “Systems and Methods of Presenting Simulated Credit Score Information,” the entire contents of each are hereby incorporated by reference herein and made part of this specification for all that they disclose. This application is related to, but does not claim priority from, U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/452,155, filed May 30, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,610,229; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/606,060, filed Oct. 26, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,015,107; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/150,480, filed Jun. 10, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,593,891; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/563,779, filed Sep. 21, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,925,582; and U.S. Prov. Pat. App. No. 60/384,650, filed May 30, 2002. The disclosures of the above-listed applications are all hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth herein in their entireties.

Background

[0002] This disclosure relates to the field of consumer credit information and particularly to the presentation of simulated credit score information.

[0003] The credit score is an important indicator of a consumer's financial health. Consequently, having a high credit score is important to consumers for many reasons. A high credit score is required for such things as loan applications, rental applications, real estate mortgages, and so on. Thus, many consumers have a substantial interest in finding ways to improve their credit scores.

[0004] There is much information available to consumers as to how to improve credit scores. For example, sources provide advice to consumers to pay off loans, to establish certain numbers of credit accounts, to establish new loans, to raise or lower credit card limits, and so on. However, this advice is generic to all consumers and does not provide information specific to a particular consumer's situation. The question for many consumers then is which of the suggested actions would be the most effective in improving that consumer's credit score based on that consumer's situation.

Summary

[0005] Thus, it would be advantageous for consumers to be able to quickly investigate the various actions that may be taken to change one's credit score and the effect that those actions would have. In particular, it would be advantageous for consumers to be able to visualize those effects in an interactive and real time manner.

[0006] An embodiment is a computer-readable medium that operates a computer system. The system receives credit information relating to a consumer. The system calculates a credit score associated with the consumer based on the received credit information and further based on a credit score calculation algorithm. The system constructs a credit score scenario user interface. The system maintains a plurality of credit score simulation scenarios and calculates a plurality of simulated credit scores associated with respective credit score simulation scenarios. Each simulated credit score is calculated based on the credit score calculation algorithm and further based on the received credit information with modifications in accordance with the respective credit score simulation scenario. The system transmits first user interface data configured to cause the display of a user interface including a listing of information associated with respective credit score simulation scenarios, in conjunction with the simulated credit scores for respective credit score simulation scenarios. The system also constructs a credit score simulation control interface. The system maintains a plurality of credit score simulation parameters and transmits second user interface data configured to cause the display of a user interface comprising a graphical indication of the calculated credit score. The second user interface data further comprises a plurality of sliders, each slider being associated with a credit score simulation parameter, each slider being divided into a plurality of segments that are colored to graphically indicate the likely effect of repositioning the slider within the respective segment. The system also transmits executable code in association with the second user interface data, The executable code is configured to update in real time, in response to the user repositioning one or more of the sliders, the graphical indication of the calculated credit score, based on a recalculation of the credit score using at least parameters determined from the one or more repositioned sliders.

[0007] In an embodiment, constructing the credit score scenario user interface further comprises selecting a subset of the plurality of simulated credit score simulation scenarios, and wherein the listing of information associated with respective credit score simulation scenarios is based on the selected subset of the plurality of simulated credit score simulation scenarios.

[0008] In an embodiment, the first user interface data is further configured to display extended information for one or more of the respective credit score simulation scenarios in response to a user interaction with the listing of information.

[0009] In an embodiment, the first user interface data is further configured to display additional credit score simulation scenarios in response to a user interaction with the listing of information.

[0010] In an embodiment, the second user interface data is further configured to display a graphical indication of a current credit score, and wherein the executable code is configured to update the graphical indication of the calculated credit score but not to update the graphical indication of the current credit score.

[0011] In an embodiment, each slider of the plurality of sliders is initially positioned based upon the credit information relating to the consumer.

[0012] In an embodiment, a system performs a method of automatically calculating credit score simulation information to a user. The system receives credit information relating to a consumer. The system identifies a plurality of credit score simulation scenarios, each credit score simulation scenario including data indicating credit score simulation parameters associated with the respective credit score simulation scenario. The system executes, using a computer processor, a credit score simulation calculation for each of the credit score simulation scenarios. Each execution of the credit score simulation calculation for a credit score simulation scenario is based on the credit information and the credit score simulation parameters associated with the respective credit score simulation scenario. The execution produces simulated credit scores for respective credit score simulation scenarios. The system constructs user interface data configured to cause the display of a user interface including a listing of information associated with respective credit score simulation scenarios, in conjunction with the simulated credit scores for respective credit score simulation scenarios. The system then transmits the constructed user interface data.

[0013] In an embodiment, the method also includes calculating a credit score based on the credit information, and wherein the user interface further includes the calculated credit score.

[0014] In an embodiment, at least one of the simulated credit scores are greater than the calculated credit score, and at least some of the simulated credit scores are less than the calculated credit score, and wherein the user interface graphically differentiates the greater and less simulated credit scores.

[0015] In an embodiment, the user interface is configured to display, upon clicking an element of the listing of information associated with a particular credit score simulation scenario, expanded information including further credit score simulation data related to the particular credit score simulation scenario.

[0016] In an embodiment, the user interface is configured to display expanded information by requesting and receiving further credit score simulation data from an external server.

[0017] In an embodiment, identifying the plurality of credit score simulation scenarios comprises selecting a subset of credit score simulation scenarios based at least in part upon the received credit information.

[0018] In an embodiment, the selected subset of credit score simulation scenarios is further based upon stored user preferences.

[0019] In an embodiment, the listing of information is sorted by the simulated credit scores for respective credit score simulation scenarios.

[0020] In an embodiment, a system performs a method of constructing a credit score simulation control interface. The system receives credit information associated with a consumer. The system calculates, using a computer processor, a credit score based on the received credit information. The system constructs user interface data configured to cause the display of a user interface comprising a graphical indication of the calculated credit score. The user interface data further comprises a plurality of sliders, each slider being associated with a credit score simulation parameter, each slider being divided into a plurality of segments that are colored to graphically indicate the likely effect of repositioning the slider within the respective segment. The system transmits the constructed user interface data. The system transmits executable code in association with the constructed user interface data. The executable code is configured to update in real time, in response to the user repositioning one or more of the sliders, the graphical indication of the calculated credit score, based on a recalculation of the credit score using at least parameters determined from the one or more repositioned sliders.

[0021] In an embodiment, the graphical indication of the calculated credit score comprises a colored dial and a pointer. The colored dial is divided into a plurality of segments that are colored, and at least a portion of the colors of the segments of the colored dial correspond to the colors of the segments of the sliders.

[0022] In an embodiment, the user interface further comprises a graphical indication of a current credit score, and wherein the executable code is configured to update the graphical indication of the calculated credit score but not to update the graphical indication of the current credit score.

[0023] In an embodiment, the user interface further comprises a graphical comparative indicator of whether the current credit score is greater than, equal to, or less than the calculated credit score, and wherein the executable code is further to update, in real time, the graphical comparative indicator.

Brief Description of the Drawings

[0024] FIG. 1 is a block diagram showing a credit score simulation computing system, as used in an embodiment.

[0025] FIG. 2 is a hierarchical block diagram depicting the organization of components of a score simulation system such as the website, as used in an embodiment.

[0026] FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a process of credit score simulation, as used in an embodiment.

[0027] FIG. 4 is a sample user interface for analyzing score simulations, as used in an embodiment.

[0028] FIG. 5 is a block diagram representing a sample data structure of a credit score simulation scenario, as used in an embodiment.

[0029] FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a process of construction of a score simulation user interface as performed on a server, as used in an embodiment.

[0030] FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a process of displaying a credit score simulation user interface, as used in an embodiment.

[0031] FIG. 8 is a sample user interface for simulating credit scores, as used in an embodiment.

[0032] FIGS. 9A and 9B show the user interface of FIG. 8 in alternate configurations, as used in an embodiment.

[0033] FIG. 10 is a block diagram representing a sample data structure for user interface elements for score simulation, as used in an embodiment.

[0034] FIG. 11 is a flowchart of a process of providing a credit score simulation user interface, as used in an embodiment.

[0035] FIG. 12 is a flowchart of a process of displaying a credit score simulation user interface, as used in an embodiment.

[0036] FIGS. 13A-D are sample user interfaces presented on a mobile application, as used in an embodiment.

[0037] FIG. 14 is a block diagram of a computing system, as used in an embodiment.

Detailed Description

[0038] FIG. 1 is a block diagram of an embodiment of a credit score simulation computing system, in conjunction with related components. Credit score simulation system 101 may be a single computing device or a plurality of computing devices connected by a network or distributed computing system.

[0039] In an embodiment, various software modules are included on credit score simulation system 101, which may be stored on the system itself, or on computer readable storage media separate from the system and in communication with the system via a network or other appropriate means. The credit score simulation system 101 may include a data collection module 102, which performs various tasks of gathering data used by the credit score simulation system. Such data may include, for example, credit data 103 retrieved from credit bureau 104. The credit data 103 may be retrieved via a network, via a dedicated communication channel, or by other means. In an embodiment, credit bureau 104 transmits credit data 103 to the credit score simulation system 101 via a secured communication channel to ensure the privacy and security of the credit data.

[0040] In an embodiment, credit data 103 is gathered on demand as required by credit score simulation system 101. In another embodiment, credit data 103 is gathered on a periodic basis independent of requests for information to the credit score simulation system 101. In another embodiment, credit data 103 is stored on the credit score simulation system 101, in which case, retrievable of credit data 103 from a credit bureau 104 may not be necessary. In another embodiment, credit data 103 is entered by a user rather than retrieved from a credit bureau.

[0041] Data collection module 102 may also gather score simulation models and/or algorithms 105 from a score simulation data store 106. The score simulation models and algorithms may include formulas, executable code, web browser code, JavaScript code, statistical parameters, statistical variables, and the like. In an embodiment, the models and/or algorithms 105 are retrieved from score simulation data store 106 on an on-demand basis as needed by the credit score simulation system 101. In another embodiment, the models and/or algorithms 105 are retrieved on a periodic basis. In another embodiment, the credit score simulation system 101 internally stores the models and/or algorithms 105, in which case a separate score simulation data store 106 may not be required.

[0042] The credit score simulation system 101 may also include a simulation module 109, which may include executable instructions for performing credit score simulations. Various algorithms for performing such simulations of credit scores are described throughout the specification. Further algorithms and disclosures of score simulation techniques and algorithms are presented in the related applications that are incorporated by reference.

[0043] Simulation module 109 may use data retrieved by data collection module 102, such as credit data 103 and/or models and/or algorithms 105, as input to the simulation. Furthermore, simulation module 109 may interact with one or more end users 107 via a network 108. In various embodiments, network 108 may be the Internet, a local area network, a wide area network, a telecommunications network, a cellular telephone network, a standard telephone network, or the like.

[0044] In an embodiment, simulation module 109 may receive one or more parameters from end user 107. Such parameters may indicate personal information about the end user which simulation module 109 may use to determine appropriate credit data 103 to be applied or retrieved. Furthermore, simulation module 109 may receive, from end user 107, requests to simulate a credit score based on certain user-defined parameters.

[0045] In an embodiment, the credit score simulation system 101 further includes user interface module 110, which may include executable instructions for constructing user interfaces or otherwise interacting with end users 107. User interface module 110 may receive data from data collection module 102 and/or simulation module 109, and use that data to construct user interfaces that may embody, for example, the results of a credit score simulation. Those interfaces may then be communicated to end user 107. Such simulations may be presented to the end user via various user interfaces designed to be easily manipulated and/or understood by the user. In an embodiment, the user interfaces transmitted by user interface module 110 are interactive. Various embodiments of the user interfaces that may be provided by user interface module 110 are shown and described throughout this specification. Variations on such interfaces and other possible interfaces will be known to those of skill in the art. For example, user interface module 110 may provide a telephone or voice-activated command interface, a SOAP or REST API, a desktop computer application interface, or the like.

[0046] User interface module 110 may be configured to construct user interfaces of various types. In an embodiment, user interface module 110 constructs web pages to be displayed in a web browser. The web pages may, in an embodiment, be specific to a type of device, such as a mobile device or a desktop web browser, to maximize usability for the particular device. In an embodiment, user interface module 110 may also interact with a client-side application, such as a mobile phone application or a standalone desktop application, and provide data to the application as necessary to display credit score simulation information.

[0047] FIG. 2 is a hierarchical block diagram showing an organization for a score simulation system. In an embodiment, the score simulation system presents a website comprising a number of web pages organized in the fashion shown in FIG. 2. In other embodiments in which interfaces other than web pages are used, similar organizational structures may be applied as is appropriate to the particular means of communication. For example, in a telephone-based system, the organization of FIG. 2 may be embodied as an automated telephone response tree.

[0048] In an embodiment, credit score simulation system 101 includes two interfaces: a public user interface 201 and an administrative interface 202. In an embodiment, the public user interface is accessible by any user in communication with score simulation system 101 while administrative interface 202 is only accessible to particular individuals such as administrators. In an embodiment, administrative interface 202 may be protected by a password, by IP-based authentication, or by other means.

[0049] Public user interface 201 may include one or more modules that may be accessed by users. The users accessing public user interface 201 may be the consumers themselves. Alternatively, the users accessing public user interface 201 may be entities interested in particular consumers. For example, a bank or landlord may access public user interface 201 to perform credit score simulation on a prospective loan recipient or tenant.

[0050] In various embodiments, the public interface may include an authenticated section that may be accessed only by authenticated users, such as members who have signed up for an account and/or paid a fee such as a subscription fee. The public interface may further include an unauthenticated section that may be accessed by users regardless of authentication status, or that may be accessed by unauthenticated users. The authenticated and unauthenticated sections may have the same features, similar features, or different features. In an embodiment, the authenticated section offers additional features not available in the unauthenticated section. For example, credit data or credit-related information is used in the various systems and methods described herein. This information be stored in member accounts or automatically retrieved based on member account data. In such an embodiment, the credit-related information may be automatically pre-populated, so that members need not enter that information, while unauthenticated users would enter their information manually.

[0051] Public user interface 201 includes a scenario simulation section 203 which may enable the user to view various predetermined scenarios and determine simulated credit scores associated with those various scenarios. An embodiment of a user interface presented by such a section is shown in FIG. 4. Public user interface 201 may further include an adjuster simulation section 204 which may enable the user to view credit scores and interactively adjust parameters that affect that score. An embodiment of a user interface presented by such a section is shown in FIG. 8. Public user interface 201 may further include other simulation section 205. In various embodiments, public user interface 201 may include all of these sections, some of these sections, and/or other sections as may be contemplated by those of skill in the art.

[0052] Administrative interface 202 may also comprise various sections. For example, it may include a scenario management section 206 where an administrator to the system may add, remove or modify various score simulation scenarios. In an embodiment, input relating to the scenarios managed using interface section 206 affects the scenarios presented in section 203 of the public user interface. Administrative interface 202 may also include an adjuster management section 207 which similarly may be used to effect the adjuster simulation section 204 of the public user interface. Administrative interface 202 may also include other management features 208 or may include fewer features. Additionally, administrators to the system may find it useful to review statistics or other information relating to the usage of the credit score simulation system. Such information may be provided using data reporting section 209 of the administrative interface. In various embodiments, other sections or fewer sections may be included in the administrative interface 202. In an embodiment, no administrative interface is provided.

[0053] FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a process of credit score simulation as used in an embodiment. The process may be performed, for example, by a credit score simulation system 101 of FIG. 1, or by other suitable computing systems. In an embodiment, the process shown in FIG. 3 may be performed substantially in real time so that the user requesting information is presented with that information without substantial delay. In various embodiments, fewer blocks or additional blocks may be included in the process, or various blocks may be performed in an order different from that shown in FIG. 3.

[0054] At block 301, the system receives credit-related information from a user and/or third parties. Such information may include personal identifying information enabling the system to determine the identity of the user or another individual. The information may further enable the system to retrieve credit data associated with the appropriate individual. Furthermore, such information may include the public data as retrieved from a credit bureau or other credit information source. In an embodiment, the credit data retrieved is a credit score. In an embodiment, the credit information retrieved is credit data from a consumer's credit history that the system 101 may use to calculate a credit score for the consumer, such as based on a credit score model of a credit bureau or based on a credit score model that is configured to approximate credit scores provided by one or more credit bureaus. Further data may be retrieved by the system and incorporated into the processes described herein.

[0055] At block 302, the system constructs one or more credit score simulation parameters and/or other data. These parameters may be used by the system to simulate a credit score. For example, such data may include the credit score itself, which may be calculated using credit data of the consumer. Additional parameters relating to the consumer's credit usage may be calculated as well. For example, the system may use credit data to calculate aggregate or average information, such as the average credit balance for the consumer or the average number of months late that the consumer pays off credit card debt.

[0056] In an embodiment, the data constructed at block 302 may include information on how much a particular consumer's credit score would be affected by various activities. In an embodiment, the data may include information about types of actions that may be taken by the individual whose credit score is being simulated. This information may be based on particular personal information associated with the individual. For example, the system may determine that a consumer has no credit cards based on, for example, information received at block 301. In such a case, at block 302, the system may determine that it is not possible for the user to pay off the consumer's credit card debt and thus, the system will not recommend doing so.

[0057] In an embodiment, the data constructed at block 302 may include summary information associated with the user's credit behavior. Such information may be derived from the user's credit report, may be received directly from the user, or may be gathered by other means. Other such parameters may be constructed at block 302.

[0058] At block 303, the system applies one or more credit score simulation models to determine a simulated credit score. Various score simulation models may be used. Some of such models are disclosed throughout this specification and in the related applications that are incorporated by reference. In various embodiments, the score simulation model may incorporate information about the consumer's actual credit score, or it may estimate the consumer's credit score based on user provided information alone and/or other information, without relying on an actual credit score. In an embodiment, the score simulation model may be based on various statistical models such as linear regression, non-linear regression, neural networks, and the like. The results of applying the score simulation model at block 303 may include one or more simulated credit scores and possibly other information, which may include, for example, recommendations for possible actions to be taken, ranges of credit scores, possible parameters for adjustment, and so on.

[0059] At block 304, the system uses the results of the score simulation model from block 303, as well as other information, to construct user interface data. The user interface data may take on various forms depending on the particular means of communication with the user who initiated the request. In various embodiments, the user interface data may be web page data, application-specific data, mobile application data, or other such graphical data. In other embodiments, the user interface data may not be visual data, but rather be audio data, XML data, comma-separated values (CSV) data, and so on.

[0060] At block 305, the user interface data constructed at block 304 may be transmitted to the user, who may be the consumer or other entity. At block 306, the user may use the user interface to adjust various simulation parameters. This may be done, for example, via an interactive user interface that provides various controls configured to be manipulated by the user. The interface may be configured to convert those user manipulations into data that may be transmitted back to the score simulation system.

[0061] At block 307, the adjusted parameters are transmitted to the system, and the system receives a request to adjust parameters. Upon receiving the request to adjust the parameters, the system further may perform various steps in the process of FIG. 3 to calculate updated credit score simulation values and provide the user with further user interface data. In an embodiment, the system distinguishes between the initial transmission of user interface data and subsequent transmissions of user interface data so that it may transmit only portions that are necessary to update the user interface data in the latter case. This may be done, for example, using an XMLHttpRequest (XHR) mechanism, a data push interface, or other communication protocols.

[0062] FIG. 4 is a sample user interface, as presented by an embodiment of the credit score simulation system. In various embodiments, the user interface shown in FIG. 4 may be presented as a web page, as a mobile form application, as a stand-alone application, or by other communication means. In other embodiments, analogous interfaces may be presented using audio or other forms of communication. In an embodiment, the interface shown in FIG. 4 is configured to be interactive and respond to various user interactions. Such user interactions may include clicks with a mouse, typing with a keyboard, touches and/or gestures on a touch screen, voice commands, and/or the like.

[0063] The user's current credit score may be displayed on the user interface using interface element 401. This credit score may be an actual credit score or an estimated credit score provided based on information submitted by the user. In addition to the user's numeric credit score, the interface may optionally or alternatively present a graphical and/or textual representation of the user's credit rating 402. In an embodiment, the graphical representation of the rating may include a dial with a pointer indicating the user's relative credit risk. In an embodiment, a textual representation may include a textual description of the user's credit risk rating such as “Very Low Risk.” Both a graphical and a textual representation may be included, or only one, or neither, in various embodiments.

[0064] In an embodiment, the interface may include a listing or other display of various scenarios 403, representing possible actions that may potentially affect the consumer's credit score. The scenarios 403 listed in FIG. 4 may be a predefined list of scenarios displayed for every consumer whose information is displayed by the system. Thus, because the same scenarios are used for each consumer, the consumer's credit rating 402 may be located at different locations between the predefined scenarios 403. As shown in FIG. 4, the interface includes scenarios 403a that would cause a decrease in credit score of the consumer, as well as scenarios 403b that would cause an increase in the credit score of the consumer.

[0065] In another embodiment, the scenarios are selected based on information relating to the consumer. For example, the system may omit particular scenarios that are not applicable to the consumer's situation, as determined based on the consumer's credit history or other personal information. In other embodiments, the system may identify actions that are particularly relevant to the consumer and graphically highlight or otherwise identify them. In an embodiment, the selected scenarios are chosen based on factors such as scenarios of the most interest to the general public, the level of impact on the simulated credit score (for example, selecting scenarios having the most impact), scenarios relevant to the consumer based on the consumer's credit history or spending habits, and/or other factors.

[0066] In an embodiment, a subset of scenarios is initially displayed, and then an expanded list of scenarios may be optionally shown upon user request. For example, if the system determines that a consumer could easily pay off credit card debt but would have more difficulty paying off a home mortgage, then the system may highlight the scenario of paying off credit card debt, and/or it may omit or hide the home mortgage payment scenario. In an embodiment, the user may be provided options to add in scenarios that are not selected to be displayed, or to remove scenarios that are displayed, thus making the user interface customizable by the user.

[0067] In an embodiment, the scenarios are presented in association with an indication of an estimated credit score that would potentially result should the user perform the associated action. The simulated credit score may be calculated based on data maintained by the system relating to the action, and it may be further based on credit information associated with the particular user. The simulated credit score may be calculated using various score simulation models, as explained previously in this disclosure.

[0068] In an embodiment, each scenario is displayed with a numeric estimated score 404 and a graphical indication 405 of the simulated score. For example, as shown in FIG. 4, the graphical representation 405 may include an up arrow, down arrow, or equal sign indicating the relative change that the scenario would have on the user's credit score. In an embodiment, to further improve the user's ability to understand the user interface of FIG. 4, the graphical representations 405 are colored to reflect the relative effect the action will have on the user's credit score. For example, actions that would increase the user's credit score may be colored green, whereas actions that would decrease the user's credit score may be colored red.

[0069] In an embodiment, the listing of scenarios 403 may further be sorted in various orders, such as by the estimated credit scores 404. The user may be able to select the order in which the scenarios are sorted. In an embodiment, the interface element 401 showing the user's actual credit score is inserted into the list of scenarios 403 in an appropriate location relative to estimated scores 404. In other embodiments, the interface element 401 showing the actual score may be placed on other parts of the user interface.

[0070] The display shown for each scenario may further include extended and/or additional information 407 relating to the particular scenario. In an embodiment, to improve the appearance of the user interface, such additional information may be hidden and only displayed in response to an appropriate user interaction with the user interface. For example, in the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, the user may use interface elements 406, for example by clicking on it, to display additional information.

[0071] The display of additional information 407 may include any additional information that may be associated with the particular selected scenario. For example, the scenario associated with additional information 407 is the scenario of making all payments on time for the next six months. The additional information includes a textual description of the scenario 408 as well as further score simulations 409 for time frames different from six months. This provides the user with easy access to further credit score simulations for related scenarios.

[0072] Additionally, the display of additional information 407 may include one or more graphical and/or textual descriptions of credit score simulations 409 for the selected scenario and/or for the extended displays of related scenario. For example, dials indicating the relative simulated credit score may be shown for the selected scenario, for any or all of the related scenarios in the extended information, for both, or for neither. Additionally, in an embodiment, the additional information 407 may include one or more links 410 to further information relating to the selected action.

[0073] The user interaction employed to display additional information 407 may be, for example, a mouse click, a tap or gesture on a touch screen, a keyboard selection, a drag and drop operation, voice command, or other form of interaction. In an embodiment, when a user requests to display additional information for one particular action, any other displays of additional information are automatically hidden thereby reducing clutter on the user interface. In other embodiments, additional information 407 may always be displayed or may never be displayed.

[0074] The location at which additional information 407 is placed may also vary in various embodiments. For example, as shown on FIG. 4, additional information 407 may be displayed underneath the particular selected action. In another embodiment, additional information 407 may be shown in an internal window within the user's web browser or other application. In other embodiments, the additional information 407 may be shown in a separate pop-up window. In another embodiment, the additional information 407 may be shown on a separate web page.

[0075] One example of a scenario that may be included on the interface of FIG. 4, in an embodiment, is whether the individual accepted a pre-approved credit card offer with a particular credit limit. The particular credit limit may be $2,500, $5,000, $10,000, $15,000, or $20,000, or any other amount, in various embodiments. The expanded scenarios associated with this scenario may be based on any subset of these credit limit amounts, or all of the amounts, or further amounts.

[0076] Another example of a scenario that may be included on the interface of FIG. 4 is whether the individual makes all payments on time for a particular number of months into the future. The number of months may be 6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months, or any other number, in various embodiments. The expanded scenarios associated with this scenario may be based on any subset of these numbers of months, or all of the numbers, or further numbers.

[0077] Another example of a scenario that may be included on the interface of FIG. 4 is whether the individual consolidates all of his/her major credit card balances onto one major credit card with a particular credit limit. The particular credit limit may be $2,500, $5,000, $10,000, $15,000, or $20,000, or any other amount, in various embodiments. The expanded scenarios associated with this scenario may be based on any subset of these credit limit amounts, or all of the amounts, or further amounts.

[0078] In order to generate the listing of various actions as shown on FIG. 4, the system may include a database or other data store of information relating to possible actions. An example of a data structure that may be employed to store such information about actions and/or scenarios is shown on FIG. 5. In various embodiments, the system may include additional information or less information in such a data structure. The data structure may be stored in any number of formats such as a relational database, XML data, HTML data, common separated values (CSV) data, or other formats.

[0079] In the embodiment shown in FIG. 5, one or more score simulation scenario data records 501 may be stored by the system. Each score simulation scenario data record may include a number of elements. For example, each record may include a textual description of the scenario 502. This textual description may be used in the listing of possible actions as shown in FIG. 4.

[0080] The score simulation scenario data structure 501 may further include one or more parameter adjustment rules 503. Such rules may be used to determine the appropriate simulated credit score to be associated with the scenario or action. For example, for a scenario of making all payments on time for the next six months, the parameter adjustment rules 503 may indicate how much a credit score would change should such an action be taken. The adjustment rules may account for the user's actual credit information in performing the adjustment of the credit score.

[0081] In an embodiment, the parameter adjustment rules comprise executable code that recalculates the estimated credit score. In another embodiment, the parameter adjustment rules comprise data relating to how to adjust parameters to be provided to one or more score simulation models and the score simulation models apply the parameter adjustment rules 503 to calculate the new simulated credit score.

[0082] The score simulation scenario data structure 501 may further include data relating to expanded simulation scenario data 504. This data may be used, for example, to calculate the information for the expanded display of additional information 407 shown in FIG. 4. In an embodiment, the expanded simulation scenario data 504 may include similar data elements to that of the score simulation scenario data structure 501. For example, it may include descriptive text and/or further parameter adjustment rules for each of the expanded simulations. In an embodiment, for example, the expanded simulation scenarios may include making all payments on time for the next six months, one year and two years. Thus, in this embodiment, the expanded simulation scenario data 504 may include descriptive text and parameter adjustment rules for each of those three possible expanded scenarios.

[0083] FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a process of constructing a scenario-based credit score simulation interface. For example, the process shown in FIG. 6 may be used to construct an interface such as that shown on FIG. 4. In an embodiment, the process shown on FIG. 6 may be performed by one or more computing systems such as the credit score simulation system 101 of FIG. 6. In various embodiments, some of the blocks of FIG. 6 may not be performed, other blocks may be included, and/or blocks may be performed in an order different from that shown.

[0084] At block 601, the system accesses credit information associated with a particular consumer. The credit information may be retrieved from a credit bureau, may be stored locally on the score simulation system, may be entered by a user such as the consumer, or may be maintained and/or retrieved from other sources.

[0085] At block 602, the system calculates or accesses a credit score and related information associated with the consumer. In an embodiment, the system retrieves a credit score directly from a credit bureau or from another source. In another embodiment, the system retrieves credit data and uses that credit data and a credit score model to calculate the credit score for the consumer. Additionally, further data may be calculated or accessed at block 602. Such data may be useful, for example, in constructing the user interface for the particular consumer's situation. For example, data on the consumer's history of credit card payments may be accessed or calculated in order to present actions and/or scenarios that are appropriate to that consumer's history of credit card payments.

[0086] At block 603, the system may retrieve a list of credit score simulation scenarios. This list may be accessed and/or derived from one or more data structures such as the data structure shown in FIG. 5. In an embodiment, the system retrieves a predefined set of scenarios that are used for all consumers. In an embodiment, the predefined set of scenarios is configured to provide most consumers with at least some scenarios that would decrease the consumer's credit score, and at least some scenarios that would increase the consumer's credit score. For example, some of the scenarios may be actions that are generally known to increase credit scores (e.g., paying off outstanding debts), while some of the scenarios may be actions that are generally known to decrease credit scores (e.g., making late payments). In an embodiment, the system may not need to retrieve the scenarios since the same scenarios are used for all consumers, but may rather have the predefined set of scenarios stored locally on the system or even directly encoded in software.

[0087] In another embodiment, the system determines a subset of scenarios that are appropriate to the particular consumer's situation. This may be based, for example, on the credit score and related information that was calculated or accessed at block 602.

[0088] At block 604, the system selects a scenario from the list of scenarios retrieved at block 603. At block 605, the system calculates a simulated credit score based on the consumer credit information accessed at block 601 or calculated at block 602 and further based on data associated with the selected scenario. The simulated credit score may be calculated based on one or more statistical models available to the score simulation system, or by other means described elsewhere in this specification or known to those of skill in the art. Thus, the system may recalculate the simulated credit score for the scenario using credit data of the consumer, with some data elements replaced with data for the particular scenario being processed.

[0089] At block 606, the system optionally calculates simulated credit scores for expanded scenarios. These calculations may be used to display the additional information associated with particular actions or scenarios. The credit scores for expanded scenarios may be calculated in the same way described with respect to block 605, or by other means.

[0090] In an embodiment, the simulated credit scores for expanded scenarios are calculated prior to transmitting data to the user. In another embodiment, the system does not calculate simulated credit scores for the expanded scenarios, and instead waits to receive appropriate requests from the user before calculating simulated credit scores for those expanded scenarios. Thus, the processes of block 606 may be performed at various times in different embodiments.

[0091] At block 607, the system determines whether there are further simulation scenarios in the list of simulation scenarios retrieved at block 603. If there are, then the system returns to block 604 and further performs calculations of simulated credit scores for each of the other scenarios. If not, then at block 608, the system constructs user interface data or other data, based on the calculated credit scores and/or other information calculated or retrieved by the system. At block 609, the constructed user interface data is transmitted to a user computer.

[0092] FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a process of displaying simulation scenarios as used in an embodiment. Such a process may be performed on a client computer that is displaying a user interface such as that shown in FIG. 4. In an embodiment, parts or all of the process shown in FIG. 7 may be performed using executable code, such as JavaScript code, sent by the score simulation computer (e.g. a server) to a client computer browser in combination with the web page.

[0093] At block 701, the system displays a listing of credit scores simulation scenarios. Such a listing may appear like listing 403 of FIG. 4. At block 702, a user selection of a simulation scenario is received. Such a selection may be, for example, a mouse click on a web page. The user selection may indicate a particular scenario that has been selected or may indicate several scenarios to be selected.

[0094] At block 703, the client computer optionally sends a request to the score simulation server for expanded scenario information. At block 704, the expanded scenario information is received by the client computer. In order to do this, the score simulation system may be configured to receive such requests for expanded scenario information and to transmit that appropriate data indicating the expanded score simulation scenario information. This expanded information may be in the form of user interface data such as web page data, or it may simply include numeric credit scores or other raw information that may be formatted by the client's computer web browser in accordance with the executable code.

[0095] In another embodiment, the expanded scenario information is already available to the client computer without performing blocks 703 and 704. This may be the case, for example, where the expanded score simulation scenario information was pre-calculated and transmitted in conjunction with the user interface data that was displayed at block 701. For example, if optional block 606 of FIG. 6 was performed, then the client computer may already have received the expanded scenario information. In such a case, blocks 703 and 704 may not need to be performed. In another embodiment, the client computer performs blocks 703 and 704 the first time a user selects a particular scenario at block 702 but it caches the result received at block 704, so that it need not perform block 703 and 704 again the next time the user selects that same scenario.

[0096] At block 705, the client computer displays the expanded scenario information. This display may be presented using any number of forms such as an expanded display on the window, on internal window within the web browser, a separate pop-up window, a separate web page or tab, or other means. In an embodiment, the user interface is configured to animate the display of the expanded scenario information.

[0097] FIG. 8 is a sample user interface for credit source simulation as used in an embodiment. In this user interface, the user's current credit score may be shown at interface elements 801 and a graphical and/or textual representation of the user's credit score may be presented using interface element 802. Additionally, a simulated credit score may be presented using interface elements 803 and 804. When the user interface is initially transmitted to the client computer, the simulated score displays 803 and 804 may be equal to the actual score displays 801 and 802.

[0098] The user interface further includes one or more credit scores simulation adjusters 805. These adjusters enable the user to modify parameters to be provided to the credit score simulation system and allow it to calculate further simulated credit scores. In an embodiment, the simulation adjusters 805 are graphical sliders including a display of a bar 806 and a handle 807 configured so that the user may adjust handle 807 across bar 806, for example by clicking and dragging it so as to slide it.

[0099] In an embodiment, bar 806 comprises a plurality of segments associated with different values to be provided to the credit score simulation system. For example, bar 806 is divided into sections, each section representing different portions of credit use such as 65-100% 808, 52-64% 809, 30-51% 810, 16-29% 811, and 0-15% 812.

[0100] In an embodiment, handle 807 is initially placed within the segment of bar 806 that most closely reflects the user's actual credit information. For example, handle 807 is initially placed within region 811 because the user whose credit score is being simulated in the interface of FIG. 8 has a credit usage value of 16-29%.

[0101] In an embodiment, each of the segments 808 through 812 is colored to reflect a credit risk associated with that segment. In an embodiment, the colors are selected to correspond with those colors used in the graphical display 802 and 804. For example, a credit used amount of 65-100% may create a high credit risk and as a result, section segment 808 may be colored the same as the high risk section of elements 802 and 804. In an embodiment, segment 808 is colored red and segment 812 is colored green, to indicate that segment 812 indicates a low risk while segment 808 represents a high risk. As shown in the example of FIG. 8, not all sliders include all risk categories and the risk categories are not uniform for all sliders.

[0102] In an embodiment, the segments of bar 806 and the other interface element 805 are created automatically by the credit score simulation system and remain positioned where they are regardless of the user's adjustment of handle 807 or other manipulations of the user interface. In other embodiments, the segments may be adjusted in response to the user adjusting one or more of the interface element 805. For example, if the user moves handle 807 to indicate a different amount of credit use, this may cause other sliders or interface elements to change their colored segments and/or handles.

[0103] In an embodiment, changing the value of one or more of the simulation adjusters results in a corresponding change to the display of the potential score 803 and 804. This is shown in detail in FIGS. 9A and 9B.

[0104] In FIG. 9A, the user has moved handle 807 into region 810 of slider bar 806. In response, the user interface element 803 displaying the simulated credit score has been updated to reflect a new simulated credit score. Additionally, display 804 has been updated to graphically indicate the changed simulated credit score. While in FIG. 8 element 804 showed a very low risk for the user, in FIG. 9A, as a result of the change of the value for bar 806, element 804 displays an average risk for the user. These updates may be performed substantially in real time, so that there is minimal delay or no delay between the user moving handle 807 and the simulated credit score values being updated. In this way, the consumer is provided with a graphical indication of how various changes affect their risk level.

[0105] In FIG. 9B, handle 807 has been further moved into segment 808 of bar 806. Accordingly, the simulated score 803 and graphical display of the simulated score 804 have been further updated to reflect the new simulated score and a high risk category.

[0106] Although the user interface has been described with respect to slider interface elements, other user interface elements may be used in various embodiments. For example, the user may select items off of a list, rotate a dial, type in information, or otherwise interact with the user interface. Additionally, the user interface may include various graphical, textual, and other indications of changes, in addition to, or rather than, updating the simulated score 803 and graphical display 804. For example, the “vs” symbol between the current score and simulated score may be colored to reflect the difference between the scores. In an embodiment, the “vs” symbol is colored red when the potential score is lower than the current score, yellow when the scores are equal, and green when the potential score is higher than the current score. In various embodiments, audible and/or tactile feedback may further be provided based on the simulated score.

[0107] The credit score simulation system maintains information about each of the adjuster elements such as slider shown in FIG. 8. The information for these adjuster interfaces may be stored in data structures such as those shown in FIG. 10. Each adjuster interface element data structure 1001 may include various information associated with the particular simulation adjuster interface elements. For example, it may include parameter adjustment rules 1002. These adjustment rules indicate how a simulated credit score should be adjusted for various values presented by the simulation adjuster interface elements.

[0108] Additionally, the data structure may include a range of adjustment values 1003 indicating what values the adjuster interface element may take on. The range of adjustment values may be a continuous range with a minimum and maximum value, or it may be a discrete set of particular values. Additionally, the data structure may include a description 1004 and/or other information useful in displaying the simulation adjustment interface element.

[0109] FIG. 11 shows a flowchart of a process of constructing a user interface such as that shown in FIG. 8. The process may be performed by a credit score simulation system 101 of FIG. 1 in an embodiment.

[0110] At block 1101, the system provides multiple simulation controls such as slider positions at the parameter values associated with a particular user's information. These controls may be provided via an interface such as that shown in FIG. 8. At block 1102, the system receives one or more change simulation control values. This change to simulation control values may be based on user interactions with the simulation controls. Such interaction may include, for example, sliding the handle on one or more slider bars.

[0111] At block 1103, the system determines a simulated credit score based on the depicted change to the simulation control values. The simulated credit score may further be based on actual credit information associated with the user including the user's actual credit score.

[0112] At block 1104, the system determines a risk category associated with the simulated credit score calculated at block 1103. The risk category may be based on internal data relating to risk categories for particular credit scores or range of the credit scores. At block 1105, the system constructs an updated user interface illustrating the simulated credit score calculated at block 1103 and the associated risk category calculated at block 1104. The constructed user interface may be a complete user interface such as that shown in FIG. 8, or only a portion of the user interface that requires updating.

[0113] In an embodiment, if the system determines at block 1104 that the risk category has not changed, then block 1105 may be omitted. In another embodiment, the system may only construct information or instructions to update the user interface and the actual updating of the user interface may be performed by an application such as a web browser on the client computer. In such a case, blocks 1104 and 1005 may need not be performed at all.

[0114] At block 1106, the system transmits updated user interface data or other data to the client computer. The updated data may be used then by the client computer to update the displayed user interface so that the user may see the new simulated credit score.

[0115] FIG. 12 is a flow chart of a process of displaying a user interface with multiple simulation control such as that shown in FIG. 8 as used in an embodiment. At block 1201, the system displays source simulation data. This data may be displayed in an interface such as that shown in FIG. 8. At block 1202, the user manipulates the user interface to adjust one or more user interface elements. The interaction may be performed by one or more mouse clicks, touches or gestures on a touch screen, drag and drop operations, keyboard inputs, voice commands, or other mechanisms. The client computer then determines appropriate simulation parameters based on the adjusted interface elements.

[0116] In various embodiments, the client computer may then proceed to perform either block 1203, block 1204, or a combination thereof. At block 1203, the client computer transmits a request to the credit score simulation system including values associated with the adjusted interface elements. The request may include data indicating those adjusted interface elements using a variety of formats in accordance with the protocol understood by the credit score simulation system. In response, the credit score simulation system may transmit updated user interface data or other data to the client computer.

[0117] Alternatively, at block 1204, the client computer may calculate an updated simulated credit score and/or other information using client-side code such as JavaScript code. In such an embodiment, the client computer does not need to communicate with the credit score simulation server which provides some possible performance benefits to the user of the client computer.

[0118] In an embodiment, rather than calculating an updated score at either block 1203 or 1204, only a score delta value is calculated, indicating not the resulting simulated credit score but a difference between the actual credit score and the simulated credit score. Executable code on the client computer or score simulator system may then be configured to update the user interface to reflect the simulated credit score, calculated based on the actual credit score and the delta value.

[0119] At block 1205, the system updates the overall score display of the user interface. Such updating may involve, for example, displaying a new simulated credit score and/or updating graphical or textual representations of the associated credit risk. In an embodiment, the updates of the overall score display is performed substantially in real time so that there is minimal delay between the adjustment of the user interface elements and the update of the score display. This provides a benefit to the user of being able to immediately view the effect of changes to the various interface elements.

[0120] FIGS. 13A-D are sample user interfaces on a mobile device, as used in an embodiment. In various embodiments, all of these interfaces, a subset of these interfaces, and/or additional interfaces may be presented. In a mobile context, the credit score simulation system may communicate with a dedicated application executing on a mobile or other computing device, or it may transmit web page data or other data that may be understood by the mobile device. The user interfaces presented by the mobile device may be similar to the web page interfaces described above, or they may be adjusted to comport with the specifications and features of the device. Additionally, the manner in which the user interacts with the mobile application may be different, in some embodiments. For example, the user may use touch screen input such as gestures to control the interface, rather than mouse input.

Example System Architecture

[0121] FIG. 14 is a block diagram illustrating one embodiment of a system that manages calendar data. In the embodiment of FIG. 14, a computing device 1401 is in communication with a user 1402, as well as an optional third-party data source 1403, via a network 1404. In an embodiment, the computing device 1401 receives data, such as credit data, from one or more data sources 1403 and accesses the data to identify information regarding one or more entities. The computing device 1401 may then perform analysis and prepare information for presentation to the user 1402. The credit score simulation system 101 may include the same or similar components as the computing device 1401. Similarly, the computing devices 1401 may be used to implement any of the methods discussed herein.

[0122] The network 1404 may include any communication network or combination of communication networks, such as one or more of the Internet, LANs, WANs, MANs, etc., for example. In the embodiment of FIG. 14, the computing device 1401 includes a computing system having one or more computing devices (e.g., computers). The computing device 1401 may include, for example, a single computing device, a computer server, a smart storage unit, or a combination of one or more computing devices and/or computer servers. Depending on the embodiment, the components illustrated in the computing device 1401 may be distributed amongst multiple devices, such as via a local area or other network connection. In other embodiments the computing device 1401 may include fewer and/or additional components that are illustrated in FIG. 14.

[0123] The exemplary computing device 1401 may be a general purpose computer using one or more microprocessors, such as, for example, an Intel® Pentium® processor, an Intel® Pentium® II processor, an Intel® Pentium® Pro processor, an Intel® Pentium® IV processor, an Intel® Pentium® D processor, an Intel® Core™ processor, an xx86 processor, an 8051 processor, a MIPS processor, a Power PC processor, a SPARC processor, an Alpha processor, and so forth. The computer may run a variety of operating systems that perform standard operating system functions such as, for example, opening, reading, writing, and closing a file. It is recognized that other operating systems may be used, such as, for example, Microsoft® Windows® 3.X, Microsoft® Windows 98, Microsoft® Windows® 2000, Microsoft® Windows® NT, Microsoft® Windows® CE, Microsoft® Windows® ME, Microsoft® Windows® XP, Windows® 7, Palm Pilot OS, Apple® MacOS®, Disk Operating System (DOS), UNIX, IRIX, Solaris, SunOS, FreeBSD, Linux®, or IBM® OS/2® operating systems. In other embodiments, the computing device 1401 may be controlled by a proprietary operating system. Conventional operating systems control and schedule computer processes for execution, perform memory management, provide file system, networking, I/O services, and provide a user interface, such as a graphical user interface (“GUI”), among other things.

[0124] The computing device 1401 includes one or more central processing units (“CPU”) 1405, which may each include one or more conventional or proprietary microprocessor(s). The computing device 1401 may further include one or more memories 1406, such as random access memory (“RAM”), for temporary storage of information, read only memory (“ROM”) for permanent storage of information, and/or a mass storage device 1407, such as a hard drive, diskette, or optical media storage device. The memory 1406 may store software code, or instructions, for execution by the processor 1405 in order to cause the computing device to perform certain operations, such as gathering sensor-related data, processing the data with statistical and/or predictive models, formatting data for user devices or other presentation, transmitting data, or other operations described or used herein.

[0125] The methods described and claimed herein may be performed by any suitable computing device, such as the computing device 1401. The methods may be executed on such suitable computing devices in response to execution of software instructions or other executable code read from a non-transitory tangible computer readable medium or computer storage device. A computer readable medium is a data storage device that can store data that is readable by a computer system. Examples of computer readable mediums include read-only memory, random-access memory, other volatile or non-volatile memory devices, CD-ROMs, magnetic tape, flash drives, and optical data storage devices.

[0126] The exemplary computing device 1401 may include one or more input/output (I/O) devices and interfaces 1408, such as a keyboard, trackball, mouse, drawing tablet, joystick, game controller, touchscreen (e.g., capacitive or resistive touchscreen), touchpad, accelerometer, and/or printer, for example. The computing device 1401 may also include one or more multimedia devices 1409, such as a display device (also referred to herein as a display screen), which may also be one of the I/O devices 1408 in the case of a touchscreen, for example. Display devices may include LCD, OLED, or other thin screen display surfaces, a monitor, television, projector, or any other device that visually depicts user interfaces and data to viewers. The computing device 1401 may also include one or more multimedia devices, such as speakers, video cards, graphics accelerators, and microphones, for example.

[0127] In the embodiment of FIG. 14, the I/O devices and interfaces 1408 provides a communication interface to various external devices via the network 1404. For example, the computing device 1401 may be electronically coupled to the network 1404 via a wired, wireless, or combination of wired and wireless, communication link(s). The network 1404 may allow communication with various other computing devices and/or other electronic devices via wired or wireless communication links.

[0128] In the embodiment of FIG. 14, the computing device 1401 may include a data collection module 1410, a simulation module 1411, and a user interface module 1412, as well as other modules or fewer modules. Each of these modules is discussed in further detail below. In general, the word “module,” as used herein, refers to logic embodied in hardware or firmware, or to a collection of software instructions, possibly having entry and exit points, written in any programming language, such as, for example, Java, Python, Perl, Lua, C, C++, C#, Objective C, etc. A software module may be compiled and linked into an executable program, installed in a dynamic link library, or may be written in an interpreted programming language such as, for example, BASIC, Perl, or Python. Software modules may be callable from other modules or from themselves, and/or may be invoked in response to detected events or interrupts. Software modules configured for execution on computing devices may be provided on a computer readable medium, such as a compact disc, digital video disc, flash drive, or any other tangible medium. Such software code may be stored, partially or fully, on a memory device of the executing computing device, such as the computing device 1401, for execution by the computing device. Hardware modules may be comprised of connected logic units, such as gates and flip-flops, and/or may be comprised of programmable units, such as programmable gate arrays or processors. The modules described herein are typically implemented as software modules, but may be implemented in hardware, firmware and/or software. Generally, the modules described herein refer to logical modules that may be combined with other modules or divided into sub-modules despite their physical organization or storage.

Example Modules

[0129] In the embodiment of FIG. 14, the computing device 1401 includes three modules, namely, a data collection module 1410, a simulation module 1411, and a user interface module 1412. In this embodiment, each of the modules is shown as part of the computing device 1401. However, in other embodiments, the modules may be distributed across multiple devices, and may be controlled and/or operated by multiple different entities. These modules are configured to perform methods as described throughout this specification. In various embodiments, fewer or additional modules may be included within a computing system.

[0130] The computing device 1401 may be configured to acquire user data and other external data such as third-party data. The various modules may comprise software alone, hardware alone, or a combination of software and hardware. The device may be especially adapted to communicate using a variety of network or communications protocols in order to communicate with the sensors or external data sources. Some of these protocols may include standard network protocols, such as HTTP, FTP, SNMP, or the like. The device may further include hardware drivers, such as USB, FireWire, Thunderbolt (Light Peak), or serial communications drivers, for example to communicate with devices in direct communication with the system.

[0131] The computing device 1401 may be configured to transmit, or initiate transmission of, data such as user interfaces, data reports, application programming interface, data, or the like, to requesting entities, such as external user 1402, that have registered interest with the system. In one embodiment, the device provides the data in an unformatted data structure, such as in an XML, CSV, TXT, or other spreadsheet, text, or web accessible data structure. In other embodiments, the device provides information in user interfaces, such as user interfaces that are configured for rendering by a web browser, mobile device, tablet device, or other device or application, for display to users. A variety of different presentations may be provided. In some embodiments, the requesting entities may indicate presentation preferences or configurations (e.g., data formats and/or types of information), and the device may transmit data based on the indicated preferences or configurations. The presentation format may also be determined based on the type of device being used by the user.

[0132] In an embodiment, any or all of the modules 1410-1412 are configured to act in real time. Thus, when data is received by the modules, the modules process that data as soon as practicable or necessary to provide users with timely information. In order to achieve this, specialized hardware may be used to gain efficiency, and executable code may be designed to minimize latency or computation time. In an embodiment, the modules, possibly with other modules of the system, are executed within a real-time operating system, to enhance the responsiveness of the system.

[0133] Several flowcharts and related methods are described throughout this specification. Although each flowchart illustrates a particular quantity of blocks, the methods associated with the flowcharts may include any subset of illustrated blocks, or may include additional blocks that are not illustrated. Also, the blocks may be performed in orders different than illustrated in the figures. Software code configured for execution on a computing system in order to perform the methods of respective flowcharts may be provided on a computer readable medium, such as a compact disc, digital video disc, flash drive, hard drive, memory device or any other tangible medium. Such software code may be stored, partially or fully, on a memory of a computing system, in order to perform the illustrated methods by those respective devices. For ease of explanation, the methods will be described herein as performed by a computing system, which should be interpreted to include any one or more of the computing systems noted above, any combination of those computing systems, and/or any other suitable computing system.

[0134] Although this disclosure has been described in terms of certain example embodiments and applications, other embodiments and applications that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including embodiments and applications that do not provide all of the benefits described herein, are also within the scope of this disclosure.

[0135] All publications and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference in their entirety to the same extent as if each individual publication or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.

Claims

Certificate of Correction present

The claims shown below may not include correction changes. Use the corrected PDF for authoritative text.

What is claimed is:

1. A system for automatically calculating credit score simulation information associated with a user, the system comprising:

a credit simulator server comprising one or more hardware processors configured to:

access first credit data of a first user from an electronic data warehouse storing credit data of a plurality of users;

wherein the plurality of simulated credit scores are based on the first credit data of the first user and the credit score simulation parameters associated with the respective credit score simulation scenario;

construct user interface data including a listing of the plurality of credit score simulation scenarios and the corresponding plurality of simulated credit scores calculated for the credit score simulation scenarios; and

transmit the constructed user interface data to a computing device; and

the computing device comprising a display and one or more hardware processors configured to:

display the constructed user interface data on the display;

detect selection of a first user interface control associated with a first predefined credit score simulation scenario of the plurality of credit score simulation scenarios;

in response to selection of the first user interface control, determine whether a first expanded scenario information corresponding to the first predefined credit score simulation scenario is cached on the computing device, the first expanded scenario information including one or more additional simulated credit scores based on the first credit data of the first user; and

in response to determining that the first expanded scenario information is not cached on the computing device, transmitting a request to the credit simulation server for the first expanded scenario information corresponding to the first predefined credit score simulation scenario.

2. The system of claim 1, wherein the first expanded scenario information includes a first time frame in spatial relation with a first simulated credit score, a second time frame in spatial relation with a second simulated credit score, wherein the second time frame is longer than the first time frame.

3. The system of claim 1, wherein the constructed user interface data includes a plurality of graphical indications in spatial relationship for each one of the respective listing of the plurality of credit score simulation scenarios, wherein the graphical indications indicate positive, neutral, or negative effect on credit scores.

4. The system of claim 1, wherein the listing of the plurality of credit score simulations scenarios are arranged in an order by the associated simulated credit scores and with respect to a current credit score of the user.

5. A system for automatically calculating credit score simulation information associated with a user and constructing a user interface for display of the credit score simulation information, the system comprising:

a credit simulator server comprising one or more hardware processors configured to:

access first credit data corresponding to a first user from an electronic data warehouse storing credit data of a plurality of users;

calculate a current credit score of the first user based on the first credit data;

calculate a plurality of simulated credit scores associated with a corresponding predefined plurality of credit score simulation scenarios, each credit score simulation scenario associated with respective credit score simulation parameters, wherein the plurality of simulated credit scores are based on the first credit data of the first user and the credit score simulation parameters associated with the respective credit score simulation scenario;

construct user interface data configured for execution by a first user computing device to:

for each of the plurality of credit score simulation scenarios, display a textual description and the corresponding calculated simulated credit score;

display a first graphical differentiation of a first one or more of the simulated credit scores that are greater than the current credit score of the user;

display a second graphical differentiation of a second one or more of the simulated credit scores that are not greater than the current credit score of the user, and

display interactive user interface controls in spatial relation to respective predefined credit score simulation scenarios;

in response to selection of a first user interface control associated with a first predefined credit score simulation scenario, update the user interface to show first expanded scenario information associated with the first predefined credit score simulation scenario, the first expanded scenario information positioned adjacent the first predefined credit score simulation scenario and indicating one or more additional simulated credit scores based on the first credit data of the first user;

in response to selection of the first user interface control associated with the first predefined credit score simulation scenario with the first expanded scenario information displayed, update the user interface to hide the first expanded scenario information associated with the first predefined credit score simulation scenario; and

transmit the constructed user interface data to the first user computing device.

6. The system of claim 5, wherein the first expanded scenario information indicates a first time frame in spatial relation with a first simulated credit score, a second time frame in spatial relation with a second simulated credit score, wherein the second time frame is longer than the first time frame.

7. The system of claim 5, wherein the first graphical differentiation and the second graphical differentiation are arranged in an order by the associated simulated credit scores and with respect to the current credit score of the user.

8. The system of claim 5, wherein the user interface data includes hidden data displayed in response to user input.

9. The system of claim 5, wherein the first expanded scenario information includes one or more user input controls to receive one or more score simulation parameters associated with the corresponding first predefined credit score simulation scenario.

10. The system of claim 9, wherein at least one of the additional simulated credit scores is further based on the one or more score simulation parameters receive via the user input controls.

11. A computerized method, performed by a computing system having one or more hardware computer processors and one or more non-transitory computer readable storage device storing software instructions executable by the computing system to perform the computerized method comprising:

accessing first credit data corresponding to a first user from an electronic data warehouse storing credit data of a plurality of users;

calculating a current credit score of the first user based on the first credit data;

calculating a plurality of simulated credit scores associated with a corresponding predefined plurality of credit score simulation scenarios, each credit score simulation scenario associated with respective credit score simulation parameters, wherein the plurality of simulated credit scores are based on the first credit data of the first user and the credit score simulation parameters associated with the respective credit score simulation scenario;

constructing user interface data configured for execution by a first user computing device to:

for each of the plurality of credit score simulation scenarios, display a textual description and the corresponding calculated simulated credit score;

display a first graphical differentiation of a first one or more of the simulated credit scores that are greater than the current credit score of the user;

display a second graphical differentiation of a second one or more of the simulated credit scores that are not greater than the current credit score of the user, and

display interactive user interface controls in spatial relation to respective predefined credit score simulation scenarios;

in response to selection of a first user interface control associated with a first predefined credit score simulation scenario, update the user interface to show first expanded scenario information associated with the first predefined credit score simulation scenario, the first expanded scenario information positioned adjacent the first credit score simulation scenario and indicating one or more additional simulated credit scores based on the first credit data of the first user;

transmitting the constructed user interface data to the first user computing device.

12. The computerized method of claim 11, wherein the first expanded scenario information indicates a first time frame in spatial relation with a first simulated credit score, a second time frame in spatial relation with a second simulated credit score, wherein the second time frame is longer than the first time frame.

13. The computerized method of claim 11, wherein the first graphical differentiation and the second graphical differentiation are arranged in an order by the associated simulated credit scores and with respect to the current credit score of the user.

14. The computerized method of claim 11, wherein the user interface data includes hidden data displayed in response to user input.

15. The computerized method of claim 11, wherein the first expanded scenario information includes one or more user input controls to receive one or more score simulation parameters associated with the corresponding first predefined credit score simulation scenario.

16. The computerized method of claim 15, wherein at least one of the additional simulated credit scores is further based on the one or more score simulation parameters receive via the user input controls.

Patent Citations (649)

Patent	Date	Inventor	Cited By
US3316395(A)	1967-04-01	Lavin et al.	Applicant
US4305059(A)	1981-12-01	Benton	Applicant
US4578530(A)	1986-03-01	Zeidler	Applicant
US4736294(A)	1988-04-01	Gill	Applicant
US4774664(A)	1988-09-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US4876592(A)	1989-10-01	Von Kohorn	Applicant
US4891503(A)	1990-01-01	Jewell	Applicant
US4895518(A)	1990-01-01	Arnold	Applicant
US4947028(A)	1990-08-01	Gorog	Applicant
US5013038(A)	1991-05-01	Luxenberg et al.	Applicant
US5025138(A)	1991-06-01	Cuervo	Applicant
US5025373(A)	1991-06-01	Keyser, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US5034807(A)	1991-07-01	Von Kohorn	Applicant
US5060153(A)	1991-10-01	Nakagawa	Applicant
US5148365(A)	1992-09-01	Dembo	Applicant
US5220501(A)	1993-06-01	Lawlor et al.	Applicant
US5239462(A)	1993-08-01	Jones et al.	Applicant
US5259766(A)	1993-11-01	Sack	Applicant
US5262941(A)	1993-11-01	Saladin	Applicant
US5274547(A)	1993-12-01	Zoffel et al.	Applicant
US5297031(A)	1994-03-01	Gutterman et al.	Applicant
US5317636(A)	1994-05-01	Vizcaino	Applicant
US5317733(A)	1994-05-01	Murdock	Applicant
US5336870(A)	1994-08-01	Hughes et al.	Applicant
US5361201(A)	1994-11-01	Jost et al.	Applicant
US5590038(A)	1996-12-01	Pitroda	Applicant
US5611052(A)	1997-03-01	Dykstra et al.	Applicant
US5615408(A)	1997-03-01	Johnson	Applicant
US5630127(A)	1997-05-01	Moore et al.	Applicant
US5640577(A)	1997-06-01	Scharmer	Applicant
US5659725(A)	1997-08-01	Levy et al.	Applicant
US5689651(A)	1997-11-01	Lozman	Applicant
US5696907(A)	1997-12-01	Tom	Applicant
US5699527(A)	1997-12-01	Davidson	Applicant
US5704029(A)	1997-12-01	Wright, Jr.	Applicant
US5708422(A)	1998-01-01	Blonder et al.	Applicant
US5732400(A)	1998-03-01	Mandler	Applicant
US5745654(A)	1998-04-01	Titan	Applicant
US5745706(A)	1998-04-01	Wolfberg et al.	Applicant
US5748098(A)	1998-05-01	Grace	Applicant
US5774883(A)	1998-06-01	Andersen	Applicant
US5793972(A)	1998-08-01	Shane	Applicant
US5802142(A)	1998-09-01	Browne	Applicant
US5844218(A)	1998-12-01	Kawan et al.	Applicant
US5857174(A)	1999-01-01	Dugan	Applicant
US5870721(A)	1999-02-01	Norris	Applicant
US5875236(A)	1999-02-01	Jankowitz	Applicant
US5878403(A)	1999-03-01	DeFrancesco	Applicant
US5884287(A)	1999-03-01	Edesess	Applicant
US5914472(A)	1999-06-01	Foladare et al.	Applicant
US5918217(A)	1999-06-01	Maggioncalda et al.	Applicant
US5924082(A)	1999-07-01	Silverman et al.	Applicant
US5930764(A)	1999-07-01	Melchione et al.	Applicant
US5930776(A)	1999-07-01	Dykstra et al.	Applicant
US5940812(A)	1999-08-01	Tengel et al.	Applicant
US5950172(A)	1999-09-01	Klingman	Applicant
US5953710(A)	1999-09-01	Fleming	Applicant
US5956693(A)	1999-09-01	Geerlings	Applicant
US5966695(A)	1999-10-01	Melchione et al.	Applicant
US5978780(A)	1999-11-01	Watson	Applicant
US5991411(A)	1999-11-01	Kaufman et al.	Applicant
US5995947(A)	1999-11-01	Fraser et al.	Applicant
US6012044(A)	2000-01-01	Maggioncalda et al.	Applicant
US6014645(A)	2000-01-01	Cunningham	Applicant
US6021397(A)	2000-02-01	Jones et al.	Applicant
US6029149(A)	2000-02-01	Dykstra et al.	Applicant
US6029178(A)	2000-02-01	Martin et al.	Applicant
US6038551(A)	2000-03-01	Barlow et al.	Applicant
US6055570(A)	2000-04-01	Nielsen	Applicant
US6064987(A)	2000-05-01	Walker	Applicant
US6070141(A)	2000-05-01	Houvener	Applicant
US6070147(A)	2000-05-01	Harms et al.	Applicant
US6078922(A)	2000-06-01	Johnson et al.	Applicant
US6088686(A)	2000-07-01	Walker et al.	Applicant
US6094643(A)	2000-07-01	Anderson et al.	Applicant
US6098052(A)	2000-08-01	Kosiba et al.	Applicant
US6105007(A)	2000-08-01	Norris	Applicant
US6115690(A)	2000-09-01	Wong	Applicant
US6115694(A)	2000-09-01	Cheetham et al.	Applicant
US6119103(A)	2000-09-01	Basch et al.	Applicant
US6128599(A)	2000-10-01	Walker	Applicant
US6128603(A)	2000-10-01	Dent	Applicant
US6154729(A)	2000-11-01	Cannon et al.	Applicant
US6182229(B1)	2001-01-01	Nielsen	Applicant
US6185543(B1)	2001-02-01	Galperin et al.	Applicant
US6202053(B1)	2001-03-01	Christiansen et al.	Applicant
US6249770(B1)	2001-06-01	Erwin et al.	Applicant
US6253203(B1)	2001-06-01	O'Flaherty et al.	Applicant
US6269325(B1)	2001-07-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US6275824(B1)	2001-08-01	O'Flaherty et al.	Applicant
US6285987(B1)	2001-09-01	Roth et al.	Applicant
US6298348(B1)	2001-10-01	Eldering	Applicant
US6304860(B1)	2001-10-01	Martin et al.	Applicant
US6311169(B2)	2001-10-01	Duhon	Applicant
US6324524(B1)	2001-11-01	Lent et al.	Applicant
US6330546(B1)	2001-12-01	Gopinathan et al.	Applicant
US6330575(B1)	2001-12-01	Moore et al.	Applicant
US6339790(B1)	2002-01-01	Inoue	Applicant
US6374264(B1)	2002-04-01	Bohannon et al.	Applicant
US6384844(B1)	2002-05-01	Stewart et al.	Applicant
US6385594(B1)	2002-05-01	Lebda et al.	Applicant
US6397224(B1)	2002-05-01	Zubeldia et al.	Applicant
US6405173(B1)	2002-06-01	Honarvar	Applicant
US6405181(B2)	2002-06-01	Lent	Examiner
US6408282(B1)	2002-06-01	Buist	Applicant
US6430539(B1)	2002-08-01	Lazarus et al.	Applicant
US5870721(C1)	2003-01-01	Norris	Applicant
US6529880(B1)	2003-03-01	McKeen	Examiner
US6532450(B1)	2003-03-01	Brown et al.	Applicant
US6542894(B1)	2003-04-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US6567791(B2)	2003-05-01	Lent et al.	Applicant
US6581075(B1)	2003-06-01	Guturu et al.	Applicant
US6611816(B2)	2003-08-01	Lebda et al.	Applicant
US6622131(B1)	2003-09-01	Brown et al.	Applicant
US6622266(B1)	2003-09-01	Goddard et al.	Applicant
US6629245(B1)	2003-09-01	Stone et al.	Applicant
US6636803(B1)	2003-10-01	Hartz, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US6658393(B1)	2003-12-01	Basch et al.	Applicant
US6766304(B2)	2004-07-01	Kemp et al.	Applicant
US6772132(B1)	2004-08-01	Kemp et al.	Applicant
US6782390(B2)	2004-08-01	Lee et al.	Applicant
US6804346(B1)	2004-10-01	Mewhinney	Applicant
US6805287(B2)	2004-10-01	Bishop et al.	Applicant
US6823319(B1)	2004-11-01	Lynch et al.	Applicant
US6832229(B2)	2004-12-01	Reed	Applicant
US6839690(B1)	2005-01-01	Foth et al.	Applicant
US6873972(B1)	2005-03-01	Marcial et al.	Applicant
US6901406(B2)	2005-05-01	Nabe et al.	Applicant
US6910624(B1)	2005-06-01	Natsuno	Applicant
US6912483(B2)	2005-06-01	Frederick	Applicant
US6938011(B1)	2005-08-01	Kemp et al.	Applicant
US6950807(B2)	2005-09-01	Brock	Applicant
US6962336(B2)	2005-11-01	Glass	Applicant
US6985887(B1)	2006-01-01	Sunstein et al.	Applicant
US6988085(B2)	2006-01-01	Hedy	Applicant
US6993504(B1)	2006-01-01	Friesen et al.	Applicant
US7003476(B1)	2006-02-01	Samra et al.	Applicant
US7016870(B1)	2006-03-01	Jones et al.	Applicant
US7028052(B2)	2006-04-01	Chapman et al.	Applicant
US7058817(B1)	2006-06-01	Ellmore	Applicant
US7062458(B2)	2006-06-01	Maggioncalda et al.	Applicant
US7065566(B2)	2006-06-01	Menard et al.	Applicant
US7069249(B2)	2006-06-01	Stolfo et al.	Applicant
US7076462(B1)	2006-07-01	Nelson et al.	Applicant
US7076475(B2)	2006-07-01	Honarvar et al.	Applicant
US7083087(B1)	2006-08-01	Gangi	Applicant
US7120599(B2)	2006-10-01	Keyes	Applicant
US7127424(B2)	2006-10-01	Kemp et al.	Applicant
US7143063(B2)	2006-11-01	Lent	Applicant
US7165037(B2)	2007-01-01	Lazarus et al.	Applicant
US7212999(B2)	2007-05-01	Friesen et al.	Applicant
US7228289(B2)	2007-06-01	Brumfield et al.	Applicant
US7243075(B1)	2007-07-01	Shaffer et al.	Applicant
US7249076(B1)	2007-07-01	Pendleton et al.	Applicant
US7254558(B2)	2007-08-01	Hinkle et al.	Applicant
US7263497(B1)	2007-08-01	Wiser et al.	Applicant
US7280980(B1)	2007-10-01	Hoadley et al.	Applicant
US7280983(B2)	2007-10-01	Kuroda et al.	Applicant
US7296734(B2)	2007-11-01	Pliha	Applicant
US7302420(B2)	2007-11-01	Aggarwal et al.	Applicant
US7308417(B1)	2007-12-01	Nathan	Applicant
US7314166(B2)	2008-01-01	Anderson et al.	Applicant
US7318224(B2)	2008-01-01	Honarvar et al.	Applicant
US7330835(B2)	2008-02-01	Deggendorf	Examiner
US7333635(B2)	2008-02-01	Tsantes et al.	Applicant
US7333937(B2)	2008-02-01	Baldwin, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US7337133(B1)	2008-02-01	Bezos et al.	Applicant
US7337468(B2)	2008-02-01	Metzger	Applicant
US7366694(B2)	2008-04-01	Lazerson	Applicant
US7376603(B1)	2008-05-01	Mayr et al.	Applicant
US7383215(B1)	2008-06-01	Navarro et al.	Applicant
US7383988(B2)	2008-06-01	Slonecker, Jr.	Applicant
US7386466(B2)	2008-06-01	McLean et al.	Applicant
US7389268(B1)	2008-06-01	Kemp et al.	Applicant
US7395232(B1)	2008-07-01	Pilato	Applicant
US7403919(B2)	2008-07-01	Chacko et al.	Applicant
US7409369(B1)	2008-08-01	Homuth et al.	Applicant
US7418417(B2)	2008-08-01	Chacko et al.	Applicant
US7451095(B1)	2008-11-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US7479949(B2)	2009-01-01	Jobs et al.	Applicant
US7480631(B1)	2009-01-01	Merced et al.	Applicant
US7505939(B2)	2009-03-01	Lent et al.	Applicant
US7529698(B2)	2009-05-01	Joao	Applicant
US7542993(B2)	2009-06-01	Satterfield et al.	Applicant
US7546266(B2)	2009-06-01	Beirne et al.	Applicant
US7552086(B1)	2009-06-01	Rajasekar et al.	Applicant
US7559217(B2)	2009-07-01	Bass	Applicant
US7584146(B1)	2009-09-01	Duhon	Applicant
US7593891(B2)	2009-09-01	Kornegay et al.	Applicant
US7593892(B2)	2009-09-01	Balk et al.	Applicant
US7596512(B1)	2009-09-01	Raines et al.	Applicant
US7596716(B2)	2009-09-01	Frost et al.	Applicant
US7603317(B2)	2009-10-01	Adler et al.	Applicant
US7610229(B1)	2009-10-01	Kornegay	Applicant
US7620592(B2)	2009-11-01	O'Mara et al.	Applicant
US7624068(B1)	2009-11-01	Heasley et al.	Applicant
US7630932(B2)	2009-12-01	Danaher et al.	Applicant
US7653592(B1)	2010-01-01	Flaxman et al.	Applicant
US7653593(B2)	2010-01-01	Zarikian et al.	Applicant
US7676418(B1)	2010-03-01	Chung et al.	Applicant
US7689451(B2)	2010-03-01	Vives	Applicant
US7689505(B2)	2010-03-01	Kasower	Applicant
US7711635(B2)	2010-05-01	Steele et al.	Applicant
US7711636(B2)	2010-05-01	Robida et al.	Applicant
US7720750(B2)	2010-05-01	Brody	Applicant
US7729983(B1)	2010-06-01	Ellis	Applicant
US7734522(B2)	2010-06-01	Johnson et al.	Applicant
US7756789(B2)	2010-07-01	Welker et al.	Applicant
US7769657(B2)	2010-08-01	Chacko et al.	Applicant
US7774257(B2)	2010-08-01	Maggioncalda et al.	Applicant
US7774270(B1)	2010-08-01	MacCloskey	Applicant
US7788147(B2)	2010-08-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US7788152(B2)	2010-08-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US7788155(B2)	2010-08-01	Jones et al.	Applicant
US7792715(B1)	2010-09-01	Kasower	Applicant
US7792716(B2)	2010-09-01	Gooding	Examiner
US7792732(B2)	2010-09-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US7801812(B2)	2010-09-01	Conlin et al.	Applicant
US7814004(B2)	2010-10-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US7814005(B2)	2010-10-01	Imrey et al.	Applicant
US7818228(B1)	2010-10-01	Coulter	Applicant
US7818229(B2)	2010-10-01	Imrey et al.	Applicant
US7835983(B2)	2010-11-01	Lefner et al.	Applicant
US7836111(B1)	2010-11-01	Shan	Applicant
US7840484(B2)	2010-11-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US7849004(B2)	2010-12-01	Choudhuri et al.	Applicant
US7853998(B2)	2010-12-01	Blaisdell et al.	Applicant
US7860782(B2)	2010-12-01	Cash et al.	Applicant
US7877304(B1)	2011-01-01	Coulter	Applicant
US7890420(B2)	2011-02-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US7900052(B2)	2011-03-01	Joans	Applicant
US7904306(B2)	2011-03-01	Johnson et al.	Applicant
US7904367(B2)	2011-03-01	Chung et al.	Applicant
US7908242(B1)	2011-03-01	Achanta	Applicant
US7912770(B2)	2011-03-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US7912865(B2)	2011-03-01	Akerman et al.	Applicant
US7925578(B1)	2011-04-01	Hong et al.	Applicant
US7925582(B1)	2011-04-01	Kornegay	Examiner
US7930252(B2)	2011-04-01	Bender et al.	Applicant
US7941365(B1)	2011-05-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US7945510(B1)	2011-05-01	Bradley et al.	Applicant
US7966255(B2)	2011-06-01	Wong et al.	Applicant
US7970676(B2)	2011-06-01	Feinstein	Applicant
US7970679(B2)	2011-06-01	Kasower	Applicant
US7970698(B2)	2011-06-01	Gupta et al.	Applicant
US7974919(B2)	2011-07-01	Conlin et al.	Applicant
US7983975(B2)	2011-07-01	Jones et al.	Applicant
US7987124(B1)	2011-07-01	Holden et al.	Applicant
US8001034(B2)	2011-08-01	Chung et al.	Applicant
US8001041(B2)	2011-08-01	Hoadley et al.	Applicant
US8005738(B2)	2011-08-01	Chacko et al.	Applicant
US8005759(B2)	2011-08-01	Hirtenstein et al.	Applicant
US8005795(B2)	2011-08-01	Galipeau et al.	Applicant
US8015107(B2)	2011-09-01	Kornegay et al.	Applicant
US8024263(B2)	2011-09-01	Zarikian et al.	Applicant
US8032932(B2)	2011-10-01	Speyer et al.	Applicant
US8055579(B2)	2011-11-01	Davies et al.	Applicant
US8060424(B2)	2011-11-01	Kasower	Applicant
US8073768(B2)	2011-12-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US8078524(B2)	2011-12-01	Crawford et al.	Applicant
US8078527(B2)	2011-12-01	Cerise et al.	Applicant
US8086523(B1)	2011-12-01	Palmer	Applicant
US8095458(B2)	2012-01-01	Peterson et al.	Applicant
US8099356(B2)	2012-01-01	Feinstein et al.	Applicant
US8131614(B2)	2012-03-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US8160960(B1)	2012-04-01	Fei et al.	Applicant
US8165940(B2)	2012-04-01	Meimes et al.	Applicant
US8195549(B2)	2012-06-01	Kasower	Applicant
US8204774(B2)	2012-06-01	Chwast et al.	Applicant
US8204812(B2)	2012-06-01	Stewart et al.	Applicant
US8225395(B2)	2012-07-01	Atwood et al.	Applicant
US8234498(B2)	2012-07-01	Britti et al.	Applicant
US8285613(B1)	2012-10-01	Coulter	Applicant
US8290840(B2)	2012-10-01	Kasower	Applicant
US8311936(B2)	2012-11-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US8315942(B2)	2012-11-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US8321334(B1)	2012-11-01	Kornegay et al.	Applicant
US8321339(B2)	2012-11-01	Imrey et al.	Applicant
US8327429(B2)	2012-12-01	Speyer et al.	Applicant
US8335741(B2)	2012-12-01	Kornegay et al.	Applicant
US8392334(B2)	2013-03-01	Hirtenstein et al.	Applicant
US8463595(B1)	2013-06-01	Rehling et al.	Applicant
US8473353(B2)	2013-06-01	Matsuda et al.	Applicant
US8489502(B2)	2013-07-01	Morris et al.	Applicant
US8515844(B2)	2013-08-01	Kasower	Applicant
US8527596(B2)	2013-09-01	Long et al.	Applicant
US8533118(B2)	2013-09-01	Weller et al.	Applicant
US8560161(B1)	2013-10-01	Kator et al.	Applicant
US8560436(B2)	2013-10-01	Ingram et al.	Applicant
US8571971(B1)	2013-10-01	Brown et al.	Applicant
US8572083(B1)	2013-10-01	Snell et al.	Applicant
US8589286(B1)	2013-11-01	Kornegay et al.	Applicant
US8595101(B1)	2013-11-01	Daukas et al.	Applicant
US8600886(B2)	2013-12-01	Ramavarjula et al.	Applicant
US8606694(B2)	2013-12-01	Campbell et al.	Applicant
US8660919(B2)	2014-02-01	Kasower	Applicant
US8694420(B1)	2014-04-01	Oliai	Applicant
US8725613(B1)	2014-05-01	Celka et al.	Applicant
US8732004(B1)	2014-05-01	Ramos et al.	Applicant
US8738516(B1)	2014-05-01	Dean et al.	Applicant
US8744956(B1)	2014-06-01	DiChiara et al.	Applicant
US8762243(B2)	2014-06-01	Jenkins et al.	Applicant
US8775299(B2)	2014-07-01	Achanta et al.	Applicant
US8781951(B2)	2014-07-01	Lewis et al.	Applicant
US8781953(B2)	2014-07-01	Kasower	Applicant
US8856894(B1)	2014-10-01	Dean et al.	Applicant
US8930263(B1)	2015-01-01	Mahacek et al.	Applicant
US9053589(B1)	2015-06-01	Kator et al.	Applicant
US9053590(B1)	2015-06-01	Kator et al.	Applicant
US9058627(B1)	2015-06-01	Wasser et al.	Applicant
US9076276(B1)	2015-07-01	Kator et al.	Applicant
US9116918(B1)	2015-08-01	Kim	Applicant
US9213461(B2)	2015-12-01	Eraker et al.	Applicant
US9256904(B1)	2016-02-01	Haller et al.	Applicant
US9558519(B1)	2017-01-01	Burger	Applicant
US9569797(B1)	2017-02-01	Rohn et al.	Applicant
US9607336(B1)	2017-03-01	Dean et al.	Applicant
US9690820(B1)	2017-06-01	Girulat, Jr.	Applicant
US2001/0011247(A1)	2001-08-01	O'Flaherty et al.	Applicant
US2001/0027413(A1)	2001-10-01	Bhutta	Applicant
US2001/0039523(A1)	2001-11-01	Iwamoto	Applicant
US2001/0042785(A1)	2001-11-01	Walker et al.	Applicant
US2001/0044766(A1)	2001-11-01	Keyes	Applicant
US2001/0049672(A1)	2001-12-01	Moore et al.	Applicant
US2002/0032635(A1)	2002-03-01	Harris et al.	Applicant
US2002/0032645(A1)	2002-03-01	Nozaki et al.	Applicant
US2002/0032647(A1)	2002-03-01	Delinsky et al.	Applicant
US2002/0035511(A1)	2002-03-01	Haji et al.	Applicant
US2002/0035520(A1)	2002-03-01	Weiss	Applicant
US2002/0049624(A1)	2002-04-01	Raveis, Jr.	Applicant
US2002/0052836(A1)	2002-05-01	Galperin et al.	Applicant
US2002/0069122(A1)	2002-06-01	Yun et al.	Applicant
US2002/0073017(A1)	2002-06-01	Robertson	Applicant
US2002/0077964(A1)	2002-06-01	Brody et al.	Applicant
US2002/0091650(A1)	2002-07-01	Ellis	Applicant
US2002/0099641(A1)	2002-07-01	Mills et al.	Applicant
US2002/0099824(A1)	2002-07-01	Bender et al.	Applicant
US2002/0107765(A1)	2002-08-01	Walker	Applicant
US2002/0111890(A1)	2002-08-01	Sloan et al.	Applicant
US2002/0128962(A1)	2002-09-01	Kasower	Applicant
US2002/0147669(A1)	2002-10-01	Taylor et al.	Applicant
US2002/0147695(A1)	2002-10-01	Khedkar et al.	Applicant
US2002/0165757(A1)	2002-11-01	Lisser	Applicant
US2002/0165839(A1)	2002-11-01	Taylor et al.	Applicant
US2002/0169747(A1)	2002-11-01	Chapman et al.	Applicant
US2002/0174124(A1)	2002-11-01	Haas et al.	Applicant
US2002/0194117(A1)	2002-12-01	Nabe et al.	Applicant
US2002/0198736(A1)	2002-12-01	Harrison	Applicant
US2002/0198806(A1)	2002-12-01	Blagg et al.	Applicant
US2002/0198824(A1)	2002-12-01	Cook	Applicant
US2003/0004853(A1)	2003-01-01	Ram et al.	Applicant
US2003/0009411(A1)	2003-01-01	Ram et al.	Applicant
US2003/0009415(A1)	2003-01-01	Lutnick et al.	Applicant
US2003/0009418(A1)	2003-01-01	Green et al.	Applicant
US2003/0018549(A1)	2003-01-01	Fei et al.	Applicant
US2003/0028477(A1)	2003-02-01	Stevenson et al.	Applicant
US2003/0041031(A1)	2003-02-01	Hedy	Applicant
US2003/0046222(A1)	2003-03-01	Bard et al.	Applicant
US2003/0046223(A1)	2003-03-01	Crawford et al.	Applicant
US2003/0064705(A1)	2003-04-01	Desierio	Applicant
US2003/0065563(A1)	2003-04-01	Elliott et al.	Applicant
US2003/0078897(A1)	2003-04-01	Florance et al.	Applicant
US2003/0101111(A1)	2003-05-01	Dang et al.	Applicant
US2003/0115122(A1)	2003-06-01	Slater et al.	Applicant
US2003/0149659(A1)	2003-08-01	Danaher et al.	Applicant
US2003/0154162(A1)	2003-08-01	Danaher et al.	Applicant
US2003/0158960(A1)	2003-08-01	Engberg	Applicant
US2003/0163435(A1)	2003-08-01	Payone	Applicant
US2003/0172039(A1)	2003-09-01	Guy	Applicant
US2003/0177091(A1)	2003-09-01	Paglin	Examiner
US2003/0187780(A1)	2003-10-01	Arthus et al.	Applicant
US2003/0195830(A1)	2003-10-01	Merkoulovitch et al.	Applicant
US2003/0204752(A1)	2003-10-01	Garrison	Applicant
US2003/0212618(A1)	2003-11-01	Keyes et al.	Applicant
US2003/0229580(A1)	2003-12-01	Gass et al.	Applicant
US2003/0236738(A1)	2003-12-01	Lange et al.	Applicant
US2004/0006536(A1)	2004-01-01	Kawashima et al.	Applicant
US2004/0010458(A1)	2004-01-01	Friedman	Applicant
US2004/0023637(A1)	2004-02-01	Johnson et al.	Applicant
US2004/0030621(A1)	2004-02-01	Cobb	Applicant
US2004/0030629(A1)	2004-02-01	Freeman et al.	Applicant
US2004/0030649(A1)	2004-02-01	Nelson et al.	Applicant
US2004/0030667(A1)	2004-02-01	Xu et al.	Applicant
US2004/0039688(A1)	2004-02-01	Sulkowski et al.	Applicant
US2004/0044615(A1)	2004-03-01	Xue et al.	Applicant
US2004/0044617(A1)	2004-03-01	Lu	Applicant
US2004/0107132(A1)	2004-06-01	Honarvar	Examiner
US2004/0111292(A1)	2004-06-01	Hutchins	Applicant
US2004/0111358(A1)	2004-06-01	Lange et al.	Applicant
US2004/0111359(A1)	2004-06-01	Hudock	Applicant
US2004/0111363(A1)	2004-06-01	Trench et al.	Applicant
US2004/0117302(A1)	2004-06-01	Weichert et al.	Applicant
US2004/0133493(A1)	2004-07-01	Ford et al.	Applicant
US2004/0138995(A1)	2004-07-01	Hershkowitz et al.	Applicant
US2004/0143546(A1)	2004-07-01	Wood et al.	Applicant
US2004/0153437(A1)	2004-08-01	Buchan	Applicant
US2004/0158521(A1)	2004-08-01	Newton	Applicant
US2004/0158723(A1)	2004-08-01	Root	Applicant
US2004/0159700(A1)	2004-08-01	Khan et al.	Applicant
US2004/0186807(A1)	2004-09-01	Nathans et al.	Applicant
US2004/0193535(A1)	2004-09-01	Barazesh	Applicant
US2004/0199456(A1)	2004-10-01	Flint et al.	Applicant
US2004/0215584(A1)	2004-10-01	Yao	Applicant
US2004/0243450(A1)	2004-12-01	Bernard, Jr. et al.	Applicant
US2004/0243506(A1)	2004-12-01	Das	Applicant
US2004/0249532(A1)	2004-12-01	Kelly et al.	Applicant
US2004/0255127(A1)	2004-12-01	Arnouse	Applicant
US2005/0004855(A1)	2005-01-01	Jenson et al.	Applicant
US2005/0010513(A1)	2005-01-01	Duckworth et al.	Applicant
US2005/0027633(A1)	2005-02-01	Fortuna et al.	Applicant
US2005/0055275(A1)	2005-03-01	Newman et al.	Applicant
US2005/0080697(A1)	2005-04-01	Foss et al.	Applicant
US2005/0080821(A1)	2005-04-01	Breil et al.	Applicant
US2005/0086126(A1)	2005-04-01	Patterson	Applicant
US2005/0086176(A1)	2005-04-01	Dahlgren	Applicant
US2005/0097017(A1)	2005-05-01	Hanratty	Applicant
US2005/0097039(A1)	2005-05-01	Kulcsar et al.	Applicant
US2005/0097320(A1)	2005-05-01	Golan et al.	Applicant
US2005/0102226(A1)	2005-05-01	Oppenheimer et al.	Applicant
US2005/0105719(A1)	2005-05-01	Huda	Applicant
US2005/0125291(A1)	2005-06-01	Demkiw Grayson et al.	Applicant
US2005/0125350(A1)	2005-06-01	Tidwell et al.	Applicant
US2005/0130704(A1)	2005-06-01	McParland et al.	Applicant
US2005/0137963(A1)	2005-06-01	Ricketts et al.	Applicant
US2005/0154617(A1)	2005-07-01	Ruggieri et al.	Applicant
US2005/0154664(A1)	2005-07-01	Guy et al.	Applicant
US2005/0154769(A1)	2005-07-01	Eckart et al.	Applicant
US2005/0159996(A1)	2005-07-01	Lazaraus et al.	Applicant
US2005/0203768(A1)	2005-09-01	Florance	Applicant
US2005/0267840(A1)	2005-12-01	Holm-Blagg et al.	Applicant
US2005/0273431(A1)	2005-12-01	Abel et al.	Applicant
US2005/0283415(A1)	2005-12-01	Studnitzer et al.	Applicant
US2006/0004654(A1)	2006-01-01	Kornegay et al.	Applicant
US2006/0014129(A1)	2006-01-01	Coleman et al.	Applicant
US2006/0031158(A1)	2006-02-01	Orman	Applicant
US2006/0059073(A1)	2006-03-01	Walzak	Applicant
US2006/0059083(A1)	2006-03-01	Friesen et al.	Applicant
US2006/0080251(A1)	2006-04-01	Fried et al.	Applicant
US2006/0095363(A1)	2006-05-01	May	Applicant
US2006/0100954(A1)	2006-05-01	Schoen	Applicant
US2006/0123461(A1)	2006-06-01	Lunt et al.	Applicant
US2006/0131390(A1)	2006-06-01	Kim	Applicant
US2006/0149674(A1)	2006-07-01	Cook et al.	Applicant
US2006/0155639(A1)	2006-07-01	Lynch et al.	Applicant
US2006/0163347(A1)	2006-07-01	Foss et al.	Applicant
US2006/0173772(A1)	2006-08-01	Hayes et al.	Applicant
US2006/0178971(A1)	2006-08-01	Owen et al.	Applicant
US2006/0178983(A1)	2006-08-01	Nice et al.	Applicant
US2006/0184410(A1)	2006-08-01	Ramamurthy et al.	Applicant
US2006/0195351(A1)	2006-08-01	Bayburtian	Applicant
US2006/0200396(A1)	2006-09-01	Satterfield et al.	Applicant
US2006/0212386(A1)	2006-09-01	Willey et al.	Applicant
US2006/0229799(A1)	2006-10-01	Nimmo et al.	Applicant
US2006/0229996(A1)	2006-10-01	Keithley et al.	Applicant
US2006/0233332(A1)	2006-10-01	Toms	Applicant
US2006/0241923(A1)	2006-10-01	Xu et al.	Applicant
US2006/0242039(A1)	2006-10-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2006/0242049(A1)	2006-10-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2006/0242051(A1)	2006-10-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2006/0248106(A1)	2006-11-01	Milne et al.	Applicant
US2006/0259364(A1)	2006-11-01	Strock et al.	Applicant
US2006/0265323(A1)	2006-11-01	Winter et al.	Applicant
US2006/0271633(A1)	2006-11-01	Adler	Applicant
US2006/0287764(A1)	2006-12-01	Kraft	Applicant
US2006/0287766(A1)	2006-12-01	Kraft	Applicant
US2006/0287767(A1)	2006-12-01	Kraft	Applicant
US2006/0288090(A1)	2006-12-01	Kraft	Applicant
US2006/0294199(A1)	2006-12-01	Bertholf	Applicant
US2007/0016500(A1)	2007-01-01	Chatterji et al.	Applicant
US2007/0016501(A1)	2007-01-01	Chatterji et al.	Applicant
US2007/0016518(A1)	2007-01-01	Atkinson et al.	Applicant
US2007/0038568(A1)	2007-02-01	Greene et al.	Applicant
US2007/0067206(A1)	2007-03-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2007/0078741(A1)	2007-04-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2007/0083463(A1)	2007-04-01	Kraft	Applicant
US2007/0093234(A1)	2007-04-01	Willis et al.	Applicant
US2007/0100719(A1)	2007-05-01	Chwast et al.	Applicant
US2007/0112668(A1)	2007-05-01	Celano et al.	Applicant
US2007/0156718(A1)	2007-07-01	Hossfeld et al.	Applicant
US2007/0168267(A1)	2007-07-01	Zimmerman et al.	Applicant
US2007/0179798(A1)	2007-08-01	Inbarajan	Applicant
US2007/0208640(A1)	2007-09-01	Banasiak et al.	Applicant
US2007/0214000(A1)	2007-09-01	Shahrabi et al.	Applicant
US2007/0226093(A1)	2007-09-01	Chan et al.	Applicant
US2007/0226114(A1)	2007-09-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2007/0233591(A1)	2007-10-01	Newton	Applicant
US2007/0244732(A1)	2007-10-01	Chatterji et al.	Applicant
US2007/0260539(A1)	2007-11-01	Delinsky	Applicant
US2007/0266439(A1)	2007-11-01	Kraft	Applicant
US2007/0282736(A1)	2007-12-01	Conlin et al.	Applicant
US2007/0288338(A1)	2007-12-01	Hoadley	Applicant
US2007/0288490(A1)	2007-12-01	Longshaw	Applicant
US2007/0299770(A1)	2007-12-01	Delinsky	Applicant
US2007/0299771(A1)	2007-12-01	Brody	Applicant
US2008/0010203(A1)	2008-01-01	Grant	Applicant
US2008/0052224(A1)	2008-02-01	Parker	Applicant
US2008/0059364(A1)	2008-03-01	Tidwell et al.	Applicant
US2008/0065530(A1)	2008-03-01	Talbert et al.	Applicant
US2008/0109740(A1)	2008-05-01	Prinsen et al.	Applicant
US2008/0133322(A1)	2008-06-01	Kalia et al.	Applicant
US2008/0140507(A1)	2008-06-01	Hamlisch et al.	Applicant
US2008/0154766(A1)	2008-06-01	Lewis et al.	Applicant
US2008/0162383(A1)	2008-07-01	Kraft	Applicant
US2008/0172324(A1)	2008-07-01	Johnson	Applicant
US2008/0177655(A1)	2008-07-01	Zalik	Applicant
US2008/0195548(A1)	2008-08-01	Chu et al.	Applicant
US2008/0201257(A1)	2008-08-01	Lewis et al.	Applicant
US2008/0205774(A1)	2008-08-01	Brinker et al.	Applicant
US2008/0222015(A1)	2008-09-01	Megdal et al.	Applicant
US2008/0222027(A1)	2008-09-01	Megdal et al.	Applicant
US2008/0222706(A1)	2008-09-01	Renaud et al.	Applicant
US2008/0270209(A1)	2008-10-01	Mauseth et al.	Applicant
US2008/0270294(A1)	2008-10-01	Lent et al.	Applicant
US2008/0270295(A1)	2008-10-01	Lent et al.	Applicant
US2008/0312969(A1)	2008-12-01	Raines et al.	Applicant
US2009/0007231(A1)	2009-01-01	Kaiser et al.	Applicant
US2009/0012889(A1)	2009-01-01	Finch	Applicant
US2009/0055322(A1)	2009-02-01	Bykov et al.	Applicant
US2009/0063330(A1)	2009-03-01	Cerise et al.	Applicant
US2009/0089190(A1)	2009-04-01	Girulat	Applicant
US2009/0099960(A1)	2009-04-01	Robida et al.	Applicant
US2009/0106846(A1)	2009-04-01	Dupray et al.	Applicant
US2009/0119199(A1)	2009-05-01	Salahi	Applicant
US2009/0119299(A1)	2009-05-01	Rhodes	Applicant
US2009/0126013(A1)	2009-05-01	Atwood et al.	Applicant
US2009/0132347(A1)	2009-05-01	Anderson et al.	Applicant
US2009/0144160(A1)	2009-06-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2009/0144185(A1)	2009-06-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2009/0158030(A1)	2009-06-01	Rasti	Applicant
US2009/0171723(A1)	2009-07-01	Jenkins	Applicant
US2009/0210886(A1)	2009-08-01	Bhojwani et al.	Applicant
US2009/0222379(A1)	2009-09-01	Choudhuri et al.	Applicant
US2009/0240624(A1)	2009-09-01	James et al.	Applicant
US2009/0271248(A1)	2009-10-01	Sherman et al.	Applicant
US2009/0289110(A1)	2009-11-01	Regen et al.	Applicant
US2009/0327120(A1)	2009-12-01	Eze et al.	Applicant
US2010/0009320(A1)	2010-01-01	Wilkelis	Applicant
US2010/0010935(A1)	2010-01-01	Shelton	Applicant
US2010/0023434(A1)	2010-01-01	Bond	Applicant
US2010/0082476(A1)	2010-04-01	Bowman	Applicant
US2010/0114744(A1)	2010-05-01	Gonen	Applicant
US2010/0121767(A1)	2010-05-01	Coulter et al.	Applicant
US2010/0122316(A1)	2010-05-01	Lyon	Applicant
US2010/0145840(A1)	2010-06-01	Kasower	Applicant
US2010/0169209(A1)	2010-07-01	Kornegay et al.	Applicant
US2010/0174638(A1)	2010-07-01	Debie et al.	Applicant
US2010/0223168(A1)	2010-09-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2010/0228658(A1)	2010-09-01	Ketelsen et al.	Applicant
US2010/0250411(A1)	2010-09-01	Ogrodski	Applicant
US2010/0253686(A1)	2010-10-01	Alsbury et al.	Applicant
US2010/0257102(A1)	2010-10-01	Perlman	Applicant
US2010/0268660(A1)	2010-10-01	Ekdahl	Applicant
US2010/0299251(A1)	2010-11-01	Thomas	Applicant
US2010/0299252(A1)	2010-11-01	Thomas	Applicant
US2010/0299260(A1)	2010-11-01	Thomas	Applicant
US2010/0324986(A1)	2010-12-01	Thomas	Applicant
US2010/0325036(A1)	2010-12-01	Thomas	Applicant
US2011/0004514(A1)	2011-01-01	Thomas	Applicant
US2011/0004546(A1)	2011-01-01	Thomas	Applicant
US2011/0029427(A1)	2011-02-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2011/0060654(A1)	2011-03-01	Elliott et al.	Applicant
US2011/0060673(A1)	2011-03-01	Delinsky et al.	Applicant
US2011/0112950(A1)	2011-05-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2011/0125632(A1)	2011-05-01	Neel	Applicant
US2011/0166988(A1)	2011-07-01	Coulter	Applicant
US2011/0173116(A1)	2011-07-01	Yan et al.	Applicant
US2011/0178841(A1)	2011-07-01	Rane et al.	Applicant
US2011/0178899(A1)	2011-07-01	Huszar	Applicant
US2011/0282779(A1)	2011-11-01	Megdal et al.	Applicant
US2011/0295733(A1)	2011-12-01	Megdal et al.	Applicant
US2012/0005070(A1)	2012-01-01	McFall et al.	Applicant
US2012/0054090(A1)	2012-03-01	Haggerty et al.	Applicant
US2012/0066106(A1)	2012-03-01	Papadimitriou	Examiner
US2012/0101938(A1)	2012-04-01	Kasower	Applicant
US2012/0101939(A1)	2012-04-01	Kasower	Applicant
US2012/0116951(A1)	2012-05-01	Chung et al.	Applicant
US2012/0123931(A1)	2012-05-01	Megdal et al.	Applicant
US2012/0136774(A1)	2012-05-01	Imrey et al.	Applicant
US2012/0253852(A1)	2012-10-01	Pourfallah et al.	Applicant
US2012/0254018(A1)	2012-10-01	Davies et al.	Applicant
US2012/0265661(A1)	2012-10-01	Megdal et al.	Applicant
US2012/0278767(A1)	2012-11-01	Stibel et al.	Applicant
US2012/0324388(A1)	2012-12-01	Rao et al.	Applicant
US2013/0006825(A1)	2013-01-01	Robida et al.	Applicant
US2013/0103571(A1)	2013-04-01	Chung et al.	Applicant
US2013/0110565(A1)	2013-05-01	Means et al.	Applicant
US2013/0117087(A1)	2013-05-01	Coppinger	Applicant
US2013/0173451(A1)	2013-07-01	Kornegay et al.	Applicant
US2013/0173481(A1)	2013-07-01	Hirtenstein et al.	Applicant
US2013/0191261(A1)	2013-07-01	Chandler et al.	Applicant
US2013/0205135(A1)	2013-08-01	Lutz	Applicant
US2013/0332338(A1)	2013-12-01	Yan et al.	Applicant
US2013/0332341(A1)	2013-12-01	Papadimitriou	Applicant
US2013/0339249(A1)	2013-12-01	Weller et al.	Applicant
US2014/0012734(A1)	2014-01-01	Megdal et al.	Applicant
US2014/0032300(A1)	2014-01-01	Zhang et al.	Applicant
US2014/0032723(A1)	2014-01-01	Nema	Applicant
US2014/0061302(A1)	2014-03-01	Hammad	Applicant
US2014/0110477(A1)	2014-04-01	Hammad	Applicant
US2014/0156501(A1)	2014-06-01	Howe	Applicant
US2014/0258089(A1)	2014-09-01	Pearson et al.	Applicant
US2014/0279329(A1)	2014-09-01	Dancel	Applicant
US2015/0026014(A1)	2015-01-01	Kasower	Applicant
US2015/0228016(A1)	2015-08-01	Chandler	Applicant
US2016/0125412(A1)	2016-05-01	Cannon	Applicant
US2017/0262758(A1)	2017-09-01	Boyapalle et al.	Applicant
US2017/0323063(A1)	2017-11-01	Krause et al.	Applicant
US2018/0082371(A1)	2018-03-01	Chandler	Applicant
US2018/0218069(A1)	2018-08-01	Rege et al.	Applicant
US2019/0102832(A1)	2019-04-01	Robida et al.	Applicant
US2019/0156227(A1)	2019-05-01	Duke et al.	Applicant
CN1290373	2001-04-01		Applicant
EP350907	1990-01-01		Applicant
EP468440	1992-01-01		Applicant
EP566736	1993-08-01		Applicant
EP869652	1998-10-01		Applicant
EP913789	1999-05-01		Applicant
EP919942	1999-06-01		Applicant
EP1028401	2000-08-01		Applicant
JP2001-282957	2001-10-01		Applicant
JP2002-163449	2002-06-01		Applicant
JP2003-016261	2003-01-01		Applicant
JP2003-316950	2003-11-01		Applicant
KR10-0638324	2006-10-01		Applicant
TW256569	2006-06-01		Applicant
WO99/046710	1999-09-01		Applicant
WO/011574	2000-03-01		Applicant
WO1/016896	2001-03-01		Applicant
WO1/039090	2001-05-01		Applicant
WO1/039589	2001-06-01		Applicant
WO1/041083	2001-06-01		Applicant
WO1/041355	2001-06-01		Applicant
WO1/057720	2001-08-01		Applicant
WO1/080053	2001-10-01		Applicant
WO1/084281	2001-11-01		Applicant
WO2004/114160	2004-12-01		Applicant
WO2005/022348	2005-03-01		Applicant
WO2005/124619	2005-12-01		Applicant
WO2006/099492	2006-09-01		Applicant
WO2006/135451	2006-12-01		Applicant
WO2007/004158	2007-01-01		Applicant
WO2007/106393	2007-09-01		Applicant
WO2007/106786	2007-09-01		Applicant
WO2007/106787	2007-09-01		Applicant
WO2009/061342	2009-05-01		Applicant
WO2009/064840	2009-05-01		Applicant
WO2009/099448	2009-08-01		Applicant
WO2010/129257	2010-11-01		Applicant
WO2018/144612	2018-08-01		Applicant

Non-Patent Literature (224)

U.S. Appl. No. 13/326,803, U.S. Pat. No. 9,569,797, Systems and Methods of Presenting Simulated Credit Score Information, filed Dec. 15, 2011.Applicant
Apte, et al., “A Probabilistic Estimation Framework for Predictive Modeling Analytics,” IBM Systems Journal, 2002, vol. 41, No. 3, pp. 438-448.Applicant
“Fraud Alert | Learn How”. Fight Identity Theft. http://www.fightidentitytheft.com/flag.html, accessed on Nov. 5, 2009.Applicant
Gopalan, R., “Panning for Sales-Force Gold”, Intelligent Enterprise, Dec. 21, 1999, vol. 2, No. 18, pp. 38-43.Applicant
International Preliminary Report on Patentability in Application No. PCT/US2018/016258, dated Aug. 15, 2019.Applicant
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/016258, dated May 16, 2018.Applicant
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2018/061877, dated Mar. 8, 2019.Applicant
International Search Report for Application No. PCT/US2005/041814, dated Aug. 29, 2007.Applicant
Langer et al., “Creditor List Screening Practices: Certain Implications Under the Fair Credit Reporting Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act,” the Business Lawyer, May 1988, vol. 43, pp. 1123-1141.Applicant
LifeLock, “LifeLock Launches First ID Theft Prevention Program for the Protection of Children,” Press Release, Oct. 14, 2005, http://www.lifelock.com/about-us/press-room/2005-press-releases/lifelock-protection-for-children.Applicant
LifeLock, “Personal Identity Theft Protection & Identity Theft Products,” http://www.lifelock.com/lifelock-for-people, accessed Nov. 5, 2007.Applicant
LifeLock, Various Pages, www.lifelock.com/, 2007.Applicant
“NewsHound: NewsHound User Guide Internet E-Mail”, of record as early as May 2, 1997, pp. 11.Applicant
“Normalize,” http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/normalize printed Jun. 14, 2010.Applicant
Schmidt, David, “Environmental Impact: The Changing Credit Reporting Landscape,” Business Credit, Apr. 2003, vol. 105, No. 4, pp. 14.Applicant
Sealey, Geraldine, “Child ID Theft Can Go Unnoticed for Years”, http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=90257, Sep. 12, 2003 in 9 pages.Applicant
TheMorningCall.Com, “Cheap Ways to Foil Identity Theft,” www.mcall.com/business/columnists/all-karp.5920748jul01,0 . . . , published Jul. 1, 2007.Applicant
Todorova, Aleksandra, “Protecting Your Child's Identity”, Smart Money, Published Aug. 2, 2007, pp. 1-5.Applicant
Abrahams, Steven W., “The New View in Mortgage Prepayments: Insight from Analysis at the Loan-By-Loan Level,” The Journal of Fixed Income, Jun. 1997, vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 8-21.Applicant
AISG's National Underwriting Database, A-PLUS, is Now the Largest in the Industry, Business Wire, Aug. 7, 1997.Applicant
Announcing TrueProfiler, http://web.archive.org/web/20021201123646/http://www.truecredit.com/index.asp, dated Dec. 1, 2002, 2 pages.Applicant
“AT&T Expected to Turn Up Heat in Card Wars”, American Banker, May 27, 1993, vol. 158, No. 101, pp. 3.Applicant
Avery et al., “Consumer Credit Scoring: Do Situational Circumstances Matter?”, Journal of Banking & Finance, vol. 28, 2004, pp. 835-856.Applicant
Awoonor-Williams, Princess Josephine, Ph.D. “Gender and Credit: An Analysis of Women's Experience in the Credit Market”, ProQuest Dissertations and Theses, 2004, pp. 148.Applicant
“Balance Transfers Offer Opportunities”, Risk Credit Risk Management Report, Jan. 29, 1996, vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 2.Applicant
Bancroft, John, “Tools Help Managers with Risk Management,” Real Estate Finance Today, May 26, 1997, pp. 11-12.Applicant
“Bank of America Direct Web-Based Network Adds Core Functionality to Meet Day-To-Day Treasury Needs”, Business Wire, Oct. 25, 1999. pp. 2.Applicant
Barone, Robert P., “The Integrated Approach to Branch Service Delivery,” American Banker, Aug. 6, 1991, http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-11128400.html.Applicant
Bilotta, Caryn, “Understanding Credit Scores,” Pittsburgh Post—Gazette, May 9, 2010.Applicant
Brown et al., “ALCOD IDSS:Assisting the Australian Stock Market Surveillance Team's Review Process,” Applied Artificial Intelligence Journal, Dec. 1, 1996, pp. 625-641.Applicant
Cantor, R. and Packer, F., “The Credit Rating Industry,” FRBNY Quarterly Review, Summer-Fall, 1994, pp. 1-24.Applicant
“Chase Gets Positive,” Bank Technology News, May 6, 2000, vol. 14, No. 5, p. 33.Applicant
Chatterjee et al., “Expenditure Patterns and Aggregate Consumer Behavior, Some Experiments with Australian and New Zealand Data”, The Economic Record, vol. 70, No. 210, Sep. 1994, pp. 278-291.Applicant
Chores & Allowances, “Do Kids Have Credit Reports?” Oct. 15, 2007, http://choresandallowances.blogspot.com/2007/10/do-kids-have-credit-reports.html, pp. 5.Applicant
Cisco: What-If Simulator, http://www.ciscocredit.com/whatifsim.html printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 2 pages.Applicant
Cisco: Your Mortgage Credit Reporting Specialists, http://www.ciscocredit.com/cc_Services.html printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 4 pages.Applicant
“Cole Taylor Bank Chooses Integrated E-Banking/E-Payments/Reconciliation Solution From Fundtech”, Business Wire, Oct. 21, 1999, pp. 2.Applicant
“Consumer Reports Finds American-Made Vehicles Close Reliability Gap with European-Made Vehicle—as Japanese Continue to Set New Benchmarks for the Industry”, Consumer Reports: Consumers Union, Yonkers, NY, Apr. 2003.Applicant
CreditAnalyst, Digital Matrix Systems, as printed out Mar. 4, 2008, pp. 2.Applicant
CreditToolkit, Digital Matrix Systems, as printed out Mar. 4, 2008, pp. 2.Applicant
CreditXpert, http://www.creditxpert.com/Products/individuals.asp printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 1 page.Applicant
“Credit Information Bureaus and ‘CIBIL’”, http://www.icicibank.com/cibil.html printed Aug. 22, 2012 in 3 pages.Applicant
CreditKarma: How Credit Karma Works, http://www.creditkarma.com/help/howitworks printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 2 pages.Applicant
Credit Source Online: The Secrets of Raising Your Credit Score, http://www.creditsourceonline.com/secrets-of-raising-your-credit-score.html printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 4 pages.Applicant
ComScore Networks Launches Business Unit to Help Credit Card Marketers Master Online and Multi-Channel Strategies—Solutions Provide Unprecedented Insight Into Customer Acquisition and Usage Opportunities, Reston, VA, Oct. 11, 2001, 2 pages.Applicant
Credit Card Management, “Neural Nets Shoot for Jackpot,” Dec. 1995, pp. 1-6.Applicant
Credit Plus, Inc., “Score Wizard”, http://web.archive.org/web/20030806080310/www.creditplus.com/scorewizard.asp, as archived Aug. 6, 2003 in 1 page.Applicant
Credit Risk Management Report, Potomac, Mar. 9, 1998, vol. 8, No. 4.Applicant
CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert 3-Bureau Comparison™, 2002, pp. 5, http://web.archive.org/web/20030608171018/http://creditxpert.com/CreditXpert%203-Bureau%20Comparison(TM)%20sample.pdf.Applicant
CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert Credit Score & Analysis™, Jan. 11, 2000, pp. 6, http://web.archive.org/web/20030611070058/http://www.creditxpert.com/CreditXpert%20Score%20&%20Analysis%20and%20Credit%20Wizard%20sample.pdf.Applicant
CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert Essentials™, Advisor View-Experian on Jul. 7, 2003, http://www.creditxpert.com/cx_ess_app.pdf.Applicant
CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert Essentials™, Advisor View-TransUnion on Oct. 10, 1999, pp. 6, http://web.archive.org/web/20041211052543/http://creditxpert.com/cx_ess_app.pdf.Applicant
CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert Essentials™, Applicant View-TransUnion on Oct. 10, 1999, pp. 6, http://www.creditxpert.com/cx_ess_app.pdf.Applicant
CreditXpert Inc., CreditXpert What-If Simulator™, 2002, pp. 8, http://web.archive.org/web/20030630132914/http://creditxpert.com/CreditXpert%20What-If%20Simulator(TM)%20sample.pdf.Applicant
Dash, Julekha, “Java on the Street,” Software Magazine, Oct. 1, 1997, vol. 17, No. 11, p. 2.Applicant
Dataman Group, “Summarized Credit Statistics,” Aug. 22, 2001, http://web.archive.org/web/20010822113446/http://www.datamangroup.com/summarized_credit.asp.Applicant
David, Alexander, “Controlling Information Premia by Repackaging Asset-Backed Securities,” The Journal of Risk and Insurance, Dec. 1997, 26 pages.Applicant
Davis, Lisa, “Safety in Numbers,” Business North Carolina, Sep. 1, 1995, vol. 15, No. 9, p. 24.Applicant
“Debt Settlement: Watch Video on how to Pay Your Debt Faster”, http://www.debtconsolidationcare.com/debt-settlement.html printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages.Applicant
Demby, Elayne, “Special Report: Letting Consumers Know the Score—and More”, Collections and Credit Risk, New York, Feb. 2003, vol. 8, Issue 2, p. 53, pp. 3.Applicant
Department of Real Estate, http://web.archive.org/web/20040619190012/http://www.dre.ca.gov/pubs_sub.htm, Jun. 19, 2004, in 5 pages.Applicant
Department of Real Estate, “Reference Book,” http://web.archive.org/web/20041011063158/http://www.dre.ca.gov/pdf_docs/ref17.pdf, Jun. 18, 2004, Chapter 17, pp. 311-382.Applicant
Dillon et al., “Good Science”, Marketing Research: A Magazine of Management & Applications TM, Winter 1997, vol. 9, No. 4; pp. 11.Applicant
Downing, Jr.; Richard, “Changes to the Credit Reporting Act,” Mortgage Banking, Apr. 1, 1998, vol. 58, No. 7, pp. 82-85.Applicant
Ecredable: Discover your AMP Credit Rating™, http://www.ecredable.com/how-it-works/amp-credit-rating printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 2 pages.Applicant
EFunds Introduces QualiFileSM, Deluxe Corporation, eFunds Press Release and Product Launch, Sep. 23, 1999, Milwaukee, WI.Applicant
Equifax: Consumer Bureau, http://www.equifax.co.in/financial-services/consumer_bureau/en_in#RiskScore printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 3 pages.Applicant
Ettorre, “Paul Kahn on Exceptional Marketing,” Management Review, vol. 83, No. 11, Nov. 1994, pp. 48-51.Applicant
“Equifax and FICO Serve Consumers”, Mortgage Servicing News, Mar. 2001, vol. 5, No. 3, p. 19.Applicant
Experian, http://www.experian.com/ printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 1 page.Applicant
Experian Announces PLUS Score; Experian Press Release dated Oct. 16, 2003; Experian Global Press Office.Applicant
“Experian Launches Portfolio Monitor—Owner NoticesSM”, News Release, Feb. 2003, Costa Mesa, CA.Applicant
Experian-Scorex Announces New Credit Simulation Tool, PR Newswire, Costa Mesa, CA, Jun. 13, 2005.Applicant
Experian, Custom Strategist and Qualifile from Funds, 2000, in 2 pages.Applicant
Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Credit Trends: Access Credit Trending Information Instantly, http://kewaneecreditbureau.com/Credit.Trends.pdf, Aug. 2000, pp. 4.Applicant
Fair Isaac Announces Integrated, End-to-End Collection and Recovery Solution, Business Wire, New York, Sep. 2, 2004, p. 1.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Calculators: Credit Assessment, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/CreditEducation/Calculators/CreditAssessment.aspx.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Help: FICO Score Simulator, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Help/Simulator.aspx?fire=5.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Products: Suze Orman's FICO Kit Platinum, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 4 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Products/FICOKit/Description.aspx.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Products: Suze Orman's FICO® Kit Platinum: FICO Score Check, as printed Jun. 7, 2005 in 1 page, http://www.myfico.com/Products/FICOKit/Sample03.html.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Products: Suze Orman's FICO®. Kit Platinum: Look for Errors, as printed Jun. 7, 2005 in 3 pages http://www.myfico.com/Products/FICOKit/Sample02.html.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Products:Suze Orman's FICO® Kit Platinum: Your FICO Score, as printed Jun. 7, 2005 in 1 page, http://www.mvfico.com/Products/FICOKit/Sample01.html.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 5 pages, http://www.rnyfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulator.asp.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Max Out All Your Credit Cards, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?Simulation=4&ReportID=1&productID=&Execute.x=105&Execute.y=23.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Miss Payments on All Accounts With a Payment Due, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?miss_payment=radiobutton&Simulation=2&ReportID=1&ProductID=&Execute.x81&Execute.y=28.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Pay Down Delinquent Balances First, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?textfieldCC=750&Simulation=7&ReportID=1&ProductID=&PayDelinquent.x=78&PayDelinquent.y=30.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Pay Down the Balances on All Your Credit Cards, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?textfieldCC1=750&SelectMonths=1&PayOption=radiobutton&textfieldCC=750&Simulation=3&ReportID=1&ProductID=&Execute.x=57&Execute.y=22.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Pay Your Bills on Time, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?select1=1&Simulation=1&ReportID=1&ProductID=&PayBillsOnTime.x=93&PayBillsOnTime.y=23.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Seek New Credit, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?new_credit=radiobutton&textfield5A=3000&tectfield5B=&textfield5C=&Simulation=5&ReportID=1&ProductID=&NewCredit.x=62&NewCredit.y=20.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Suggested Best Action, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?Simulation=111&ReportID=1&ProductID=&TopAction.x=66&TopAction.y=16.Applicant
Fair Isaac Corporation, myFICO: Sample: FICO Score Simulator: Transfer Credit Card Balances, as printed Jun. 8, 2005 in 2 pages, http://www.myfico.com/Content/Samples/Sample_ScoreSimulatorResults.asp?textfield222=5000&Simulation=6&ReportID=1&ProductID=&TransferBalance.x=86&TransferBalance.y=24.Applicant
FamilySecure.com; “Identity Theft Protection for the Whole Family | FamilySecure.com” http://www.familysecure.com/, as retrieved on Nov. 5, 2009.Applicant
Fickenscher, Lisa, “Merchant American Express Seeks to Mine its Data on Cardholder Spending Patterns,” American Banker, vol. 162, Issue 56, Mar. 24, 1997, pp. 1-2.Applicant
Financial Engines, http://corp.financialengines.com/ printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 1 page.Applicant
Fisher, Joseph, “Access to Fair Credit Reports: Current Practices and Proposed Legislation,” American Business Law Journal, Fall 1981, vol. 19, No. 3, p. 319.Applicant
Forrest, David, “Achieving Perfect Credit—Lesson 3: Assessing Your Situation,” http://www.fool.com/seminars/ev/index.htm?sid=0029&lid=300, 2002, copyright 1995-2002, in 7 pages.Applicant
Frank, John, “Scoring Takes on a New Meaning,” Credit Card Management, Sep. 1996, vol. 9, No. 6, pp. 155-159.Applicant
“FTC Testifies: Identity Theft on the Rise”, FTC News Release, Mar. 7, 2000, pp. 3.Applicant
“Fund Manager,” Portfolio Management Software website, indexed into Google on Jan. 7, 2005, Retrieved Oct. 24, 2014 http://www.fundmanagersoftware.com/, http://www.fundmanagersoftware.com/help/gph_tp_pieasset.html, http://www.fundmanagersoftware.com/demo2.html.Applicant
GAO-03-661, Best Practices: Improved Knowledge of DOD Service Contracts Could Reveal Significant Savings, GAO, Jun. 2003.Applicant
Gibbs, Adrienne; “Protecting Your Children from Identity Theft,” Nov. 25, 2008, http://www.creditcards.com/credit-card-news/identity-ID-theft-and-kids-children-1282.php, pp. 4.Applicant
Gilje, Shelby, “Keeping Tabs on Businesses That Keep Tabs on Us”, NewsRoom, The Seattle Times, Section: SCENE, Apr. 19, 1995, pp. 4.Applicant
Giudici, Paolo, “Bayesian Data Mining, with Application to Benchmarking and Credit Scoring,” Applied Stochastic Models in Business and Industry, 2001, vol. 17, pp. 69-81.Applicant
“Green Tree Investors May Go to Court,” Mar. 4, 1998, http://web.archive.org/web/20001101080021/http://www.channel4000.com/news/stories/news-980304-120038.html.Applicant
“Groups Demand Government Action on Online Marketing to Children,” American Marketplace, Apr. 4, 1996, vol. 17, No. 7, p. 53.Applicant
Gualtieri et al., “The Forrester Wave™: Big Data Streaming Analytics, Q1 2016”, Forrester®, Mar. 30, 2016, pp. 14, https://www.sas.com/content/dam/SAS/en_us/doc/analystreport/forrester-big-data-streaming-analytics-108218.pdf.Applicant
Healy, Thomas J., “The New Science of Borrower Behavior,” Mortgage Banking, vol. 58, No. 5, pp. 26-35, Feb. 1, 1998.Applicant
Hill, Kerry, “Identity Theft Your Social Security Number Provides Avenue for Thieves”, NewsRoom, Wisconsin State Journal, Sep. 13, 1998, pp. 4.Applicant
ID Theft Assist, “Do You Know Where Your Child's Credit Is?”, Nov. 26, 2007, http://www.idtheftassist.com/pages/story14, pp. 3.Applicant
Ideon, Credit-Card Registry that Bellyflopped this Year, Is Drawing some Bottom-Fishers, The Wall Street Journal, Aug. 21, 1995, pp. C2.Applicant
“Impac Funding Introduces Enhanced Website for Static Pool Tracking of MBS Transactions,” Waltham, MA; Webpage printed out from http://www.lewtan.com/press/1208044_Impac-Lewtan.htm on Mar. 20, 2008.Applicant
Instant Access to Credit Reports Now Available Online with DMS' CreditBrowser-based system also Simplifies Credit Decisioning and Offers a Central Point of Control, Business Wire, Dallas, May 23, 2000, p. 0264.Applicant
Internal Revenue Service Data Book 2000, Issued Aug. 2001, Revised May 2003.Applicant
Jones, Yvonne, “Consumers Understood the Basics but Could Benefit from Targeted Educational Efforts,” GAO U.S. Government Accountability Office, Mar. 16, 2005, pp. 128, http://www.gao.gov/products/GAO-05-223.Applicant
“JPMorgan Worldwide Securities Services to Acquire Paloma's Middle and Back Office Operations,” Webpage printed from http://www.jpmorgan.com on Apr. 1, 2009.Applicant
“Judging Credit: Consumers Need Better Finance Tools”, News Journal, Daytona Beach, FL, Dec. 28, 2002.Applicant
Kulkosky, Edward, “Credit Scoring Appeal Transcends Underwriting,” American Banker, vol. 161, No. 93, p. 8, May 15, 1996.Applicant
Kuykendall, Lavonne, “Divergent Paths in Early Pacts with Credit Bureaus”, American Banker, May 30, 2002, vol. 167, No. 3, pp. 2.Applicant
Lan, Joe, “The Top Portfolio Management Software,” http://www.aaii.com/computerizedinvesting/article/the-top-portfolio-management-software, Includes Discussion thread, Fourth Quarter 2011, pp. 17.Applicant
Lee, W.A., “Experian Eyes Payments, Mulls Deals” American Banker: The Financial Services Daily, 2pgs., New York, NY, May 30, 2003.Applicant
Lee, W.A.; “Fair Isaac Taps Institutions for Credit Score Distribution”, American Banker: The Financial Services Daily, New York, NY, Apr. 9, 2002, vol. 167, Issue 67, 1 Page.Applicant
Lee, W.A., “Money, Quicken, and the Value of Alliances”, American Banker: The Financial Services Daily, 2pgs., New York, NY, Jul. 28, 2003.Applicant
LendingTree.com, “Lender Ratings & Reviews,” http://web.archive.org/web/20091015043716/http://www.lendingtree.com/lender-reviews/, Oct. 15, 2009, in 21 pages.Applicant
Letter to Donald A. Robert from Carolyn B. Maloney, dated Oct. 31, 2007, pp. 2.Applicant
Letter to Donald A. Robert from Senator Charles E. Schumer, dated Oct. 11, 2007, pp. 2.Applicant
Letter to Harry C. Gambill from Carolyn B. Maloney, dated Oct. 31, 2007, pp. 2.Applicant
Letter to Harry C. Gambill from Senator Charles E. Schumer, dated Oct. 11, 2007, pp. 2.Applicant
Letter to Richard F. Smith from Carolyn B. Maloney, dated Oct. 31, 2007, pp. 2.Applicant
Letter to Richard F. Smith from Senator Charles E. Schumer, dated Oct. 11, 2007, pp. 2.Applicant
LifeLock, “Identity Theft F.A.Q.” http://web.archive.org/web/20080215093614/http://www.identitytheftkiller.com/promo/faq.php, Feb. 15, 2008, pp. 8.Applicant
LifeLock; “How Can LifeLock Protect My Kids and Family?” http://www.lifelock.com/lifelock-for-people/how-we-do-it/how-can-lifelock-protect-my-kids-and-family printed Mar. 14, 2008 in 1 page.Applicant
Longo, Tracey, “Managing Money: Your Family Finances”, Kiplinger's Personal Finance Magazine, Jun. 1, 1995, vol. 49, No. 6, pp. 4.Applicant
Lund, Graham, “Credit Bureau Data: Maximizing the Benefits,” Credit Management, May 2004, ProQuest Central, pp. 44-45.Applicant
Merriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary, 10th Edition, 1999, p. 79.Applicant
Miller, Margaret, “Credit Reporting Systems Around the Globe: The State of the Art in Public and Private Credit Registries”, Jun. 2000, pp. 32, http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTRES/Resources/469232-1107449512766/Credit_Reporting_Systems_Around_The_Globe.pdf.Applicant
Montgomery County Housing Report, Residential Market Report, Jan. 2004 in 6 pages.Applicant
MyFico, http://www.myfico.com/products/ficoone/sample/sample_scoresimulator.aspx printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 3 pages.Applicant
National Alert Registry Launches RegisteredOffendersList.org to Provide Information on Registered Sex Offenders, May 16, 2005, pp. 2, http://www.prweb.com/printer/240437.htm accessed on Oct. 18, 2011.Applicant
National Alert Registry Offers Free Child Safety “Safe From Harm” DVD and Child Identification Kit, Oct. 24, 2006. pp. 2, http://www.prleap.com/pr/53170 accessed on Oct. 18, 2011.Applicant
National Alert Registry website titled, “Does a sexual offender live in your neighborhood”, Oct. 22, 2006, pp. 2, http://web.archive.org/wb/20061022204835/http://www.nationallertregistry.com/ accessed on Oct. 13, 2011.Applicant
“New Privista Product Provides Early Warning System to Combat Identity Theft”, PR Newswire, Oct. 24, 2000, PR Newswire Association, Inc., New York.Applicant
“New for Investors: Asset Allocation, Seasoned Returns and More,” Prosper, http://blog.prosper.com/2011/10/27/new-for-investors-asset-allocation-seasoned-returns-and-more/, pp. 4.Applicant
Novack, Janet, “The Coming Fight over FICO,” Forbes, Dec. 18, 1995, vol. 156, No. 14, p. 96.Applicant
Occasional CF Newsletter; http://www.halhelms.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=newsletters.oct1999; Oct. 1999.Applicant
Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting, DOE/EIA-M065(2004), Model Documentation Report: Macroeconomic Activity Module (MAM) of the National Energy Modeling System, EIA, Washington DC, Feb. 2004.Applicant
Pagano, et al., “Information Sharing in Credit Markets,” Dec. 1993, The Journal of Finance, vol. 48, No. 5, pp. 1693-1718.Applicant
Partnoy, Frank, Rethinking Regulation of Credit Rating Agencies: An Institutional Investor Perspective, Council of Institutional Investors, Apr. 2009, pp. 21.Applicant
Powerforms: Declarative Client-Side for Field Validation, ISSN 1386-145x, Dec. 2000.Applicant
“ProClarity and Microsoft to Host Free Seminar Series on Retail Analytics with Independent Analyst Firm-ProClarity to Share Best Forrester Analysts to Discuss Trends and the Future of the Retail”; Business Wire; pp. 2; Aug. 13, 2003.Applicant
“Qualifying for Debt Settlement”, http://www.certifieddebt.com/debt/settlement-qualifications.shtml printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 2 pages.Applicant
Quantix Software, “Investment Account Manager,” available at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1UwNTEER1Kk, as published Mar. 21, 2012.Applicant
Ratner, Juliana, “GMAC to Sell Risk-Management Advice; Target is 150 Biggest Home Loan Servicers,” American Banker, vol. 161, No. 53, p. 16, Mar. 19, 1996.Applicant
“Recognition and use by Appraisers of Energy-Performance Benchmarking Tools for Commercial Buildings,” prepared by the Institute for Market Transformation, NYSERDA, Feb. 2003, pp. 6.Applicant
“Resolve Debt for Less: With Help from Freedom Financial” http://www.debtsettlementusa.com/ printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages.Applicant
“RF/Spectrum to Offer Score,” National Mortgage News, Special Report; Credit Reporting & Scaring, Jun. 9, 1997, p. 40.Applicant
Risk Monitors, “New GMAC Unit Focuses on Portfolio Risk,” PR Newswire, Mar. 13, 1996, pp. 2. http://www.thefreelibrary.com/NEW+GMAC+UNIT+FOCUSES+ON+PORTFOLIO+RISK-a018092212.Applicant
Saunders, A., “Data Goldmine,” Management Today, London: Mar. 1, 2004, 6 pages.Applicant
Screenshot for Investment Account Manager v.2.8.3, published at http://www.aaii.com/objects/get/1642.gif by at least Aug. 30, 2011 in 1 page.Applicant
“Settling Your Debts—Part 1 in Our Debt Settlement Series”, http://www.creditinfocenter.com/debt/settle_debts.shtml printed Jan. 9, 2013 in 6 pages.Applicant
“Shareholders Sue Green Tree Financial,” Dated Dec. 4, 1997, http://web.archive.org/web/20000419070107/http://www.wcco.com/news/stories/news-971204-092238.html.Applicant
Singletary, Michelle “Ratings for the Credit Raters”, The Washington Post, The Color of Money column, Mar. 24, 2002 in 1 page.Applicant
Singletary, Michelle, “Score One for Open Credit Ratings”, The Washington Post, Washington DC, Jun. 18, 2000, 3 pages.Applicant
Stanton, T.H., “Credit Scoring and Loan Scoring as Tools for Improved Management of Federal Credit Programs”, Financier, Philadelphia, Summer 1999, vol. 6, 36 pages.Applicant
Steele, Georgia, “Fair, Isaac Seeks Mortgage Tech Opportunities,” National Mortgage News, Special Report; B& C Lending, Mar. 23, 1998, p. 34.Applicant
Stein, Benchmarking Default Prediction Models: Pitfalls and Remedies in Model Validation, Moody's KMV, Revised Jun. 13, 2002, Technical Report #020305; New York.Applicant
Sullivan, Deidre, “Scoring Borrower Risk,” Mortgage Banking, Nov. 1994, vol. 55, No. 2, pp. 94-98.Applicant
Taylor, Marshall, “Loan-Level Pricing Draws Interest From Investors,” Real Estate Finance Today, Jul. 7, 1997, vol. 14, No. 14. p. 10.Applicant
“The Best of the Best,” Mortgage Technology, Nov. 1, 2003, vol. 10, No. 8, pp. 34-53.Applicant
“TransUnion—Child Identity Theft Inquiry”, TransUnion, http://www.transunion.com/corporate/personal/fraudIdentityTheft/fraudPrevention/childIDInquiry.page as printed Nov. 5, 2009 in 4 pages.Applicant
TransUnion: VantageScore®—Consistency in Credit Scoring, http://www.transunion.com/personal-credit/credit-reports/vantage-score.page printed Oct. 12, 2012 in 2 pages.Applicant
Trulia, “Trulia Estimates,” http://www.trulia.com/trulia_estimates/, printed Feb. 18, 2014 in 2 pages.Applicant
Tuman, Diane, “What is a Zestimate?” Mar. 2013, pp. 5, http://www.zillow.com/wikipages/What-is-a-Zestimate/.Applicant
Vamosi, Robert, “How to Handle ID Fraud's Youngest Victims,” Nov. 21, 2008, http://news.cnet.com/8301-10789_3-10105303-57.html.Applicant
Van Collie, Shimon, “The Road to Better Credit-Card Marketing,” Bank Technology News, Sep. 1995, pp. 4.Applicant
Verstraeten, Geert, Ph.D.; Issues in predictive modeling of individual customer behavior: Applications in targeted marketing and consumer credit scoring; Unversiteit Gent (Belgium) 2005.Applicant
Wahl, Martin, “The Stampede to Subprime,” Mortgage Banking, Oct. 1, 1997, vol. 58, No. 1, p. 26(7).Applicant
Watts, Craig, “Consumers Now Can Know What Loan Rate Offers to Expect Based on Their FICO Credit Score at MyFICO.com,” Mar. 6, 2002, pp. 2, http://www.myfico.com/PressRoom/PressReleases/2002_03_06.aspx.Applicant
Watts, Craig, “Fair, Isaac and Equifax Give Consumers New Score Power Tools Offering Greater Insights for Managing Their Credit Health,” May 21, 2002, pp. 3, http://www.myfico.com/PressRoom/PressReleases/2002_05_21.aspx.Applicant
Webpage printed from http://www.magnum.net/pdfs/RapUpBrochure.pdf as printed Mar. 3, 2008.Applicant
“We Eliminate Bad Debt”, as printed from http://www.webcreditbureau.com/start/, dated Aug. 22, 2012, 1 Page.Applicant
West, David, “Neural Network Credit Scoring Models”, Computers & Operations Research, vol. 27, 2000, pp. 1131-1152.Applicant
Wood, Greg, “Top Streaming Technologies for Data Lakes and Real-Time Data”, http://blog.zaloni.com/top-streaming-technologies-for-data-lakes-and-real-time-data, Sep. 20, 2016 in 3 pages.Applicant
Yang, et al., “An Analysis of the Ex Ante Probabilities of Mortgage Prepayment and Default”, Real Estate Economics, Dec. 1998, vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 651-676.Applicant
Yücesan et al., “Distributed Web-Based Simulation Experiments for Optimization”, Simulation Practice and Theory 9, 2001, pp. 73-90.Applicant
Zimmerman et al., “A Web-Based Platform for Experimental Investigation of Electric Power Auctions,” Decision Support Systems, 1999, vol. 24, pp. 193-205.Applicant
Zoot—Instant Rules GUI, www.zootweb.com/instant_rules_GUI.html as printed Mar. 3, 2008.Applicant
Zoot—Rules Management GUI, www.zootweb.com/business_rules_GUI.html as printed Mar. 3, 2008.Applicant
Zoot—Zoot's Hosted Environment, http://www.zootweb.com/zootasp.html as printed Mar. 3, 2008.Applicant
Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated May 30, 2003.Applicant
Preliminary Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Sep. 15, 2003.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Jan. 25, 2008.Applicant
Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Jul. 23, 2008.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Jul. 25, 2008.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Oct. 2, 2008.Applicant
Examiner Interview Summary in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Jan. 14, 2009.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/452,155, dated Apr. 2, 2009.Applicant
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion for Application No. PCT/US2005/041814, dated Aug. 29, 2007.Applicant
Provisional Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 60/168,272, dated Dec. 1, 1999 in 14 pages.Applicant
Provisional Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 60/168,276, dated Dec. 1, 1999 in 82 pages.Applicant
Provisional Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 60/213,367, dated Jun. 23, 2000 in 20 pages.Applicant
Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/653,595, dated Aug. 31, 2000.Applicant
Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Feb. 22, 2001.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Jan. 20, 2006.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Apr. 20, 2006.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Jul. 11, 2006.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Sep. 8, 2006.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Dec. 1, 2006.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Mar. 1, 2007.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated May 10, 2007.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Nov. 8, 2007.Applicant
Response to Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Jan. 3, 2008.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Mar. 21, 2008.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,453, dated Jun. 3, 2008.Applicant
Application as filed in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, filed Jun. 25, 2002.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Oct. 22, 2007.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Jan. 22, 2008.Applicant
Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Apr. 14, 2008.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Jun. 11, 2008.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Aug. 21, 2008.Applicant
Response to Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Dec. 22, 2008.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/183,135, dated Feb. 26, 2009.Applicant
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 11/169,769, dated Mar. 24, 2010.Applicant
Application as Filed in U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,984, dated Feb. 27, 2006.Applicant
Office Action in in U.S. Appl. No. 11/363,984, dated Dec. 26, 2008.Applicant